The blog for Mets fans
who like to read

ABOUT US

Greg Prince and Jason Fry
Faith and Fear in Flushing made its debut on Feb. 16, 2005, the brainchild of two longtime friends and lifelong Met fans.

Greg Prince discovered the Mets when he was 6, during the magical summer of 1969. He is a Long Island-based writer, editor and communications consultant. Contact him here.

Jason Fry is a Brooklyn writer whose first memories include his mom leaping up and down cheering for Rusty Staub. Check out his other writing here.

Got something to say? Leave a comment, or email us at faithandfear@gmail.com. (Sorry, but we have no interest in ads, sponsored content or guest posts.)

Need our RSS feed? It's here.

Visit our Facebook page, or drop by the personal pages for Greg and Jason.

Or follow us on Twitter: Here's Greg, and here's Jason.

USF is 6-1

Being No. 2 in the nation (No. 1 by the judgment of impartial computers) was fun while it lasted, but my USF Bulls obviously don’t care for northern lights. While you were busy watching The Office or the season finale of Mad Men or Game Five from Cleveland (or perhaps not watching television at all), I was watching my alma mater’s short-lived national championship dream get sacked by a hard-charging Rutgers defense and run over by the remarkable Ray Rice in Piscataway on ESPN Thursday night. We lost 30-27. Maybe we can still win the Big East and grab a BCS berth. Maybe we’ll get another one of those muffler or pizza bowls. We won’t be topping Ohio State anytime soon.

For about an hour, an hour-and-a-half, I was extraordinarily bummed out. Then I remembered this whole thing was pretty new to me and I never expected to have the green and gold candle relit so brightly this autumn by a program that didn’t exist when I was going to school down there. It’s been exciting reconnecting to my USF roots, a thousand-plus miles and twenty-plus years removed. I’ll keep tabs on my team the rest of the way. Their season, unlike another I could mention, continues with honor.

If anybody cares, Flashback Friday will be up later today, and then Jason and I will be retiring our consecutive-days-posted streak at 213, having blogged daily between March 21 and October 19. We’ll be around throughout the offseason, just not every day.

After the Fire

I experienced an epiphany one day in 2007. It was Wednesday, May 30. I was kind of punchy, having fallen asleep on the reclining love seat in the living room after coming home from the Armando-Jose-Delgado twelve-inning thriller of May 29, and perhaps a little loopy from the fumes of the fire that broke out in another apartment in our building the following morning. I was tired, but I was alert to the situation at hand.

Over the previous few days, everything Met was working perfectly. We had swept the Marlins in Florida and then humbled the Giants in one of the great games Shea or any stadium will ever see. The Braves were in pieces. The Yankees, for that matter, were in pieces. The Red Sox were burying them. I endured what seemed like hours of monotonous Richard Neer through a long car ride the Sunday before just so I could keep hearing the FAN updates: Mets sweep, Yanks swept. Braves swept, Red Sox sweep. Everything we could ever want was coming true.

Even the fire on Wednesday, all things considered, wasn’t so bad.

I was still worn out on the afternoon of the 30th when, having decided everything was as close to copasetic as could be, I lit out for the nearest King Kullen to pick up a few groceries. I was sporting a Mets shirt and a Mets cap. This was not unusual. As I pulled into the supermarket lot, I saw somebody wearing a Yankees cap. That was not unusual either, nor was the familiar feeling of clenching that I’d been doing for a decade. Oh brother. I wonder what he’s going to say.

Then the epiphany: That fucker couldn’t say anything to me, not one goddamn thing! This was way beyond all the self-esteem grasping I’d been doing on and off since the late ’90s when I was prepared to answer any charges that the Mets suck with a veritable graph demonstrating that consecutive winning seasons and regular Wild Card contention meant, in fact, the Mets didn’t suck. I no longer had to make the case. The Mets were making it for me. They made it pretty clear throughout 2006 and now they had sealed it. The Mets didn’t suck. I didn’t suck for being their fan. We were now the arbiters of who sucked.

After the fire was the most satisfied I would be in 2007.

***

Five-Year Plans didn’t exactly yield long-term results for the Soviet Union, so there isn’t much sense in attempting to execute one now. Still, I thought I was in the midst of one.

We started this blog in 2005, a year that had a little of this, a little of that where the Mets were concerned: first year of Pedro and Carlos and Omar and Willie; last year of Mike; emergence of David and Jose; a whisper of Wild Card contention; a whiff of disappointment…a great way for us to get our typing fingers wet.

Then 2006 and the fast start and the obviously impending division title and the drama of a postseason with its highs and its lows and its lingering beauty…truly a privilege to blog.

Last winter, it dawned on me what an opportunity we had here. A season like 2005, a season like 2006 and, eventually, unbeatable storylines for 2008 (the last year of Shea) and 2009 (the first year of Citi). For the first five years of this endeavor, I theorized, it couldn’t get any better.

And smack in the middle? 2007? Of course this was going to be the world championship year.

It never, ever, ever occurred to me that we would have something of historic proportions to blog about in 2007 and it would not involve Met success. I just assumed the next logical step for a franchise that had come within one extra flare — just one — a gork, a ground ball with eyes, a dying quail…just one more dying quail of the World Series would in fact be in the World Series. Once we made the World Series, logically we would win it.

And wouldn’t that be something to write home about?

***

Well, we got a memorable storyline, all right, with a nice little twist there at the end. Nice little twist of the knife. Alanis Morissette would call it ironic. I don’t think it was irony. I don’t know that it was tragedy. I do know I would have chosen a different ending. Wouldn’t have we all?

But mostly I know that I knew very little about what was coming when this year began. And since I do know I was not alone in feeling this way, I know something greater was at work than sorry arms and aging legs.

For dousing my fiery passion, for altering my secret Five-Year Plan, for derailing our September and leaving our October blank, for showing once again that none of us — none of us — knows our elbow from our Aase, it is with great reluctance that I announce our Nikon Camera Player of the Year for 2007 is Uncertainty.

Why Uncertainty? Because you just never know.

***

Uncertainty takes its place alongside our previous Faith and Fear Nikon Camera Players of the Year, radiomates Gary Cohen and Howie Rose in 2005 and Shea Stadium in 2006, for having defined its season like no other entity. They broke up Gary and Howie and they’re going to tear down Shea, but Uncertainty isn’t going anywhere soon. Surely we learned that much in 2007.

***

When did you know? I mean really know, deep down in your heart know? When did you give up on your expectations? Surely you had them. We all had them. How could we not? Even if there was enough to make you suspicious, how could you not believe these Mets were going to leap that little hump that had separated them from the World Series in 2006?

Did you see it coming in Spring Training? I’d be self-aggrandizing my powers of prophecy to tell you I saw it, but when we were losing Grapefruit game after Grapefruit game, I had a dark little inkling that something was awry. But I dismissed it as quickly as it arose. Ah, these games don’t count. Why am I sitting up late stressing over Chan Ho Park?

Did you see it coming in April? When we weren’t sweeping the Nationals by throwing our gloves on the field? Sure, it was irritating losing games to the Braves, but not beating the Nationals on a regular basis at Shea…shouldn’t they have been easy pickin’s?

Did you see it coming in May? A little? We took first in May. We peaked in May. There were afternoons when we played like children in the best way possible, grinning and winning and surprising ourselves by how much we could accomplish in the course of a springtime afternoon. But there were days and nights when we were downright ordinary. Yet these were the 2007 Mets! The heirs to the 2006 Mets! The hairless 2007 Mets! They got buzzcuts and they started winning!

The night that followed the afternoon that followed the fire that followed the Delgado walkoff that followed Benitez balking Reyes home…we were shut down completely by Barry Zito who we were supposed to get, as we welcomed back Guillermo Mota who was supposed to be gone.

I never did care for those buzzcuts.

***

June wasn’t a week old when we all saw it coming. This was the month with all the playoff opponents: Detroit, L.A., Yankees, Twins…preceded by Arizona and Philadelphia, teams that lacked only priors. The Mets played 18 consecutive games against the lot of them and lost 14. Panic was in the air.

