The blog for Mets fans
who like to read


Jason Fry and Greg Prince
Faith and Fear in Flushing made its debut on Feb. 16, 2005, the brainchild of two longtime friends and lifelong Met fans.

Greg Prince discovered the Mets when he was 6, during the magical summer of 1969. He is a Long Island-based writer, editor and communications consultant. Contact him here.

Jason Fry is a Brooklyn writer whose first memories include his mom leaping up and down cheering for Rusty Staub. Check out his other writing here.

Got something to say? Leave a comment, or email us at (Sorry, but we have no interest in ads, sponsored content or guest posts.)

Need our RSS feed? It's here.

Visit our Facebook page, or drop by the personal pages for Greg and Jason.

Or follow us on Twitter: Here's Greg, and here's Jason.

Oh Yes, We Call it the Streak

The Mets winning 11 games in a row.
Dwight Gooden winning 14 games in a row in one season.
Tom Seaver winning 16 games in a row over two seasons.
Tom Seaver striking out 200+ batters a year 9 years in a row.
Tom Seaver striking out 10 batters in a row to finish a game.
Jacob deGrom striking out 8 batters in a row to begin a game.
R.A. Dickey pitching one-hitters 2 starts in a row.
Turk Wendell pitching in 9 games in a row.
Moises Alou hitting in 30 games in a row.
Mike Vail hitting in 23 games in a row as a rookie.
John Olerud reaching base 15 times in a row.
Richard Hidalgo homering in 5 games in a row.
Mike Piazza recording an RBI in 15 games in a row.
Jose Vizcaino recording a hit in 9 at-bats in a row.
Rusty Staub recording a pinch-hit in 8 pinch-hit at-bats in a row.
Jeurys Familia converting 52 saves opportunities in a row.
Jose Reyes playing in 200 games in a row.

And, barring uncooperative weather, electrical shenanigans or some other stripe of catastrophe in the hours ahead, Faith and Fear recapping 2,000 regular-season Mets games in a row.

He was referred to as the Iron Horse, yet how many games in a row did Lou Gehrig blog?

You read that right, if you read it all. We are on the cusp of FAFIF 2,000 (or F2K). There’s Cal Ripken, there’s Lou Gehrig, and then there’s us, if you’re not too picky about what actually happened in our respective consecutive games played/blogged streaks.

Some Mets streaks are more famous than others. Anthony Young’s streak of 27 losses in a row may be the most famous of them all, but it wasn’t delightful. Jose-Jose’s all-time Mets best games-played streak from 2005-2006 isn’t famous at all (even I had to look it up), but it does get at the consistency inherent in our heretofore unknown streak. How obscure is FAFIF’s run at 2,000? You’ve just now heard of it. Jason only heard of it last week when I told him about it, and he’s one of the two bloggers responsible for it. Nevertheless, this streak is real and it is spectacular. Or maybe it’s just real. I don’t know. We started a blog before the beginning of the 2005 season, we recapped the first game (a loss), we recapped the next game (a loss) and we kept going until suddenly we were up to 1,999 on Sunday (a loss).

Contrary to the impression I’ve crafted directly above, they haven’t all been losses. The Mets’ record since we’ve taken it upon ourselves to have something to say out loud about every game they’ve played is 1,011 wins and 988 losses. That, like Jeurys’s streak, takes into account the regular season only. For the record, we’ve recapped 25 postseason games in a row. We’d be happy to recap more of those.

We don’t know when more of those will be available. We do know a game between the Mets and Rangers is scheduled tonight and, should it be played to a decision, we plan to tell you our thoughts about it sometime between its final out and the first pitch of the game after it, which projects as the 2,001st in our streak.

Not to get ahead of ourselves. As has been the case since April 4, 2005, we blog ’em one game at a time.

Blowin’ in the Draft

With your first selection of what to do on Thursday night, June 15, at 7 o’clock, I hope you’ll choose to make a visit to Bergino Baseball Clubhouse, 67 E. 11th St. in Manhattan. I’ll be there talking about my book Piazza: Catcher, Slugger, Icon, Star with gracious owner and podcast host Jay Goldberg, going deep on the catcher who went deep more than any other, especially how the Mets came to be the unlikely landing spot for the unlikely superstar. Copies will be available, and if you’d like me to sign yours, I’d be delighted to bring out the ink.

The 62nd-round pick nobody saw coming to the majors, let alone landing in New York.

Though it’s Piazza’s name atop the marquee, the Mets of the 1990s — particularly before they ever got together with Mike — are as intrinsic to the story as the title character. One of my goals in writing this book was to trace was how a franchise and its eventual face could have no common ground in the middle of a decade yet become eternally enmeshed and synonymous with one another before that decade was done. Thus, I spent a good deal of the early chapters exploring who the Mets were when Piazza was revving up his bat in L.A. and how they tried to morph into something better before he arrived in New York — and how tough that was for them to accomplish.

Maybe it would have been had they drafted better.

A tentpole of the Piazza legend is where he stood in the amateur draft. Essentially, he had no status. You probably know the numbers most associated with 31’s humble professional beginnings: drafted in the 62nd round with the 1,390th overall pick by the Dodgers in 1988 because Tommy Lasorda was pals with Mike’s father, Vince Piazza. Mike’s power potential was recognizable, but he didn’t have a position, hadn’t done much as a college player and, well, he needed a break if he was gonna get picked by anybody. Enter the “courtesy pick,” as it was called. A favor for Lasorda who wanted to do a favor for the elder Piazza? Pals, schmals. The Dodgers were smart to give a kid who might hit an opportunity. Mike took it from there.

Where in that era, I wondered, was the Mets’ draft choice who nobody saw coming but broke through? Where, for that matter, was the Mets’ draft choice who was seen coming, made it big and kept the club’s streak of winning seasons going? Ah, there was the rub. The Mets weren’t drafting so hot in those days. Or most days.

I wrote a lot about the Mets’ draft history within the context of Piazza’s ascent, culminating in his veritable national debut at the 1993 All-Star Game, where Mike was one of the glittering attractions alongside Ken Griffey and Barry Bonds. The last-place Mets had nobody like any of them in terms of performance or personality or both. Their All-Star was Bobby Bonilla, having a decent season at the plate but at the bottom of the league in public relations. Alas, I wound up cutting almost all of it for space. Since another MLB draft is right around the corner — the Mets will pick 20th on Monday night, June 12 (and higher, probably, in 2018) — I thought it would be timely to share this deleted scene from Piazza.

To paraphrase Troy McClure from “The Simpsons 138th Episode Spectacular,” if that’s what was cut, what was left in must be pure gold.


No wonder the Dodgers’ 1988 draft was the stuff of legend. But you know whose 1988 draft you didn’t hear much about in 1993? Or ever? The New York Mets.

The amateur draft behaved more like a stiff wind that blew in the face of their efforts to move forward, particularly where top draft picks were concerned. The Frank Cashen Mets were constructed on a foundation of sturdy high school choices: Darryl Strawberry (first selection in the nation, 1980) and Dwight Gooden (first round, fifth overall, 1982). It was enough to make a fan forget how little the Mets derived from their upper-echelon picks in the alternating years. The Mets drafted high in the early ’80s because they were constantly finishing low. They didn’t always make the most of it. Witness the choices of Terry Blocker (with the fourth overall pick in 1981) and Eddie Williams (No. 4 in 1983).

