The blog for Mets fans
who like to read

ABOUT US

Greg Prince and Jason Fry
Faith and Fear in Flushing made its debut on Feb. 16, 2005, the brainchild of two longtime friends and lifelong Met fans.

Greg Prince discovered the Mets when he was 6, during the magical summer of 1969. He is a Long Island-based writer, editor and communications consultant. Contact him here.

Jason Fry is a Brooklyn writer whose first memories include his mom leaping up and down cheering for Rusty Staub. Check out his other writing here.

Got something to say? Leave a comment, or email us at faithandfear@gmail.com. (Sorry, but we have no interest in ads, sponsored content or guest posts.)

Need our RSS feed? It's here.

Visit our Facebook page, or drop by the personal pages for Greg and Jason.

Or follow us on Twitter: Here's Greg, and here's Jason.

Be Amazed at the Friends You Have Here on Your Trip

In a way, this starts with Willie Randolph as long as he’s still managing our team. Willie Randolph commenced on the New York Mets adventure of a lifetime in the middle of February three years ago, as did Jason and I.

Watching Randolph’s Welcome Back press conference Friday, I felt an unusual kinship with Willie. Skip said something about starting his fourth season here. Has it really been that long? I know that it has, I know that he kicked off his first Spring Training in 2005 and I know that it is now Spring Training 2008, so it all adds up. But gosh, is this really his fourth year on the job, the fourth year of the Willie Randolph Era?

More to the point, are we really beginning the fourth year of Faith and Fear in Flushing? Given that our first day of posting was Willie’s first day of helming, February 16, 2005, I suppose we are.

Happy third anniversary, FAFIF family. I don’t know Willie except from TV but I’ve gotten to know many of you and can say that it is the friendships I have gained and had enhanced because of this blog that tastes — à la the mythical Champagne our manager suggested he and his players would sip last September — sweetest of all. Hence, our glass is raised to you who read us and you who write us and you who meet us at the game and you who wear our shirt in your travels and you who tell two people so they tell two people…and you who prefer Yoo-hoo to Champagne for that matter. Here’s to you who have been with us to now and you who will be with us again.

If blogging at its best represents community, I suppose Faith and Fear, when the Mets were at their worst, was our communal crying, cursing, growling and gnashing towel. Hard to glance back at our third year without taking into account September 2007 (the subject that just happened to dominate Willie’s presser) and how we all died inside a little, maybe a lot. But as one whose self-appointed task it was to chronicle that which killed us as it was in the process of doing us in, I believe we came out of it stronger because we came out of it together. I’d rather die inside with all of you than die inside alone…if those are indeed my only Met options.

Maybe they won’t be in Willie Randolph’s and our fourth year. The Mets — we hope — will do what they can to right recent wrongs, while we continue to vigilantly keep company, share common ground and root that our rooting grants us the victory we celebrate so gleefully in this space that all the confetti Lower Broadway can bear will have nothing on the blizzard of words we will be not dreading, but dying to write. Can’t say for certain what the Mets will do next, but I can assert with assurance that however our team plays on the field or in my mind, I will be extremely happy to come home to Faith and Fear in Flushing and live it to the hilt alongside my partner and among every one of you.

Two Stretches

Welcome to Flashback Friday: Tales From The Log, a final-season tribute to Shea Stadium as viewed primarily through the prism of what I have seen there for myself, namely 358 regular-season and 13 postseason games to date. The Log records the numbers. The Tales tell the stories.

6/9/99 W Toronto (A) 2-0 Reed 12 77-75 W 4-3 (14)

Excuse me while I check in with the front desk.

Topic?

Longest game I ever went to at Shea Stadium.

Innings?

Fourteen.

Time?

Four hours, thirty-five minutes.

Day game or night game?

Night. Definitely night.

Well, the night helps, but that’s not that many innings or that many hours, historically speaking in Shea terms.

I’m aware of that. But I do have some good stories.

Do you?

I wouldn’t bother you with this if I didn’t.

Is this another of those journey of self-discovery Flashbacks or was this actually a good game?

I’d say it was a good game.

Do the Mets actually win this game? We’ve been getting some complaints that the Mets never seem to win in these Flashbacks.

Trust me. It’s a win worthy of Mets Walkoffs.

Uh-huh…you got anything longer than fourteen innings? There’s a twenty-five inning game on file. I don’t suppose you went to that one.

No, wasn’t there for that.

What about the twenty-three innings in 1964. That was seven hours and twenty-three minutes and it was the second game of a doubleheader. A half-hour longer and it would have lasted from May into June. Were you there for that?

I was like a year old then!

I didn’t ask your age. I asked if you were there.

No, I wasn’t there on May 31, 1964.

Well, all right, if that’s the longest you’ve got. You sure it was good and not just long?

It was both.

All right. Go ahead.

I do want to tell you about my longest game, but I am a little disappointed I can’t serve up a really impressive number. That Memorial Day twinbill in ’64 was really something, I’ve been hearing all my life, but that’s a full nine innings out of my price range. And the twenty-five innings ten years later? I vaguely recall watching it go into extras on Channel 9, but even I wasn’t awake, at the age of eleven, to see Hank Webb wing that pickoff attempt up the right field line so Bake McBride could score from first on September 11-12, 1974. Despite being a most nocturnal Mets fan, I’m afraid I don’t have one of those legendary marathons in my Log. Sorry about that.

But I’ve got this one, and I’m quite fond of it. It is from the most magical year in Mets history that didn’t result in a pennant and those of us who stayed to the better (not bitter) end knew right away we had taken part in one of its most magical nights. And mornings.

It is my pleasure and honor to set the Flashback machine for the very first time to 1999, specifically to 6/9/99, a night for buffoons, for groupies, for gullibility, for extremism, for uninformedness, for camouflage, for comebacks, for ties, for heat, for long relief, for adequate fly balls, for unlikely victory, for setting a tone, for turning a page and for two seventh-inning stretches — one now, one later.

Gosh, where to begin?

Let’s start with the ’99 Mets themselves. They weren’t yet quite the ’99 Mets who earned that faint-praise banner over the right field wall, the one that credits them for their Wild Card and NLDS success, the one that could just as easily say “1999” and say it all. The Mets who entered June 9 had been playing well…for three days. For eight days before that, they were playing terribly (0-8 to the Diamondbacks, Reds and local team of unknown origin) and getting coaches fired. Out went Apodaca and Niemann and Robson. In came Wallace and Jackson and Brantley. Did it matter? Bobby V, who was also thought a goner in some circles, must have thought so. On the night Steve Phillips showed three coaches the door, the Mets had played 55 games and had 27 wins to show for it. The sharks were snapping at Bobby’s heels. You’re doomed, Bobby, right? Right?