But hey, we’re the Mets! We’re in first place! Sooner or later, you know we’ll snap out of it. We won a division last year. We came within a game of the Series. We play Takin’ Care of Business after wins because we take care of business.

The power of positive thinking seemed to right the ship. We swept Oakland and kicked dirt on St. Louis, our erstwhile October tormentor. Then we boogied on down to Philadelphia and won two on a Friday and one on a Saturday. I saw the first and third of them. With eight of nine won, I was giddy gliding toward home on NJ Transit. I had brought my iPod for the train trip and kept playing Bachman-Turner Overdrive as I rolled through Central and North Jersey on June 30, one month after the fire.

I wonder if I’m celebrating too much too soon, I actually thought. I wonder if I’m enjoying this to excess. Maybe I shouldn’t be too happy. We haven’t actually won anything. Maybe I should stop indulging in personal triumphalism. Maybe I should just play “Takin’ Care of Business” once.

Nah.

***

In 2007, I had my moments of fright that I was jinxing the Mets, that I was letting myself get ahead of the situation. But I didn’t worry as much as in past years about it. I didn’t want to. I wanted to enjoy this particular ride. I didn’t want to believe anything could stop it.

I didn’t want to believe what I was seeing. Three losses to the ne’er-do-well Rockies. Jose Reyes, that vibrant blur of enthusiasm and line drives, dogging it to first in Houston. John Maine giving the lousy Reds a large lead right away. Losing in San Diego. Struggling with the Nationals again. July was supposed to put June behind us. It didn’t. For two months, we played sub-.500 ball. Yet we led the division by three games.

***

I saw the future on August 11. I saw the Mets gift-wrap it, tie a bow around it and prepare to give it away. This I couldn’t deny. I saw the Mets spit up a game to the Marlins they had no business regurgitating. I’d already been on edge. A loss that could have been avoided in Milwaukee…a bad call setting the tone in Chicago…more frustration with Atlanta…and now we couldn’t beat Florida at home.

On August 11, we led the Marlins 3-1. Glavine was pitching in the seventh, facing the bottom of the order. He gave up a hit. He recorded an out. Then he was lifted for Mota.

In a matter of minutes, it was Marlins 5 Mets 3.

Yet the Mets, the Mets of 2006-07 persevered off Justin Miller: Milledge; Castro; Reyes; Castillo; two runs were built in a blink. The Mets tied it up. Sure, David Wright fouled out and Jose was thrown out trying to tag up (another lousy call), but that’s OK. We’re the Mets. They’re the Marlins. We just stuck a dagger in their heart. We’ll finish the job later. We’ll take care of business.

Heilman gave up two in the eighth and we lost 7-5. To the Marlins.

***

I’m OK with the idea that this isn’t the season we’ve been waiting for. Not happy about it. Not satisfied with it. Not necessarily resigned to the notion that it won’t be, because it’s August 12 and 46 games remain and we are in first and I still believe we are capable of staying in first, at least as capable as anybody else is of replacing us there. But as Miguel Cabrera drove home Cody Ross and Hanley Ramirez in the top of the eighth Saturday night, as I watched from an upper deck box another late-inning score turn away from the Mets’ favor, as I considered how most of the past ten weeks have played out, as I took in the width, depth and breadth of the 2007 season to date, I realized that the Mets truly and really might not make the playoffs.

Not just might not win the World Series. Not just might not win the pennant. Not just might not win the first round. Not just might not win the division. Not just might not win the Wild Card.

The Mets might not make the playoffs in 2007.

Me, 8/12/07

***

There was a time in the same month in which they executed that which is now known as The Worst Collapse Ever that the Mets were a lock. They had stumbled so unceremoniously so many times, most notably at the end of August in Philadelphia (takin’ care of business, indeed), but they bounced back. They were the Superball of baseball. They’d had a seven-game lead, let it melt, and chilled long enough to build it all the way back to seven by September 12. The Mets reeled off a 10-2 spurt. They were out of reach. Let the Magic Number countdowns and playoff lotteries and Met-a Culpas commence!

How dare I have thought something so right could go irretrievably wrong?

***

I did pretty well at being a student in first grade and second grade. It was a matter of pride and, to be honest, a matter of fact, that I was, for two years running, known (known, mind you) as “the smartest kid in the class”. But there was a spring day in second grade when I felt really dumb. I don’t remember what the day’s assignment was, but our teacher, Mrs. Cohen, told us we had to complete it quietly at our desks before we could have recess.

Everybody finished before I did. They had recess. I lingered and lagged, occasionally looking out the window to notice everybody else, none of whom was considered “the smartest kid in the class,” running around and yelling and tossing a ball or something. My assignment remained undone. It was getting late, so I hustled to finally finish. When I handed my paper to Mrs. Cohen, who was ready to move on to other lessons, I asked if I could have a little recess time outside. Sure, she said, go ahead, but don’t take too long.

I went outside. Everybody else had come in. I was all alone. I ran around in a circle a couple of times so I felt I was getting what was coming to me. Then I went back to my desk.

The first-place Mets who were swept three by the second-place Phillies; lost two of three to the fourth-place Nationals; blew leads of 3-0 and 7-4 before losing in ten innings to the last-place Marlins; were swept three more by the fourth-place Nationals; dropped a makeup game to the sub-.500 Cardinals; and lost two of three on the last weekend to the last-place Marlins reminded me of that spring afternoon in second grade.

They brought it back a lot.

***

It was exactly four months after the fire that the season ended. After the fire, I was full of certainty. There was nothing after the season except certain emptiness. Willie Randolph and Omar Minaya, the certified geniuses of 2006, had reverted to politicians, making the talk show rounds and insisting that no, the statistics didn’t tell the story, the losing twelve of seventeen wasn’t the complete picture, that this was still a good team that had endured a bad stretch, that the young players had just gained valuable pennant race experience for the first time. Randolph and Minaya had just watched their party lose both houses of Congress and were now in front of microphones telling anyone who was buying that the pro-Phillies election was just a blip. Really, they said, we’re living in a great Met era.

The Phillies played. The Yankees played. The Mets scattered. Shea went unoccupied. Citi Field went up, brick by potentially lucrative brick, but its foundation had been shaken. We really don’t know if it will be the home of winners come 2009 or if it will be just a pricey novelty for a little while. Willie Randolph was retained, more for the appearance of stability, I’m convinced (the team’s owners are politicians, too), than for anything he can offer as a manager. Tom Glavine declined his option for 2008, received $3 million to go away and didn’t offer a definitive plan for next year. It’s not impossible that he returns. God help us if he does.

In May when Cliff Floyd came back with the Cubs and June when Mike Piazza came back with the A’s, I heard each man go on the record lauding Mets fans’ judgment. Yes, they each said in so many words, they can be harsh when you fail, but when you come through for them, they really make you feel as if you did something great. The Shea faithful are faithful even if a segment thereof is not the most patient of sects. We can argue the merits of booing your own until we are orange and blue in the face, but who would have told anybody on the premises on September 30 that you’re sending the wrong message by booing the Hall of Fame pitcher who just hit the opposing pitcher with the bases loaded to force in the fifth run of the most important first inning of the year?

I didn’t boo Tom Glavine when he left after recording one out in nine chances. I was too busy cursing him and cursing myself for having been suckered into supporting him, publicly no less. I was certain I had gotten past my smoldering distaste for this ex- but never quite former Brave. I thought five years as a Met makes you a Met. In the end, it didn’t.

Glavine took lots of heat for not seeming hot and bothered that he turned in, almost inarguably, the worst pitching performance in a crucial game in Mets history. If the timing didn’t make it bad enough, the credentials of the pitcher made it unfathomably horrible. But there he was, the 303-game winner, in front of reporters, showered and powdered and explicitly “not devastated” by his cratering.

As the Mets offered themselves up to the media after they missed the playoffs, SNY showed each of them being true to themselves. Tom wasn’t devastated. Paul was one question from bopping Gary Apple. David held the emotional fort as long as he could. “Look at the way each of them is dealing with it,” Stephanie observed. “Glavine’s in denial, Lo Duca’s defensive and Wright wants to cry.”

