The blog for Mets fans
who like to read
ABOUT US
Faith and Fear in Flushing made its debut on Feb. 16, 2005, the brainchild of two longtime friends and lifelong Met fans.
Greg Prince discovered the Mets when he was 6, during the magical summer of 1969. He is a Long Island-based writer, editor and communications consultant. Contact him here.
Jason Fry is a Brooklyn writer whose first memories include his mom leaping up and down cheering for Rusty Staub. Check out his other writing here.
Got something to say? Leave a comment, or email us at faithandfear@gmail.com. (Sorry, but we have no interest in ads, sponsored content or guest posts.)
Need our RSS feed? It's here.
Visit our Facebook page, or drop by the personal pages for Greg and Jason.
Or follow us on Twitter: Here's Greg, and here's Jason.
|
by Greg Prince on 30 July 2006 12:06 am
Hello? Is there somebody there? Are you at the screen door? Well, nice of you to visit. Won't you come in? No, it's no bother.
You must be quite hot on a day like this. So humid of late. It feels a little too close to be comfortable. I would love to offer you a cold glass of tea but I'm afraid the icebox doesn't cool like it used to. I hope you'll forgive its tepid nature. Perhaps I could fry you up some of those green tomatoes from out back. Oh wait, we don't grow those here anymore. I don't think I've had one since the Krispy Kreme closed. Or am I thinkin' of somethin' else?
Please forgive an old woman her lapses and her occasional eccentricities. It hasn’t been easy here this year. My right arm doesn't work as good as it used to either. All that choppin'.
This place is a mess and I apologize for that. The lawn is unsightly, the kudzu is chokin' everything in sight and too many things to identify by name leak slowly. But I like it here. It reminds me of the good times.
We don't have many visitors anymore. It's the war, you know. The War of Northern Aggression. Those horrible Metropolitans and their overtly vicious way of runnin' and hittin' and pitchin' and catchin'. I'm afraid it's simply taken a toll on our beloved Southland.
Oh, but never mind that right now. I do hope you can set a spell and catch up. Tell me, have you heard from my cousin Leopold? Leopold used to be such good company, the way he'd lean forward and lean back and lean forward and lean back. I do declare that man could lean every which way but still!
You haven't heard from him, though, have you? I miss my cousin Leopold. I hear tell he took off for one of the border states…Maryland, I think. Things just haven't been the same without him.
Would you like to look at some photographs? I have the albums right here. I confess I took them down from their shelf when the summer began and have neglected to return them to their rightful place. Since The War of Northern Aggression took hold, there are days when these photographic images are all I have for comfort.
Oh, would you look at that? Look how fresh and young our boys were then! Those crisp white shirts, those neat navy caps with the red brims. Mmm. Look, there's Mad Dog. We all laughed when we called him that because there was nothin' angry about that boy. He was so quiet, but Lord, he was special. Special as the day was long. He's gone now. Gone to one of those cities with the ivy.
That's Tommy. We don't talk about him anymore.
Oh, will you look at this one? Little Johnny Rocker! Oh, so young, so precious. My, how I thought that left arm of his would go on forever. I suppose he said a few things those ungodly Metropolitans didn't care for and it got him into a bit of hot water. Oh my! Now, I'm not sayin' I agreed with Johnny, but he sure was fun to have around. Surely nothin' to lose your religion over.
There's General Cox, lookin' so handsome, so determined. Right next to my cousin Leopold. This must have been taken a good dozen years ago by now. I lose track of the calendar, so I may be off a little, but I do believe that's when we emerged triumphant in the Battle of Ohio. That was our world championship. Just the one. To realize there is only one is enough to give an old woman the vapors, I do declare.
The years have blended one after another, one after another. At first, it was easy to remember. We had so little in our beloved Southland. Then the winnin' came and it simply continued. I know, some might say we were spoiled, that we thought our paradise would endure like the sun in the sky on the first night of summer. Mmm.
Oh, take a look at this album. The photographs in here, see? This was when our Metropolitan friends were civilized. You could invite them down for a weekend and they would behave so hospitably you would almost think they were sweet southern boys themselves.
There's that nice young man who had political aspirations, always smilin', always chattin'. So polite. Did you know he came down here one autumn evenin' and allowed our boys to score at will? So thoughtful.
And there's that catcher they used to have. He could ruffle a few feathers with his occasional deep fly balls and such, but you knew when he was around nothin' bad was goin' to become of us. Always minded his manners. Even that colonel they had, the one with the name sort of like a heart, wasn't it? Yes, Valentine, that was it. I didn't particularly care for him, but when he was in charge, those fellas never caused any lastin' damage.
It's not like that now. Those nasty Metropolitans cause nothin' but trouble. I don't like it. I don't like it at all. Forgive my language but they are ill-mannered beasts, every last one of them. The catcher they have today? He's nothin' like that fine, upstandin' young man with the mustache. He just keeps playin' and keeps hittin' — it's offensive!
And I don't like that man in centerfield. He catches everything and he hits everything and he doesn't seem at all slowed down by anything! I wouldn't say this too loudly, but I fear he may be every bit as good as our Andruw…maybe better.
I liked it when they would travel here with those outfielders who didn't quite know where they were goin' next. Oh, remember that young man who went to college right here in Georgia? Payson was his name? What's that? Yes, Payton! That Payton was such a charmin' boy. Did you know he once kept runnin' all the way to third base with two out when it was clear he was goin' to make it three out? Oh my, I still smile at that memory.
It's all memories now. Our Brian Jordan and all those home runs that always seemed so dramatic. Our Eddie Perez and all those hits that always seemed so surprisin'. Our startin' pitchin' and those wins. Mmm.
Memories, just memories now. Those unconscionable Metropolitans have seen to that. For fourteen consecutive summers, we knew we could count on the early autumn meanin' somethin' to us. The early autumn might not have lasted long, and we may not have turned out to see the festivities it wrought, but it was to be depended upon, like a beautiful spring cotillion. Now there is so little to be depended upon.
