The blog for Mets fans
who like to read

ABOUT US

Greg Prince and Jason Fry
Faith and Fear in Flushing made its debut on Feb. 16, 2005, the brainchild of two longtime friends and lifelong Met fans.

Greg Prince discovered the Mets when he was 6, during the magical summer of 1969. He is a Long Island-based writer, editor and communications consultant. Contact him here.

Jason Fry is a Brooklyn writer whose first memories include his mom leaping up and down cheering for Rusty Staub. Check out his other writing here.

Got something to say? Leave a comment, or email us at faithandfear@gmail.com. (Sorry, but we have no interest in ads, sponsored content or guest posts.)

Need our RSS feed? It's here.

Visit our Facebook page, or drop by the personal pages for Greg and Jason.

Or follow us on Twitter: Here's Greg, and here's Jason.

That Shark Bites

Call it what you will, the facility in which the Florida Marlins play home games maintains one undeniable Yogiesque tradition.

Nobody goes there — it's not crowded.

The fun of a Marlins home game is guessing the attendance, which one could probably do with aid of an abacus. The figure in the boxscore says Thursday's was 12,423. The AP account says fewer than 5,000 showed. Wayne Hagin said it was really about 1,500. When he presented the Defensive Play of the Game in the postgame show, I could make out the scattered applause of about three people. And the play was made by a Marlin.

We will have Land Shark Stadium in all its guises to kick around only through 2011 as that sign on its outfield wall indicates. The Marlins finally got somebody to ante up and build a new ballpark for them: somewhere that isn't in the middle of nowhere, something with the retractable roof that's going to make midweek afternoons in August less unbearable, pending the combatants. The clinically dead 2009 Mets versus the modestly plausible 2009 Marlins might not draw a minyan to an air conditioned Taj Mahal. But let's not blame our potentially forever doomed Mets for the attendance shortfall off the Florida Turnpike's beautiful Exit 2X. We always seem to turn out a fistful of dislocated New Yorkers to pump up the Marlins' numbers. Indeed, cries of “Let's Go Mets!” filled pockets of oppressive air hanging over what used to be known — no kidding — as Joe Robbie Stadium, Pro Player Park, Pro Player Stadium, Dolphins Stadium and Dolphin Stadium. If it weren't for Mets fans in South Florida, it regularly appears there'd be no fans in South Florida.

Nobody going to Marlins games is a cherished local custom. Once a year this time of year, you can look forward to the annual picture of Whatever It's Called with nobody inside except for way down there on the field. A Major League Baseball game is in progress despite attracting the most minimal interest possible short of none. It's treated as news when clearly it's business as usual.

Tim Redding, supported lavishly by some suddenly hot and humid lumber, didn't mind the loneliness. He understood there were going to be more people on his club's Disabled List than there'd be in their opponent's grandstand. “This stadium has been empty for years,” he said after defeating the Fish. “It's just sad. But it's 90 to 100 degrees here every day from the middle of May to the beginning of October. I wouldn't want to be out there sitting in the stands roasting, either.”

That is what is known in other endeavors as running down the product. “Hey kids! Don't come out and see me or my friends next time we're in town!” But can you blame Tim for being honest? Fran Healy wouldn't be able to hype a 90-degree August afternoon affair between two nowheresville teams at something whose very name begs you to disregard it. Fran used to promise that Shea would be rocking. What would he blather if hired by the Marlins — that Land Shark will be sweating?

There's no telling if South Florida can ultimately support a baseball club when it has a more readily accessible, retractable-roofed park to call its own. I used to think so. I also used to care. I'd like to see the National Pastime succeed wherever it goes. Plus my parents long ago had a condo not all that far away from the eventual site of Joe Robbie And Such, so while I never developed any real attachment let alone affection for Miami-Fort Lauderdale, I did sort of know the area and thus felt the most microscopic fleck of proprietary interest in it having baseball.

But recently I rewatched the final game ever played at Shea Stadium, which you probably recall was a Marlin victory over the Mets at literally the worst possible time. It was the Marlins' job to play hard and try to win, just as it was a year earlier when they did the same thing. That's fine in and of itself. But the excitement they showed in having done nothing more than eliminating somebody else from postseason contention? Since I was at that game and my mind was in a dozen different places at once, I didn't quite focus on their uproarious celebration. Except for not donning NATIONAL LEAGUE SPOILER t-shirts and not dousing each other with non-alcoholic beer, you wouldn't have known the Marlins weren't going any deeper into autumn than the Mets were. As our friend and blolleague Dana Brand puts it in his splendid new book, I hope they “languish unloved and unnoticed for a very long time to come”.

