The blog for Mets fans
who like to read
ABOUT US
Faith and Fear in Flushing made its debut on Feb. 16, 2005, the brainchild of two longtime friends and lifelong Met fans.
Greg Prince discovered the Mets when he was 6, during the magical summer of 1969. He is a Long Island-based writer, editor and communications consultant. Contact him here.
Jason Fry is a Brooklyn writer whose first memories include his mom leaping up and down cheering for Rusty Staub. Check out his other writing here.
Got something to say? Leave a comment, or email us at faithandfear@gmail.com. (Sorry, but we have no interest in ads, sponsored content or guest posts.)
Need our RSS feed? It's here.
Visit our Facebook page, or drop by the personal pages for Greg and Jason.
Or follow us on Twitter: Here's Greg, and here's Jason.
|
by Greg Prince on 30 January 2012 12:01 pm
Coming this Sunday night: The favorite football team of many (if not all) Mets fans, playing for the championship of its sport.
Coming NO Sunday night in 2012, as far as we know right now: The favorite baseball team of all Mets fans, playing for anything…not even to get us closer to 2013.
ESPN released its preliminary Sunday Night Baseball schedule a couple of weeks ago, and the Mets were conspicuous — to Mets fans, anyway — by their absence: ten dates, no Mets. Mind you, the Mets could still easily pop onto the slate since there are still fifteen Sunday nights unaccounted for by The Worldwide Leader and the Mets were, at last check, one of thirty MLB teams. Anybody who’s held a ticket for 1:10 PM and magically discovered the first pitch would be fired seven hours later knows how that works.
Until then, however, the Mets are officially an afterthought where Major League Baseball’s theoretical premier showcase is concerned. The Phillies are assured a spotlight game. The Braves are listed for a Sunday night, too. So are the Nationals. The Marlins aren’t, but the debut of Not Joe Robbie Stadium will serve as ESPN’s Opening Night presentation on Wednesday, April 4. Everybody in the N.L. East looms as a national cablecast big deal…everybody but us.
Except for what that implies about prospective competitiveness, I don’t sense a lot of mourning in Metsopotamia.
The natural rhythms of baseball fandom make the sport less of a fit for prime time programming than football. The Super Bowl used to kick off on Sunday afternoon (the first eleven of them), but it’s not at all odd that after the first XI, it started coming on after six. It’s football. It’s spectacle. It doesn’t even have to be championship football. Monday Night Football was once upon a time a sensation. It’s still an institution. Sunday Night Football is a huge ratings hit week in and week out. Put a pigskin under the lights and it shines brighter.
Stick a horsehide under the lights, however, and we tend to whimper. The World Series hasn’t been an all-matinee affair since 1970 — further back than the last daytime Super Bowl in 1977 — and yet a critical mass of traditionalists still yearn longingly every October for the way it used to be, as if that was the way it was always going to be. In the regular season, five or six days of the week we put up with night baseball, but the spirit of the “nineteenth-century pastoral game” (as George Carlin winked at it) seems to demand at least one contest a week be played in the glow of the sun. I suppose if you live away from New York and you don’t partake of the packages that provide every game any time on any device, the Mets on Sunday Night Baseball is a boon, meaning the lack of it is kind of a blow to your access. For those of us with easier access to SNY and ’FAN, we can watch the Mets when they’re “supposed” to be on any given Sunday and cope with the scoreboard consequences by sunset.
Win or lose on a Sunday afternoon, Sunday night is cleared away. You can watch two other teams whose results don’t matter to you, secure in going to bed without a final. Or you can put baseball aside for The Simpsons or AMC or, if you’re really crazy, no TV at all. Your Sunday night rhythms wouldn’t necessarily notice. It’s different when the Mets are playing. When the Mets are playing, you have a whole other set of rhythms let alone priorities.
In case you’re wondering, the Mets playing on Sunday night at the behest of ESPN hasn’t impeded their periodic winning ways since the series known as Sunday Night Baseball was inaugurated in 1990. Nor has it gotten in the way of their periodic losing ways. According to proprietary Faith and Fear in Flushing research (consisting of multiple trips to Baseball-Reference and Retrosheet, helped along by Google News Archive, a stack of Mets pocket schedules and an uncommonly sticky memory), the Mets have played on ESPN’s SNB 69 times, losing 34 and winning 35. That’s been good for a .493 winning percentage, pretty much in step with the Mets’ overall .497 mark from the past 22 seasons.
It only seems like the Mets lose to Tyler Clippard every time they play in that time slot on that channel. In reality, though the inconvenience factor can be irritating and doing without GKR is unquestionably akin to sensory deprivation, the Mets acquit themselves no worse in veritable Games of the Week than they do the rest of the week.
Is that why ESPN reserved them a spot every year since 1990? Was it because the Mets had that certain something that made them a coast-to-coast coaxial attraction? Was it because the Mets are from the largest of markets and had just spent a half-dozen years finishing first or second when Sunday night became a baseball night? Or was it because Sunday Night Baseball’s mandate, when it first started, was to do one game from every ballpark every season?
