The blog for Mets fans
who like to read
ABOUT US
Faith and Fear in Flushing made its debut on Feb. 16, 2005, the brainchild of two longtime friends and lifelong Met fans.
Greg Prince discovered the Mets when he was 6, during the magical summer of 1969. He is a Long Island-based writer, editor and communications consultant. Contact him here.
Jason Fry is a Brooklyn writer whose first memories include his mom leaping up and down cheering for Rusty Staub. Check out his other writing here.
Got something to say? Leave a comment, or email us at faithandfear@gmail.com. (Sorry, but we have no interest in ads, sponsored content or guest posts.)
Need our RSS feed? It's here.
Visit our Facebook page, or drop by the personal pages for Greg and Jason.
Or follow us on Twitter: Here's Greg, and here's Jason.
|
by Greg Prince on 20 April 2013 5:21 am
Harvey’s better. And we’re not so bad ourselves.
The pitcher you may have caught on TV, and if you can’t be John Buck, that’s not a bad way to catch him. Certainly you have the benefit of helpful camera angles, possibly pause and rewind buttons and all the concentration you care to muster. You could see for yourself Friday night as you’ve probably seen three times prior this season what a job Matt Harvey is doing of baffling hitters and promulgating victory.
But the phenomenon is something you really should have been a part of at Citi Field. It was something else. It was Harveysteria. It began in earnest Friday night and I don’t see any good reason for it to end.
Matt Harvey was promoted to the Mets late last July and made an immediate impression fully within reason. You know: rookie callup, got ya excited, backslid here and there, encapsulated those lessons about not being altogether over the moon too soon for his or your own good.
We can stop with that now.
I’m here to tell you to take the training wheels off your hopes and dreams. I’m here to tell you that in Matt Harvey’s first full season in the major leagues, you can project whatever you like onto this kid. I’m here to tell you to not take it easy. I’m here to tell you to go in hard.
Matt Harvey is why you become a baseball fan. Matt Harvey is why you ask somebody to take you to a baseball game when you’re a kid and why you keep going to baseball games when you’re a much older kid.
You know what Matt Harvey did from the mound. You know what Matt Harvey did to the Nationals. You know how Matt Harvey overshadowed Stephen Strasburg. But you couldn’t quite know, unless you were there, what Matt Harvey ignited at Citi Field Friday night.
He turned it on. He plugged it in. He lit up a fan base. He wired us for sound. He transformed a facility into a ballpark. He made Mets fans pay attention to a Mets game, for crissake. I’ve been going to that place for five seasons now and unless we were having the circumstances spelled out for us, we were never quite absorbed into the action as we were when Harvey outpitched Strasburg, overpowered Strasburg’s teammates and, when faced with his single moment of adversity, plum Harveyed up until adversity disappeared into the lingering fog.
There’s no fog enshrouding what Harvey accomplished, though. Yeah, seven innings, four hits, three walks, one run (somehow) and the three runners who boarded the bases in the seventh with nobody out and weren’t permitted to exit their stations until there were three out in the seventh.
Yet that wasn’t even the best part.
The best part was when Harvey wasn’t pitching, but watching. Ike Davis and Lucas Duda had taken to slugging, supporting their pitcher with a couple of extra runs on the off chance he’d need them. Ike and Lucas socked it to Strasburg, who hadn’t been sharp, but hadn’t been dented since the first. Strasburg was the co-attraction when the night started, and though he amounted to little more than a light mist in the face of Hurricane Harvey, he’d hung around in that way top pitchers do if you don’t knock them out ASAP. But now, with two home runs in the sixth to go with the two runs from the first, Strasburg was severely dented…the very same Strasburg who’d been hyped to the high heavens since his big league debut in 2010, the year the Mets quietly drafted a kid out of the University of North Carolina who, until Friday, had never made it to the same breath as the Washington sensation.
For three years, it’s been Strasburg, Strasburg, Strasburg. He was the Marcia Brady of the National League East. It’s tough to say Stephen Strasburg wasn’t chatworthy, but when there’s one pitcher in your division who’s on everybody’s lips and he’s not on your team; and when you’re convinced your pitcher has, by all recent objective measure, surpassed that other team’s pitcher; and when your team has taken what little it’s had to hang its hat on and traded it to Toronto — well, godammit, this is where we grab the mic and change the conversation.
There was no prompt on the scoreboard. There were no t-shirts distributed ahead of time. There was no social network behind it. There was just a chant rising from the seats, the seats that were being occupied for baseball instead of abandoned in search of Shack Burgers and frozen cocktails.
“HARVEY’S BETTER!”
Are they saying what I think they’re saying?
“HARVEY’S BETTER!”
Wait…have these people put that together themselves?
“HARVEY’S BETTER!”
Holy Tim Foli, they’re taunting Strasburg! They know what’s going on!
“HARVEY’S BETTER!”
By George Stone, I think they’ve got it!
If long-term health and contractual status hold out, there will be plenty of time and way more evidence provided to determine if, indeed, Matt Harvey is better than Stephen Strasburg or, heaven forefend, Stephen Strasburg is better than Matt Harvey. Matt Harvey will go up against other aces from other rivals, too. Matt Harvey will draw crowds and focus in an age when crowds are usually sparse and focus tends to be fractured. Matt Harvey will win and the Mets will be forced to follow if they care to keep up.
Inevitably, it will all be traced back to the “Harvey’s better” game, one of those nights destined to stay with those who were in on its ground floor. Mets fans from 2013 who have yet to be introduced will sit next to one another some night up the road and trade reminiscences as Mets fans do. They will feel each other out, who was where for what and so forth. If it’s the relatively near future, one of them will say “Harvey’s better,” and the other of them will know what it means. If it’s far off, there will be a prelude to set the scene, about this game I was at when Matt Harvey was in his first or second year, against the Nationals, and the sentence will be finished by a different voice: you mean the ‘Harvey’s better’ game? I was there, too!
