The blog for Mets fans
who like to read
ABOUT US
Faith and Fear in Flushing made its debut on Feb. 16, 2005, the brainchild of two longtime friends and lifelong Met fans.
Greg Prince discovered the Mets when he was 6, during the magical summer of 1969. He is a Long Island-based writer, editor and communications consultant. Contact him here.
Jason Fry is a Brooklyn writer whose first memories include his mom leaping up and down cheering for Rusty Staub. Check out his other writing here.
Got something to say? Leave a comment, or email us at faithandfear@gmail.com. (Sorry, but we have no interest in ads, sponsored content or guest posts.)
Need our RSS feed? It's here.
Visit our Facebook page, or drop by the personal pages for Greg and Jason.
Or follow us on Twitter: Here's Greg, and here's Jason.
|
by Greg Prince on 11 May 2006 11:57 pm
Behold the blowout! The mighty aberration! My team is kicking your team’s ass like there’s no tomorrow. You don’t want there to be a tomorrow because it is obvious that your team can never hope to compete with my team, because my team is blowing your team…OUT!
Perspective is pummeled in a blowout. I can’t see the forest for the lumber. If the Mets win by a lot on a Wednesday, as they did last night, I’ve decided they’ll win by even more on Thursday (if they’re not rained out* as might be the case on this particular Thursday), and come Friday, the rest of the league will cower in the opposing clubhouse and forfeit the flag. Why even bother? We’re the Mets. We blow you out.
It never quite occurs to me that a 13-4 laugher is not normal. I’m intoxicated. I’m a big man. My team’s a big team. Too bad it doesn’t last.
The most legendary blowout in Mets history (the one they were on the walking-tall end of) was in 1964, their third year of wretched existence. The Mets beat the Cubs 19-1. A fellow was said to have called Newsday.
“How many runs did the Mets score today?”
“19.”
“Did they win?”
The Mets have scored as many as 23 runs, in 1987. Beat the Cubs 23-10. That was silly. The Mets have given up as many as 26, to the Phillies in 1985. They were down 16-0 after two. I preferred to focus on the seven they scored between the third and the ninth, but that’s another story for another rainy evening.
My favorite blowout — maybe even more so than last night’s — was a 17-1 smackdown of the Pirates thirty years ago this spring. I had nothing in particular against the Pirates. They’d won more division titles than us (to that point, we were the only two kings of the National League East, founded 1969), but I wasn’t thinking about that on the third Saturday in April. The victim didn’t matter. The score did.
The 1976 Mets were nothing special, I suspected. They were managed by dishwater-dull Joe Frazier. Not the boxer Joe Frazier. The manager Joe Frazier. See? Doesn’t that sound lame? He managed at Tidewater the year before. When he was appointed to replace Roy McMillan, the papers’ reaction was, “Who?” The Mets tried to get across the idea that nobody’d ever heard of Walter Alston when Brooklyn brought him up to manage 22 years ago and he was still helming the Dodgers. That sounded like a stretch to me.
I was also as sore as Mets fan could be that Rusty Staub had been traded for Mickey Lolich over the winter. Rusty was the best player on the 1975 Mets, a team that for a few (OK, a hundred) breaks could’ve beaten the Pirates. Staub was considered a clubhouse lawyer, so M. Donald Grant had to off him. He was to be replaced by Mike Vail, who’d lit up the previous September with a 23-game hitting streak. Just staring at the name Mike Vail conjures images of hope and, as often happens where a Met prospect is concerned, dreams dashed. Rusty was traded to open up a spot for Vail. Vail broke his leg playing basketball. And Mickey Lolich was about 55.
But the Mets were off to an OK start. A couple of days earlier, Dave Kingman hit one of those Dave Kingman home runs in Chicago. He broke a window on Waveland Avenue, Ralph Kiner told us. We were over .500, we still had Seaver and Koosman and Matlack and Del Unser (a journeyman outfielder on whom I was briefly fixated). Maybe we could do something. But just maybe
My doubts did a 180 on this beautiful Saturday afternoon. Did I say beautiful? It was 96 degrees…96 degrees on April 17 in New York! The weather report that night announced we were the hottest spot in the country today. Wow! Honest to god, I assumed that if it was 96 degrees in New York, it must be, I don’t know, 125 in Florida.
