The blog for Mets fans
who like to read
ABOUT US
Faith and Fear in Flushing made its debut on Feb. 16, 2005, the brainchild of two longtime friends and lifelong Met fans.
Greg Prince discovered the Mets when he was 6, during the magical summer of 1969. He is a Long Island-based writer, editor and communications consultant. Contact him here.
Jason Fry is a Brooklyn writer whose first memories include his mom leaping up and down cheering for Rusty Staub. Check out his other writing here.
Got something to say? Leave a comment, or email us at faithandfear@gmail.com. (Sorry, but we have no interest in ads, sponsored content or guest posts.)
Need our RSS feed? It's here.
Visit our Facebook page, or drop by the personal pages for Greg and Jason.
Or follow us on Twitter: Here's Greg, and here's Jason.
|
by Greg Prince on 13 September 2011 1:23 pm
Welcome to The Happiest Recap, a solid gold slate of New York Mets games culled from every schedule the Mets have ever played en route to this, their fiftieth year in baseball. We’ve created a dream season that includes the “best” 139th game in any Mets season, the “best” 140th game in any Mets season, the “best” 141st game in any Mets season…and we keep going from there until we have a completed schedule worthy of Bob Murphy coming back with the Happy Recap after this word from our sponsor on the WFAN Mets Radio Network.
GAME 139: September 9, 1969 — METS 7 Cubs 1
(Mets All-Time Game 139 Record: 20-28; Mets 1969 Record: 82-57)
Tuesday night. Shea Stadium. A black cat appears.
Is that all she wrote?
With apologies to Homer the Dog and Mettle the Mule (and, for that matter, George “The Stork” Theodore), the unnamed black cat that crossed in front of the visitors’ dugout when it was full of Chicago Cubs is the most famous animal in New York Mets history. He was plainly working for the home team when he seemingly sought out — depending on whose version you believe — Glenn Beckert, Ron Santo or Leo Durocher, and irreversibly altered the luck quotient of the 1969 pennant race. The Cubs who came to town as the holders of the longest-lived lead the National League East had ever seen (in, granted, the first year there was a National League East), would be leaving with their proverbial tails tucked between their hind legs.
And the Mets were clearing their collective throat to roar the roar of a fresh, new frontrunner.
It was a night to say hello to one legend and bid a derisive adieu to another.
Foregoing the question of where that cat came from anyway, who was he intending to spook? The whole Cubs team, broadly, but specifically? A wire-service photo that appeared in papers nationwide the next day identified the Cub in the on-deck circle past whom the Flushing feline of the moment padded as second baseman Beckert; his face and uniform number were obscured, but he was the second batter in visitors’ lineup, and since the episode is generally recalled as occurring as the game got underway, Glenn was a logical candidate. Later accounts, however, fingered the victim of furry misfortune as Santo, and, indeed, the third baseman turned announcer definitely created a sideline from autographing copies of the image in retirement.
Rick Talley, in The Cubs of ’69, meanwhile, deduced the kitty had another target in mind:
“Somebody released the feline in front of the Cubs dugout early in the no-contest, and while some players chuckled as the cat ran back and forth in front of the bench as if trained, Leo the Lion stared straight ahead. Perhaps the King of Beasts knew.”
On whomever he set his gaze, the black cat was recognized immediately as bad luck for one team, and not the other. Richard Dozer in the next day’s Chicago Tribune described a first inning in which “the frightened feline reversed his course and dashed under the stands to safety on the other side, next to the Mets’ dugout.” And years later, Shea’s head groundskeeper Pete Flynn recalled in the book, Moments in the Sun, “He looked in the dugout and gave them the jinx. The cat came from behind home plate and went in front of the Cubs dugout. It was a bizarre moment.”
Most bizarre of all, at least from the perspective of past performance, was how the Mets had making their own luck dating back to August 16. They’d won 21 of 27 entering the Night of the Cat, while the Cubs didn’t need any superstitions gone awry to tell them things weren’t going their way any longer. Since August 20, they’d lost 12 of 19. The table-turning had placed the Mets only a game-and-half-back before the cat reared head (depending on your allegiance) adorable or ominous head.
Once the cat had his say, it was the Cubs who were put out. In the bottom of the first, after Chicago had gone down in order, two Ferguson Jenkins walks set the stage for Ken Boswell to double home two runs and give Tom Seaver as much lead as he’d need. Seaver was money by this point in the 1969 season. Certainly his manager thought so. As Bob Sales of the Boston Globe noted, Gil Hodges’s neatly printed on his lineup card, as the Mets’ ninth-place hitter, “$eaver – P”.
Tom didn’t give up anything for three innings, long enough for the Mets to increase their margin, thanks to a botched Cubs pickoff attempt that didn’t erase leadfooted Art Shamsky at second and a succeeding two-run homer from Donn Clendenon. The Cubs manufactured one run in the top of the fourth, but Seaver personally got it back when he doubled in the bottom of the inning and came around on a fielder’s choice and sacrifice fly. A Shamsky home run and a Jerry Grote RBI double eventually elevated the Mets’ advantage to 7-1.
Which wasn’t enough to bring out the cat for an encore but was plenty of cue for the 58,436 in attendance (51,448 paid) to serve as Hallelujah! chorus behind Seaver. They took out handkerchiefs, they waved them in the general direction of the third base dugout and they serenaded the Chicago manager with a new twist on an old favorite.
Goodbye Leo!
Goodbye Leo!
Goodbye Leo!
We hate to see you go!
It was splendid accompaniment to Seaver’s 21st win of the season, as was Karl Ehrhardt’s extraordinarily topical sign held aloft in the box seats no far from where the serenadee sat and fumed:
TOOTHLESS CUBS —
JUST A LOTTA LIP
“These fans,” Durocher was heard to grumble as he was heckled en route to the team bus, “they’re not goin’ after any maiden.” Yet in other, seemingly distant lifetimes, Durocher was one of them. He had been a New Yorker. He played (albeit without distinction) with Babe Ruth on the Yankees. He cajoled the Dodgers to the 1941 pennant, Brooklyn’s first in 21 years. His guile was behind the miraculous Giant comeback of 1951. Now, however, Leo the Lip was on the wrong side of the field and the wrong end of a miracle in the making. The usually garrulous manager had only this to say to reporters after Seaver completed the 7-1 defanging of the once proud Lion and sliced what was left of the Cubs’ divisional lead to a fragile half-game:
“No comment. No fucking comment.”
ALSO QUITE HAPPY: On September 7, 2006, the fastest set of wheels in the National League showed what they could do upon accelerating. The suspicion was they — and the team for whom they revved so effectively — couldn’t be stopped.
In the bottom of the sixth on a Thursday night at Shea, as the Mets led the Dodgers, 4-0, Jose Reyes shot a Brad Penny pitch up the right-center field gap with two on. The ball eluded Matt Kemp, so Jose just kept going. Kemp tracked down what seemed likely to become Reyes’s 17th triple of the season.
It was destined to be more. In this year of Ho-ZAY! HozayHozayHozay!, three bags just weren’t enough for the speedy Met shortstop. He rounded third and headed for home well ahead of the relay throw that had no chance of catching him. Reyes slid headfirst, bellyflopping onto the plate for no better reason than it appeared to be fun.
Jose Reyes was nothing but fun by this point of the 2006 season. His three-run inside-the-park home run gave the Mets a 7-0 lead they’d hold for the rest of the game and put them 35 games over .500 for the first time since 1988, the last time they won the N.L. East. Appropriately enough, the win reduced the Mets’ magic number for clinching another division title to the one on Reyes’s back: 7.
GAME 140: September 10, 1969 (1st) — METS 3 Expos 2 (12)
(Mets All-Time Game 140 Record: 24-24; Mets 1969 Record: 83-57)
The Mets were going to ascend into first place sooner or later. It’s just that nobody would have ever bet on sooner.
Ever…at least not the ever that started in 1962 and rolled on until a few weeks before, when the Mets were improved, but still a light year or two from first. But that was all ancient history now. The New York Mets who couldn’t be mentioned in the same sentence with first place no longer existed. They’d been replaced with a couple of dozen fellows who wore uniforms eerily similar to that of their predecessors, but the resemblance ended once these Mets took the field and deposited their results in the standings.
This was a franchise for whom finishes above last place were news, and there were only two of those in seven seasons. Precedent indicated that would be a reasonable Met goal again. In 1969, the birth of the first expansion team in their time zone since them figured to guarantee the newly created six-team National League East’s basement would be furnished with Montreal Expos paraphernalia. Sure enough, the Mets didn’t spend any time in sixth.
More aspiration? The Philadelphia Phillies — featuring a disgruntled Richie Allen and little else — loomed as pretty crummy; the Mets finished only three games behind them in 1968. The Phils fell into fifth to stay by late May. That meant one last and next-to-last were occupied by teams who weren’t the Mets.
Higher up the food chain were the Pittsburgh Pirates, a sub-.500 team the year before and, despite the dangerous bats belonging to Roberto Clemente and Willie Stargell, not considered pitching-laden enough to be a serious contender heading into ’69. By June, the Mets had put the Pirates in their rearview mirror.
The St. Louis Cardinals were a heavy favorite to contend for their third consecutive league championship — or divisional championship, anyway. But the Redbirds were grounded early. Save for a brief Cards resurgence in mid-August that coincided with the Mets groping to find themselves, St. Louis was not a direct challenger to ascendant New York. The Mets spent the bulk of 1969 ahead of the once-formidable Cardinals.
Let’s review:
Sixth place? Not the Mets.
Fifth place? Not the Mets.
Fourth place? Not the Mets.
Third place? Not the Mets.
Second place? That was the Mets most every day from June 3 through September 9. It was a helluva accomplishment considering the humble beginnings that never completely shook off their humility for seven years. The Mets were better than everybody in their immediate sphere except for one team: the mighty Chicago Cubs.
But the Cubs, as the Mets had just witnessed, were no longer mighty by September. Leo Durocher had brought them to Shea for two games and they left town with two losses. The separation between Chicago and New York in the standings — which, when the Cubs were running away with the division, felt like the 789.4 Rand McNally miles — was down to a half-game.
A half-game? That’s a day’s work as baseball math goes. You win and your prey loses, you’ve got it. You’ve got first place. The Mets couldn’t take on the Cubs directly, but they could make a pretty significant push on their own, as they were playing the last-place Expos twice this Wednesday evening at Shea. True, the Cubs were down in Philadelphia, taking on a the next-to-last place Phillies, but in their case, other teams’ positions hardly mattered.
