The blog for Mets fans
who like to read
ABOUT US
Faith and Fear in Flushing made its debut on Feb. 16, 2005, the brainchild of two longtime friends and lifelong Met fans.
Greg Prince discovered the Mets when he was 6, during the magical summer of 1969. He is a Long Island-based writer, editor and communications consultant. Contact him here.
Jason Fry is a Brooklyn writer whose first memories include his mom leaping up and down cheering for Rusty Staub. Check out his other writing here.
Got something to say? Leave a comment, or email us at faithandfear@gmail.com. (Sorry, but we have no interest in ads, sponsored content or guest posts.)
Need our RSS feed? It's here.
Visit our Facebook page, or drop by the personal pages for Greg and Jason.
Or follow us on Twitter: Here's Greg, and here's Jason.
|
by Jason Fry on 5 December 2007 5:10 am
OK, quick quiz: If I told you that the Mets had just swung a deal in Nashville (they haven't), and included a link where you could find out the details, what would be your emotions as you clicked through?
If you chose “anxiety,” “despair,” “dread” or a similar word as your answer, welcome to the 2007 offseason.
I mean, honestly. Somehow the Collapse of Sept. 30 has only grown since that terrible day, slowly becoming an avalanche wiping out everything in its path. I thought the excision of Tom Glavine, whom any sane person knew could never wear blue and orange again, might cure it. It didn't. I thought the simple passage of time might do it. It didn't. And this offseason of discontent certainly hasn't done it.
I don't know if Lastings Milledge will be the next Manny Ramirez, Rondell White or Alex Escobar. None of us do. But I do know nonsense when I hear it, such as when Omar Minaya stammers that he's improved the pitching staff by adding an old catcher who can't hit and a platoon corner outfielder. Omar referenced the Kris Benson trade in counseling patience, and in doing so accidentally touched on the probable reason for Lastings' exile: off-field issues. But there's a big difference between the Benson deal and the Milledge deal. We all knew Kris Benson's probable future, because we'd seen all too much of his present: At the time (in what may be, for other reasons, the most-trafficked post in Faith and Fear history), I compared him to “a bath that took 20 minutes to fill at the end of an exhausting day and was lukewarm the second you got into it — not so cold that you pulled the plug, but not warm enough to keep you from repeatedly dunking your knees until you realized you were enduring what you thought you'd be enjoying.” Benson was an overpaid, brittle, eminently replaceable journeyman — his mouthy wife may have been the reason he got run out of town, but his essential uselessness was the reason I didn't care about seeing him go.
Did Milledge have his own off-field issues? Sure, from “Bend Ya Knees” to getting suspended to stupidly waking up the moribund Marlins. When it comes to baseball mores there's a thin line between exuberance and obnoxiousness, and you could usually find that line by locating Lastings and then moving a couple of steps back. Granted. But he was also 22. He had demonstrated enticing ability on a big-league ballfield, he was cheap, and his future was yet to be written. How that kind of player yields a no-stick catcher and a corner guy who needs to stop listening to Bible thumpers is absolutely beyond me. If Omar turns around tomorrow and trades Estrada and Church as part of a package for Erik Bedard, I'll quiet down fast. But do any of us really believe that's coming? Or does the Milledge deal smack of the bad old days, of a hypersensitive ownership that would rather have a mediocre team of controversy-free nobodies than the occasional back-page blowback of a team with an actual personality? This feels like the dismantling of the late-80s teams, like the dead-ass early 00s squads where everybody was whispering in ownership's ear. Milledge is gone, Lo Duca is gone, and I have trouble believing that what we're witnessing are purely baseball decisions.
What's next? What will Omar return from Nashville with? And what will he pay to get it? Will Carlos Gomez and Mike Pelfrey and Philip Humber — all far too young to write off in my book — vanish from our ledger? With Santana, Bedard, Haren and the others seemingly out of our reach, what retread with a dull present will their futures be sold for? (Think that's pessimistic? If I'd told you Milledge had been traded to the Nats for two players, would Ryan Church have been in the top five players you picked? And would you have ever guessed Brian Schneider?)
