The blog for Mets fans
who like to read

ABOUT US

Greg Prince and Jason Fry
Faith and Fear in Flushing made its debut on Feb. 16, 2005, the brainchild of two longtime friends and lifelong Met fans.

Greg Prince discovered the Mets when he was 6, during the magical summer of 1969. He is a Long Island-based writer, editor and communications consultant. Contact him here.

Jason Fry is a Brooklyn writer whose first memories include his mom leaping up and down cheering for Rusty Staub. Check out his other writing here.

Got something to say? Leave a comment, or email us at faithandfear@gmail.com. (Sorry, but we have no interest in ads, sponsored content or guest posts.)

Need our RSS feed? It's here.

Visit our Facebook page, or drop by the personal pages for Greg and Jason.

Or follow us on Twitter: Here's Greg, and here's Jason.

Shore Looks Like Maryland

Unless his mom Sharon keeps a green screen handy, it appears there’s no doubt that Ross Chapman has taken his well-traveled Faith and Fear t-shirt to Maryland, the eleventh state (plus D.C. and Switzerland) for which we have photographic evidence of The Numbers in action. You’ll note the Ocean City footprint just a little above Ross’ nicely capped noggin — which I can tell you, having watched two games in the kid’s company, is one of the only things that’s over this young man’s head.

Hey, CW11 — What the Heck?

Dear CW11 executives,

Readers of this blog will attest, I hope, that I'm not a bluenose. My language is frequently terrible, I like my beer, and I'm not overly concerned with a certain level of bad behavior. And without getting political, I'm a firm believer that it's my job to raise my four-year-old son — not the government's, his school's or the media's.

But my running interference between my kid and the parts of the world I don't want him to know about yet shouldn't have to extend to censoring Mets-Nationals day games. First there was an ad for “Halloween,” with kids afraid of a certain house, knives brandished and people in terror. Now, a couple of innings later, “Death Sentence” — with much of the same and a thug telling Kevin Bacon he's coming to kill the rest of his family. (Hey, and now as I write this here's “War.” Thanks.)

Joshua understands there are scary movies and grown-up stories. So do I. But they have their time and place, and this isn't it. I'm trying to raise my kid as a Met fan, to appreciate things like El Duque bringing decades' worth of pitching guile, Carlos Beltran hitting a majestic home run and David Wright redeeming an error with a do-or-die barehand pickup. That shouldn't have to go hand in hand with trying to distract him from the idea that there are people who kill other people's children and then go after the rest of their family. Even in the realm of violent movies, that's a bit too close to home for a little boy.

If Joshua's up in the seventh inning of a night game and sees an ad for “Death Sentence,” that's my fault. But it's not the seventh inning of a night game. It's Sunday afternoon, folks. My worries about what's going to come through the set during an afternoon game should be limited to beanballs and umpire-manager dust-ups.

I'm sure a lot of you have kids too, so I'm confident you understand what I'm saying. Somebody at your network is making a mistake that makes you look irresponsible. Let's please not have any more of this.

Regards,

Jason

Damion in the Rough

Through Saturday night, according to Baseball-Reference.com, no active player had played in more games without getting to the postseason than Damion Easley. While “Win One For Easley!” hasn't exactly been my 2007 rallying cry, it's occurred to me a couple of times that this classiest of veterans making his first playoff appearance, helping us get there if in fact that's where we're headed, would be one of the nice sidebars to this year's overall story. We saw with Franco in '99 then Delgado and Lo Duca in '06 what it means to have a longtime player finally touch October as a beginning instead of an end.

Without diagnosing off a television screen, all we can do is cross our fingers that Easley gets the use of his left ankle back soon. Having watched too many Mets go down with too many miserable-looking leg injuries that heal on their own time, I'm not counting on Damion playing a part in securing a postseason berth let alone his participating in what might come after. Then again, I'm not a doctor and I don't play one in the blogosphere.

Nevertheless, damn. I'd say damn for anyone with a third-degree sprain who crumpled in nth-degree pain, but in strictly human terms, why Easley, why now? I don't particularly think he's the difference between maintaining a modest first-place cushion and plummeting through the safety net. I just feel bad for the guy. He's going to be 38 soon. He's played since 1992. He's always managed to be on the wrong team at the wrong time: the Angels when they choked; the Tigers when they tanked; the Devil Rays at all; the Marlins after they were champs, the Diamondbacks before they snaked back to life. I've heard him say that he was really looking forward to being on a winner this time around.

