The blog for Mets fans
who like to read

ABOUT US

Greg Prince and Jason Fry
Faith and Fear in Flushing made its debut on Feb. 16, 2005, the brainchild of two longtime friends and lifelong Met fans.

Greg Prince discovered the Mets when he was 6, during the magical summer of 1969. He is a Long Island-based writer, editor and communications consultant. Contact him here.

Jason Fry is a Brooklyn writer whose first memories include his mom leaping up and down cheering for Rusty Staub. Check out his other writing here.

Got something to say? Leave a comment, or email us at faithandfear@gmail.com. (Sorry, but we have no interest in ads, sponsored content or guest posts.)

Need our RSS feed? It's here.

Visit our Facebook page, or drop by the personal pages for Greg and Jason.

Or follow us on Twitter: Here's Greg, and here's Jason.

They Call It a Loss

I wanted the Mets to win because I’m a Mets fan. That part’s pretty obvious. They’re my company for the good-weather part of the year, an unscripted nightly show. When that show ends well I’m happy. When it doesn’t, I’m not.

I wanted the Mets to win because I like R.A. Dickey. I like the way he turns expectations about what great athletes are like upside down. I like that he is interesting and I like even more that he is not afraid to be interesting, in a sport whose traditions and preparation and media routines actively encourage conformity and blandness.

I wanted the Mets to win because we say too often that some well-paid ballplayer’s performance was courageous. Not that Dickey was storming Utah Beach, but he was in a lot of pain, basically unable to run, and — if we can pull the camera back a bit — facing what happens after a storybook season gives way to a more realistic and less fun sequel. Dickey was running out of big-league dreams last spring, then saw the tumblers of opportunity line up to give him a spot start with the Mets. He did well enough to get another one, then another, and wound up having a wonderful year, one in which all his talent and hard work and attention to his very difficult craft suddenly flowered. For that he got a well-deserved contract and the chance to stop worrying about a short-term run of bad luck leading to a permanent demotion to civilian life. This year, things have not been so easy. He has battled ineffectiveness, bad luck and now injury and pain — and done so as thoughtfully and calmly as he dealt with success and good luck and becoming a fan favorite.

I wanted him to win because of all of that, and for a while it looked like he would.

But close games without much offense exist on a weird see-saw. R.A. Dickey was going to be the story, not needing to run and field because he was striking everybody out with a knuckler that was a thing of beauty. But there was another story waiting in the wings, like an understudy nobody wanted to see: that of the Mets’ offensive futility, in which a run scratched out of an accidental bunt was all that kept Dickey from crashing down.

The eighth seemed innocent enough. Ronny Cedeno singled, but Nick Evans retired Dusty Brown on a gazelle-like grab of a popped-up bunt, with Dickey face-planting in the grass perilously close to him, and then Matt Diaz fanned and was so infuriated that he began breaking things in the dugout. Two outs, one to go and the question while the Mets hit would be whether K-Rod would come out to defend the 1-0 lead or if it would be Dickey’s all the way. (Is K-Rod getting loose? Is he getting loose quickly or slowly? Did the cameras spot R.A. getting handshakes and attaboys?)

Then Jose Tabata got grazed in the elbow by a wandering knuckler.

Up stepped Josh Harrison, the ball from his first big-league hit still awaiting him in the dugout.

“The rookies are always the ones who get you,” I warned Emily, who was not pleased with this defeatism.

Sure enough, Harrison singled to tie the game.

Dickey walked Andrew McCutchen (who’d fanned the previous three times) and up came Neil Walker — who rammed a knuckleball that did very little up the middle for a 3-1 lead and a slow walk to the dugout for Dickey, his fine work undone in a matter of minutes.

Offensive Futility 1, Valiant Knuckleballing 0. Or, as they said in the old days, Get Me Rewrite.

2011 has been a very strange year, marked by streaks of competence and slogs of futility. We’ve dealt with owners being ill-advisedly talkative and the gravity of a massive lawsuit and the possibility of new ownership and the dread of trades and free-agent exits, and now — horrible and familiar — we’re stuck watching as injury after injury after injury has reduced a potentially good but uncertain club to a mediocre one and then continued to chew away at that mediocrity.

You eventually go numb in years like this, with the losses blurring together and hurting less until the offseason allows the reservoir of hope and self-delusion to refill. But as you slide into surrender, individual games can still sting, leave you staring at darkened ceilings frowning and muttering.

Games like tonight’s.

The Happiest Recap: 049-051

Welcome to The Happiest Recap, a solid gold slate of New York Mets games culled from every schedule the Mets have ever played en route to this, their fiftieth year in baseball. We’ve created a dream season consisting of the “best” 49th game in any Mets season, the “best” 50th game in any Mets season, the “best” 51st game in any Mets season…and we keep going from there until we have a completed schedule worthy of Bob Murphy coming back with the Happy Recap after this word from our sponsor on the WFAN Mets Radio Network.

GAME 049: May 31, 1988 — METS 5 Dodgers 4 (11)
(Mets All-Time Game 049 Record: 25-26; Mets 1988 Record: 34-15)

And a rookie shortstop shall lead them. Or at least save them. Not that the battle-hardened Mets of 1988 needed much saving, as their fast, furious and first-place start attested, but the fact that the recent world champions could be so soon steadily if subtly restocked was testament to the depth the organization built into its foundation throughout the 1980s. Games like this represented the reaping of what had been sown for several years at the minor league level.

The Mets and Dodgers faced off at Shea this Tuesday night as division leaders, adding a little potential playoff preview juice to a set of late spring games. Embellishing the intrigue was the generation gap separating starting pitchers: 43-year-old 324-game winner Don Sutton in his valedictory go-round for the Dodgers versus 23-year-old Dwight Gooden, 81-27 in his still young, still phenomenal career, 8-1 on the season. Considering his mileage, Sutton gave Tommy Lasorda a strong outing, allowing only two runs in five innings before exiting in the sixth with a broken nail on his pitching hand after surrendering a leadoff double to Gary Carter. Gooden, meanwhile, entered unprecedented personal territory when he took the ball to start the tenth inning. Except for Game Five of the 1986 NLCS, Davey Johnson had never asked Doc to go more than nine.

Of course the presence of a tenth inning could be interpreted to mean Doc didn’t finish off the Dodgers in regulation, and given Gooden’s high standards, that would be a reasonable interpretation. Carrying a 2-1 lead into the ninth (with only three hits given up all night), Gooden was reached for the tying run when Kirk Gibson led off the inning with a home run. Davey broke protocol and kept Gooden in the game after the Mets couldn’t win it the home ninth. “He was still throwing 93 miles an hour,” the manager figured. “It’s his game to win or lose.” Dwight responded by retiring Mike Scioscia for the first out of the tenth but then allowed three consecutive hits, giving the Dodgers a 3-2 lead. Doc left in favor of Roger McDowell, who let in one of his starter’s inherited runners.

Down 4-2 in the bottom of the tenth, the Mets struck back against L.A. closer Jay Howell: one-out walks to Lee Mazzilli and Lenny Dykstra set up run-scoring singles by Wally Backman and Keith Hernandez. The Mets had ensured an eleventh inning.

Randy Myers, a bit player on the 1986 champs who had emerged as the Mets’ closer by the end of 1987, came on to stifle the Dodgers. In the bottom of the eleventh, Los Angeles reliever Alejandro Peña got two quick outs but couldn’t do a thing with Elster. The shortstop, who had come in for defense in the eighth to help Gooden preserve his 2-1 lead, hadn’t been hitting much all season. If he had, perhaps the 23-year-old who was the 24th man on the ’86 postseason roster would have started regularly at short as projected. He didn’t start this game because Davey Johnson looked for every opportunity — starts by flyball pitchers Gooden and Sid Fernandez, in particular — to shift Howard Johnson to short and use Dave Magadan at third. They hadn’t been hitting much, either, but the rookie Elster, at .223, had no offensive credentials on which to fall back.

But Elster spun his good-field/no-hit reputation on its ear when he walloped Peña’s first pitch into the left field bullpen to give the Mets a 5-4, 11-inning win. If this was a playoff preview, it was certainly encouraging. Myers and Elster were stepping up among a new generation of Met weapons, while the Mets seemed to have the Dodgers’ number. They had swept a three-game series against them in California two weekends earlier and now had taken two straight from L.A. at Shea.

ALSO QUITE HAPPY: On May 27, 2000, the journeyingest of journeymen could relish reminding his original team of what they let get away all those years before. Todd Zeile, once a young catcher for the St. Louis Cardinals, was in his first season as the Mets’ first baseman and on his eighth team overall, when he stroked a solo home run off Andy Benes in the top of the first at Busch Stadium this Saturday night to extend the Mets’ early lead to 5-0. It looked like a laugher for Zeile and his newest mates, but New York starter Rick Reed was uncharacteristically rocked and relievers Rich Rodriguez and Pat Mahomes were ineffective behind him. Before the sixth inning was done, the Mets trailed 7-6. In the visitors’ eighth, however, the Mets hit their reset button. Two walks sandwiched a Craig Paquette error, loading the bases for erstwhile Redbird Zeile to take wing and a little revenge on the club that sent him on his ultimately itinerant path five years earlier. The ex-Cub, -Phillie, -Oriole, -Dodger, -Marlin and -Ranger launched Dave Veres’s 1-1 pitch over the left field wall for a grand slam and put the Mets back on top, 10-8. Zeile’s current team would tack on another pair in the ninth and go on to win 12-8.

GAME 050: May 29, 2007 — METS 5 Giants 4 (12)
(Mets All-Time Game 050 Record: 21-29-1; Mets 2007 Record: 33-17)

He who was known to run wild wreaked havoc on the basepaths. He who was known to go deep put his power on display. And he who will never be remembered by Mets fans for the much he did right left his old audience with a familiar impression in what proved to be his final, unimpressive appearance at Shea Stadium.

Fortunately, Armando Benitez was wearing some other team’s uniform by then.

Consider some of the man’s accomplishments in orange, black and blue: Benitez was the closer on the only two Mets clubs to earn consecutive postseason berths, in 1999 and 2000. In parts of five seasons, he compiled 160 saves, nearly twice as many as any other righthanded Met reliever, second-most in franchise history to John Franco, the southpaw whose fireman role he usurped in the middle of the ’99 season when Armando — striking out 14.8 batters per 9 innings that year — emerged as an almost unhittable setup man. Benitez established a new single-season Met saves record in 2000 and broke it in 2001. To date, he remains the last Met to save a World Series win.

