The blog for Mets fans
who like to read
ABOUT US
Faith and Fear in Flushing made its debut on Feb. 16, 2005, the brainchild of two longtime friends and lifelong Met fans.
Greg Prince discovered the Mets when he was 6, during the magical summer of 1969. He is a Long Island-based writer, editor and communications consultant. Contact him here.
Jason Fry is a Brooklyn writer whose first memories include his mom leaping up and down cheering for Rusty Staub. Check out his other writing here.
Got something to say? Leave a comment, or email us at faithandfear@gmail.com. (Sorry, but we have no interest in ads, sponsored content or guest posts.)
Need our RSS feed? It's here.
Visit our Facebook page, or drop by the personal pages for Greg and Jason.
Or follow us on Twitter: Here's Greg, and here's Jason.
|
by Greg Prince on 17 July 2009 4:00 pm
Welcome to Flashback Friday: I Saw The Decade End, a milestone-anniversary salute to the New York Mets of 1969, 1979, 1989 and 1999. Each week, we immerse ourselves in or at least touch upon something that transpired within the Metsian realm 40, 30, 20 or 10 years ago. Amazin’ or not, here it comes.
The last thing I wanted to hear in the summer of 1979 was that someday the Mets were going to be good. Someday was so, so far away. The slightest hint that the calendar might be sped up so it would get here one ice age sooner…that maybe, just maybe we weren’t so bad…yeah, that would be sweet.
In the middle of July, the Mets went nuts and won five in a row — two from the Dodgers, three from the Giants. The Dodgers were terrible and the Giants weren’t any good, but that was hardly the point. The Mets had been the pits for three seasons running, and now they were winners. They were 5-0 in their last five anyway. I wasn’t in the mood to be told what I was watching was the most fleeting of mirages.
Leave it to my friend Larry, who didn’t keep up with the day-to-day details of baseball, to drag me kicking and screaming back toward the conventional baseball wisdom of the late ’70s. Apropos of nothing, he called the Saturday night after the Saturday afternoon when the Mets had streaked to their fifth straight and tossed me an aside:
“The Mets are so bad, they’re gonna have to invent a place lower than last place for them.”
It was like tossing me a grenade. And I, naturally, jumped on it. No, I said, you don’t understand. The Mets have won five in a row. People aren’t going to be making jokes like that about them anymore.
But of course they would. The Mets were still in last place because prior to that 5-0 run, they were 33-48. And after that 5-0 run, they would go 25-51. If anybody bothered to bring the Mets up in conversation for the balance of that season, it was not to speak of them in reverent tones.
For the 1979 Mets, however, someday would have to do. We knew. We knew deep down it was gonna take some time this time. The Mets were buried in last place from May 7 on. On the July day I was sure a corner had been turned, the Mets were 5½ out…of fifth place. A five-game winning streak had brought them no closer to first than a dozen games. And that was as close as they got until the decade was over. The Mets finished 35 games from first place in 1979, after finishing 24 games out in 1978 and 37 games out in 1977. The early ’80s, the occasional illusion of progress notwithstanding, weren’t much kinder in the GB column.
Someday…someday…so we waited. We waited and we watched whoever the Mets threw out there. Reviewing All-Star Game highlights on the MLB Network a few weeks ago, I saw again some of those in whom I invested my dreams: John Stearns, Pat Zachry, Lee Mazzilli, Joel Youngblood. Today somebody has a bad week and I advocate trading him. Back then it didn’t occur to me the best players on the Mets might make for decent trade bait. They were our best players. We were going to build around them, our All-Stars — and our might-be All-Stars: Steve Henderson, Doug Flynn, Craig Swan and so on. This was the core of my team for nearly four seasons. These were my brightest hopes for baseball happiness.
I wasn’t happy. I was loyal and I could be distracted by All-Star appearances as I was by modest achievements (Henderson’s second-place finish for Rookie of the Year in ’77; Flynn’s Gold Glove in ’80; Swan’s ’78 ERA title) and the odd five-game winning streak. That was very odd. The Mets won five in a row in the middle of 1978, did it again in 1979 and then inexplicably roared through their last six of ’79 to avoid losing the 100 games that so richly deserved to be plastered on their permanent record. The Mets wouldn’t exceed six straight victories for nearly a half-decade from there.
To reiterate, I wasn’t happy. I was merely waiting. I was waiting for this unit to gel as I had been informed by Mets management it would. There was scant evidence from the standings and little encouragement to be gleaned from the action on the field, but these were my guys. When one of them did something well, it wasn’t an anomaly. It was evidence that our day was coming. An All-Star berth was validation, as long as one conveniently ignored that the requirement that every team needed to be represented was partly the reason we had All-Stars.
Pat Zachry was a legitimate selection in 1978, though. To Mets fans like me, Pat Zachry was never going to overcome the stigma of being the righthanded starter obtained from Cincinnati for Tom Seaver, but through the first half of 1978, the pitcher having the better year between the two was Pat Zachry. No kidding. Zachry was 10-3 after shutting out first-place Philadelphia on July 4. It was his fifth complete game of the season. His ERA was 2.90, lower than Seaver’s 3.18 — and that was with Tom finally throwing a no-hitter in June. The Franchise in exile was only 9-6 in early July, still stung from an 0-3 start. There were stories in the New York papers wondering out loud which team got the better of the Tom Seaver deal one year later.
Those stories would stop soon enough, and not just because of a newspaper strike. Seaver had a decent (for him) year when all was said and done. Zachry’s, however, ended in July when he kicked a dugout step in frustration at giving up the hit that allowed Pete Rose to tie Tommy Holmes’ modern N.L. hitting streak record at Shea. Zachry fractured his left foot and was never compared favorably to Seaver again.
But he was an All-Star, just as Joel Youngblood would be three years hence. Joel Youngblood hit the picket lines batting .359 in 1981. When baseball decided to bring its sport back with a delayed Midsummer Classic, ‘Blood was the obvious choice from the Mets. He was a few plate appearances shy of leading the league in hitting at the time of the players strike (typical, in that Joe Torre could never quite commit to Joel at any one position despite having witnessed first-hand his awesome arm in right), but .359 in anything more than spot duty is worthy enough of All-Star consideration. That, and no other Met had been seen burning it up before they all walked on June 11. Thus, there was Joel Youngblood being introduced among the Schmidts and the Dawsons in Cleveland. And there he was pinch-hitting for Fernando Valenzuela at the height of Fernandomania in the top of the second. And there he was immediately popping up to Rod Carew in foul ground.
And there went Joel Youngblood, first-time and last-time All-Star.
Quick: What do Tom Seaver, Darryl Strawberry and Mike Piazza have in common? They are the only Mets to have accumulated more All-Star appearances as Mets than John Stearns. John Stearns was a four-time Met All-Star. Several Mets of note have matched that total, but only the three aforementioned Met legends have exceeded it.
Three times — in ’77, ’80 and ’82 — John Stearns was the only Met named to the squad. The Dude, as he was sometimes known, hustled and cared but was the Mets’ mercy pick each time out. They all look like Willie Mays in the boxscore, however, so an All-Star’s an All-Star, even a last-minute All-Star as Stearns would be on his other night near the spotlight.
In 1979, Ted Simmons was elected and injured. Johnny Bench was selected and injured. That left Tommy Lasorda with an opening behind Bob Boone and Gary Carter. That made John Stearns, no better than the fifth-best catcher in the National League that year, a four-time Mets All-Star for all time. John Stearns didn’t play in the ’79 game, but he was introduced just as he was the other times. John Stearns, if we are to employ these mighty narrow parameters, was as or more stellar a New York Met than all but three men in the 48-year history of the franchise. Going only on quantity, John Stearns was more of a Met All-Star than Keith Hernandez (three selections), Jerry Koosman (two), Tug McGraw (one) or Rusty Staub (none). Gary Carter, Dwight Gooden, David Wright and Carlos Beltran have made four National League All-Star teams as Mets — same as John Stearns.
