The blog for Mets fans
who like to read
ABOUT US
Faith and Fear in Flushing made its debut on Feb. 16, 2005, the brainchild of two longtime friends and lifelong Met fans.
Greg Prince discovered the Mets when he was 6, during the magical summer of 1969. He is a Long Island-based writer, editor and communications consultant. Contact him here.
Jason Fry is a Brooklyn writer whose first memories include his mom leaping up and down cheering for Rusty Staub. Check out his other writing here.
Got something to say? Leave a comment, or email us at faithandfear@gmail.com. (Sorry, but we have no interest in ads, sponsored content or guest posts.)
Need our RSS feed? It's here.
Visit our Facebook page, or drop by the personal pages for Greg and Jason.
Or follow us on Twitter: Here's Greg, and here's Jason.
|
by Jason Fry on 9 September 2018 11:07 am Bravo to all the stalwarts who came out to Citi Field on a night water droplets were falling from the sky, accompanied by hits sprinkling a perplexed Noah Syndergaard. Winter-hat night seemed perfectly well timed. Imagine the attendance if a certain third baseman who most definitely is not experiencing a rift with his employeers, no absolutely not thank you nothing to see here, had been activated, but oh well.
Noah looked pretty good early, a start after throttling the Giants for a complete game, but the middle innings saw the Phillies racking up both walks and hits. Noah’s 109th pitch was a 98 MPH fastball that Cesar Hernandez turned around into a 110 MPH fastball to Syndergaard’s ribs, dropping him on the mound to crawl after the ball and then leave the game.
It was an awful moment, but X-rays were negative, Noah was full of jokes after the game and all seems well, so … exhale.
Fortunately — to use the word in the lesser, between-the-lines sense — the Mets were raining hits of their own down on Zach Eflin and his successors (his many successors), who collectively hung an absurd number of breaking pitches. The Mets certainly showed their gratitude. Tomas Nido picked up strikeout victim Dom Smith by whacking a one-out, bases-clearing double in the second, Todd Frazier launched a three-run homer an inning later, Michael Conforto chipped in a solo shot, and the Mets had enough firepower to keep the Phils at bay. (Tip of the cap to Jerry Blevins, who fanned old friend Jose Bautista after Syndergaard’s exit, preventing a laugher from threatening to become a groaner.)
Mets 10, Phillies 5. Somewhere Jacob deGrom is being stoic.
The box score has a couple of interesting stories in it — and here, I’m using definitely “interesting” in a “September of a lost season” way. Nido’s career began in a rather surreal fashion, as he collected his first hit at Wrigley Field and three minutes later ended a game by being tagged out approximately 25 feet from home. (Narrator: “That’s so 2017 Mets!”) Nido’s not being billed as the Mets’ catcher of the future, perhaps because the previous owners of that tag can be found on the disabled list or hitting in the .230s, but his defense has drawn plaudits and he does have a Florida State League batting title on his resume. That guarantees success about as much as a three-run double on a misty night, but it ain’t nothing.
Blevins’s year began miserably. Regarded as one of the trustworthy components of the Mets’ pen, he walked two guys in his first appearance and stumbled through horrific stretches in mid-April and late May, with his struggles perhaps not helped by Mickey Callaway‘s decision-making. (Remember Blevins getting caught shaking his head in disgust when not called upon at Citizens Bank?) His ERA sat at an unsightly 5.84 on Memorial Day, but since then Blevins has whittled it down to a more palatable 3.65. It’s still not a year Blevins will want to discuss when he’s on a porch in his rocking chair — hey, maybe the problem was that he finally got a Topps card as a Met — but it and he look a lot better than they once did.
Finally, how will the Phillies view 2018? They vaulted back into contention a year or two ahead of schedule and are battling for the division title with the equally precocious Braves, but neither team is exactly coming to the wire like a thoroughbred. Odds are that won’t mean anything come October, when the Mets and their own implosion of a season will be a memory. But the Mets are at least getting a chance to play spoiler, battling two teams that had fun summers but look like they’ve suddenly become all too aware of what’s possible.
by Greg Prince on 8 September 2018 12:50 pm The independent Atlantic League, best known in Metsopotamian circles as base of operations for Buddy Harreslon’s Long Island Ducks, includes a team called the Road Warriors. You can’t go to one of their home games because they don’t have any. They are literally a travel team, existing to even out the circuit in years when the numbers get overly odd. This season, for example, with the Bluefish having abandoned Bridgeport and not yet having resettled into their future identity as the High Point (N.C.) Rockers, the Road Warriors were reincarnated out of logistical necessity. Their mission seems to be go out there and be the best Washington Generals you can be, for as you might expect, playing nothing but away games will wear down any roster. After dropping a 4-1 decision in Central Islip to the Ducks Friday night, the Road Warriors’ second-half record fell to 10-46 on the heels of a first-half record of 17-46.
Forty miles to the west, a team that plays 81 home games presumably looked on in envy.
The New York Mets, who bunk regularly in Flushing, are a dismal home team, which is a shame since if they weren’t stuck playing half of their contests in the same place might be reasonably competitive. The Queensless part of their itinerary they’ve got fairly well under control. Following feisty road trips of 7-4 and 5-4, the Mets stand at 35-36 when wearing gray pants. That is the essence of not bad. The accepted formula for success in baseball is play .500 or so on the road and clean up at home.
Unfortunately, the Mets are a mess at home. After a typical Citi Field performance Friday — a 4-3 loss to the visiting Phillies — the Mets’ home record ticked down to 28-41. That is the essence of atrocious. On the road, the Mets are formidable foes. At home, they’re more Atlantic League than National League.
Perhaps I’m extra sensitive to this situation because the homestanding Mets are particularly putrid when I’m on hand to root them toward victory. They and I fail together. In 2018, their record with me at Citi Field is 5-11, same as Steven Matz’s in general. Matz took a no-decision on Friday, having plowed his way through 103 pitches over five innings. Matz was just good enough not to be terrible, not good enough to be wholly effective. He probably would have been great had this game been played anywhere else.
The Mets’ offense was tepid for any league or locale. Jay Bruce homered. Dom Smith homered (to the opposite field, no less). Brandon Nimmo, accelerating from first after a walk, scored on a beautifully placed Jeff McNeil double into the right field corner, the essence of hit-and-run. That was the non-tepid portion. Everything else didn’t rise remotely to the level of lukewarm. There was nothing else. Aaron Nola, whom I have to stop meeting like this (I’ve seen him beat the Mets three times in two cities this year), gave up no other hits. Phillie relievers Seranthony Dominguez — who I continually think was knighted on his way to the ballpark — and Tommy Hunter retired their six batters on a total of thirteen pitches. The Mets’ approach in the eighth and ninth seemed to consist of beating the traffic, which, having gotten a rare ride home, I could have told them was a waste of time. Citi Field personnel was about as skilled at regulating exiting autos out of the parking lot formerly known as Shea Stadium as Mets hitters were at getting on base.
Come to think of it, I didn’t see anybody regulating traffic. Or any Mets getting on base.
Matz gave up two runs and Nola allowed three, which means somewhere in between, the Mets bullpen couldn’t preserve requisite amounts of bacon. The kiddie corps of Eric Hanhold, Tyler Bashlor, Daniel Zamora and Drew Smith was tasked with holding a contender at bay. The contender prevailed, thanks to Hanhold encountering a bit of bad bloop luck and Bashlor being taken practically to the World’s Fair Marina by Rhys Hoskins. Oh well. Good to see the youthful arms getting a chance nonetheless. Good to see Dominic at first base, too. The highlight of the evening, beyond the sportsmanlike “thank you” pregame video for Asdrubal Cabrera, was an incredible pick of a desperation heave by McNeil to retire the no longer so beloved Cabrera on a grounder to deeply shifted second in the eighth. Dom’s mitt was practically in right field as he securely plucked Jeff’s one-bounce fling to end that inning.
