The blog for Mets fans
who like to read

ABOUT US

Greg Prince and Jason Fry
Faith and Fear in Flushing made its debut on Feb. 16, 2005, the brainchild of two longtime friends and lifelong Met fans.

Greg Prince discovered the Mets when he was 6, during the magical summer of 1969. He is a Long Island-based writer, editor and communications consultant. Contact him here.

Jason Fry is a Brooklyn writer whose first memories include his mom leaping up and down cheering for Rusty Staub. Check out his other writing here.

Got something to say? Leave a comment, or email us at faithandfear@gmail.com. (Sorry, but we have no interest in ads, sponsored content or guest posts.)

Need our RSS feed? It's here.

Visit our Facebook page, or drop by the personal pages for Greg and Jason.

Or follow us on Twitter: Here's Greg, and here's Jason.

Chuck McElroy, Please Don't Pick Up the Courtesy Phone

That's whom I was thinking about when Shingo after came in and gave the Marlins a bingo. (By jingo!) Him and Billy Taylor. Dial-up being dial-up, I'm not going to investigate, but I'm sure Taylor and McElroy might have made decent first impressions before being packed off after a single partial season.

Yes, a nice win today, followed down here in Vacation Paradise (which it totally was today — 80, just enough breeze to cool things off) via the WB and FAN, which was accessible with some mild gymnastics while walking about. Was particularly glad to see Clifford hit one to dead center (fuck the Marlins for every goddamn time one of their fielders has caught a drive from us in one of Soilmaster Stadium's 440' cul de sacs), Wright pour it on late and Seo show that whatever nuttiness is going on, he's not coming out of the rotation. And to see some tolerable production coming out of second base — all is not lost, Kaz, just do what you're capable of and don't get hurt, y'hear?

It's funny about the Braves. I don't have the same dread that usually manifests itself when we arrive in Turner Field with a season in the balance, and you've absolutely nailed why: Because it's extremely hard to claim that we even deserve to be in the running for something at this point. If the Braves knock us into 2006, it will hurt, but it won't be the shock that '98 or the '99 postseason or '01 were. Those were a lot better teams than this one; an end to '05 would just be finally coming back to earth, even if it were Schuerholz's Slaughterers offering the coup de grace.

Which isn't to say I don't like this team. I do — a lot, despite my grousing about Victor and Kaz and Kaz and Ice and Offerman and Looper and Koo and Graves. There's a difference between bad roster moves and bad guys, and of this year's Mets, Offerman and DeJean are the only ones who seem like they might be guys you wouldn't particularly want to root for. I like this team and I'll cheer madly for whatever wild-card hopes we have until math dictates otherwise (and we still might win — plenty of time left), but this ain't a great team, and no amount of devotion can hide that. It's a .500 team trying to make the leap to the next level, but the mismatches and the growing pains and the roster mismanagement and the injuries and the bad luck strongly suggest that's not going to happen. That's OK in a year in which .500 and respectability would have been accomplishment enough — mission most definitely accomplished even if nothing else happens. Do I want more than that? Of course. Will I be disappointed not to get more than that? Sure. Will I be surprised not to get more than that? Absolutely not.

Bad First Impressions

The Redbirds were glowing with success as they lined up in the narrow runway between their locker room and the ball field. They were serene, confident and rich. They followed their drillmaster, Dr. Walter C. Eberhardt of St. Louis University, to the grass along the first base line. “Con-grat-u-lations on your last season,” Eberhardt sang out in a deep voice between exercises. “But that was last season, men, and this is another year. Now, on your backs, stretch out, stretch out, now bend to the waist, sit-ups, three, four.”

—The defending National League champion St. Louis Cardinals report to spring training, 1969, as recorded by Joe Durso in Amazing: The Miracle of the Mets.

Nice win Sunday. Now go get another one.

No kidding. Beating the Marlins after losing two to them is a fine thing. Picking up ground when the top three in the Wild Card race lost it is beautiful. But don't give it back. Not Monday.

The Mets are lucky. They're pretty good, but they're mostly lucky. They don't deserve to be under any kind of post-season consideration. After 136 games, can you tell me you've seen a team in Mets uniforms that you can picture playing beyond October 2? Unless the October opponent is the Diamondbacks, I don't think you can. I can't.

But they're here, so it's time to make the best of it, albeit in the worst possible place to try.

Atlanta. Turner Field. It's where Mets dreams have been dying for almost a decade. If it doesn't stop this week, we're gonna have to wear commemorative patches next season.

Like every sensible Mets fan, I've been dreading this trip. The relatively easy part is over and that didn't flow all that smooth. Now it's Atlanta, followed hard by St. Louis. At the moment when we can least afford to screw up, we are thrown against the league's two best teams, two teams whose tournament we want to wheedle our way into. The Redbirds are far and away the class of this circuit, but never mind them right now. It's the Braves who stare us in the face. It's the Braves who always stare us in the face. We're two losses out of a playoff spot but it's not hard to imagine us being five behind somebody by Wednesday night. No matter what happens when the other WC wannabes play each other, precedent suggests handling our own affairs will be a chore.

We have to win games in Atlanta. Plural. We shouldn't be in a position for it to matter. We've lost too many times in too numbskullish a fashion to be called contenders, but that's neither here nor there any longer. We are contenders. Our colleagues in four other cities have been thoughtful enough to be almost as mediocre as us, so let's take advantage of their largesse. Let's not do what we did against Philadelphia and Florida. Let's not lose games. Plural.

A New York Mets win should always be something to revel in, but the New York Mets have left us little in the way of that luxury. Nice win Sunday. Now go get another one.

While we must look forward, I can't let Saturday night pass without an attempt to put its stupefyingly defining moment into proper context.

Has anybody in the history of the New York Mets made a worse first impression than Shingo Takatsu? Given what was at stake, I'd have to say no. He is the Anti-Jacobs. To the extreme.

I've tried to think of a Met whose first Mets moment was as horrid and costly as Shingo's. I gravitated to pitchers. A position-player generally doesn't have that kind of negative impact at his fingertips. He might go 0-for-5 or make three errors but it's unlikely that he and he alone will kill the team. Pitchers are different. They've got the whole game in their hands.

Here are some Takatsuan performances that come to mind. Please send the children to their rooms. This isn't pretty.

Tom Glavine: Before we loved him to death, The Manchurian Brave opened the 2003 season in Arctic conditions at Shea and did nothing to warm anybody's heart. His line on March 31: 8 hits, 4 walks, 5 earned runs 3-2/3 innings. His ERA was 12.27. The Mets lost 15-2. Things remained chilly for the pitcher and the team for a loooong time.

