The blog for Mets fans
who like to read

ABOUT US

Greg Prince and Jason Fry
Faith and Fear in Flushing made its debut on Feb. 16, 2005, the brainchild of two longtime friends and lifelong Met fans.

Greg Prince discovered the Mets when he was 6, during the magical summer of 1969. He is a Long Island-based writer, editor and communications consultant. Contact him here.

Jason Fry is a Brooklyn writer whose first memories include his mom leaping up and down cheering for Rusty Staub. Check out his other writing here.

Got something to say? Leave a comment, or email us at faithandfear@gmail.com. (Sorry, but we have no interest in ads, sponsored content or guest posts.)

Need our RSS feed? It's here.

Visit our Facebook page, or drop by the personal pages for Greg and Jason.

Or follow us on Twitter: Here's Greg, and here's Jason.

We Ain't Half-Bad

OK, actually half-bad is exactly what we are. But compared to what we were not so long ago….

It turns out nothing can stop Dillon Gee except thunder, lightning, lunatic gales and cruel but sensible precautions related to long rain delays and surgically repaired labrums. Our favorite advanced-stats conundrum mowed down the Braves for four innings, scratched only by an Alex Gonzalez double, but was denied a chance to go 8-0 because he couldn’t go five innings. (The win, arbitrarily, went to Bobby Parnell.)

I remain fascinated by Gee, who’s a confounding specimen whether you’re an advanced-stats guy or fan who talks intangibles. ESPN New York’s Mark Simon did a nice job digging into Gee’s numbers today, and you can still see the red flags: Going into tonight’s game, his fly ball:home run rate was 16:1, where 10:1 is typical; his xFIP was 3.91, not bad but not matching his otherworldly ERA; and his BABIP was .244, a lot less than the typical .290-to-.310 range.

If any or all of those numbers regress to the mean, Gee won’t look so fantastic, and writers and fans will start intuiting negative things from how he carries himself on the mound, where right now we see positives. I liked Brian Costa’s Wall Street Journal piece on Gee, which came complete with wise quotes from R.A. Dickey and Terry Collins about how nothing fazes him, but I worry such analysis is a variant on a timeless baseball Just So story: If you’re a young pitcher who doesn’t outwardly fret about things, a 7-0 record means you’re cool and mentally tough, but an 0-7 record means you’re bloodless and selfish. This isn’t a shot at Costa, who’s a lively writer with a nose for interesting tales. Rather, it reflects my worry that we’re all hard-wired for this kind of storytelling, for constructing narratives and sniffing out motives to fit whatever facts we think we have. It’s very hard not to do it, even when conclusions may be premature.

But whether Gee is just on a lucky streak or has qualities that will become clearer and more appreciated as we amass more information, he’s a joy to watch and wonder about. (I could have waxed rhapsodic for 400-odd words about whether Manny Acosta is average and unlucky or actually bad, but you’d have lost interest and gone back to watching Canadians behaving deplorably on YouTube.) Gee can throw his change to either edge of the plate, his location is generally terrific (Bill Miller handed out several unwarranted balls to veterans), and he throws harder than you think. He works quickly and unfussily, with the little pause in his windup the only thing about his motion that stands out. The way I’d describe Gee is uncomplicated, which I mean as a compliment: He conducts himself like a man who knows he’s doing something inherently difficult, the outcome of which is out of his control to an aggravating degree, and therefore thinks he should go about it with a minimum of mechanical and emotional fuss and bother.

That’s storytelling again. I don’t know if it’s true, but it seems to fit the facts we have. And I sure want it to be true.

* * *

With the rain falling for a second time, the Mets yielded to Game 7 of the Stanley Cup Finals, then very politely returned a couple of minutes after the Bruins finished dismantling the Canucks. Gee was gone, but D.J. Carrasco, Parnell and K-Rod all pitched beautifully to finish what he’d started, shutting out the Braves on two hits, two rain delays, about 35,000 empty seats, one bobblehead and an excess of lightning. The Mets played a crisp game in the field and on the basepaths, with one Angel Pagan Class of ’09 headscratcher the only real blemish. Daniel Murphy played a beautiful game at third, Jose Reyes was his habitual dangerous self with the bat and in the field, Lucas Duda looked surehanded at first, Jason Bay looked sounder at the plate and all was well — a winning road trip is assured, and the Mets are back at .500 despite all their missing players and payroll.

Which leads us dangerously close to storytelling again. The Mets are getting terrific starting pitching and riding a Beltranesque salary drive by Reyes, and it wouldn’t be much of an oversimplification to stop there. But OK, beyond that they seem a bit like my characterization of Gee: They’re playing unfussy, sound baseball and as a result they’re winning a lot more often than not. Baseball is always fun, but it’s a lot more fun when you begin to trust your team. I was genuinely surprised that the Mets didn’t beat the Pirates on Monday night, not because the Pirates are the Pirates (they’re having a glass happily half-full season just like we are) but because I’d come to expect the Mets to not make mistakes and beat themselves. When they did, I wasn’t angry so much as I was startled.

When your team’s playing like that, you see the familiar ghosts are made of tissue paper and string, and you dismiss apparent portents as mere noise. Frankie Rodriguez came in for the ninth against the heart of the Braves’ order in a non-save situation, which historically has coincided with his attention being a bit fitful. He calmly retired Dan Uggla and Brian McCann on fly balls to Bay, then faced Chipper Jones.

Chipper, in the Mets’ traditional house of horrors.

He struck out, at Turner Field no less. And I realized I hadn’t been worried.

* * *

Some things to note:

  • If you haven’t read  Ted Berg’s meditation on baseball and family, love and loss, . It’s amazingly good.
  • Tonight at 7 p.m., Greg and Howard Megdal will read from the late Dana Brand’s books at the Tappan Library in Rockland County. I can’t make it, but I hope a lot of you can. More details here. And if you’re up and about this morning at 7:35 a.m., check out Greg on WKNY, 1490 on the AM dial in the Kingston area.
  • Mets fan Roger Hess is currently climbing Denali in Alaska to raise funds for the Tug McGraw Foundation to help battle brain cancer in honor of his friend and fellow Mets fan David, in the midst of his own battle with that insidious disease. Read their story here and, if you can, please give what you can here.

Reading for Dana

In the wake of Dana Brand’s passing, Howard Megdal had a fine idea. He noticed Dana had a date scheduled well in advance to read from his books Mets Fan and The Last Days of Shea at the Tappan Library in Rockland County, not far from where Howard lives. Wouldn’t it be something, Howard suggested, to keep the date? Wouldn’t it be something to go and read for Dana? Sounded like something plenty good. He asked me to join him, and I said yes. Like Howard, I couldn’t be more humbled at the prospect.

The date is tomorrow night, Thursday June 16, 7 o’clock ’til 9. Howard and I will read what Dana wrote, discuss as best we can why Dana wrote and, hopefully, meet some Mets fans and fans of Dana’s. If we can introduce anybody unfamiliar with either to both, all the better. (And don’t worry: all action from Atlanta will be subtly and respectfully monitored.)

If you’re in the vicinity of 93 Main Street in Tappan, we hope you can join us. (Also keep in mind the date of July 16 for the celebration of the life of Dana Brand at Shea Stadium/Citi Field; details here.)