And almost no Mets fan is moved by any of it because what gets remembered is a laundry list of late and close situations turned too close or too late by Benitez’s tendency to not shut the door at the worst possible junctures: pennant race games; playoff games; the World Series games he didn’t save. In a sport spiced with precisely measured statistics, it is the chewy anecdotal center that leaves the most evocative aftertaste. Saves records and all else notwithstanding, it’s little wonder a vocal majority of Mets fans never got the Benitez bitterness out of their saliva or their subconscious.

On this particular Tuesday night, the Mets and the San Francisco Giants — for whom Benitez had registered 45 saves since 2005 — hooked up over a dozen innings that were fairly fascinating long before the ghost of blown saves past stuck his fingerprints on the storyline. Oliver Perez, off to a solid 6-3 start (2.54 ERA) in ’07, endured a rough first inning when Randy Winn greeted him with a leadoff homer and allowed another solo shot, from Bengie Molina. Perez settled down from there, retiring his next 14 batters and eventually striking out eight while walking nobody. His only other blemish of consequence was another solo home run, in the seventh, struck by first baseman Daniel Ortmeier (the first of his career).

Ollie was matched K for K by heralded rookie Tim Lincecum, making his first-ever start at Shea and fifth overall. The first 14 Mets batters all made outs against the nascent Freak until Carlos Beltran worked out a fourth-inning walk and Carlos Delgado homered to tie the score at two. A Jose Reyes single and a Beltran double put the Mets up 3-2 in the sixth. After Ortmeier tied it, Lincecum pitched the bottom of the seventh, disposing of Damian Easley, Carlos Gomez and pinch-hitter David Newhan with ease. Lincecum’s final line in his New York debut: 7 innings, 3 hits, 3 walks, 3 earned runs and eight strikeouts.

A game defined by pitching and power was accented by excellent defense, from Reyes and Beltran on the Mets’ side and from Omar Vizquel for the Giants, particularly in the bottom of the ninth when, with the potential winning run on second, the San Francisco shortstop lived up to his legend and robbed Julio Franco of a possible game-winning hit, a ground ball a diving Vizquel refused to let leave the infield.

The legend of Armando Benitez came into focus for what remained of the 47,940 on hand after a walk, a wild pitch, a sacrifice bunt, a hit-by-pitch and a fielder’s choice brought home a run for the Giants in the top of the twelfth. The 4-3 lead gave manager Bruce Bochy a save situation and, as such, Bochy called on his closer.

You could tell by the boos.

Benitez gave heart to Mets fans whose hearts were ripped out often enough (if, it bears repeating, not always) when he closed for them between 1999 and 2003. A seven-pitch at-bat climaxed with ball four to Jose Reyes, giving the Mets a leadoff baserunner who was a threat to steal — threat enough that Benitez balked Reyes to second. After Endy Chavez bunted Jose to third and Beltran grounded out to second, Delgado came up. Reyes continued to present a threat at third, dancing around and taunting the pitcher, though the odds of him attempting to steal home in the twelfth inning, with two out, his team down a run and their fiercest slugger batting were nil.

But Benitez was distracted nonetheless. Reyes teased him into his second balk of the inning, allowing Jose — without benefit of a base hit or a stolen base — to trot home with the tying run. “I just tried to put some pressure on him,” Reyes said, “and it worked.”

Two pitches later, Benitez gave up a long home run to right to Delgado, giving the giddy Mets a 12-inning 5-4 win (with Carlos’s walkoff homer serving as a cheerful bookend to Winn’s top-of-the-first leadoff homer) and Armando Benitez two defeats — the L in the game, of course, and the loss of his spot on the Giants’ roster. Two days after imploding, Armando would be shipped to Miami, where he enjoyed his finest season in 2004, when he recorded a league-leading 47 saves for the Marlins. To the chagrin of his former followers in New York, he was deadly against the Mets in ’04: 11 saves in 12 appearances, every one of them a Florida win.

That was ancient history by 2007, even if 2004 was more recent than the indelible Met tenure of Armando Benitez, one that left wounds that on some level would always feel fresh — from games not closed out against the Yankees; not closed out against the Braves; not closed out against the Giants and J.T. Snow, for that matter (though Armando would be taken off the hook in that NLDS contest). Armando Benitez had not been forgotten by Mets fans and probably never would be, though by doing everything he could — two balks and a walkoff home run — to write one of his vintage trademark Shea endings, he had given the home crowd an indisputably beautiful memory to keep for as long as SNY continued to run this game as an aptly titled Mets Classic.

Though he made 36 appearance with the Marlins in 2007 and 8 more for the Blue Jays in 2008, Armando Benitez would never pitch at Shea or against the Mets again…and he’d never record another major league save.

ALSO QUITE HAPPY: On June 2, 1989, a Mets pitcher performed very much as he had in perhaps the greatest Mets’ victory ever, though his role in that more famous game has never exactly been celebrated. Rick Aguilera came in to start the top of the tenth inning of the sixth game of the 1986 World Series with the scored tied at three, and left it with the Mets trailing the Red Sox by two runs. The Mets would score three in the bottom of the inning, and Aggie would vulture the most ignored and probably undeserved W in Fall Classic history. Three years later, on a Friday night in Flushing, the starter-turned-reliever was on in the eleventh inning of what for eight innings was a scintillating 1-1 pitchers’ duel between Dwight Gooden (8 K’s) and the Pirates’ John Smiley. Randy Myers and Jeff Robinson picked up their respective starters’ gauntlets and kept the game tied through the ninth and tenth. Now it was Rick’s turn and, just as on October 25, 1986, little good came of it. A leadoff double to Jeff King and an RBI single by Glenn Wilson gave the Bucs a 2-1 lead. Aguilera stood to be the losing pitcher if the Mets couldn’t rally in the bottom of the eleventh. But as was the case in what became known as the Bill Buckner Game, Aggie was rescued by his teammates. This time (albeit with stakes much lower), Mackey Sasser singled, Kevin Elster bunted him to second and Dave Magadan belted the first pitch he saw from Randy Kramer over the right field fence. Mets win 3-2 in eleven; winning pitcher: Rick Aguilera. It was Aggie’s first extra-inning win as a reliever since that hallowed Saturday night against the Red Sox. It was also his second win of the 1989 season. His first had come against the Cubs in April. The losing pitcher that day? Calvin Schiraldi.

GAME 051: June 5, 1987 — METS 5 Pirates 1
(Mets All-Time Game 051 Record: 26-25; Mets 1987 Record: 26-25)

Hard to believe something could be more of an attraction than Spider-Man’s wedding, but when 51,402 jammed into Shea Stadium on a Friday night, it probably didn’t have all that much to do with the previously arranged pregame nuptials between Peter Parker and Mary Jane Watson. What Mets fans wanted to do two months into the 1987 season was turn off the dark — and turn on to Doc.

The Mets’ promotional comics calendar bumped up against a slice of real-life drama when Dwight Gooden made his first start of the season after spending a month undergoing drug rehabilitation treatment and another month pitching his arm back into shape in the minors. His out-of-town tryouts deemed successful, Doc was scheduled to reopen off Broadway, and uppermost in many minds was the critical reception he’d elicit.

One critic panned his starring role before the curtain even rose on his Shea return. Acerbic Dick Young, fewer than three months from dying, used his bully pulpit in the Post to urge the Shea faithful to, as his paper’s front page headline put it,  “STAND UP AND BOO”. Young habitually attacked “druggies,” and to the longtime columnist, Doctor K was nothing more than another such loser who deserved no hero’s welcome considering he had tested positive for cocaine in Spring Training. Sure, Mets fans might have missed that right arm, but Young couldn’t look past the young man’s nose:

“If I could choreograph things tonight, I would do it this way: Enter Dwight Gooden…50,000 people boo loudly. That’s to let him know how society feels about the wrong he has done, abut the damage he has committed to the millions of kids who worshipped him.”

Young did allow that fans should feel free to cheer Gooden later in the game as they wished. In that sense, the packed Shea house took his advice, but jumped Dick’s gun. There was very little booing for the prodigal Doctor K. Instead, he was greeted by an ovation Murray Chass described as “thunderous” in the New York Times. And when he was removed with two outs in the seventh, holding a 3-1 lead over Pittsburgh, he brought the crowd to its feet again. His descent into the Mets’ dugout didn’t deter the outburst of passionate approval, as Gooden was brought out for a curtain call.

“I didn’t expect any boos,” the Doctor said afterwards.

In between ovations, Gooden pitched well, if not at the superstar standard he created for himself in 1984 and 1985. Then again, given all the attention, the long layoff and the personal pressure, 4 hits, 4 walks, 1 run and 5 strikeouts (including that of Bucs leadoff batter Barry Bonds to begin the game) in 6⅔ innings was plenty good enough to gain the Mets a 5-1 victory and set Doc on a path that everybody who cheered him hoped would be straight, narrow and successful for the rest of his career.

ALSO QUITE HAPPY: On May 28, 2008, an unlikely fisherman helped the floundering Mets reel in a desperately needed win against a school of Marlins that had been veritable sharks of late by Flushing Bay. The same club that gave the Mets the final nudge of their 2007 collapse was back in town looking to take two of three in their first 2008 Shea series. After splitting two games, the Fish seemed en route to making the Mets’ lives — consumed by the impending when-not-if dismissal of manager Willie Randolph — that much more miserable as they led the home team 5-4 going to the bottom of the ninth this Wednesday night. But the worm turned as pinch-hitter Endy Chavez treated an 0-2 Kevin Gregg pitch like bad bait and bashed it over the right field fence. The 5-5 tie remained in effect until the top of the twelfth, when Alfredo Amezaga homered off Duaner Sanchez. Once more the Marlins led by a run, but once more they found their position slippery. Justin Miller started the bottom of the twelfth by issuing a leadoff walk to David Wright, then allowed a single to Carlos Beltran that chased David to third. One out later, Fernando Tatis, until very recently a little-used minor league refugee (he had barely played in the majors since 2003) lashed a double to left, driving in the tying and winning runs for a 12-inning 7-6 Mets victory. The heretofore washed-up Tatis — nine years removed from his only standout season — was more thrilled than most walkoff batsmen: “It’s unbelievable. It’s amazing. It’s a great feeling.” Not only had he won his new team a ballgame, but he had made great progress in his bigger quest. Tatis explained later in the season that the reason he wanted back in professional baseball was to provide enough money to buy land to build a church in his hometown of San Pedro de Macoris in the Dominican Republic. The land got bought, the church got built. Ultimately, you might say, Fernando Tatis was gratified to beat the Fish for a day, but was really dedicated to teaching a man to fish for a lifetime.

Sometimes Plan D Works

Dillon Gee wasn’t supposed to be here. Neither was Justin Turner. Or Jason Pridie. Or Ruben Tejada. Willie Harris wasn’t supposed to start. Daniel Murphy wasn’t supposed to play first.

