The blog for Mets fans
who like to read

ABOUT US

Greg Prince and Jason Fry
Faith and Fear in Flushing made its debut on Feb. 16, 2005, the brainchild of two longtime friends and lifelong Met fans.

Greg Prince discovered the Mets when he was 6, during the magical summer of 1969. He is a Long Island-based writer, editor and communications consultant. Contact him here.

Jason Fry is a Brooklyn writer whose first memories include his mom leaping up and down cheering for Rusty Staub. Check out his other writing here.

Got something to say? Leave a comment, or email us at faithandfear@gmail.com. (Sorry, but we have no interest in ads, sponsored content or guest posts.)

Need our RSS feed? It's here.

Visit our Facebook page, or drop by the personal pages for Greg and Jason.

Or follow us on Twitter: Here's Greg, and here's Jason.

Edible Garbage

Ah, Garbage Time. Been a while.

(Theatrical sigh.)

Garbage Time is weird. Losing generally produces a dull ache instead of the sharp pain felt while you still dream of the postseason, but winning, weirdly, can be more fun. And I know why: When your team’s aiming at first place, or the wild card, or even just has a chance to pass the third-place team and then we’ll see, the joy of winning is followed all too swiftly by fretting about losing. What if we don’t win tomorrow? If only we’d won that game two days/a week/two months ago, we’d be a game closer! It’s great we’re in first, but it’s only 2.5 games — that could be gone in three lousy days!

A Garbage Time win means a lot less, but it comes with no such baggage. Your team won. You’re happy. The end.

Of course this game was weird anyway. I’ve fallen into the bizarre sleep habits that are a peril of being a freelance writer — on Tuesday night, for instance, I slept from about 10:30 at night until 2:30 in the morning, happily missing most of a horrid Mets game, worked through the dawn, collapsed around mid-morning and woke up groggily around noon. So a 6:35 p.m. start for a West Coast game was like being subjected to a dizzy-bat race, temporally speaking, even beyond Greg’s admonition that it’s always 3 a.m. in southern California. Wait, is it 10 at night again? Dinner time? 4 in the afternoon? What the hell time is it, and why is someone doing this to us?

That looked like what Dillon Gee was thinking after he was cuffed around in the first inning and stared in at Josh Thole with runners on second and third and one out. But Gee gathered himself and struck out Jesus Guzman, who plays against us like he’s the son of some baseball god, at least, and then got Orlando Hudson (who may be the friendliest man in baseball, judging from his greetings to any opponent in proximity and constant smiles) to ground out to escape dispiriting early harm. After that Gee was terrific, and lucky to boot — witness his third-inning behind-the-back grab of a hard grounder struck by Jason Bartlett. Ball in hand, Gee whirled and fired to second, and I had nightmare visions of Angel Pagan corralling the ball (or forgetting to do so), followed a few hours later by Terry Collins sounding exasperated as he said philosophical things. But no, Gee’s timing was perfect: Ruben Tejada arrived just as Gee’s throw did, for a very nice double play that made you think this just might be our day after all.

And why not? After all, David Wright had somehow pounded a three-run homer despite having to stare out at a pretty fair pitcher in Mat Latos while being mired in Mordorian shadows. (Lucas Duda would later try the same thing, only to be denied by the enormous, often awkward-looking Kyle Blanks. Essentially, Duda flied out to himself.) And then, the capper in the fourth: Wright speared Logan Forsythe’s apparent double, sprawling across the foul line, faked the throw to first and then darted to third, where he tagged out a disbelieving and one presumes deeply chagrined Cameron Maybin. (As Gary and Ron noted on the replay, Wright faked out San Diego third-base coach Glenn Hoffman, too.) Wright trotted off the field looking quietly pleased with himself, in possession of not only the third out but also Maybin’s lunch money, light-up yo-yo and the four-leaf clover he’d found in recess and pressed in a dictionary.

After that, there was the welcome, somewhat surprising sight of Manny Acosta preventing disaster in the seventh and the unwelcome, not particularly surprising sight of Ryota Igarashi doing his best to screw up the ninth. Fortunately, by then the Mets’ margin for error was unscrewupable — which was exactly the kind of game they and we could have used right about now, whatever the heck time that was.

Fewer 6-1 Losses, Please

Usually when the Mets visit the Padres, even if it’s a good game — even if it’s a day game — it feels like it’s taking place at three in the morning. The Padres are the official team of the wee, small hours, no matter what the little and big hands say. Tuesday night’s game flew by at a brisk 2:31 yet it still dragged interminably.

That, though, had as much to do with the Mets losing 6-1 as it did San Diego’s insistence on being in San Diego. The wrong end of a 6-1 score leaves you with about as lame a loss as a team that’s out of it in the second half of August can muster, particularly when it’s against another team that’s out of it in the second half of August.

6-1 is not close enough to offer you glimpses of false hope or rout enough to allow you to write it off as just one of those things. You — our team — may have thrown yourself into every minute of that 2:31, but the numbers suggest you asked somebody to punch in for you.

6-1 means you’re stuck in second place in a two-team race for nine innings, just as you’re stuck being in some other place than one that’s vital to a playoff race once the game is over. You’re not going to win, you are going to lose, it’s not going to substantially matter either way.

But you still wish your team could have put up a better fight.

Faced with the intrinsically discouraging 6-1 portion of the schedule from here until the final series of the season (which is when we’ll suddenly realize how much we’re going to miss our team when it’s gone, thus every out will seem precious), we look for signs that somebody’s doing the right thing in terms of playing time. We want to glean that there is meaning to be had and experience to be gained. We want to believe the kid who didn’t get a long enough look from April until now is going to be allowed to use these barren weeks to plant a seed for the future. We want to believe our manager will wisely deploy his limited resources and cultivate a harvest for next year.

We want to win some games in the interim while we’re at it, but in the abstract we say that’s not our bottom line. We want a future to take root, even though we’ve been warned diligently all our lives not to read too much into what transpires in the Septembers of our years.

Should Terry Collins do whatever it takes to win any given game among the final forty? Hells yes. There is an indelible result to every baseball game at this level and it’s important enough for Tim Kurkjian to want to paste in a notebook (whether he physically does so or not anymore). These aren’t simulated games and this isn’t the Florida Instructional or Arizona Fall league. When somebody decides to refund me my ticket price or a portion of my cable bill, then the Mets have my blessing, paraphrasing Apu from The Simpsons in his Nye Mets phase, to take a relaxed attitude toward winning.

But that’s not the same as endorsing fealty to whatever hasn’t worked or isn’t working, and it’s certainly not a blanket endorsement of reflexively playing veterans over rookies…or rookies over veterans. Unless you’re committed to a Logan’s Run lineup in 2012, one assumes almost everybody on your active roster is vying for a place on the next Mets team. Thus, if one theoretical night out of forty Terry wants to see what Scott Hairston can do at second base, I won’t squawk; Scott Hairston is all of 31 years old, and if you could figure out a way to make him a touch more valuable in 2012 — like by keeping him the fudge out of right field — it might be worth considering bringing him back.

Or if the Mets are facing a lefty pitcher Ronny Paulino absolutely scalds (like Chris Capuano, against whom he’s 6-for-17…d’oh!), I can live with veteran Paulino getting a start in September even though I’d like to see Josh Thole learn to hang in there against lefties. You don’t have to display mindless adherence to The Percentages — absolutely give Thole some of those southpaw assignments — but by the same token you’d be a little derelict in your duties to not take advantage of your clearest opportunity to win.

Of course if you’re helming a team that’s well out of it by now, you don’t know what your clearest opportunities to win are, so by all means experiment. Throw Mike Pelfrey in relief as you did last night. That was a small joy to behold, and not just because it meant our exposure to Big Pelf would by definition be brief. Let’s get an idea about flexibility versus roles. Each of our five starters has tossed a bit of relief this season and pending late word that Pelf slipped on his ice in the clubhouse, no starter has suffered for relieving.

Whether it’s situational or out of curiosity, there’s nothing necessarily wrong with an inning here or there out of the bullpen for a starter. It used to take place routinely in baseball’s dark ages, before Tony La Russa enlightened us all and invented niches. And if you can figure out, without wrecking him prematurely, a way to let Pedro Beato start between now and September 28, go for it. Terry’s already talking about him trying it in winter ball. Do it in summer ball if you’re confident you can stretch him for five innings. Or truncate him for a ninth inning, even a third of a ninth inning — say the last third.

Save opportunities should be as up for grabs as anything — though if Jason Isringhausen has some fantastic, not necessarily ancient matchup history in his favor against a particular batter due up (the Braves’ Alex Gonzalez vs. Izzy: 1-for-11), let’s not blindly insist we must leave it to Beato or Parnell or whoever isn’t Isringhausen. We still want to get the wins that are within our grasp and we should use the tools that turn grasps into grips. But just your garden-variety save? All we are saying is give Pelf a chance…though Pedro or Bobby or Not Igarashi would probably be a better bet in that spot.

Mix and match. Use your judgment. Win as much as you can while not being afraid of the opposite fate. Anything should go, considering everything that’s come before hasn’t gotten us terribly far.

And keep the 6-1 losses to a minimum as best you can. Thanks.

The Happiest Recap: 115-117

Welcome to The Happiest Recap, a solid gold slate of New York Mets games culled from every schedule the Mets have ever played en route to this, their fiftieth year in baseball. We’ve created a dream season that includes the “best” 115th game in any Mets season, the “best” 116th game in any Mets season, the “best” 117th game in any Mets season…and we keep going from there until we have a completed schedule worthy of Bob Murphy coming back with the Happy Recap after this word from our sponsor on the WFAN Mets Radio Network.