Mention of Matt Harvey’s name of late eventually evokes another dozen names, all pitchers, all predecessors of his, mostly on the Mets, sometimes from elsewhere. If you’re an optimist, they’re great pitchers to whom you believe Harvey might measure up. If you’re less sanguine, you’re cataloguing pitchers who have shown Harvey’s kind of promise but experienced careers that limped off into mediocrity, injury-riddled or otherwise. Friday night, without necessarily meaning to, my companion (to whom I owe another round of thanks for an outstanding seat from which to watch what we hoped would be a duel but were delighted to see develop into a romp) and I rolled out our own series of names — some you’d guess, some you wouldn’t. Thing is, even as we bathed Harvey v. Strasburg in the glow of golden precedent, I was comforted that Matt is something new to us. He’s not the Next This or Another That. He’s Matt Harvey. We’ve never had one before.
And I swear I’ve never had Citi Field feel like the thriving home of the baseball team I care about before. When it comes to emotion and electricity, Citi Field has never had more than a temporary power surge run through it, certainly nothing organically generated. A no-hitter (now that we know what one is like) would be enormous in a parking lot — or a former parking lot, at that. That twentieth win revealed itself a one-off in the scheme of things once the twentieth-winner was shipped abroad. Batting titles, franchise records, the occasional walkoff win…here and gone, basically.
But Harvey besting Strasburg, on the heels of Harvey besting every comer who’s taken him on in 2013, with the crowd understanding intrinsically what it meant (while taking joyous note of events transpiring in the world outside the ballpark’s brick walls)…that’s not just a night to remember. That’s a night to build on.
by Jason Fry on 19 April 2013 12:02 am
Remember when Matt Harvey nearly no-hit the Twins?
That was fun.
Since then, this is what we’ve had:
Sunday: Snowed out
Monday: Snowed out
Tuesday: Lose double-header
Wednesday: Snowed out
Thursday: Lose
And now here’s Matt Harvey on tap again. Well, except he’s facing a team that’s just a bit better than the Twins.
Oh, and it’s supposed to rain.
I assumed they would lose today, which was a combination of all the horrible things that had happened in the previous four days of baseball and the fact that I loathe Coors Field. Now that Soilmaster Stadium has been replaced by Loria’s Hallucinogenic Palace and Fraud Shop, it’s my least favorite place on the planet to see the Mets play baseball. Well, OK, there’s Hiram Bithorn, but if ill luck or Seligian chicanery ever take us back to that hellhole, I’m boycotting the whole affair.
The Mets have now played 71 games at Coors Field, which is 71 too many. Their record in the Airless Confines is 28-43, which is a good 20 games better than I would have figured. When the Mets are at Coors, they have a variety of ways to lose, and generally the suspense involves waiting to see which one they’ll select. There’s the horrifying blowout, with baseballs rocketing out of parks and relievers hiding in terror. There’s the messy suckfest, in which neither team can do anything right but you know the Mets will execute the final fatal pratfall. But the worst of them is what we might call the airlock game — the Mets get out to an early lead and seem to be playing something that resembles baseball, but then asphyxiation sets in. The scoring stops. The good at-bats stop. Sloppy play makes an appearance. More sloppy play commences. Rockies in rearview mirror are suddenly closer than they appear. And then you wait for them to lose, either suddenly but inevitably or thoroughly and inevitably.
Both ends of the Doubleheader from Hell were like that. So was this afternoon’s game.
When I start thinking that we’re 8-63 all time in a park, I generally take myself to Retrosheet in an effort to get my perspective back. But it didn’t work this evening. It just made me remember delights like these:
April 26, 1995: This was the first game in Coors Field history and the first after the strike, an 11-9 loss ended rather iconically by Dante Bichette’s home run in the 14th. What you may have forgotten (or suppressed) is that John Franco blew the save in the ninth, surrendering a two-out double to Larry Walker. Or that the Mets had the lead going to the bottom of the 14th, and with one out and Joe Girardi on first Andres Galarraga grounded to Tim Bogar. Instead of starting a game-ending double play, Bogar muffed it. The next hitter was Bichette.
April 27, 1995: The Mets took a 7-2 lead and gave the ball to Josias Manzanillo, who gave up five in the sixth. The walkoff loss was hung on Kevin Lomon, making his big-league debut as a Rule 5 pick from Atlanta. He surrendered a two-out single to today’s manager Walt Weiss, scoring future Met Jim Tatum. The Mets would send Lomon back to the Braves by Memorial Day, but he lives on thanks to the worst baseball card in The Holy Books, and possibly in the history of baseball cards.
April 11, 1996: Dave Mlicki gives up three singles and a grand slam to Larry Walker before recording an out. WHEEEE!
April 12, 1996: Down 6-2 in the ninth, the Mets fight back to 6-5 and have Jose Vizcaino on third and Edgardo Alfonzo on second with one out. Chris Jones is called out on strikes. Kevin Roberson walks. Bernard Gilkey strikes out.
July 23, 1996: Let’s play two! In the first game, the Mets fight back with six in the eighth to tie the game at 7-7. Doug Henry enters the game, and with one out in the ninth surrenders a single, a walk, a single, a walk (to the pitcher) and a walk-off single. In the nightcap, the Mets score six in the sixth, erasing a 7-0 deficit. Mlicki immediately gives up two runs, but the Mets go up 10-9 in the eighth. Enter Jerry DiPoto, who blows the lead. In the bottom of the 9th, Henry retires nobody for his second loss of the day: walk, double, intentional walk, walk-off single to Eric Young, father of current Rockies nemesis Eric Young.
July 24, 1996: The Mets tie the game with two in the eighth. In the bottom of the 10th, Paul Byrd walks Weiss, who moves to second on a sacrifice, then third on a groundout. The Mets put Galarraga on first via an intentional walk, then put Weiss on home via an unintentional single to Vinny Castilla.
May 6, 1997: The Mets blow a 4-0 lead, a 6-5 lead, pull within 11-10, lose 12-11. Apparently exhausted by this effort, they are then swept in August.
So … yeah. After three years of playing games at Coors Field, the Mets were 3-13. I don’t think I’ve ever recovered from that introduction to the place. The Mets were 7-5 over the next three seasons, but then the horror shows began again. In 2010 they lost three of four in May, the last three by an aggregate score of 26-6. They blew a 7-0 lead to lose 9-8 in May 2003. In July 2007 they were swept by a combined score of 34-12.
Or how about this one?