At least there's the free-agent market. Come on down, Livan Hernandez! Plop your indeterminedly-aged body between whatever's left of Moises Alou and Luis Castillo, the oldest 32-year-old in baseball. Luis is here for the next four years — at which point he'll be playing second base with a walker. Seeing how you're supposedly under 50, Livan, I'm sure we've got at least two years for you too. (Seriously: When we sign Livan Hernandez, just kick me in the head so I'll be in the proper frame of mind to react.)
I'm a Met fan. I've been through plenty of lousy seasons. I've seen a couple of Septembers turn to ash in the final days. But I've never seen an offseason where I found myself bracing for a punch in the gut every time I saw my team's name on the Web. The solution to this, as with so many of life's problems, is for baseball to hurry up and return, even if it's only the sublime pointlessness of spring training. But we just got the first snowfall. It's not even Christmas. And I find myself scared to think what will come by the time we get to Valentine's Day.
by Greg Prince on 4 December 2007 3:51 pm
Many Mets fans have fervently hoped for years that Gil Hodges would gain induction into the Baseball Hall of Fame. Now it turns out that by being denied access, the honor is all his.
After yesterday's newly rejiggered Veterans Committee subcommittee election results were announced, we learned a plaque will hang in Cooperstown for Walter O'Malley. This is who the Hall of Fame sees fit to deify: not someone who brought joy and grace and runs batted in by the boatload to the loyal borough of Brooklyn, but someone who packed up the plantation and shipped it to Los Angeles.
Walter O'Malley is a Hall of Famer like the Ayatollah was Time's Man of the Year. His impact was undeniable, but that's Nook of Notoriety stuff, not the hallowed Hall we spend so many hours idealizing and so many more hours figuring out how to get to without hitting a deer or anything. You don't schlep through dark roads and miles of highway anxiety to stare at a plaque devoted to a man who destroyed so much collective and individual happiness. If he bested Brooklynites with a big bat like Musial's or a live arm like Spahn's, OK, that's fair, that's baseball. But he did it with an airplane and a fleet of moving vans.
That's just wrong.
Pete Hamill is the spokesman for the half-century of heartbreak, anguish and disgust that defines the post-1957 Brooklyn Dodgers fan, and in today's Daily News he nails most magnificently the injustice of Walter O'Malley's enshrinement in Cooperstown:
For some of those people who roared and cheered, the hurt would last a lifetime. Many felt like naïve fools. Baseball wasn't a secular religion after all. It was a business, as cold as any business. That disillusion was permanent.
If O'Malley made money on the West Coast, then he got his reward. He got richer. If baseball grew more lucrative because it forged a footprint on the Pacific Coast, then O'Malley's peers and business descendants have already collected their honor. They got richer. That's worthy of praise on some level, some ledger somewhere. Just not in the Baseball Hall of Fame, an institution I once wished would accept Gil Hodges but I now understand is no longer worthy of association with a truly great icon of baseball.
The Veterans Committee subcommittee on executives also elected Bowie Kuhn yesterday, proving there is hope for errand boys everywhere.
by Greg Prince on 4 December 2007 3:49 pm

As long as I live, when I hear “manager of the New York Mets,” this 1970 Topps card is the image that will stick with me. Gil Hodges is to Mets managers what sky is to earth: he’s what’s up there above everybody else as high as you can see. I loved Davey Johnson, I loved Bobby Valentine, but I revere Gil Hodges.
• Seven consecutive 100+ RBI seasons
• One of the top sluggers of all-time at the time of his retirement
• One of the best fielding first basemen ever
• Key on- and off-field role on one of the great dynasties in National League history
• Universal admiration and esteem while he played and while he managed
• An outstanding leader of a previously pathetic expansion team…in the American League with the mid-’60s Washington Senators.
• And that whole Miracle Mets thing, not incidentally.
I understand there’s an organization of some sort that aspires to be known as a Hall of Fame, that it attempts to bestow baseball immortality on its members. They have long been incomplete in their mission.
And now they’re just insulting.
by Greg Prince on 3 December 2007 12:31 pm
It's not losses in October or September or April through August that try Mets fans' souls. It's what goes down in the offseason. It's Lastings Milledge for Brian Schneider and Ryan Church and all the rationalizing one is forced into when it happens.