I blame those dratted Metropolitans. No sir, I do not care for that new man in charge of their brigade, that Colonel Randolph. He is unsmilin' and unyieldin'. What happened to that other colonel they had, after the fella with the heart name? Who? Why? Was that it? No, Howe, that's right. Colonel Howe. What a gentleman! Never would think of upstagin' our home team. I suppose he's gone, too, just like my Cousin Leopold.
The pitchers these awful Metropolitans bring with them, I must say I don't care for their likes either. That young man who had been sick for a month who had the bad manners to re-enter the battle just last night? I thought he was showin' us the common courtesy of allowin' us several runs and would then stand aside. But instead, he just stubbornly, stubbornly wouldn't give in. I am not one to criticize, but bad manners will raise my ire. I feel the same today as regards that fella with the royal blood. I'm sorry, I'm not so good with names anymore. He's a count of some sort…or a duke…a Duque, yes, thank you. That Duque was even more impolite than the fella last night. Why, he drove in nearly as many runs as he permitted!
I miss that young man with the political aspirations. He would never stand in the way of our success.
I had such high hopes for our boys. So many of them are from these parts, you know? Alas, our crops have been trampled by all that awful artillery those savage Metropolitans brought with them. They never used to do that. They were the friendliest people. Oh, do you recall that great big bear of a man they would bring in to finish games? Those games got finished, but not nearly to their likin'! Mmm.
It's all over now. Our precious way of life is in ruins. There will be no October here, not even an early October. Our Chipper is in pain and our Betemit has been dispatched to the west and our Colonel Cox has lost that golden ability to strategize and all our homegrown crops…sapped of their usefulness. My cousin Leopold is gone. Mad Dog is gone. Johnny Rocker is gone. I haven't seen Johnny Smoltz since I don't know when either. The only thing we have around here for succor is the distant revvin' of automobile engines drownin' out what's left of our faint tomohawk chant. Those fast cars seem to make our people happy now. It takes their minds off The War of Northern Aggression.
You must be tired of listenin' to an old woman ramble on so, but dear, you have to understand. For me, it was always baseball. Atlanta Braves baseball. It wasn't the most popular pastime here, but it was the best we had to offer. Now, no matter what the boys say about how they're fightin' for one more division flag, it is gone. Gone with the Metropolitans and their enormous, pretentious lead.
Mmm. I do declare.
by Greg Prince on 29 July 2006 11:23 am
What other men require a trip to St. Lucie or Norfolk for, Pedro Martinez does in Atlanta.
What other men take a series of games for, Pedro achieves in an inning.
What other men hope will lead them to a gradual recovery, Pedro uses to morph almost instantly into Pedro.
Jesus, he's good.
Friday night was made up of many beautiful parts, but perhaps the loveliest was watching Mr. Martinez become Mr. Martinez as our lonely eyes turned to him. He was terrible in the first and I was terribly concerned — Petey! This ain't your homecoming game no more! — then I remembered he was entering the game cold. There were no rehab starts, just this real one.
Pedro completed all of his rehabilitation in one inning.
Why one inning?
Because any less and The Man wouldn't be human.
Zito? Willis? Maddux? You're kidding, right? After the first inning, we reacquired an ace…our own.
After he got past the first and settled down in the second, it was essentially over. A Martinez who wasn't injured wasn't going to lose to a Ramirez whatever that guy's health was. This was a Pedro night. Can't think of a better place for him to have it.
Oh those Braves. Those Braves fans. They said this was the largest crowd ever to attend a baseball game in Atlanta. Larger than Henry Aaron's 715th? Larger than any number of World Series games? Of course it was. Was it because Braves fans are wired into their Wild Card — excuse me, division title — race? That they really appreciate the comeback their team is attempting to effect? That they see this series as the beginning of a historic march through Georgia and back to the top? That they relish the scintillating rivalry between their Braves and our Mets? That as keenly insighted baseball fans, they were extremely interested in witnessing one of the great pitchers of our time make his first start in a month?
Nah. It was NASCAR Night. And fireworks afterwards. Maybe it was half-off Cokes when you fear a red fannypack, too. Despite losing 6-4, I'll bet they derived exactly as much baseball-related enjoyment from the evening as they did when the Braves regularly resided in first place instead of where they claim they are now: storming toward it like white lightning.
I'd let you know how close to the Mets the Braves have crept, except that's a lot of numbers to crunch and I'm kind of tired.
Think NASCAR draws a single soul more to its dusty tracks on Braves Night?
Real shame about Larry Jones. Seriously. You know my Commandments, particularly this one:
Don't Root For Injuries. In Game Five of the 1988 NLCS at Shea, Kirk Gibson slid into second and came up in obvious pain. Mets fans cheered. There, I thought, that's it, we're screwed. Be a human being about these things. Wish no pain on anyone. Wish they enjoy a pain-free three-month stay on the DL instead.
Thus, when LJ reaggravated his Chipping muscle and agonizingly lurched to the dugout, I did not laugh or guffaw or chuckle or giggle or hoot. No way, not me. The “Get Well” bouquet, however, may have missed the last DHL truck of the night.
Whenever the television shows the Turner Field bullpens, I can't help but notice the large food court trash cans prominently placed behind the mound. They're the Ted's version of Florida's Soilmaster sacks, but tidier. You can't miss them. I wonder…do they represent some sort of subliminal message about the messes Atlanta relievers create? Are they telling us the whole season's been a waste? That the Braves refuse to be refuse?
After Friday night's six-pitcher loss to the Mets, they announced they had picked up onetime hot closer commodity Danys Baez from the Dodgers for the excruciatingly irritating Wilson Betemit. Danys, like Bob Wickman, will surely assist in their ongoing cleanup and recovery effort. That's two firemen who aren't Chris Reitsma and Jorge Sosa (even if they are suspiciously Dan Kolbish)…and only 6-1/2 games in back of the Reds with merely the Diamondbacks, Giants, Rockies and Marlins between them.
