The blog for Mets fans
who like to read
ABOUT US
Faith and Fear in Flushing made its debut on Feb. 16, 2005, the brainchild of two longtime friends and lifelong Met fans.
Greg Prince discovered the Mets when he was 6, during the magical summer of 1969. He is a Long Island-based writer, editor and communications consultant. Contact him here.
Jason Fry is a Brooklyn writer whose first memories include his mom leaping up and down cheering for Rusty Staub. Check out his other writing here.
Got something to say? Leave a comment, or email us at faithandfear@gmail.com. (Sorry, but we have no interest in ads, sponsored content or guest posts.)
Need our RSS feed? It's here.
Visit our Facebook page, or drop by the personal pages for Greg and Jason.
Or follow us on Twitter: Here's Greg, and here's Jason.
|
by Greg Prince on 20 November 2006 8:52 pm
Congratulations to Ryan Howard, the National League's Most Valuable Player. He joins Joe Girardi, N.L. Manager of the Year, and Brandon Webb, the circuit's Cy Young winner in the 2006 awards pantheon. Great jobs, fellas.
Howard, you beat out Carlos Beltran (fourth in the voting after becoming the first Met to win a Gold Glove and a Silver Slugger and start an All-Star Game in the same year), Jose Reyes (seventh), David Wright (ninth) and Carlos Delgado (twelfth).
Girardi, you topped Willie Randolph, the runner-up skipper.
And Webb, you finished way ahead of Billy Wagner, sixth among pitchers when all the ballots were counted.
You guys rocked. And you were smart. You piled up your qualifications and then beat the rush. I mean you and your Phillies, your Marlins and your Diamondbacks were all home by the evening of October 1, the morning of October 2 at the latest. Our Mets had to keep working for almost three more weeks.
What suckers.
But seriously…
Franchise record for homers (tied).
Franchise record for runs scored (broken).
Silver Slugger.
Gold Glove.
All-Star starter.
Team has best record in sport and wins division by largest margin.
And he finishes FOURTH?
Where's that New York bias we're always hearing about?
by Greg Prince on 20 November 2006 6:58 pm
Greetings from Omar Minaya's pocket. That's where I'm wintering.
The healthy level of skepticism one should maintain in any situation has seeped away where me and the Mets' GM are concerned.
Trade away relatively young lefty Royce Ring when lefties are lefties? Omar knows what he's doing.
Sign potentially decrepit Damion Easley off a tepid year? Omar knows what he's doing.
About to grab Moises Alou, the recently achy 40-year-old who doesn't move well and isn't a stickler for hand sanitation? Omar knows what he's doing.
I'm a shill. I'm Tony Snow. I've got sunshine on a cloudy day if Omar Minaya's my forecaster. My hot stove is room temperature. There's nothing to debate: Omar says it; I believe it; that settles it.
When did I get this easy? I didn't trust Steve Phillips as far as I could throw him even after he general-managed us to a World Series. Omar Minaya could package Jose Reyes and David Wright for Jimmy Wynn and lawn furniture and I suspect I'd rationalize it.
Getting rid of those contracts now is going to free up the budget nicely. Reyes never did get to 20 homers or 20 triples. Wright has yet to win an MVP. That GQ spread was pretty embarrassing. Wynn's a proven commodity. He's the Toy Cannon! Sixty-five isn't that old for a slugger. If he hit 37 homers playing in the Astrodome in '67, imagine what he'll do at Citi Field in '09 when his option kicks in. Lawn furniture will come in handy when we start to move. Omar's a genius!
This is supposed to be the time of year when we question authority, when we assume that every move our team makes is the wrong one. You know, like swapping that stud Mike Jacobs for that malcontent Carlos Delgado…like taking on the overrated Paul Lo Duca…like letting go of good ol' Jae Seo for Duaner Somebody…like giving up dependable Kris Benson for a Yankee patsy and a minor leaguer nobody ever heard of…like soaking up Quadruple-A flotsam along the lines of Endy Chavez…like signing clearly decrepit Jose Valentin off a tepid year.
What I can't figure out is where I got the idea that Omar knows what he's doing.
by Greg Prince on 20 November 2006 6:58 pm
Greetings from Omar Minaya's pocket. That's where I'm wintering.
The healthy level of skepticism one should maintain in any situation has seeped away where me and the Mets' GM are concerned.
Trade away relatively young lefty Royce Ring when lefties are lefties? Omar knows what he's doing.
Sign potentially decrepit Damion Easley off a tepid year? Omar knows what he's doing.
About to grab Moises Alou, the recently achy 40-year-old who doesn't move well and isn't a stickler for hand sanitation? Omar knows what he's doing.
I'm a shill. I'm Tony Snow. I've got sunshine on a cloudy day if Omar Minaya's my forecaster. My hot stove is room temperature. There's nothing to debate: Omar says it; I believe it; that settles it.
When did I get this easy? I didn't trust Steve Phillips as far as I could throw him even after he general-managed us to a World Series. Omar Minaya could package Jose Reyes and David Wright for Jimmy Wynn and lawn furniture and I suspect I'd rationalize it.
Getting rid of those contracts now is going to free up the budget nicely. Reyes never did get to 20 homers or 20 triples. Wright has yet to win an MVP. That GQ spread was pretty embarrassing. Wynn's a proven commodity. He's the Toy Cannon! Sixty-five isn't that old for a slugger. If he hit 37 homers playing in the Astrodome in '67, imagine what he'll do at Citi Field in '09 when his option kicks in. Lawn furniture will come in handy when we start to move. Omar's a genius!
This is supposed to be the time of year when we question authority, when we assume that every move our team makes is the wrong one. You know, like swapping that stud Mike Jacobs for that malcontent Carlos Delgado…like taking on the overrated Paul Lo Duca…like letting go of good ol' Jae Seo for Duaner Somebody…like giving up dependable Kris Benson for a Yankee patsy and a minor leaguer nobody ever heard of…like soaking up Quadruple-A flotsam along the lines of Endy Chavez…like signing clearly decrepit Jose Valentin off a tepid year.
What I can't figure out is where I got the idea that Omar knows what he's doing.
by Greg Prince on 19 November 2006 10:01 am
I like to give Hozzie The Cat a little chest/belly rub when he allows it, which is infrequently. Tonight he did. As I crouched down to find his purr zone, I serenaded him with a quick and unoriginal chorus of Ha-ZEE! Ha-zee Ha-zee Ha-ZEEE! I was a little more off-key than usual when it occurred to me that it must be more than a week since I'd caught myself wandering around the house singing the “Jose!” song. I'd been doing that a lot during the playoffs and afterwards. Same for “off to never never land!” I even entered November breaking into occasional chants of LET'S GO METS! with no Mets (or cats) in sight. So much of that stuff had built up on my brain since the first game of the postseason that there was no way it would evaporate with the last out of October 19.
It's November 19 now. An entire month has passed since Carlos Beltran passed on a curveball. Somewhere along the way, the mourning period passed. Just like that, we've crept deep into the offseason.
The World Series came and went. Sports Illustrated's World Series issue came and went…into the trash. An MLB holiday gift catalog came today. The back page features all kinds of world championship merchandise, with the METS misspelled terribly and various shades of orange and blue registering as red. MLB should get itself some better copyeditors and a new printer.
It's been a month and it still annoys. But it's been a month. You think you'll never get over these kinds of losses and…well, you don't, but you do. You don't in the sense that you're always going to replay and regret in your mind what you can do no longer do anything about on the field. That's baseball's evil beauty. But you do get on with your life, limp as your life is without any new baseball to fill it.
A month is behind us. Nineteen weeks are ahead of us until Opening Night in St. Louis. ESPN has been thoughtful enough to make a rematch between us and the Cardinals their Sunday night lidlifter on April 1. The bad news is the last time we were assigned this particular slot and responsibility, we were postponed (it was April 2, 1995, “Mets” and “Marlins” in replacement baseball until a judge issued an injunction to stop the madness; actually, that wasn't bad news at all). The good news is the Baseball Equinox has been moved up by ten hours from our previous estimate. On Tuesday, January 9, at 9:55 PM, we will be just about exactly between that final called strike in October and whatever 2007 brings us starting in April.
One month removed from 2006, we're closer to next year than we've ever been before.
by Greg Prince on 19 November 2006 10:01 am
I like to give Hozzie The Cat a little chest/belly rub when he allows it, which is infrequently. Tonight he did. As I crouched down to find his purr zone, I serenaded him with a quick and unoriginal chorus of Ha-ZEE! Ha-zee Ha-zee Ha-ZEEE! I was a little more off-key than usual when it occurred to me that it must be more than a week since I’d caught myself wandering around the house singing the “Jose!” song. I’d been doing that a lot during the playoffs and afterwards. Same for “off to never never land!” I even entered November breaking into occasional chants of LET’S GO METS! with no Mets (or cats) in sight. So much of that stuff had built up on my brain since the first game of the postseason that there was no way it would evaporate with the last out of October 19.
It’s November 19 now. An entire month has passed since Carlos Beltran passed on a curveball. Somewhere along the way, the mourning period passed. Just like that, we’ve crept deep into the offseason.
The World Series came and went. Sports Illustrated‘s World Series issue came and went…into the trash. An MLB holiday gift catalog came today. The back page features all kinds of world championship merchandise, with the METS misspelled terribly and various shades of orange and blue registering as red. MLB should get itself some better copyeditors and a new printer.
It’s been a month and it still annoys. But it’s been a month. You think you’ll never get over these kinds of losses and…well, you don’t, but you do. You don’t in the sense that you’re always going to replay and regret in your mind what you can do no longer do anything about on the field. That’s baseball’s evil beauty. But you do get on with your life, limp as your life is without any new baseball to fill it.
A month is behind us. Nineteen weeks are ahead of us until Opening Night in St. Louis. ESPN has been thoughtful enough to make a rematch between us and the Cardinals their Sunday night lidlifter on April 1. The bad news is the last time we were assigned this particular slot and responsibility, we were postponed (it was April 2, 1995, “Mets” and “Marlins” in replacement baseball until a judge issued an injunction to stop the madness; actually, that wasn’t bad news at all). The good news is the Baseball Equinox has been moved up by ten hours from our previous estimate. On Tuesday, January 9, at 9:55 PM, we will be just about exactly between that final called strike in October and whatever 2007 brings us starting in April.