May 23, 2008: Billy Wagner surrenders a homer to Matt Holliday, and the save. Jose Reyes leads off the 10th with a double … and is picked off. Aaron Heilman loses it in the 13th, an inning that starts with him yielding a single to the pitcher.
Or the April 14, 2010 game where the Mets tied it in the ninth on a throwing error by Chris Iannetta, survived to extra innings, and then Jennry Mejia surrendered a leadoff homer to Iannetta?
Or the April 27, 2012 game in which Scott Hairston hit for the cycle … and the Rockies won 18-9? (Three words: Schwinden and Acosta.)
Or Tuesday? (Do you know what the Mets’ record in extra-inning games is at Coors Field? It’s 1-5. In one-run games, they’re 5-13.)
Or today?
Next time the Mets go to Denver, let’s play none.
by Greg Prince on 17 April 2013 6:07 am
Please come to Denver
With the snowfall…
—Dave Loggins
Submitted for your approval…nah, scratch that. Who here would approve of anything the Mets did Tuesday night in the city that’s been their personal Twilight Zone for two decades? Not fans of the Mets. Certainly not fans of crisp, clean baseball. Perhaps fans of the Rockies, but honestly, those are 200 people who can go home and thaw at a glacial pace for all I care. That just leaves fans of the supernatural, since only a Rod Serling could imagine a doubleheader like that which the Mets and Rockies just played to horrifying conclusion.
Submitted for our disapproval, then: Baseball — the summer game. But some summers are slower to occur than others. Witness the summer of the fourth year of the second decade of the twenty-first century, a season nowhere in sight as a baseball team from the Northeastern United States travels across its continent into colder and colder climes until not only does summer disappear from the horizon but the current spring is reduced to a memory. Only winter goes on, into apparent eternity, a time and space best measured in…the Twinight Zone.
The Mets and Rockies played two baseball games in Denver. They were supposed to play one. Or were they supposed to play three? Who can remember anymore? It’s been snowing in Denver since the weekend. Or was it snowing in Minneapolis and then it snowed later in Denver? Impossible to keep track. The Mets played two games in Minnesota, both of them wins. They were supposed to play a third. It couldn’t be done. Colorado came next and, with it, more snow. A first game was postponed due to snowout, as if that’s a thing. Then there was one of those day-night doubleheaders, except the day got away because the Rockies, whose home is somewhere amid the Rockies — where it’s been to know to snow during the spring — were perplexed when it snowed on their ballfield as to how to remove the snow. So everybody grabbed a shovel.
State-of-the-art snow-removal technology at its finest, eh?
The snow was shoveled, the hoods were pulled up over the ears and it was “play ball!” at 5:10 PM Eastern, 3:10 PM Mountain, get here when you can get here and stay all you want because nobody’s coming anyway. The day-night doubleheader became a traditional twinight doubleheader (though the tradition of selling one ticket for two games in one night is admittedly the stuff of ancient civilizations), except technically you had to show another ticket or get another voucher so the Rockies wouldn’t have to give anybody back their money. Thus, I believe it was the world’s first single-admission split doubleheader.
In the first game, everybody wore 42, David Wright hit two home runs, Dillon Gee was alarmingly ineffective and nothing good came of any of it. The Mets lost, 8-4.
Nothing good came of the second game, but much more so. Whereas the opener was garden-variety lousy (save for wasting a pair of Captain jacks and the lessons attached to the proliferation of the Butch Huskey look), the nightcap was straight-out Serling. It was the Mets at Rockies so perfectly staged — which is to say too bizarre to be to easily digested, too real to be easily dismissed — that if you only glanced at it, you’d think it was the Rockies at Mets.
Because that’s what the Rockies wanted you to think. Except they got to keep the home team share of the gate…which wasn’t anything like the actual attendance…which is the kind of trickery the National League never used to pull until the founding of the Rockies and Marlins in 1993.
You know, because we see the Marlins approximately every two weeks and their owner is so relentlessly slimy, we tend to bristle more virulently over the misdeeds and shortcomings of the Miami franchise than any other in our midst. But the Rockies — to my thinking the National League’s most exotic road flower since the Astrodome stopped seeming wondrous and the Expos ceased to be — came along on the same 1993 plague train. Though I tend to maintain a default conceptual soft spot for those who have followed in our expansion footsteps, man, have the Rockies been a mostly nightmarish element in our existence for twenty years. Maybe “nightmare” is too strong. Not so much a bad dream but a weird dream, especially these trips to Denver. Especially this trip to Denver, which weirdly celebrates our complicity in bringing the Rockies to light.
That, of course, is why the Mets were wearing home uniforms at Coors Field in the second game Tuesday night, because the Mets were the hosts to the birth of the Rockies on April 5, 1993, a deceptively promising afternoon which I could imbue with sun-splashed nostalgia until inevitably getting to the crux of that inaugural Colorado season from a Flushing perspective. The Mets removed their uniforms’ racing stripes, added a tail to their wordmark and started the year 2-0 at Shea. I went to both games and was giddy with anticipation for what else 1993 would bring.
It all rolled downhill like a Colorado avalanche after that.
In the second week of the Rockies’ existence, the discomfortingly 2-3 Mets (already swept a weekend series by Art Howe’s allegedly underwhelming Astros in between bouts of right fielder Bobby Bonilla snarling geographically at reporter Bob Klapisch) visited Mile High Stadium, where they won two and lost one. That should’ve been a good sign, but somehow it wasn’t. The night games started at 9 o’clock Eastern, which had to have been some kind of first for the Mets. The enormous football stadium cast strange shadows, like out of the 1950s, at least on television. The Mets tried on new, not particularly flattering road uniforms for the first time. There was something off about the entire experience.
Our boys left town after David Nied defeated Dwight Gooden, which had to have been a typo, but was factually correct. Nied was the Zack Wheeler of his day, more or less, snatched from pitching-rich Atlanta in the 1992 expansion draft. He got hurt and never panned out. Gooden was Gooden, still capable of intricate surgery on occasion, including Opening Day, when he bested Nied and the newborns on four hits and no runs. After losing at Mile High, Gooden — who had been hit hard by Houston the day Bonilla informed Klapisch he was guiding tours of his home borough — was 1-2. The Mets were 4-4 and definitely not clicking. They came through Cincinnati at 6-5. They’d get to the end of the following week at home, 8-7.