Yet the Mets still won, beating the surprising Charlie Morton and the relatively surprising Pittsburgh Pirates with a flurry of singles and overcoming their usual woes with runners in scoring position. For all the times the Pirates have haunted us at their ballpark, their fans aren’t thrilled about having to play here either — the Bucs are now 0-8 at Citi Field.

Sure it’s the unassuming Pirates, but we’re not exactly world-beaters ourselves right now, and stripping the lineup of David Wright, Ike Davis was bad enough without also removing Jose Reyes, home because his grandmother died. Without Reyes, the Mets are … what, exactly? Comical? Pathetic? Anonymous? Underwhelming?

(I could have noted the absence of Jason Bay, given a planned day off, but the Jason Bay whose absence would be notable hasn’t existed since 2009. The one we got hasn’t done anything in particular to arouse our ire — he’s said the right things and tried his hardest — but he hasn’t done much of anything else, either.)

But the Bisons and CompleMetary players did enough, led by solid work from Turner, Murph and Tejada, with signs of life (including a startlingly good running catch) from Angel Pagan and a big hit from Josh Thole.

And then there was Gee.

Gee isn’t exactly a striking mound presence: In terms of his windup, stuff and build he’s basically your generic pitcher. You could call him a Rick Reed type — a guy who needs to mix up his pitches and hit his spots to be successful. But then most second-tier pitchers are Rick Reed types — if they’ve got multiple pitches working, mix them up effectively and have good location, they can undress any lineup on any given night. But such nights are rare — most of the time, they have to contend with a pitch or two that’s hard to harness, or they’re missing in one direction or the other, or the hitters and scouts have been poring over video and processing the ever-increasing amount of data about them and discovered a pattern or a tell or some other flaw to exploit. And, indeed, Gee junked his slider after Chris Snyder massacred one in the first inning, getting by for the rest of the night with fastballs and change-ups. First-tier pitchers armed with better stuff have a bigger margin for error and can often shove aside such obstacles, winning despite themselves. Second-tier guys can’t, which is why so few Rick Reed types are actually Rick Reed. (To say nothing of being Greg Maddux.)

Gee is now 5-0, which makes the question of his regression pretty much a when, not an if. And indeed, BABIP and xFIP strongly suggest that he’s been very lucky in his first 15 career starts — coming into tonight, his xFIP was 4.74 (compared with a 3.08 ERA) and his BABIP was an flashing red .233. The usual range for BABIP is .290 to .310 — Reed’s career BABIP was .284, while Maddux’s was .281. (To complete the dip into advanced stats, Reed posted a 4.03 career ERA and a 4.36 xFIP, while Maddux’s career ERA was 3.16 and his xFIP was 3.73.)

All that tells us we should be wary of getting too excited about Gee, and remember that if we reach for unquantifiable terms in describing players, we’re quite possibly trying to imbue statistical noise with greater meaning. But then some Rick Reed types succeed — and it doesn’t seem like too much of a reach to note that Gee seems like a smart pitcher who doesn’t complicate things unnecessarily or let bad luck get to him. When he hits a run of it — as the stats all but guarantee he will — we’ll learn more about him, and have a better idea of how much his intangibles were just our wishful thinking and storytelling. But a less lucky Dillon Gee could still be useful. Here’s hoping.

The Jose Reyes and Friends! Hour

You hear that music?

Ho ZAY! Ho Zay Ho Zay Ho Zay! HO Zay! And FRIENDS!

That song can mean only one thing! It’s the time for all you kids at home to tune in to your favorite animated adventures on The Jose Reyes and Friends! Hour!

Ho ZAY! Ho Zay Ho Zay Ho Zay! HO Zay! And FRIENDS!

The Jose Reyes and Friends! Hour, everybody’s afterschool favorite has moved to Channel 11, Sundays at 1. But don’t worry — all your best cartoon pals will be there!

Ho ZAY! Ho Zay Ho Zay Ho Zay! HO Zay! And FRIENDS!

On today’s The Jose Reyes and Friends! Hour, watch as…

Ricochet Reyes outruns bullets!

Daniel Droop-A-Long picks up runners!

Peter Paganamus finds his way home after being hopelessly lost!

Magilla Beltran sits anywhere he wants!

Justin Quest continues to do extraordinary things!

Tejada Cat goes on the prowl for ground balls!

Quick Draw Jon Niese and his sidekick Baba-Thole baffle those nefarious Phillie nogoodniks!

All the two-out action! All the two-out fun! And the gang may even be helped out when the rarely fun and barely actionable Bay Dog pulls out his Canadian club and does something…maybe even anything!

Ho ZAY! Ho Zay Ho Zay Ho Zay! HO Zay! And FRIENDS!

Remember, kids, it’s The Jose Reyes and Friends! Hour, Sundays at 1, right after Popeye and right before Please Don’t Eat the Daisies, only on Channel 11, WPIX-TV.

The Jose Reyes and Friends! Hour is brought to you by sugary sweet cereal and toys you think you want but will never really play with.

Ho ZAY! Ho Zay Ho Zay Ho Zay! HO Zay! And FRIENDS!

***

Meanwhile, a different kind of show, but one just as enjoyable in its own way: The Happy Recap Radio Show remembers Dana Brand, with reminiscences from a few of the bloggers (myself included, at the 76:00 mark) who knew him, read him, admired him and loved him. Thanks to THR for going the extra mile on a holiday weekend and producing a wonderful audio keepsake. Listen to it here.

Going to the Game on May 28

The brick is still there. The brick is always there. The brick couldn’t be more reliable. Stephanie and I trundled down the stairs from the 7, shlugged sample cups of Pepsi Max, disposed of them and zagged right to inspect our etched immortality.

OUR FIRST DATE
METS 8 GIANTS 3
MAY 15, 1987

It’s a little worn around the edges, but that’s OK. It makes the brick seem a little more permanent, as if cobblestone streets surround the modern edifice masquerading as a thriving remnant of Ye Olde Breukelen (pity the architects who came to the site with their finely honed presentation only to be halted by their client with, “Let me tell you how this is going to work — the front of the building is going to look like Ebbets Field.”). A brick can absorb quite a pounding in two-and-a-third seasons, including the harsh winters in between. I once saw somebody standing on our brick as his group posed for a picture, and I was going to raise a fuss about it, but then I thought that I’ve stood on quite a few bricks without malicious intent since April 2009. Still, random feet on our brick will, over time, add to the toll it takes. The same can be said for all the bricks that line Mets Plaza.

Stephanie and I acknowledge our brick as surely as it acknowledges us. It always makes us proud to pick it out of a crowd of bricks on the first shot. It’s more impressive Stephanie can do this since she’s not quite the regular visitor here that I am.

Having zagged, we now zigged to the Rotunda entrance. I have a particular security guard in mind. If someone has to handle the contents of my bag, I prefer it be him. The other guards are employees. This guard is a person. He does his respectable check of my belongings and tells me to have a good time. Every employee, starting with the wall of personnel enigmatically erected to smile at you when all you want to do is cross the road and see your brick, welcomes me to Citi Field with practiced cordiality. They may even mean it. My guy, however, definitely means it.

I’m briefly onced-over by the next security man. I get a man because I’m a man. Stephanie gets a woman in deference to her being a woman. Sometimes I’m patted down (hence the issue of men and women and who pats down who). The first home game after Bin Laden was caught and killed, I was positively frisked. I broke out into ticklish laughter. Saturday night I was simply wanded. I was clean. So, apparently, was Stephanie.

At Shea, I had my tickets out long before I reached my entry gate. At Citi, I’ve learned to keep them in my wallet almost up to the last second. With security tables and wanding and patting and intermittent requests to unzip jackets or put down bags (sometimes they insist, sometimes they don’t), tickets just get in the way. Not until I’m deemed no threat to the well-being of the physical plant do I remove my tickets. I always worry this will hold up the works. It never does. I hand one to Stephanie and approach the turnstile first for scanning. In every other situation, I would take the chivalrous “after you” tack, but at ballgames it’s easier if I go first because I know as much lay of the land as it’s possible to know. My ticket scans, and I enter. Stephanie’s ticket scans, and she enters. I always feel a palpable sense of relief at being on the inside. It’s like getting through customs unscathed.

The Mets are giving away tote bags tonight. These were the sorts of premiums that used to be distributed on Mother’s Day, for ladies 14 and over. Then the Mets were inundated by complaints in September 2008 when a Johan Santana bobblehead day was scheduled for a Sunday afternoon. ESPN demanded it become a Sunday night. Parents who thought bringing their kids to a school night game that started after 8 o’clock was irresponsible didn’t bring them. When they produced their tickets and requested the bobbleheads in absentia for those sons and daughters, they were told, sorry, they’re for kids only. The Mets’ method for sorting out this recipe for guaranteed disappointment was to make every promotion for everybody — no more age limits, no more gender specifications. It was a very egalitarian solution.

That’s how the first 25,000 fans at Citi Field Saturday night were given tote bags that by Stephanie’s and my reckoning were either “feminine” or “kind of gay” or perhaps evocative of what was known many decades ago as flower power. What really made the tote bag something that looked more fit for moms than dads was the orange belt that rings the upper tier of the blue canvas. Even accepting our communal affection for blue and orange, this bag — which isn’t particularly deep and doesn’t let you tote all that much — looks like a crafts class project of Marcia Brady’s.

I have kept, since swiping it from my high school’s English department the last semester of my senior year, a curio from the era before mine, a book called Teen Scene: 1001 Groovy Hints & Tips. As the title would indicate, it offered hundreds and hundreds of nuggets of moddish advice. The Mets totebag of 2011 brought to mind this groovy hint and/or tip from that 1970 paperback:

Decorate a carton and fringe it for your own wastepaper basket.

On the issue of promotional androgyny, Stephanie didn’t think the men who flung the tote over their shoulders were flattered by it. To me, it’s blue and orange, as is much of what I own. “Borderline,” I decided, when I got home. But I probably won’t be flinging it over my shoulder any time soon.

Take the belt off and it’s a pretty innocuous bag, but the belt really “makes” it. “Belted and cinched” is how Stephanie described our bags when we received them, harking back to the recurring SNL Gap sketch wherein Chris Farley, Adam Sandler and David Spade played catty salesgirls whose only piece of advice to their customers was that blouse will look fine once you belt it and cinch it.

I shoved our controversial bags into my relatively manly black schlep bag that I schlep everywhere when I’m using public transportation and led us into the Mets Museum. I had read in Phil Mushnick’s column a couple of weeks ago that the Mets had done the sort of thing they’d assiduously avoided since the opening of their Ebbets-exteriored clone. They recognized a piece of ancient Polo Grounds history.