Dom Smith (announced by Marysol Castro and illustrated on the scoreboards as Dominic; who can keep up?) is mysteriously still only 23 despite being drafted five years ago and possessing a very old soul. Smith at first meant Bruce in right, which is at odds with whatever the most recently stated gameplan of getting Bruce reps at first. Like the weather in Chicago, wait five minutes and you’ll get a new gameplan stated in Flushing. The fact that Bruce didn’t play first was utterly lost on a repeat Bud Light customer a couple of rows in front of Joe and me. During one of the at-bats when Jay didn’t homer, the guy cursed Bruce out because he was keeping Peter Alonso from receiving a September looksee. Thus, Jay Bruce, by adhering to what’s written on Mickey Callaway’s almost always accurate lineup card, reveals himself a diabolical genius.
Also prevented from playing by mysterious forces otherwise known as the New York Mets’ overwhelming desire to be reimbursed by their insurer was David Wright. Wright worked out before the game. He will play in a simulated game before the next game. The Mets will continue to send a mouthpiece to face reporters and create a dubious rationale for not activating him. Friday it was something about you can’t bring back your 35-year-old captain who’s been working his hind quarters off just to pinch-hit a little because, uh…hey, look over there! That’s the way to draw enthusiastic crowds to your 28-41 home team.
But still we come. Some of us. Me, anyway. The MTA tried to warn me away. At 103rd Street Friday evening, an announcement was blared that our train would terminate at 111th Street, one stop shy of Mets-Willets Point. Apparently the train traffic up ahead was more daunting than the parking lot traffic was going to be later, so our 7 local was directed to simply give up. (No wonder it’s so identified with the Mets.) Despite being instructed to wait on the platform for a train that promised to roll a little further east, I opted for the station stairs and hoofed it the rest of the way. I found the improvised stroll quite pleasant. It made Citi Field seem like it was in the middle of somewhere — Corona, to be specific. Thirty years ago, in my driving days, I was directed to unofficial parking somewhere down 111th Street, the last time I remember taking roughly the same pedestrian route. The walk was probably shorter on July 2, 1988, because Shea was closer than Citi. Also, the Mets won that night; Darryl went deep, Doc went nine. The walk back to 111th Street included a detour to a Mr. Softee truck (this was also in my ice cream days). I’d call July 2, 1988, a good night.
I’d call September 7, 2018, a good night, too, honestly. I grumble and grimace, but deep down I relish every opportunity to go 1-0 in my last one, no matter how often it winds up as 0-1 en route to 5-11 or whatever. That explains the recurring trips to Citi Field. Nine innings with Joe perfectly situated behind home plate in Promenade. The extended departure from the parking lot and subsequent ride home with Rob, who had alerted me he’d be viewing the action from the sponsored soft drink terrace. Shouting out trivia answers in case the contestant needed help (he didn’t; good for him for getting the questions right). Encouraging the kid who tried to break the base-stealing record (she didn’t; good for her for running hard all the way). Imploring those who stood oblivious to the action to sit DOWN IN FRONT (to which the Bud Light dude interjected we should relax because the Met batting was just gonna ground out on the next pitch anyway…which he did). Clapping along with “Lazy Mary”. Realizing how of few of the Italian lyrics to “Lazy Mary” I’ve managed to learn despite continual exposure to all of them. Trying to figure out why so many people value a Mets game in progress as a backdrop for photos of themselves while completely ignoring the very same Mets game in progress.
This was a problem that first arose at Shea in 2008. Phones weren’t uniformly smart then, but digital cameras were commonly carried. Never mind that Delgado is batting. Never mind a pennant race is in progress. Ooh, get this picture of me right now! I was a little more understanding of the impulse then, as the stadium where we gathered was about to vanish from view. Last night, it occurred to me after the fact, was the tenth anniversary of the final day-night doubleheader Shea hosted. That was also against the Phillies. I was there for both ends, September 7, 2008. Joe was with me for the night half as Johan Santana quieted the crimson interlopers and kept the Mets in first place a wee bit longer. That nightcap was a quietly emotional experience for me because I’d been going to games at Shea with Joe basically forever and now that was ending. Shea was ending. I was determined to go to every home game that month, and I did. It didn’t keep the Mets in first place, nor did it keep Shea standing.
But I’ve kept going to Flushing, no matter that the train lets me off in Corona. I’ve been going to games with friends like Joe and Rob at Citi Field since 2009, just as I’d been going to Mets games at Shea since 1973. The organization may not merit much in the way of our patronage (StubHub-discounted as it may be), but where else are we going to see the Mets play? Even lose aggravatingly in seasons that stop far short of 111th Street? Where else are we going to be Mets fans to our fullest? I can do most of my rooting from afar, but not all of it. Ten years into this ballpark, I still readily embrace compiling a record of 5-11 over that which would be 0-0 without me.
Actually, the Mets’ home record would be 28-41 either way.
by Jason Fry on 6 September 2018 12:46 pm Wednesday evening found me driving back to New York after dropping my kid off at school north of Boston. The rental-car place closed at 9; if things broke my way and I drove more speedily than I’m now accustomed, I could make it. Maybe. Perhaps. If I pushed it.
I decided to go for it; traffic was light and I was driving a Denali, which is the approximate size and weight of a battleship and thus useful for encouraging dawdlers to vacate the left lane.
Plus I had the Mets, playing ball in L.A. at the weirdo time of 7:35 pm. Zack Wheeler would be on the mound continuing to show us the marvels of Zack Wheeler 2.0. The other Mets would be doing whatever they did or didn’t do. It was a baseball game and usually that’s enough good company to get me through anything.
Except as I listened to Josh and Howie recounting the action, I found my mind drifting in a way you definitely don’t want your growling, ZIP Code-sized SUV drifting.
We have seen our 55th Met. We have an oh-so-Metsian controversy about health and money that makes us angry/weary. We have a potential Cy Young winner at the top of our rotation.
Those are the storylines just completed or left to be checked off this season, and my mind drifted because it’s not much. Jacob deGrom is a story every fifth day. David Wright‘s situation is fluid and I only have so much anger in me pending new information. The Eric Hanhold Era has begun.
The rest? Eh. We have no meaningful games to play until winter has come and gone, and the other Mets stories are incremental. Can Wheeler keep pitching at the high level he’s shown this summer? Do Steven Matz, Noah Syndergaard and Michael Conforto look healthy? Can Amed Rosario keep building on recent successes? Can Jeff McNeil keep improving defensively and slashing base hits? Is some coach remembering to clean the cobwebs off Dom Smith so he doesn’t suffocate?
Those aren’t meaningless storylines by any means — most of them will be pretty important in determining whether we’re optimistic or nah about the 2019 Mets. But that will be a discussion in the springtime. Right now, it’s not exactly the stuff that gets the blood pumping — there’s no unknown rookie to scrutinize after an exciting minor-league season (ahem) or triumphant return on tap (double ahem).
And so I found myself more concerned with my ETA in Brooklyn and where I was going to top up the gas tank than I was with whatever was going on in L.A.
What was going on L.A. was entertaining enough, provided you were a Mets fan. The Mets bled the Dodgers dry with a hilarious (Met fan) or infuriating (Dodger fan) rain of bloops, dunkers, worm-killers and parachutes over the infield. Those that found Dodger gloves tended to clank off of them. The Dodgers looked more like one of their short-season affiliates than a club fighting for a postseason spot, which is going to happen but is still the kind of thing that provokes long, sustained booing. Meanwhile, Wheeler pitched well, even staying in after a scary line drive off the chest, and the Mets won the game, the series and the road trip.
I felt bad not feeling more about all that. But that’s what the season has come down to — low stakes and incrementals. What does it all mean? That’s a question for March, and March is very far away.
by Greg Prince on 5 September 2018 11:23 am The bane of the East Coast baseball fan, the midweek late night West Coast start time, had avoided our drowsy chaperoning for more than five months, but every season will eventually find a reason to literally keep you awake when you should probably go to sleep. Maybe not a good reason, depending on how you view prying your eyelids open as a Tuesday becomes a Wednesday and the Mets revert to being the Mets, but the completists among us remain determined to stay awake.
