The blog for Mets fans
who like to read
ABOUT US
Faith and Fear in Flushing made its debut on Feb. 16, 2005, the brainchild of two longtime friends and lifelong Met fans.
Greg Prince discovered the Mets when he was 6, during the magical summer of 1969. He is a Long Island-based writer, editor and communications consultant. Contact him here.
Jason Fry is a Brooklyn writer whose first memories include his mom leaping up and down cheering for Rusty Staub. Check out his other writing here.
Got something to say? Leave a comment, or email us at faithandfear@gmail.com. (Sorry, but we have no interest in ads, sponsored content or guest posts.)
Need our RSS feed? It's here.
Visit our Facebook page, or drop by the personal pages for Greg and Jason.
Or follow us on Twitter: Here's Greg, and here's Jason.
|
by Greg Prince on 4 August 2014 8:57 am
Sunday marked 10 years since Bob Murphy’s passing. Though those who fill his role today do a fine job of it, Murph remains missed because how do you ever stop missing Bob Murphy? He is the voice of New York Mets baseball. Is, not was. Not long ago I heard a clip of him. I don’t remember if it was from a milestone game or just a random recording, but I warmed up all over. That was what Bob Murphy did for a Mets fan for 42 years. That’s what Bob Murphy does, even when instead of manning the broadcast booth, he’s on assignment in the historical archives and personal memory.
Thank you, Murph. You seemed uncomfortable when people mentioned how much you meant to them. I was about to say you shouldn’t have been, but if that’s what made you you, then I guess you knew what you were doing.
by Greg Prince on 4 August 2014 8:25 am
This business wherein the Mets overcome years of being mostly bad and become mostly good is not a linear endeavor. Homestands of 8-2 are followed up with road trips of 5-5. Two out of three get taken from the Phillies only to have two of three (with one to go) given to the Giants. Exhilarating Saturday nights when your rookie ace outduels a bona fide contender’s hired gun dissolve into Sunday afternoons when the bona fide contender’s tough lefty stymies your improvised lineup while your heretofore solid veteran tosses batting practice.
You’re set to soar one minute, you’re brought down to earth the next. Our most recent minute gave way to gravity, Madison Bumgarner and the unrelenting offensive stylings of Hunter Pence and Buster Posey as ongoing hints of Met progress were eclipsed, 9-0. Bartolo Colon’s 200th win didn’t occur. Nor did a third Met hit. Other than Juan Lagares making the kind of basket catch that sends shivers into the great beyond until they run down the spine of the late Vic Wertz, there was nothing to recommend Sunday’s blowout loss among partisans of the blue and orange.
Except for it not being the norm. Or not being more than approximately half the norm. If we have really entered the era in which the Mets definitively flirt with .500, then we can take comfort in the notion that they’re bound to win as many games as they lose. It lets you overlook how crummy losses like Sundays can be.
Rome, as the renowned emperor Frank Cashen could have told you, refuses to get built in a day. Of late, it is in fashion among Mets fans of a certain vintage to invoke 1983, recalled more than three decades on as a platform for greatness. I’ve invoked it a couple of times myself. The key narrative element from that 31-year-old campaign is, sure, the Mets weren’t yet ready to contend, but oh the steps they took. Strawberry emerging! Hernandez arriving! Darling debuting! And so on!
Grab a seat next to me in Promenade sometime and I’ll take you through the wonders of 1983, particularly the 11-3 spurt that was going on at this very moment in that very year — Mookie scoring from second on a groundout; Terrell homering twice against the Cubs; Orosco winning or saving almost every single day — but then I’ll have to add that after the Mets grew thrilling, they reminded us they weren’t done growing. The Mets of 1983 finished 20-26 in their final 46, and nobody knew for sure that 1984 would present itself as the 1984 that implied 1986 and the stuff of future documentaries was right around the corner.
Momentum simply doesn’t usually unfurl unimpeded. One step up, one step back, give or take a step. Your retroactively beloved 1968 Mets, springboard for a miracle, actually lost 53 of their final 91. Your sizzling second-half Mets of 1995, a 34-18 unit that had us all panting for 1996, gave way to a miserable 71-91 season that left us psychologically unprepared for the 88-74 revival of 1997. You go back and you look at the pieces coalescing in their respective time frames and it all makes sense that the vast improvements happened as they did. You slog through the reality, however, and you find yourself enduring more 9-0 losses than you seem (or care) to remember.
As long as the reality includes its share of peeks at the other side, that’s fine. It means our sights are firmly fixed on getting better, not getting worse…or staying bad.
Without examining 35 seasons worth of archives, I’ll go out on a limb and declare Saturday night’s 4-2 win over the Giants at Citi Field as the best regular-season Saturday night win over the Giants at home since the Steve Henderson Game of blessed memory. For those of you just tuning in, that was June 14, 1980, when the Mets fell behind early, looked totally hopeless and found themselves trailing, 6-2, entering the ninth. They won, 7-6, anyway, when Hendu belted a three-run homer into the Met bullpen. The moment was so pumped full of organically occurring adrenaline that it is believed to have inspired the very first Shea Stadium curtain call.
This past Saturday night took on a different form, but the surge of Met emotion was very similar. Like John Montefusco in 1980, Jake Peavy wasn’t allowing any hits. Montefusco took a no-hitter into the sixth against his Met opponents. Peavy was perfect-gaming us on August 2, 2014, clear into the seventh. The difference was on the Met side of the mound. Whereas Pete Falcone had been lit up, thus necessitating the eventual heroics of Steve Henderson, Jacob deGrom was dousing the Giants as effectively as Peavy was dampening the Mets. No-hit efforts were being fired back and forth as if shot out of a Pepsi Party Patrol t-shirt cannon.
The Giants disrupted the Hippo Vaughn/Fred Toney tribute concert first, when Pablo Sandoval doubled into left-center, Lagares revealing himself as no more than superhuman when he dove from a distance and came up empty (he had made a brilliant running catch earlier, lest you think Juan’s glove takes nights off). The Panda was stranded on second in the top of the seventh and then he might have inadvertently gotten in the way of Peavy in the bottom of the inning when he ran into a railing chasing a foul ball during Curtis Granderson’s leadoff at-bat. The Giant trainer wanted a look at his valuable knee, much to the consternation of Keith Hernandez, who demanded Pablo return to his position ASAP and some Neosporin applied to his scrape later.