No wonder they're the team to beat.
Hell, it was so much fun doing just that, let's beat them some more!
If you're not feeling charitable toward the Braves — and that's OK — you might wish to direct your impulses of generosity toward this Met-hearted initiative.
by Jason Fry on 29 July 2006 3:46 am
Top of the 2nd. In Atlanta. We've scored two to get the evening off on the right foot, then been rocked back on our heels by a four-spot. Braves 4, Mets 2, all momentum gone, eight innings of struggles and pain to come. We wouldn't score. Then they'd add one here, two there, make it 6-2 or 7-2, we'd make a little countercharge late, get it to, say, 7-4 with one on and one out, fail to score, then the roof would cave in. Lots of chopping and whoa-oh-ohh-awohing, another Turner Field loss.
I'd seen this game before. We'd all seen this game before. Afterwards Bobby Valentine would speak, well, bravely and try not to let the fury and hurt show on his face. He'd fail. Or Art Howe would say that we'd battled and say some more things that would instantly depart from our minds as too ethereal and pointless to keep even in short-term memory, kind of like Art Howe himself. We'd drop the second game, possibly in excruciating fashion, possibly in merely humiliating fashion. Then, if it mattered, we'd lose the third. And if it didn't matter we'd win the third, and pump our fists afterwards but it would feel like we could barely raise our arms to do so. Because we'd know we hadn't accomplished anything but getting dragged two steps closer to the hangman.
That's the blueprint. Or rather, it was the blueprint.
The new blueprint is that Pedro Martinez bears down after a worrisome start and ices Atlanta for six more innings of variously crafty, efficient and occasionally dominating baseball. The new blueprint is Carlos Beltran coolly bringing us even with a two-out hit in the second, making it 4-4 once again, Jose Valentin getting things done when they needed to be done, and David Wright rocking the pastels for a little insurance. The new blueprint is not letting some Atlanta pitcher with poor location and bad body language gather himself and find a groove — it's getting him out of his windup and out of the game. The new blueprint is glittering relief from guys doing their jobs one sterling inning at a time.
The old blueprint is Jay Payton and Armando Benitez and Braden Looper and everyone else who came up short at some Turner Field horror show. But that blueprint is as gone as they are. The new Braves, these 2006 Braves, are 13 back and just lost Chipper Jones again. They gave us their best shot and we came right back and put them on the floor for keeps. Tomorrow Marcus Giles and Andruw Jones and the others will be full of more talk about how they're not chasing the wild card, they're chasing us. Whatever. Look in the paper, fellas — you've got to chase the Marlins first.
Mets play tomorrow afternoon. Another audition for El Duque. He might have a role in October. Willie might rest a regular, seeing how it's hot as hell. Gonna need those guys in October. We have to take the long view these days. Still, important not to look past that day's game. So who are we playing? Hmm, let me check. All I remember is it's some third-place, sub-.500 team.
by Greg Prince on 28 July 2006 7:09 pm
Welcome to Flashback Friday, a weekly feature devoted to the 20th anniversary of the 1986 World Champion New York Mets.
Twenty years, 43 Fridays. This is one of them.
This is all I knew about John Franco in 1986:
He closed games for the Cincinnati Reds.
He was very good against us.
And I hated him.
Why did I hate this previously anonymous 25-year-old southpaw? Besides the facts that he closed games for the Cincinnati Reds and was very good against us? Because he hated the Mets. He said unflattering things, at the very least. After our single most memorable contest of that regular season…
…that 14-inning, four-ejection, catcher-at-third, relievers-in-the-outfield, knock ’em, sock ’em, rock ’em baseball game of July 22 dropped by the Reds hours after rightfielder Dave Parker mishandled the easiest fly ball ever with two out in the ninth…
…the diminutive Redleg — whose third anti-Met save of the year was also muffed by Parker — lashed out at the team that beat and beat up his own.
They walk around like their stuff don’t stink. If that’s not cocky, what is?
That’s how the quote reads in Jeff Pearlman’s The Bad Guys Won!. I kind of recall reading it in contemporary accounts as “their [bleep] don’t stink.” However it was actually phrased, I think we got the idea: John Franco didn’t care for the Mets. Naturally, a Mets fan’s instinct was to not care for John Franco.
Went on that way through 1987, 1988 and 1989. Franco entered games for the Reds and tried to get the Mets out. That didn’t endear him to me. When he was mentioned as a possible wager courier for his manager, Gamblin’ Pete Rose, it was worth a chuckle. Who cared what hot water Franco was implicated in? He was a dirty, dirty Red. His Brooklyn heritage held no more water for me than, say, dirty, dirty Cub Shawon Dunston’s.
My birth paperwork certifies me as born in Brooklyn, so I’m entitled to say, as regards my fellow Brooklynites, you’re either with us or against us. That me and Franco and Dunston — a .203 batter versus the Mets in 1986 — shared a little fleeting geography meant nothing. That they wore uniforms that didn’t say “Mets” meant everything.
I wouldn’t have imagined in 1986 that a time would come when I’d be living and dying with and not against Shawon Dunston, just as I would have been mighty surprised to learn I’d spend a decade-and-a-half grimacing on behalf of Johnny (not John, but Johnny) Franco. Someday, in a distant future, I’d watch Johnny hold the Atlanta Braves scoreless in the eighth and ninth, and Shawon lead off an inning by fouling off every pitch in creation — and I’d be bathed in delight because they’d be wearing Mets uniforms and helping the Mets achieve, inarguably, their most Amazin’ victory since 1986.
Who knew? Not me. Couldn’t have. While we live in a moment, it’s extraordinarily difficult to envision that that moment and all the circumstances surrounding it will evolve into something else entirely. In 1986, I didn’t see John Franco traded to the Mets for Randy Myers in advance of 1990, sprouting facial hair and becoming an all-time Met hometown hero. If I couldn’t see that, how could have I forecast Shawon Dunston’s making perhaps the greatest late-season cameo in contending-Mets history?