The Mets have a cache of guys like this. They don't spout that nauseating “I came here to get my ring” tripe, but they are vets who have played long and hard and were happy to land in a situation whose possibilities outweighed the drawbacks: Easley, Alou, Green, Anderson. None of them has had what you'd call an overly productive season, but they've each been part of the crazy quilt that's stitched together just enough quality spurts to keep this team aloft. Easley's big moments were early (the out-of-nowhere blast that tied Colorado in April, the smash sequel to put the Mets ahead of Arizona in May) and recent (regaining his power stroke at RFK). He picked up a good chunk of the second base slack between Valentin going out and Castillo coming over. He was playing first base in last night's win, for goodness sake. He's been all over the diamond. He's done whatever Willie Randolph has requested, even if Willie refers to him as “Damon Easily” in interviews.

I like guys like that. How can you not? Like the rest of his cohort, he's a shade above rank journeyman but clearly no longer star material. But they all know how to play the game. Sometimes they don't execute as we'd like but you can just feel their knowledge for the game shimmer off them as they work pitchers, take extra bases, position themselves a shade over to gain a step on the next hitter. When Reyes or Wright or Milledge comes through, it's exciting. When Damion Easley makes an impact, it's just so gratifying.

We've fluffed and folded that old chestnut about rooting for the laundry a lot of late. We've had to since so many of our more familiar laundry-wearers keep finding their way to the Disabled List. Somebody will come up and dress in a freshly pressed Mets uniform today because Damion Easley can't. We'll root for that fellow, too. And for Easley to overcome what befell him Saturday night. Whatever Damion's fate is where the Mets laundry is concerned, he's worn it well.

The Cat Days of August

Hozzie and Avery, the best modern-day double play combination this side of Jose Reyes and Luis Castillo, urge the Mets to fully concentrate over the final 41 games of the 2007 season. They suggest treating each game like a tiny bug and never taking their focus off it. Not that we ever get bugs, mind you.

There Goes Mr. Cedeño

With all his running willy-nilly hither and yon of late, Jose Reyes’ stolen base total has leapt to 62. Barring some calamity out of Here Comes Mr. Jordan in which he is compelled to trade bodies with Ramon Castro, he will steal four more bases, then another before we know it. And with that, Jose — the first infielder to swipe 60 or more bags in three consecutive seasons, according to Elias — will own the Mets’ single-season stolen base record, en route, probably, to piling it way higher than the 67 currently required for the mark.

It will be a most happy moment for a most happy fella, a most speedy fella, a most deserving fella. Team records are made to be broken and set again by great players. Even in a season that pales by comparison to the season before, Jose Reyes, 24, already qualifies as a great player.

Amid the dust Reyes kicks up under whoever’s too-late tag he steals his 67th, the wayside will claim a victim as collateral damage of Jose’s feet-powered feat. Roger Cedeño’s line in the Mets record book will fall there, just as Mookie Wilson’s did in 1999 when his 58 steals succumbed to Roger’s 59th on August 30 eight years ago. Of course Mookie recorded many Mets accomplishments that continue to transcend markers as mundane as records to this day.

Roger, on the other hand, had mostly his stolen base record.

Every time you miss a Met who has been traded and think “I wish we could get him back,” consider the cautionary tale of Roger Leandro Cedeño. For one season, Cedeño was a scrappy and successful Met, sparking rallies, sprawling for catches and, most notably, stealing 66 bases, eight more than any Met prior to him ever nabbed. He may not have been a classically sound player, but for 1999, he was extremely effective. He, too, was a most happy fella. When I think of Roger Cedeño in his first Met season, I see a wide smile — remember him on his back at home plate exchanging fisticuffs with thin air after sliding home with the winning run off Curt Schilling in the ninth? — and a surfeit of spunk…the kind Mr. Grant told Mary Richards he hated, the kind every Mets fan adored.

Cedeño 1.0 was necessary payment for Mike Hampton, the lefty ace who would be the difference between losing a dramatic League Championship Series and winning a comparatively calm one. It was a reasonable exchange, him and Dotel to obtain a pitcher coming off a 22-4 season. But I missed Roger in 2000 and was predictably thrilled when the Mets reacquired him via free agentry in December 2001.

Cedeño 2.0 was a system downgrade. Roger couldn’t do anything right in 2002-03, save perhaps for inciting the ire of Roberto Alomar by taunting him over the condition of his perm on his 1988 rookie card (anybody who pissed off Robbie Alomar deserved a few Nikon Player of the Game votes in my book). He couldn’t get on base. He couldn’t get under a fly ball. He couldn’t get out of his own way. He couldn’t get thousands of grumpy fans out of his own hair. His support plummeted faster than his statistics. He played the unfortunate role of Convenient Scapegoat in The Worst Team Money Could Buy, The Long Unawaited Sequel.