John Thomson: He was Wild Card insurance or at least a theoretical boost to the rotation down the 2002 stretch. Thomson had the misfortune to make his Mets debut some 40 minutes after the season's most devastating loss, the August 3 first-game choke by Armando Benitez against Craig Counsell and the Diamondbacks at Shea. With the joint having all but cleared out for the nightcap, Thomson took to the hill and surrendered 7 hits and 3 walks for 7 runs (only 3 earned, but nobody was in the mood for technicalities) over 6 innings. The Mets lost and would lose without winning at home for the rest of the month. Thomson is the starting pitcher for the Braves tomorrow.

Brett Hinchliffe: He turned an emergency start into a catastrophic one. Two innings on April 26, 2001 in Milwaukee yielded 9 hits and 8 earned runs. He left the game, the team and the bigs with a lifetime Met ERA of 36.00 and no parting gifts.

Mike Hampton: Don't know if it was the schools, but something about Japan didn't agree with our newly anointed ace. Mike Hampton had the honor of throwing the first pitch in the first Major League game outside this continent on March 29, 2000, and he went with that theme. He threw many pitches outside. Hampton, traded to the Mets after a 22-4 season in Houston, walked 9 in 5 innings, allowing the Cubs 2 runs. Just two? He lured Chicago into four ground-ball double plays before leaving (the Mets lost 5-3). It took several starts for Hampton to settle in as a Met…and one year for him to decide he didn't want to.

The Rutles: They were the Dirk, Barry, Stig and Nasty of the Mets bullpen. Our very own Prefab Four: Yorkis Perez, Toby Borland, Barry Manuel and Ricardo Jordan composed a group debut on April 1, 1997, coming on in “relief” in San Diego once Pete Harnisch began to lose it in the sixth. What Harnisch started, the lads finished, combining to surrender — and it really was a laying down of arms — 6 hits, 6 walks and 9 earned runs in a 12-5 loss. The Mets got better as 1997 progressed. These blokes had absolutely nothing to do with it.

Alejandro Peña: The once-reliable Dodger set-up man made his Met debut at Shea on April 9, 1990, Opening Day. He faced Jay Bell. Bell doubled. He faced Andy Van Slyke. Van Slyke doubled. He faced Bobby Bonilla. Bonilla singled. He faced Barry Bonds. Bonds singled. He was removed. That he was ever invited back was astounding.

John Candelaria: On September 11, 1987, Ron Darling went out for the year with torn ligaments in his thumb. At the tail end of a year when the adage that you can never have enough pitching resonated all too forcefully, the defending world champion Mets fished around for another hurler. On September 15, they dealt two minor leaguers to California for veteran lefty John Candelaria. On September 18, desperately groping at the first-place Cardinals, they started John in his prior place of business, Three Rivers Stadium. The Candy Man immediately went sour, facing 12 Pirates who pillaged him for a leadoff homer (John Cangelosi), a double, two triples…8 hits in all, leading to 5 earned runs in an inning-and-a-third. Candelaria's Met ERA teetered at 33.75. To be fair, there wasn't much good pitching in what turned out to be a 10-9 final in Pittsburgh's favor (hmmm…familiar score and pattern). John made two more starts for the Mets and won both. The Mets finished three behind St. Louis.

Mac Scarce: The ostensible replacement for Tug McGraw made his first appearance as a Met in Pittsburgh on April 11, 1975. He came on to face Richie Hebner with the score knotted at three and runners on first and second. Hebner singled. The Pirates won. Scarce, swapped four days hence to Cincinnati for Tom “The Blade” Hall, never made another appearance as a Met. His first, last and only impression was one batter, one game-losing hit.

Roger Craig: The first pitcher to pitch for the New York Mets, in St. Louis on April 11, 1962, was responsible for setting a rather atonal tone for the club's inaugural campaign. In the first inning of his team's existence, Roger Craig gave up 3 hits and a balk, resulting in 2 runs. After tossing a spotless second, Craig was touched up for four singles, a double and a stolen base, yielding 3 more Redbird runs in the third. Craig left after three frames with the lowest ERA in Mets history, 15.00. Of course it was the only ERA in team history.

There. Nine debuts to remember because to forget them would be to repeat them…though I guess we just did Saturday. In the words of Leonard Pinth-Garnell, stunningly bad. Exquisitely awful. Couldn't be worse! Yet no matter how many productions of Bad First Impressions I've looked at, none ranks quite so low as Shingo Takatsu's.

Most of the above came in April, the calendar early enough and the circumstances innocuous enough so as not to be fatal. The ones that didn't, those by Thomson and Candelaria, were at least wrought by experienced arms in situations where the managers in question could feel reasonably confident that terrible things wouldn't happen.

Shingo Takatsu was a reclamation-project callup coming in to take on budding superstar Miguel Cabrera with the bases loaded at a perilous juncture in a critical September showdown against a Wild Card rival when there was no track record to indicate that this might be a good idea.

This was worse than Candelaria.

This was worse than Hinchliffe.

This was even worse than the Rutles.

This was, to channel Mr. Pinth-Garnell once more, monumentally ill-advised.

And yet we get to play more meaningful games. Isn't baseball something?

Don't Know What We've Got With Shingo Takatsu

You and your Unholy Books. Ever since I bore witness to them almost five years ago, I have rooted for them and for their contents to flourish. I keep up on who's a new Met first and foremost in order to confirm with you the status of the next entry within those heretofore sacred volumes.

Therefore, in the bottom of the seventh when Willie pulled Padilla (Met No. 766) and replaced him with Shingo Takatsu, I wasn't thinking “What The FUCK?” or “WILLIE! THIS GUY NOW?” or “here comes an American League reject who hasn't pitched since I don't know when to make his debut against one of the best hitters there is in the absolute most crucial situation in the absolute most important game of the year.”

I thought, “Oh good, No. 770. I wonder which card of Shingo Takatsu's Jace has.”

I'm apparently not enough of a Toppsmudic scholar to have correctly interpreted the purpose of The Unholy Books. I realize now they exist to record and reflect reality, not create it. Nobody's successfully created a Met out of thin air since George Weiss did so with Hobie Landrith.

Anyway, it didn't look any different or better at home than it did in your vacation paradise. YNH Stadium continues to disturb with its assortment of patio furniture in the bullpens and its men's room tiles scattered about various side walls and its 40,000 empty orange seats sweating and its yard markers calling attention to a pockmarked infield and its superstrength light bulbs borrowed from the climactic scene of White Nights shining in the eyes of converted second basemen who are hopelessly lost and generally befuddled in right field to begin with.

That said, it would've looked just fine if Victor Diaz could've held onto a fly ball, if Larry Poncino could've made a one-way-or-the-other call on the pitch that got away from Lo Duca while Castro dashed into contemplation mode and if I had never, ever found cause to be more than dimly aware of the man who would become the 770th player to enter a Major League game in a New York Mets uniform — somebody holding the fate of our hard-fought season in his funkyjunky right hand, somebody named Shingo Takatsu.

