The blog for Mets fans
who like to read

ABOUT US

Jason Fry and Greg Prince
Faith and Fear in Flushing made its debut on Feb. 16, 2005, the brainchild of two longtime friends and lifelong Met fans.

Greg Prince discovered the Mets when he was 6, during the magical summer of 1969. He is a Long Island-based writer, editor and communications consultant. Contact him here.

Jason Fry is a Brooklyn writer whose first memories include his mom leaping up and down cheering for Rusty Staub. Check out his other writing here.

Got something to say? Leave a comment, or email us at faithandfear@gmail.com.

Need our RSS feed? It's here.

Visit our Facebook page, or drop by the personal pages for Greg and Jason.

Or follow us on Twitter: Here's Greg, and here's Jason.

Dykstra & McDowell for Samuel

Welcome to Flashback Friday: I Saw The Decade End, a milestone-anniversary salute to the New York Mets of 1969, 1979, 1989 and 1999. Each week, we immerse ourselves in or at least touch upon something that transpired within the Metsian realm 40, 30, 20 or 10 years ago. Amazin’ or not, here it comes.

I didn’t think it was a bad trade. I had mixed emotions, to be sure, but those were tinged by sentiment. For the purposes of winning baseball games, I didn’t think it was a bad trade.

I was wrong. I was wrong to think sending Lenny Dykstra and Roger McDowell to the Phillies in the middle of the 1989 season wasn’t a bad trade.

It was a bad trade. It’s probably not given long enough shrift as one of the more deleterious trades the Mets have ever made. Maybe that’s because it’s got so much competition. Ryan for Fregosi usually stops all conversation, but Nolan Ryan didn’t help a division rival win a pennant and Jim Fregosi didn’t keep the Mets from winning one themselves.

This is hindsight talking, but hindsight took the early bus where this one was concerned. It might not have seemed altogether ludicrous — may have even looked beneficial — that Sunday in Philadelphia when two stalwarts of a past champion dressed in the visitors clubhouse but left the Vet with the home team. The Mets of 1989 were past champions and very much acting the part for the first 2½ months of the season. That’s why drastic action was deemed necessary.

The Mets entered ’89 as favorites to hold the N.L. East in their pocket as they had been favored regularly every April since 1985. But our sluggers were sluggish and the club limped to a 3-7 start; they’d sit in last place more than two weeks in. A mini-surge captured them first place soon after in a very tight, very fluid divisional race. But traction was elusive. After 60 games, they were 30-30, in third place, four games out.

The previous December I read Roger Angell describe how old the Mets looked in the sun, on the field in Game Five of the ’88 NLCS, the day after Mike Scioscia became Mike Scioscia. Within days of that issue of the New Yorker hitting newsstands, those Mets — which is to say the past champion Mets — began to be taken apart the way we would watch Breeze Demolition take apart Shea Stadium twenty winters later. The first piece to be extracted was Wally Backman, traded unceremoniously to the Twins for three minor leaguers who never made it to the bigs. Wally Backman remains the Met who epitomizes the “he comes to kill you” ethos every Met fan sentient back then recalls with such wistfulness. But he was given away for three instrumental breaks; Jeff Bumgarner, Steve Gasser and Toby Nivens cannot be said to have added up to a song.

That was the only trade of note the Mets made heading into ’89, but shipping Backman off to Minneapolis was move enough. It cleared the way for the future, for Gregg Jefferies. After his earth-moving callup in ’88 (109 ABs, none before August 28, actually earned him Rookie of the Year votes), a position would have to be found for Jefferies, who was more hitter than player. Wally’s position was deemed Gregg’s. What had been the property of Backman and Tim Teufel now belonged to the heir apparent. Angell was right. Keith Hernandez was aging — 35. Gary Carter was aging — also 35. Darryl Strawberry wasn’t old (27) but his maturity was never a given. McReynolds, HoJo…nice players, but Jefferies was the star in waiting. This was the beginning of the overhaul of a team that had won to a team that would win again.

Yet Jefferies struggled, and the old guys got older, and plenty else wouldn’t click, and something had to be done. Enter…or should we say exit Lenny Dykstra and Roger McDowell. It wasn’t their fault the Mets were a stagnant .500 team, but there was doubt they’d ever exceed what they had been. Randy Myers throwing peas, with converted starter Rick Aguilera chipping in, made McDowell’s hotfoots superfluous in the bullpen. He was a sad 1-5 by mid-June. Dykstra was part of a center field platoon and not particularly amenable to going halvsies with Mookie Wilson any longer. There was no particular dropoff in his production in 1989, but management looked at Lenny and saw a part-time player who swung for the fences far more than his frame suggested would be ideal.