Determination isn’t always good enough. Around midnight, with the Mets trailing the Dodgers, 5-4, I drifted off. Admittedly, like the Mets versus the Dodgers, I didn’t fight off my foe very effectively. I gave into a nap. The Mets apparently gave into whatever usually gets the best of them in Los Angeles because when I awoke around one o’clock, the Mets were trailing the Dodgers, 11-4.
What was wrong with Corey Oswalt and Jacob Rhame, perpetrators of the six-run seventh through which I sawed wood? Damned if I know. I’ll just take it on faith that it wasn’t their or our night. Oswalt could use some more consistent work, probably, but he had to be ousted from the rotation to the far reaches of the bullpen to provide stability for Jason Vargas, Tuesday night’s starting pitcher who never saw Wednesday morning Eastern Time. VARGY from the adorable Little League uniforms was one of the best kids you could ask to pitch. Vargas in plain ol’ road grays was again the guy whose ERA is too high to pass for a section number at Citi Field.
Rhame may just have residual vertigo from all the times he’s been down and up in 2018. Standard-issue option action aside, Jacob has three times out of five been the Mets’ choice for 26th man on those occasions when the roster temporarily expanded because of makeup doubleheaders and the like. In other words, when it’s Rhame, it’s poured.
Predictably, Rhame was the designated extra fellow for the resumption of the suspended game in Chicago last week and then got to stick around as Kevin Plawecki tore himself away from the Mets for a few days, having made some ridiculous excuse (oh right, his first child was being born). By September 1, it apparently wasn’t worth the trouble to option Rhame again, so he continued to be available to expand five-run deficits into the seven-run variety while New York nods off.
Earlier — not long after Rich Hill straightened himself out from feeding a couple of gopher balls to Mets batters, which he seems to do every start against us — history came trotting in from the visitors bullpen, succeeding Tyler Bashlor, who initially succeeded Vargas. History technically wore No. 70, but its true numerical significance could be found in the sighting of the 55th Met of the season, the first time there’s ever been one. Eric Hanhold’s maiden entry into a 2018 Mets game (not to mention Major League Baseball) meant we’ve officially had more personnel traffic this year than in any other year, most notably 1967, when there were 54 Mets losing 101 times. Nobody stopped the game to authenticate the 24-year-old righthander we received last season from Milwaukee in exchange for turncoat Neil Walker, but Hanhold did OK for himself, regardless, throwing a scoreless inning-and-a-third, setting the stage for brief adequate outings from Daniel Zamora and Paul Sewald, leading to the wholly inadequate activity rendered by Oswalt and Rhame.
Exceptions certainly exist, but when you fall asleep with the Mets having used five pitchers and you stir to find them on their seventh, it’s probably a sign that the game was not worth waking up for.
by Greg Prince on 4 September 2018 3:18 pm Jacob deGrom’s pitching is transcendent. Wins, losses and no-decisions have all but ceased to matter. Prospective Cy Young voting feels irrelevant. Track all the statistics you like, but they’re just numbers. Measurements capture only so much of what makes deGrom an avatar of practically unprecedented excellence.
I’ve been on a bit of a journey as I’ve watched Jake over the course of the past month, traveling from bitter when the Mets don’t score on his behalf; to euphoric when they do; to disgusted when others haven’t fully recognized his brilliance; to angry when forces conspire against his fortunes; to nearly paralyzed with fear that he won’t succeed in full; until I arrived Monday night in a state of what I imagine bliss is like.
I didn’t know if the Mets would win (they did). I didn’t know if Jake would win (he didn’t). I just knew it was going to be all right, because Jake was going to be Jake and he would pitch as he has throughout this sublime season and, ultimately, nothing could hurt him or, by extension, us. The Dodgers might score an additional run after scoring one, yet they couldn’t alter his being. His teammates might not support him optimally through their offense and defense, yet it would not impede his progress. Jake would be out there on that mound for as long he was permitted to stay, seeking to get batters out because it is what he does, as if that alone is why he pitches in our midst.
The Mets winning is clearly of import to him. He is a professional competitor. He smiles broadly at postgame questioning when his team has won. He effects a sterner visage when they don’t. The answers are mostly the same regardless because the pitching is mostly the same. The pitching is of a caliber nobody else can match. DeGrom can put a different spin on a given pitch depending on occasion and urgency, but he can only say the same things so many times so many different ways.
Monday night at Dodger Stadium, the particularly impressive wrinkle to his outing was the bottom of the sixth inning, game tied at one. Given the Mets’ recent history versus Los Angeles, it was reasonable to expect walls to come crashing in via some combination of slugger, error or other creeping terror. The Mets hadn’t lost twelve in a row to L.A. by accident.
Yet there Jake was, taking on four hitters of varying pedigrees, each of them capable of ruining the end of anybody’s holiday weekend. Every one of them — Joc Pederson, Justin Turner, Manny Machado, Max Muncy — challenged his abilities, demanding no fewer than seven pitches and as many as twelve pitches per his respective plate appearance. Nearly one-third of the pitches deGrom would throw Monday were thrown in one-sixth of the innings he would work. The noise level rose. Dodger fans may have a reputation for arriving late, leaving early and waving incessantly, but they do create a sound of doom when they are properly moved. Many a Mets pitcher has been swallowed up by Chavez Ravine’s momentum.
But not Jake. There’d be loud fouls. There’d be steps off the rubber There’d be moments for contemplation. But after 34 pitches, there was a strikeout of Pederson, a grounder by Turner that was mishandled by Amed Rosario, a strikeout of Machado and a perfectly positioned Jeff McNeil picking up a ground ball and firing it to Wilmer Flores to retire Muncy.
Four batters, three outs, no damage. Jacob’s pitch count had soared from 75 to 109, so that was gonna be that in terms of his active participation in the evening’s affair. The score was still 1-1. Turner had gotten him in the first for a solo home run (maybe we shouldn’t have let him go). DeGrom got the run back of his own RBI accord in the fifth (Jacob’s batting average of .167 is eerily similar to his earned run average of 1.68). Unless the Mets pushed across a run in the seventh and the bullpen protected the hypothetical lead without pause thereafter, it meant deGrom wouldn’t get a win.
I shrugged at the thought. And when the Mets proceeded to load the bases only to leave them that way in the seventh, I shrugged again. I’m past wins and losses where Jake is concerned. Jake’s season is past wins and losses. The Mets winning would be nice, I decided — and it surely was, when Brandon Nimmo arranged exactly that outcome via his ninth-inning, three-run pinch-hit homer — but what was a lack of a W going to say about deGrom that hasn’t already been said?
DeGrom’s pitching exists in another realm. The most conventional of statistics were left in the dust long ago. In some other season, when set against the portfolios being compiled by Max Scherzer and Aaron Nola, we’d be compelled to make a case for deGrom because 8-8 in no way reflects his year’s inherent sparkle. C’mon, look at the ERA! Look at this peripheral this or that! Instead, early in September, it’s the opposite. Isn’t 16-6 worth something? What about 15-4? Too bad for Max and Aaron. Conventionality belongs to yesterday.
DeGrom is the word.
Mind you, the performances of those other pitchers are of concern only if we are concerning ourselves with the National League Cy Young Award. I’d welcome Jake’s being voted it, as would Mets fans everywhere, but to obsess on a slab of hardware determined by the judgment of others comes off somehow as almost gauche. Somebody’s gonna vote for Scherzer or Nola instead of deGrom when the category is best pitcher? There was a time, approximately two weeks ago, when that would incite me. I heard various expert types — Tim Kurkjian, Tom McCarthy, Michael Wilbon — weigh in, in one way or another, that Jacob deGrom didn’t seem likely to win the Cy Young or wasn’t quite worthy of it. I was infuriated. Blasphemy! Sacrilege! Inane dronery!