But at least Roger Cedeño still had that single-season stolen base record he had set in 1999 when he was younger, when the Mets were better, when we were all a little more human.

He won’t have that for long. One week ago today, Jose Reyes woke up with 54 steals for 2007. One week later he has 62. He has two in each of the past three games, including last night’s when his deadly running and his nifty fielding helped defeat the Nationals quite soundly. I won’t “at this rate” it because that’s usually the kiss of death, but Reyes should pass 66 any day now. If he gets a good enough jump, he’ll pass it on the way home from Washington.

I’ll be elated to watch new history established by the shortstop who has enhanced the meaning of the phrase “fast track”. I love when Mets records fall because it means something good is happening for the Mets right now. But I’ll be just a touch saddened to watch the Roger Cedeño of 1999 — the good one — run out of the shard of team history he earned on grit, skill and Rickey Henderson’s tutelage, leaving him in too many minds as only the Roger Cedeño of 2002 and 2003 — the inept one — if he’s remembered at all.

Even as Reyes potentially and preferably places the record well beyond the previous standard, it would be sweet if somebody someday hears the name Roger Cedeño and the first reaction it elicits is “wasn’t he the player who held the stolen base record before Reyes?” and the second reaction is “he really helped us that year, that really great year.” No third reaction will be necessary, unless it’s “hey, look, Jose just stole another one!”

On the theme of team records, I recommend you read this year-old article from the Washington Post that I found yesterday and still find fascinating today. Do Nationals break records held by Expos? Or by Senators? Or do Rangers and Twins break Senators records? Does anybody break Expos records? What about records held by Browns — Cleveland Browns and St. Louis Browns? How amid issues never definitively addressed by recurring franchise/city shifts did Fred Wilpon not manage to have Pee Wee Reese grandfathered in as a Met? And if he ever does, can I have Mel Ott?

The Day After

Willie Randolph's postgame analysis of whatever we collectively hallucinated in Pittsburgh was harsh. (I had vague hopes of Willie turning over the buffet table, though I knew better — that tradition seems destined to end with Lou Piniella's departure from the managerial ranks.) I can only imagine, though this may be giving a confounding team too much credit, that the various postmortems on the plane to D.C. were harsh as well. But mostly, I was happy that Tom Glavine would be on the mound, his 300-win resume and perfectionism demanding a certain focus from his teammates that had been missing 24 hours earlier. (One of the most-embarrassing memories of an embarrassing period in Mets history remains the sight of Glavine staring out at Roger Cedeno, clearly dumbfounded that a) anyone could play the outfield that badly; and b) that he'd willingly signed up for a team with such players on it.)

Glavine got that focus , thank goodness — and we all got the kind of run-of-the-mill win that's chiefly memorable after blowing 5-0 wins to last-place teams, but welcome all the more for that.

The lasting memory of this game won't be Glavine mixing his pitches the way he once could do routinely, or the sight of Mike DiFelice (now our No. 1 catcher, yipes) chugging into third. Rather, it was Reyes and Castillo turning a CGI-assisted double play. Apparently they've been practicing shovels and transfers in the Matrix. (Castillo, in Keanu Reeves voice: “I know the pivot.”) Good thing, too.

Postscript: This Tim Marchman discussion of Pedro will have you roaring like a “Braveheart” extra by the end. Pedro Martinez is no ordinary man, and every time he's ever been doubted he's shoved it right in everyone's face. It won't be long before he does it again. From Tim's keyboard to the baseball gods' ears.

Every FAN Needs Its Rose

If you can remember when there were first times and when there were long times, but when there was no first time/long time, then it’s Flashback Friday at Faith and Fear in Flushing.

Twenty years ago this month Dick Young died. I know — easy applause line. Go ahead: give his demise a hand if you are so inclined. Between railroading Tom Seaver out of town and attempting to poison the atmosphere for Doc Gooden’s return from rehab, that nominally sad event didn’t call for restraint or politeness.

But dancing on a Mets Hellion’s grave isn’t the point here. The point here is Young, one of the gigantic figures of New York sports, passed from the scene on August 31, 1987 and a local radio station produced and ran a short but smart feature on it.

That was the first time I honestly thought Sportsradio 1050 WFAN knew what it was doing.