Wrong, said the embattled manager. Give me another 55 games. I’ll win…40! That’s how many! I’ll go 40-15! He might have used first-person plural, but no doubt he was thinking singular. Everybody laughed, but with Dave Wallace tending the pitchers and Al Jackson watching the pen and Mickey Brantley working on swings, the Mets won a game. Then another. Then another. They were 3-0; all the Mets had to do was go 37-15 and Bobby V would be the genius he said he was.

My phone rang at work, at the ol’ beverage magazine. It was Ed from a major brewer. Ed from a major brewer was a fan of some local team of unknown origin. His job got him access to tickets for Mets games, games Ed had no interest in attending, games for which Ed could be a nice guy and share the wealth with those would value them. Ed had been favoring me, the only Mets fan he seemed to know, with the occasional company seats intermittently since 1995. The Mets had never lost when he did me that solid.

“I’ve got four for Wednesday night against the Blue Jays,” Ed told me. “Do you want ’em?”

I never turned down Ed.

Four fine field box seats on the third base side. One for me. One for Laurie a few desks over since Laurie had regularly favored me with freebies when she got her hands on them. One for my new pal Richie whom I met via AOL over the winter and could now say I’d known since 1962 if he could make it (he could). And one, since he happened to be standing nearby as Laurie and I were making our getaway plans, for Yuri, the slightly off-center ad salesman and Pirates fan who didn’t really know baseball (couldn’t properly pronounce Stargell and had never heard the phrase “junior circuit”) but was kind of fun when he didn’t want you to mention his peanut-flavored soda client in your story.

Yuri, Laurie and I took the 7 out from the city. Yuri, away from the office, was a different sort. He wasn’t, how to put this…a jerk. He was actually quite engaging. Though others would supercede him in my esteem many hours later, he became my hero on that subway ride, explaining in detail too exact to be BS how he had stared down an evil company executive to shake loose a commission he had been owed. I left Manhattan rolling my eyes at Yuri. I arrived in Queens almost looking up to him, except maybe for the inability to properly pronounce Stargell.

We met Richie at Gate D. I always met Richie at Gate D in 1999. Always to that point was three games, but it felt like forever. Richie drove in from Long Island, from a town not all that far from mine, so he wasn’t a bad guy to know when the game was over. “You sure?” I’d ask when he offered me a ride. “I can take the train.” But he was sure it was no big deal. Richie coached Little League, including his 12-year-old son that year. Richie knew pitching. Richie knew baseball. Richie was not that much older than me, but in 1999 I kind of adopted him as the baseball big brother I’d never had.

I never know what to make of the stew I create when I introduce various acquaintances and friends. Theoretically, Richie and Laurie knew one another as they had sprung to life from the same electronic message board. Because I did not mention their screen names, Laurie had no idea until I confirmed it that Richie was the same guy on AOL who composed the Lynyrd Skynyrd parody “Ooh, That’s Mel” for Mel Rojas. When she knew that, she was truly impressed. As for Yuri, he was slipping back into his preternatural goofiness which Richie decided to take advantage of. Richie is an electrician but told Yuri he was a state trooper. Yuri pestered him on and off throughout the evening for stories of high-speed chases.

Prior to the 7:40 start (the last year the Mets would wait that long for first pitch), we were told we had a special guest on the field. It was the president of Venezuela, Hugo Chavez. He has quite a reputation these days as an America-hating strongman (who, to be fair, provides extra security for the family of Johan Santana) but back then he was just some visiting dignitary — in town to drum up financial support for his home country, the socialist Chavez slammed the closing gavel to end the day’s trading on the New York Stock Exchange — invited to throw out the first ball. He took some pictures with Venezuelan second baseman Edgardo Alfonzo and was honored with the playing of the Venezuelan national anthem.

Venezuela. Canada for the Blue Jays. USA for the rest of us. Three anthems that night. Has to be a Shea record.

Hugo Chavez, even once you know his reputation, was clearly not the most unlikable public figure on the Shea field that June night. That distinction belonged to Blue Jay starter David Wells. Thirteen months earlier, Wells pitched a perfect game elsewhere in the city. Eight months prior he had become a world champion. Now he was a Torontoan, exiled north so a fine, upstanding man of character named Roger Clemens could take his job (and maybe a few shots of “lidocaine and B12” to the ass region). Barely 18,000 were charmed enough to sit in on this Interleague special. Far too many of them applauded Wells when he took the mound. Far too many of them sat to our right. Three broads (the only way to properly describe them) dressed and behaving like David Wells greeted him effusively and repeatedly. I’d rather have sat near the America-hating strongman.

They whooped it up as Wells went largely untouched and our pitcher, the low-profile Rick Reed, was nicked for solo homers by Jose Cruz, Jr. and Darrin Fletcher (a Reeder nemesis, according to resident Reederologist Laurie) plus an RBI double by Carlos Delgado. It was 3-0 by the fourth and there was nothing in Wells’ performance to indicate the Mets would do a damn thing about it. YEAH, BOOMER! they bellowed. What can you say to that when you’re down 3-0?

Reed left after six and Laurie (annoyed by the fleeting presence of a woman she identified as a Mets camp follower, someone who knew Richie from the online world…and to think I used to be amazed that people ran into people they knew at Shea Stadium) followed shortly thereafter. It was going to be a quick night, she figured, a quick 3-0 loss and she was tired. That made it me and Richie the non-state trooper and Yuri the gullible ad salesman with the strange client base and the Wells broads and some otherwise distracted patrons who were following a Knicks playoff game via cell phone. I would not have given the Mets much chance of making their post-purge mark 4-0 when they came up for last licks. But at least it would be quick.

Ah, but these were the ’99 Mets! These were the Mets who had already established a precedent for ninth-inning drama a few Sundays earlier when they trailed another accomplished starter, Curt Schilling, by four and scored five. That one I watched glumly on television, waiting impatiently for the last out so I could take that shower I’d been putting off all afternoon. The last out never came and the shower didn’t take place until I jumped up and down in front of the TV and pounded the couch and shouted “GOOD! GOOD! I HATE THAT GUY!” as Schilling marched off in defeat. (For the family-nature sake of this blog, let’s say I was fully dressed while I did that.) The Mets were down three-nothing to Wells in the ninth? Hell, they’d been down four-nothing to Schilling.

