Those clouds are pushing away from Citi Field, not toward it. They have to be. They just have to be.
|
Those clouds are pushing away from Citi Field, not toward it. They have to be. They just have to be. Meant to get this picture all year, got it on Closing Day. The Mets, as we know, work hard on erasing their history, but somehow this MTA sign survives at the stop formerly known as Willets Point — Shea Stadium. If you watched Curb Your Enthusiasm Sunday night, you were no doubt tickled by Jason Alexander’s take on the faux Seinfeld reunion proposed by Larry David. Yes, George declared, a reunion show is a great idea, because now, at last, we can leave the show on a good note. Larry is mystified by this implicit criticism of Seinfeld‘s farewell, but the viewer gets it. The Seinfeld finale did not feel of a piece with the rest of the series run and suffered as a result. The same could be said for most sitcom finales whose inflated goodbyes tend to come off as foreign or out of place vis-à-vis the narrative arc we thought we knew. The bigger the program, it seems, the more disappointing the finale. But how often does the final episode dramatically exceed all that came before it? The 2009 Mets left on the best note possible Sunday afternoon. Granted, the best note available to them, literally speaking, was a 70th victory. That it came bundled with a three-game sweep and two players’ finest individual career performances didn’t in any way blot out that these Mets were nobody’s idea of must-see baseball. If they were a sitcom — and god knows they repeatedly played like one — they would have been put on hiatus in midseason. Wonderfully, I was able to brush much of their reality show aside yesterday for a few hours. While never quite able to forget how little the Mets were playing for or how much more this kind of 162nd game would have aided them on their previous two final dates, I had my best day of the year at Citi Field by far. Nelson Figueroa’s first complete game shutout and Angel Pagan’s 4-for-4 near cycle were compelling reasons on their own, but on a Closing Day when there were no particular competitive stakes in sight, that was mostly sweet background music. I mostly wanted one final day in the sun. I wanted to sit in good seats with a good view with the one I loved. That much I secured when Stephanie and I settled into Section 326, Row 4. If I ever hit it financially big, my season tickets will be right there. Best look I’ve had at everything since that preseason stroll they let us take in early April. It provides the money shot for Citi Field, a facility where money tends to overwhelm baseball’s better angels (FYI, Sunday’s showdown between the hopeless Mets and lifeless Astros was loftily assigned Silver status). The 300s, at least the middle of them, are my double-edged Citi sword. They provide an awesome perspective, yet they’re disgustingly overpriced. How they came up with $115 as a face value for the ticket I had yesterday — affordable via the good graces of StubHub — is beyond me. Mr. Wilpon, tear down this Club designation for your glorified Logezzanine. Give the people a chance to enjoy more of your park. That would include one of the unnecessarily hidden treasures of Citi Field: the bars on the Logezzanine level. This, my friends, is gracious living. I’m not a barfly, I’m rarely even a bar patron, but one of the simmering discontents I’ve shared with my beer aficionado amigo Jim Haines is that without a Caesars Club ticket, the bars are off-limits. OK, it was a way bigger discontent for Jim than for me. Jim saw the bar on the right field side of Excelsior during that open workout and envisioned a perfect season ahead. He’d be there so much, he promised, they’ll call out “JIM!” when he walks in. Then he learned he was less welcome at this bar than Diane Chambers was at Cheers. Still, we never let go of the long-term goal of our being seated if not effusively greeted at what we came to call the Norm! Bar. It would be perfect, he thought: Mets game on TV, beers flowing, profanity-laden exhortations and other baseball dialogue ongoing, and (following some sobering diet colas) back to our seats for the happy recap. There was something about the scenario as Jim painted it that didn’t have me questioning why we needed to sit at a bar and watch a ballgame at a ballgame when, in fact, there was a ballgame right there to watch live. I just accepted it as best-of-all-worlds material, and wondered why only Caesars Club patrons could be trusted to sit at a bar (or, for that matter, drink an adult beverage that wasn’t beer or wine). It took 81 games, a little couples coordination and the Mets sucking so much that StubHub could be kind and generous to both of us, but Jim and his wife Daria bought tickets in nearby Section 327 after we got ours in 326. Stephanie and I sought out the Haineses, and by the top of the fourth, Jim and I were finally living the dream. We excused ourselves from our better halves, ambled up to the bar that was conveniently right behind us and took our long-delayed places amid the granite and spirits. All that was missing was an exchange worthy of Ken Levine: “What’s going down, Normy?” “One Astro batter after another. Gimme a Hoegaarden.” Jim and I put in three effective innings at the Norm! Bar. Overpriced beer? Of course. It’s Citi Field. But the sun poured in, you didn’t have to plead with the bartender to switch to SNY (or explain what SNY was) and it was one of those ideals that came to life better than we had anticipated. Jim effortlessly invoked Mel Ott along the way. So did Dave Anderson Sunday, but I didn’t see that ’til I got home. We returned to the seats for the Seventh Inning Stretch. By then, the notion of being taken out to the ball game carried more poignancy than usual. It was Closing Day and we knew we’d never get back — not to Citi Field in 2009 we wouldn’t. On paper, that was appropriate. On paper, the Mets were angling toward 70-92. In my mind, and every other sentient Mets fan’s mind, we’d had all the Mets we could take from this year. Physically, I kept watching, kept listening and kept attending; mentally I’d checked out around the second week of August. Yet it was a glorious afternoon, the Mets were winning, Nelson Figueroa was a master moundsman, Angel Pagan was doing everything right…and it would all be over in a blink. We were winding down without angst. There was no 2007 horror show to absorb, no 2008 cavalcade of gobsmack. This had