Speaking of authors of Mets books worth delving into, check out Howard’s latest, Taking the Field: A Fan’s Quest to Run the Team He Loves.  It’s an engaging trip through the mind of the would-be general manager of the New York Mets, and a worthy addition to your baseball library.

Oh, and I think you might hear me on WKNY, 1490 on your AM dial in the Kingston area, Thursday morning at 7:35, though when I checked them out during drive time Wednesday morning, they were playing “Faithfully” by Journey. Hmm, maybe that was a plug for Faith and Fear. Anyway, you can listen in here.

The Promise Keepers: Reyes & Carter

I’m pretty sure Jose Reyes gave me a Metgasm Tuesday night.

It was in the top of the sixth when, with Ruben Tejada on second, Jair Jurrjens threw his 2-1 pitch high and tight at Jose, pushing our Met of Mets off the plate. Since they had obviously just waxed the dirt at Turner Field, Jose stumbled sideways and fell down. I wouldn’t call it a knockdown pitch, but it did knock down Jose.

Jose Reyes gets knocked down, he gets up again. Jair Jurrjens is never gonna keep him down.

Next pitch, Jose Reyes did what absolute stud superstar baseball players do. He knocked the ball into center field to drive home Tejada. Drove himself to second on the throw while he was at it, punctuating this incredibly exhilarating two-pitch sequence of events with that claw thing Mets do when they do something like Reyes does…which is to say when they do something great.

I thought it was great. I thought it was outstanding. Actually, I didn’t think so much as emote. It just blurted out of me, with no one around to hear it but the cats, when I considered how Reyes got mad and got even all in one swing:

“OH MY GOD! OH MY GOD! OH MY GOD!

That, I believe, was my Metgasm. I don’t remember the last time I had one quite like it. I wasn’t just excited. I was, shall we say, satisfied. If it wasn’t only the sixth inning, I would have rolled over and fallen peacefully asleep.

Of course it was the sixth inning and it was Turner Field, where the Mets rarely send the Braves gently into that good night, not even when Jose Reyes the human verb — all action — is punctuating and clawing and hitting and running and, per Charlie Sheen (or, more topically and less disturbingly, Jon Niese), winning. The Mets were winning 4-1 after Jose’s random act of vengeance. It felt like they were winning 14-1. That’s always a little dangerous, particularly at Turner Field. When your scoreboard total doesn’t match the one in your head, you are subject to creeping terrors.

Or Chipper Jones. Whichever bats first.

I’m relieved to report that Tim Byrdak relieved with Reyes-like brilliance and Carlos Beltran defended with Reyes-like élan and Frankie Rodriguez closed with a Reyes-like exclamation point and the Mets followed their leader into victory, slipping here and there, but overall maintaining their balance straight into third place.

Other Mets had roles to play in this prime-time edition of The Jose Reyes and Friends! Hour, but Jose was clearly the star of this show. Jose is clearly the star of almost every show this cast puts on. He’s been the star of this season, the star of this franchise. He is, as that football coach once said about an opponent, who we thought he was.

And isn’t that something? Jose Reyes is who we thought he was, who we thought he was going to be, who we were told he was going to be…who we were, in a manner of speaking, promised he was going to be. Jose Reyes was this organization’s top prospect close to a decade ago and now he’s this team’s top player. Not just this week or this month, but this generation. Sometimes in tandem with David Wright, but right now, due to circumstances beyond his hobbled teammate’s control, totally singular in his spectacularity.

The Mets tell us about lots of prospects. That’s what ballclubs do. Most of them don’t amount to anything amazing. A handful succeed. One, in all these years, has turned into exactly what we could have dreamed. And we’re watching him lead off every night. We’re watching him go 3-for-5 or something like it as a matter of course. We’re watching him double and triple and occasionally homer and frequently steal and be the Jose Reyes they told us he’d be in 2003, the Jose Reyes he indicated he’d be in 2005, the Jose Reyes he was for the bulk of 2006 and 2007, except more polished, more mature, more skilled, more knowing…more everything, except injured.

More money, too, but I’m trying not to think about that. It’s not something I want to emote over. It’s something I prefer to believe will somehow get done. Get Einhorn officially on board, let him play a few rounds of high-stakes poker, let him rake in a pot of Reyes chips and let’s stop kidding ourselves that the Mets will be the Mets in 2012 and beyond without their all-time leadoff hitter and — it took me a long time to come around on this — all-time shortstop (sorry Buddy).

Jose’s done his job. Jose’s kept his promise. Jose’s kept the Mets’ promise. He has arrived at a level where no born & bred Met position player has ever landed. Edgardo Alfonzo, whom I loved and will always love, simply didn’t have Reyes’s ceiling. Darryl Strawberry, of whom I was quite fond, could bundle his assets into a thriving portfolio, yet never quite shook his liabilities. David Wright…still wonderful, just different. You can imagine finding another player (if not person) like David Wright. It wouldn’t be easy and it wouldn’t be cheap and it would be a miserable task by any means, but you could probably substitute if absolutely needed (stressing that you shouldn’t want to).

Where ya gonna find another Jose Reyes? Where have the Mets ever found another Jose Reyes? Jose Reyes was Jose Reyes when he came up and grew to become an ever more phenomenal version of himself. There was a detour or two along the way, but he was always Jose Reyes, and it worked. That never happens.

Well, it may have happened once before in terms of a Met position player being who he was supposed to be. I’m thinking of Gary Carter. Not homegrown, certainly not fleet afoot, but he, like Jose, lived up to his promise. The Mets traded for Gary Carter, high-priced, highly accomplished veteran, implicitly promising he was going to be the difference-maker. Hell, Carter explicitly promised he was going to be the difference-maker. Got up at his press conference, showed off his right ring finger, said he was leaving it unadorned for the World Series ring he was going to put on it.

As a Met. And he did it.

Quick, what other Met position player ever did that? Donn Clendenon was a difference-maker, but as one of 25 more or less co-equal pieces, and nobody seriously viewed the Mets as one player away from where they eventually went; plus Clendenon wasn’t an All-Star, let alone a future Hall of Famer. Keith Hernandez was a huge difference-maker, but he was brought on board at a different stage of the team’s development (and didn’t exactly embrace his arrival). Rusty Staub was a force, but not that kind of force precisely. Mike Piazza — everything but the ring…not his fault they didn’t get one, but they didn’t. You can say the same of Carlos Beltran and, for that matter, Carlos Delgado. George Foster was a bust. Bobby Bonilla was woefully miscast, to put it kindly. Robbie Alomar was a disaster. Jason Bay…yeah, right. The Mets have groped about for saviors and leaders and superstars and guys who were going to put them over the top from the outside, but only one, in terms of stature and impact and determination, really took on the task and delivered. That was Gary Carter.

With Carter on our minds for all the wrong reasons of late, it’s occurred to me he and Reyes have quite a bit in common. They were both recognized for their world-class smiles. They were both criticized for their world-class smiles. Gary Carter’s ebullience was a red cape to National League teams in 1985 and 1986. Think Kid cared? Did he ever stop pumping his fist or raising his arm or slapping the palms of his teammates high in the air? Did Carter let up for one minute as he raised the Mets’ game? And remember how Reyes was supposedly too happy, too joyous, too expressive for his own good?