And they’d never be over .500 again. The Mets’ record in 1993 ended up at 59-103, eight games worse than the Rockies, five games worse than the Marlins, thirteen games worse than the 1992 Mets who inspired Klapisch and John Harper to write a book in which that squad was portrayed as the “worst” value buy imaginable. If that was true, then this bunch was sub-worst. The 1993 Mets’ mark of 59-103 (achieved, if you can be said to achieve such a plateau, by winning their final six in a row) was the lowest posted by any Mets squad since 1965. It outworsted every one of those notorious Grant/de Roulet debacles Mets fans of my demographic wallow good-naturedly in now that we’re not living them any longer. It wasn’t remotely approached by the hapless Howe gang of a decade later let alone recent dispiriting Met editions.
Not only were those Mets spectacular underachievers — Pythagoras claims the 1993 Mets performed well enough to win 73 games, but I’m pretty sure Pythagoras was slamming ouzo when he made that calculation — they were boorish in the process. The threats of Bonilla were merely the tip of the ick-berg. Every big name acted the part of the bad seed. Everybody you never heard of deserves his hard-earned obscurity. Anthony Young didn’t deserve to lose a million consecutive decisions, but somebody on that collective of the damned was going to have to bear a heavy statistical burden that transcended mere futility. They were awful and they were ugly. One forlorn pitcher dropping the back 15 of an eventual 27 consecutive losses was the least of those Mets’ misdeeds.
Anyway, the 2013 Mets decided to play dressup per the Rockies’ request and slipped into their 1993 home uniforms at Coors Field. As you might have guessed by the above paragraphs, this caused some searing last-place flashbacks as soon as they showed off the Shea whites, the light pinstripes, the narrow lettering and that goddamn tail underneath “Mets”. It doesn’t take much to jolt me back into a time and space I haven’t occupied for decades. Seeing the Mets pretend it was 1993 transported me 20 years back in a way a contemporary game hasn’t taken me out of a moment since 2005, specifically the June night I saw the Mets wandering through the Oakland Coliseum and recovered all kinds of deeply repressed memories of losing the 1973 World Series.
This wasn’t worse, exactly, but it didn’t set a very helpful tone. Nor did the conditions so apparent on television. Gary Cohen concealed his contempt for the Mets having to play in 35-degree temperatures (plus wind chill of who knows what) thinly and elegantly. He and Keith Hernandez were dressed for a bitchy January morning’s wait for the 6:08 to Penn Station. Poor Kevin Burkhardt looked like the last kid whose mom forgot to pick him up from hockey practice. I don’t think our broadcasting knights were complaining about having to work in the cold. I think they were dismayed that the beautiful summer game of baseball is so crammed with unnecessary inventory — greetings from daily Interleague play! — that clearing eight inches of snow for two games on the eve of several more inches is considered sound strategy.
As enthusiastic as Colorado was in the temporary days of Mile High Stadium (a name Keith insists on using for the local club’s permanent home of now 19 seasons) and as gorgeous as Coors Field is, there’s never anything normal about playing the Rockies in Denver. First there was the elevation. Then there was the humidor. Always was the possibility of snow. They had to clear snow away for the first game ever played at Coors Field — a crushing Mets loss to open the 1995 season. They had to jury-rig day-night doubleheaders before they were fashionable because of freak storms and high demand — the Mets were swept one of those in 1996. Yet Tuesday night, perhaps because it came on the heels of Minnesota, tipped into “pushing it” territory. The mind raced as the nightcap plodded.
• Why are they really making the Mets play in such bitter cold everywhere they go?
• Why are they really making the Mets wear those 1993 home uniforms?
• Ohmigod, they’re going to relocate the Mets to Colorado, aren’t they?
• The New York Mets of Denver are going to lose 103 games again, aren’t they?
• Wait — does this mean we get CarGo and Tulowitzki here? Tell me more about this plot!
Such are the thoughts that swirl around when there’s snow present at one too many baseball games. I swear I got up a couple of times to look out the window to see how bad the storm looked here before I realized that the winter weather was happening two time zones away.
This was all very eerie, and the Mets’ leading by six runs didn’t much allay the spookiness, considering the eight runs they’d shoveled onto the board through the top of the fifth accumulated with all the force of a light dusting. Not that you won’t take eight runs, but the Mets’ provisional success seemed more a result of Jeff Francis’s inability to get the ball over than anything Collin Cowgill and Marlon Byrd were doing, even though Collin Cowgill and Marlon Byrd were doing swell jobs. The 8-2 lead also didn’t feel sturdy because for his second start in two, Aaron Laffey pitched like the guy on the wrong end of the score, never mind he never has to pay for his transparent mediocrity. Nevertheless, Laffey limped through four wobbly innings and was poised, you’d have figured, to give Terry Collins one more to position him — unless something crazy happened — for the win.
Several crazy things happened, starting with the removal of Aaron Laffey after four innings. Canceling Collins & Warthen’s Laff-In was a different twist on taking one for the team. In this case, Laffey saw his chance for his first Mets win taken away so he could come back four days hence to pitch against the demonstrably more dangerous Washington Nationals. So far in ’13, Laffey’s made his mistakes against Marlins and Rockies, orders where you can get away with being hittable for a while (apparently). But the Mets are so shallow in the starting pitching pool and so determined to not “start the clock” on Wheeler any sooner than they have to that they are confusing Aaron Laffey with Johan Santana. Johan Santana gave the Mets eight solid innings on the Tuesday of the final week of the 2008 season when a playoff spot was on the line and then brought him back, meniscus and all, to carry them as far as he could on the succeeding Saturday.
This will be the last time Aaron Laffey will be compared to Johan Santana, but before we leave the profane comparison, consider that was a September with everything on the line and Johan was our ace. This is April and the Mets, because of a doubleheader (or two, pending the next couple of days) are “forced” to preserve Aaron Laffey so he can be deployed on short rest. Not because he’s that splendid, but because he’s that here.
Laffey left after four, leaving the six-run lead in the hands of Josh Edgin, who worked with LaTroy Hawkins, Mike Baxter — his insertion in left so quiet it couldn’t be heard above the din of dozens — and the Rockies’ offense to make a game of it after all. By the end of the fifth, the Mets were up by two. And you knew…you knew…the Mets would not win by 8 to 6.