long ago become a season that existed in merely technical terms. It was kept alive only because it was plugged into a pocket schedule. Merciful end-of-life counseling would have recommended pulling the plug with two months to go. These Mets were beyond any cure universal health care might offer. That wasn’t worth dwelling on Sunday. We could forget the surfeit of injuries and the lack of fundamentals. We could forget the myriad missteps. We could forget how badly run this organization seemed and how short the new ballpark came up in matching its hype. Almost every built-in indignity of Citi Field dissipated yesterday. Maybe it was because I had the right ticket or maybe it was because I was done detecting its drawbacks. If I had never attended a game there before yesterday, I’d tell anyone who criticized it as I have after 36 games of experiencing it that you’re crazy, this place is great. Ignorance and not asking too many questions sometimes amounts to bliss. Stephanie and I made our final shared Citi Field meal the following: 1 lobster roll (high price covered mostly by the $15 swipe card I received as part of the Gary Keith & Ron package the day before); 1 chicken nachos (a culinary gem lost in the sea of fancier fare); and 1 custom-tossed Caesars Club salad (an excellent touch). We consumed it in the “club” that seemed unusually upbeat. We enjoyed our view. We enjoyed our friends the Haineses. As noted, I enjoyed my bar time. I enjoyed my final 2009 chorus of “Take Me Out to the Ball Game”. I then thoroughly enjoyed rooting Nelson Figueroa home. I haven’t been a big booster of his. If anything, I’ve groaned at the sight of Figueroa (and Redding and Misch) taking the ball, no matter how positive the outcome, because I assumed it was all a massive setup for a 2010 return to mediocrity. “Great, now they’ll all get untradeable five-year contracts for pitching adequately in garbage time.” It’s the same reason I cringed as Brian Schneider raised his average through September. “Don’t re-sign him, Omar! DON’T!” No such worries in the eighth and ninth yesterday. I really wanted Nelson to get the shutout. Not until I turned on Howie and Wayne for the final three outs did I know he’d never had one. Howie said that as bad as this season had gone and how much he and everybody wanted it to end, he was now feeling sad that it was about to be over. It was all going so beautifully — for Figgie, for all of us. Who wouldn’t want it to continue? Nelson gave up a two-out single to Lance Berkman, which briefly reawakened my demons. I gave myself over to liking Figueroa and the 2009 Mets and now, I thought, the shutout will disappear and they’ll blow a four-run lead and we’ll all stomp out of here moping and cursing. Daria noticed my sudden surge of discomfort and asked if this was anger or disappointment bubbling to the surface. Both, I said, but I should be long past it. Instinctive ’09 dread went as quickly as it came. Carlos Lee flied to Pagan in left, and you could put the gleam of Closing Day as well as the disaster that rendered it a footnote squarely in the books. Figgie nailed tight his first shutout. The Mets won their first Closing Day since 2004. They barely managed 70 victories, a low “C” average. Daniel Murphy led the team with 12 home runs. Nobody was their best player, but I compiled a 26-10 Log…and my 26th win instantly emerged as my personal highlight of the year. Something about Sunday kept getting better, even when it was officially over. We stuck around to watch the season be packed away. Two years ago, I stared in utter shock at the nothingness Shea evinced in the wake of the 8-1 loss that knocked us out of contention. One year ago, I attempted to reconcile all my competing emotions once we lost 4-2, lost another playoff spot and lost a stadium. Yesterday? Tranquil might be the word, and tranquility was fine. There was an extra burst of applause for Figueroa and Pagan as their exploits were flashed on DiamondVision (bigger crowd than you’d expect), but there was no 1997– or 1985-style appreciation for a Met job well done. A job wasn’t well done in 2009. It can’t be because everybody was sitting at the bar that I heard very little cheering in the course of the afternoon. Citi Field’s biggest roars arose Sunday in response to news from Kansas City, for Giant touchdowns. The Mets reaped what they sowed. They didn’t deserve more than perfunctory acknowledgement, so we didn’t send them a farewell bouquet of sobs and plaudits. The Mets knew this and didn’t inflict a propagandistic highlight video on those of us who lingered. Natalie Merchant thanked us for being so forthcoming with our discretionary income, and that was that. Yet, somehow, I was moved. I was moved to witness a season’s end, even an indisputably lousy season’s end. That’s why I go to Closing Day. The three final wins were a decent parting gift (as opposed to the Fan Appreciation prize, which was…oh wait, the Mets didn’t bother with Fan Appreciation Day), but I wasn’t fooled. This is the same team that just lost three in a row to the Nationals last week. No, this was not a season I wanted to continue. I just wanted to pay it my respects. Not the 70-92, but the 26-10; not the frustration I endured from afar, but the good times I enjoyed on-site despite my reservations regarding the host venue; not whatever bad surrounded this team, but the good people I sat with, cheered with and commiserated with 36 different times in 2009. I have nothing but respect for the grand habit I’ve cultivated of going to baseball games and spending precious hours with the people I’m fortunate to call my friends. It felt precious in April. It felt even more so in October. Like I said, it kept getting better. We didn’t rush away from the ballpark per usual. Our foursome meandered to the Field Level and down the Rotunda stairs. I executed my preferred exit ritual: tip the cap to Mr. Rickey and Mr. Robinson; tap the Mr. Met sign; touch a brick in the archway. That’s usually that. But then Stephanie mentioned our commemorative brick to Daria, and Daria was so charmed she insisted on taking our picture with it (my right knee went ouch, but it was a lovely gesture). Having accepted their invitation to join them at a beer garden in Astoria, we set out on a walk through Flushing Meadows Corona Park to their secret parking space. By the weather you’d think the season was still going. It wasn’t, but we already knew that. Then the beer garden, and its own set of