Peavy stood through the injury timeout and waited and waited some more. When the game resumed, the Mets applied their bats to his heretofore untouchable pitches and smeared results all over the scoreboard. Granderson walloped one to deep right that was caught, but it was a harbinger of whacks to come. Daniel Murphy doubled past Michael Morse, who was noticed loitering in left field but you wouldn’t really call him a left fielder. The last remaining no-hitter, never mind perfect game, was over. Hippo and Fred could go back to 1917, thank you both very much for your service. David Wright singled Peavy’s next pitch into no man’s land — which is to say more or less near where Morse stood — Murphy going to third. Peavy, by now seething enough to serve as his own adjective, peevishly plunked Lucas Duda to fill the bases.
Travis d’Arnaud lined the second pitch he saw to right, deep enough to score Murph and end the double shutout. In a span of nine deliveries to five batters, from Grandy’s ride to the track to Travis’s RBI, the aura of Jake Peavy’s invincibility completely dissipated and the Mets took a lead. Then, Lagares singled in Wright and Wilmer Flores doubled in Duda and Lagares, and it was 4-0 after being interminably 0-0.
Rub some Neosporin on that, Jake.
Breathing room granted, deGrom coughed up half of his newfound lead on a one-out pinch-single to Travis Ishikawa in the eighth. Instinctive pangs of doubt stirred but were brushed away when Jeurys Familia struck out Pence and grounded out Brandon Crawford. In the ninth, Jenrry Mejia did that thing where he makes it marginally “interesting” but doesn’t actually leave much doubt and saved the 4-2 victory.
It wasn’t Steve Henderson, but it was close enough. It was exciting like Steve Henderson. Heretofore dormant Citi Field came alive like sleepy Shea Stadium woke up 34 years earlier. It wasn’t in a vacuum, either. The 1980 version of slaying the Giants represented the culmination of a homestand in which the Mets kept coming from behind, giving currency to the Magic Is Back meme that ruled our thinking as we hopped, skipped and jumped into our first Doubleday/Wilpon summer. What deGrom was doing was similarly in line with contemporary style: pitching youthfully and marvelously. The whole young thing (not Chris, not Eric) was crackling Saturday night, too.
The runs were generated by d’Arnaud, Lagares and Flores. The outs were recorded by deGrom, Familia and Mejia. None of them has played an entire major league season yet. None of them is older than 26. All of them are excelling together, feeding our dreams, fueling our momentum.
The Mets who beat the Giants Saturday night leapt straight out of the Kim Wilde songbook. They’re the kids in America.
New York to east California
There’s a new wave coming, I warn ya
I also warned myself how capricious kids (including the 41-year-old ones like Colon) can be. On June 15, 1980, the day after Steve Henderson electrified Metsopotamia, there was a run on the Shea box office. The old joint, under renovation, had no more than 44,910 tickets to sell. The Mets sold every one of them. Mets fans bought into the Magic act. And on the Sunday afternoon that followed the greatest regular-season Saturday night in Mets history, the Mets essentially disappeared, bowing, 3-0, before the arm of Bob Knepper and the bat of Darrell Evans. For that matter, they had lost the preceding Friday night, 3-1, to Vida Blue. The Giants won the weekend despite losing the only game anybody in New York would remember.
In other words, sort of like these last three games, when the Mets couldn’t do a thing with Ryan Vogelsong and Madison Bumgarner on either side of doing wonderful things to Jake Peavy. Whatever happens in the Monday afternoon series finale, my sense is we’ll remember the Peavy-deGrom game and forget the defeats that preceded and succeeded it. If we’re lucky, not to mention good, we’ll remember it as a step in an inevitable direction toward where we’ve been dying to go forever.
by Jason Fry on 3 August 2014 2:44 am
Where did Jacob deGrom come from, anyway?
I’d heard of him, of course, but not in a Matt Harvey/Zack Wheeler/Noah Syndergaard way, in which each mention is part of a countdown, the promotion becomes a rallying cry, and if the first big-league start comes at home you figure out if you can go so years later you can tell people you were there. DeGrom wasn’t even Rafael Montero, an intriguing arm not quite considered in that elite company. In February I wrote that deGrom might turn into “a Gee type” (which, to be clear, was considerable praise) and if you’d asked me for a fuller scouting report I would have identified him as a useful piece — spot starter, maybe, or a middle reliever, or a guy to spin off as part of a trade. As far as I can tell, that was the first time Jacob deGrom had ever been mentioned in these pages.
Now he might very well turn out to be Rookie of the Year. To quote Joaquin Andujar‘s favorite word, “you never know.”
We first noticed deGrom for his otherworldly hair, and then mourned his tendency to be snakebit — he didn’t record his first win until his eighth start in late June, despite pitching pretty well up until then. Recently, though, all he’s done is win — his last five starts have all been superb outings ending with Ws by his name. He’s got a solid sinker that generates ground balls, a four-seamer he uses up in the zone to change hitters’ eye levels, and breaking stuff that’s progressing. He throws strikes and is clearly unafraid.
It’s pretty awesome.
Emily and I almost went Saturday night — after I caught up with Greg to talk Mets before the cameras (more on that in a minute), my wife and I went out for Thai food in Woodside and tried to decide between continuing along the 7 to Citi Field and Fireworks Night or heading south to catch the Cyclones for Star Wars Night. We settled on neither — we were tired and allowed ourselves to admit that what we most wanted was our own couch. I turned on SNY just in time to see Juan Lagares fly through the air to take a double away from Brandon Belt — an amazing play even by Lagares’s ridiculous standards, as he seemed like he had actually accelerated while airborne.
DeGrom cruised along after that, but the Mets were being stifled by Bosox castoff Jake Peavy, who hadn’t won a game since April. Both reached the seventh without having given up a hit, and Peavy was working on a perfect game.
Neither would get his wish. DeGrom’s bid for immortality evaporated on a Pablo Sandoval double in the top of the seventh that Lagares gave an ill-advised courtesy dive for. Peavy, meanwhile, had his world cave in when the Mets batted. The trouble started with nobody out: Sandoval smashed into the fence chasing a Curtis Granderson pop-up that landed several rows deep, gashing his leg on a sound mike. The trainers took a minute or two to attend to him, and when Peavy got back on the rubber things didn’t seem the same. He got Granderson on a hard drive to Hunter Pence, then Daniel Murphy roped a ball to left. It should have been caught, but Michael Morse (who nearly killed me a couple of years ago on a different Star Wars Night) took a Family Circus route to the ball and it fell in. Then, in rapid succession, Peavy gave up a David Wright single, hit Lucas Duda with a pitch, watched Travis d’Arnaud hit a hard liner for a sac fly, surrendered a single to Lagares and then watched a double down the line from Wilmer Flores. Somehow it was 4-0 Mets and things had turned decidedly imperfect.
