The blog for Mets fans
who like to read

ABOUT US

Greg Prince and Jason Fry
Faith and Fear in Flushing made its debut on Feb. 16, 2005, the brainchild of two longtime friends and lifelong Met fans.

Greg Prince discovered the Mets when he was 6, during the magical summer of 1969. He is a Long Island-based writer, editor and communications consultant. Contact him here.

Jason Fry is a Brooklyn writer whose first memories include his mom leaping up and down cheering for Rusty Staub. Check out his other writing here.

Got something to say? Leave a comment, or email us at faithandfear@gmail.com. (Sorry, but we have no interest in ads, sponsored content or guest posts.)

Need our RSS feed? It's here.

Visit our Facebook page, or drop by the personal pages for Greg and Jason.

Or follow us on Twitter: Here's Greg, and here's Jason.

Finding Their Seats

The thing that never shows up in the boxscore or even The Log (10-7 on the season, likely clinching a winning record for the year; woo-hoo!) is how easily irritated I get at a Mets game. It has nothing to do with the outcome, which on Sunday was dandy, but rather the actions of those in my immediate sensory sphere.

My companion and I arrived in our seats by 12:20 for the 1:10 start because we didn't want to be Nos. 25,001 and 25,002 when Willie Randolph Bobblehead Dolls were only going to the first 25,000 (we needn't have worried). That gave me 50 minutes before first pitch to get riled up by my most peevish peeve: people who can't find their seats.

I'm sure there was a time I made the wrong turn, wandered into the wrong section, sat in the wrong row and had to be redirected. I know that when I visit a foreign ballpark, it takes me a moment or more to get my bearings. But as a fan who has entered those pearly Shea gates 300 or so times, I feel I can find virtually any seat blindfolded. Our 2001 Tuesday/Friday plan made me a master, learning by rote repetition and needing something else to think about besides Todd Zeile. When we were going to games twice a week (at least), I began to notice how clueless the plurality of daytrippers were. For every time I've been asked or, more likely, felt compelled to interpret a section, row and seat for some bewildered soul holding a ticket whose only hint of destination was the clearly marked section, row and seat printed right there in readable, bold, black ink, I could be an usher there.

No, I take that back. To be an usher there, I'd have to make myself scarce when needed to perform my duties. Then I'd have to expect a tip.

Sunday was Kiwanis Day at Shea Stadium. It was also Scout Day (the Cub and Brownie kind; Gary LaRocque was nowhere in sight). And Tropicana Batboy/Batgirl Day. And Crohn's & Colitis Awareness Day. And Sterling Awards Day. I forgot that when you show up real early for a weekend afternoon game, you are subject to a stream of ceremonies that, no matter how worthy the honoree or admirable the cause or influential the sponsor, is not why you came.

Anyway, it was Kiwanis Day. The Kiwanis have supported the Mets for “more than a decade,” which I found amusing in that the Mets have been around for 44 seasons and the first Kiwanis Club was organized in 1915. The Kiwanis do fine things and I invite one and all to learn more about their mission of service. What I found out Sunday before the game was I would be sitting one row in front of several rows of Hicksville Kiwanis members. I figured that out when various local chapters were being recognized on the field and a cheer went up behind me for Hicksville. (It's my reporter's training.)

Somewhere between the end of the Kiwanis plaques being handed out and, oh, the third inning, dozens of Hicksville Kiwanis and guests made their way up the steps of Mezzanine Section 21 to find Rows K, L and M. It was a chore for most of them. I grant you Shea Stadium has its mysteries (like the elevator that Does Not Stop On This Floor), but each section is reasonably designated these days. They even upgraded it a couple of years ago. There are two entrances to each section and sometimes somebody with Seat 24 will come in where Seat 1 is, but it's navigable. The newly stuck Row-letter appliqués have already peeled off in some places, but if you discern Row C and Row E, you can bet the one in between is Row D.

Look, it's just not that hard, people. Find your seats. Need a role model? Look no further than some of your favorite Mets: Doug Mientkiewicz, Kaz Matsui and Miguel Cairo.

Blessedly, each of them found a place to sit on Sunday. On the bench. No offense to any of them. We never really got a full dose of Minky, Kaz has been hitting and Cairo was never supposed to be more than one of Rando's Commandoes. But as the season has gone to seed, there has been less and less reason to see any of those gentlemen do anything more than sit and offer encouraging words of wisdom to their younger, more athletic, less stale teammates.

Miracle of miracles, the home team's lineup was freshened by a delightful breeze of hope floating in from Flushing Bay. Didja notice something strange about the infield Sunday?

It didn't creak.

Left to right, David Wright, Jose Reyes, Anderson Hernandez and Mike Jacobs all started. Each of them was born in the 1980s (surely a Mets first). Two of them we're happily familiar with, the other two — both 2005 Sterling Award winners — we're suddenly meeting in real time. I don't know whether Jacobs or Hernandez is the future and I doubt we'll divine their fate and ultimate functionality right away. We've seen Jakey get in and out of and back into the buggy already. Which end of the horse will he look like when it's all over? Hernandez was awfully slick with the glove but didn't do anything with the bat. Is he all that in the field and might he be a little more than he appeared to be at the plate? Let's get a taste of an answer. In mid- to late September, with a pennant race gone and two weeks remaining, the last thing Actualhead Willie needs to do is affix their butts to pine.

That Glavine kid was pretty good, too. I wish we'd had him from the time he signed his contract instead of just the last couple of months. He threw 118 pitches and only got stronger (the same could be said for my constitution when the bullpen gate didn't swing open between the eighth and the ninth). While Tommy (Tommy?) toyed with a lineup laced with a classic mix of old and new Braves poison (they even trotted out Brian Jordan to remind us that a lovely September Sunday afternoon at Shea is never but a Mets closer removed from utter ugliness), his 118 pitches were complemented by four in a row from 2002 Wild Card bolsterer John Thomson in the bottom of the sixth:

1) Ball four to Reyes

2) Double by Diaz

3) Double by Beltran

4) Homer by Floyd

Four pitches, four runs, a 4-1 lead, a 4-1 win. It's a special day, indeed, when the Mets find their way over the Braves more easily than their fans find their seats.

Forever Young

What I can’t get over in absorbing the news that Donn Clendenon has passed away is that the ’69 Mets have 70-year-old men.

The math is easy enough. Clendenon turned 34 a month after he was obtained from the Expos for four minor leaguers. 1969 was 36 years ago. Add 36 to 34 and you’ve got the age Donn Clendenon lived to before succumbing to leukemia Saturday.

Donn Clendenon was 70. The 1969 World Champion New York Mets, forever young in photograph and highlight film and contemporary account and 1969, are increasingly comprised primarily of what we used to call old men. Neither 60 nor 70 is as old as it used to be, they say, but it’s up there. The ’69 Mets we’ve lost over the past few years — Tommie Agee, Tug McGraw — died tragically young. Neither saw 60. That’s young enough to be tragic, especially when we’re talking about the baseball team that won it all with so many “kids” in their twenties.

But Clendenon was technically not one of the wunderkinder. He was the veteran presence, the guy who was almost 34 when he came here from some combination of Montreal, Houston and the Scripto Pen Company; pre-free agency, he basically decided where he was going to play, and, for all our sakes, it was New York. In 1969, 34 was baseball-old. For that matter, 34 was considered four years over the age of trustworthiness in some quarters. That was a long time ago.

Even then, Donn Clendenon was from another era. His father, Nish Williams, was a catcher in the Negro Leagues. He signed his own first pro contract in 1957 when the Giants and Dodgers were still, barely, ours. The Pirates, playing in Forbes Field as they did in the twilight of Honus Wagner, brought him up in 1961, a year before the Mets existed let alone became synonymous with futility.