One month removed from 2006, we’re closer to next year than we’ve ever been before.
by Greg Prince on 17 November 2006 12:03 pm
Tom Seaver and I have this much in common: We had crappy 32nd birthdays. Mine culminated in a cafeteria at C.W. Post on New Year's Eve 1994. But never mind me.
Tom's? Well, I don't know where he was coaxed into “celebrating” by well-meaning/misguided/übertouchy relatives on November 17, 1976, but I do know that thirty years ago today, he did not get exactly what he wanted. The Atlanta Braves, not the New York Mets, signed Gary Matthews as a free agent. It was perhaps the signal event that led to the departure of Seaver seven months hence along with the intents & purposes collapse of National League baseball in New York.
Happy birthday to us.
When I think of Gary Matthews — now Gary Matthews, Sr., I suppose — I usually think of the Sarge who helped lead a platoon of Cubs over the hill in 1984, capturing the divisional flag that was very nearly ours. His numbers weren't astounding (14 homers, 82 ribs, .291), but it seemed like he collected all of them against the Mets. By then, Matthews was 34, playing almost every day for the last time in a career that ended in 1987.
Right now, I'm thinking of the Gary Matthews who didn't become a Met in the winter of '76-'77. That Gary Matthews, 26, had lots of company. Every player in the very first free agent class, just freed by the death of the reserve clause, didn't become a Met. The critical mass of the suddenly shuttered Oakland A's dynasty was on the market, but none of them — not Rudi, not Tenace, not Bando, not Campaneris, not Fingers, not Athletic by way of Baltimore Reggie Jackson — was coming our way. Nor was Bobby Grich or Don Baylor or Don Gullett. Nor did we think they might.
This was the daring new world some were salivating over and others were dreading. This was a clutch of star and superstar ballplayers who would become available to the highest bidders every November. This had never happened before. Instead of engineering trades or banking on minor leaguers, you could just buy the guy you needed. Pay the man and he was yours.
Not the kind of atmosphere that sounds conducive to the business practices of one M. Donald Grant. Maybe if Mrs. Payson were still alive…Joan Payson, after all, wasn't stingy. It's been said the Mets' original owner, who died in 1975, tried to buy Willie Mays from the Giants when he was truly Willie Mays. She wanted to purchase Stan Musial from the Cardinals to kick things off in grand style in '62. Grant might have gone for that, a cash transaction from his team to another team. But the idea of forking over a barrelful of currency to the player himself? That wasn't Grant's game even if it was rapidly become everybody else's.
So if you read the papers, you didn't entertain too many fantasies about Reggie Jackson reporting to Huggins-Stengel in February. Though the Mets made their picks like everybody else in the re-entry draft (in which you chose whom you'd have the rights to negotiate with, a rather pointless barrier that was done away with in the next collective bargaining agreement) and they were theoretically thinking about several players, it was clear the Mets were not going to part with top dollar to snag top names.
There was one player, however, who seemed like a fit. That was Gary Matthews, then of the Giants. He had just completed his fourth full season in San Francisco. His stats weren't stunning, not even by the standards of the day — 20-84-.279, 12 steals — but he was solid. Good outfielder. Didn't miss games. Entering his prime. In other words, he was the kind of regular the Mets were missing. Despite a spurt that earned the Mets their best record since 1969 (86-76), the Mets were hurting for offense in 1976. Only Dave Kingman managed more than 15 homers or 80 RBI…and he batted 238. Heck, Matthews would have led the '76 Mets in stolen bases.
Those Mets, as was their fashion for nearly a decade, relied on pitching. Jerry Koosman caught fire and won 21 games, finishing second for the Cy Young. Jon Matlack chipped in 17. And Tom Seaver? Future lock Hall of Famer Tom Seaver? Nine-time All-Star Tom Seaver who led this power trio in strikeouts (235) and ERA (2.59)? Tom went 14-11.
Like the Met offense of the mid-'70s, that was just sad.
The world was changing around Seaver. It always had. The June amateur draft was just coming in when Seaver was first eligible in 1965. The Dodgers tabbed him but he opted to stay in school at USC. The next year he was thrown into a January draft that, according to a very thorough Met historian, included those who had been drafted the year before but did not sign — a status that would have been impossible to garner without there having been a June draft in the first place. The Braves picked him and signed him but hadn't noticed or decided not to notice that the Southern Cal season had begun when they secured his signature. They were two non-Pac 10 games and Seaver hadn't pitched in them, but they violated a line between professional and amateur. The Brave contract was voided and, after Seaver was deemed ineligible for college ball, every Major League team was afforded the opportunity to match Atlanta's offer to Tom.
That led to the greatest hat there ever was, the one into which three pieces of paper were tossed representing the three teams who thought it was worth signing 21-year-old Tom Seaver for a little more than $50,000. One said Phillies. One said Indians. One said Mets.
You know which one was drawn.
Seaver's appeal upon his Met debut in 1967 wasn't just the pitching, though that was key. The writers loved him. He was educated. He was articulate. He thought about things. He was the harbinger of the erudite athlete and at the vanguard of the Mets who would no longer be automatic losers. It was his professionalism as much as his right arm that made Tom Seaver one of the icons of his age.
All those qualities also manifested themselves into a player who dared to use an agent to negotiate a contract (heresy until the early '70s), to be very active in the union and to speak his mind about how his team was run. By 1976, he had made two things fairly apparent: he wanted to be paid what his pitching was worth and he wanted the Mets to pay a hitter who would make his pitching pay off.
He wanted Gary Matthews. He didn't get him. None of us did. While Grant, as recounted by Jack Lang in the indispensable New York Mets: Twenty-Five Years of Baseball Magic, did make an offer, it wasn't competitive with what Ted Turner was willing to ante in Atlanta. Three decades ago today, as Tom Seaver blew out 32 candles, Gary Matthews went to the Braves, agreeing to $1.2 million for five years — barely enough to win you one year of Damion Easley now, but big bucks then.
Repercussions?
Tom Seaver was burned twice. First, no middle-of-the-lineup hitter. The Mets entered '77 with essentially the same personnel from '76, meaning their offense was a disgruntled Kingman and seven other fellows who weren't here on hitting scholarships. Lee Mazzilli and John Stearns may have portended a youth movement, but neither was a slugger-in-waiting. Otherwise there were several aging parts (Grote, Harrelson, Millan, Torre) and not a lot of improvement.
Second, Tom Seaver was being outpaid if not outearned by the new free agents. Seaver, who had been voted three of the previous eight National League Cy Young awards, had signed a new deal in the spring of '76 just ahead of the gold rush. Now the likes of Wayne Garland, who timed his single 20-win season perfectly to earn a ten-year $2.3 million deal from the Indians, were racing by him. The Yankees made Reggie Jackson a very rich man. The Angels, Padres and Rangers all invested in ex-A's. They didn't succeed but it wasn't for lack of investing.
Seaver was on a team that wasn't trying to get better and now he was being underpaid, certainly relative to what the first free agents were getting ($225,000…less than Wayne Garland on an annualized basis). He didn't have much use for the way Grant was taking care of business, feeling he'd not been dealt with in good faith when he last signed. A feud erupted and by the third month of the 1977 season, Seaver, like Kingman (also contract-discontent), was gone.
The Mets were done. They were already playing badly and they just got worse. They finished last for the first time in ten years in '77. They would repeat the feat in '78 and '79, performing their unremarkable brand of baseball before handfuls of the disinterested. They fell off the map in a manner that makes 2002 and 2003 and 2004 look like a golden age.
If thirty years ago today, when Tom Seaver turned 32, the Mets had decided it was worth topping Ted Turner's bid and had signed Gary Matthews, would have things changed? Would have Seaver thought, hey, that's a great addition and maybe taken a different tone or tack in attempting to renegotiate with Grant? Would have Grant, probably looking a bit like a hero, softened, too? Would have there been more player activity? Might have the Mets made a move on Reggie Jackson who greatly admired Seaver and was not yet in the Yankees' pocket and never said which New York team he'd have to play for in order to get that candy bar? Would have the city's baseball landscape shifted one way instead of another?
That's a lot of ifs there and they probably ignore the systematic rot of the Mets' operations that predated passing over Gary Matthews. Still, even though the early free agentry didn't help too many teams (many got hurt or old and Matthews never broke out as a superstar), it would have sent a message to the fan base that the Mets weren't living in the past. When Grant fired Joe Frazier at the end of the next of May, he exclaimed things were going just peachy in light of the Mets' successes in 1969, 1973 and the two good months at the finish of '76.
Oh brother, I thought at the time. We are so screwed.
Seaver, of course, would have more dalliances with the changing times. His second go-round as a Met ceased abruptly with the bizarre experiment known as the compensation pool. Had the players and owners not negotiated such an insipid compromise to their free agent haggling in 1981, Seaver never would have been available for the White Sox to pluck after their pitcher, Dennis Lamp, signed with the Blue Jays in a spectacularly unrelated move.
Oh brother, I thought at the time. We are so screwed again.
Seaver's Major League coda, his truncated comeback with the Mets in '87, was also a product of the free agent waters turning choppy. He was on the open market the winter the teams were colluding. He said a couple of years ago he is convinced this kept anybody from giving him a legitimate looksee after his perfectly decent showing with the Red Sox in '86 when No. 41 was 41. His stay in Boston ended injured, but he insists he was healthy and good to go the following spring. By the time the Mets auditioned him in June, it was too late and his career was over.
Add 'em up and you have four separate instances — amateur eligibility violation, the first re-entry class, the compensation pool and collusion — in which off-field machinations very much tied to their times had a profound effect on where Tom Seaver played. He wouldn't have been a Met without the Brave mistake. He might have stayed a Met had Matthews not been a Brave. He might have finished a Met had it not been for Lamp and the White Sox (and Cashen's front office not protecting him). He might never have put on the Met uniform a final time had collusion not gotten in the way of him continuing his career unobstructed.
The one we're interested in at the moment is the Matthews component, and not just because this, Tom's 62nd birthday, is the 30th anniversary of it. This is the 31st free agent season, the 31st winter in which baseball teams have been allowed to pursue ballplayers in mostly unfettered terms and the 31st winter in which ballplayers have happily accepted their advances.