Now, having been privileged to tag along on deGrom’s march into history, my main thought regarding the views of those who would choose another over Jake is I will wish them enlightenment. May they see what the rest of us see. I realize it can be hard to decipher if you’re not properly positioned. Trying to make out Jake’s 1.68 ERA from the vantage point of Nola’s 2.23 or Scherzer’s 2.28 kindles visions of Laffit Pincay, Jr., the jockey on top of Sham, the fastest horse in the 1973 Belmont Stakes…except for Secretariat, who galloped home 31 lengths ahead of him.
If a Cy Young awaits deGrom, that’s delightful. If it doesn’t, I can’t promise I’ll be at peace with the verdict, but right now it really and truly strikes me as beside the point. If it can’t be earned on the field, it’s out of our hands (even Jake’s). A pennant race is about wins and losses, and its essential nature as a competition overshadows everything, especially down the stretch. The batting average derby of 2011 was about our guy outpointing his rivals; it felt natural to pull for Jose Reyes to get hits and cross our fingers that Ryan Braun and Matt Kemp didn’t. If there was a legitimate contest for the ERA crown, I might feel the same way rooting for Scherzer’s and Nola’s to tick up as I regularly thrill to deGrom’s when it dips, but lately I don’t relish their shortcomings quite so much. They’re terrific pitchers. It shouldn’t take their bugs to cast deGrom’s features in the most positive light possible.
Similarly, wins assigned to pitchers don’t tell much of this story anymore, except perhaps as curious sidebar. Drew Smith got the win Monday night because he had been the most recent Mets pitcher when Nimmo belted his untying home run. Smith pitched well for one inning. His connection to the victory was more than incidental, less than wholly determinant. I’m no longer caught up in worrying that Jake won’t get proper credit for his pitching. His pitching is credit enough. The start before the one against the Dodgers, versus the Cubs last week, was his showcase. He went eight innings that wore on me emotionally like seven games of a World Series. Not the seventh game, but seven games, evocative of those October nights when you can’t stand the idea of a single thing going against your team.
That night at Wrigley Field might have represented the Rubicon for how I’ve come to view Jacob deGrom’s 2018. I was so anxious every inning, every pitch. The Cubs must not be allowed to score more than one earned run; none would be preferable, but perfection is difficult to achieve, even for the deGroms among us. Chicago could cobble together eight hits, could work out one walk, they could leave seven men on between the first and the eighth — but there was to be no surfeit of scoring that would reflect poorly on Jacob.
And there wasn’t, which was plenty for me. Eventually there’d be bullpen and rain and suspension and resumption and, in the end, Paul Sewald (who, at 0-11 lifetime, may also have some thoughts on the efficacy of wins and losses) giving way to Daniel Zamora giving up a game-losing double to Ben Zobrist, but that was all agate compared to having watched Jacob deGrom pitch like Jacob deGrom yet again, over and over, almost untouched, something like impenetrable, perhaps even inscrutable. Wrigley last Wednesday was when I stopped stressing over what Scherzer and Nola were doing, ceased concentrating on Cy Young chances, quit resenting the impressions of others, even vaulted over the notion that “Jake deserves better” than getting dinged with no-decisions never mind defeats.
Witnessing Jacob deGrom pitching like Jacob deGrom is its own reward and award. He transcends the circumstances that surround him. Every start of his may be less an entire World Series than a ticker-tape parade for the soul.
I’ve experienced Seaver and Gooden and Dickey at their finest, to namedrop the Mets’ three Cys to date. They were extraordinarily dominant at their peak. So is Jake, I suppose, but he seems something different if not exactly something more. What distinguishes him, I think, is he seems morally opposed to giving up runs, like it’s his guiding principle. He strikes out loads of batters, but only because sometimes that’s how outs are recorded. He’s not a latter-day Dr. K in that sense. He’s phenomenal without being a phenomenon, an attraction without attracting undue attention to himself. Jacob set two records in the process of holding off the Dodgers: most quality starts in a row by a Met in one season; most consecutive starts by any major league starter giving up no more than three runs in the modern era. Jake was asked what it meant to him to have accomplished both of those feats. He admitted he wasn’t aware he had done either, but was quite polite about their significance, as if he wouldn’t want to hurt the feelings of the records to which he was just at that moment introduced.
That’s so deGrom.
by Jason Fry on 2 September 2018 11:46 pm Somewhere around the midpoint of today’s Mets-Giants game, I was asked what’s been wrong with Noah Syndergaard this year.
I wasn’t sure what to say. After all, there Noah was, throwing 99 MPH fastballs and 92 MPH sliders. There he was pushing for his 10th win pitching for a terrible team, and mowing down Giant after Giant.
And yet it wasn’t a crazy question. We saw him labor against the Cubs, and we’ve all had the sense that somehow, Noah is less than he’s been. Not so long ago he looked destined to redefine what a classic power pitcher looked like, taking the classic arsenal and amping up its numbers, then combining it with tactical brilliance and that certain meanness that every ace needs.What happened instead was that he got hurt, first seriously and then naggingly. And the Syndergaard who returned seemed to be missing that tantalizing something.
My answer, arrived at fumblingly, was that Syndergaard was mostly dealing with messy mechanics because he’d been denied the long strings of regular, uninterrupted starts a pitcher needs for consistency and confidence. But I added that I also thought Syndergaard had come down with a touch of Ron Darling Syndrome, complicating his approach in a way that was a credit to his intellect but might work against his raw talent. To oversimplify a bit, in learning more about pitching, Syndergaard might have neglected throwing.
I was neither satisfied with that answer nor particularly confident in it. Maybe that’s right. Maybe that’s sort of right. Or maybe it’s dead wrong, and Syndergaard’s only real problem is our outsized expectations bumping into the ebb and flow of a career.
Whatever the case, there was nothing lacking on Sunday against the Giants. Syndergaard allowed just two hits, walked one and was scratched for a lone run in posting his first career complete game, which he ended with an exclamation point by fanning Evan Longoria on a 99 MPH sinker.
The series against the Giants was an example of how I can be horrified by the way the Mets are run and yet agree with the refusal to tear down the team. Jacob deGrom would be a deserving Cy Young winner, Zack Wheeler has taken a big leap forward as a pitcher, Steven Matz has had an up-and-down season but one with some superb stretches, and we’ve covered Syndergaard. Four starters of that quality is a superb hand, and what other teams are desperate to develop; if you have them, you’re thinking about how to finish the deal, regardless of what other misfortunes you’ve endured or inflicted upon yourself.
The Mets might have had more runs on Sunday if not for the heroics of Giants shortstop Alen Hanson; they might have sweated the outcome a lot more if not for the heroics of Jeff McNeil, whose two-run single gave Syndergaard a three-run lead in the eighth.
McNeil can hit — that’s obvious. But what I particularly appreciate about him is his growth as a fielder. When he arrived in New York (about a month after he deserved a call-up), he looked barely adequate at second base, with the pivot making you want to cover your eyes. But McNeil has worked his butt off, and looks much improved. Hopefully the Mets are noticing that, and deciding it deserves to be rewarded, instead of setting up yet another promising young player for the horrors of the Full Conforto.
* * *
DeGrom and Alex Wood face off Monday night, but don’t forget the Brooklyn Cyclones’ regular-season finale. The Cyclones are half a game out of the New York-Penn League’s wild card, trailing the Auburn Doubledays, with the Staten Island Yankees right behind them. To go to the playoffs, Brooklyn needs to beat the Yankees and have Auburn lose — which is what happened today. If you’re so inclined, listen here.
by Greg Prince on 1 September 2018 8:15 pm It’s September 1, 2018. The Mets entered the month 59-75, 15 games removed from any stratum of playoff action. The kind of context that gives September its juice eludes us. We have an individual honor to root for where Jacob deGrom is concerned. We have an unfortunate soap opera to sort out where David Wright is concerned (such a drama queen, that one). We have the usual minutiae to mark down given the expansion of the roster. As soon as we see the newly promoted Eric Hanhold make a pitch, some of us will channel our inner Homer Simpsons and emit a WOO-HOO! because it will give us 55 Mets in one season, a record. Anybody else who shows up, we’ll mark them present, too.