It was too a nice a day to be outside once the top of the first at Three Rivers commenced.
Wayne Garrett led off against Bruce Kison and singled. My boy Del struck out but John Milner singled. Ed Kranepool, a Met as long as any of us could remember yet mysteriously merely 31 (which sounded older when I was 13), singled to make it 1-0. SkyKing struck out but then Ron Hodges walked to load the bases. Bud Harrelson singled to plate two. Felix Millan doubled and went to third on an error. Two more scored. When Jerry Koosman struck out against Kent Tekulve (brought into face one of the worst-hitting pitchers in the world), the Mets led 5-0.
5-0! The Mets scored five runs in the first inning! It wasn’t even five-nothing. It was, in the parlance of Bob Murphy, the Mets five, the Pirates coming to bat. The point is the Mets, in my 13-year-old mind, never scored in the first inning. I suppose they had. I know they had. The leadoff hitters in Game 3 of both the 1969 and 1973 World Series — Agee and Garrett, respectively — hit home runs (10 years later, Lenny Dykstra would do the same). Two sets of numbers that made no sense to me were 96 degrees on 4/17 and 5-0 in the middle of the 1st.
I wasn’t yet familiar with the quote from the Mets’ first president George Weiss, spoken in his Yankee days, that the ideal situation was for his team to score five runs in the first and then slowly pull away. For at least a few minutes, rooting for the Mets was like rooting for U.S. Steel. We’re up 5-0 and the Pirates haven’t batted. When are we going to see some more?
The top of the second looked promising. Wayne Garrett doubled. Unser singled, but Garrett was thrown out at home. The Mets were turned away in this frame. Damn! Damn Wayne Garrett! Why was Wayne Garrett still playing third? Every year we were promised a new third baseman. The great third hope of this off-season was Roy Staiger. I’d read about him every week in The Sporting News in ’75. He was tearing up the International League. Bring up Roy Staiger!
Garrett withstood Roy Staiger and held onto his job, much to my chagrin. Wayne Garrett was exactly what was wrong with my team in the mid-1970s. Not him specifically, but our inability to rid ourselves of boring players and replace them with exciting players. Why didn’t they just do that?
The Pirates pushed a run across in the bottom of the fourth — singles from Sanguillen, Oliver and Bob Robertson. It ended 5-1. I didn’t take that as a threat. I assumed there was no legal way the Mets could lose if they led 5-0 in the first. But it was beginning not to feel like something great was going to happen.
Oh me of little faith. With two out in the top of the fifth, Krane reached on an error by Dave Parker. Kingman doubled Eddie to third. Then Ron Hodges singled them both home. I wouldn’t swear to it, but it was probably one of the last three or four hits of any consequence Ron Hodges ever got. Ron Hodges came up from Double-A in 1973 when Jerry Grote was injured. Against these very same Bucs, the No. 79 Greatest Met of the First Forty Years put a tag on Richie Zisk in extra innings in late September, then drove in the winning run in a huge game.
Ron Hodges would play for another eleven seasons, all as a Met; only Kranepool exceeds him in team history for once a Met, always a Met longevity. I don’t remember him doing much between that magical night at Shea and this hot afternoon in Pittsburgh. I know he didn’t do anything afterwards, all the way to 1984. I doubt he ever drove in two runs with a single again, but don’t hold me to that. Ron Hodges was sort of a Wayne Garrett in training. If our roster had room for Ron Hodges, there was something terribly wrong.
Regardless, it was 7-1 through six.
What is a blowout? I don’t mean philosophically. I mean by how many runs do you have to win? That’s easy. Seven. Seven runs makes a blowout. Winning by six (or one) is fine, but it’s not a blowout. A run here, a run there, and you could win 7-1 and forget about it. If you win 8-1, however, you’re bringing the pain.
In the seventh, eighth and ninth innings, the Mets would inflict upon the Pirates a whupping worthy of a Bicentennial. Five in the seventh. Two in the eighth. Three in the ninth. Along the way, Dave Kingman hit a three-run job, Ron Hodges got another hit and Steady Eddie Kranepool went deep. Jerry Freaking Koosman doubled and scored en route to a complete game victory.