The Cubs had met the enemy, and it was as much them as it was whomever they were playing. They were also going up against the specter of the Mets, who suddenly couldn’t lose, and the surging relentlessness of the schedule. That the Cubs had to play anybody was bad news for them. That the Mets would have two shots at the Expos…let’s just say moving day loomed.
The Mets made their move first. Their doubleheader started well ahead of the Cubs’ single night game at Connie Mack Stadium. To add a little drama to the prevailing trends, the Mets and Expos — knotted at two from the fifth inning on — needed to go to extra innings in their opener. Until they had a final, the standings couldn’t budge even temporarily…no matter how much they were plainly dying to.
In the bottom of the twelfth, after Bill Stoneman got two quick outs, Cleon Jones singled and Rod Gaspar walked. Ken Boswell came to the plate. Here is how Ralph Kiner described the climactic swing:
“The pitch is hit through the middle, it’s gonna go into center field, a base hit and the Mets will win it! Coming around to score is Cleon Jones, and the Mets have won the ballgame, three to two, on the base hit.
“So for the first time in the history of the New York Mets, they have gone into first place!”
The standings, as of September 10, 1969, 8:43 PM Eastern Daylight Time, couldn’t have been more provisional. The Mets and Expos had another game to play, while the Cubs and Phillies were still in progress down the New Jersey Turnpike. Nevertheless, the fans knew they were in on an unprecedented moment, declaring, in case anybody missed it…
WE’RE NUMBER ONE!
WE’RE NUMBER ONE!
WE’RE NUMBER ONE!
Their assertion was confirmed by the Shea scoreboard:
LOOK WHO’S NO. 1
It wasn’t the Cubs anymore. The NY METS were listed as having WON 83 and LOST 57. That information was posted one line above the record of the CHI CUBS, who had WON 84 and LOST 58. The all-important PCT. was included to let every Sheagoer and the entirety of the free world know the Mets held an advantage of .593 to .592.
That was it. It would be referred to as one percentage point, but technically it was one one-thousandth of one percent. In the jargon of Chesterfield Cigarette ads of the day, the Mets’ winning percentage was no more than a silly millimeter longer than the Cubs’. But it was longer. And larger. And bigger. And better.
The Mets were No. 1. By the end of the night, the Phillies downed the Cubs, 6-2, and the Mets (behind Nolan Ryan’s complete game, eleven-strikeout three-hitter in the nightcap) swept Montreal, 3-2 and 7-1. That translated to a full one-game lead for the Mets.
The first-place Mets, that is.
ALSO QUITE HAPPY: On September 8, 1970, what was once the stuff of miracles was now mired in the relatively mundane business of defending what had been previously, if miraculously, attained. Then again, the concept of a title defense in baseball is more myth than reality. Once the season after a championship begins, everybody is even. Everybody is Oh and Oh. Everybody has to start from scratch and attempt to build a new championship.
That’s what the 1970 Mets were doing in September…almost desperately. They dropped out of first place in early August and had been clawing to get back on top for more than a month. They closed in on their 1969 perch against Montreal this Tuesday night at Shea when they put five runs on the board in the eighth inning, extending their lead to 10-2. The key blows were a three-run double from Ken Boswell and a three-RBI single off the bat of reliever Tug McGraw. McGraw replaced starter Gary Gentry in the fourth and had tamed the Expos ever since. He’d stay in the game in the ninth, but after surrendering a three-run homer to Bob Bailey, Gil Hodges called on recent pickup Ron Herbel to get the final two outs and preserve the 10-5 win.
Also starring for the Mets was Cleon Jones, whose season to date was a far cry from the All-Star campaign he put up in 1969. His 3-for-5 evening (a triple and two doubles) allowed the .340 hitter from the year before to build his hitting streak to 15 consecutive games. By the time it was over, on September 15, Cleon would make it 23 straight to establish a new club record. But even with the recent surge, Jones was batting only .277, or more than 60 points lower than his 1969 average.
As for the Mets as a whole, the triumph over Montreal, combined with a Pirate loss, lifted them to within a half-game of first place. They would forge a tie with Pittsburgh the next night and share a piece of the penthouse as late as September 14, but 1970 was destined to provide nothing of a championship nature for the Mets, save for the rapidly fading memories of what had been so miraculous so recently. They’d finish in third, six games out.
GAME 141: September 7, 1984 — METS 10 Cubs 0
(Mets All-Time Game 141 Record: 19-29; Mets 1984 Record: 79-62)
So close. So gosh darn close. Even for the annals filled with the darnedest, closest attempts to carve into the record books the very first no-hitter ever thrown by a New York Met, this one was excruciating.
But this effort had a twist. Most of the not-a-no-hitter heartbreak stems from longevity. The longer a no-hit effort goes, the harder the fall when the first hit falls in. But here, on a Friday night at Shea when a massive crowd was dying for as big a Met moment as possible, it wasn’t closeness to the finish line that nailed their dreams. It was how close the one gosh darn hit came to being an error.
Which nobody could be blamed for thinking it should been scored.
Rookie Dwight Gooden had already been magnificent in 1984. Now, pitching to the first-place Cubs, against whom the Mets were making their last desperate lunge (from seven games out), he turned almost invincible:
• No hits and two strikeouts in the first.
• No hits and two strikeouts in the second.
• No hits and two strikeouts in the third.
Sense a pattern? With Mookie Wilson and George Foster each driving in three runs by the bottom of the third, the Mets didn’t have to worry about offense. And with Doctor K on the mound, pitching wasn’t a concern.
History, however, was growing on everybody’s minds. The appetizer came in the second when Doc passed Grover Cleveland “Pete” Alexander for the National League rookie strikeout record. That rated hearty applause from the more than 46,000 on hand, but it felt like there could be more…like there should be more. In the fourth, the feeling escalated as Gooden set down the Cubs in order again. By the fifth, the Mets had a 7-0 lead (on Mookie’s fourth ribby), and the buzz intensified.
Dwight Gooden, so good…but no-hitter good?
The leadoff batter was Keith Moreland, an earlier strikeout victim. This time, though, he made contact…if not a lot. He rolled a grounder up the third base line. It rolled like Moreland ran: slowly. Third baseman Ray Knight, playing deep, had to charge it. He fielded it, but by no means cleanly. Knight couldn’t and didn’t make a throw.
On NBC, where the game was airing nationally, and throughout Shea, Mets fans awaited the word: Hit? Error? Error? Hit?
Hit.
Or so the official scorer said.
The groan was palpable. Twenty-three seasons had conditioned Mets fans to recognize a no-hitter as it was getting away from them, and this one shouldn’t have been that. This one was shaping up as the real thing, the one that was going to break the disappointing mold.
Hit.
“I couldn’t throw it,” Knight said later. “I never got a grip on the ball.”
Doesn’t sound like a hit, didn’t necessarily look like a hit, but it went into the books as a hit — the only Chicago hit in the Mets’ 10-0 win that was swell in terms of the bottom-line result and the necessary inching up on the Cubs, but deflating considering what it could have been. Dwight Gooden struck out eleven batters in going the distance. It was the fourteenth double-digit performance of his young career.
And it was his first one-hitter.
Knight, an August acquisition from the Astros, had no equity with the Shea crowd yet, so he drew boos. The no-hitter-starved fan base probably wouldn’t have acted too kindly toward him, either, had they heard him say, as he did after the game, that he would have scored it a hit, although he did allow, “I’d gladly take an error on it.”
Davey Johnson brushed it off as “a hit all the way,” and the man who came one clean grip and throw from making the most immense Met history imaginable was relatively nonchalant about what he lost while gaining his 15th win of the year. “I’m not disappointed,” Gooden said. “The hit doesn’t matter. I just wanted to win the game.”
Dwight Gooden was a great Mets pitcher. But it was obvious he had never been a Mets fan.
ALSO QUITE HAPPY: On September 7, 1973, the long, hard slog from a frustrating last to an improbable first continued in two languages. The Mets traveled to Montreal for a Friday night doubleheader, and if you had to ask anyone to choose which team was the surprise contender at Parc Jarry, the standings would suggest you take a close look at Les Expos, who entered play in second place, three games out. It was the first time the ’Spos — now in their fifth season — were in anything resembling a pennant race. The Mets, on the other hand, had only, in the space of the previous week, tiptoed from sixth to fifth and then fifth to fourth. But if customs didn’t stop them, why would the Expos?
Vous devez croire, incidentally, is a rough French translation of “You Gotta Believe.”
After Jon Matlack, aided by a one-out save from resurgent Tug McGraw, made Wayne Garrett’s leadoff homer hold up for a 1-0 win in the opener, the two teams settled in for a very long Canadian night. Jerry Koosman extended his then club-record scoreless innings streak to 31⅔, before Bob Bailey drove home Felipe Alou in third to give the Expos a 1-0 lead. It held up until the seventh, when a Pepe Frias error and a Mike Torrez fit of wildness (three consecutive walks) allowed the Mets to tie the score.
It stayed tied for a very long time, as relief aces Mike Marshall and Tug McGraw (following Harry Parker’s three scoreless frames) steered the game deep into extra innings. Tug wriggled out of a bases-loaded jam in the tenth by striking out pinch-hitter Clyde Mashore. Marshall, who would go eight-and-a-third, danced through figurative raindrops as well, grounding out Rusty Staub with Mets on second and third to escape the fourteenth.
The big breakthrough came in the fifteenth: John Milner singled, Ed Kranepool doubled and, one out later, Don Hahn lifted a fly ball to push the Mets’ second run across. McGraw would be allowed to bat for himself and he singled home two runs later in the inning, though he’d be thrown out trying to take second.
Yogi Berra, tuned into McGraw’s hot-handedness (going for his sixth win or save in his last six appearances), left him to pitch a sixth inning, but after one Expo run scored, he finally removed him in favor of Ray Sadecki. The veteran lefty retired Pepe Mangual and Alou, and the Mets came away 4-2 winners. They had swept the Expos and climbed to within four games of first-place St. Louis and a half-game of now third-place Montreal in the most fluid pennant race anybody had ever seen. Five teams were within five games of first, yet none of them was more than three games above .500. The Mets, at 68-73, were smack dab in the thick of things.