It's definitely not the 31st year in which the Mets have been an enthusiastic participant in these sweepstakes. After avoiding taking it seriously in '76-'77, they dipped a toe in the next winter. Two toes: Tom Hausman and Elliott Maddox. We were led to believe free agents could change our lives. Reggie Jackson did that for Yankees fans. Reasonable contributors for a few years apiece, Hausman and Maddox weren't lifechangers. The Mets didn't go after those. Oh, they took a brief run at Pete Rose in the winter of '78. But Rose laughed them out of the room when they came in about two- or three-hundred grand lower per annum than what he grabbed from the Phillies. Also, the Mets weren't any good and Pete Rose (no good in a different sense) recognized that.
The Mets' first honest-to-goodness bid for name free agents came in the winter of '80, chasing Dave Winfield and Don Sutton. By then, Wilpon and Doubleday were in charge and were desperate to be taken seriously. They missed out on both eventual Hall of Famers, settling for reMetsing Rusty Staub plus Mike Cubbage and the pitcher Dave Roberts. 'Twas nice to have Rusty home, but otherwise, not a lot of impact there.
Frank Cashen pretty much stopped after that. He was building a farm system and making shrewd swaps. His disdain for free agents was practically Grantlike. Once in a while, a Dick Tidrow or a Don Aase would wander in through the back door, but otherwise, free agentry was tantamount to the plague in Flushing for the balance of the 1980s. Given that it was the Mets' longest period of sustained excellence, it was hard to argue the Bowtie should have gone the other way.
The '90s represented a sea change. Cashen was leaving, Harazin was taking over and the Mets were trying to fend off mediocrity. It was time to bring out the checkbook. Coleman following 1990, Murray and Bonilla following '91. Bobby Bo was the prize, as hard as it is to believe today. The Mets outbid the Angels and the Phillies to get him. It was considered a good thing.
As you know, all three were disappointments (to put it kindly) and the Mets retreated from free agentry; their only significant additions between the 1992 and 1998 seasons via the FA route were Joe Orsulak, Brett Butler and Lance Johnson. It wasn't until Steve Phillips succeeded Joe McIlvaine that free agents were pursued with any sense of purpose, an approach that yielded Robin Ventura and Rickey Henderson for 1999, the first time any free agents played a major role in major Met success.
Phillips' later stabs — Zeile, Appier, Trachsel, Cedeño, Weathers — didn't click nearly as consistently. His last winter crop, specifically Tom Glavine and Cliff Floyd in '02-03, wouldn't pay off until much later. The Mets fell down a veritable well and the next GM, Jim Duquette, didn't find much of a rope in free agentry. He would sign Mike Cameron, Braden Looper and Kaz Matsui but lowball Vladimir Guerrero. Duquette used free agentry to plug holes rather than make splashes.
That all changed with Omar Minaya. Pedro Martinez and Carlos Beltran and Billy Wagner are Exhibits A, B and C. The results were happy. This winter, the Mets will try to sign somebody of substance. If they don't get it done, it won't be because they don't really want to or don't really know how to. This quote from a Bob Klapisch piece in the Record this week shows how differently free agentry is treated by the Mets — and how differently free agents treat the Mets — on Tom Seaver's hopefully happy 62nd birthday from the way it all went down (or failed to) on The Franchise's 32nd:
“We're hot. It's hot to be a Met, we've got a good thing going on here,” said one club official. “A couple of years ago, we couldn't get Henry Blanco to come here, and that was even after we offered him more money than anyone else. He still said no. That's all changed.”
As we like to say in these parts every November 17, that's Terrific.
by Greg Prince on 17 November 2006 12:03 pm
Tom Seaver and I have this much in common: We had crappy 32nd birthdays. Mine culminated in a cafeteria at C.W. Post on New Year’s Eve 1994. But never mind me.
Tom’s? Well, I don’t know where he was coaxed into “celebrating” by well-meaning/misguided/übertouchy relatives on November 17, 1976, but I do know that thirty years ago today, he did not get exactly what he wanted. The Atlanta Braves, not the New York Mets, signed Gary Matthews as a free agent. It was perhaps the signal event that led to the departure of Seaver seven months hence along with the intents & purposes collapse of National League baseball in New York.
Happy birthday to us.
When I think of Gary Matthews — now Gary Matthews, Sr., I suppose — I usually think of the Sarge who helped lead a platoon of Cubs over the hill in 1984, capturing the divisional flag that was very nearly ours. His numbers weren’t astounding (14 homers, 82 ribs, .291), but it seemed like he collected all of them against the Mets. By then, Matthews was 34, playing almost every day for the last time in a career that ended in 1987.
Right now, I’m thinking of the Gary Matthews who didn’t become a Met in the winter of ’76-’77. That Gary Matthews, 26, had lots of company. Every player in the very first free agent class, just freed by the death of the reserve clause, didn’t become a Met. The critical mass of the suddenly shuttered Oakland A’s dynasty was on the market, but none of them — not Rudi, not Tenace, not Bando, not Campaneris, not Fingers, not Athletic by way of Baltimore Reggie Jackson — was coming our way. Nor was Bobby Grich or Don Baylor or Don Gullett. Nor did we think they might.
This was the daring new world some were salivating over and others were dreading. This was a clutch of star and superstar ballplayers who would become available to the highest bidders every November. This had never happened before. Instead of engineering trades or banking on minor leaguers, you could just buy the guy you needed. Pay the man and he was yours.
Not the kind of atmosphere that sounds conducive to the business practices of one M. Donald Grant. Maybe if Mrs. Payson were still alive…Joan Payson, after all, wasn’t stingy. It’s been said the Mets’ original owner, who died in 1975, tried to buy Willie Mays from the Giants when he was truly Willie Mays. She wanted to purchase Stan Musial from the Cardinals to kick things off in grand style in ’62. Grant might have gone for that, a cash transaction from his team to another team. But the idea of forking over a barrelful of currency to the player himself? That wasn’t Grant’s game even if it was rapidly become everybody else’s.
So if you read the papers, you didn’t entertain too many fantasies about Reggie Jackson reporting to Huggins-Stengel in February. Though the Mets made their picks like everybody else in the re-entry draft (in which you chose whom you’d have the rights to negotiate with, a rather pointless barrier that was done away with in the next collective bargaining agreement) and they were theoretically thinking about several players, it was clear the Mets were not going to part with top dollar to snag top names.
There was one player, however, who seemed like a fit. That was Gary Matthews, then of the Giants. He had just completed his fourth full season in San Francisco. His stats weren’t stunning, not even by the standards of the day — 20-84-.279, 12 steals — but he was solid. Good outfielder. Didn’t miss games. Entering his prime. In other words, he was the kind of regular the Mets were missing. Despite a spurt that earned the Mets their best record since 1969 (86-76), the Mets were hurting for offense in 1976. Only Dave Kingman managed more than 15 homers or 80 RBI…and he batted 238. Heck, Matthews would have led the ’76 Mets in stolen bases.
Those Mets, as was their fashion for nearly a decade, relied on pitching. Jerry Koosman caught fire and won 21 games, finishing second for the Cy Young. Jon Matlack chipped in 17. And Tom Seaver? Future lock Hall of Famer Tom Seaver? Nine-time All-Star Tom Seaver who led this power trio in strikeouts (235) and ERA (2.59)? Tom went 14-11.
Like the Met offense of the mid-’70s, that was just sad.
The world was changing around Seaver. It always had. The June amateur draft was just coming in when Seaver was first eligible in 1965. The Dodgers tabbed him but he opted to stay in school at USC. The next year he was thrown into a January draft that, according to a very thorough Met historian, included those who had been drafted the year before but did not sign — a status that would have been impossible to garner without there having been a June draft in the first place. The Braves picked him and signed him but hadn’t noticed or decided not to notice that the Southern Cal season had begun when they secured his signature. They were two non-Pac 10 games and Seaver hadn’t pitched in them, but they violated a line between professional and amateur. The Brave contract was voided and, after Seaver was deemed ineligible for college ball, every Major League team was afforded the opportunity to match Atlanta’s offer to Tom.
That led to the greatest hat there ever was, the one into which three pieces of paper were tossed representing the three teams who thought it was worth signing 21-year-old Tom Seaver for a little more than $50,000. One said Phillies. One said Indians. One said Mets.
You know which one was drawn.
Seaver’s appeal upon his Met debut in 1967 wasn’t just the pitching, though that was key. The writers loved him. He was educated. He was articulate. He thought about things. He was the harbinger of the erudite athlete and at the vanguard of the Mets who would no longer be automatic losers. It was his professionalism as much as his right arm that made Tom Seaver one of the icons of his age.
All those qualities also manifested themselves into a player who dared to use an agent to negotiate a contract (heresy until the early ’70s), to be very active in the union and to speak his mind about how his team was run. By 1976, he had made two things fairly apparent: he wanted to be paid what his pitching was worth and he wanted the Mets to pay a hitter who would make his pitching pay off.
He wanted Gary Matthews. He didn’t get him. None of us did. While Grant, as recounted by Jack Lang in the indispensable New York Mets: Twenty-Five Years of Baseball Magic, did make an offer, it wasn’t competitive with what Ted Turner was willing to ante in Atlanta. Three decades ago today, as Tom Seaver blew out 32 candles, Gary Matthews went to the Braves, agreeing to $1.2 million for five years — barely enough to win you one year of Damion Easley now, but big bucks then.
Repercussions?
Tom Seaver was burned twice. First, no middle-of-the-lineup hitter. The Mets entered ’77 with essentially the same personnel from ’76, meaning their offense was a disgruntled Kingman and seven other fellows who weren’t here on hitting scholarships. Lee Mazzilli and John Stearns may have portended a youth movement, but neither was a slugger-in-waiting. Otherwise there were several aging parts (Grote, Harrelson, Millan, Torre) and not a lot of improvement.
Second, Tom Seaver was being outpaid if not outearned by the new free agents. Seaver, who had been voted three of the previous eight National League Cy Young awards, had signed a new deal in the spring of ’76 just ahead of the gold rush. Now the likes of Wayne Garland, who timed his single 20-win season perfectly to earn a ten-year $2.3 million deal from the Indians, were racing by him. The Yankees made Reggie Jackson a very rich man. The Angels, Padres and Rangers all invested in ex-A’s. They didn’t succeed but it wasn’t for lack of investing.