Let indifference be the eternal mark of the Florida Marlins. Let their infrequent paying customer come to be known as someone “disguised as a non-empty seat”. Let the ghosts of the Montreal Expos — who Jeffrey Loria raped and pillaged en route to Miami — haunt the roof of the new ballpark so it leaks and creaks and remains wide open for every 6 o'clock thundershower. Let them find a more embarrassing corporate name than Land Shark Stadium. And let their whole outfit be devoured by real sharks.

Yeah, we suck this year and we may suck a while more. Or we may not. Nothing looks good when you're unexpectedly calculating a tragic number in late August (20 for the division, 21 for the Wild Card). Our ownership was fleeced, our GM's apparently overmatched, our erstwhile stalwarts disappear into infirmaries never to return, their replacements might not push the Atlantic Theater Company if they entered the Broadway Softball League and the next 34 games loom as the baseball equivalent of Mao's Long March…except it'll probably be less fun and more treacherous. The Mets are 30-49 since June 1, which was when Beltran first started to ache in earnest. That's nearly half a season of getting our brains beat in and having nothing to shield our noggins except ever thicker copies of the DL. We're playing at 1979/1993 levels. Of course it appears all is lost and all is doomed forever.

But today we stuck it to the Marlins in front of essentially everybody who cares about them. So for one night in 2009, I feel good to be a Mets fan.

If you somehow missed AMAZIN' TUESDAY, the report from the press pool is here, with another perspective here. If you haven't secured your copy of Faith and Fear in Flushing: An Intense Personal History of the New York Mets, you may do so here or here, after which we invite you to discuss it and keep up to date on future events here.

Very Bad Things Are Coming

(For posterity: Mike Pelfrey was bad. Cory Sullivan was briefly good. Mets lost in Florida. None of this matters.)

The Mets, I fear, are about to tumble into an abyss. I fear they are nearing a horrifying period, duration unknowable but probably not brief, that will damage the franchise and fray its ties with its fanbase. I'm not talking about 2009, that plague year of injuries that keep mounting when you don't they can any more. I'm not talking about Citi Field, a nice place to see a ballpark whose flaws are fixable and, indeed, gradually being fixed. I'm talking about things that are harder to fix, and will take longer to recover from.

Yesterday afternoon, amid news of MRIs and trades and press conferences and conference calls, I felt a twinge of unease that had nothing to with Johan Santana's elbow and what value the Mets would get back for Billy Wagner. I couldn't quite figure out what it was until later — and when I did figure it out, I wondered if I'd known what it was all along, and just hadn't want to admit it.

Simply put, I didn't believe a single thing anyone connected with the New York Mets said on Tuesday afternoon.

Actually, that isn't true. I do, for instance, believe that Omar Minaya was telling the truth when he appeared foggy on the details of the condition of Santana's elbow back in spring training. “Spring training was such a long time ago,” he said. And I believe him when he said that he couldn't remember what an evaluation of Santana's elbow at the All-Star break had shown. (See Joel Sherman, if you dare.)

Which makes it unbelievable that the Wilpons could even think of letting Omar keep his job.

Let's review. This is not an ingrown hair Pat Misch might have complained about to a trainer. This is Johan Santana's elbow. And Johan Santana's elbow is the hinge around which much of this team's fortunes turn, and in which the Wilpons have invested more than $100 million. How is it that Omar Minaya is not intimately familiar with every medical report concerning that elbow, with every pang reported or suspected, with every nuance of its care and protection? Spring training is not such a long time ago where Johan Santana's elbow is concerned — it was the starting point of 166.2 innings of wear and tear, every 0.1 of which needed to be justified when talking about that amount of money. And Omar's own words make it glaringly obvious that when it came to the Wilpons' prize investment, he's been asleep at the switch.

“Paperwork, that's false hustle.” Uh-huh. More and more, that foolish quote given to Sports Illustrated in better times looks like it should be Minaya's professional epitaph. Because it seems like every time he addresses the media, he reveals that he hasn't done his homework.