The last part was definitely true. Otherwise, the chances seem remote that (with an assist from that spring’s season-delaying lockout) the first-ever Sunday Night Baseball would have emanated from that baseball hotbed known as Olympic Stadium in Montreal. The Big O hosted the Expos and the Mets on Easter Sunday night in 1990. The Mets did not rise to the occasion, losing 3-1 before 10,187 French Canadian souls.
But when Sunday Night Baseball made its Shea debut on July 29, 1990 — the Mets’ first scheduled Sunday night home game since historically dreaded Game Four of the 1988 NLCS (Scioscia) — the home team was ready for its closeup. Mackey Sasser blasted a grand slam off Jose DeLeon, Doc Gooden threw seven shutout innings and the Mets clipped the Redbirds’ wings, 6-0. With the Mets in first place and attendance still reported by gate as opposed to tickets sold, we know nearly 42,000 looked past the nontraditional starting time to enjoy the result. Three weeks later, on August 19, Doc would notch another W, but this one wasn’t nearly as easy. Gooden had the Giants down, 10-2, at Candlestick in the sixth. An Ernest Riles grand slam halved the margin and the bullpen — rotation demotee Bobby Ojeda, Alejandro Peña and future Mets Hall of Famer John Franco — barely hung on as the Mets escaped with a 10-9 win.
Even as the Mets began to slip in real life after 1990, they were still reasonably hot stuff on Sunday Night Baseball, appearing three times apiece in 1991 and 1992 and splitting the sextet. One of the Mets’ few spectacular triumphs of the era occurred on Sunday night, August 30, 1992, when Bobby Bonilla — in probably his finest hour on the active payroll — ripped the first pitch he saw from Rob Dibble with two out in the ninth for a two-out, three-run homer that served to snatch a 4-3 win from the jaws of 3-1 defeat. The kicker was the Mets and Reds were wearing 1962 throwback uniforms and Dibble, as frustrated as Bonilla was elated, tore his old-timey Reds vest to the ground, never to retrieve it.
But when the Mets lost on Sunday night in this period, it was not pretty. Two of their three setbacks came at Wrigley Field, where Sunday Night Baseball doubled down against nature by not just skipping afternoon baseball but doing in the one place night games were still novelties. The first of those losses, on August 11, 1991, proved particularly furshlugginer (to use the technical term). The Mets and Cubs dragged each other deep into the night, not ending their mutual defiling of the Friendly Confines until George Bell’s sent Pete Schourek’s second pitch of the fourteenth inning over the ivy for a 3-2 gutkick. It was the third consecutive loss of a road trip that would plummet to 0-10 before the Mets were allowed to go home and lose an eleventh straight.
On September 13, 1992, the Mets made another Sunday Night Baseball appearance in Montreal, their third in three years. This one was the worst of them. Oh, it looked good for a while, with Dick Schofield engineering a double play so sparkling it was nominated for an ESPY the first year they had ESPYs. But the slick fielding as well as the 5-2 lead Gooden carried through seven became forgotten when the Expos trimmed the Mets’ lead to 5-4 in the eighth and erased that temporary disadvantage with Larry Walker’s three-run walkoff blast off ad hoc closer Anthony Young.
And as miserable as that plot twist was, it would become a footnote to the real legacy of that Sunday night in Quebec: the postgame snit rookie Jeff Kent fashioned when the Mets’ vets hid his street clothes in favor of a pimp suit. Even as 7-5 losers long banished from contention, the Mets somehow still found time to haze — and even that they couldn’t do seamlessly in 1992.
Or as Jeff Torborg reportedly fumed, “Give the kid his fuckin’ clothes back.”
Despite the franchise’s downward trajectory, ESPN believed in the Mets’ drawing power enough to pencil them in three times in 1993. The Mets went 0-3, which figured since the Mets spiritually went 0-162 that year (59-103 in actuality).
The Mets gave viewers a good show on June 20 at Three Rivers Stadium when Bret Saberhagen stifled the post-Bonds Bucs, 2-1, through eight innings. Ah, but the ninth: a couple of base hits; future Mets Hall of Famer John Franco replaces Sabes; a bunt; an intentional walk; an unintentional bases-loaded walk to tie it; and another single to lose it, 3-2. With the loss, the Mets fell 27½ back with 95 to play.
The Mets — and the then-ubiquitous Gooden — played above their heads on July 11 at Shea as they battled the Dodgers to a 1-1 tie for seven innings. Alas, the game turned on L.A. rookie Pedro Martinez’s 2⅓ sharp innings of relief and Eric Davis’s eighth-inning homer off Doc. The Mets lost 2-1. They’d make it a Turkey-for-’93 on September 19 when what must have looked to programming executives like a fabulous matchup months earlier — the two-time N.L. West champion Braves hosting the conceivably dangerous N.L. East Mets — went completely awry. Atlanta thumped New York, 11-2. T#m Gl@v!ne was touched for nine hits in six innings, yet the Mets couldn’t plate more than two runs off him…and none off Bobby Cox’s bullpen.
ESPN’s Mets fever broke in 1994. The network scheduled them the mandatory once and maybe counted itself lucky that the game — against the similarly downtrodden Cubs at Shea on August 21 — was never played. A strike wiped it and everything else out for the season. Nevertheless, the Mets were on tap to be the first team anybody saw bat when 1995 opened…but that came with an asterisk that was just dying to be denoted.