GAME 115: August 12, 2000 — METS 3 Giants 2
(Mets All-Time Game 115 Record: 19-29; Mets 2000 Record: 68-47)

Benny Agbayani had given Mets fans so much since bursting onto the Shea scene in 1999. He’d given them hot streaks, clutch hits, even a wakeup call from Japan. He’d given them plenty

So what was one more item to the generous Hawaiian?

This Saturday night at Shea had started as a good night in the midst of a good month. Since returning from their traditional series of beatings at Turner Field in mid-July, the Mets had won 14 of 17, including their last three. Mike Hampton was keeping the Mets on their winning path, shutting out the Giants for the first three innings, long enough for Mike Bordick to pop his third home run since becoming a Met in a deadline deal two weeks earlier. All was well until in the fourth, when Jeff Kent doubled to lead off and Bordick’s bad throw allowed Ellis Burks to reach. A fielder’s choice grounder by Rich Aurilia moved each runner up a base, and Hampton filled the sacks when he hit J.T. Snow.

It was a bit of a jam for the lefty, but it could have been a lot worse had he not flied Met-killer Bobby Estalella to left field. It was a sacrifice fly, which would tie the game, but it was only one run and there was still plenty of game left..

But you know there wasn’t? A third out. The scoreboard knew it. The vast majority of 50,064 on hand knew it. The Giants knew it. Twenty-four of the Mets knew it.

The one Met who was caught unaware of the number of outs also happened to be the Met who caught Estalella’s fly for the second out. That was Mr. Agbayani, the Benny who never stopped to think before giving of himself.

The same Mr. Agbayani who never stopped to think before giving the ball to a fan in the stands…which you can’t do with two out and runners on base, because it allows the runners to advance two bases. Benny’s random act of kindness — he handed the ball to a seven-year-old kid sitting down the left field line — was functionally no different from overthrowing the cutoff man and landing the ball deep in Loge.

Kent had already scored on the fly. Now Burks was waved home from second and Snow was awarded third.

And the kid who thought he had been blessed by a good-hearted left fielder? Jake Burns of Bronxville was in for a surprise, because as suddenly as Benny handed him the horsehide, Agbayani — realizing the literal error of his ways — raced to the railing and poached it right back.

So Benny, in a blink, had committed an E-7; was directly responsible for a run; wore pineapple-sized egg on his face; and had acted as what seven-year-olds in less linguistically sensitive times would have called an Indian giver. (Though later in the game, Benny made sure a Met ballboy brought the boy a replacement for what he was compelled to repossess.)

“I looked at the scoreboard and I guess I saw the strike count instead of the outs,” was Benny’s explanation. In case he looked at the run count, the Giants now had more than the Mets.

Benny Agbayani was not having a very good top of the fourth. Or bottom of the fifth, for that matter; he struck out with the bases loaded to end that frame. But teammates pick teammates up. Hampton struck out Shawn Estes to end the San Francisco fourth, and Todd Zeile doubled home two runs in the seventh to give the Mets a 3-2 win that took the edge off Agbayani’s embarrassment. And on another Saturday night, less than two months later, Benny would bat against the Giants with the score tied in extra innings and all would be forgiven. Once he beat Aaron Fultz with a home run in Game Three of the 2000 NLDS, Benny’s Boner became just another delightful chapter in one of the Mets’ most lovable legends.

As for young Jake’s cameo in The Benny Agbayani Story, the seven-year-old, who at the moment the left fielder plucked the ball from his hand appeared stunned, was philosophical afterwards:

“It was weird.”

ALSO QUITE HAPPY: On August 13, 2010, the best story the Mets had come up with in years came close to rewriting franchise lore — and no one was better suited to find the words to describe nearly the first no-hitter in New York Mets history than R.A. Dickey.

The knuckleballer who emerged from as close to nowhere as any 35-year-old veteran could surprised Mets fans with both his pitching and his postgame quotes. A more eloquent player no one could recall. And a better knuckler the Mets had never seen coming from one of their own. Dickey was on top of his game this Friday night at Citi Field, dueling Cole Hamels 0-0 through five.

The Mets’ best chance to score was done in by the same video review system that had treated the Mets well in the recent past. Journeyman first baseman Mike Hessman, a lumbering slugger with more minor league home runs than anybody active, made a bid for his second big league blast of the year and seemed to have it in the bottom of the fifth. But after calling his high fly to the top of the enormous left field wall a home run, the umpires conferred and re-ruled Hessman’s shot a triple — an extra base hit that Mike was not running nearly hard enough to attain. The decision to split the baby, as it were, didn’t help the Mets, as Hessman remained stranded on third (and Hessman stayed stuck for the rest of his brief Met career on 1 HR, a minimally powerful distinction he shares with an eclectic group of Met position players that includes Jimmy Piersall, Rod Gaspar, Tim Foli, Frank Taveras, Tom Paciorek, Brett Butler and Alex Cora).

The dramatic focus returned to Dickey who was making the most of it after five-and-a-third innings. He had allowed only one Phillie to reach bases, and that was via a walk to ex-Met Wilson Valdez. Thus, R.A. was nearing no-hitter territory — or no-hitter watch territory, a space some Mets fans approach as soon as the other team’s leadoff hitter is retired. As inevitably happens to Met hurlers, Dickey did not reach the unreachable star. As had happened three times before in Met one-hitters, it was the opposing pitcher who broke up the no-hit attempt. Hamels was the batter who besmirched R.A. bottom line with a one-out single to right in the fifth. Had Jeff Francoeur been playing a little more shallow, he might have had a chance to nail Cole  at first…and the names of successful hitting pitchers Chin Hui-Tsao, John Curtis and pre-Met Ray Sadecki could have remained in trivial mothballs.

But “if” is a word attached to many a would-be Met no-hitter.

Jimmy Rollins forced Hamels at second and no other Phillie got on all night. In the sixth, David Wright and Carlos Beltran paired doubles and gave Dickey all the offense he would need. When he flied Placido Polanco to right in the ninth, Dickey could claim the 35th one-hitter in Mets history, 1-0, one that saw Hamels valiantly go the distance, too, albeit in a losing cause.

All that was left after the 2:09 masterpiece was for the master craftsman to put his work in perspective:

“There’s definitely no woulda-shoulda. There’s, ‘Aw shucks, I wish that wouldn’t have happened.’ That’s probably the most satisfying thing about this night for me is that there’s no regret. I had an outing without regret, and you rarely can say that about an outing. There’s always one pitch that you didn’t execute right, or a sinker you didn’t get or a ball you left over the plate that got raked in the gap. There’s always a regret. This game is about how to handle regret, it really is. Tonight, man, I could have pitched into the wee hours.”

Imagine what he might have said had Francoeur thrown out Hamels.

GAME 116: August 14, 1979 — Mets 18 BRAVES 5
(Mets All-Time Game 116 Record: 18-30; Mets 1979 Record: 49-66)

It was a good night to be Lee Mazzilli. It wasn’t much of a night to be Dock Ellis. It wasn’t much of year to be the New York Mets, but then what does it say about the kind of evening the Atlanta Braves were enduring when their opposite numbers in the National League’s other cellar hung so many crooked numbers on them?

When the Atlanta Rhythm Section sang in the 1970s that “babies squawled as August crawled” and that “the dog days were scorchers — Southern torture” they may very well have had Fulton County Stadium in mind, particularly days that ended with two basement cousins, the sixth-place Braves and the sixth-place Mets, duking it out before 5,770 souls for whom a nice cool movie theater apparently wasn’t appealing. These were the dog days when Atlanta and New York combined to sit 41 games out of their respective firsts and when managers Bobby Cox and Joe Torre were not yet geniuses, just apprentices learning their craft in the least appealing jobs imaginable.

Torre’s job was more appealing than Cox’s on this Tuesday night. Mazzilli as much as any Met saw to that. Lee had been the best part of 1979 for every Mets fan, from his sizzling start (leading the league with a .462 average two weeks into the season) to his All-Star turn (a game-tying pinch-homer in the eighth, a game-winning RBI walk in the ninth — off Yankee Ron Guidry, no less) to his pinup style, form and good looks (inspiring the Mets to hold Lee Mazzilli Poster Day for which their glamorous centerfielder posed capless). The Mets didn’t cause much of a stir in ’79, but Mazz sparkled, no matter how big or small the stage, no matter how packed or empty the house.

He did it at Shea, where the Mets drew only 788,905 all season, so Fulton County (769,465) was no empty challenge in that regard.

In the first inning, in front of whoever cared to watch, Mazzilli struck a two-run homer to stake Ellis to an early 2-0 lead.

In the second, after a three-run double from Alex Treviño extended the Mets’ margin to 5-0, Mazz’s  fielder’s choice grounder to first baseman Dale Murphy became an E-3 and led to Treviño scoring. And two batters later, when Ed Kranepool doubled, Mazzilli came around to make it 7-0.

Ellis gave up two solo homers in the Brave second, but the Mets got the runs back, with Lee playing part yet again: he had walked behind Frank Taveras (double) and Treviño single) and all three scored when right fielder Gary Matthews couldn’t deal cleanly with Richie Hebner’s single.

The Braves were down 10-2 in the middle of the third, and it should’ve been easy cruising from there for Ellis, acquired from Texas in mid-June for Mike Bruhert and Bob Myrick. But it wasn’t Dock’s night. He gave up a three-run homer to Bob Horner, cutting the Mets’ lead to 10-5 with two outs. After Murphy reached on Doug Flynn’s error, Torre was sufficiently unnerved and removed Ellis (in what turned out to be the final season of a twelve-year career) in favor of Andy Hassler, the other veteran pitcher the last-place club imported at the trading deadline. Hassler got out of the inning with no further Braves scoring.