It wasn’t until June 15, 1969 that the team came to stand, 100%, for something else altogether. Swapping the law firm of Renko, Collins, Carden and Colon for future lawyer and World Series MVP Donn Clendenon was akin to advertising that next year — next eon, in light of everything that had gone on since 1962 — was here. The Mets had never made a trade for a vet to put them over the top because never before were they within yodeling distance of that apogee. On 6/15/69, they were nine games out, almost double-digits’ distance from the unreachable Cubs, but in second place…as good a place as any to start taking yourself seriously.

Has any in-season trade in Mets history paid the immediate dividends that the Donn Clendenon deal did? They got him in the middle of June and, by the middle of October, they were world champs. Who else did that? Even Keith Hernandez, acquired exactly 14 years later, didn’t make that quick a difference.

In Stanley Cohen’s 1988 retrospective, A Magic Summer, it is instructive to reread how Donn Clendenon’s teammates recalled him almost twenty years on. “The catalyst,” according to Art Shamsky; “a take-the-pressure-off kind of guy,” said Tug McGraw; “probably the key to our whole season,” in Wayne Garrett’s mind — “the ingredient we needed.”

Were 37 RBIs ever as important as those Donn Clendenon collected between June 15 and the end of the regular season? He played in only 72 games in ’69 because he platooned with Ed Kranepool. Think about that for a moment. The fortunes of a franchise, a city and maybe the sport pivoted on the presence of a man who split time with, well, Eddie Kranepool. But Kranepool plus Clendenon, along with Boswell plus Weis, Garrett plus Charles and Shamsky plus Swoboda was the sum of Gil Hodges’ parts. Their individual numbers matched their reputations, which is to say Earl Weaver is likely still having night-sweats.

Clendenon was clearly the most accomplished of the 1969 Mets’ irregulars. He’d had two seasons of better than 90 RBIs as a Pirate and in ’68, The Year of The Pitcher, drove in 87. The Mets didn’t have anybody with those credentials (thus Mr. Weaver’s lingering bouts with insomnia). The expansion draft made him an Expo. Good sense prevented him from becoming an Astro. A college education and off-season planning gave him the option of working for Scripto (as a VP, no less). Foresight and fortune, though, had a different script in mind.

There was some disagreement regarding who was really the MVP of the World Series. Some thought Al Weis and his improbable .455 average earned it and that his beyond-the-realm homer in the fifth game clinched it. But who could argue with what Donn Clendenon did? Four games, three home runs, including the blow that turned Game Five around. To that point, only Babe Ruth, Lou Gehrig and Duke Snider had gone deep more often in any World Series. Batted .357. Slugged over a thousand. Maybe the ’69 Mets were the epitome of 25 equally valuable players, but if anyone deserved to drive home the Dodge Challenger, it was Donn.

Little is said about Clendenon’s two remaining seasons with the Mets. It is very much worth noting that he set the team record for runs batted in in a season in 1970 with 97 (in fewer than 400 at-bats), breaking the mark of 94 established by Frank Thomas in 1962. After the Mets moved out of the Polo Grounds, nobody had topped 76 until Clendenon. His 97 would stand as the record until Rusty Staub drove home 105 five years later. No righthanded Met batter topped it until Dave Kingman wound up with 99 in 1982.

It’s no wonder Donn Clendenon stood out as a veteran, accomplished, professional power hitter on the New York Mets. He was that good and they hadn’t had anybody quite like him before. The same, I’ll bet, could be said for Donn Clendenon in the clubhouse. My first-hand recollections of him are scant. He became a Met about two months before I began following the Mets at all and was gone before my ninth birthday. He was simply there in that way that players on your favorite team seemed to have been a part of your life forever (because in the baseball sense, they had). I knew he wasn’t Willie McCovey or Lee May or Richie Allen when it came to monster first basemen. He was Donn Clendenon, which was the best the Mets and I could ever hope for.

The image that popped to mind when I learned of his passing actually came from The Perfect Game, Tom Seaver’s autobiography written with/by Dick Schaap. It’s the image that had informed the way I thought of Donn Clendenon then and informs the way I think of Donn Clendenon now. It’s the way I will always think of him, I’m sure.

The first time we played at Shea after Clendenon joined us, Nancy drove me to the park and walked into the lobby in front of me. She spotted Clendenon. “I know who you are,” Nancy said.

Donn was wearing a Jamaican shirt and a vest, and he turned to Nancy and very suavely kissed first her hand, then her arm. Nancy thought Donn was charming; she was positive he didn’t know who she was. I knew he’d figured out she was my wife and was putting on a little show. At least, I thought so.

“Hi, Donn,” I said. “What are you kissing my wife’s arm for?”

“It’s great to be a Met,” said Donn.

Taking the Bitter With Whatever That Thing That's Supposed to Go With the Bitter Is

If we hadn't imploded at the end of August, yesterday's game would have been agonizing: Trachsel in the first inning, chasing that tricky third out like it was the end of the hallway in Poltergeist; a crap call by the ump turning a two-run single for Piazza into another Andruw Jones put-out; back-to-back homers by the Mikes giving us some desperate hope; Shingo and Zambrano quickly reminding us the hope was desperate; and our seventh-inning rally of course coming to naught despite having the heart of the order coming up.

If we'd been in a pennant race, bitterest gall. Since we're not, just another crap day at the office during garbage time. (By the way, Furcal and Andruw weren't even trying. It's some cold comfort to me that they won't be trying in the playoffs either, guaranteeing another disappointing October for the middling percentage of Fannypack Nation that bothers getting playoff tickets.)

Incidentally, it's a shame no one's writing one of those Inside the Mets accounts of this season, because I for one would love to know what's going on between Omar, Willie and the coaches and ownership. It's like Kremlinology in Flushing: Today's article of faith is tomorrow's discarded idea, obvious moves aren't made or even discussed, and the whole decision-making process is utterly mysterious.

One thing I have finally figured out is that Willie likes keeping things close to the vest with the press or outright misleading them, refusing to discuss his real motives for moves (or their lack), even when those motives make sense or are at least defensible. Couple of examples off the top of my head:

* Reyes as a leadoff hitter. I think there was a method to Willie's madness here. He finally said sometime this summer that (I'm paraphrasing) he'd been working on teaching Reyes to swing at better pitches instead of trying to remake him as a player who walks a lot, for fear of leaving him baffled at the plate. Which, after seeing Reyes' dramatically better at-bats in the second half, does make a certain amount of sense to me. (And, I'll say through gritted teeth, is in line with something Joe Morgan said about not wanting to take away Reyes's aggressiveness.) The implicit point was Willie wanted to develop him as a leadoff hitter and not further down in the lineup, with better pitch selection paving the way for working counts — from hitting strikes to hitting the right strikes, if you will. The thing of it is that the explanation only came late in the summer and then almost by accident; before that Willie offered platitudes and brush-offs where the subject was concerned. I think he was trying to protect Reyes from the media, in effect keeping them distracted by looking at OBP when Willie was trying to teach Reyes something else.

* I think something similar was going on with that stuff about Wright hitting eighth and paying his dues. That mostly didn't happen; what I think Willie was doing was offering the media a distraction in an effort to take the pressure off Wright. With Wright seemingly consigned to the No. 8 hole and being asked to pay his dues, most anything he did to build on his rookie season would look like a positive; if he'd always been ticketed for the middle of the lineup, the scrutiny would have been more intense and the pressure correspondingly greater. As it turned out, Wright didn't need coddling, but Willie didn't know that in March. What's interesting to me was Willie effectively put all the scrutiny on his own move instead of on the player; of course he never let on that that was what he was doing, so we had to figure it out.

Not that there aren't moves for which I can't come up with even a theoretical explanation:

* Trachsel/Zambrano. I have no idea what the original plan was, how it changed, or what anybody was trying to accomplish at any point.

* The bullpen. Who's in what role? And who's gonna be in that role next week? Spin that wheel! Graves and Koo are here; they're gone; they're back; Koo's gone, Graves will get the chance to audition despite having utterly flunked a rather extended audition already, yet it's been a couple of days since that was said, and no Graves in sight. Juan Padilla's finally getting to pitch, but nobody seems to acknowledge Heath Bell's on the roster, and Royce Ring can't even get that far. Looper's gonna be the closer for the rest of the year. No, maybe he won't be. But Heilman definitely won't close. No, maybe he will. Around and around we go. Wheeeeee!