revelations and bratwurst. My Closing Days occasionally have codas, but they usually involve gloom and despair. They’re rarely as much fun as yesterday. So thanks to Jim and Daria for embellishing 2009’s surprisingly happy ending. Thanks to Stephanie for liking baseball and me enough to make us the perfect threesome on a day like Sunday. Thanks to everybody who was kind and generous enough to spend an inning or more with me this past season. Thanks to everybody who lets me extend my days and nights at the ballpark by telling you about them here. As we toasted yesterday, here’s to 2010. We come to bury the 2009 season this afternoon. We’re not ever going to praise it, no way, no how. It saddens me nonetheless that the baseball season is ending. Not this season, but the season. I left Saturday’s Mets game after forty of so minutes of the rain delay, despite having a hunch they’d resume play eventually. I just didn’t want to be there anymore. I hadn’t exited a game early all year, yet it felt right to abandon ship. Besides, I’d be back Sunday, per usual, for Closing Day. Hours later, however, I was saddened. No, not that I didn’t stick around. Content to tap my phone’s browser to confirm that the Mets indeed held on for my 25th win of the year, I wasn’t even motivated enough to find FAN reception. I had gone into the city to meet Stephanie who was finishing up some work. In past years it would drive me crazy to leave as many as four innings on the table. Not this year. I needed an out more than Frankie Rodriguez. My sadness materialized after the game was over, after she was done working, while we were walking down Second Avenue in search of a noodle house. With the rain gone, it had become a warm October evening in Manhattan. Lots of pedestrians, lots of cars, lots of life. And no Mets, I thought: The Mets barely exist right now and by this time tomorrow, they won’t exist at all. None of these people care about the Mets. Life is about to go on without my favorite team. I contrasted that sense of the situation with another evening a few years ago in the same neighborhood. Stephanie and I had chaperoned a group from her senior center to Shea Stadium. It was June 2006 and the Mets were as hot as the weather. We had beaten the Reds, we had had a great time and, having dropped off our charges, we were looking for a place for dinner. All I could think about and talk about was the Mets… • how great they were playing; • how far ahead they were in their division; • how many wonderful players they had; • how excited the fans were that afternoon; • how jammed Shea was; • how we kept running into people on the street wearing Mets gear as we strolled; • how the world and the city were falling into place as we always wanted it to. How long ago it seemed Saturday night. Now we were a lousy team nobody cared about, a lousy team I couldn’t be bothered to stick around through some raindrops to watch. I didn’t care enough to tune in their game if it was going to inconvenience me. If I didn’t care, why would anybody else out here on Second Avenue? The murky sky reminded me of yet another night when Stephanie and I walked through Manhattan, over on the West Side. It was just over twenty years ago, the night we got engaged, also a Saturday. I gave her an engagement ring hours after giving her a Mets jacket of her very own (which would make the ring an anticlimax, you’d assume). I thought of how that night in 1989 became so many baseball moments together, particularly that afternoon game in 2006, and how the highest highlight of my 2009 at Citi Field was not any of the 35 official games I’ve attended, but the afternoon before the season started. It was the workout the Mets opened up to ticket plan holders — which we’re not, but a friend is, and the friend couldn’t make it, so he passed his admission onto us. My big moment that day was when we wandered through the Caesars/Excelsior level (they uncharacteristically let everybody look at everything) and we plopped ourselves down in seats in front of the press box to take in our new stadium. Stephanie doesn’t immerse herself in baseball as I do, but she is a keen observer of ballparks. We’d sat in so many of them across this continent and analyzed them thoroughly. Now, suddenly, we had this one that would be the one we’d call home. As wary as I was of Citi Field, I was so happy to be there with the woman I loved, opening up the next chapter of our baseball life together. We return almost to the scene of that high point of 2009 today. With StubHub’s help, we’re in Excelsior this afternoon, a few sections to the left of where we absorbed Citi Field’s panorama and promise for the first time. In early April, we didn’t know what would play out on the diamond below. In early October, we know too much. But Saturday night, on Second Avenue, I was just grateful to anticipate one more day in the sun with my wife and the Mets. Even these Mets. For those who are relatively new to Faith and Fear and wonder what it is we do when the season ends, besides stare out the window and wait for spring, we do pretty much what we do throughout the season: we blog about the Mets. So when you need a Mets fix, even a Mets tangent (especially a Mets tangent), we’ll be here. We’ll be here for you, we’ll be here for us, we’ll be here for the Mets. Starting tomorrow, I hope to not have to add the caveat “even these Mets” ever again. Before the season ends, please take the Faith and Fear readership survey here. When we sat down it would start to rain. When we got up it would stop. When we sat down again it would start to rain again. It was a misty, murky, muddled-up day out at Citi Field — one that started early. Emily and Joshua and I trooped through the bullpen gate at 11:30 for the Gary Keith and Ron event, which was filled with genial Mets folk buying shirts and raffle tickets for a good cause and lining up to eat hot dogs and nachos and popcorn because why wouldn't you? We met Ron Darling briefly (I admired his genial poise while under siege), said hi to friends, glimpsed Gary Cohen and Howard Johnson and Omir Santos from afar, hooked up with Greg and then made our way through the bowels of Citi Field to stand on the warning track during the national anthem. As was true at Shea, I was amazed by the sheer size of a major-league stadium seen from ground level. On TV it's hard to grasp just how big the field is — up close and personal, you wonder how so few balls can be hits in so vast a space, and