Mets 17 Pirates 1. 18-1 if Garrett’s safe at home in the second.
The 1976 Mets were going to be all right. More than all right. Unstoppable.
Except there was a tomorrow, and the Mets lost during it. Ralph or Bob or Lindsey probably said something about momentum being akin to the next day’s starting pitcher. Whoever pitched, the ruthless streak of world domination was over at one (yeah, they lost Friday night and didn’t even win the series). Though they straddled first place around the end of April, mediocrity caught up to the aging Mets in 1976. Their record was deceptively respectable (86-76) but the team of my youth, the one that had three great starters, never enough hitting and finished third almost every year, and in fact finished third that year, was done.
Where’d it all go?
Wayne Garrett and Del Unser were traded in July to Montreal for Pepe Mangual and Jim Dwyer. It was a trade that helped nobody.
Roy Staiger took over and made me miss Wayne Garrett.
Mike Vail recovered from his injury but never put together another hitting streak that I heard about.
Mickey Lolich looked lost, fat and for the first bus home to Michigan. Rusty Staub made the American League All-Stars.
Nobody accused Joe Frazier of smokin’ or even breathin’. Walt Alston retired at the end of the season. Of all the hearts and flowers sent his way, none mentioned that the logical heir to his obscurity-to-longevity career path was Joe Frazier. Pulseless Joe was fired at the end of the following May. Replaced by a guy named Torre. Wonder where he went.
Jerry Koosman won 21 games but was robbed of the Cy Young by those who voted for Randy Jones who left enough of an impression to be signed by the Mets five years later when he was more Anthony than Cy Young. Kooz continues to escape Hall of Fame consideration.
Dave Kingman hit 37 homers, 32 of them before a misguided attempt at catching a fly ball put him on the DL. After being on pace to break Hack Wilson’s National League record, Sky lost the home run crown for the year to Mike Schmidt by one. His charm, never more than tenuous, also seemed to go out the window by the spring of ’77.
Tom Seaver won 14 games. I insisted that if he pitched for the Big Red Machine, he’d have won 30. I didn’t plan on actually finding out the accuracy of that assessment.
Ron Hodges hit .226.
The Mets’ and Pirates’ exclusive hold on the National League East ended after seven seasons of one or the other winning the division, thanks to the Phillies’ not blowing their big lead, no matter how hard they tried. The Pirates would stay competitive. The Mets would go away.
There would be tomorrows for the Mets. All of them, as far as my 13-year-old eye could see, were terrible. The 1976 Mets — decrepit, flawed, torpid when not blowing out opponents — won more games and finished higher in the standings than any Mets team would for eight long years. I was in seventh grade when they pounded the Pirates. I was a senior in college the next time they posted a winning record. Given what was to come, the ’76 Mets blew out all their successors.
*It’s one hour later and raining torrentially, but it’s a half-inning too late for a rainout: Phillies 2 Mets 0, middle of the fifth. Gavin Bleeping Floyd? Where’s Bruce Kison when you need him?
by Jason Fry on 11 May 2006 2:05 am
Feel better?
Before tonight's game, I told Joshua “Tom Glavine is going to throw a no-hitter tonight.” Emily rolled her eyes. Joshua wanted to know what a no-hitter was. (See, he's already a Met fan.) So I told him, and then I decided to offer a twist on my usual no-hit ritual. Normally, each inning a Met pitcher completes without allowing a hit, I blithely (i.e., I affect what I imagine is the tone of a fan who's used to no-hitters) announce: “[# of outs] to go!” Tonight I decided I'd do that at the beginning of the game. “27 to go!” I chirped as Glavine got set on the rubber. And I decided I'd count the outs down one by one, something I'd figured I might do if a Met pitcher ever took the mound after I got to say “three to go.” Unless that happened and I was convinced changing would jinx things. (Probably doesn't matter: If we ever get that far I'll undoubtedly be huddled in a ball behind the couch, unable to speak.)