If you could trade two players rapidly devolving into spare parts and get a player not long removed from being considered one of the true comers in the game, how could you not? Enter Juan Samuel.

Geez, this guy was good. The Phillies were nothing special from 1984 through 1987, but Samuel was. Struck out more than should be tolerated, yet for four seasons put up hellacious numbers. Stole as many as 72 bases; drove in as many as 100 runs; collected 28 homers and 15 triples in the same season. Sadly, none of those were his most recent stats when the Mets got him. Juan Samuel had a down 1988 and was doing no better in 1989. But Davey Johnson had his eye on him since he came up in 1984 and Davey got his man, a two-time All-Star second baseman, and inserted him in the lineup every day…in center.

To be fair, he made the switch as a Phillie, but this was the emerging Met way: get somebody who played one position as a rule and jam him into another. Howard Johnson would try shortstop until short could stand it no more. Gregg Jefferies bounced between third and second. And center field at Shea, once the province of legends Dykstra and Wilson (suddenly a utilityman), was bequeathed to a converted second baseman.

A second baseman who couldn’t play center. He was a terrible centerfielder. Didn’t get good breaks. Didn’t know what he was doing. And he didn’t make it worthwhile by hitting up a storm. No longer on turf, Samuel stopped tripling. He stole 31 bases in 3½ months, but didn’t get on enough for it to make a difference. Batted .228 as a Met. His OBP was .299, a stat that may not have been in vogue twenty years ago but was glaringly weak enough to change Davey’s habit of penciling Samuel in as his leadoff hitter by August.

Individually, he was a bust and as far as helping the team…well, the Mets were three over, two out, in third place on June 18, the day of the trade. A week later, after sweeping the Phillies at Shea, the Mets moved a percentage point ahead of the pack. But that was it. They would never see first place again in 1989. It can’t all be laid at Juan Samuel’s feet (which indeed proved useful when he unleashed a karate kick on Norm Charlton in a rollicking brawl versus the Reds), but let’s just say the Mets didn’t lose it in spite of him.

The sour taste Mets fans of long memory might still have from Dykstra & McDowell for Samuel probably stems from the future success of Lenny Dykstra and the sense that the ’86 ways that began to fade with the dismissal of Mitchell and Knight and accelerated with the exile of Backman really began to evaporate when Dykstra left. Those are legitimate reasons for wanting to spit out the residue of Juan Samuel’s tenure. But let’s not forget that not only was Samuel ineffective as a Met, he was damn near insubordinate toward the end. As the season drew to a close, Davey Johnson wanted to consider what he had to look forward to for 1990. The manager penciled Samuel in to start a game at second base. Having proved an inadequate centerfielder (and Jefferies having shown himself utterly unreliable up the middle), Davey figured it was worth a try.

Juan Samuel refused to play second base for the Mets. Said it wasn’t fair to him, that he wasn’t properly prepared, that that’s not what he’d been doing the entire season. So he didn’t play second. By December, he was traded to the Dodgers for Mike Marshall and Alejandro Peña. (And, for what it’s worth, 1989 would be Davey’s last full season as Mets manager.)

Roger McDowell’s visibility as a reliever would recede after leaving the Mets. He bounced from Philly to L.A. to Texas to Baltimore, never making it back to the postseason before lighting his last major league match in 1996. His greatest post-Met fame would come in TV appearances that had nothing to do with saves or holds. He was a mainstay in the annual MTV Rock ‘n’ Jock Softball soirees (they kept inviting him back long after his sinker stopped sinking) and he endures in Seinfeld reruns as the notorious “second spitter” in “The Boyfriend,” a.k.a. the two-parter with Keith Hernandez.

Lenny Dykstra, however, was the gift that kept on giving as a reminder of where the Mets had been and where they were unwillingly going. We should have known something was up when he made his first appearance at Shea as a Phillie five days after the trade. After accepting a large ovation from his old fans, he stepped in against Bobby Ojeda and tripled. He’d score moments later on a Dickie Thon homer.

The man they called Nails didn’t light the world on fire as a Phillie otherwise in 1989. He left the Mets a .270 hitter and finished the year at .237. His OBP dropped from a so-so .362 with the Mets to a positively Samuelian .297 for his new team. The Phillies tried to give him away in the offseason. They found no takers. Frank Cashen was among those who said thanks, but no thanks.