appreciate the almost-superhuman skill of even journeyman outfielders and banjo hitters. From the warning track, the stands are imposingly high, a mountain to be filled with people and with noise. Except, well, there wasn't much of either on this penultimate day of the star-crossed 2009 season — I suspect we GKR minions could have given the rest of the stadium a pretty good fight. The anthem passed and we were herded back to the bullpen entrance, past various itinerant Astro hurlers, to take up residence in left-center near the apple. Where, very soon, it began to rain. After a bit of back-and-forth negotiations with the heavens, we wound up in a little knot under the scoreboard, not entirely dry but no longer actively wet. And there we passed the time companionably enough, chatting about the game, saying hi to a welcome number of readers and friends (including a brokered meeting between Joshua and Ross Chapman, who I can attest is impressively polite and grown-up and kind to six-year-olds), and attending to bathroom trips and souvenir outings. Nobody was paying particularly close attention to the game happening out there beyond the tucked-away apple, and nobody was feeling too bad about that. Or at least nobody was until I started feeling that way. In 2005, the inaugural year for me and Greg as Faith and Fear in Flushing, the Mets fell short of the postseason but were clearly on the ascent. There was a crackle and spark at Shea until the beginning of September, and an afterglow that lingered even after Willie Randolph's team was turned away. 2006 was magic, a charmed season right up until the final moments, even if they did come 10 days too soon. 2007 and 2008 ended in devastation and disbelief, but their final hours were the stuff of high drama, a tightrope act between joy and agony. 2009, on its next-to-last day, was very different. It was irrelevant. It was the dregs of a season that had been decided in July. It was the motions being gone through. And as such, it was a new experience for me (and I assume for my co-blogger, though I'll let him speak for himself) as a chronicler. What a terrible thing, I thought to myself. The Mets are down there playing and nobody cares. Not even us. But then I thought that no, that wasn't quite right. We did care. After all, we were there, flesh and blood amid a sea of phantom attendees. (37,000, ha!) We might have gotten a bit fuzzy on the inning and the score (it did change back and forth due to umpires huddling), but we knew the Mets were winning and we were close to an official game. And we were all having a good time at the ballgame, weren't we? It Didn't Matter, but that wasn't the same as saying it didn't matter. And so I realized I'd reached the final stage of dealing with the 2009 Mets. It was acceptance. And it felt OK. And then it began to rain like it meant it, and the players disappeared, and Emily and Joshua and I sought shelter for a time and then decamped for Brooklyn, certain that this one had ended Mets 4, Astros 1 (F-5). When it turned out it hadn't, when I flipped on the TV out of idle curiosity and found Brian Stokes engaged on the mound, I settled in to see how things would turn out. I hadn't been hungering for a regulation-length baseball game, but I knew that in 24 hours the Mets would be gone, so I took what I was being offered. At one point I flipped over to the Royals-Twins game and was startled by the contrast — over there, Zack Greinke was on the mound and Joe Mauer was at the plate and 50,000 Twins fans were cheering and screaming and worrying and praying, while on SNY the clonk-clonk of Cow-Bell Man echoed through a stadium by now absurdly empty. I thought about sticking with the Twins, with finding out how the AL Central would play out, but I decided not to. There would be time for things like that. The Mets — even such unworthy specimens as this year's Mets — deserved my attention during their final hours. We had to go to dinner and I set TiVo to record the rest, taking some small satisfaction from the fact that it thought it was recording football. (Not yet you're not!) And then, after dinner, I watched the end, with Sean Green antagonizing the couple of hundred remaining fans and Frankie Rodriguez coming in to clean up his mess. And there was a day to go. A day, when we'd once wanted so much more. But also a day when, amid the horrors of late summer, I'd wondered if I'd wind up wanting less. Nope. One more day, one more game. Seemed about right to me. Acceptance. Before the season ends, please take the Faith and Fear readership survey here. You're not just reading the blog for Mets fans who like to read. You're reading the blog entry of a Mets fan who set a record Friday night — a personal record, but a record just the same. With the Mets' decisive victory over the Astros, I improved my 2009 home season mark to 24-10. Four times previously (including two regular season/postseason combos) I reached 23 wins. That was the heights. Now the heights have gotten higher. Yes, in this otherwise cursed campaign, somebody's Log is filled with W's. The Mets are 24-10 for me in 2009 with two games to go. They're 15-30 at home without me; 15-30 is the mark that got Joe Frazier fired in 1977, a year in which Mets didn't hit home runs in bunches, but more on that in a bit. Even weirder in this otherwise godforsaken hellhole of a season, they've gone 5-0 for me on Friday nights. Friday nights in recent years, particularly late in those years, were the stuff of deathtraps and suicide raps. Not this year. This year of all years was my golden year at least one night a week. Then again, factor out Fridays and I was still a nifty 19-10. I can't say Citi Field isn't, in its own way, trying to win me over. Let us not forget John Maine. John Maine has started seven games in the young life of Citi Field. I have witnessed every single John Maine start at Citi Field. We're 6-1 together: an early loss followed by six consecutive wins. That makes him the first Mets pitcher to win six consecutive home starts in nineteen years. So I saw that history. And I saw the 47th Met triple of the year, lashed by the heretofore presumed dead Nick Evans, tying a team record. Plus, as usually occurs around these Mets, there was the strange saga of Daniel Murphy. After Jeff Francoeur hit his tenth Met home run in the sixth, I revealed to my friend Rob Emproto (with whom I kept alive a streak of fifteen consecutive seasons with at least one game attended