Franco of the Reds is the most extreme example of “who knew?” from 1986. Dunston of the Cubs and, for that matter, Orel Hershiser of the dirty, dirty Dodgers (0-2, 5.60 ERA in three starts against our ’86ers) would join him on the 1999 Mets and play key roles in extending the fifth game of the National League Championship Series into history. They were no more than bit players in our ’86 drama, three National Leaguers of budding renown to be stampeded en route to our ultimate glory. We didn’t see any of them coming to and working for us when we would really, really need them in a time then far, far away.
Who thinks of such things while the present is already in progress? Can you look up and down the rosters of 29 teams that aren’t the Mets right now and find me somebody who you can project as a big part of the 2019 Mets? Is there out there as we speak a Franco, a Dunston, a Hershiser or even a Rickey Henderson (dirty, dirty Yankee) who will put on a Mets cap and become Our Guy, putting behind him for the duration of his stay at NuShea any negative association we had with him because he’s so crucial to another pennant drive?
As divined via Ultimate Mets Database, sixty men who played for other teams in 1986 would eventually become New York Mets, including Brooklyn’s own Lee Mazzilli, who rejoined the team of his youth that very August 8. Mazzilli was one of five former Mets who wore non-Mets uniforms twenty years ago not knowing they’d be Mets again. The others: Bill Almon and Clint Hurdle (each returned to the fold in ’87), Alex Treviño (’90) and Hubie Brooks (’91). Everybody but Hurdle would leave the Mets a second time to play elsewhere, the lousy traitors.
Not quite fitting into the past & future category was only the greatest Met of them all, Tom Seaver. A White then Red Sock in ’86, Tom Terrific would go out as Tom Tentative in 1987, auditioning in June to fill a temporary shortfall in the Mets’ rotation but not measuring up to his own standards of excellence and retiring before not making the staff. The last colors he wore in pursuit of professional success, however, were blue and orange, so let’s give him an asterisk as the unofficial 61st future Met of 1986.
The last-place Pittsburgh Pirates of 1986 would contribute the most players, six, to the Mets of 1987 and beyond. Besides Mazzilli and Almon, the Bucs bequeathed us Rich Sauveur, Barry Jones, Joe Orsulak and a kid outfielder/third baseman named Bobby Bonilla.
Bobby Bo, who today resides in an ample circle of his very own in Met Hell, probably didn’t get our attention in 1986. Acquired from the White Sox in mid-season, he batted 23 times against us as a Pirate, registering six hits and driving in no runs. But it was Bonilla becoming a Buc that dislodged Mazzilli from the Pittsburgh roster. About a week later, Mazzilli was re-signed by the Mets to put the deluxe in pinch-hitter deluxe that October.
The Pirates’ callous dismissal of our disco-era idol was the first example of another team’s personnel move that would indirectly impact the Mets’ planning vis-à-vis players who played in 1986 as something other than Mets. One of the first that followed came the next spring when Kansas City GM John Schuerholz wanted Ed Hearn so badly that he dealt the Mets ’86 Royal callup David Cone. The most recent vintage-’86 domino to tumble? It happened last winter when Atlanta GM John Schuerholz declined to give Julio Franco, an integral part of the 1986 Indian uprising, the two years he sought.
Then Atlanta wasn’t in the same division as us. Today they’re barely in the same league. But I digress.
In between Mazz and Moses, ’86 enemy alumni have come to mean many different things to us. Kevin McReynolds appears in our consciousness both as one of the more talented all-around players we’ve ever had and as the dry sponge that began absorbing the fun out of Mets baseball. Either way, we probably don’t think about him in terms of the 1986 San Diego Padres, not the 8 RBI he got off us in 12 games, not the time he fouled back a ball through that tiny square behind home plate at Jack Murphy Stadium while batting against the Mets.
Juan Samuel’s ’86 Phillies track record — no power, but 7 steals vs. the Carter Corps — is meaningless to us. He cost us Lenny and Roger is what we understand. Likewise, triviots who recognize the name Jeff Musselman aren’t impressed with whatever he did at Toronto’s Exhibition Stadium circa 1986. It’s what he dared to do here in 1989 — show up at Shea in exchange for Mookie Wilson — that sticks in our collective craw.
On the other hand, there are 1986 players who were Mets to be named later who don’t penetrate the brain as ours on instinctive inspection.
• The world at large would be correct in recalling Cy Young winners Bret Saberhagen as a Royal and Frank Viola as a Twin. We’re sure not quick to claim them as our own despite a good season apiece from each; “Bleacher” and “Choker” are what I’d come up with as one-word responses to their names if so pressed.
• Edwin Nuñez (Mariners) and Bob McClure (Brewers & Expos) may have hopped aboard the 1988 division express before the trade deadline, but are they really on your roll call of champion Mets?
• Unless you’re a nut with a blog and/or killer card collection, you’re probably not linking the names Roger Mason (Giants) or Luis Rivera (Expos) with the name New York Mets no matter that they each worked a Shea shift in 1994. To be fair, you’re probably not remembering them all.
• Mets Classics aficionados are more likely to recognize Chico Walker as the last out from the ’86 division clincher than as a ’92-’93 not-terribly-Amazin’. When those same diehards pop in the first of the nine discs from the ’86 boxed set and fast-forward to the thrilling ending, they see Jesse Orosco striking out Kevin Bass, the scariest batter in the Astro lineup, not the 1992 Met who went 0-for-7 in a far less legendary 16-inning marathon. Through whichever lens you choose to view him, you’ll see somebody kicked Bass each time.
• And if we have any friends from Cardinal Country looking in, we hereby relinquish to you all intellectual property rights to Tom Herr and Vince Coleman…except to occasionally despise them as our own.