And wasn’t Philadelphia thankful? Not unlike the renaissance Ray Knight experienced in 1986 after proving untradeable off an awful ’85, Dykstra blossomed in 1990: batted .325, led the National League in on-base percentage at .418 and hits with 192, made the All-Star team and finished ninth in MVP voting. The next two years were injury-riddled (due partly to driving drunk in ’91), but he was back in form in 1993, leading the league in hits, walks and runs, finishing behind only Barry Bonds for Most Valuable Player honors and spearheading the Phillies’ pennant drive. Lenny hit the tenth-inning home run that would win pivotal Game Five of the NLCS in Atlanta, and he came close to snatching the World Series from Toronto by posting four steals, eight ribbies and four homers, including a three-run job in Game Six that was snowed under by Joe Carter’s later heroics but was incredibly and characteristically clutch in its own right.

While Lenny Dykstra was doing all that in 1993, the Mets were finishing last, 44 games under .500, 38 in back of Philly. Juan Samuel was a Cincinnati Red and bitter memory by then. Even though Dykstra never had anything close to a big season again (retiring after 1996), the critical mass created by his ’93 performance and Samuel’s total disappearance made the deal one of utter infamy for Mets fans. Dykstra may have been cited in the Mitchell Report. He may be fighting myriad lawsuits. His businesses, so successful before the stock market tanked, may be in trouble. But he’s one who got away, one of too many. It wasn’t a Ryan, an Otis, a Kent or a Kazmir with Dykstra. He achieved something tangible with the Mets. He won a ring here. So did Ryan, but Ryan was unfulfilled potential through 1971. Lenny had already paid dividends and we let him go when he still had miles left on his warranty.

Samuel goes down as a bad acquisition, sure, but also a harbinger of dreadful things to come. First off, from the time Mookstra vacated center in deference to Juan until Carlos Beltran accepted several Brinks Trucks to play there, the Mets had no serious full-time, long-term centerfielder. Other than one hot year from Lance Johnson and some good months from Jay Payton, it was essentially vacancy signs and poor planning 410 feet from home plate. Samuel also signaled a new era of reliance on misguided reclamation projects. You can draw a line from Samuel to Baerga to Alomar (though I could swear Robbie didn’t need reclaiming until he got here)…maybe this is one of those “it always happens to us” default modes to which Mets fans tend to revert, but, honestly, we always seem to grab once-great players without wondering why they were so available for the grabbing. That’s also how George Weiss insisted on stocking the 1962 Mets, incidentally.

Twenty years ago the Mets weren’t meeting reasonable expectations and they floundered. They did something about it. It didn’t work where Juan Samuel was concerned. But they would do more. We’ll be back in a few Fridays to consider their other major move of the summer of 1989 — and how 1986 ended for good.

Flash back to how a Mets fan became the Mets fan he is today with Faith and Fear in Flushing: An Intense Personal History of the New York Mets, available from Amazon, Barnes & Noble or a bookstore near you. Keep in touch and join the discussion on Facebook.

12 comments to Dykstra & McDowell for Samuel

  • Anonymous

    do you think the franchise had trouble getting over the loss in the '88 NLCS (the same way I think they had trouble with the loses in Game 1 of the 2000 WS and Game 7 of the 2006 NLCS)? I had forgotten about that one, but it fits into the pattern I've seen.

  • Anonymous

    I was nine, and my friends and I called him “Juan Sam-smell.”

  • Anonymous

    don't forget the Game 6 NLCS loss in 1999. dammit.

  • Anonymous

    Damn, that brought back some awful memories. I remember attending a day game at Shea, looking forward to seeing our new all-star, followed by a night game in the Bronx, where the Yankees had just given up on Rickey, trading him that day for Eric Plunk and a handful of magic beans. The giddy mood at Shea was almost as satisfying as the gloom in Yankee Stadium, as the Rickey trade was viewed as waving a white flag. Rickey was just the latest example of a big name free agent who clashed with the Yankee brass and was shipped out of town. And EVERYBODY at Shea thought we had struck gold with Sammy.
    One of the most frustrating things about the Mets dynasty-that-never-came-to-pass is that the team seemed to be doing all the right things to keep it going. The McReynolds trade was viewed as a real coup, as was the Samuel debacle. You can't accuse Cashen of resting on his laurels. I don't know if anything could have been done to prevent the Doc and Daryl implosions, as well as Keith's patella (still makes me wince) and Gary's decline. But unlike this year's team, Mets management worked tirelessly to surround their nucleus with top tier talent. There's no way Cashen would have entered the season with Murphy, Church and Livan as regulars. The Mets deserved better than they got in 1989. This year is another story.