Hey, Schneider's a pretty good defensive catcher. He gives us strength up the middle. He can handle a pitching staff. And Church? He sprayed doubles all over RFK last year. Get him in a less cavernous setting and who knows what kind of power numbers he'll put up? Also, he was probably naïve and didn't mean anything offensive when he said the one thing anybody remembers him ever saying.
Yup — nothing like a steady diet of chicken salad and lemonade to get you through the winter.
My crystal ball is completely fogged up so I can't tell you how much, how little or how not at all we will regret the departure of Lastings Milledge. He could be as multifaceted and dynamic as his flashes of brilliance have suggested or he could be a hopeless head case forever baffled by the intricacies of the curveball and the niceties of clubhouse decorum. There is ample anecdotal evidence to support either possibility. Don't know and won't find out with the Mets. I suspect a little of each is probably what the Nationals will get.
I would have liked to have found out here, though. I would have liked to have watched a 23-year-old rightfielder who we've seen dash around first and hit into gaps and make circus catches and throw out baserunners try to do a little more of that on a fulltime basis. I would have liked to have discovered how jaunty his home run homages would have become…or observed how he toned them down as he grew older. But I would have liked to have seen the home runs. What I don't like is that a kid, yes a kid, with as much talent as he's shown has been shown the door based on personality — probably the simple misdeed of having one.
Know your place, rook, indeed.
That's gotta be why Lastings Milledge is a Washington National. It's not because two partial-season auditions didn't yield Rookie of the Year stats or automatically secure a corner outfield job. It's not because of a couple of complex handshakes. It's not because “his stock has dropped” as a performer. Who can tell what his stock is at 22? He had his ups, he had his downs, but he still has his future. He couldn't bring you the mythical frontline starter just now? That means he had to bring you two middlebodies instead of perhaps developing into the kind of player others call you to obtain? You give him up for a catcher and an outfielder whom, intuition suggests if they were such hot stuff, would have been picked off by a smart team that saw their value long ago or deemed building blocks by the Nats and thus stubbornly maintained? Without having at hand the transcripts of every dialogue every GM has been having with Jim Bowden, I can't say for sure that no other team went looking for Brian Schneider and Ryan Church. But I wouldn't bet there was a huge market and I would bet recent top prospects weren't offered in exchange.
Listening to Omar explain the heretofore hidden desirable attributes (perfect Met fits, it turns out) of Schneider and Church on Friday was more painful than cramping up at Twister. Schneider is gonna give us that strength up the middle we've been so yearning for…though I don't remember “strength up the middle” even once entering the conversation as a dire need to be addressed in the past two years. And Church? He's a gem — a gem! — Omar tells us. He's just what we were looking for and we didn't even know it.
What's that old bromide about baseball general managers, lying and lips moving? I don't expect Omar to come out and declare “somebody didn't like Lastings Milledge, thought he was a bad seed, decided he was never gonna grow out of it and we had to get rid of him pronto à la Carl Everett for John Hudek; Schneider and Church were who I could come up with on short notice, and it turns out they play positions where we have holes at the moment, know what I'm sayin'?” But the lines weren't that tough to read between. Unless this was a trade made on perceived merit, in which case…Brian Schneider and Ryan Church in exchange for a tooled-up outfielder who in no way had played himself out of further consideration and who will not be 23 until April?
Come now, Mr. Minaya.
With the caveat that this offseason has been rife with making cases for or against infielders and catchers who aren't or were never going to be 2008 Mets, thus maybe we ought not take any projections involving Church or Schneider too seriously, what's done is done. If we wanted to root for a team that had no chance of giving up on young talent for older mediocrities, we should have devoted ourselves to fantasy baseball. Otherwise, our club (any club) will occasionally bring you players you weren't seeking, give away players you anticipated enjoying and engineer trades that make you miserable at worst, rationalize at best. The gamest among us can Google VORPs and whatnot to detect the positives in Chruch's production or suddenly remember the time Schneider nailed Reyes at second when it appeared Jose had the base stolen cold. The rest of us can stew, brace for the genius move coming next and take not a little solace in the knowledge that we've been known to be plenty wrong about plenty of trades before.
by Greg Prince on 1 December 2007 1:51 pm

When all was said and done, maybe Lastings Milledge should have just kept jogging down the right field line that very firstpromising June afternoon, shaken everybody’s hand goodbye and then hit the road. For it seemed the moment he displayed a bit of verve and panache, he was on somebody’s list…and I don’t mean this extraordinarily memorable one.