Having my consciousness raised where the massive talent of Miguel Cabrera is concerned is another phenomenon I could've put off for the foreseeable future.

To be fair, our newest pitcher stayed in and retired the next four batters, which perhaps provides the answer to the one question we all had to be asking in our heads: “Aside from that, Mrs. Takatsu, how did you enjoy the game?”

Shingo's statistically successful Mets debut (ERA: 0.00) combined with the Astros' loss — about time that Clemens voodoo doll kicked in — and the Nats' comeback win over the Phillies keeps us within dreaming distance. As I watched Washington triumph (bang zoom, indeed), I couldn't exactly decide if it was good or bad for us. Good in eyes-on-the-prize terms, but we're last in the N.L. East again. What the hey — I didn't like being mired amid all those teams anyway. If this Wild Card chase has reinforced anything, it's how much I absolutely despise the Marlins, the Phillies and the Shingo Takatsu of divisional opponents, the Nationals (I'd never heard of them either at this time last year). If this is our competition, I just as soon not belong to any pennant race that would have us as a member.

On the other hand, I still like and admire The Holy Books. I just wish they were entering Sunday a 769-card affair.

Now, an unfair comparison I've resisted making…until now:

FOSTER VS. BELTRAN

FIRST YEAR AS A MET

THROUGH 135 GAMES

FOSTER 1982: 13 HR 63 RBI .252 AVG

BELTRAN 2005: 14 HR 62 RBI .265 AVG

Everything Is the Same Down Here

They have the WB. You can view the varieties of Soilmaster. I've got Internet access of a sort. I can writhe around on a couch going insane while we suck.

Tell me something good. Shingo Takatsu entering the rosters of The Holy Books in singularly wretched fashion doesn't count.

A New Orleans Tale

Before we skedaddle for Jersey, I'll leave you with a tale of baseball and New Orleans.

There aren't a ton of them — Rusty Staub is from there, but beyond that it hasn't been so long that the town even had a minor-league team. But I do have one, from the two summers when I lived down there. The second summer I fell in love with Emily. The first summer she wasn't around, and I fell in love with reporting and writing and storytelling and all the things that have somehow sustained me since then, thanks to some kind-hearted and tough (by proper turns) folks at the Times-Picayune who taught the world's greenest intern everything his little mind could hold.

Baseball took a back seat then — my summer-sublet shotgun at Esplanade and Chartres, on the edge of the Quarter, didn't have a TV, and in those days before the Internet, satellite radio and crazy bloggers New Orleans may as well have been Mars for Met-watching. The best I could do was scouring the long version of AP stories that moved over the wire at work. So my Met watching that summer was limited to Braves and Cubs games, on whatever TV I could find.

The most-reliable venue I could find was a bar in the Quarter ostensibly for Chicago expats. This wasn't really a tourist bar, though they'd take their money — its clientele was a little harder, and all knew each other in that borderline-unhealthy bar way. (New Orleans is singularly experimental and open-minded when it comes to bars of whatever theme.) But they'd always have the Cubs on, so for the two series we played against the Cubs in the summer of '89, I was there.

I was young and dumb back then, so my habit was to drink about a beer an inning, which means my memories of the early innings would be crystal-clear with the intensity of a fan getting the rare treat of seeing his team, and the later innings not so much. The regular bargoers accepted me or shrugged me off — until an odd incident that Retrosheet suggests must have come during the July 28-30 series at Wrigley.

At some point during the Mets-Cubs game one night, the bartender decided to switch on porn on another TV — and we're not talking sanitized hotel-room porn. (This was a bar that was always trying to attract more female customers. Never worked. Mystery to me.) So now I'm on about beer five. If I turn my head one way, the Mets are in a tense game with the hated Cubs on TV; if I turn my head the other way, hardcore porn.

Being a good fan, I of course keep watching the Mets.

Which seems fine until it's time for my next beer, at the inning. I look up at the bartender is staring at me from his station down at Porn Central. So are all the other customers. They're not particularly friendly stares. Uh-oh. What have I done now? Did I just get caught openly rooting for New York? Would anyone really care?

“We got a question,” says the bartender.

“OK,” I say, suddenly aware that I'm at least a couple of beers too late for an adroit navigation of bar-stool diplomacy.

“We noticed you keep looking at that –” and the bartender indicates the TV that's been showing the game — “and you don't seem interested in looking at this.” And he points to the heavy breathing and pneumatic goings-on. “And we're wondering why that is.”

Man, I think, I haven't been called gay for liking the Mets since about 1981. And I've never been the subject of a recreational beating because of it. That may be about to change. In fact, it likely is about to change if I say the wrong thing.

So I point to the set with the Mets game and say, “Well, I'm not sure what's going to happen here,” and then point to the porn TV and add, “but I've got a pretty good idea how this is going to turn out.”

Total silence. Then, broken — thank Christ — by all of the regulars laughing at once. They keep laughing. They buy me beer. From then on, I'm golden in that bar, even if I am a Met fan.

That was 16 years ago. It's numbing to think what's happening down there now. That bar probably isn't flooded — the Quarter's pretty much the highest ground in the city — but has it been looted? Has it burned? I hope not. I hope things are back to normal there and everywhere else down there as soon as possible. But “soon” doesn't seem to be in the cards. Maybe not even “possible”. Just heartbreaking.

Anyway, not to leave you a down note. Take care of our blue-and-orange lads. See you if the vagaries of vacation dial-up allow.

Roll Over

That was it? That was the vaunted “roll” we waited to get on for 4-1/2 months? Nine of eleven against three certifiably lousy teams and one that's roughly our peer? Now it's over?

That ain't gonna cut it. Neither is the new math, the one in which we have now lost five of six. It's a trend. It's practically a way of life.

I suppose one could get on the Infamous Victor Z for continually wriggling into just enough trouble that getting out of it with limited damage was damage enough. Yeah, if Trachsel had started, he would've thrown his weekly one-hitter. Seems Dontrelle Willis is an awfully good pitcher and without The World's Greatest Cat taking matters into his own paws, we can't touch him.

We can't touch a lot of pitchers who aren't Dontrelle Willis either lately.

Trach is back in the rotation, if there is indeed a rotation, Monday in Atlanta. By then we could be 5-1/2 out. Ouch — worst-case scenario in effect, y'all, but this team is more Happy Time Harry than Jiggle Billy right now.

Baseball Team Hunger Force…Assemble! Cause if we don't, we're stuck at No. 4 in the 'hood, G.

Your Name Here Stadium always brings me down. With the passing of the Big O from the scene, is there a worse ballpark to look at on TV than this one? RFK at least has the curiosity factor on its side. And Shea, for all the beating it takes by every beat writer who must've gotten stuck in an elevator there, at least has pretty colors, especially if you're partial to infield green, fence blue and box seat orange.