Things got dicey in the eighth as deGrom seemed to tire and dicier in the ninth, as Jenrry Mejia did his best to convert a double play into a horrible error and threw a hanging curve that Morse somehow missed instead of turning into a game-tying homer. Either could have proved fatal; neither did, and the Mets had won.
* * *
Before the game Greg and I met up in Queens to talk about the ’86 Mets in front of the cameras for Heather Quinlan’s forthcoming ’86 Mets: The Movie. Heather’s a terrific documentary filmmaker and a diehard Mets fan, and we had a great time answering her questions and shooting the breeze. You can read more about the project here, here and here, and follow it on Twitter here. And please contribute to the project’s Kickstarter — among other things, your support will go to travel costs for more interviews with ’86 Mets and securing footage. We’re grateful to Heather for letting us share our ’86 memories and perspectives and looking forward to what we know will be a great film.
by Greg Prince on 1 August 2014 10:03 pm
Is the game over yet?
No.
Is the game over yet?
No.
Is the game over yet?
Yes.
The Mets and Giants ceased their Friday night hostilities so quickly it was as if they were worried about staying one step ahead of the Sharknado. As it happened, only the Giants bared their offensive teeth, with two runs early, three runs later and no problem staving off whatever guppy-like attack the Mets could muster. The home team managed three baserunners, two hits and one plate appearance beyond the bare minimum. The only Met run came on a Lucas Duda opposite-field home run, which shouldn’t raise as much as an eyelash, since Lucas Duda homers daily. Once the Mets were behind by five runs, I figured their only chance was The Man Science Forgot belting a six-run homer.
Seriously, ol’ Lucky Duds rounds the bases in the eighth with Duda Dinger Twenty, and it’s as swell as swell can be, but then you unfasten your seat belt because you know nothing else is going to happen against Ryan Vogelsong from there to the end of time (which was all of 2:06). What I would have liked to have seen at that juncture was Lucas’s New York teammates taking a cue from Rudy’s Notre Dame teammates.
“Coach, I want Duda to bat in my place.”
“Don’t be ridiculous, David. You’re a captain. Act like it.”
“I believe I just did.”
That’s probably against the rules, but sending Duda to the plate no more often than every nine batters presents the Mets with a severe competitive disadvantage.
On the flip side, Jon Niese was spectacular, except when he wasn’t, which was when he allowed those five Giant tallies. They’ll all look line drives in the morning paper, according to Keith Hernandez, but the first couple of runs were a result of Niese forgetting whatever he learned in pitchers’ fielding practice, not running a comebacker toward the runner at second, instead flinging the ball sloppily at his shortstop and setting up the second-inning scores that would all but bury him. Then Niese settled into Niese Classic mode, that state where you can’t believe anyone ever touches him. Then he gave up a couple of triples and three more runs in the seventh.
That’s how you lose, 5-1, in two hours and six minutes. Duda goes right by going left, Niese goes terribly wrong in the midst of going mostly right and Vogelsong goes so long that the whole endeavor turns out very short. Just like that [insert snapping-finger sound], Friday’s gone with the wind. Come Saturday morning, there’ll be plenty of time to set up those fireworks Christina and Alexa love so dearly.
by Greg Prince on 31 July 2014 10:42 am
The 2014 World Champion New York Mets’ highlight DVD — whose title, Soak It Up, of course refers to the several million 7 Line hit towels we twirled as our boys rode triumphantly up the Canyon of Heroes — features one of the biggest blows of the year, Daniel Murphy’s fifth-inning, opposite-field, three-run homer, the one that put the Mets up, 4-1, in that pivotal Wednesday afternoon game against the Phillies in late July.
Interspersed with interviews of Murph, baserunners Ruben Tejada and Curtis Granderson and hitting coach Lamar Johnson are reactions of “typical fans” like myself. You’ll see the part where I talk about being busy doing other things in the middle of the day but pausing in front of the television long enough to watch Daniel’s at-bat versus Kyle Kendrick, and when he drove the second pitch he saw over the left field wall, you hear me say, “For the first time I could remember all season, I jumped up in my living room and raised a fist in the air.”
They used that part of my interview, but they cut the part where I added, “The only thing missing was a curtain call.” It’s a shame that they didn’t bother including my historical riff on how the 11-2 win took its place among memorable Mets midweek home afternoon wins over the Phillies, including the sweltering slugfest from 1985 when Doc faced Koosman; or the day Delgado got the big hit and the Mets prevailed in the then-rivals’ July 2008 showdown series; or — and I really think they should have kept this — that this game provided an echo of the game from the previous August, when Daniel collected four hits, which turned out to be Ralph Kiner’s penultimate game as a Met broadcaster. They also omitted my observation that this romp over Philadelphia occurred on the 45th anniversary of the doubleheader loss to the Astros, the one in which Gil Hodges strode purposefully to left field and removed Cleon Jones for not hustling after a ball.
“The Mets were swept that day at Shea in 1969,” I explained, while trying not to sound pedantic about it, “but it was a very real turning point toward turning a young team into world champions, and now, at Citi Field, we were looking out to left field and seeing something that pointed the Mets toward October…different but similar in terms of momentum.”
Can you believe they didn’t use that bit? These people have no sense of history.
Instead, they flashed Lucas Duda’s bomb to the Pepsi Porch from the eighth before making a perfunctory Sharknado reference and then moving on to how the Mets approached the trade deadline the next day and how it paid immediate dividends the ensuing weekend when the Mets exacted revenge on the Giants for a series sweep suffered in early June in San Francisco. What really disappointed me about the production, however, was they didn’t use the other aspect I wanted to talk about from the July 30 win. You’d think they could’ve at least included it as a DVD extra or something.
Here’s a partial transcript of what I told them:
“Yeah, so Murphy’s home run was huge, no doubt. And I really did jump in the air and raise a fist. I mean, I hadn’t been this excited about a given swing in quite a while. It was just one of those instinctive Mets fan reactions when something happens and your body doesn’t even know what it’s doing and your head doesn’t stop to think about it.