Seaver was on a team that wasn’t trying to get better and now he was being underpaid, certainly relative to what the first free agents were getting ($225,000…less than Wayne Garland on an annualized basis). He didn’t have much use for the way Grant was taking care of business, feeling he’d not been dealt with in good faith when he last signed. A feud erupted and by the third month of the 1977 season, Seaver, like Kingman (also contract-discontent), was gone.
The Mets were done. They were already playing badly and they just got worse. They finished last for the first time in ten years in ’77. They would repeat the feat in ’78 and ’79, performing their unremarkable brand of baseball before handfuls of the disinterested. They fell off the map in a manner that makes 2002 and 2003 and 2004 look like a golden age.
If thirty years ago today, when Tom Seaver turned 32, the Mets had decided it was worth topping Ted Turner’s bid and had signed Gary Matthews, would have things changed? Would have Seaver thought, hey, that’s a great addition and maybe taken a different tone or tack in attempting to renegotiate with Grant? Would have Grant, probably looking a bit like a hero, softened, too? Would have there been more player activity? Might have the Mets made a move on Reggie Jackson who greatly admired Seaver and was not yet in the Yankees’ pocket and never said which New York team he’d have to play for in order to get that candy bar? Would have the city’s baseball landscape shifted one way instead of another?
That’s a lot of ifs there and they probably ignore the systematic rot of the Mets’ operations that predated passing over Gary Matthews. Still, even though the early free agentry didn’t help too many teams (many got hurt or old and Matthews never broke out as a superstar), it would have sent a message to the fan base that the Mets weren’t living in the past. When Grant fired Joe Frazier at the end of the next of May, he exclaimed things were going just peachy in light of the Mets’ successes in 1969, 1973 and the two good months at the finish of ’76.
Oh brother, I thought at the time. We are so screwed.
Seaver, of course, would have more dalliances with the changing times. His second go-round as a Met ceased abruptly with the bizarre experiment known as the compensation pool. Had the players and owners not negotiated such an insipid compromise to their free agent haggling in 1981, Seaver never would have been available for the White Sox to pluck after their pitcher, Dennis Lamp, signed with the Blue Jays in a spectacularly unrelated move.
Oh brother, I thought at the time. We are so screwed again.
Seaver’s Major League coda, his truncated comeback with the Mets in ’87, was also a product of the free agent waters turning choppy. He was on the open market the winter the teams were colluding. He said a couple of years ago he is convinced this kept anybody from giving him a legitimate looksee after his perfectly decent showing with the Red Sox in ’86 when No. 41 was 41. His stay in Boston ended injured, but he insists he was healthy and good to go the following spring. By the time the Mets auditioned him in June, it was too late and his career was over.
Add ’em up and you have four separate instances — amateur eligibility violation, the first re-entry class, the compensation pool and collusion — in which off-field machinations very much tied to their times had a profound effect on where Tom Seaver played. He wouldn’t have been a Met without the Brave mistake. He might have stayed a Met had Matthews not been a Brave. He might have finished a Met had it not been for Lamp and the White Sox (and Cashen’s front office not protecting him). He might never have put on the Met uniform a final time had collusion not gotten in the way of him continuing his career unobstructed.
The one we’re interested in at the moment is the Matthews component, and not just because this, Tom’s 62nd birthday, is the 30th anniversary of it. This is the 31st free agent season, the 31st winter in which baseball teams have been allowed to pursue ballplayers in mostly unfettered terms and the 31st winter in which ballplayers have happily accepted their advances.
It’s definitely not the 31st year in which the Mets have been an enthusiastic participant in these sweepstakes. After avoiding taking it seriously in ’76-’77, they dipped a toe in the next winter. Two toes: Tom Hausman and Elliott Maddox. We were led to believe free agents could change our lives. Reggie Jackson did that for Yankees fans. Reasonable contributors for a few years apiece, Hausman and Maddox weren’t lifechangers. The Mets didn’t go after those. Oh, they took a brief run at Pete Rose in the winter of ’78. But Rose laughed them out of the room when they came in about two- or three-hundred grand lower per annum than what he grabbed from the Phillies. Also, the Mets weren’t any good and Pete Rose (no good in a different sense) recognized that.
The Mets’ first honest-to-goodness bid for name free agents came in the winter of ’80, chasing Dave Winfield and Don Sutton. By then, Wilpon and Doubleday were in charge and were desperate to be taken seriously. They missed out on both eventual Hall of Famers, settling for reMetsing Rusty Staub plus Mike Cubbage and the pitcher Dave Roberts. ‘Twas nice to have Rusty home, but otherwise, not a lot of impact there.
Frank Cashen pretty much stopped after that. He was building a farm system and making shrewd swaps. His disdain for free agents was practically Grantlike. Once in a while, a Dick Tidrow or a Don Aase would wander in through the back door, but otherwise, free agentry was tantamount to the plague in Flushing for the balance of the 1980s. Given that it was the Mets’ longest period of sustained excellence, it was hard to argue the Bowtie should have gone the other way.
The ’90s represented a sea change. Cashen was leaving, Harazin was taking over and the Mets were trying to fend off mediocrity. It was time to bring out the checkbook. Coleman following 1990, Murray and Bonilla following ’91. Bobby Bo was the prize, as hard as it is to believe today. The Mets outbid the Angels and the Phillies to get him. It was considered a good thing.
As you know, all three were disappointments (to put it kindly) and the Mets retreated from free agentry; their only significant additions between the 1992 and 1998 seasons via the FA route were Joe Orsulak, Brett Butler and Lance Johnson. It wasn’t until Steve Phillips succeeded Joe McIlvaine that free agents were pursued with any sense of purpose, an approach that yielded Robin Ventura and Rickey Henderson for 1999, the first time any free agents played a major role in major Met success.
Phillips’ later stabs — Zeile, Appier, Trachsel, Cedeño, Weathers — didn’t click nearly as consistently. His last winter crop, specifically Tom Glavine and Cliff Floyd in ’02-03, wouldn’t pay off until much later. The Mets fell down a veritable well and the next GM, Jim Duquette, didn’t find much of a rope in free agentry. He would sign Mike Cameron, Braden Looper and Kaz Matsui but lowball Vladimir Guerrero. Duquette used free agentry to plug holes rather than make splashes.
That all changed with Omar Minaya. Pedro Martinez and Carlos Beltran and Billy Wagner are Exhibits A, B and C. The results were happy. This winter, the Mets will try to sign somebody of substance. If they don’t get it done, it won’t be because they don’t really want to or don’t really know how to. This quote from a Bob Klapisch piece in the Record this week shows how differently free agentry is treated by the Mets — and how differently free agents treat the Mets — on Tom Seaver’s hopefully happy 62nd birthday from the way it all went down (or failed to) on The Franchise’s 32nd:
“We’re hot. It’s hot to be a Met, we’ve got a good thing going on here,” said one club official. “A couple of years ago, we couldn’t get Henry Blanco to come here, and that was even after we offered him more money than anyone else. He still said no. That’s all changed.”
As we like to say in these parts every November 17, that’s Terrific.
by Greg Prince on 14 November 2006 11:25 pm
The roads of Rome stood for two thousand years and more; who would predict less for the roads of Moses? Who would predict less for his Shea Stadium, a structure consciously shaped to resemble Rome’s Colosseum…?
—Robert Caro, “The Power Broker: Robert Moses and the Fall of New York,” 1974
The DiamondVision menu was classed up for the postseason. Instead of bombarding us with various iterations of “You there, what’s in the box?” and “Uncle Jack’s Steak Sauce Presents: Which is closer, Greece or Albany?” as it did from April through September, the big screen featured a few muted presentations, including an infomercial of sorts.
It started with Gary Cohen explaining that the Mets played their first two years in the Polo Grounds. As the camera came up on the Rheingold sign in the deep, deep center on the northern edge of Harlem, I clapped real quickly. I had to — the image faded in a few seconds, sort of like the first home of the Mets seems to have in the official memory. It ended with a lavish tour of CGI Park, the computer-generated portrayal of what we have since learned (thanks, fast and first, to Hotfoot) will be called Citi Field. On the two occasions the bit was shown while I was sitting next to my co-blogger, Jason applauded heartily at the New Ballpark pitch. I think he was afraid they would cease construction on it if he didn’t.
I toasted history as I tend to do. He cheered progress as is his prerogative. Nobody did much of anything for the here and now. The script, you see, also paid lip service to Shea Stadium, noting it became the home of the Mets in 1964 and that many fine things had happened in it. Shea, like the Polo Grounds, was in the picture to pave the way to the future, to Citi Field. This wasn’t an educational filmstrip. It was hype, and that was fine.
It’s going to be fine, too. Citi Field, on which ground is at last officially broken (a mere five months after the new day actually began rising), doesn’t roll off the tongue probably because after 43 seasons, anything that plays home to the Mets and isn’t called Shea Stadium is going to sound and read bizarre. If you’re a devotee of South Park, perhaps the second thing, after “really?” that crossed your mind when you learned what the naming rights bidding yielded was Tuong Lu Kim, the recurring Chinese character who operates City Wok. He slurs the soft-c into more of a “sh” when he answers the phone “City Wok!” and encourages you to try his specialty, the “City Beef”.
Let’s try not to think about that (though now I’m stuck with it in my head until at least 2009). Let’s not worry that other, less kindly disposed observers will find the easy rhyme. After being subjected to a zillion choruses of a Yankovicked “step right up and beat the Mets,” big deal. Let’s not pay any attention either to the predictable chorus of columnists who between now and October 2008 will sniff that tearing down renovated Yankee Stadium is a crime against nature (the Babe and Larrupin’ Lou will be aghast on their Bill Gallo cloud, though it will be tough to tell by their expressions) while demolishing Shea is a public service. Have the good sense to ignore them, too. I’ve never heard a Mets fan, not even my technically accurate friend Jason, put down Shea the way those who don’t pay for the privilege do. The press elevator must really work in the new parks.
Anyway, don’t fret at what sounds like “Citi”. Be glad instead that 1) $20 million a year will flow into the Mets’ no-fee checking account before being laundered into Scott Boras’ pockets; 2) There is an implied NYC feel to the sponsor even though I recently received a Citi statement from the city of Sioux Falls, S.D.; 3) I’ve heard of this company and so have you; 4) This company’s name is probably not going to change substantially any time soon; 5) The joint won’t be named for a chain of pet supply stores unless Petco buys out Citi Group; 6) No ATM fees for me…presumably.