Anyway, it didn't work. Though Glavine did get to 16, which isn't bad. And don't tell me that was tempting the baseball gods, because all the superstitions of millions of superstitious Met fans haven't been worth a damn for 40+ years.
But nearly everything else worked. Glavine pitched exactly the way you'd want a crafty old pitcher with a big lead to pitch (and hit like a lithe young power hitter), the boys hit doubles and home runs and took advantage of errors and kept the hammer down. And I'd say the leather got flashed, but we were even better bare-handed: I'd barely gotten over oohing and ahhing over Reyes' flip to Matsui's bare hand and nice turn to Delgado (Kaz apparently rehabbed his knee under the tutelage of Bill Mazeroski) when Wright made that stunning bare-handed grab of a ball pinwheeling off the third-base bag. (At the time, that one looked potentially significant: It got Glavine to “21 to go.”)
Whew. It's nice to relax from a third inning on. Rubber game tomorrow, weather permitting.
by Greg Prince on 10 May 2006 10:23 pm
And at least there's something that makes it OK: We get another one tomorrow.
The smoke shooting out of my ears when Heilman threw that ball away cleared sometime this morning. Your promise that another Mets-Phillies game would eventually arrive didn't make me feel any better, but since there's nothing I can do about last night, I'll take it.
Mets-Phillies games suck until further notice.
by Jason Fry on 10 May 2006 2:38 am
“Baseball is a lot like life. The line drives are caught, the squibbers go for base hits. It's an unfair game.”
Typical of the early Mets that Hot Rod Kanehl's greatest contribution to the game of baseball would be a quote. Still, it's a pretty good quote. Kanehl would have liked tonight's game. Well, not liked it — not if he retained any of his orange-and-blue loyalties — but nodded his head at how it unfolded.
Pedro Martinez was ridiculously dominant — except for that second inning. Other than that second inning, he didn't give up a hit. What did he get to show for it? Nothing. Brett Myers? He was pretty good too. Nothing to show for it. The winning pitcher? Tom Gordon was rocked for three hits, including a line drive by Carlos Delgado that did get caught — only it was by someone who bought a ticket. The squibber? It made a losing pitcher of Aaron Heilman, not long after he got victimized by a ball that landed on the line and then somehow didn't bounce into the stands. Kaz Matsui got penalized for not adjusting his batting eye to Doug Eddings' suddenly itinerant strike zone. And poor Julio Franco got ejected without even getting to play.
From the heart-into-throat whooosh! of Delgado's home run to the ya-gotta-be-kidding-me glower of losing on a fricking spring-training play. Ugh.
It's an unfair game. But then Hot Rod told us that a long time ago.
And at least there's something that makes it OK: We get another one tomorrow.
by Greg Prince on 9 May 2006 2:36 pm

Faster than a speeding Rollins…more powerful than a Bobby Abreu…able to leap Citizens Bank Park in a single bound.
Look, up in the sky! Or down the Turnpike!
It’s a mascot!
It’s a cranial mishap!
No, it’s Mr. Met feeling positively SUPER these days.
And why shouldn’t he be? Bolstered by a four-game lead, a .677 winning percentage and the long overdue vanquishing of the corrupt Coxmen, he arrives in an unsavory city determined to turn the nefarious Phanatic even greener with envy. Aided by his trusty superfriends Pedro Man, The Glavinator and Steve Trachsel (sorry, he’s just not all that dynamic), Mr. Met will twist Philadelphia bats into pretzels and prevail in the fight for truth, justice and the National League East!
At least that’s how it’s scripted. Stay tuned…
Super rendering of Mr. Met courtesy of Zed Duck Studios.
by Greg Prince on 9 May 2006 12:57 pm
Deep breath.
Coming next, nine games on the road: Philadelphia, Milwaukee, St. Louis.
Another deep breath.
After that, home: the Skanks, the Phils.
Fifteen games that won't make or break the season — we are 21-10, none of those opponents is looking forward to hosting or visiting us — but a real, extended test of what we are and who we might be. It would have been an “interesting” enough stretch if our rotation was intact. It will be that much more revealing because it isn't.
But before we take on four very good teams for the next two-plus weeks, might I recommend another deep breath.
Go…now let it out.