The “Bad Guys” reputation that developed over the years notwithstanding, the 1986 Mets were, in real time, viewed widely as Gary Carter’s team. He was Mr. Outside to Keith’s Mr. Inside. If Keith ran the clubhouse like a capo (at least in the mythology of the day), Gary put a respectable face on the operation. Ivory Soap, Newsday, Northville Gasoline…he was everywhere. He was the biggest star in the Met galaxy, which is saying something considering the presence of Mex and Doc and Straw. But it wasn’t just commercials or image. Gary Carter gave you an extra, much-needed layer of faith in the Mets when he came over in ’85. He was the security blanket. Gary Carter is up this inning. How can we not score?

Jose Reyes may not have been marketed (or hasn’t marketed himself) to within an inch of his life, but the Mets are his team now. It’s a good fit. When you see the Mets coming, you see Jose. When you watch them from this angle, as a Mets fan, in whom do you trust? Who soothes our inner Linus the way Jose does? Jose Reyes is up this inning. How can we not score? He doesn’t lead as talented a club as Carter did, but imagine, if you dare, how much less talented, less soothing, less interesting it would be without Jose.

I don’t want to imagine that. Let somebody who can do something about it do that, and then act appropriately. Let me just watch and enjoy and take pleasure in what we’ve got and, boy do I hope, what we will continue to have.

Mets fan Roger Hess is currently climbing Denali in Alaska to raise funds for the Tug McGraw Foundation to help battle brain cancer in honor of his friend and fellow Mets fan David, in the midst of his own battle with that insidious disease. Read their story here and, if you can, please give what you can here.

The Happiest Recap: 061-063

Welcome to The Happiest Recap, a solid gold slate of New York Mets games culled from every schedule the Mets have ever played en route to this, their fiftieth year in baseball. We’ve created a dream season consisting of the “best” 61st game in any Mets season, the “best” 62nd game in any Mets season, the “best” 63rd game in any Mets season…and we keep going from there until we have a completed schedule worthy of Bob Murphy coming back with the Happy Recap after this word from our sponsor on the WFAN Mets Radio Network.

GAME 061: June 14, 1965 — Mets 1 REDS 0 (11)
(Mets All-Time Game 061 Record: 21-28; Mets 1965 Record: 21-39-1)

There was rarely a penalty for any pitcher deciding to pitch the game of his life versus the New York Mets in their first four years. Ask Jim Bunning, whose 1964 perfect game at Shea Stadium raised his profile so high that it probably edged him into the Hall of Fame and maybe Congress. Ask Sandy Koufax, who would pitch plenty of his games of his life before he was done but chose the 1962 Mets for his first no-hitter. Ask most every ace moundsman nine National League staffs sent to face the basement babies throughout ’62, ’63, ’64 and well into ’65.

But don’t ask Jim Maloney. He didn’t get to take full advantage of excelling against the Mets, not on this Monday night at Crosley Field. But, oh, did he excel, and oh, was he taking advantage of the generally easily duped Mets.

From striking out Billy Cowan to lead off the game to striking out the side in the third and striking them out again in the eighth, Maloney was untouchable. His only imperfection was walking Ed Kranepool to open the second…and choosing the wrong night to go so long without being touched.

His opposite number on the mound was Frank Lary, known in his American League days as the Yankee Killer, but he was doing an admirable job of snuffing out Reds. He wasn’t as close to flawless as Maloney, but for eight innings, he did what he had to do, holding Cincinnati to five hits, three walks, a hit batsman and — this is key — no runs. In the top of the ninth, Casey Stengel pinch-hit for Lary with Joe Christopher, but Maloney struck him out. He did the same to Cowan for the third time in the evening.

By the middle of the ninth, Jim Maloney had faced 28 Mets batters. One of them walked. Twenty-seven of them made outs. Fifteen of them struck out. But Maloney wasn’t winning. He was only tying because of Lary, also known as the Mule. Frank was at his most mulish in the eighth when after hitting Tommy Harper, Harper stole second and raced to third on Chris Cannizzaro’s bad throw. With the go-ahead run ninety feet away, Lary grounded Pete Rose back to the mound to erase the Red menace.

Met defense had been surprisingly obstinate, too…after a fashion. In the fourth, Vada Pinson made it second on a stolen base attempt in which Cannizzaro’s pitchout worked beautifully until shortstop Roy McMillan dropped the throw. Gordy Coleman (who would later make a dazzling stop on the Mets’ only bid at a hit in regulation) continued his at-bat and struck out, but strike three got by Chris, who chased the passed ball. While he did so, Pinson kept running from second. Cannizzaro found the ball and fired it to Lary, who tagged him at home.

In the bottom of the ninth, it fell to Mets reliever Larry Bearnarth to display a little stubbornness, and he proved plenty recalcitrant. Pinson flied to rookie Johnny Lewis in right before Frank Robinson drew a walk. But Bearnarth bore down, getting Coleman to foul to Gonder (who had replaced Cannizzaro behind the plate) and Deron Johnson to ground to McMillan, forcing Pinson at second.

For Maloney to cash in on his incredible night’s work, he’d have to keep going. So he did. Chuck Hiller lined out to start the tenth. Charley Smith struck out swinging. Kranepool stuck out looking. Maloney had now pitched ten hitless innings and collected seventeen strikeouts. “A catcher’s dream,” Cincy backstop Johnny Edwards would call him.

Yet he still wasn’t winning.

An Edwards single to lead off the bottom of the tenth and a sacrifice of pinch-runner Chico Ruiz by Leo Cardenas got a Red into scoring position for the fourth time all night, but Ruiz never got past third. It was 0-0 heading to the eleventh.

Lewis led off for the Mets. On a 2-1 pitch, he homered to center. There — just like that Maloney was not only not winning, he was losing, 1-0. He’d recover to strike out Swoboda for his 18th K of the game and two batters later, after allowing a single to McMillan, get a double play ball out of Gonder, but the spell was broken. Bearnarth made sure it stayed that way by pitching a scoreless eleventh, and the Mets came away with a 1-0 win.

Despite being no-hit for ten innings. Despite being struck out eighteen times. Despite being the 1965 Mets.

“I can’t help but feel good,” Lewis, who had struck out thrice, said afterwards. “But it was a heartbreaker for Maloney to lose. He threw good, real good. In fact, I never saw a pitcher throw as hard to me as Maloney did.”

What was hard on Maloney was losing the game of his or most pitchers’ lives. “I’d just as soon win ballgames as pitch a no-hitter,” the flamethrowing righty insisted before taking his postgame shower, though he acknowledged he knew the no-no was in progress and that he really wanted it. He may not have felt terribly enriched by the experience of losing a game he judged “by far the best I’ve ever pitched,” but Reds owner Bill DeWitt immediately announced a $1,000 raise for Maloney, big money in those days for the son of a California car dealer.

Not bad for losing to the last-place Mets.

ALSO QUITE HAPPY: On June 13, 1988, David Cone was making a habit of not giving up the ball. Eleven days after going 10 innings in an eventual 13-inning win over the Cubs, Coney found himself working overtime once more. Versus St. Louis at Shea, he had given up only one run in nine innings (on a Bob Horner sac fly in the fourth), so Davey Johnson let him ride. Cone gave his manager no cause to regret the decision, retiring Tony Peña, Luis Alicea and pinch-hitter Duane Walker — up for Card starter Larry McWilliams, who had gone nine — in order. The Mets got Kevin McReynolds to third base in their half of the inning and chose to pinch-hit for Cone. Alas, Lee Mazzilli popped to third. The teams kept playing until the twelfth, when Mazz, who stayed in the game at first, made amends by singling home Wally Backman with the decisive run. The bulk of the pitching this Monday night was performed by Cone, but the 2-1 win went to Randy Myers, who hurled two perfect innings of relief. More than just another win for the East-leading Mets, the game marked the last time a Met starting pitcher pitched ten innings twice in the same season, let alone month.