On April 2, 1995, ESPN was preparing to look at us live from Joe Robbie Stadium in Miami with 50 fill-ins wearing Mets and Marlins uniforms. MLB, with the sole exception of the Orioles, was thumbing its nose at its striking players (and its fans), preparing to start the year with replacement players. And they got real close to playing games that counted until the owners agreed to abide by Judge Sonia Sotomayor’s injunction against replacement games. The 1995 Mets — the real ones — would have to settle for opening their season late on a Wednesday afternoon as the first visitors to Coors Field a few weeks later (a crushing defeat televised by ESPN) and two Sunday Night losses of no historical note.
When the Mets dropped a 2-1 decision at Shea to Cincinnati on June 23, 1996, their second loss in two SNB appearances that year, Sunday Night Baseball was feeling less like a treat and more like torture. Dating back to Jeff Kent’s tantrum (though to be fair, rookie hazing is moronic), the Mets had lost seven in a row in the spotlight and had two appearances paved over by labor pains. Between the rutted track record and their six consecutive losing seasons, you wouldn’t think ESPN would exactly be seeking the Mets out come 1997. Yet Shea was chosen as site for what passed as a special occasion: the first Sunday Night Baseball matchup between Interleague opponents.
It was a rematch of the 1986 World Series, the Red Sox visiting the resurgent Mets. The last time the Red Sox alighted on a Sunday night in Queens, Boston rode high, taking Game Two of the ’86 Fall Classic, 9-3, blistering an unsteady Dwight Gooden in the process. Eleven years later, on June 15, 1997 — Dave Mlicki’s Eve, if you will — the Red Sox earned small revenge for 1986, taking that initial Interleague series two games to one on the strength of a Sunday night 10-1 rout.
Surely the only Met who could have been remotely satisfied with the forced festivities was Kevin Morgan, a seven-year minor leaguer who was called up to fill in amid myriad infield injuries. Morgan pinch-hit in the seventh, popped out, stayed in to play third…and ended his big league career the very same night. But don’t cry for this Moonlight Graham Met. Kevin Morgan has worked in the Met front office in various capacities since 1998.
Sunday Night deliverance wasn’t far off for the 1997 Mets, either. They snapped their eight-game losing streak in what would someday seem a most unlikely venue, but as of July 13, 1997, it was just another ballpark.
In their inaugural series at brand new Turner Field in Atlanta, the Mets fell behind, 6-0, in the first when the Braves jumped on the recently stellar Bobby Jones (he struck out Ken Griffey and Mark McGwire back-to-back in the All-Star Game five days earlier). Jones dug the Mets a hole, but Butch Huskey dug them right out of it with a two-run homer in the second and a three-run dinger in the fourth, both off Brave starter Denny Neagle. Bobby Valentine left Jones in to fend for himself after his horrific first and the manager’s confidence was rewarded with six shutout innings that left the Mets tied, 6-6. In the tenth, Alex Ochoa put the Mets up, 7-6, by homering off Mike Bielecki. That became the final score and the Mets’ Sunday Night slumpbuster. Better yet, the Mets took their first series at the Ted, three games to one. (Gosh, what a friendly place!)
In 1998, ESPN went to the Mets-Red Sox well again, broadcasting another tepid Boston win (5-0, on June 7 at Fenway Park) before availing itself of a new toy that would redefine the Mets’ Sunday Night Baseball presence forever more.
Here came the Subway Series. It and the Mets’ topsy-turvy Sunday Night history from 1998 forward will be FAFIFed in Part II.
by Greg Prince on 26 January 2012 12:56 pm
There was Cleon and Tommie…
“I’ll track that thing down for ya.”
And Tom Terrific, who they also called The Franchise…
“Throw strikes.”
And Little Buddy…
“Let ’em hit it on the ground.”
Jerry the Kooz and Jerry the Catcher…
“Keep the ball down, would ya guy?”
Rusty the Orange…
“Hey, call me in a pinch.”
And his guy Mex who wasn’t even Mexican…
“A little tardy on that swing.”
And William the Mook…
“Gotta run.”
And then there was Hank McGraw’s high-strung brother Tug…
“Ya gotta believe!”
Eddie the Krane…
“What took ya so long?”
Gary the Kid…
“Don’t give up yet.”
Big Straw…
“We’re goin’ deep tonight, be ready.”
And Doc, who liked to operate alone but sometimes needed some help to finish the job.
“I’ll get it to ya later.”
And now there’s the fifteenth player in the club, Johnny Three Times, who got that nickname ‘cause he always loaded the bases.
“I’m gonna go put a guy on, put a guy on, put a guy on.”
Johnny drove us crazy, but he usually got us outta hot water. That’s why he’s made it in the crew now. See, it’s the highest honor they can give you, especially if you’re a kid from Bensonhurst.
Wise choice.
by Greg Prince on 24 January 2012 2:46 pm
Gary Carter Stadium in Port St. Lucie…has a nice ring to it, doesn’t it? Won’t happen, though, because Gary Carter was a catcher and isn’t a corporation. Some company few Mets fans had ever heard of before 2010 or have any idea what exactly it does owns the rights to the name of the Mets’ primary Spring Training facility, and the Mets aren’t about to revoke those rights. Somebody wants to pay the Mets, the Mets are in no position to scale high moral ground and return the money.