Denial was the least pretty reaction of them all. Of course you give up five and leave three on in the first, you’re going to hear it from the crowd. But I cannot believe that a pitcher of Tom Glavine’s caliber — saluted as he’d been as he approached and surpassed 300 victories — had managed to build up so little goodwill in five Mets seasons that he didn’t rate the slightest sympathy from a representative sample of 54,453. A 303-game winner who wasn’t steeling himself with denial before he hit the first base foul line would have received that much. Maine, Perez, Pelfrey…freaking Brian Lawrence wouldn’t have been booed the way Glavine was, wouldn’t be regretted as Glavine will always be for his spectacular fade down the stretch in 2007.

I’m not glad he faded. I wish he had succeeded. I’d be perfectly willing to continue to indulge the illusion that I liked Tom Glavine being on the Mets up to and including November 1 and the seventh game of this year’s World Series if necessary. But on some perverse if impractical level, I’m thrilled that I didn’t have to root like hell for him one more batter than necessary. There’s a limit to the well-worn laundry argument. We sell bits and pieces of our soul to cheer on players we never wanted here. I once sat in the left field boxes and yelled “C’MON VINNY!” at Vince Coleman. I put my hands together for Mike Stanton. I could, for a time, look at Guillermo Mota in a Mets uniform without queasiness. And I gave my all for Tom Glavine because that was what I was supposed to do. I stood in my living room on the night of August 5 and applauded his landmark achievement. I applauded him a week later at Shea when his employers honored him with 300 golf balls and other tokens of appreciation.

We do sell our souls from time to time. Baseball’s personnel pool is too fluid not to. But I think a fan has to draw the line somewhere. I didn’t draw it firmly for Vince Coleman or Tommy Herr or Bobby Bonilla or Mike Stanton or Michael Tucker or Guillermo Mota. I draw it, finally, until the tip of the chalk breaks to keep Tom Glavine away from my heart and my head for the rest of my days. You will not read me rationalize ever again on behalf of Tom Glavine as a New York Met. He has lost his rationalization privileges.

I’ve taken that much of my soul back.

***

Glavine was a major culprit in the Worst Collapse Ever. He wasn’t the only one. The anti-Glavine, my precious Jose Reyes, was useless when it mattered most. Delgado’s hip pointed the wrong way just when the rest of him seemed to have figured things out. Nobody played second base more than 50 games the whole year. Lo Duca was angry more than he was good. Shawn Green leaned on his bat in the on-deck circle like he was waiting for a bus…and then stepped to the plate as if he had just missed a fleet of them. Really, where most of the Mets were concerned, the ineptitude was viral.

Wright the Valiant was on base the entire second half, but he couldn’t carry an entire offense on his back. Nor could Beltran the Magnificent, nor Alou the Astounding. These three, the 3-4-5 hitters almost every game, hit .352 combined in September. And it didn’t really help all that much. The only consistent pitcher — starter or reliever — in September was Pedro Martinez, and it would have taken a medical miracle to have wrenched an additional inning from him in any of his five sterling starts.

When even Pedro Martinez overcoming anatomical odds can’t rescue you, you are beyond hope.

***

There was a moment in September that was nice to see. I mean just nice. It was during one of the five wins in the final seventeen games, the one in which Ollie Perez held the Marlins at bay for eight innings, the kind of endurance generally unheard of from the Met rotation in 2007. With a large lead, Willie pulled him and the camera caught Ollie sitting down, collecting his thoughts when Jeff Conine walked over and shook his hand.

Jeff Conine? Jeff Conine who’d been a Met for about a month? Jeff Conine who contributed virtually nothing to this pennant drive? Jeff Conine who was about to retire no matter what the Mets did during his abbreviated tenure here?

Yeah, Jeff Conine. I wondered if Oliver Perez and Jeff Conine had done more than nod at each other since Conine joined the Mets. But there he was, being very much a veteran toward a younger player. I liked that. I really liked that. I suppose I liked Conine, too, though I never got much of a look at him as a Met. Nobody did.

I liked Castillo turning double plays and Anderson clubbing doubles and triples and, before them, Easley and Valentin contributing with smarts and base hits (Valentin could manage this ballclub someday, it occurred to me recently). I like older players, probably because they’re the ones closest in age to me. I like them a lot.

I just don’t need to see as many as often in 2008.

***

It was an imperfect roster, it is now obvious. There was almost nobody in the universally accepted prime of his career. The older guys broke down. The younger guys broke down, too, and had the nasty habit of not being fully formed (except for Wright). Kids like Gotay and Gomez and the tantalizing Lastings Milledge went untested at Randolph’s prerogative. Should have they played more? Would have they been the difference? Can’t tell without it having happened. I know I wasn’t particularly excited about entrusting our championship fate to a bunch of kids. But that’s because I thought we had a championship fate. We did not.

Remember the Mets’ rebuilding program of maybe three months in 2003 and three months in 2004? Remember the obtuse “Catch the Energy” come-on? Remember Jim Duquette’s retrofitted rationalization that Shea Stadium was a pitcher’s park, thus let’s load up on whiz-bang defenders and speedsters? It was enough of a strategy to allow me to bite my tongue when Vladimir Guerrero could have been had for a song in the winter of ’04 but was passed on. No, I said, we don’t need the best player in the National League. It’s not part of the plan.

What plan? There’s never any plan with this team. Or maybe there are just failed plans. “Catch the Energy” fizzled and next thing we knew, we were signing free agents. Good free agents. Game-changing free agents. I’m not complaining. But then we gave up on the youth movement, save for two positions. We had to have experience because we were so close. We were going to win the World Series in 2007. We needed to do that with Shawn Green and Moises Alou and an array of second basemen, many of whom could remember when Chevy Chase was boffo box office.

I don’t know that there is such a thing as rebuilding. It may very well be a polite euphemism for sucking without spending. But someday I hope to see the Citi Field Mets bring up some outfielders and let them play.

***

Magic Number countdowns throughout Metsopotamia stalled at 4. Anxious e-mails regarding potential playoff ticket acquisition halted. And unlike May 30, I didn’t want to wear a Mets shirt or a Mets cap or a Mets anything ever again — at least not right away. I wasn’t worried about what the lunkheads at King Kullen might say. I just didn’t want any part of us so soon. It took me more than a week after the season disintegrated to pluck so much as a faux Vaughn tee out of a pile of moderately viable garments to wear around the house. I preferred not being seen in it when I ventured outside to get the mail.

I’m back in my usual wardrobe since the Yankees were eliminated. Their losing helped. It always does.

***

I’m still superstitious about baseball. I was superstitious on May 17 when I realized my sitting patterns were key as the Mets mounted their furious five-run comeback on the Cubs. I was superstitious on September 29 when John Maine came oh-so-close to pitching the first…DON’T EVEN THINK IT…in Mets history. But my conviction that my thoughts and actions have an impact on the doings down below feels a little misplaced. There weren’t enough good thoughts in the world to save the Mets in September. There weren’t enough precautionary thoughts to block out all that expectation we had accumulated in advance of the reality of 2007.

I used to be more superstitious about baseball. Now I would just as soon be surprised by five-run ninths and not expect a blessed thing.

***

Is this still the golden age of Mets baseball? Was 2006 the norm and 2007 the aberration? Were Willie and Omar right, not just politic, in selling their storyline that a historic collapse could happen to anybody?

The 1970 Reds were the original Big Red Machine: Rose, Perez, Bench of course, but also Lee May and Bobby Tolan and Tommy Helms and rookie shortstop Davey Concepcion shunting aside Woody Woodward and kid pitchers named Wayne Simpson and Don Gullett and a 20-game winner in Jim Merritt and a formidable bullpen led by Wayne Granger and Clay Carroll. The ’70 Reds raced out in front of the pack the way the ’06 Mets did. The ’70 Reds fell a little short the way the ’06 Mets did. The ’70 Reds loomed as a powerhouse for years to come the way the ’06 Mets did.

The ’71 Reds went 79-83 and wound up in fourth. Their collapse was complete and early. But the ’71 Reds were an aberration in the history of Cincinnati baseball. Joe Morgan was acquired — terrible announcer but a heck of a second baseman — and the ’72 Reds won a pennant and the ’73 Reds won a division and the ’74 Reds won 98 games and the ’75 and ’76 Reds were World Champions, considered one of the great dynasties ever.