The missed opportunities of Mets drafts past were beginning to echo down the halls of time. From 1965 — the year the June amateur draft was instituted — to 1976, the Mets selected three major league mainstays with their respective first-round picks: Jon Matlack (1967), Tim Foli (1968) and Lee Mazzilli (1973). Before, between and after these diamonds in the rough were harvested, it was all fool’s gold. Whether injuries or overestimation undermined the best efforts of their scouts and decisionmakers, the Mets derived virtually no big league help from the first round on nine separate occasions. It seems cruel to dredge up the classic example of highly regarded catching prospect Steve Chilcott being the apple of the Mets’ eye when they owned the first overall pick in the 1966 draft, leaving outfielder Reggie Jackson on the table for the Kansas City Athletics to pluck, but that choice was indeed made.

Reggie Jackson was at the All-Star Game in Baltimore. He’d be at Cooperstown later in July as a first-ballot Hall of Famer, going in as so many before him had, as a Yankee. There was thought that since he established himself as a superstar in Oakland, that he, like Rollie Fingers the year before, would be portrayed on his plaque with an Athletic A. Or he could have followed Catfish Hunter’s example. When the righty was voted in by the writers in 1987, he chose to not choose between his tenures with the A’s and Yankees and asked to be enshrined with a blank cap. But a front-office position in the Bronx materialized for Jackson and that other NY won out. Mr. October, as ever with an eye on the bottom line, declared upon his election, “Going into the Hall of Fame with players like Mantle, Ford, Gehrig, DiMaggio, Ruth, is good for Reggie Jackson, so I’ll go in as a Yankee.”

Take that, Rollie.

Chilcott, meanwhile, would have for eternal company several other Met first-rounders who never saw the majors. George Ambrow (1970), Richard Bengston (1972) and Tom Thurberg (1976) also never rose to the heights of their profession. Another, Cliff Speck, taken seventeenth overall by the Mets in 1974, bounced around the minors for more than a decade before finally making the majors as a Brave a dozen years later. Speck pitched in thirteen games for Atlanta in 1986, but was back at Triple-A in 1987, never to return to what we soon, thanks to Bull Durham, learned to call The Show.

Cliff Speck’s thirteen games in the majors didn’t amount to much, unless you’re Les Rohr (Mets first top pick, 1965), Randy Sterling (1969) and Rich Puig (1971), and together the three of you combined for thirteen major league games in toto. Throw in Speck’s résumé and you’re up to 26…or about half as many as the first Mets pick of 1975, Butch Benton, compiled for three teams in four non-consecutive seasons over an eight-year span. Nevertheless, one resists the temptation to say Speck fell of a cliff or that Cliff’s career amounted to little more than a speck on the MLB map, because who wouldn’t want to pitch in thirteen major league games? When Kevin Costner as Crash Davis explained to his celluloid teammates what The Show was like in 1988 — white balls for batting practice, cathedrals for ballparks, room service back at the hotel — we in the audience could all picture ourselves enduring the 377 minor league games Cliff Speck pitched in the minors to experience the thirteen greatest games of his life.

For mere mortals, the 377 minor league appearances Speck made between ’74 and ’88 sound pretty good. As Crash’s manager in Durham told him, going to the ballpark and getting paid to do it beats the hell out of working at Sears.


Drafting amateur baseball players is an inexact science for all. College baseball doesn’t yield the same sense of certainty the higher-profile college sports do, and when you’re talking about high school athletes, you’re attempting to project not just what a baseball player might achieve but discern what kind of an adult an adolescent might turn into. Scouting reports that don’t include a bevy of question marks simply aren’t being honest.

Still, you’d figure you’d get a few right now and then, if just by accident. The Met eye for amateur talent turned keen between 1977 and 1979, with Wally Backman, Hubie Brooks and Tim Leary each a top pick destined for solid careers (though Leary had to endure a debilitating injury as a Met before succeeding as a Dodger). Beyond Strawberry and Gooden, the Mets either lucked or skilled their way into some fine picks once Cashen took over baseball operations.

Blocker, the head of the class of ’81 might have fizzled, but underclassman Lenny Dykstra, chosen in the thirteenth round, went on to flourish, as did the Mets’ twelfth-round pick, a high school pitcher from Texas named Roger Clemens…though Clemens rejected the Mets’ offer and headed for college for the time being. Nineteen Eighty-Three yielded the underwhelming Williams, but also righty starter Rick Aguilera, eagle-eyed batsman Dave Magadan and submarine-flinging reliever Jeff Innis. Behind Gooden in 1982, they took bullpen stalwart Roger McDowell in the third round; in the old secondary phase of that June’s draft, they scooped up closer-to-be Randy Myers in the second round. In the soon-to-be-discontinued January amateur draft of 1984, they took shortstop Kevin Elster with their second selection. Names not associated with great feats in Met uniforms — John Christensen, Floyd Youmans, Calvin Schiraldi — were drafted as well in this era, proving their true value once they were inserted into trades that brought to New York players — Bobby Ojeda, Gary Carter — who are indelibly associated with great feats in Met uniforms.

On a lesser scale, the Mets’ and nation’s first pick of 1984, Shawn Abner, proved himself valuable as trade fodder in the wake of the 1986 World Series when the Mets used him to help nab San Diego’s sound-as-a-pound left fielder Kevin McReynolds. And in June 1985, with the twentieth overall pick in the nation, fifteen spots after the Pirates took Barry Bonds, the Mets went for Gregg Jefferies, who emerged as Baseball America’s Minor League Player of the Year twice and played in the same 1993 All-Star Game as Piazza.

By then, Gregg was a member of the Cardinals, having worn out his hotly anticipated welcome in New York, but that’s another story. Or maybe it isn’t. Jefferies couldn’t have shown more talent rising up the Met chain. His first few weeks as a regular, coinciding with the stretch drive of 1988, was so electrifying you could picture him doing public service spots for Con Edison. Heaven, earth and Backman were moved to make the 21-year-old rookie the everyday second baseman for 1989 and, presumably, the decade ahead.

From there, Jefferies didn’t exactly flop, but it couldn’t be said that he flourished. Mostly he rubbed his teammates the wrong way. Jefferies was a prodigy with a bat, a liability with a glove and maybe not mature enough to handle his workplace environment. It is less recalled that he garnered Rookie of the Year votes in both 1988 and 1989 and that he led the league in doubles in 1990 than it is that he was the subject of veteran enmity (Myers scrawled “Are We Trying?” across a lineup card in a not-so-veiled shot at the struggling tyro), made allies of enemies (McDowell fought him as a Phillie and the Mets weren’t exactly rooting against their old teammate) and faxed a cease-and-desist letter of sorts to WFAN that constituted a public plea to be left alone.

That he had talent was borne out once he fell into the nurturing hands of St. Louis manager Joe Torre. That his ability to cope wouldn’t outstrip his ability to lash line drives in Flushing was not immediately evident when the Mets drafted and signed him out of Serra High School in San Mateo, California. But because these things are inexact, and because someone of Jefferies’s ilk did not stick around to anchor the Met offense in post-Strawberry New York…and because Jefferies was an absolute success story relative to the top Met draft picks that followed him, you can see — certainly with hindsight — that a subterranean down year like 1993 was bound to materialize and wash away whatever good vibes remained from up year nonpareil 1986.

