The blog for Mets fans
who like to read


Greg Prince and Jason Fry
Faith and Fear in Flushing made its debut on Feb. 16, 2005, the brainchild of two longtime friends and lifelong Met fans.

Greg Prince discovered the Mets when he was 6, during the magical summer of 1969. He is a Long Island-based writer, editor and communications consultant. Contact him here.

Jason Fry is a Brooklyn writer whose first memories include his mom leaping up and down cheering for Rusty Staub. Check out his other writing here.

Got something to say? Leave a comment, or email us at (Sorry, but we have no interest in ads, sponsored content or guest posts.)

Need our RSS feed? It's here.

Visit our Facebook page, or drop by the personal pages for Greg and Jason.

Or follow us on Twitter: Here's Greg, and here's Jason.

Various Injustices

Bryce Harper arranged his own early exit. Steven Matz decided to stay a while longer this time. And Mark Carlson … well, he didn’t know if pitches were coming or going.

For the Mets, Matz was the happy headline. A start after recording not even a solitary out against these same Phillies, he acquitted himself far better, pitching aggressively — and, to be fair, being supported defensively. Matz has always had a bit too much Jon Niese in him for my tastes, and in the third it looked like he was about to perform an oh-so-Niesean fade. Cesar Hernandez doubled, Aaron Altherr walked, and Jake Arrieta bunted the ball a trifle too hard to Matz. Matz stared at Todd Frazier, waiting to record the out on Hernandez at third … and took the sure out at first instead. Oh boy, I thought. Here it comes. The crumble, the scuffing and kicking around the mound, the implosion, the departure, the hangdog postgame press conference. The Full Niese, in other words.

But no, not tonight. Matz fanned Andrew McCutchen, got a ground ball to short, and walked off unscathed — and, it would turn out, on his way to a victory.

That victory was helped by RBI hits from Pete Alonso and Wilson Ramos and a homer from Jeff McNeil — heroics that, unfortunately, unfolded amid the distractions of yet another baseball ump show. Harper was ejected in the fourth for chirping from the dugout about balls and strikes, an eruption that earned him a postgame scolding from Arrieta, who went on to accuse the rest of his teammates of not being ready to play after the rain delay. Things are not well in Philly, not after getting spanked by the Rockies and finding their engineered-to-dominate outfit scuffling along a tick above .500. (Things aren’t particularly better in our own N.L. East nook and cranny, but we won tonight and they didn’t, so there … at least for a night.)

Anyway, Harper was wrong on the particulars but right on the generalities. Yes, Mark Carlson had a dreadful night behind the plate; no, Harper wasn’t one of his more visible victims. The various strike-zone recording services are all a little different, but I rolled through the game pitch by pitch on ESPN’s feed and the strikes called on Harper all looked more or less legit. But Carlson missed plenty on other hitters: a whopping 18 by my count, including pitches in the ABs to Alonso, Ramos and McNeil.

I had the bad calls at 10-8 in terms of Benefiting the Phils vs. Benefiting the Mets, with Matz also getting squeezed in the Rhys Hoskins AB that yielded a home run. But as I wrote last week, surely the point isn’t to be bad at your job but have the incompetence be evenly distributed. Every single game offers evidence that baseball’s umpires are inept at correctly judging balls and strikes. They’re putting their thumbs on the scale during key moments, and it shouldn’t matter that there’s no malice involved. The game is being distorted, and baseball ought not to stand for it any longer. I think moving the mound back is reckless and dangerous and starting extra innings with runners on second is stupid and unnecessary, but I would like balls and strikes to be called correctly, and altering the game so that they are would be a change that I, for one, would greet with open arms.

Anyway, Harper departed, equilibrium disturbed but hair still perfect — seriously, he was like an action figure that came with an extra Angry Bryce head. After that some good Met bullpenning and bad Phillie bullpenning turned a close game less close, with an excess of Mets getting hit by pitches, rain beginning to fall again, and Edwin Diaz arriving for the ninth (a la some loopy Callaway formula that I’d rather not think about) and sending the Phillies away to think about what they’d done.

That wasn’t bad for a night where I’d figured the only victor would be the rain. I just wish Mark Carlson hadn’t brought his own little black cloud.

Addendum: I missed that one of the changes to be tested in the Atlantic League is indeed an automated strike zone. Huzzah! Moving the mound back is still crazy, though.

9 comments to Various Injustices

  • Daniel Hall

    Every time Sweet Pete gets nailed, I yowl in horror – even while asleep! Seriously, other teams’ pitchers – throw it at your catcher!!

    So it’s April of Year I and Bryce the Choker has already made good friends with his new team? This pleases me. In the league for most of a decade, still swings and misses at every pitch a tad over the strike zone, and probably has not run out a pop on the infield in his life. Just $328m to go on that contract, Phils, just $328m to go.

  • 9th string catcher

    For the life of me I can’t imagine what Bryce was thinking coming to the Phillies. Pass up playing in Southern California or even Northern California to be in Philadelphia for 13 years? They are going to hate him. I mean, Philly hates just about everybody. They’re going to love an infant like Bryce.

    What’s the over-under on kapler at this point? I’d say he’ll be gone by 75 games in.

    Oh and we need robots behind the plate. These guys are worthless.

  • JoeG

    My understanding is that Harper chose Philadelphia over California because of the tax laws. I’m not an accountant, or a millionaire, but seems to me that after a certain amount you have enough money, and things like where you are going to call home, and the team that will define your legacy, should start taking priority.

  • LeClerc

    I agree with Jason that home plate umpiring is often the pits – and worse – sometimes unfairly alters the outcome of a game.

    The vertical boundaries of the strike zone can be tracked perfectly by “electronic eyes” (like tennis line calls).

    But the horizontal boundaries present a technical challenge because they vary with the height (as well as the stance) of the batter. A lot of egregious calls are the result of an umpire internalizing an imaginary “standard size batter”. Robots or not, Harper will remain a prima donna.

  • Argman

    I recently started listening to a podcast by Michael Lewis called “Against the Rules.” He uses the NBA to illustrate his point in the first episode, which is that the “privileged,” in this case sports superstars, feel that they are too good to be judged by mere mortals, and rail against their perceived injustices when a decision goes against them. Hence Harper’s exceedingly large number of ejections since he’s been in the league. He is a super talent, and although he doesn’t maximize those talents he’s still a very good player, but he acts like the spoiled child that he essentially is.

  • open the gates

    “…he was like an action figure that came with an extra Angry Bryce head…”

    I have to remember not to read your posts while drinking iced coffee.

  • gil

    “Harper departed, equilibrium disturbed but hair still perfect — seriously, he was like an action figure that came with an extra Angry Bryce head.”

    Thats almost worthy of a tee shirt. Classic stuff, Jason. If I was drinking coffee I would have spit it out.

    Hope Wheeler gets tough for us tonight. LGM

  • NostraDennis

    I wonder who the first player will be to get tossed this year after saying something like “When our Robot overlords put you guys out of a job, you are one umpire I will not miss”.