* The bench. Offerman's still here despite being a surly boor who can't run the bases. Ice Williams is still here despite demonstrating that he now can neither hit nor serve as a defensive replacement. Eric Valent can do both, but he's playing golf somewhere. Anderson Hernandez is coming up if the brass can figure out which Class of 1990 prospect we could bear to release. No, he's not coming up. Oh wait, yes he is. But now that he's here, the stupendously useless Miguel Cairo is playing anyway. Does Omar think he's still in Montreal and not allowed to make roster moves?

I'm beyond being frustrated by it, because it no longer much matters — this season's lost, and I've never really thought garbage time was much good for figuring out players like Heath Bell or Anderson Hernandez anyway. I'd just like to know a little more about what was going on behind the scenes, because I sure as heck can't figure it out.

We've No. 72!

I'm not in the habit of fondly quoting Dick Young, but when he learned that the 1980 Mets' highlight film, following a 67-95 record, was titled Getting Better All The Time, he asked if the people in charge of naming it were the same people who put out Pravda.

Yet things are getting better all the time. We just won our 72nd game. Forget for a moment that it's paired with 75 losses, 20% of those accumulated in the last three weeks. Instead, consider the W's.

2003: 66 wins

2004: 71 wins

2005: 72 wins…at least!

That's two consecutive years of increased wins and improved winning percentage even if we lose the next fifteen (which I wouldn't rule out). Do you know the last time the Mets got better all the time like that?

Hold onto your hat or some other item that can substitute as headgear.

1986.

That's right. The Mets have not posted consecutive, escalating win totals since they last won the World Series. That was the fifth straight year of improvement starting with 1982.

Since then and before now? The Mets have put up better win totals/winning percentages (useful for considering strike-shortened seasons) than they did the previous year in 1988, 1990, 1994, 1997 and 1999. They came close to doing two in a row twice. In '95, their Pct. dipped ever so slightly from .487 to .479. And in '98, they repeated their 88-74 record of '97.

But mostly they've been getting worse every year for almost 20 years. Not anymore though. Not technically. The marketing department can definitely claim practically unprecedented success here. Aside from that five-year stretch from '81 to '86, when they rose from a 64 (pro-rated for the 41-62 combined total of '81) to 65 to 68 to 90 to 98 to 108 victories, the Mets have never improved more than two years running ('63-'64; '68-'69; '75-'76).

Why are these Mets, after having lost 15 of 18, suddenly historically magnificent?

Pedro. He's the only reason. Accept no substitutes.

For eight innings, no worries. In the ninth, with two on and nobody out, not as many worries against the Braves as I would have with anybody else on the mound. When Chipper stood in as the potential third run of yet another atrocious Atlanting, I looked at who was at bat, then looked at who was on the mound. For the first time since that chippy bastard came into the league, I felt no trepidation. I honestly didn't fear Larry Wayne Jones. Screw you, putz. We've got Pedro Martinez. Don't mistake him for who you usually see straight ahead when your teammates are on base and curly NYs cower all about. This is not [name any Mets pitcher of the past decade]. You do not have an advantage against this man. In fact, you are not his equal. You may get a hit against Pedro Martinez, but you are not to expect it. Not the way you would against [name any Mets pitcher of the past decade].

Having Pedro protecting his own four-run lead over the Braves is as comforting as holding a newly adopted kitten.

Hey, whaddayaknow, we got one of those Friday night, too. The Princes are a two-cat enterprise once more. Our September callup is named Avery, brother of Hozzie, successor to the late, great Bernie the Cat. The night our Bernie died, Pedro threw eight shutout innings against the Marlins. Sixteen weeks later, the night Stephanie brought home our Avery, Pedro threw nine shutout innings against the Braves.

Pedro Martinez.

He ensures history.

He foils enemies.

He celebrates my cats.

And every five or so days, he makes me do this:

Purrrr…

Flashback Friday: 1990 (Part I)

The year was 1990. I was 27.

It was a year of transition.

I know, everybody says that about every year. It’s the kind of title NFL Films gives perpetually crappy teams for their highlight reels: Arizona Cardinals…A Year of Transition.

But it was. 1990 was unlike any year in the life.

It was the year I moved out of the house.

It was the year my fiancée moved in with me.

It was the year my mother died.

And it was the last year that the Mets as I knew them for so long were, in fact, the Mets as I knew them for so long.

If there was ever going to be a year when I might have discarded baseball and pleaded no lo contendre to the charge that I allowed myself to be distracted from the Mets by overwhelming matters of substance, 1990 would have been that year.

But it wasn’t and I didn’t. Amid a seismic personal shift that separated what came before from what came after, I was just doing what I’d always been doing. I rooted for the Mets like it was life and death. I didn’t know how not to.

Maybe being a Mets fan was all I could be sure of that spring. That and knowing I couldn’t hang around the house anymore, not like I’d been doing for the nearly five years since I graduated from college.

The first couple of years were excusable. I got out of USF in ’85 and came home to watch the Mets. Then ’86 was ’86. Who could think of anything else but the Mets?

A year later, I had something new to dwell on.

On Monday night May 11, 1987, the Mets visited Cincinnati. Mookie Wilson led off the top of the third with a homer to put the Mets up 2-0. In the bottom of the inning, Rick Aguilera gave back both runs. I listened to the game get tied in the lobby of a residential hotel called, depending on which sign you looked at, the Lincoln Square or the Parc Lincoln, 75th between Broadway and Amsterdam.

Tony, my college buddy, was staying there. He was still in college and for six weeks, all of New York was his campus. USF had some scam where you could get summer semester credit by coming up here and going to plays and museums. Tony had just broken up with his fiancée and this was a perfect excuse to get away from Tampa. I was working at View magazine downtown that day. It was one of the several freelance gigs (they covered television and I put together their Nielsen and Arbitron charts) that kept me from being totally useless in the late ’80s. Tony, who had a way of seeming like he was up for anything, suggested I come up to the Parc Lincoln/Lincoln Square and we’d hang out. Most Monday nights I just went home to watch the Mets. Sure, I said. I’ll come up.

As Tony neared, I unhooked myself from my headphones and clicked off WHN, saving myself the agony of what would be a 12-2 defeat. Then I controlled the impulse to roll my eyes because Tony was not alone. Tony was always convening little groups…and I wasn’t a fan of little groups.

He brought two girls along. One I immediately figured out because he hadn’t shut up about somebody else who was on the USF trip, so that must be her. It was. Her name was Diane. Diane brought her roommate.

Starting with the end of my sophomore year in 1983, when my first romance faded, right up to that very moment four years later, I couldn’t meet a member of the opposite sex and not instantly size her up and prepare some kind of contingency chat on the off chance that me and her would hit it off. It never got much beyond the imaginary conversation stage. I didn’t get out nearly enough and when I did, I didn’t know what to do.

Only once to that very moment wasn’t I thinking in those terms. And it was, in fact, that very moment. I was thinking “why is Tony always dragging total strangers into our hanging-out time?” and “2-2. Fucking Aguilera.” What I wasn’t thinking was anything pertaining to the second girl Tony was introducing me to, Diane’s roommate.

Stephanie.

Therefore, over the course of the next 20 minutes, I didn’t even have boilerplate at my disposal. I ad-libbed. We talked about the weather, but gosh darn it, it was like we were actually talking about the weather. She asked if she needed to go get a jacket. I said, no it was still warm out. We left the hotel and she said she found it a little cool. I loaned her my jacket. She accepted.

The four of us roamed to a video store (so much for all of New York being their campus), but within a block, we were no longer the four of us. We had paired off. Tony and Diane. Me and Stephanie.

I didn’t even know her last name but there’d be time for details. By the end of the evening, I knew she was it. Right away, I popped the question. You know, the big one.

“Do you want to go to the Mets game with me on Friday night?”