Listen, I advocated going for top dollar and avoiding utter embarrassment if possible. The Mets seem to have achieved the first part, and while the second part is a matter of taste, Citi Field — albeit a little generic to the point of fictional and rather resonant of a minor league facility in Islip — isn’t a total disaster. As Mets fans, we’ve conditioned ourselves to treat noncalamities as moral victories. Score one for us.
The park…I mean field itself? We’ll see. You can draw up all the virtual realty you want. No way of knowing how extraordinary or how extraordinarily disappointing the new digs will be until we’re inside. I reserve judgment while fervently hoping for the best.
That leaves us with Shea Stadium, which is where I want to go right now. That’s where I went in 2006 on 29 separate occasions (30, counting my wishful World Series jaunt). That’s where I’ve been going to see Mets games since 1973. Unless you were in the vanguard of the New Breed in ’62 or ’63, it’s the only home you as a Met fan have ever known.
Shea Stadium is my Nikon Camera Player of the Year for 2006, winning the honor that went to our soon-to-be-sundered radio team in 2005. Shea of course is slated to disappear after 2008. This award doesn’t portend longevity, does it?
Often derided as maybe the worst ballpark in the Majors, I’ve decided Shea Stadium was the best thing about a very good season, at least for me…and it’s my award. The Mets won 50 regular-season games here in ’06, two more in the NLDS and two in the NLCS (though the home-field advantage kind of lapsed at the end). That certainly helped its cause, but I came to love and regard Shea more than I have in ages for two other reasons.
One was, predictably and sentimentally, that it was suddenly living on borrowed time. It’s not right to speak ill of the nearly deceased. The other reason it became my cause was given to me by somebody I met for the first time this year at, not ironically, Shea.
In April, Dan Ziegler, who you may know as the consistently enjoyable lone star of Lone Star Mets, was visiting the home of his favorite team for the first time in 20 years. He lives in Arlington, Tex., but remains as loyal to the Mets as he was in his New Jersey youth. It was a very big deal for him to fly to New York for the sole purpose of taking in two Mets games in April, less than two weeks after the plans for Shea’s successor were unveiled.
Naturally, the subject of ballparks came up. Dan is a regular visitor to Ameriquest Field, home of the Rangers. Opened in 1994, it was one of the first retro delights in the Majors — a Priti Field, if you will. Dan told me he likes it fine (as did I on my one visit in 1997), but said Shea was better. You’d be surprised, he told me, how fast the novelty of a new park wears off. Shea, old and scruffy as it is…now this is a place to watch and feel baseball. The “energy” was what Dan kept coming back to. It was so strong, so real. The ballpark in Arlington, whatever it was called that week, couldn’t hope to match it.
“Everybody gets buck wild over here when they watch a ballgame,” somebody else — Benny Agbayani — once said of Shea. “This is the most exciting place that I’ve been to, where the fans are into the game from the first inning to the ninth. I can just imagine the people who don’t have tickets, at home. They probably wreck their TVs.”
Perhaps it’s unfair to compare the commitment of Mets diehards to Metroplex timepassers, Rangers fans likely just checking their watches to see when Cowboy camp kicks off. So if we are who we are, not where we sit, the stadium shouldn’t make a difference. Whether at Shea or Citi, we’ll still be in New York and we’ll still take baseball seriously. Just because we’ll be a little more comfortable and far less sardined doesn’t mean we’ll forget how to root, root, root for the home team.
Yet Dan’s sentiments stayed with me all season. Despite my occasional and pungent discontent with Shea, I realized in 2006 what a special place we will lose come 2009. That makes letting go unexpectedly difficult and hanging on to what remains all the more imperative.
Whether Shea Stadium is afforded the cachet in death it’s been deprived in life remains to be seen. Its backstory — a municipal stadium situated among the parkways, amenable to several types of events, ideal for none — is 410 feet removed from the musty tatters of the Polo Grounds and Ebbets Field (former home of the Brooklyn Dodgers, in case you hadn’t heard). Shea probably won’t be bygone enough in our time to evoke objective wistfulness. The second the Mets can’t gin up nostalgia to sell everything from it that would otherwise go into a Dumpster, they’ll barely mention it. Thus, it’s on those of us who sat in it, stood in it, leaped in it and high-fived in it to give it the round of applause it’s earned…to love it in the present-tense while we still can.
We know the superb and the supernatural have occurred here. You can run down the catechism with minimal prompting, Casey to Mookie, Rocky to Robin, Agee to Endy, Del Unser to Delgado, John Lennon and Paul McCartney to John Maine and Paul Lo Duca (not to mention Jim Bunning to Jeff Suppan…sigh). We all know, too, our own histories: the first time we were brought here as kids; the first or last time we took our loved ones; that time it was so cold or so warm (sometimes in the course of the same week or same game, depending on your ticket); and, oh, that time it was so much fun. Say Shea and you’ve probably said all you need to say to conjure countless memories and umpteen emotions.
What I think is easy to overlook is how well we — counting us as Mets — and it go together. Hell, by the end of Game Six against St. Louis, I couldn’t tell us apart. Where was that corporate vibe that was going to quiet everybody and everything in October because every other fanny in every other seat would belong to a well-connected frontrunner? The place was more alive than I’d ever heard it or felt it. After Billy Wagner put out his final fire of 2006, we were sweating, we were trembling, we were barely able to stand. In other words, we were Shea and Shea was us. In tandem, we were just trying to hang on for one night more than we’d been told we had left.
Into each life a little rain must fall. Rain pours on Shea. Wind howls into it. It was allegedly supposed to be covered by a dome or at least be closed off. It didn’t and it wasn’t. If you believe Robert Caro’s assertion that Shea was Robert Moses’ “answer to the Colosseum of the Caesars,” it was never going to.
Hence, Shea is immune to nothing. Nor are we. We sit outside too long. We sniffle. We hurt. We don’t hold up perfectly in the course of a long year. Our calves go south at the worst possible juncture. Whether we throw or we house or we cheer, we’re all bound to be a little rickety in our forties.
But we are who we are. We don’t march in lockstep. We are not of one mind. We don’t all don navy windbreakers or red caps. We’re a little raggedy around the edges. We are individuals with our own quirks. Half a row loves the Met who’s at bat, the other half is actively demanding he be packed off to Seattle ASAP. The bon mots share vocal space with the You Sucks. We are individuals woven together for common cause. Shea, in that sense, is one of us.
I don’t see a cookie cutter — unless a chunk of cookie got stuck in the pan. Quick, how many other stadia have looked like Shea? Even in the multipurpose ’60s, nobody else mimicked the Colosseum. Credit/blame the vision of master builder Moses or architects Praeger-Kavanaugh-Waterbury or Mayor Wagner for spending $25 million and getting a three-quarters complete facility a year late for New York taxpayers’ money (John Franco, who grew up in the Marlboro Houses of Bensonhurst and knows a little something about such handiwork, suggested anything built by the city wasn’t going to be all that nice). Shea may not measure up to the antiquities its generation replaced in terms of stone originality, but it was also never the Vet or Three Rivers. It was open. It was inviting. It was distinctive, even.
Before the Cardinals built the current Busch Stadium, they toyed with renovating the old one, specifically ripping open the outfield to provide a good glimpse of the Mississippi. Some computer models were worked up, one of which was dismissed by management as looking “too much like Shea Stadium.”
As if that could be a bad thing.
To really get Shea, sit in the upper deck, in left field. From high on in Section 36, say, as I did on a July afternoon seven years ago. From there, you see it all. You see why we’re where we’ve been since 1964. You see the lush green Moses yearned to develop into New York City’s premier park…the highways that link to create the heart of the Metropolitan area…the Long Island Rail Road station — “your steel thruway to the Fair gateway,” as it was advertised in the 1964 yearbook — originally opened to usher visitors to baseball over here and Peace Through Understanding over there…the IRT, also known as the 7 train, because, well, this was a City field.
That day, as prelude to Matt Franco zinging Mariano Rivera, I understood as I never did before the great truth of Shea Stadium. It was built for us. It was built for us kids, many of whom had parents who moved east, from Brooklyn, from Queens. It was meant to be our playground, our day care center. “I used to say,” Ron Swoboda once recalled, “that the Mets were the biggest babysitting service in the city.”
We raised a fuss and made a racket, but that was all right because we helped drown out the planes (does anybody even still notice the planes?). There’s a reason, I decided, home plate more or less faced Long Island — Great Neck, maybe — without decisive obstruction. It was gesturing toward us kids to come on over and come on in and come play. It was big but not daunting. It was colorful: yellows, later oranges. It had to be designed for or by children. “Tinker Toy architecture,” George Vecsey described it. The ballpark, like the team, was a gift to us, the kids who toddled out of the early ’60s. Did it have to be left open at one end? Let’s just infer that Mr. Moses and Mr. Wagner simply didn’t finish wrapping it in time for Christmas morning, April 17, 1964, and we were too anxious to wait another minute.
Shea’s youthful exuberance, even in middle age, remains its charm. Where else could have…
HoZAY!
HozayHozayHozaaay!
HOzay!
HoZAAAY!
…taken off as it did in 2006? Jose Reyes heard those chants in Japan. He said they reminded him of Shea Stadium. So did Manny Acta. So did Ryan Howard, not altogether cheerfully.
That’s how we roll. We’ve never needed ThunderStix. We don’t really require the cues from DiamondVision. We know enough to get out of our chairs and go to the window, as it were. It’s what we do. We brought the ethic of Roger Angell’s “‘Go!’ Shouters” over from the Polo Grounds and expanded upon it.
Has there ever been a purer exhortation of faith than LET’S GO METS!? It’s concise without being neat, raucous without being threatening. It can’t be contained, which is why it’s ideal for a horseshoe like Shea. It’s three easy syllables, perfect for the kids and the kid in each of us. The scoreboard need never rev it up again for it to be generated twenty times a game. It rises when we’re hitting and when we’re fielding. It squirts out with nobody on and it rocks the Queens night when the bases are loaded. It’s ours. I’m sure it will survive the trek across the parking lot but I can’t imagine it will ever translate to as much a part of home after 2008.
William A. Shea, the superlawyer whose Continental League machinations led to the formation of the Metropolitan Baseball Club of New York (we should really name something after that guy), was a renowned mover and shaker. That makes sense because if you’ve sat in the upper deck for a playoff game, you know it moves and it shakes. I stood still for it in 2000, frozen when I assumed my demise awaited me below, somewhere in the mezzanine. But we survived. When things started quaking again this October, I joined in the jumping. If me adding my full force to a condemned structure couldn’t kill it, what could?