Ah, the first all-sports station in New York or, more or less, anywhere. I once read there was one in Denver. And I can remember when WWRL gave itself over, circa 1981, to the Enterprise Radio network, which employed a Bostonian named Eddie Coleman. But WFAN was something else.

Boy was it ever. It was very satisfying, on the face of it, to have a station devoted to sports 24 hours a day. What other topic should get that kind of wall-to-wall coverage? But, y’know, sports…24 hours a day? What the hell are they going to talk about?

At 3:00 PM on July 1, 1987, when WHN spun its last country platter — “For The Good Times” by Ray Price — and Suzyn Waldman started the first update in WFAN history (something about Ron Guidry), we found out that repetition goes a long way. In the beginning, or at least right after Waldman, there was Jim Lampley taking calls about Darryl Strawberry. You could get a lot of mileage out of Darryl Strawberry in 1987. Darryl was either very or faking sick that week, slithering his way out of a big series with the Cardinals to raised eyebrows in his own clubhouse. Every series against the Cardinals was big in 1987. Every series the Mets played was big in 1987. There was plenty to talk about and about and about.

It was no accident that Emmis Broadcasting chose the Mets’ flagship station to pioneer all-sports. You might say WFAN was the house the Mets built and you would be more right than wrong.

WHN began dabbling in sports talk the previous winter on the heels of broadcasting the greatest season in the history of the New York Mets from start to finish. They picked up Bob Costas’ new syndicated talk show. Called themselves Sportsradio WHN even. When the Mets’ championship defense began, they expanded pre- and postgame coverage to wonderfully absurd lengths. Less country, more sports. Those were the good times.

But all the time? Gosh, sure, we’ll try it.

It wasn’t working. Don’t get me wrong. It was great to not have to call Sportsphone or wait ’til :15 or :45 to go the news station for a score. The FAN, as it went by familiarly, wasn’t shy about sharing scores. They did it four times an hour. Plus they placed correspondents at every game all over the continent. Need to know exactly what was going on in Arlington between the Royals and Rangers? The FAN had it covered. Need to know Paul Molitor’s daily take on his hitting streak? You could tune in like clockwork to the Molitor Monitor. And need to get something off your chest, like, say, whether Darryl Strawberry was really under the weather on Monday or your considered opinion on whether in fact Straw was jakin’ it so he could record “Chocolate Strawberry”?

Sportsradio 1050 WFAN was for you. It had Lampley and Greg Gumbel among network TV people you’d heard of and Coleman, Waldman, sports updater John Cloghessy and overnight host Steve Somers among those you hadn’t. Art Shamsky was an original, holding court at “the training table” during lunch hour. We were promised the most famous sports talk host in America, Pete Franklin, for drive time, but Pete was (unlike Darryl) indisputably ill when the FAN came on, so he was filled in for a lot by guys name Lou (Lou Boda, Lou Palmer, Lou ever).

It was a mish-mash, that first FAN summer. Its constancy was great. Its informational potential was promising. Its content was mostly vapid. No, it wasn’t just the first wave of Vinnies from Queens (Vinnie from Queens is the archetype caller everybody remembers). We weren’t new to sports talk in New York. Bill Mazer had done it before on WNBC and a previous incarnation of WHN. Art Rust was still bellowing away the evenings on WABC. Richard Neer and Dave Sims hung in there at ‘NEW and ‘NBC, respectively. Eventually all these voices would wind up on the FAN for a while or forever because eventually WFAN ate up all the sports talk within the sound of its voice. We were used to dopey callers. They weren’t so bad because we weren’t yet inundated by them.

The hosts? Some were better than others, but the whole tone of WFAN felt consultant-driven, as if a company with a lot of money never bothered to figure out how to spend it wisely. Thus, WFAN had almost nothing resolutely New York about it in the early going. Who cared about Royals games? Who cared about Paul Molitor? Who cared about getting college football scores every quarter-hour? Who cared about Jim Lampley or Greg Gumbel in this context? Who did Pete Franklin think he was fooling? (And as far as doing radio was concerned, Art Shamsky was a heck of an outfielder.)

Almost everything WFAN brought onto the New York scene was a waste of time. The two things it held onto, however, made it a municipal treasure.

It had the Mets. It had Howie Rose. On the Mets and Rose, you could build an empire if you were smart enough to keep both around.