There’s no telling how exciting or disappointing he will be as a Nat, but the Lastings farewell does ensconce Milledge (2003) among top Met draft picks who amounted to little as Mets, if they amounted to anything at all here other than trade bait. Among them in the past quarter-century:
Eddie Williams, Shawn Abner, Lee May, Chris Donnels, Dave Proctor, Alan Zinter, Al Shirley, Preston Wilson, Kirk Presley, Paul Wilson, Ryan Jaroncyk, Robert Stratton, Geoff Goetz, Jason Tyner, Billy Traber and Scott Kazmir.
FYI: None of the above, each picked No. 1 by the Mets (if not overall) in his respective draft, played in more than one season as a Met, except for Chris Donnels. If Chris Donnels is your rule’s exception, then your rule is pretty sad.
With the fortunes of Philip Humber and Mike Pelfrey pending, that leaves Lastings behind only Gregg Jefferies, Jeromy Burnitz and Aaron Heilman among No. 1 selections since 1983 who contributed even a touch here, even if his contribution was limited to 350 at-bats and a slew of fan-friendly high-fives.
Makes one wonder why we even bother drafting in the first round.
by Greg Prince on 30 November 2007 6:41 pm
That was the last time Titanic saw daylight.
—Rose DeWitt Bukater
I remember reading a quote from a young man who worked for the Al Gore campaign in 2000. The Supreme Court decision that halted all vote-counting in Florida came down on December 12, a Tuesday night. For months after, the kid confessed, he felt haunted on a weekly basis. Every Tuesday night reminded him of the night of December 12, the night the high court handed the election to the other candidate. A little melodramatic, I thought, but passion and disappointment will do that to a person.
Today is November 30, the last day of the month, the first time a month has ended on the 30th since September 30.
On September 30…do I really have to mention what happened?
The next time a month ends on the 30th, it will be April, a Wednesday. The Mets will, as they did in September, be playing an afternoon game at Shea. The Pirates will be the visitors. It will be the 27th game of the 2008 season, barring postponements. By then, with a record somewhere between 0-26 and 26-0, we’ll have fresh concerns. Knowing a month is ending on the 30th won’t mean anything in particular where baseball is concerned.
This afternoon, the 30th lingers for me as I suppose it has at least once every waking hour since September 30, 2007 became September 30, 2007. At this moment two months ago, I was watching some Marlin walk, or not be out on a potential double play, or reach base in advance of other Marlins doing more and worse damage. The variables, the villains, the victims…no need to go into them again.
It was the last baseball game we watched with a sense of overriding purpose. No wonder it sticks in the mind’s eye.
Last week, Stephanie and I were in Stop & Shop stocking up for Thanksgiving. The store’s music system played “This Is It” by Kenny Loggins. I’ve always liked that song. It’s No. 348 in the Top 500, in fact. I nodded when I heard it on September 30 in a large outdoor setting somewhere west of Stop & Shop.
You think that maybe it’s over
Only if you want it to be
Wow, I thought. That’s pretty appropriate for today, September 30.
Are you gonna wait for your sign, your miracle
Stand up and fight
Yes, absolutely…stand up and fight!
Your back’s to the corner
This is it
Don’t be a fool anymore
Uh, yeah…like I said, very appropriate.
This is it
The waiting is over
Funny thing about a song, even if you like it, even if it’s on the nose at the moment you’re hearing it: It can go on too long. And the more I heard “This Is It” before the first pitch of September 30 with all its admonitions that you Mets better be ready for what’s ahead, the more I began to worry. When you’ve lost 11 of your previous 16 and seen a seven-game lead turn into a first-place tie, a four-minute song played to completion gives you a lot of time to fret.
“This Is It” would in short order segue into That Was That, and we know how that went. Now when I hear “This Is It,” as I did in the supermarket last week, I get a little queasy.