The 2005 White Sox shared several of the same characteristics as the 1970 Reds and the 2006 Mets, except the Sox went all the way; first time since 1917. Can’t think of a fan base (other than ours, naturally) that deserved it more. They could be forgiven for assuming a repeat was in order in ’06. Those White Sox had a great start, too. But it didn’t last.

“Still,” wrote film critic and South Side superfan Richard Roeper in the afterword to Sox and the City, “there was that ferocious lineup, and just enough good outings from the starting staff to make you believe that at any moment, the Sox were going to shift into a higher gear and blow away” the competition. “With all the distractions and disappointments,” Roeper wrote of the year-after hangover, White Sox fans still expected a finishing kick that would push the Chicagoans into another October. It never came.

“That’s what made things so frustrating,” Roeper explained. “The Sox didn’t have to be great in the last two months to get into the playoffs; they had to be average. They played hard, but they seemed to be lacking a sense of fire and urgency.”

In 2007, two years removed from their championship season, the White Sox went 72-90 and wound up in fourth.

***

Of all the sadness attendant to The Worst Collapse Ever, one of the saddest events was the death of glorious 2006. Even if ’07 proves to be a bump in the historical road, there is now separation. It no longer feels seamless. ’07 was a continuation of ’06. ’07 was going to perfect ’06. It would take all the robustness and add a couple of flourishes. Everybody who was good in ’06 was going to become great; everybody great was going to become awesome. We’d win more than 97 games. We’d win more than a division series. We’d rearrange Shea’s upper right field wall one last time. And we’d be takin’ care of business every day.

“All season long,” Roeper wrote of the White Sox’ failure to follow up 2005 with an equally satisfying 2006, “I urged my fellow fans not to expect a repeat. Live in the moment!”

I wish I’d read this book before September.

***

Theoretically, the future has never been more foreseeably agreeable for the Mets. If the three young pitchers who now seem to have assured themselves of rotation slots each succeed, our 2007 fortunes would figure to do no worse than shadow our 2006 accomplishments. That trio could easily go quartet by April 2008. The outfield would be rehabilitated next, with two of three fast-rising kids patrolling corners currently occupied by short-term elders. Not as publicized but just as tantalizing this spring is an eventual first base candidate who got some good swings in before being sent down. Thus, in a blink, we could be swimming in a plethora of prime: Maine, Pelfrey, Perez, Humber, Gomez, Martinez, Milledge, Carp joining Reyes, Wright and Beltran. Throw in two or three strategically signed free agents by our nonpenurious ownership and we’re looking at a nucleus that rivals our not-so-wild dreams from the crest of 1988. If you’re inclined to take it a step further, there’s the TV network and the new ballpark and the vast resources contemporary sports success seems to yield in staggering amounts every time you turn around. The foundation for this organization shapes up as solid as the accumulated brickage that will define Citi Field.

And you know what it all guarantees for our Mets and our Mets-related happiness? Absolutely nothing. It never did and it never will. Per the in-sickness-and-in-health vows each of us took when we betrothed ourselves to our team, the reality that everything’s a year-in, year-out crapshoot shouldn’t matter one little bit.

But it’s something to keep in mind.

Me, 3/18/07

***

I guess I was never really that certain about 2007. I don’t mention that to let myself off the hook or attach the gift of exceptional vision to my blogging. I thought we might not win, but it never occurred to me that we would lose. I did understand there are no guarantees, though I was pretty sure we entered the past season as close to one as one could legally get.

The fine print at the bottom of the fan contract said otherwise. That’s the clause that says Uncertainty is the only thing that’s certain, that you’re guaranteed nothing, that you really do have to take them one game at a time, whether you’re 4-0 in April, 33-17 in late May or 83-62 and leading the field by seven games with seventeen to go on the Twelfth of September.

Damn. I should have read the fine print more closely.

***

We were in the midst of a five-year plan. Blog about a little of this, a little of that in 2005. Then a division championship and a postseason in 2006. Then something monumental and unforgettable in 2007.

Can’t say we didn’t have that to blog about.

The five-year plan, I suppose, is still in effect. The fourth year is next year. And next year will arrive.

Of that I am certain.

Torre Out! (In 1981!)

As the Western World waits to learn of the drawn-out fate of the revered Joe Torre, it’s nice to know that history repeats itself.

Thanks to a link from the one and only Metstradamus, we are reminded that a less revered Joe Torre was fired from his New York managerial perch once before. And that we as a civilization lived through it.

You gotta watch this YouTube link to the past, to Sunday, October 4, 1981, to the day the Torre watch was as succinct as could be…even if the Eyewitness News report wasn’t.

TV used to be long! Soundbites weren’t bites — they were enormous chomps! And hair…well, hair, like jeans (ooh la la), was something else, too.

Torre was fairly classy in the aftermath of this, his first dismissal. I love the characterization of how Frank Cashen broke the news to him after the Mets’ split-season divisional lunge (a.k.a. “the good times”) came up short: “The man came out and told me straight on.” News wasn’t managed nearly as tightly as it would come to be. Notice he’s interviewed in his office, not in front of a wall of dancing logos.

Yet not all questions from this video are answered:

• For example, what do you do with a chubby dog?

• What was Lee Mazzilli thinking with the mustache?

• How did the sainted Rube Walker survive 14 seasons? (Even if he merited survival, it’s hard to believe any pitching coach could last through five different managers).

• What array of narcotics would lead anybody to believe that we needed a “wild man” like Billy Martin to “come help coach the Mets”?

Thanks again to Metstradamus for the best YouTube clip I’ve seen since somebody turned me on to the TaB Mindsticker campaign.

Dreaming Someone Else's Dream

Downstairs in our house you'll find a treadmill, and on one arm of that treadmill you'll find my iPod and headphones. The playlist I currently queue up for running is called MARCH 2007, which means very little beyond the fact that I created it then, thanks to months of adding a song here and subtracting one there. The songs are my typical fare — power pop and punk, indie noise and teenage crunch rock. A couple of exceptions aside, the common denominator is the songs have to move — they're for running, after all.

As you might guess, I listened to various incarnations of MARCH 2007 all season. Usually I'd get on the treadmill around 8:30, after Joshua had exhausted even his ability to forestall bedtime and I'd procrastinated for my own self-defeating reasons. 8:30 usually meant the middle innings, and running would usually take me into the 7th — I saw lots of Met innings triumphant and tragic and ordinary while sprinting in place, my iPod blasting loud enough for Emily to hear it in the next room. (Tinnitus? WHAT?)

After a rather Metsian collapse in September, I've been trying to whip myself back into shape this month. The treadmill schedule remains the same — except now there are no Mets. No Gary. No Keith. No badly lit, vaguely porno-looking actors and actresses saying they'd wished they'd had their teeth whitened years ago. Instead, there are Rockies and Diamondbacks, Indians and Red Sox, Chip Caray and Joe Buck and Dane Cook, the Miller High Life vigilante deliverymen and the Verizon techie mob.

In many of those Met innings I'd daydream about how some of these songs would work at Shea Stadium or CitiField — how, say, the get up get up part of “You Could Have It So Much Better” would work as a between-innings psyche-up on Diamondvision, or the leisurely crunch of the Hold Steady's “The Swish” would be awesome to start a big game. (This is a subject I've obsessed about before.) But all of a sudden, watching these strange teams and new ads, I've found myself paying attention to different songs. And I can't understand how this playlist ever seemed peppy, because the whole thing practically drips with tragedy and lyrical warnings I must have heard all summer and failed to heed.

Now you show in the ruins, ask me how I'm doin'

Baby can't you tell?

Stuck in Dogtown again….

If you're not in the postseason, it's always filled with ghosts — you see your team in the background of establishing shots for players still playing (Jimmy Rollins hit against the backdrop of the Mets dugout until Jimmy Rollins too went home), or mistake one uniform for another. (Oh hell, that's not Reyes — it's Soriano!) Ron Darling's been around, a welcome respite from TBS tomfoolery even when wedged between Charles Barkley and Frank Thomas. Masato Yoshii was the answer to a trivia question during Red Sox-Indians last night. These glimpses are what we get this year.