In the draft conducted during the June the Mets were running and hiding from the National League East like they had never run and hid before, the Mets used their first pick on the son of a major leaguer. Lee May, Jr., like Ken Griffey, Jr., was the progeny of a component of the Big Red Machine, albeit a slightly earlier version that hadn’t yet worked all its bugs out. The elder May was a serious slugger, knocking 111 home runs out of NL ballparks between 1969 and 1971. He was at the center of the package that was sent to Houston to obtain Joe Morgan. Morgan added a new dimension to Cincinnati, revving the Reds — once they tightened their bolts with the likes of Griffey, Sr. — toward their two world championships. When Junior was taken first overall by the Mariners in 1987, you took his championship bloodlines seriously.

When the Mets picked May out of a Cincinnati high school…well, to be honest, in 1986, the draft didn’t grab your attention the way it would in years to come, but you recognized a name like Lee May. You figured the son of a man who produced 354 home runs, made three All-Star Games and earned MVP votes on six occasions was at least going to show up at Shea one of these days.

He didn’t. Lee May, Jr., topped out at Tidewater, failing to reach double-digits in home runs in an eight-year career, never batting higher than .257 at any of his minor league stops. May would later find a place in the game as a hitting instructor (his son, Jacob, was drafted by the White Sox in 2013), but he was not around to help Jefferies and the Mets as 1986 commenced receding in the immediate collective consciousness.

Nor was Chris Donnels very much. In the same first round that bestowed Griffey on the Mariners, the Mets took Donnels. Being defending world champs, they drafted 23 picks later. To say Donnels didn’t belong in the same round as Griffey isn’t exactly a slam at Donnels. Griffey proved a draft unto himself.

But could have the Mets done better for themselves than the third baseman from Loyola Marymount University? They did, in later rounds of the 1987 draft, taking yet another MLB legacy, slowly developing catcher Hundley, in the second round and intermittently promising lefty pitcher Pete Schourek in the third. With their 38th-round pick, the Mets tabbed Anthony Young, who may not have succeeded a great deal more than Donnels — 82 games as a Met in ’91 and ’92 before drifting to the Florida Marlins in the expansion draft — but he was still on hand in ’93 and he certainly became more famous.

Or infamous.


The reinforcements simply weren’t bubbling up from beneath the surface. If the Mets were trying to patch together the remnants of their would-be dynasty with expensive dollops of Krazy Glue, it was because there wasn’t bonding element otherwise available to them. Once the Mets reached the mountaintop with so many homegrown stars and studs, they got very little out of the drafts that followed. 1988, the Year of Piazza, was par for the uninspiring course.

They got no Strawberry. They got no Gooden. In terms of who they selected and signed from that draft, they got exactly two players who would reach the major leagues with them: shortstop Kevin Baez (batted .179 in 63 games between 1990 and 1993) and second baseman Doug Saunders (28 games in 1993, encompassing 73 plate appearances without a single run batted in, the franchise record for offensive unproductivity among non-pitchers).

But both did make The Show, knowing the delights Crash Davis went wistful over for moviegoers. So did Joe Vitko, drafted by the Mets in the 38th round of 1988. The righty pitcher declined to sign, continued at college and remained attractive enough to the Mets for them to pick him in the twenty-fourth round of 1989. This time he said yes. Three years later, he was in the majors, carving out his own Saunders-like niche in the Met annals as the first Met player to be born in the 1970s, unwittingly heralding a lost generation of prospects. Joe pitched in three games in September 1992, then never again in the majors.

Dave Proctor had the “never” part down cold. Dave was the Mets’ first-round pick in 1988, sixty-one rounds and 1,369 slots ahead of Piazza. The righthanded pitcher from Allen County Community College in Kansas was as good a bet as any to pay off in the world of the amateur draft. The Dodgers themselves thought so two years earlier when they picked him as a high school senior in the twenty-ninth round. Like Clemens in 1981 (and many throughout the history of the amateur draft), he decided to go to school and see if he could do better. Proctor’s stock had only risen since. Dave had a family tie of his own not just to baseball, but to the Mets. His uncle was Mike Torrez, the Opening Day starter for the Amazins in 1984, filling the George Lazenby role between Tom Seaver in ’83 and Gooden in ’85.

With Torrez serving as his nephew’s negotiator, the twenty-year-old looked forward to inking his pact and getting on with his career. “He’s always told me how good New York is to pitch in,” the draftee said, adding patiently of his new employer, “I think they’re looking to me for more in the future, not going in right away. They want to develop me, and the Mets have a tradition of good arms, and I’m hoping they can mold me into one.”

It didn’t happen. Proctor tried. The Mets tried. His arm didn’t cooperate. An injury halted his rise at Double-A Binghamton, where one final start in 1992 resulted in an ugly 23.62 ERA. It doesn’t mean his JC coach was off base when he declared in 1988, “Dave’s got the world by the horns. I think he’s ready to go out and have a bright future in major league baseball.” The Mets agreed. Fate refused to concur.

May. Donnels. Proctor. In a more predictable enterprise, these were the players who should have been surrounding the likes of Jefferies when the Mets faced off against Piazza and the Dodgers in 1993, presumably pre-empting the need to lure free agents to Flushing. Yet none of the above was a New York Met during what projected as the primes of their major league careers. Conversely, Piazza wasn’t supposed to be hitting home runs at Shea or any other National League ballpark, never mind tipping a cap among All-Stars at Camden Yards.

Did we mention how unpredictable baseball can be?

On first-round Russian roulette went, the Mets almost always finding the bullet in the chamber. Alan Zinter in 1989. Al Shirley in 1991. Jeromy Burnitz, their top pick in ’90, actually made the majors in June of 1993, injecting a little thump into the Met lineup and a little hope into the Met future, and Preston Wilson — Mookie’s stepson — was going to benefit from all the goodwill possible after getting the nod in ’92. But in 1993, when Mets fans could have used the biggest jolt of optimism possible, their team took Kirk Presley.

Presley as in Elvis. Kirk was the King’s third cousin, born in Tupelo, Mississippi, and everything. Talk about a family connection. It had nothing to do with baseball, but it was something to remember Kirk by, as his potential, too, succumbed to aches and pains. An otherworldly 37–1 right-hander with a 0.58 ERA and multiple no-hitters on his scholastic ledger, the youngster who never knew his outsize older relative didn’t get the chance to shape a professional identity of his own, beyond that of yet another failed top Mets draft pick. “It is frustrating when that’s the first question they ask,” the 18-year-old admitted of Elvis the summer he was drafted, “but I guess that’s part of it.”

It could have been worse. Right around the time Presley was getting fed up with every reporter’s obvious angle, the Mets were being hounded and dogged (sorry, Kirk) by questions they were tiring of answering. When you’re a last-place team plumbing new depths of notoriety, it’s hard to hew to Crash Davis’s timeless interview advice and stick with “we gotta play it one day at a time” as your all-purpose thoughtful response.

To paraphrase the other Elvis — Costello — every day the 1993 Mets rewrote the book. Bonilla may never have taken Bob Klapisch on that tour of the Bronx, but in a way, Bobby got his revenge on Bob, for The Worst Team Money Could Buy was already and instantly out of date.