So how about the Gary Carter New York Mets Spring Training and Minor League Complex? It’s a little bulky, but it covers all the bases. Since there’s more to the Mets’ operation in St. Lucie than just the field where the Mets sell naming rights and play exhibition games — and since the umbrella operation doesn’t seem to have an official name — there’s an opportunity there. There’s a chance to call it something. Something appropriate.
The Gary Carter Complex…when it’s mentioned as a matter of course on SNY or WFAN, will it sound like something for which they advise you to seek counsel if you’re prone to taking frequent curtain calls? Oh hell, that’s all right. Curtain calls imply you just did something worth pumping your fist and waving your helmet over.
Carter certainly did his share of that on our behalf from 1985 to 1989.
On the other side of Florida, in St. Petersburg, Mets minor leaguers once trained at the Payson Complex, named for the lady who owned the team. So there’s precedent here. Give Mets minor leaguers the privilege of learning their craft at the Carter Complex, named for the man who owned the town.
Two towns, actually. There was New York, circa 1986, and there was Port St. Lucie in 2006. Gary Carter managed the St. Lucie Mets to the Florida State League championship six years ago. That was a one-season deal (on the heels of winning a division title at the helm of the 2005 Gulf Coast Mets), as Carter followed his managerial muse elsewhere, but the Kid has been an undeniable fixture in the Treasure Coast region: as a longtime citizen of Palm Beach Gardens; as a benefactor of Palm Beach County schools through the Gary Carter Foundation; and as baseball coach at Palm Beach Atlantic University. Honoring Gary Carter where he lives (approximately 40 miles north of his home) would recognize his contributions to his community and give the Carter family a chance to relish the recognition on a going basis.
Aside from the geography, there is the irresistible symbolism of Gary Carter’s name gracing the site where New York Mets baseball experiences its rebirth every spring. Gary Carter arriving in Mets camp in the spring of 1985 represented hope and anticipation as perhaps no new Met before him had. Gary Carter was there to lead us toward the promised land. The journey began that first Carter spring. It reached its completion just two autumns later.
He was a helluva hitter and catcher for all seasons, but when I think of spring and the Mets, I think of Gary Carter and 1985.
The Carter Complex is my simple response, I suppose, to the recurring question about what to do, if anything, with No. 8. You can fill in all the possible answers yourself, whether you’re in favor of immediately retiring it because of Gary Carter’s battle to keep going, respectful but reticent to make that grandest of historical gestures given the franchise’s ideal numerical hierarchy, or of the belief that the best way to pay proper homage to the uniform number of a Mets Hall of Famer is to circulate it among his worthiest successors.
I don’t feel like getting into an argument about it, not even with myself. I see all the angles on this, I think, and given the right spin, I can agree with any of them. It’s a sports fan tic to require a final score on every issue. That, I believe, is why we are drawn to Hall of Fame evaluations, “all-time” rankings and why a number should or shouldn’t be retired. And as people who stand by while the physical condition of an athlete who contributed so mightily to our happiness grows dire, we are overtaken by a desire to do something about it…to push another run across the plate, as it were. Again, the sports fan instinct at work.
Gary Carter’s number on the left field wall at Citi Field wouldn’t diminish the inherent honor attached to placing it there, but it also isn’t the first number I would have thought to affix there had we not been compelled to contemplate Gary Carter right now. That’s why retiring No. 8 doesn’t seem at all wrong, yet neither does it seem perfectly right. To my Met mind, the Gary Carter New York Mets Spring Training and Minor League Complex in Port St. Lucie, Fla., seems unquestionably fitting in terms of tribute and taste.
So do it, Mets. Do it now. Do it so Gary Carter’s name is on the door when the Mets return for their annual rebirth in a few weeks. There’s no earthly reason to wait.
by Greg Prince on 23 January 2012 9:42 am
Fine Sunday night for Cousin Harvey’s favorite football team. Satisfying retribution exacted against San Francisco for kidnaping New York’s first National League baseball team. Intriguing thought crossing my mind as I dare to dream that the forthcoming Giants-Patriots Super Bowl works out as well as the last one:
If the Giants win a fourth Super Bowl, how on earth does a Giants fan complain about anything? Anything Giants-related, at any rate. The rest of your life remains up for grabs, but if your team unfurls a fourth championship banner in generally living memory — particularly if they’re spread out one per decade for the last four decades (’80s, ’90s, ’00s, ’10s) as these would be — how could you say “boo” to anything about your team?
Ever? Or if not ever, then for a very long time?
I suppose it doesn’t work that way, but how would I know for sure? My primary rooting interest is in a Mets franchise that won championships twice, seventeen years apart, and hasn’t won one in the 25 going on 26 years since. Having lived through The Years After (1970 and 1987), I know the complaining reignites quickly enough after the glitter fades. Why do you think that with so much other crap that’s come along across two millennia that we still bitch/moan about Terry Pendleton? Letdown is the seamy underside of triumph.