Then there are the alumni — except there really aren't, not in 2007. There's Paul Byrd on the Indians and Kaz Matsui on the Rockies. Peer in dugouts and you'll see Clint Hurdle and Luis Rivera and Dave Magadan. Provided you remember a) that Luis Rivera was a Met and b) what he looks like. Tony Clark went home last night, joining Cliff Floyd and Doug Mientkiewicz and Darren Oliver and quasi-Met Justin Speier. From the dugout ranks, Joe Torre and Larry Bowa and Orlando Mercado are home already, Torre maybe for good. I bear none of these former Mets any particular ill will — if anything, it's nice to hear a familiar name now and again. But of course it's not the same — it feels like some cruel part of a trick question. How will you feel about moving Reyes to second when Kaz Matsui's in the 2007 World Series? Um, great! Hey, wait a minute….

The sooner the better, you see me this way

We can't go on like this pretending it's OK

It's twisting and turning inside me again

We keep getting closer to the end

You keep raising the stakes I keep making mistakes

Like a lot of us, I had October blocked out and socially sacrosanct. I was going to Europe in September, but so what — I'd be home and ready in time for the main event. I was in for Game 1 and Game 5 of the NLDS — with “Game 5” being one of those concepts you're not sure how to address with the baseball gods. I'd like to go but I'd rather not go if instead they can wrap it up in Game 3 or Game 4 but I'm not saying I wouldn't go or I'd be disappointed because if they need Game 5 of course I want to be there, etc. That didn't happen, but there are other reminders. Most every night Joshua looks out the window around 7 to see if the outdoor lights are on yet, which he learned means the Met game is on. (They're on a timer for 7:10 pm.) While he's adopted bandwagon teams (the D-Backs are out but the Red Sox are still alive), there's still that moment where I have to remind him that there are no more Met games this year. Not that I blame him — I keep monitoring the weather as if it were of import, as if I might find myself standing outside for four hours one of these nights. I keep forgetting it doesn't matter.

I can't stand to think about a heart so big it hurts like hell

Oh my God I gave my best but for three whole years to end like this

Well do you want to fall apart?

I can't stop if you can't start

Do you want to fall apart?

I could if you can try to fix what I've undone

Cause I hate what I've become

Was it really just over two weeks ago? It seems like about a million years, somehow. I suppose that's good — anything that takes us away from Tom Glavine's inability to pitch and Jose Reyes' inability to hit and Lastings Milledge's inability to shut up and the veteran Mets' inability to care is a much-needed shot of baseball morphine.

But numb is no way to go through October. (By the way, I'd really like to stop hearing that in my head as “ahk-TOE-bur.” Stupid Dane Cook.) Have you watched the Colorado Rockies play? The God squad thing kind of annoys me (to quote Ron Darling, I don't trust any player who doesn't drink beer), but Troy Tulowitzki might actually be able to fly and Matt Holliday is a Wrightian gladiator to be appreciated for the wonderful things he does with a bat in his hands. And the Rockies were sure jumping like merry pagans last night — I could root for them. Have you heard the Jacobs Field crowd? Any bunch of 40,000+ fans can be loud for three or four innings, but they're ear-splitting for all nine, a civic concentration of pure will and total adoration. I could get behind that. I'm least likely to clamber aboard the Red Sox bandwagon (done that, they're still bathed in the afterglow and the pink hats need their ranks thinned a little), but if you want to see a perfectly constructed baseball team, it's the Red Sox: a terrifyingly lethal, beautifully balanced collection of monsters and assassins and wild-eyed kids.

And then there's baseball itself, in all its beauty — and when it's played at the highest possible level by the best teams in the land it's astonishingly beautiful, even when it doesn't end until 1:30 in the morning. And thank goodness, because right now it's all we have and everything we need. Before you know it the leaves will be gone and the snow will be here and you'll be staying up an extra hour to see Anderson Hernandez ground out in some winter-league game. No, I can't let go quite yet. Please don't make me.

You're in my mind all the time

I know that's not enough

Well if the sky can crack there must be some way back

To love and only love

The 2007 Mets didn't deserve to go anywhere; it's right and proper that they aren't around any more. But they have given me some consolation nonetheless. In the days after the implosion, I wondered what their legacy would be for me as a fan. Would their shadow darken the happy hopes of, say, a seven-game lead with 17 to play in some future September? Would their complacency keep me from giving my heart to some deserving Met squad yet to be assembled? At first I was afraid it would. Now, I'm confident it won't. While I've kept myself busy around my own personal hot stove, I've already let the 2007 Mets go fuzzy in memory, to be forgotten and replaced by the 2008 Mets. That team will share much of the same roster yet be altogether different, as every year's team is. And every day takes us further from the one and closer to the other, and the chance to try again.

Truly Back in the Day

“[I]n the steep streets of Manhattan across the river,” Joe Durso wrote in Amazing: The Miracle of the Mets, “computer cards and ticker tape rained from office windows while people danced on the sidewalks below. The Mets were the champions of the world on October 16, 1969.”In broad daylight, no less.

The Champions of Channel 39

Good thing Russ Hodges doesn't work for TBS. Because if he reacted in 2007 as he did in 1951 to the clinching of the National League flag, he could do no more than whisper that excuse me, I don't mean to wake you, but, uh, the Rockies won the pennant, the Rockies won the pennant. No, don't get up. It's not that big a deal. I'll tell you about it in the morning.

Report it any louder and he'd probably get sued for violating noise control statutes.

I watched Troy Tulowitzki throw out Eric Byrnes at first base to end an improbable sweep of the NLCS. Then I looked at the clock: 1:38 AM. The pennant had been won when a large chunk of the potential audience was asleep. And ignored.

What were they doing putting the National League Championship Series on so late? And what were they doing putting it on basic cable? Perhaps it is anachronistic and overly romantic of me to believe that if you can't be in prime time then you should be in daylight, but this was, at best, truly unfortunate, and at worst, a broadcasting farce.

Twenty-two minutes before two in the morning. The champions of the world's oldest professional baseball league were crowned at twenty-two minutes before two in the morning. Disgraceful.

Yes, I know the game was taking place in another time zone. May as well have been taking place on another continent. I'm sure Rockies fans in and around Denver didn't mind staying up kind of late to see their first-ever ticket for the World Series get punched at 11:38 PM MDT. We're all used to baseball games that go on and on (though this one was over in a relatively tidy 3:17). But this wasn't the Western Conference final. This wasn't a regional affair. This was the NATIONAL League title on the line. The whole nation deserved a look at the Rockies and their historic polishing off of the Diamondbacks. Every baseball fan should have had easier and earlier access to this amazing story of an upstart that rose from mediocrity to 21 wins in 22 games.

Instead it's news to them. Somebody somewhere decided sticking half the LCS action on at 10:21 PM Eastern was a good idea. Somebody else decided it was OK to let the other series in the DH league take five-minute breaks between pitches. Probably the same somebody figured out the more off days, the better. The World Series between the solar-hot, soon-to-be-cooling-their-heels Rockies and the Indians or Red Sox won't start until a week from tomorrow. Baseball will recede even further from coast-to-coast consciousness until then.

Even a seven-game barnburner in the ALCS will proceed at a snail's pace. Game Four is tonight. Game Five is Thursday night. They built in an extra off-day for the travel between Cleveland and Cleveland. That's right, there's no game Wednesday. If it goes seven, there will be baseball on Saturday and Sunday. Then, eight days from now, there will be a World Series.

Will anybody outside the two towns directly involved remember it's on?

This is such a shame. The Rockies deserve better. The A.L. winner deserves better. Baseball fans deserve better. Baseball keeps taking bows for drawing record attendance in 2007 then hides its crown jewels. Every year they keep finding ways to obscure their product. For several Octobers they'd bury at least one LCS game in one market on Fox Sports Net or FX. Now they shift all the first-round and half the second-round action to TBS, home of Everybody Loves Raymond reruns. It's Channel 39 on my cable system. Even I kept forgetting when and where these games were on.