Vous devez croire, indeed.
by Greg Prince on 13 September 2011 7:01 am
The New York Mets wish to thank New Era and Major League Baseball for setting aside standard uniform regulations so Mets players and coaches could honor the bravery and courage of New York’s first responders and service agencies in memory of the lives given so selflessly in the heinous attacks of September 11, 2001. The Mets’ wearing of caps bearing the insignias of those agencies is but a small way of continuing to remember the enormous contributions of the men and women who came to the aid of those in need at a most crucial hour in our city’s and our nation’s history.
Something like that. A couple of announcements, read at the ballpark and over the air…maybe with the most subtle of reminders that if you are interested, a Mets cap with an American flag patch sewn on the side is available, too, and a portion of its proceeds will go to the 9/11 Memorial and Museum, Flight 93 Memorial and Pentagon Memorial (a hefty portion, in an ideal world). Take care of MLB’s licensed apparel partner and let the Mets play ball one night a year in the caps of the FDNY, the NYPD, the PAPD, the OEM, the EMS, the K-9 corps, the Court Officers and anybody else I may have failed to list.
Everybody nods, everybody applauds and life goes on as best it can.
Too bad nobody could come to this kind of solution, or a realization that this kind of solution — and it didn’t necessarily have to be this exact version — would have made everybody feel better and nobody look bad. Terry Collins, sick of the whole thing’s dissection by now, says, “It was not what we had on our heads. It was what was in our hearts.” True enough, and if you couldn’t see into the Mets’ hearts Sunday night, then you weren’t looking closely enough at the classy, heartfelt tribute that preceded their game with the Cubs.
But it is a little about what was on their heads. Or, more specifically, what wasn’t.
Blame the Mets for that, but only in the sense that you’re blaming them for having done the right thing ten years ago and continuing to do the right thing, capwise, for another six years thereafter. The Mets wearing the caps of the first responders to 9/11 — in some cases the actual caps worn by the actual responders, as Todd Zeile recalls — was as heartfelt a statement as a baseball team could make about being part of something bigger than they were. It’s one thing to wear an “N” and a “Y” and say you play for New York. It’s another thing to borrow, with blessings, the crests of those for whom you play and literally play for them.
That’s what the Mets did in 2001, with heads held high for 18 games. That’s what the Mets did again, in commemoration of the most chilling acts of heroism imaginable, every year thereafter from 2002 through 2007. In 2008, MLB stepped in and told teams to wear other caps, with jury-rigged red, white and blue team logos, and they kept that up through last year. The Mets dutifully complied.
They sought to do differently this year for the tenth anniversary. MLB had a problem with it. It is to their everlasting discredit that they did.
MLB was shortsighted, to put it extraordinarily kindly, in rejecting the Mets’ efforts, no matter how the decision was made, no matter who said what to who or who threatened who with what. The Mets wanted to wear the kinds of caps they wore in 2001 in 2011. They were told not to. We can implore the Mets to show more backbone or cojones or whatever phrase you choose to indicate a stronger stand of defiance, but it shouldn’t have come to that.
MLB should have recognized, as ESPN’s Buster Olney suggested, that the Mets wearing the caps of first responders was not only the right thing to do, but a part of their heritage. It’s an established tradition, a serious one. MLB should have said, “Look, we want to sell caps with American flags. But what the Mets do to honor their community transcends merchandising opportunities by so much, that even we’re not so thick-skulled that we can’t recognize it. So let’s get them to make a few announcements plugging New Era and let them play ball. Tomorrow we’ll go back to business as usual.”
Monday night, by the way, was business as usual. The Mets wore regulation caps, didn’t hit and lost for the fifth time in six games. So there, Joe Torre, is your cherished “uniformity”.
Oh, and one more announcement that could still be made:
In 2012, Major League Baseball will inaugurate Community Service Recognition Day, when each of our 30 teams will promote the organizations in their communities who are dedicated to helping others by having its players and coaches wear the caps of those groups on the field for one game. Major League Baseball thanks the New York Mets for setting an example we can all follow.
Instead of worrying in corporate dunderheaded fashion (per Olney’s reporting) that, “heaven forbid, there might be another tragedy…and then what we would do about caps?” (as opposed to worrying about the consequences of the tragedy itself), MLB can embrace its unique role as unifier rather than marketer. Do they realize how many community-based agencies across America wear baseball caps despite not being baseball teams? Don’t they see what baseball means to people beyond licensed branding? There is an inherent connection still between this game and this nation. The cap is a statement unto itself, one that isn’t translated strictly in an accounting of receipts.
Why is there an FDNY cap anyway? Don’t firefighters have helmets? Don’t the police have hats of their own to match their uniforms? Yet there is an NYPD cap and an FDNY cap. Everybody, at some level, wants to wear a baseball cap of their own. Everybody wants to be part of the team. MLB, in turn, can be part of their teams — part of a lot of teams. This doesn’t have to be solely about New York and its first responders. There are agencies and organizations in other cities that do great things for those communities. Let the teams there follow the Mets’ path in that regard. Let the Nationals, as they wanted, honor the Navy SEALs. Let the Rockies honor those who make a difference in Denver. Let the Mariners do it in Seattle and the Dodgers do it in Los Angeles and so on.
For one day, MLB, use your heads. It doesn’t have to be on the emotionally loaded day of September 11, but that does seem ideal, given that it’s more and more being promoted as a day of service. It doesn’t have to be just one organization per team. Look what the Mets meant to so many in ’01 by wearing the caps of several different agencies.
Let it be a local decision, ballclub to ballclub. Give New Era (or whoever) their props as suggested above and let the teams say to their cities, you’re with us, so we’re with you. You and and our entire community mean so much to us that you are, literally, top of mind. Look at us — we honor you right from the very top of who we are.
Y’know what? It should be about what’s in the heart, but sometimes you can tell what that is much quicker by seeing what’s on the head.
Especially in baseball.
by Jason Fry on 12 September 2011 2:25 am
You know that Toshiba ad where they ship the laptop without the shock-resistant hard drive, and there’s a nationwide power outage and a guy drinks bad milk and turns into a zombie and bites his roommate and then there are zombies everywhere? (You’re a Mets fan, you have to know it.) I imagine Major League Baseball must had that warning in mind when they refused to let the Mets wear caps honoring first responders during tonight’s game.
Sure, to those of us not gifted with the foresight of MLB mandarins, it seemed natural and right for the Mets to honor first responders on the 10th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, seeing how the Mets were a) the New York team playing at home on Sept. 11, b) had just participated in a nicely done, nationally televised ceremony honoring those killed that day, and c) were paying homage to the 2001 team’s gesture of remembrance.
But let the chain of dominoes fall before you judge MLB too harshly. If the Mets had received permission to wear those caps, the Yankees might have asked to do the same, seeing how they also represent the city wounded so grievously 10 years ago. And then the Nationals might have wanted to don such caps, since a hijacked plane struck the Pentagon on that terrible morning. And then the Pirates might have decided to honor first responders, given their proximity to Shanksville, where Flight 93 crashed after its passengers saved untold more lives in D.C.
And then, if the Mets, Yankees, Nationals and Pirates had worn such caps, more and more teams might have wanted to do so. You might even have had the nightmare scenario of 30 teams honoring their local firefighters, police officers, EMTs, Coast Guard members and others, inspiring fans both to remember 9/11 and to give thanks for the people in their hometowns who run towards danger instead of away from it.
And if that had happened … well, I’m not sure what would have befallen us next, but thank goodness Bud Selig and Joe Torre were vigilant and protected us from whatever it would have been.
* * *
As for the game, it was actually something of a relief when extra innings arrived and the crowd thinned out and the parade of visiting ex-Mets stopped.
I’m not saying there was anything wrong with what had come before — the ESPN crew was properly solemn and reflective, with Bobby Valentine interesting as always whether talking about the aftermath of 9/11 or the game in front of him; the Mets did a fine job with a poignant, understated commemoration; and the ex-Mets were thoughtful, particularly John Franco with his pitch-perfect recollection of the team as “a little Band-Aid on a big wound.”
Rather, it was that the emotional weight of the entire day had been so crushing that it was hard to get invested in the game — which made it a very faint echo of what Greg and Emily and I and others felt on Sept. 21, 2001, before Mike Piazza’s bolt off Queens-raised Steve Karsay let all that accumulated tension and sorrow blow, to be replaced (at least for a little while) by joy. There wasn’t and couldn’t have been any such release tonight, though ESPN kept trying to cast various Mets as the Piazza-esque hero in waiting, and it was impossible not to remember and do the same thing in the stands or at home. But what we did get was a game that crossed so thoroughly into funhouse-mirror territory that the solemnity receded, with the Mets and Cubs taking turns refusing to win it until the Mets’ relievers were so awful that the Cubs basically had no choice but to prevail.
(The frustration of the Mets’ inability to get the big hit when it mattered was an unhappy reminder of what happened to the Brooklyn Cyclones Saturday night, when their season ended with a 1-0 loss to the Staten Island Yankees. But I’m going to wait and write about that on a night when we’re not all so wrung out.)
* * *
Anyway, back to the damn hats, which I found myself getting angrier and angrier about as the night went on. (With an interlude during which I demanded of poor Jason Pridie why he couldn’t have dented a seat in the Pepsi Porch in his previous at-bat.) I got angrier, but also found myself baffled and saddened that someone had done something so inexplicably dumb, making the Mets’ efforts feel unfairly hollow. Until I found myself trying to wish the whole thing away.
I wish MLB had come to its senses this morning and not issued an edict that was tone-deaf, ridiculous and ensured they’ll be cleaning up Augean stables of thoroughly deserved bad PR.
Failing that, I wish the Mets organization had shown more spine and told MLB to stick it, they were going to support their city with the same gesture that accompanied their selfless efforts of a decade ago, and would now stand for everything they’ve continued to do through programs such as Tuesday’s Children.
Failing that, I wish the Mets players had shown a little spine and told the organization and MLB to stick it, because they were honoring their city the way their baseball forebears had. (David Wright’s acquiescing limply to MLB orders and then tepidly rebelling by wearing a first-responder cap in the dugout only made manners worse.) [Struck given R.A. Dickey’s tweet that someone from MLB took Wright’s hat away after the fourth inning. You can’t make this shit up.]