Y'know what Miami's YNHS reminds me of? North Haverbrook — the town that had the Monorail Cafe yet denied that a monorail (monorail!) had ever come through town. Really, the N.L. expansion teams of the '90s are a lot like that the cities screwed over in that Simpsons episode. Bud Selig/Lyle Lanley sold a bill of goods to Florida, Colorado/Ogdenville and Arizona/Brockway, and don't they regret ever having signed on the dotted line? Well, sir, there's nothing on Earth like a genuine, bona fide, electrified Major League franchise!

The Marlins, no matter how many World Series they accidentally win or no matter how much they wipe the Soilmastered floor with us, were a bad, freaking idea. Maybe not in concept. South Florida's a big market, sure it should have a baseball team. But that hollow facility (one of the few I've never been to but also one of the few I have no desire to see) just visually wreaks. That whole tired-teal meets prefab-retro meets NFL-first is just so stuck in 1993. The Dolphins tore up the turf Thursday night so it had that going for it Friday. Then throw in those insipid sacks of Soilmaster Red that the cameras always capture in the Mets' dugout. They don't have a closet or something? It's not a baseball stadium and it never will be without baseball fans.

Maybe South Floridians are geniuses for avoiding this place but save for a few post-season games and an opener or two, have you ever seen a concentration of Marlins fans in YNHS? Lousy sports town. They had an ABA franchise called the Floridians. They would report an attendance exponentially higher than it could possibly have been. When called on it by an eyewitness who was able to count the house during timeouts, the team's PR man suggested that you're not taking into account all our many fans who are out at the concessions or using the rest room. Say this for the Floridians: They led the ABA in chutzpah.

Now for a moment from the world…

Don't know about the rest of you, but as much as I love complaining about the Mets' performance and their opponents' subpar accommodations, I find myself caught in between. I won't lay a “sports aren't important in the scheme of things” rap on you because we've all made a relatively conscious decision that they are. But watching the citizens of New Orleans and Mississippi struggle in the condition that they've been left to struggle in makes griping about almost anything else seem silly by comparison.

The video of the convention center and all the suffering it portrays is particularly jarring. I've been in that convention center as a reporter covering events that involved copious amounts of food and water. The electricity worked. The plumbing worked. There was regular sanitation. Whatever else I saw of New Orleans, however quirky, charming or rundown, was functional. It's hard to believe that that city and the one I've been watching on television when I haven't been watching the Mets are one and the same. It's unfathomable that those are our fellow Americans who have been crying out for official help that's been criminally late in arriving.

Don't get me wrong. The Mets losing to the Phillies and the Marlins and falling behind in the Wild Card race still bites and I still relish making time to note it to myself and to all of you. But I sincerely hope that rooting for an inconsistent sports team is eventually everybody's biggest problem in this country. I appreciate that you let me use a bit of your baseball-reading time to mention that. It's been on my mind as much, I'm guessing, as it's been on yours.

I'm sure you know where to find them, but here are links to the Red Cross and the Salvation Army.

Finding the Handle

Poor Glavine. Poor us. That was baseball like it oughta be — two teams playing hard for big stakes, and one mistake cost us. Well, two mistakes — one of organization and one of execution. I felt for TEM. Watching him fumbling for that ball snapped me back to Keith Hernandez crawling in the mud in '88, a man trapped in a nightmare. Watching Looper I was a fan trapped in a nightmare, watching a closer who's only effective when guys are standing on one side of the plate.

Keeping one eye on the game at work, I wrote down scrawled notes on the back of a piece of paper. Some excerpts:

g butterfingered on dp, must pitch to utley. little flare by bell on 0-2 pitch, two runs. fuck! … reyes somehow out on high chopper to 3B bag. 3 pitches on 2 outs after glavine gassed. wtf, kaz? … coulda been leadoff single, score on double, double, 2-0 with beltran on 2nd, no out. instead it just sucks. … good inning by glav. 3-2 on vd — Ks. what was he looking for? great pitch on difelice … YES, TRIPLE! kaz RBI groundout. get run, kills a little mo. … goodness, victor. we got a call! TRAP! glavine? 3-2 on pratt? 124 pitches! YOW! 126 total. great performance by glavine. … reyes 3-1. wow. very close on 3-2. great pitch. he's learning. damn. no help from the sun. kaz will lead off. … FUCKING LOOPER! still, howard's gonna get a lot of those. we're toast. looper cannot get lefties! goddamn michael fucker. um, looper can't get lefties out. rollins! fuck! we cannot keep going w a closer who can't get lefties out. … c'mon kaz! we're ready to love you! 102 mph? really? he's missing. good eye, kaz. YES! KAZ! c'mon carlos, don't try to do too much. goddamn it! cliff. ugh. c'mon dw. oh boy. 0-2. great pitch! yes, yr out.

It's possible I doomed us by not having a big enough piece of paper — I was pretty much out of space as Wright came to the plate. Apologies.

Dunno what I could really add to my play-by-play. We didn't find the handle and we lost. Simple as that. Can we survive Florida, Atlanta and St. Louis? The stats would say no, the schedule would say no, the team's crazy quilt of Ws and Ls and highs and lows would say…who knows. I can't get the handle on that any more than TEM could. I suppose there's a reason they play 'em.

Flashback Friday: 1980

The year was 1980. I was 17 years old.

I learned the truth at 17.

I learned that advertising slogans are come-ons, not guarantees. I learned that a few dozen wins in the middle of summer does not mean a pennant is in the offing. I learned that every promising story doesn’t have a happy ending, just an ending. I learned that the magic isn’t back just because somebody says it is.

And I learned that a baseball team isn’t all it seems at 17.

Ah, but there was a fleeting moment when I was 17 when I hadn’t learned any of that. I was happier when I was that much more ignorant. For a summer, I basked in the momentary sunshine of being 3-1/2 behind and thinking my team was going somewhere.

It did — right back to fifth place when all was said and done. But somehow I’m not fazed by that or by the 95 losses that piled up at year’s end or the eventual likelihood that when my team got good, pretty much nobody from then would have anything to do with it.

I still don’t care. I was in love with the 1980 Mets. They weren’t the first Mets team I was ever hung up on, but I think, given where I was in life, that they were my first love. I didn’t date or anything like that in high school, so that description may be apt, as apt as it is sad. When I was 10, I learned that you gotta believe; at 17, I was infatuated beyond belief.

Once it got going, I don’t think it ever occurred to me that this team wasn’t a contender. I don’t think I ever saw a reason it couldn’t win. Manager Joe Torre was a genius. Doug Flynn was a Gold Glover in the making. Frank Taveras had played on a team that eventually went to the World Series, albeit after trading him. Lee Mazzilli and John Stearns were certified All-Stars. Steve Henderson was talented enough to have been the linchipin of a trade involving Tom Seaver. Elliott Maddox was at long last the third baseman who would put down roots. John Pacella’s hat fell off but he got guys out. Mark Bomback was an absolute find; they called him Boom-Boom for what hitters went-went on him, but he found ways to win. Tom Hausman was my candidate for Cy Young.