But the Mets weren’t done. They put up two in the fourth without Mazzilli’s help, then another one in the fifth that Mazzilli made possible by tripling and scoring on Jose Cardenal’s single. The Mets led 13-5 after five and had tallied in every inning so far. Finally, they slowed down for a couple of innings, but took an emphatic curtain call in the eighth by scoring five more times. The last of the Met runs that crossed home plate — accounting for the 18-5 final — was carried by a young man from Brooklyn in an unusually tight gray polyester uniform.

By then, home plate was as familiar as the old neighborhood in Sheepshead Bay. Mazzilli scored five runs, tying the team record set a year earlier, also against Atlanta, by Lenny Randle. The 18 runs, meanwhile, represented the third-most ever scored by the Mets in one game to that point, and the most since they put 20 on the board in the same stadium versus the same team eight years earlier.

The Mets sure had some big nights against the Atlanta Braves in the 1970s. What a pity they couldn’t lure them into the same division and play them more often.

Or maybe not.

ALSO QUITE HAPPY: On August 14, 1993, the Mets weren’t going anywhere as a team — unless you count “down” — so youngsters with a pulse and some promise were welcome to make an impression. One Met with a long tenure ahead of him was granted his first opportunity to impress, while another Met who was just getting the hang of his craft inadvertently chose this Saturday night in Philadelphia to peak.

Different directions awaited starting pitcher Bobby Jones and starting shortstop Tim Bogar. Jones was being injected into the Mets’ rotation along with some high hopes. The 23-year-old righty was chosen in the supplemental phase of the first round of the 1991 amateur draft, compensation for losing Darryl Strawberry the offseason before. If that wasn’t pedigree pressure enough, Jones hailed from the city of Fresno, Calif., known by every sentient Mets fan as the hometown of one George Thomas Seaver.

Compensate for Darryl? Pitch like Tom? It was a lot to ask right out of the box, but Bobby showed he had something on the ball, going six in his first outing and surrendering only one earned run…though five in toto, thanks to miscues by Jeromy Burnitz in right and Bobby Bonilla (two) at third. But Bogar, a rookie infielder being given every chance to win the starting shortstop job, provided Jones with plenty of margin for Met errors by punching a pair of doubles, a three-run homer and, to top it off, an inside-the-park home run to account for the final run of a rare 9-5 Mets win.

Unfortunately, Bogar’s punctuation came back to put a period on the end of his 1993 season. By sliding into home headfirst, he tore ligaments in his left hand and was out for the rest of the year. While Jones became a Met pitching mainstay through 2000, Bogar was relegated to the bench when he returned in 1994 and spent the following three seasons pulling fill-in duty until he was traded to Milwaukee for Luis Lopez.

GAME 117: August 17, 1969 (2nd) — METS 3 Padres 2
(Mets All-Time Game 117 Record: 15-33; Mets 1969 Record: 66-51)

Some 84 miles north of Flushing, 3 Days of Peace & Music had been promised. At Shea Stadium, the draw was 4 Games of Pitching & Triumph. Both festivals delivered memorably.

The big story in New York this third weekend in August was taking place on Max Yasgur’s farm in upstate Bethel: the Woodstock Music and Art Fair, arguably the most extraordinary pop culture event ever staged. It began on Friday night and wound through mud, storm and traffic to Monday morning. By Sunday afternoon, 400,000 would be Age-of-Aquarians were encamped to listen to, among others, Joe Cocker, Country Joe and the Fish, Ten Years After and the Band.

Down in Flushing, the performers of note were Tom Seaver, Jim McAndrew, Jerry Koosman and Don Cardwell, and they were on the brink of creating a legend that, like Woodstock’s, would extend well into the 21st century. Just as there was nothing like Woodstock before Woodstock, the 1969 Mets as they were about to be understood were truly taking shape at the very same time.

The Mets of 1969 were already the best Mets team ever but by the middle of August, few were the hints that they were destined for transcendence. Since jarring the Cubs by taking four of six in two July series, the Mets had gone a very mortal 11-14, including six losses in six tries against Houston. Their young pitchers’ arms ached, their heads-up play diminished (as evidenced by Gil Hodges’s removal of Cleon Jones for not hustling after a ball in left field against the Astros) and their distance from first place lengthened. Heading into Woodstock weekend, the Mets had slipped into third place behind St. Louis and trailed Chicago by a daunting margin of 9½ games. On top of it all, the same rains that softened the ground at Yasgur’s Farm forced a postponement of the Mets’ Friday night opener versus the Padres. Thus, while the music played upstate (and the festival grew so memorably festive), the Mets would have to get in tune with back-to-back doubleheaders.

The concert got underway with more than a few hitches, but it fast took on a life of its own. The local Times Herald-Record headlined the affair a buffet of FREEDOM, POT, SKINNY-DIPPING, and that was after only the first night. As word from Woodstock reached the five boroughs, the tarp was being rolled up at Shea for Saturday’s twinbill. While Country Joe fired up the masses in Bethel, the Mets were fixin’ to sweep San Diego. Seaver fired a four-hit shutout in the opener, McAndrew and Tug McGraw combined on a four-hitter in the nightcap. The Mets won 2-0 and 2-1.

Sunday, while everybody at Woodstock was recovering from the Grateful Dead, Creedence Clearwater Revival, Janis Joplin, Sly & the Family Stone, the Who, the Jefferson Airplane all in a row — not to mention everything else (HIPPIES MIRED IN A SEA OF MUD, the Daily News blared) — the team that played a few IRT stops from Woodside prepared for their second consecutive doubleheader. Even better at this moment of unprecedented enthusiasm for free expression, it was Banner Day. After the opener, won 3-2 on a Jerry Koosman five-hitter, bedsheets unfurled in Flushing, a good 3,612 of them. The winning entry celebrated “One Small Step for Hodges, One Giant Leap for Met-kind,” reminding the 35,711 who skipped Woodstock that there was plenty going on among all worlds that summer.

The Mets, no squares, trotted out after the last of the fan banners breezed by with their annual placards of appreciation, spelling out for the fans that “You Turn Us On!”

So as not to disappoint those grooving on the Mets, the Amazins served notice they would not be dropping out of the pennant race anytime soon. Thirty-three year-old Don Cardwell, clearly not of the peace & love generation (he once grabbed Ron Swoboda’s love beads on a team flight and stuffed them in the trash; talk about a bad trip), spread good vibes nonetheless, giving up no runs while scattering eight hits over seven innings to hang tough in a scoreless duel with Clay Kirby. Cardwell finally received a little help from his friends once Buddy Harrelson tripled in two runs in the bottom of the seventh, and J.C. Martin, pinch-hitting for the pitcher, tacked on a sac fly. Though the Padres would manage a pair of runs off Cal Koonce and Ron Taylor, the Mets hung on to sweep their second doubleheader in two days with another 3-2 win, Cardwell’s first since the Fourth of July.

If it wasn’t exactly the “breakfast in bed for 400,000” Wavy Gravy and his Please Force were passing around, it was revelation enough for the crowd in Queens to chew on. The Mets who had stumbled through late July and early August were straightening up and about to fly right. By the time Jimi Hendrix was reinventing “The Star-Spangled Banner” early Monday morning in Bethel, the Mets had taken themselves higher in the N.L. East, flying over the Cardinals and edging to within eight games of the Cubs. Soon enough, they’d put the weight of a full-blown pennant race on Chicago — that four-game winning streak mounted at the expense of the Padres was on the verge of becoming a movement of Woodstock Nation proportions, at least in the standings.

And soon enough after that, an AP story would be written that described a pennant-clinching scene 84 miles south of Bethel:

Several hundred youngsters clustered in front of the Met dugout shouting “We’re No. 1” and gesturing with their fists in the air. A special corps of policemen kept the frantic fans out of the dugout as torn paper spewed down from the stands and a mini “Woodstock Pop Festival” set in on the infield.

Or as the Who put it between those doubleheader sweeps, “On the amazing journey, together you’ll ride.”

ALSO QUITE HAPPY: On August 20, 1985, a 20-year-old pitcher on the verge of his 20th win turned back the clock. Dwight Gooden was winning game after game, retiring batter after batter, yet the unbeatable Doctor K didn’t seem to be inspiring quite as many K’s to be hung from Shea Stadium’s K Korner as he was when he was a rookie just the year before. In 1984, Doc struck out 10 or more opponents at Shea on nine different occasions. Yet “only” three times to date in the 1985 season had the Doctor reached double-digits in strikeouts at home, the most coming when he fanned 13 Phillies in May. There was nothing wrong with him getting to 18-3 in slightly less spectacular fashion than expected — and it was all right that he saved some of his more prodigious strikeout nights for the road — but wouldn’t it be nice if the Doc of ’85 could strike ’em out at Shea the way he struck ’em out at Shea in ’84?

For one Tuesday night, the Doctor kept the K Korner very busy. Beginning with the final out of the top of the first — Joel Youngblood — and running through the second out of the top of the seventh — Ron Roenicke — Gooden was on a potential record pace. He had accumulated 14 strikeouts with seven outs to go. The 31,758 who gathered at Shea could sense history in the making. They knew Tom Seaver shared the all-time record for most K’s in a nine-inning game with 19. If they were going to allow anybody to break it, Gooden would be the one.