As for Johan's own conference call, in which he said he was fine with how things had been handled? I don't believe him either. I believe he's a good employee who wouldn't hang his bosses out to dry for a bunch of reporters, and I believe he'd pitch until that arm was ready to fall off rather than give in to pain or defeat. But the former has little bearing on the truth of what happened, and the latter is just another indication that the Mets' baseball people have been cavalier at best and negligent at worst.

Next came the trade of Billy Wagner to the Red Sox for two prospects (Chris Carter and someone yet unleaked) we've been telegraphed not to expect too much from. Here the Mets said the right things — Billy's a good soldier who deserves a postseason shot, we got prospects back, etc. — but I didn't believe any of that either. The Mets dumped Wagner's salary, plain and simple. They could have held on to him, offered him arbitration and taken a shot at high draft picks, but they didn't do that. What does it say about the state of the Mets that they felt they needed to recoup the relatively paltry (by baseball standards) sum of $3.5 million?

And this is where it starts to get really troubling: I don't believe the Mets are going to put that $3.5 million towards making the baseball team better.

I've read analyses of the Wagner deal arguing that two middling prospects are a better bet than two draft picks when you take into account the uncertainty of signing and developing draft picks, and maybe that's true. But I also read a lot of approving reactions to the Wagner trade based on the assumption that prospects are better because the Mets draft incompetently and/or won't sign their draft picks anyway. And even if nothing else I imagine to be true is true, that's incontrovertible evidence of a serious fan-relations problem.

But let's talk about draft picks. As noted in the New York Times, the Mets signed only seven of their picks from the draft's first 10 rounds and spent $1.86 million on those signings. That's less than the Tampa Bay Rays spent. Less than the Florida Marlins spent. Less than the Oakland A's spent. Less than the Kansas City Royals spent. Less than the Pittsburgh Pirates spent. In fact, it's less than every other team in baseball spent. Asked about this by the Times, the Mets' director of amateur scouting pointed out that the Mets went nearly $400,000 over slot to sign top pick Steven Matz, as if we should be proud of them for ignoring toothless bullshit decrees from Bud Selig they never should have paid attention to in the first place.

And going back to Omar, you probably remember reports doubting that he'll be fired — not so much because he doesn't deserve it, but because he'd pocket $2 million and the new guy would want his own staff, leading to more payouts to freshly terminated employees. Again, the kind of money that would instantly bankrupt me or Greg and most of you, but not a huge amount of money for a giant-market club with a new, high-priced stadium.

And all of this seems to point to what we'd prefer not to discuss.

The Mets have been tight-lipped about exactly how much money Bernie Madoff stole form the Wilpons — I've seen estimates ranging from $700 million to less than you'd think. Whatever the figure is, I sympathize immensely with the Wilpons. To be robbed by someone you trusted must be beyond awful, and to have the extent of your violation be the subject of endless questioning and voyeuristic interest must be infuriating. The Wilpons should have been able to enjoy the first year in the new ballpark they built to evoke things they hold dear, and they've had little chance to do that. None of what they've gone through should be anybody's business.

Except, unfortunately, it is. What the Wilpons can and will pay, and what that will mean for the team that takes the field in 2010 and subsequent years, affects everything. It affects free agents big and small, not just in who gets offers in the first place, but in how agents assess the overall competitiveness of the team and the likelihood that team will add pieces to try and get their clients a ring. It affects sponsors wondering if their companies will be showcased with a winner or a laughingstock. It affects draft picks, scouting and minor-league operations. And, of course, it affects fans wondering if it's worth it to shell out for season tickets or partial plans.

If the Wilpons have absorbed horrific losses that are indeed affecting the team, sooner or later that will be impossible to hide. If they haven't, their silence and their team's recent actions have created the perception that they have. Either way, the team we love is mired in a toxic situation. Loyal, rational fans openly scoff at what the Mets say about injuries, personnel moves or draft picks. They don't believe the GM has a plan, and they're starting to believe the owners won't spend money to put things right.

I desperately hope I'm wrong about this. I hope the Wilpons are OK financially, for their own sakes and not just for how it might affect my evening plans. I hope that their team is really unaffected by their losses. I hope that they are looking hard at what is wrong with their considerable investment. And I hope next year all this looks like paranoia and distraction bred by a year of buzzard's luck, and we spend a summer to remember in Citi Field, enjoying the terrors and joys of watching a healthy team chasing a division title.

