The blog for Mets fans
who like to read
ABOUT US
Faith and Fear in Flushing made its debut on Feb. 16, 2005, the brainchild of two longtime friends and lifelong Met fans.
Greg Prince discovered the Mets when he was 6, during the magical summer of 1969. He is a Long Island-based writer, editor and communications consultant. Contact him here.
Jason Fry is a Brooklyn writer whose first memories include his mom leaping up and down cheering for Rusty Staub. Check out his other writing here.
Got something to say? Leave a comment, or email us at faithandfear@gmail.com. (Sorry, but we have no interest in ads, sponsored content or guest posts.)
Need our RSS feed? It's here.
Visit our Facebook page, or drop by the personal pages for Greg and Jason.
Or follow us on Twitter: Here's Greg, and here's Jason.
|
by Greg Prince on 6 May 2011 8:20 am
Willie Mays is celebrating his 80th birthday today.
The Mets are having another Collector’s Cup Night tonight.
Willie Mays began his Hall of Fame career at the age of 20 with the New York Giants, baseball ancestors of the New York Mets.
The cup is orange.
Willie Mays hit his first home run 60 years ago this month off future Hall of Famer and New York Met Warren Spahn at the Polo Grounds, which would become the first home of the New York Mets.
The cup says “Mets”.
Willie Mays would win the National League Rookie of the Year award in 1951.
The cup also has a picture of Mr. Met.
Willie Mays was on deck when the greatest home run in baseball history ended the greatest game in baseball history to complete the greatest pennant race in baseball history, a duel that involved two teams based in the city of New York, the Giants and the other baseball ancestor of the New York Mets, the Brooklyn Dodgers. That pennant race, which culminated in Bobby Thomson‘s “Shot Heard ‘Round The World” off Ralph Branca, was the signature episode of the signature era of National League baseball in New York, a period that loomed so large in the collective consciousness that it was agreed National League baseball simply had to return to New York a few short years after it was mistakenly allowed to physically disappear. Spiritually, it remained. The Mets exist because the Giants and Dodgers did…because players like Willie Mays did…especially because players like Willie Mays did. Then again, there was no player quite like Willie Mays.
The cup also has a sponsor’s logo.
Willie Mays once turned around, ran like there was no tomorrow, tracked a fly ball to deepest center field in the outer expanses of the Polo Grounds and caught a ball that was destined to be at least a triple. In doing so, he turned around an entire World Series and helped send the New York National League franchise to the 1954 world championship.
The cup holds about 20 ounces of liquid.
 Willie Mays and his basket catch, as caught by Daily News cartoonist Bruce Stark in 1973.
Willie Mays did so much so thrillingly as a New York Giant in the 1950s that Joan Payson, the owner of the New York Mets, made every effort to bring him back as a New York Met in the 1960s. She didn’t succeed until the 1970s, but when she did, Willie Mays put on a New York Mets uniform and captivated an entire city when he homered to win his first game as a Met, against the Giants no less, in 1972.
The cup is the kind of cup you used to be able to get with a large soda.
Willie Mays at his peak could hit, hit with power, run, field and throw like no other player before him or after him. He showed that as a New York Giant. He gave only hints of it as an aging New York Met, but he was a New York Met. The greatest player baseball ever saw last saw him as a New York Met helping his team to a pennant in 1973, just as he helped his New York Giant team to a pennant in 1951 and a world championship in 1954.
The cup can also hold pencils.
Willie Mays was honored by the New York Mets when they played at the Polo Grounds and he was a visitor from San Francisco. He was honored again by the New York Mets when they played at Shea Stadium and he had announced his imminent retirement. His “Willie, say goodbye to America” speech made for one of Shea’s most emotional moments.
The cup can hold any number of items, one supposes.
Willie Mays turns 80 today, just after the only two franchises for which he ever played, the Mets and the Giants, took part in a three-game series at Citi Field, where Willie Mays has yet to be acknowledged in any serious way.
The cup is plastic.
Happy 80th birthday to the Say Hey Kid. And enjoy Collector’s Cup Night tonight.
by Greg Prince on 5 May 2011 8:23 pm
Isn’t it nice when the Mets behave as we prefer them to? Pelfrey slick instead of sick; Beltran boasting upper body strength and no discernible knee problems; Reyes on the fly; Rodriguez setting off anxiety attacks but giving up no runs. We can accept all that and we can enjoy the results.