Mets Going Backwards

Jimmy Piersall and the Mets might not have been the best fit when they came together for 40 games in 1963, but no .194 hitter ever left behind a more camera-ready legacy. The story’s been told as much as any from the second season of New York Mets baseball. Piersall, who had his talents and his troubles, landed on the worst team in captivity, sent from Washington, D.C., to Washington Heights as compensation for the managerial services of beloved just-retired first baseman Gil Hodges. The career American Leaguer, two-time All-Star outfielder, and subject of a major motion picture starring Anthony Perkins — following Piersall’s nervous breakdown and the book he wrote documenting it — was miscast as a member of Casey Stengel’s tenth-place ensemble, but he definitely had one intensely memorable Met swing in him.

Sitting on 99 lifetime home runs for almost a month after joining the Mets on May 24, Piersall decided that when he finally moved into triple-digits, he was going to do something special to celebrate. Finally, on June 23, in the first game of a Sunday Polo Grounds doubleheader versus the Phillies, the Mets’ starting center fielder swung and connected for No. 100 off a mild-mannered (cough-cough) righty named Dallas Green.

Jimmy Piersall eschewed Satchel Paige’s advice and looked back. He kind of had to.

Then, once he knew it was gone, he ran the bases in a backwards motion, reversing his gait all the way from first to home. This trip was different from what anybody had ever seen in a baseball game, and it has yet to be forgotten. When it was reported on this Sunday in June, 54 years later, that Piersall had died at 87, it was hard not to conjure the signature image of No. 34 approaching the plate, the runner glancing over his right shoulder to make certain he wasn’t straying from the baseline. Two other players are visible in the foreground of the photograph that survives, neither of them forming a welcoming committee. On-deck hitter Tim Harkness’s body language indicates impatience (and admirable restraint in not wielding his bat ASAP). Phillies catcher Clay Dalrymple is likely monitoring the actions of his batterymate, for Green did not appreciate Piersall’s brand of flair. Dallas wrote decades later in his memoir, “I was pissed off by his antics. I stalked him as he rounded the bases, swearing up a storm.”

The backpedaling bit didn’t go over huge among Metsian observers, either. In the Daily News, Dick Young labeled Piersall “a pure-beef hot dog,” and compared him to the tap dancer Bill “Bojangles” Robinson. Nonpareil character Stengel — who had long ago revealed a sparrow under his cap while playing big league baseball — legendarily declared there was room for only one clown on his team, and it wasn’t gonna be the guy whose NL average was trending inexorably downward. By mid-July, the former Red Sock, Indian and Senator, added Met to his ex-files. Jimmy caught on with the Los Angeles Angels (then actually of Los Angeles) and played for them until 1967, homering only four more times, rounding the bases in orthodox fashion on each occasion.

How mundane. Duke Snider, who had recently launched a milestone home run of his own for the very same 1963 Mets, said to the man of the counterclockwise hour, “I hit my 400th homer and all I got was the ball. You hit your 100th and go coast-to-coast.” Indeed, Piersall received national attention, a one-way ticket to Southern California and enduring…notoriety is often misused, but it seems to be the go-to word here. On a team where loads of losing was gamely tolerated, the guy who hit a home run to key an eventual 5-0 win was grimly frowned upon in real time and in most retellings.

Nevertheless, we remember it to this day and appreciate it as an element of what made the early Mets the early Mets. Nobody got killed. Nobody got hurt. Piersall’s feel for what was good fun may have gone afoul of his sport’s code of honor, yet, generally speaking, he didn’t exempt himself from his singular sense of the absurd. Or as he was known to say, “I’m crazy, and I got the papers to show it.”

At least Piersall meant to go backwards — and at least his team won the day he did so. I doubt going backwards was part of the current Mets’ plan, yet there they keep going, in the wrong direction. They’ve dropped from the periphery of contention, they’ve drifted well south of .500 and even their routine inning-ending machinations can’t properly end innings.

Posterity will tell if the signature play of Sunday, June 4, 2017, will linger in the baseball subconscious as its predecessor from Sunday, June 23, 1963, has. My guess is probably not, yet once again, the Mets did something so decidedly different from the norm that onlookers were left to wonder if anybody else had ever seen anything like it.

• First, with one out and Josh Harrison on first, they turned a 5-4-3 double play to complete the top of the seventh at Citi Field.

• Then they left the field for the weekly extended-mix version of the seventh-inning stretch, the one that commences with “God Bless America,” continues with “Take Me Out To The Ball Game” and concludes with “Lazy Mary”.

• Then they prepared for the bottom of the seventh, only to be informed, no, your double play didn’t count, it’s still the top of the seventh, get your pitcher back on the mound.

Yeah, that sort of sequence doesn’t unfold very often.

Give or take a silly millimeter, this wasn’t the Mets’ fault, exactly. Well, theoretically, Neil Walker could have kept a foot more convincingly planted on second base while retrieving the relay of John Jaso’s grounder from third baseman Wilmer Flores. As was, Walker caught the ball and threw it for an uncontested out at first. Jaso was definitely retired on the play. Harrison, meanwhile, didn’t bother running all the way from first to second; he knows what a 5-4-3 double play looks like when he’s caught in the middle of one. If replay review didn’t exist, you wouldn’t have blinked at the out call on what we used to refer to as a neighborhood play, the neighborhood in this case appearing to be comprised of attached row houses. There was virtually no space between Neil’s shoe and second base. But just as replay review exists, so did the slightest sliver of daylight when it mattered. Pirate skipper Clint Hurdle thus issued a challenge to confirm that Walker’s foot was not on second base at the precise moment he took Flores’s throw, and the umpires were obliged to cooperate. Confirmation was forthcoming. Harrison was ruled safe.

In any other inning, or even on another day of the week in the same inning, such inanity would have proceeded relatively smoothly and generated no more than annoyance for transpiring at all. But Sunday being Sunday, and “God Bless America” being sacred (for if it is not sung at a ballpark, America might not get blessed), the umps felt compelled to respectfully wait to go through the motions of making it clear to everybody who might care that video officials in Chelsea were being consulted. As a result, Terry Collins, his team, the fans on hand and the folks at home were quite surprised to learn that, once the seventh-inning stretch rituals were over, the top of the seventh was to be rejoined, already in progress, with two out and pinch-runner Max Moroff on second.

Naturally, it all conspired to undermine whatever was left of the Mets’ chances. Josh Edgin, who had thrown the nullified double play ball, immediately surrendered a run-scoring single to David Freese, which increased the Pirates’ lead from substantial to prohibitive. Then Edgin got the third out. Then there was another seventh-inning stretch, albeit sans “God Bless America”. Whether it’s the crew in Chelsea or the Lord in heaven, you can bother ultimate arbiters with your sincerest beseechments only so many times in one day.

Eventually, the lopsided visitor-friendly score built to an 11-1 final that is rather misleading, for the contest was never that close. The defense was bad, the offense was worse and Tyler Pill was no remedy for what ailed us. The only legitimate home-team highlight occurred when Collins couldn’t resist demanding his own challenge in the top of the eighth. Since the play nominally in question wasn’t remotely disputable, I assume Terry insisted the umps ask the replay officials to examine his life choices and see if the decisions that led him to manage such a lousy club on such a lousy day could possibly be reversed.

There wasn’t enough to overturn.