But I fear the goblins are all too real. I know the Mets are badly run, I fear they're financially damaged, and I worry that the latter will make it impossible to fix the former. And if that's true, 2009 is just a preview of what awaits us, for who knows how many years to come.

Now We're Mischtified

Ollie Perez is out for the season in deference to right knee surgery. One would like to believe it was patellar tendinosis that caused Ollie to be so godawful almost every start this year, and that when they address his tendon issues, he'll be on the road to reverting to the Ollie who was unhittable often in 2007 and occasionally in 2008. They may want to install a strike zone detector somewhere deep within his being while they're poking around.

The Mets' next five starts are scheduled to be taken by Kevin Kobel, Ray Burris, Juan Berenguer, Dock Ellis and Tom Hausman…sorry, those are the five pitchers who started five consecutive games for the Mets in September 1979, and to be fair, there was a doubleheader mixed in there. Otherwise we might have seen Craig Swan or Pete Falcone.

Either of whom would be at least a No. 2 in the current rotation.

The Mets' next five starts in real life are scheduled to be taken by Mike Pelfrey, Tim Redding, Pat Misch, Bobby Parnell and Nelson Figueroa, though Jerry Manuel told Joe Benigno and Evan Roberts that if he has to use Misch in relief to win a game tonight or tomorrow (because using Pat Misch is such an ironclad guarantee of success), he'll go with Lance Broadway on Friday.

Stephanie asked me if Lance Broadway was actually somebody's porn name.

Two Kinds of Hopeless

“He could have fun in a stalled elevator.”
—Bob Murphy, on Tug McGraw

Inside the attic of Two Boots Tavern, I’m convinced there is a painting of the National League standings that grows grayer by the month. There’s probably also an X-ray of Dorian Gray’s right elbow up there, and every time I walk in the restaurant to read aloud, its ulnar collateral ligament tears a little more.

Gotta be, right? I can track the progress of this blighted Mets season by the prevailing background vibe at each of our generally genial Two Boots events.

• In June, for METSTOCK, we looked up at the Mets game frequently and enthusiastically, convinced the Mets we’d known since 2006 or thereabouts were going to put away those not particularly pesky Baltimore Orioles, because that’s what the Mets are supposed to do. Alas, Frankie Rodriguez legitimately blows a save for the first time and our team falls three behind the Phillies. Not good, not good at all, but not cause for giving up.

• In July, on the first AMAZIN’ TUESDAY, as new rightfielder Jeff Francoeur ducks a ball he couldn’t make out in the Washington lights, the Mets prove unquestionably down in the dumps, frustrating the hell out of everybody who takes intermittent peeks at the Two Boots TVs. We lose 4-0 to the lowly Nationals and fall an improbable — but not impossible — seven out of the N.L. Wild Card lead. Still, we care that we lost because there’s still something to care about up on those screens.

• It’s August now, and we just had our second AMAZIN’ TUESDAY, an extraordinarily enjoyable evening among friends and extended Summer Family. The game was on per usual, and glances were taken, but this time the Mets didn’t devastate us in the ninth or disappoint us much before then. They barely distracted us. That’s what happens when yet another wave of your personnel has been disabled, shut down, traded or whatever. The biggest cheer (and, really, it was more of a non-groan) erupted when it was noticed Francoeur was playing through thumb pain. The biggest buzz, such as it was, came not from Nelson Figueroa’s reasonably robust emergency start (every Mets start is essentially an emergency start) but from the sight of Gary Sheffield leaving with whatever was ailing him…though I’d have to say the most excitement emanated after the game, when we learned J.J. Putz was announced as out for the season.

Somebody must have had Putz in an injury pool.

The Mets lost to the Marlins, dropping their record to a season-worst twelve games under .500 and pushing them more games back of whatever it is we’re no longer contending for than I care to check. Everybody in our reading room was a Mets fan, but nobody seemed hot or bothered over the defeat. That’s what happens when losses accumulate swiftly and numbingly.

Yet our band of brothers and sisters, united for this evening entirely by our Mets fandom, enjoyed a pretty Amazin’ Tuesday, what with the beer and the pizza and the in-depth Mets discussion. The way we Mets fans can have fun in this stalled elevator of a season indicates we may very well be as hopeless as our team.