I wasn't the only one. TBS's ratings fell from the LDS to the LCS. That's not my concern except that it represents how few baseball fans were watching. If it's because people weren't interested in Colorado vs. Arizona, then shame on them, it shouldn't matter who's playing because the two best teams left are playing. But if it's because somebody decided to start these games at an hour when millions of people were calling it a night on a channel way up the dial, then shame on the somebodies who made the decision.

Call me naïve, but baseball's playoffs shouldn't be tactical programming. They should be baseball's playoffs. They should be where everybody can see it and everybody can find it. They should be on so people who should care shouldn't have to ask the next morning, “Did they play last night? They did? Who won?”

The Rockies won. The Rockies won the pennant. The Rockies have won everything in sight lately. The Rockies have to be seen to be believed. Too bad they haven't been seen all that much.

P.S. On this date 38 years ago, the New York Mets completed stunning the baseball world by winning the 1969 World Series. Time of miracle: 3:17 PM.

Day-In, Day-Out, Day-Vid

”To be voted the most valuable player on the worst team in the history of major league baseball is a dubious honor, to be sure. But I was awarded a 24-foot boat equipped with a galley and sleeping facilities for six. After the season ended, I docked the boat in Ocean City, New Jersey, and it sank.”

—Richie Ashburn, MVP, 1962 New York Mets

The best player from the club that endured the Worst Collapse Ever was David Wright. We have no boat for him, but he was a life preserver.

Declaring Wright the Mets’ leading man is not a judgment call. It required no analysis, just observation. I observed just about every Mets game in 2007. And I kept score.

Over at Crane Pool Forum, there is an enjoyable exercise called Schaefer POTG voting. POTG stands for Player of the Game. Schaefer was the one beer to have when you were having more than one in the 1970s, particularly if you were a Mets fan after Rheingold withdrew its sponsorship. Schaefer took over as brewer of record for a few key years in the mid- and late ’70s. One of the beer’s calling cards before it, too, went out of business as an independent entity (leaving Mets suds primarily the province of Anheuser-Busch, St. Louis, Missouri), was Schaefer Player of the Game voting. After every radio broadcast, Ralph Kiner, Lindsey Nelson and Bob Murphy would vote on the star of the day or night. Their system was six points for the best player, three for the second-best, one for the third-best…if you were having more than one.

I had forgotten all about this little gem of Metsiana until 2005 when I joined the CPF, a lively and literate bunch who revitalized Schaefer voting in the waning days of Piazza and early days of Pedro. On Opening Night 2007, I decided to cast my ballot and soon was hooked on process. I decided that instead of making a subjective decision about which Mets would be best in the coming year, I would just vote after every game and then go back later (combing the CPF archives last week) and tabulate my scores.

The rules are similar to the radio booth regulations of yore. No one player can get more than six points in any one game. The total for any one game can not exceed ten. Otherwise, you are welcome to ticket-split to your heart’s content. Some of my fellow voters saw fit to break down scores to a tenth of a point, but that was too exotic for me. I issued nothing less than a half-point and employed no fraction smaller than a half-point. Sometimes all I issued was a half-point, usually out of spite after a blowout loss (there was no awarding zero points allowed or otherwise there would have been a lot of them thrown about, particularly in June). Sometimes a surfeit of nice performances led to a fistful of 1.5’s so everybody could get a little credit. As with Schaefer beer itself, it probably led to some watered-down individual totals. Only three times did I see fit to hand out the almighty sixer:

• When Carlos Beltran made that catch on Tal’s Hill and then drove in the winning run in the seventeenth inning.

• When Paul Lo Duca homered twice and collected seven RBI in Cincinnati.

• When John Maine flirted seriously with a no-hitter just when we needed something like it most.

I did not keep a running total of my points awarded. I didn’t trust myself. If I knew one of my favorites was lagging (not that I had all that many favorites in 2007), I could picture going out of my way to slip him a marker. I could also see myself withholding reward from those whom I was convinced habitually received too much credit.

Like David Wright, whom I don’t love nearly as much as most Mets fans only because most Mets fan love him to excess and I only love him to scale. One David Wright equals one David Wright in my eyes. One David Wright hits like the dickens and hustles like heck and causes no problems. But his erratic throwing and the comparisons to certain other local infielders (which he himself doesn’t make but he never refutes to my satisfaction by admonishing, “Jeter can kiss my hot corner ass”) and the extra credit he is given, consciously or otherwise, for being born in the United States and speaking English as a first language (again, not his doing and nothing wrong with him doing it; hell, I do it) all find their way under my persnickety skin.

I wish he could hit the first baseman’s glove more regularly. Otherwise, I wouldn’t change a thing about him. I chanted “M-V-P!” along with the masses, even though I didn’t really believe it, but I do believe that Jimmy Rollins and Matt Holliday and Prince Fielder all have warts on their game that I never see when hearing only that they did great things to help their teams win. Those who don’t watch David Wright every day and only hear about him the way I experienced those other MVP candidates would have to wonder what, if anything, is wrong with him. Given a couple of weeks’ distance from the scrutiny I apply to all Mets, I tend to wonder why I, too, don’t love him to excess. Now and again during these playoffs, I catch myself thinking how awesome it would be for David Wright to be enjoying whatever spotlight TBS’s basic cable coverage provides. I don’t catch myself thinking that about any other 2007 Met.

My Schaefer voting was done in real time, without giving myself a chance to think about anything but what just happened. If somebody got a big hit, he got points. If somebody made a nice play, he got points. If somebody helped us win, he got points. If somebody delivered even in a losing cause, he got points.

By my own calculations, nobody got more points among Mets in 2007 than David Wright. Nobody did more for the Mets in 2007 than David Wright. Whatever my mild hangups about the kid, I cannot deny that David Wright was my very own Schaefer Player of the Year in 2007. (He was also Crane Pool Forum’s as a whole by a healthy margin.)

David’s last three years:

2005: 27-102-.306

2006: 26-116-.311

2007: 30-107-.325 (plus 34 SB and .962 OPS)

Gosh, maybe Mets fans root for him so much because he’s so good.

For those of you who weren’t scoring at home, David totaled 120.5 points, finishing 2.5 ahead of Carlos Beltran’s 118. That sounds close, but it was more like close in that closer-than-it-appears sense. Beltran came on like gangbusters in September (an excellent time to come on like gangbusters) but never led the race. Maybe if the regular season had lasted another week, Beltran might have overtaken Wright, but if the regular season had lasted another week, the Braves would have overtaken the Mets, with the Nats and Marlins charging hard, so never mind.

What made David’s showing all the more impressive was his consistency. He had, if you can remember that far back, a pretty grim April (when the Mets got by swimmingly without getting the most from him). Then he put up five terrific months while playing almost every day. Wright not only posted the most points of any Met, he merited points in more games than any other Met. He played 160 and rated a vote from me in 89, the best impact percentage (.556) of any Met regular…though Met regular isn’t the most dependable phrase one can use when discussing this team.

With almost every position player of substance logging time on the DL this past season, only Wright and Jose Reyes topped 144 games in action. On the surface, their Schaefer stats were similar. Reyes finished third to Beltran with 108.5 points and rated a vote from me in 87 of 160 games played, but the real story, as you no doubt noticed, was how Reyes faded.

Jose led the POTG derby into the last week of August when Wright passed him. In retrospect, it’s understandable that a slugger would collect more points than a speedster. I was prone to giving Jose a half-point here, a half-point there if he stole a base that led to a run on an otherwise nondescript night, but it was hard to accumulate points on his behalf without extra-base hits. Yet there was more to Jose’s decline than style, as we all saw. He just stopped producing. Nothing with his legs, nothing with his bat, not all that much with his glove. It was a far cry from April and May when Jose built up a big Schaefer lead and the Mets were at their best. I suppose you could make a case that since their twin peaks were linked, Reyes is kind of permanent MVP for the Mets…but I don’t think you win that designation by proving your value in absentia.