GAME 062: June 11, 2005 — METS 5 Angels 3 (10)
(Mets All-Time Game 062 Record: 25-24; Mets 1965 Record: 32-30)

It wasn’t an easy assignment awaiting Marlon Anderson. He was coming off the bench to pinch-hit against one of the best relievers in baseball, one he had seen only once before. Then again, Marlon Anderson was one of the best pinch-hitters of the National League in 2005, having connected for a dozen pinch-hits since signing as a free agent with the Mets.

Still, he was going to be facing Francisco Rodriguez of the recently redubbed Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim, the 23-year-old fireballer they didn’t call “K-Rod” for nothing. As if there was some doubt to the kid’s effectiveness in this Saturday night Interleague Shea showdown, Rodriguez had just struck out David Wright to start the bottom of the ninth. The Mets trailed 2-1 and were down to their final two outs when Willie Randolph chose Anderson to hit for fellow utilityman Chris Woodward.

Anderson chose this moment to do something no Met had ever done before, on a 3-1 pitch from K-Rod. We pick up the action from Gary Cohen on WFAN:

Fastball driven in the air toward right-centerfield…chasing back is Finley…on the track, reaches out…

CAN’T GET IT! Kicks it away! It’s rolling toward the corner!

Anderson around second! He’s on his way to third! Finley’s tracked it down! Anderson is being…WAVED AROUND! He’s comin’ to the plate…the relay throw…he slides…

SAFE!

It’s an inside-the-park-home run! And it ties the game!

Marlon Anderson with an inside-the-park home run…he is shaken up…Jose Molina arguing the call, Mike Scioscia out as well, but Marlon Anderson has tied the game at two and two with an inside-the-park home run. Finley tried to field it on the warning track, kicked it toward the corner, and Anderson came all the way around ahead of the relay throw by Adam Kennedy…

Anderson still down on his knees as Mike Herbst and Willie Randolph look after him, but with his FIRST home run as a New York MET, Marlon Anderson has tied the game, and as he gets to his feet, he gets a ROUSING ovation from the crowd at Shea Stadium!

A stunning turn of events, and not just because it was the first pinch-hit inside-the-park home run in New York Mets history. Consider that Anderson was not blessed with great speed, so no wonder he was down on his knees when the play was over. Consider that he hit it between two of the great outfielders of their time, Steve Finley in center and Vladimir Guerrero in right, but the ball eluded them both. Finally, consider what the television replays showed as Anderson huffed and puffed his way around the bases.

He was blowing bubbles. Chewing bubble gum and blowing bubbles from it while tying the score at three.

Marlon was hardly the only star of what became a 5-3, ten-inning Mets win. Kris Benson had pitched seven strong innings, allowing his only two runs on a double play grounder to Bengie Molina (later replaced in a double-switch by his brother Jose) and a Kennedy sac fly. He got his last out when Carlos Beltran robbed Molina (Bengie) of a two-run homer with a leaping grab at the center field wall. Aaron Heilman followed with two scoreless frames. After Anderson’s PHITPHR — and K-Rod’s subsequent strikeouts of Kaz Matsui and Doug Mientkiewicz — Braden Looper was nicked for an unearned run in the tenth. Jose Reyes, turning 22 that Saturday, opened the bottom of the tenth by reaching first base on a pop fly over third that fell into very shallow left. He moved to second on Mike Cameron’s seven-pitch walk against Brendan Donnelly and, after Beltran and Mike Piazza struck out, stole himself a birthday present — third base — with two down.

That little surprise came on the eighth pitch of Donnelly’s battle to the bone versus Cliff Floyd (the Angel reliever thought time had been called). Floyd, healthy and thriving as a Met after two injury-riddled seasons, jumped on the ninth pitch from the rattled Donnelly — who threw 32 pitches in all in the tenth — and sent it soaring into the Flushing night for a three-run game-ending homer.

The win went to Looper, the walkoff mob surrounded Floyd (whose epic at-bat included a drive to right that appeared homerbound before hooking foul), but it was Anderson, 31, who created the indelible image of the Bazooka blast. It may not have been as majestic a shot as Floyd’s, but it sure was something to see. Anderson turned on as many afterburners that were available to him once his ball hit Finley’s knee. Third base coach Manny Acta waved him toward the plate, and Marlon blew bubbles and sucked wind until he was all the way home.

In the annals of New York National League inside-the-parkers, it may have been the most dramatic of the genre since 33-year-old Casey Stengel sped as best he could around the bases to give the Giants a 5-4 lead in the top of the ninth in the opening game of the 1923 World Series at Yankee Stadium. That was a trek Damon Runyon captured it 82 years earlier in prose very much of its time.

With apologies to Mr. Runyon, then…

This is the way old “Marlon” Anderson ran Saturday night, running his home run home.

This is the way old “Marlon” Anderson ran running his home run home in a Met victory by a score of 5 to 3 in the second game of an interleague series in 2005.

This is the way old “Marlon” Anderson ran, running his home run home, when there was one out in the ninth inning and the score was Angels 2 Mets 1 and the ball was still bounding inside the Met yard.

This is the way—

His mouth wide open.

His warped old legs bending beneath him at every stride.

His arms flying back and forth like those of a man swimming with a crawl stroke.

His flanks heaving, his breath whistling, his head far back.

Angel infielders, passed by old “Marlon” Anderson as he was running his home run home, say “Marlon” was muttering to himself, adjuring himself to greater speed as a jockey mutters to his horse in a race, that he was saying: “Go on, Marlon! Go on!”

People generally laugh when they see old “Marlon” Anderson run, but they were not laughing when he was running his home run home last month. People — 34,000 of them, men and women — were standing in the Met stands and bleachers out there in Flushing roaring sympathetically, whether they were for or against the Mets.

“Come on, Marlon!”

The warped old legs, twisted and bent by many a year of baseball campaigns, just barely held out under “Marlon” Anderson until he reached the plate, running his home run home.

Then they collapsed.

They gave out just as old “Marlon” Anderson slid over the plate in his awkward fashion with Jose Molina futilely reaching for him with the ball. “Larry” Young, the Major League umpire, poised over him in a set pose, arms spread wide to indicate that old “Marlon” was safe.

Half a dozen Mets rushed forward to help “Marlon” to his feet, to hammer him on the back, to bawl congratulations in his ears as he limped unsteadily, still panting furiously, to the bench where Willie L. Randolph, the chief of the Mets, relaxed his stern features to smile for the man who had tied the game.

“Marlon” Anderson’s warped old legs, neither of them broken not so long ago, wouldn’t carry him out for the top half of the next inning when the Angels made a dying effort to undo the damage done by “Marlon.” His place in the lineup was taken by “Braden” Looper, whose legs are still unwarped, and “Marlon” sat on the bench with Willie Randolph.