I read a few scoffs at the notion that the underachieving and downright incompetent 2009 Mets had four All-Stars. You pay Wright, Beltran, Johan Santana and Frankie Rodriguez as much as you do, the mystery isn’t how a sub-.500 team rated four invites — the mystery (if you haven’t been watching SNY or reading the DL) is how you’re under .500. Historically speaking, the shock isn’t four 2009 Mets were All-Stars. The shock is two members of the last-place, eventually 63-99 1979 Mets were.
By comparison, the 1999 Mets were bound for demi-glory yet sent only one man, Piazza, to the festivities in Boston that year. Robin Ventura and Edgardo Alfonzo would sandwich Mike in the MVP voting that fall; they’d finish 6-7-8, respectively. Yet neither Fonzie nor Robin got the call. Despite an aggressive Mets push on behalf of Rey Ordoñez to put on a fielding exhibition in the sport’s grandest exhibition game, he didn’t go either. Nor did John Olerud, despite reaching the break hitting .309 and getting on base at a .450 clip. The Best Infield Ever on a team on its way to 97-66 and the playoffs was snubbed.
But the 1979 Mets, lodged in last place for months, had two All-Stars, proving perhaps the danger in using such honors as any kind of historical barometer. Still, it was great. It was great that Stearns was the man they called when they already had Boone and Carter and they couldn’t get Simmons and Bench. And, yes, of course, it was great that the whole world was about to meet Lee Mazzilli. Lee of Lee Mazzilli Poster Day. Lee of the Sunday News Magazine cover story that declared “if this team has a future, its name is Mazzilli.” Lee of the Sports Illustrated profile in which, at 24, the kid talked plaintively about making his “first million” (link via the Mazzilli-loving Mets Police). Lee of the .462 average that decisively led the league early, a figure that more than thirty years later I can pull out of my head without thinking twice.
World, Lee Mazzilli…Lee Mazzilli, world.
The planet made his acquaintance when he was introduced before the All-Star Game in Seattle. It became intimate with him when he pinch-hit for the father of future Met Gary Matthews, Jr. and flicked a Jim Kern delivery into the nether regions of the Kingdome to tie the game at six in the top of the eighth. He strode the Earth like a Colossus when he wisely accepted a fourth ball from Ron Guidry with the bases loaded and two out an inning later. He flipped his bat away, driving in what would stand as the winning run.
That was the moment that apotheosized Lee Mazzilli into the symbol of all that was potentially good about that dismal Met era. First off, he won the All-Star Game even if, to posterity’s annoyance, the Most Valuable Player trophy was mistakenly handed to Dave Parker. Secondly, he did it against a Yankee. Until Dave Mlicki, the Mazzilli-Guidry encounter was the closest we ever came to a Subway Series (Mayor’s Trophy Games notwithstanding) and, as Mlicki ensured in ’97, the Mets prevailed. It was no small feat for ’79. Not a single Mets fan allowed the respective affiliations of the principals go unremarked upon in and around the Metropolitan Area the following day. Third, Mazz (always…always…always Mazz with two z’s, por favor) traveled to the Pacific Northwest not out of charity or contingency. He was hitting .333 when he was named to the squad. He would have been an All-Star centerfielder from any team. He was the All-Star centerfielder from ours.
That was great.
It wouldn’t last for Mazzilli. He’d never be objectively thought of that highly again as a full-time player after 1979, just as Pat Zachry was never All-Star material after July 1978, just as Joel Youngblood’s destiny after August of ’81 wasn’t more All-Star appearances but a single trivia answer (only player, two teams, two cities, one day, a hit for/in both). Like Henderson and Flynn and Swan, they never quite blossomed beyond seeming to us like they might. Our default All-Star was inevitably Stearns, not because he was outstanding, but because he was a catcher. Defending league champion managers groped about bad teams’ rosters for catchers then the way they plumb the depths of bad teams’ bullpens nowadays for All-Star closers.
But, y’know, I swore they were going to be a good team soon enough. If only the Mets would make a trade that would vault them from sixth to fourth one of these years. You get to fourth, you’re only one step from third. And if you’re in third…well, you can count.
They tried, I thought. They acquired Willie Montañez who styled like crazy before they had a word for it. They acquired Richie Hebner, which didn’t seem like such a terrible idea until Hebner made it clear he didn’t care for the concept (and then played with raging apathy). They got to the trading deadline in 1979, June 15, and pulled off two deals that might have looked helpful to a contender but baffled me on behalf of my last-place team. They sent Mike Bruhert and Bob Myrick to Texas for veteran righty Dock Ellis and they purchased from the Red Sox veteran lefty Andy Hassler. Two tested arms could be a boon in a pennant race.
There was no pennant race going on here.
But anything looked better than nothing when you were a Mets fan then. As I will never forget Lee Mazzilli was batting .462 on April 18, 1979, I will never forget the guy working the snack bar at Nassau Beach that summer. I’m wearing my Super Stripe Mets cap. He sees it and responds unusually positively. Hey, he blurts, you’re a Mets fan? I’M a Mets fan, too! (It was that unusual for our kind to come across one another.) We shake hands and we commiserate, but the guy’s so excited at the sight of a Mets cap that he can’t contain himself.
I like those pitchers we got, he says, meaning Hassler and Ellis days earlier, not Seaver and Koosman from when we were younger. I think in five years we’re gonna be really good.
Five years? I just nodded, but inside I screamed.
FIVE YEARS? I CAN’T WAIT FIVE YEARS!
Damned if the hot dog guy wasn’t a veritable Kreskin. Oh, he was wrong about Dock Ellis and Andy Hassler. They were useless to us and went the way of Montañez and Hebner and Jose Cardenal and every other disinterested old-timer/short-timer who was just passing through in 1979. The same could be said for Mazzilli, Youngblood, Zachry, Swan, Flynn and Henderson, all of whom hit the pavement before the ’80s could truly take hold at Shea Stadium. Only John Stearns hung on, and that was because he went on the DL a month after his final All-Star appearance in ’82 and never seemed to come off it.
It did take five years. It was so, so far away from where we sat in that National League East basement apartment of 1979, but the Mets did get really good in the summer of 1984. It was right around this time of year, actually, when the Mets blossomed as the Mets directly before them never would or could. The Mets finished at home against Cincinnati before the All-Star Break in July a quarter-century ago and then picked up their schedule in Atlanta — just like they did last weekend and just like they’re doing right now, come to think of it. We had four All-Stars then, too: Keith Hernandez, Darryl Strawberry, Jesse Orosco and Dwight Gooden. Nobody questioned it because we clearly deserved all the recognition we could muster. The 1984 Mets were the first-place Mets at the All-Star Break. They took a five-game set from the Reds from Thursday to Sunday and then, because being the first-place Mets wasn’t enough, they gathered by their dugout and threw their caps to the fans.
If the 1979 Mets had done that, there would have been a cap for everyone in attendance.
It took five years for Willie Montañez to somehow morph into Keith Hernandez, for Joel Youngblood to bleed into Darryl Strawberry (by way of a used-up Ellis Valentine), for Dock Ellis to become Doc Gooden. The ’84 Mets were our first winners in a baseball generation. They bridged the All-Star Break with an eight-game winning streak, taking the first three they played against the Braves after several in their ranks helped the N.L. win the All-Star Game in San Francisco following that cap-tossing love-in at Shea. Eight in a row…it was a skein of success that dwarfed every such effort at sustained triumph between 1977 and 1983.
I don’t know if having a winning ballclub was worth waiting that interminably long for, but I’m absolutely certain it felt as sweet as could be when it arrived, no matter the individual identities of the Mets who delivered it — and us — at last.
Join Mets By The Numbers’ Jon Springer, Mets historian/author Matt Silverman, ESPN Uni Watch’s Paul Lukas and me for the first of three AMAZIN’ TUESDAYS July 21, 7:00 PM, at Two Boots Tavern. It will be an evening filled with reading, rooting and a decided lack of Richie Hebner. Get all the details on our Tuesday night soirée here, and please vote Richie Hebner into Metstradamus’ Hall of Hate here.