You just weren’t sure how that was going to happen or when the tipping point would come into view. While the Mets channeled the wrong part of Jackie Robinson’s legacy, opting to have the courage to not fight back, Scott Atchison (who has that Duke Snider quality of looking twice as old he already is) scaled the Rockies with ease in the sixth and nearly had them tumble onto his prematurely gray pate in the seventh, but deftly avoided a rockslide. The Mets held that 8-6 lead into the eighth, clear up to Brandon Lyon recording two quick outs and teasing the easiest of comebackers to the mound.
Oh, it only looked easy. Josh Rutledge’s tapper eluded Lyon and the Rockies readied to roar. In came Scott Rice — we’re really getting to know these fresh bullpen faces of 2013, aren’t we? — and against the shift went Carlos Gonzalez for his 43rd hit of the doubleheader, sending Rutledge to third. Exit Rice, enter Bobby Parnell, for whom luck is a rumor, unless it’s bad luck with just a touch of Anthony Young residue of design. For Parnell, it was not bothering to hold CarGo on first. There was no look over, there was an uncontested steal and there were suddenly tying runs on second and third. But then Parnell did what he was supposed to do, enticing Michael Cuddyer to hit a grounder to surehanded Ruben Tejada at short.
Well, he hit it to Ruben Tejada, at any rate. The surehanded version is AWOL this season. Ruben threw high and astray of first. The two runners scampered home (second base indeed represents scoring position) and it was, at last, 8-8.
You knew it would be. You didn’t know if that meant the Mets were altogether doomed as opposed to inconvenienced. There was no reason they couldn’t come back in the ninth after Parnell left it tied. With two outs, Baxter walked and the obviously bearded and deceptively dependable Justin Turner singled, bringing Tejada up. The redemption angle was juicy. It was also a mirage. Ruben flied out. A good Parnell ninth kept it tied. Come the tenth, a shaky Rafael Betancourt walked two Mets as Collins emptied his bench the way he’d emptied his bullpen — both Terry and Walt Weiss managed as if this was the seventh game of Spring Training — but Betancourt flied Wright to right to keep the Mets from a ninth run for the fifth consecutive inning.
With literal last resort Greg Burke pitching in the bottom of the tenth, Eric Young — who could have been Eric Old as this game languished well into a fifth hour — socked a ball to deep right that Byrd tracked down. Marlon prevented a triple, which is the kind of thing that can really lift a team in extra innings.
But not Byrd’s team. With two out, Burke walked Gonzalez, which nobody could complain about. Cuddyer hit a tricky grounder to Wright…a very tricky grounder. Wright couldn’t figure it out and it bounced into left field. The scorer couldn’t figure it out either, first assigning David an error, later changing it to a hit for Cuddyer. It should’ve been an error because it should’ve been handled. Then again, the Rockies should’ve been handled but rarely are. Gooden should’ve handled them on the first trip in to Denver in 1993 when Eric Young’s father, Eric Young, Sr., was Colorado’s leadoff hitter; more than 52,000 showed up at Mile High; and the Mets’ 5-3 loss was accomplished in a tidy 2:14.
They should’ve been handled 20 years later, but Gonzalez wound up on third base. Then he wound up across home plate once Burke allowed a game-losing single to Jordan Pacheco. Collins used just about everybody and just about everybody had a hand in letting the nightcap get away by the miserable score of 9-8. It’s a great score when it’s in your favor. Doubleheaders are fine affairs when you go 2-0. The Mets went 0-2. It took them 4:19 to lose the second game, 2:59 to lose the first one, 2:02 to wait for the snow to be shoveled and a half-hour to change from honoring 42 to evoking 1993. Everything took forever but it all looked dismal just the same.
Let this be the postscript: should you be worn out by the rigors of your team competing in a very exhausting doubleheader; if you’re distraught from having to pepper your existence with the chills and neuroses of baseball played a mile above sea level; if you crave the summer game but demand it full time and with no strings attached, there is a place where there is never a delay on account of weather, where balls do not require adjustment on account of the havoc nature wreaks on humidity. But unless you wish to relocate to a tropical non-paradise and make a business arrangement with a nefarious art dealer lacking in both taste and scruples, you will resign yourself to the occasional hectic April business trip your ballclub makes into the heart of the Rocky Mountains, a range detectable on digital maps uploaded for your planning pleasure — in the Twinight Zone.
by Greg Prince on 16 April 2013 1:09 am
Jason Maoz of the Jewish Press recently published a heartfelt appreciation of all baseball has meant to him since the summer Tom Seaver (the Matt Harvey of his day, I hear) began to illuminate our landscape. Maoz has been a faithful Mets fan going back more than 45 years now, and as such, has never forgotten a particular kindness bestowed on him by a pitcher who proved mighty terrific in his own way one sparkling evening at Shea Stadium.
[J]ust as we were about to dejectedly make our way up to the cheap seats, a stubble-jawed player who’d been watching us from the edge of the infield walked over and said, “Hey, wait a sec, guys.”
And so it was that Daniel Vincent Frisella, a spot starter and reliever who, though having a fine season, would never quite fulfill his potential, spent the next ten minutes signing every yearbook, scorecard and baseball thrust in his face, chatting away as if he were an old friend of ours.
Danny Frisella was the righthanded complement to Tug McGraw in Gil Hodges’s 1971 bullpen. Together, they pitched more than 200 innings, struck out more than 200 batters and totaled 19 wins to go with 20 saves — while each reliever kept his earned run average below two. Like Gil and Tug, Danny is, sadly, long gone. Yet knowing the spirit of his deed lives on every bit as indelibly as his stats reassures one about…I don’t know…maybe it’s that the intersection of baseball and humanity makes for a ceaselessly fascinating boulevard; maybe it’s that bullpens are historically bastions of decency; maybe it’s just something nice to think about on a night when once again there was no game and not much else to be happy about. Take your pick. It’s a sweet story in a very thoughtful essay and I hope you read it here.
by Greg Prince on 13 April 2013 9:20 pm
And God said, Let the frozen waters from the heaven be melted unto one place, and let the dry land appear: and it was so.