The Mets very quietly have done a very solid thing. A plaque on display in the outfield of the Polo Grounds, a memorial to Capt. Eddie Grant, a Harvard grad, lawyer and for three seasons a Giants infielder, disappeared sometime after the Giants’ last game in the Polo Grounds, in 1957.

Grant was killed in World War I in October 1918 during a mission he led to find and rescue “The Lost Battalion.” Grant, who at 34 enlisted despite being three years beyond draft age, is one of 14,246 buried in the Meuse-Argonne American Cemetery in France.

Though Grant is still memorialized by a short stretch of road called The Eddie Grant Highway just a few blocks from Yankee Stadium — it leads to the Cross Bronx Expressway — his achievements as a scholar and athlete and his self-sacrifice as a soldier were about to be forgotten here.

But the Mets recently hung a replica of that plaque, word for word as it first appeared at its dedication in the Polo Grounds, Memorial Day, 1921. It can be viewed in the Citi Field exhibit that includes a historical salute to Giants’ and Mets’ baseball played in the Polo Grounds.

Mushnick reported this addition to the museum on May 15 and I’d been eager to confirm it existed. I told one of my friends about the article and he, cynical like me, asked who I thought told Mushnick about it.

I went directly to the Polo Grounds’ share of the stadium exhibit and sure enough, the legendary plaque was recreated in full. All of Grant’s athletic and military accomplishments were listed, accompanied by an explanation of the plaque’s history. As a latter-day New York Giants buff, I was gratified. As a student of baseball history, I was impressed. But as a Mets fan who has wanted the Mets to embrace in some substantive fashion their two-pronged line of ancestry, I was thrilled. I was thrilled that someone in the Mets organization, perhaps at the highest level, went the extra 483 feet (the distance from home to deepest center at the Polo Grounds) to carve a niche for a meaningful piece of local baseball lore: something that had nothing at all to do with the Dodgers, something that had nothing directly to do with the Mets, something that represents the kind of patriotism and sacrifice the Mets honor every game when they single out a veteran for our appreciation. The Eddie Grant plaque’s dedication having occurred ninety years ago this week is a perfect, perhaps coincidental, touch.

The Mets indeed, per Mushnick’s description, did this quietly. They should feel free to clear their throats and announce their deed: “Come to the museum and learn who Eddie Grant was. See how a New York National League baseball team once upon a time remembered an American hero.” There’s so much noise in the Mets’ world these days. This is one time when quiet isn’t necessarily an ideal antidote.

We didn’t linger much longer in the museum. I always feel a bit guilty that I don’t spend many minutes there on every Citi Field visit I make, but after a while, if you’ve been there often, you’ve seen most everything. But I always feel very good in there even if I’m just passing through. It’s an essential element of the Citi Field experience and I was pleased to see a lot of milling and a good bit of reading going on there Saturday night. I love to see Mets fans taking advantage of the museum’s easy access and breezy informativeness, and I love the fans of the opposing team — even when it’s the Phillies — opening themselves up to our story.

The museum cleverly leads you to the team store. There was far more milling in the store than the museum. Stephanie tends to browse hard but has held off on purchases thus far this season in her two visits. She’d like a mini-pennant to add to her workspace in her new office (among a certain strain of Queens social workers, Stephanie is considered a leading Mets fan, and she’d like to maintain that image), but the Mets don’t seem to sell such a compact item, only standard and oversized felt banners. I have a mini-pennant, acquired in the late ’70s buried somewhere amid my piles and my boxes, and I’d gladly loan it out from my “collection,” but I have no idea where it lies. The lay of the land in my own closet is much more mysterious to me than the pathway into Citi Field.

There are no mini-pennants on sale at the Mets team store, but there is a surfeit of Jason Bay merchandise, much as seven years ago there was no shortage of Kaz Matsui shirts, Kaz Matsui caps and Kaz Matsui Celebriducks. The only shortage was willing buyers: for Matsuimabilia in 2004, for Baypparel in 2011. I never went in for Kaz gear and Saturday I avoided the temptation to Bay it up. I did, however, splurge on two t-shirts whose proceeds, I hope, will be used to extend Jose Reyes’s professional association with the club (as if my five Jose Reyes shirts haven’t already contributed to the cause). One was a vintage-style 1986 World Champions shirt, a necessary companion to the 1969 World Champions shirt I bought from the same store two years ago. The other, an orange issue, said simply Mets on the front and CARTER 8 on the back. I don’t know if Gary Carter gets a cut on t-shirt sales, but I’d like to believe a vibe from a name and a number on the back of a shirt can be sent to a cancer patient at Duke.

Electric orange and Gary Carter sound about right, actually.

After standing in a surprisingly long checkout line and waiting for the cashier to conquer the complexities of UPC technology on the full-size Mets pennant the Tigers fan from Michigan in front of me was purchasing, Stephanie and I left the store (showing an employee my receipt, ensuring that yet again I steal only from my high school English department) and headed for the escalator up to Field Level. I glanced around at the Jackie Robinson Rotunda, specifically the parts where Robinson is most intensely lauded: his guiding principles; his inspirational quote; the mosaics that, tile by tile, tell his life story in black & white photography. I have to confess to thinking that I sort of wish David Einhorn, should he assume control of the franchise, finds a tasteful, somehow respectful way to ease up on the Jackiefication of the Mets’ main entrance.

I remember Fred Wilpon being most proud (and Rachel Robinson being most surprised) that the Robinson tribute was so permanent, that it wasn’t — like, for example, Joan Payson’s hat, a staple of the museum in 2010, locked in storage in 2011 — a rotating exhibit. It jibed perfectly with Wilpon’s self-satisfied assertion about overriding any architectural guidance as laid out in the instantly infamous New Yorker article. “I loved the Dodgers, I loved Ebbets Field, I idolized Jackie Robinson, now you will, too,” was what Wilpon was almost defiantly telling us when Citi Field opened.

“All the Dodger stuff — that was an error of judgment on my part,” Wilpon told Jeffrey Toobin. Yet the error sticks out as E-CEO on Citi Field’s permanent scorecard. The “Fred Wilpon built a shrine to the Dodgers” charge (and it is a charge, not a commendation) is one disgruntled Mets fans make as a matter of course even though once you come up the escalator from the rotunda, you are — at least since the renaming of the Ebbets Club — subject to no institutionalized reminders of the Dodgers, a few shirts and caps in the ’47 Store window notwithstanding. But an exterior so eerily imitative that it transcends homage and a rotunda so devoted to one individual with zero ties to the team in residence is plenty Dodger stuff enough. It’s Dodger stuff too much. This isn’t a new revelation, but Wilpon’s remarks to Toobin, embellished by the sense that there may be light at the end of the Wilponian tunnel, makes me wish the owner’s influence starts getting erased around the edges as soon as possible.

It may be unfair I’ve come to conflate Jackie Robinson with Fred Wilpon more than, say, Branch Rickey, but whose fault is that? Seeing the impact of Jackie Robinson in the Jackie Robinson Rotunda isn’t the problem. Seeing the impact of Fred Wilpon is. Perhaps we can eventually be reminded of Fred Wilpon in a more benign way. Perhaps after a decent interval, Fred’s hat can be put on display in the museum next to Joan’s.

After gliding up the escalator, Stephanie and I caucused on where to get our supper. Keith’s Grill, she said, not surprisingly. Stephanie saw the two segments SNY aired (one during a game, another during Mets Weekly) in which the great man himself gave us a tour of his new epicurean interest. I tried the Gold Glove Burger at the beginning of this endlessly eventful month, and was quite sated. Though I maintained multiple yens — a preoccupational hazard at Citi Field — I figured we could make Chez Hernandez our first stop for her and I could maybe make another for me.

But Keith’s Grill has blossomed as an attraction and we encountered a line long enough to necessitate the installation of a network of traffic-regulating velvet ropes (not really velvet and not exactly ropes) to keep the line from unruliness. If you were presenting a stage play, you could use the popularity of Keith’s Grill to mark the passage of time. On April 11, it was barren and windswept. On May 3, there was a clutch of curious customers. On May 28, it had become a (if not the) place to be. We joined the snaking line as I decided too much time would be sucked up for me to wait it out with Stephanie and find something else for myself. So we finalized a game plan: the Mex Burger, no jalapeños, for her, the Gold Glove and its Keith-prescribed two squirts of ketchup for me. Another lay-of-the-land situation unfolded. “You better order,” Stephanie said, as we switched places in line so I’d be the one to communicate all nuances and niceties.

As we waited to place our order, the Mets were saluting the military in recognition of Memorial Day. From the Field Level corner where Keith’s Grill sizzles, you can’t exactly make out all the pregame fussiness. There was something with an oversized flag. Somebody then sang an unfamiliar patriotic song. When our linemates heard music, a few removed their caps. It wasn’t anthem time yet (which didn’t stop one pushy burger patron from shouting randomly at a passerby, “TAKE OFF YOUR HAT!”). Then it was anthem time, which is generally awkward if you’re not at your seat. Do you drop everything and stand at attention even though there’s nary a star nor stripe in sight? Do you go about your business even though you’re violating unenforceable baseball decorum? I tend to half-ass it, stopping until I see somebody else is walking casually along, starting on my path again until I see someone solemnly standing arrow straight. It’s very awkward.

Easier to clarify was what to do while the starting lineups were being read. I couldn’t hear them too clearly as we moved like an irresistible force inevitably toward ordering, but I knew Alex Anthony was announcing the Phillies first. So I booed. Most of that was in reaction to our first sighting of critical crimson mass, about a dozen interlopers from the Delaware Valley chanting their brutally mutated “Let’s Go…” chant (any “Let’s Go…” chant that doesn’t end in “Mets!” is hopelessly corrupted and should be immediately deleted from the hard drive). One Phillie fan at Citi Field is one too many. Predictably, in deference to geography, StubHub and the National League East standings, we were inundated. A few awaited Keith’s specialties, which I guess was permissible since I partook of Bull’s Barbecue at Citizen’s Bank in 2007. Some Phillie partisans had no compunction against not just eating Met food but carrying Met tote bags. It didn’t flatter them, either.

I booed the usual suspects even as I wasn’t sure precisely who I was booing. I prefer specificity in my disapproval. My friend Joe was mighty impressed in April when I told nine Diamondbacks nine different reasons I considered them unworthy opponents, few of which I any longer remember. Saturday night, I contented myself with steady booing, varying only to inform Domonic Brown that he was a “nonentity”. Stephanie, I appraised, 50% enjoyed my steady stream of negativity toward the visitors, 50% wondered if I’d inflame the passions of the wrong critical mass of Phillie fans. I wasn’t worried, however. I haven’t lasted a lifetime in ballparks without picking my spots and choosing my battles. Cheering the Mets as they were introduced was a much more buoyant exercise, though the quality of the PA was rather muddy from where we stood, so by the time I got around to applauding Nick Evans, Ronny Paulino was being introduced.