The Dog That Didn't Bark

Lots of seasons don’t go quite the way you fantasize — your team’s undone by some combination of poor performances, bad decisions, ill health, lousy luck, or just by not being as good as the competition. By late spring you figure your October will be free; by summer you’re thinking about next season. Which is all OK — it’s just baseball, after all. For us, a bad harvest doesn’t mean famine or foreclosure, just needing to diversify our sources of entertainment.

So far, the 2017 Mets haven’t lost a spectacular number of games — once things normalize a bit, they’re probably some variation of a .500 team, which is only heart-rending compared with preseason rankings. What feels different this year is the way the Mets have lost those games. I know it’s the confirmation bias talking, but the 2017 Mets seem allergic to run-of-the-mill losses. Every single one seems to be a tragedy or a farce, leaving you with a ragged hole in the chest where your battered orange and blue heart used to beat. Lose 6-3 on a sleepy afternoon? No sir, not this squad. They’re going to load the bases with nobody out and still fail, or find a new reliever to melt down hideously, or gag on a game-ending double play.

Which made Saturday all the more extraordinary: with all the pieces arranged for disaster, the Mets walked away from the puzzle. The dog didn’t bark. No murderer came to the door. They actually won.

Perhaps it helped that they were playing the Pirates, a team having a similar season of perplexing disappointment. (Though in a far kinder division in terms of second chances.) Or that Neil Walker was playing the Pirates, whom he treats like a scorned ex hell-bent on showing you how wrong you were.

Robert Gsellman didn’t go deep enough to make us stop sighing about the shell-shocked bullpen, but he did pitch well enough to make us scrutinize the starting pitching and ask Whither Gsellman? without being ironic. (Seriously: Whither Gsellman?) Fernando Salas entered with a skinny lead and exited with that skinny lead intact. Jerry Blevins came in and did his usual masterful work (his strikeout of Josh Bell was pure and simple cruelty), even with his teammates providing their usual bout of sabotage.

And then Terry brought in Addison Reed an inning early.

At first I thought Terry had gone modern, reasoning the closer’s job was to dispatch the toughest hitters in the order when they arrived instead of automatically handling the final inning. But Terry doesn’t do modern, and I’d forgotten Andrew McCutchen‘s slide down in the Pirates’ order. No, Reed was going to get six outs or die trying.

Which Reed did, somehow. John Jaso didn’t ruin everything, as he has before. Nor did Gregory Polanco, David Freese or Bell. Reed walked off the mound with 36 pitches thrown and a victory secured, and the Mets had won a 4-2 game. If that sounds relatively ho-hum, well, 2017 will remind you otherwise soon enough.

The Stuff That Dreams Are Made Of

Lucas Duda’s second home run had just left the building and perhaps the solar system. The Mets’ seventh run of the evening was crossing the plate, their lead over the Pirates was reaching three and it was only the fifth inning. My good friend Jeff, once he was done jumping up and down like the kid a long Lucas Duda home run will turn an adult Mets fan into, draped his right arm around my shoulders and grabbed me as good friends will when they want to share with you something they’ve decided you need to hear.

“Guys like us,” Jeff declared amid the cheers — “this is what we dream of. Other guys may dream of sleeping with supermodels. Not us.” He made a sweeping motion with his left hand to encompass the pulsating scoreboard, the forlorn visitors hanging their heads all over the field, the giddy occupants of the first base dugout and our neighbors whooping it up around us in Promenade. “This is our dream.”

That was in the bottom of the fifth. We woke up in the top of the sixth. No dream. No supermodels. Just Pirates running round and round.

The Mets had led the Pirates, 7-4, when the fifth ended. Before they batted again, they trailed, 11-7. Prospective winning pitcher Matt Harvey gave way to presumptive savior Paul Sewald. Between them, they gave up as many runs as they possibly could. Neil Ramirez came on to…well, Neil Ramirez came on. Tells you pretty much what you need to know.

What had been the stuff that dreams are made of dissipated into a 12-7 drubbing. Five Met runs in the fifth weren’t nearly enough. Seven Met runs overall — generated primarily by Duda (3 RBIs on two stratospheric blasts), Michael Conforto (his own two-run homer) and Neil Walker (a run-scoring triple facilitated by a stumbling Gregory Polanco) — also weren’t nearly enough. The Mets could have loaded the bases in the ninth, produced a grand slam and still trailed by one.

For the record, the Mets didn’t load the bases in the ninth. They barely tickled the bases after Lucas went extraordinarily deep a second time, and left them completely unoccupied during the final inning. But let’s not make this about offense that levels off too soon. The Mets scored seven runs in the first five innings, which constitutes a dreamy amount, provided your pitchers don’t proceed to give up eight.

The Mets’ pitchers didn’t give up eight. They gave up twelve, a quantity certain to shred your win probability to a fine mist unless you score thirteen. So that part, the part where the Mets went from winning by three to losing by five, was not a highlight. Nor was the Free Shirt Friday t-shirt, judged by Jeff as “hideous,” though, with apologies to Pittsburgh catcher Elias Diaz and his six RBIs, the giveaway garment earned player of the game honors. You had to give it to either the shirt or this guy CitiVision kept showing us, a guy who pulled one Free Shirt Friday t-shirt after another over his head until he was wearing so many of them that he could have been moonlighting as the Michelin Man. I don’t know how many shirts (or beers) that took. Guys like him are in their own league.

Also not in the box score, yet not to be overlooked: a guy named RALLYMAN. I couldn’t overlook him. He was in my line of sight. Have you seen RALLYMAN? RALLYMAN wears a custom jersey identifying him as RALLYMAN and adorns it with a cape (given the whipping winds, I thought he might take flight à la Sister Bertrille). Then, if you’re situated in just the wrong seat, he enthusiastically blocks your view. RALLYMAN, to be fair, played ball while the Mets played ball, moving his act slightly to his right at my request so I could see batters and the pitches they scalded.

RALLYMAN, incidentally, was trying to rally the Mets, not the Pirates. Like Harvey, I’m willing to give him a no-decision.

Jeff and I converge at Citi Field once a year, save for the years he can’t make it up from his home in the Washington area, where he curses out every move the Nationals make, every breath the Nationals take. There were also a couple of years between 2012 and 2016 when he copped to being too disgusted to deal with the Mets, except at relatively nearby Nationals Park. Some years, guys like us have all the luck. In 2016, our game featured a twelve-run inning, all of it belonging to the Mets. In 2017, we got twelve runs spread out disproportionately over two consecutive half-innings. Guys like us, we win some; we lose some; we examine the team museum with a veritable jeweler’s loupe; we faint from the prices in the team store; we just miss a Mr. Met photo opportunity (with him, not against him); we devour a mess of Blue Smoke; we analyze Jay Bruce’s true self with scant evidence to support our respective assertions; we critique where our 23-30 ballclub’s construction went awry; we wonder why the Pirates continue hold on Met runners who are no threat to run; we save our souvenir cups; we grab our pocket schedules; we board the 7 Super Express; and at Woodside we say see ya later until next time, probably next year.

Maybe not what guys like us dream of, exactly, but the Jeff game is always a highlight of my season. Except for the losing by five. That part was as hideous as the Free Shirt Friday t-shirt. The guy on the video screen probably had so many to put on because nobody around him wanted theirs.