Cy Young? I was young. I was old enough to know better but chose not to. I had already learned far too much in the previous three years that I was dying to forget. 1980 would cleanse me.

1980 was wonderful because 1979 was dreadful, 1978 was desperate and 1977 was disgusting. When I became a Mets fan, they were becoming world champions. I knew that was a little out of the ordinary, but I didn’t expect the Mets to eventually become the opposite of world champions. I didn’t expect them to live down to their pre-1969 heritage. I didn’t expect them to collapse on me.

But they did. The Mets made being a Mets fan no fun when I was in junior high. They made it a chore. They made it a badge of stupidity. Whatever awkwardness I carried into adolescence was not helped by being known as The Mets Fan. I didn’t bargain for it. When I was a kid, there were lots of us. By the late ’70s — 8th grade, 9th grade, 10th grade — there weren’t. There were some guys who didn’t make fun of the Mets and some other guys who felt kind of sorry for the Mets, but there were mostly Yankees fans.

Yankees fans? Where the hell did they come from? Look way out in front and you could see them gathering in a mass. The other New York team, the New York team that was of secondary importance when I was growing up, had taken over. In their wake they swept up a lot of former Mets fans…a lot of very weak-minded, shallow, soulless, craven bastards whose company I decided I could do without.

On the eve of the 1977 season, I got a call from one of my friends, a kid named Stephen. He had been a Mets fan, but now, he revealed, he was going to be a Yankees fan. Not only that, he told me, but the other Steven in our circle? He was switching. And this guy David? Him, too.

They went with the crowd. They and seemingly millions like them opted for instant gratification. For success by association. For winning the moment it appeared to be available.

I stayed a Mets fan. That sounds very noble or at least like it was a decision of some sort. It wasn’t. What was to decide? I was a Mets fan starting when I was 6. I stayed a Mets fan. That was that. There was nothing to think about. Mets got bad? That hurts, but I’m a Mets fan. Mets trade my favorite player of all-time? I wish they hadn’t, but even if Tom Seaver’s not here, the Mets still are. I root for them. The Mets just keep getting worse and less popular and by 1979 it’s all they can to do not lose a hundred games and they don’t come close to drawing a million people and almost nobody you know likes them and almost everybody makes fun of them and, by extension, you?

That sucks. But I’m a Mets fan. I don’t know how not to be. Not then, not ever.

Still, it would’ve been nice if the Mets could’ve gotten better. It seemed like a pipe dream, a fantasy. It seemed like the Mets would forever wallow in irrelevancy and ineptitude. It seemed like the Mets would forever finish last or, if the Cubs could be persuaded to be just a little worse, fifth.

I’d had a social studies teacher, Mr. Patton (he rode his bike to school) who told me he was a Mets fan but hoped they would lose every game in 1979. If they did, he said, maybe the team would be sold.

They lost only 99 but he had the right idea. In 1980, the clueless De Roulet family sold the Mets to Nelson Doubleday and Fred Wilpon. They hired Frank Cashen, the old Orioles’ GM. It was something if not much. The Mets wanted to be new. Their yearbook presented them as the NEW New York Mets, but it was more a concept than reality. The 1980 Mets looked a lot like the 1979 Mets. The biggest difference I could detect was an exchange of third basemen. Gone was the surly Richie Hebner (I was at the game the previous August when he saluted the fans in his own unique way) and in his place came Phil Mankowski.

The NEW New York Mets, featuring Phil Mankowski, who made two errors in his very first inning at third while the Mets made six, did not seem all that new. They got off to a 9-18 start, the highlight of which was Mankowski beginning a five-month stay on the DL. The bad baseball was sin enough, but they were taking out ads telling us how much better they were going to be. Those ads said The Magic Is Back.

I can still hear the laughter.

The worst came at the end of the first homestand. The Mets drew 2,052 for a midweek afternoon game against the Expos. THE MAGIC GARDEN was the back page Post headline, giggling over a picture of 53,000 empty wooden seats.

So they weren’t any good and nobody liked them. Well, nobody but me and Joel, my best friend through high school. Shortly before that season started, I had my fondest non-Mets wish come true when I was tabbed to be editor-in-chief of our high school paper. My first act was to add Joel to the masthead and find something for him to do. Talk About Mets With Me Editor would’ve been the most apropos title.

We had a good group back then. Our pal Larry also came aboard the Tide that spring mostly because he was the first in our crowd to get a driver’s license. I wanted to name him Transportation Editor. But Larry didn’t follow baseball. We met a very smart, younger guy (skipped a grade) named Fred. Fred was very funny and was up for anything. I went to his house one afternoon toting a transistor radio, listening to a Mets game that drew 2,052. I was very matter-of-fact about it. I thought I detected a smirk from Fred, but he kept it mostly to himself. He didn’t follow baseball. Nor did John, the earnest guy from the other side of town or Mark from Lido. Adam, Fred’s neighbor, did, but he was a Yankees fan.

Essentially, it was me and Joel and Phil Mankowski against the world in the spring of ’80, against preconceived notions, against an uninspiring track record, against smug, hateful Yankees fans who told us we were no good. As eleventh grade wound down, though, the world would begin to come our way, just a little.

The Mets started to win. Not a lot. Not to an extent that anybody who didn’t care would notice, but enough so that people like me and Joel did.

• In late May, they swept the Braves. The Braves were as lousy as the Mets, but we never swept anybody.

• In early June, the Mets took four in a row from St. Louis and Pittsburgh. Those were pretty good teams.

• On June 11, the benches emptied at Shea as the Mets took on the Dodgers. Ron Cey was pissed off at Craig Swan for coming inside. No punches were thrown but Mike Jorgensen took a swing. Hit the winning grand slam in the tenth off Rick Sutcliffe. POW!

The Regents were just around the corner but mostly I studied the Mets’ chances. After Jorgy went deep and stuck it to L.A., the Mets were two games under .500, just six games out. The Mets were winning late and they were losing not that much. It was beginning to feel a lot like Christmas.

Three nights later, it was New Year’s Eve.

There are dates that you live through that you know you’ll remember as long as you have a mind. When Neil Armstrong walked on the moon, July 20, 1969 made itself indelible in my memory. When Nixon said he was going to resign, I knew I’d always be able to identify August 8, 1974. And once the events of June 14, 1980 became the events of June 14, 1980, there was no way I would ever, ever forget June 14, 1980.