Finally, we were called to order. I told the man what we wanted: one Mex, no jalapeños; one Gold Glove. And, as I was certain would happen, I was asked about 30 seconds later what it was again we wanted. It’s a little chaotic down there at Hernandez’s Hideaway, so I could excuse the stutterstep.

Less forgiven was the preparation of the Gold Glove bun. Mine was given one squirt of ketchup. One. This was no small gourmand detail. Keith was very specific on SNY that his signature burger required two, the second to keep the pickles in place. I’ve come to take that as gospel on every Boca Burger I prepare at home (as I try to fool myself into thinking it’s a real burger). When I pointed out to counter personnel that they were being stingy with the ketchup, they courteously directed me to the condiment station and said I could add extra ketchup over there.

That’s not the point, I restrained myself from responding. I’m here for the Keith Hernandez treatment, and it doesn’t begin and end with the Tootsie Pop garnish. Instead, I nodded and said nothing. I decided I’d try my Gold Glove with the one barely adequate squirt of ketchup obscured under the lettuce leaf.

We waited for our burgers to grill, clutching our Lipton Brisk (Stephanie’s) and Diet Pepsi (mine) and paying $30.50 for the whole thing. Two cheeseburgers and two beverages cost more than a CARTER 8 t-shirt. But there was no HERNANDEZ 17 t-shirt for sale in the team store, and sooner or later, your Mex bill comes due.

At last, somebody inserted our burgers between our buns and we emerged from the steamy line. First pitch was only minutes away, but that was all right. Our seats — thoughtfully passed along to us by Jason and Emily when they discovered they’d be out of town this weekend — were only a few sections over from Keith’s Grill. Let’s just take the burgers over there and see the game from the start, I said, hoping to skip the usual Citi Field ritual of eating away from one’s seats.

That plank of my platform was not passed by acclamation. Stephanie didn’t want to eat her supper at her seat, not at Citi Field, where fine dining is part of the gracious-living appeal. Our Field Level tickets entitled us to entrée into Caesars Club, of interest to Stephanie because it meant we could sit in a chair in front of a table and properly bite into the Hernandez hamburgers. I suggested alternate accommodations, such as those fairly convenient standing stations beyond center field, but a chair and a table is what my wife wanted. “I can go to Caesars Club and meet you at the seats,” she said by way of compromise.

I didn’t want that. I wanted to enjoy my supper with my wife. And if it meant foregoing the first pitch from Mike Pelfrey to Jimmy Rollins and first few pitches that followed, it was a small price to pay. It was certainly smaller than $30.50 for two cheeseburgers and two beverages. I consented to the Caesars detour, my small snit at Stephanie’s bizarre priorities melting by the time we reached the Excelsior Level.

We presented our special-access tickets, found an empty table, of which there several, and positioned ourselves to watch the top of the first on TV (just like at home) while we sampled the best Keith’s Grill had to offer. The verdict: Stephanie was infatuated with the tanginess of the Mex. I liked the Gold Glove better than I had previously, though it really was missing that additional dollop of ketchup (while the allocation of kettle chips had decreased from generous to adequate). Most happily, two people could devour the entire feast in the time it took Big Pelf to make short work of three Phils.

“I’m ready when you are,” Stephanie said when it was apparent we were both done chewing our meat and crunching our chips. Stephanie always says, “I’m ready when you are” as quick-serve restaurant situations wind down. It’s one of those endearing aspects of being married to the same person for nearly twenty years that you know your spouse will say that. I was, indeed, ready, but not ready to bolt from Excelsior to Field Level because I knew (or at least sensed) we might miss the best part of the game while in transit on a staircase. So taking advantage of our temporary Excelsior existence, I suggested we stand out in the concourse, behind one of the sections of seats, and watch the bottom of the first. I didn’t want to miss Jose Reyes leading off.

My instinct was correct, as correct as Stephanie’s for sitting down and eating like human beings instead of commuters. Jose doubled, Then Jose stole third. Then Justin Turner singled him home. Just like that, a Jose Reyes production had ensued: Jose’s franchise-leading stolen base total increased; Jose’s franchise-leading run total rose; and Jose’s career hit total closed to within 238 of Ed Kranepool’s for yet another franchise best. The pursuit of that last record, so stubbornly clung to by Eddie for 35 years, assumes Jose is given every chance to continue making team history beyond the July 31 trade deadline.

The Pelfrey Mets led the Hamels Phillies 1-0, and a night of possibilities opened up before us. Two batters had raked Cole. Carlos Beltran was up. Jason Bay, as cold as Canada through the rainy spring, but 1-for-1 in his last 1 at-bat the warm night before, would follow. The Met majority in crimson-speckled Citi Field was ascendant. The closest thing our normally disengaged park has to a roar was unleashed.

But its oxygen dissipated as soon as it encountered reality. Beltran struck out. Turner stole second, but Bay struck out. The part of our lineup in which I had confidence was done for now. Nick Evans, in his fourth season as an unknown quantity, grounded to third for the third out. Now we could head to our seats.

Eight innings later, Stephanie and I and however many defeated Mets fans who remained to the acrid end departed in the unwanted company of a giddy, gloating red wave. Marching out through Field Level and down the rotunda stairs, we hit the bricks with more force than the Mets hit Hamels, Contreras and Madson. But, we agreed, we’d enjoyed one splendid supper.

***

Dana Brand, our friend and fellow blogger whom we lost earlier this week, is remembered in the New York Times, here, and by his Hofstra University colleagues and students, here. Learn more about the July 16 Shea Stadium/Citi Field Dana Brand tailgate tribute GKR is organizing, here.

 

A public memorial service celebrating the life of Dana Brand will be held at the Newtown Meeting House in Newtown, Conn., this Saturday, June 4, at 1 PM. It will be my deepest honor to speak at this event regarding what Dana meant to the Mets fan and blogger community. Friends and readers of Dana’s are most welcome to join in the celebration.

Baseball Enjoyed While Result Disdained

Bad to have lost. Better had it been won. Good that it was played. That was Friday night, Mets vs. Phillies, undesirable outcome disallowed from overshadowing several elements that pleased me greatly as I sat and watched from my living room couch.

• Justin Turner returned to all-world status, 4-for-5 at bat, all-encompassing in the field, grinning and radiant from his teeth out to his hair. Those orange terrycloth swatches they were giving away…Turner Towels, right?

• Jose Reyes met his nightly quota of hits and runs, inevitably compiled in mass quantities once Roy Oswalt took a hike. Two days after quietly crossing the plate for the 663rd time in his career, thereby establishing the Mets record for scoring, Jose recorded two more base hits for his lifetime ledger, upping his total to 1,189, good for second place on the all-time Mets list. Jose Reyes has just passed Cleon Jones a few days after passing David Wright. That’s an all-time Mets great in our midst, in case you weren’t sure. Our midst, by the way, is where he must remain.

• Chris Capuano’s dynamite first inning had me in early no-hitter dreamland. Chris Capuano’s determined second inning — aided by a deep fly to left tracked down by Jason Bay and a grounder wonderfully smothered by my boy Ruben Tejada — began to put in place the pieces for how we could see this was going to be the night for which we had all waited a half-century. Chris Capuano’s deteriorating third inning (paging Dirk Lammers!) girded me for the worst. But Chris gave it far from his worst, going six darn good innings that should have been more. It’s not so much that Terry should have not pinch-hit for Caps so he could have kept pitching. It’s that Caps would have been a better bet than Willie Harris to hit with a runner on second and two out.

• My boy Ruben Tejada crafted a masterful sixteen-pitch walk with two out in the eighth, encompassing a mere ten foul balls and frustrating the Antonio bejeesus out of Antonio Bastardo. The Phils’ reliever was so upset that it was all he could do to strike out Scott Hairston on four pitches, but still…a sixteen-pitch walk is more proof that baseball is the only realm in which nothing happens for the longest time and it’s endlessly fascinating.

It was during this deliriously interminable plate appearance that my boy Ruben Tejada morphed into “Ruby…Ruby…Ruby” for whom I was pleading with Coach Dan Devine to send into the game. This was after a parade of seniors dropped their jerseys on Devine’s desk so Ruby could play in their place but before the Notre Dame radio announcer described the growing frenzy sweeping the stands:

It’s just occurred to me what they’ve been chanting for the last few minutes. It’s the name “Ruby,” Ruben Ruettiger, a walk-on senior, subject of an article in yesterday’s student newspaper, The Observer.

Sixteen pitches is a very long time. And I will watch Rudy at the drop of a hat.

• Michael Stutes’s seventh-inning pickoff attempt on Reyes would have been, per the old line about Rex Barney and home plate, stupendous had second base been high and outside. Or had one of his teammates been moving anywhere toward it. Stutes stepped off, whirled, fired…and no one was there to enjoy his artistry. Jose dove back to second, checked his e-mail, swung by Blue Smoke, made good use of his Wet-Nap, took off for third and arrived there safe and secure. When he scored on yet another smash hit by Justin Turner, we led and we looked very good.

Hard to believe it didn’t all add up to a happier ending.

There were a few other moments that when taken out of context — or perhaps cleverly rearranged by a talented video editor — left me feeling better than a 6-4 loss normally does. Rollins and Utley getting tangled under a 99.9% third-out pop fly, thereby allowing Jose to reach; Oswalt letting his internal seething get the best of him while two hits turned that error into a Reyes run; Bay finally getting a base hit with a runner on, albeit not an RBI base hit and after blowing a platinum opportunity earlier; Beato back to being what Gary Cohen called “his old self” (I’m tickled to think a rookie has an old self); K-Rod not melting down as much as suffering nicks and cuts, yet being noticeably professional about it when interviewed; seeing Angel Pagan again; learning R.A. Dickey may not be D.L. Bound; discovering the existence of Dale Thayer; David Wright not completely covering up his dismay about the infamous “not a superstar” remark but leavening it by revealing that his parents texted him that he was their superstar; and the SNY booth and Citi Field scoreboard paying classy tribute to our friend Dana Brand (for whose life a celebration is planned on the site of Shea Stadium’s home plate, July 16; details here).

Plus it wasn’t raining and it was warm and the place looked fuller than usual and more people were in those good seats than usual and it’s the beginning of summer and it’s Mets baseball and I’m going with my wife to Saturday night’s game. Yeah, I was decently happy overall, results-driven instincts and fresh reason to be Met-despondent notwithstanding.