together) that I hoped Murph's home run total would stay on eleven. He could triple all he wanted and score on an error, but I wanted no Met to mash a twelfth home run in '09. The lowest total for the team lead, as mentioned here recently, is twelve homers, accomplished (if you wanna call it that) by Stearns, Henderson and Milner in 1977. If you remember 1977, you remember it being very bad for the Mets, but more for a Seaver shortage than a power shortage (Lenny Randle's July 13 notwithstanding). This season, though? In this park? I thought 2009 deserved the dubious honor of having the fewest home runs hit by a team leader. Lotsa triples, no homers — perfect for a team with a great batting average and never enough scoring. Murphy comes up as a pinch-hitter in the eighth with two out. Rob starts laughing. He can feel it. “This one's going over the Modell's sign,” he says. This is before Murph sees a pitch. It's just a hunch. Daniel takes ball one, ball two, ball three, yet I agree with Rob's assessment. Daniel Murphy, who was welcome to produce at will for the 150 or so games that I was unaware of this twelve home runs thing, is going to hit one out just because I — for my own admittedly bizarre reason — don't want him to. Suddenly Daniel is Shawon Dunston from ten years ago, fouling 'em off left and right. The count is three and two for quite a while. Then, Doug Brocail, who I'm pretty sure is old enough to have played with John Milner, serves up a juicy one and…BAM! Waaaay gone to right. Daniel Murphy is suddenly Adam Dunn. It's home Run No. 12 on the season. Stearns, Henderson and Milner scooch over on the couch. 2009 looks a little less awful than it really is. Every Mets fan cheers. One does so a little begrudgingly. But I did cheer. If your biggest problem is a pinch-hit two-run homer from a player who leads the team, then you're probably having a pretty good night. Also, I had great ribs. Blue Smoke, you lead the league in yum. • Mets Walkoffs examines the 66 Mets who were no threat to hit twelve home runs. These are the fellows who blasted one out and never blasted again, at least not as Mets. (Please note Mets Walkoffs' URL has shifted to http://metswalkoffs.blogspot.com/ and adjust your bookmarks accordingly — and don't tell me you haven't bookmarked Mets Walkoffs!) • My thanks to the several individuals who were kind enough to introduce themselves and mention their enjoyment of Faith and Fear in Flushing: An Intense Personal History of the New York Mets, available via Amazon, Barnes & Noble and a fine bookstore near you. (Rob got quite a kick out of my being spotted.) I'm guessing it makes for great October baseball reading since there won't be, for the third consecutive October, much worthwhile baseball-watching. • You know about the letter the Mets should've sent. A brief quote of mine regarding the one they actually transmitted appears in the weekend edition of amNew York; scroll down to page 3 of this PDF. • Don't let this season end without taking the Faith and Fear readership survey, here. Dear Mets Fan: As we come to the close of a very disappointing season, I wanted to reach out to you on behalf of the entire New York Mets organization and tell you a few things. First off, we’re sorry. We’re extremely sorry for how the 2009 season unfolded. We’re sorry for our performance on the field and we’re sorry for our performance as the stewards of this organization. We did a very poor job for you. I suppose you knew that if you stuck with us through this awful year, but I think it’s necessary that somebody with responsibility for this mess take responsibility for this mess. We’re sorry for the way our team performed between the lines. Wins and losses are a matter of competition and clearly our competitors outclassed us in 2009. There is no way to guarantee how successful a team will be on the field, but a baseball team should able to guarantee you a few things: that they will always hustle; that they will always execute the simple fundamentals of the game; that they will not give up no matter the score or their record. It is clear that the 2009 Mets did not live up to that implied guarantee and, for that, we are sorry. We are sorry as well for the caliber of our roster, particularly in the second half of the season. You know about our injury situation. Obviously we did not deploy the players we planned to for much of 2009. Again, some things are out of an organization’s control. But a good organization is prepared for all contingencies, and I feel we should have had a more Major League-ready corps of replacements at hand, whether on our higher-level minor league teams or through acquisition. We are also sorry for the injuries. An unprecedented avalanche of aches and pains befell most of our topline players at one time or another in 2009, and while it is the players who hurt the most, we know the effect of their absences took a toll on you. As with wins and losses, injuries are sometimes simply a part of the game, but we also see, as we look around our sport at other, healthier organizations (and those who suffered injuries yet persevered with greater results), that there are measures that can be taken to minimize the repercussions from injuries and perhaps the incidence of them. You have my apologies for the above. Now I would like to tell you about how we might go about preventing a repeat of the horrors of 2009 in 2010. First, we greatly appreciate the hard work put in by our general manager Omar Minaya. He was hired as general manager at the end of the 2004 season, and two season later we were a division winner and playoff team. He did a great job to get us there, but it is abundantly clear he did not succeed at taking us to the next level or even maintaining the level we achieved. Omar will be offered a consulting position in the organization for the duration of his contract with the New York Mets, because we do value his experience and opinions on some baseball matters, but he will no longer be our executive vice president, baseball operations or general manager. Jerry Manuel was a breath of fresh air when he succeeded to the manager’s office in the middle of the 2008 season. We do not hold Jerry responsible for our failure to hold a first-place lead of several games last September; we believe he was one of the major reasons we contended as we did. But there is no way one could watch the 2009 Mets and not take issue with how this team was run. Players performed not just badly