The blog for Mets fans
who like to read

ABOUT US

Greg Prince and Jason Fry
Faith and Fear in Flushing made its debut on Feb. 16, 2005, the brainchild of two longtime friends and lifelong Met fans.

Greg Prince discovered the Mets when he was 6, during the magical summer of 1969. He is a Long Island-based writer, editor and communications consultant. Contact him here.

Jason Fry is a Brooklyn writer whose first memories include his mom leaping up and down cheering for Rusty Staub. Check out his other writing here.

Got something to say? Leave a comment, or email us at faithandfear@gmail.com. (Sorry, but we have no interest in ads, sponsored content or guest posts.)

Need our RSS feed? It's here.

Visit our Facebook page, or drop by the personal pages for Greg and Jason.

Or follow us on Twitter: Here's Greg, and here's Jason.

No Good Answer, Obviously

As a connoisseur of postgame media scrums, I recognize a no-win question when I hear it. No-win questions are asked after brutal losses that carry almost definitive consequences. It almost doesn’t matter how the question is answered. The question just has to be asked.

The no-win question that was asked of Carlos Mendoza following the Mets’ mostly self-inflicted 6-2 loss to the Marlins on Friday night in Miami (though, to be the fair, the Fish did some inflicting, too), regarded the mistakes the Mets made, not only in the preceding innings but for weeks on end and how they have gone uncorrected. Carlos Mendoza prefaced his answer with, “That’s a good question, obviously.”

Unless Mendoza had an actual solution and an explanation for why it wasn’t implemented, there is no good answer…obviously. Then again, the question wasn’t asked to garner a rating of how good the inquiry was.

Mendoza continued:

“It’s on me, it’s on all of us. We continue to make the same mistakes, and it’s costing us games.”

Obviousness won that round, but what do you want from a skipper sinking with his ship? The manager is official spokesman for his team’s shortcomings. To Mendoza’s credit, he doesn’t always try to put a happy face on them. There are no happy faces where the 2025 Mets nearing their end are concerned. There is nothing to be happy about. Maybe for a minute, but just wait until the next minute. To paraphrase Felix Unger’s promise when he served as Oscar Madison’s announcer when Oscar hosted a sports call-in show, the team with the frown is coming around to drag you down to the ground.

As these Mets occasionally do, they got our hopes up early, or at least didn’t dash them for a while. They were coming off a solid win in Chicago that followed a crushing loss that followed an exhilarating win that followed two kicks to the midsection that followed a couple of romps that we might have thought negated whatever had been going wrong before. This is a pattern we should be used to by now. The Mets fell to four games over .500 on September 12. On September 26, Friday night, the Mets dipped again to four games over .500. They were famously 21 games over .500 in this very same season. Perhaps we should be impressed that they’ve stopped plummeting and are now merely bouncing around.

Francisco Lindor led off the game by homering against former Cy Young winner Sandy Alcantara. Two pitches in, we’re up, 1-0. You want to take this as momentum. Lindor being Lindor in the final days of a season is a wonderful thing, we learned during last season’s final days. We’ve seen reminders of it during this season’s final days. The reigning MVP runner-up reaches 31 home runs, besting a recently great pitcher in the process, as the Mets shoo away the best the Marlins have to offer. If we take care of Alcantara on Friday night, we have no reason to fear whoever they throw at us on Saturday and Sunday. Hell, if the Brewers cooperate, maybe we’ll clinch by Saturday night. Then Juan Soto singles and steals, because if Juan Soto is on first, he can’t stand still. He wants into the 40/40 club. He’s at 43/37 as of the first inning and will up his membership bid to 43/38 by the third inning. As long as he doesn’t get thrown out pursuing his individual goal or take the bat out of somebody’s hands while doing so, the extra ninety feet are usually welcome. Two batters later, Pete Alonso doubles Soto home, collecting his 124th RBI for his efforts.

Are you seeing these numbers? Lindor, Soto, and Alonso are posting what they’re supposed to be posting. If superstar statistics electrified the lineup from the first inning to the ninth, Mendoza would be lobbed questions like, “How about those three guys?” That wasn’t the talk of the scrum.

Brandon Sproat went to work, and it was working out great from the first through the fourth. No hits allowed until the fourth. No serious Marlin threats at all. Nolan McLean gave the Mets what was needed Thursday night at Wrigley for a reasonable period of time, now Sproat seemed to be doing the same. Jonah Tong not so much on Wednesday, but two-thirds of Generation MST3K keeping us in orbit is better than none. The Mets looked poised to score some more off Alcantara in the second and third, but a little bad luck was hit into here, and an opportunity was not made the most of there, and going to the bottom of the fifth, the score remained Mets 2 Marlins 0.

In the bottom of the fifth, nothing good happened, except it ended. The season may have ended, too, but that will require hindsight. Give it a day or two. We will know soon enough.

Sproat was hit hard.
Alonso did not make a makeable play.
Gregory Soto was hit hard.
Gregory Soto did not pay enough attention to what was happening on the basepaths.
Ronny Mauricio did not pay attention in general.

I could go into details, but by the time six runs scored to transform a game a Mets fan could see as a continuation of progress into a game that confirmed every Mets fan doubt, details were almost beside the point. Except that the bullpen had to be called on earlier than desired, per usual (meaning we’ll ask another kid, Dylan Ross, to come up and save a portion of our bacon ASAP), and, oh, that part about Mauricio materialized because Brett Baty felt something in his side and had to exit the game and possibly the season, whatever is left of it.