How much did they want the kid to get the record? So much so that when Dan Gladden sent a routine pop fly wide of first, not a few booed when Keith Hernandez opted to catch it instead of dropping it to allow the at-bat to continue. Mex’s insistence on fielding his position cost Doc a strikeout — what nerve!

If the Doctor was disappointed, he hid it well, shutting down the Giants the rest of the way for a 3-0 victory while settling for a “mere” 16 strikeouts. He was now one win shy of twenty and presenting convincing evidence that if he felt like it, he could challenge a big-time record anytime he wanted.

Nobody would have guessed as his 1985 kept elevating into a season like no other that Dwight Gooden would never strike out as many as 16 in one game again.

Izzy, Nimmo and What Happens In Between

If you spent the night renewing your membership in the Diehards’ Club by watching the Mets play extra innings against the Padres, you not only got to see a Mets win — you got ample opportunity to reflect on the team’s past, its future and (oh yeah) it’s glass-half-something present.

The accolades and the happy sentiment go to Jason Isringhausen for his 300th save, and fittingly so. As Mets productions generally are, it was a nail-biting affair: Izzy put runners on first and second after collecting the first out, the second out moved the winning run into scoring position as Ruben Tejada opted for the safe play at first rather than the dicier one at second (I thought that was wise — Tejada would had to flip the ball across his body with his momentum going the wrong way), and then Logan Forsythe cracked a liner at Tejada that he bobbled a Izzy aged visibly, Joe Boyd-style. Happily, Tejada bobbled it right in front of him, Tejada snatched up the ball and fired it to Lucas Duda for the win and the milestone.

I’ve waxed rhapsodic about Izzy before, but his story’s good enough for an extra round of appreciation. In 1995, a 22-year-old Isringhausen went 9-2 with a 2.81 ERA. If I’d told you after that he’d collect a grand total of 39 more wins by mid-August 2011, you’d have concluded that something was going to go badly wrong, and you’d have been correct. (And if I’d told you that Paul Wilson and Bill Pulsipher would collect 53 big-league wins between them … oh, let’s not.) Yet there was a Plan B — Izzy found himself as a closer for the A’s and Cardinals, though his 2006 injury did bring us Adam Wainwright. As he high-fived teammates tonight, you could see the purple C of the scar on the inside of the elbow: The kid who once hurt himself falling off motel balconies somehow found a way to persevere through not one but two Tommy John surgeries.  Izzy looked like a long shot to even make the team in St. Lucie, let alone become its closer, but both things happened. It’s been wonderful to sit and cheer for the kind of story few prodigal sons get to write.

As for the Mets’ future, Brandon Nimmo signed on just before midnight for a cool $2.1 million. What does this mean? Ask us in 2014. I don’t know if Nimmo will have his number retired, raise our hopes for a few fitful years, or never make the bigs — there are too many Ryan Jaroncyks, Geoff Goetzes and Kirk Presleys in our history for any of us to assume anything close to the best. Honestly, at this point the dollar figure is the more hopeful sign — it’s over slot, as were the terms of a number of deals the Mets struck with their draftees, including $650,000 for 15th-round pick Phil Evans. After years of abiding by Bud Selig’s ludicrous slotting guidelines, making short-sighted, skinflint moves like the Billy Wagner salary dump and generally behaving like the Pirates East (except the Pirates outspent them), the Mets have finally approached a draft without unilaterally disarming themselves first.

As for the present, it was a scratch-and-claw affair, marked by some remarkably good Padres defense from Will Venable and Aaron Cunningham and Alberto Gonzalez and some typically Metsian bad luck, as Duda’s seventh-inning smash up the middle hit umpire Todd Tichenor, forcing David Wright to stay put. Fortunately, Duda had other at-bats, most notably the ball he utterly demolished in the second inning — Duda hit it so hard you could barely see it off the bat, and I half-imagined the fans 435 feet away would wind up showered by fragments of yarn and horsehide. Duda looks like he did last September, which is a good sign — as is Josh Thole turning in better at-bats and being rewarded with hits. Then there’s Terry Collins. Come garbage time last year, the Mets were too often a collection of the walking dead — those who possessed the ineffable quality of Veteran Leadership (TM) got at-bats while the kids sat on the bench and no one in the useless, rudderless front office told Jerry Manuel to put the club’s future ahead of his own. It’s garbage time again, but Collins knows Duda’s future lies in right field, and that he has to have time there. Just as he knows that Izzy reaching 305 or 306 saves is nowhere near as important as Bobby Parnell reaching 5 or 6.

The Mets’ past is worth celebrating, and their present is more fun than we would have thought. Now it’s time to work on their future.

* * *

Please consider a contribution to the Dana Brand Memorial Scholarship Fund, in memory of our blogging colleague and friend.

Dana Brand Memorial Scholarship Fund

Joseph Fichtelberg, chairman of the English department at Hofstra University, has notified us of the establishment of a scholarship fund that honors the memory of the great Mets fan, blogger, author and friend Dana Brand:

***

It was less than three months ago that Dana Brand was taken from us. I worked with Dana for twenty years — a significant portion of his life — at Hofstra University, where Dana was a professor of English. I admired his wit, his humanity, his generosity, his optimism, his wisdom, his honesty, his passion for life. Anyone who read Dana’s books or his blog knows what I mean.

Last April, on his fiftieth Opening Day, Dana recalled listening to his first on a radio in his room. “In my mind, I often go back to that room and feel the skin of the radio, the smell of my mitt, and hear the voices…when I was seven, I had no concrete sense that there could even be such a thing as fifty years. I knew there had been cavemen and dinosaurs. I knew my parents were in their thirties, and my grandparents were in their sixties. That is all I knew about time.”

At Hofstra, we would like to keep Dana’s memory alive. We have established the Dana Brand Memorial Scholarship Fund in his honor, and we would be grateful for your contribution.

You can contribute in two ways — by check or online. Please send checks to

Meredith Celentano
Assistant Vice President for Development
102Q Hofstra Hall
Hempstead, NY 11549.

You may send online contributions to www.hofstra.edu/giving. Under “Gift Designation,” please specify the Dana Brand Memorial Scholarship Fund.

At the time of his death, Dana was organizing another Fiftieth Anniversary event — a Hofstra conference on the history of the Mets. That conference, to be held a little after Opening Day next April, will be dedicated to Dana and to the rich life he left us.

***

If you have further questions, please contact us via e-mail: faithandfear@gmail.com.

Also, Mets Brand, a collection of blogger remembrances of Dana Brand, is available as an e-book and paperback. Any proceeds from the sale of this title will be contributed to Pitch In For A Good Cause, an organization Dana supported enthusiastically.

Jason Bay: Prophet Without Honor

The Mets have lost five in a row, ten of thirteen. Those are trends we haven’t seen since the atrociousness of April. There was no sign the Mets would snap out of it then, but they did. There’s no sign the Mets will snap out of it now, and, given that no return date is set for Jose Reyes, they might not. But while I’m still gullible enough to believe the Mets aren’t, at heart, a 5-13 or 3-10 outfit, the players doing the losing should use this opportunity to lie to me, if only to get me through the black hole that is inevitably the San Diego series.

It doesn’t have to be a full-out prevarication in the realm of “we’re still in this thing” or “we’re not out of this thing yet.” Just a little something along the lines of “we go out there every day thinking we’re going to win and we try our best.” Say it with enough conviction — and back it up with an occasional win — and I’ll watch Petco After Dark much less forebodingly.

You want a player quote to rile you up? Never mind Pelf’s “unrealistic” comment. Try what Jason Bay said prior to the Diamondbacks series:

“This is a dangerous road trip. Given where we’re at in the season, it could be a defining moment.”

The beauty part, according to Andrew Keh of the Times, is this doomsaying occurred to Bay as the three-game sweep was just getting underway, before Arizona had won any of the three games they were about to win. It’s like Jason visualized the result and made it so.

Now only if he could will baseballs off his bat and over fences more often than a week here and a week there.

It’s not what the Mets say that’s killing them. It’s the myriad things they don’t do. I could catalogue them beyond “win,” but Jason Bay’s rah-rah “yup, we’re sure in trouble now” pep talk already has me rooting against the sunrise. It’s darkest before the dawn, you know — especially when Jason Bay is “standing in the outfield” realizing “the Mets could very well be experiencing the beginning of the end.”

That’s Keh’s paraphrasing, by the way, and it’s the most damning Met passage I’ve read in the Times in a while, recent inane peripheral taunts included. I’m not surprised Bay said it, though. He’s keen on admitting when things aren’t going well, or when he assumes they’re not going to get much better, like when he was asked about a long fly ball he hit that appeared headed for or perhaps over Citi Field’s unforgiving left field wall yet landed short of both. His response:

“You get used to it.”

Per Thomas McKean in 1776, surely we have managed to promote the gloomiest man on this continent to the middle of our lineup. Those quotes are the most deprrrressing accumulation of disaster, doom and despair in the entire annals of Metropolitan history.

To be clear, McKean was talking about General Washington’s letters from the front to the Continental Congress, but the conclusion the Delaware Scotsman reached regarding Washington matches mine where our British Columbian is concerned — Jason Bay would depress a hyena.

This may seem like random Baygoating, except during Sunday’s loss, Gary Cohen and Ron Darling were speculating on who from the current roster are shoo-ins to be here in 2012. Gary came up with only three names (to which Ron agreed in that way Ron has of agreeing with everything): David Wright, Jon Niese and the $66 Million Man, whose presence for next year seems guaranteed not by his recent hot streak having lifted his season’s slash lines to a rousing .248/.330/.363 but by his contract delivering unto him another 32 extra-large.