It was a group outing, Tony and Diane, me and Stephanie. It was in an upper deck box that I heard the heard the words I never thought I’d hear a girl say to me.

“My first baseball game…neat!”

That was the spring of ’87. Stephanie was completing her freshman year at USF. We knew within weeks of that first game — Mets 8 Giants 3, Sid carried a no-hitter through five but left with a knee injury — that we’d eventually marry and that Stephanie would be moving to New York to live with me in sin for at least a little while before we made everything official. In other words, I was on the clock. She would graduate in April 1990, so sometime in the ensuing three years I would have to get my act together and secure a steady income and a residence for the two of us.

I took my sweet time. Part of that was the plague of inertia that continued to infect my career. ’87 went by and I wasn’t doing anything particularly lucrative or enjoyable. ’88 was on the same path until summer. Then, all at once, things got worse.

First off, due to a misunderstanding, I lost my two biggest freelance clients. Apparently they were competitors and neither one of them cared for me writing for the other. Before I knew it, I was without work. Just as I was absorbing that news, my mother began complaining mightily about her chronic bad back. This was more than the usual kvetching. It was bad enough to put her in the hospital in early August. Within days, my father was told it was cancer. He told my sister and somewhere along the way somebody told me. We weren’t supposed to tell my mother, at least not right away, because she didn’t handle that kind of information very well.

No wonder I didn’t have a job in communications. I couldn’t even talk to anybody in my own family.

The Princes were not wired for dialogue. My brother-in-law’s family yelled a lot. It was frightening to be around but at least they weren’t repressed. We were. Or at least my mother did a good job of helping us resist the temptation to speak our minds. Our psyches weren’t particularly healthy, though that now paled in comparison to the condition my mother was in.

I went to the hospital to ostensibly watch a Mets game with her right after the diagnosis. We’d had that together since college ended. When the Mets clinched the division, then the pennant and then the World Series in 1986, she and I were practically Carter and Orosco embracing in celebration. Baseball was the only circumstance under which I gave up the distance I generally kept myself at around her. The rest of the time, I was on edge looking to avoid the wrong sentence or piece of intelligence that would set her off. In his one and only remotely public observation on our family dynamic, my father once told me, “Your mother has free-floating anxieties that tend to put everybody on the edge of hysteria.”

But during Mets games, Mom and I were on the same side.

We didn’t watch the Mets lose to the Expos all that closely in her room at South Nassau. Instead, she brought up Stephanie. She knew things were serious between me and her. Mom claimed to like her but she wasn’t Jewish. In college, Tammy, my first girlfriend, wasn’t Jewish (in fact she had the nerve to be Asian). My mother’s overreaction to that relationship — calling me at school to tell me how much physical pain she was in as a direct result of who I was dating — never left me. Long after Tammy and I went our own ways, I was on guard for what would happen the next time I met somebody who wasn’t Jewish. No matter how many Mets games we watched together, this was an issue that would not fade as easily as Howard Johnson’s batting average.

Before she took ill, she kind of danced around the subject. When it came up, it came with a thud. One Thursday night in February of ’88, around 9:57, I was getting ready to do what I always did. I was going to watch L.A. Law. At that moment, she called me from my room to the top of the stairs to tell me she was very worried that Stephanie and I wouldn’t be married by a rabbi. I could hear “previously on L.A. Law” firing up in the background. Of course, we’ll get married by a rabbi, I told her.

“You will?”

“Absolutely, it’s what we both want to do.”

Total lie. But I had TV to watch.

Six months later, she’s in the hospital and she’s bringing it up again. Not so much the rabbi who will perform the hypothetical ceremony but the general discomfort level she still had about this Jew (not Jew) mix. Was I sure about Stephanie?

“Mom,” I said. “I’m sure. I was sure about 10 minutes after meeting her.”

“Really?”

“Yes.” This time I was telling the truth.

This relieved her a great deal because she claimed that’s how it was for her and Dad when they first met. So from there on out, I no longer had to play defense. At 25, I was free to marry who I wanted.

My mother was in the hospital until early September. Frequent outpatient radiation treatments followed into mid-October (until the Mets were eliminated by the Dodgers in the NLCS). The whole family, plus a nurse’s aide and two ambulette drivers, were enlisted to be on-site for every session. It was an all hands on deck situation, so I didn’t really notice that I wasn’t working. But as my mother went into what seemed like remission, I couldn’t help but notice my bank account was getting mighty lonely. The clock continued to tick. 1989 was underway, leaving me a year and change to be ready for a fully matriculated Stephanie.

Never being a very good freelancer (I was fine at what I did but was crappy about finding more to do), I decided I needed an actual job. I discovered that right there on Long Island, a magazine existed that was devoted to one of my favorite topics: beverages. That’s true, too. I’d been collecting soda cans since I was in seventh grade.

I called the editor, a man named Alan Wolf. By habit, I asked if he had any need for a freelancer. He asked me if I’d like to be associate editor. Just like in the movies, I got the job.

It wasn’t so bad being among people every day. Beverages were fun enough though I couldn’t imagine writing about them for more than six months or, at most, ’til the end of the year. I was making a living and my mother, despite having to make trips into the city for chemo every six weeks or so, wasn’t doing too badly. That September, I convinced Stephanie, now a USF senior, to fly to New York for the weekend. I surprised her with an engagement ring — a size or two too big. The first people we told were my parents. My mother was so thrilled that from her bed — she had begun feeling back pain again – she strongly suggested I take Stephanie to the jeweler so it could be immediately resized. I told her, no, time is tight. We’re going to a Mets game tonight (at which the 1989 Mets were mathematically eliminated). While Stephanie, whose non-Mom placidity was a big part of what drew me to her, was content to take care of the ring when she got back to Tampa, my mother called me at work after Stephanie left to berate me for not making resizing job one.

First I was doing the wrong thing by getting serious with the shiksa. Now I was mistreating her. Existing in the vicinity of two very different Mrs. Princes promised to get interesting before it got blissfully dull.

But we never found out. Shortly after the engagement announcement, my mother’s back grew worse. She was checked into Roosevelt Hospital in Manhattan for an operation in early October. It wasn’t all that helpful. She came home in November but regressed in December. More hospitalization, this time into February of ’90. Fortunately, Alan at the beverage magazine was understanding and gave me the flexibility to deal with my mother’s situation. “Situation” is the best word I can think of. She wasn’t really with it anymore by Christmas. Her lucidity evaporated while her body shriveled. As spring began to bloom, my father, my sister and I were all, essentially, waiting for my mother to die.

Good a time as any to move out of the house, no?

Oy. Like everything else, it was something I didn’t mention to my father. My mother had always veered toward letting it all out. Dad said little, but he was clearly suffering through all this. At the very moment when a family needs to come together, he was unapproachable and I made for a lousy approacher. I’ve always liked him and I know he’s always liked me, but god only knows what either one of us is thinking is at any given moment.

Quietly, around St. Patrick’s Day, I contacted a real estate agent who found a two-room deal upstairs from a 60ish lady in Baldwin. Same town as my sister, only 10 or so minutes from Dad. Instead of feeling as if I had achieved my long-postponed independence, I fought off pangs of guilt. I absolutely had to do this — Stephanie was graduating April 28 — but now I wasn’t going out on my own and setting up a new life. I was abandoning ship. My father didn’t say it to me and I don’t know that he even thought it, but there was little to suggest that he saw it as a positive.

I’d put off the actual moving as long as I could. In fact, the apartment was almost bare until the weekend before graduation, Earth Day weekend. I rented a Ryder van from Hicksville and enlisted the aid of my best friend in the world Chuck to help fill it. Chuck and I would compare and contrast overbearing, over-the-top mothers. His usually won but mine was never far off the pace. That, as much as our knowing each other since the college paper and common interest in sports, bonded us for life.