And since no one was willing to say no to a terrible decision enforced by the guy a rung above them, well, I wish the Mets had at least beaten the Cubs.
by Greg Prince on 11 September 2011 11:51 am
I’ve been watching the reading of names at the Ground Zero memorial. What gets me, besides the cruel endlessness of the list and the heartbreaking personal codas family members send skyward to those they lost, is the sheer randomness of it. People who happened to be in the wrongest place at the wrongest time — them and the people who doubled down on fate and rushed in to maybe save some strangers — those are the victims and the heroes. It didn’t have to be them, it shouldn’t have been them, it shouldn’t have been anybody.
And that has not a thing to do with baseball, just as baseball had not a thing to do with the horror of ten years ago. I keep reading Mike Piazza’s home run “healed” the city. It didn’t. It was a grand and wonderful element of a baseball game, and it made for a helluva sidebar and I begrudge no one whatever they choose to take from it. But watching those sons and daughters and husbands and wives and mothers and fathers and brothers and sisters still grappling with the emotions attached to losing their loved ones, I don’t know what the definition of healing is in this context.
Still, I’m glad Mike hit it and I remain glad the Mets played that game when they did. It was on the schedule, but the schedule, so inviolate that teams play through veritable monsoons so as to adhere to it, was already off its moorings. Everything was up for grabs. A few weeks of baseball games? In the days following the acts of madness and their tragic consequences, who cared? Honestly, I didn’t.
But they played and people showed up, your co-bloggers among them. And before you knew it, they played again (and we kept showing up). One week later than planned, every team finished out its schedule. The Mets played all 162 in 2001, including 81 at Shea Stadium. Not much could be expected to stay intact in September and October of 2001, but baseball did, especially the Mets.
Ten years later, the Mets keep their hands on the legacy they cultivated then. They still visit firehouses. They still do their part for the families most directly affected. Tonight they’ll give over Citi Field to remembrance of a moment bigger than themselves, yet one whose fabric they are inextricably woven into, if just for a stitch here and a stitch there.
The Mets do the right thing more than we’d suspect. This is one of those times. It makes me proud to count myself among their fans.
by Greg Prince on 11 September 2011 1:55 am
Saturday’s Mets game can be broken down into three convenient segments.
1) Top of the first through the top of the eighth
Cubs, taking advantage of dopey defense and ordinary Capuano (which is to say solid yet relentlessly unexciting), build 3-0 lead over Mets, who, in turn, do nothing with Randy Wells.
No further comment necessary.
2) Bottom of the eighth
Now this part was fun.
Willie Harris walks as a pinch-hitter, thereby negating the strong impression that Willie Harris never does anything as a pinch-hitter.
Jose Reyes, with a hitting streak on the line and a batting average lead in perpetual jeopardy, lashes a double into the gap, which is in itself exciting.
Harris turns on the speed I forgot he has (remember when Willie Harris seemed so otherworldly — before he was a Met?) and scores to put the Mets on the board at last.
The Second Baseman Known as Ruben Tejada singles, though in such a way so that Jose can only motor to third (Jose doesn’t seem quite as quick as he used to, does he?).
David Wright singles like he means it, driving home Reyes, making it 3-2, and suddenly this Saturday didn’t seem so somnambulant after all.
With Tejada on third, Wright moves himself up to second on a daring steal.
Pagan is no help, but then Jason Bay — who is help after serving nearly two seasons as the human equivalent of an S.O.S. flare — does what the Jason Bay of the moment does. He singles hard to left, bringing home the tying and go-ahead runs.
As if they are that would-be flash mob from that cell phone commercial, the Mets offense (sans trenchcoats and disapproving expressions) gather without warning and produce a 4-3 lead — an excellent phenomenon on its own terms, plus it carries the potential to make a winning pitcher out of Daniel Herrera, of whom a little goes a long way.
3) The rest of the game
Bay gets picked to apply an abrupt dimmer switch to the Mets’ flash.
Then Wright makes an error to start the Cubs’ ninth.
And Parnell — who, it took me five months to decide, reminds me greatly of Kenny Powers’s brother on HBO’s Eastbound & Down (though Kenny Powers’ brother has a real Rise to the Occasion scene late in Season One) — continues to shrink in stature, and I don’t mean in the Daniel Herrera sense, ’cause that dude stands a little figuratively taller every day by getting batters out when needs to…unlike Parnell.
And Aramis Ramirez is intentionally walked, which I find silly, no matter that the idea of loading the bases with Parnell pitching is just as silly.
And the idea that Parnell is a closer is silly, too; I’d rather see Daniel Herrera at this point; or Manny Acosta; or Josh Stinson; or Kenny Powers, for that matter.
And the Mets fall behind, 5-4, en route to losing by the very same score, the same one they won by in such exhilarating fashion on Friday night.
It is as if the Mets didn’t get the message that they had to keep playing (well) clear to the end of every game. Perhaps they, like the guy who breaks into his dance routine at Grand Central a half-hour too early, should look into a new plan.
by Greg Prince on 10 September 2011 3:20 am
“Everything changed” after September 11, 2001. No need to delve deeply into the litany of all that implies. But to keep it relatively light, has “everything changed” when it comes to going to a Mets game?
I mean once you endure security’s dutiful searches, wandings and pat-downs…and salute the Veteran of the Game…and are asked a second time, if it’s Sunday, to remove your cap for “God Bless America”…and notice that red, white and blue ribbon on the old Shea scoreboard skyline and how the bulbs on two of the buildings remain permanently unlit.
Taking that kind of stuff into account, has everything changed Metwise?
Given what we’ve known for ten years as of tomorrow, those aren’t particularly subtle alterations to the routine of going to a Mets game, and on some level, they and anything else that hints at what went on in New York a decade ago always gets my attention. It reminds me I no longer live in a time when…
• I can walk straight to my gate without pause if I choose;
• “Take Me Out to the Ball Game” and “Lazy Mary” constitute the entire seventh-inning stretch repertoire on any given Sunday or other day;
• ballpark allusions to “veterans” refer primarily to the likes of Lenny Harris;
• and all the lights glow atop that scoreboard skyline.
The awareness that 9/11 happened never fully leaves you at a Mets game, but why should it? It never fully leaves you as a person. The sadness never fully leaves you. Chances are it never will. Think about it too long, and you wonder about Mets fans who went to plenty of games before 9/11 but never again had the chance to do something they no doubt assumed they’d be doing for years to come.
But like I said, I want to keep it as light as possible here. You’ll get all the heavy you can handle by the time Sunday’s over. So excuse me if I skip over the graver, weightier issues inherent in “everything changed.” I’m thinking only in terms of Mets games, as that is what we do in this space if we can help it.
A Mets game, I’m happy to report, is still a Mets game in that way that a Kiss Cam is still a Kiss Cam and a Cy Young is still a Cy Young. It’s not really a fundamentally different experience than it used to be ten or more years ago.
Sure, Shea became Citi, and balls down the line became harder to track, and ticket prices cried out for readjustment, and people didn’t necessarily follow every pitch even if they could see them…but we knew that already. One same old story at a time, please. I’m just talking about some variation on the recurring sentiment that It’s Friday night, it’s six o’clock, I gotta get going ’cause I’m meeting my friend at the Mets game.
You can still do that.
I did that last night, the way I did almost precisely ten years ago. As America prepares to remember (as if it could forget) September 11, 2001, on September 11, 2011, I was reminded of September 1, 2001, on September 9, 2011. 9/1/01, if you will, was the last game I attended at Shea before, you know, “everything changed”. It was a Saturday night with my friend Joe, who was, even then, one of my steadiest Mets companions. We had known each other and been going to Mets games for more than a decade to that point. It’s a decade later and here we are, Joe and I, still going to Mets games.
Did “everything change”? Quite the contrary, I’d say. Mostly, nothing changed.
There are still people in your section you wish would shut up or at least lower their volume.
There’s still too much crap on the video screen between innings (though you’ll never, ever, ever see another animated “airplane race”).
There are still lulls in the action whose pace you dearly wish would pick up already.
There are dratted bottoms of innings that end too quickly.
There are dreaded tops of innings that drag on endlessly.
There are still reasons for Joe and I to hiss not altogether good-naturedly at schools of Marlins, flocks of Cardinals or packs of Cubs. If we’re really hissed off, we’ll take out our frustrations on whichever Metropolitan we deem most culpable.
But — and you knew there had to be a but — there are also people in your section who make the night more entertaining without realizing it (like the round, boisterous woman who kept advising Pelfrey when Cubs were on base, “TAKE YOUR TIME! HE AIN’T GOIN’ NOWHERE!”). And occasionally the PA announcer surprises you delightfully (by telling you, for instance, that John Olerud is not just the answer to our trivia question but he’s right here at Citi Field…and we applaud heartily). As for those lulls, those really aren’t so bad. They let you fill in literal and figurative blanks, depending on whether you’re keeping score or just catching up.
Best of all, there are some tops of innings that couldn’t go much faster and there is the occasional bottom of an inning that lasts the perfect length. When you get one of the latter late, as we did in the ninth on 9/9/11 or in the eleventh on 9/1/01, and it ends with an RBI double delivered by a likable reserve with the initials J.T. (Justin Turner now, Jorge Toca then), well, that’s what you came for, isn’t it? You came to obtain the small thrill you ideally associate with your obsession of choice. You got a Mets game that, with one fortuitous swing, turned into a Mets win. It’s a soothing, satisfying, stimulating sensation writ a bit more large because you were there to see it, hear it and feel it.
So you let out a roar of approval.
And you high-five your friend.
And you concur with your temporary neighbors — acquaintances with whom you will probably never cross paths again — that this was a fine thing we witnessed together.
And we all scurry off toward home or wherever a little happier than we were when we came in. Maybe a lot happier if the game was that good or the standings are that amenable.
Joe and I are old shoes after knowing each other since 1990, especially when it comes to the Mets. Our steps to, at, and from the ballpark —whatever context the season provides, whatever circumstances the outside world inflicts on the periphery of our chosen obsession — are as sure as can be. We know what we’re doing at Citi Field, just as we knew what we were doing at Shea Stadium. We like it when it works as well as it did on Friday night. We’re not put off by it when it’s not nearly as good. We’ve got a cherished familiarity in progress: as fans, as friends, as guys who go to Mets games.
