A Mets fan walks into an Applebee’s. That’s not a setup to a quip. It actually happens once a year that I know of, with me as the Mets fan. Applebee’s menu tends to shake out a bit on the salty side for my tastes, but salty is something I’ll never be if somebody is kind enough to take or, more accurately, send me there on the house every January.
My wife’s birthday, you see, was last week, and when my wife’s birthday is nigh, my sister and her husband never fail to send us a generous gift card for Applebee’s, a national chain restaurant conveniently located to where we live. Its proximity is its primary appeal to us. Barely having to drive and not having to pay equals eating good in the neighborhood. More partial to bringing in than dining out, we don’t usually take advantage of the hospitality on-premise, but this January we made an exception. We went to our town’s Applebee’s for lunch last Wednesday. It was the same afternoon the Mets introduced Bo Bichette to the press; the day after the Mets acquired Luis Robert, Jr.; a few hours before the Mets traded for Freddy Peralta. This is how a Mets fan who walks into an Applebee’s has come to mark time this January.
And who should greet Stephanie and me practically inside the door at Applebee’s but Pete Alonso? Specifically, a substantial color photo of the Polar Bear that graced the bulk of a wall adjacent to the hostess station. With each index finger raised in the direction of the crowd, Pete appeared to be celebrating one of his franchise-record 264 home runs. The image must have gone up since last January, the last time I was in there to pick up our gift card’s worth, because had it been up the year before, I would have noticed it. And had this visit been before December of 2025, I would have kvelled without qualification that a name-brand casual dining establishment — or any establishment, really — was devoting a place of prominence to the longtime signature star of the Mets.
Now, in January of 2026, Big Pete was just another piece of flare that a joint like Applebee’s mandates to imply one of its outlets is suitably sporty and righteously regional. They also have lots of pictures of area Little League and high school athletes up as well. I didn’t check to see who among them has since graduated. I do know Alonso works in Baltimore these days.
Pete will always be a Met icon. A decade from now, that picture, if corporate hasn’t mandated its removal, will stand as a pleasant reminder of a player who did great things for the nearby team and was well-loved while doing it. A sizable portrait of Pete Alonso by then will hit like a sizable portrait of, say, Cleon Jones now. If Cleon was the de facto face of our Applebee’s, you think I’d ask to speak to the manager and request we not be shown somebody who finished his career on the South Side of Chicago, nowhere near our local Applebee’s? Yet stepping right up to greet Pete was not what I was planning on doing last week. I was having a hard enough time getting to know who’s actually on the Mets at the moment.
I wasn’t planning on this, either, but I now root for a team that features Bo Bichette, Luis Robert, Jr., Freddy Peralta, and, if his minor league deal amounts to anything, Craig Kimbrel. Fine. Great. Maybe wonderful. But I wasn’t planning on it. I’ve certainly known their names and something about their games. I didn’t know they were Mets. They weren’t until very recently. Nevertheless, here they come into my life and your life, along with some other fairly familiar ballplayers who played elsewhere in years past. To some extent, that’s every winter on the verge of Spring. Some winters it feels organic. Some winters it feels transformative in a welcome way. This winter it feels almost random. If Leonard Nimoy were still hosting his syndicated program, he’d be in search of context for these Mets.
The Mets as we knew them — the Mets with whom we lost patience on the road from 45-24 to 38-55 — ceased to exist in the segment of the offseason that bridged 2025 and 2026. Then there were a few weeks when there didn’t seem to be much to the Mets at all. A lot of deletion. Sporadic addition. Tempting as it was to lose patience with the lack of progression, that was OK. It was late December and early January. There was no baseball yet. Somebody would be playing as Mets by the end of March.
The Mets as we know them at present, at least the Mets to whom we are being introduced these days? I don’t know. I really don’t. I guess that’s OK, too. Even it isn’t, it’s going to be.