ALSO QUITE HAPPY:
On June 14, 1963, a Met of great renown achieved a long-in-the-making career milestone. Since the Mets hadn’t been around even two years and they had done little as a unit to earn anything but infamy, it figured that most of what this Met had done before was done as something else altogether. Nevertheless, Duke Snider wore a Mets uniform as he blasted a first-inning, two-out pitch from Bob Purkey out of Crosley Field. When Snider drove himself and Ron Hunt home, it gave the all-time Dodger great the 400th home run of his career, making him the eighth player in big league history to hit that many. The Mets would go on to beat the Reds, 10-3, and sixteen summers later, a plaque would hang in Cooperstown featuring Snider’s likeness and a notation that somewhere between 1947 and 1964, Snider logged time with NEW YORK N.L.

GAME 063: June 21, 1984 — METS 10 Phillies 7
(Mets All-Time Game 063 Record: 27-22; Mets 1984 Record: 36-27)

If Believing with a capital “B” hadn’t been much in vogue at Shea Stadium for the previous ten years, there was a pretty good reason: there had been little to Believe in, certainly not in the vein of when Belief was last in style there.

1973 was a very long time removed from 1984, and it wasn’t just the chronology that made it seem so distant. The Mets had only now and then sniffed contention since the autumn Tug McGraw made the phrase “You Gotta Believe” part of the Mets’ Talmud. They certainly hadn’t made the most of their fleeting acquaintance with success in the ensuing decade, but 1984 was unfolding in a very different, very pleasing manner.

After losing their first Opening Day since 1974, the ’84 Mets won their next six games. Fueled by two sterling rookie pitchers, Dwight Gooden and Ron Darling, and led by first-year manager Davey Johnson, exploded expectations, never fading from contention as April became May and May became June. Once they reached seven games above .500 on June 14, it was as high as they had gone beyond break-even since 1976 ended. As summer dawned, they found themselves in a three-way dogfight for first place with the similarly surprising Chicago Cubs and the perennially contending Philadelphia Phillies. They Mets entered this Thursday Shea matinee against the Phils in second place, a half-game behind their neighbors to the south. Overall, it was as good a position as they’d been in this late in a season since 1975.

Most Met seasons were effectively over by June. This one was just getting to the good part.

A tight 1-1 duel between starters Walt Terrell and Charlie Hudson veered in a completely different direction come the bottom of the fifth as a Juan Samuel error helped the Mets score five times and chase Hudson. Their 6-1 lead, however, began to crumble in the top of the seventh when Terrell walked his first two batters and Jeff Stone beat out a bunt (his third hit of what would be a 4-for-5 day) to load the bases. Terrell left in favor of Jesse Orosco, but Orosco allowed a pair of two-run singles to Mike Schmidt and John Wockenfuss and, before long, the Mets were down 7-6.

It was a familiar script from what life had been like at Shea since 1973, but the Mets called the press box and bellowed, “Get me rewrite!” Or something like that. Phillie reliever Bill Campbell opened the home seventh by allowing back-to-back singles to Danny Heep and Hubie Brooks. Ron Hodges, one of two 1973 Mets still extant in Flushing, grounded to second, resulting in a fielder’s choice to first, scoring Heep from third. Now it was tied. George Foster, getting the day game off, was brought on to pinch-hit for shortstop Jose Oquendo and was intentionally walked to set up a double play.

Orosco was due up, and a pinch-hitter was in order. Usually in a late-game situation, that would be the other 1973 Met on the active roster, Rusty Staub. A cursory glance at Campbell would lead one to infer it would definitely be Staub. He was a righty and Rusty was a lefty. Perfect matchup…except for one thing. Rusty couldn’t hit Campbell. Dating back to 1976, when Staub was with Detroit and Campbell was with Minnesota, he didn’t hit him…at all. Over fourteen at-bats, Rusty was 0-for-14 versus this pitcher. And if any manager in 1984 was aware of matchups, it was statistic-savvy, computer-literate Davey Johnson.

But Johnson also knew Rusty Staub was one of the best pinch-hitters ever and figured he was due. Besides, Rusty, like Ron Hodges, had been around Shea the last time the Mets made a move on first place. Hence, as if 1973 had just been reincarnated, Rusty swung and singled home Hubie with the go-ahead run. And if the ghosts of pennant races past didn’t already seem present, Phillie right fielder Sixto Lezcano misplayed a Wally Backman foul fly, extending the second baseman’s at-bat long enough for him — facing Jim Kern, who had replaced Campbell — to manage a run-scoring grounder that plated Foster. The Mets were up 9-7.

Doug Sisk negotiated a tough top of the eighth and kept the margin at two. In the bottom of the inning, Kern (a Met on paper for two months in 1981-82 before being sent to Cincinnati as part of the Foster deal) loaded the bases for Hodges who, per the prevailing Belief of the day, walked to drive in a tenth New York run. The Mets led 10-7 and Sisk ended it that way.

The Mets leapfrogged the Phillies to take a half-game lead in the N.L. East on the first day of summer. Their ascension occurred sooner than it did in 1973 (when it happened on the first night of fall), but with Hodges and Staub coming through when it counted, it felt a lot like that year of blessed memory. Except that Tug McGraw, in his final season as a player, was languishing on the Philadelphia disabled list.

ALSO QUITE HAPPY: On June 20, 1985, the Mets didn’t win that year’s division title but they did everything they could to take care of the previous year’s business, understanding it would pay definite dividends in the present. The Cubs had come into Shea for a midweek quartet of games so big to both team’s fortunes that a stadium attendance record for a four-game series was set: 172,092. Every Mets fan who paid his way into Shea got his money’s worth when the Mets swept all four from their former nemeses from the Windy City. The ’84 division champs came to New York on a five-game losing streak. They left it absolutely reeling, with nine losses in a row. The Mets, on the other hand, were surging in the general direction of first place after Sid Fernandez struck out ten Cubs in six innings and George Foster drove in four runs on one grand slam swing in the third inning to complete the sweep. The good it did the Mets in the standings was plain as day following this matinee — they stood in a flat-footed second-place tie with St. Louis, a half-game back of Montreal for the lead in the East. What it meant to the Mets psychically a year after the Cubs beat them out for first? Let’s just say that when the Shea public address system blared Paper Lace’s 1974 hit “The Night Chicago Died” after this Thursday afternoon capper, nobody in New York questioned the taste behind the musical choice.

Congratulations to David Hurwitz, Mickey Lambert and Ken Mattucci for winning our 1986 World Series DVD Happiest Recap Quiz. And congratulations to you if you order what they won from A&E Home Entertainment.

That Ken Burns Crap

To be clear, I love Ken Burns — I’m a sucker for every move in his arsenal, from the slow pans of old photos to the sage talking-head in his (or her) study. And I read Bart Giamatti’s invocation of baseball and the seasons at least once a year and wind up sniffling. What I love about baseball, and what this blog celebrates, is how the games get bound up with our lives. We have nothing to do with the games’ outcomes, and nothing we do is reflected in a box score, but each baseball season gets woven into our own, with what we were doing and thinking and feeling bound up with what happened on the field. I’ll always be able to tell you that for Game 6 I was sitting on the end of a bed in a motel room in Lawrence, Mass. with my Mom the only other one awake and believing and that for the 10-run inning I was in the mezzanine with Greg and Emily and Danielle and for the horrible collision between Beltran and Cameron I was walking over West Street from the World Financial Center. It doesn’t matter in the historical record, but it does — immensely — where our own chronicles are concerned.