Think about where we've been recently. San Diego, San Francisco, Atlanta. Amazin' enough. Home for Washington and Pittsburgh. Nothing routine. A season within a season.
Now one more. Breathe in, breathe out. Think lately, very lately. Specifically, think about that weekend we just witnessed.
When will we see another weekend like the one we just saw against the Braves? Will Shea ever see another weekend quite like it? Has this franchise had a more entertaining, more intriguing, more portentous three games at once? Certainly not in this century.
Think about all we have to remember from this series. It was breathtaking.
Think about the re-emergence of Carlos Beltran from mediocrity to top tier. Hit a home run in each game. Ran around the bases and the outfield like my kitten tears through the living room. Made that note in Sports Illustrated that reported MLB players voted him one of their most overrated seem utterly catty.
Think about the resilience that has a team come from behind four times on a Friday night and once more on Saturday. It wasn't until Francoeur flustered Fortunato that I was more or less convinced the Mets wouldn't sweep. It was 8-1 in the top of the sixth. By the bottom of the ninth, down 13-2 with runners on first and second, I was joining in the “Let's Go Mets!” chants. I wasn't serious…or was I?
Think about Jose Reyes and his barrage of base hits — his singles, his doubles, his triple. Started Friday batting .242, ended Saturday batting .280. Think about him and a reheated Wright manning that left side not just for the next [fill in reasonable number of] years but doing it right now. Quietly, they've been here forever and they're still nowhere close to 25.
Think about Cliff Floyd and then go light a candle for him. Even in a slump without end, he hit a patented Monsta shot to keep Friday night going.
Think about Gary Cohen and Keith Hernandez turning their SNY baseball caps inside out to spark a 14th-inning rally. And that it worked!
Think about Jorge Julio, winning pitcher Friday, saving pitcher Saturday. Did you ever think you would without at least three derogatory adjectives?
Think about Darren Oliver. The last time I did before 2006 was when I was in Texas nine years ago. Nike had a commercial starring Ken Griffey, Jr. smacking the ball off some pitcher in a Rangers uniform. I picked up the Dallas Morning News and the TV sports columnist noted that the pitcher in the ad was Darren Oliver. “That's who we got, the guy from the Nike commercial?” was my reaction to his invitation to our spring training. Saturday he proved himself our best long man since Pat Mahomes, bailing us out of a pretty impossible situation. Bonus points for his quote in Sunday's paper about a day game after an endless night game not being as arduous a task as imagined: “That's why they have coffee and Red Bull.”
Think about the crowds. Better than 47,000 on Friday night. Better than 48,000 Saturday and Sunday. Shea, she doesn't look so bad when nearly filled and very loud. 144,189 Mets fans can't be wrong.
Think about Billy Wagner. Think pleasant thoughts. They're bound to get validated before too long.
Think about Xavier Nady running back to the fence to make a catch and Kaz Matsui giving the Mets the lead and Carlos Delgado fielding better than we'd been led to believe and Heilman and Sanchez frustrating Brave after Brave and Jose Valentin shaking off those Jerry Martin comparisons my friend Richie and I were making with such certitude a few weeks ago.
Think about even the unhappy stuff. Losing a starting pitcher for the duration the way we did, losing a catcher for the afternoon the next day. Not pleasant, but the sequences of events surrounding them are already indelible. It's all part of baseball's rich pageant, for better or for worse. We've had a lot of better, we can handle a little worse. (Get well, Victor; keep your head on, Paul.)
Think about Jose Lima showing up in a Mets uniform. I mean, why not? If nothing else, he'll add to the retelling. Oh, and remember when we had to use Lima? He was blonde!
Think about the Braves, but not as much as you used to. Famous last words and all that, but honestly, did they look like the Braves to you? Me neither. They're capable, they're dangerous, they're accomplished…they're eight games out, five games under .500 and 2-4 in their last six against the Mets. You can argue that if a few things had gone right for them, they could've won maybe all six. You can counterargue that since when do the Braves need breaks to break the Mets' hearts? I won't stop monitoring their activities but the Phillies are four games closer and, until further notice, of greater concern to our fortunes. They're also who we play next.