Oh yeah. Progress. We’re back to that.
Dammit, I wanted to look forward to this new ballpark without reservation. I’ve been craving this on some level since 1994, the first time I stepped off a MARC train from Washington at Camden station in Baltimore and took a long look at the red bricks that formed the back of Oriole Park, particularly the sign that greeted me: WELCOME HOME. I swear I channeled Ned Beatty in Rudy when he saw Notre Dame Stadium for the very first time:
This is the most beautiful sight these eyes have ever seen.
Everything I had salivated over in the two years that I read about Camden Yards was exceeded. How often does that happen? “They got it right,” I kept muttering to myself. “They got it right.” I didn’t care a whit about the Orioles. I was just so impressed that a ballpark could look like a ballpark. I wanted the Mets to have one of these.
So what happened between 1994 and the present? 2006, mostly. Dan Ziegler’s insightfulness. The realization that progress implies what you cherished before was not the ideal. That what was built for my youth and my adolescence has been deemed obsolete by those who operate it. That a stadium constructed in 1963 and 1964, when I was still learning to spout “Metsie! Metsie!” stands no chance of standing 50, never mind 2,000 years. The physical focal point of the single constant of my sentient life, my default destination if I had to pick anywhere I wanted to be at any given moment, will vanish before the next decade dawns.
Citi Field’s pending glory is a reminder of Shea Stadium’s undeniable doom. It can’t beckon without mocking. And boy will it be weird come April when what were barely stakes in the ground when we last craned our necks to check out the activity beyond centerfield will have grown into the actual skeleton of a structure. It was already weird in June when it was just stakes.
Plus, change frightens me. Encountering change is like facing Suppan with the season on the line. It scares me hitless.
More than all that, though, more than the chilling metaphor of a ballpark just a little younger than myself returning to the ash heap from which it rose, the thing about 2006 that makes the end of Shea an almost stunningly melancholy affair is the times that were so much fun.
I’m not talking about my childhood. I’m talking about now. Last month. The month before. April in the cold. June in the humidity. August in a drizzle. At a stage of my life when a blue-ribbon commission should be issuing reports that my concourses are too narrow and my pipes are in danger of bursting and that we’ve really got to do something about your seat size, I enjoyed myself too much to notice what cried out for replacement.
It helps when your team wins lots of games and such but I’m the guy who brought bad luck to the good Mets. It didn’t matter. I was riding high. Row V high. Orange…blue…green…skyward red. It didn’t matter. Snaking lines for the men’s room? It didn’t matter. Trip from the upper deck to the elevated platform so long that I should have earned credit card miles? It didn’t matter. Overofficious jerks barring me and my bride from Daruma delicacies? Even that didn’t matter, no matter how insulting.
There was an evening when a strikingly blonde fellow in a Brazilian soccer jersey and a very unofficial-looking Yankees cap neared me at Woodside (Shea’s outer boundary for my psychic and commutation purposes). He approached me as I waited for the 7. When he saw my suspicion at what was on his head, he took it off. He was visiting from the Netherlands and just wanted directions to Shea. Is this the train? Yes, I said. Follow me.
It wasn’t a tough assignment. The 7 pulled into Willets Point. I told him we get off here, he said thanks and I lost him in the crowd. I met up with Jason, we watched Shawn Green record his first Met hit and the Mets sweep the Cards. Hours later, I saw the Dutch guy leaving with whomever it was he was meeting. The Yankee cap was nowhere in sight. Neither he nor his friend carried a backpack or a bag. I deduced that a night at Shea made him realize he was in the right place with the wrong hat and discarded it. I don’t know what became of him after, but at the very least, William A. and I helped prevent one soul from trending wayward.
Just a small moment in a year of momentous ones, a small moment like the other small moments that add up if you’re careful enough to relish them.
Like the lady who refused to stand at her aisle seat one more damn time to let pass the endless stream of foot traffic that was ruining her night.
Like the chirpy staff photographer who offered my co-blogger and me the opportunity to have our picture snapped in the bottom of the ninth with the tying run batting (we declined, though I had the right item to feature if she clicked).
Like scolding the kid who was kicking my seat and the kid stopping.
Like Mike of Mike’s Mets gently explaining to me that, uh, Dontrelle Willis is hitting those home runs lefthanded, not righthanded like I thought.
Like Dan of Westchester (not to be confused with Dan of Texas) and I suddenly deciding, on a victorious ramp, that “Takin’ Care Of Business” was the best song ever.
Like Laurie contorting herself from Maddux fan back to Mets fan in the time it took Grady Little to change pitchers.
Like the two roars that told me both Kent and Drew had been tagged out by Lo Duca when I couldn’t quite see the plate.
Like the tens of thousands of cheers for Mike Piazza walking in from the bullpen and the tens of thousands more for Ed Hearn and his erstwhile teammates walking in from the stands.
Like the Fandini whose appeal escapes me but I had to have and the Dunkin’ Donuts quarter-holder that was OK, I guessed, but felt compelled to fill.
Like the metallic blue beer bottle I was determined to keep and the cobalt blue champagne bottle I will never discard.
Like the bus lot full of eager seniors.
Like Gate E, where, before Game One of the NLCS, I saw dozens of satin, Davey-era jackets wrapping torsos that weren’t alive during the Johnson administration. Our franchise was now old enough, I divined, to have fathers passing down sacred Mets garments to their sons.
Like the boardwalk — the wooden thruway to the Shea gateway — from the LIRR stop onto which I gained entry by flashing the same ticket to inattentive conductors all year long. Every time I rode the Port Washington line in October, the boardwalk, that great bridge between Shea’s World’s Fair roots and its immediate World Series hopes, was jammed with Long Islanders like me. LET’S GO METS! and HoZAY! sprung up every few feet, petered out and renewed themselves over and over. These fans grew up in the ’60s and the ’70s and the ’80s and the ’90s and the now. They, in the parlance of Terry Cashman, were rushing to the stadium in Flushing because nothing could be more important than the Mets and loving them toward another win. Every one of them was sure this was going to be the year at Shea.
They were right. It was.
by Greg Prince on 14 November 2006 11:25 pm
The roads of Rome stood for two thousand years and more; who would predict less for the roads of Moses? Who would predict less for his Shea Stadium, a structure consciously shaped to resemble Rome’s Colosseum…?
—Robert Caro, “The Power Broker: Robert Moses and the Fall of New York,” 1974
The DiamondVision menu was classed up for the postseason. Instead of bombarding us with various iterations of “You there, what’s in the box?” and “Uncle Jack’s Steak Sauce Presents: Which is closer, Greece or Albany?” as it did from April through September, the big screen featured a few muted presentations, including an infomercial of sorts.
It started with Gary Cohen explaining that the Mets played their first two years in the Polo Grounds. As the camera came up on the Rheingold sign in deep, deep center on the northern edge of Harlem, I clapped real quickly. I had to — the image faded in a few seconds, sort of like the first home of the Mets seems to have in the official memory. It ended with a lavish tour of CGI Park, the computer-generated portrayal of what we have since learned (thanks, fast and first, to Hotfoot) will be called Citi Field. On the two occasions the bit was shown while I was sitting next to my co-blogger, Jason applauded heartily at the New Ballpark pitch. I think he was afraid they would cease construction on it if he didn’t.
I toasted history as I tend to do. He cheered progress as is his prerogative. Nobody did much of anything for the here and now. The script, you see, also paid lip service to Shea Stadium, noting it became the home of the Mets in 1964 and that many fine things had happened in it. Shea, like the Polo Grounds, was in the picture to pave the way to the future, to Citi Field. This wasn’t an educational filmstrip. It was hype, and that was fine.
It’s going to be fine, too. Citi Field, on which ground is at last officially broken (a mere five months after the new day actually began rising), doesn’t roll off the tongue probably because after 43 seasons, anything that plays home to the Mets and isn’t called Shea Stadium is going to sound and read bizarre. If you’re a devotee of South Park, perhaps the second thing, after “really?” that crossed your mind when you learned what the naming rights bidding yielded was Tuong Lu Kim, the recurring Chinese character who operates City Wok. He slurs the soft-c into more of a “sh” when he answers the phone “City Wok!” and encourages you to try his specialty, the “City Beef”.
Let’s try not to think about that (though now I’m stuck with it in my head until at least 2009). Let’s not worry that other, less kindly disposed observers will find the easy rhyme. After being subjected to a zillion choruses of a Yankovicked “step right up and beat the Mets,” big deal. Let’s not pay any attention either to the predictable chorus of columnists who between now and October 2008 will sniff that tearing down renovated Yankee Stadium is a crime against nature (the Babe and Larrupin’ Lou will be aghast on their Bill Gallo cloud, though it will be tough to tell by their expressions) while demolishing Shea is a public service. Have the good sense to ignore them, too. I’ve never heard a Mets fan, not even my technically accurate friend Jason, put down Shea the way those who don’t pay for the privilege do. The press elevator must really work in the new parks.
Anyway, don’t fret at what sounds like “Citi”. Be glad instead that 1) $20 million a year will flow into the Mets’ no-fee checking account before being laundered into Scott Boras’ pockets; 2) There is an implied NYC feel to the sponsor even though I recently received a Citi statement from the city of Sioux Falls, S.D.; 3) I’ve heard of this company and so have you; 4) This company’s name is probably not going to change substantially any time soon; 5) The joint won’t be named for a chain of pet supply stores unless Petco buys out Citi Group; 6) No ATM fees for me…presumably.
Listen, I advocated going for top dollar and avoiding utter embarrassment if possible. The Mets seem to have achieved the first part, and while the second part is a matter of taste, Citi Field — albeit a little generic to the point of fictional and rather resonant of a minor league facility in Islip — isn’t a total disaster. As Mets fans, we’ve conditioned ourselves to treat noncalamities as moral victories. Score one for us.
The park…I mean field itself? We’ll see. You can draw up all the virtual realty you want. No way of knowing how extraordinary or how extraordinarily disappointing the new digs will be until we’re inside. I reserve judgment while fervently hoping for the best.