But mostly it’s a September when an eleven-inning, 2-1 victory steered by Steven Matz for the first seven (eleven strikeouts) and brought home on a combination of strong relief (Lugo, Blevins, Gsellman), enough offense (Nido, Flores, Frazier) and a touch of glove (Nimmo) is…fine. Now we’re 60-75. We pick up a half-game on the road to nowhere.
We’ll take what we can get, and if a win is what we can get on a sunny Saturday afternoon in San Francisco, we’ll raise a thumb in its honor and anticipate Sunday afternoon’s ballgame. We have only so many of those left.
It’s September 1. It should have more to it than this. It should have stakes. It should have tension. It should have hope, or at least the illusion thereof. It should have a pennant race or playoff chase or whatever one wants to call it in the Wild Card age. September 1 should loom as the launching pad to a grand climax. Instead it’s the continuation of an extended denouement, except with a couple of more players lingering on the bench and in the bullpen.
But it hasn’t always been that way. Sometimes our team enters September with stakes and tension and hope and no less than a conceivable shot at October, which is what it’s all about. I mean, yeah, it’s about green grass and blue skies and family and friends and all that…but that’s subtext. The story of choice in a given year is winning enough so that you get to this point and you think you’ll win it all.
We’ve been there. We haven’t always won it all. Sometimes we haven’t won very much from this moment forward, but we made it through five months with the promise of a sixth that might lead us to a seventh, and if you’re playing when most of the rest of baseball has gone home, then you know you’ve had a helluva season.
This year, “hell” and “season” have gone together chummily and fiendishly. Other years, the words pair very differently, as in we’re having a helluva season. I count 23 of them where we’ve said that with some degree of sincerity and accuracy when August is done, 23 years when we arrived at September 1 dreaming big and thinking deep. When we get one of those, we are Mets fans first, whatever else in the background. There’s nothing like one of those Septembers.
This is nothing like one of those Septembers.
As a reminder of how it works when it is, I decided to try to remember those other Septembers. The Firsts of those Septembers, at any rate, when life was neither slow nor oh so mellow. Join me as we tour the subconscious of Mets fandom when September comes in like a lion and we’re ready to roar.
It’s September 1, 1969.
Having split a doubleheader at Candlestick, the Mets enter the month 76-54, already with more wins than they’ve ever had in any one season.
After all these years, our Mets really are Amazin’.
Tom Seaver just notched No. 19, tying Jerry Koosman’s mark from last year.
Cleon Jones is batting .351, for goodness sake.
We trailed the Cubs by 9½ less than three weeks ago and now the deficit is down to four.
We’re a little more than a week from Chicago coming into Shea.
Anything is possible, right?
I swear I don’t know how Gil Hodges has done it, but he seems to be doing something.
It’s September 1, 1970.
After sticking it to the Cardinals in St. Louis, the Mets are 68-64 and in a real dogfight, in third place, but only a game-and-a-half behind the Pirates and a half-game behind the Cubs.
Seaver’s lost a few in a row, but he still has 17 wins, seems a lock for 20 and another Cy Young.
Sure wish we were hitting more, though.
Agee’s at .291 and Shamsky’s flirting with .300, but Cleon is more than 70 points off his final average from last year.
Ah, last year.
Tough act to follow, but we are closer to first this September 1 than we were last September 1.
It’s September 1, 1973.
I can’t believe I’m saying this, but I don’t think we’re out of it.
It was a horrible summer, but as Labor Day approaches, look at us, only 5½ back — and nine under, at 62-71 — but out of last place.
Fifth place doesn’t look so bad when everybody is bundled together like this.
Look, we just beat the first-place Cards.
McGraw, who’s mostly sucked, got the win with four innings of relief.
His ERA is still over five, but relief pitchers’ ERAs don’t necessarily mean anything.
The other important thing is we seem to have a healthy, representative starting lineup.
I’m telling you, this division is there for the taking.
It’s gotta be.
It’s September 1, 1975.
We’re hanging in there.
Lost the last two in L.A., but still: 71-64, a manageable five games back of Pittsburgh, only one behind Philly and St. Louis.
Speaking of managing, Roy McMillan’s making a difference, isn’t he?
Nobody wanted to see Yogi go, but it was time for a change.
Gotta love the change brought by Mike Vail.
Roy stuck him in left and Mike’s responded by batting .381, including his last seven games in a row.
See what happens when you play the kids?
Well, one of the kids.
Rusty’s no kid, but he’s driving in runs like crazy.
Felix is no kid, but he’s out there every day.
Seaver, who’s also no kid, goes for No. 20 tomorrow at Shea versus the Buccos
He has a chance to strike out his 200th, too, for the eighth year in a row.
We have a chance to make up ground in this series.
1969…1973…1975? Why not?
It’s September 1, 1981.
The strike was terrible, costing us something like 60 games when all is said and done, but you can’t complain about the aftermath.
Instead of being buried below four teams and barely fending off the Cubs for last, look at us now: a full-fledged second-season contender.
What else do you call being 2½ out entering September, tied with the Cubs of all teams for third, behind only first-place St. Louis and second-place Montreal.
It’s up for grabs.
We’ve won 11 of 21 since they started playing again and there’s no reason Joe Torre can’t figure out a way to get us even more momentum.
It won’t take much more.
Sure wish Ellis Valentine would get it going and that Pat Zachry could find some consistency (and that Lee Mazzilli would finally get off the schneid; what happened to him?), but Hubie Brooks is batting over .300 and Mookie Wilson isn’t far off.
It’s anybody’s ballgame.
Might as well be ours.
It’s September 1, 1984.
I haven’t given up hope yet.
Admittedly it looked much better a month ago, before we made a habit of losing to the Cubs, but even taking that sweep at Wrigley into account, we’re within reach, just 5½ back at 74-59.
Obviously this is the best we’ve been in a very long time.
We can get better.
We have them in for three in a week and go out to Chicago a week later.
They’re the Cubs.
They haven’t won anything since 1945.
They sure as hell didn’t win in 1969.
I’m kind of counting on form holding where that’s concerned.
I’m also counting on Dr. K, who goes for his 14th in the opener against the Padres today.
Man, that Gooden kid’s been on fire.
They also say Calvin Schiraldi, who Davey Johnson is starting in the nightcap, is supposed to be real good.
Look like we’re going to activate John Stearns, too.
Nobody deserves a real pennant race more than the Dude.
I hope we can start closing the gap here.
What a shame it would be not to win it this year.
Then again, we do seem well positioned for next year no matter what.
It’s September 1, 1985.
This has got to be the moment this franchise’s life has been leading to.
What a year…what a team!
Doc’s basically the greatest pitcher ever, Carter’s taping his knees and holding things together, Keith is slumping but he’s still Keith and Darryl’s gonna keep getting better (he’s only 23, you know) — yet here we are, two games behind the stupid Cardinals.
Twenty-four games above .500 at 76-52, yet we can’t get into first place to stay.
Doc’s winning streak even came to an end.
He’s 20-4, so maybe we’ll overlook yesterday’s loss.
We need everything we can get.
Paciorek’s been a disappointment and Bowa hasn’t done anything.
After the finale of the series in San Francisco, it’s off to San Diego, then Los Angeles, then home for St. Louis.
Gotta keep pushing.
This is our year.
I can feel it.
It’s September 1, 1986.
For the first time, we enter the final month in first place.
The Mets are 87-43 and lead the second-place Phillies by 19.
We have a video (“Let’s Go Mets”).
We have a Magic Number (14).
We have a month to go and it’s a formality.
This, to understate the case, is great.
I could do this every year.
It’s September 1, 1987.
What is it Starship keeps telling us on the stations that aren’t 1050 Sports Radio WFAN?
“It’s not over ’til it’s over.”
How can it be?