Or ever, ever forget Steve Henderson. My goodness how I’d never forget Steve Henderson after that Saturday night. Steve Henderson was one of four players received by the Mets in exchange for Tom Seaver three years earlier, almost to the day. Hendu, it was said, was the difference-maker. Pat Zachry was taking Tom’s starts, not filling his shoes. Doug Flynn was all glove, no bat. Dan Norman was rumored to be down in Tidewater learning to switch-hit. But Steve Henderson was the kind of talented outfielder the Mets never had, the kind of talented outfielder the Reds had too many of.

Steve Henderson was a nice player. He collected hits, some of them clutch, during his time as a Met. He wasn’t George Foster, Ken Griffey or even Cesar Geronimo, but we liked him. I liked him. Maybe my standards had been hopelessly lowered since 1977, maybe my heroes were mediocre baseball players, but he was one of my favorites, right there with Mazzilli.

On the other hand, Steve Henderson hadn’t homered all year through June 13. It was getting to be a cause celebre. The Mets didn’t hit many homers to begin with. Jorgensen, who got his fifth with that grand slam, was the Mets’ idea of a slugger in 1980. The Daily News was running a chart, comparing the day-to-day progress with that of Roger Maris in 1961. Not Jorgensen vs. Maris but 1980 Mets vs. Maris. They were running neck and neck.

The Mets weren’t hitting anything against John Montefusco and the Giants on June 14, not for the first eight innings. We fell behind 6-0 in the fifth. It was 6-2 entering the ninth, a second straight loss to San Francisco staring the Shea crowd in the face.

But these were the 1980 Mets and this was June 14.

Maddox grounded out against Greg Minton.

But Flynn singled.

Jose Cardenal, useless his entire Met tenure, grounded out, moving Flynn to second.

Mazz singled Doug home.

It was 6-3.

Frank Taveras walked.

Claudell Washington, acquired so recently that he was the only Met with no name on his back, singled Mazz home and Frankie to second.

It was 6-4.

Allen Ripley replaced Minton. All he had to do was retire Henderson.

He couldn’t.

He didn’t.

Steve Henderson hit a three-run homer.

The Mets won 7-6.

THE METS WON 7-6! THE METS CAME BACK FROM 6-0! THE METS SCORED FIVE IN THE NINTH!

THEY NEVER DO THAT!

It was bedlam everywhere you looked. There was Cy Hausman catching the ball in the Mets’ pen. There was Hendu circling the bases. There were his teammates waiting for him at the plate. There were the fans not letting him go into the clubhouse until he returned for a curtain call.

And there I was, jumping up and down in front of the televsion in my parents’ bedroom, all alone.

THE METS WON!

I ran into the dining room. I breathlessly explained to my sister and her boyfriend what just happened. This was big, this was unprecedented, this was the greatest thing that had occurred to the Mets since at least 1973.

My sister’s boyfriend, a former Shea Stadium vendor who grew up in Flushing and thus took a lifelong dislike to baseball, had one question:

“Who cares?”

Killjoys. I continued running through the house that night and I swear I didn’t slow down all summer.

Everything was better. Shea was better. It was alive with color. The fence was repainted royal blue. The old wooden seats were replaced, top to bottom, with bright plastic ones — red, green, blue and orange, beautiful Mets orange. And the seats, instead of holding nobody, held everybody. The day after Steve Henderson made June 14, 1980 a night to remember, Shea was sold out. They drew more people that Sunday afternoon (44,910…some sections were still being refurbished) than they did in their first six-game series in April. The Mets lost, but that was a technicality.

The Magic Was Back!

Magic was my favorite word in the summer of 1980. When school ended, my father relocated his office from the city to Rockville Centre. Instead of hiring a full-time receptionist, he gave me the job. Truth be told, it was kind of slow, so I mostly sat at my desk, answered the occasional phone call and listened alternately to WYNY, a middle-of-the-road FM station that my father didn’t mind too much and WPIX, reborn as a Top 40 station. One of the first new songs I heard from that desk was by Olivia Newton-John.

You have to believe we are magic

Nothing can stand in our way

Fate! A song called “Magic” was a big hit in the summer of ’80. I listned carefully for “Magic” by Pilot and “Do You Believe in Magic?” by the Lovin’ Spoonful and “This Magic Moment” by Jay & The Americans. For the first time, I had a soundtrack for my season.

Given that there wasn’t much more to do at work, I read the papers. It was the first summer I read every paper available every day. The Post, the News, the Times and Newsday were brimming with Mets stories. Anything I could find, anything that confirmed the Mets’ presence in a four-way race with the Expos, the Phillies and the Pirates, I absorbed as quickly as it was printed. I remember a new weekly paper came along to cover the burgeoning New York sports scene. There was too much for just daily papers now.

There was also a lot to listen to. 1980 was the summer I discovered sports talk radio. On WMCA, the Mets’ flagship, there was a man named Art Rust Jr. He guaranteed the Mets would be playing October baseball at “Flushing by the Bay.” He also promised that by the end of the decade we’d have interleague play and every team would be under a dome. He referred to good defensive catchers as guys who could really flash that leather behind the dish. When Art got to be a bit much, I turned my loyalties to WFUV, Fordham’s radio station. There, every Sunday night between 11 PM and 2 AM, hosts and callers debated Mets vs. Yankees. For college students, they weren’t bad, except for this one hyperobnoxious Yankees fan who sounded awful on the air. His name was Michael Kay.

The Mets were on a mission. I could feel it. I wanted to high-five, a gesture I picked up from watching football games, everything in sight. I wanted to beat everybody in the N.L. East like it was life and death. On the Fourth of July, the Mets split a doubleheader with the first-place Expos. There was another near-brawl brought on by Bill Gullickson headhunting our Jorgy (who had once suffered a serious jaw injury) because Montreal, I figured, couldn’t stand the fact that the Mets were so good. I pedaled from Long Beach to Island Park where Joel was working at Shell Creek Park, signing out volleyballs, to fill him in on the action. If I had seen an Expos fan as I crossed the bridge between towns, I’m convinced I would’ve started a fight.

It took me until July 6 to go to my first Mets game of this brilliant, new era. Joel wasn’t available, so I enlisted Larry. Larry was a great guy, but like I said, not a baseball fan. That wasn’t necessarily a bad thing. It made him more observant of details a baseball-savvy person might not pick up on. In the bottom of the first, Mazz doubled. We were sitting in the orange seats behind third base. As he rounded second, I put up both my hands to warn him to stop where he was. “What are you,” Larry asked me, “the coach?” He caught something. I had begun to mimic what I was seeing on TV because I was watching every single game as if there would be a test afterwards. I couldn’t say that before 1980, but now I could.

The Mets lost that game but Shea was beautiful. Even the ride home was good. We had to change at Jamaica. Another Mets fan, our age, started telling me how happy he was, how great it was to watch the sports report on the news and how sometimes the sportscaster, whether it was Bill Mazer on channel 5, Marv Albert on channel 4 or Warner Wolf who had just taken all his highlights (couldn’t get enough of those) from channel 7 to channel 2, would sum up the night’s events with “Mets win, Yanks lose.” For so long, it had been the opposite.