The atmosphere surrounding a series between our humble little engine that occasionally can and the last team to win the World Series, however, is another matter. It was unacceptable and it was wholly unenjoyable.
Where did all these San Francisco Giants fans come from all of a sudden? Out of the success-carved woodwork, one presumes. It happens. You take a team from a large metropolitan area, have them achieve a substantial victory, and let their followers — however long they’ve been followers — know their recently successful team is going to be in town, and what happens is what I witnessed first-hand at Citi Field Tuesday and Wednesday nights and what I could make out intermittently while watching/listening semi-committedly Thursday afternoon.
I saw a ton of orange and black without the saving grace of any blue, and I heard a torrent of “LET’S GO…” without its logical conclusion. It was wa-a-a-a-ay too San Franciscan in Flushing this week, right down to the chill wind blowing off the water.
When I say I’d like to see some Giant influence represented within our Ebbets Faux ballpark, this isn’t what I had in mind.
Too many modern-day fans were rooting for the modern-day Giants, who were the modern-day New York (N.L.) team’s opponents. It’s distasteful, but except for the proportion, it wasn’t tangibly worse than Phillies fans materializing by the multitude in 2009 or Cubs fans taking up an uncomfortable chunk of Shea’s seats in 2004. Those teams became happenings and our town has lots of people from other places (as well as unfortunate proximity to Pennsylvania). It’s also reminiscent of the oodles of star-fudgers who donned Cardinal red or Cub blue at Shea in the late ’90s because they had absolutely adored Mark McGwire or Sammy Sosa ever since somebody told them to. Whereas any given Mets series used to attract a relative smidgen of the Other Team’s fans, I guess it’s become fashionable and fairly simple for every “Other” fan who wants in at a given series to get in.
(And it’s not like the mere presence of Mets fans by the Paysonload hasn’t annoyed hardcore patrons in Miami or Washington or Pittsburgh or Baltimore or, in days of yore, Philadelphia or Montreal.)
The sad part isn’t that Giants fans made more noise than Mets fans for three games. It’s that Giants fans felt they had more reason to make noise for three games — and that Mets fans are in such an ongoing funk that we tend to generate mostly the sounds of silence. Tuesday night, I overheard one excited younger Giants rooter innocently ask his companion, while the Mets were at bat in a very close game, “Why aren’t the Mets fans cheering? This is when their team needs their support.”
I don’t have a good answer for that guy, even as I agree with his premise. I mean, yeah, we’ve been beaten, battered, bruised, psychologically kicked in the mental nuts for the last bunch of seasons…we all know the litany. And I could throw in, as I have off and on since it was built, how Citi Field wasn’t designed to inspire organic fan enthusiasm for anything more than upscale eats. Though I still believe there’s something at odds between our ballpark’s legitimate appeal and the ideal of what a ballpark is actually for, I’m not going to blame Citi Field specifically for the shush factor that prevails at most Mets games.
We’re Mets fans. We know about behaving like Mets fans in the classic sense. We grew up with the Shea ethos and by now most of us have been reminded, courtesy of SNY’s Mets Yearbook series, of what that’s supposed to look like and sound like.
But we don’t look like that any more and we don’t sound like that anymore. Maybe, because of the miserable course of events that have suffocated our Metsian instincts, and because the amenities of post-Shea life distract us so, we just don’t have it in us anymore…or maybe we do, but it’s buried too deep down to instantly access in a late and close situation.
If we go to Citi Field and we don’t enjoy the sensation of the Other Team’s fans filling the silences with their excitement, we — as Mike Piazza puts it on the big screen during rare rallies — know what to do. Most of the time, there’s more of us than there are of them. Even this week, there were more of us than there were of them (though not by many and not by the ninth). So why don’t we outshout the opposition? Why don’t we have such a wall of sound going that it would never occur to them (whoever them may be) to challenge our vocal hegemony?
And why are there so many tickets available to them anyway?
