The blog for Mets fans
who like to read


Greg Prince and Jason Fry
Faith and Fear in Flushing made its debut on Feb. 16, 2005, the brainchild of two longtime friends and lifelong Met fans.

Greg Prince discovered the Mets when he was 6, during the magical summer of 1969. He is a Long Island-based writer, editor and communications consultant. Contact him here.

Jason Fry is a Brooklyn writer whose first memories include his mom leaping up and down cheering for Rusty Staub. Check out his other writing here.

Got something to say? Leave a comment, or email us at (Sorry, but we have no interest in ads, sponsored content or guest posts.)

Need our RSS feed? It's here.

Visit our Facebook page, or drop by the personal pages for Greg and Jason.

Or follow us on Twitter: Here's Greg, and here's Jason.

Excellence Again and Again?

If anyone feared a 2007 letdown following the success of 2006 (and who didn't?), it hasn't happened. I suppose you could just look at the standings and figure that out for yourself, but out of curiosity, I did some checking to determine how historic the Mets' fine start is coming as it has on the heels of a very good season.

It's pretty historic.

Here is how 2006 + 49 games of 2007 ranks in terms of winning percentage among the best Full Mets Season + 49-Game samples.

Note: There's nothing magical about the 49-game mark, it just happens to be where we are after a delightful weekend and it's close enough to one-third of a season to form impressions considering there's no game today.

1) 1986-87: 133-78 (.630)

2) 1985-86: 132-79 (.626)

3) 2006-07: 129-82 (.611)

4) 1988-89: 125-84 (.598)

5) 1987-88: 126-85 (.597)

6) 1969-70: 125-86 (.592)

7) 1999-2000: 124-88 (.585)

8) 1984-85: 120-91 (.569)

9) 1990-91: 118-93 (.559)

10) 1997-98: 117-94 (.555)

What, if anything, does this portend for the rest of 2007? I'm not sure, of course, but '07 — nagging dings and vexing slumps notwithstanding — is one of only four successor years listed above that, after 49 games, has resulted in a winning percentage at least 50 points (.050) better than its predecessor's already excellent full season.

In other words, we're running at a .653 winning percentage (106-56 if you like to dream) right now, a nifty .054 better than where we finished 2006. History indicates that if the Mets win at least 90 games one year and have a winning percentage 50 points better than they achieved at the end of that first year after 49 games the next year, it's a pretty good sign in terms of things to come.

The newly discovered 90/50/49 Rule in action:

1987 Full Season W%: .568

1988 49 Games W%: .694

Improvement: +.126

1988 Full Season W%: .625

1988 Differential 49G to End '88: -.069

1985 Full Season W%: .604

1986 49 Games W%: .694

Improvement: +.090

1986 Full Season W%: .667

1986 Differential 49G to End '86: -.027

1984 Full Season W%: .556

1985 49 Games W%: .612

Improvement: +.056

1985 Full Season W%: .604

1985 Differential 49G to End '85: -.008

2006 Full Season W%: .599

2007: 49 Games W%: .653

Improvement: +.054

2007: Full Season W%: TK

2007: Differential 49G to End: TK

If precedent presents any kind of clue, we see that an already very good Mets team that improves upon its winning percentage for 49 games — approximately the first third of the next season — by at least 50 points (+.050) is likely on its way to a significantly better overall record than its predecessor.

Full Year 1988: +10 wins versus 1987

Full Year 1986: +10 wins versus 1985

Full Year 1985: +8 wins versus 1984

The '88 and '86 Mets did not maintain their respective .694 winning percentages (they both would have wound up with about 112 wins if they had), but they each put down a pretty effective marker in those first 49 games to launch them toward division titles. 1985 stayed pretty consistent throughout and its 98 wins would be golden in the Wild Card era.

I wouldn't swear to it based on my statistical noodling, but if the Mets can simply not screw up a whole lot over the next 113 games, I think we're in pretty good shape.

65-48 from here on out would get us to where we got last year: 97-65. The track record provided by 1988, 1986 and 1985 (each season building on an already very good record the year before) indicates a dropoff from the 49-game blistering pace of improvement is to be expected, but it shouldn't be so severe that it hampers us in the long run. If we suffered the worst of those three dropoffs, with our winning percentage declining by 1988's .069 over the last 113 games, we'd go 66-47 (.584) the rest of the way and wind up with 98 wins.

98 wins would be just dandy.

Also, for what it's worth, we seem to be in the midst of one of the finest two-year runs in Mets history. So enjoy that if you can stand to.

9 comments to Excellence Again and Again?

  • Anonymous

    the big picture is wonderful enough, but as baseball weekends go, i cannot recall a regular-season one quite as sweet as this one in many moons.
    the grilled steak and fried potatoes is the mets sweep and the braves swept.
    the skanks being swept? that's the cold watermelon being cut open.

  • Anonymous

    the big picture is wonderful enough, but as baseball weekends go, i cannot recall a regular-season one quite as sweet as this one in many moons.
    the grilled steak and fried potatoes is the mets sweep and the braves swept.
    the skanks being swept? that's the cold watermelon being cut open.

  • Anonymous

    Guess I'm getting spoiled when a 65-48 pace sounds like a let down. Played out over an entire season it would approximate a 93-69 record, four less wins than last season (when we took a little snooze in September). That mark would be satisfying for most others but not for the 06/07 clubs. We're much better than that.And not to get worried about the supposed hold over us that the Braves have. Should Atlanta win the wild card they won't play us in the division series and history shows they have a habit of being eliminated in the first round.

  • Anonymous

    'scuse the virtual hiccup. it's what happens when i schadenfreude too quickly.

  • Anonymous

    Just to clarify, Joe, we're on a 106-56 pace. I'm saying all we need is a 65-48 to go with our 32-17 to equal last year's mark and that if history indicates anything, it's that we'll do at least that much.
    Provided, of course, the Mets play to the standard they've set for a season and a third.

  • Anonymous

    That's quite all right. I was on a fairly long drive last evening and though I was quite through with Richard Neer, I kept the FAN on just to absorb the 20/20 updates.
    Mets sweep.
    Braves swept.
    Yankees sweep.
    Red Sox swept.
    Eyes on the prize, but no reason we can't enjoy a peripheral glimpse of all the ribbons at the fair.

  • Anonymous

    Got yer “sweep” swapped with yer “swept” there, Greg.
    Just to be clear, the Yankees lost three straight to the Angels.
    The Nationals are closer to the Mets than the Yankees are to the Red Sox.
    I wonder.
    When A-Rod opts out of his deal this winter to go play for Anaheim, will he talk about being motivated not by money, but by the chance to play for a contender?

  • Anonymous

    I'm trying so hard not to overdo the glee (because it seems whenever I stop to point out, even to myself, that we've reached some new apogee, we begin to stumble), I guess I choked.
    Thank you for allowing me to get it right as regards Sunday's key action:
    Mets sweep.
    Braves swept.
    Yankees SWEPT.
    Red Sox sweep.
    A-Rod probably read what Orlando Cabrera said about Angels fans as opposed to Yankees fans and is already under-the-table negotiating.

  • Anonymous

    Hi Greg,
    Understood your point…. I just realized how far we've come when a 65-48 pace (17 games over .500) over 2/3 a season seems like a disappointment and we'd be asking “what went wrong?”.
    Guess one shouldn't get to be too complacent to sneeze at a 93-69 record. However, that's how good this team is.