Finally, think about this. We get caught up in baseball for a thousand reasons and, on a weekend like the one just past, divine a thousand rewards from our entanglements. We also let it drive us nuts, willingly or otherwise. But once in a great while, somebody reminds us what it's all about. One of my Mets e-mail buddies, Joe Dubin, told our little group on Saturday what this particular weekend was like for him and his wife Mary Jane. I asked him if I could share it with all of you and he graciously consented.
This was a rough week for us because my dad, who is 91, had to be rushed to an emergency room for what turned out to be a urinary infection. During the week a hospital doctor told us he was in the last stage of his dementia and it would now only be a matter of time because he is not digesting enough food and liquids. TO OUR GREAT RELIEF his nursing home staff told my mom today this is not the case, hospitals have said the same about so many other patients and we should relax and not worry. He's back at the nursing home and even though he gives them a hard time, they are able to get enough nourishment into him (seems only my mom is the only one able to get him eat a full meal). He also wears a pacemaker which helps to keep his vital signs strong.
Needless to say last night MJ and I were quite numb and feeling down. If ever we needed a perk-me-up to help us unwind it was then. So of course, that Met marathon was the shot in the arm we so much needed. We cheered as the Mets made their comeback (MJ thought for sure they were going to lose, the pessimist), groaned with Wagner, jumped like a baby when Cliff came through, laughed along with Keith and Gary and roared as David put the game away. And my mom, who had to be going through this the worst, had us call her often to hear the game's progress (she does not have cable).
That's the beauty about baseball and being a Met fan in particular. Even during the rough times the game will always be there to help us make it through the times of sorrow and grief when we are ready. It's good to know that as some things change, others don't. Being a family of Met fans really helped us all last night (and again this afternoon). Just too bad my Dad sleeps through most of the afternoon games!
by Greg Prince on 8 May 2006 10:43 pm
Saw a dude at Shea yesterday sport a plain white t-shirt on whose front was drawn a clock. On the back, he or somebody assisting him scrawled LIMA TIME!
I wonder at what point in the afternoon he decided he’d ruined a perfectly good undergarment.
That Lima’s a pistol, all right. His right arm may never genuinely emerge from quadruple-A purgatory, but he can put on the trappings of a show. From the dye job to his hugging a fan in the stands who wore one of his old Dodger jerseys (before he took his warmups; I thought you weren’t allowed to talk to a starting pitcher for 24 hours before he goes to work) to inserting himself between Lo Duca the catcher and Lo Moron the umpire, he was everywhere…except in Angel Hernandez’s version of the strike zone.
We’ll probably see Jose Lima again in a few days despite and not because of how he pitched Sunday. He wasn’t any good but he wasn’t that bad. That’s enough to earn you a second look from the first-place Mets these days. Because they are the first-place Mets, I can’t get too mussed up about him or Jeremi Gonzalez or Dicky Gonazlez or Dicky Selma. Ask me again after three games in Philadelphia.
Watching Lo Duca’s Coneheaded blunder unfold from the mezzanine, it didn’t take three seconds to realize it was David Vu all over again. He got a huge hand after his ejection, proving that the fans love a hollaback guy more than grace under pressure. I weakly applauded his piss if not his vinegar since it struck me that Paul Lo Duca did nothing right after his tag went unrecorded by Hernandez (Howie Rose suggested we were paying for the bad call we liked on Opening Day). Arguing without paying attention to the runner — even if it is to argue with the worst umpire in the history of the world — and making contact with an umpire — even if it is the worst umpire in the history of the world — is stupid times stupid. Bad beloved backstop! Bad!
But Angel Hernandez is the worst umpire in the history of the world. The story that came out afterwards about him deciding in advance that the Lima Time Zone does not extend as far east or west of the plate as Eastern Daylight Smoltz is more proof, as if we needed any, that his next assignment should be in the California Penal League.
That said, his actions weren’t unprecedented. Yes, as much as you go to a game and you see something you haven’t seen before (except for me seeing yet another Mets loss in 2006), Hernandez’s declaration that prior success is rewarded at the expense of a less celebrated opponent is nothing new. And it isn’t always the Angel of Awful’s doing.