After Chuck reminded me two or three dozen times that Hicksville was very far from where we needed to be (thus making the extra gas we burned to pick it up and return it decidedly against the spirit of Earth Day), he and I hauled a dresser from the top floor of my house down to the main floor and through the kitchen. From there we had to angle it around a refrigerator and a clothes dryer to get it through the door that would lead us to the basement, the garage and the van. It was a struggle for two men. For three, it might have gone smoother, but I’ll never know. Because while Chuck and I finagled, my father sat about two feet away, head buried in the previous day’s or perhaps the previous month’s Wall Street Journal while the Mets-Montreal game blared away on channel 2. Dad didn’t offer to help and I didn’t ask him. It was like we weren’t in the same kitchen.

Four years earlier, during the top of the tenth inning of the sixth game of the World Series, my father got the idea that if he didn’t seem to pay attention to the action that it would help the Mets. With Dave Henderson homering off Aguilera, it was worth a try (when the Red Sox took the lead, I was nervously spooning Grape-Nuts Flakes into my mouth; I never ate that stuff again). He struck the same pose in April 1990 that he did in October 1986, hunched over the table, reading or maybe not reading an old newspaper. In both cases, he decided that if he pretended not to notice what was going on around him, that maybe it wouldn’t happen.

While Chuck and I were moving furniture and my father was staring at stock tables, my mother was in the back room with the home health aide. She had barely said anything intelligible to anybody for three months. Mostly she sweated and shrunk. The baseball season started without her. The last game we watched together was the third game of Oakland’s sweep of the Giants in the Earthquake Series of ’89 from her hospital room. She was amused that I pulled for San Francisco solely because they used to play in New York.

With her on the DL, I couldn’t tell her about the lockout that truncated spring training or how the Pirates battered Doc Gooden on Opening Day or that the Game of the Week was now on CBS instead of NBC or that Tim McCarver (whom she liked) was doing it, instead of Vin Scully (whom she didn’t) or that John Franco from the Reds had replaced Randy Myers as our closer after they were traded for each other. I couldn’t stay up late with her one night in April to point out that Mackey Sasser just materialized in the home dugout wearing a warmup suit and a look of confusion. He had flown home to Alabama for his father’s funeral, flown back into LaGuardia and noticed the lights were still on at Shea. It was the 13th inning. Davey Johnson told him to get dressed and grab a bat. He made the final out. I couldn’t tell her that the Mets were off to a lousy start. I suppose I could’ve told her, but she couldn’t have heard me.

The clock did its thing the next weekend. I flew to Tampa, helped Stephanie pack, watched her graduate and then we flew back. My father picked us up at JFK and, after taking us to breakfast, took us back to Long Beach. He brought us into my mother’s sick room. I’d pretty much avoided it since she came home. I couldn’t stand to watch and I didn’t know what to do with myself. The last time Mom saw Stephanie was around New Year’s when she came up for my birthday. At the time, Mom was in Roosevelt and high on morphine. She told all of us that we should stay for the big New Year’s Eve celebration, that they were bringing in a band. Between the end of December and the end of April, she hadn’t said or recognized much at all.

We go into her room and my father wakes her. “Dear, you remember Stephanie, don’t you?”

This is what my mother said:

“How did your classes go?”

“Your hair looks so beautiful!”

“Does your mother still have that security-guard job?”

My mother had no idea where she was those final months. If she knew any of us, we couldn’t tell. It was all she could do to remain alive. But at that moment, she knew my fiancée (yes, her mother did have a security-guard job) and she was as pleasant a mother-in-law as I ever could’ve hoped for.

Stephanie and I then loaded my car, said goodbye to my father and moved into our apartment in Baldwin. Seven Sundays from that Sunday, a couple of hours after Doc Gooden broke 100 on a radar gun for the first time, Sandra Prince died just shy of 61. Before she was put to rest, I handed Suzan something that I said I’d greatly appreciate her making sure Mom was wearing.

It was a button signifying who won the 1986 World Series. She told Dad and Dad told her he thought that was very nice.

June 17 marked the end of a miserable two-year battle with cancer — it was cancer in a blowout — and the start of a giddy 11-game Met winning streak. By then, my fiancée and cohabitant (we postponed making wedding plans so our marriage wouldn’t come hard on the heels of a funeral) wouldn’t have been surprised that I’d draw such a quick and easy parallel between the final breath of my mother’s life and the Mets’ upward change in fortunes. She knew what she was getting herself into and still signed on. It wasn’t just my choice of first-date venue. About a month into her initial New York stay in 1987, we spoke on the phone. She asked me how my day had been.

“Great,” I said. “Dwight Gooden beat the Cubs. But you probably don’t care.”

“If it’s important to you,” she said. “It’s important to me.”

That was all the permission I needed to be very much myself with Stephanie West. Yes, I eventually learned her last name along with a few other salient details.

Stephanie Nelson West was born in Kansas.

She went to high school in North Fort Myers, Fla.

She majored in gerontology.

She enjoyed smooth jazz and her favorite movie was Amadeus.

She possessed a marvelously dry wit (“you sure think a lot of people are morons,” she noted when I hurled my favorite m-word at the TV) and a terrific sense of the absurd (“Orrrrlando Merrrrcado” would rrrroll off her tongue every time our backup catcher du jour came to bat on the car radio).

She was a cat person, certainly more than I could ever imagine myself being.

And part of her childhood was spent in and around New York City, a period from which she retained a few vital facts.

We were together the weekend in June ’87 that Tom Seaver announced he would attempt a final comeback with the Mets. Listening to the news on Mets Extra in my Toyota, she asked me why Tom Seaver ever left in the first place.

Whatever I told her, “OHMIGOD! SHE KNOWS WHO TOM SEAVER IS!” is all I could think. “I’VE GOT THIS GIRLFRIEND WHO’S ALL WONDERFUL AND SMART AND BEAUTIFUL AND PLACID AND SHE KNOWS WHO TOM SEAVER IS!”

I automatically assumed she remembered Lee Mazzilli from back then, but no. Just as well. That would’ve been too much. I didn’t need to marry that lady who twirled her arms behind home plate during the World Series. I just wanted to be with somebody who thought it wasn’t silly that I was a big Mets fan. And she didn’t.

She didn’t think it was silly when on our first full night in Baldwin she came into the bedroom to find me yelling at the radio because David Cone, ball firmly in hand, was yelling at the first base umpire while two Braves baserunners crossed home plate unmolested.

She didn’t think it was silly when I stalled all grocery and laundromat trips until Howie Rose got through restating the highlights of the game I just sat and watched for three hours.

She didn’t think it was silly when I took her to a Saturday night game in May that wasn’t nearly as “neat!” because even though the Mets romped over San Diego 11-0, it was chilly and she didn’t know to bring gloves (she would eventually judge that where cold Saturday nights were concerned, staying home would keep her even warmer).

It was of more interest to me than Stephanie that we had just unknowingly witnessed the final win collected by Davey Johnson, the Mets’ manager since 1984. Davey was by far the most successful manager the Mets ever knew, but the team muddled along south of .500 through April and May. Despite or maybe because of his otherwise brilliant career, Frank Cashen apparently hated him.

Davey almost got it the previous October. I had just finished reading The Boys of Summer, wherein Roger Kahn recalled meeting with just-deposed Dodgers skipper Charlie Dressen when he learned that his own father had died. Well, on the day in October 1989 that WFAN was reporting what appeared to be Davey Johnson’s then-imminent dismissal, my sister left an urgent message about my mother at my office: “Tell him it’s a medical emergency.” Of course I thought the worst. Dressen and Kahn’s father. Davey and my mother. They both got reprieves but not long ones.

At the end of May, this guy Joe who also worked at the beverage magazine (he’s the one who gave Stephanie and me the tickets for the Saturday night game) told me he heard while at lunch that Davey Johnson was fired. The previous summer, the Mets detached themselves from Lenny Dykstra, Roger McDowell, Rick Aguilera, Lee Mazzilli and Mookie Wilson. In October, Gary Carter and Keith Hernandez were allowed to walk. Now Davey. Our own boys of summer were all almost gone.