Four months and a day to Next Year. Whatever it brings, it can’t start soon enough.
OH — AND WE SEEM TO HAVE TRADED LASTINGS MILLEDGE TO THE NATIONALS FOR SOME ODD REASON.
We get Brian Schneider, who’s been catching for a while (bye bye Johnny), and Ryan Church, the last batter John Franco ever faced as a Met and someone who apparently takes his last name a little too seriously.
The Milledge era is over too quickly to assess him as a finished product. We probably take our own prospects too much to heart to evaluate them in terms of their value on the market as a whole. But at 23 next year and with plenty of tools still in his shed, this doesn’t seem like a lot to get back. Maybe he really is attitudinally damaged goods in more eyes than not. Maybe Omar’s building something more than we can see. But at the moment, trading Lastings Milledge today hasn’t really upgraded my opinion of months that end on a 30th day.
by Greg Prince on 29 November 2007 4:08 pm

Whoever is responsible for placing advertising on mets.com has replaced the offer to download select (and purely hypothetical) games from the Mets 2007 Postseason directly to your PC with one that says you can download select 2007 Mets Full Games directly to your PC. It’s not a fine distinction and we applaud the alteration.
We do, however, feel compelled to point out that the only 2007 Mets Full Game available for downloading directly to your PC is the game of August 5, Mets at Cubs, best known as the 300th career win by a current Atlanta Brave. While we don’t necessarily dispute the historical significance of this event, whoever is responsible for inventory might want to rethink what is being stocked in light of, oh, everything.
by Greg Prince on 27 November 2007 11:51 pm
by Greg Prince on 27 November 2007 11:46 pm
Gl@v!ne gone. Mota gone. Now the generally unlistenable Tom McCarthy has packed up his microphone for Philadelphia, where, if his slowness on the draw remains true to form, the Phillies will be clinching the 2007 N.L. East any minute now.
These are marvelous consolation prizes, I tell you what.
I wasn't a fan of McCarthy's. Nothing personal, I just didn't think much of his play-by-play abilities, didn't find him a compelling storyteller and he left me cold as a radio companion. Other than that, he was swell.
Some fans don't worry about the broadcasters. I do. Decades of Murph and two golden seasons of Gary and Howie raised my standards sky high. I want the Mets to think carefully before they hand the keys to the kingdom to Eddie Coleman (familar but plodding) or any ol' interloper. If they can figure out a way to have Gary do radio during the intervals when Keith and Ron are speaking on SNY, that would be ideal. If they can have Howie call pitches and then take listener calls in between, that would be OK, too. Neither is probably an option. I don't have a candidate in mind, just be careful. There is nothing more intrinsic to the enjoyment of the long season than the radio. The radio has not worked properly since the end of 2005. Mets, make it work again.
For a sterling example of when it worked flawlessly, do yourself a favor and turn your dial to Loge 13, which will lead you to another page of unmatched delights.
And for those of you who like to sneak an earbud in while at Shea, here is when you can look forward to going for the last 81 times of your life. I like the confidence the Mets display by referring to September 28 as the “final regular season game” at their current home, as if they know something we don't about October 2008. Then again, I just saw an ad on mets.com informing me I can “download select games from the Mets 2007 Postseason” directly to my PC for a mere $1.99, so I don't know if I'd take everything they tell me on their site at face value.
by Greg Prince on 27 November 2007 12:15 pm
The players were confident in mid-September.
• “I can't see how we can lose unless we all drop dead,” declared one of the pitchers.
• “I don't see how we can lose unless everything goes wrong,” the starting catcher predicted.
• “I think we'll win now,” was the future Hall of Famer's verdict.
• “We will walk in,” enthused the veteran outfielder.
• “I can't help thinking we are sure to win,” said one of the rookies.
The manager didn't want to stoke the fires — “I am not making any claims just now. It's going to be a hard fight.” — but he had always fancied himself a winner.
The press was impressed, too. The Times said the locals were “practically certain of winning the pennant, having established an almost impregnable position in the race.” One of the other papers insisted on September 20 that the chances New York's National League powerhouse would be overtaken were as likely as a “snowfall on the Fourth of July”.