In 1999, precedent meant something. Maybe it was because his groupies took off after eight, maybe it was because he was due at the China Club for a belated birthday celebration, maybe it was because David Wells Sucks, but he didn’t have a ninth any better than Schilling. Rickey Henderson (whose first-inning steal delighted Yuri as he had never seen him in person before) grounded out, but Hugo Chavez’s and my favorite Met, Fonzie, got on via single. John Olerud forced him at second, but Oly managed to leg it to first. Piazza singled him to third. On what had to be de facto defensive indifference on a Wells Girl-size scale, Mike stole second (Yuri should have been more impressed by that particular SB). Then Robin Ventura — whose seemingly innocent two-run homer that made it 4-2 on May 23 served as warning shot to Schilling and the Phils — singled to center.

Now instead of 3-0, it was 3-2. Now instead of Wells being one inning away from a shutout, he was lifted. Now instead of Yankees fans thinking this was a good night to come to Shea and be asinine, it was a night for Mets fans to jump up and down and punch inanimate objects and express their vitriol for Blue Jays pitchers and affirm their belief that you don’t leave before the final out.

In came Billy Koch of Rockville Centre, practically my neighbor from Long Island. I’d never heard of him, but Richie had (of course he did; Richie knew pitching). He can throw hard, Richie warned me. And he did. He may have been a little anxious, however, as this was his Shea debut and Shea is a lot closer to RVC than SkyDome is. In front of what remained of 18,254 and however many RVC relatives Koch left passes for, Billy the kid attempted to mow down Brian McRae. Normally, that wasn’t so tough. But B-Mac got a piece of the ball and lined it to short left, far enough to drive in pinch-runner Luis Lopez from second and place himself there in his stead with a double.

Hey, we didn’t lose! Hey, we tied it up! Hey, we’re still playing! HEY, WHERE’S YOUR DAVID WELLS NOW?

It would have been very tidy to have won the game right away, but Jays manager Jim Fregosi (always a welcome sight at Shea) intentionally walked Roger Cedeño to bring up Rey Ordoñez to set up a force at any number of bases, all of which Rey-Rey was capable of tapping toward weakly. Ordoñez, however crossed up the Toronto strategy by tapping weakly to Koch. He threw to Delgado and we were headed to extras.

Extras at Shea. If it ends in ten, it’s no big deal. Eleven means you know you’ve gotten your money’s worth. The twelfth inning is when it all starts to feel kind of kooky. It felt that way in the stands, as Yuri began to insist that he really needed to get home and Richie revealed he was due on a job site at 5:30 in the A.M. But when you’ve gotten this far into the process, how can you abandon it?

We got to the twelfth and we sat tight. The Knicks finished their playoff game, a big win judging by the cheers. The Mets couldn’t finish theirs. Koch did Rockville Centre proud even as he annoyed us, rendering the tenth and eleventh moot, same as Dennis Cook and John Franco did to the Blue Jays, just harder. Bobby V ran through his reserves, sending up just about everybody, save Benny Agbayani. Benny was Honolulu-hot then, already a partially fledged cult hero by the second week in June; he was hitting .409 and had smacked two homers Monday night. It was mysterious to us that he wasn’t called on. We found out later that he fouled a ball off his substantial self or during BP and was thus unavailable. It’s one of those things for which you can be at the ballpark for hours and hours and not know if somebody doesn’t fill you in. Nobody did.

The same could be said of the most famous moment from June 9, 1999, perhaps the signature image from one man’s career in New York, at least as some of his detractors (and possibly his supporters) choose to see it. In the twelfth, with long man Pat Mahomes following Reed, Wendell, Cook and Franco to the mound, Shannon Stewart reached for the Jays. He took off for second and Piazza unleashed a throw surprisingly equal to the task of catching Shannon stealing. We who remained said, ALL RIGHT! for we thought Stewart had been gunned down. ‘Cept Randy Marsh gave the batter, Craig Grebeck, first and Stewart second on catcher’s interference. We booed. We called Marsh a lousy scab based on my flawed recollection that he was a replacement ump in ’79 (never once using such language on our Reeder, who was just trying to make a decent living, get off his back). Richie, IBEW 3 member in good standing, cried for “a good union ump” to take Marsh’s place.

No dice. Marsh wasn’t going anywhere. Bobby Valentine was, however. He argued, he was tossed. We cheered the pointless cheers that fans cheer when they don’t get their way but imagine their cause has been rightly defended. We could see Piazza hadn’t interfered. We could see Stewart should have been out. We could see Valentine was valiant.

What we couldn’t see was Bobby V return to the dugout in what would eventually be considered his trademark disguise: the shades, the fake mustache (two eyeblack patches), the cap whose non-baseball logo I’ve never quite deciphered. I think he got it from the grounds crew. He reappeared in the dugout, the one place in which his appearance was verboten. It was picked up by the TV cameras, but not in the third base field boxes. We had no idea that a 3-3 game in the twelfth with no end in sight (thanks to the recurringly life-saving Mahomes, the kind of long reliever good teams seem to conjure out of nowhere) was not the story of the evening. The story was Bobby Valentine, the crazy insufferable genius gadfly self-promoting SOB manager to end all managers couldn’t just loiter in the runway like every other ejected skipper since the days of Muggsy McGraw. If your Rorschach on Bobby V was he was an unbalanced attention hound, you didn’t care for his alibi that he was just poking his head in to keep the guys loose. If you believed, as I did on most nights, that Bobby perfected whatever aspects of baseball he didn’t invent, you found it amusing, even uplifting; hell, he emblazoned a caricature of himself in that sneaky garb of his on the cover of the menus at the restaurant he opened across the Grand Central two years later. But if you were at Shea Stadium in the twelfth inning on June 9, 1999, mostly you found out about it later.

Later is what it got. Yuri still kept threatening to leave, but didn’t. Richie still had to get up early, but ignored that reality. I just wanted a happy ending, a three-game sweep of the Blue Jays and a four-game Mets winning streak. Mahomes got out of Marsh’s mess in the twelfth. Graeme Lloyd replaced Koch and picked up where he left off. Nothing for the Mets in the bottom of twelve. Nothing for the Jays in the top of thirteen. David Wells was probably beating up coffee shop patrons in Manhattan by now and Hugo Chavez likely began to think ill of America after one too many cold, hard Aramark pretzels, but we loyal Mets fans and stray Pirates fans continued to watch baseball. Lloyd gave up a single to Henderson (no SB) but then got Alfonzo, Mahomes (good hitter) and Piazza in the bottom of the thirteenth. Pat struck out Chris Woodward, walked Willis Otañez (Shawn Green, the Jewish Jay and best landsman seen at Shea since Shamsky, pinch-ran; I applauded lightly in observance of one of his identities while rooting for a pick-off in deference to his other more pressing characteristic) but took care of Stewart and Grebeck before Marsh could do any more damage.