“But still, it was only 4-1 at that point, and Wheeler had really labored. Yet Zack’s still in there for the seventh, which on one hand you like to see, but given how many pitches he’d thrown in the early innings, I had to wonder why Terry hadn’t made a move. Sure enough, frigging Jimmy Rollins — can I say frigging? — leads off with a homer, and now it’s 4-2, and eventually Collins pulls Wheeler and brings in Dana Eveland, who’d been hit on the elbow a couple of nights earlier, and he doesn’t have it, and suddenly the Phillies have runners on first and third and Marlon Byrd of all people is coming up. I can envision the whole thing unraveling right then and there.
“In another season, Byrd hits one off of Eveland or Jon Rauch or I don’t know who, but this wasn’t another season. This was 2014, when the Mets were changing for the better — hey, maybe you guys can use that as a title: Changing For The Better. Or you can stick with the towel thing. It would be great if you could get the rights to use “Car Wash” instead of using a generic music bed. I don’t know what your budget is, but since they started playing Rose Royce at the ballpark, it would be a nice touch.
“Anyway, Eveland goes out and Jeurys Familia comes in. I was bracing for the worst, because that’s just what you do as a Mets fan with the bullpen in play and the Phillies in town and an ex-Met at the plate.
“But y’know what? I should’ve braced for not the worst. Well, no, I should always brace for the worst, because it’s when you let your guard down that the worst happens with this team. At least it was prior to 2014. I guess after winning the World Series maybe I can ease up on the precautionary thinking…no, maybe not, because that’s what helped get us here. That and what the front office did at the July 31 trade deadline. But you said you wanted to get to that later.
“Where was I? Oh yes, Byrd was up and Familia was in. Familia was so good all year, y’know? When was the last time we had an eighth-inning guy like him? Aaron Heilman? And we remember what happened with Aaron Heilman. You’re probably not going to use that, are you? Only contemporary upbeat stuff, huh? Well I was usually very upbeat about Familia and he didn’t let me down. Byrd swings at the first pitch — Marlon’s better than that, but the Phillies must’ve really wanted to get the game and the season over with — and he taps it to Wright, who throws to Duda and the Mets are out of the inning, still up, 4-2. And then comes the five in the bottom of the seventh where even Familia is driving in a run, and it’s 9-2, and at the end of the day it all looked so easy, even preordained.
“Thing is, it wasn’t. Without Familia getting Byrd out, without the kind of lockdown bullpen the Mets had after all those years when you worried about who’d leave the gate open — there, that should make your sponsors happy — we had guys who wouldn’t let leads get away at crucial junctures. I know Murphy was the hero that day, that all you asked me to do was remember where I was when Daniel hit that homer, but I had to mention Familia. That was the real fulcrum of that game, maybe the whole season. Familia’s contribution was so enormous that I was still thinking about it the next morning.
“I know the Phillies sucked…I mean…let me try that again…I know the Phillies weren’t very good, but to be a first-place team, you have to beat the last-place team, and the Mets had to beat the Phillies that day. Lose to them and it’s ‘same old Mets,’ but they weren’t the same old Mets. The whole team — Murphy, Duda, Familia — they all contributed, just like 1969.
“Maybe not exactly like 1969…what’s that? We’re out of time? Oh, OK. You sure? Because I have a couple of parallels to draw between the Mets trading for Clendenon at that year’s deadline and that deal the Mets made on July 31 this year…or should I say the deal the Mets didn’t make?”
by Jason Fry on 29 July 2014 11:20 pm
The funny thing is I figured we were going to win this one.
The Mets have a way of hanging in there against Cole Hamels, then biting out his throat and letting us all unearth his ill-advised chokers comment to chortle over. So even though it was 2-0 and we were running out of outs, I was serenely waiting for sweet, sweet revenge.
And then Dillon Gee got in trouble and the normally reliable Josh Edgin came in and Chase Utley tried to get hit by a pitch and failed and then Edgin got a borderline call for a 2-2 count and Utley fouled one off and Utley fouled another one and then Utley hit one that I believe broke a guy’s rear window.
A guy who was parked in Islip.
Grand slam, 6-0 Phillies, and drive home safe everybody.
(Here’s a pause to cringe at the memory of the brilliant orange Los Mets jerseys. The Mets looked like traffic cones out there, and hit like them too. Still think black and pink would be a bad idea?)
But back to Utley. Forgive me, but I don’t loathe him. He’s not a shit-talker like some of his teammates, or given to domestic violence, or just generally loathsome. He just beats us, as he’s supposed to.
I don’t even hate the Phillies all that much — they’re too pathetic these days, the baseball equivalent of a broken-down car with people living in it. (Led by a shirtless Ruben Amaro Jr. waving a rusty machete and screaming for everyone to get away from his treasures.) Rather than hate Utley, I fear him — he’s expressionless and dead-eyed and always waiting for us at Citi Field, with his swing perfectly engineered for the right-field seats. I wish the Phillies would trade him somewhere he can’t hurt us — Japan might work as a start.
Anyway, you’re gonna win a third of your games and lose a third of your games and it’s what you do in the other third that matters, a baseball sage once said. Despite my seventh-inning delusions, toss this one in the pile of 54 that weren’t going to go our way. Oh well — at least the Mets will be right back at it tomorrow around noontime, and if they win that’s a series victory and a game closer to .500.
Which is increasingly what I want most out of this strange year — a milestone I’d be willing to call success. An 81-81 season, with tons of starting pitching teed up for 2015, some promising young hitters who could make the roster come July or August, and the possibility of a trade to improve the lineup before then. Is that a pathetic thing to shoot for? Maybe it is. But after these dreadful years of financial ruin and grim waiting, it would feel like a genuine step forward. We’d have a reason for honest-to-goodness hope. And we all need it.
by Jason Fry on 29 July 2014 7:49 am
A sportswriter once asked Yankees owner Colonel Ruppert to describe his perfect afternoon. Replied Ruppert: “It’s when the Yankees score eight in the first and then slowly pull away.”
Wrong team, different margin, but yeah — a flurry of first-inning Mets hits was all Bartolo Colon would need, and all we’d need with our team finally back home after weeks of wandering the post-All-Star Game world. Epic drama is the lifeblood of a baseball fan, but a nightly dose of it is a hard way to live: the occasional laugher makes for a very nice respite.
The only flaw exhibited, as far as I saw, was that the Mets were wearing their horrible Padres-style camo ensembles. I’m all for Military Monday and supporting the troops, but the sand-colored togs might actually be the worst outfit this team has ever worn — they’re an incoherent mess that assaults the eye more viciously than the return of the tail, the brief-lived white ice-cream hats and most everything you can think of except the Mercury Mets, and that was only for a night. Want to make Military Monday special? How about a flyover, extra introductions of men and women in uniform, and scoreboard features about Mets who served? (In fairness, I haven’t been — perhaps some or all of these things happen already.) Freedom from terrible uniforms would be a small tribute as well.