And if you want to read about Thanksgiving with Lee Mazzilli, what are you waiting for? Faith and Fear in Flushing: An Intense Personal History of the New York Mets is available from Amazon, Barnes & Noble or a bookstore near you. Keep in touch and join the discussion on Facebook.
Oh, and nice story on Gary, Keith and Ron from John Koblin in the Observer here.
by Greg Prince on 17 July 2009 3:54 pm

Jay Schreiber of the Times had a banner suggestion recently: organize Banner Day anew, albeit online. He called for entries and is showing off what he judges the “most noteworthy” among them (some illustrated, some merely spelled out) on the Bats Blog. I was particularly fond of this one that is credited to Paul Stoddard. Low-tech, but it really gets across the spirit of what used to be a cherished annual event. It’s supportive, it’s sentimental, it acknowledges the reality of the situation and it never forgets those three magic words that can heal any occasion.
Memo to the actual Mets management: There is no reason in hell, doubleheaders or no doubleheaders, why this core Metsian celebration of yore cannot be reconvened for real in the new venue. Even M. Donald Grant knew enough to institute, promote and continue Banner Day.
by Jason Fry on 17 July 2009 3:35 am
I think I started getting excited around 3 p.m. — the Mets are playing tonight! Weirdly, it was almost like Opening Day II — no, I didn't have particularly high hopes, not after the torrent of injuries and bad luck and craptacular baseball that was the first half of 2009, and not after Omar Minaya brought that first half to a thudding halt by making a jaw-droppingly stupid trade. (Yes, I advocating trading Ryan Church. I don't remember advocating trading him for a player who is quantifiably worse in every measurable capacity except birthdate, though.) But still, this is baseball — take it away for 72 hours and I was a wreck no matter what the standings say. They're the Mets, and if I can watch them play baseball I will, even if I suspect that baseball will wind up being painful to watch.
So I was happy at 3 p.m. Heck, by 5 p.m. I was thinking that they do have a pretty soft schedule, and by 6 p.m. I was thinking good thoughts about Angels Pagan and Berroa, and by 7 p.m. we practically had the division won. Six-and-a-half out, so what? That's nothing that can't be cured by a 12-game winning streak, or by Jeff Francoeur suddenly becoming a convert to the Church of OBP (crap, I said “Church”), or by Jose and the Carloses being rebuilt in a secret operating room by government agents. (STRONGER! FASTER!) Bring on the Braves!
But that feeling faded fast. Oliver Perez got through the first with unaccustomed rapidity as Joshua and I watched. The kid was pleased, but I shook my head, muttering that two of those outs had gone awfully far. Being proved right within three pitches by Yunel Escobar and Garret Anderson might have given my son newfound respect for me, but I would have been happier if he'd gone to sleep thinking his dad was sure a pessimistic bringdown.
Oliver pitched tolerably; these days that's grounds for optimism. It was somewhat cruelly ironic for him to start the second half against Derek Lowe, who's morphed from The Pitcher Who We Sensibly Didn't Want to Pay $15 Million When He's 40 to The One That Got Away and Left Us Watching Fuckin' Oliver Perez. Honesty and the fact that you can check compel me to admit that I thought paying Lowe that much for that long would have been nuts and bringing back Oliver was an acceptable gamble, so I can't do more than mutter on that score. And I already bitched about Church-for-Francoeur, so let's just move on.
By the way, this blog post went through rehearsal with a lot of bitching about Brian Schneider and his apparent inability to block the plate. But then Schneider made that insane, backhanded spear of an Ollieball that was headed for the backstop. I don't know how he did it; Keith was so discombobulated he said “Jesus” on the air, and so Schneider not quite doing two things at once was forgiven. Though I'm still not buying a Toyota from him or harboring any desire to see him in 2010.
Anyway, after a brief Met uprising matched by the Braves, it was down to the middle relievers, as approximately 68 trillion baseball games have been before. Whose reliever will be unlucky and/or bad first? It was ours, of course — Pedro Feliciano committing the oft-punished sin of walking the leadoff hitter, which led to Bobby Parnell against Chipper Jones and me sitting glumly in bed knowing how that would end. I've long maintained Chipper will get a standing ovation at Citi Field when he arrives for his apparent last at-bat, heralded for being a worthy enemy all these long years. Yes, but we'll also be cheering the fact that he soon will no longer be able to bedevil us. How many generations of young Met hurlers has Larry Wayne sent trudging off how many mounds?
As a final note, this game did have a vivid demonstration of how fundamentally unfair baseball can be. Pat Misch — whom I only recently stopped confusing with Jon Switzer — is pitching in the eighth. Anderson slaps a ball into the hole that Alex Cora knocks down, but it squirts away just long enough for Anderson to be safe at first. Casey Kotchman sneaks one between short and third. Greg Norton — precursor to the most depressing Mets Dash in history, now hitting under .100 — hits a well-placed changeup one-handed for a little parachute and the insurance run. Nate McLouth then hits a tracer — easily the hardest-hit ball of the inning. So of course that's the one that winds up in the second baseman's glove. Baseball, man.
Ah well. 7 1/2 back, cavalry not detectably closer, front office should be kept away from telephones and email to fend off further absurd moves. And somehow, despite all this, I wish it were tomorrow, with Mike Pelfrey and Jair Jurrjens warming up and the evening cooling down and the game just a few minutes away. Baseball, man.
The first of three AMAZIN' TUESDAYS is coming to Two Boots Tavern July 21. It will be a Mets night devoted to reading, rooting and Roger Cedeño. Get all the details here. And get your copy of Faith and Fear in Flushing: An Intense Personal History of the New York Mets from Amazon, Barnes & Noble or a bookstore near you. Keep in touch and join the discussion on Facebook.
by Greg Prince on 15 July 2009 8:00 am
I’d be a lot more miffed about the National League’s umpteenth consecutive All-Star defeat if…
A) The Mets and hosting duties for a portion of the 2009 World Series weren’t looming so definitively as mutually exclusive propositions.
B) The lack of National League home field advantage was theoretically going to cost the Mets an extra game at Shea Stadium in the World Series; Citi Field, I believe, provides no field advantage to date.
C) I hadn’t dozed off at the moment of truth, with Ryan Howard up and two on in the bottom of the eighth. I was technically in mid-snooze, thus was awake just long enough for false hope to materialize before it drifted away with my consciousness.
D) I wasn’t completely comatose when Frankie Rodriguez, according to the boxscore, made incredibly short work (six pitches) of the American League in the ninth.
E) Rodriguez or Santana or somebody besides Heath Bell was charged with the loss.
I had no idea I maintained a substantial reservoir of animus for Heath Bell until given the opportunity to express an opinion to the TV screen.
When the American Leaguers were introduced before the game, I booed the usual suspects — Jeter, Rivera and their new moneyed buddy Teixeira. When the National Leaguers, ostensibly “my” guys, were introduced, I reflexively booed:
• every Phillie;
• both Marlins;
• Molina obviously;
• La Russa obviously;
• Ryan Franklin for associating with Molina and La Russa;
• Joe Torre for old times’ sake;
• the two Astros because I used to work for a company owned by the guy who owns the Astros and it did not end well;
• Trevor Hoffman for being so unclutch when it might have mattered to us in 2006 (and then being a bit of a snot about it);
• and, without advance planning because I had forgotten that he’d be there, Heath Bell.