And God called the dry land Target Field; and the grouping together of the opponents he called Twins: and God saw that they weren’t so good.
And God said, Let Harvey bring forth heat, the arm yielding strikes, and the slider hitting spots after his fastball, which is a seed unto itself, upon the mitt of Buck: and it was so good.
And Target Field brought forth no hits in the bottoms of innings, and the arm yielded strike after strike, fastball and slider hitting spot after spot, the seed unto itself landing upon the mitt of Buck; we all saw it was so good.
And then the serpent that is Morneau; the temptation is to say he was the snake who spoiled paradise in the bottom of the seventh with two out when he turned unto a slider that did not hit its spot and did not land upon the mitt of Buck, but rather clanked off the pole of foul; yet Morneau cannot spoil that which is only now being created into something so sacred as the turn of the Metropolitan Rotation toward the next Day of Harvey.
And the afternoon of not quite the Second No-Hitter in the History of the New York Mets was the Third Day of Harvey of Twenty Thirteen.
And it was good.
by Jason Fry on 13 April 2013 1:10 am
OK, not quite … but it sure felt that way.
I would love to get an up-close look at Target Field, which I’ve seen praised as a wonderful park and the anti-Citi for its generous portions of Twinsiana. And one day I will. But tonight I was happy to be 1,200 miles away huddled on a nice warm couch in weather that merely resembled Scotland’s instead of Hoth’s.
From the sight of Terry Collins standing like a plastic figure in a snow globe to the umpires bundled in balaclavas to the hardy (or crazy) Minnesota fans hanging around with their team down 11 on a horrid night, it was an evening for someone who abhors the cold to simultaneously savor and deplore. Sure, there’s a brain-damaged grandeur to football players peering through blizzards and the wreath of their own breath to look for another guy to crash into, but baseball’s designed for long pauses and stretching out under summer skies. Opening Day can be cold because it’s winter’s rearguard action, and October can be cold because you’re playing for a title. But playing in snow flurries in Minnesota in April is just ridiculous. (And judging by the weather forecasts, it may be the second-nicest day the Mets get on this trip.)
Given the conditions, nearly everybody involved in tonight’s mess deserves a pass — the baseball had to be like a cue ball out there, and it looked like it as Vance Worley face-planted into a historically bad line (7 ER in 1 IP leaves a heckuva mark) and Jon Niese kept trying to fall off the tightrope. Ruben Tejada threw one ball away and wound up spinning like a top over another, while the Twins couldn’t catch anything. (Except possibly their death of cold.) Just ugly all around.
But ugly can be fun, particularly when the good guys put up five in the first, five more in the second and then slowly pull away. And when there are little redemptive mini-dramas along the way. My favorite was the Murphy-Tejada double play in the third, one of the prettiest I’ve seen in years. You can review it here, but it really needs to be seen in slow motion to be appreciated — I missed the first batter of the next inning because I was watching it again and again on TiVo’s super-slow mode. Tejada catches the ball facing center field, dragging a toe of one foot behind him to locate the bag, then spins to throw to first, and in doing so drags a toe of the other foot to record the out, with the pirouette bearing him smoothly out of Ryan Doumit’s line of fire, save for a final gentle leg lift to let Doumit’s thigh pass beneath him. Disrupt Ruben’s timing by a fraction of a second or move him half an inch out of alignment and the whole thing would fall apart into a missed bag, a nasty collision or both, but none of that happened and what we got instead was seemingly effortless, tossed-off grace. And baseball crafts these little jewel boxes in each and every game, handing them out to fans who are paying attention.
I notice those tiny margins of error more and more as I grow older and get more games under my belt. John Buck blasted his nightly home run, this one a grand slam that escaped even the mysterious gravity of Target Field. Buck has now hit more home runs in 2013 than last year’s catching corps did all year, which is celebration of the now and indictment of the then all in one. But what was easy to lose in the merry Buckhanalia was what a near thing his latest blast had been. Pedro Hernandez’s eighth pitch to Buck was the fatal one, but the accessory to murder was the sixth pitch, a 2-2 offering that Buck fouled into Joe Mauer’s glove, where it nestled for a split-second before plopping to the dirt. Foul ball, and two pitches later a 6-2 Mets lead that we all knew was shakier than it looked had become a 10-2 countdown to the inevitable. Those missed chances and near things? They’re as much part of baseball as the beautiful moments where everything meshes perfectly, like it was always meant to be.
by Greg Prince on 11 April 2013 9:44 am
Just trade Jordany Valdespin so we can get to the part where the Mets gave up on him too soon. When he has a good game or a string of them or, for all we know, a career of them, we can just throw the Valdespin trade on the pile with Jeff Kent and Jeromy Burnitz and whoever the Mets in moments of pique decided wasn’t worth the trouble of tolerating growing pains or unorthodox personalities. Or if he fades from the scene due to a lack of refinement and/or maturity, Valdespin can be Lastings Milledge or Fernando Martinez, guys who legendarily never got the message.
But if you’re not going to trade him, let him play and do his thing. Work with him on adjusting his thing if his thing is so overwhelmingly offensive to the delicate sensibilities of the people who contract the vapors every time this guy claps his hands or makes a face or shows a pulse. Jordany Valdespin, like every position player who isn’t John Buck, is a flawed Met, but he’s an exciting Met and, at the moment, a generally effective Met. In Wednesday night’s Hefnerrible loss, Jordany recorded the following: three infield hits; two diving catches; one jog between third and home that wasn’t consequential given Daniel Murphy’s misguided sense of direction yet not exactly an endorsement of headiness; and one bases-loaded, full-count, caught-looking, inning-ending, rally-dousing strikeout on a filthy Kyle Kendrick pitch that caught the inside corner of the plate after Hefner was mysteriously sent up to bat in a situation that cried out for a pinch-hitter.
He may have also worn a t-shirt on the team bus. I’m not sure.