Continuing to slog through John Feinstein’s Play Ball, his as-it-happened tour of the 1992 season, I came upon this anecdote this morning from then-Cleveland manager Mike Hargrove:
…[E]arly in the season…I had umpires telling me we were no good or we had no right to yell about calls… Heck, I remember when I played here and [former umpire] Bill Deegan called me out on strikes one night on a pitch that wasn’t even close. I said to him, “Bill that’s not a strike.” He followed me back to the dugout and said, ‘So what if it wasn’t a strike? You guys are playing over your heads, anyway.
One chapter after revealing that umpires can be presumptuous and unprofessional, Feinstein reported, no kidding, that Braves fans take regular-season success for granted and that Barry Bonds is a total jerk.
Baseball’s timelessness can really be overrated.
by Jason Fry on 8 May 2006 3:49 am
“I've been waiting to say this to you for a long time. … Deep down in my stomach, with every inch of me, I pure, straight hate you. … But goddamn it do I respect you.” — Wes Mantooth.
In other words: Nice game, Smoltz.
If the Braves lost today, they would have been 10 out. Sure, only May, and Atlanta has a habit of snoozing until summer and then laying waste to the league. But still, one imagines there would have been a hint of panic in the air — double-digits behind a team that doesn't appear in the least bit scared of the Braves anymore? So could Smoltz step up? Three hits over six innings. On three days' rest. Yeah, he could step up.
Still, while the brooms didn't get to wave, we all feel like it would be an excellent idea to hide our five starting pitchers (whoever they may be at the moment) in an armored car and we discovered we actually can hate Angel Hernandez more than we already did, not a bad weekend of baseball: Did we really think we'd take two out of three with Trachsel, Zambrano and TBD pitching? And while that certainly wasn't the way even the most rabid Zambrano detractor wanted to see his Met career end, we did witness what I bet was Kaz Matsui's Beltran Moment and saw definite progress (however scary it might have been) from Jorge Julio, who could wind up in a lot more critical role for us when the pitching gets sorted out.
So. A much-needed off-day, and then it's time to fix the Phillies' wagon. If there's a hole in Ryan Howard's swing, Pedro and Glavine will find it. Homecoming of sorts for Billy Wagner. Pat the Bat, inevitably. The oddity of a Phillies game without a Vince Piazza sighting or talk of Mike growing up in Norristown. Those close fences whispering to Beltran and Wright and Delgado and Floyd. Third base whispering to Reyes after he rifles one up one of those deep alleys. Should be fun.
by Jason Fry on 7 May 2006 6:44 pm
We may come back for the sweep (after the last couple of days I won't put anything past this team) or we may wind up dropping the finale, but one thing's for sure: We'll still be talking about that top of the second.
Even before the zaniness began, we'd seen one of the rarest plays in baseball, the kind you can win bar bets on: What's the only situation in which a baseball team can, in effect, decline a penalty? When a ball is put into play on a balk: The team at bat can either take the balk or the outcome of the play. The Braves did no such thing, but if Jordan had hit the ball up the middle, they certainly would have. So much for our double play (nicely turned, too), and a sure sign that we were entering Goofyland.
I doubt Paul Lo Duca knows about the spring night David Cone became too occupied with screaming at an umpire to consider that runners were continuing to circle the bases. Of course that was against the Braves, on April 30, 1990. I also doubt Lo Duca remembers the hideous summer day that ended with Michael Tucker gouging Mike Piazza's thigh and getting a ridiculous safe call from Angel Hernandez, the worst umpire in the major leagues. Also against the Braves, natch.
A demented mash-up of those two infamous calls? Well, it would have to be against the Braves. And Angel Hernandez would have to be manning home plate. So there was Lo Duca and there was Brian McCann being called safe — it pains me to say that it looked like the right call. There was Lo Duca firing a live ball into the earth (Coney just held it while Gregg Jefferies tried desperately to get his attention), so mad you could almost see the cartoon lightning bolts zipping out of his head, with Ryan Langerhans taking advantage of his largesse to take third. Who was at the plate? John Smoltz. Who was the opposing pitcher on April 30, 1990? John Smoltz. Who pays Michael Tucker's salary these days? The Mets. If they'd panned up to a luxury box and found Mark Lemke, Dale Murphy, John Franco, Cone and Jefferies shaking their heads, I wouldn't have been a bit surprised.