Middle of the fourteenth. We’d wondered if we’d hear “Take Me Out To The Ball Game” a second time. We did. A very punchy performance by everybody. The whole thing about not caring if we ever get back took on a whole difference resonance. The clock had already struck midnight. This was now the game of June 9 and June 10, Eastern Daylight Time, no less.

All right, Mets — get serious and win this thing!

We’d been thinking and saying words to that effect since yesterday, but now we meant it. Lo and behold, here came some 1999 Mets to the rescue against fourth Toronto reliever Tom Davey: Luis Lopez, destined to be left off the postseason roster, walked; Brian McRae, traded at the deadline for Darryl Hamilton, did the same; after Dan Plesac replaced Davey, Roger Cedeño, whose distant future would sadden drastically inside Shea’s blue walls, bunted them over. And now it was up to Rey Ordoñez to end this thing.

In the third, Rey-Rey popped to third.

In the fifth, Rey-Rey flied to center.

In the eighth, Rey-Rey grounded to short.

In the ninth, Rey-Rey grounded to the pitcher…but you already knew that.

In the twelfth, Rey-Rey grounded to short again.

You can’t say Rey-Rey wasn’t getting his bat on the ball. And when you do that, who the hell knows what will happen next? In this case, Ordoñez, who had actually been hitting well of late — not just for him, but for a professional baseball player (6-for-9 in the first two games of this series) — swung, made contact and lifted a fly to left, over the head of the drawn-in Jacob Brumfield. Rey-Rey’s otherwise unremarkable fly scored his buddy Luis Lopez from third and just like that, after four hours and thirty-five minutes, your New York Mets were 4-3 winners in fourteen.

Can’t say a Rey Ordoñez single to secure a walkoff win is anticlimactic, yet a little bit of me hoped to challenge those 23- and 25-inning marathons from Shea lore, but Yuri’s wife would have begun to wonder and Richie had to get up soon and, come to think of it, so did I. My first order of business later that morning would be to call Ed at the major brewer and thank him — it was never any skin off Ed’s nose, but until he was transferred out of media relations in the early ’00s and could no longer provide those ducats, the Mets never lost a single game for which he sent me tickets…except for one in the Bronx, but road games are in a different section of The Log and therefore don’t count.

Yuri praised this game as the one game to see if he was going to see one at Shea Stadium in his life, and I’m pretty sure that was it for him. Richie praised coffee and graciously gave me a lift home; the LIRR would have meant a long Woodside wait that late. When I walked in the door, I grabbed The Log as always and entered the essentials. Technically, this was my second fourteen-inning game, my second fourteen-inning win and even my second 4:35 elapsed. Technically, June 9, 1999 only tied March 31, 1998 — the previous season’s opener — for longest in The Log, but that one was a day game. Trust me, this one lasted longer.

It was also momentous in another self-absorbed way. With the victory, my record (or the Mets’ with me in home attendance) edged up to 77-75. Since early ’98, I’d been climbing above .500 only to dip back under a few ill-timed losses later. I was three outs from getting tangled up in that tango of mediocrity once more, but Ventura, McRae, Mahomes, Ordoñez and the inspirational Bobby V all teamed to save me. That night began a 10-1 stretch inside The Log, a run that would set the tone for the life of The Log. If I can avoid going 0-33 in 2008, I will kiss Shea goodbye with a winning regular-season record. Having plunged as low as 38-53 at one point in my Sheagoing history, I consider that a significant if totally passive accomplishment on my part.

The Log’s page-turning 10-1 stretch peaked on August 6, a 2-1 win over the Dodgers, which also happened to be the 55th game since upper management put Bobby on notice and Bobby declared he’d go 40-15 over the next two months. That magnificent bastard did exactly that. He and his players, that is. They were 67-43 and had taken first place in the N.L. East. The Mets would cool off a bit as summer wound down, but there would be plenty of tricks left up their collective sleeve in 1999. It would prove to be a very good year for never leaving Shea before the final out.

Acknowledgement must be paid to FAFIF reader Jerry Balsam for reminding me out of the blue last year that Hugo Chavez was a visitor to Shea that night. I also tip my cap toward The Ballclub for its excellent Lost Classics account of this very same game which served to jog my memory on a couple of other helpful details.

Find A Way Back Into Love

Is it a coincidence that Valentine's Day coincides with Pitchers & Catchers? Aren't they the two most romantic dates on the calendar? Shouldn't they just be fused as one mushy, gushy holiday wherein we could celebrate all our true loves with utter efficiency?

Happy Valentine's Day today, and a good Pitchers & Catchers to one and all, too. As we are moved to say every year at this juncture, it's about time.

Special Cupid's greetings to all those who combined to make this an unexpectedly happy holiday: namely our heartthrob Johan Santana and the great Metsopotamian masses who secured his professional home for the next seven seasons. The list of enablers would have to include you and you and you and you and me and all of us who pay the freight and, not completely coincidentally, raised a ruckus and never quite let it settle down after certain unpleasant events transpired in the year before the one we're in now. I don't know that you and you and you and you and I can take tangible credit for forcing management's hand — it's not like Omar Minaya hadn't heard about what's been going on in Minnesota every fifth day for five years — but it's not out of the question that our collective crankiness helped nudge the party line off from where it sat in early October 2007, a month when the Met hierarchy had nothing more on their plates than press availabilities and nothing more to say than “we're fine, we're swell, it was just a little stumble, but otherwise it's all good.”

Yes, the Mets can be said to have run a very competitive divisional race in 2007. And a sinkhole on 17 would make for easy par at TPC Sawgrass if nobody acknowledged its presence signified a natural disaster.

I'm very much into politics, especially on recent Tuesdays and Saturdays, but I didn't need managers and general managers behaving like politicians last fall. I didn't need spin. I didn't need to be focus-grouped. I needed acknowledgement, tacit if not explicit, that something had gone terribly, terribly awry by those who oversaw the debacle that landed on our heads and pierced our hearts. I required accountability. I imagine you did, too.

Now, with pitchers and catchers joining David Wright (he got to St. Lucie first; it's just what he does) to fire up the first sparks of 2008, 2007 doesn't materially matter. We're not 5-12 in our last 17 anymore. We're 0-0 like everybody else. We're not collapsed. We are risen. And that is great.