But in a good way.

Thanks to all who came out for our second AMAZIN’ TUESDAY, along with the sensational staff at Two Boots Tavern. If the Mets continue to exist in some discernible physical form, we’re going to do it one more time, on September 15. We’ll be announcing another great lineup of readers and talkers shortly.

Where's Nolan Ryan Now That We Could Actually Use Him?

Just to catch you up on New York Mets pitcher depletion matters:

• Johan Santana, out for the season as you might have suspected once he was scratched from tonight's start. He's going in for “minor” arthroscopic elbow surgery to remove bone chips. I know…shudder, but they fixed his knee OK, proving perhaps that every Met who goes out with an injury maybe someday comes back. Nick Evans takes his place on the roster, thereby quelling all those urgent “Where's Nick Evans?” inquiries that show just how far we have fallen as a people.

• Billy Wagner, traded to Boston for two demi-prospects to be named. He waived his right to refuse shipment, saving the Mets some money in the short term and perhaps helping the Red Sox in the fight for the Greater Good this fall. Mostly Billy Wagner will help Billy Wagner look for another contract/closer role next year. I tend to agree with a friend who calls Wagner “Armando Benitez with more self-esteem,” but good luck to him anyway given his hard work getting back to the majors and 101 saves in a Mets uniform (fourth-most behind Franco, Benitez and Orosco). The occasional self-serving outbursts and ninth-inning blowups don't completely negate the stability he gave the post-Looper bullpen — and he's the reason there's even one Metallica song on my iPod. In any event, this grants the previously demoted Pat Misch a return trip from Buffalo. Other than Angel Pagan's two varieties of homer, Pat Misch's four scoreless innings were the best thing about Sunday's überdebacle. That also shows just how far we have fallen as a people.

• J.J. Putz, not pitching for the Cyclones tonight as scheduled, his return to the Mets pushed back just a little further. Somehow I doubt the Putzheads in Brooklyn were really expecting (or lining up) to see him. On the positive side, Cyclones Poker Chips Night is still on for Saturday, September 5. Better poker chips than elbow chips.

(Oh, and Ollie's knee is going to be examined. Wish they'd look at Omar's head while they're at it.)

AMAZIN' TUESDAY Tonight!

UPDATE: THIRD AMAZIN' TUESDAY IS SEPTEMBER 15, 7:00 PM, WITH GREG PRINCE, JON SPRINGER, JEFF PEARLMAN AND JOHN COPPINGER, TWO BOOTS TAVERN. CURRENT INFO HERE.

Just a reminder that your friends from Faith and Fear are co-hosting AMAZIN' TUESDAY tonight at 7:00 at Two Boots Tavern on the Lower East Side, 384 Grand St., between Norfolk and Suffolk, accessible via the F to Delancey and other popular subway lines. If you haven't been to one of our nights of reading, rooting and Randy Milligan, an impartial observer filed reviews from Metstock in June and the first AMAZIN' TUESDAY in July. When you see what you missed, surely you'll want a piece of the action this time around.

Our guests are two of the most insightful observers of the Metsopotamian condition we know. Dana Brand, author of 2007's wonderful Mets Fan, will be sharing with us The Last Days of Shea, so brand spanking new the ink is still wet. Dana also blogs regularly, thoughtfully and passionately here, and you are urged to read him regularly. Caryn Rose, known in these parts as Metsgrrl, is one of the go-to sources for life at Citi Field and its psychic environs. We're so happy to have them both.

Phil Hartman, the most Met-minded restaurateur New York has seen since Rusty Staub called it a day, will be serving up The Stork, a pizza made with Creole chicken, wild mushrooms, cheddar and mozzarella in honor of George Theodore and the (Tim) Teufel Shuffle martini, which, naturally, is shuffled not stirred. Phil's AMAZIN' TUESDAY offer of a free beer in exchange for a Met baseball card still stands. It's a great way to rid your collection of those unwanted Ollie Perezes.

Speaking of baseball cards, you're in for a treat when Jason gives you a look inside his glorious obsession that is The Holy Books. You haven't lived until you've heard what it's like to live without Al Schmelz.