Howie was a vaguely familiar voice to me over the years, both from Sports Phone and his here-and-there radio work. He had been on WCBS-AM doing sports for a while in the ’80s. He pulled a couple of stints on WHN back in the days when stations that weren’t sports stations actually covered sports because they also covered news (those days, which included non-news stations treating hourly newscasts as staples, are essentially gone). It was his new assignment, begun in late Spring Training of 1987 that made him almost a part of my family.

“Howie Rose,” Joel said to me after I quoted him for the 50,000th time, “is your father.”

Before we heard there was going to be a FAN, Howie was on WHN hyping a new show, Mets Extra. He called it “every Mets fan’s dream.” He was 100% right. Seventy-five minutes before every Mets game, 75 minutes after every Mets game. That, if you’re keeping score at home, added up to 2-1/2 hours of solid Mets talk and nothing but solid Mets talk wrapped around every single Mets game. That, in case you’re too young to remember ’86 and its immediate aftermath, is how big the Mets were then. I’ve yet to encounter any sporting phenomenon since then in this market that comes close. Any.

Was it really a dream come true? Well, I didn’t really dream of such a thing as 2-1/2 hours of solid Mets talk on a daily basis, but only because I don’t aspire to possibilities anywhere close to that lofty.

Howie was technically not the first Mets Extra host. During the 1986 playoffs and World Series, WHN decided to cash in on the fervor and fever by airing a pregame show hosted by Dave Cohen and Rusty Staub. I remember Roger Angell coming on as a guest (which is something I don’t remember ever happening on the FAN). Rusty was Rusty. Cohen wasn’t anything great. Thus, let’s recognize the Rose version as the Real McCoy (which is the kind of not-quite-ancient, not-quite-modern reference Howie would make so effectively on the air.)

The first installment of the new Mets Extra ran after an exhibition game right before the season started. Howie began with a nice preamble, explaining how much he was looking forward to this, how we’d get all kinds of reports on Met health and batting orders and farm clubs and inside info from Davey Johnson, who will come on each day. He really imbued it with a sense of higher purpose.

Then he took his first call. It was to ask what were we going to do about Rafael Santana. He hit .218 last year. Is Elster going to be ready soon? Can we play HoJo there more often once Magadan is off the DL?

The second call pointed out Santana was going to drag down the lineup, I’m really worried about Santana.

The third call: “Howie, can the Mets get more pop out of shortstop than Santana?”

I didn’t know Howie Rose’s tendencies well yet, but in retrospect, I find it hard to believe he didn’t cry. Instead, he calmly pointed out that the Mets just came off a World Series victory in which Rafael Santana was the everyday shortstop and on this team, whose offense was improved in the offseason with the acquisition of Kevin McReynolds, it really doesn’t pay to worry about Rafael Santana.

Poor Howie.

Mets Extra was a smash. Technically I don’t know what the ratings were, but I listened before every game and after every game. All 2-1/2 hours. I loved the give and take between Howie and Davey. I loved the attention the Mets were being given by somebody who obviously understood the Mets and us Mets fans. This was the job Howie Rose was born to.

When Emmis declared its intention to flip 1050 from country to sports, they held a fancy press luncheon and announced it would conduct a “nationwide talent search”. In David J. Halberstam’s Sports On New York Radio, Howie said he had one thought: “At that point, I knew we were screwed.”

Poor Howie.

Whatever else Emmis did wrong twenty years ago, they got it right when they kept Howie to do Mets Extra and, on nights there was no ballgame, host a five-hour call-in show. Let me tell you something in case you never heard it or completely forgot it: Nobody — nobody — in the history of that station ever did a call-in show as well as Howie Rose.

Howie respected the format. He respected the callers (if not their hypothetical trade proposals, which always boiled down to Barry Lyons for Barry Bonds). He respected his guests. He worked at it. He did all-baseball shows in the middle of the winter, the Hot Stove League. He did theme shows, bringing on, say, members of the ’61 Yankees. Yes, Howie was a Mets guy, grew up in Bayside a Mets fan, but he was so damn professional. He knew the Yankees and could talk about them with historical accuracy. He knew football, basketball and, of course, hockey. He was a New York sports fan turned New York sports host turned, on occasion, New York sports play-by-play announcer. One Presidents Day, he called an overtime tilt between the Rangers and Devils in the afternoon and pulled his five-hour shift that night — a workload he noted was killing his throat.

They couldn’t work him enough for my tastes. He was just so sensible about everything. I didn’t necessarily agree with every point he made, but they were all fair-minded and thought-out. He didn’t bark. He didn’t snap. He didn’t cut anybody off. He cared about sports, the way New Yorkers do.