Bud Harrelson was named manager. Everybody loved good ol’ Buddy, including the players if you go by results. The 1990 Mets snapped out of their maudlin state and took off in June. Everybody got hot.

Dave Magadan tore through the National League and stepped over the rotting carcass of Mike Marshall to take over first base. Gregg Jefferies lived up to all his unreasonable expectations. Daryl Boston and Mark Carreon equaled one really good centerfielder. Mackey Sasser hit the ball well and threw it almost adequately. Frank Viola started and John Franco closed like the All-Stars they were.

Stephanie got a job as a social worker in the city and I got up extra early to drive her to the Baldwin station every morning. On the way home, I’d stop off and buy every paper (including the recently launched National, which one day put a viola-cradling Viola on its cover in honor of all the Sweet Music he was making) and drool over our stats before getting ready for work. The papers were full of us. The stories about the Yankees involved Steinbrenner getting suspended and them finishing last. About the only glaring misstep the Mets made was momentarily assigning No. 24 to a rookie named Kelvin Torve. The mistake was immediately rectified and Willie Mays’ legacy was safe for eternity.

A few of the ’86 Mets lingered, but it was primarily a new bunch of boys of summer terrorizing all comers in the 26-5 stretch that rocketed us from languishers to leaders by early July. This was good in that it indicated the Mets were capable of renewing themselves. If we could turn over most of the roster in four years’ time and still be this good, one could safely guess that we’d remain strong into perpetuity. That’s what I figured, anyway.

Of course none of this would have been possible without a couple of holdovers. Doc was becoming Doc again. Viola was labeled the ace and everybody said Coney had the best stuff, but I never let go of my image of Dwight Gooden as Dr. K. After all, Dwight Gooden did throw 100 MPH the day my mother died and my mother loved Dwight Gooden. And Darryl was totally Darryl in the way we’d waited for him to be since he came up in 1983. It wouldn’t be fair to say he carried the team since the team was holding up its end, but Straw was something else. He hit the scoreboard. He landed on the cover of Sports Illustrated in a flattering light. He was Darryl Strawberry and we were winning and in the weeks following the saddest event of my life, I couldn’t have been baseball-happier.

All the high-fiving that caused must have taken a toll on me. I developed a searing case of tendonitis in my right wrist. Maybe it was the voluminous typing I was doing at the beverage magazine. I did write a lot and my publisher appreciated my efforts to play through pain. When Alan fretted over my health, the publisher told him, “The kid can always type with one hand.”

Wouldn’t let tendonitis slow me down. I was due in Denver for a recycling conference, part of my beverage beat. Schlepped with me a 400-page book called The Giants of the Polo Grounds which immediately, despite its unwieldiness on my reading hand, became my favorite sports book ever. The New York Giants also became my favorite team that I never got to see play, The Boys of Summer notwithstanding.

I wore all manner of strap and splint on that wrist through the summer. One looked like the thing bowlers wear. Another inspired some dirty jokes around the office. I went to an orthopedist who injected me with cortisone and told me to “go home, relax and watch the Mets.” I hadn’t said a word to him about baseball either. Guess he could see it in my eyes.

Despite receiving the shot heard ’round the wrist, the discomfort continued into late July. I headed east on the LIE to another orthopedist, one whom my mother had seen. He gave me a prescription for another painkiller and a chance to hear what was rapidly becoming a call for the ages. The Mets were home for a twinight doubleheader which meant Howie Rose came on with Mets Extra while I was driving home from the doctor. Howie made much of the way the game ended the night before when the Mets nearly blew a seven-run lead in Philadelphia in the ninth. It went from 10-3 to 10-9 until Tommy Herr, a thorn in our sides from the Cardinal rivalry, lined out to Mario Diaz to end it. Bob Murphy, who had seen it all, had never seen this.

“They win the damn thing!” Murph, exhausted, exhorted. It was stunning — our since-1962 announcer dropping a four-letter word into his game-ending call. Howie was so tickled by it, he played it and asked Bob about it. Murph was, as ever, sheepish. But “the damn thing” took on an existence of its own.

I got a call from Chuck who asked me if I heard it. I was on medication but he was in stitches. Chuck was also “on the bandwagon”. He was good about that. My best friend always took great care to tell me he wasn’t a Mets fan but liked the Mets for my sake. Then he’d tell me what was wrong with them in greater detail than anybody I knew could. But he wasn’t a fan. He and I would spend the next decade-and-a-half referencing “the damn thing” and joking about the “bandwagon,” but I couldn’t have known that then (though I could’ve figured).

Damn thing is the Mets began to lose some damn things. For all the winning and swearing, they never could break free of the Pirates, a young, hungry team featuring two outstanding players, Barry Bonds and Bobby Bonilla, a Bronx native who said he grew up idolizing Lenny Randle. Things became more damned when Kevin Elster, our shortstop and matinee idol (Steph dubbed him The Cute One) went down with a torn labrum in his right shoulder. Though they tried to treat him by shooting him full of Indocin — “Hey!” I thought. “That’s my medicine!” — he was done for the season. And without a shortstop, well, you lose a lot of damn things.

Due to software limitations, the exciting conclusion of 1990 follows in a separate post.

Flashback Friday: 1990 (The Exciting Conclusion)

This is the exciting conclusion of 1990. Part I appears in a previous post.

We hung and we clung and still had a shot at the top rung as August wound down. The Mets went out and got the damn Tommy Herr for the stretch drive. A catcher named Charlie O’Brien, too (Mackey Sasser hadn’t been the same since absorbing a hard slide from Jim Presley in Atlanta). For September, the Mets recalled a hot pitching prospect named Julio Valera. Buddy immediately placed him in the rotation, taking Ron Darling’s spot. Ron Darling threw some big games for us in the ’80s, but this was a new day. The callup won his first start.

The era of the Julio Valera Mets had begun. At the moment it happened, it seemed like a good thing.

This was my first pennant race with Stephanie. Slowly she was drawn into my baseball rhythms and found out what it meant to live with all that pressure. We moved into first place on Labor Day, but the next night, the Mets went down 1-0 in St. Louis. So much for being in first place after Labor Day. When that game ended, I made a horrible noise in the living room that brought her rushing in from the bedroom.

“What’s the matter?”

“Lee Smith struck out HoJo. We lost. DAMN!”

Stephanie got used to my noises.

This was also my first pennant race without my mother, at least in the modern era. She was gone but my dad was still in Long Beach. Just because the three of us couldn’t watch games together anymore didn’t mean the two of us couldn’t.

Or so I thought. Still popping Indocin in early September, I drove over to his house to watch a crucial showdown between the Mets and the Pirates. When the season began, I would’ve called it my house and I wouldn’t have felt so strange watching this game. Mom and Dad and I watched all the big ones together in ’85 and ’86 and ’87 and ’88 and what few big ones there were to watch in ’89.

In ’90, I needn’t have bothered. When my mother died, so did my dad’s interest in baseball, practically all at once. He barely looked up from his Wall Street Journal or at the game from Pittsburgh. I didn’t go over to his house for baseball after that. He sold it the following May.

I got used to Dad’s obliviousness. And my mom’s absence, though the fact that she was missing a pennant race bugged me. I found myself one morning before work dropping off a video at Blockbuster. My mind was on the Mets, per usual, and it wandered to John Franco, the new closer. Mom would’ve recognized him as the guy who was always getting us out when he was with the Reds. She didn’t much care for him then. Neither did I. I still didn’t have much use for his suddenly erratic ways (while Randy Myers became a Nasty Boy for first-place Cincinnati), but there was something about him I couldn’t help but root for. Probably that he was from Brooklyn, like my mother. Sitting in that parking lot, I was struck by one thought: Mom would’ve liked John Franco on the Mets.

I cried for a minute and then drove off to the beverage magazine.

The Mets played just well enough to stick near the Pirates so that they still had a reasonable chance when Pittsburgh came to Shea in mid-September for two must-games. This was this year’s version of the Mets-Cardinal showdowns with St. Louis in ’85 and ’87. Actually, since those didn’t go so well, I hoped they were something better.