It’s a Citi of strangers, Stephen Sondheim might suggest. They’ve all come to work, come to play. Bo Bichette, a late recast for Kyle Tucker (and owner of our most soap operatic name since Blade Tidwell), evinced believable enthusiasm for becoming a Met as he chatted with the media ahead of us going to Applebee’s. He accepted a large sum in order to express his enthusiasm. He worked in a couple of opt-outs in case being a Met isn’t as awesome as he thought it could be. Shortly after his signing was reported, I got around to watching an MLB Network special dissecting Game Seven from last year’s World Series. I saw through newly opened eyes Bichette belt a three-run homer to put Toronto up early. “Hey,” I thought, “we just got the guy who did that!” Bo wasn’t playing third base for the Blue Jays then or ever; he will be for us. What’s a new season without a sense of defensive adventure?
Luis Robert, Jr., is considered a heckuva center fielder and can count a fabulous season in his not too distant past. I’ll try to forget that also described Cedric Mullins last summer. Robert doesn’t necessarily have to follow directly in the footsteps of White Sox-turned-Mets stars like Tommie Agee and Lance Johnson to succeed in center. By dint of not being a Metsian Mullin, he pencils in as an automatic upgrade. Yet I am genuinely sorry we gave up Luisangel Acuña to nab him from the pale hose, though I’m sure some of that is my pinch-running obsession talking. In 2025, Luisangel Acuña pinch-ran more than any Met but three ever had in a single season? He was inserted 23 times for PR purposes, tying him with Hot Rod Kanehl (1963), Leon “Motor” Brown (1976), and Tim “Bogie” Bogar (1996) for frequency, and he did it without a widely disseminated nickname. Six stolen bases as a pinch-runner, eleven runs scored. Promising enough as an everyday player that during the one month when he received regular reps, mostly at second, he was named April’s National League Rookie of the Month.
The promise more than the pinch-running record was what made dismissing Acuña sting. When we traded for Luisangel at the 2023 deadline, it was deemed a coup of sorts. He showed up a little ahead of schedule in September 2024 and made himself extremely useful in spurts. Then he got a little lost in a middle infield logjam, and the front office guy who replaced the front office guy who acquired him saw him as no less expendable than Joe McIlvaine judged Tim Bogar. Acuña appeared on our depth chart in the same ad hoc makeover that brought us Drew Gilbert, and Gilbert’s been gone for months, becoming the next center fielder for somebody else instead of us. Yet when the world was slightly younger, Gilbert the outfielder and Acuña the infielder were joining our top draft pick from 2022, Jett Williams, who it was said could play infield and outfield, in making our minor leagues formidable. I saw Williams up close in the Citi Field press conference room when the Mets were presenting their organizational awards at the end of 2023. My private pet name for him immediately emerged: Diamond Stud, inspired by the sparkling earring he modeled. That was a blah season, but soon, I could tell myself, we’d have the Diamond Stud carving out a spot on our diamond, maybe in the same lineup with Acuña and Gilbert.
They’re all elsewhere now, with two of them never having ascended to the Mets. In my adolescence, I liked leafing to the back of the Official Yearbook to get a gander at our Future Stars, even if they tended to be Butch Benton and Luis Rosado. Anticipation is a baseball fan’s core competency. I had no idea how any of the crop lately blossoming down on the farm were going to actually fit into our big league plans, but I liked knowing they were on their way up. Gilbert went to San Francisco to obtain Tyler Rogers, one of the myriad relievers who couldn’t stem 2025’s tide of futility. Williams went to Milwaukee alongside Brandon Sproat for Freddy Peralta. I’ll no doubt applaud the first strike Peralta throws as the Mets’ 2026 titular ace, probably when he appears on NBC come Opening Day, just as I’ll put my hands together for the first fly ball Robert reels in behind him.