Though all sporting enterprises are also-rans in my angst-ridden affection when compared to my Mets attachment, I’ve managed to revel in tastes of ultimate success elsewhere — and stew over the acrid aftertaste of their inevitable letdown. It happened with the Giants in 1987 and 1991 and 2008. It happened with the early ’70s NBA champion Knicks I loved as a child; the mid-’70s ABA Nets I loved as a slightly older child, too (in their case the letdown was precipitated by the opening of the trapdoor that purported to welcome them into the NBA). The Islanders dynasty of 1980-1983 fell apart nearly thirty years ago and has yet to remotely reassemble.
But there’s something different going on here if the Giants win again. One championship now and then (more then than now where the Mets are concerned) represents a healthy cyclicality. A spate of them in proximity to one another is great fortune. But to have a couple here and then a couple there? Two relatively golden ages that don’t overlap but almost abut (when you consider 1991 through 2006 produced six additional playoff berths and another Super Bowl appearance)? If the Giants achieve that…well, you literally can’t complain.
If you’re a Giants fan of a vintage old enough to recall Super Bowl XXI, then you’ve been blessed three times already, even if in between Lombardi presentations there were some frustrating downward spirals. If you’re XXX years of age or younger, you haven’t had it so bad, because you have Super Bowl XLII in the very recent past. You’re not the football equivalent of the younger Mets fans I come across who don’t exactly cherish 1969 and 1986 because unlike them, you’ve experienced the highest of highs directly as opposed to historically. Now, if XLVI is colored the most desirable shade of blue, then everybody with an overarching Giant allegiance should be very happy.
I mean so happy that you have nothing to complain about.
You can’t complain about a potential letdown because shut up, you just won two Super Bowls in five seasons.
You can’t complain about getting knocked out of the playoffs because shut up, you just won two Super Bowls in five seasons…and you did it before.
You can’t complain about not making the playoffs because shut up, you have four Super Bowls that span just over a quarter-century, do you have any frigging idea how lucky you are?
It may not be a dynasty in the Steelers of the ’70s or Niners of the ’80s sense, but it may be better. It means your “suffering” (in the Giants’ case, the interminable wait for pre-XXI salvation and then the XVII years between XXV and XLII) has been ameliorated twice. You win again and the letdown period after XLII has been wiped out as well. There’s no longer any backlash to invoking the good old days the way there can be for the Mets since for some (even those who lived through them), the good days can serve as a bitter reminder that they aren’t being matched by particularly good new days. If you win in two weeks, you root for a team that won its league title in 1986, 1990, 2007 and, as the NFL calendar continues to call it, 2011.
The Giants do all that for you, you really can’t complain.
And if you’re a sports fan, what fun is that?
by Greg Prince on 21 January 2012 1:36 am
Several immediately upcoming events to know about with a Mets 50th anniversary flavor. Get out a shovel and dig a path to any and all of them.
• Sunday between 9 AM and 5 PM, MAB Celebrity Services is hosting 50 Years of Amazin’ Baseball at Citi Field’s Caesar’s Club. There’ll be Q&A, there’ll be autograph opportunities (or opportunitie$) and there’ll be a slew of Mets from Choo Choo Coleman to…what, Choo Choo Coleman’s not enough for ya? You almost NEVER see Choo Choo Coleman (let alone hear from him) at stuff like this, so here’s your chance to pay Original Met homage, bub. Guys named Seaver, Mays, Gooden, Strawberry and Hernandez will be among the myriad “other” attendees. Admission is $12 for adults, kids under 14 get in free. All the info is here.
• On Tuesday night at the Marriott Marquis in Times Square, Choo Choo and his 50th-anniversary friends (the aforementioned and then some) will be the featured attraction at the Baseball Assistance Team fundraising dinner. B.A.T. works to help baseball folks who could use it, and the marquee at the Marquis shows their brethren really come out for his annual event. More info on the massive Met presence here, with ticket information here.
• On Saturday, January 28, the Casey Stengel Chapter of SABR will have a 50th anniversary Mets flavor to it as well, with a special panel starring Buddy Harrelson and co-starring Huffington Post’s Billy Altman, Mets statistical analyst Ben Baumer and minor league video coordinator T.J. Barra and SABR NYC’s own Harvey Poris. George Vecsey, author of two great Mets-intensive books, will also be speaking. You can join the local chapter of the Society for American Baseball Research for its annual meeting at the New York Public Library (5th Avenue and 40th Street, 6th floor) at 10 AM; admission is $25. Visit the Stengel site here.
While not tied into the 50th anniversary, the Thurman Munson Dinner (Tuesday, January 31, at the Grand Hyatt around the corner from Grand Central) will be honoring a couple of 2012 Mets, Daniel Murphy and R.A. Dickey, along with 1973 Mets manager Yogi Berra. Other sports stars will be on hand as well. The dinner benefits AHRC New York City; you can read about the organization’s work here. For ticket information, please call 212/249-6188.
Though each is a worthwhile event for any Mets fan in winter, you should be advised if you find yourself snowed in at any point this weekend — or even if the sun comes out — you can get suitably lost in Best Mets, the latest handcrafted history produced by the prolific Matt Silverman. You know you can trust Matt as a leading source of Met retrospectives not just from the definitive coffee table volume, New York Mets: 50 Amazin’ Seasons — The Complete Illustrated History (which you’re cheating yourself out of if you don’t have it) but because the subtitle of his new book refers to the Mets as “AGONIZINGLY AMAZIN’” Only someone who really gets the Mets could have come up with that line.