But is it that easy, even with the sublime Santana in the Mets fold (unfortunate phrase, Mets fold), to put it all behind us? Is it that simple, even with the preternaturally disappointed Gl@v!ne dispatched back where he belongs, to blot the abysmal taste off our tongues? Does the twin-wisdom of renovating Port St. Lefty with Sr. Stupendous after resisting re-signing Mr. One-Third really rewind and erase the signature dive Gl@v!ne's now-former team so indelibly signed off on?

Did firing Don Imus end insensitive discourse in our time?

Prior to Santana, I was almost dreading Spring Training, almost dreading having to root for these Mets again, the Mets who joined T#m Gl@v!ne in that epic freefall, essentially the same cast minus a few offenders but topped off by the inspirational presences of Ryan Church and Brian Schneider. By the same token, however, I looked forward to Spring Training. I looked forward to whoever was a Met donning again a Mets uniform in a year that wasn't the one before the one we're in now. I had to see some 2008 Mets out there, even if a bunch of them were 2007 Mets until proven otherwise.

I'm a little more sanguine about the whole thing now. Maybe it's the exchange of two-time Cy Young winners and the quality and consistency we can expect from the 200-some innings we have clearly upgraded. Maybe it's just spring fever in February kicking in the way it's supposed to if you're a baseball fan — that marvelous virus of innate optimism to which no lover of this game should ever be immune as winter winds down. Still, I wonder. It's not the usual wonderment my blog partner detects in me annually, the way he's noticed that I never quite trust the new faces in our old places until I've seen them do something for us. It's wider and deeper than that.

It's a sinkhole of mistrust.

We came into last Spring Training obsessing on one pitch, one called strike that ended a postseason. We had had our heart broken at the end of 2006, but generally speaking, we didn't go to bed angry. We didn't hold it against the Mets. We rushed to embrace their next season. We trusted them to make it right.

Are you feeling that easy this time around? I'm not, and I don't say that in defiance of the Mets. Of course I want to be that easy. I want to melt into a pool of swoon at the first sight of meaningless exhibition play. I want to tingle from the back of my neck to the top of my rump when a public-address announcer addresses the public to announce, “now batting, number seven…” I want to be thrilled to pieces to hold this steady date with my perennial baseball Valentines.

I guess I will be. But it's gonna take some time this time, it really is. This may be the first Spring Training during which I need to get myself in rooting trim, to look past what even Johan Santana can't quite strike out just yet, to small-b believe…

• That the team that crushed me and my spirit five months ago is capable of not doing the same again…

• That it's not just another enormous tease…

• That it's legitimately possible that a baseball season doesn't have to end on a called strike three or with a resounding thud…

• That it could actually end with a much more desirable multiple-choice answer.

It's gonna take some time this time, and this time I don't think I'm just saying that.

Santana's awesome. Other Mets are capable of being so. They could gel into something special. They could congeal into something less. The same could be said before every season, but deep down — save for the prohibitive bowsers you can see woofing from a mile down the road — you always find a reason to Capital-B Believe in the Mets in February. That's what we do — we Believe. Now we have Johan Santana topping a team that was arguably two Johan Santana starts from October 2007. As the football Giants recently taught us, once you get to the tournament, you remain eligible for bigger and better prizes as long as you remain alive.

But does Mets + Santana actually = Guarantee? The way-improved rotation sparkles in the mind's eye, but did Delgado just grow younger, healthier and consistent? Has Schneider found a stroke he never had? Is Sanchez picking up where he left off an eon ago? Are the collected nuts and bolts that comprise Alou and Castillo sufficiently greased and tightened? Will Wright (please) keep getting better? Will Reyes (pretty please) stop getting worse? Are the Mets of Johan Santana a reinforced powerhouse capable of going where we, by now, are salivating for them to go, or are the Mets, despite the hefty commitment to Johan Santana, going to be weighed down by where they've been? And, putting aside the not incidental construction of our 25-man roster and how it stacks up in comparison to those taking shape in Clearwater and Orlando this month and next, can we and our recently raised expectations handle yet another take on devastation?

Sometime after Gl@v!ne took off his Mets jersey for the last time and Santana put on his for the first, I reasoned to myself that if the Mets are determined to not win a spot in the tournament in 2008, or do so but then fail for a 22nd consecutive season to Take It To The House, that's kinda, sorta OK, 'cause '08 is more about Shea's final act than it is about anything else. But I don't think I bought it, because a baseball season is too long to ignore your baseball team's ongoing lack of success, no matter how distracted you think you'll be by other potential priorities. Now that Johan's on board, there is a temptation to expect good things…but I'm burnt out on expectation after last year. Still, no team has ever ended a ballpark's tenure by winning a World Series in it. Gosh, I'd like ours to be the first.

Yeah, it would be great.

Sure, it's possible

No, I don't know if it's probable.

Damned if I want to know what it will feel like when it sinks in that it won't happen — and I say “when” and not “if” partly because there is technically only a 1-in-30 chance that it will, partly because we're 0-for-our-last-21, with the last two misses hurting far worse than any of the previous nineteen, with last one stinging exponentially more than even the one before it.

Once upon a time, it didn't much matter. Once upon a time — several times upon a time, actually — the idea of the Mets winning a World Series was a lofty goal at the outset of Spring Training, but hardly something that seemed essential to my well-being. But on Valentine's Day 2008, even as we return to active and daily devotion to our baseball team, even as our instinct to unconditionally love them encounters our calculations, our logic and our uneasy memories from when we saw them leave us last…well, let's just say I think I could use a really jubilant hug about eight months from now.

Edgardo Alfonzo Wishes Us a Happy Valentine's Day

I’ve never been a secret admirer of Edgardo Alfonzo. My baseball affections for the would-have-been all-time Mets hit leader (had he remained a Met a few more seasons, which would have been nice) have been oft-expressed in these parts. And now, as you can see, they’ve been requited. Fonzie…you shouldn’t have!

OK, he didn’t, but the National League’s best all-around second baseman from the shank of the Bobby Valentine era was such a sweetheart that he agreed to pose with Valentina the Bear on Beanie Baby Day at Shea in the ever-lovin’ year of 1999. This picture was snapped by our very own hobbyist-media embed, Sharon Chapman, then on assignment for Mary Beth’s Bean Bag World magazine. Fonzie wasn’t the only Met with a heart of gold that morning. Several of Valentine’s players took time out from their Wild Card pursuit to fondle something furry for all the world to see. Now those are what I call real Mets.