’Cause we haven’t been buying what the Mets have been selling. We’re under no obligation to, of course. It’s a shame that we’re not running, mousing and clicking over each other to the box office, to mets.com, to StubHub, to whatever it would take to get a foot in the door. It’s a shame that the Mets in 2011 aren’t attracting us en masse like they did as recently as 2008. There’s a fistful of legitimate reasons — from tight money to lousy players — but it’s still a shame. On some level I love that I, as a diehard, can go when I want and sit, within reason, where I want and not have to stand in overly long lines (save one) but I’d rather be banging my head against the bricks that I can’t score a ticket for that big game, because I want there to be a big game and I want there to be filled sections and I want there to be more Mets fans than there are Mets seats.
There are more than 42,000 Mets fans, obviously. There are zillions of us out here as well as sometimes in there. Last-place team, $19 parking, geometrically skewed sightlines once you get deep into the 520s…good reasons why zillions aren’t crowding into Citi Field. Believe me, comrades, I’m not trying to lay a guilt trip on anybody for not going to more games. You’re probably paying for cable, you might have bought a nice TV, you count up your kids and multiply the cost of what they’ll want if you take the plunge and go to a game…and then you consider it’s not such a great product at the moment.
I wish it were. I wish it were shoutworthy. I wish I shouted more. I don’t know what the average age of the “LET’S GO METS!” shouter was when it was going strong, but I’m sure it was younger than me now. Still, I try. I joined one of my neighbors last night in a desperation chant in the ninth as Brian Wilson secured a 2-0 lead that may as well have been 20-0. What’s the point of straining your throat if you don’t think you’re really helping? It’s cold, our team’s not good, we’re terribly outnumbered by now…“LET’S GO…” ah, whatever.
If it occurs to anybody that maybe they ought to start shouting, likely futility is a reasonable reason to draw the opposite conclusion. If, that is, you’re the kind of fan who does a cost-benefit analysis as you root. Maybe you are. To invest in a night at Citi Field, you kind of have to be the kind of fan who does a cost-benefit analysis.
One thing I’ve noticed the last few years, maybe even back to the end of Shea but definitely at Citi, is how hard these chants are to sustain through one lousy pitch. A Met gets on base, “LET’S GO METS!” gets on the DiamondVision, a plurality of the crowd gets going and, as the Other Team’s reliever goes into his motion, everybody stops. Not sure when a baseball game turned into the Masters. You’re shouting, and then you halt, presumably to see what happens, maybe because by MLB rule the video board can’t continue prompting you once the batter is in the box and by now a generation has grown up thinking you only rev up when an electronic image instructs you to.
It’s weird. It’s antithetical to Mets fan behavior as we knew it. We — and by we, I mean the we you see in those ’60s and ’70s and ’80s highlight films — were fine making it about us. We cheered because we were Mets fans and didn’t get too hung up on whether it was going to be effective where the final score was concerned. We made it about us. I find it ironic that in a society in which individuals are increasingly making everything about them, the segment of society that goes to Citi Field to ostensibly support the home team is hesitant or reluctant or oblivious when it comes to a big, showy display of what “we” stand for.
Dance cam? Kiss cam? Pizza box cam? Green eggs and cam? At somebody else’s direction, in short spurts, the Mets fan can be as demonstrative as possible. Left to our own devices, figuratively and literally, we seem to want to be left alone. We’re still Mets fans. We’re still dwelling on what’s wrong with our team and what it would take to make our team right again, but it generally doesn’t occur to us to express it spontaneously, loudly and — should such expression gain a scintilla of momentum — in unison. It’s just not what we do anymore.
When I first saw and heard the San Francisco fans making a collective spectacle of themselves, I was surprised at how they overshadowed us. After experiencing it up close and from a distance for a few days, I’m surprised it doesn’t happen every series against every Other Team.
by Greg Prince on 5 May 2011 11:42 am
 Philadelphia occasionally hosts nice sporting events.
Somewhere between Halladay vs. Niese and Lee vs. Young, the Mets-Phillies pitching dynamic from last weekend was all Tug, as in Team McGraw member and Faith and Fear reader Sharon Chapman finishing her latest race, the Broad Street Run, while sporting the FAFIF wristband. Sharon has run at both ends of the New Jersey Turnpike to raise money and awareness for the Tug McGraw Foundation, a Team McGraw effort with which we’ve been happy and proud to assist, albeit from a sitting (and sometimes drinking) position.