As for Daniel Murphy’s inability to puzzle out a vaguely tricky grounder that more or less cost us a win…well, you can’t have everything.

The Happiest Recap: 046-048

Welcome to The Happiest Recap, a solid gold slate of New York Mets games culled from every schedule the Mets have ever played en route to this, their fiftieth year in baseball. We’ve created a dream season consisting of the “best” 46th game in any Mets season, the “best” 47th game in any Mets season, the “best” 48th game in any Mets season…and we keep going from there until we have a completed schedule worthy of Bob Murphy coming back with the Happy Recap after this word from our sponsor on the WFAN Mets Radio Network.

GAME 046: May 31, 1977 — METS 6 Expos 2
(Mets All-Time Game 046 Record: 25-26; Mets 1977 Record: 16-30)

Managing the Mets was a tough task, but not so tough that the next guy in charge couldn’t theoretically find time to play a little baseball while holding down his presumed full-time job. Chairman of the board M. Donald Grant and GM Joe McDonald must have thought so, for they announced on a Tuesday night at Shea that the man who was about to assume the office of Mets manager would be Joe Torre — as in Joe Torre, player-manager.

Unlike the seven skippers who preceded him, Torre was not long retired as a player. Time would prove that something of a trivial detail, however. Joe’s playing days weren’t completely done come the end of May 1977, but they were getting there. He’d insert himself into two games as a pinch-hitter before hanging up his spikes on June 17. More pertinently, the Mets were getting nowhere as the tenure of Joe Frazier came to a skidding halt, so why not try the Brooklyn boy who grew up to become not just an All-Star all around the diamond — catcher, third base, first base — but an acknowledged clubhouse leader. Two of the Met veterans who counted the 36-year-old Torre as a friend were Tom Seaver and Dave Kingman, both embroiled in salary-driven disputes with the Met front office when Joe took his new job.

Two stars looking to get out of town, on top of the 15-30 record that had landed Frazier’s Mets deep in last place, was a ton to toss on the rookie manager’s desk, but Joe took the daunting circumstances facing him in stride. “I am here to manage the team on the field,” he said before helming his first club. “Tom Seaver has made it known he wants to be traded and Dave Kingman wants to play out his option. I’d like to think they might change their minds. My office is open to them.”

As for the unit he figured he’d have at his disposal, Torre predicted, “We’re going to win a lot more games than we have. We’re not as bad as we’ve been playing and should be a representative team.” The representing started right away, as Torre led his charges to a victory immediately, a 6-2 win over the same Expos who the afternoon before had swept the Mets a Memorial Day doubleheader and put the final nail in Frazier’s managerial coffin. Part of Torre’s plan was to institute a set lineup, topped by recently acquired handyman Lenny Randle at third base, batting leadoff. Randle responded to his new status by singling, doubling, walking twice and scoring two runs.

There was a spark at the top of the order, and the Mets as a whole heated up under Torre’s tutelage. “It makes an awfully long year if you quit in May,” the manager said. The message was received ASAP: the Mets won seven of their first eight games with Joe as their leader. It wouldn’t last, and Torre’s relationship with his discontented stars didn’t make much difference even in the short-term, but when the man who would go on to win 2,326 regular-season games and four World Series titles enters the Hall of Fame as a manager, it will have to be recalled how it all began for Joe Torre: cleaning up Joe Frazier’s mess and attempting to set the Mets on course in what was rapidly becoming their most wayward season ever.

ALSO QUITE HAPPY: On May 27, 2009, an uncommon run of Met luck continued in a realm where they had proved curiously invincible. Four times previously in 2009, including thrice in the four games before this Wednesday night affair at Citi Field against the Nationals, potential Met home runs became subject to Major League Baseball’s new video review rule. In every instance, the decision that followed the second look — whether it confirmed the call on the field or reversed it — went in the Mets’ favor. This one, however, was going to be a tougher sell. In the sixth inning of a 3-3 tie, with Gary Sheffield (who had benefited from a video confirmation two nights earlier) on first, Daniel Murphy stroked a fly ball to right field off Jordan Zimmermann that…what? Did it land on the warning track of its own volition? Or did it scrape the unhelpfully yellow and white Subway Sandwich ad that fronted the Pepsi Porch overhang, which would make it a home run by the reckoning of the new ballpark’s ground rules? Washington right fielder Adam Dunn played it as if it was a live ball and threw it to the infield to eventually cut down Sheffield at the plate. Sheffield, on the other hand, played it as a home run and thus wasn’t running all-out. It was initially called a home run, but television replays on SNY seemed extremely inconclusive. Three members of Larry Vanover’s umpiring crew, however, spent several minutes out of sight examining all angles and decided the initial call should stand. It was a two-run homer for Murphy, allowing the Mets to take a 5-3 lead en route to a 7-4 final.

GAME 047: June 10, 1966 — METS 5 Reds 0
(Mets All-Time Game 047 Record: 25-25-1; Mets 1966 Record: 18-29)

You want out-of-the-box success? Then you want Dick Rusteck. No Mets starting pitcher was ever better sooner than the 24-year-old lefty from Chicago. And, judging by the relatively few households in which his name became enduringly recognizable, no Mets starting pitcher of surpassing promise ever disappeared quite so quickly.

But nobody envisioned that while Rusteck was doing his thing…his one and only thing, just about.

The Notre Dame graduate was having a fine year in Triple-A Jacksonville (pitching alongside first-year pro Tom Seaver) but “didn’t expect to get called up,” he told author William Ryczek. “My record was 4-0, then 5-0, then 6-0 and I wasn’t called. Then I lost one and I got hit by a batted ball [in BP, but Suns teammate Bud Harrelson] — and I couldn’t throw. I was sure they wouldn’t call me up.”

Perhaps it was the Metsian way of doing things to wait until a prospect was incapacitated to give him his big break, but Rusteck was ready for the big time, as personified by the Cincinnati Reds of Tommy Harper, Pete Rose, Vada Pinson, Deron Johnson, Tony Perez and Leo Cardenas. “I wasn’t nervous,” the kid said. “I just tried to force myself to pitch the way I did at Jacksonville.”

A Friday night at Shea, in front of nearly 34,000, and Rusteck treated the whole scene as if it were just another outing in the International League. He no-hit the Reds for four innings and maintained his poise after Perez broke up his bid for immortality with a leadoff single in the fifth. That would be one of only four hits the Reds would collect on the night, all of them singles. Backed by two Eddie Bressoud homers, Rusteck cruised to a complete game 5-0 shutout in his major league debut, the only Met starter to achieve that kind of instant success (Grover Powell threw a shutout for the Mets in his first big league start in 1963, but he had pitched several times in relief before that). Dick struck out four and walked only one in defeating Cincinnati ace Jim Maloney.

The reviews were raves. Ralph Kiner, watching from the Mets’ broadcast booth, said, “His fastball moves. A couple of times the ball jumped more than half a foot as it came up to the plate.” Home plate ump Ed Sudol testified that Rusteck’s fastball “has a tendency to rise at the last instant. It had the batters off balance and was probably the main reason they popped up so much.”

Because baseball is baseball, and baseball is rarely predictable and only occasionally fair, Dick Rusteck’s debut shutout was his last win in the majors and 1966 was his only season in the bigs. “Four days later,” he would recall for Ryczek, “I tried to pick up a ball and I could hardly lift my arm. I had a real sharp pain in my shoulder. They pleaded with me to start, because after pitching a shutout, how could you possibly not come out for your next turn?”

Rusteck was bombed by St. Louis in one-plus innings of ill-advised work in that second try. One more start, in early July versus the Pirates, didn’t go much better. There’d be a trip to the Disabled List, a few games out of the bullpen and a return to Jacksonville in 1967…and 1968. Rusteck would bounce around the minors clear to 1977 when he wound down his career on the unaffiliated Salem Senators of the Northwest League. His left shoulder healed, but his left elbow went bad, as did his luck. One day in Rochester, for example, a piece of glass fell from a building and cut his non-pitching shoulder badly enough to require seventeen stitches.

But for one night, at 24, Dick Rusteck had pitching successfully in the major leagues all sewn up.

ALSO QUITE HAPPY: On June 4, 1985, the Dodger Stadium mound served as the operating table as baseball’s most skilled surgeon extricated himself and his team from a most critical jam. The matchup that attracted 49,386 to Chavez Ravine on a Tuesday night was the same one that stirred Shea Stadium ten days earlier: Fernando Valenzuela vs. Dwight Gooden. The showdown at Shea was a disappointment to Mets fans, as their beloved Doctor K fell 6-1 to L.A., dropping Gooden’s record to 6-3, but this late-night West Coast rendezvous was a different story. The phenomena emeriti (Valenzuela ’81, Gooden ’84) hooked up in a pitchers’ duel worthy of the phrase. Fernando had limited the Mets to five hits through eight innings, one of them a solo home run by Ray Knight. But he was matched on the scoreboard and outdone stylistically by Doc. Through seven, Gooden had also allowed five hits and one run (a homer by Pedro Guerrero) but had struck out nine Dodgers. Trouble, though, beckoned in the bottom of the eighth. Steve Sax singled, as did Ken Landreaux; Sax raced to third while Landreaux moved up to second on the throw in from the outfield. Davey Johnson opted to have Gooden intentionally walk Guerrero, loading the bases with nobody out. And this is where the operation gets serious: Doc strikes out Greg Brock, pops up Mike Scioscia foul to Gary Carter and strikes out Terry Whitfield. So much for the Dodgers’ bases-loaded threat. Come the top of the ninth, the other duelist dropped his weapon, as Valenzuela allowed three Met runs. Gooden, of course, came out for the ninth and finished his own gut-check masterpiece, a 4-1 eight-hitter, featuring a dozen strikeouts.

GAME 048: June 4, 1969 — METS 1 Dodgers 0 (15)
(Mets All-Time Game 048 Record: 33-18; Mets 1969 Record: 25-23)

There was Jackson Heights. There was Brooklyn Heights. There was Washington Heights. But nobody was scaling the heights in New York like the Mets were in the late spring of 1969. With one increasingly characteristic thrilling victory, they reached all kinds of new peaks and didn’t appear intent on stopping their climb anytime soon.

It had already been a homestand like no other in Mets history. After salvaging a split of a two-game set with the expansion Padres, the Mets swept three from the Giants for the first time in their relatively young lives. Then the Dodgers came to Shea and the Mets beat them twice. On getaway night, they attempted to fully eradicate the ghosts of their other ancestral oppressor.