Speaking of uniforms, an interesting bit of Mets lore popped up yesterday. The Mets’ baseball logo was created in 1961 by cartoonist Ray Gotto; back around the time of QBC ’14, uniform designer Todd Radom revealed the surprising discovery that Gotto first created the logo in pink and black, with publicist Lou Niss requesting that the colors be changed to orange and blue. That was both fascinating and baffling: black was a couple of generations away from its later vogue, and pink seemed as unlikely then as it does now. But Radom kept digging and discovered yesterday that there was a perfectly logical reason for Gotto’s choice: pink and black were the colors of Greentree Stable, owned by Joan Payson and her brother John Hay Whitney.
The Mets had a glorious period in black, and pink has crept into the palette for Mother’s Day and games dedicated to fighting breast cancer. But pink and black? Maybe it’s just the aftereffects of a night gazing at Colon swathed in yards of camo, but why not try it for a night or few? I’ve always wished the Mets would try throwback uniforms designed to showcase the alternate names for the franchise — the Skyliners, Meadowlarks, Continentals et al. (I’ve long thought Skyliners would have been a badass name for a franchise, but that’s another post.)
“Meadowlarks,” in fact, was Payson’s preferred name for her club. Why not Joan Payson Night, with the Meadowlarks taking the field in their pink and black home alternate uniforms?
by Greg Prince on 28 July 2014 3:18 am
“The Mets — ah, the Mets! Superlatives do not quite fit them, but now, just as in 1969, the name alone is enough to bring back that rare inner smile that so many of us wore as the summer ended. The memory of what these Mets were in mid-season and the knowledge of what they became suggest that they are in the peculiar position of being simultaneously overrated and patronized in our recollection.”
—Roger Angell, 1973
Almost nobody scores runs off Jacob deGrom. Almost nobody hits home runs but Lucas Duda, but Lucas Duda hits a home run almost every day. Put those facts of Met life together, and you have a decent shot at being up by at least 1-0 in a given game started by deGrom and co-starring Duda.
Sunday, the Mets were up by twice that much. Through six innings, luxuriously locked deGrom had the Brewers thoroughly washed, set and braided, leaving them trailing the Mets by two runs, both of which scored on Duda’s 18th round-tripper of the season, his fourth since the All-Star break and the Mets’ fifth in that span. Except for Curtis Granderson reminding us he’s alive and belting one out on Saturday, it’s been all Duda all the time in the Metropolitan power department dating clear back to July 12, when Chris Young delivered his dramatic pinch-homer against the Marlins. That was more than two weeks ago.
Chris Young hasn’t hit a homer in more than two weeks and it’s still the second-most recent Mets not named Lucas Duda have managed.
Jacob and Lucas did their jobs. No other Met with a bat was doing much of anything. Once the Brewers scratched out a couple of base hits to start their seventh, another Met faction would be counted on to perform capably.
With two on and one out, deGrom heads for the hair dryer and the rest of us are left to hope the Met pen doesn’t curl up and die. It’s instinctive behavior for us to think that way. How will whoever’s coming in on the heels of another beautiful start ugly it up?
Trick question. Vic Black entered and kept the game looking sharp in its natural tones; two popups rinsed the Brewer threat out of our hair the seventh. In the bottom of the eighth, after the Mets put two on for no apparent reason in the top of the inning, Jeurys Familia was called on to maintain the Mets’ 2-0 edge. Maintain, he did, in order, no less.
“Even with the best of the short men, the brevity of their patchwork, Band-Aid labors; their habitual confinement in faraway (and often invisible) compounds during the long early stretches and eventful midpassages of the game; their languorous, cap-over-eyes postures of ennui or lassitude — are they asleep out there? — for the first two or three hours of the event; their off-putting predilection for disorder and incipient disaster; the rude intrusiveness of their extroverted pitching mannerisms into the staid game-party; their reckless way of seizing glory, or else horridly throwing away a game nearly in hand, all in the space of a few pitches — all these confirm some permanent lesser status for them: scrubs, invisible weavers, paramedics, handymen. The slur persists, I think, in spite of clear evidence that relief men — the best of them, at least — are among the most highly rewarded and most sought-after stars of contemporary baseball.”
—Roger Angell, 1985
The bottom of the ninth brought Jenrry Mejia to the mound. That’s how it works these days: Black to Familia to Mejia, with maybe Edgin mixed in if a particularly nasty lefty is lurking. They don’t individually avoid every hazard — Vic can walk guys and Josh has been known to roll around on the ground at the worst junctures imaginable — but they’ve certainly grown consistent of late, haven’t they? Consistently dependable, I mean, in case your instincts are still set on Farnsworth or Valverde or, for that matter, Manny Acosta Time.
Do you remember the last ninth-inning lead a Met reliever irretrievably mishandled? If you don’t, it’s a sign that the times, they really have a’changed. Best as I can tell, it was on June 7 at San Francisco when Mejia allowed a 4-3 lead to dissipate into a 5-4 loss. That was more than seven weeks ago. It was so long ago that I had to comb through the Met pitching logs on Baseball Reference to find one of those “BL” notations that signify a pitcher was served a double-scoop of futility: a blown save and a loss.
So in comes Mejia, whose previous six outings each merited an “S” in the box score. On SNY, it was mentioned that the last Met closer to streak that efficiently was Billy Wagner in July of 2008 (no great shakes before that sudden spurt of spectacularity, Billy would pitch three more times and then be shut down for the season, setting up that year’s bullpen for exploits likely still inducing nightmares in particularly skittish Metsopotamian precincts). Mejia was seeking his seventh save in seven consecutive outings. The last Met closer to do that? I don’t know. I assume either Jesse Orosco or Jesus Christ.
Mejia’s not necessarily a bump-free ride. An opposing batter or two reached base in five of those six saves. But none reached home. That’s key. Also helpful is not teetering on the brink of debacle. You get to do that now and then if you’re a closer, since “closer” is a subset of “human”. But you do that too often, it’s not just bad for our nerves, it’s tough on the closer’s shoulder, elbow, what have you. Goodness knows Jenrry Mejia has lost enough time to injury. He shouldn’t hurt himself and he shouldn’t hurt us.