Regardless of how well our veteran newcomers mesh with the likes of Lindor and Soto, I’m going to miss the budding future I was anticipating. Williams was a bejeweled anecdote to me. I hoped there’d be more to him. Sproat was already a little something. Four starts of varying return last September, but it was a beginning. I nestled Sproat between Nolan McLean and Jonah Tong to form my ideal youthful pitching core for 2026 and beyond — I dubbed them Generation MST3K as I looked forward to them coming of age and me nurturing their narrative. I was taking on the Gen-K ghost of Izzy, Pulse, and Paul from thirty years before. No, that crew never really set sail, but I had time on my side this time. Or so I dared assume. Oh well, M and T are still here. I suppose Christian Scott can be subbed in as the “S,” but it won’t be quite what I envisioned.
I’m all for improving the present product with relatively proven commodities. As of March 26, I plan to open my arms to Bichette, Robert, Peralta, Marcus Semien, Luis Polanco, Devin Williams, Luke Weaver, Luis Garcia, Tobias Myers, Grae Kessinger, whoever. I get an extra kick out of Kimbrel being here if only because he’s been around so long that I can remember it being a big deal that David Wright whacked a late-inning dinger off him in Atlanta. I know these new guys without really knowing these new guys. No matter their experience, they’re new as Mets. I’ll get to know them. At the moment they’re mostly whoever. Alonso & Co. were us. Some of Pete’s peers are still on hand. Some of the kids from the proverbial back of the yearbook remain; a few have crept toward the middle and front sections since they were freshmen. Not everybody slated to inhabit Citi soon is a stranger.
Nonetheless, this Met winter has left me feeling a chill on the cusp of Spring. Then again, so did winter twenty years ago. Carlos Delgado was precisely the kind of slugger we prized perennially. Paul Lo Duca figured as the best possible Mike Piazza successor. Billy Wagner was exactly what we needed to caulk all those Looperesque leaks. At Shea in 2006, however, they loomed as strangers, as did the spare parts we seemed intent on amassing post-2005. Endy Chavez? Jose Valentin? Xavier Nady? Duaner Sanchez? Jorge Julio? Darren Oliver? Chad Bradford from Moneyball? Julio Franco from the 1982 Phillies? Some had reputations. Some you’d have labeled lesser-known. They were all bound at some point for Port St. Lucie, itself diluted by something called the World Baseball Classic. On paper, which was something I was in the twilight of buying daily, it looked all right. In my soul, the surroundings were disturbingly unfamiliar. I felt almost isolated from my team. Seriously, who were these guys and how did they get to call themselves Mets?
Then the season started, and most of the aforementioned made great impressions, and the new Mets coalesced with the core Mets from 2005, and the 2006 Mets morphed into a division champion I cherish to this day. Four eventual Hall of Famers played for those Mets, none more brilliantly than the most recently anointed of them, Carlos Beltran, elected to Cooperstown somewhere amid Bichette, Robert, and Peralta alighting in our midst. I hope his plaque portrays him as a Met, but even if it doesn’t, Beltran wore our cap in 2006, which turned out to be quite a year for the collection of players — and fans — who did just that.
Maybe we’ll someday say something of that nature for the Mets who are currently comprised largely of accomplished whoevers. Or we’ll wonder what the hell went wrong the way we have in the wake of strangers looking better in theory than they did on the field. Either way, they’ll have our attention; then our familiarity; then some combination of our esteem and disdain. You know, like Mets every year.






Maybe appropriate that the picture of Pete shows his back; as he symbolically walks out the door.
Beltran begat Zack Wheeler, who begat… oh yeah, nothing.
I had forgotten about the 2005 offseason. That begat a pretty good year, up until the 9th inning of G7.
I can remember the hype around the 1991 and 2001 offseasons and the terrible results that followed. Hell, I even remember the 1974 offseason with Unser, Kingman, Torre and Gene Clines.
Will miss Pete and Nimmo for sure, but time to turn the page.
Really mixed feelings here, and you did a great job putting it in perspective. I guess I always preferred veteran leadership to change gradually: a Keith Hernandez here, a Ray Knight there, wow, here comes Gary Carter, later we throw in Bobby Ojeda, and suddenly you have a championship team. When you change the culture suddenly, it’s a real throw of the dice: you can get 2006, or you can get The Worst Team Money Can Buy. Or something in the middle. I guess we’ll have to wait and see.