Happy February 14 from Faith and Fear, along with No. 13 in your 1995-2002 program, No. 9 among your One Hundred Greatest Mets of the First Forty Years, and No. 3 (first Seaver, then Gooden, then Alfonzo) in my heart of Met hearts.

Willie Mays Welcomes Us to Spring Training

New York Giants centerfielder Willie Mays has just won the MVP award, just won the World Series and just made The Catch that will live forever. He is the best player in baseball and by March of 1955, possibly its most famous. Yet amid the rites of Spring Training, the future Met is as accessible to a kid in search of an autograph as any ballplayer, which is to say very much so. No wonder so many kids — all eras, all ages — love the day pitchers, catchers and legends in the making report.

Photo courtesy of Americana the Beautiful: Mid-Century Culture in Kodachrome by Charles Phoenix, a pretty a-Mays-in’ book in its own right.

History Reminds Us These Things Happen

And you thought September 30, 2007 was unique. Apparently, the Mets collapsed on some other day in some other year, though I think if those who dreamed up the chapter titles for 1969’s The Year The Mets Lost Last Place knew what awaited this franchise almost four decades down the road, they wouldn’t have taken an 11-4 loss to the Expos so hard (nor might have the late Karl Ehrhardt, whose final sign raised that Friday evening read SAME OLD STORY).

History tells us this first so-called Mets collapse — they had only two days earlier risen high enough to perceptibly plummet — was quite ephemeral in nature. By October 16, 1969, whatever went wrong on July 11 was completely corrected. Likewise, maybe the most recent Met misstep, even if it was a stumble for the ages, will be swept into the dustbin of history soon enough. Given that Pitchers & Catchers report today, why the hell not?

Place Your Bets

Some of this conversation actually took place last month while I was in Vegas for a bachelor-party weekend:

Me, approaching cashier: I want to place a wager on the New York Mets winning the 2008 World Series. What are their current odds?

Cashier: 8-to-1.

Me: Huh.

Cashier: How much do you want to wager?

Me: Well, that's a good question. Let's see. During the season I watch each game, plus a bit of pregame and at least a bit of the wrapup afterwards. So that's about four hours a day. Then I probably spent two more hours worrying about them if they've lost or exulting if they've won. And, I dunno, throw in another two hours checking news, blogs and various Internet chatter, and of course writing this blog. That's what, eight hours a day for half the year? In the offseason I usually think about the Mets for about two hours a day, I guess. It was probably only an hour a day during this latest offseason, but that's because I was really busy and mad at them and didn't want to think about that absurd contract they gave Luis Castillo or why in hell they traded Lastings Milledge. But I did TiVo a bunch of Met classics and watched the '69 Series games with my kid. So I dunno, let's say 90 minutes a day during the offseason. I'd have to put a value on that, which isn't easy to —

Cashier: Sir —

Me: And of course what I'd put onto the table would extend far beyond this year. I mean, I still think about '86 and '88 and '99 and '00 and '06 and every other year that's not so easily pinned to extra games in October. I'm still fuming about 2007, after all. I can work myself into snit subconsciously while working on something and not realize for 20-odd minutes that I've been fuming about Benitez letting Paul O'Neill get on base or Reyes's drive not quite getting over Edmonds' head or Gl@v!ne hitting freaking Dontrelle Willis. So you're talking hours and hours and hours into the future when I'll be thinking about the 2008 Mets, for better or worse.

Cashier: Sir, if I could —

Me: And what about the Mets' effect on the rest of my life? Like making plans around day games, or arranging my life so I can at least have my little radio in one ear, or the fact that Emily and I got married on September 30th so our anniversary would never conflict with a playoff game. That ought to be worth something, right?

Cashier: In fact —

Me: And then there's all the stuff. I mean, I don't go to as many games as I used to, though Joshua will be nearly six by season's end, and he can now sit through an entire game without getting too horribly wiggly. But I'll go to a bunch, and hopefully there'll be a lottery for postseason tickets, and I'll beg my friends to remember me if they win and I don't. And there are all the baseball cards I collect, and The Holy Books in which anybody who's ever been a Met gets enshrined. And shirts for Joshua and caps for us — do you know how much we spent last year when Joshua announced what he really wanted was pictures of David Wright and Jose Reyes in the same frame? And books if there are new books. And blog server costs, right? Mustn't forget about those.

Cashier: Sir —

Me: I know I'm just scratching the surface, but that's a start. So, I hope you were keeping track of all that. How many hours is that, and how shall we value those hours now and into the future for as long as I live? And the cards and caps and the rest of the stuff? Do we amortize that, or what? Look, I know this is complicated — however you want to value all this, I trust your judgment.

Cashier: Look, buddy —

Me: And if they don't win, that's OK. Well, as long as it's not like 2007, it'll be OK.

Cashier: I've been trying to tell you. All we take here is cash. Not your eight hours of thinking a day, or the daydreaming, or the time spent watching the games, or the social and economic toll of rearranging your life around a baseball team, or the value of the tickets and the baseball cards and all the stuff, or your stupid blog costs. Just money, pal. Cash on the wood.

Me: Oh. Really? Gee, that seems kind of mercenary.

Cashier: Really.

Me: Huh. OK. Fifty bucks then.

Cashier: You got it. Here's your stub.

Me: Oh, and $20 on the 2008 Tampa Bay Devil Rays. They're a 150-to-1 shot!

Cashier: And how much unquantifiable crap do you have vested in them that you need to tell me about?

Me: The Devil Rays? Ha! What am I, insane?

You Can't Go The Distance Without Some Resistance

There was a time when I wanted to be Billy Joel. In tenth grade, a teacher asked everybody in the class to name the person, presumably famous, he or she would be if being that person were possible. I wrote down Billy Joel. And I think I meant it.

52nd Street was out then and its lead single, “My Life,” spoke to me, maybe for me. It followed The Stranger, which also spoke to and/or for me. I was 16 years old and from Long Island. If Billy Joel couldn't speak for me then, he was in the wrong field and I was on the wrong Island.

From roughly the end of junior high to the middle of college, Billy Joel was my spokesman and every album Billy Joel released was a personal milestone, each a defining benchmark in my life; go ahead with your own life; leave me alone. Every year for a half-dozen years, BJ (as one stoner kid in that class called him — “yeah, BJ!” — when Mrs. Alcabes read my answer aloud) came through with those deep thoughts I was sort of thinking or was bound to if he hadn't already thought them up. Things were OK with me those days when I had Billy declaring he'd rather laugh with the sinners than cry with the saints. His suggestion that sinners had much more fun was all the license I needed to cut ninth-grade geometry, even with finals and a Regents on the horizon. And if I never cruised the Miracle Mile per se, I knew it was on the North Shore somewhere, in the same county I lived, in the same county where he grew up.