Good luck pawning what’s left of that deal off on the Brewers or Giants.

For the scratch involved, I’m well past demanding offensive value in kind. I’m just asking Bay pretend to seem upbeat about the next 42 games. Try, “This is a dangerous road trip FOR THE TEAMS WE’RE PLAYING. Given where we’re at in the season, this could be a defining moment OF VICTORY!”

Lie to me, Jason Bay. What’s the harm? You’re already accepting superstar sums of money under false pretenses.

The Pelf Thing

I can see why it’s a big deal that Mike Pelfrey spoke his mind. It reveals that he has one. Watching him on the mound for six seasons, particularly when things begin to go a little haywire, I wouldn’t have sworn under oath that he had a noodle to use.

Other than that, I don’t quite get why what Big Pelf said to the always reliable New York Post passed for inflammatory. Perhaps it’s a sign of the age we live in that stone-cold conformity is so valued that if anyone gets the slightest bit out of line, it’s “heavens to Betsy!” time. Or conversely — and more encouraging from our own parochial standpoint — perhaps the Mets have been such gung-ho adherents of Terry Collins’s Norman Vincent Peale-esque positive thinking that even mild apostasy sticks out like a, well, Big Pelf.

What’d he say, again? This, per Mike Puma:

“It’s unrealistic for anybody at the end of last year to come in and say, ‘The Mets, this is a one-year thing, next year we’re going to win it all.’ It’s unrealistic.”

That’s controversial? That violates the tenets of jockspeak? That inspired every reporter’s favorite source, “One Met,” to respond (anonymously) like this?

“He’s cutting his own throat. What’s his record, six and nine? He’s supposed to be the ace of the [bleeping] staff. Why don’t you go and win 12 or 13 games?”

The Mets were a sub-.500 club in 2010 that entered 2011 with no substantial improvements to its roster, save for the addition by subtraction of a few bad, overpaid actors. They stumbled to a miserable start, straightened out, believed in themselves, pushed the proverbial boulder uphill, overcame injury after injury, won more often than they lost for three months — occasionally in exhilarating fashion…and never came close to legitimately contending before the boulder began coming after them (which, sadly, it continued to do Saturday night in Phoenix). So I’d say Pelf’s supposedly damning quote was on the money, pretty tame and probably traveled from his brain to his mouth as a fairly benign thought-segment, particularly in the context (a word athletes only use when asked to explain something they are said to have said) of the rest of the article.

If he said something like “it was always going to be tough for us this year” or “you have to have patience in this game” it would have been taken as somewhere between benign and sage, and nobody but Mike Puma diehards and relatives would have noticed.

As for the idea that a 6-9 pitcher should offer fewer opinions than a 12-4 pitcher, that would be the politic tack to take, given the parameters of the industry in which Pelf makes his very good living. But it’s a free country. If R.A. Dickey can Tweet to his heart’s content, then Pelfrey can occasionally summon his mind and speak it. And he has. It’s worth noting Mike was the only Met to publicly take umbrage with the idea that the club was about to trade its lineup’s most consistently dangerous weapon just before Carlos Beltran was dispatched to San Francisco:

“I understand that if you want to get something back for him, you have to trade him. But in the same sense I would think if we ended up getting rid of him, the front office’s view is that we don’t have a chance, because he gives us our best chance to win. If he’s not here, then they felt we can’t rebound from where we’re at.”

Forgive Pelf if he wasn’t particularly interested in where Zack Wheeler fits into the big Met picture come 2013. Mike Pelfrey doesn’t know if he’ll fit into the big Met picture come 2013 — or 2012, for that matter. Pelf’s suddenly the third-longest tenured Met, behind Reyes and Wright. His inadvertent role on this team in 2011 is something akin to that of Bobby Jones in the late ’90s or Steve Trachsel in the middle ’00s, the senior starting pitcher who has slogged through hundreds of innings, had his moments (if not nearly enough of them) and has to wonder as often as not where’s the [bleeping] pot of gold at the end of this blue and orange rainbow? Hence, I can’t blame him if a little of his discontent seeps out now and then, no matter that it’s not properly aligned with the company-approved program.

If this is what takes to be considered a malcontent, then we’re all a little too thin-skinned.

Though on the flip side, if Pelf is considered a malcontent, then the Mets should look to trade him at once, because after six seasons of his slogging through hundreds of innings, I’ve seen enough and would welcome whatever half-baked alibi they need to get rid of him. I’ve never been a large Big Pelf believer, and his occasional bouts of success have failed to convince me he was ever on the verge of becoming the real thing. Yet because he was a No. 1 draft choice and because he was thought of as having great stuff and because on paper he’s physically imposing — and because his won-lost record has occasionally been speakworthy — the Mets have counted on him more heavily than they would a slightly shorter guy with slightly lesser stuff who was drafted slightly later.

That “One Met” who fumed that Pelf’s supposed to be the “ace” of the staff is as bewildered as I’ve been that he was ever considered on that level (though given that only one starter can start one game at a time, I find “ace” one of the more overblown concepts of baseball, along with won-lost records and speaking while saying nothing). Pelfrey was a top pitcher for maybe five months of his first five years as a Met. Tabbing him the Opening Night starter shouldn’t have been laced with so many implications or expectations. I have an unprovable hunch that had the assignment been handed to Niese or Dickey, it would have been viewed as mostly another turn in the rotation. Because it was Pelfrey, it became a thing, and the last thing Big Pelf needs is another thing.

Which I guess his “unrealistic” comment became, just as that knot that developed on his right elbow after being whacked with an exit-inducing line drive from Gerardo Parra became yet another thing, hopefully not a painful or debilitating thing. I wish the Big Pelf no ill. He’s that Met I like in spite of not being able to stand — or can’t stand no matter how much I like him. It’s nothing personal, or even theoretically personal, considering I’m a fan and it’s silly to think I know Mike Pelfrey as a person rather than as a jumble of quotes and impressions. Whatever — I’m just not that enthusiastic about him pitching for my team. Let him live and be well and enjoy a Phil Humber mini-renaissance in the other league when this year is over.

In the meantime, let him say what he wants.

Summer Swoon

Whatever hopes we had of catching the Braves (and somewhere in our Ya Gotta Believe hearts we all had them) have melted away over the last two weeks. At the end of July, you may remember, the Mets took four in a row from the Reds; since then, we’ve won a grand total of four against everybody else — and even in those wins, it felt like the Mets were fighting themselves as much as the opposition.

To be philosophical, it happens. This is the time of the year when the marathon earns the name, when the chronic hurts and the innings and the travel and the endlessness of it all give a solid kick to the teams that aren’t quite ready or well constructed enough, booting them towards the back of the pack. And it doesn’t help that this is the time of year when overachieving teams realize they’ve Wile E. Coyote’d their way halfway across the gorge, but that’s only halfway and gravity has checked back in from its smoke break. It sure looks like that’s happening to the Mets now.

Which, on the one hand, is understandable.

But on the other hand, damn it.

I felt some sad, sickly blogger distant cousin of that feeling around 10 p.m., when I found myself thinking that Dillon Gee was getting whacked around and there was a long way to go tonight and there were more late games coming. It’s never a good sign when the prospect of a couple of hours of baseball makes you sigh — because you know you shouldn’t do that. You think back to winter and staring out the window and waiting for it to be spring, and you realize suddenly you’ve switched to thinking ahead to winter and staring out the window and waiting for it to be spring, and you remember how in early January you swore you’d do anything just be able to spend 10 minutes watching Dillon Gee pitch to Sean Burroughs and Cody Ransom and Ian Kennedy, and now it’s mid-August and Dillon Gee is pitching to Sean Burroughs and Cody Ransom and Ian Kennedy, so what are you complaining about?

And then Sean Burroughs and Cody Ransom and Ian Kennedy all hit doubles and you think, This isn’t really all that much fun.

But baseball being baseball, it’s still diverting even when extracting joy from your heart rather than adding it. An inning later, I watched Willie Harris’s ludicrous little bloop fall in among Ransom and the voluminously inked Ryan Roberts and Paul Goldschmidt and thoroughly enjoyed reading lips as Kennedy completely fail to hide his fury at his own infielders. WHAT? WHAT THE FUCK? THERE WERE TWO OUTS! WHAT THE FUCK WAS THAT? AND WHAT THE FUCK KIND OF NAME FOR A 35-YEAR-OLD MAN WHO ISN’T A GAY PORN STAR IS CODY RANSOM? I’M GOING TO GO SIT IN FUCKING CENTER FIELD AND GET MY SHIT TOGETHER WHILE YOU FUCKING GUYS REMEMBER HOW TO CATCH A FUCKING POP-UP. I MEAN, FUCK! *

David Wright was so startled that he immediately flied out. That was less amusing.

I was also startled to see Goldschmidt’s catch while descending dugout steps (a description that sounds vaguely like a painting) waved off by the ump because Goldschmidt had left the field of play. I never knew that, and it seems vaguely unfair. So I can race up the steps and shove a hot dog vendor out of the way and catch a ball, but Goldschmidt or Ike Davis or anyone wearing a uniform that has their own name on it for a non-embarrassing reason can’t? ** It’s disappointing, because there go my fantasies of going back in time and having Yadier Fucking Molina connect off Aaron Heilman only to realize that Endy Chavez has jumped not at the wall but over it and is now standing serenely in the bullpen with his glove up and a goofy grin on his face.

Anyway, Mets lose. It’s late in a number of ways. Let’s all carry on.

* This may not be exactly what he said. My lip reading is a work in progress.