That’s the familiar part. As for what’s not necessarily the same as it ever was, we’re significantly older than we used to be (that’ll happen if you’re lucky). We’re each more mellow or perhaps just a little less intense than the guys who went to these games in the suddenly distant past. And, of course, we go through security; and we applaud those who’ve served our country; and we stand a little extra longer on Sundays. Yeah, things have changed since we went to that last pre-September 11 Mets game in 2001.
But not that much.
by Greg Prince on 9 September 2011 1:45 pm
Welcome to The Happiest Recap, a solid gold slate of New York Mets games culled from every schedule the Mets have ever played en route to this, their fiftieth year in baseball. We’ve created a dream season that includes the “best” 136th game in any Mets season, the “best” 137th game in any Mets season, the “best” 138th game in any Mets season…and we keep going from there until we have a completed schedule worthy of Bob Murphy coming back with the Happy Recap after this word from our sponsor on the WFAN Mets Radio Network.
GAME 136: September 1, 1975 — METS 3 Pirates 0
(Mets All-Time Game 136 Record: 23-25; Mets 1975 Record: 72-64)
Long before the Mets marketed their late-1980s consistency as “Excellence Again and Again,” they simply displayed it year after year, every fifth day. Once in a while, just in case you needed a statistic of some sort to confirm that what you were watching was indeed routinely excellent, such a number would be presented.
Really, the only number you needed was “41,” but Tom Seaver had another one he showed off annually.
Every year, starting with his second year in the majors, Tom Seaver would strike out at least 200 batters. He mowed down the opposition with such 1-2-3 regularity that you might not have realized you witnessing history being made. But you were. It came into focus at the end of the 1974 season when Seaver, enduring his least rewarding campaign to date (11-11, 3.20), went out in a blaze of glory, striking out 14 in his final start. That gave him 201 strikeouts for the year, the seventh consecutive year Tom could say that. It was also the first time any National League pitcher could make such a claim; only Walter Johnson had done it in the American League.
Thus, what had been routine was on everybody’s radar as Seaver’s personal comeback season of 1975 unfurled. Barring the unforeseen, Tom Terrific was going to strike out a 200th batter before the year was over, earning him sole possession of a major league record — a barometer as much as it would be an achievement.
The stage couldn’t have been set much more perfectly than it was on Labor Day at Shea. Seaver and the Mets were coming home from a California trip that featured a five-game winning streak in San Diego and Los Angeles, pulling them to within five games of first-place Pittsburgh, who just happened to be their opponent this Monday afternoon in front of a nearly packed house. Tom had 194 strikeouts and 19 wins, so one standard Seaver performance would be all that it would take to notch a couple of trademark round numbers.
And of course, Seaver’s standard was excellence.
The Pirates were reminded of that as their matinee got underway. Three Bucs stepped up in the first and three Bucs grounded out to Felix Millan at second. No strikeouts yet for Seaver, but no baserunners. And after Mike Vail launched the first home run of his big league career, off John Candelaria (giving him a nine-game hitting streak), Seaver returned to stifling the Pirates: grounding Willie Stargell to Bud Harrelson — playing his first game since May 25; striking out Dave Parker for No. 195 on the season; and grounding Richie Hebner to Dave Kingman at first. Kingman flipped the ball to Seaver covering the bag to complete the second.
Manny Sanguillen drew a walk to open the visitors’ third, but the Pirates would do no further damage. Candelaria would go down looking for Seaver’s second K of the day, his 196th of 1975.
In the fourth, still ahead 1-0, Seaver marched inexorably toward his plateau. Ed Kirkpatrick struck out for No. 197. With two out, after Stargell singled for the first Pittsburgh hit of the day, Parker fanned again. That made it 198 strikeouts on the year for Seaver.
The fifth included a Pirate hit, by Sanguillen, but no other Pirate offense. No strikeouts, either. But the top of the sixth ended with Stargell looking at Seaver’s 199th.
The bottom of the sixth gave Seaver some additional cushion just in case he’d need it, with Rusty Staub and Joe Torre each driving in runs. The Mets led 3-0 going to the seventh, which is when Tom went for history.
There was one on and one out when the odometer prepared to turn. Lindsey Nelson had the call on WNEW-AM:
Manny Sanguillen is coming up. Walked and had a base hit.
Swing and a miss, it’s strike one.
Sanguillen is hitting Three Twenty-Four. He’s a tough man at the plate.
Seaver now sets, checks back over his shoulder, deals the strike-one pitch, swung on and missed. In with the fastball, it’s oh and two.
And the crowd here’s riding with Seaver on every pitch. They’re very knowledgeable, they know exactly what the circumstances are with regards to records and everything else.
Two-strike count do Sanguillen. Seaver sets up now, he checks back over his shoulder, here’s the pitch…swung on and missed! Struck him out! An ovation for Seaver, who has struck out two-hundred batters!
[Jerry] Grote turns and tosses the ball over to the dugout. That’ll be placed among Seaver’s souvenirs. He is the only pitcher in the history of major league baseball to strike out two-hundred or more batters in eight successive seasons. He’s getting a standing ovation at Shea!
Tom Seaver, the only pitcher in all the long history of major league baseball to strike out two-hundred or more batters in eight consecutive seasons.
Seaver was so overwhelmed by his accomplishment that he followed it up by striking out pinch-hitter Bob Robertson for strikeout 201.
When the day was over, Seaver had 204 strikeouts for the year, ten for the game. He also had a 20th win for the fourth time in his career. The 20-7 Seaver had led his Mets to a 3-0, four-hit, 95-pitch complete game victory over the Pirates (whom he’d mysteriously failed to beat since 1973), moving them to within four of the N.L. East lead.
“Considering everything,” Seaver allowed, “this might be my biggest day: the twentieth game, the 200 strikeouts and shutting out the Pirates in a pennant race.”
Everybody was in awe of the pitcher who had been awing baseball for close to a decade.
“I’ve never seen him better,” his catcher Grote swore.
“I kind of felt sorry for Sanguillen,” Torre said of Seaver’s 200th victim. “He didn’t have a chance up there.”
“That’s the best I’ve seen him in a couple of years,” marveled Pirate skipper Danny Murtaugh. “He brought some heat to the plate. You can’t feel bad about losing that one.”
“He’s never thrown that well since I’ve been in the majors,” Parker attested after striking out three times.
“If you think he looked good from upstairs,” advised sidelined Pirate outfielder Richie Zisk, who watched from the third base dugout, “you should have seen him from ground level. He threw one fastball in the eighth that St. Peter couldn’t have hit.”
“He’s probably a better pitcher right now than he’s ever been in his life,” observed Seaver’s own manager, Roy McMillan. “He’s spotting the ball better than ever, and he’s mixing his pitches beautifully. It’s a sign of maturity.”
Seaver being Seaver, he didn’t spend a lot of time praising himself afterwards. He described himself as having been “terrible in the bullpen” and “struggling” even as he was setting down the Pirates 1-2-3 in the first. As for the rest of the game, he acknowledged, “It was an emotional experience. You have to divorce yourself from it and appreciate it,” but at the same time, “We’re in a pennant race and that’s the club we have to beat. We’ve got to get off on the right foot. It’s almost demanded.”
The race was real enough on Labor Day so that when a bottle of champagne was uncorked in the clubhouse to celebrate Seaver’s record (one he’d extend to nine straight seasons with 200 strikeouts a year later), Seaver’s toast to Grote reflected his Terrifically competitive nature:
“To Cincinnati, in October.”
It turned out to be wishful thinking. The 1975 Mets, though they rose from 71-91 the year before to 82-80, never got any closer than four games out, yet Seaver’s excellence never dimmed. He was rewarded for his 22-9, 2.38 ERA (243 SO) comeback campaign with his third National League Cy Young Award. When it was all over, Jack Lang posed a pertinent question in the Sporting News:
“Were the Mets eleven games better or was it just that Tom Seaver was eleven games better?”
When Seaver was on, it was hard to imagine that any team could be better than his.
ALSO QUITE HAPPY: On September 10, 1985, the first round of the most hotly anticipated heavyweight bout to hit Flushing in a dozen years went to the Mets, 5-4 over the Cardinals. The opening flurries turned out to tell most of the story.
Down 1-0 after Ron Darling surrendered a home run to Tommy Herr in the top of the first, the Mets regrouped in the bottom of the inning. Mookie Wilson, starting his home first game since June 28, singled. One out later, Keith Hernandez stepped up. It was Mex’s first plate appearance since he was compelled to testify in court in Pittsburgh the week before that he had used cocaine when he was with St. Louis between 1980 and 1982.
How would the Shea fans react? In the middle of a pennant race, with their team tied for first and Hernandez recognized as the primary reason the franchise had turned around over the past two years?
They greeted him with a standing ovation.
“I don’t believe the fans are saying with their greeting, ‘Well done, Keith, we approve,’” Keith wrote in If At First. “They’re saying, I hope, ‘You made a mistake It’s done. Some of us have made that mistake, and worse, and we’re not subjected to this public scrutiny. We’re OK, you’re OK. Play ball.’”
Collecting himself (taking Danny Cox’s first pitch while doing so), Hernandez inserted his head back into the game and punched a single to left-center that allowed Mookie to score all after Vince Coleman slipped on the outfield grass.
The score was tied but the action was just beginning. Keith stood on second with two out as Whitey Herzog ordered Cox to walk Darryl Strawberry. The next batter, George Foster, took his sweet time being the next batter. He stepped in and out of the box enough to raise Cox’s ire. The Cards’ pitcher reacted by hitting Foster right in the rear. George wasn’t too happy, and neither were the Mets. Benches emptied, but no further hostilities were exchanged.
That is unless you count Howard Johnson’s bat taking a powerful swing at the fourth pitch he saw from Cox. It was a fastball that was next seen competing with incoming flights to LaGuardia for airspace. The grand slam put the Mets up, 5-1. Some nifty relief pitching from Roger McDowell put down a later Cardinal threat and the Mets held on, 5-4, to take a one-game lead over their archrivals
GAME 137: September 1, 1996 — METS 6 Giants 5 (10)
(Mets All-Time Game 137 Record: 20-28; Mets 1996 Record: 61-76)
Mets fans knew there was only one Mookie Wilson. Now there was evidence at least one post-Mookie Mets player knew it, too.