I too have been thinking of the other time the Mets acquired a dynamic centerfielder from the White Sox (Tommy Davis, we hardly knew ye). Many A-G chants and a Commissioner’s trophy later, that one worked out really well. Good thing that there is no Bob Gibson to go headhunting in Spring Training to derail year one like it did to Agee in 1968. Let’s just hope that the talented Robert, Jr. just needed a White Sox exorcism to re-ignite his career. At the risk of the obvious, we still need a power bat in the middle of our lineup to strike fear in opponents (presumably the Schwarber daliance was a recognition of that fact). We will see what happens at the trade deadline.
Well, it’s a longer lineup. Time will tell if it’s a stronger one. Just on HRs we replaced Alonso/Nimmo/McNeil/Mullins with Polanco/Bichette/Semien/Robert. So on being able to hit the ball out of the park it’s close to a wash (I have 75 leaving and 73 coming in). Is it better to have a big threat after Soto in Pete or several smaller ones who hit (except for Robert) with better contact. Dunno. But if it were me 5/150 for Pete would’ve been OK figuring we’d lose money on the last two years of the deal. Maybe that’s why I’m not a GM.
But it’s the same as the last several years. If the lineup is decent vs quite good depends on uncertainty – Alvarez, Baty (wherever he plays) and if Benge can have an impact. I’m not sure what’s gonna happen with Vientos and Mauricio. Anyway, this is the team. When I want to protest I’ll wear my Alonso jersey. When I don’t I’ll wear the t.
Still SMH over Diaz though. I’m hoping something comes through about why he liked LA/didn’t like NY. Otherwise losing him for peanuts sure looks like a screwup.
Loved Sondheim, still do, love the title reference as well.
Hey Disco, we traded every bench player we could find, and we also got Mike Vail as well. We also brought up the Amazin’ Randy Tate, who almost got us our first no-hitter, until he gave up a hit in the 8th to Jim Lytle and then eventually lost the game.
And every day
Some go away…
Utter disgrace this team did not make the playoffs last year. Sure, we had NO pitching, and a manager who panicked when the opposition hit a ball hard against any pitcher who was getting outs.
They asked Mendoza if there is anything HE can do differently this year, and instead of being his arrogant self, he looked real scared and came out with a laundry list of how he could improve himself.
You KNOW he was read the riot act by management.
We can get very emotionally attached to players that have been around a while. But honestly, could we really have tolerated running the same core of guys out there for another year and expecting different results? Something had to be shaken up and we may not agree with all the moves, but it took guts to gut this team. Let’s see what happens.
Agreed, Seth. Even though we had NO pitching after JUN13, the Core 4 or 5 were inconsistent verging on terrible at times, especially in clutch situations.
Let’s see what happens, as maybe a different set of guys with similar stats might get a few clutch hits sometimes.
BTW, can Bo Bichette walk yet?
As often happens here, there is an unexpected takeaway for me. Tim Bogar?? PR Specialist? I remember him as being sort of chunky, I certainly didn’t remember him doing anything notable on the Basepaths.
Just checked: Stole 13 bases, Lifetime. Did not steal a base 12 times, Lifetime, when he was trying to steal a base. And in that almost record-setting Pinch Running Year of his, he was one for four.
Bottom Line, I guess, he was no Luisangel, Pinch Running or otherwise.
Remember, Tim Bogar was a Met from 1993-1996, one of the blackest black holes of Met history. The fact that Bogar’s modest skill set was overexposed to the degree that it was is more of an indictment of his team than it is of him.
Hey, Eric1973,
Speaking of young Mets starting pitcher Randy Tate, I remember when Mike Jorgensen returned to the Mets after having been traded to the Montreal Expos along with Ken Singleton and Tim “Crazy Horse” Foli in exchange for the late, great Rusty Staub several seasons before.