They were. For a pair of nights in the middle of September, Shea was bursting at the seams and delirious. So was David Cone. He was far-removed from his blunder in Atlanta our first night in the apartment. This was September, and David Cone was a September pitcher. He struck out Andy Van Slyke to end the first and bullrushed the home dugout. He high-fived everybody in sight. In the bottom of the inning, Magadan (.328, best Met average since Cleon Jones; knowing that won me a Mets Extra trivia quiz) doubled home Jefferies and Keith Miller. Two runs were all our nutjob with the Laredo motion needed. David Cone pitched a three-hit complete game with eight strikeouts. Mets won 2-1 and closed in on the Pirates.

The next night, I didn’t get home in time to watch from the beginning. So it was in my 1981 burnt orange Toyota Corolla, barreling west on Atlantic Avenue in Freeport, that Gary Cohen let me know Darryl Strawberry had sent one soaring off Doug Drabek and over the right field fence. Outta here! Three-run homer! Two-zip deficit now a 3-2 lead in the fourth. Bedlam filled my tinny speakers. I honked my horn and high-fived my steering wheel the way Cone had slapped his teammates’ hands the night before. (All at once, my wrist felt fine.)

It was confirmation, as if we needed any, that Darryl was worth the Jose Canseco-type money he’d been demanding all summer, that Frank Cashen would look quite the fool to let a 28-year-old, left-handed slugger (37 HRs, 108 RBIs) who runs well, drips charisma and comes through in games like this take a free-agent hike.

The Mets added another run and handed Doc Gooden a 4-2 lead. He wasn’t as dominant as Cone, but Gooden was — as every other back-page headline since 1984 had blared — good enough. In the eighth, Doc gave way to Franco who didn’t blow it. Mets won 6-3. We were now 1-1/2 back with 19 to play, including those three to finish the season in Pittsburgh. It’s the Pirates who would be chasing us by then.

Didn’t happen. Doc kept up his part of the bargain. He wound up 19-7, perhaps his bravest year. But Buddy couldn’t manage. Viola unraveled down the stretch and Franco was no help. Junior Noboa of the Expos reached him for a deadly RBI one night. Junior Noboa! Everybody stopped hitting. The Expos in particular killed us. We lost a doubleheader to them when their starting pitchers were Brian Barnes and Chris Nabholz. Brian Barnes! Chris Nabholz! Darryl claimed a bad back. McReynolds, growing more lifeless and joyless by the day, was also hurting. One night late in the race, the starting leftfielder was Keith Miller and the starting rightfielder was Pat Tabler, the bases-loaded but little else guy. They weren’t the answer. Julio Valera wasn’t the answer. Nor was Tommy Herr who never stopped being a Cardinal.

Charlie O’Brien was just one of many to not man his position satisfactorily. The Mets went through seven catchers in 1990. Merrrrcado was mellifluous but otherwise unmemorable. Mackey got more and more confused, the mound as far away as Alabama in his mind. Dave Liddell got one at-bat, one hit and disappeared, though not as mysteriously as Barry Lyons. He was thrown overboard late in the Johnson administration and was never heard from again. Randy Hundley’s son Todd had a cup of coffee before being shipped back to Jackson. Alex Treviño alighted briefly without warning or impact like a mirage from the early ’80s. Ron Hodges didn’t but probably could have. The Mets never did get around to replacing Gary Carter that year.

There were no easy answers, except perhaps that I had to change the way I rooted. Despite the Mets’ perennial contention and my previously unshakable confidence, we were still chasing the Pirates. I had been cocky as recently as 1988 when I was sure the Mets would beat Orel Hershiser and the Dodgers in the playoffs. That sense of Mets-in-first Destiny had turned shaky ever since. By September ’90 — after Noboa, after Barnes, after Nabholz, amidst Valera — my default position shifted, at last, from chest-beating bravado to karma-tending humility. The baseball gods became my prime constituency. Appeasing them would become my daily burden.

Perhaps this change of sensibility was working. They were giving me a break. Despite their foibles, the Mets were somehow still breathing with a week to go. They were four out with four to play, the last three scheduled for Pittsburgh. If they could win their final Sunday game at Shea (the season ended in mid-week because everything was pushed back by that spring lockout) and the Pirates lost, the Mets could still win three in a row and force a playoff. It wasn’t much, but it was hope.

Beverage obligations being what they were, I would have to find out second-hand. I was due in San Francisco for a meeting of beer wholesalers. I left Stephanie instructions to follow the action and have a score ready for me when I landed.

As soon as my captain turned off the fasten seatbelt sign, I hustled off the plane, marched to a pay phone and called my fiancée. Stephanie, who via my yelps of victory and groans of defeat, had been truly indoctrinated into the franchise in earnest, had her report ready.

“They lost.”

And even if they hadn’t, the Pirates of Bonds and Bonilla (I wondered if we could ever get one of them) won. They were the division champs. We finished 91-71, four games out, second place. Fifth time in seven years we were the runner-up.

Unlike the Mets, Stephanie came through like a champ at the end of September. Not only did she track the score for me, but she taped “Mets Extra” for me if I wanted that, too. As Chuck (a.k.a. Carlos) said many times on her behalf, “¡Que mujer!”.

Losing to the Pirates hurt, but there was always 1991. The Mets were good every year, right? Besides, it was life-affirming to have someone to share the ups and downs and everything else with day after night after day. I couldn’t say that before 1990, but now I could.

Maybe it was good karma that got me into the lobby of that hotel with the two names in 1987. Maybe it was just dumb luck. Whatever it was, I gladly took it and ran with it. I’d have preferred a woman I loved who loved me coming along in conjunction with a first-place finish, but one miracle at a time.

To console me over not winning the East, Stephanie bought me a trinket, a tiny windup baseball with feet and a Mets cap. Wind him up and he walked deliberately, not unlike Dave Magadan. As consolation prizes go, it was very sweet. Unfortunately, she was also the bearer of more bad Mets news. One Friday morning in November, she awoke me with a bulletin: Darryl Strawberry, our biggest boy of summer, was going west. He had signed with the Dodgers.

Without a word, I trudged out into the foyer of our apartment, wound up my toy and allowed it to walk off the edge of its flat surface and onto the floor. Then I went back to bed to sulk.

Stephanie didn’t think that was silly at all.

The year was 1990, 15 years ago.

I was 27.

Flashback Friday is a weekly tour through the years, every half-decade on the half-decade, wherein a younger Mets fan develops into the Mets fan he is today. Previous stops: 1970, 1975, 1980, 1985 (Part I) and 1985 (The Exciting Conclusion). Next stop: 1995.

Here's to the Losers from Lunch

Another chance to disapprove

Remember when our biggest problem was Victor Diaz taking an extra base with a 17-run lead? Me neither. It's 15 of 18 following Thursday's matinee performance. 15 of 18 what need not be specified. Like Oprah requires no last name (or Sondheim requires no first), our losing is that beloved a recognized national institution. But it doesn't make the Mets good lunchtime company.

Another brilliant zinger

Remember when Victor Diaz pulled out September games with two outs in the bottom of what appeared to be the final inning? Me neither. A year ago, the kid who wore 50 hit a famous bottom-of-the-ninth home run to ruin the afternoon of all those Cubs fans who invaded Shea for a Saturday. One of the interlopers was a lovely man named Frank. Frank treated me to the game, one his Cubs desperately needed, one that he was sorry he traveled all the way up from Washington to witness after Craig Brazell finished it off. Since then, he's bought Nationals' season tickets. Got an e-mail from him Thursday afternoon, moments after Diaz — now displaying 20 on his front and back — struck out to end our loss. It was titled, “He was better at number 50.” (Too'Shea, Frank. Too'Shea.)

Another reason not to move

Remember when there was hope upon the land and the worst part about going to a Mets game was cramming onto the 7 afterwards? Me neither. I'm guessing they could've piled all of Thursday's attendees into one car and still been able to comfortably make all local stops to Junction Blvd. The Mets Express has stalled, and another hundred people just got off of the train.