Gil Hodges assigned this task to 26-year-old lefthanded rookie Jack DiLauro, making his first start that Wednesday night after a handful of relief stints. “Gil told me I’d be starting two or three days in advance,” the former Tiger farmhand recalled for author Stanley Cohen nearly twenty years later in A Magic Summer, “but it felt more like a month. I was really nervous, and it took me a couple of innings to calm down.” Yet DiLauro appeared every bit the serene veteran across nine innings as he fired shutout ball at Los Angeles. Jack struck out five, walked two and, aided by some slick defense, allowed only two hits.

Bill Russell reached DiLauro for a first-inning double, “and I came within a couple of inches of giving up more. Buddy Harrelson saved a run with a great play at short” on a liner by Wes Parker, “and Cleon caught a drive at the wall that held up” in the second. When Jones hauled in that fly ball from Russell, DiLauro “took a deep breath; from that point on, I was all right.” Better than all right — after walking Andy Kosco with two out in the third, the rookie retired the next sixteen batters he faced, taking him through nine.

DiLauro received a standing ovation after Bill Sudakis flied out to end the top of the ninth. “That was the biggest thrill of my career,” Jack told Cohen. “I had been pitching in the minors for six years, trying to make it to the big club. And now, after my first start, to get an ovation like that from a New York crowd…it’s a moment I’ll never forget.”

Only problem for the Mets was Bill Singer, who would win twenty for the Dodgers that season, was just as effective, and a lot more overpowering. Singer struck out ten Mets while walking no one and giving up no hits through six innings. Harrelson became the first Met baserunner by singling to open the home seventh. A sacrifice bunt, a hit batsman and a fielder’s choice grounder landed the Mets runners on first and third with Ed Kranepool up to give the Mets a chance to take the lead. But Dodger catcher Tom Haller picked Buddy off third to end the threat. An Art Shamsky single with one out in the ninth was the only other offense the Mets generated versus Singer.

The starting pitchers exited and extra innings arrived. Tug McGraw held off L.A. in the top of the tenth as fellow screwballer Jim Brewer did the same to the Mets. McGraw and Brewer would give way to teammates Ron Taylor and Al McBean, respectively, and the zeroes would continue to flow. In the top of the fifteenth, however, things got very sticky for the Mets. With pinch-runner Billy Grabarkewitz on third (after a Jim Lefebvre double) and Russell on first, Willie Davis chopped a ball up that seemed headed up the middle for a run-scoring base hit. Taylor, luckily, stood in the way.

“It hit the back of my glove,” the reliever said after the game. “When it did, I thought it was by far a hit.” But the deflection altered the course of events long enough for second baseman Al Weis to lunge for the ball and make an off-balance throw to the plate. Jerry Grote took it on a short hop and tagged Grabarkewitz for the second out of the inning.

“It was the greatest play I’ve ever seen on any team I’ve ever played for,” the Mets’ catcher marveled.

After escaping the top of the fifteenth when Parker fouled out to third (L.A. batters had left a dozen men on base and had gone 0-for-14 with runners in scoring position), it was the Mets’ turn to make the Dodgers sweat. Walt Alston’s new pitcher, Pete Mikkelsen, made things difficult on himself immediately by walking Harrelson. A Tommie Agee grounder forced Buddy at second. Up stepped rookie third baseman Wayne Garrett, who stroked a single to center. Davis — who had three Gold Gloves in his future — charged the ball…but the ball charged right past him. As it rolled toward Shea’s center field wall, Agee came all the way around from first to score the winning run, as the Mets beat the Dodgers in fifteen innings, 1-0.

It was a great win by any measure, but what made it extra special was all the ways it could be measured:

• The Mets had won their seventh consecutive game, matching the franchise record previously achieved in 1966 and ending this eight-game homestand 7-1.

• The Mets had engineered what Leonard Koppett referred to as “the longed-for double sweep of the Giants and Dodgers”. How longed-for? Consider that the former New York City representatives of the National League teamed to slap around the baby Metsies 58 times in 72 opportunities in 1962 and ’63 and had never been fully avenged…not until late May and early June of 1969, that is.

• The Mets raised their record to 25-23, two games above .500, a modest apogee to the naked eye, but one the Mets had never seen in nearly seven and one-third seasons of playing baseball. And as they jetted to the Coast to take on the California teams on their turf, the Mets would do so as sole proprietor of second place in the National League East — another first.

“It was June,” Dana Brand wrote in Mets Fan, “and my eye didn’t need to look for my team at the bottom of the list. They were in second place. And for the very first time in my eight years of looking at the standings, the two-digit number on the left was larger than the two-digit number on the right.”

More than a plane took off for the West Coast after that win over the Dodgers. Hope did, too.

ALSO QUITE HAPPY: On May 31, 1982, the Mets reached an era’s high-water mark, though that wasn’t the idea. Overall improvement was in evidence since the ’82 season had started, and achieving a record six games above .500 was supposed to be a steppingstone to maybe reaching seven…or eight…or more over the break-even mark. But being safely on the happy side of .500 was achievement enough in the judgment of Mets fans when their long-downtrodden team took a bite out of Joe Torre and the Western Division-leading Atlanta Braves. While Torre — making his first trip back to Shea since being dismissed the previous October — had been riding high in Dixie, Met partisans could be satisfied by the progress that had transpired under the guidance of new manager George Bamberger. Bambi was supposed to be a marvel with pitchers, and his starter this Memorial Day at Shea, Charlie Puleo, a 27-year-old rookie who had languished in the Blue Jay system since signing out of Seton Hall in 1978, was surely blossoming under George’s wing. The New Jersey native baffled the Braves until there were two outs in the eighth, striking out ten batters along the way. Bamberger removed Puleo with an 8-3 lead that reliever Craig Swan protected en route to a 10-4 Met victory. Charlie’s record rose to 5-2. Ellis Valentine banged out four hits, including a two-run homer. John Stearns went 3-for-5, stole a base and drove in three. The Mets were 27-21, easily their best record at any point in any season since 1976…and ultimately their best record at any point during any season in that fallow period until 1984.

In Praise of English Teachers

It occurred to me today — as R.A. Dickey slipped on the Wrigley Field grass and had his right foot slipped into a protective boot (lord help the Met who nicks himself shaving); and the Mets bore witness to the Cubs’ ability to scamper around the bases in the bitter cold; and David Einhorn introduced himself to us as either our savior or simply another obscenely wealthy hedge fund manager with $200 million getting bored in his back pocket — that 2011 hasn’t been the best of years for English teachers. I’ve lost my two favorites in the past five months.

Dana Brand wasn’t my English teacher, but as word of his passing sunk in throughout Thursday, I considered that there’s a whole other segment of people who are feeling a void right now, people unrelated to Dana by bloodline, marriage or even Mets Fandom. This has to be a crushing blow for his students past and present. When you lose someone who helps you reach inside yourself and communicate with the world around you, it leaves a mark.

It left a mark in January when I lost my English teacher, Mrs. Cuneo.

Technically, I haven’t had an English teacher lately, but Mrs. Cuneo was it for me. She was my ninth-grade English teacher. She, in case you’re wondering, is why you have the opportunity to read me here or anywhere. Mrs. Cuneo is the one who convinced me I was a writer and that I was going to be a writer and that there was no chance I’d be anything but a writer. I’d love to tell you what she said to so clearly blaze that segment of my life path, but I don’t remember. If there was a single flashpoint or conversation, I’ve forgotten it (and since I’m renowned in certain circles for my alleged Marilu Henner-like memory, that’s unlikely).

As best as I could piece together when I was compelled by her death to recall ninth-grade English, I remembered being buoyed by the confidence Mrs. Cuneo exuded on my behalf whenever she read something I wrote, and how she strongly suggested I write something more. It was infectious. This woman was so matter-of-fact about what I could do and what I should do, that I just felt dutybound to follow through. It wasn’t that she taught me some hot new way to conjugate verbs or unlocked the mysteries of participles and predicates for me. She essentially said, “You’re a writer,” and I believed it. Before ninth grade, I was just a kid who could write when called upon to do so. From ninth grade on, writing — like rooting for the Mets — was what I did.

I hadn’t actively thought of Mrs. Cuneo in decades, probably, when I got a phone call in early January from Ellen. Ellen was my seventh- and eighth-grade English teacher. I never called her Ellen then but when we found ourselves in unlikely touch a couple of years ago, she reintroduced herself as Ellen, and since we’re both adults now…sure. Anyway, Ellen called me and said she had some bad news about Jo.

And I was thinking, “Who’s Jo?”

Jo was Josephine. That was Mrs. Cuneo’s first name. Honest to goodness, I never knew that. Maybe “J. Cuneo” on a report card, but otherwise she was Mrs. Cuneo to me — always was, always will be. Well, by whichever name we were referring to Mrs. Cuneo, Mrs. Cuneo had passed away at the age of 87. Ellen knew how much she meant to me, and thought I’d want to know. Mrs. Cuneo’s wake would be taking place not far from where I live, so I would definitely pay my respects.

I showed up at the funeral home on a weekday afternoon and was surprised not so much that there were many people there, but at how many people there were young people — in their early twenties, I’d guess. I learned Mrs. Cuneo had kept teaching until only a few years before, into her eighties. The young people at the funeral home showed up for the exact same reason I did: because their English teacher meant that much to them.

Someone pointed out Mrs. Cuneo’s son for me. I extended my hand and said what I came to say: I’m a writer…and it’s because of Mrs. Cuneo (not “your mother” or “Josephine”). This made the son happy, even though he’d been hearing variations on the theme for a couple of days. After he called his sister over so I could repeat my testimony, he asked me when I had Mrs. Cuneo for a teacher.

“Ninth grade,” I said.

“No, what year?”

“1977-78.”

“1977 — wow.”

Yes, I suppose — wow. By January, it had been about 33 years since the spring of 1978, since Mrs. Cuneo had last encouraged me to write a little more than was required, probably 32 years since I had seen her at all, but her influence has been with me the whole time. Even without the nudge a person’s passing provides, I knew that. If you had asked me ten or twenty years ago, “How did you become a writer?” Mrs. Cuneo’s name would have come up no later than the third sentence of the second paragraph.

Professor Dana Brand at Hofstra University, I’d be willing to bet, had that kind of impact on his students. Good English teachers stay with you. Mrs. Cuneo did. Ellen did. A couple I had in college still do, and college was more than a quarter-century ago. I’ve been on my own as a writer since then, which may be why I so appreciated knowing Dana.

Beyond all the reasons that existed to befriend him and admire him and, sadly, to miss him, he was an English teacher who really liked my writing. He wrote some of the nicest things anybody has ever written about what I’ve written. He did so as a fellow Mets fan and as a blogging peer, but I’m pretty certain deep down that when I would read his thorough critiques or his offhand remarks, I’d see a gold star atop my paper. That English teacher thinks I can write — maybe I can!

Trust me, that feeling never fully goes away.