Congratulations to Sharon on another race put in the books, and thanks for one more showing of the best wrist running.
by Jason Fry on 4 May 2011 11:31 pm
I love Tim Lincecum, I really do. I love that perfect motion of his — my description of it last year was “the equation that solves a knotty physics problem, and leaves you smiling at the elegance and beauty of the answer,” which I’m not going to improve on. I love his God-given talents, his individuality, his doggedness, and most of all the fact that he somehow sailed through the anonymizing factory that is minor-league baseball without some idiot pitching coach ruining him or enough people deciding he was too small to meet their definition of success and so denying him any chance at it. Lincecum was so good so quickly that nobody had a chance to fuck him up, and now he sits atop the pitching mountain, walking on his hands before games and not bothering to ice his arm after starts, happily out of reach of the ligament-shredding groupthink that Organized Baseball calls wisdom. (The fact that Lincecum is nicknamed the Freak tells you everything you need to know about baseball and new ideas.) My goodness I love him.
Important caveat, though: I love him a lot more when he’s tormenting somebody else.
Lincecum didn’t look that good early — he was a bit wild, a bit out of kilter, and with Chris Capuano gritting his way through the Giants’ order you could at least imagine this was our night, a chance to put an Amish stitch in the grand tapestry recounting the Lincecum Conquest. In the sixth, the thoroughly revitalized Carlos Beltran led off with a double, after which Ike Davis trudged rather unhappily to the plate. Lincecum had fanned Ike twice already, and a third K looked like a question of when, not if — Ike was perilously close to helpless up there. But somehow he MacGyver’ed his way through tapping balls foul and watching balls slip just wide of the plate, fighting back to 3-2 over nine pitches and then serving the 10th neatly up the middle to put runners on first and third. If Ronny Paulino did just about anything it would be 1-1 Mets, and then we’d see.
Unfortunately, the Mets had Lincecum’s attention now. He got Paulino to send a little dandelion puff aloft that Freddy Sanchez converted into an out with a nice sliding catch, somehow springing up and heaving a perfect throw homeward to keep Beltran on third. (Staying put was unquestionably the right call.) Willie Harris then struck out. Let us pause for a deep sigh, a stare heavenward and a moment insisting that WILLIE HARRIS HAS TO HAVE AT LEAST ONE MOMENT THIS YEAR, RIGHT? (If he doesn’t have one soon, can he be crammed into the Boyer-Emaus chute and never spoken of again?) Jason Pridie also fanned, and that was that.
Seriously — that was that. Other than a Beltran single in the eighth, no other Met reached base. In fact, foul balls became the stuff of victory. After Ike’s single, here’s what the Giants did:
As recounted above, Lincecum needed 10 pitches to get Paulino to foul out and fan Harris and Pridie. Seven out of 10 pitches were strikes or went for outs.
In the seventh, Lincecum ended his night by striking out the side on 18 pitches — five balls, 13 strikes.
In the eighth, Ramon Ramirez, Javier Lopez and Sergio Romo faced four batters. They threw 16 pitches — just three of them balls — in collecting a flyout and two more Ks.
In the ninth, Brian Wilson threw 11 pitches — just one of them a ball — in fanning Josh Thole and Pridie and getting Lucas Duda to foul out for the ballgame.
Four innings total, nine Ks, 55 pitches — just 12 of them balls. It was impressive. It was dominant. If you like watching pitchers not overthinking things, changing speeds, and throwing strikes, it was even beautiful.
I sure wish I’d watched it happen to someone else.
* * *
Slightly less depressing: I chatted with New York Magazine’s Will Leitch about the Mets and their confounding lack of no-hitters earlier today. Check out it here.
by Greg Prince on 4 May 2011 12:00 pm
 Keith's Grill, moving out of the shadows.
I love when the Mets take our advice before we even offer it. In Amazin’ Avenue Annual 2011, Jason and I offered up a slew of ideas on how to best extended the Mets legacy at Citi Field. One of them, which we expanded upon recently, was reinstituting the Banner Day doubleheader in 2012 and making it again a yearly Met tradition. The Mets haven’t gotten back to us on that.