We appeared dead in July (10 out at one point), but we’ve kept making up ground.
Then we lose ground.
But we ain’t dead yet, not at 74-57 and the Cards only 5½ ahead.
This last West Coast trip is off to a good start and, before you know it, we’ll have the Redbirds in our sights at Shea.
We’ll have our pitching intact, we’ll have momentum…you’re gonna count us out after what we did last October?
I don’t think so.
It’s September 1, 1988.
Have we shaken off the Pirates for good yet?
They gave us all we wanted (not that we wanted it), but it appears they’re chasing only our dust.
Even with yesterday’s loss to the Padres, we seem to have this thing in good stead: 78-54, a 7½ game lead and, oh look, a whole new weapon in Gregg Jefferies, who’s batting .429.
Mookie’s been tearing it up since Los Angeles, Darryl’s gotta be the MVP and we’re gonna have some playoffs again.
I missed those.
It’s September 1, 1989.
Quite the scramble in the East, huh?
We’re tied for second with the Cardinals, 2½ in back of the Cubs, with the Expos, for whom Mark Langston maybe wasn’t the big differencemaker, only three out.
I wish I felt more confident, but I have the sense we made our big move in August, not just getting Viola but then edging to within a game-and-a-half of first.
Then Don Aase gives up that home run to Willie Randolph two Sundays ago at Shea and shades of Terry Pendleton and Mike Scioscia began to descend.
Still, we swept the Dodgers on the Coast (revenge!) and we’re part of the race, so you never know.
Plus Doc might be coming back at some point.
It’s September 1, 1990.
We’ve reloaded for the home stretch, picking up Tommy Herr, Charlie O’Brien and, for when the bases are loaded, Pat Tabler.
Plus we’ve called up Julio Valera to take the Saturday start against the Giants (sorry, Ron).
Honestly, I thought we would have pulled away by now, considering how Buddy Harrelson lit a fire under this bunch in June.
Instead we’re sitting here tangled up with the Pirates, 74-53, a half-game back.
Losing Kevin Elster was a bigger deal than I imagined.
So, in retrospect, was never fully replacing Gary Carter.
Magadan’s done the job succeeding Keith, though, and a rotation of Gooden, Viola and Cone oughta be unbeatable in September.
Oughta be.
We’ll see, I guess.
It’s September 1, 1997.
Maybe I’m nuts, but I think we still have a chance.
Granted, seven games out with 27 to go is asking a lot, but I’m keying in on those four in Miami the second-to-last weekend on the schedule.
The Marlins won’t pull away with the Wild Card and I figure the Giants and Dodgers will beat each other up in the meantime, clearing the way for us to make a charge.
After taking three of four, including those last two in Baltimore, I’m not surrendering yet by any means, but I will concede being en route to our first winning record in seven years — 73-62 as we speak — is its own reward.
I had no idea Bobby Valentine was this much of a genius, but anybody who could weave so many spare parts into a fairly legitimate contender deserves the title.
I don’t know if we deserve the Wild Card.
That you have to earn (geez, I sound like Fran Healy).
That’s what September is for for us for a change.
Beats the hell out of what September’s been like at Shea most years of late.
It’s September 1, 1998.
Some days I can barely breathe from this Wild Card race.
Where are we now?
After beating the Dodgers last night (Reeder with his 16th), we are tied with the Cubs for the Wild Card, both of us 76-52, the Giants two back.
Don’t mind me speaking in the first-person plural.
This has been the kind of season to take very personally.
On one hand, Leiter’s been amazing, Olerud is hitting like he did for Toronto and Mike…Mike seems to have calmed down.
He can breathe.
On the other hand, Bobby V has to do a lot of mixing and matching.
Lenny Harris.
Butch Huskey.
Tony Phillips.
It’s like the NBA used to have with foul shots: three to make two.
I love Fonzie, but he’s not quite what he was last year.
I tolerate Franco, but geez, he does not contribute to relaxed breathing.
Nevertheless, deep breaths are in order.
We’ve got a month to get back to the playoffs for the first time in a decade.
We can do this.
It’s September 1, 1999.
I’m having the time of my life, I’m pretty sure.
True, my life would be better without the Braves in it, but other than them, it’s been as dreamy a season any this side of 1986.
More like 1985, I suppose.
The ups, the down.
Lots of them.
Hard to believe they were ready to fire Valentine.
Hard to believe we kind of came back to earth a little after that 40-15 surge he promised and delivered.
Here we are, entering this final presumably crazy month of this already certified crazy year 80-53, 3½ behind goddamn Atlanta, but three up on the Wild Card field.
This infield doesn’t make errors.
Ventura’s like an MVP.
So is Mike.
Hell, Fonzie went 6-for-6 the other night at the Astrodome.
The starting pitching could use a little length (good thing we picked up Kenny Rogers), but the bullpen is solid.
I think we’re gonna do it this year.
Not sure what “it” is yet, but we’re gonna do something.
It’s September 1, 2000.
I don’t want to alarm anybody, but we are in first place.
The first-place New York Mets, 79-54, leading not just the hated Braves (albeit by a half-game), but everybody in baseball.
Well, we’re tied with the White Sox for best record in the sport, but never mind them.
We went 20-9 in August.
Mike made the cover of SI, and I’m not even nervous about that.
Benny threw a ball into the crowd — a live ball — and we won anyway.
Hampton’s come around, Bordick’s been a pro, Rick White’s enhancing the relief corps.
I’m almost too calm about how well things are going for us.
But also very excited.
It’s September 1, 2001.
All right, I know.
It’s a long shot.
Of course it’s a long shot.
We’ve spent practically the entire season under .500, looking dreadful for massive swaths of it.
But so did the 1973 Mets.
Blasphemous?
Possibly, but consider this.
Even though we’re 64-71, we’re hot.
We’ve won 10 of 13 and we’ve whittled the divisional lead to single digits.
The Wild Card may be out of reach (go figure), but do either the Braves or Phillies look like worldbeaters to you?
We have three at the Vet after we finish these two with the Marlins at Shea and six — SIX! — versus the Braves later in the month.
I understand the odds, but what if it is 1973 again?
I gave up repeatedly from April until the middle of August.
Why give up now?
It’s September 1, 2005.
This is a real “why not us?” moment, don’tcha think?
The Wild Card is as up for grabs as in any year we’ve been one of the teams doing the grabbing.
Being 69-63 is good for fourth place in this little playoff derby, but it puts us only 1½ in back of the Phillies.
The Astros and Marlins have the nerve to insinuate themselves between us and them (with the Nationals hanging a half-game behind us), but it’s all there for us if we win this afternoon.
It would have been far better had Pedro not been off his game last night, thus depleting the momentum Ramon Castro provided us the night before — and it would have been fantastic had we simply kept playing at Arizona, where we swept four and combined to beat the Diamondbacks, 32-5, in two of them — but Willie Randolph has us in it, and that’s all we can ask for.
Whatever happens, it’ll be good experience for the kids.
Wright, Reyes, Jacobs, Diaz, welcome to the pennant race.
It’s September 1, 2006.
We’re 82-50, 15½ up on the Phillies, a Magic Number of 15.
We’ve got Beltran posting MVP-type numbers, Reyes running wild and Lo Duca making us if not forget then not miss Mike Piazza.
We could probably use a little more pitching depth, but when isn’t that true?
Otherwise, we have few worries.
Helluva year to this point.
Can’t wait to see what awaits several weeks from now.
I don’t want to get too ahead of myself, but what a 20th anniversary present for 1986.
It’s September 1, 2007.
I’d like to think we’ve taken the most resounding punch the Phillies can give us and we’re still on our feet.
That four-game sweep at Citizens Bank this week was brutal, but look at the bright side.
We remain in first place, two games up on them.
If we were really teetering, we’d be ready to fall into a tie with them ASAP.
Instead, we won last night in Atlanta, plus we’ve got Pedro coming back when we get to Cincinnati on Monday.
We’re 75-60.