1986 belongs at the top of any list of Mets seasons, but it’s a 1986 Oriole, Don Aase, who sits at the top of the all-time alphabetical list of Mets. If you were around for his one year of Mets “service,” you’ll remember one thing and one thing only about it: that as the Mets made their most serious move on first place in 1989, Don Aase gave up a late-summer Pendletonian home run that turned that season irrevocably to the bad. It was against the Dodgers on August 20 in the top of the ninth, a three-run shot off the bat of Los Angeles’ second baseman.
The Dodgers had quite the future-Met pedigree that Sunday. Eddie Murray, Mike Marshall and Alejandro Peña — all active in 1986 — along with Lenny Harris (a Double-A Vermont Red at this time two decades back) were among five gonna-be’s who were not even a gleam in our eye on August 20, 1989. They, like ex-Met Ray Searage, were all sporting LA’s on their caps. But none of them was the accomplished infielder who blasted that heartbreak homer off of Aase. That particular Dodger of 1989 who would be yet another Brooklyn-rooted Met for one season in the 1990s was, sad to say, a dirty, dirty Yankee in 1986. Like Aase and Nuñez and Dunston and Hershiser and all the Eventupolitans whose future was unknowable then, we probably weren’t giving him a whole lot of thought twenty years ago.
If you’re wondering what that guy is up to these days, I think I heard something about him being Julio Franco’s manager.
Come to think of it, you wouldn’t have guessed six years ago that “Yankees 2000” would eventually become code for the curse that befell that rancid franchise for ruining the last Subway Series and the name of a really good blog that promotes the curse as well as happier Met thoughts. Yankees 2000 took a break from its noble mission to profile one of its readers and fellow bloggers…me, for some reason. Read that if you dare/care (you’ll learn how FAFIF could have been LMAGE had not a better thought prevailed) and check out the rest of Y2K while you’re there. It almost makes you forget Luis Fucking Sojo.
by Jason Fry on 28 July 2006 12:14 pm
That's what Crash told Nuke you needed to play this game with. In recent days as a collective fan base we've practically wallowed in the former: Can we get by anybody in the playoffs with this rotation? Is Heilman out of his rut yet? Is Pedro healthy? What's wrong with Glavine? What's happened to our starting pitching in general? Are we going to trade Lastings? Are we not going to trade Lastings? And so on and so on, until sometimes you're left thinking, Jeez, this is sure one messed-up .594 team.
Well, Crash was right: You've got to have fear. A certain measure of fear is a good thing, both on the diamond and in the big, less-well-defined place around it in which the rest of us stumble through our days. The fearless get complacent, stop seeking opportunities, stop enforcing high standards for themselves, and never see what's coming until it knocks them flat. So OK, let's face our fears: Even when firing on all cylinders, our starting pitching isn't the kind of thing to stop anybody's heart once the stands are hung with bunting. And the starters aren't firing on even most cylinders right now — going down the line, they look hurt and out of sync and like Trachsel and too old and too young. Another starter would make us feel a lot better — but it has to be the right starter and we can't give up a big piece of the future and if we pull the trigger we better win. Which is a lot of tumblers to try and line up just so.
But in worrying about all these bogeymen, we've forgotten that other thing Crash told Ebby Calvin to bring to the table. How about a little arrogance?
After all, we've got no shortage of material: We've got the best record in the National League. We've scored the most runs in the National League. We've given up the fewest. Our run differential is +77 — the next-best mark in the NL is +25. We're 10 games over .500 on the road. We lead the majors in steals and are within six of leading the NL in home runs. We lead the league in ERA. We're second in the league in Ks. If it's close, we'll beat you — we're 22-10 in one-run games. Extra-innings? We're 8-5. Walk-offs? Ten in the books, with more heroics to come.
In short, we're a monster, a terrifying orange-and-blue beast with power and speed, stingy pitching and a flare for the dramatic. Playing us is like getting in the ring against a 25-armed hydra of a boxer. We've got supercharged kids who'll beat you and wily old men who'll do the same. Fourth outfielders and Hall of Famers and reclamation projects and budding superstars, speedballers and dead-fishmongers. Get through one terrifying Carlos and we'll come right back at you with another one. Escape Young Jose and we'll do you in with Old Jose. When we're going good we're unstoppable and when we're going bad we're still a handful.
And so now we head down south to face the Braves. They've looked better of late, give them that. They've looked dead before, that should be remembered. But put yourself in the other guy's shoes: Get swept and the flickering pilot light of their division hopes goes out. Lose two out of three and they've just wasted three days. Take two out of three, they gain one lousy game. If everything breaks right for them and they sweep us? They're two games under .500, nine games out of first and it's August. Not exactly the kind of thing to make you feel, um, chipper.
The Braves have gone 14-7 over the last three weeks — and for their troubles they've gained 1 1/2 games on us. At that rate, they'll catch us in mid-January. Sure, they've put themselves back in the wild-card picture. But they're five out and need to jump over three teams — and six more teams are within 2 1/2 of them. We've tried to solve that math problem before and know it's tear-your-hair-out stuff. The Braves, for all their good recent play, are a bad weekend away from last place. We're a bad weekend away from…from what, exactly? A stern talking-to from the manager? We can put their season on life support this weekend. All they can get is our attention.
Fear and arrogance. Let's not get so preoccupied with the one that we forget the other. We've got October problems. Fine. It's not October. While we're working on those, let's enjoy the heck out of July and August and September.
The Braves? Bring on the Braves.
by Greg Prince on 28 July 2006 1:01 am
By now, it’s as intrinsic to the home game experience as the apple, the Italian sausages and the expansive parking. It’s too clever and stirring to have ever become wallpaper but also a little too out-of-context to be completely appreciated when we’re exposed to it. It’s delivered regularly by the only Finch — sorry, Sidd — to ever make an actual impact inside Shea Stadium.
You know the drill. The Mets are tied or behind, they’ve got a runner or more on base and the other team is caucusing on the mound. Cue the anchor of the UBS-TV nightly newscast:
So I want you to get up now. I want you to get out of your chairs and go to the window. Right now. I want you to get up right now, sit up, go to your windows, open them and stick your head out and yell…
We know the rest. There was a time we could’ve figured out to scream “LET’S GO METS!” on our own, but if we’re going to be electronically provoked, Howard Beale’s “I’m mad as hell” diatribe sure beats “MAKE SOME NOISE!” as a tickler.