But one thing they did go ahead and implement (presumably in the works before our article was published so we can’t take credit for it) was our suggestion that they Name More Stuff after Met legends. Camden Yards celebrates Boog Powell with barbecue. Citizens Bank Park pays homage to Greg Luzinski with barbecue. Manny Sanguillen has a barbecue stand in PNC Park. There seems to be a culinary theme there, and there’s already a popular barbecue concession at Citi Field, and one of the most beloved Mets of all time was a longtime spare rib chef of great renown…so we said, hey, how about hooking up Rusty Staub? What could be better than adding a touch of Le Grand Orange to the delectable aroma of Blue Smoke? (Actually, that idea was generated by FAFIF reader Kevin From Flushing, but he said go right ahead and co-opt it, so we did.)
I don’t know what the politics of barbecue sauce are, exactly, but I haven’t seen any famous red hair around the pulled pork, so there went that brilliant concept for now. We also didn’t see any movement on our notion that the Acela Club should be the Stork Club Presented by Acela, with George Theodore as official greeter; or Hershey’s Dunk Tank should be transformed into Hershey’s Krane Pool; or, one we (and Kevin) really thought was a natural, rechristening the El Verano Taqueria as Mex’s El Verano Taqueria.
Mex! Keith Hernandez! Tacos! C’mon!
That hasn’t flown, to date, but boy was I happy when on the first homestand of 2011 I noticed, tucked away in a corner of the left field Field Level concourse was a kiosk marked KEITH’S GRILL. I was even happier when I realized Keith wasn’t the name of some brokerage firm but actually Keith Hernandez, late of first base and more permanently of the SNY broadcast booth.
The Mets named something for a Met! Not as fluid a connection to the Met in question as we had proposed, but it was a step in the right direction. Only problem was nobody was going to Keith’s Grill. It was out of the way, it was unknown and it sold the one item everybody was already queuing up for just up the hallway: hamburgers. Keith in 2011 had an unenviable task: displacing (a little, anyway) Shake Shack. It looked to be way tougher than Keith’s assignment in 1983: displacing Dave Kingman.
Since first examining Keith’s Grill, some sizzle has gotten going. Keith himself has put on his straightest face and publicized the heck (if not hell) out of it. I saw a lengthy segment on Mets Weekly in which Keith explained why his burgers — the Mex and the Gold Glove — are constructed as they are. Then a half-inning or so was devoted during a telecast to showing how they’re made. Why watch Scott Hairston take a swing when you can watch Keith Hernandez take a much juicier bite?
I’m happy to report, based on experiential observation, that Keith’s Grill is catching on. Nice little line on Tuesday night for its two-piece menu, which I joined so I could see for myself if the Gold Glove glittered in real life as it did on TV. It wasn’t a Shake Shack wait by any means, but it also wasn’t ready to go. They really grill those burgers for you, which takes a few minutes. And they really do add kettle chips and a Tootsie Pop garnish for your ten bucks.
The verdict? I liked it. It’s a Brooklyn Burger, which means the meat is…well, let’s just say it’s not Shake Shack (which I think is dandy if not otherworldly), but the fixin’s are applied as Keith promised they’d be (ketchup holding the pickles in place, et al) and it’s a satisfying nosh. More than a nosh. It’s substantial. The chopped onions really make the burger an event and the kettle chips (generously doled) make it a meal.
Plus, it’s Keith’s Grill. Supporting Keith is not a bad thing to do at all.
 Duke's Grill, relegated to CGI.
The existence of something named for a Met put me in mind of the original plan for Citi Field, or at least one aspect of it as illustrated in the CGI renderings that made the rounds when the ballpark was yet to have as much a corporate sponsor. Across from the Ebbets Club was something named Duke’s Grill. It was presumably a placeholder, penciled in to give us an idea of what we were in for. I was less impressed by the grill than I was wary of Duke’s. We already knew we were in for an Ebbets Field facade and an Ebbets Club and a Jackie Robinson Rotunda. Duke’s Grill, too? Even as an example of what was to come, I found the prospective saturation-Dodgering of the Mets’ new home a Bummer.