It’s not quite as up there as maybe we projected when were running away with this thing three months ago (when we were 33-17), but how many years do you get to run and hide from your division?
I haven’t even looked at that the Wild Card standings in case the unthinkable happens and I’m not going to.
Think positive thoughts.
It’s September 1, 2008.
In between my bouts of melancholy over the impending closing of Shea Stadium, I am allowing myself to enjoy our unusual first-place standing — 76-61, a game ahead of Philadelphia — without rancor or remorse.
How can I stay mad at the Mets for tearing down my ballpark when I’ve got Santana rounding into Cy Young form and Delgado slugging like crazy since late June, roughly around the time Jerry Manuel took over.?
How about Beltran with that grand slam to beat the Marlins last night?
As ever, there’s a few too many injuries nibbling away at the roster, but Murphy and Evans have filled in nicely and no doubt reinforcements are on their way.
I don’t know much about Jonathon Niese (that’s how he spells it), but he’ll start in Milwaukee and maybe he’ll help.
We miss Maine and Wagner, but then again, I already miss Shea.
Sure would love to send it out in style.
It’s September 1, 2015.
It’s not like us to buy in to the Mets being good, but they’re getting to the point of no return.
Or no returns, if you like the retail metaphor.
I understand how they let us down in their most recent playoff chases, but this isn’t one of those teams.
These are the Yoenis Cespedes-injected Mets, 73-58 at the moment, 21-11 since we found out he’d be donning one of our uniforms.
That’s what I’d call an impact player.
I’d also call the 6½-game lead over Washington sturdy.
Anything can happen, of course.
Usually that implies anything bad, but I don’t believe that’s gonna be the case the rest of the way.
We slew a few ghosts at Citizens Bank this week, sweeping both the 2015 Phillies and the specter of 2007.
At the risk of riling up the gods, the Nats don’t seem that great and we…we seem pretty darn good.
Not just Cespedes, but the rest of us.
I’m ready to creep out on that limb and suggest not even Terry Collins making weird calls to the bullpen will knock us from our perch.
Well, maybe I should wait until the three-game series in DC to speak in certainties.
But I’m feeling good.
Feeling better, for sure, than I have in a very long time where this team is concerned.
It’s September 1, 2016.
I’m as surprised as you are that we’re here, in the thick of the Wild Card race, a game-and-a-half back of St. Louis for the second ticket to potential paradise.
San Francisco’s two ahead of them, and we’ve still got the Pirates and Marlins nipping at our heels, but considering where we were a veritable blink ago — 60-62 and barely hanging on — I’ll take it.
After winning nine of eleven (two better than Jeri Ryan territory), our record is a very respectable 69-64, and in the age of double Wild Cards, very respectable can get it done.
Besides, we took two of three at Busch after the winning the last two in San Fran.
Could it be we’re actually the best of the middling lot?
Again, that’s all it takes sometimes.
We’ve stopped sucking.
Cespedes has resumed slugging, as witnessed by his walkoff homer over the Marlins the other night.
I had my doubts about Reyes, but he’s been a decent third baseman.
Cabrera’s been a godsend.
Actually, we’re getting by on a lot of godsends.
Two Riveras I’d never heard of before.
James Loney.
Justin Ruggiano, though I guess he’s out for the season now.
And who the hell is Robert Gsellman?
Just keep giving Terry pieces.
He’ll make ’em fit and maybe we’ll make it back to October after all.
by Jason Fry on 1 September 2018 3:18 am Let’s be clear about one thing after a day where clarity was sadly lacking: Zack Wheeler was wonderful.
Wheeler’s blossoming is one of the unalloyed positives to come out of this weirdly bitter Mets season: Wheeler seems to have shaken off injuries and rust and youth to become the top-flight starter we’d imagined since he arrived. He was dominant, electric, downright deGromian in throttling the Giants: four hits and no walks over seven innings, with nine punchouts.
Unfortunately Wheeler was also deGromian in being abandoned by teammates paid to do something with a stick in their hands. Andrew Suarez, a rookie lefty (two words that make sawdust of Met bats) was pretty darn good himself, and the Mets squandered the few opportunities they had. With runners on first and third in the seventh, Jay Bruce tapped into a double play to keep the game scoreless; with the Mets down one in the eighth and Brandon Nimmo on second, Jose Reyes fanned and Michael Conforto grounded out. Then a whole lot of Met relievers arrived to get not a lot of outs, and the ballgame went down the toilet in a hurry.
Points to Giants rookie catcher Aramis Garcia, child of Met fans, whose first big-league hit was a homer into the left-field stands and whose second big-league hit came in the same inning. I’m too inept to dare try looking it up, but there have to be a lot of major leaguers who retire never having had two hits in the same inning, and Garcia checked that one off on his first night. Another oddity: the game-winning RBI, to use a stat that makes “pitcher win” seem like bWAR, went to another brand-new Giant, Chris Shaw, whose first hit still lies in his future.
Unfortunately, off-field news once again proved the larger story, as David Wright rejoined the Mets to continue his rehab but then received a muddled message from whatever passes for an authority figure these days. It started with word that Wright had medical clearance to play in the minors but not the majors, which was baffling to all involved, and then morphed into the front office wanting to see certain things from Wright before activating him to finally play big-league ball again.
So what are those things? We never really found out. Wright wasn’t specific, perhaps by choice or perhaps because he had no specifics to give. And while I’m not a psychologist, his demeanor when questioned by beat reporters was … well, let’s call it “odd.” A little stunned, perhaps; maybe a little pissed. Wright reiterated that he intends to play this month, and talked about determination and motivation, but it sure didn’t sound like a plan that everybody understood.
Maybe I’m being paranoid. I really, really, really hope so. But something’s wrong here, and the oh-so-Metsian question is what.
What’s not in question is the Mets are back to the only thing in which they reliably lead the league: namely, fucking up.
The positive interpretation of today’s mini-drama is that communications were mishandled between the brass and Wright and the brass and the media. Wright was told something, and instead of having a point person, everyone was left to interpret it, starting with Wright himself. There was no general manager to address the media because there is no general manger; instead, various heads attached to the three-headed chimera that isn’t a GM were heard from secondhand. Needless to say the Wilpons remained silent, unseen and unaccountable as is their wont. The closest thing to an authority figure in the whole mess was Mickey Callaway, who may or may not have known what he was talking about and whose pronouncements just made things worse.
David Wright working towards returning should be an inspiring story for a team and fanbase that could sure use one. But the Mets have managed to turn it into something weird and confusing, botching yet another one-car funeral.
And again, that’s the positive interpretation.
The negative interpretation … well, it’s easy to describe, because it’s scarily plausible. It would have something to do with insurance money and how much of it the Mets would forego this year and next year if Wright plays; who makes the decision that Wright is ready to play or not; and whose best interests that person (or persons, or lack of an actual person) has in mind. Wright said that issue hasn’t come up in his discussions with the club, but that only made me wonder if the team was blindsided by the possibility that Wright might actually return and now doesn’t know what to do.
It goes without saying that if that’s what’s going on, it will be the kind of back-page nightmare that terrifies the Wilpons and — as has happened to innumerable clay-footed despots in fairy tales — inevitably comes to pass because of that fear and its hold over them. A PR nightmare like that is the last thing the Wilpons need, this fanbase needs, and Wright needs — and two out of three of us don’t deserve it.
But let’s admit it: wouldn’t a triumphant return turned curdled and grudging be a fitting ending for this sour, off-kilter season?
by Greg Prince on 29 August 2018 11:20 pm Pending makeup dates instigated by rain, an atmospheric condition that seems to follow the Mets all about the continent, Wednesday brought us the final weekday afternoon game of the season. Yes, we’re actually at that point of the schedule when lasts are taking their final at-bats. Last day baseball infiltrates the traditional workweek. Last visit to Wrigley Field. Last interaction with the National League Central.
First time, though, for a sentence of this nature: Hardy veterans Jason Vargas and Todd Frazier led the Mets to a resounding victory over a first-place team.