The nature of the Schaefer beast favors everyday players over starting pitchers, none of whom took the ball more than 34 times in 2007. The flip side is a starter who files anything close to a “quality start” is going to rate at least three points per start, probably more, thus a moundsman can make up ground in a hurry. It figures, then, that after Carlos Delgado in fourth place (way behind Reyes), the three most relatively reliable Mets starters lined up close together for fifth, sixth and seventh places.

After taking turns leading the pitching pack, John Maine finished atop the hurling heap with 65 points. He should have blown the field away given his All-Star-caliber first half, but he disappeared for a large chunk of the summer. The same could be said for Oliver Perez (63.5 points). Both men saved their seasons with big starts against the Marlins in the last two weeks of September…two of the only three starts down the stretch that exceeded six innings pitched after September 15, by the way…and ugh.

Tom Glavine finished seventh, three points behind Perez. He was good there for a while, though all I can remember now is seven runs in a third of an inning.

The rest of the Top Ten: Paul Lo Duca just behind Glavine, Moises Alou just behind Lo Duca (remember Moises missed two-and-a-half months) and Orlando Hernandez who rode some mighty spry performances into tenth place. El Duque was so sporadically spectacular that it almost made up for his near-complete no-show in September.

Worth mentioning just beyond the Top Ten:

• Shawn Green finished one point behind El Duque, in eleventh place. Green missed a couple of weeks in late May and early June and was later benched in favor of Lastings Milledge but he played 130 games yet was outshone by corner outfield counterpart Alou in the Schaefer voting. Moises: 43 fewer games. Shawn: 3 fewer points. It’s yet another damning indictment of a player I couldn’t help but like and can’t help but admit was disastrously ineffectual.

• Jorge Sosa, one tends to forget, was a pretty darn good fifth starter for a couple of months. He was my twelfth-place finisher, combining competent starting and decent relieving, the only Met who filled both roles well for any discernible stretch.

• Lastings Milledge came in 13th, which doesn’t sound like much until you realize he didn’t begin to play in earnest until after the All-Star break and participated spottily in September.

• Damion Easley, all but forgotten except for a little retroactive pity by the final month, was a damn effective role player in the first half and finished 14th for the year. That’s more than a couple of pinch-hits talking. That’s some pretty fine second base, first base and outfield play, too.

If there was either a flaw in the Schaefer system or a great revelation buried within it, it is to be found in the ranking of Billy Wagner as the fifteenth-best Met of 2007. How could that be? Billy was an All-Star! Billy piled up saves! Billy didn’t remind anybody of the treacherous three (Franco, Benitez, Looper) hardly at all!

Thing is, the closer didn’t really pitch in enough game-changing situations to merit a lot of points. The Mets made a habit of winning games that weren’t too terribly close in the early going. When Wagner was called on, the situations weren’t quite do or die. He got some three-run leads and he didn’t give them away. Perhaps he’s suffering in this metric for “doing his job,” but at the end of the day, getting three outs never seemed as significant as the starter getting 18 of them or the third baseman knocking in a few runs. I don’t mean to underplay his contribution — I’d rather have had him than his immediate closing predecessors — but I found again and again in a win that others’ contributions loomed larger than the man paid to finish things up. I don’t know if Damion Easley was more valuable than Billy Wagner, but I know he wound up with two more points…and that Easley didn’t play from the middle of August on.

Relief pitchers in general fared poorly under my Schaefer judging. Though they were bullpen staples from April through September, I had Aaron Heilman behind Endy Chavez, who missed almost three months; Pedro Feliciano behind Marlon Anderson, who showed up in July; and Scott Schoeneweis behind Jose Valentin who barely made it past the All-Star break. Then again Heilman, Feliciano and especially Schoeneweis all had well-documented difficulties and the other guys tended to succeed when called upon. That’s Schaefer for ya.

One name that deserves a very honorable mention is Pedro Martinez. He pitched in only five games, but he pitched well enough in those five games to deserve 18 points. His average of 3.6 Schaefer points per appearance was the best on the team and he was the only Met to be awarded points for every one of his appearances — plural. I gave Jon Adkins a single point for his single inning in his single appearance, but that’s not even cup-of-coffee stuff. That’s Coffee-mate. With only five opportunities to shine, Pedro ranked ahead of Valentin, Schoeneweis, Guillermo Mota and…once you’re down to Mota, does it really matter?

For those of you who like numbers, here are the rankings from Wright on down to the Met quartet who did nothing and got nothing:

David Wright 120.5 points (160 games played; 89 games in which he was voted points)

Carlos Beltran 118 (144; 78)

Jose Reyes 108.5 (160; 87)

Carlos Delgado 73 (139; 54)

John Maine 65 (32; 22)

Oliver Perez 63.5 (29; 22)

Tom Glavine 60.5 (34; 24)

Paul Lo Duca 59.5 (119; 47)

Moises Alou 58.5 (87; 38)

Orlando Hernandez 56.5 (27; 18)

Shawn Green 55.5 (130; 47)

Jorge Sosa 41 (42; 25)

Lastings Milledge 34.5 (59; 27)

Damion Easley 34 (76; 27)

Billy Wagner 32 (66; 36)

Endy Chavez 30 (71; 22)

Aaron Heilman 28 (81; 35)

Luis Castillo 26 (50; 26)

Ramon Castro 25 (52; 20)

Marlon Anderson 21 (43; 13)

Pedro Feliciano 20 (78; 25)

Ruben Gotay 19.5 (98; 21)

Carlos Gomez 18.5 (58; 16)

Pedro Martinez 18 (5; 5)

Jose Valentin 17.5 (51; 15)

Scott Schoeneweis 14 (70; 19)

Guillermo Mota 13 (52; 15)

Joe Smith 12 (54; 13)

David Newhan 11 (56; 8)

Mike Pelfrey 10.5 (15; 7)

Julio Franco 10 (40; 8)

Aaron Sele 10 (34; 9)

Brian Lawrence 7 (6; 4)

Ricky Ledee 5.5 (17; 3)

Jeff Conine 5 (21; 6)

Mike DiFelice 2.5 (16; 5)

Chip Ambres 2 (3; 1)

Ambiorix Burgos 2 (17; 2)

Sandy Alomar, Jr. 1.5 (8; 3)

Jon Adkins 1 (1; 1)

Willie Collazo 1 (6; 1)

Philip Humber 1 (3; 2)

Jason Vargas 1 (2; 1)

Ben Johnson 0.5 (9; 1)

Carlos Muñiz 0.5 (2; 1)

Players who received no points: Anderson Hernandez (4 games), Chan Ho Park (1 game), Lino Urdaneta (2 games), Dave Williams (2 games).

My deep gratitude to Yancy Street Gang of Crane Pool Forum for organizing Schaefer POTG voting all year long, to say nothing of running the most indispensable Mets site in the world. Props, too, to all of CPF’s raters and debaters for making Schaefer voting the one vote to cast when you’re casting one-hundred and sixty-two.

David is the One Met to Have...

After Rheingold and before Budweiser, Schaefer took over as the Mets’ beer sponsor in the mid-1970s. It seems almost sacrilege to associate any beer jingle with the Mets that doesn’t begin with My beer is Rheingold the dry beer…, but it must be said that Schaefer was the one beer to have when you were having more than one and listening to a Mets broadcast around the Bicentennial.

“Having more than one”…try sneaking that pro-drinking message on the air today.

Schaefer’s role in Mets history is honored throughout the season when Crane Pool Forum members vote for the Schaefer Player of the Game in the tradition that Bob, Ralph and Lindsey did from, I believe, 1975 to 1978. This year’s CPF winner (mine, too) was David Wright.

Congratulations David, even if you’re more a vitaminwater kind of guy.

All in All, You Can be a $195 Brick in the Floor

Timing, it can not be overstated, is everything. You want to sell something, you want to sell when demand is high. You don't want to be ambling the greater Yorktown area in late 1781 peddling King George commemorative medallions, y'know? So on some level you have to wonder how fortuitous a month October 2007 was for the Mets to put on sale…bricks!

One assumes the timing was meant to be spot on; with the Mets marching through October to greater glory, why wouldn't fans flush with pennant fever want to take advantage of the following offer?