Duke Snider was a Met for one season, but I seriously doubt Duke’s Grill was an homage to that, his 1963 All-Star status notwithstanding. I wouldn’t be surprised if there was a Pee Wee’s Ice Cream and a Furillo’s Pizza and a Gene Hermanski Ham ‘n’ Eggery on the drawing board somewhere. It riles me up a bit to think what a Brooklyn Dodger wonderland Citi Field was conceived as (for one man) and it sates me to know there was Mets fan blowback to the overdoing of the theme, and that a marvelous Mets museum was opened in the park’s second year, and that in the third year there is no longer an Ebbets Club but there is definitely a Keith’s Grill.
We still want our Banner Day Doubleheader back next year, but we appreciate the Gold Glove burger in the meantime.
by Greg Prince on 4 May 2011 3:14 am
And we never failed to fail
It was the easiest thing to do
—Crosby Still & Nash
No doubt there are San Francisco Giants fans this morning (many of whom squealed with irritating delight at Citi Field) who took Tuesday’s night’s extra-inning win over the unformidable New York Mets as a sign of some sort. Their team was experiencing The Hangover, not winning much, hardly scoring at all, falling dangerously off the pace in their division. After 28 games, the 2011 Giants simply weren’t the 2010 Giants, at least not the Giants who finished 2010 as champions of the baseball world (Japan not included).
The Hangover, whatever its merits as a cinematic franchise, brings its own special burdens to fans of a defending titleholder. The first thing you learn is you’re not really defending anything. The game that ends a World Series ends everything about your championship season. Your next official game is about five months later and at that point, you’re tied for first, last and everything.
The Giants of 2011 may be in store for a better, more fortunate fate, but I recognize a certain underlying similarity between their present tires-in-the-mud status and that which afflicted the 1987 Mets through roughly a sixth of their Season After. You watch your team that you remember being so indefatigable, so clutch, so obviously bound for glory, and you just wait for that reality to reset. Thus, when you pull a win out of a mess as the Giants did against the failure-prone Mets, you might be moved to decide your magic is back.
But it doesn’t arrive so easily. It certainly doesn’t stick like glue. That was last year’s magic, and it’s rarely transferable. Sometimes you just win a game because the other team insisted on losing it, the way the Mets did Tuesday night. Yet you look for signs of what you still perceive as normality. We won! Aubrey Huff homered in the tenth and the Beard came on and got the save! Just like last year!
Nothing’s ever like last year. 1987 wasn’t like 1986, no matter how much I wanted it to be. My first Mets game that season was right around this juncture of the schedule and it happened to be a Mets-Giants game of surpassing importance where my personal life was concerned even if it told me little about my baseball team (although the two are usually interchangeable). That game, on May 15, 1987, was my first date with the woman who would eventually marry me. “Neat — my first baseball game!” was Stephanie’s reaction to the Shea tableau, and I didn’t have to hear much more.
As for the Mets that 1987 night, they sure looked like 1986. It was as lovely as my new girlfriend: El Sid holding San Fran hitless for five innings; Strawberry, Dykstra and HoJo homering; the Mets winning easily, 8-3. They’d looked mostly dismal up until that Friday night, losing nine of eleven dating back to May 2 (the day Tim Raines returned to the Expos from Collusion and treated Jesse Orosco like he was Manny Acosta). It was “still early” and all that, but the Mets of 1987 were clearly off their game. It didn’t make sense to me or to any Mets fan who had grown accustomed to a perfect blend of invincibility and destiny. Now the Mets were just another team…just another lousy team. But then they got this big win against the Giants, they looked like their “old” selves, and maybe this was going to be the turning point.
Even if you weren’t around in 1987, you’ve probably noticed it’s not represented on the upper left field wall at Citi Field. The Mets emerged from their mid-May morass eventually, but never again (and I mean never again) reached the heights of 1986. The Giants, for all I know, will pivot from raking R.A. Dickey, befuddling Josh Thole and tattering Taylor Buchholz and make a serious move on the Colorado Rockies, return to the postseason and not stop believin’ clear to the only result that can possibly satisfy their incredibly annoying fans after 2010. My well-documented fondness for the legacy of the New York Giants notwithstanding, I don’t really care what San Francisco does when they’re not playing us (or reportedly investigating trades with us). But I definitely recognize what’s going on with them.