Two-to-One Odds

Brewers 2 Mets 1. Not the outcome of choice in these parts, but a reassuring baseball score for a sunny Thursday afternoon. If you’re gonna lose by a run…well don’t, but if you have to, do it neatly, quickly and move on. Two-one without extra innings implies satisfying efficiency.

Yet this game lingered too long to be filed away so squarely. It lasted just past three hours. Three hours for three runs? Shouldn’t have that been over sooner? For comparison purposes, I sought out a 2-1 game I recall from many moons before: Padres 2 Mets 1. It’s featured toward the end of Mets Yearbook: 1978, wherein mic’d up manager Joe Torre urges Jerry Koosman — “Koozy,” he called him that Wednesday afternoon — on to no avail.

That 2-1 decision, on August 16, 1978, in which the Mets totaled four hits and the Padres nine, took 2:21 to complete at Shea. The most recent 2-1 loss in Mets history, which occurred at Citi Field over 3:02, encompassed the same number of home team hits and two more from the visitors. There were three walks combined in 1978, five in 2017, though one was intentional, which doesn’t require the messy issuing of four balls anymore. There was one error this Thursday, none 39 years ago. Five more batters struck out now (21) as compared to then (16), and batters didn’t stray from the box then as they tend to now. Plus commercials. Always commercials.

A little extra time here, a little extra time there…nah, it doesn’t add up to a fan watching and wondering why the heck one 2-1 loss in which the Mets bat in the bottom of the ninth takes forty-one minutes longer to conduct than the other 2-1 loss in which the Mets bat in the bottom of the ninth.

I suppose a few minutes needed to be devoted in modern time to Terry Collins barking at Fieldin Culbreth. And Culbreth needed a moment to eject Collins. Collins was upset that the umpires reinterpreted an interpretive-to-begin-with call. You rarely see managers strenuously emote at umpires anymore, now that we have video replay review. But this call — stemming from Wilmer Flores getting entangled in the wayward Milwaukee bat boy and thus not catching a foul pop hit by Eric Sogard — fell outside the purview of the crew in Chelsea. All Collins could do was gripe once the call went from out on interference to never mind, just a foul ball that didn’t get caught. All Culbreth could do in response was lend an ear and give a thumb.

So you needed some time for that fourth-inning escapade. Zack Wheeler needed time to make a few more pitches before getting Sogard to ground into an inning-ending double play that eased even if it didn’t erase the irritation surrounding Wilmer and the bat boy (Wilmer and the Bat Boy — coming to ABC this fall!). Also, the Brewer hit just prior to Sogard’s at-bat unfolded in slow motion. Chase Anderson bunted a ball in the air that Travis d’Arnaud didn’t catch and didn’t throw to second, which was the whole idea of not catching it. Travis threw to first, but Chase, the pitcher, beat it out. That seemed to take a while.

A Thursday afternoon shouldn’t be the place to hurry baseball along, but 2-1 works better when paced better. Anderson gave up only three Met singles and one Met walk across 104 pitches that covered seven innings. One-hundred four pitches and no runs allowed sounds like it should get you to the ninth, but Anderson didn’t see the eighth. The Met offense didn’t see the scoreboard until Chase was chased by his manager, Craig Counsell. Flores got even with that benignly clumsy Brewer bat boy (presumably a Met employee not suited to the outfit he was assigned…a lot of that going around Flushing lately) by taking Jacob Barnes deep on the first Brewer pitch not delivered by Anderson. It got out with enough exit ferocity to shave at least a few seconds from time of game.

Think about it: One guy throws 104 pitches and can’t be touched. One guy throws one pitch and the lead he was bequeathed is instantly halved. Then again, Wheeler threw 102 pitches, wasn’t nearly as untouchable as Anderson, yet lasted only two-thirds of an inning less and gave up only two more runs.

Juggling these numbers about doesn’t change the 2-1 equation. Zack gave up one run in the third, another in the fourth, but survived into the seventh thanks to three double plays. Ten hits allowed in 6.1 IP could do you more damage. But three hours in the sun should probably yield more than three runs in all, and ideally the Mets would wind up with more than one of them.

Could have been worse. It was exactly a year earlier, on a Wednesday afternoon, I sat through thirteen innings that required four hours and forty-one minutes and resulted in the same 2-1 loss for the Mets. Well, not the same. No two ballgames, whatever their scores, are precisely the same. I guess that’s why they keep making new ones and we’ll keep watching every one that they make.

Showing Up With Nothing

Pitching’s hard. You knew that. But dig into everything involved with pitching and you wind up amazed that anyone can do it at all.

Never mind, for a moment, the routine and chronic physical danger inherent in it — the stress and pain of doing something unnatural and damaging over and over again. And put aside the rare but catastrophic danger inherent in it — the non-zero chance that this next pitch may be the one that causes the shoulder to bark, the fingertips to tingle, the elbow to burn, or be transformed into a missile fired back at the head faster than anyone can process the danger and react.

Even if we could assume physical safety, pitching would be really hard — there’s the need to commit the windup and the stretch to muscle memory, to get and keep your limbs working in sync, to ensure a fatigued arm stays at the proper angle, to coax weary legs into guiding the front foot to the right landing spot and following through properly. All of that has to become a process that can be repeated 100 times in a row, despite stress and strain and distractions and bad luck.

Hell, pitchers have to do all that and commit stepping on and off the rubber to muscle memory — to name a seemingly small thing that’s also pretty hard. If I were forced onto a big-league mound, this is what would happen: I’d immediately walk somebody or give up a hit, balk that guy around the bases while trying to throw my next pitch, and then run off the field to hide in a cave and starve myself to death.

But pitchers learn all that, and work at it, and become masters of something that should be impossible. Even the least successful of them has done something extraordinary.

Now let’s throw in one more wrinkle. Sometimes really good pitchers do everything right, walk out to the mound to ply their trade, and discover that despite all their preparations they have arrived unable to put up a fair fight. The breaking pitches won’t bite, the fastball won’t go where it’s told, the change-up arrives so exuberantly that it’s become a lousy fastball, and so on. That pitcher has arrived at a gunfight and wishes he was the much-mocked dummy holding a knife — because all he has is a handful of air.

That’s what happened to Jacob deGrom against the Brewers. He was down 2-0 before he recorded an out, and it didn’t get much better. To point out that this is the same deGrom who was the hero of the realm in his last start is to underscore the point. In all likelihood (caveat because you never know with this ravaged team), there’s no why worth pursuing. DeGrom’s usually good; on Wednesday night he was really bad.

That’s it, it happens, and if you can get past the unavoidable partisan aspect of it, you might find yourself thinking it’s kind of wonderful. Sometimes your seat’s not even warm and the Mets are unloading on Sandy Koufax or Greg Maddux or Roger Clemens or Jake Arrieta and what looked like a stressful appointment has become a giddy carnival. And sometimes before you’ve dressed that first hot dog Tom Seaver or Dwight Gooden or Al Leiter or Jacob deGrom has his hands on his knees and the manager and the pitching coach are exchanging helpless shrugs.

It’s just baseball, deciding it’s that pitcher’s turn.

(Oh, and Mr. Met got in trouble but I don’t care because it’s dumb.)

Whose Game Was This Anyway?