Why boo Heath Bell, the only former New York Met on either roster (not counting American League starting leftfielder and RBI leader Jason Bay, whom the Mets swiftly expunged as a minor leaguer in exchange for the essential Jason Middlebrook and Steve Reed in 2002 because, according to faultless talent guru Steve Phillips, he didn’t project as more than a fifth outfielder)? I didn’t boo Nolan Ryan the eight times he represented three other teams in All-Star Games. I didn’t boo Kevin Mitchell twice or Lenny Dykstra thrice or Randy Myers four times or Amos Otis five times after each became an All-Star in their respective post-Mets existences. (Total All-Star selections for Ryan, Mitchell, Dykstra, Myers and Otis as Mets: 0.) But Heath Bell, stepping up on that line and tipping that cap…I didn’t see it coming. I didn’t see Heath Bell going butterfly after his several stints as a wayward Met caterpillar and I didn’t see my reaction turning so viscerally virulent at the sight of him spreading his wings.
Let’s just say Heath Bell and I are just not a good mix. It’s strictly business, nothing personal. In the now 82 games I have rooted for Heath Bell’s team to win since 2004, updated to include the 2009 All-Star affair, Heath Bell’s team is 28-54. Incidentally, in the 10 games I have rooted for the teams of Jon Adkins and Ben Johnson to win, their combined record is 3-7…and holding. But never mind that. Never mind that Heath Bell received a change of scenery and eventually became an All-Star. Never mind that whatever scenery presently surrounds Jon Adkins and Ben Johnson, the pair the Padres sent the Mets for Bell after 2006, it wasn’t remotely in evidence at Busch Stadium Tuesday night. Adkins is employed as a Lotte Giant in South Korea. Johnson may or may not be playing baseball professionally. The Mets released him last year and he is still listed somewhere as a free agent.
Heath Bell is an All-Star. An All-Star losing pitcher, but the first part decisively trumps the second part. Heath Bell left the Mets and became an All-Star. Heath Bell left the Mets, became an All-Star and the Mets, via the characteristically sharp eye of Omar Minaya, reaped 30 Ben Johnson plate appearances (5 hits, 2 walks, 1 run batted in) to go with one entire Jon Adkins inning pitched (scoreless, if that makes it any better). The Mets signed Heath Bell as an amateur in 1998, nurtured him in the minor leagues, brought him up in ’04 and do you know what they have to show for him?
As of Sunday afternoon, they had his uniform top.
No kidding, it was still lying around. I saw it before the game on the Amazin’ Memorabilia table on Field Level where they attempt to sell off whatever isn’t sitting in the MeiGray warehouse in Jersey. They were offering, among other pricey items, a bunch of the numbers peeled from the outfield wall during the Shea Goodbye countdown (the real one, not the good one) and an autographed No. 19 Heath Bell Mets jersey, last worn no more recently than three years ago.
I don’t know when Heath signed it. It could have been somewhere during his 2004-2006 Mets tenure on those occasions when he wasn’t visiting lovely Norfolk. It could have been as a favor to somebody who didn’t trade him away when he came back as a Padre setup man in 2007 or 2008. Or it could have been in the giddy atmosphere attendant to the birth of the new joint when Heath Bell, after salivating over possibly recording the first save in the ballpark that could have been his, twirled his figurative mustache in satisfaction at doing just that. He forever owns the first two saves in Citi Field history, actually.
To see Bell introduced as a National League All-Star, only a few players after Frankie Rodriguez, was to be reminded that Heath failed in multiple Met auditions…that he and Rick Peterson clashed fatally…that Willie Randolph could never garner any confidence in him, not even when stellar righties like Braden Looper to Mike DeJean to Danny Graves were the alternatives…that the Mets haven’t nurtured a homegrown closer since Randy Myers…that the most saves any homegrown Met has compiled as a Met since Randall K was traded for John Franco are 18, by Franco’s temporary injury replacement Anthony Young — five fewer than Bell has this season…that Frankie, as good as he’s been, is quite expensive at a time when too many WilponBucks that could be spent on other pressing needs have gone the way of Bernie Madoff.
I don’t root against individual Mets unless I divine there’s some greater good to be gained from hoping for their hastened demise (i.e. the front office might stop deluding itself that Robbie Alomar should spend one more second in a Met uniform in 2003), but there have been a handful I didn’t root particularly hard for. Heath Bell fell in that category. Others saw his stuff, mined his stats and predicted the success he now experiences. Bully for them. The guy whose efforts were often painted in heartwarming tones just left me cold, which probably left me incapable of forecasting his All-Star future (Tuesday was, they mentioned on Fox, his first All-Star appearance on any level, including scholastic). In the time Bell was a Met, I pulled for Victor Zambrano. I sincerely wished the best for Kaz Matsui. I squinted hard to detect the drop of gas I was certain was left in the tank of Jose Lima. Those were futile, unpopular causes, but they were Mets and they seemed fleetingly worth the trouble. Heath Bell…maybe it was the Mets’ 28-53 mark when he pitched in their uniform (team efforts or not, mopping up or not), but I couldn’t get excited about his prospects. If he worked out, fine. When he didn’t, oh well. I won’t pretend I was sorry to see him go or that I’m happy he’s doing far better for another team than he did for mine.
But even I would have held onto him long enough to make a better deal than Jon Adkins and Ben Johnson.
The first of three AMAZIN’ TUESDAYS is coming to Two Boots Tavern July 21. It will be a Mets night devoted to reading, rooting and Roger Cedeño. Get all the details here. And get your copy of Faith and Fear in Flushing: An Intense Personal History of the New York Mets from Amazon, Barnes & Noble or a bookstore near you. Keep in touch and join the discussion on Facebook.
And for the love of Metstradamus‘ annual Hate List voting, head on over there and cast your historically accurate vote for either Richie Hebner or Pete Rose. Make Shane Victorino wait his turn. He’s won too much lately.
by Greg Prince on 13 July 2009 6:53 pm
Once a year I forget how much I hate every player on 15 rival rosters and root for the National League All-Stars. But every year, given the shark-infested waters under the various bridges we've burned ('06 NLCS, '07/'08 collapses), it gets harder to muster that ol' team spirit.
It got more difficult between innings at Sunday's Mets game when the CitiVision operators offered a “salute” to the 2009 Senior Circuit standard-bearers.
They commenced by showing us first baseman Albert Pujols. I don't think anybody in the stands was really paying attention at that point. No reaction whatsoever for someone who usually generates jeers and bad 33-month old memories. I applauded so softly that it was imperceptible even to myself. But I did applaud. At this point Albert Pujols is the George Washington of the National League. He's at the head of the list and you can't dispute his ranking.
Then second baseman Chase Utley. This unleashed the furies. BOOO!!! Chase Utley? Signature player of our current archrivals? The only batter in the history of civilization whose home run stroke has been shown to have benefited from Citi Field's contorted dimensions? I know we're all in this together come Tuesday night, but nobody here wants to look at Chase Utley unless it's video of him falling into a pit on top of…
Shortstop Hanley Ramirez? YEECH! And BOOOOOO!!!!!! Hanley Ramirez is a one-man teal wrecking crew. He plays on while Reyes gingerly jogs. His team is ahead of ours in the standings, which isn't nearly the Marlins' biggest crime based on their accumulated record of late September misconduct in these parts.
Third baseman David Wright. Supportive applause, warm cheers. Our guy. The Mets brass sometimes likes to promote its own. Sometimes.
Outfield starters next. They begin with Carlos Beltran. Good choice. He won't play in St. Louis. I don't know if he'll even show up (probably not). But nice to remember he was having a good season before going down. Another positive reception.
Outfielder Ryan Braun. A pin could drop.
Outfielder Raul Ibañez. That's not Ra-uuuul we're responding, but it's his uniform absorbing the abuuuuse more than the man. He hasn't been around here enough to meaningfully stoke our collective ire (though he's sure making strides).
I'm thinking we're moving onto the pitchers, but I've conveniently forgotten the other position whose starter is voted on by the fans. And the Mets being the Mets, it is his face now featured on our screen.
Catcher Yadier Molina.
AAAAAUUUUUGGGGGHHHHH!!!!!
BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!
AAAAAUUUUUGGGGGHHHHH!!!!!