As for living without Johan Santana, we'll be doing that, too, for it is what we do when such a burden is thrust upon us. The Mets-Marlins game will be on and you're welcome to look up at a TV while we talk, read and kibitz, but feel free to look at us, your pizza or your drink instead as the action at Soilmaster Stadium dictates.

We're not judgmental. We're Mets fans.

To reach Two Boots Tavern, you can take the F to Delancey and walk two short blocks south and two blocks east to Grand between Norfolk and Suffolk. There is also the J, M or Z to Essex or the B or D to Grand. Phone: 212/228-8685.

When Your Luck Is Batting Zero

The Mets lost again, which of course you probably expected.

Jeff Francoeur hurt his thumb making that great catch Sunday, which can't possibly surprise you.

And now Johan Santana will miss his Tuesday start with elbow discomfort. Johan Santana's elbow was about the only thing that wasn't giving us discomfort in 2009.

Scratch that small favor.

I'm Calling It Shame

“Ain’t nothin’ horrible gonna happen today!”
—Nate Cox, shortly before he’s macheted to death by his brother Dewey in Walk Hard

I probably would have remembered being at Sunday’s game for the two three-run homers the opposing team blasted in the top of the first.

Or the way the home manager took out his starting pitcher after he ran a 3-0 count on the opposing pitcher, still in the top of the first.

Or the opposing pitcher being a first-time returning icon.

Or his giving up an inside-the-park home run to the first batter he faced.

Or the opposing centerfielder facilitating the four-bagger by apparently being too delicate to pick up a baseball that was by no means wedged between the fence and the ground.

Or the opposing pitcher/returning icon singling in a run despite being a terrible hitter.

Or the inside-the-park home run hitter also hitting an outside-the-park home run.

Or the opposing second baseman, with a batting average worse than even that of the offensively pathetic home catcher, collecting several hits while playing in place of perhaps the fiercest visiting player the host venue had ever known.

Or the way that the opposing second baseman — his average seemingly soaring with every plate appearance — was robbed of an additional base hit by the home rightfielder who was mimicking his franchise’s greatest right field play ever.

Or the way that spectacular catch was mistakenly ruled a trap, allowing the opposing second baseman to race unmolested to third.

Or the way the umpires conferred and ruled that trap call a mistake, thus foiling the opposing second baseman vis-à-vis the extraordinary effort of the home rightfielder.

I’ll probably remember all that, too, but I wouldn’t blame anybody if they forgot all of it and only remembered the now mythic ending of what shall forever be known by one sobriquet. All index entries regarding the events of August 23, 2009, whether they be “Pagan, Angel (leadoff inside-the-park home run)“; “Martinez, Pedro (relatively triumphant return)“; “Perez, Oliver (enormous waste of money and time)“; or “Umpires, Terrible (rare competent performance of tasks in series)”, will necessarily carry the notation seePlay, Game-Ending Unassisted Triple“.

The Game-Ending Unassisted Triple Play Game…or TGEUTPG for short. I’m pretty sure that’s the sound I made when Jeff Francoeur’s liner landed in Eric Bruntlett’s glove and Eric Bruntlett stepped on second to force a departed-for-third Luis Castillo in advance of tagging an onrushing Daniel Murphy.

“TGEUTPG!”

It’s pronounced exactly as it feels.

You could say lots else at a moment like that, and I’m sure we all did. I could hear it like I’ve heard little else this year. New Shea…I’ve been calling it Citi Field, but the impulse, given the lunacy of the bottom of the ninth is, as those ubiquitous t-shirts suggest, to go with the area’s indigenous name…was roaring like Old Shea in the bottom of the ninth. Visions of improbability befitting Saturday night’s celebration danced in the heads of everyone who stayed for the — if you’ll forgive the understatement — dramatic conclusion to Sunday’s affair. Could have I been the only Mets fan doing the math and refashioning Bob Murphy’s signature declaration? We had been down 6-0, now it was 9-6 going on 9-7 and, if we could go on a just a little longer, we could win this Damn Thing 10-9, just as we did in Philadelphia in 1990, (and would do there again in 2008). It wasn’t a perfect construct, with the cities, situations and teams trading roles, but it was in the air, even if I couldn’t bring myself to utter it for fear of ruining it.