And that they can’t play the Mets every night.
***
On the subject of magic that resists transfer, there was only one “First Baseball Game in the City of New York After,” and it was the one that took place following the horrifying events of September 11, 2001. Yet I got the distinct impression that Mets management thought hosting the first baseball game in the city of New York after May 1, 2011, would be automatically as momentous and memorable — that it would be an Upper Case affair waiting to happen.
It didn’t work out that way, and not just because the Mets lost to the Giants instead of beating the Braves.
The Mets organization showed genuine appreciation to members of the U.S. Military Tuesday night, they wore this year’s (dubious) model of the MLB-sanctioned red, white and blue caps ahead of schedule, and they even put on sale a sackful of special patriotic pins — Mets logo with American flag; Mets logo with Statue of Liberty — in one of the team stores I visited. But despite the flourishes, it was just another Tuesday night at Citi Field. We weren’t coming together. We weren’t making our stand against fear. We weren’t doing anything more special than watching the Mets play the Giants. That’s special enough.
As much as it feels sometimes like ten years haven’t added up to a decade’s remove in these parts, we are by no means embedded in the same precise municipal mental space as we were on September 21, 2001 — and praise be for that, of course. Nobody wants to wonder if it’s safe to go to a baseball game or if it’s appropriate to go to a baseball game. In 2011, we go to a baseball game or just about anywhere we want. It’s different than it used to be, pre-9/11, but it’s not the same as it was that one singular moment in time.
I was at Shea on September 21, 2001. Even though I honestly didn’t have the same reaction many did to Mike Piazza’s home run (how does a home run “heal a city” so emotionally overwhelmed, never mind physically altered?), I completely appreciated why it meant so much to so many. It meant plenty to me to be in that stadium that night. Opening the ballpark and playing the game…I thought that was the big victory.
What happened at Citizens Bank Park Sunday night in response to word organically spreading that Global Public Enemy No. 1 had been eliminated was beautiful. It made for a serendipitous bookend that the New York Mets were playing on ESPN ten years after the New York Mets kick-started baseball — and maybe our hearts — after the tragedy our military was finally able to avenge this past weekend. But that was Sunday, and it was spontaneous. This was Tuesday, and it seemed of questionable value to try to recreate those emotions, let alone play off whatever lingers from ten years before. Giving active military personnel free tickets? Fantastic. First ball honors for a representative of each branch? Classy. Adding an extra round of “God Bless America” on a weeknight? Fine, I guess.
Suggesting, however subtly (particularly via CitiVision), that the Mets are implicitly linked to a great national victory just because they as opposed to, say, the Texas Rangers happened to be playing baseball in prime time on this particular Sunday night? I don’t know.
But I did learn it’s impossible to instantly conjure an unforgettable evening just because it seemed like a neat thing to try.
by Greg Prince on 3 May 2011 1:43 am
Welcome to The Happiest Recap, a solid gold slate of New York Mets games culled from every schedule the Mets have ever played en route to this, their fiftieth year in baseball. We’ve created a dream season consisting of the “best” 25th game in any Mets season, the “best” 26th game in any Mets season, the “best” 27th game in any Mets season…and we keep going from there until we have a completed schedule worthy of Bob Murphy coming back with the Happy Recap after this word from our sponsor on the WFAN Mets Radio Network.
GAME 025: May 7, 1991 — METS 6 Dodgers 5
(Mets All-Time Game 025 Record: 29-22; Mets 1991 Record: 15-10)
Darryl Strawberry was always a big deal at Shea Stadium. Why would a change of uniform lessen his impact?
The best everyday player the Mets farm system ever produced; their seven-time All-Star selection; their only Rookie of the Year who wasn’t a pitcher; their franchise leader in home runs, runs batted in and runs scored; and their seemingly eternal lightning rod had left the only professional organization he had ever known in November 1990, just over a decade after signing with them, excelling for them and occasionally exasperating them. Darryl had often threatened to bolt for his hometown Los Angeles Dodgers when free agentry beckoned, and that’s exactly what he did.