The Brewers can be a mountain of an assignment in a ninth inning, and they presented Jenrry with multiple hills to climb. Mt. Lucroy, for example, can elevate the ball. But he grounded to short for the first out. Mt. Davis — the strangely spelled Milwaukee version that got on in the seventh, not the Oakland iteration that blocks out the Alameda County scenery — also grounded to short, but inconveniently unauthoratively. Ruben Tejada, back in the lineup Sunday after the republic nearly dissolved in his absence, made a desperate grab and throw, but Khris Davis was safe by a step. Mt. Reynolds, who might as well be a mountain, struck out, but then Mt. Segura nuisanced Mejia with a single to center.
Well, isn’t this a predicament? Two out, but two on. Lyle Overbay is the last slope Mejia must scale. He’s oh-for-two lifetime against Jenrry, which doesn’t mean much, unless you’ve watched one too many Met closers over the years, in which case you believe Overbay is overdue. After Mejia falls behind two-and-oh-no, you don’t just believe it, you’re bracing for it.
Then, one more pitch, the eighteenth of the half-inning. It becomes a grounder to second so harmless that Daniel Murphy doesn’t rush the throw to first. Call the batter Lyle Oh-for-Three. Call the pitcher 7-for-7. Call a Mets fan relieved by the relief pitching he’s been seeing over an extended period.
I love the sight of Jenrry Mejia stomping off the mound in triumph. I love the smell of reliable relief pitching in the late afternoon. It smells like…victory. We’re not used to that aroma. Met bullpens usually stink. But the one we have now is kinda sweet. I’m kinda sweet on it. On its arms. On its heart. On its insistence on not imploding.
“My gratitude always goes back to baseball itself, which turned out to be so familiar and so startling, so spacious and exacting, so easy-looking and so heartbreakingly difficult, that it filled up my notebooks and seasons in a rush. A pastime, indeed.”
—Roger Angell, 2014
by Greg Prince on 27 July 2014 4:14 am
There were probably more than a few nights during Joe Torre’s reign as manager of our New York Mets when I clicked the dial to Channel 9, sat down clearly intent on paying attention, but then got preoccupied reading or something. Now and then I would look up and notice the Mets were losing. Come the ninth, I’d put down my book, magazine or newspaper, see a runner reach base, get my hopes up and have them dashed immediately.
That happened here in the heart of the apparently never-ending Terry Collins era Saturday night. The TV was controlled remotely, the channel was 11 and the distractions were primarily digital and feline, but the same basic formula held. I didn’t find the game gripping and the Mets came up short.
Some things change only a little.
The Mets’ lack of zazz at Miller Park, where the most interesting sidebar was provided by whatshisname the lefty being annoyed that he couldn’t get out of a jam in the fifth and wasn’t allowed to pitch anymore in the sixth, won’t be protested too harshly here, as it provides me an alibi to write about Joe Torre’s imminent Hall of Fame induction, a prospective event that would have overwhelmed with joy circa 1978 because I would have assumed he was going in for the many titles he’d be winning with the Mets in the decades ahead.
In truth, I don’t remember thinking Torre was going to manage his way into the Hall of Fame on those nights when his Mets teams weren’t particularly gripping. But I guess I learned my lesson. For the record, I don’t think Terry Collins will be joining Joe Torre in Cooperstown, though he is sort of following in his footsteps. Nobody managed the Mets for more games without guiding the team to a winning record in any given season than Joe. Take Torre out of the equation, and nobody’s managed the Mets for more games without guiding the team to a winning record in any given season than Terry.
While we’ve been sitting here waiting for that package containing the future to be dropped off by UPS, the current skipper has been racking up sustainability numbers all out of proportion to his winning percentage. Saturday’s 5-2 defeat in Milwaukee was Collins’s 590th game as Mets manager. Since the All-Star break, he has passed Casey Stengel (582) and Yogi Berra (588) to place fifth in the Metropolitan managerial longevity department. Each of them is in the Hall of Fame, too, so maybe Terry’s more of an immortal than I imagine.
Blips of promise aside, it seems he’ll never take the Mets above .500 and it seems he’ll never be dismissed based on his record, so maybe there is no putting him out of our misery. But never mind Collins, his pitcher batting eighth and his weird seasonlong fondness for Abreu and C. Young over giving every last shot to Nieuwenhuis and Brown. This is about Torre, remember?
I never grew as crabby watching Torre not win with the Mets as I do watching Terry do the same. I probably wasn’t as intermittently sour in my teens as I’ve become in middle age, or maybe I just hadn’t seen enough blah baseball yet. Also Torre seemed to hint at better days, not signify settling for waiting. Joe, who managed 709 Mets games, played in 254 Mets games and — in action far more gangsta than anything Jerry Manuel ever attempted — player-managed twice, represented progress, or at least the illusion of it.
Maybe that’s why I didn’t connect my frustrations with the often unwatchable Mets of 1977-1981 to their fearless leader. I had seen Brooklynite Torre play, both as a superstar MVP opponent and a revered veteran coming home at last. Joe was immensely experienced, undeniably local and gave good quote. Hell, he was my first baseball card. When he transitioned from the clubhouse to the manager’s office, it qualified as exciting. All Met managers prior to Torre were guys who played in the majors a million years earlier, a.k.a. before I had ever heard of baseball. Torre was a mere 36 years old when handed the keys to the roster on May 31, 1977. Joe Torre’s the manager? Why, he was hitting .300 just last year! Maybe the Mets aren’t so stodgy after all!
That conclusion was valid for approximately two weeks when management punctuated its harrumph! toward modern times by sending away the high-priced players who dared to grumble that the franchise was being run into the ground by its retrograde chairman of the board. The Mets weren’t going anywhere post-Seaver and post-Kingman in 1977, but they did have Torre, and by dint of being neither his predecessor Joe Frazier nor our albatross M. Donald Grant, he was dynamic.
Then, the next year, the Mets showed up at Shea wearing snappier uniforms, pullovers with a couple of buttons at the top and a touch of blue and orange trimming adorning cuffs and collar. With the decade 80% over, the Mets had decided to join the 1970s. Joe was still a young man as managers went and his players were those kids you were urged to bring your kids to see and they were gaining maturity right before our eyes! Right before our eyes when we bothered to look up from our book, magazine or newspaper, that is.