The thing is, sometimes those mystic chords of memory can drown out what actually happened on the field. Which is what happened with tonight’s game.

Let’s rewind. Emily and I spent the weekend up in Massachusetts for her 25th high-school reunion, with Joshua in tow, and came back early this evening. In my younger years I spent many a foolish evening driving hell-for-leather between distant points, holding on to the faintest strand of the Mets’ radio broadcast as distance and storms chewed away at it. Those nights are mostly gone: I now live in the same city as my team, watch them on a humongous, crystal-clear TV, and even when I’m on the road the telephone I carry in my pocket can summon up WFAN’s feed with a few taps on its glass screen.

It’s Jetsons stuff that would have left the 20-year-old me agog and eager for such a wonderful world to hurry up and arrive. And he would have been right, mostly. Except Friday night MLB’s servers were on a smoke break, and no matter what we did the radio feeds on At Bat ’11 returned only the message CONNECTION ERROR. So up through Connecticut and out across Massachusetts we went with the old analog radio as companion, and by the far side of Worcester WFAN was fading in and out, whining and dipping and threatening to be replaced by the babble of some other station on a nearby frequency.

You know what? It was great. Emily and I were in front, listening to the Mets wallop the Pirates and complaining good-naturedly about Wayne Hagin, while Joshua slept in the back and all was darkness outside. I kept up vaguely with Saturday and Sunday’s games on Gameday, but 7:10 tonight found us somewhere around White Plains, rocketing the rental car down the Hutch having thoroughly enjoyed our long weekend but also eager to get home to our regular places and rituals. Being present for the Mets game was one of those rituals — the first familiar piece to fall back into place, in fact. Joshua put aside his book and cheered on the Mets and asked questions about rookies and batting averages and the game was our companion as we got ourselves back to Brooklyn. It kept Emily company on the radio as she returned the rental car; in the house, I turned on the TV and there were the Mets again in big beautiful living color, for me to keep an eye on as I sorted through the mail and the newspapers and for Joshua to peer at from the bath. The kid went to bed and Emily came home and we did more restoring of order and moved downstairs to our own bed for the final inning. The Mets lost, but they had shepherded us back to where we belonged, and so that was OK.

Well, except someone please yank the needle off that scratchy old acetate of “Ashokan Farewell” for a moment. Because while all of that stuff above is true, and deeply felt, it wraps tonight’s actual game in a blanket that’s warm but also obscures some pertinent facts. Like the Mets lost because a) Jose Reyes got called for a dopey obstruction play; b) Daniel Murphy screwed up on the basepaths; c) Lucas Duda screwed up on the basepaths and d) Manny Acosta and Tim Byrdak failed on the mound. In doing so, the Mets once again failed to move to .500. They missed out on stashing away another victory in the absence of David Wright and Ike Davis and Johan Santana. They wasted a good start from the enigmatic Mike Pelfrey. They left their wraparound series in Pittsburgh with a split instead of the sweep they could have had if they’d played better ball.

That’s harder to render in sepia tones.

Maybe years from now Joshua will strap his EKG headset on to project an entry into his holographic memory blog and it’ll be recalling how when he was a kid he put down a book by the guy who wrote The Lightning Thief because the Mets were on the radio and an obscure Met named Justin Turner was one of his heroes as an eight-year-old and some of his favorite early memories are of talking baseball with his Mom and Dad while on one of their nutty car trips. Should that happen, I doubt he’ll remember that Reyes got called for obstruction and the next morning he found out the Mets had shot themselves in the foot a couple of more times and lost. He may even spend an hour poring over some advanced version of Retrosheet in an effort to figure out what game it might have been — I’ve been stuck doing that myself. Which is OK — the feeling and the memory will be the important part.

But that other part should be recorded too. And so here it is: It was a joy to slip back into our lives, starting with listening to the Mets as a family.

It would have been even more joyous if the Mets hadn’t played so crappily.

Win the 1986 World Series! NOW!

What do you mean you don’t have the boxed DVD set from the 1986 World Series? What do you mean you’ve lived this long without eight discs that include each game of that blessed Fall Classic (yes, even the losses use Games 1, 2 & 5 as coasters or give them to your cats) plus the final game of the NLCS, all sixteen scintillating innings of it?

Well, let’s put an end to that right now. A&E Home Entertainment wants to award three such boxed sets to Faith and Fear readers right now. To help them do you the solid of the year — or quarter-century, as it’s turned out — I will now provide you with one of the easiest contest quizzes in FAFIF history. All the answers to the questions I’m about to ask you have been published on this blog since April 5, 2011, either on a Tuesday or a Friday, in your favorite twice-weekly feature, The Happiest Recap.

For those of you who have committed every last word of every one of my painstakingly researched, meticulously crafted essays to memory, this will be a snap. For the rest of you slackers, you can just look ’em up (if you’ve never clicked on the tag “The Happiest Recap” at the bottom of one of those bad boys, this would be a good time to do so) and track down what you need. It’s an open-blog quiz.

First three FAFIFites to e-mail all twenty correct answers (hint: specificity helps) to faithandfear [at symbol] gmail [dot] com will be our three winners. All decisions of the judge are final.

***UPDATE: WE HAVE OUR WINNERS. THANKS FOR PLAYING.***

For those who don’t win this contest, here’s a link to order the set. It’s well worth having, even if it doesn’t come free to you.

But let’s hope it does. Good luck!

1) Who relieved Tom Seaver in his first win?
DON SHAW

2) Who made the final out of Bob L. Miller’s first Mets win since 1962?|
RON CEY

3) Who homered to lead off the game Armando Benitez ended by surrendering a home run to Carlos Delgado?
RANDY WINN

4) Who was the last batter Victor Zambrano faced as a Met?
ANDRUW JONES

5) What musical special aired on NBC opposite the game that featured Darryl Strawberry’s first major league home run on WOR-TV?
MOTOWN 25

6) Who scored the first run against Dwight Gooden in his major league debut?
DENNY WALLING

7) Who collected the last base hit Tom Seaver gave up before the Mets traded him?
JOE FERGUSON

8) Who homered twice to support Dick Rusteck’s four-hit shutout?
EDDIE BRESSOUD

9) Whose flyball did Mookie Wilson misplay to put the Mets behind 6-5 before his home run off Bruce Sutter beat St. Louis 7-6?
TITO LANDRUM

10) How many home runs did Mike Piazza need to hit in 2004 to break Carlton Fisk’s career home run record for catchers?
FIVE

11) Whose grand slam precipitated the appearance of John Cangelosi on the cover of Sports Illustrated?
RYAN THOMPSON

12) What lefty did Terry Francona have warming up in the ninth inning when Curt Schilling allowed five runs to the Mets?
JIM POOLE

13) How many pitches were thrown in the twenty-inning Mets-Cardinals game of 2010?
652

14) What was the name of the promotion Carvel sponsored at Shea Stadium on the day the Mets and Pirates wound up playing eighteen innings?
SUPER SUNDAE SUNDAY

15) What reliever did Larry Bearnarth replace prior to Bearnarth pitching ten innings of relief versus the Cubs?
TOM STURDIVANT

16) What Met player’s uniform lacked a name on the back when Steve Henderson homered to beat the Giants on June 14, 1980?
CLAUDELL WASHINGTON

17) Who threw the pitch that resulted in the home run that would come to be commemorated by a marker in the left field Upper Deck at Shea Stadium?
LARRY JASTER

18) Who made the final out of the Mets’ first home win ever?
FRANK TORRE

19) Who struck out directly before Omir Santos’s video-review home run at Fenway Park?
JEREMY REED

20) One week before Jack Fisher won an eleven-inning start, he lasted 11⅔ innings only to be removed for what reliever?
DON SHAW

Mets Yearbook: 1977

The debut of Mets Yearbook: 1977 somehow eluded me last week, but luckily I noticed it was coming on after Sunday’s game and learned it will be repeated Tuesday afternoon at 1:30, so consider this your DVR alert.