but in embarrassing fashion, whether it was fielding, hitting, baserunning or pitching. We are dismissing Jerry as our field manager and releasing his coaching staff, all of whom — like Jerry — are decent men who tried what they considered their best yet presided over a massive failure in 2009. We will evaluate each of them for other positions in our organization, but you will not see any of them in Mets uniforms next year. The doctors and trainers we employ are all qualified professionals, but it has become apparent they do not adequately serve the needs of the New York Mets. It cannot be a coincidence that our Disabled List remained so crowded through 2009 or that certain players’ prognoses and diagnoses so wildly diverged from reality for so long. We are replacing every doctor and every trainer who works with the New York Mets. We will be undergoing a most through and extensive search to fill the above positions. We are taking the same tack throughout our organization. Nobody in player development or scouting will be immune to reevaluation in the offseason, and we are prepared to make changes in those slots as well. I promise you we will not jump at the first candidates we see to become our new head of baseball operations, our new manager or our new medical team. We have done that far too often in the past with deleterious effect on the long-term good of our organization. I look forward to offering you specifics as soon as we have them. Rest assured, we have the resources to compete for free agent talent, but I think you understand large contracts aren’t going to solve all of our problems. This isn’t a copout or a veiled allusion to the money my family’s other concerns may have lost to Bernie Madoff. We are going to start building a serious farm system, with an emphasis on doing everything on the field the right way. Ostensibly we do that now, but you could never tell from watching our team perform. I understand there are some of you for whom on-field performance is all, and that as long as the Mets are winning, then you’ll be happy with us. Of course winning is paramount to me and everybody else here. Our goal remains another World Series title as soon as possible — as well as our team playing a brand of baseball of which you’ll always be proud and never ashamed. But I also know many of you have concerns about our new ballpark, and I would like to address those as its first year ends and the rest of its life approaches. Thank you if you bought one of the 3.15 million tickets we sold in 2009. Every single one of those transactions is valued by us. Whether you were a full season-ticket holder, a partial season-ticket plan holder or someone who attended individual games (perhaps dealing with ticket brokers in the early going when demand was inflated), your patronage is important to us. Moreover, your loyalty in a season like the one we’ve just completed towers over our thinking. We owe every one of you an apology for the way we conducted our business regarding the inaugural season of Citi Field. It was bad luck that we opened a new facility of which we were justifiably proud as our nation sunk into its deepest recession in decades. We planned Citi Field during a more vibrant economy and set much of our pricing with those parameters in mind. It’s not unusual for a sports team to try to get the most the market will bear, and that’s the tried-and-true path we followed. We were wrong to do that. Quite frankly, we were as greedy as we thought we could get away with being through much of the ballpark on many of our dates. We didn’t take into account the recession. We also didn’t take into account the roots of our game or our team. Baseball’s supposed to provide the most affordable entertainment possible. It’s supposed to be an accessible day or night out with your family, your friends, that special someone. Yet we priced large swaths of our tickets insanely high. We designated some games as more attractive than others and created a complex pricing plan that, now that I’ve examined it closely, makes little sense. These are baseball games. Simple baseball games. Yet we were regularly asking for $75, $100 and up for decent seats. That’s not the baseball I remember as a kid going to Ebbets Field in Brooklyn. Even accounting for inflation, that’s not close to reasonable. We could have had all our star players healthy, we could have contended for the playoffs, and it wouldn’t have been worthy of what we understand a baseball game to be. Nor would it have been true to who we are. We’re the New York Mets. We long prided ourselves on being “the people’s team,” yet I now realize the only people who could afford the face value we were charging for too many of our tickets are people I see at my country club. I’m so sorry about that. We are doing away with categorizing games by tier and we are meaningfully reducing ticket prices for 2010 and beyond. We can still make a very healthy profit without ostentatiously gouging you. We want to give you a reason to buy our tickets and sit in good seats and watch our games. We don’t need to give you another reason to shun us after the year we’ve had. You’ve perhaps heard our reflexive answer to all criticism of our pricing by pointing to the Promenade level and the relative affordability of those seats. Indeed, we are proud to have maintained price points as low as $11 in 2009, but I must admit, after taking the time to go to our upper deck and attempting to view the field from every section, that we have failed to make these seats worth whatever we were charging you. I hoped for a ballpark that, like Ebbets Field, would have a feeling of “character” to it, so I signed off on some unorthodox angles both in terms of the shape of the seating bowl and the field. I apologize. I didn’t know it would be so inadequate for the simple act of watching a baseball game. I’m aghast that we sold you as many seats as we did that had no view of the right or left field lines, and that you can’t see the main scoreboards from so many places. This is unacceptable, thus this winter we are working with engineers to see what we can do about redesigning our physical plant to make it work for you. If we are successful, you will see the difference. If we can’t move things around, then we will label those seats with obstructed views what they are and will charge accordingly. We do have some very nice seating sections in Citi Field, but I noticed that not all of them were filled or particularly