Was Joe Torre a good manager with bad players when he helmed the Mets? Or did he have a load of learning ahead of him to qualify for the pedestal he will be put on this afternoon upstate? I don’t know that I was sophisticated enough in the late ’70s and early ’80s to delineate, but I never minded his extended tenure and I gave him every benefit of the fifth- and sixth-place doubt. The Mets were already tumbling relentlessly into the abyss when he took over for Frazier, so I never blamed him for not rescuing them. The evanescent spurts of Magic-Is-Back type improvement, as viewed through Joe-colored glasses, obscured the shortcomings of a team that was perennially warding off 100 losses. If he didn’t seem preternaturally wise like Gil Hodges or supremely serene like Yogi Berra, he also didn’t seem out of his element like Joe Frazier.
You know how Collins’s biggest strength is that “he’s never lost the clubhouse”? Well, Lee Mazzilli seemed to like Joe Torre. Steve Henderson seemed to like Joe Torre. I liked Lee Mazzilli and Steve Henderson. That was as much Pythagorean theorem as I ever cared to apply to baseball, including the year I studied advanced algebra.
Torre was a fixture at Shea from the minute he was traded to the Mets from St. Louis in the fall of 1974, but after five years as manager, his time was up. The pace of displacement was accelerated by the installation of a new general manager. Joe may have come with the place, but Frank Cashen was entitled to make renovations. When 1981 ended no more successfully than 1980 or 1979 or 1978 or 1977, it was goodbye Torre, hello somebody else. Managers, you may have heard, are hired to be fired…except for Terry Collins, who will be telling your grandchildren’s grandchildren that the Mets are in most games; that they’re just not getting the big hit; and that he’s going to sit Flores yet again because, “It’s important that we get Ruben going.”
If you weren’t around when Torre was a Met through and through, you probably picture him in the other kind of pinstripes, the ones that never featured those neat blue and orange accents. Or maybe you just know him as the common sense-averse MLB executive in charge of keeping the Mets from wearing FDNY, NYPD and PAPD caps every September 11. He’s been exalted since October of 1996, by which time you could be pretty sure he felt secure enough to leave “NEW YORK METS, 1975-1981: Player, player-manager & manager” off his résumé.
He wasn’t exalted when we had him, but he was going to lead Mazz and Hendu and the rest of the kids to fourth place if everything broke right, and if they can get to fourth and stay close to third by the All-Star break…
When Joe Torre’s Mets had visions of first-division sugarplums dancing in my head, you can bet I put down whatever I was reading and paid rapt attention.
Torre will put down his cup of Bigelow Tea long enough to stroll arm in arm in performance-enhanced arm into the Hall with two other exalted managers: Bobby Cox and Tony La Russa. In one particular parochial context, we can lump them as a unit and consider them the Treacherous Three. Cox’s Braves beat our boys in the 1999 NLCS; Torre’s Yankees ruined the Subway World Series of 2000; and La Russa was the one who started Jeff Suppan in Game Seven in 2006 and closed with Adam Wainwright. Not incidentally, also ensconced in Cooperstown as managers are the late Dick Williams, from the 1973 A’s, and Tommy Lasorda of the 1988 Dodgers.
In other words, every manager who has succeeded against the Mets in October has been honored for depriving us of an extra ring or five. You could view that as something of a slap at our sanity, but I prefer to take it as a cosmic compliment, as if various Veterans Committees decided the hardest thing a manager can do in baseball is keep the Mets from a championship. Once you step right up and beat the Mets, however, you’ve really earned your plaque.
Conversely, not in the Hall of Fame as of this writing are the two extraordinarily talented managers who led the Mets to world championships. Label me as parochial as you like and let Walter White stir the Stevia into my Bigelow, but would you really not take Gil Hodges or Davey Johnson over any of these guys any day of the week?
by Greg Prince on 26 July 2014 1:46 pm
It’s not so much that if you watch enough baseball, you see something new every day. It’s that if you watch enough baseball, you see something you’ve seen some other day, thus allowing you to perhaps sense what’s coming directly at you.
On the surface, the Mets’ come-from-moribund victory over the Brewers Friday night came out of nowhere. They were Dead Team Napping for eight innings, shamefully wasting another rock-ribbed effort from Zack Wheeler. Zack (6.2 IP, 3 H, 2 BB, 1 ER, 9 K) was undermined by a complete lack of offense, an absence of second base defense and, ultimately, a few too many pitches thrown. Also, it was his misfortune to be paired off against Yovani Gallardo, who was just a little better and a little better supported.
The result appeared fait accompli until the Mets didn’t make the final out of the top of the eighth as initially assessed. Eric Campbell grounded a ball up the middle that ticked off Gallardo’s glove and bounced to Rickie Weeks, enabling the hustling pinch-hitter to take first, but only after a replay challenge. Campbell had originally been ruled out by Mark Ripperger, which tentatively completed Gallardo’s eighth shutout inning and allowed him to walk off the mound with a commanding 2-0 lead.
When the out was overturned by the eagle-eyes of Chelsea Market, Gallardo’s night was undone. Or it was done but not as planned. Ron Roenicke took him out then and there, and while there was no immediate penalty to be paid (Will Smith struck out the slumping Curtis Granderson), I had an inkling the flow of the game had been irrevocably disrupted. Everything had gone the Brewers’ way thus far, but it could have gone further for them. Daniel Murphy had played an atrocious game in the field, yet only one unearned run scored from his well-meaning mishaps. Gallardo was masterful, yet he lost an out and now he was out of the picture.
Neither was more than a couple of pebbles in the shoe of things, but let enough pebbles accumulate and suddenly you’re stopped in your tracks. Think about all the games you’ve seen and how the disruptive influence arrived not without warning but rather the slightest sense of foreboding.
For example, rewind to October 11, 1986, Game Three, National League Championship Series. Bob Knepper is pitching for the Astros. Darryl Strawberry is batting fifth for the Mets. It’s a great matchup for Houston. During the season, nobody was worse against Knepper than Strawberry: 0-for-10, five strikeouts. No walks, no sac flies, no nothing. In the second inning of Game Three, another strikeout. But in the fourth inning, with Knepper having kept the Mets mute and the Astros loudly posting four on the board off of Ron Darling, Straw did something. Not much, but something: an infield single of the dinkiest variety.
Darryl, I thought 28 years ago, is not consigned to helplessness against Knepper anymore. He’s recorded a hit. He can do that again.
Two innings later, when Darryl came up with two on and the Mets down by three, lefty Strawberry vs. lefty Knepper loomed (at least in my mind) as a fair fight. And sure enough, Darryl got to him with a towering three-run homer to tie the game and (though a few more gripping innings would have to transpire) set the stage for Lenny Dykstra’s walkoff blast off Dave Smith, the one that reversed the trajectory of the series and, in essence, made the last world championship in New York Mets history possible.