I don’t know that I’ve thought in those terms since Old Shea stood tall and New Shea parked cars. Infrequent has been the occasion in 2009 when I was worried enouigh about the outcome of an individual game to fret jinxing it. These Mets have not seemed worth shielding from superstition nor have they much been in a position in which the slightest flap of a butterfly’s wings could tangibly alter the outcome of history. Had things unfolded differently Sunday, the Mets would have surged to within 13½ games of first with 38 to play. The bottom of the ninth wasn’t about a pennant race (if it had been, I’d be deep into the Xanax by now). It was about why you stay to the bottom of the ninth despite losing all day and all season. It was about why you don’t get up and leave after the top of the first when the mold for much of what you’re about to experience has clearly been cast. It was about imagining how you’re going to celebrate one of the greatest comebacks in Mets history and then fighting off the impulse to imagine such a happy ending because if you think like that, it’s never going to happen.

I thought like that. It never happened. But I’m not blaming myself, not when I have the 2009 Mets as accomplices.

There will be no UltiMET Classics from this season, except perhaps airing on other teams’ regional sports networks. You could argue, if you prefer taut to turbulent, that this exhibition of baseball shouldn’t be confused for classic. Even the climactic moment, one so swift and final it left absolutely no room for denouement, was forged by an error (at first), another error (at second) and a quasi-error (again at second). The Phillies were failing as much as the Mets were succeeding, but we never claimed the Mets didn’t need all the help they could get. It would enhance this game’s classic bona fides if indeed Eric Bruntlett had extended himself as heroically in the bottom of the ninth against Jeff Francoeur as Francoeur had against Bruntlett in right in the top of the ninth when he channeled Ron Swoboda. The Phillie second baseman, however, just happened to be in the right place while every Met who mattered found himself in the wrong place. The two runners in motion would have been better off standing still, while Francoeur’s mistake was suddenly developing a knack for making contact.

But who could have guessed? All day, I’d been muttering “no DP” whenever a Met got to first with less than two out. I guess I should have been more expansive in expressing my anxieties.

New Shea roared right to the instant Francoeur’s liner was caught and trebled. Then the roar was supplanted by an echo roar, that of the maybe 20% of the house that was satisfied with what had just transpired. The Phillies fans were maybe a fifth as loud as we would have been en masse had things worked out, but I’m sure they were just as ecstatic as we were on the verge of becoming. Why not? They had just seen their fragile closer not blow a three-run lead and their stonehanded fill-in second baseman compensate for all the damage he did in the preceding minutes, which itself was about to cancel out all the fine hitting he did while subbing for the chronically Meticidal Chase Utley.

You’re not expecting to hear any kind of widespread positive reaction at home, whichever home it is, when the Mets are thwarted. The only time that’s happened is when the opposing team is from another precinct of New York. At the end of Sunday, I suppose the only good I could divine besides the Mets battling, never saying die, yada yada yada, is this happened against the Phillies in a season when we’re long out of it and not against the Yankees at any time ever. It’s hard to believe, actually, that this wasn’t a Subway Series ninth inning, that there wasn’t a dropped popup or bases-loaded walk to a relief pitcher mixed in there to spice up the meatball, as it were.

I would say that would be too much, but wouldn’t you think we’d already exceeded our annual quota of too much? Isn’t a game that begins with two three-run homers too much? Isn’t it too much that the first three-run homer is hit on the twelfth pitch of an at-bat? Isn’t it too much that the second three-run homer is hit by a guy who had been 0-for-23 against the Mets this year? Isn’t three years and $36 million for Oliver Perez too much?

The whole day was a bit much, starting with my having woken up Sunday morning at three o’clock with the kind of headache one might contract had a surgeon taken the Manhattan Yellow Pages, dipped it in cement and inserted it into your brain through your ear. I somehow shook it off, though, and by eleven o’clock I was on the Long Island Rail Road with my friend Joe, heading where we hadn’t headed together since April. Our reception committee included:

• A man on the 7, looking very much the Sam Elliott part in Mask, commenting approvingly on my DELGADO 21 t-shirt (“I bought his jersey because I like his politics”) and recommending Fred Wilpon sit Ollie down with Sandy Koufax thereby solving everybody’s problems;