This was all the night after Valdespin tripled to maybe spark a little life into a dormant attack in a ballpark where we’re constantly reminded no lead is safe (the Phillies led by six in the fifth) in a sport where we’ve been told a triple is the most fabulous play there is (better than sex, according to a noted expert). Valdespin congratulated himself on the triple. Everybody else admonished him for enjoying the moment, even after he directly scored on a passed ball. He had brought the Mets a little closer in a game where the object was to win and we watched in the hopes the Mets could win. Yet Valdespin upset the unwritten code or perhaps darted into the visiting clubhouse to try on another t-shirt.
Maybe the guy is a royal pain in the rear when you’re actually around him. Maybe he’s just that caustic in close quarters. Maybe he’s the “1” in Steve Phillips’s old “24 + 1” A-Rod equation but doesn’t have the goods to back it up. Maybe he’s impenetrable to the wisdom the Mets unfirable corps of coaches dispenses, assuming they dispense wisdom. Maybe the Ambassador, in his role as Captain, has given him numerous talkings-to that just won’t take. It’s also possible that Jordany Valdespin plays the game the way it was played by the national team that won the World Baseball Classic, given that he’s from the same place, and it doesn’t always translate. Team Dominican Republic exuded “passion”; Jordany displays “histrionics”. Maybe it’s all about context.
Several of the Mets’ announcers can barely conceal their contempt for him. Most of the beat writers run their Thesaurii ragged to take nonlibelous shots at him. His manager can barely stand to look at him and has to force himself to write his name onto the lineup card, whether he produces or not. At the moment, he’s producing. The Mets outfield, despite Terry Collins’s stated preference for everyday assignments, is a six-card monte affair most nights.
Lucas Duda’s commenced an assault on National League upper decks. Collin Cowgill was last week’s catalyst (or cattle-ist), is this week’s afterthought. Marlon Byrd had a big hit a few days ago. Kirk Nieuwenhuis isn’t a backup infielder, which would make him more useful. Mike Baxter, he of the historic great play, made one pretty bad play and one pretty lucky play last night. And Jordany Valdespin, hitting .400, robbing opposing batters and being, shall we say, fascinating in the process, isn’t simply sent out there every game for several games in a row for some reason. Or for obvious reasons. Or reasons obvious to those who make decisions but not to me.
Give him a chance to succeed and grow up. Or give him a ticket out of here if his presence bothers you so much. Maybe you can exchange him for a fifth starter. We have a pile of those, too.
by Jason Fry on 9 April 2013 10:38 pm
Look, just forget about that one.
Certainly Dillon Gee would like to.
I came out of Gee’s nightmare of a second inning thinking that Objects on Scoreboard Are Less Dire Than They Appear — several of the hits had just found holes, the Mets were driving balls off Cliff Lee, and it was Citizens Bank Park.
But then came Gee’s nightmare of a third inning, in which a quarter-mile worth of home runs did substantial harm to such optimism. It was the alternate path to the same lousy destination, speedy and overwhelming instead of gradual and cumulative, but equally awful. Would you rather fight one horse-sized duck or a hundred duck-sized horses? Gee can say he’s duked it out with the baseball version of both and neither one was pleasant.
At 7-0, well, you could still dream — but then Cliff Lee relaxed or found himself or remembered he was Cliff Lee, and then aside from the heroics of John Buck and the histrionics of Jordany Valdespin this one was over.
We’re still at the point in the season when you can remember every game and are just glad that baseball is a nightly habit again, meaning games like tonight’s don’t hurt so much as they’re just kind of annoying. 5-3 on the season, back at ’em tomorrow for the rubber game (weather permitting), grounds for optimism and all that.
But still, let’s have no more like this one, OK?
by Greg Prince on 9 April 2013 9:24 am
The Mets taking it to Roy Halladay is a great thing. I’m not sure that’s who they beat up Monday night, however.
That couldn’t have been the Roy Halladay who gave the Mets and the rest of the National League fits in 2010 and 2011 after owning the American League for years prior. This was the Roy Halladay who encountered back and shoulder miseries last year and clearly hasn’t shaken the aftereffects. If the Phillies want to send Roy 2.0, bugs and all, to the mound, then I have to be all for the Mets exterminating his pitches with extreme prejudice. He’s a pitcher in a Phillies uniform, period. Yet I surely didn’t derive any extra pleasure from the fact that the back of the uniform read HALLADAY 34.
’Cause that couldn’t have been the same guy who wore that uniform so vexingly for so long.
The 7-2 result, with seven earned runs charged to Halladay in four-plus innings? That’s for keeps, and we’ll keep it. But c’mon, that wasn’t the two-league Cy Young winner out there, not the man who threw one of the only two postseason no-hitters in captivity, definitely not the guy who entered Monday with a 9-2 lifetime record versus the Mets, neither of the losses having transpired over the past decade. Of course I wanted the Mets to prevail over the great Roy Halladay — but knocking around this fellow of deteriorating physical abilities didn’t fulfill that desire. I wanted the Mets to stick it good to the Halladay they had on the ropes but couldn’t quite knock out the last time I was in Philly, three years ago. I wanted the Mets to avenge the Halladay who dropped a Saturday night masterpiece on my buddy Jeff and me one weekend later. I wanted to get even with the Halladay who refused to be gotten to the day before SEAL Team 6 got to a far more offensive enemy.
Let me stress again: I’ll accept the victory on behalf of the New York Mets. I’ll thank John Buck for continuing his MVP campaign, Daniel Murphy for stoking the hit-maker machinery behind the popular score and, most of all, Matt Harvey for being the kind of pitcher fans of other teams dream of getting to but can only dream (7 IP, 3 H, 2 BB, 1 ER and 9 K without being nearly as suffocating on the Phillies as he was on the Padres). Yet disposing of this Halladay so effortlessly…it wasn’t bitter, but somehow taking him over the wall and relentlessly pinning him up against it didn’t feel particularly sweet.
This twinge of not-quite-rightness doesn’t apply elsewhere on the Phillie staff, mind you. Slice and dice Hamels until he’s Cole slaw? Pass me a plate. Unsteady Kendrick until he has no choice but to keep on truckin’ toward the showers? I’m the red ball express of lovin’ for that. Make Lee surrender tonight? Please use Citizens Bank Park to re-enact the Battle of Appomattox Court House, a conflagration which went into the win column for the team from the north 148 years ago today.