The club was honoring Wilson by inducting him into its Hall of Fame, and he may have been given no greater honor than that which Lance Johnson bestowed on him in pregame ceremonies. The current center fielder who regularly wore No. 1 paid homage to his predecessor in position and numerology by taking the field wearing No. 51. On this Sunday at Shea, Johnson told Mookie and the crowd of 40,000, there can only be No. 1 in the house.
The man known as One Dog in tribute to his dog track speed took to 51 just fine once the bell rang for the game against the Giants. In his first year in Flushing, Johnson had already taken (from Mookie) the single-season Met record for triples and was well on his way to displacing Felix Millan (191) as the hitter with the most hits. It became a typical One Dog day in the sixth when, at 1-1, Lance’s 18th triple and 184th hit of the season drove in Alvaro Espinoza and Rey Ordoñez to give the Mets a 3-1 lead. Johnson came home a batter later on Edgardo Alfonzo’s sac fly. One Dog had already doubled in the fourth and he would single in the ninth, giving him a 3-for-5 game and a .321 average.
Eventually, though the Giants retied the score against Bobby Jones and Paul Byrd, and the game went to the tenth inning. With a runner on second and two out, John Franco gave up a go-ahead double to Rick Wilkins. As tended to be the case with Franco in close games, there was a borderline call he didn’t care for, one pitch before he gave up the big hit. Once he got out of the inning, Franco was still peeved and let home plate ump Larry Poncino know about it.
Poncino, in turn, let Franco know he was ejected from the game. Words grew harsher and tempers more heated from there. “I had to get my money’s worth after that,” Johnny said.
The Mets’ new manager, Bobby Valentine, in office less than a week at that point, agreed: “I couldn’t have said it any better than John.”
Everybody felt good and vindicated, except the Mets still trailed, 5-4, going to the bottom of the tenth. But some aggressive baserunning would take care of that. Tim Bogar walked to lead off the inning and Andy Tomberlin’s one-out pinch-double sent him around third, heading for home. Wilkins was in Bogar’s way, but not for long. Tim bowled over the San Francisco catcher and pulled the Mets even; perhaps he was fired up by Franco having tossed a water cooler in Poncino’s general direction along with a steady stream of invective.
“[Wilkins] wasn’t giving up the plate,” Bogar said, “and I wasn’t going in there without a fight.”
The Mets may have appeared beaten through most of the season, thus necessitating the August 26 change of managers from Dallas Green to Valentine — “We needed to change the dynamics,” according to co-owner Fred Wilpon — but now they were fired up. Tomberlin, who had taken third on the throw home, showed he wasn’t coming down the line for a spot of tea on Carl Everett’s ensuing grounder to second. Here came Andy…here came the throw home from Steve Scarsone…and there went the ball, dropped by Wilkins. Tomberlin was safe and the Mets won, 6-5. The winning pitcher was Franco — someone thrown out of the game before the rally and after he threw the top half of the inning’s final pitch.
Johnny was getting good at this. He himself noted that he’d gotten himself ejected for arguing on Mookie Wilson’s big day just as he was booted for fighting on his own day back in May.
Just another exciting afternoon at Big Shea for Bobby V, who was refamiliarizing himself with his old surroundings. “If you don’t like that game,” the former Met player and coach declared afterwards, “you don’t like baseball, apple pie and all that other stuff.”
ALSO QUITE HAPPY: On September 5, 2010, the Mets carried on a great franchise tradition of keeping the Wrigley Field scoreboard operator busy. In the same place where they scored 23 runs in 1987, 19 runs in 1964 and 43 runs across three games over two days in 1990, the 2010 Mets — no offensive juggernaut — put 18 hand-placed numbers on the board to whip the home team, 18-5. The aesthetic highlight of this Sunday assault was Ruben Tejada’s first major league home run, one of five RBIs for Jose Reyes’s fill-in at shortstop. Tejada, a 20-year-old infielder of slight stature and even slighter batting average (.185 at day’s beginning), lifted a fly ball to deep left, which was going, going…
Hard to tell exactly how far it had gone. Tejada, a conscientious rookie, wasn’t taking any chances and hustled his way around the bases, sliding into third for a triple. But the umpires caucused and decided (correctly) that the ball landed in the basket that fronts the left field bleachers. Thus, the kid was told to get up and keep going.
In other words…gone! Ruben trotted home with the Mets’ seventh run of the game. A pair of five-run innings followed to make it a traditional Wrigley rout.
GAME 138: September 12, 1985 — METS 7 Cardinals 6
(Mets All-Time Game 138 Record: 26-22; Mets 1985 Record: 84-54)
Two teams tied with two-dozen games remaining can’t really be expected to settle their affairs so far from the end of their respective seasons, but there was definitely a High Noon feel to this Thursday afternoon at Shea. The Mets and Cardinals, in a tango at the top of the N.L. East across the summer, found themselves on the same field with the same record with nine innings in front of them. When they ended, only one could possibly lead the other.
Who would it be?
It was close enough to demand a coin flip at the beginning of the day’s business. The Mets and Cards were tied now. They’d been tied six times since August 10. Who was to say they wouldn’t be tied after 162 games? Given that possibility, National League president Chub Feeney gathered the clubs’ GMs, Frank Cashen of the Mets and Dal Maxvill of the Cardinals, before the first pitch to decide home-field advantage for a potential one-game playoff. As the visitor, Maxvill was asked to call it. Dal went with heads; it was tails.
“I’ll play at home,” Cashen announced with little fanfare.
Then the Mets went out and did what they could to ensure no divisional playoff would be necessary. Three consecutive two-out doubles — from Darryl Strawberry, Danny Heep and Howard Johnson — built a 4-0 first-inning lead off putative Cardinal ace Joaquin Andujar, the volatile righty who had lately ceded the role of St. Louis stopper to John Tudor (the southpaw who outlasted Doc Gooden in a ten-inning 1-0 duel that retied the East). The Mets got the best of Joaquin again in the second, as Wally Backman doubled in Mookie Wilson to make it 5-0. Whitey Herzog’s patience ran out as Mookie crossed the plate; the White Rat replaced Andujar with Ricky Horton. But that didn’t pay immediate dividends, as two walks (only one intentional) and a hit by pitch plated Wally with the sixth Met run.
Ed Lynch couldn’t have had a better setup: Big lead, demoralized opponent, just throw strikes and…it was a decent strategy on paper, but Lynch wasn’t right five days after his dust-up with Mariano Duncan in L.A. He allowed the Cardinals three runs in the third and another two in the fourth. Lynch left after five in favor of the usually unreliable Doug Sisk, but Sisk kept the Cardinals grounded for two frames. Meanwhile, Herzog had inserted rookie Pat Perry to calm the Mets’ bats and he lulled them into a near-catatonic state. By the time Ken Dayley replaced Perry in the seventh (and continued to leave Met hitters drowsy), it remained 6-5.
The Cardinals went on the attack in the eighth inning, and anybody who’s ever walked the streets of New York with winged creatures flying around knows that can be dangerous. With one out, ex-Met Mike Jorgensen dropped a double on Roger McDowell, and Ozzie Smith followed with a single that moved pinch-runner Tom Lawless to third. McDowell exited and Jesse Orosco entered. The Wizard of Oz stole second as Tito Landrum worked out a walk. Now there was one out, the bases were full of Birds and righthanded batter Brian Harper stepped to the plate to take on the lefty Orosco.
Jesse came up huge, drawing a ground ball to Rafael Santana. The shortstop stepped on second and threw to Keith Hernandez at first for the inning-ending double play. It was still 6-5, Mets. The home team didn’t increase its lead in the eighth — they had accumulated all of two hits and one walk since they last scored — but Orosco had an edge to protect heading to the ninth.
The first St. Louis batter was the pesky Vince Coleman, the catalyst for the Cardinals. It was Coleman getting on base and running that had transformed these Redbirds into a contender in 1985. Walking him here would have been lethal to Orosco. Good thing, then, that Jesse grounded Vince to HoJo at third. The speedy Coleman couldn’t beat Johnson’s throw to Hernandez, and there was one out.
Then Willie McGee crossed everybody up by homering.
It was a most unCardinal-like thing to do. They manufactured runs on foot. But not this time. McGee’s big blow had finally erased a Met lead that had seemed impenetrable in the second inning and then too imperiled for too long. The game was tied at six.
Jesse — who had surrendered the game-losing home run to Cesar Cedeño the night before in the tenth after Gooden had gone nine — bore down and escaped further damage. The score stayed 6-6 heading to the bottom of the inning. The day that had begun with a tie at the top of the standings would now reach for its climax with a deadlock on the board.
Appropriately, the Mets one-, two- and three-batters were due up in the bottom of the ninth. As if a fresh start was in their grasp, Wilson led off against Dayley and he chopped a ball toward short that Smith gloved but threw in the dirt to Harper at first. Mookie’s speed took care of the rest and the Mets had their first hitter. Their second, Backman, did what second-place hitters ideally do. He bunted successfully. Wilson sped to second with one out.
That brought up Keith, who was the focal point of attention when the series began, coming back to New York after his drug trial testimony and driving in a run in his first at-bat Tuesday night. But that had been his last hit. Mex was 0-for-11 since then, and it wasn’t exaggeration to suggest a city’s hopes was resting on his shoulders. See, this wasn’t just any Thursday. This was dubbed Baseball Thursday, the day when by serendipity of scheduling the Mets were home in the afternoon playing a crucial pennant race showdown versus their closest rivals and the Yankees would be home at night playing a crucial pennant race showdown versus their closest rivals, another avian team, no less (the Blue Jays). The Mets — tied for first — and Yankees — 2½ out — had never been in the thick of the chase this late in the season simultaneously. Talk of the first Subway Series in 29 years permeated the entire Metropolitan Area.
Summer still had more than a week to go on the calendar, but this was autumnal baseball, replete with “a nip in the air,” as the Times put it, to go with the shadows that September would bring to Shea. The playoff weather coincided with the frenzied atmosphere, as more than 46,000 New Yorkers beseeched Keith to do a little more for them on top of all he’d done on their behalf since coming over to their side from the Cardinals’ side in June of 1983.
“I stand more erect in the box than usual,” Hernandez described in his season diary, If At First. “When I’m having a bad day, I do this to help release some muscle tension and slow things down. Relax, relax, relax. Crouching has the opposite effect.”