** I’m just a blogger. I can’t do this anyway.

The Happiest Recap: 112-114

Welcome to The Happiest Recap, a solid gold slate of New York Mets games culled from every schedule the Mets have ever played en route to this, their fiftieth year in baseball. We’ve created a dream season that includes the “best” 112th game in any Mets season, the “best” 113th game in any Mets season, the “best” 114th game in any Mets season…and we keep going from there until we have a completed schedule worthy of Bob Murphy coming back with the Happy Recap after this word from our sponsor on the WFAN Mets Radio Network.

GAME 112: August 15, 1985 — METS 10 Phillies 7
(Mets All-Time Game 112 Record: 20-29; Mets 1985 Record: 69-43)

What happens when two of the three greatest starting pitchers in Mets history hook up at Shea Stadium? Not the pitching duel you might imagine, not when it was Dwight Gooden briefly off the top of his game and Jerry Koosman at the end of the line…and not when it was stiflingly hot at Shea and the ball was carrying into a dimension momentarily unmarked by time and space.

Now that we mention it, Gooden vs. Koosman does sound a little Twilight Zone-esque, offering as it does a blurring of noncontiguous Mets eras. Jerry Koosman was the lefty anchor of Mets staffs from 1967 through 1978. Doc Gooden headed Mets rotations from 1984 until 1994. The gap between their tenures would imply a stark separation of their careers. Yet while Gooden, 20, was taking the National League by storm as a sophomore in ’85, Koosman was  hanging on as  42-year-old Philadelphia Phillie. The veteran of the Mets’ first two pennant-winning clubs actually hadn’t pitched that badly in his twilight — entering this Thursday matinee with a 6-3 record, 3.71 ERA and three complete game wins to his credit on the year — but this was neither 1969 nor 1973 any longer.

Then again, by the time the day was over, it wouldn’t look like the same 1985 Gooden had been steamrolling through since April.

Koosman took his licking first. Three Mets batters in Davey Johnson’s righty-stacked lineup — perhaps a sign of respect for the old southpaw who flied him to left for the final out of the ’69 World Series — showed no sentimentality in the bottom of the first when, with the Mets down 1-0, they made Kooz feel every one of his 42 years. Pennant-race pickup Tom Paciorek, Gary Carter (making a rare start at first base) and Ray Knight all homered. It was the first time three Mets had homered in one inning in eleven years. The Mets took a 5-1 lead and figured Doc would cruise, per usual, from there.

Gooden promptly gave back a run when Koosman’s second-inning groundout scored Glenn Wilson to make it 5-2. It was the 46th RBI of Jerry’s career, and it would be the last positive accomplishment of Koosman’s baseball-playing life. In the bottom of the second, after recording two quick outs, Paciorek walked, Carter singled and Darryl Strawberry singled to bring home Paciorek. That put the Mets up 6-2 and brought John Felske out of the Phils’ dugout to remove Kooz.

Jerry would make one more start six days hence, against the Dodgers at Veterans Stadium. He’d give up a grand slam to Mike Marshall, follow it with a homer to Candy Maldonado and leave in the top of the first with five earned runs in two-thirds of an inning pitched. Between his abbreviated outing at Shea and that nightmare at the Vet, Koosman saw his ERA climb from 3.71 to 4.62. He’d go on the DL shortly thereafter in deference to a chronic knee problem and never pitch again. Kooz would retire from the game after 19 seasons with 222 wins and a perfect mark of 4-0 for the Mets in six postseason appearances. (He always did prefer pitching in cooler weather.)

Koosman was already the distant past for Mets fans in 1985. Gooden was the scintillating present. He could do no wrong all summer — except for this sweltering day at Shea when he couldn’t do much right. Mike Schmidt tagged Doc for a two-run home run in the third and Rick Schu reached him for a leadoff shot in the fourth. After Dwight enjoyed his first scoreless inning of the day in the fifth, Davey figured five runs and eight hits were enough in the 95-degree heat and lifted his prodigy with a 6-5 lead. It was his shortest outing of the year, save for the rain-soaked night in Atlanta that became the 16-13, 19-inning marathon of July 4 & 5. Following that epic strangeness, Gooden won each of next his seven starts, completing five of them.

“It was a weird day,” Gooden assessed of his most unDoclike effort in this otherwise magical season. “I just didn’t do my part.”

Still, if the Mets’ bullpen could pick up for him, Doc was in position to improve his record to an otherworldly 19-3, showing that even when he didn’t do his part, Gooden still knew how to gain at least partial credit.

Unfortunately for the Doctor’s ledger, the bullpen didn’t do its part all that well. In the seventh, Terry Leach’s bout of wildness and Rafael Santana’s error on a Von Hayes ground ball led to the Phillies’ sixth run, tying the game and costing Doc a decision. Strawberry’s fielder’s choice grounder regained the lead for the Mets in the bottom of the seventh, but Doug Sisk and Jesse Orosco combined to re-create a tie in the top of the eighth, making the score 7-7.

Salvation, with an air-conditioned chaser, awaited in the bottom of the eighth when Lenny Dykstra broke the deadlock with a wind-assisted RBI ground-rule double. Then Hayes, beneficiary of Santana’s E-6, discovered the fates could be fickle when he overran a Strawberry pop fly in left (where Felske had just moved Von from center) and two more Met runs scored. The Mets went out in front 10-7, and Orosco pitched an uneventful ninth for what became his fourth win of the year instead of Doc’s nineteenth.

Koosman might have been done for good, but Gooden would be back to being Gooden circa 1985 soon enough. He still hadn’t lost since late May, he was still riding a franchise-record 12-game winning streak and the Mets were still undefeated in his starts dating back to late June. The Mets, meanwhile, had just finished a stretch where you could say they had given it their all. On July 1, the fourth-place Mets lost 1-0 to the Pirates to fall to three games over .500, five games behind the frontrunning Cardinals. Then the Mets took off on one of their all-time Amazin’ tears: 30 victories in 37 games, bracketed by two nine-game winning streaks.

Yet no matter the confidence expressed by the likes of rookie Dykstra — “if we keep playing like this, with everybody contributing, I don’t see why we can’t walk away with it” — the portion of the schedule when the Mets routinely dominated their competition was over. This 10-7 sloppy slugfest the day after a vexing defeat — the automatically clutch Keith Hernandez mysteriously grounded into a game-ending double play with the bases loaded in the bottom of the ninth with the Mets down 2-1 — left the Mets only a half-game up on the Cards for the division lead. They had played so well for so long, yet they couldn’t shake the Redbirds. On the other hand, the Redbirds had played very well themselves and couldn’t shake the Mets.

Neither the Mets nor the weather would stay as hot as they had been from July 2 to August 13, but arguably the Mets’ hottest pennant race ever hadn’t even begun to reach its boiling point.

ALSO QUITE HAPPY: On August 9, 2006, a Mets legend’s homecoming was on the verge of overstaying its welcome. Shea Stadium stood and cheered the night before when Mike Piazza returned to the scene of his most dramatic triumphs. That Piazza was wearing a San Diego Padres uniform didn’t bother too many people. With the first-place Mets rampaging through the N.L. East and leading 3-2, Mets fans could be magnanimous with its applause as good ol’ Mike singled in the sixth off Steve Trachsel. The Mets held on, Mike had his hit, all vibes were good.

Now it was the second night of Piazza’s return, and everybody who didn’t get a chance to greet him the night before was just as welcoming. The bonus this Wednesday was Pedro Martinez’s inclusion in the script. Pedro was a pretty popular figure at Shea himself, and his start was more than incidental. It was the first appearance at home in almost seven weeks for the injury-plagued ace. The good news for Mets fans was Pedro looked perfectly healthy, giving up only two runs and three hits in 7⅓ innings. The other good news was Piazza evoked the halcyon turn-of-the-millennium days at Shea when he rocketed a solo home run off Martinez with one out in the fourth. The Mets were still ahead 4-1 at that point and, again, magnanimity could rule — Piazza received a huge ovation as he rounded the bases. He even received a curtain call afterwards.

“The last thing I want to do is show up the other team,” Mike explained, with typical humility. “When they ask you to do it, it’s one of those things.”

Then Mike did it again, this time with two out in the sixth, also with nobody on. This second home run off Pedro cut the Mets’ lead to 4-2 and some grumbling could definitely be detected in the crowd. The warm feelings for Piazza would never dissipate from Flushing airspace, but this was suddenly a game and the 2006 Mets were most definitely the home team in the present.

Mike: “I think after the second one, it wasn’t as warm. I felt the energy shift.”

Which is why Piazza’s final attempt to awake the ghosts of Mets past became so suddenly irksome. He made his bid in the eighth, the Padres down two, with two on. Aaron Heilman was pitching after Pedro had walked Brian Giles and ex-Met Mike Cameron. Piazza stepped up with a chance to put his new team ahead. He was not being cheered lustily anymore. He was actually booed by a significant percentage of the crowd that adored him when he represented benign nostalgia innings earlier.

Being Mike Piazza, he brought the drama, taking Heilman deep…deep enough for breath-holding, though not deep enough for soul-crushing. Piazza’s long fly came down in front of the center field wall, caught by Carlos Beltran. Mike could return to the gauzy pedestal he built for himself from 1998 to 2005, and the post-Piazza Mets of 2006 could hold on to win again, 4-3.

GAME 113: August 13, 1982 — METS 6 Cubs 4
(Mets All-Time Game 113 Record: 23-26; Mets 1982 Record: 49-64)

Some years what little that goes right eventually leads to more wrong. For proof of that sad phenomenon in the lost Mets season of 1982, look no further than right field at Shea, where for one Friday night, everything seemed just fine.