The Roy Halladay of 2013, who looks suspiciously like the Johan Santana of the part of 2012 when he stopped looking like Johan Santana altogether…it wasn’t as much fun watching him get hit hard as it should’ve been.
But I’ll take it.
And I hope you’ll take a listen to my and Matt Silverman’s 1973-centric appearance from Sunday night on SportstalkNY Live, via podcast here.
by Jason Fry on 8 April 2013 1:33 am
On Sunday afternoon a strange thing happened at Citi Field: The Mets won the kind of game that used to constantly go the Marlins’ way.
Seriously, if you’ve been a Mets fan for 10 years or so, look at this sequence out of context and tell me it doesn’t conjure up Soilmaster Stadium, Luis Castillo, Antonio Alfonseca and all matter of South Florida horrors: One-run lead, one out in ninth. Hit by pitch, single to short left, runner on first beats throw to third, trail runner takes second on throw, little bounder eludes third baseman, jubilation for home team.
Except this time we did it to them.
A win’s a win, but it’s also true that the Marlins have been stripped by Jeffrey Loria to the point that they barely resemble a major-league team — there’s Giancarlo Stanton, who’s either in an early-season slump or feeling the weight of carrying eight teammates, and nobody else of note. Worse than that, though, there are things that make you wonder what exactly is going on with this franchise beyond savage downsizing. Like why was the Marlins’ bullpen catcher jogging out to the bullpen on Saturday with a reliever desperately needed? Why were the Marlins insisting on playing the stone-legged Ruben Tejada like he was going to zip to first after bunting to third? And why in the world did Mike Redmond bring the infield in Sunday with one out, the tying run on third and the winning run on second?
The Marlins aren’t completely hopeless, as 20-year-old Jose Fernandez demonstrated — despite making the rather abrupt jump from Single-A, the rookie mixed an impressive fastball with an evil curve and cameos by a pretty fair change-up, striking out Mets in droves. He didn’t look raw or scared out there — if anything, he looked like he was having fun, chomping gum and going about his business with cool efficiency. The Mets made contact off Fernandez in the first but came up short, making you think they’d soon find the range and drive the rookie from the game. But in the second, Fernandez fanned Ike Davis, followed by Mike Baxter and Lucas Duda. (Granted, the first of those feats isn’t particularly noteworthy.) After that he was cruising. The fifth was particularly impressive: Duda went down again to start the inning, frozen by a nasty curve that caressed the outside corner. With a runner on first, Fernandez floated an errant curve to Anthony Recker for the Mets’ first run. He then went right back to that pitch, tearing up Marlon Byrd on another beautiful breaking ball and extracting a harmless pop-up from Collin Cowgill.
The Mets countered with Aaron Laffey, revealed as an unprepossessing ham-and-egger with an odd habit of seeming to genuflect in the direction of the plate after pitches and a broad face that beneath a baseball cap makes him look a bit like Charlie Brown. Laffey didn’t irreparably harm the cause, leaving the Mets down three with one out in the fifth, but 10 hits over 4 and 1/3 does not make for enthusiasm — he was a bit of bad luck (or a better lineup) away from resembling Charlie Brown after a barrage of line drives leaves him lying on the mound in his skivvies, surrounded by clothes and socks and those Peanuts shoes that (rather charmingly) resemble dinner rolls. Afterwards, Terry Collins was kind about Laffey’s performance, noting his lack of work in the spring and saying he’d start again, though when, exactly, is not clear. Personally, I’d rather see Collin McHugh given the next chance, but since we won let’s be charitable and hope the Mets brass sees something in Laffey beyond this not being his first rodeo.
The hurler I did not want and still do not want to see was Zack Wheeler. Wheeler was shaky in his Las Vegas debut, for one thing, and for another keeping him in Sin City until midsummer will give the Mets an extra year of his services and ensure his salary doesn’t escalate rapidly through arbitration. Even without the Wilpons’ woes, this seems like a no-brainer in a year when a postseason berth is highly unlikely, and service-time calculations are rapidly becoming part of baseball’s financial laws of physics. So then why was Jose Fernandez — drafted one pick after Brandon Nimmo — on the mound for the Marlins? If I had to guess, it’s because the Marlins no longer have any kind of philosophy whatsoever, beyond gaming the system. Player development? Salary structures? Oh come now: In Lorialand there is no long-term future for anybody except the owner, sulfurously a-slumber in his garish swindler’s fortress on a mound of pocketed revenue.
With Fernandez out of the game the Mets began a slow-motion comeback that was apparently doomed until the wacky ninth, helped by stalwart work from the bullpen and then by smart play from two players badly in need of a gold star or two.
After a Steve Cishek pitch just brushed Tejada’s jersey with one out in the ninth, Kirk Nieuwenhuis came to the plate. Nearly a year ago, Nieuwenhuis became a cult hero by beating Heath Bell, then of these same Marlins. But that was before he began swinging at anything and everything, amassing strikeouts at a frightening rate and getting passed on the center-field depth chart by more or less everybody. With a 1-and-2 advantage on Kirk, Cishek tried to lure him into swinging at a breaking pitch slithering off the outside corner. Last summer it would almost certainly have worked; this time Nieuwenhuis took it for a ball. After a foul, Cishek took aim at that corner again, but this time the ball slithered the width of a mitt too far into the heart of the plate and Nieuwenhuis whacked it into left for a single.
Fielding the ball was Juan Pierre, who continues to be employed by general managers despite a complete lack of power, a failure to understand that one can also reach first base on a walk, and the worst arm in the big leagues. Tejada had held up thinking the ball might be caught, but alertly steamed from the near side of second all the way to third despite being in Pierre’s sights. Worse for the Marlins, Pierre’s throw to third was wide and handled indifferently by Chris Valaika, allowing the similarly alert Nieuwenhuis to streak into second. That prompted Redmond to inexplicably play the infield in, and two pitches later Byrd smacked a little bounder down the third-base line.
If Valaika had been playing back, he might have thrown Tejada out at home, or froze him and nipped Byrd at first, or trapped Kirk between second and third, or done something else to make us groan in dismay. (Or maybe everyone would have been safe. Hard to say.) As it was, the ball skipped down the line, banging off the stands while Nieuwenhuis followed Tejada home, and we had done unto the Marlins as they have so often done unto us.
|
|