Keith swings at strike one from Dayley. He’s relaxed enough to think along with Dayley, who “throw the fastball right where he wants, but right where I’m looking, too. I hit it through the gaping hole on the left side…”
Tim McCarver picks up the action on SportsChannel:
“Base hit left field! Here comes Wilson! Coleman can’t come up with it, Mets win, seven to six! The Mets are in first place by a game!”
It was the 22nd game-winning RBI of the season for Hernandez, a National League record for a statistic that hadn’t been around for very long but seemed indicative of what Keith was born to deliver. He came up, got a hit and the Mets won. They took two of three from the now totally hated Cardinals and, yes, they took first place. They even had that coin flip in their back pockets.
With any luck, 1985 wouldn’t come down to that, but September wasn’t nearly over for either team — and even when it ran out, the season would still have a week to go, including three more Mets-Cardinals games, in St. Louis. But a one-game lead with 24 to play was a one-game lead with 24 to play.
ALSO QUITE HAPPY: On September 8, 1969, the first-place Chicago Cubs were ready to take a historic fall. All they needed was a little nudge.
The New York Mets were more than happy to provide it.
While the Mets were gaining steam in the second half of August and the first week of September, the Cubs juggernaut had begun to take on water. Every hint of righting the ship was negated by an undeniably wrong turn. The latest evidence that the 1969 Cubs weren’t quite what they were cracked up to be came via the four-game losing streak with which they were saddled as they made their way to New York for a two-game showdown with the Mets. There was never supposed to be a showdown with the Mets. As recently as September 2, the Cubs had won their fifth in a row, allowing them to reopen a five-game lead on the Flushing upstarts. It may not have been the nine by which they led the back as late as August 16, but it was still pretty formidable.
Besides, who was chasing them? The Mets. The same team manager Leo Durocher derided when, after salvaging the third game of their series the last time they came to Shea, he was asked if those were the real Cubs out there today.
“No,” Leo retorted. “Those were the real Mets.”
Durocher wasn’t afraid to speak his mind or incite an opponent. Almost two months to the day, Durocher returned to have his words fed back to him on a blue-and-orange platter. Chicago’s nine-game lead that became a five-game lead was now down to 2½. The real Mets were proving unstoppable of late, winning 18 of 24. Leo might have thought he had the answer to their relentless upward trajectory.
Knock them down.
That was what Cub starter Bill Hands attempted to do to Mets leadoff hitter Tommie Agee in the bottom of the first this cool, rainy Monday night. Hands came up, high and tight chin music aimed at Agee’s coconut (a head that had absorbed a pitch from Bob Gibson to commence his first Spring Training as a Met in 1968). Agee was dusted. Hands was pleased. “I was not told to do it,” Bill insisted to Rick Talley, author of The Cubs of ’69, nearly two decades later. “I just did it.”
If Hands was trying to send the Mets a message, the wires got crossed en route to home plate. True, Agee grounded out in that first plate appearance, but the Mets weren’t scared off. If anything, they were ready to retaliate. The first batter Jerry Koosman saw in the top of the second was Ron Santo, he who irked Mets and Mets fans alike earlier in the year with his post-victory heel-clicking. No heel-clicking here. Maybe just some furtive wrist-rubbing after Kooz let Hands know that just doing it would come with payback.
“I don’t mind getting knocked down,” Agee said later. “As long as my pitcher retaliates.”
Nobody ordered Jerry to take out Ron. It was just what needed to be did, and he did it. “Our pitchers,” Gil Hodges advised, “know all about taking care of our people.”
Hands would try to get even by coming inside at Koosman in a later at-bat, but the most effective revenge came a batter later when Agee let Hands know he was just fine. Tommie homered with Bud Harrelson on base to give the Mets a 2-0 lead in the third. The Cubs answered with a pair of runs in the sixth, but once again, Agee’s bat got very talkative in the bottom of the inning. He led off against Hands with a hustle double to left. When Wayne Garrett singled to right, Agee took off for third and just kept going. There was a play at the plate…a very close play. Cubs catcher Randy Hundley applied a swipe tag to the thinnest of air that separated his mitt from Agee’s body.
Tommie was safe. The Mets led three to two…no matter Hundley’s endless objections. They began the instant after Satch Davidson ruled in the Mets’ favor — Randy jumped high enough to match his dudgeon — and they never really stopped. Twenty years later, Hundley was still complaining that Davidson got the call wrong.
“I tagged him so hard I almost dropped the ball,” Hundley swore to Talley. “Right up his bloomin’ side. It wasn’t just a little tag: I swept him right up the uniform. I was really afraid I would drop the bloomin’ ball.”
For all of Randy Hundley’s protestations, the only thing bloomin’ that frenzied night in New York was Koosman’s strikeout total. Jerry had fanned seven through six, and added five over the next three to give him thirteen on the night. When it was over, Koosman had a complete game 3-2 victory and the Mets were within 1½ of the Cubs. The baker’s dozen worth of K’s were dandy, all right, but what meant the most to the Mets was Koosman standing up for Agee — and all the Mets — when he let Leo know that those knockdown tactics of Hands’s were a nonstarter.
“He tried to run us out of the ballpark on the very first pitch,” one Met said of the opposing skipper, “and he found out that he couldn’t do it.”
by Jason Fry on 9 September 2011 2:01 am
Following too many losses I’ve tried to be philosophical: Watching your team lose a baseball game isn’t so bad — in fact, it’s the second-best thing you can do with three hours.
Which is sometimes true, but breaks down when it comes to doubleheaders. There are a lot of things that are more fun than watching your team lose a baseball game, take a brief break, and then promptly lose another one.
Game 1’s starter was Chris Schwinden, who by his own admission never expected to make AA ball. To be horribly unfair, if you saw Schwinden you’d probably say the same thing — he looks not only thoroughly ordinary but, well, lumpy. (I know that’s shallow. Besides the fact that I’m pretty lumpy myself these days, Heath Bell looks more like a guy in search of a La-Z-Boy than a star closer, and Babe Ruth needs no introduction.) Schwinden’s unprepossessing in action, too: He looks like your basic chucker, a guy who sort of slings the ball and relies on the eight guys behind him to keep bad things from happening.
In belated fairness to Schwinden, the eight guys behind him proved particularly unreliable in the early innings of Game 1: If Angel Pagan wasn’t misplaying a ball and air-mailing the cutoff man, Ronny Paulino was dropping the throw at home, which couldn’t have helped a young pitcher’s nerves. Schwinden might have been forgiven if he wondered if his fielders had also cheated the odds by escaping the Eastern League. To his credit he settled down after that, pitching capably enough in what’s been billed as his only start of the year, and maybe his only Mets start ever. Meanwhile, Jason Bay hit a grand slam, bringing most of the Citi Field crowd to its feet to make about as much noise as 250 or so people can make. Seriously, it was like a continuation of the Marlins’ series, with green shirts dotting acres of green seats.
Having played the early innings like drunks in a fistfight, the Mets and Braves then spent the rest of the twinbill playing more like teams irritated at losing an off-day. Chipper Jones throttled several Mets pitchers, as is his wont, and Nick Evans hit into bad luck in both games, sending a long drive to Jason Heyward that possibly would have been out of 2012 Citi Field, and then getting robbed by Jack Wilson in the nightcap.
Game 1 ended with the Mets failing to capitalize on a leadoff single by Jose Reyes: Ruben Tejada went too far for strike three after failing to bunt and watching Jose stick tight to first, Justin Turner was retired on a bullet of a liner to Michael Bourn in center, and Lucas Duda was caught looking on a perfect pitch to end things. The executioner was Braves super-rookie Craig Kimbrel, who leans in for the sign with shoulders lowered, eyes peering plateward and pitching arm dangling ominously, a display that reminds me of a vulture sitting on a root sticking out of a cliff face. Kimbrel was much admired in the SNY booth for his intimidating demeanor, which the vulture thing tells you I bought into pretty thoroughly myself. But we have to remember this stuff is storytelling, not scouting. Kimbrel is a lights-out closer, so he looks like an intimidating bird of prey. If he were a mop-up guy with an ERA north of six, we’d snicker that he looks like he can’t see the signs and is going to fall off the mound. It’s phrenology, basically.
Game 2’s highlight, besides the fact that it ended, was the Mets debut of hulking Quad-A slugger Valentino Pascucci, likely the last new entry in The Holy Books for 2011, and the 917th 915th Met. While I still think it’s bullshit for the Mets to reissue Carlos Beltran’s No. 15 so soon, I was glad to see Pascucci’s long and rather strange baseball journey bring him back to the Show at last.
He was last sighted at Shea, in the Montreal Expos’ final game. Pascucci went 3 for 4 that day, collecting a long single off Heath Bell in his final at-bat. Then he was off to Japan (where he played under Bobby Valentine as a Chiba Lotte Marine, alongside Benny Agbayani and Matt Franco, not to mention Satoru Komiyama and Matt Watson), Albuquerque, New Orleans, Lehigh Valley, Portland, Albuquerque again, the Camden Riversharks, Buffalo, and finally the Mets. How many times must he have decided “fuck this fucking game?” (Obligatory Crash Davis reference? Check.) But he didn’t, and tonight there he was, in the blue and orange and black drop shadow and phony parchment of a Mets uniform. I was happy for him, and for another little piece of Mets history.
And then I thought to myself that he looked like a slightly smaller version of Fezzik from The Princess Bride.
To which Andre the Giant Met responded by promptly lining a single. Which perhaps wasn’t as useful as bashing Chipper against a rock this afternoon would have been, but that wouldn’t have been sportsmanlike. Besides, Mets fans and minor-league pilgrims have something in common: We take what we can get.
Addendum: Here’s wishing the Mets’ Jay Horwitz and Shannon Forde speedy recoveries from broken ankles. One of the pleasures of the Mets’ outreach to bloggers has been getting to know Shannon, Jay and the rest of the Mets’ media-relations folks. Get well soon, you two.
by Greg Prince on 8 September 2011 7:53 am
Tuesday night’s Mets-Marlins extra-inning affair at beautiful Joe Robbie Stadium dripped on until about one in the morning (or as they call it in the Bronx, prime time). Then, about twenty minutes later, or so it felt, there was a Wednesday night Mets-Marlins affair at the same facility whose turf, it saddens me to report, does not appear to have been aided one little bit by the signature product from the fine folks at Pro’s Choice.
Maybe somebody needs to actually open the sacks of Soilmaster to get it to work.