vocal. I’m thinking specifically of the Excelsior level which we envisioned as one of many of our “club” areas. I can see now this was a mistake in thinking. I’m not sure why we were so overcome with the desire to foster elitism in our ballpark, but we will pull back from that misdirected objective in 2010. Next year, the Excelsior level — now to be known as the Mezzanine — will be open to all pedestrian traffic as will all its amenities. If we allow our fans to walk through the upstairs and the downstairs of Citi Field, we should allow them through the heart of the park, too. As chairman and CEO of the Mets, it shouldn’t surprise you I park wherever I want, thus I had no clue we were charging $18 for each car to park in our lots. My deepest apologies for this affront to your intelligence. Parking will be free in 2010. It’s enough you’re buying yourself a ticket. I don’t know why you should have to buy one for your car. We will also offer merchandise and food menu items at price points that won’t make a parent swallow hard when his or her child asks for a cap or a hot dog. There is nothing at Citi Field that makes me prouder than the Jackie Robinson Rotunda. Jackie was a great baseball player in New York, a great American and a great human being. I consider it one of my finest accomplishments in my thirty years as part of ownership that I have helped make the New York Mets custodians of his legacy. The Jackie Robinson Rotunda is the culmination of this effort and I still get chills when I enter it. That said, the New York Mets have a much greater legacy to present and share with our fans, and properly showing it off will be a top priority of this organization next year and every year. While we appreciate our sponsors’ support, we realize plastering their names on everything that doesn’t move in no way enhances your enjoyment of the baseball experience. Thus, the Caesars Club will now be known as the Polo Grounds Lounge, named for our first home, and it will be redecorated to celebrate the part of our heritage that comes from the New York Giants, just as the Ebbets Club attempts to commemorate our connection to the Brooklyn Dodgers. Likewise, the Acela Club will be recast as the Shea Cafe, celebrating the man who paved the way for National League baseball to return to New York and the stadium long ago christened in his honor. Both venues, along with the Ebbets Club, will be open to all ticketholders. We began to install a few scattered reminders of New York Mets history through Citi Field in the latter stages of the 2009 season. That was just the tip of the iceberg, I promise you. It took us a while to understand that we are part of a grand historical continuum, but now that we’ve gotten it, you’ll see the evidence. Yes, there will be statues erected to honor the greatest of Mets legends and personalities. Yes, there will be broader and more detailed photographic exhibits throughout the park to shine a light on the players who made the Mets the team you love. And yes, we will, on Opening Day 2010, cut the ribbon on the New York Mets Hall of Fame and National League Museum, making it an attraction and destination every bit as inviting as the ballpark itself. Naturally, we will resume Mets Hall of Fame inductions in 2010 and make Mets Hall of Fame Weekend a grand and annual tradition. (Details regarding our 2011 Fiftieth Anniversary Celebration will be revealed soon.) I think we came a long way in the first year of a ballpark in terms of food offerings and general hospitality, but we can do better. We can always do better. We will tailor our promotions so as to offer you items you actually want (and you will get, whether you are among the first 25,000 to show up or arrive a little later) and events you will actually anticipate. We will turn the noise level down so you can speak and hear between innings. We will also decrease the organizational smugness that still seeps out from too many corners of our operation. We’re lucky to have you come to see us. We need to stop acting as if it’s the other way around. All of our personnel — and that includes me and every member of my family who works here — will undergo rigorous customer service training during the offseason. Whether it’s the counterperson who sells you the beverage growling at you as he or she takes your money or the security guard who won’t abide a simple request to let you tap an acquaintance on the shoulder because that person has a “better” ticket than you, you shouldn’t encounter avoidable annoyances at a Mets game. We’re going to figure out how to be better people in our interactions with you. We have some really great people working here right now. We want all of our employees to live up to that standard. I’m writing to you because you’re a Mets fan. You don’t have to be, no matter how much it feels like you are locked in to the habit. You come to our games, you watch us on TV, you listen to us on the radio, you wear our logo no matter what, you spend every available waking moment thinking of ways we can improve ourselves. I can’t thank you enough for your support, particularly after a season like the one we just endured, which came on the heels of a very sad ending in 2008 and an incredibly frustrating one in 2007. We must not take your loyalty for granted, and we will not. I’ve promised you a lot today. I can’t promise you a world championship in 2010, but I can promise you every effort will be made toward securing one and that everything surrounding that effort will be much sounder and more professional. Finally, I will promise you this: If you do not see real, concrete progress toward the goals I’ve set out in this letter, I will put the New York Mets up for sale following the 2010 season. There is nothing I would want to do less. It is my fondest hope that the Wilpon family will be privileged enough to steer the Mets organization for generations to come. But if we show no signs of succeeding in caring for this public trust, we no longer deserve that opportunity. You, on the other hand, deserve the best. You are Mets fans. We are the stewards of this organization, but it’s your team. It’s about time we remembered it and acted like it matters. All my best for an Amazin’ future together, Fred Wilpon Chairman and Chief Executive Officer New York Mets *** Flashback Friday returns October 9. Please read Metstradamus today. It’s another masterpiece in blogging. And, if you haven’t already, please take our readership survey here.