The Youthful Enthusiasm of Dana Brand

I will endure its passing, but I would have loved to have been an old man in these seats, under these lights.

That’s what Dana Brand wrote in Mets Fan, in an essay he entitled “For Shea“. I’ve thought of those words often since Shea Stadium was scheduled for and then met its ultimate demise. Every time I felt silly for missing the imperfect ballpark or ungrateful for not unquestioningly accepting the obvious improvements its successor offered, I reminded myself of what had been taken away from me: the opportunity to be an old man in those seats, under those lights. I never equated Shea Stadium with that segment of life. Shea, no matter how decrepit its infrastructure turned, was an expression of youthful enthusiasm. The Mets were an expression of youthful enthusiasm.

Dana Brand knew how to express youthful enthusiasm. To me, in the Mets Fan world I’ve been fortunate enough to inhabit, where I was blessed to have known Dana Brand and call Dana Brand my friend, he was the embodiment of youthful enthusiasm.

Dana was born at exactly the right moment in time to be and to call himself a Mets Fan. He was 7½ years old when they played their first game. That meant Dana and the Mets started with the same clean slate. The Mets, for too long, filled their slate with losses. Dana filled his (and that pocket notebook he toted everywhere) with the youthful enthusiasm of someone who wasn’t thrown by their conspicuous lack of success. “I want,” he would write well after 1962, “my baseball to be like real life, seasoned with failure and disappointment, ennobled by hope, and studded with just a few spectacular moments of pure joy.”

Dana began embracing the Mets and their intrinsic nature at the instant there were Mets to embrace and he never stopped, not until yesterday, I suppose, when he passed away at the criminally young age of 56.

We’re lucky in that Dana wrote relentlessly about his personal relationship with the Mets, the way others might write about a personal relationship with their deity. Thanks to him, we know what we missed if we missed it and we’re sure what we saw because he saw it, too. Through two marvelous books and a vital, eloquent blog, Dana let us into his Mets Fan world, from 1962 on. He made me understand those early years I didn’t see. He made me appreciate the texture of 1969 more than I possibly could have even after living with it in my consciousness since I was six. He laid out the entire life of the franchise and what we take it mean to us tribally and why it means so much to us individually.

He loved the Mets and boy did he love Shea Stadium. He got Shea Stadium as few others ever have. He got what made it more than its rotting architectural bones. He got how so many grew up in it and had every reason to suspect they’d grow old in it, under those lights. That Dana Brand had the foresight to anticipate such an actuarial possibility is a credit to him as a writer and a thinker, because every moment I spent with him he never really stopped being that kid who loved the Mets. Don’t let his academic day job and professorial demeanor, let alone his scholarly credentials (which were substantial), mislead you. Dana Brand was a kid who loved the Mets. He was just one of the older kids when we got to meet him.

After I learned that Dana had died, I flashed back on our last meeting, unplanned, in the Jackie Robinson Rotunda at Citi Field on April 10. He was at the first Sunday home game of the year alone and I was at the first Sunday home game of the year alone. Dana wanted to soak up the new season in solitude. I wanted a magnetic schedule and didn’t feel like asking around if anybody wanted to go. When we recognized each other, we greeted as old friends, as people who had been old friends going much further back than September 2007, which is when we actually first met. As I learned on that occasion, at the Long Beach Public Library, we went way the hell back. I guess I knew that from having read Mets Fan, but it was kind of thrilling to feel it unfold in person. Here was, per the title of the book from which he was in my hometown to read, a Mets Fan. Here was somebody who shared my life with me without knowing it. That’s how it is among all of us, isn’t it? With Dana, it was immediate and it was warm and it was as all-encompassing in a Mets Fan sense as it could be.

In April, we did what Mets Fans like us who go way the hell back do: we complained. We complained about the Mets. We bitched and we moaned and we griped and we found fault. But not for a second were we unhappy while we were doing this. Oh, we would have preferred whatever it was about the team and the management and the ballpark that didn’t satisfy us be resolved to our tastes. We would have preferred to have had to have spoken up to hear each other over the fluttering of a few more championship banners and we wouldn’t have minded if whoever decided what gets sold in the team store opted to stock a small shelf with books like ours. But these were fleeting if recurring misgivings. The overriding emotion for Mets Fans like us is we were very happy in the context of what aggravated us. We were thrilled, on some level, to be a little disappointed in the Mets, to care that much about the Mets, to share that much about the Mets. I always thought Dana maintained an ideal for his team and it was his mission to frame a world in which they lived up to what he knew they were at their core; to what they will always be to all of us; and to what they meant eternally in the heart and the soul and the beautiful mind of the kid of 7½ who deserved a longer stay in those seats under those lights.

Ugly Early

As baseball fans, we have a lot of phrases we repeat to ourselves to keep watching after things have gone to hell. As Mets fans, I’d wager we have even more of them.

Down 8-1 8-0 [sorry, was apparently huffing paint thinner] after the top of the first? You never know how the other starter will come out.

Score just zoomed from 2-1 you to 6-2 them? It’s hard to pitch with a big lead.

Down two runs, no one on base, one out to go? Bloop and a blast, of course.

The vast majority of times, all these phrases do is offer a little comfort while you demonstrate that you’re a sucker. But we say them anyway, because it’s what we do.

Dillon Gee comes out for the bottom of the first and promptly gives up four runs? Maybe he’ll settle down.

This didn’t seem terribly likely. It was freezing at Wrigley, with a 20-mile-an-hour wind whipping in and the radar showing a sheet of red and yellow moving up from the southwest. Gee quite obviously had no feel whatsoever for his curveball and possibly not for anything else, either: Standing on the mound, he was constantly blowing on his hand, mist swirling out of his mouth with each breath. It was a horrible night on which to play baseball, and it was going to get worse.

Now, throw in the other factors, such as the possibility that Fred Wilpon would be quoted saying shitty things about his players and/or setting draconian payroll targets in yet another publication, or that the Mets’ defense would engage in more bag-on-the-head slapstick, or … or God knows what, really. As Greg captured marvelously but depressingly yesterday, right now the definition of a brave Mets fan is one who continues to show up at this screwed-up office to confront whatever unfathomable nonsense will be on the docket this time.

“Overwhelming and absurd” is it exactly. After an off-day turned into Maelstrom Monday, the Mets got to actually have some say in their condition on Tuesday, and the bar was pretty low for getting everybody to calm down. They didn’t need to win. They just needed to play baseball with some modicum of professionalism, letting the game’s normal rhythms and routines quiet the waters. So of course they displayed exquisite timing in playing what might have been their worst game of the year, a relentlessly thorough exhibition of depressing dingbattery that left us all wanting to break stuff.

Anyway, yeah. That was what was going on when Dillon Gee gave up four in the bottom of the first.

But there was a bigger game afoot, and by the middle of the second it had revealed itself. You saw it after Mike Quade sent Casey Coleman home and brought in Justin Berg, who failed to throw a strike on his first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth, ninth, 10th, 11th or 12th pitch, a rather convincing demonstration of ineptitude that led to his own departure. When James Russell then arrived and rather matter-of-factly threw strike one to Jason Pridie, he got a near-standing ovation. And veteran Mets fans knew where we stood.

One of Metdom’s reliable pleasures is the early-season donnybrook with the Cubs at Wrigley. Sometimes the Mets win these and sometimes they lose them. Sometimes the wind is howling out and sometimes it’s whipping in. Sometimes both teams are good, sometimes one is and the other manifestly is not, and sometimes they both pretty much suck. Regardless of the details, you tend to see wacky Wrigley affairs coming early, and you buckle up knowing you’ll get somewhere in the neighborhood of 20 runs, at least one lengthy rain delay, a parade of relievers sad bad and accidentally effective, the near-certainty of a managerial ejection, errors and baserunning blunders, lots of emo from the Cub faithful, and an ending you don’t see coming but feels like the logical last piece the next day.

With the Mets somehow up 6-4, I was ready and in fact sort of eager — in these affairs, even Met losses don’t have the sting they do elsewhere, because just crawling out of the wreck more or less intact feels like an accomplishment. Plus Keith Hernandez was clearly unhinged, something I’ve noticed tends to happen without Ron Darling acting as superego. Gary Cohen, sensing the possibilities and unable to help himself, was also starting to bait Keith; I decided that when this game got to the 12th inning and it was 3 a.m. and more rain was coming, I was TiVoing the rest and setting it to KEEP UNTIL I DELETE, which I would never do. It was gonna be that good.

And I maintain it would have happened — except Mother Nature shrunk the whole affair down to snack-sized proportions and Gee refused to live down to his role.

Rather then get pinata’ed and depart for a period of shocked penance on the bench, Gee did what suckers like us are always hoping starters in his predicament will do: He settled down. It didn’t get any warmer or drier or more pleasant, but somehow Gee harnessed his wayward pitches and started knocking Cubs off left and right.

Which led to the drama within the drama: When baseball becomes a race against the weather, less can actually be more. When the Mets opened the top of the fifth with a rally, you could sense Mets fans everywhere caught in a dreadful tug-of-war. More runs are always nice, as is beating up on the Cubs. But once it started raining it wasn’t going to quit, and so those extra runs could actually result in the entire game being washed away and not counting. Those runners out there were quite possibly the opposite of insurance runs — they were runs that somehow might decrease one’s chance of winning.

Which, honestly, would just have been so, so, so Metsian.

It didn’t happen, though. The rain held off long ago for the game to go official and for Carlos Beltran to hammer a triple up the gap, prompting a sudden fury in me and a yell of “WHAT THE FUCK WAS THAT 65% TO 70% OF, FRED???!!!” (The most annoying thing to me about Wilpon’s New Yorker quotes, besides the shitshow they provoked, was the revelation that Fred is every bit as unfair to Beltran and myopic about his value as those late-night WFAN callers whose putrid, mouth-breathing stupidity makes you wonder how in the world they can operate a phone.) The last sight of the game wasn’t some Met long man trudging off as Cubs hugged each other, but Quade screaming at the umps he knew had signed his team’s death sentence.

So the Mets won. One day later than when we all desperately needed it for a mental clean slate, perhaps, but they won.

And now we’ll all be back at the office tomorrow, wondering what the hell’s in store for us this time.

Addendum #1: I talked the Mets, baseball, New Orleans and hardcore porn with the folks at Bloomberg Baseball yesterday. Despite the porn discussion, I swear it’s perfectly safe for work.

Addendum #2: For a terrific story about how fringe guys such as Gee live while waiting to see if they’ll stick with the Mets or rejoin the Herd, see The Wall Street Journal’s Brian Costa. I always wondered about this particular subject; Costa does a great job turning it into an interesting, very human tale.