Lots of lists in this paperback, lots of good humor, not a little angst, much thought and a hardcore Mets sensibility. Who could ask for anything more? Get your Best Mets here, your 50 Amazin’ Seasons here and all the Met Silverman there is to enjoy here.
Finally and obviously, we send the best wishes we have to offer to Florida for Gary Carter and his family. No. 8 is No. 1 in our hearts.
by Greg Prince on 18 January 2012 12:31 pm
Mike Pelfrey’s been re-signed, so that’s a load off our minds. If we didn’t have the tall wonder’s shortcomings on which to dwell, what starter’s lack of progress would obsess us ahead of Spring Training?
Jon Niese’s probably, which seems a little quick, considering he’s only 25 and has yet to make more than 30 starts in a single season. Non-pitching injuries seem to have a nasty habit of finding and disabling him, the latest of them a right-side muscle strain that knocked him out in August last year. Before departing for the year, he was more competent than dominant most outings, maybe a little shy of real consistency. His ERA (and ERA+) was off a bit from 2010 though his WHIP was a little better than it had been. Overall, his pre-injury 2011 indicated a Mets lefty starter who has the potential to improve.
But history indicates he’s doomed. It’s not his history, mind you, but the history of homegrown, lefthanded Mets starters.
By having been around for fragments of 2008 and 2009 and most of 2010 and 2011, Jon Niese moved up to No. 3 on the all-time Games Started list where southpaws of purebred Met pedigree are concerned.
Meaning? Meaning the Mets have been a little lacking in signing and developing lefthanded starters just about forever.
Put another way, there was Jerry Koosman, with 346 starts between 1967 and 1978; there was Jon Matlack, with 199 starts between 1971 and 1977; and now there’s Jon Niese with 64 starts since 2008.
Kind of quiet there for approximately three decades, wasn’t it?
This isn’t a trend. It’s a chronic condition of some sort, though I have no idea how it came about. It spans ownerships, front offices, papacies…how is this even possible? How could this be it? Is there a deep-seated organizational allergy to lefties? Does looking for another Tom Seaver mean indulging the Pelfreys longer than waiting out the Nieses? Is the dictionary definition of “sinister” taken overly literally in Flushing?
I didn’t have to guess Koosman was No. 1 on this list and I was pretty certain Matlack was No. 2. Yet as I got to thinking about Niese and who might have directly preceded him as a mainstay homegrown lefty starter around here, I realized there had been basically nobody since the aforementioned Koosman and Matlack were traded well over thirty years ago.
There have been other lefty starters, of course, but nobody the Mets drafted, groomed and brought to the majors on their own. The closest pitcher matching that description was Sid Fernandez, in that the Mets acquired him after he’d had a cup of coffee with the Dodgers and kept him at Tidewater for half a season before recalling him in 1984. But that’s not really the same thing. Los Angeles did the spadework on Fernandez — and even if you want to say, “Yeah, but he established himself with the Mets,” we’re still talking about a guy who came up 28 years ago and hasn’t pitched for the Mets since 1993.
Niese isn’t just astoundingly high up there among homegrown lefty starters, he’s pretty lofty among all Mets lefty starters in terms of most games started, according to Baseball Reference:
1) Koosman, 346; 2) Fernandez, 250; 3) Al Leiter, 213; 4) Matlack, 199; 5) T#m Gl@v!ne, 164; 6) Al Jackson, 138; 7) Bobby Ojeda, 109; 8) Oliver Perez, 91; 9) Johan Santana, 88; 10) Pete Falcone, 86; 11) Frank Viola, 82; 12) Jon Niese, 64 (one ahead of non-mainstay Glendon Rusch).
The rules state you can import your pitchers, so there’s nothing illegitimate about employing the Leiters, the Ojedas, even the Ollies if you have to. But should you have to to the exclusion of your own guys? Shouldn’t you have your own guys? Shouldn’t you be able to raise a lefty from scratch to take a hundred or more starts in your rotation every now and then after a half-century? By modern standards, that’s three seasons and change if you stay healthy. If Niese can avoid strains, tears and worse, you’d think he should pass that veritable milestone some time in 2013.
You’d think. But it’s obviously not that easy if you’re a starting pitcher who used your left hand to sign your first professional contract with the Mets. If that’s your story, let’s just say you’re going to be pretty disappointed if you were hoping to be a part of a large lefthanded complement.
Before Niese, the most oft-used post-Matlack homegrown lefty starter the Mets had was 6’ 5” Pete Schourek, who took the ball 47 times to varying degrees of success between 1991 and 1993. He was here and gone before reaching Niese’s current age, with Dallas Green giving up on him the first chance he got (as he tended to do with young players). Schourek landed in Cincinnati and enjoyed a sharp upturn in fortunes, finishing second in the 1995 Cy Young voting, thus giving credence to the old saying about not giving up on lefties too soon. Pete was never very good after that, but kept pitching in the majors for the Reds, the Astros, the Red Sox, the Pirates and the Red Sox again until 2001, giving credence to yet another old saying, that if you’re a lefthanded pitcher, somebody will take a chance on you.