That leaves us with Shea Stadium, which is where I want to go right now. That’s where I went in 2006 on 29 separate occasions (30, counting my wishful World Series jaunt). That’s where I’ve been going to see Mets games since 1973. Unless you were in the vanguard of the New Breed in ’62 or ’63, it’s the only home you as a Met fan have ever known.
Shea Stadium is my Nikon Camera Player of the Year for 2006, winning the honor that went to our soon-to-be-sundered radio team in 2005. Shea of course is slated to disappear after 2008. This award doesn’t portend longevity, does it?
Often derided as maybe the worst ballpark in the Majors, I’ve decided Shea Stadium was the best thing about a very good season, at least for me…and it’s my award. The Mets won 50 regular-season games here in ’06, two more in the NLDS and two in the NLCS (though the home-field advantage kind of lapsed at the end). That certainly helped its cause, but I came to love and regard Shea more than I have in ages for two other reasons.
One was, predictably and sentimentally, that it was suddenly living on borrowed time. It’s not right to speak ill of the nearly deceased. The other reason it became my cause was given to me by somebody I met for the first time this year at, not ironically, Shea.
In April, Dan Ziegler, who you may know as the consistently enjoyable lone star of Lone Star Mets, was visiting the home of his favorite team for the first time in 20 years. He lives in Arlington, Tex., but remains as loyal to the Mets as he was in his New Jersey youth. It was a very big deal for him to fly to New York for the sole purpose of taking in two Mets games in April, less than two weeks after the plans for Shea’s successor were unveiled.
Naturally, the subject of ballparks came up. Dan is a regular visitor to Ameriquest Field, home of the Rangers. Opened in 1994, it was one of the first retro delights in the Majors — a Priti Field, if you will. Dan told me he likes it fine (as did I on my one visit in 1997), but said Shea was better. You’d be surprised, he told me, how fast the novelty of a new park wears off. Shea, old and scruffy as it is…now this is a place to watch and feel baseball. The “energy” was what Dan kept coming back to. It was so strong, so real. The ballpark in Arlington, whatever it was called that week, couldn’t hope to match it.
“Everybody gets buck wild over here when they watch a ballgame,” somebody else — Benny Agbayani — once said of Shea. “This is the most exciting place that I’ve been to, where the fans are into the game from the first inning to the ninth. I can just imagine the people who don’t have tickets, at home. They probably wreck their TVs.”
Perhaps it’s unfair to compare the commitment of Mets diehards to Metroplex timepassers, Rangers fans likely just checking their watches to see when Cowboy camp kicks off. So if we are who we are, not where we sit, the stadium shouldn’t make a difference. Whether at Shea or Citi, we’ll still be in New York and we’ll still take baseball seriously. Just because we’ll be a little more comfortable and far less sardined doesn’t mean we’ll forget how to root, root, root for the home team.
Yet Dan’s sentiments stayed with me all season. Despite my occasional and pungent discontent with Shea, I realized in 2006 what a special place we will lose come 2009. That makes letting go unexpectedly difficult and hanging on to what remains all the more imperative.
Whether Shea Stadium is afforded the cachet in death it’s been deprived in life remains to be seen. Its backstory — a municipal stadium situated among the parkways, amenable to several types of events, ideal for none — is 410 feet removed from the musty tatters of the Polo Grounds and Ebbets Field (former home of the Brooklyn Dodgers, in case you hadn’t heard). Shea probably won’t be bygone enough in our time to evoke objective wistfulness. The second the Mets can’t gin up nostalgia to sell everything from it that would otherwise go into a Dumpster, they’ll barely mention it. Thus, it’s on those of us who sat in it, stood in it, leaped in it and high-fived in it to give it the round of applause it’s earned…to love it in the present-tense while we still can.
We know the superb and the supernatural have occurred here. You can run down the catechism with minimal prompting, Casey to Mookie, Rocky to Robin, Agee to Endy, Del Unser to Delgado, John Lennon and Paul McCartney to John Maine and Paul Lo Duca (not to mention Jim Bunning to Jeff Suppan…sigh). We all know, too, our own histories: the first time we were brought here as kids; the first or last time we took our loved ones; that time it was so cold or so warm (sometimes in the course of the same week or same game, depending on your ticket); and, oh, that time it was so much fun. Say Shea and you’ve probably said all you need to say to conjure countless memories and umpteen emotions.
What I think is easy to overlook is how well we — counting us as Mets — and it go together. Hell, by the end of Game Six against St. Louis, I couldn’t tell us apart. Where was that corporate vibe that was going to quiet everybody and everything in October because every other fanny in every other seat would belong to a well-connected frontrunner? The place was more alive than I’d ever heard it or felt it. After Billy Wagner put out his final fire of 2006, we were sweating, we were trembling, we were barely able to stand. In other words, we were Shea and Shea was us. In tandem, we were just trying to hang on for one night more than we’d been told we had left.
Into each life a little rain must fall. Rain pours on Shea. Wind howls into it. It was allegedly supposed to be covered by a dome or at least be closed off. It didn’t and it wasn’t. If you believe Robert Caro’s assertion that Shea was Robert Moses’ “answer to the Colosseum of the Caesars,” it was never going to.
Hence, Shea is immune to nothing. Nor are we. We sit outside too long. We sniffle. We hurt. We don’t hold up perfectly in the course of a long year. Our calves go south at the worst possible juncture. Whether we throw or we house or we cheer, we’re all bound to be a little rickety in our forties.
But we are who we are. We don’t march in lockstep. We are not of one mind. We don’t all don navy windbreakers or red caps. We’re a little raggedy around the edges. We are individuals with our own quirks. Half a row loves the Met who’s at bat, the other half is actively demanding he be packed off to Seattle ASAP. The bon mots share vocal space with the You Sucks. We are individuals woven together for common cause. Shea, in that sense, is one of us.
I don’t see a cookie cutter — unless a chunk of cookie got stuck in the pan. Quick, how many other stadia have looked like Shea? Even in the multipurpose ’60s, nobody else mimicked the Colosseum. Credit/blame the vision of master builder Moses or architects Praeger-Kavanaugh-Waterbury or Mayor Wagner for spending $25 million and getting a three-quarters complete facility a year late for New York taxpayers’ money (John Franco, who grew up in the Marlboro Houses of Bensonhurst and knows a little something about such handiwork, suggested anything built by the city wasn’t going to be all that nice). Shea may not measure up to the antiquities its generation replaced in terms of stone originality, but it was also never the Vet or Three Rivers. It was open. It was inviting. It was distinctive, even.
Before the Cardinals built the current Busch Stadium, they toyed with renovating the old one, specifically ripping open the outfield to provide a good glimpse of the Mississippi. Some computer models were worked up, one of which was dismissed by management as looking “too much like Shea Stadium.”
As if that could be a bad thing.
To really get Shea, sit in the upper deck, in left field. From high on in Section 36, say, as I did on a July afternoon seven years ago. From there, you see it all. You see why we’re where we’ve been since 1964. You see the lush green Moses yearned to develop into New York City’s premier park…the highways that link to create the heart of the Metropolitan area…the Long Island Rail Road station — “your steel thruway to the Fair gateway,” as it was advertised in the 1964 yearbook — originally opened to usher visitors to baseball over here and Peace Through Understanding over there…the IRT, also known as the 7 train, because, well, this was a City field.
That day, as prelude to Matt Franco zinging Mariano Rivera, I understood as I never did before the great truth of Shea Stadium. It was built for us. It was built for us kids, many of whom had parents who moved east, from Brooklyn, from Queens. It was meant to be our playground, our day care center. “I used to say,” Ron Swoboda once recalled, “that the Mets were the biggest babysitting service in the city.”
We raised a fuss and made a racket, but that was all right because we helped drown out the planes (does anybody even still notice the planes?). There’s a reason, I decided, home plate more or less faced Long Island — Great Neck, maybe — without decisive obstruction. It was gesturing toward us kids to come on over and come on in and come play. It was big but not daunting. It was colorful: yellows, later oranges. It had to be designed for or by children. “Tinker Toy architecture,” George Vecsey described it. The ballpark, like the team, was a gift to us, the kids who toddled out of the early ’60s. Did it have to be left open at one end? Let’s just infer that Mr. Moses and Mr. Wagner simply didn’t finish wrapping it in time for Christmas morning, April 17, 1964, and we were too anxious to wait another minute.
Shea’s youthful exuberance, even in middle age, remains its charm. Where else could have…
HoZAY!
HozayHozayHozaaay!
HOzay!
HoZAAAY!
…taken off as it did in 2006? Jose Reyes heard those chants in Japan. He said they reminded him of Shea Stadium. So did Manny Acta. So did Ryan Howard, not altogether cheerfully.
That’s how we roll. We’ve never needed ThunderStix. We don’t really require the cues from DiamondVision. We know enough to get out of our chairs and go to the window, as it were. It’s what we do. We brought the ethic of Roger Angell’s “‘Go!’ Shouters” over from the Polo Grounds and expanded upon it.
Has there ever been a purer exhortation of faith than LET’S GO METS!? It’s concise without being neat, raucous without being threatening. It can’t be contained, which is why it’s ideal for a horseshoe like Shea. It’s three easy syllables, perfect for the kids and the kid in each of us. The scoreboard need never rev it up again for it to be generated twenty times a game. It rises when we’re hitting and when we’re fielding. It squirts out with nobody on and it rocks the Queens night when the bases are loaded. It’s ours. I’m sure it will survive the trek across the parking lot but I can’t imagine it will ever translate to as much a part of home after 2008.
William A. Shea, the superlawyer whose Continental League machinations led to the formation of the Metropolitan Baseball Club of New York (we should really name something after that guy), was a renowned mover and shaker. That makes sense because if you’ve sat in the upper deck for a playoff game, you know it moves and it shakes. I stood still for it in 2000, frozen when I assumed my demise awaited me below, somewhere in the mezzanine. But we survived. When things started quaking again this October, I joined in the jumping. If me adding my full force to a condemned structure couldn’t kill it, what could?
Oh yeah. Progress. We’re back to that.
Dammit, I wanted to look forward to this new ballpark without reservation. I’ve been craving this on some level since 1994, the first time I stepped off a MARC train from Washington at Camden station in Baltimore and took a long look at the red bricks that formed the back of Oriole Park, particularly the sign that greeted me: WELCOME HOME. I swear I channeled Ned Beatty in Rudy when he saw Notre Dame Stadium for the very first time:
This is the most beautiful sight these eyes have ever seen.