Alcantara found his groove and the Mets didn’t disturb it. He pitched into the eighth without giving up another run. I guess he’s still great. The Mets mounted their final challenge once Sandy departed, loading the bases without a hit, until it came down to closer Tyler Phillips versus pinch-hitter Mark Vientos. Phillips seems to be workshopping a John Rocker or at least Brad “The Animal” Lesley persona; the dude slaps his face on his way in from the pen. If he’s not afraid to inflict punishment on his own visage, you think quelling Vientos is gonna be a problem for him?

It wasn’t. Mark struck out, and, one inning later, it was over. The game, for sure. The brief retention of the third Wild Card would be done when the Reds’ 3-1 lead in Milwaukee went final. (The Diamondbacks lost in San Diego and got themselves altogether eliminated.) Met hopes of making the postseason hang in the immediate balance. We have to win today to stay alive. If we lose, we need Cincy to lose to ensure Sunday isn’t mere bookkeeping. A school of thought suggests that making these intricate calculations are simply motions a fan goes through en route to reaching a glaringly apparent conclusion, and that the team such a fan roots for is going to make these motions and calculations academic by finding a way to bow to the Marlins at least once in these final two days.

This school of thought may not be the school in which we wish to enroll, but I’m pretty sure I hear a bus rumbling down the street to pick us up for the winter semester.

12 comments to No Good Answer, Obviously

  • Sadecki33

    From top to bottom, they have no one to blame but themselves. This is one of the most maddening Mets teams I’ve seen since my masochistic fandom began in 1968. Oh well, at least the Cyclones won a championship.

  • greg mitchell

    Today’s Mendoza lowlight (of several choices, as per usual) as the game got away:

    Sproat suddenly struggling in 5th inning. Game is tied. Defense didn’t help. Gives up bloop single to right so now runner on first but he’s only thrown 65 pitches and two righties coming up. Definitely a 50/50 call on removing him. Good thing they have a righty up in pen.

    Oh wait, they do not! Mendoza as usual had decided before the game no doubt who would be first in, and that would be lefty Soto no matter what. But remember, they are allowed to warm up 2 pitchers at once!!! And it used to be standard for most teams in most games. And we are in game #160 with season on the line.

    Well, maybe Brazoban, the obvious righty choice, was not available after hurling 3 innings a few days ago. Think again, as he would be called on two innings later.

    So: Mendoza takes his time getting anyone up in the 5th. When he does the pick is Soto, who is only good against lefties, but will now be facing righties with the game on the line. It’s not as if he is Billy Wagner. No matter, replace righty Sproat–and don’t even have a righty up in pen! Hard to believe this guy was a bench coach before–and no wonder Boone got such heat. BTW, Yankees with Boone crushing it to the finish while Mendoza’s Mets stinking up the joint.

    • Eric

      With all the vibes, gimmicks, and Lindor clutchness of the 2025 Mets, the lockdown pitching game after game after game is the biggest reason the Mets won the 3rd wildcard last year. After June 12, the pitching has been the opposite of lockdown in 2026.

      What happened to the pitching lab and all the other organizational improvements Cohen supposedly paid top dollar for?

  • eric1973

    Regarding Sproat, the hard hit balls were caught and the bloops and dunkers fell in. Mendoza should have left him in. Sproat had plenty left.

    Regarding Soto, especially after his Marte/Lindor comments, you know he wants to get to 40/40 just to show that this is better than Lindor’s 30/30. No love lost there.

    I was shocked to hear Mendoza’s lame reasoning for starting Mullens over Taylor. He didn’t want to start him 3 days in a row after coming back from a hamstring. LET HIM PLAY!

    Pathetic comments by Pete after the game, saying every game in the season is just as urgent as any other. Mendoza makes these kind of comments as well. And Pete kept saying how ‘Happy’ he was that he got the out on that shot he needed to field. Said it 5 times. Whether they believe it or not, it just sounds completely ridiculous.

  • Eric

    That was a formulaic 2025 Mets loss. Other teams can score early and hold onto a slim lead. That’s a lot to ask for this team.

    I want the Mets to make the post-season of course because I’m a Mets fan. But if I was just a baseball fan, I’d prefer the Reds because, besides the chronic ugly baseball befitting a bottom-rung team, the Mets are not a complete team with the collapse of the pitching staff.

    They haven’t earned it. They don’t deserve it. And it may be better in the long run for them not to make it and thereby compel big changes for 2026. Even so, I hope the Mets squeak in.

    At least Tong, Sproat, and McLean have gained valuable MLB experience to learn from.

  • Cobra Joe

    An old Chinese proverb:

    “Wise is the fool, who knows NOT what to say.”

    Words that the garrulous Gary Cohen might want to seriously consider.

  • Cobra Joe

    That revered Chinese proverb reminds me of the fascinating book on the mighty Yangtze River that we mentioned to Sister Cordes in our fifth grade current events discussion:

    “The Yellow River” by I.P. Daly (or is that spelled “Dailey”?)

    PS Sister Cordes was NOT amused.

  • Cobra Joe

    I think WFAN should bring back the great Steve Somers tonight to offer “Mets rehab” for the many disheartened and depressed Mets fans in the tri-state area.

    • eric1973

      Agreed, my friend.

      That was so much fun driving home from Shea and listening to the Mets Post Game followed by the great Steve Somers.