There was no stopping Ray Knight from scoring the winning run in Game Six, but the 1986 World Series MVP had no compunction against doing a stop ‘n’ chat with FAFIF reader Jim LaFemina, who visited Nationals Park Wednesday wearing his mint Faith and Fear t-shirt. Jim reports Ray, despite being in the broadcast employ of our new archrivals, is a class act all the way, graciously gracing Jim’s Series ball with his most valuable signature. It’s a sphere that already bears the imprints of a certain Mr. Wilson and Mr. Buckner. Memo to Bob Stanley: get on the ball. And you can get in the shirt by clicking here. What better way to commemorate the second anniversary of Collapse Day than by folding, crumpling, blowing away and being kicked in the collective groin by the Washington Nationals? This was the first time we'd played on September 30 since the September 30 that has come to define the fortunes of this franchise to which we are mysteriously and inextricably linked. The September 30, 2007 follies and the actions of the weeks that preceded them was a foreshadowing of what this team would become. A bunch of chumps with no clue, no pride and no professionalism. The New York Mets have done almost nothing right in any on-field or off-field sense since blowing that seven-game lead two Septembers ago. Except for a brief spurt of solid play in July and August 2008, they've been a dismal team populated by dismal players led by dismal management. They weren't much healthy when it counted last year or early this year and we've seen how they've disintegrated since getting ill. No Reyes, no Delgado, no blah-blah-blah? No pride and no professionalism. Chumps! This is not an outfit that gets easily inspired let alone motivated. It's content to be swept by the one team in the National League that used to be indisputably worse than it. How do I know it's content with being beaten about the ears by a ragtag 103-loss unit? Because they let it happen. Because they always let it happen. Because the Nationals had 103 losses when this series began and they have 103 losses now. Because I'm the genius who watches this team enough to know quality when I don't see it. The Mets are up to 92 losses, incidentally. Only the calendar running out will keep them from topping 95. Fire Jerry. Fire Omar. Deduct a day's pay from everybody's enormous salary and donate it to a good cause. I'm gonna go stare in the mirror and ask myself, speaking of no clue, why I've made the weekend plans I have. I'll be at Citi Field Friday. I'll be at Citi Field Saturday. I'll be at Citi Field Sunday. I'll be at peace Monday. Infinitely stupider, but at peace. Oh, and speaking of even MORE no clue…this. Can't somebody fire a Wilpon or two? If the rage hasn't overcome you, please take our readership survey here. Thank you. Maybe I'd just gone numb, but a couple of weeks ago it seemed to me that the Mets at least stopped losing in horrifying ways and began losing in quiet, mundane ways. Not that it ultimately mattered to the bottom line — for we the faithful it was kind of like being a lobster placed in water that was gradually brought to a boil instead of being hurled into something already bubbling and hissing — but it sure felt less traumatic. I'd even come to feel gentler towards this batch of dog-eared, hopeless players. Yeah, they'd been incompetently assembled and stupidly led and made lots of dopey mistakes, but they'd also been hurt and unlucky, and wasn't that a shame. But then you get games like tonight's, and all you want is for it to hurry up and be Monday already. After games like tonight's, I don't need my final glimpse of green grass on the home field, or a last “Take Me Out to the Ballgame,” or baseball that really matters to me. After games like tonight's, I just want the embarrassment and anger to be taken away until I've built up six months of desperately needed emotional callus. We turned the game on late, vaguely shamefaced about such a basic final-week lapse, and saw to our shock that the Mets had a 1-0 lead, the bases loaded and nobody out. Of course they converted none of those runners, causing to me to emit my first burst of language that's not supposed to be uttered in front of six-year-olds. Of course Mike Pelfrey looked great, surrendered a first hit to the goddamn pitcher on a broken-bat floater, then proceeded to give up the lead on a flurry of genuine hits. And of course the Mets spat the bit in spectacular fashion. Bases loaded for Brian Schneider, who at least had lined to right for the final out of the first. This time he pops meekly to Ryan Zimmerman in foul territory. Up comes Jeremy Reed, one of the least useful Mets in a season that's seen stiff competition for the title. Reed saws his bat in two on a soft little liner that plops right into the second baseman's glove, giving him just time enough to double off Jeff Francoeur at first. Fantastic. Bottom of the inning, Anderson Hernandez throws away a double-play ball. Luis Castillo is so impressed with this that he tries to turn an impossible double play and throws the ball into the dugout. The Nats lead. The incredible thing, watching the Mets continue to impersonate major-leaguers, is that they ever could have trailed. Understanding this, the real surprise of the 9th inning is why I wind up surprised. Cory Sullivan strikes out fishing against Mike MacDougal, who's one of those guys whose stuff makes you wonder why he's bad. Angel Pagan singles. Luis Castillo gets called out on a questionable third strike, but — to quote my favorite aphorism not yet shared with Joshua — when you're going horseshit they fuck you. Then it's David Wright, who strikes out haplessly, leaving us to once again worry about what his future holds. Wait a moment, something's not right there. I think I programmed that last bit as a key combination sometime this summer. Sorry about that! Let me try again! David Wright rockets a drive up the gap, clearly ticketed for somewhere beyond Elijah Dukes' reach. Dukes races for the fence, flings his glove out desperately, crashes into the edge of the scoreboard, flops on the ground — and lifts up the ball nestled gently in his mitt. Emily, face down in bed beside me, offers a little sub-covers mutter of woe and pity and bitter amusement. I neither move nor make a sound. Dukes and his teammates frolic in the outfield like puppies. I stare at the TV. The replay shows Wright rounding first, eyes fixed on right-center. He slows to a halt, without expression. In the background of the shot, a National clambering over the dugout rail is overcome by glee and tumbles butt-first to the turf. I shut off the TV and wait to be told this year is finally over and I can go. If you haven't yet, please take our readership survey here. Thank you. |
||
|
Copyright © 2025 Faith and Fear in Flushing - All Rights Reserved |
||