Everything I had salivated over in the two years that I read about Camden Yards was exceeded. How often does that happen? “They got it right,” I kept muttering to myself. “They got it right.” I didn’t care a whit about the Orioles. I was just so impressed that a ballpark could look like a ballpark. I wanted the Mets to have one of these.
So what happened between 1994 and the present? 2006, mostly. Dan Ziegler’s insightfulness. The realization that progress implies what you cherished before was not the ideal. That what was built for my youth and my adolescence has been deemed obsolete by those who operate it. That a stadium constructed in 1963 and 1964, when I was still learning to spout “Metsie! Metsie!” stands no chance of standing 50, never mind 2,000 years. The physical focal point of the single constant of my sentient life, my default destination if I had to pick anywhere I wanted to be at any given moment, will vanish before the next decade dawns.
Citi Field’s pending glory is a reminder of Shea Stadium’s undeniable doom. It can’t beckon without mocking. And boy will it be weird come April when what were barely stakes in the ground when we last craned our necks to check out the activity beyond centerfield will have grown into the actual skeleton of a structure. It was already weird in June when it was just stakes.
Plus, change frightens me. Encountering change is like facing Suppan with the season on the line. It scares me hitless.
More than all that, though, more than the chilling metaphor of a ballpark just a little younger than myself returning to the ash heap from which it rose, the thing about 2006 that makes the end of Shea an almost stunningly melancholy affair is the times that were so much fun.
I’m not talking about my childhood. I’m talking about now. Last month. The month before. April in the cold. June in the humidity. August in a drizzle. At a stage of my life when a blue-ribbon commission should be issuing reports that my concourses are too narrow and my pipes are in danger of bursting and that we’ve really got to do something about your seat size, I enjoyed myself too much to notice what cried out for replacement.
It helps when your team wins lots of games and such but I’m the guy who brought bad luck to the good Mets. It didn’t matter. I was riding high. Row V high. Orange…blue…green…skyward red. It didn’t matter. Snaking lines for the men’s room? It didn’t matter. Trip from the upper deck to the elevated platform so long that I should have earned credit card miles? It didn’t matter. Overofficious jerks barring me and my bride from Daruma delicacies? Even that didn’t matter, no matter how insulting.
There was an evening when a strikingly blonde fellow in a Brazilian soccer jersey and a very unofficial-looking Yankees cap neared me at Woodside (Shea’s outer boundary for my psychic and commutation purposes). He approached me as I waited for the 7. When he saw my suspicion at what was on his head, he took it off. He was visiting from the Netherlands and just wanted directions to Shea. Is this the train? Yes, I said. Follow me.
It wasn’t a tough assignment. The 7 pulled into Willets Point. I told him we get off here, he said thanks and I lost him in the crowd. I met up with Jason, we watched Shawn Green record his first Met hit and the Mets sweep the Cards. Hours later, I saw the Dutch guy leaving with whomever it was he was meeting. The Yankee cap was nowhere in sight. Neither he nor his friend carried a backpack or a bag. I deduced that a night at Shea made him realize he was in the right place with the wrong hat and discarded it. I don’t know what became of him after, but at the very least, William A. and I helped prevent one soul from trending wayward.
Just a small moment in a year of momentous ones, a small moment like the other small moments that add up if you’re careful enough to relish them.
Like the lady who refused to stand at her aisle seat one more damn time to let pass the endless stream of foot traffic that was ruining her night.
Like the chirpy staff photographer who offered my co-blogger and me the opportunity to have our picture snapped in the bottom of the ninth with the tying run batting (we declined, though I had the right item to feature if she clicked).
Like scolding the kid who was kicking my seat and the kid stopping.
Like Mike of Mike’s Mets gently explaining to me that, uh, Dontrelle Willis is hitting those home runs lefthanded, not righthanded like I thought.
Like Dan of Westchester (not to be confused with Dan of Texas) and I suddenly deciding, on a victorious ramp, that “Takin’ Care Of Business” was the best song ever.
Like Laurie contorting herself from Maddux fan back to Mets fan in the time it took Grady Little to change pitchers.
Like the two roars that told me both Kent and Drew had been tagged out by Lo Duca when I couldn’t quite see the plate.
Like the tens of thousands of cheers for Mike Piazza walking in from the bullpen and the tens of thousands more for Ed Hearn and his erstwhile teammates walking in from the stands.
Like the Fandini whose appeal escapes me but I had to have and the Dunkin’ Donuts quarter-holder that was OK, I guessed, but felt compelled to fill.
Like the metallic blue beer bottle I was determined to keep and the cobalt blue champagne bottle I will never discard.
Like the bus lot full of eager seniors.
Like Gate E, where, before Game One of the NLCS, I saw dozens of satin, Davey-era jackets wrapping torsos that weren’t alive during the Johnson administration. Our franchise was now old enough, I divined, to have fathers passing down sacred Mets garments to their sons.
Like the boardwalk — the wooden thruway to the Shea gateway — from the LIRR stop onto which I gained entry by flashing the same ticket to inattentive conductors all year long. Every time I rode the Port Washington line in October, the boardwalk, that great bridge between Shea’s World’s Fair roots and its immediate World Series hopes, was jammed with Long Islanders like me. LET’S GO METS! and HoZAY! sprung up every few feet, petered out and renewed themselves over and over. These fans grew up in the ’60s and the ’70s and the ’80s and the ’90s and the now. They, in the parlance of Terry Cashman, were rushing to the stadium in Flushing because nothing could be more important than the Mets and loving them toward another win. Every one of them was sure this was going to be the year at Shea.
They were right. It was.
by Jason Fry on 14 November 2006 4:24 am
The silver shovels have been lowered and raised, the symbolic dirt has been flung, the pols have grinned, the hands have been gripped, Mets on Apparent Permanent Retainer Reyes and Wright and Maine have smiled for the cameras (somebody let these guys go home!), and the new place has a name.
And not a bad name, to my mind.
CitiField. Well, OK, it is a field in a city. As my co-blogger notes, could have been worse. Could have been a lot worse. CitiField is far better than all the parks named after drinks and dot-coms and telephones and cellphones. Just imagine Banco Popular Stadium or Nymex Field or the Donald Field at Trump Meadows. Heck, the Arizona Cardinals had to fend off a restaurant chain that wanted to name their park Pink Taco Stadium. Yes really. How would that one have sat with us?
Should it have not had a corporate name at all? Maybe. But for better or for worse, this is the modern world: For all but a very few parks, a corporate moniker is practically the law of physics, and the parks that are exceptions have a history and character that not even Shea's most-avid partisans could claim for it. No one who hasn't been huffing paint thinner would ever call Shea a lyric little bandbox, or refer to its friendly confines. The Yankees, actually, are an exception to the exception: They play in a park made pedestrian by a bad makeover, yet still couldn't get away with a corporate name. So be it — let their mystique and aura and all that cost them a little money for a change. Besides, you just know they'll make up the difference by unveiling the Enterprise Rent-a-Car Captain Derek Jeter Intangibles Celebrity Pavilion and the Red Envelope Twenty-six Rings Baby Parking Complex, or similar atrocities that will test my co-blogger's newfound calm.
Jackie Robinson Field? It would have been disappointing if the Mets had reached back to Ebbets Field with only an architectural salute. But I think they did enough — and Rachel Robinson, hardly a shrinking violet at 84, said she was satisfied. For Jackie Robinson and Arthur Ashe to face off across the 7 tracks would have been satisfying, no argument there. And if the Mets played in Brooklyn (as I once dreamed they might), I'd campaign loudly for the idea. I saw 42 put on the outfield wall on a frozen night. I live just blocks from a plaque on the site of the old Dodger offices, commemorating where Branch Rickey and Robinson inked his big-league deal. It's a plaque facing a big, empty street corner that could use a statue to join the one outside Keyspan and the one that will be in the CitiField rotunda. But that's another post. For now, in my book, the Mets did enough.
As for those certain-to-heard taunts of ShitiField? Ha. I'm not worried. Because let's face it: That's where we play now.
I have many, many cherished memories of things that happened at Shea. Ordonez's debut. The Mets' last fight. Piazza's first game. The 10-run inning. Clontz's wild pitch. Pratt hitting it over the fence. The Grand Slam Single. Agbayani's dinger. Bobby Jones flirting with perfection. Timo jumping up to make the pennant arrive more quickly. Piazza's last game. The 2006 clincher. John Maine's season-extender. And those are just some of the big ones. I have many, many cherished memories of seeing these things that happened at Shea with people who are dear to me: my wife, my little boy, my good friend and co-blogger, my fellow travelers in orange and blue, my pals just along for a day's ride.
But these things, these memories, are not Shea itself.
That, sadly, is something else. It's broken seats and sticky concrete and bathroom lakes and escalators that don't work on Opening Day and a general, grinding crappiness that wears you down. ShitiField, in other words. And I'm ready for an end to it.
This new park? It may not be your thing if you think the retro ballparks with their bricks and their trusses have run their course. I harbor no fantasy that the decrepit ushers and lemon-pussed security guards and Aramark drones will show up for their first day of work with attitude transplants. Our park being our park, the contests on the videoboard will be a mix of illogical and insultingly easy, we'll be shown Rangers-Royals highlights, and several Met-related facts will be incorrect. But the park itself won't be shitty, if only because it'll be a modern ballpark, with all the seats actually facing the field and the action visible while getting concessions and a host of other little things other fans have been able to take for granted for years. I can't wait.
And that corporate moniker comes with a not-to-be-overlooked bonus. Twenty million dollars a year, every year. Money for a Carlos Beltran-level free agent, every year for a generation. That in itself is no guarantee of anything — Al Harazin and Jeff Torborg could have come in last with it — but it's awfully nice to have working in your favor when free agents come to visit and the draft pick you want has hired Scott Boras and the deadline deals come with contracts needing to be restructured. Does it risk turning us into the Yankees? We don't like to admit this, but to outsiders we already are. Closer to home, we've got a shortstop and third baseman who play this game with such joy you want to laugh out loud, and they've got a shortstop and third baseman who seethe and plot against each other like they're putting on some pinstriped version of “Heathers.” I'm not the slightest bit worried about us turning into them.
CitiField and SNY filling the coffers, Wright and Reyes wearing the colors. I've got a name for it: The Golden Age. Let's get it started.
|
|