My life. My troubadour. My favorite artist.

It's thirty years later and by no means would I say I want to be Billy Joel nor have been Billy Joel.

• I would have made a ton of money, but I would have been gamed out of it by relations.

• I would have married a supermodel, but I would have divorced a supermodel.

• I would have bought a sweet ride, but I would have driven it straight into a tree.

• I would have written some gems, but halfway through these three decades, I would have would have stopped writing almost altogether and I would have gone from The Stranger to just getting on strangers' nerves.

Billy Joel wasn't an ideal role model, not even retroactively. Sometimes a fantasy is best left unfulfilled. But he was still my piano man, my angry young man, my main man straight through The Nylon Curtain, the album whose “Allentown” made me think, whose “Laura” made me wary, whose “Pressure” made me nervous, whose “Goodnight Saigon” made me well up with tears. One side, four songs, total immersion…and “She's Right On Time” awaited on the flip side.

By god, how I loved Billy Joel for that roughly five-year period marked, in my mind, from the first bottle of red to the final whistle that blew ominously on those steelworkers in Pennsylvania. He was it for me, a category unto himself. There were two kinds of music by my reckoning: Billy Joel and everything else, in exactly that order.

So why am I not unqualifiedly thrilled that he's going to play the last non-Merengue concert ever at Shea Stadium? Why does this melding of two of the avatars of the two passions of My Life, music and Mets, not feel quite right? Why do I want to tell everybody who's been leaving nasty comments under the picture of Billy Joel in a Mets cap, cutting this awesome entertainer down to 3:05, to cut it out but can't quite convince myself to be his most forceful advocate on this particular issue?

NO, IT'S NOT the Yankee thing, not really. Sure, it's always annoyed me that the carrier from Norfolk (the Tidewater area, for crissake) picked the Yankees up for free. And I never liked that the Yankees grabbed the headlines every time (though Pete Rose could always go screw himself). And if “Brooklyn's got a winning team” and “Mickey Mantle/Kerouac” could be a part of “We Didn't Start The Fire,” then “Amazin' Mets” could have been subbed for “Bernie Goetz”. In fact, every time I sing along, I indeed insert “Amazin' Mets” after AIDS and crack (though maybe that's not very good company). It's not that or the pictures of him a couple of times in the vertical swastika. I can only do so much ideological purity on non-baseball matters. “You spoke to me and for me, Billy, but you invited Rick Cerone up on stage one night in 1980 — get lost.” Can't do it.

NO, IT'S NOT the lack of Met thing. Billy Joel's Mets cap last week fit all right (once they gave him one that wasn't a size too small). He sang the national anthem before Game Two in '86. “New York State of Mind” was a postgame staple circa 2001. His concert at the Garden on October 15, 1986 made for legendary accompaniment to the winning of the National League pennant. He even managed to pull the name Vinegar Bend Mizell out of the recesses of his memory at the press conference (available for and worth viewing at mets.com if for nothing more than the theater of it) that announced his July concert. I give him the celebrity dispensation, same as I've given the likes of Paul Simon and Chris Rock, New Yorkers who have shown up at Shea and other local stadia as mood and opportunity dictate. Paul McCartney became running buddies with Joe Torre circa 2003 while Bruce Springsteen was trading licks with Bernie Williams and forgetting whose pitching he featured in the “Glory Days” video. Do we rip their faces out of the they-played-Shea montage? Celebrities, with rare exception, are too busy becoming and staying famous to be fans like the rest of us. That's probably why we appreciate it so when one of them truly commits to a team (or detest it even more when they commit to the wrong team).

NO, IT'S NOT that somebody else would be more or perfectly appropriate. The Beatles can't come together in 2008. I would assume that somebody reached out to Paul and he said no, so if you can't get him for your stadium show, then it's up for grabs. Ringo? Liberty DeVitto's seat is waiting. Ringo can totally sit in (Ringo's current single “Liverpool 8” includes the line, “In the U.S.A./When we played at Shea/We were number one/And it was fun”; all hail Ringo). Hard, however, to see Ringo fronting Shea all by himself, even with his All-Starr Band. The Beatles would be more appropriate than anybody to play the last concert at Shea. Everybody else followed in their footsteps. The Beatles opened Shea Stadium to rock 'n' roll. Everybody else was just playing where the Beatles played. While it would be nice, on merit, if somebody whose commercial and creative peak came after Jose Reyes was born were a logical candidate, it's not so bad that someone who has never not attributed his rock 'n' roll inspiration directly to the Beatles kind of squares the horseshoe.

NO, IT'S NOT that the honor of playing the last non-Merengue concert at Shea requires a blood-soaked loyalty oath to the New York Mets and to the republic for which it stands. Unless you want to save the date for Yo La Tengo based on actual baseball fandom or Baha Men by pleasant association, Billy Joel of Hicksville is as appropriate as anybody else for this gig, more appropriate than most. (By the way, isn't Shea a city facility? If the Parks Department wanted to schedule An Evening With Mike Francesa as its closing act, would the Mets have veto power?)

NO, IT'S NOT the decline of his output followed by the dearth thereof. I bought An Innocent Man as soon as it came out in 1983, just as I did The Nylon Curtain and Songs In The Attic and Glass Houses when they came out. I liked a lot of it, but it struck me as overly self-indulgent. I bought The Bridge as soon as it came out in 1986. It was the first Billy Joel album since high school that I hadn't attempted to memorize every lyric from (though I appreciate that the otherwise cringey “Modern Woman” is the only song I know of that clearly mentions “1986”). I bought Storm Front as soon as it came out in 1989 and realized if Billy Joel were Joe Blow, I wouldn't have bothered. I bought River Of Dreams as soon as it came out in 1993. By then I was reconciled to being a creature of habit. I would have bought the next new Billy Joel album after that, but there wasn't one. Now it's fifteen years and counting, if not exactly waiting. I've bought the live albums and the compilations and such, but I can't say I haven't found other music to occupy the interregnum. From that last quartet of increasingly disappointing albums, however, there are enough gems to have created maybe a pair of good ones. Add those songs to all that Long Island soul-searching that got me through high school and a chunk of college, and I'm confident he could still blow everybody else's set list away.