Sadly, the 1977 season itself did not elude me, and even less fortunately, it was repeated in spirit throughout 1978 and 1979, so be warned that if you watch this particular edition of the best show on television, you will (especially if you lived sentiently through 1977 as a Mets fan) require the latest the pharmaceutical industry has to offer in the way of antidepressant medication.

Ohmigod, Wes Westrum might have muttered had he been paying attention to his old posting, wasn’t 1977 awful? I’ll assume you, as a FAFIF reader and therefore de facto intermediate student of Mets history, understand why. Yet you’ll want to watch Mets Yearbook: 1977 anyway. You will want to see propaganda take off in new and unpredictable directions. You’ll want to hear new manager Joe Torre explain (from a horse farm in an undisclosed location) how he’s stopped thinking of the atrocity that was committed on June 15 of that year as the Tom Seaver trade and has begun to think of it as the Steve Henderson trade.

Kudos to anyone who can think of it at all and look forward to coming to work the following year, but Torre is upbeat about his “new look pitching staff”. Ed Kranepool (whose reams of service time is featured early, a dead giveaway as regards how few actual highlights a particular highlight film encompasses) visits his old high school ballfield in the Bronx and is as upbeat as Ed Kranepool can possibly be, which is to say reassuringly grim. We also meet Lee Mazzilli and Steve Henderson, even if neither of them can enunciate worth a damn (and these were my favorite post-Seaver players). We are treated to a festival of leather jackets and out-of-control coiffure and a general late-1970s vibe of Shea despair.

Elliott Maddox is coming! Willie Montañez is coming! Tim Foli is coming back! Jerry Koosman isn’t going anywhere (yet)! And, in a moment of genuinely inspirational reportage, Jackson Todd survives a cancer scare. Plus there’s the great blackout of ’77; Doug Flynn complaining about the high cost of Big Apple living; the four great center fielders of New York lore alighting for Old Timers Day and inspiring Terry Cashman to write a song about three of them; Met wives playing softball; Jon Matlack’s kid running in circles before Dad is traded to Texas; Lenny Randle solving the third base problem (somebody’s always solving the third base problem on Mets Yearbook); and a parade of banners that the miserable management of this miserable team still had the good grace to permit on the field, making us wonder yet again why a beloved tradition that survived arguably the worst year in Mets history isn’t immediately revived by the club’s current cup-happy marketers. (Afraid the fans’ feet will ruin the grass for soccer?)

Mets Yearbook: 1977 is, either in spite of or because of its content, a triumph of the highlight film genre. You’ll never want to live through a 1977-style season again, but you won’t want to miss evidence that it actually occurred.

Image courtesy of “Mario Mendoza…HOF lock” at Baseball-Fever.

Keep on Dreamin' of Livin' in a Perfect World

In one of those misbegotten seasons when Daniel Murphy doesn’t leave too soon on Jason Bay’s sacrifice fly but Angel Pagan forgets to brush a foot over second, Pagan is out at first before Murphy gets home — and Murphy likely leaves too soon anyway. But the whole thing is moot because Bay strikes out looking.

In one of those seasons we’re too used to, Pagan doesn’t catch Lyle Overbay’s high fly ball with his glove to the wall. The wall catches it and his glove gets there a second too late for it to count as anything but a trapped double — and it probably bounces off his glove and over the wall so that the opponents’ fireworks show is gloating rather than embarrassing.

In another season that isn’t this one the way this season is right now, Willie Harris comes up with two out and immediately makes it three out. Scott Hairston remains stuck on one home run forever. Chris Capuano patiently explains away his frustration at being saddled with another no-decision or loss. Jose Reyes doesn’t smile once when asked about the obvious toll the pressure is taking on him as he attempts to carry the club on his slender shoulders. R.A. Dickey may be ready soon to throw off a mound for the first time in weeks, or he may not be ready for a while. Carlos Beltran isn’t close to resuming baseball activities. Justin Turner toils away in Buffalo. Johan Santana is shut down until next spring. Terry Collins storms out of his postgame presser…again.

But that’s not this season. Not now it isn’t.

I don’t know what it will be before long. I’ve attended too many dadgum Met rodeos that went all to tarnation to allow me to completely buy into the exhilaration these 2011 Mets are providing more often than not of late. These are the same 2011 Mets who have yet to rise above .500 since April 6. Their most flattering relevant recent sample size — 7-3 since June 2 — isn’t large enough to have tipped the overall scales in their favor. Their long-term success — 27-20 since April 21 — hasn’t been, from an objective statistical standpoint, all that successful.

They’re a surprising 32-33 in 2011? They were 43-32 in 2010, 33-29 in 2009, 82-63 in 2008, 83-62 in 2007, 68-60 in 2005, 43-40 in 2004. I wouldn’t give you more than two plug nickels for the way those rodeos disintegrated when crunch time arrived.

Nevertheless, I watch the 2011 Mets bear down and hang with ’em. They scratch out the run they need to take a lead; they make the catch they need to preserve the lead; they kickstart the rally they need to extend the lead; and they dock serenely on the shores of the Allegheny with a tougher-than-it-sounds 7-0 win over Pittsburgh in Pittsburgh.

It’s not important to wonder how long this kind of thing might last. It’s important to enjoy that it’s going on now.

To support Roger Hess’s climb up Denali to raise funds for the Tug McGraw Foundation in honor of his friend David, who has fought so valiantly to beat his brain tumor, please visit here.

If This Is It

Was it the lure of the Mets that crammed PNC Park’s third-largest crowd into the home of the Bucs the way only Greece, Ecuador and soccer draw throngs to Citi Field? Was it the promise of fireworks and Huey Lewis & The News postgame? (Can Huey Lewis really be considered “news” 27 summers after Sports?) Or is Pittsburgh turning on to its non-football, non-hockey, non-awful baseball team at last because, well, at last they’re not altogether awful?

Despite openly declaring them my doomsday team a couple of years ago, I tend to not consider the Pirates when they’re not on our dance card, but lately it’s been blacker and golder than usual, so learning that they’re both chasing mediocrity and not chasing away customers…that’s nice, I guess. When the Mets are at sublime PNC Park and the talk drifts to Manny Sanguillen and Al Oliver, you can’t help but hope that once they fall off our schedule, the Pirates somehow fall into contention in the N.L. Central. At a game under .500 and four behind St. Louis in the loss column, maybe they already have.

And what about us, whom I consider continuously? Are the Mets in contention in the N.L. East? They’ve been playing like a team that wins a lot for a little while now. It’s not quite the same as winning a lot — Saturday reminded us of the difference — but it’s made this season of low expectations one of medium reward…at least.