Part of me respects the Mets' attempt to accurately complete the lineup. I don't like when history is revised to make people comfortable (our 2006 highlights DVD implies Game Seven ended with Endy's catch). But the Mets can sure be weirdly selective in what they choose to emphasize. The key, I suppose, is making certain Mets fans feel at least a little belittled by their own organization. Two weeks ago, during the Subway Series finale (the score of which was 3-2 at the time), they skipped the Eighth Inning Singalong altogether. The Eighth Inning Singalong is a dopey conceit, but this was when “Meet The Mets” had trumped “Sweet Caroline” as the song of record. To the extent the Singalong is liked or even anticipated, “Meet The Mets” is the reason why. “Meet The Mets” is our song.
But gee, you could hear somebody in charge thinking, if we play “Meet The Mets,” a good portion of this crowd at this particular game might mock it. And since we can't count on our Citi Field patrons showing any more life than our baseball team, let's just skip the whole thing.
The organist did play “Sweet Caroline” during the pregame that Sunday night, incidentally. They really can't help themselves, can they? (It was booed at 7:20 prior to an 8:05 start.)
As usual, I digress. The Mets plastered, without a satiric caption, the face of Yadier Molina, the single worst villain from a practical standpoint in Mets history. Quick — name someone else who hit a home run that almost literally ended a Mets postseason. Do the Yankees blow kisses to Bill Mazeroski or Luis Gonzalez? Falling down the Chase-Hanley hole isn't good enough for Yadier. Get those Arpielle mini-excavators to race over his supine body, and that we can applaud. Better yet, announce Yadier Molina's All-Star image and post “NO PICTURE AVAILABLE”. You don't need to be John McEnroe to declare YOU CAN'T BE SERIOUS about expecting a respectful round of applause from a building filled with Mets fans when you're beaming Yadier Molina in oversized living (unfortunately) color.
Catcher Yadier Molina.
AAAAAUUUUUGGGGGHHHHH!!!!!
BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!
AAAAAUUUUUGGGGGHHHHH!!!!!
It crossed my mind that maybe somebody in the control booth was having diabolically ironic fun with us. But I don't think the fourth-grade interns they hire for stuff like this go that deep.
They finished up by showing Johan and Frankie, and they were clapped upon, but geez. After the Mets sent their best to Chase Utley, Hanley Ramirez and Yadier Molina, it's no wonder the apple was too embarrassed to show its face more than once.
by Greg Prince on 13 July 2009 6:52 am
There's a most pleasing sliver of my baseball season that recurs now and again, one I tend to forget about as soon as it's transpired, which is too bad. It's the great underreported gem of any year. I don't think I truly noticed it myself until yesterday.
Let's say it's a Sunday morning and I've made arrangements to meet somebody outside the ballpark — whichever ballpark it happens to be this year — kind of early, like an hour before gametime. Doesn't happen too often, and when it does, I'm a little cranky at first because it means sacrificing the few winks I generally get between Ed Randall and Ed Coleman; my sleeping patterns are perpetually askew, so I appreciate the extra hour here and there.
But if I'm going to push myself out the door for anything on a Sunday morning, it's going to be for a Mets game. Push, I did Sunday. Down to the LIRR station, up to the LIRR platform (where I run into my junior high English teacher and her husband; he's a Mets fan who has almost finished my book and tells me we had essentially the same mother — the things you never imagine learning while slogging through eighth grade), onto the 11:01 to Woodside. Except for presenting my ten-trip to the conductor once before Jamaica and once after, I'm cut off from the world by my iPod and several sections of the Times. Come the first sighting of the Interboro Jackie Robinson Parkway, I trade my reading glasses for my distance glasses, stuff all reading materials back into my 2004-model Sports Bag Day Catch The Energy sports bag and prepare to disembark. Moments later, it's Woodside, where the LIRR connection is too far off to stand around and wait for, so I invest two flights of stairs and one Metrocard swipe in the 7.
It's Sunday, so there's no express. Weeknights I won't take the local. Weeknights are too rushed for the local, even if I'm an hour early for the game as occasionally happens. Who want to make eight stops when you can make only two? On Sunday, there's no such decision to make. It's Sunday, so it's all local.
And it's all good. On Sunday morning, when it's not yet noon, the local can take its time. On Sunday morning, the first two cars are blissfully uncrowded. It's not a matter of getting a seat. It's a matter of which seat I'd like. Sometimes I want the window because I need WFAN reception, but I've sort of fallen out of that slice of the ritual. The iPod doesn't leave my ears for a long time. I've got a big chunk of bench to myself, I've got my music, I've got my reading glasses on and my papers out again.
It's a sweet ride. Well-paced. There's no onslaught of Manhattan passengers at 74th Street. It's too soon for that. There are just enough Mets fans so I don't feel like an oddball and just enough neighborhood folks — Jackson Heights, Corona, Flushing — to remind me there's a world outside the Gates where I'm headed. On weeknights I feel like something of an intruder among tired people returning home from work. Sunday morning is Sunday morning. Nobody's intruding on anyone. There's plenty of time, there's plenty of space.
I look up from my reading and try to gauge the Mets fans. Which ones are the habitual attendees, the ones whose grim devotion to the cause puts mine to shame? Which ones are the couples whose boyfriend half got the tickets in hope of impressing or indoctrinating the girlfriend half? Which ones are the citydwellers who haven't been to a game in years but somebody gave them tickets; who only go to a game once a year and treat it as an adventure; who like the Mets fine but could take or leave them? It's easy enough to make out the parents who are raising their kids right. I wonder how many innings the children on board will sit through, squirm through, nosh through, whine through, want stuff through and show just enough interest through so the dad is given heart to do this all again when they're just a little older.
I like the out-of-town visitors, especially when a team without a huge following is playing the Mets and that team isn't a current or ancient enemy. We've had our battles with Cincinnati, to be sure, but hostilities have been minimal in this century. There's always a trickle of Reds fans or their counterparts on these veritable special guest occasions. They're fine until further notice. I like the nonaligned riders, too, the stray American League fan on a ballpark sojourn. I don't mind taking out my earbuds to give directions, though “Mets-Willets Point” is pretty hard to miss.
Past Junction Boulevard. Past 103rd Street. Past 111th Street. Into the station of choice. The papers are back in the bag again and the distance glasses are on again. Our car empties. Every car empties. More Mets fans than I realized on the rest of the train even if it's still before noon. So many different variations on Metswear. Plenty of homages to WRIGHT, of course. BELTRAN and REYES are active. SANTANA pitches every day if you are to believe the backs of the jerseys and t-shirts. Somebody's still clinging to PIAZZA. There's always a SEAVER just as there's always someone who won't waste a perfectly good ALOMAR even if Alomar was a perfect waste. PULSIPHER and PAYTON sneak through the turnstiles from another era. Somebody handed down a CARTER to the next generation. And somebody else goes to a lot of trouble and secures something otherworldly like a Chiba Lotte Marines top with VALENTINE 2 on the back (when such exotica is spotted, one must stop observing, step up and salute with a “hey, nice jersey!”)
Early on a Sunday, there won't be much in the way of chanting. If it's the Reds or some other cameo-appearer, there won't be smack talk. The drinking teens are taking a later train, so it's not particularly loud. Some 40,000 may find their way into our ultimate destination in the next hour or so, but it's not a stampede from the 7, through the station, down the staircase. It's steady. Steady and reassuring. I've been doing this forever. Shea Stadium becomes Citi Field and I'm still doing it. Gate E is now the Left Field Gate, but the principle remains the same. Sometimes, if tickets were distributed in advance, we meet inside. Sometimes, if someone's grilling, we meet at somebody's van. Sometimes texts and cell calls fly. Sometimes it's as simple as the solitude of the stairs, the plaza, a side trip to my brick and the appointed spot at the appointed moment, a little after noon. The earbuds stay in until the person of the hour emerges as promised.