All my Billy Joel concerts — I've been to four — came after I was sold on his brilliance as a songwriter and a spokesman for me. All his so-so recordings were what were being toured behind when I saw him in '84, '86, '87 and technically '93-'94 (New Year's Eve at the Coliseum). It didn't matter. Even the numbers I didn't care for from the studio exploded in person. I had never been to a big-time concert before Billy Joel at the Bayfront Center in St. Petersburg. It turned out to be the one I was waiting for. That night, he turned the title track “An Innocent Man” into heartache live whereas it was schmaltz on cassette. I had the same kind of reaction to “Big Man On Mulberry Street” and “This Is The Time” on The Bridge tour.

• The afternoon after that St. Pete performance, I was up and at 'em and back across the Howard Frankland Bridge to take in the Mets and Jays at Al Lang. In a 24-hour period I saw Billy Joel and Dwight Gooden for the first time.

• In December '86, after his almost-Christmas show at the Coliseum, I stopped at a 7-Eleven on Hempstead Turnpike for a cold beverage and found the RC Cola cans that celebrated the National League and World championships of two months earlier; I loved him the most when the Mets were at their worst and now I could connect him to the Mets at their best. I still have those cans.

• Five months later at the Brendan Byrne Arena snapped a streak of 188 consecutive Mets games attended, watched or listened to, one that ran from April '86 to May '87, postseason gratefully included…and three nights later I met my future bride.

• I can't peg anything specifically Metsian to New Year's Eve 1993 except maybe that the warm way Stephanie and I and 16,000 stood and sang “Piano Man” as one has made me think it would work a lot better than “Sweet Caroline” at Shea. I'll bet it will be pretty good there even without a ballgame. (It was also lovely to officially end 1993.)

I don't know that Billy Joel can vocally deliver a concert in 2008 the way he did in those halcyon days when I saw him previously. Every time I've heard him attempt a high note on TV, the results haven't been pretty. But he'll work it. He'll be Al Weis if he can't be Donn Clendenon. He'll get the job done, and whatever band he convenes will throw strikes like Seaver, Koosman and Gentry. I don't doubt Shea's last non-Merengue concert will be a great show, even at 2008 prices (when Billy said at his press conference that he insisted prices be kept reasonable, as in under $100, I nearly gagged). I think those tickets to the Bayfront Center 24 years ago were fifteen bucks.

So it's not I don't think he'll be very good. It's not that I've gone from considering him an idol in teens to a bit goofy in my forties. It's not that — despite trying his best last week to invoke “The House That Casey Built,” seeing, he swears, more Mets games than Yankees game in his time — his favorite baseball team isn't our favorite baseball team. And it's certainly not because I consider myself some sort of Murray Hewitt and would write him off as not rock 'n' roll enough for the occasion or that it's somehow to his discredit that he can write memorable songs in a wide variety of styles. Why am I not utterly enthused that in mid-July on a Wednesday night, Billy Joel will crash our party and play Shea Stadium as the last non-Merengue act ever to do so?

I have two theories:

1) I don't want anybody to play the final anything at Shea Stadium because of all that implies.

2) When Billy Joel played Yankee Stadium in 1990, he said that when trying to nail down a venue for a really big show, he first considered Shea because the Beatles played there — but then he remembered Grand Funk played there and decided their legacy made Shea Stadium a far less special place for him. I found and still find that one of the most unnecessary and snotty things an artist on top of the world could have said about another act which by then had limited cachet in music circles. Unless Grand Funk Railroad trashed the Hassles' amps or TP'd their tour bus back in the day, that quip, more than any subsequent public or artistic misstep taken by Billy Joel, revealed feet of clay on my adolescent idol. Wouldn't play Shea because Grand Funk had defiled it? You can take your Downeaster Alexa and ram it into a tree, too, for all I care. Plus I saw Mark Farner at Jones Beach in 1988 on a Super '70s Fest bill that included Bachman-Turner Overdrive (who closed the evening, incidentally, with “Takin' Care Of Business”) and he was excellent.

Yeah, it's got to be that business about Grand Funk.

Look Both Ways

Hit or an error? Look to your right. The scoreboard transmits the official ruling. Look to your left. The Sign Man tells you what you’re thinking.

Before there were helpful little gadgets any more exotic than a transistor radio, you had two sources of information to enhance your Sheagoing experience. You had the biggest scoreboard in baseball over the right-centerfield fence and you had Karl Ehrhardt the Sign Man, in that one-of-a-kind derby of his, sitting behind third. The Manufacturers HanovEr sign would tell you it was an E. The Sign Man would make it clear the ball should have been caught.

The most famous images of Karl Ehrhardt, who died this past week at 83, relate to the Mets in triumph, which is as it should be. Karl was the superest of the superfans, and if you saw a picture of the Sign Man after the fact, it was because the fact involved the greatest of Mets moments. His most iconic sign, at least to me, was the one he held up as the Mets became world champions the first time: THERE ARE NO WORDS.

Yet Karl did not pull punches, right down to the end. He disappeared from the Shea crowd after 1981, a result of some dispute with management over admission — perhaps management’s myopic focus on being the new broom sweeping out the old miasmic atmosphere, as if Mets fans couldn’t differentiate between hating a few lousy ballplayers and disliking themselves. Anyway, he was still there in ’81, the year of the baseball strike, the rupture in the summer I graduated from high school. I remember seeing Ehrhardt interviewed once the stoppage was settled. First bad Met play (and there were bound to be a few), he promised to tell the Mets what we would all be thinking: GO BACK ON STRIKE.

And he did. For all his joyous acknowledgement of THAT OLD MET MAGIC and his victory-bound queries of BELIEVE IN MIRACLES?, it was the brassy honesty in editorial comment that stayed with me after the Sign Man became the stuff of legend. I hated that the Mets didn’t arrange for Karl Ehrhardt to keep sitting where he had from the early days of Shea Stadium, but I loved that the Mets couldn’t buy off the Sign Man. I loved that as the years went by, you would inevitably meet somebody at a game, somebody you didn’t know but you knew was one of you, and he or she would ask, “Hey, remember the Sign Man? Karl somebody? He came to every game at Shea and he had all those signs and he’d pull them out at a moment’s notice and he always held them way up over his head and it would be the exact right thing to describe what was happening right then and there…Karl Ehrhardt, yeah, that was his name…the Sign Man. Wasn’t he great?”

Yeah. We remember.

There Are No Words

Karl Ehrhardt, 1924-2008.

Photo courtesy of Shea Stadium: Images of Baseball, Arcadia Publishing