The Citi Field Fanwalk is where Mets fans can become a permanent part of Citi Field through the purchase of individual engraved bricks surrounding the main entry of Citi Field. Fans will be able to recognize their family, friends and favorite Mets moments through lasting tributes engraved directly onto the bricks of the plaza outside of the Jackie Robinson Rotunda.

Obviously putting this sort of expensive “I am a Met, dammit!” trinket on sale shortly after the Mets themselves collapsed into a pile of bricks wasn't what whoever makes these decisions had in mind. If they could have seen what was coming, one imagines the offer would have been pushed up a few weeks, even a few crucial days:

The Tom Glavine Brick is perfect to fire or fling from any section of Shea Stadium should a passionless 300-game winner with the personality of a rock carry the immediate fate of your franchise in his hands come the season's final day and drop it so it smashes into a million little pieces before your team comes to bat. For a small surcharge, you can engrave a personal message of animosity to this poor excuse for a Met so he will be able to recognize exactly who disdains him and why.

But the Marketing Dept. wasn't nearly that creative.

As mets.com describes in detail, your brick, depending on how big it is and how much you want it to say, will cost you between $195 and $395 plus tax and a “convenience fee” of $5 to cover the replica brick you get for your very own home Fanwalk. What's convenient about that? Well, it certainly makes your wallet easier to tote around.

It's impossible to be party to a come-on like this and not roll your eyes. It's also impossible to consider it and think, “well, maybe if I move a few things around, I can find $200 for my brick.” Superfannisheness being what it is, who doesn't crave this ultimate in ÜberMet identification? Hey, I'm part of Citi Field! And not in the way Jimmy Hoffa is allegedly part of Giants Stadium! One of these days, the Mets are gonna walk all over me! As long as intimacy issues dictate that you're not going to be able to get inside Citi Field as often as you'd like*, the least you can do is be permanently outside it.

Yes, I both scoff at this scam and wonder if I should hurry up and get in on it. The immortality aspect of it appeals to our worst and best instincts. There'll be no denying you're a Mets fan if it's there for everybody to see. You are not a front runner if you're on a brick. You're in it for perpetuity. Why, you can be as enduring as Citi Field itself!

Which will be how long exactly?

Those of us who grew up alongside Shea Stadium, who are roughly the same age as the Condemned Man, probably never thought our ballpark would ever come down. But there it is, on the clock, 81 regular-season games to go (I'm not making allowances for postseason in 2008 — not after 2007 I'm not). It's such an accepted fact of life now that it takes some serious thinking to think how seriously stunning it is. In 1964, 1974, 1984, 1994, Shea Stadium was going to be here forever. Even in 2004, as city and team officials dickered into oblivion, it seemed impossible to believe it would be gone. Come 2014, it will be parking.

So how long will your brick remain in place? Maybe long enough so you won't know it won't be there forever? Shea Stadium will have served 45 seasons. Ebbets Field, whose ever mourned demise is eternally on our psychic tab, also gave its team 45 seasons. (The final version of the Polo Grounds put in 47 seasons for the Giants and two more for the Mets, but according to informed sources, the Polo Grounds and the Giants barely existed.) If Citi Field endures in the tradition of its wayward dad and its mythical grandpa, then let's chalk it in for being home to the New York Mets from 2009 to 2053.

If we are to assume baseball and the planet continue to revolve, then what? If Citi Field doesn't stand any more forever than any park besides Fenway and Wrigley, it will be replaced. Maybe in Flushing. Maybe somewhere else. I'll probably never know, so no skin off my nose, I suppose. Still, tough to believe a brick can make you a “permanent part” of anything. Maybe the Fanwalk remains at the doorstep of Jack Roosevelt Robinson's rotunda for the life of Citi Field, but Citi Field's life is probably as finite as everybody and everything else's.

Due to demographic trends, population movement and theological shifts, synagogues in the Northeast are merging in order to survive. Examining the reluctant coming together of 60-year-old Wantagh Jewish Center and 80-year-old Farmingdale Jewish Center as the brand new Farmingdale-Wantagh Jewish Center, Paul Vitello of the Times recently wrote:

What would become of the memorial plaques — those brass plates inscribed with the names of deceased congregants — attached to the walls and pews of the synagogues left behind?

When those plaques were installed, they were presumably up for the long haul. Who knew the long haul would carry an expiration date?

I don't mean to be sadly fatalistic about it. If all you do is focus on the pointlessness of everything, then you're on the road to total Nihilism (an extreme form of skepticism that denies all existence), which is only one short step above Glavinism (poor pitching that destroys all existence, combined with a rationalization that the results aren't devastating). But all I can think of with this Fanwalk thing, beyond the $5 convenience fee even, is an offer somebody will someday make to somebody else:

Authentic Citi Field Brick!

Engraved in 2008!

Laid in 2009!

Makes A Great Gift!

*Thanks to the wonderfully vigilant Loge 13 for the link to 100 Greatest Days in New York Sports author Stuart Miller's op-ed piece in the Times suggesting Citi Field capacity be expanded to 49,000 considering that once luxury suites are accounted for, only 33,500 seats per Mets game will be available to the general public as plans now stand.

USF is 6-0

The battle of Interstate 4 belongs to your AP-ranked No. 5 University of South Florida Bulls!

It was a stampede! A stampede, I tell you! USF 64 UCF 12! I must use more exclamation points!! Maybe 64 of them!!!

The University of Central Florida Knights would allow me to run up the punctuation score. They allowed a lot Saturday and saw more green than any USF opponent this season. They spent the afternoon backed up halfway to Orlando. I’d say they’re third-and-Plant City right about now.

This is how Bullish I am on my 6-0 alma mater: I spent this crisp and sunny Saturday afternoon at my computer listening to play-by-play courtesy of WFLA-AM’s streaming audio. WFLA is the station whose sports talk show I called into as a freshman to complain that the Mets’ run at a second-half title in 1981 wasn’t being given enough respect by the Tampa Tribune‘s baseball writer. I had my finger on the pulse of the market, I tell you what.

I had never listened to a USF football game before. They didn’t have USF football games when I went there. It didn’t occur to me until this morning they have USF football radio broadcasts. I heard a woman interviewed during halftime who said the enterprise she represented had been selling something Bulls-related since they became nationally ranked. “Front runner!!!” I scoffed, careful to use multiple exclamation points. Why, I’ve been a diehard USF football fan since at least a week before they became nationally ranked!!!

Two weeks after deciding it wasn’t worth ever again being excited over a sports team’s prospects because all they’ll ever do is lose twelve of their final seventeen games and make you miserable, I am using every ounce of green and gold in me to prevent myself from gloating unbecomingly over how we just Bullhandled UCF. I’m pretty sure I gloated over the Phillies’ poor start six months ago. Let me check…yes, yes I did. This would be a good time to change the subject to something that makes me look less foolish. Like…

64-12!!!

Sorry UCF, you can’t stop me. Of course you can’t stop me — I’m from USF.

My goodness, I’ve never said with that the remotest sense of pride before.

Listening to USF football with severe interest was bizarro world. It could be described as listening to a Mets game for the first time ever and discovering that there is a whole media apparatus devoted to you. Except there was no Gary Cohen within earshot. The announcers were college football homers all the way, which would usually turn me off, but why be interested in college football if you don’t have a heavily pronounced rooting interest? Why would anybody who isn’t a gambler care about college football if it not for the “we” proposition? During the game, Chuck called and everything we said about USF was “we” this and “we” that, punctuated by “Can you believe this? Can you believe this?”

We weren’t talking about the sudden ascension of our alma mater to gridiron prominence. We were talking about how we were talking about USF football at all. “We” didn’t have a Wooden Nickel‘s worth of school pride between us through the ’80s, the ’90s and most of the 2000s. Now we’re “we” to the max.

We rule!!! We’re No. 5!!! BCS rankings come out this week and We will be in them!!! Nothing could possiblie go wrong!!!

Except we play the Scarlet Knights at Rutgers this Thursday night and everything could definitely be ruined there. Tough opponent, their house, short week, the starters can’t even go six, the relievers can’t get anybody out, Reyes has been all messed up since August…whoops, wrong anxieties.

USF is 6-0. Even the Mets were only 4-2 at this stage in April when it all looked and felt this good.