Ellis Valentine was as much the personification of that benighted campaign as anyone. Acquired in 1981 for promising reliever Jeff Reardon, the Mets looked to him as a buy-low bargain. Valentine was one of those five-tool players: hit, hit with power, run, field and especially throw. Injury had derailed him in Montreal. Perhaps he’d put it all together once more in New York.

He didn’t, not even when the Mets put him together with George Foster and Dave Kingman in the middle of a lineup that, as the ads had it, promised to light up the city via Metropolitan power surge. The lights no more than flickered with Valentine starting in right and batting fifth. The club began falling apart in June and Ellis did little to keep it together as summer took its toll on the Mets’ chances. He showed little power, almost no speed and his batting average was meandering around .250 as August approached.

His arm, though, was still golden. The rest of his game may have been less Dave Parker than Dorothy Parker, but Valentine could throw with the best of them any day of the week, a skill he demonstrated on a Friday night in Flushing against the Cubs before an intimate gathering of 12,617.

In the top of the fifth, Bill Buckner led off with a walk versus Pat Zachry. Leon “Bull” Durham singled to right. Buckner, who could still run, raced for third. Valentine pulled the trigger on his rifle of a right arm and shot him down. Buckner was thrown out at third. The Cubs didn’t score.

One inning later, it was ex-Met Steve Henderson’s turn to lead off, and he doubled. Junior Kennedy lifted a fly to right, catchable by Valentine, but deep enough, to Hendu’s thinking, that he could dart to third and get in scoring position. But no — it was rifle time again. Valentine gunned down the erstwhile Stevie Wonder for his second outfield assist at third base of the night. And the Cubs didn’t score in that inning either.

Ellis Valentine’s arm was just one tool, but it had a brilliant evening. His bat didn’t do too badly, either, as Valentine’s single in the bottom of the seventh (his second of the night), proved the key hit in a three-run inning. Ellis’s hit put the Mets ahead 5-4 in an eventual 6-4 win. But Valentine’s bat wasn’t the story. It was his arm. Twice. Ellis Valentine, who not long before was fighting the since-traded Joel Youngblood for playing time, didn’t seem like such a bad acquisition after all.

“Valentine has the best throwing arm among right fielders in the National League,” George Bamberger told reporters afterwards. “No one is close. He has won the job, and no one is going to take it away from him.”

What a nice night for a guy who’d had too many rough ones. And what a nice note to leave Ellis Valentine’s Mets career on…but we can’t quite say goodbye on two dynamite outfield assists because Ellis stepped on his own storyline.

His arm had barely cooled off when his mouth got going. Given the media’s attention the afternoon after finally starring in a Mets win, Valentine didn’t waste it, at least not to his thinking at the time. He announced that he considered the Mets “the worst organization in baseball,” that “they can offer all the money in the world, and I wouldn’t stay” and, oh yeah, “I believe there’s a conspiracy against me in this organization.”

Mind you, this was one day after his shining moment in the field. It was perfect, in its way, for 1982, a season that began with some promise — 27-21 — and had spiraled well down Flushing’s plumbing system since (and was about to get a whole lot worse; a 15-game losing streak was literally a day away when Ellis voiced his discontent). Bamberger was compelled to readjust his attitude toward his right fielder: “If a man walks in that door and says he doesn’t want to play, I will do all I can to get him off [the club].” The manager added he’d keep playing Valentine every day, but “if he comes in here and tells me he doesn’t want to play, boom — that’s it.” Frank Cashen, meanwhile, called the situation “distressing”.

Funny thing was Youngblood’s August 4 trade to Montreal, best known for positioning Joel to collect two base hits in two cities in the same day, was a boon to Valentine in the short term; he had gone 14-for-32 in the week-and-a-half since it happened. But don’t get Ellis Valentine started on the Joel Youngblood trade: “They traded him right back into our division. I thought that was very stupid.”

He may have had a point, actually, but there would be latent bright sides to this dark lining in the silver cloud of the Met win Valentine made possible with his arm on August 13.

The Mets withstood their right fielder’s tantrum in decent shape. Valentine, who was in the final year of a three-contract that paid him $200,000 annually, wasn’t given “all the money in the world” to stay. Bamberger played him plenty the rest of the way, and Valentine did raise his average cosmetically, to .288, but it was over for him and the Mets. That was fine because the Mets had another right fielder who was almost ready to play full-time. Kid named Darryl Strawberry…from the same Los Angeles high school as Valentine, as it happened. The Mets were desperate for credibility and power when they traded for Valentine in 1981. With Strawberry and others in the pipeline for 1983 and beyond, their desperation days were ending, and they’d make few godawful trades like Reardon for Valentine in the immediate future.

As for Ellis Valentine himself, he knocked around baseball a couple more years before finding himself out of the game at age 31. Beset by drug and alcohol problems, he realized his life wasn’t going to get better without help…which he found. He worked to overcome his demons and has devoted his life since baseball to proactively advising kids to not make the same mistakes he did.

That, too, should be scored an assist for Ellis Valentine.

ALSO QUITE HAPPY: On August 10, 2005, the baseball world was still buzzing from the highlight that was beamed from Petco Park late the night before. It was the seventh inning in San Diego. Brian Giles was the batter with nobody on and one out. He swung at a Dae-Sung Koo delivery and blooped it off the end of his bat into short left field…or deep short, depending on your perspective. It was going to fall in, because the only fielder with any kind of angle on it was third baseman David Wright, and Wright is a righty, so his glove hand was…

…of no consequence whatsoever.

Wright reached out and grabbed Giles’s ball with his bare right hand; he grabbed it, he fell with it, he held on to it. Petco gasped and then applauded. Because everybody probably needed to catch their breath after that most unroutine flyout, Willie Randolph made a pitching change. The audience that stayed up late in New York was treated to a dozen more replays. It never got old. The only problem was it didn’t get the Mets back into the game. They were trailing 6-3 and wound up losing 8-3.

So how does Wright react the next night? He takes matter into both of his hands this Wednesday evening at Petco: He singles home the Mets’ first run in the top of the first; he takes second on a double steal four pitches later as Carlos Beltran steals home to make it 2-0; he doubles home two more in the top of the third to make it 4-0; he smashes a three-run homer off Brian Lawrence in the fourth to make it 8-0; he tops it of with an ninth-inning single that helps build a run to make it 9-0. The final is Mets 9 Padres 1, David Wright going 4-for-5 with 6 RBI, 3 runs scored, a homer, a double, a stolen base…and in the field, on the heels of his making quite possibly the most astonishing regular-season catch in New York Mets history?

Nothing. No chances for Wright, as the Padres learned not to hit any balls anywhere near either of his hands.

GAME 114: August 9, 1963 — METS 7 Cubs 3
(Mets All-Time Game 114 Record: 29-19; Mets 1963 Record: 37-77)

Forget that line about how you have to be a pretty good pitcher to lose twenty games. You have to be a plenty strong human being to endure being a twenty-game loser by the first week of August. And to arrive at such a humbling mark in a fashion in which you’d have to believe Somebody Upstairs (besides George Weiss) was telling you to find another profession?

Let’s just say Roger Craig dug deep to persevere as long as he did in 1963. The veteran of two world champion Dodger clubs already knew what he was in the midst of after emerging as the ace of the 1962 Mets. That team was loaded with “pretty good pitchers,” which is to say four of its hurlers lost at least 17 games. Nobody lost more than Craig, who took 24 defeats in the Mets’ inaugural season. On the flip side, he led those Mets in wins with 10 — or exactly a quarter of their 40 victories. By comparison, that year’s Cy Young winner, Craig’s old Los Angeles teammate Don Drysdale, won 25 games, but his total represented a lesser percentage of his team’s 102 wins.

Hard to believe the Cy Young voters overlooked Roger completely.

Come 1963, Craig commenced to setting a much more encouraging pace for himself. When he beat L.A. on April 29, he evened his record at 2-2. Maybe his second year as a Met would be different from his first.

It would. Oh, it would.

Only one of the “2’s” in Roger Craig’s record would hold steady and it wasn’t the one on the right. The win column remained stubbornly unchanging for Craig, but the other column, where they keep track of the losses? The updates would be frequent. Beginning on May 4, with a 17-4 shellacking at the Polo Grounds at the hands of the Giants, and winding through the spring and into summer, Craig did nothing but lose.

There would be a few blowouts, to be sure, but most of Craig’s losing was of the excruciating variety: 4-2…4-3…1-0…like that. As the defeats mounted, the luck grew harder. When Roger lost his 18th consecutive decision on August 4 — the one that made him a 20-game loser with 52 games to go in the season — it was in a 2-1 game at Milwaukee’s County Stadium. Twelve of those 18 straight losses charged to Craig were contests he lost by one, two or three runs. His luck was typified by the way he lost the eighteenth: the Brave run that beat him scored when a pickoff attempt went awry. And Craig was known to have a great pickoff move.

“If he bought a graveyard,” Tracey Stallard said of his teammate, “Nobody would die.”

Craig somehow kept his perspective alive as long as his unwanted streak insisted on living, too. “I try not to think about how many games I’ve lost, or think about how many I might lose,” he said after the 17th consecutive defeat. “Sure, maybe I joke about it after a game, but I’ll tell you this: If I ever find myself thinking about losing during a game, I’ll know it’s time to quit.”