  • Anonymous

    Whatever it is that makes the Mets the Mets since '86 in terms of lethargy and purposelessness and the dreaded “lack of leadership” really seemed to kick in in '89. I'm not as wed to the Scioscia theory as others are because they stayed in it well into September. If Scioscia and the '88 NLCS had killed them, I think they would have sunk a lot lower in '89. But by being a little better than a .500 club up to mid-June and being considered a huge disappointment shows how high the bar was set in those days. When the decade began, I did pirouettes when they reached .500 in July. When it ended, reaching .500 was a downer.
    But they could have won in '89 and they could have won in '90 and they were in it to early August in '91. So while long-term the Scioscia home run is a dramatic turning point, I've never considered it a death blow.

  • Anonymous

    On paper, the McReynolds deal was, if not a steal, than a net positive. The guy was considered one of the emerging talents in the league. Mitchell had been a part-time player whose ceiling wasn't rated as high. Plus we got Gene “Death on Lefthanders” Walter. Since it happened soon after '86, it was a little shocking they were breaking up that old gang of ours, but there was a great vibe from it. We, the defending world champions, were bringing in a top-flight player to keep this budding dynasty in bloom.
    It's when you factor in a) Mitchell's MVP season (though the Padres gave up on him, too, a la the Indians with Jeff Kent and, later, San Diego with Jason Bay, making our trades of those guys to those teams seem slightly less shortsighted since we apparently weren't the only ones who missed the boat on their talent); b) McReynolds' pronounced lack of enthusiasm for being on what was then the biggest, baddest, most glamorous team in baseball (remember the whooshing out of the clubhouse after games); c) the realization that Mitchell was gone because he was a “street tough,” a quality Mets fans loved in him and the '86 team; and d) that removing Mitchell as a “bad influence” on Straw and Doc didn't keep them out of trouble that Mitchell for McReynolds becomes yet another piece in the narrative of how the Mets were quick to rip out their heart and soul.
    McReynolds had one outstanding season as a Met, one very good season and a couple of not altogether bad years though you could feel his interest level slipping through the screen. But if you had all the information Frank Cashen had from a baseball perspective in December 1986, you'd probably jump at the chance to acquire him.

  • Anonymous

    Maybe it was because I was a huge Lenny fan at the time, but I remember that this was considered to be a bad trade even in '89. Or perhaps the jury was split. Nonetheless, there were a number of fans who thought that Davey unfairly never gave Lenny the shot that he deserved to be an everyday player. And I know lots of fans mourned the loss of guys that really defined the spirit of the '86 Mets. But sentiment aside, even from a pure talent perspective, I feel like it was highly questionable whether the Mets got the better half of the deal at that time.

  • Anonymous

    You're right that it wasn't hailed universally as a Met steal the way Matt Lawton, et al for Roberto Alomar was, though I think that had more to do with the halo Dykstra and McDowell retained from '86 — though anyone who said we were giving up too much for too little was proven absolutely correct.
    All trades of guys you've grown used to disorient you a bit, but it was particularly shocking to see Dykstra in a different uniform. The essential Metsiness of Lenny, despite spending more time with the Phillies than the Mets (and being a weird post-playing days character, to put it mildly), never fades. I doubt any Mets fan is posting on a blog this week as sammy_fan.

  • Anonymous

    Ha, good point, Greg re: sammy_fan. Unless, of course, that guy also happened to be a huge Cheers fan.

  • Anonymous

    Back then, I used to buy the Elias Baseball Analyst on the day it came out in early March. In 1987, Elias gushed about the Mets and how it was unprecedented that a champion would add a player of McReynolds caliber. If you had told me that we would be sitting here in 2009 with zero additional championships I would have thought you insane. Of course, Doc went to Smithers between the Elias publication date and Opening Day.
    Kevin Mac aside, trading Mitch because he was supposedly a bad influence on Doc and Daryl sounds an awful lot like the Yank-mes getting rid of Billy Martin to keep Mantle and Ford in line.

  • Anonymous

    I clearly recall driving down the Jersey turnpike the day they made this trade and the WFAN reaction being largely positive. Samuel was thought to be one of those exciting power/speed guys that other teams always seemed to have and the Mets didn't, and that a change of scenery would only help.
    The Phils also traded Steve Bedrosian to the Giants that day, and the feeling was they'd traded away both division championships. BTW, they got for Charlie Hayes, Dennis Cook and Terry Mulholland for Bedrock — another deal that looked very good for the Phils come 1993.