But it did snow. There was a blizzard of disappointment. The team that couldn't possibly blow it blew it, succumbing to hubris and a hard-charging rival.
It happened in '07, as we know. But it also happened in '08, a scant 99 years ago, covered and enlivened all over again of late by Cait Murphy in Crazy '08, the incredible true story of what she terms with justification “the greatest year in baseball history”. The quotes above, as you might have suspected, were jury-rigged into our post-Collapse context from Murphy's retelling of the 1908 pennant race among the Giants, the Cubs and the Pirates. New York led the pack, Chicago and Pittsburgh stayed on their tails, Fred Merkle didn't touch second…
Listen, there's so much more to 1908 than just the Merkle Game, and it all receives its due and then some by Murphy's hand. I began reading Crazy '08 in early summer, put it aside as I, like my cat, got distracted by newer, shinier objects, but just recently picked and lapped it up. As fate would have it, I had left off on almost precisely the page where New York (N.L.) begins to believe the flag is in the bag. Thus, learning how confident the Giants were entering their final few weeks of play in the light of the events surrounding their descendants' impersonation of two-dozen folding chairs was eerie to say the least. Actually, it gave me chills to read about the Giants nursing a Met-like lead (4-1/2 up with 21 to play, 7 in the loss column) and acting as if the issue had been settled for good.
Everybody thought so. Everybody was wrong.
“Sportswriters can be excused for saying stupid things; it is part of their job,” Murphy offers on page 180. “What is unpardonable is that the Giants begin to preen.”
Why was this bad behavior? Do you have to ask?
“It is unwise to estimate World Series winnings until the season is over; it is essential not to do so in public. The baseball goods demand humility, and when it is not forthcoming, they extract it.”
Superstitious as players were a century past, they may not have fully understood that in 1908. We sure as hell know it in 2007. Still, even taking into account terrible timing and devastating disappointment, I wouldn't go too nuts drawing sharp parallels between the '08 Giants and the '07 Mets.
First off, the Giants didn't collapse. They were outplayed by sizzling competition from Chicago, with Pittsburgh pushing both of them to the bitter end. The Cubs finished 99-55, the Giants and Pirates 98-56. The Mets failed to win an 89th game.
Second, the Giants had Christy Mathewson, who started 44 times and won 37 games. Met victory leaders Oliver Perez and John Maine together started 61 times and won 30 games.
Third, Matty completed 34 of his starts, lessening the need for a prehistoric Guillermo Mota, Jorge Sosa or Scott Schoeneweis to give back one of his many leads.
Fourth, there was the Merkle matter, an inimitable episode that Murphy posits is the keystone moment in American sport. The New York Giants fan that resides inside my soul says we were robbed on September 23 at the Polo Grounds when Fred Merkle didn't touch second as the winning run scored because it was not custom for trailing baserunners to advance to the next base (especially when the field was being deluged by a swarm of bugs, cranks and “fans” — all of which were the same thing). The logical person in my head understands, however, that a rule is a rule (he was supposed to touch second), regardless of custom…though if custom has prevailed all along, then how do you suddenly decide the Cubs can summon a ball, maybe not even the right ball, and force the kid at second when he's just doing what he's been doing all along? The greatest game of its time and maybe all-time was declared a tie and wound up being replayed at the end of the season, which was when the Cubs made off with the pennant and headed for the World Series, which they would win handily…and never again.
If the 2007 Mets were robbed, it's safe to say it was an inside job.
Cait Murphy's book is brilliant as history, riveting as drama, heartbreaking as baseball. I got to meet the author at a New York Baseball Giants Nostalgia Society dinner in July and was delighted to discover she is a Mets fan. Knowing that after finally finishing Crazy '08 leaves me to wonder how much of her massive research resonated for her 99 years after the fact when the Mets made our '07 far crazier than it needed to be.
I still have chills.
The players referenced above, Giants all, are pitcher Red Ames, catcher Roger Bresnahan, Hall of Fame hurler Christy Mathewson, outfielder Cy Seymour and rookie Fred Merkle. The manager is John McGraw and the other paper in town was the New York World.
|
|