The initial recognition, the warm greeting, the cheery interaction between friends is the payoff on the ride. You were looking forward to this and this, it turns out, was worth looking forward to. A dozen sidebars will reveal themselves, other swell Mets fans will join in, but eventually, because there is a main event involved, the substance of the game supercedes all. You enjoyed the ride, you enjoy your friends, you embrace your surroundings, but the fortunes of the afternoon are at last in the hands of the Mets. This particular Sunday, they hit plenty, they pitch just enough and they win their second in a row, a streak that will stay current for several days running thanks to the vagaries of the July schedule. The Mets are on a roll. Life, therefore, rocks.
The ride home will be better because of what just happened. The ride in, however, was guaranteed to be good no matter what was going to occur. It was something comfortingly familiar yet it was loaded with anticipation for the unknown. I've done it so many times and I always want to do it again. Especially on a sleepy Sunday morning.
***
• Baseball takes an All-Star Break but Faith and Fear in Flushing plays through. Look for our annual series of midsummer essays to carry you through to 7:00 Thursday night.
• You might want to christen the return to real baseball July 16 with a trip to Foley's NY on W. 33rd St. between Fifth and Sixth, across from the Empire State Building. As the Mets take on Ryan Church and the Braves in Atlanta at 7:00 PM, Foley's will feature the stylings of Frank Messina, the Mets Poet. We saw Frank at Varsity Letters in April, and he (and his book) are worth your attention.
• As long as you're making plans to take in a road game at a public venue, we suggest you mark your calendars for 7:00 PM, July 21, the first of Three AMAZIN' TUESDAYS at Two Boots Tavern on the Lower East Side. I'll be hosting along with Jon Springer of Mets By The Numbers, and our special guests will include Paul Lukas of ESPN Uni Watch and Matt Silverman, co-author (with Keith Hernandez) of Shea Goodbye. All the salient details are here. We'd love to see you for an immensely Mets evening of reading, rooting and Rey Ordoñez.
• Read the book my junior high English teacher's husband is enjoying: Faith and Fear in Flushing: An Intense Personal History of the New York Mets, available at local bookstore and online from Amazon and Barnes & Noble. Join the discussion on Facebook.
by Greg Prince on 12 July 2009 2:30 am
Jeff Francoeur is the best thing to happen to this ballclub of ours since the butcher and the baker and the people down the street gathered to make an appointment to get acquainted with the Mets of New York town.
Jeff Francoeur is the rising tide that lifts all boats: Johan Santana threw his best game in ages; Omir Santos rediscovered his magic; Angel Pagan stayed healthy; and Bachman-Turner Overdrive blared.
Jeff Francoeur is the blanket that covers right field, the bolt that solidifies the lineup, the spark 24 otherwise flickering personalities required in order to light up Citi Field.
Jeff Francoeur is the reason the Mets are banishing Gold's from their hot dogs and topping all Franc-furters with Frenchy's mustard.
Jeff Francoeur is wearing No. 12 because he was thought to be no more than half the player Willie Mays was — but now that's he's proven that estimate was off by 100%, he'll be suiting up in No. 24 tomorrow.
Jeff Francoeur is on the Mets and the Mets are 1-0 with him and for one game, we the hypercritical Mets fans have no complaints…none at all.
Jeff Francoeur joined the struggling Mets and the Mets stopped struggling. Tell the boys from 1969 there's a new miracle worker in town.
Join us July 21 for the first of Three AMAZIN' TUESDAYS at Two Boots Tavern, a Mets night devoted to reading, rooting and, of course, Jeff Francoeur. Get all the details here. And if you can take a moment's breather from rightfully praising Jeff Francoeur, get your copy of Faith and Fear in Flushing: An Intense Personal History of the New York Mets from Amazon, Barnes & Noble or a bookstore near you. Keep in touch and join the discussion on Facebook.
by Greg Prince on 11 July 2009 12:35 pm
What's the big deal about Jonathan Sanchez? We have no hitters in our lineup all the time.
On the Friday night the Mets traded Church, their offense may as well have stayed in temple. Then again, every night is the Sabbath for these bats. A day of rest…a week of rest…a month of rest…there's a reason Bob's Discount Furniture, purveyor of sleeper sofas, sponsors the Mets.
Meet the Slumber Company. And it's not like the rightfielder we just traded for is Dave Parker.
Then again, why get out of bed when you're facing Bronson Arroyo, the second-greatest pitcher in the history of baseball (bowing only to Joel Piñeiro)? Arroyo toys with the Mets over and over. I can only assume he's won three or four Cy Youngs.
Arroyo (21 runs surrendered in his three previous starts against non-Mets) is clearly unbeatable. The guy from the other night on the Dodgers is unbeatable. So is the Phillies starter last Sunday. They're so awesome I couldn't remember their names without looking. No offense (as if we have any to give) to Clayton Kershaw and Joe Blanton. It's just that it's getting hard to keep track of who shuts us out. The Mets have been shut out three times in five games by three different teams. They've absorbed a shutout in five of their past six full series. Since scoring nine inexplicable runs against Pittsburgh on July 2, they've scored 10 runs in seven games. The last Met to homer was Fernando Tatis, more than a week ago. The last Met to steal a base was Frank Taveras, around 1980.
The Reds launched two balls that somehow cleared the unclearable fences of Yosem-iti Field (last Mets home homer was by Gary Sheffield seven home games ago). Can't do anything about those once they're gone. It was the run Cincinnati scored in between the Joey Votto and Lance Nix blasts that illustrated why this team has exhausted its slack quota vis-à-vis its lack of Reyes, Beltran, Delgado, whoever. Brandon Phillips is on third. Jerry Hairston misses a squeeze bunt. Phillips is as dead as the Mets lineup. Brian Schneider, who somehow survives while all associated with him are whisked away, fires to David Wright. All Phillips can do is create a basepath of distraction inside the third base line and hope the Mets botch an easy out. And it works. Wright throws a little high to Schneider and Schneider is completely flummoxed. It flicks off his glove and Phillips steps on the plate.
I cursed out David Wright's off-target throw for a minute or two, which made me feel guilty since David must be crying himself to sleep most nights. Switching over to MLB Network during the next commercial break made me feel better. The throw, according to Dave Valle and repeated slo-mo replay, wasn't off-target. Schneider, the big-deal defensive catcher, presented Wright with a terrible target, too high and too far to the right of the plate. It wasn't the fault of DW after all.
It was all BS.
Wright and Schneider aren't Buffalo herdsmen. They're not playing because somebody in front of them isn't. They're the starters. They're the veterans. And they can't execute a play in which a baserunner is dying to be executed. It's just one play, but it's been a season of so many plays like that. Amid nonexistent hitting and barely adequate starting pitching, the Mets can't throw from home to third to home without giving up a run.
No wonder we're caught in a most un-Wise big city crunch.
Into the teeth of 2009 steps Jeff Francoeur, so I'm feeling better. They built largely unnecessary Citi Field primarily to take our money, but also allegedly from some vague desire to promote outfield adventures. Jeff's our man, I guess. He's got that cannon of an arm. So did Ellis Valentine. Come to think of it, so did Ryan Church.
What did Church do so badly that he needed to be traded? Nothing from what I saw, but the same could be said of what he did particularly well to merit staying on, at least since the several times the Mets played bocce with his noggin. Ryan, his propensity for misfortune and his recurring bewildered expression would have fit in well on the Wes Westrum Mets, which is pretty much what the Jerry Manuel Mets have become, save for the insertion of inappropriate managerial cackling where “ohmigod, wasn't that awful?” used to go.
Wanna keep Ryan Church? Would have been fine with me. Wanna trade Ryan Church? Fine with me, too. His place in Mets history was secured when he took the last swing ever taken at Shea Stadium. It was for an out, which is what Ryan Church is now. Given the pair of mishandled concussions to his coconut, I wouldn't wish the door hit him on the way out, but I do wonder whether he remembered to touch third.