Three weeks later, Joel and I made it out there. I was very confident of my abilities to guide us from the LIRR to the Subway at Woodside but I led us down a staircase to the street that made us miss the first train that came. Joel let me know about it. When we arrived, he wanted to buy two field boxes from a scalper. They were 10 bucks each. I said no. I wasn’t ever going to spend that much to see my team in my stadium.

We got pretty good seats nonetheless at the box office. “As long as no balls are hit in the right field corner, we can see everything,” Joel said. Jerry Morales was starting there. Eventually, Jerry and a ball went into the corner and out of sight. The ball came out. Jerry didn’t. The right field corner immediately became known as Jerry Morales territory between us. The Mets lost. They lost John Stearns, too. He took a foul off the index finger. Out for the season.

The Mets hung in. They played footsie with .500, twice touching it if never going over. Joel and I went into the Village on a Friday night in early August to see Uncle Floyd, the subversive faux-kiddie show host, live at the Bottom Line. On the train home, we ran into a guy we knew from school. He was at the game. The Mets beat the Astros, he said. Then they won the next night. Both times they came from behind. On Sunday, the Mets went for the sweep, falling behind early. Steve Albert said that was only fitting, that’s how the Mets like it. I had the feeling he shouldn’t have said that. The Mets lost.

But it wasn’t fatal. The Mets got to mid-August still playing pretty well. They took two of three from the defending world champions in Pittsburgh and were 56-57, 7-1/2 out of first. Since that awful 9-18 start, the Mets had gone 47-39, a solid, winning record that spanned more than half a season.

Next up was a five-game set against the Phillies at Shea. This, I was convinced, would be the moment we took off. This would be 1969 and 1973 all over again. I sat down with the schedule, factored in all the ground the Mets would gain over the weekend (we had nothing but aces — Zachry, Bomback, Swan, Burris, Roy Lee Jackson — ready for ’em) and then all the wins they could count on when the West Coast teams came in. It would take a pennant race, but the Mets would prevail.

The Phillies swept the Mets. Five straight. They weren’t close, none of ’em. By Monday morning, the Mets were 11 games out of first and for the first time all summer I avoided every single newspaper. Somewhere along the way, Flynn and Taveras went down. The rest of the homestand was just as bad. The Mets tumbled and tumbled again. I went to one more game. It was against the Giants. The Mets lost. Ripley didn’t pitch. Henderson didn’t homer. My record at Shea in the year it was made over was a drab 0-3. I would never have such a bad record there again, but I couldn’t have known that then.

By the time my senior year in high school began, the Mets had returned to where they were in the spring. Nobody talked about them except to mock them. One guy in my AP History class asked if my “The Magic Is Back” t-shirt meant I was a Doug Henning fan. Even at home I couldn’t get any love. On a Sunday in September, when the U.S. Open was finishing and the football season was starting and the Yankees were closing in on another division title, I was at the kitchen table, wrapped up in the fading Mets.

“All those other sports on,” my dad asked, “and you’re watching this?” He shook his head and walked away.

Yeah, I was watching. I never shook the idea that it was a great season, even as the Mets finished up — or down — 11-38. It was the exact mirror image of 1969’s last 49 games. The Magic was out of the standings while the fans had vacated the stands. I was still watching. In the last week of the season, Joel Youngblood practically channeled Steve Henderson or at least Mike Jorgensen. He hit a two-run homer off Grant Jackson to beat the Pirates 5-4 in the tenth. It was witnessed by 1,787 souls, the lowest attendance ever at Shea (a record that would last 24 hours). There were no derisive headlines the next day, though. Met misery wasn’t novel enough to rate the back page.

By then, the 1980 Mets were no longer the 1980 Mets who had me running gleefully through the house in June. Torre was now managing rookies. Mookie Wilson, Hubie Brooks and Wally Backman were all recalled in September. Maybe they’d be recalled longer than the season itself which felt like it had faded from institutional memory even before it was over. On paper, the Mets’ 95-loss campaign appeared not altogether dissimilar from ’77, ’78 and ’79 except that they finished fifth and drew more than a million. Boom-Boom won-won 10 games and led the team in victories. The hitters, all of them, tied Maris with 61 homers. Statistically, the Mets of ’80 were of a piece with the disgraces that preceded them.

Emotionally, they couldn’t have been more different. The Mets acted like a contender for three months, and all I really wanted was to root for a team that seemed to have a chance. They led the sports. They got segments on This Week In Baseball. They gave me something to talk about and think about and never, ever forget about.

Just to be lifted from the morass of last place and to have a little hope — what a gift for one summer. Try to explain that to somebody who wasn’t in high school or thereabouts then. Try to explain that to a fan of any other team.

The year was 1980, 25 years ago.

I was 17.

Flashback Friday is a weekly tour through the years, every half-decade on the half-decade, wherein a younger Mets fan develops into the Mets fan he is today. Previous stops: 1970, 1975. Next stop: 1985.

Expanding Our Roster

Editor's Note: As you are probably aware, baseball blogs can expand their rosters beginning September 1. We at Faith and Fear in Flushing have called up Dodd, a young blogger with great stuff, for the stretch drive. He's a little raw, but we hope you enjoy his debut.

The Mets suck.

The Mets totally suck.

I'm serious. I don't wanna do this. I don't even like baseball.

What?

I didn't say that. You just thought I said that. You're the one who likes baseball. I was just nodding to shut you up.

Fine, I'll do it.

OK, so I'm supposed to blog today's Mets-Phillies game…

Wait, don't they have sites for this crap? Doesn't ESPN have a site or something? Don't they give the scores on TV?

Perspective? What's that?

Well who cares what “we” think?

Big deal, losers writing about baseball for other losers. Congratulations.

I did NOT say I wanted to do this. What I said was I wanted you to buy me an iPod and you said you wouldn't do it unless I watched a baseball game with you and told you how much I liked it because you're so pathetic. Now I have to do this too? No wonder you don't have any friends.

Real friends, not just other losers you meet online.

I suppose if we're gonna get to Best Buy before it closes I better do this. So what am I supposed to say?

Um, the Mets lost to the Phillies 3 to 1 on Thursday.

What? They already know that? Well, DUH!

Tell them WHY they lost? Because they suck. I already said that.

Fine…the Mets lost to the Phillies 3 to 1 on Thursday. Although I'm pretty sure it had something to do with them sucking, I'm supposed to give you “perspective,” whatever that is.

My perspective is baseball is stupid. And the Mets are stupid. The Mets don't ever win, do they?

What? Two world championships? Is that a lot?

I didn't think so.

So anyway, the Mets are apparently trying to win games more than they usually do and it's not working. I'm told that the game they just lost was a big game which figures since they suck. If they didn't suck, they probably would've won, but they didn't, so they do.