Anyway, Mike Jorgensen was on Kiner’s Corner with the equally late, great Ralph Kiner and Mr. Kiner mentioned to Jorgensen that he had once hit a home run off of promising young Mets starting pitcher Randy Tate and that Tate was never quite the same dominating young pitcher he had been before giving up that homer to Mike Jorgensen. In fact, Tate’s major league career did not last that much longer.
To which a smiling “Jorgy” replied, somewhat uncharitably, “Yeah, I ruined him!”
Alas, what might have been for Randy Tate as a solid starter for the New York Mets.
Hey Cobra Joe, Those mid-70’s teams finished 3rd a few times, and were a lot of fun to root for, especially with Lindsey Nelson, Bob Murphy, and Ralph Kiner doing ALL the games. I think they let Ralph Kiner leave for 1 game so he could attend his own HOF induction.
Revisionist historians who know nothing about those days ignore the fact that Dave Kingman was a geniune star in the 70’s, and was voted to start the 1976 All Star Game. He was on track that season to break Hack Wilson’s NL HR record of 56 until he broke his thumb in July while diving for a ball hit by Phil Niekro. He had 32 at the break, and wound up hitting ‘only’ 37.
And he should have won the MVP in 1979 over Keith Hernandez (a ‘Judy’ Hitter) and Willie Stargell, a sentimental favorite.
Come on.
Hernandez led the league in runs scored, doubles and batting average. He walked more than he struck out and slugged over .500, finishing with an OPS of .930/OPS+ of 151. 7.6 WAR. Plus, he was the best first baseman around and we all know about his leadership on the field. His team finished 10 games over .500 and 3rd in the division.
Stargell definitely got the sentimental vote, but he was the leader – at 39 – of a team that won its division (and, of course, the World Series, though that doesn’t count when the MVP vote occurs). Lifetime achievement award? Maybe, but I’ve seen worse. We Are Famaleeee.
Kingman had a good year hitting in Wrigley – 48 HR, with league-leading slugging and OPS – but still managed “only” a 4.1 WAR and his OPS+ was lower than Keith’s. Kingman was 2 years removed from playing for 4 teams in 1977, during which he compiled negative WAR for the Mets and the Angels. Kingman was a butcher in the field and, as far as I can tell, was universally regarded as a gigantic asshole. Cubs finished 5th in the division, under .500. He finished eleventh in the MVP voting that year.
After Keith retired, there was NEVER any talk of him as a Hall of Famer because the standards were higher back then. Now, they have watered it down so much, that the HOF is virtually meaningless. I liked Ted Simmons, too, but come on, man!
So a guy gives a rat to a female sportswriter. I’ve given worse gifts.
Eric1973,
Yes Ralph Kiner, Bob Murphy and Lindsey Nelson were the absolute best trio of New York Mets announcers in the team’s 64-year-history. Those three men were always informative, insightful and fun to listen to during a Mets broadcast. And, they were definitely NOT “woke” and “politically-correct” like a certain Mets announcer is today.
And, Dave Kingman was always great to watch at the plate and to see him connecting to launch one of his many majestic home runs into the Shea Stadium parking lot. Heck, even when “Sky” Kingman struck out, he was also great to watch, in the way that he flung his bat away in disgust.
By the way, wasn’t the Dave Kingman for infielder Bobby
Valentine and relief pitcher Paul Siebert trade just another one of those absolutely dreadful Met trades? “Thank you, very much,” M. Donald Grant.
At least, Dave Kingman had a second act with the Mets, when the Mets wisely unloaded Steve Henderson (the “key” player in the awful Tom Seaver trade) on the Cubs in exchange for David Arthur Kingman.
Cobra Joe,
Agree with you on everything. And the reason that fateful night in 1977 is called The Midnight Massacre is that Seaver AND KINGMAN were BOTH very highly regarded.
I choose to look at it this way:
If Seaver would have stayed with the Mets, he never would have gotten his 300 wins. And pretty cool that WPIX allowed Lindsey to call the last out of Seaver’s 300th win against the Yankees. A selfish self-promoter like Gary Cohen would never do something like that.