See? As long as baseball is being played, it’s never too late for a few miracles.
Go figure these Mets. Led by Frazier, they put ten on the board in support of Vargas and various bullpen successors, yet couldn’t score two freaking runs for Jacob deGrom — or anybody who pitched in his wake — and went down to a 2-1 defeat when the game suspended Tuesday night resumed play Wednesday afternoon. Hard to blame the eleventh-inning defeat on the Mets’ impotent lumber, however, when it was Paul Sewald who all but literally threw away the game.
Paul, who seems like a nice enough kid, is 0-11 in the big leagues, all of it in service to torpedoing already dim Met prospects these past two miserable years. That’s not what you’d call a promising launch to a career. Sewald entered the potentially endless 1-1 affair in the eleventh, walking Javy Baez to get his feet overly wet. Victor Caratini laid down a bunt. Sewald pounced, grabbed and sailed a throw over first base as if he had chosen to idle his afternoon away on Lake Michigan. If the object was to nail Caratini in right, this might have been the play to make. I don’t think it was. Ah, Paulie, maybe someday it won’t all go to L with you.
It didn’t take long for the ivy-covered walls to come crashing in. An intentional walk was issued. An out was recorded. A pitching change was made. Daniel Zamora entered. Ben Zobrist batted. This was a classic Z-on-Z matchup. Zobrist bested Zamora, singling up the middle (where’s a shift when you need it?) to alphabetically clear away what remained of the night before’s soggy leftovers.
But that wasn’t that for Wednesday. Tuesday night’s game was masquerading as a matinee, the seventh resumption of a suspended contest in Mets’ history and the third loss the Mets have waited an abnormal span of time to absorb (the others occurred well after the blackout in 1977 and under less legendary circumstances in 2013). Fortunately the day-after result didn’t diminish the Mets’ enthusiasm for the real afternoon game at hand. Frazier put it out of reach early with a first-inning grand slam and Vargas kept it out of reach into the sixth. The Cubs seemed to be mailing it in, but we’ll accept delivery of a 10-3 win postmarked WRIGLEY FIELD anytime.
Good to see Wrigley Field in daylight. One didn’t used to have to add the qualifier, but night ball now predominates on the North Side, thus there hasn’t been a Mets at Cubs day game since July 20, 2016, which happened to have been the day of my father’s memorial service, so the date kind of sticks with me. It was also the first time the Mets won at Wrigley since July 19, 2016, the night preceding that particular occasion. I vividly recall the morning of the Twentieth, hurriedly writing up Jeurys Familia’s ninth-inning wizardry (he somehow got himself out of a bases-loaded, nobody-out mess) and then donning a dark suit for the cheery ride out to Pinelawn.
Then, last September, the 2017 Mets dragged their not so lively selves back to Wrigley for three night games in which they were outscored, 39-14, which sounds like one of those random couplings of numbers invoked to exaggerate a series of blowout losses, but no, the Mets were really outscored, 39-14. Not only was it depressing, it was at night. Wrigley at night is splendid when you’re clinching a pennant. An afternoon is preferable if you’re going to wallow well below .500.
And a 10-3 win is most choice of all.
How about these Mets and their usually creaky components operating to factory specs? Vargas is overindexing at last. Frazier is suddenly the biggest ex-Little Leaguer going. Jose Reyes pinch-hit and tripled in two runs, even. Hey, have you noticed Jose Reyes is still a Met? I’m the guy who says that without the snarling or sneering usually associated with Internet communication where No. 7 is concerned, yet I’m as amazed as anybody. Barring unforeseen 40-man machinations — or somebody falling down a steep hill on the off day in San Francisco — Jose appears on the cusp of entering September as one of only four Mets active every darn game of 2018 (joining Robert Gsellman, Seth Lugo and intermittently firing sparkplug Amed Rosario), meaning he’ll probably make it to year’s end with his roster spot intact. I am indeed amazed and quietly contented over this long-term development reaching fruition. God forbid it’s repeated in 2019, but for now, as long as you’re giving me good, old-fashioned day baseball at Wrigley Field, give me a player I rooted particularly hard for tripling like he did when he and the century were young and I wasn’t nearly as old as I am now.
Not pictured in Chicago or any MLB facility just yet: David Wright, but we’ll see. He’s playing in Las Vegas. He’s banging out a few hits. He’s making barehanded scoops and firing accurately to first (Paul Sewald take note). Also, per Marc Carig’s reporting in The Athletic, he needs to commence loosening his back today for a game next week. That’s exaggeration, but apparently not much. I couldn’t tell you if David is physically up for the rigors of major league competition. I couldn’t tell you how fiscally clever it will be of the Mets to keep talking out of whichever side of their mouth in order to preserve whatever they might collect from the insurance company if they can hold Wright back. I can tell you that if David Wright honestly believes he can play, I will believe in him. I’ve been believing in David Wright most of this century, too.
Days are better with ballgames and thoughts of ballplayers you yearn to see compete in them again.
by Jason Fry on 29 August 2018 2:51 am How can you have a recap when you don’t have a final score yet?
When that final score’s yet to be recorded but the show everyone came to see is over. That’s how.
No offense to Seth Lugo, Steve Cishek or whatever Met and Cub relievers follow them when the game resumes, tied 1-1, in the 10th. Maybe reaching a conclusion will take mere minutes. Maybe it will require hours. And — because you never know — perhaps it will be an epic, a spiritual descendant of the night the Mets and Braves played all night and 3 a.m. fireworks left Atlantans worrying that a spectral General Sherman had returned to wreak further havoc.
But the teams will have to work pretty hard to create anything as dramatic or impressive as Jacob deGrom’s Tuesday night performance.
We need to order some more superlatives for the Mets’ ace as his unbelievable season — with that word earned in so many ways — rolls along. DeGrom was his usual dominant self on the mound, hitting 100 MPH in erasing Javy Baez and later all but eviscerating Daniel Murphy in a key spot. He was a wizard with the glove, denying the Cubs a run in the fourth by spearing a Kyle Schwarber grounder and finishing his night by pouncing on an eighth-inning grounder from Victor Caratini to turn a critical double play. And he was the Mets’ MVP at the plate, rolling a perfectly placed little single through the 5.5 hole to score Todd Frazier in the sixth.
Alas, that was the only run the Mets would score. Give some credit to Cole Hamels, who was pretty respectable himself for five innings. Assign some blame to the mean-spirited BABIP gods: Jeff McNeil led off the seventh with a booming triple that the wind downgraded from a home run, then had to perform two hasty reversals off third as first Austin Jackson and then Michael Conforto absolutely smoked line drives off Jorge de la Rosa. Jackson’s drive nearly took Baez’s hand off and Conforto’s slammed into Anthony Rizzo’s glove, leaving the Mets with nothing for their efforts.
That meant deGrom was working with his usual minimal support, and it cost him a chance for a victory in the seventh. Ben Zobrist hit a sharp ground ball under Jay Bruce’s glove, giving the Cubs runners at the corners and the chance to score a run without another hit, which they soon did. It was a play Bruce should have made, but beware the easy narrative: our latest first baseman probably not of the future had made a great diving stop in the bottom of the second, denying Caratini a leadoff double. And other Mets had deGrom’s back, at least when gloves were involved: Brandon Nimmo ran down Murphy’s drive into the right-field corner in the first, and Jackson made a fine running catch in the sixth.
But the line score’s the thing, and it told the same old depressing story: deGrom was fantastic but left with no chance at a win. And when he departed, so did the crackle and zip of an otherwise meaningless game for the Mets. The Mets with deGrom on the hill are a must-see show; the Mets without him are a low-budget snooze. And Mother Nature agreed, washing away any thought that the teams would be able to play a 10th inning.
Honestly, that was the perfect ending, but baseball rules dictate that a more quantitative conclusion be reached. The two teams will do so later today. Here’s hoping the Mets win, of course. But even if they earn their bows, the star of the show will have already left the building.
|
|