Doesn’t it?
With the off night last night, I decided I wanted to see more of Network than just Beale, portrayed to the Oscar hilt by the late Peter Finch, exhorting us as if it were nothing-nothing and Dusty Baker is chatting up Mark Prior after walking Carlos Beltran (exactly the situation that elicited “…and stick your head out” yesterday afternoon). I watched the DVD both with and without director Sidney Lumet’s commentary; it was a cinematic doubleheader sweep.
If you know nothing more about Network than it spawned what the American Film Institute chose as the 19th Greatest Movie Quote of All Time, then you should be mad as hell that you haven’t seen it and you should not take this anymore. Rent it or, better yet, buy it. It is the single most prescient movie ever made about the way we would come to live and the most penetrating film I’ve ever seen about the medium that dominates our consciousness whether we want to admit it or not.
I first saw Network on my 14th birthday. What I understood enraptured me immediately. Paddy Chayefsky’s screenplay is so unsparing toward television that you’re ready to destroy your tube until you realize you need it to watch Network again. And the Mets, of course. Still, after CCA chairman Arthur Jensen (Ned Beatty) regales him the riot act…
The world is a business, Mr. Beale! It has been since man crawled out of the slime, and our children, Mr. Beale, will live to see that perfect world in which there is no war and famine and oppression and brutality — one vast and ecumenical holding company, for whom all men will work to serve a common profit, in which all men will hold a share of stock, all necessities provided, all anxieties tranquilized, all boredom amused.
…well, let’s just say you wonder what would happen if that was the speech they excerpted on DiamondVision to fire up the crowd.
Probably nothing.
Network foresaw reality television and the assault it would make on our senses. It understood that if corporations wouldn’t exactly replace countries, they would have a great deal to do with how they are run. It was so cynical about cynicism that it, like Beale as the honestly mad prophet of the airwaves, rose above the morass it portrayed by being pure of heart.
When you watch Bill Holden and Faye Dunaway and Peter Finch and Bob Duvall and Ned Beatty and a cast of dozens at the top of their game and see Lumet’s and Chayefsky’s craft translate to art, you feel a little cheap going along with the Mets’ use of the “Mad as Hell” speech like it was a rally monkey. It’s more than that.
That said, the Mets aren’t wrong to ally themselves with Network. Not after what I noticed during last night’s viewing.
In the runup to Beale’s defining scene, he breaks down twice: first on Tuesday, September 23, 1975, when he threatens to blow his brains out on the evening news and then, the next night, when he literally yells “bullshit!” over and over again. His position becomes tenuous, to say the least, but he sure gets lots of attention — everybody in town is covering the newsman. UBS programming executive Diana Christensen (Dunaway) picks up a copy of the Daily News the morning after his second explosion and thumbs through it, describing the true-to-their-times contents to an assistant:
The Arabs have decided to jack up the price of oil another 20 percent, and the CIA has been caught opening Senator Humphrey’s mail, there’s a civil war in Angola, another one in Beirut, New York City’s facing default, they’ve finally caught up with Patricia Hearst — and the whole front page of the Daily News is Howard Beale.
Sure enough, we see a very authentic News cover, headlined BEALE FIRED over Peter Finch’s picture. But thanks to the magic of DVDs, we see something else if we pause strategically. We see the back page, and if we squint, we’re pretty sure we can make out the word METS.
We can, indeed. We assume it’s a made-up headline of some sort, but what we’re looking at is pretty detailed, so we read carefully and we can’t quite believe what we’re seeing:
CUBS NIP METS IN 11TH, 1-0
SEAVER NO-HITTER FOR 8 2/3
Well I’ll be The Great Ahmed Khan. In a triumph of realism, that’s a genuine back page headline. And since Howard Beale had prefaced his first cry of “bullshit!” by noting the date as Wednesday, September 24, 1975, I could look it up and confirm what I thought that September 25, 1975 back page headline was about:
It’s the Joe Wallis game.
Jungle Joe Wallis was a Cubs outfielder of no note whatsoever when Tom Seaver started in Chicago on 9/24/75. It was an afternoon (of course it was, Wrigley having no lights then) when the Cy Young-bound ace had it goin’ on. No hits in the first or the second or the third all the way through whenever I got home from seventh grade and turned on WRVR-FM to listen. Tom continued to mow down Cubs while I sat and hoped. Perfect through six. A walk to leadoff batter Don Kessinger ended that at the start of the seventh, but no damage done and, more importantly, no hits. None in the eighth either.
Tom Seaver was no-hitting the Cubs. Tom Seaver, who was good for approximately one one-hitter every other year — four to date in his incandescent career — was getting close, just like he had against Jimmy Qualls and the Cubs six years earlier at Shea, just like he had against Leron Lee and the Padres three years earlier, also at Shea. Both of those died with one out in the ninth. No Met had ever come closer.
There was the little matter of Rick Reuschel, a formidable opponent. The Cubs starter had scattered four Met singles and one Met double over eight. It was 0-0, just like it was at Shea yesterday between Prior and Maine. In the top of the ninth on September 24, 1975, Felix Millan, Mike Vail and Rusty Staub went down 1-2-3.
Now Tom Seaver entered the bottom of the ninth poised to make history, more or less. If he could get through the ninth without giving up a hit, then he would have…nine no-hit innings. But since it would still be 0-0, would it be a no-hitter? By the rules of the day, not exactly, but it would be the moral equivalent of a no-no, the first in Mets history. It would be something out of Harvey Haddix (Tom’s first Mets pitching coach, FYI). To make it count, the Mets would eventually have to score one for Tom and Tom would have to keep it goin’ on into the tenth or however long it took. We were asking the ace of a team that had failed to achieve a no-hitter for almost 14 full seasons to maintain one beyond the regulation limit.