Baseball: It's even crazier than you think it is.
by Greg Prince on 7 May 2006 11:04 am
It was the elbow, all right.
His teammates knew, his manager didn't. Once again, when you want to feel empathy for Victor Zambrano — and he deserves it, based on Michael Morrissey's account in the Post — you're at a loss. You credit him with sucking it up and pitching better than he ever has as a Met (he made Andruw Jones look completely foolish) and for going out and being determined to do his job, especially on an early afternoon after a long night when six-sevenths of the bullpen got work.
But you're a pitcher and your livelihood is in your elbow and your ultimate value to your team is in that elbow and you come back to “man, what are you thinking going out there?” How could you not let your manager know you're hurting? (Come to think of it, how could Randolph and Peterson not know something that Pedro Martinez and Darren Oliver did?) How could you go out there and, according to David Lennon in Newsday, end your season by tearing your flexor tendon when you had to sense you were in danger of doing yourself perhaps irreparable harm?
Of course Victor Zambrano doesn't occur in a vacuum. I imagine if I were a soft-spoken sensitive soul from another country who has never gotten anything close to an even break from the fans of the team that I pitch for, I'd feel compelled to show them. If that was his motivation or it was the natural instinct of an athlete to compete and not let the guys down or an underestimation of how much pain he was in, then it's understandable if not exactly excusable. Lisa Olson in the News lays out the “heartbreaking” particulars in chilling terms:
Blame the snarky media, the impatient fans, the organization that might not have done its best due diligence. In the end, there's a man who once had great promise — “best stuff I've seen in a long time,” said [Cliff] Floyd — who may never pitch again.
Since we all tend to take everything Pedro does or says as the Gospel Truth, I think we owe him the courtesy of considering his statement on his friend Zambrano as reported by Morrissey:
Martinez said Zambrano has been hurt all year and opted to pitch yesterday “because of the damn pressure you guys put on him. Before you guys really hurt a guy, you need to do a little research,” Martinez said. “We're human beings, and we're trying to do a job.”
The media has a job to do but they, too, don't do it in a vacuum. Victor Zambrano has pitched badly more often than not. He's also been hurt on more than one occasion since he's been here. It's easy for me to sit here and type that guys should sit if they ache, but that's apparently not how it works. They all have guaranteed contracts but they force themselves out there. Beltran did. Wright did. Zambrano did. Some hurt more than others. When Beltran recently took a few days to get it together (because he nearly fell apart last year by pushing it), the “whispers” start over how tough he is. Ludicrous.
Anybody who's watched Victor Zambrano since August 2004 could have ascertained that this was not a pitcher performing up to his ability. Anybody who saw him leave the mound late in Spring Training and then read that he had such a bad case of the flu that they had to tend to him intravenously could figure that this was not somebody at the top of his game. Yet there he was, pitching in Washington on April 13. Not pitching well, but pitching. The rationale, that perhaps his injury and his illness had taken a toll on him, was eighth-paragraph stuff for most of us. Oh, it's Victor again. How's Kazmir doing?
Let's not pretend he was going through life as Walter Johnson before waking up with an owwie. Victor Zambrano could be maddening on the mound, as maddening for losing the strike zone as for our could-having-sworn he had such great control of it just an inning or a start or a week ago. The Are you there God? It's me, Victor persona stood in dispiriting contrast to the confidence of Pedro, the steeliness of Glavine, the matter-of-factness of Trachsel, the determination of Bannister, the effortlessness of Benson, the emotion of Seo. C'mon Victor! We care! Don't you?
He did. He cared about pitching, he cared about contributing, he cared about not letting down people who didn't care all that much what happened to him if he was going to go three-and-oh on yet another batter. Now he's headed for the Disabled List and surgery and when or if he'll be back, who knows? The same people who were so upset to see him take the ball every fifth day will be angered by his inability to do the same.
As human beings, we'd feel sorry for a guy in so much pain that he pushed himself until he was crying. As Mets fans, we don't feel anything for a Met in that position until it's too late.
|
|