Jeff Francoeur? I tend to be automatically impressed when we get a guy I've heard of for doing something other than sucking out loud his entire career, provided he's measurably younger than Moises Alou. My first-blush image of Francoeur is frozen from 2005, the last of the Brave division winners. Francoeur came bursting off the assembly line with Brian McCann and seemingly a dozen homegrown Atlantans, making our lives miserable for the first and presumably not final time. I'm still surprised Ryan Langerhans and Pete Orr aren't superstars.
I needed to be reminded that in the pantheon of Braves rightfielders Jeff Francoeur wasn't the second coming of Henry Aaron, that he hasn't been burning it up these past couple of seasons, that he was briefly demoted to the minors in 2008, that he had been playing his way out of his hometown for a while — and even I was cognizant that he will swing at anything.
That said, what the hell? This team was spiraling downward with Ryan Church, so it can attempt to alter its trajectory with Jeff Francoeur. He's here because the Mets didn't want their guy and the Braves didn't want theirs; because Jeff's only 25; and because he doesn't carry an onerous price tag (the Braves threw in a few bucks to make the contracts even…when was the last time a team had to send the Mets money?). Once Francoeur is offed, which seems inevitable given the Mets' perpetually revolving right field door, one suspects he won't be missed. I've watched Victor Diaz come and Lastings Milledge go amid the heightened hopes that enshrouded them both. I've heard Omar Minaya hail the potential longevity of Xavier Nady and the upside of Ryan Church. Who can take this position or, for that matter, this general manager seriously anymore?
This is Kevin Bass in 1992, Richard Hidalgo in 2004. This is a Mets team with limited to diminishing upside taking a flyer on a guy who's fallen from favor elsewhere. This is what it's come to. In the context of where 2009 now sits — a 12-24 record since June 1 — acquiring Jeff Francoeur, also known as “doing something, anything,” is as encouraging a development as anything else the Mets have produced lately.
Which in itself is pretty discouraging.
Trade sitting home on July 21 for joining us on July 21 for the first of Three AMAZIN' TUESDAYS at Two Boots Tavern, a Mets night devoted to reading, rooting and Roy McMillan. Get all the details here. And get your copy of Faith and Fear in Flushing: An Intense Personal History of the New York Mets from Amazon, Barnes & Noble or a bookstore near you. Keep in touch and join the discussion on Facebook.
by Greg Prince on 10 July 2009 10:49 pm
You read it here first on February 24: Ryan Church would not last the season as the Mets' primary starting rightfielder because nobody lasts the season as the Mets' primary starting rightfielder two seasons running. Well, maybe Jeff Francoeur will. The ex-Brave with the great arm arrives in exchange for Ryan, who hopefully leaves with his head intact. Francoeur, unlike Church, has a track record of playing practically every day. I wonder how long it will take for him to contract a rare tropical disease or crash into Angel Pagan.
by Greg Prince on 10 July 2009 10:27 pm
Welcome to Flashback Friday: I Saw The Decade End, a milestone-anniversary salute to the New York Mets of 1969, 1979, 1989 and 1999. Each week, we immerse ourselves in or at least touch upon something that transpired within the Metsian realm 40, 30, 20 or 10 years ago. Amazin’ or not, here it comes.
They — 17 writers contributing notes, observations and asides to editors Dick Schaap and Paul Zimmerman, that is — wrote a book about what happened 40 years ago this week. It’s called The Year The Mets Lost Last Place, but its focus is on the middle of July 1969. In fact, it came out before the season was over, so it doesn’t even mention how the whole thing turned out (though a paperback edition does).
What a moment in time. “Nine crucial days,” the book calls them. It starts with July 8, 1969. It was more than the beginning of a series with the Cubs. It was more than the beginning of a chapter. It was, in terms of creating the world in which we live, the big bang.
It was when the Mets were born.
I know what the birth certificate says: April 11, 1962. I acknowledge that and I respect that. The Mets were born then. Seven years and three months later, however, they were born again.
July 8, 1969 is when this franchise experienced a new birth…the rebirth of slick — the Mets, Amazin’ without Casey Stengel’s sarcastic overtones, were cool like dat. Their second time was clearly the charm.
Gone as of July 8, 1969 were all traces of the old Mets. Well, the roster didn’t change in the dead of night, but then again, it didn’t have to. Throughout the first half of 1969, we were only waiting for their moment to arise.
Waiting and winning. Those were the Mets by July 8, 1969, in second, 45-34, 5½ games from first place. Same margin as they are just over 40 years later, come to think of it, but it’s worlds different now. Now there are, generally speaking, expectations. Then when you spoke about the Mets, it was Mets whose birthright was loss and last place. Those Mets shed that unwanted skin in April and May and June of ’69. Those Mets ceased to exist somewhere between Spring Training, when Gil Hodges suggested 85 wins was doable for a team that had never lost fewer than 89, and July 8, when the second-place Mets prepared to host the first-place Cubs.
It was a whole new ballgame.
On “the day the Mets became a contender,” as TYTMLLP put it, the world was ready and waiting. New York sat at the kitchen table with a knife in one hand, a fork in the other and a napkin tied around its neck, hungry for a baseball team like this. A Mets team like this. “Ever since 1965, when they outdrew the Yankees by half a million spectators, the Mets have been the baseball team in New York, and the Yankees have been the other team,” the book said in real time. Problem was the Mets were locally pre-eminent without portfolio. National League baseball was the preferred variety, but what the people really wanted was winning National League baseball, a commodity absent since the heyday of Don Newcombe and Dusty Rhodes. Now they were getting it. “For the first time in at least five years,” TYTMLLP reported, “New Yorkers by the millions were talking baseball.”
Mets baseball. Talking about it, relishing it, mainlining it. The laughs were of the “with us” rather than “at us” nature. Everybody was in on the joke that the Mets were no longer a joke.
Everybody included Joseph Ignac of Elizabeth, 65 and without a team to take seriously since the Giants won in ’54. He took two hours of buses and subways to be first in line at Gate E for a general admission seat the morning of July 8. “As he heads for the park, Ignac is looking forward for the first time to watching his team fight to become a pennant contender.” The boxscore says 55,095 other Mets fans had the same notion that Tuesday afternoon.
Everybody included Jerry Koosman of Minnesota, summering at a rented house near LaGuardia Airport. He stepped into his backyard and was gratified that it would be “a beautiful day for a ball game. Just the way I like it — not too hot, not too cool.” Thirty-seven years later, in the runup to the 2006 playoffs, Matt Yallof of SNY asked Kooz to reflect on what it was like to pitch in New York in October 1969. I always liked pitching in cool weather, Kooz answered literally and practically. Over four decades, whatever the season, Jerry Koosman always kept his cool.
Everybody included Frank Graddock, settled in front of his television in Ridgewood throughout the game, one that commenced at 2:05 PM. The action on Channel 9 was far along by 4 o’clock (this was 1969; nine innings took only 129 minutes), but it wasn’t over. Mrs. Graddock — Margaret — only knew 4 o’clock meant the serial Dark Shadows was coming on Channel 7. Dark Shadows was a huge show then. My sister watched it every afternoon. Frank Graddock’s wife watched it every afternoon. This, however, wasn’t just any afternoon in 1969. There were no VCRs, no DVRs and apparently Frank did not consider radio an option. As TYTMLLP chronicles, a battle over which channel the Graddock TV would be tuned to ensued and it would turn fatal. While the Mets were being reborn, Frank Graddock was drinking. Drinking plenty, apparently.
The Graddocks’ domestic dispute yielded dark shadows of its own. Of course Frank Graddock deserved to be charged, as he would be the next day, with the first-degree murder of his wife. Of course it was a heinous response to something as silly as what would appear on the TV screen. Yet every time I read that Margaret Graddock tried to change the channel from 9 to 7 while the Cubs led 3 to 1…I don’t want to sympathize with Frank, but I can’t help but think Margaret could have stood to have missed a few minutes of Dark Shadows.