I had hoped Tyler Pill might be Grover Powell. Grover Powell’s first major league start, for the Mets in 1963, was a complete game shutout, which didn’t happen for Mets rookies every day in 1963, nor, come to think of it, today. Before long, Tyler Pill 2017, who reacted well to the lights in Flushing for 5⅓ innings, appeared more to my eyes as a proximate ringer for Rick Anderson 1986. Do you remember Rick Anderson’s major league debut? Came up to the team you’d think least likely in need of a spot start and spot-started his heart out — 7 IP, 0 ER — before his bullpen blew both his and the team’s win.

There’d be no W next to Pill’s name mainly because Asdrubal Cabrera uncharacteristically chose Tuesday night to ever so briefly be the reluctant reincarnation of Luis Castillo. Luis Castillo recorded 337 base hits as a New York Met in three-and-a-third seasons, including 147 in 2009, a year when he hit .302 and played in 142 games, 141 of which you’ve all but forgotten about because on June 12 of that year…yeah, you know.

The circumstances that surrounded Cabrera on a foggy, misty night at home in front of curious onlookers versus Milwaukee were far different from those that bedeviled Castillo eight Junes ago in the hostile cauldron of the Subway Series one borough north, but the bottom line result, a dropped pop fly that allowed two runs to score, was close enough for massive discomfort. When Luis Castillo became Luis Castillo, he was done in not only by an inexplicable E-4 with two outs in the bottom of the ninth and the Mets clinging to a one-run lead, but the Van McCoy-like hustle of Mark Teixeira, for once Alex Rodriguez popped his seemingly harmless ball into the Bronx air, Teixeira commenced to gallop from first base, never breaking his gait. Thus, when brother Luis’s fortunes turned black as the night, Teixeira was able to trot across the finish line…I mean home plate, giving the Yankees a win, the Mets a loss and Castillo a reputation that, judging by the instantaneous social media reaction that accompanied Cabrera’s gaffe at shortstop, remains solid as the rocks each of them pulled.

Ah, but one difference: Domingo Santana, who was on first for the Brewers as Jett Bandy launched a pie-easy pop somewhere above Asdrubal’s head, stopped, stood and soaked in the proceedings like the spectator he had become. Perhaps he forgot there were two out. Perhaps he doesn’t have the same bloodlines as Teixeira, who likely would have cottoned to the muddy track. Though the Brewers on second and third scored on Cabrera’s drop to knot the score at four, Santana cantered only 180 feet from first, which is all that saved Asdrubal from total and enduring Castilloan infamy.

The Mets went from a relatively relaxed win to a burdensome tie. Their hitters — including Cabrera (whose three hits ceased to be his Tuesday calling card), Lucas Duda (who had hammered a homer in the sixth because suddenly he constantly makes noise) and Neil Walker (who reached a thousand career hits in the dinkiest, dunkiest fashion possible, but they’re all line drives in the next afternoon’s blog post) — stopped hitting. Their pitchers, however, did all right. Fernando Salas could have done better, but give the guy a break, he was still dizzy from having singled for the first time in his life. Jerry Blevins should have squirmed from trouble after Salas got the Mets into it, but Blevins presumably pitches in his sleep, so let him rest. Josh Edgin got through the eighth, Addison Reed the ninth.

Extras beckoned. Who were ya gonna call? Well, Josh Smoker hadn’t pitched in six days, which reads like a misprint because since when do Mets relievers go six days without pitching, but he was tanned, rested and ready. In the gloom of the shadows and fog that enveloped Citi Field, I wouldn’t swear he was tanned — it seemed like a good night for Joe Torre to send up Joel Youngblood and for the whole thing to be declared a tie — but Josh was definitely the other two things. He Smoked his way through a jam in the tenth, got the Brewers in order in the eleventh and pitched a scoreless twelfth. Hey, I thought, maybe we have another Shaun Marcum on our hands, someone who can absorb messy extra-extra-inning spills (but without issuing delusional media criticism).

By the bottom of the twelfth, the youthful Pill was showered, dressed and, by the looks of him, catching up on his social studies homework. Cabrera was still on the hook and hearing short-memoried boos, though who could blame the dozens who remained to serve in the Greek chorus? Crappy nights without resolution, accented by awful umpiring (with Manny Gonzalez tackling the evergreen role of Angel Hernandez), remind you how much baseball is played because it has to be played, not because it ought to be played. Perhaps Rob Manfred should look into a rule change that would reduce the schedule from 162 games to only the good ones.

Ah, but what makes a good one? Your team winning surely helps your point of view. What looked bad in the tenth as the Mets couldn’t touch Brewers closer Evil Knebel, and the eleventh when they were similarly distant from repurposed Milwaukee starter Wily Peralta, began to display attractive qualities in the twelfth. Pinch-hitter T.J. Rivera, who is almost as from the Bronx as Neil Walker is from Pittsburgh, singled to lead off. Michael Conforto, who will not be written into the All-Star starting lineup but don’t let that discourage you from writing him in, walked. Jose Reyes, whose Reyesnaissance has stalled again, inadvertently moved Rivera to third, which is where we wanted him to be. And Jay Bruce, who I sensed would win it on one swing two innings earlier, made me look like a prophet delayed with another swing, this for a line drive into center scoring Rivera.

The final was 5-4 in 12, which immediately made me think of Game Four of the 1988 NLCS, except then the Mets were the ones stuck on 4 and Mike Scioscia’s name still resonates so loud that it drowns out the worst of Luis Castillo. This time around, the Mets had the 5, the win and a new precedent for fans to be reminded of the next time a game goes on and on but not hopelessly off the rails.


Writing — sports and every other kind — is a diminished craft this week following the passing of Frank Deford, a talent for whom the word “great” is understatement.

I met Frank Deford once. It had to have been, in the world of Frank Deford, the Jose Santiago of encounters. It was no doubt inconsequential to him. It made me feel very good in the moment in took place. Mr. Deford came to a meeting of the New York Baseball Giants Nostalgia Society on 231st Avenue in the Kingsbridge section of the Bronx. There was no need for him to do this. True, he had written a book about the Giants, and I know from my comparatively scant experience as an author that you don’t say no to an invitation to talk about your book, but he was Frank Deford, the book was no longer new and he surely didn’t need to make every scene to which he was invited.

But he came. Our group leader, Bill Kent, probably didn’t grasp just how big a get Frank Deford was. He was Frank Deford, the writer from Sports Illustrated from when that meant everything, many-times honored for his sportswriting, the revered voice of NPR, founder of The National…Frank Deford! And he came, to the church in the Bronx where Bill arranged for us to every few months have meetings and pizza and Giants talk and the occasional guest speaker. Bill seemed to go through life not realizing all he was accomplishing to add to the happiness of those he touched.

Frank Deford talked Giants, specifically the early 20th century version that formed the basis of an evocative SI article that grew into his book. He didn’t act like a big get, just a guy who found a baseball subject that fascinated him and that he wanted to share. He shared without air. He shared even while Bill interrupted to ask if anybody wanted another slice (because Bill would do that). Later, Mr. Deford stood in the back amid the emptying pizza boxes and chatted with anybody who cared to chat. I had brought my copy of The Old Ball Game, which I figured could be only embellished by the author’s autograph. While asking him for it, I figured I could tell him how much I loved The National, the daily sports paper that should be presently in its twenty-eighth year of publication, except it went out of business in 1991, less than eighteen months after Mr. Deford founded it.