Whatever it was Tom Seaver was nearing, it seemed huge.
It grew larger after Tom K’d Kessinger. It became absolutely immense when he struck out Rick Monday. That’s two All-Stars who went down for Seaver’s seventh and eighth strikeouts. All that stood between him and a slightly warped version of immortality was Joe Wallis.
Who?
I’d never heard of him. I doubt few had. This was right out of the Qualls textbook, the chapter that said beware the most unfamiliar man on the roster when your team is attempting to record its first no-hitter. The Cubs lineup that September day was roughly half veterans of accomplishment, half youngsters with a future. They were men whose baseball cards I could pull out of my collection at a moment’s notice: Kessinger, Monday, Cardenal, Thornton, Madlock, Trillo, Mitterwald, Reuschel — I knew who they were.
I had no idea who Joe Wallis was. Listening on the radio, I didn’t even know he didn’t spell his name Wallace. I just knew what Jimmy Qualls had done and that I didn’t want the same thing to happen. Qualls was one out in the ninth. This was two. Maybe that would help.
It didn’t.
With two outs in the bottom of the ninth inning of a game between the New York Mets and the Chicago Cubs, Joe Wallis lined a clean single into right field, the first base hit surrendered by Tom Seaver all afternoon. In a baseball life marked by the long and hard development of a sixth sense about these things, I can honestly say I could feel it coming.
I want to say I remember there being two strikes on Wallis, but I can’t say that for sure. I don’t remember either whether it was before or after Wallis ended Seaver’s bid that Bob Murphy mentioned he was known as Jungle Joe. In the past 31 years, he hasn’t been known for anything except that base hit, his 16th and final safety of 1975. He would play in four more seasons as a Cub then an Athletic and register exactly 200 more hits. His career ended before his 28th birthday.
Neither Seaver nor the Mets would come away from Chicago with their first no-hitter. They would be, as the News accurately reported, unhappily nipped in the 11th, 1-0, Skip Lockwood taking the loss. Seaver, who would go 10 and give up three hits but no runs, would no-hit the St. Louis Cardinals as a Cincinnati Red three years later. The New York Mets, who avoided being no-hit by the Cubs yesterday, have never had a pitcher, even a combination of pitchers, throw a no-hitter for them. In the 4,882 games the Mets have played since Joe Wallis singled with two out in the ninth, they have yet to come that close again.
Now that’s something to get mad as hell about.
by Greg Prince on 26 July 2006 8:43 pm
If you're producing a sportscast tonight and you have one highlight to show from this afternoon's Mets-Cubs game, that's easy. You pick Jose Valentin singling up the middle with the bases loaded and two out in the bottom of the tenth and then receiving highly affectionate super atomic noogies from his teammates for his walkoff RBI, scoring the only run anybody had all day.
Life is fun when you win by one, so that's absolutely the money shot; the ambassador to Azerbaijan could tell you that. But if you could show two highlights, you'd back it up two batters to Carlos Delgado at the plate. There were already two outs then, Beltran on first and Glendon Rusch — remember him? — going lefty a lefty with our cleanup hitter. Delgado, no longer in a slump but not having done anything yet today, did something he almost never does.
He went the other way.
It was dynamite. Placing a ball just over and inside the third base bag, it trickled far enough down the line to send CB to third and CD to second. That forced Pitch-Count Killjoy Dusty — he removed Prior after 103 tosses and 5-2/3 no-hit innings — to order Rusch to walk Wright, load the sacks and bring up Valentin. The nonchantworthy Jose (Ho-ZAY! Ho-Zay-Ho-Zay-Ho-ZAY!) did the rest.
Earlier in the season, when the Delgado shift began to eat its namesake alive, it was asked in polite company why Carlos D. didn't just go the other way. The answer — “he doesn't do that” — reminded me of perhaps my favorite Peanuts strip ever. It's a real cold night, see, and the gang is surrounding Snoopy's doghouse worried about the beagle's warmth as he lay atop his abode. We could bring him a blanket, somebody says. We could get him a heater, somebody else offers.
Why, asks Linus, can't he just sleep inside the doghouse?
Everybody stares at Linus and then gets back to their discussion.
I don't know why Carlos Delgado won't or can't hit to left more often, but like staying inside on a chilly night, it makes sense to me.
Going the other way turned out to be the theme of Camp Day. Prior sure departed from his previous injury-riddled form, though to be honest, we don't care. Maine, coming up as big as Utah, has taken what appears to be a permanent U-turn from Norfolk. He's a lock for the five- or six-man rotation…at least through next week. The Mets themselves have left Loserville (and the Cubs) behind after a disturbingly long layover there. For those of you whose skies fall far too easily, the Braves can take two from the Marlins tonight and tomorrow and then three from us, and we'll still be eight ahead of them on Sunday.
Attention worst-case scenarians: Go the other way and relax.
The best other way we've gone is way the fuck away from 1993. 1993, you say? Why bring that up? Today, in our 101st contest of 2006, we achieved our 60th win of the season — one more than we managed in toto thirteen horrible years ago. If it felt like an eternity trudging from Saturday to Wednesday to top 59 wins, imagine or recall what 1993 felt like when it took 162 big ones just to reach that tragic number. '93 was also the last time we were no-hit, an occurrence that seemed unlikely today, but after 6-1/3 going without, thoughts of Darryl Kile (and Ed Halicki…and Bill Stoneman…and Bob Moose…) pound in your head.
No matter what happens during the rest of 2006, even if John Maine turns into Dave Telgheder, we are now assured of nothing less than our eighth-lowest win total ever.
1962: 40
1981: 41 (strike year)
1965: 50
1963: 51
1964: 53
1994: 55 (strike year)
1993: 59
Watch out 61-101 squad of 1967 — we're coming to get you next! If we can take one of three from these Cubs, then anything's possible.
by Greg Prince on 26 July 2006 3:47 am
I sat here Saturday night and declared we had all the starting pitching we could possibly use right inside our three blue walls.