Who rounds out the Homegrown Lefty Top Five behind Koosman, Matlack, Niese and Schourek? I could have given myself as many guesses as he had Met starts — 36 — and I’m fairly sure I wouldn’t have come up with Eric Hillman, a contemporary of Pete Schourek’s, both for era (1992-1994) and height (6’ 10”). Hillman was as tall and as lefthanded as Randy Johnson…and that’s where the comparison ended. Nevertheless, Eric parlayed his 4-14 Met tenure into three years in Japan, including one season playing for Bobby Valentine on the same Chiba Lotte Marines squad that included future Mets Julio Franco and Satoru Komiyama.
I wouldn’t have come up with Hillman, but he’s half the answer, tied for fifth in this category. I wouldn’t have come up with the other half, either: Tug McGraw, not much remembered as a starter, despite a few intensely memorable outings among the 36 Met appearances he made in a non-relief role between 1965 and 1974. From Tug doing what he wasn’t famous for, you have to drop down to the 20 starts made by Bill Pulsipher in three star-crossed stints (1995, 1998, 2000). From there, it’s 1994-1995 Met fizzler Jason Jacome, with 13 — starts, not minutes…unless you want to count Greg A. Harris, who was a righthander in 14 Met starts in 1981, yet was continually mentioned as ambidextrous, and much later in his career threw lefty and righty in one game just to say he did. Hisanori Takahashi started a dozen games with his left arm in 2010, and he hadn’t pitched for a major league team before the Mets, but he spent ten prior seasons with the Yomiuri Giants of Japan’s Central League, so he doesn’t count as a homegrown Met lefty starter any more than Harris or Fernandez. And we can’t in all good faith count Mr. Tie, Rob Gardner, who made 21 starts for the Mets in 1965 and 1966. He came to the majors as a Met, but was originally signed by the Twins, so there’s another non-decision we reluctantly shift to Rob’s record.
So that’s eight lefthanded pitchers — Koosman, Matlack, Niese, Schourek, Hillman, McGraw, Pulsipher, Jacome — who meet the seemingly not onerous criteria of signing with the Mets originally and making as many as ten starts with the team following their initial big league promotion. By any measure, only the first two of those names qualify as what you’d call long-term Met rotation stalwarts. Niese is an unfinished product and a not altogether known commodity, given that he’s had only 64 starts…yet in a sense, he’s the closest thing we’ve had to a Koosman or a Matlack since Koosman and Matlack.
Talk about a lefthanded compliment.
by Greg Prince on 16 January 2012 1:11 pm
My dad’s one of those people who scans the Paid Death Notices in the Times to see if anybody he knows has recently become somebody he knew. He was surprised to discover his cousin Harvey was among the listings two Sundays ago. He died at 81 on January 4…or to put it in terms Harvey would have appreciated, between the Giants beating the Cowboys to win the NFC East and the Giants beating the Falcons in the first round of the playoffs.
Here’s how Harvey’s listing memorialized him:
Loving husband, brother, father and grandfather. Internist, bibliophile, US Army veteran, lover of music and politics, unshakeable Yankees and Giants fan. He will be sadly missed.
I didn’t really know Harvey, save for two meetings from more than twenty years ago. As it happens, each of his unshakeables, if you will, made themselves readily apparent.
The first time was during the 1990 World Series when our Long Island branch of the family was invited up to Harvey headquarters in Westchester to break bread. Dad and Harvey had been close at some point, I was told. Then they weren’t. Then my mother died and folks were getting together again. Anyway, it was a lovely evening and a lovely dinner and all, and it led to the living room TV being turned on to catch the remaining innings of Game Three of what was turning into a shocking sweep of the A’s by the Reds. Everybody who drifted to the television declared temporary fealty to the Cincinnati cause. Harvey and his crew were all excited that good ol’ Lou Piniella was positioned to win a championship — Lou, Hal Morris, Jose Rijo, the GM Bob Quinn and anybody else who had some connection to the Yankees. Good ol’ Lou! He really deserves this!
Yeah — I added enthusiastically, elated that I was in a room of baseball fans — and Randy Myers! I’m a Mets fan, so I’m really happy for Randy Myers!
Except for Jack Buck and Tim McCarver doing the game on CBS, there was silence, save for the sound of Harvey & Co. staring at me like I had three heads.
Randy Myers…you know, the Mets closer who’s now one of the Nasty Boys. Yeah, I really liked Randy Myers. Sorry the Mets traded him.
Even Buck and McCarver were quiet now.
Yup…big Mets fan here. That’s me. Did I mention that?
Talk about a stranger in a strange land.
Just over a year later, the Harvey bunch was at my wedding, which took place on a Sunday afternoon in November, which is significant in that, well, it was a Sunday afternoon in November, and if you’re so inclined, that means one thing more than it means anything else. Knowing Harvey was a Giants season ticket holder and knowing the Giants were on the road to play the Cardinals meant I wasn’t at all surprised when Harvey sought me out shortly before four to let me know his party was gonna be getting going.
“Kickoff in Phoenix in ten minutes, huh?” I asked good-naturedly.