Jerry Koosman kept his cool while the passions of the Metropolitan Area heated up: 8 hits, 4 walks but only 3 runs against the most dangerous lineup the N.L. had to offer through 9 innings. Ferguson Jenkins, though, was coolest of all. Cleon Jones reached on an Ernie Banks error in the fourth. Ed Kranepool touched him for a solo home run in the fifth. And that was it. For eight innings, Fergie Jenkins was almost perfect. The Mets trailed by two against a pitcher emerging as one of the best of his generation.
Then they didn’t.
Ken Boswell pinch-hits for Koosman to start the bottom of the ninth and lofts a ball that is catchable in a devil’s triangle among the shortstop Don Kessinger, the second baseman Glenn Beckert and an unaccomplished centerfielder named Don Young. Young would have had it had he seen it. He didn’t. Because Beckert and Kessinger had backpedaled on the ball, no one covered second. Boswell stands there with a gift double.
Tommie Agee fouls out. One out. Donn Clendenon steps up. Donn Clendenon stepped up in mid-June as the righty first baseman Gil Hodges required for his platoon with Kranepool. He’s gotten a slew of big hits since he was traded here from Montreal. Now Donn’s batting for Bobby Pfeil. Clendenon steps up for real: a long shot to left-center. Young’s got this one in the webbing of his glove. Then he doesn’t. He hits the fence and the ball squirts loose. Three months later Agee would make a similar play against the Orioles but hold on ice cream cone style. Nobody could know that on July 8, just as Boswell couldn’t know whether Don would maintain control of Donn’s ball. Ken has to be careful and gets only as far as third on the Clendenon double.
Cleon Jones, one of two Mets baserunners during the first eight innings, is up next. Cleon entered the game batting .354. He’s 0-for-3, including reaching on that earlier error. He will end the day at .352, 1-for-4, because he shoots a liner to left. Don Young has nothing to do with this play on which Boswell, then Clendenon score. It is 3-3. The Mets have tied the Cubs.
Jones on second. Art Shamsky up. Leo Durocher orders an intentional pass. Wayne Garrett, a rookie, grounds to second, a second out that moves the runners up. Durocher could walk the next batter, Kranepool, to face light-hitting J.C. Martin. Martin’s starting because he’s a lefty and Jenkins is a righty. It’s not like Jerry Grote, a righty, is a better option for Gil. It’s not like there’s another Clendenon waiting in the wings. (And it’s not like Leo’s making a call to the bullpen; again, this was 1969.) So Leo tells Fergie to face Ed. Ed Kranepool’s a Met from just after the Mets were born the first time, in 1962. Ed has not distinguished himself across the eight seasons he’s been a Met. Ed isn’t old — he’s 24 — yet he’s already ancient.
But Ed Kranepool did hit a home run off Ferguson Jenkins in the fifth inning, the only hit the Mets had most of Tuesday. He collects their fifth, a bloop single to left that scores Cleon from third. The Mets win 4-3. Ed Kranepool was an eternal disappointment and .227 hitter when the afternoon began. He is a hero when it ends.
Jerry Koosman was the winner, but so were the millions who had invested themselves in his team. Joseph Ignac, 65 of Elizabeth, for example. He had a two-hour trip home on the subway and the bus. He could have flown. “Never once, in his eight seasons of cheering for the Mets,” it was written in The Year The Mets Lost Last Place, “has he felt so good. For the first time, he doesn’t miss Willie Mays quite so much.”
Less than seven hours later, the early edition of the Times is on the streets. “The story of the Mets’ rally is on the front page of the newspaper,” TYTMLLP reports. “The Mets have been on the front page before, but only once for winning a ball game, way back in 1962, when, after nine consecutive defeats, they scored the first victory of their existence.”
That existence was now from another time. The Mets existed on a different plane, in a different context, for different stakes starting July 8. The news was the stuff of the front page of the New York Times, but Don Young didn’t have to wait until eleven that night to read it. He hears it immediately from captain Ron Santo and skipper Leo Durocher. He absorbs the blame for the first-place Cubs losing to the second-place Mets. The Mets are a team coming together. The Cubs are individuals falling apart at the first sign of stress, the first instant they dip from 5½ to 4½ ahead of the team that couldn’t have possibly beaten them but did.
The next night he is benched in favor of an even less proven centerfielder, Jimmy Qualls. The name is instantly familiar 40 years later because Tom Seaver outdoes Ferguson Jenkins from Tuesday, let alone Wednesday’s opposing pitcher Ken Holtzman, on July 9. He’s not almost perfect for eight innings. He is absolutely perfect. The Mets lead 4-0 behind Seaver’s no-hit, no-walk, no-baserunner, 11-strikeout masterwork. Seaver stays perfect for one more batter in the ninth, Randy Hundley (who attempted to bunt his way into infamy but was an easy out at first). It was Qualls, however, who ruined the perfect storyline with a clean single between Cleon Jones in left and Tommie Agee in center. The Mets win anyway. 59,083 are enthralled, energized and enraptured. Amazin’ is once and for all stripped of its sardonicism. The Mets take two of three from the Cubs at Shea. A week later the Mets take two of three more from the Cubs at Wrigley. Much would happen later in the heat of summer and the cool of fall. But that would be for later.
“Now it is 1969,” Mark Mulvoy wrote that July in Sports Illustrated as the dust settled from the Mets’ two series wins over the Cubs, “and in the fairyland of Shea Stadium, the toad has turned into a prince.”
The transformation was official as of July 8. The Mets were reborn as an honest-to-goodness baseball team that was likely beat any other baseball team any day of the week. Nothing would ever be the same. In the short-term, starting with Seaver’s one-hitter on July 9 and fast-forwarding through October 16, 1969, that (save for the fate of the late Margaret Graddock) was all for the best.
Since? All for the best, too, considering you wouldn’t want to rewind to 1962 and its attendant follies but you can only be born so many times. The Mets have fallen and arisen repeatedly these past 40 years, but expectations changed for the Mets that second week of July and they changed forever. The Mets would never get away with losing again. They’d be just like everybody else after 1969.
“It is different now, obviously,” Leonard Shecter reflected once the ride was complete. “Casey Stengel is gone. A pennant has been won, and a world championship. It is a glorious thing, and yet it is somehow sad. For what we feel for the Mets now will never quite be the same as what we felt for them in [their] first two years. We have tasted victory and we shall root not for survival, but for more victory. It was inevitable, we understand now, for this to happen; it’s only that it happened so soon, so swiftly. Still, the Mets are still there (at slightly higher prices) and there is still much joy to take from them.”
Still.
***
The Jimmy Qualls Game received a hellacious callback from Michael Bamberger on si.com this week. Highly recommended reading here. The same can be said for the job Bamberger did in the magazine’s “Where Are They Now?” cover story on the ’69 Mets, which you can link to here but would be better off buying, collecting and keeping. Magazines that go to the trouble of putting Tom Seaver on their cover in 2009 deserve your support.
Another leading actor from 1969, Ron Swoboda, recently gave an Amazin’ interview to The Real Dirty Mets Blog. How appropriate, in that a Shea banner once proclaimed RON SWOBODA IS STRONGER THAN DIRT. You can relive everybody’s contributions every day via Rob Kirkpatrick’s 1969: The Year Everything Changed blog here.
***
MEANWHILE, THIRTY YEARS LATER…
Though it was not the focus of today’s Flashback, I would be remiss if I did not extend Tenth Anniversary salutations to the…
Most
Exciting
Tense
Spectacular
…three hours and forty-seven minutes I ever spent in the Upper Deck of Shea Stadium. Happy birthday to the Matt Franco Game, played to glorious conclusion on this date in 1999. There was much joy to take from the Mets then, too.
***
It would be anything but imperfect if you joined us for the first of Three AMAZIN’ TUESDAYS at Two Boots Tavern on July 21, a Mets night devoted to reading, rooting and Ray Sadecki. Get all the details here. And get your copy of Faith and Fear in Flushing: An Intense Personal History of the New York Mets from Amazon, Barnes & Noble or a bookstore near you. Keep in touch and join the discussion on Facebook.
|
|