• A Mickey Lolich-sized man in the row in front of us who told us (without our asking) that it was a mortal lock the Beach Boys would be singing the national anthem, but it wouldn’t be the “real” Beach Boys, therefore he planned to heckle these Mike Love-led latter-day impostors with cries of “WHERE’S BRIAN WILSON AND AL JARDINE?” (the Beach Boys, FYI, were nowhere in sight);

• Four teenagers next to him who spent most of the afternoon taking pictures of themselves — that is, holding the camera in front of their faces and laughing hysterically — when not being engaged by the Brian Wilson guy;

• A man behind us who informed his seatmates that the Mets have an option year remaining on Carlos Delgado (they don’t), that the Mets are not permitted to use Billy Wagner because he was put on waivers (they are); and that Billy Wagner wears No. 34 (he doesn’t);

• And my favorite, the woman I remember from a previous outing in this particular section, she who I dubbed Captain Obvious. Captain Obvious points out all that is readily apparent (except that Billy Wagner wears No. 13, because she asked the guy who was sure he wore 34 — and is not righthanded, since it was No. 64, righty Elmer Dessens, warming up that brought all this on), repeats it incessantly and complains about it. Captain Obvious is also a weathervane, as in Sean Green throws a strike, he’s very good/Sean Green throws a wild pitch, he’s very bad. My previous exposure to Captain Obvious informed me “Jerry has to use Sean Green to get him mentally well in the head.” Also, Captain Obvious enjoyed a trip to the air-conditioned Verizon Studio. Know how I know that? Because she mentioned it approximately every eight seconds for five consecutive innings.

But I would have forgotten all those fine people had Jeff Francoeur’s liner sailed past Eric Bruntlett’s glove, or at least would have downgraded them from irritating to colorful. I would have reveled in Angel Pagan’s longball versatility and gotten a far greater kick from Shane Victorino invoking his own secret ground rule in the first instead of simply picking up the ball Pagan hit to the wall. I would have remembered something, vaguely, about Ollie Perez giving up a couple of bombs to Jayson Werth then Carlos Ruiz, but would have chalked it up as another no-decision and given him credit for, in his fashion, displaying those innate winning ways that make him worth every penny he’s getting. I would have needed reminding, maybe, that August 23 was also Pedro Martinez’s homecoming, and that I did clap when I first saw him in the wrong uniform, but, as so often happens, the storyline I suspected would be primary wound up no more than tertiary. I would have delineated great foreshadowing from Francoeur’s catch on Bruntlett, particularly the shoe polished way the umpires caucused to overcome their tendency to make calls with their eyes closed all weekend. And, if we had won the Damn Thing the way it began to appear we were en route to doing, I would have recanted every nasty thing I thought of and yelled at Brian Schneider and his .176 uselessness. I would be invoking Eric Bruntlett for the rest of my days every time we didn’t think something could go right instead of the way I’ll probably be invoking him every time something goes inevitably wrong. I even had a scenario worked out in which the Phillies would be eliminated in the first round and a narrative would take hold that once Lidge and Bruntlett blew that game to the Mets, you just knew they weren’t repeating. It wasn’t an essential aspect of what I imagined, but it did cross my mind.

I’d say a lot crosses my mind in a game like this, but I’m fairly certain I’d never seen a game like this until Sunday.

Alas, Jeff Francoeur’s liner sailed into Eric Bruntlett’s glove. I stared at second base, counted the sudden surfeit of outs, absorbed the echo roar of what no longer felt like New Shea and trudged out of Citi Field with my friend Joe, each of us deconstructing what the hell just happened and how the hell it could have happened.

AMAZIN’ TUESDAY returns to Two Boots Tavern August 25 at 7:00 PM. Join Jason Fry, Dana Brand, Caryn Rose and me for a fun night of reading, eating, drinking and all things Mets baseball (Mets baseball optional). Full details here.

Faith and Fear in Flushing: An Intense Personal History of the New York Mets is available from Amazon, Barnes & Noble or a bookstore near you. Keep in touch and join the discussion on Facebook.

I’ve followed the crowd to Twitter. Follow me there, if you like.

Um, Wow

I always said my hope was that sometime in a hopefully long lifetime of watching baseball, I’d get to see an unassisted triple play.

I suppose I might have qualified that a bit.

In other news, it’s not our year.

From '69 to '09

Angel Pagan, ’69 Topps style, with Seaver and Agee behind him. A nice touch from a very nice Citi Field ceremony.