Suck, I mean.

Details? I don't remember what happened. It was like hours ago.

Uh…some old dude pitched. And he couldn't pick up a ball. And the other team scored. And the Mets didn't score like at all…oh wait, they scored once when that fast dude ran really fast or something.

And then the Mets lost like they usually do. And they still suck.

There. Can we go now?

I'm supposed to give them reasons why the Mets lost? Didn't I just do that? Oh man, it's amazing what you losers can find to kill time with. Can't you download porn like everybody else? I know a really kickass site for that!

Loser.

The Mets lost their game today because they don't have enough good players. The Mets should get more good players, more good players than the other team has. Today the other team had more good players. The Mets suck.

Is that enough? Because I don't know what else to say. I still don't know why you made me do this.

What? Link to the ESPN site? So there is an ESPN site? You're writing about these stupid baseball games for other stupid baseball fans and then you're all like “go to the ESPN site for the box score”? Wow, you bloggers are bigger losers than I thought.

Um, if you need to know more about why the Mets suck, click here or something. Losers.

That's it, I hope. It is? Good.

What do you mean Best Buy is closed? Oh, you SUCK!

I hate baseball.

Editor's Note: We will be slightly contracting our roster beginning September 2. Dodd has been designated for assignment. And he's not getting an iPod.

Keep Me Up 'Til September Ends

I heard Pedro after the game talk about the mistakes he threw. If he's big enough to own up to his, I'll own up to mine.

1) I wore MARTINEZ 45 to Shea. It was the third time I've worn it this season. The Mets are 0-3 when I've done that. In retrospect, I figure I was asking for it the first two times because Pedro wasn't pitching then. But tonight? Geez. Sorry. Yo, shirt: Back into the drawer until winter. (Give my regards to VAUGHN 42 while you're there.)

2) When Pedro was briefly rolling, retiring the primary Philadelphia banes of our existence, I turned to my companion and remarked what a pleasure it was to have a pitcher who has no problem handling Abreu and Burrell. Ryan Howard hit the next pitch over the left field wall and nothing was ever the same. I hope I mean that in the short-term sense. I will never again say nice things about a future Hall of Famer unless he's up by eight runs after six.

3) With the Cardinals up 2-0 on the Marlins and us up 2-0 and the Braves having beaten the Nats in their first game (though I declared their doubleheader a gimme because there was nobody to root for between them) and the Reds not yet having taken on the Astros, visions of a September 1 that included us at the top of the Wild Card standings began to dance off first base in my head. Thirty-seven seasons of hypercaution gave way to glints of optimism. My sincere apologies for not being more of a wet blanket.

So I'm owning up to my mistakes and I'm willing to suffer the consequences. I'm willing to have Glavine take care of the Phillies Thursday afternoon, willing to have the Mets take two of three and willing to have me absorb the one loss there was to be absorbed in person. Three hours of my life that I'll never get back is a small price to pay to get back to within a half-game of the WC.

Besides, it's not about where we are on September 1. It's about coming home on the afternoon of October 2 and figuring out what time our first-round game is.

WHOA! Who's getting optimistic now? Well, there's wet-blanketing and there's the reason we do this. The reason we do this — be fans beyond all the stuff about how we like to “suffer” for our teams — is to have a September and use it to get to October. As I fought my way through the uninvited, unwanted, unnecessary U.S. Open beautiful-people hordes exiting the 7 (oh Muffy, it's raining…this Flushing place is awful!), I had an extra bounce in my step. Man, I thought, I haven't felt this way since 2000. September's starting and we're good and we're close and we're not done. Has it really taken us this long?

After the Phillies ruined a perfectly good storyline (oh Chase, it's raining…this Flushing place is awful!), I was left to contemplate what September can be like in Metsopotamia.

It's not pretty.

Our most mythic month has had its moments. September '69 and Goodbye Leo, we hate to see ya go! and September '73 and Tug slapping glove to thigh and September '86 when the Mets were so bold that they painted A SEPTEMBER TO REMEMBER at the base of the leftfield wall and handed out pennants every night lest anybody get the idea we wouldn't have one in October. September '88 was at the heart of a 29-8 finishing thrust that kicked sand all over the East and frightened the Dodgers into submission (I fell asleep toward the end that year — what happened in the playoffs?).

Thing is, September hasn't been much of a Met month since 1988, a mere 17 years ago. When the Mets had nothing to play for, it didn't matter what they did. And when they did have something to play for, well, hoo-boy. I suppose it's all kind of irrelevant given that hardly anybody on this team had anything to do with anything that happened more than a couple of years ago, but the Mets have not cashed in on any opportunities presented by any September since Gregg Jefferies was hatched from his pod.

• The Mets couldn't catch the Cubs in September 1989. The Cubs!

• Every pitcher except Doc, especially Frank Viola and John Franco, made a ptui! noise of some sort when confronted with the bit in their mouth in September 1990.

• Bobby Jones' right hand was either too sweaty or too dry, I forget which, in September 1997 during a crucial game at Turner Field. He didn't get out of the first. (What, you thought Al invented that?)

• September 1998, lost last five games, don't wanna talk about it.

• The melodrama of 1999 was exacerbated thirty times over by the Mets' near-fatal collapse that September. It's more fun to relive than it was to live.

Five years ago tonight, as September 2000 dawned, I was beside myself — it's true, there were actually two of me — with joy because the Mets had pulled ahead of the Braves. No Wild Card pikers us. We were going to capture the actual division title that was rightfully ours (we won the first one, therefore it belongs to us). About five minutes later, the Mets went to St. Louis and lost three straight one-run games, all of them in walkoff fashion. A few days later, following a series of crushing losses that featured a grand slam by Benito Santiago off Benitez in Cincinnati that turned an 8-7 eighth-inning lead into an 11-8 loss, the Mets were thoroughly ensconced in second behind Atlanta. The Wild Card looked dicey for a bit but was preserved. Still…

• September 2001, not a good month in New York to begin with. In his own nefarious way, Brian Jordan made baseball matter here every bit as much as Piazza did. I never thought I'd hurt over baseball again, but only a dozen days passed after 9/11 when Brian Jordan wrecked our miracle comeback, already in progress. Six days later, he wrecked it again. Honestly, as beautiful as Mike's 9/21 shot was, it was Jordan torching our bullpen over (9/23) and over (9/29) that refocused my attention on the Mets. I suppose I owe Brian Jordan some small debt for helping me return to normality and care about a silly game. (Now that's what you call some serious rationalization.)

Well, better that September has the capacity to disappoint than not matter at all. I'll take my chances with whatever lies ahead versus talk of spoilers and callups and hunting and fishing. September has arrived. We're part of the welcoming committee. And we don't necessarily have to wave goodbye when it's over.

The first pitch of the rest of our season is scheduled for 1:10 PM.