Since then, we've given up eight runs a game.
I opined last night that Paul Lo Duca, not Mike Piazza, is the best possible catcher we could have right now.
Then tonight's game ends with the bases loaded, Lo Duca at bat and a defensive inside-out swing that sends Bobby Howry's slider to nest in Neifi Perez's glove.
Our pitching's gone to seed.
Lo Duca didn't deliver.
I'm a little nervous about spotting any good of consequence in anything I see from the Mets.
Thus, consider the source when I tell you that Tom Glavine has really great hair.
No kidding. I see him surrounded by microphones and notepads offering up explanations like they're fastballs high in the strike zone after these losses, and I'm like, “man, that guy looks pretty good.” Looks better in the clubhouse than on the mound lately. I generally don't notice these things, but it's a shame he has to wear a cap.
If he comes out bald next week, he can blame me. But if his hair is all we lose, then we'll be all right.
by Jason Fry on 25 July 2006 5:45 pm
Before we move on to tonight's game, a quick acknowledgment that last night saw the unveiling of another significant work by The Artist Currently Known as Keith Hernandez. Xavier Nady ended the sixth when Jacque Jones made a very nice running catch that left him nearly flipping over the padded wall beyond the right-field foul line. We had friends over for dinner and were keeping half an eye on the game, sound off, while chatting. As Jones made the catch, a fan in the front row cringed comically away from the ball like a man who suddenly finds himself sharing an inflatable raft with a Great White Shark.
Man, I thought. When they come back from the break, Keith is going to be killing that poor blighter.
Sure enough, after Phil Nevin grounded out to start the seventh, out came the replay. We turned up the sound expectantly. Keith was all over it — he even used the telestrator. “In sandlot,” he said, “that's the guy you put in right field.” Ouch!
I laughed and then turned expectantly to Emily, who didn't disappoint.
“You're lucky that wasn't you,” she said, hitting her mark perfectly. And therein lies a story, one veteran readers may have heard it before. (If so, sorry.)
May 11, 1996 was marked by an 18-minute fight that began when Pete Harnisch cold-cocked Scott Servais — amazingly enough, the last fight the Mets got into, not counting slow walks to the foul lines with furrowed brows and Mike Piazza chasing relievers around infields. John Franco celebrated John Franco Day by getting ejected for his part in the melee. Great game, great fight. But that's another story.
Earlier in that long-ago game, Emily left her seat for refreshments, leaving me and our friend Chris, the Human Fight of commenting fame, in the mezzanine. While she was gone, a batter hit a ball right at us — no angle, depth perception absolutely zero help. And, well, not to put to fine a point on it, but we cringed away from it. You might call the nature of our cringing spasmodic. You might call it pathetic. You would not call it a particularly proud moment.
Someone about 10 feet in front of us wound up with the ball and held it up proudly as the Human Fight and I exchanged a somewhat-ashamed glance.
“Good thing,” he said finally, “that your wife wasn't here to see that.”
As if on cue, enter Emily from the tunnel, hot dogs and what-not in hand.
“YOU TWO!” she boomed. “I SAW YOU ON TV! YOU COWERED AWAY FROM THAT BALL!”
Much merriment in our section. Muttering and foot-gazing from the Human Fight and me. Cringing telestrated guy who's spent today getting crap from his buddies, I feel your pain.
by Jason Fry on 25 July 2006 4:43 am
Well-said, blog brother. (If you just got here and want to know what I'm going on about, skip down a bit.)
I'll go a step further and say that while I'll always have an extra-large spot in my heart reserved for Mike Piazza, this team is better off with Paul Lo Duca. And it's not just a factor of timing, of Piazza's inevitable decline allowing someone else to take the stage. It's more than that.
Don't get me wrong: As you noted, Mike Piazza lifted this franchise out of the doldrums essentially by his lonesome and became a New York icon. He'll be back soon and the fans better be on their feet. (And to think he ended his first year receiving A-Rod-level boos. The shame!) But while obviously a smart, thoughtful guy, Piazza never seemed comfortable in the spotlight. There was a very revealing quote about him in one of those periodic devastating stories about the Mets, one that appeared in the New York Times Magazine during the wretched Alomar years.
Piazza said his favorite movie was “Patton,” and noted that he'd love to work for a guy like that. Work for a guy like that, not be a guy like that. He didn't want to be a leader, he wanted to be led.
But while there may be born leaders, more often that not leadership is something that's thrust upon people — if you want to stick with your military history, look at Grant, a man transformed by leadership's call from a drunken shopkeeper to the savior of the Republic. It was a call Piazza never chose to hear — he wanted to be an ensemble guy, letting leadership settle on players on the decline and players who didn't deserve the mantle and pitchers with the front office's ear and even relievers.
Lo Duca isn't going to the Hall of Fame. He's not the kind of player that makes you put off the trip to the men's room if he's due up this inning. But in one important respect, he's far more than Piazza was: He leads, and he's not the least bit shy about doing it. There's the clubhouse leadership so ably captured by Tom Verducci in SI last week, and there's the on-field variety, too. Even before the Mets starting reeling off victories and collecting clutch hits and running wild and playing pinch-me baseball, there was something different about them, something new. And it didn't take long to find the source: When the game was in the balance, there was Lo Duca coming out to the mound to bark at a pitcher losing focus, or making sure the infielders knew their assignments. The crackle and sizzle of this team begins behind the plate, with Captain Red Ass. And it's an energy, an edge, that I never saw with Piazza.
I love Mike Piazza. He defined an era with this team and carried us up from nothing to some of the happiest years of my life as a baseball fan. And I want to see his 31 up on the wall with 14, 37, 41 and 42. But this is a better team with Lo Duca. It's not so quantifiable through OPS or VORP or RCAA, but you can absolutely see it in the most important stat of all: W-L. There's a reason Lo Duca is still beloved in Los Angeles and Florida, a reason his old manager chose to wear his number. This year, it's been our great good fortune to appreciate why.
|
|