This time I got a look less like I was an alien and more like I’d found out his dirty little secret. Thing is I totally, totally, totally respected Harvey’s unstated reason for bolting my wedding. If the Giants hadn’t been having such a letdown of a season in 1991, I might have divined the location of the nearest television, my first hours of matrimony notwithstanding. I understand unshakeable fandom. I understand not wanting to miss a pitch, or in Harvey’s case, a down. The wedding of some vaguely familiar relative versus play-by-play on the car radio? I know which one I would have chosen if I’d been in his position that Sunday — and that’s with my wedding having been universally agreed upon by all who attended it as pretty darn delightful.
Thus Harvey fit the basics of one ilk of the classic New York sports stereotype: Westchester-Yankees-Giants. As evidenced during the 1990 World Series, we had little common ground on which to strike up a baseball conversation. But football would have been a different matter had we ever crossed paths again.
I’ve never quite hit the mark when it comes to locale-baseball-football around here. As a Long Island-bred Mets fan, I suppose I should have gravitated to the Jets as if by instinct, but the Giants — who didn’t train at Hofstra, didn’t (except for one orphaned season) play at Shea and didn’t rhyme with “Mets” — got to me first. They weren’t any good when they made themselves known to me in 1969, but they became my team in their sport, and I’m generally unshakeable about such affiliations. The Jets got to me eventually, and making room for them in my psyche proved an almost involuntary reflex, yet on my Permanent Record (namely the Sports Illustrated subscriber survey on which I had to pick an NFL team so I could receive bonus pages I rarely read and a 1995 highlight tape I never watched), I’m listed as leaning Giant.
When the Giants and Jets played in Week 16, I essentially rooted for plays to work. I couldn’t bring myself to pull for one team to succeed at the other’s expense. When it was over, I was thrilled that the Giants were going to have a golden opportunity to win their division (at the expense of the Cowboys, no less), yet I was genuinely sorry it pretty much screwed up whatever playoff chances the Jets had. My position on New York football teams, as formulated in the 1970s when neither was the slightest bit good, is the more each succeeds, the better it is for all of us. I figured my odds were improved with two local teams, even if the Steelers of that era would win more games in a year than the Jets and Giants combined.
I know many Mets-Giants fans, though probably more Mets-Jets fans. I also know Yankees-Jets fans, despite the prevalence of the Cousin Harvey stereotype. Doesn’t seem to matter what part of the Metropolitan Area you’re talking about these days when it comes to allegiance alignment. TV, radio and the Internet reach all five boroughs and all surrounding suburbs with pretty much the same speed. Also, it’s a free country, so Mets fans can do what they want with their non-baseball innings.
Me, I’m rooting for the Giants, which I’m not sure I expected to have the chance to be doing as January moved along. I’m thrilled they beat Green Bay. I’m happy they’re going to San Francisco with a trip to Indianapolis at stake. And I’ll be ecstatic when Pitchers & Catchers report and I only vaguely recall getting caught up in something that wasn’t the Mets.
by Jason Fry on 15 January 2012 6:06 pm

That’s Joshua’s Jose Reyes shirt, off to Goodwill, and if you’ll excuse me I need a minute. There seems to be something in my eye.
by Greg Prince on 13 January 2012 7:43 pm
 He could have been elected mayor at this moment.
If you didn’t make it to the ticker-tape parade the City of New York threw for its World Champion New York Mets in 1969, then by all means click right here for a delicious two-minute, forty-one second bite of it, courtesy of NYC Media. It’s part of a series called City Classics that combs the municipal archives for what would have to be characterized as Neat Stuff. For this episode (which I found on Channel 22 of my cable system), the fun starts at 1:10 and goes through 3:51. After that it gets kind of depressing.
 They really knew how to name streets in those days.
Highlights include generous scanning of the Met-crazed crowd; a few words from John Lindsay, who had been hitching his re-election wagon to the Mets for several months; and the only man from whom the City Hall crowd really wanted to hear, Gil Hodges, who would have been voted into office immediately for anything he liked had his name been on a ballot. Gil humbly introduces the players and coaches who followed his lead into glory.
 No. 1, eternally.
From there, we see the ticker-tape fall and the parade roll up the Canyon of Heroes. Everybody was very happy that autumn afternoon, including those of us who glimpsed it on TV in wonder as tykes. It still works as found footage. See how many Mets legends (and one villain) you can spot!
And if you’re not the type to forget ’69, then by all means visit Never Forget ’69, a fine blog whose updated URL belongs on your list of Mets bookmarks.
by Greg Prince on 12 January 2012 7:18 pm
Johan Santana is throwing from flat ground in St. Lucie and hopes to be ready for Opening Day. Adam Rubin has the story here, MetsBlog offers SNY video here.
Even with too many other signs pointing downward, and even as there are “no assurances” that the ace of the staff will be ready to face the Braves by April 5 (or that Johan will ever really be Johan again), geez it feels good to know on a Thursday night in January that Johan Santana was throwing from flat ground in St. Lucie earlier today.
Also good: Friend of FAFIF Sharon Chapman on the run once more for the Tug McGraw Foundation. Details on contributing to a worthy cause here.
|
|