Roger’s fellow Mets certainly thought of ways to make him a winner. Long before a black cat would take on more positive connotations in Mets lore, catcher Norm Sherry sought to track one down for Craig to bring to the mound with him when he warmed up. That didn’t exactly work out, but anything would go as far as a change of luck was concerned. When the streak was at 13 of all numbers, Stallard loaned Craig his uniform digits, 36. Craig pitched beautifully in them, carrying a 1-0 lead into the bottom of the ninth at Philadelphia. Alas, with one out, he surrendered a triple to Tony Gonzalez and a game-losing home run to Roy Sievers. With 36 having yielded him nothing more than a 14th straight loss, Craig returned to wearing No. 38.

Still, nothing was beyond trying, including yet another numerical stab in the dark. At the behest of a dream Polo Grounds clubhouse guard Ted Decker shared with him — as chronicled in Jerry Mitchell’s The Amazing Mets — Craig switched from 38 to 13 before his August 9 home outing against the Cubs. Decker told Roger he dreamt he saw him winning a game with No. 13 on his shirt. That’s all a pitcher with a 2-20 mark needs to hear to be spurred to sartorial action.

No Met had yet worn 13, according to Mets By The Numbers by Jon Springer and Matt Silverman. Baseball was as superstitious as any endeavor in 1963. You didn’t see 13th floors in skyscrapers or Row 13 on any airplane, either. But few of those entities had suffered luck as rotten as Roger Craig’s, so why not tempt fate? And why not up the stakes, as Craig did at the end of the pregame meeting Roger ran as part of his duties as Mets player representative? He completed the business at hand and then added an addendum:

“I’d really like to win this one tonight, boys.”

Maybe that’s what was holding Roger back all those months — maybe he simply forgot to tell his teammates what he wanted. Or maybe it was the sight of No. 13 taking the hill under Coogan’s Bluff that appeased the baseball gods. Or perhaps it was just the streak’s time to take a powder.

Whatever it was, it wasn’t going to be easy, not even with Craig holding Chicago in check for seven innings and the Mets clinging to a 3-2 lead. As had happened so often before, one bad pitch bit the pitcher, in this case, one that resulted in a leadoff eighth-inning triple for Billy Williams, which was followed by a Ron Santo fly to center that tied the score at three and put Craig’s streakbusting in jeopardy. Roger hung in there and didn’t give up anything else in the eighth or ninth. It stayed 3-3 heading to the bottom of the final inning of regulation.

With one out, the Mets tried to rescue Roger from an 0-19 span — which would have matched Philadelphia Athletic Jack Nabors’s all-time worst single-season losing streak from 1916 — and a 2-21 overall mark for the year. Joe Hicks singled off Cubs starter Paul Toth. Choo Choo Coleman struck out, but Al Moran doubled, sending Hicks to third. Lindy McDaniel relieved Toth. Casey Stengel had no choice but to pinch-hit for Craig. He chose Tim Harkness, a hero earlier in the season when he beat these very same Cubs on a fourteenth-inning grand slam. Cubs head coach Bob Kennedy wouldn’t give Tim that kind of chance again, intentionally walking him. That loaded the bases with two outs and brought up Jim Hickman.

Jim Hickman happily played the role of Tim Harkness this time around, working the count to three-and-two before lifting a fly to left field that took advantage of the Polo Grounds’ singularly weird dimensions. “It just ticked the overhang of the upper stands,” Mitchell wrote, “before falling to the field.”

All that mattered is it left the field of play fair for a grand slam home run — the grand slam home run that gave the Mets the 7-3 victory to make a winner at long last out of Roger Craig. Of course no one was quicker out of the dugout to greet Hickman than the winning pitcher.

“The first thing I had in mind,” Craig said, “was to make sure he touched home plate. I’d have tackled him to make him do it if I had to.”

As of Friday the 9th, No. 13 was 3-20 and keeping a death grip on that uniform for the rest of the season. It proved sort of lucky, as Roger went on a three-game winning streak before backsliding to a final record of 5-22, 15-46 in two seasons as a Met. Finally, the fates smiled on him by getting him traded to St. Louis after the season for outfielder George Altman and reliever Bill Wakefield. By October of 1964, he’d be pitching in the Fall Classic and earning his third world championship, as a Cardinal. As Mitchell put it, “No prisoner ever received a pardon with more sincere expressions of gratitude.”

Indeed, Craig evinced no bitterness over his experience in New York, just as he never pointed fingers at an offense that didn’t score for him or fielders who might have made a few more plays on his behalf. “My two seasons with the Mets were a blessing,” he said. “It taught me how to cope with adversity.”

ALSO QUITE HAPPY: On August 11, 1988, the answer to the question, “It has to happen eventually, doesn’t it?” was answered in the affirmative, albeit after an unexpected delay of what felt like epic proportions. “It” was Gary Carter’s 300th career home run, a milestone that figured to belong to the All-Star catcher sooner rather than later as the ’88 season got underway. Carter started the year with 291 home runs and enjoyed a hellacious (or, in the clean-living Kid’s case, “heckacious”) April, belting seven homers in the Mets’ first 18 games. When No. 299 sailed out of Jack Murphy Stadium on May 16, it figured to be only a matter of time before Carter could take a very enthusiastic curtain call in honor or reaching a very significant round number.

But nobody defined “matter of time,” so it became an open-ended chase. Gary went homerless over the second half of May. And didn’t go deep once in all of June. And lit up no skies on the Fourth or any other date of July. Carter’s plate appearances without the one hit he really wanted were mounting at such a rate that they threatened to reach 300 before his home run total did.

In fact, you could honestly say, “there’ll be lights attached to Wrigley Field before Gary Carter hits his 300th homer.” It was true. The Mets came to Chicago in the second week of August to play what turned out to be (thanks to a rainout) the first official night game in the old ballpark’s history. Carter started in that one, on August 9, came to bat four times, walked and doubled, but extended his homerless streak to 255 consecutive plate appearances.

Two days later, Carter took another shot at 300. And this time, lit by nothing but Thursday afternoon sunshine, he got it, taking a 2-2 pitch from Al Nipper into Wrigley’s left field bleachers to give the Mets an early 1-0 lead. All at once, Carter could relax after nearly three months of letting the chase weigh on him. “I pressed pretty often,” he admitted once No. 300 was tucked away. “It was brought to my attention all the time. Everyday somebody brought it up.” Not that Carter ever shied away from the spotlight, but “when you try for home runs, they never come.”

Two more Met home runs would come that day, one a solo blast from Lenny Dykstra and the other the game-deciding ninth-inning grand slam Kevin McReynolds launched to put the Mets ahead for good, 9-6.

Never Say Die, Always Say Hope

The Mets never say die, but sometimes they die anyway. They won’t say die for the next 45 games but I suspect what remains unspoken will occur more or less half the time no matter their best intentions.

Of the choice between “more or less,” more would certainly be preferable. When a team that isn’t supposed to be very good flirts with a winning record, you hate to see that marker fall away. Play like they did for most of this homestand (save for about five innings when their reluctance to die meshed with a refusal to lose), and we’ll have a hard time remembering the Mets were several games over .500 at one point relatively late in 2011.

Hopefully it won’t come to that. Hopefully the Mets who made us hopeful will give us a statistically substantive souvenir to take into that gaping maw that opens wide when the next 45 games are over. Hopefully this team that is currently one game under .500 for the year can go three games over .500 for the remainder of the season and finish with more than 81 wins. Hopefully those of us with notoriously sticky memories won’t be trying to convince the rest of you that those 2011 Mets played better than their record for the ages indicates.

The Mets never say die, but I say hopefully quite a bit.

Hopefulness is a preoccupational hazard of being a Mets fan, given all the hope you allow to fill you in your ruminatory interludes. Even when the Mets are hopeless, you are hopeful. Or you hope to be hopeful. That’s about all we had in 2009, where there wasn’t anything in front of us to make us hopeful after 117 games. That’s probably also about all we had in 2010, when our legitimate modicum of hope (we were eleven games over. 500 once; you could look it up) had turned to tatters after 117 games.

This here, after 117 games of 2011, permits greater, deeper hope. Sure, we’ve dropped eight of eleven, and yeah, an offense- and defense-challenged matinee is not much of an advertisement for short-term enthusiasm as the Mets wing their way west, but you can’t deny the hopefulness the Mets have brought us. Maybe it won’t yield the most pleasing of results over the course of the remainder of 2011, but at some indeterminate date to be named…you’ll be able to hope and not feel like a dope.

Are the Mets building a surefire contender for 2012? Many roster machinations await before one can dare to formulate any kind of remotely accurate answer, so I’ll pass on predicting. Yet if playing the game admirably counts for anything, they’re going in the right direction. Granted, a close contest decided on a pickoff attempt that didn’t become a pickoff and an E-6 that should have been a third out isn’t the best symbol for Baseball Like It Oughta Be, but I am…yes…hopeful that type of stuff, as shepherded by a diligent manager and monitored by a sensible front office, will work itself out.

Despite intermittent bouts of frustration that come from rooting for  a .500-ish team, I try to remember that all I asked out of this bunch when the season was young was that they keep hustling, keep charging, keep trying. They’ve been pretty good about keeping their end of the bargain. The bottom-line satisfaction’s been sporadic — and it shouldn’t utterly demoralize us if their final record lands north of 2009’s 70-92 but south of 2010’s 79-83 — but you can’t help but appreciate the overall effort. If you can’t revel in a team in contention, the next best thing if relishing a team that almost always plays like it thinks it is.

The Mets never say die. Someday they won’t die nearly as often, either. Maybe some of these Mets will still be some of those Mets when that day comes.

Of that, too, I am hopeful.