He was intelligent, for goodness sake. Intelligent sports talk. In New York. I’m telling you, it existed.

That report on the death of Dick Young? Whose voice do you suppose we heard explain the significance of the columnist? It wasn’t somebody from Iowa. It was Howie. I heard that and I knew that this station had a real shot because, obviously, somebody there was listening to him and valuing his judgment. It may not sound like much, but after a summer of the most irrelevant crap you could imagine, sandwiched by a full loaf of Darryl calls (handled maladroitly by one disinterested or overmatched host after another), it was a breakthrough.

The FAN eventually found its financial footing. There was always something in the paper about it teetering on the brink, but Emmis made a deal to swap frequencies, trading 1050 for 660. Grand old WNBC, pretty toothless since Howard Stern was fired in ’85, went out of business on October 7, 1988 and WFAN took up residence down the dial, Imus in the morning, Franklin in the afternoon, any number of experiments the rest of the time (anybody remember Stan Martyn’s gentle nostalgia show on Saturday nights?). Pete Franklin gave way to two local boys in the afternoon. The rest is kind of miserable history.

WFAN is a necessity for the New York sports fan. It is not a joy. It is a horrible listen most of the time. I can’t begin to describe how much I despise their marquee names and find nothing but disappointment in most of their secondary talent. My reaction is so visceral because radio is so personal. But it’s never as simple as “if you don’t like it, change the station,” because it is part of being a sports fan in New York. You can go days or weeks avoiding it or confining your listening only to Mets games (and the long-since-abbreviated Mets Extra), but sooner or later you’ll put it on for a score or to hear about some big story and you’ll find yourself stuck in its evil groove again. One of its self-important hosts will eventually turn you off from it, but you won’t be able to help yourself. At some point you’ll turn it back on. Thanks almost entirely to one host who was there at the beginning and, albeit in a far different capacity, is there today, it built itself into a New York institution.

Howie Rose left the talk show grind in 1995. He became TV voice of the Islanders and the Mets, eventually rotating back to radio half the year as the only possible legitimate successor to Bob Murphy. He’s wonderful in that role, too, but I really miss his nightly gig. Nobody’s filled his shoes on WFAN. Nobody. They’re all pretenders. WFAN had a lot of problems at the beginning, but they had the perfect host.

On the other hand, how many calls about Rafael Santana could one man be expected to take?

If you didn’t catch WFAN’s reunion weekend in June, visit their site to listen to Howie Rose’s too-short hour and fifteen minutes of reminiscence. There are some other interesting airchecks there, but as was the case from ’87 to ’95, Howie is the highlight.

Next Friday: The card I waited all summer for.

For The Good Times

It’s been theorized in our darker hours that the Mets used up every bit of karmic energy in their reserves to pull out the 1986 World Series and once Buckner became Buckner, that was it, no more titles for us.

Has it occurred to anybody that maybe we’re subject to the WFAN Curse?

When the Mets were last champions, it was under the banner of flagship station WHN, a very listenable country station right here in the middle of the big city. The Mets and WHN were a nice fit. Sheila York, the nighttime DJ who followed Bob Murphy and Gary Thorne on the air, was always very supportive of the cause. I was sorry when she and future Shea PA man Del DeMontreaux and Dan Taylor and the rest of the staff — everybody but Howie Rose — lost their jobs when all-sports WFAN came into being.

I wasn’t much of a country music fan, but I liked how the Mets infiltrated something that wasn’t necessarily baseball by nature, the way baseball should weave itself into every facet of life, even Alabama records. I also liked the idea of the Mets being on a station whose name you either knew or you didn’t. Calling a sports station “FAN” seemed like too much of a sop to its audience.

All right, so things more or less worked out on the sports station. But it seems to me that the Mets are a much smaller part of WFAN’s overall consciousness now than they were in 1987 or, for that matter, than they were on WHN in 1986 — for 21 years the last season in which the last Mets broadcast of the season was a win in late October.

(I looked all through my many boxes and bags of flotsam and Metsam for the Mets Country bumper sticker pictured here but came up empty. Luckily, Big Apple Airchecks came to the rescue, and this image I remember so well from the back of many a bumper is courtesy of their WHN tribute page.)

Now Let Us Never Speak Of It Again

Game?

What game?

I saw no game.

There was no game.

You thought you saw a game?

No.

You saw no game.

There was no game.

Oh My God, Wasn't That Awful?

You know what's smack in the middle between champs and chumps?

Chimps.

Last time I checked, chimps had never won a World Series. Or much of anything else.