Another vodka stinger

I'll drink to that.

Hands Across America

Last night: Ninth inning, two outs, two strikes, the Giants up 4-2 on the Padres. One more strike, and they'll sweep San Diego. They'll be only four out with Barry Bonds back in the lineup. Wheeee! Dare to dream, San Francisco!

Except the closer gave up a two-run double to Sean Burroughs. Fella by the name of Benitez. Pads won in 10.

With Giants fans feeling a bit raw today, we thought we'd pass along this handy letter. Fill it out and email it (or print it and snail-mail it, if you're feeling retro) to that Giants fan of your acquaintance who needs to know he or she isn't alone. Because around these parts we're as much about Helping and Healing as we are about Faith and Fear. Kumbaya, everybody!

Dear [name of Giants fan],

On behalf of our hundreds of thousands of members, let me welcome you to the Armando Benitez Survivors Support Group. We have a host of services available to help you through this difficult period in your life.

Here at ABSS we understand what you're going through. Whether you're an avid fan of real-life baseball or just one of those chalk-white obsessives who tinkers endlessly with a fantasy roster, Armando Benitez can be a powerful, destructive force in one's life. We understand the anguish of watching triumph turn to tragedy with a single brainless heave of a ball. We know the false security one gets from seeing unimportant games saved and big ones go down the tubes, and how naked and alone one feels when this false security is stripped away. We understand the terror of knowing one's happiness and/or statistics are in the hands of a volatile man-child with an uncanny ability to hear every taunt from the crowd and a propensity for off-field problems, including shacking up with self-described witches who put hexes on him.

At ABSS we pride ourselves on being nonjudgmental. We too have been lulled by single, never-to-be-repeated seasons of glittery stats and saves piled up during garbage time. We too were once seduced by 98-mph fastballs and the whisperings of the bloated tempter. We feel your pain, and we're here to make it OK.

We understand that you may be crying out, “How could I have been so blind?” We know you are likely regretting your cavalier dismissal of our members' warnings. That's OK — this is the first day of the rest of your life, [name of Giants fan]. You'll find that as with so many things, acceptance is the first station on the path to recovery. So until you and some of our hundreds of thousands of other members can join hands at one of our nightly meetings, please consider our cyberhands joined with yours in fellowship and understanding. It's OK. You're among friends now. Let it out.

Yours in ulceration and eventual recovery,

[Your Name]

New York City Chapter, ABSS

Armando-free since July 16, 2003

P.S. Please note that ABSS has no Miami chapter. See “single, never-to-be-repeated seasons of glittery stats” above.

P.P.S. Want Looper?

24,049 Lost Souls

Your movie this week stars nobody and features nothing.

—Pearl Forrester, Mystery Science Theater 3000

The Mets are now little more than time chasers. I got to Shea at some point Wednesday night and some three hours later I left. I returned home from whence I started when it was over. Baseball was apparently played.

But I was there. This, I told my companion, who freely admitted there was no way he'd be there without my advance ticket buy (made when we eyed this as one of dozens of potential showdowns for the…nah, don't even say it), is what we will look back on next year, or perhaps the year after that, or some distant year beyond that one, when the Mets are titlebound. “Yeah, remember that game against the Nationals in September '05, how we went and there was nobody there and the Mets lost? Yeah.”

Yeah.

Me, my buddy Dan and 24,047 other lost souls have an alibi as to where we were on September 14. If we're suspected of any crime, we can honestly plead insanity.

24,049 was the announced attendance. I'd say a good 12,025 of our fellow ducatclutchers decided to cut out the middleman in order to cash in the “Get a Sub With Your Stub” offer on the back of the ticket. Think about it: If somebody bought a $5 upper deck jobbie and, instead of using it, took it directly to Subway to buy any 6″ Sub at regular price and receive a second Sub of equal or lesser price FREE with the purchase of any 21 oz. drink, that person came out ahead.

Like the Nationals. Again.

Nobody cheered. Nobody booed. Nobody except Jose Guillen reacted to anything. Three Nationals converged on a pop fly and none bothered to catch it. They were rewarded with a double play grounder.

And a win. Again.

Even the Pepsi Picnic Area, on a “bring your empty can, get in for free” Wednesday, looked unpopulated.

“Hey, if ya finish that soda now, you can see a Mets game for free!”

“Nah, that's OK. I'm enjoying it and don't want to tarnish my memory of it with an unpleasant association. Plus I'd really like to get my nickel back. I will take one of those Subs though.”

Is this even the same season we started in April? I don't much care for 2005 Version 2.0. I liked the prototype much better.

To be fair, Dan and I had a marvelous time in very reasonable weather. Until recently he worked a night shift so this evening was three years in the making. (The Mets apparently no longer work nights.) We agreed that going to an implications-free baseball game that turned into the 14th loss in 17 games was better than staring into space come November and wishing we had such a diversion.

But of course the Mets suck, so let's not give them a free pass for providing green grass and fertile topics of conversation. Dan and I decided we could've done this in a bar, but then we'd have to keep badgering the bartender to turn the channel to the Mets game. And you know he wouldn't.

Did you know that the Mets haven't won two in a row in three weeks?

Did you know that no Mets team has ever been over .500 as late as 139 games into a season as this one was and finished under .500 as this one seems determined to do? For that matter, no Mets team has been anything like eight games over in late August only to finish — lemme check to see where they are right now — a hundred games under.

Did you know The Log hates when I inflict games like this one on it? I'm now 9-7 for the year with three more visits to the periodontist…I mean Shea scheduled. This was Lifetime Regular Season Game At Shea No. 298 for me. It was my goal to get to No. 300 in 2005 which is what I'd be collecting on Closing Day if not for my adding this one. Now The Log is angry that, barring rain, I will finish with an odd number for the season and may punish me by making me go 9-10 which would piss me off in ways that the Omaha Leon Brown card did you. Plus, at No. 301, I'll wind up commencing a whole new page at the end of a season, something The Log considers bad form. The Log can get very cranky and may force me to fit in an extra Rockies game if I'm not good to it this weekend.

Maybe the baseball gods are exacting a toll on me for getting sick twice this season when I held tickets for games that turned into wins but couldn't go. Dan, however, is probably right when he says the baseball gods aren't really paying attention to the Mets these nights.

Why should they be any different from the rest of us?

Stuck in My Craw

From John Harper in the Daily News today:

Because Hernandez is not on the 40-man roster, Mets' brass apparently was debating the idea of releasing one of their players to open a spot for him.

“We haven't decided what we're going to do yet,” assistant GM Jim Duquette said. “We're still talking about it.”

To quote those water ballerinas from an old AFLAC duck ad that last year's Mets broadcasts rammed into my cerebellum, never to be removed: Huh? Wha? Come again?

How about releasing Jose Offerman, who was useless even before performing his cranial-anal docking maneuver at a crucial point in last night's game? How about Gerald Williams, about whom no more needs be said? If we're worried about a glut of middle infielders, why not send Miguel Cairo packing? (Heck, he'd probably get picked up by the Yankees and kiss Omar and Willie on his way out.) How about one of the pitching staff's failed experiments? Dae-Sung Koo's been a flop and the brass are pissed at him for refusing to warm up last month anyway — why not send him home early? How about Danny Graves, who has exactly as much chance of collecting his $5 million option for 2006 as I do of receiving it through some spectacular bank error? How about Kaz Ishii, solidly locked in at the bottom of any starting-pitching depth chart we could construct?

With the exception of Graves's utterly hypothetical option, none of these guys is signed for 2006. I can't imagine any of them would get us compensatory draft picks. None of them has any conceivable future with the Mets. (Of course, I said that last year about Ice Williams.)

Seriously, what am I missing? This doesn't seem like anything requiring some huddle o' suits. From my point of view, figuring out which 2005 Met to release is like figuring out which chucklehead political appointees to boot out of FEMA: Candidates aren't that hard to find.