Examine the pertinent numbers that go into determining the c-word: The Mets are two games below .500, which is extraordinarily ordinary until you connect it to its distance from a playoff spot, which is, as we speak, 5½ out, with 98 to play. That’s borderline contending if there’s anything to contend for when there are still 98 to play. The two teams that hold provisional claim to the National League Wild Card are the last two teams we played, Atlanta and Milwaukee. And we just beat them each two out of three.

So why not us?

Well, ’cause we’re not going to, that’s why. I mean, c’mon. Look at these Mets. They’re playing about the best they possibly can and the best they have to show for it is six wins in their last ten games. 6-4: not bad. 6-4: pretty good. 6-4: not extraordinary.

Which is what the Mets are. I chuckle when I hear mentioned that if not for some shabby bullpen work, the Mets would have been on some hellacious winning streak of late. As if the bullpen isn’t part and parcel of the whole package. When the bullpen was untouchable, the outlier was so-so starting. Or not enough hitting. Or uncertain fielding. Or injuries. We overcome something sometimes but it overcomes us just as often. We’re not that good, teamwise.

Yet that’s OK. Honestly, it really is. It’s not very much fun to watch the Mets not convert ten hits into more than two runs against Pittsburgh. It’s not very much fun to watch nine Pirates leaping (or however many made rally-killing catches in the course of Saturday evening). It’s not very much fun to watch Chip Hale choose caution over the last, best chance the Mets had to tie the score in the eighth. It’s not very much fun to watch Daniel Murphy test positive for Guinness Stout…or play third base as if he had.

But these Mets are fun on their own terms, in their own dosage. They’re an almost-.500 club playing in small spurts at a .600 pace. Maybe the spurts will extend themselves. I’m guessing they won’t. Right now the starting pitching, all of it, is superb. It can’t last. It could, but it probably won’t. There have been downpours of basehits, but few bolts of lightning to generate runs all at once. There is admirable stick-to-it-iveness where guys playing out of position in fact play as well as they can out of position, but that’s not the same as playing really well overall.

If this is it, as Huey Lewis suggested in 1984, this isn’t the worst thing I’ve ever seen as a Mets fan. I’ve seen worse in 2010 and 2009 and I could keep going. This is fun enough. This is a season whose medium reward surpasses what we could have reasonably anticipated, both from when we had the 18-game start that inspired one blogger to use some form of the word “atrocious” 15 times and from when we saw our first and third basemen trip over each other and onto the DL from there.

Maybe it gets even better. Maybe these five starters are the goods more than I’m believing. Maybe the bullpen is done blowing up. Maybe Murph becomes a master of one or more of his trades. Maybe Reyes is the object of no trades. Maybe, maybe,  maybe. Or maybe not.

Beats the hell out of definitely not.

To support Roger Hess’s climb up Denali to raise funds for the Tug McGraw Foundation in honor of his friend David, who has fought so valiantly to beat his brain tumor, please visit here.

Stream of Winning Consciousness

Kinda busy, kinda distracted. Mets score a run in the top of the first on no hits, I hear out of one ear. That’s nice, I think. But why didn’t we get any hits?

Three straight Pirate hits and the tying run right after, it is mentioned while I’m still doing something else. Damn, I think, that’s not good. Gee must not have it. He was bound to not have it eventually.

A single here, a single there. One by our Jose, one by their Jose. Each erased on a double play. Is it still tied? It is? Gee still in there? He settle down? What about Charlie Morton? Is he really going that well after last year going so poorly?

Is there any way I can use “Morton’s Stake House” as a headline tonight if we win and not have people think I can’t spell steak? And what does that even mean?

Not concentrating, still have things to do. Still kinda listening, kinda not.

Wayne, get to the point of your Three Rivers press box story already. I’m sure there is none.

Pagan doubles. That’s good. What’s that? He scores? So now we’re winning, right? The Pirates never did get more than that one run in the first. I guess Gee doesn’t not have it after all.

Duda did something? And now he scores? We’re up 3-1? This is a better game than I thought.

Tejada does something good. Tejada always does something good. How is it I was seemingly the only person in the world who wanted Ruben Tejada playing second base for this team this year from the get-go? Don’t wanna make it about me, but damn it, I was right to love this kid from the start.

Then again, I thought Tim Bogar and Luis Rivera got raw deals in 1994, so what do I know?

Hey, Reyes beat out a weird hop or something. So, what, the bases are loaded?

Turner…isn’t he slumping? Oh well, he couldn’t keep it up forever. Hey, Turner singled home two more runs! Guess he isn’t slumping. Where’s Reyes in all this? Scoring, that’s where. What is it now?

Mets 6 Pirates 1. Hey, I gotta start paying attention.

Pagan triples and scores. It’s 7-1. Time to sit down and focus. Lemme just find something to microwave.

Did Gary say Reyes homered? Sonofagun, Reyes homered! It’s 8-1! And it wasn’t like Reyes was trying to homer, so we can enjoy it, right? Reyes will be 28 tomorrow. Can everybody stop treating him like he’s 14?

Man, they gotta keep Reyes.

Gee’s still in there, huh? Gee gave up three hits to start the game and I assumed he was running out of luck. He’s not running out of anything, even gas. He’s gone seven and has gotten more effective.

Eight-one. This is great. Beltran’s being taken out for a pinch-runner up seven runs. You sure, Terry? Is a seven-run lead safe at PNC Park? It wasn’t safe for the Pirates at Citi Field. Don’t we usually find a way to blow these here? Maybe not.

Hey, look at Beltran with that big smile on his face talking to Duda. Didn’t I see something like that earlier in the season or maybe last September? Those two have a bond. Duda’s like the only Met who makes Carlos light up like that. Keith just said something about “that’s veteran leadership.” It’s not just two guys having a good time ’cause their team’s winning by seven runs?

Jason Bay’s not playing. I don’t miss him at all.

Gee in trouble, a little. Two on but two out and — and there’s a seven-run lead in the eighth. Calm down. Gee gets out of it by getting Xavier Paul to ground out. Pirates have had more Xaviers than anybody the last few years.

He probably isn’t gonna pitch the ninth. Nobody ever pitches the ninth. No Met starter, anyway. I wish everybody studied as many old box scores as I do just to appreciate how everybody used to pitch the ninth.

Jack Fisher was better than people probably realize, but I only look at the winning box scores, so of course I’m going to think Jack Fisher does nothing but win. And, let’s be honest: I don’t think anybody besides me walks around in 2011 thinking about how good or not good Jack Fisher was 45 years ago.

Just as well Dillon comes out. The kid was in a little trouble there before Xavier Paul. Man, if nothing horrendous happens, Gee’s gonna be 7-0. Gee hasn’t sucked since they were in Houston and he was probably trying to impress his pass list. Can somebody tell me why we weren’t supposed to take this guy seriously after he pitched so well last September?

Who’s in? Byrdak? Why not? Will Terry let him face lefties and righties with a seven-run lead? I feel like I just started watching this game and now I’m totally invested in it. C’mon Byrdak, don’t make this messy. I don’t wanna see Manny Acosta come in. I never wanna see Manny Acosta come in.

Nice slow grounder, Reyes to Tejada to Murphy…double play!

We win. That was fun.

To support Roger Hess’s climb up Denali to raise funds for the Tug McGraw Foundation in honor of his friend David, who has fought so valiantly to beat his brain tumor, please visit here.