Eric Campbell being ruled safe and Ron Roenicke removing Yovani Gallardo wasn’t Straw going deep at a critical juncture in the playoffs, but it was surely something. It was enough to make me think, as I did with that squib Darryl converted into a base hit nearly three decades earlier, that I shouldn’t assume nothing was going to happen next.
We get to the top of the ninth. It’s still 2-0. Murphy is due to lead off, using his bat and not his glove, a small victory unto itself. He’ll be facing Frankie Rodriguez, a notoriously unsettling presence in his Met days, though quite successful in his current go-round as a Brewer. The fact that he was being talked up as the all-time closer he’d been performing as lately reminded me of a Met encounter from a year ago with a reliever who was Rodriguez’s temperamental opposite.
Nobody could touch Mariano Rivera, right? Especially on his farewell tour, which alighted at Citi Field on May 28, 2013. The Mets gave him gifts to toss into the back of his closet, invited him to throw the ceremonial first pitch to John Franco and, presumably, would bestow upon him the honor of collecting one more save for his scrapbook.
Except the Mets had knocked out Rivera a few times over his storied career and here, in the ninth, trailing 1-0, they opted to not be impressed by his unmatched credentials. Three batters came up, the Mets scored two runs and the great Rivera left the Metropolitan midst forevermore carrying a loss.
The batters due up against Rivera in that ninth from fourteen months earlier? Daniel Murphy, David Wright and Lucas Duda.
The batters due up Friday night in the ninth against Rodriguez? Daniel Murphy, David Wright and Lucas Duda.
These guys did it once before, was my new thought. Maybe they can do it again. To be fair, I wouldn’t have been shocked had they not, but I wasn’t going to be stunned if they did.
Murphy jumps on the first pitch and doubles. We are either very much in business or about to be incredibly frustrated. Leadoff baserunners tell you some things but not everything. Still, Daniel acquitted himself beautifully from his fielding follies and it sure as hell beat not getting on base.
Wright found himself in an oh-and-two hole. The old Frankie could have reared back and struck him out. But Rodriguez hasn’t been the old Frankie since he was a young Angel. Recent spurt of excellence notwithstanding, he’s more often just an old Frankie. Having watched him overworked as an Anaheimian (when they were my favorite American League team) and struggle as a Met, I believed in my gut that if you can keep Frankie in an at-bat, the odds of wearing him down turn in your favor. Even when he was reasonably dependable, his path to prevailing was almost inevitably fraught with drama.
Maybe that’s the case with every closer, but it really always felt that way with Frankie. Thus, when David fouled off the oh-and-two delivery and then took ball two, I fastened my seat belt for a helluva ride. David did not disappoint, driving Murph in from second and me to the conclusion that not only were the Mets not doomed, but that they might be on the verge of the opposite of doom.
Duda? Has he ever had a big hit in a ninth inning? Why, yes: against Rivera. He drove in the winning run that Subway Series night. Of perhaps more relevance, Duda hit a massive home run the night before in Milwaukee. It was barely window dressing in a 9-1 loss, but he seemed so loose about it, which wouldn’t necessarily be a factor in my thinking about anybody, except Lucas always strikes me as…I don’t want to say not quite human, but there’s something about Duda’s demeanor that suggests he was developed in a laboratory, then forgotten about by science.
When it was mentioned during the San Diego series that Lucas hailed from Southern California, I was genuinely surprised. I don’t think of Lucas Duda as being from anywhere. I just assume he materialized one day on the Mets’ organizational chart and they kept routinely promoting him, sort of like Milton in Office Space.
Nevertheless, Duda is listed on the roster as real and he hit a real, long shot on Thursday night that wasn’t a big deal on the surface, but I noticed that when he returned to the dugout — and his sensors told him to cooperate with the forthcoming human horseplay — they started in with the towels. My first instinct was to scoff that trailing by eight runs, the Mets should put the kibosh on their silly celebrations. My second instinct, however, countermanded that call. I decided it was a positive sign that the bench was engaged in a game that was about to be lost. If they haven’t truly given up when down, 9-1, maybe they won’t give up as a matter of course in whatever remains of this season.
Not giving up can pay off. Rattling a capricious closer can pay off. Keeping slight but daunting deficits from widening can pay off. Insisting on a replay review can pay off. It’s the little things that become big things, and the biggest thing was Duda swinging at Rodriguez’s first pitch and beaming it toward his home planet, or at least Wauwatosa. The 2-0 defeat to which the Mets were sentenced was commuted in the space of eight pitches: one to Murphy, six to Wright, one to Duda.
One less than the same trio needed to torpedo Rivera.
Rodriguez stayed on the mound, looking less than confident and being somewhat shy of effective, but got out of the top of the ninth with no further scoring. Hence, Jenrry Mejia would be called on to preserve a 3-2 Mets’ lead.
And what does he do? He walks the leadoff hitter, Jonathan Lucroy. It’s a six-pitch battle that puts Mejia in a hole. Jenrry’s been so good for so long (in the annals of Met closing, a couple of superlative months equals an eternity), yet this is a recipe for disaster. Milwaukee’s a first-place club. They can turn this thing around as quickly as it turned around on them. Who the hell wants to play the victim on Brewers Classics?
Maybe that wasn’t going to happen. Maybe Mejia was going to dip into his multifaceted arsenal and confound the next three Brewer batters. But, boy, give an assist to Ron Roenicke for some very helpful managing. I’m not sure Jenrry Mejia has a shiny new save without him.
Logan Schaefer was sent up to bunt. I didn’t love it because it seemed like something I’d seen Terry Collins instruct far too often, but OK, play for the tie at home and all that. Maybe it’s worth a shot.
Except at one-and-one, Mejia throws Schaefer ball two, a plainly unbuntable pitch. Yet Schaefer offers and misses. It was a misguided attempt. More misguided was Roenicke’s insistence on telling him to do it again. Another desperate bunt brought Schaefer contact with only air.
The game was basically over right there. Sure, Carlos Gomez could have killed us (he’d homered in the seventh) and Rickie Weeks was as capable as anyone of burying us, but Roenicke short-sheeted his club’s bed before they could make it and lie in it. Or make Mejia lie in it. Either way, Mejia struck ’em both out and the Mets, once sure losers, were certified winners.
The clichés don’t matter. Except for the one about never saying die.
|
|