As he signed his book for me, I offered a vaguely coherent pleasantry, dropped a name (the wrong name, I’m pretty sure) of a friend of a friend who was involved in his old paper and drew from Mr. Deford a warm acknowledgement that yes, The National was indeed a pretty good thing. With that, I thanked him for his talk and his time, and he was as nice as could be in return. Soon he was gone. I don’t think he had any pizza.

Baseball Is Cruel, Ridiculous and Also Sometimes Fun

Our blog pal Shannon Shark of MetsPolice has a running gag in which he imagines the Mets aren’t a ballclub but a TV show, with Greg as its fiendishly inventive show runner.

Confronted with games such as Monday afternoon’s, I wonder if Shannon might be on to something.

Last week, you’ll recall, Terry Collins caught hell from a fair-sized chunk of Mets nation (including this writer) for removing Robert Gsellman after 84 pitches, a decision he made a night after burning his least unreliable relievers despite a big lead. Spoiler alert: the shallow end of the bullpen failed Gsellman and Terry and the Mets lost.

Fast-forward to the sixth inning of Monday’s game. The Mets had a 3-2 lead, which with our bullpen is basically like being down two, and had loaded the bases with two out. Gsellman had thrown 89 pitches, showing off an effective sinker that generated ground balls and allowing just one run on three hits.

Due up to bat? Gsellman, of course.

I mean, you tell me what to do there. A base hit could give the Mets a 5-2 lead, which with our bullpen is basically like being tied. Gsellman’s not where you’d typically turn for a base hit. Yet he’d thrown only five more pitches than in the outing when his removal became a federal case. One more inning from Gsellman would mean one fewer inning from the bullpen. It would mean better-rested guys on Tuesday with unknown quantity Tyler Pill taking the hill. And so on.

It’s the kind of dilemma a mean-spirited show runner might throw at a manager and an increasingly high-strung fan base. (As well as yet another obvious reason the designated hitter is bullshit, but that’s a different post.)

That was the cruel part. Terry chose to let Gsellman bat, which led to the ridiculous part.

Facing reliever Rob Scahill, Gsellman worked the count to 2-2 and stared at a 94 MPH fastball on the inside corner. It was a good pitch, and strike three … except for the part where C. B. Bucknor called it a ball. Manny Pina‘s shoulders slumped slightly behind the plate. Scahill paused in front of the mound, restrained himself from hopping up and down in disbelief, and returned to his post. Gsellman took one step backwards, out of the batter’s box, and stood there looking faintly embarrassed.

The next pitch really was a ball. Gsellman walked and it was 4-2 Mets.

Gsellman cruised through the seventh and gave way to newly beloved Met Paul Sewald, who turned in a spotless eighth. Enter Addison Reed, a steely and reliable setup man turned nerve-rackingly shaky closer. Reed gave up singles to the first two guys, and oh lord it was happening again.

Even the most dispassionate fan will catch himself or herself squirming in agony on the couch and fuming that So-and-So needs to try harder. It’s dumb, but forgivable in low doses — from the comfort of the sofa it looks like it shouldn’t be that hard for a world-class athlete to throw a ball over the plate, hit the ball to the right side, or lift a pitch to the outfield. Just try harder, we urge athletes who’ve outworked thousands of competitors to attain their current position. Just focus, we implore guys whose workplace includes thousands of screaming onlookers and a guaranteed public dissection of failure.

In good times and bad, Reed looks vaguely perturbed on the mound — he always reminds me of the deputy in a Western who’s tried reason but now finds himself reluctantly sauntering out into the dusty street to settle things with sixguns. I know it isn’t true, and thinking otherwise is just dopey guy-on-the-couch projection, but Reed looked like he’d had enough of this self-inflicted shit. He nodded at Rene Rivera and went to work on Pina. Suddenly the fastball looked like it had a bit more bite, a little more wiggle. Reed fanned Pina on three fastballs cutting over the edges of the plate, struck out Jonathan Villar on the last of four fastballs, then threw a pair of sliders to Orlando Arcia, the second of which arced softly into Michael Conforto‘s glove.

And just like that, justice prevailed again in Metstown. That, unexpectedly, was the fun part.

Who Are You and What Have You Done With the Mets?

A couple of times in my life, I’ve witnessed someone forget to engage the parking brake while on a slight incline. (OK, once I was that person.) The car doesn’t move all that swiftly at first on its journey to where it’s not supposed to be, but its momentum builds steadily and pretty soon the slow-motion disaster has become inevitable, downgrading your status from potential hero to cringing bystander.

Saturday night’s Mets game was like that: the hitters stopped hitting and the nightly game of bullpen roulette ended like you feared it would. So Sunday night’s game in this same park against these same Pirates wearing these same odd green uniforms probably didn’t strike any of us as an ideal way to spend a holiday evening.

Between family commitments and a certain learned wariness, I got there a bit late, arriving to find Matt Harvey on the wrong side of a 1-0 deficit in the fourth. Not too bad, but this bunch has taught me a few things, such as the fourth inning coming before our starter tires and the hellmouth of the bullpen door yawns open to unleash its ghastly denizens upon the overconfident and inattentive.

But this night, decidedly un-Metsian things were to transpire.

Like Asdrubal Cabrera whacking a two-out double to turn that 1-0 deficit into a 2-1 lead, followed by a parade of innings featuring MORE RUNS. Three more in the fifth! One more in the sixth … that came after the Mets seemed bound and determined to short-circuit a scoring chance! One in the seventh thanks to a line-drive homer from Lucas Duda!

And that wasn’t all. In the fourth, Harvey was looking at second and third with one out — the kind of situation that has undone our defrocked superhero too often this year. This time, Harvey struck out Francisco Cervelli and Jordy Mercer with mid-90s fastballs to escape harm. An inning later, a two-out rally brought Gregory Polanco to the plate with a chance to cut Pittsburgh’s deficit to one. Harvey dropped a back-foot slider on the Pirates’ best player to hold the line. He only went six innings, but they were six effective innings in which he pitched with the closest thing we’ve seen to his old arsenal and, perhaps as importantly, looked like he trusted those pitches.

But could the Mets get nine outs before giving up six runs, exhausting the entire bullpen, or both? Never say never, at least not with this basket of destroyables.

But Paul Sewald — who’s steadily risen up the admittedly thin ranks from Oh Yeah That Guy to Just Possibly Not So Bad to Seems Pretty Reliable — turned in two decent innings, at which point Terry Collins turned to Neil Ramirez.

Ramirez hasn’t exactly buried us in evidence that he can get major-league hitters out. But a five-run lead in the ninth? This is your Montero Moment, Neil!

So Ramirez walked Mercer, struck out Saturday Night Massacre-er John Jaso, then walked Jose Osuna. That sent Jerry Blevins to the bullpen mound and hearts into the more-familiar lodgings of our throats. But Ramirez then retired not just the next hitter but the one after that. Yes, that really was Neil Ramirez leaving the mound to high-fives and attaboys, instead of departing because a frowning manager had decided it would be better for him to stop practicing his trade.

All these things happened. They happened in the same game. They led to a Mets win. I’m not sure exactly how that occurred, but replicating it 65 to 70 more times this year would be just fine with me.