The Mets and the Marlins. They just kept going. They never left. They found the ugliest place in America for baseball and they grimly resolved to continue pecking away at each other, two direction-impaired pigeons hopelessly attracted to the same murky birdbath.
Is it any wonder I cracked open a fortune cookie as the 1-0 regulation series finale moved briskly through its sixth or seventh hour, and it read, “HELP! I AM BEING HELD PRISONER INSIDE A METS-MARLINS GAME!”?
Well, I could have.
Nobody forces me to watch Mets-Marlins games, yet one is always in progress everywhere I look, so they are awfully difficult to avoid. We nod off with the Fishes. We wake up with the Fishes. We go outside with the Fishes and discover summer has disappeared and fall is in gear. I fully expect there will be more Mets-Marlins games today, tomorrow and into eternity.
Salvation? Mets.com claims there are no more games with the Marlins immediately ahead: not here, not there, not anywhere for the rest of 2011.
But I assume that’s a lie.
I assume the Marlins stowed away on the Mets’ plane back to New York.
I also assume, as in The Blues Brothers, the Marlins have already convinced the folks at Bob’s Citi Bunker that they are the Good Ole Boys, and by the time the actual Atlantans show up today for their makeup 4:10 twinbill, the Marlins will have engaged the Mets in another 18 or 27 or 36 innings of soggy, saggy Fishball.
I assume Wayne Hagin is broadcasting it right now.
Finally, I assume that when Fredi Gonzalez complains incessantly that his team is the authentic Mets opponent du jour, Jack McKeon will excuse himself to the parking lot so he can write out an American Express travelers check to cover the extensive bar tab. Except McKeon and his band will instead lie in wait to assault the Cubs when they arrive so they can take Chicago’s place for three or four or twenty more games against the Mets this weekend.
Are we done with the Marlins yet for 2011?
Are we really and truly done with them?
Was the 1-0 kissoff to Joe Robbie actually it?
Will Emilio Morrison Buck really not be leading off at 4:10?
Will Gaby Sanchez and his stinging bat really not be watching every breath I take, every move I make, every bond I break?
Can we really scrub the teal accents out of the Mets logo?
’Cause I don’t believe it.
We’ve been playing the Marlins every day and every night and every morning for the past five months. Sometimes — like when R.A. Dickey is starting and Bobby Parnell isn’t closing — the result is satisfactory. Yet no matter the score, the process grinds clear down to the nub of the soul when it’s Marlins, Marlins and more Marlins. I’m honestly surprised the Mets are not still down in Miami, engaging in the same continuous (as opposed to continual) night-day-night doubleheader until the Dolphins troop in Sunday morning to tell them in no uncertain terms that they don’t have to go home but they can’t stay there.
The Mets play the Marlins. It’s the only thing I know anymore.
by Jason Fry on 7 September 2011 2:08 am
By about the fifth inning or so it was clear that the only way to capture this Bataan Death March of a game was chronologically, as fear ebbed and flowed and was overtaken by exhaustion. If you have trouble fixing just when something happened or recalling what sparked some outburst from me, rest assured that it doesn’t really matter. Here we go:
— I have nothing in particular against Miguel Batista except being bad on a long-ago fantasy team of mine, but seeing him out there in No. 47 makes me reflexively dislike him. Ah, T@m Gl@v!ne, someday we’ll forgive you.
— I have a lot against Jack McKeon, on the other hand, starting with his irascible gamesmanship and continuing on through any number of his Pleistocene habits. Though in fairness he is exactly the person I’d want to inflict on Hanley Ramirez. Watching Jack in the dugout reminds me of him trying to psych out a very young Jason Isringhausen by objecting to some writing or color on his glove, which prompted Bobby Valentine to head to the mound with a Sharpie and spend a good three minutes blackening the offending portion of Izzy’s glove while talking a blue streak to his pitcher. I think he was trying to distract Izzy, but the effect was ruined by the fact that Bobby V’s face was contorted into a rictus of hatred. I wonder if Izzy remembers that.
— I’m really happy Val Pascucci has been rewarded with a call-up, but honestly, No. 15 should have stayed in mothballs for a good two or three years at least. That’s disrespectful.
— The constant mutter of fan conversations is really aggravating. I think Gary and Keith could double as PA announcers by raising their voices slightly. What are there, 1,200 people here? At maximum?
— Fuck Greg Dobbs. Every year seems to bring a Marlin I reflexively can’t stand. It used to be Cody Ross, that shudder-inducing fetal pig of a man. Now it’s Dobbs. Granted, he got a head start claiming this title by being The Angriest Phillie in our clashes with them before they got horrifyingly good. You can see him champing at the bit to beat us, every game. Possibly including this one.
— Wow, the Marlins went by number and identified Mike Baxter as Blaine Boyer. This is quite the operation they have here. Does anyone else wonder if a spiffy new park will really fix what’s wrong with this franchise? Yeah, Soilmaster Stadium sucks, and their cheapjack owner is loathsome. But the problem with the Marlins is they play in a flighty city full of dimwits who don’t particularly like baseball. Will a retractable roof and more expensive seats really fix all that? Or will the 2012 Marlins just play in a better-looking, half-empty building? Really, the obvious thing to do is contract them and impose the Armin Tamzarian treatment: No one will ever mention the Marlins again, under penalty of torture.
— Manny Acosta is proof that you can never completely give up on relievers, unless they’re Rich Rodriguez or Danny Graves.
— Angel Pagan, on the other hand, is proof that you can never assume a player has truly taken a leap forward. His misplay on Emilio Bonifacio’s little dunker bordered on criminally negligent, and it’s the kind of play he’s made all too often this year. And goddamn it, here comes Dobbs. Sigh. This is the kind of game we always play here. Some little something doesn’t get done, and the whole mess unravels before you can say “Luis Castillo.” I can feel defeat looming.
— Ah, but Pagan seeks to redeem himself, with a little help from Logan Morrison not pulling off a good but makeable catch. And now … NICK FUCKING EVANS!
— I love Evans. The guy can just plain hit, and he’s a pretty good first baseman, all things considered. Sure, he made an error on a rather spastic throw — but he also made a gutsy throw to get the lead runner at second, and he’s saved David Wright several errors with nice scoops. And his grasp of the strike zone is precocious. There’s got to be a place for him somewhere on this team next year.
— Whoa, did a black cat actually run in front of the Marlins’ dugout? How was it not our dugout? And a rabid black panther? That ate Wright?
— Izzy, fighting himself, finally prevails in a nine-pitch duel against Jose Lopez, catching him on a curve at the ankles. But here’s that fucking Bonifacio. And so of course Izzy strikes him out, with Ronny Paulino coolly stepping on home after the dropped third strike instead of forgetting the rule and trying to throw to first past a speedy runner. Paulino knows his stuff.
— And Pagan continues to atone with a shot off the first-base bag!
— Ah, Bobby Parnell, crumbling before our eyes even as Terry Collins tries to sculpt him into a closer. I didn’t think Mike Cameron would be the one to kill us, but Soilmaster finds a way. Young pitchers have growing pains and closers have spells, but that image of Parnell’s hand snapping down to his shoetops after Cameron’s double is disturbing.
— Donnie Murphy, whoever that is, is 4 for 40 on the year. Which means he’s certain to be the one to kill us. Stranger things have happened, and usually do here.
— Tim Byrdak versus Goddamn Greg Dobbs, whom I swear the Marlins are sneaking up as every third hitter. The crowd is down to what, 400? In games like this you never can see the hero or the villain coming — it’s only later that it makes sense and seems inevitable. But I’ve got my usual bad feeling about Dobbs.
— Nope. On we go.
— On God, Wright dropped a ball that should have been Jose’s. Tricky, over-the-shoulder grab, landed fair. Now it’s second and third. Wright looks agonized. Reyes much the same. And here’s Murphy — their Murphy, not our injured one — up again. Anonymous Marlin, which means potential killer.
— Wait, why is McKeon pinch-running a converted catcher for Cameron? And how did Ryota Igarashi get out of that? (Answer: Tight hamstring. Meaning, “that was the answer to the question of Cameron’s removal.” Igarashi’s recent effectiveness? That defies rational explanation.)
— OK, the Marlins have the Z team in. There’s a catcher in the outfield and their massive, ineffective tub of a pitcher in. If there’s ever a chance for us to do something good at Soilmaster, this is it.
— Evans is up and I find I’m glad it’s him. Baseball can sure change quickly. BASE HIT! NICK EVANS IS GOING FROM THE BACK OF THE MILK CARTON TO THE FRONT OF THE WHEATIES BOX!!!!!!!
— Paulino, it should be noted, has caught 12 innings with a broken toe. He is one tough hombre.
— It’s absolutely silent now. The Mets just tried a suicide squeeze, which almost always gets a crowd baying in alarm and hope and anticipation, only there was no reaction because there’s no crowd. Seriously, the players may outnumber the fans.
— Unofficial count of the crowd is 347, sayeth Gary. The announced attendance is 22,318. HAHAHAHAHAHA. I bet there are foul balls lying in abandoned sections, waiting to be found by some confused kids tomorrow afternoon.
— Very nice at-bat by Ruben Tejada, again. So of course, to confound me, on the 11th pitch he guesses wrong and looks at a splitter that doesn’t really split and goes right down the middle. Ugh, baseball.
— Jose drives in a run! And becomes your National League Batting Leader again! At least two dozen fans are rejoicing! More seriously, Jose leaning down and bending his knees to muscle a liner drive over the infield is one of my favorite sights in baseball. Please don’t make me miss it.
— Nice line by Gary Cohen: “So [Josh Stinson]’s been in this position [closing] in the Eastern League … where the crowds are probably bigger than they are tonight.”
— Stinson, another Louisianan seeking a save. I hate myself for thinking that.
— Please don’t face Dobbs. Even though the Marlins would be down 7-4 with one on, he’d somehow hit a three-run homer. Those are the Soilmaster rules.
— Whew. No Dobbs. We win! And go a game over .500 at this travesty of a joke of a horror show, with one to play. One more game before nothing bad can happen to us in this teal monstrosity ever again.
— Seriously, if you shook me awake in mid-January and said, “the Mets are playing an exhibition game RIGHT NOW, and it’s on TV,” I hope I’d have the presence of mind to ask, “It’s not at Soilmaster, is it?” Because if you said yes, I’d tell you that’s OK, I can wait until March.
|
|