Strawberry was gone from the Mets in 1991, but he clearly wasn’t forgotten. When he made his return to Shea that May, he was — Dodger gray notwithstanding — automatically the biggest deal in the house.
And that was before a pitch was thrown. “For more than six hours,” Joe Sexton wrote in the Times, “Strawberry had been the focus of an emotional and entertaining maelstrom, the man who prompted and endured wild swings of sentiment in his return to the site of his greatest and lowest moments.”
It was electric all right, if not exactly a lovefest. Darryl’s propensity for stirring controversy and, establishment of club records notwithstanding, disappointment, did not diminish when he reappeared at Shea for the first time since the previous September. His first at-bat as a Dodger, against Met starter Frank Viola, was cheered enthusiastically…but it was also booed. That was pretty much how it went for Strawberry from 1983 to 1990. Darryl was pretty much whatever a given Mets fan wanted him to be, alternately or maybe simultaneously hero and villain. Representing the enemy made the choice simpler. As the evening progressed, the boos for a slugger who was a threat to the home team had no problem overtaking the cheers.
“It’s nice to be back in that atmosphere,” Strawberry said afterwards, perhaps realizing he and Shea, for all their conflict, were a match made in Metsdom. “It’s the way they are. I feel no bitterness toward them. A lot of people in the course of the night said a lot of nice things.”
Magnanimity came fairly easy for Mets fans, consider Viola was staked to a 6-0 lead by the bottom of the fourth. Among those picking up the RBI slack for Strawberry was another first-round draft pick, Chris Donnels. Making his major league debut, the Mets’ top amateur selection of 1987 singled home Howard Johnson to up the New York lead 3-0.
Donnels was destined to be a footnote, however — on this night, as in the course of Met history. (Unfair to point out, perhaps, but true nonetheless: six years after the Mets used their No. 1 pick on Strawberry, they won the World Series; six years after they used it on Donnels, they lost 103 games). Yet even with a six-run Met lead, this was always going to be about Darryl. He was why a Tuesday night in early May saw 47,744 customers pay their way into Shea. And he was why they wouldn’t be disappointed in their investment.
In the top of the sixth, with Dodger second baseman and former Met center fielder Juan Samuel on first, Strawberry ripped into the first pitch Viola attempted to throw past him. It never saw Rick Cerone’s catcher’s mitt or any other fielder’s glove. It was bound, like so many fly balls struck by Straw since ’83, for parts unknown. It went down as the man’s 124th home run hit at Shea, but the first he sent soaring as something other than a Met.
That certainly quieted Darryl’s legion of detractors, as did the home run Dodger first baseman Eddie Murray immediately followed with. But things never remained calm around Straw for very long, so it wasn’t surprising that the prospect of his next plate appearance, in the eighth, stoked enough emotions — and idiocy — so that Shea security had to spring into action because fans were pelting their former right fielder with…strawberries as he waited his next turn in the on-deck circle.
The big Strawberry wasn’t bruised by this outpouring, and, in fact, he was ripe and ready to go in the top of the ninth when the Dodgers threatened again. Thanks to run-scoring hits from ex-Mets Gary Carter (a pinch-double) and Samuel (single), Darryl strode to the plate with two out and the Dodgers within one. Brett Butler stood at third as the tying run. One Strawberry swing could put L.A. up 8-6. The fate of the night came down to Darryl versus his former teammate John Franco. Franco had already given up those two runs, and after watching him for a year-plus as the Mets’ closer, few fans had trouble imagining what Darryl might do to him next.
To their surprise and mostly delight, Johnny grounded the Strawman to third. Donnels picked up the ball, fired to Dave Magadan at first and ended Darryl’s return to Shea favorably for the Mets, 6-5. The game had a little something for every Mets fan left in the unusual position of wanting to witness a Mets win and a Strawberry home run while realizing they were not mutually beneficial. No wonder they made so much noise.
“It was a roar as opposed to clapping,” was how Darryl described the atmosphere that surrounded him at Shea versus what he was trying to get very used to in L.A. “This is loud. This is very loud.”
Darryl Strawberry was in the house. Shea couldn’t have been set at any other volume.
ALSO QUITE HAPPY: On May 2, 1999, as the Mets celebrated the 30th anniversary of their 1969 world championship by handing out VHS copies of the Look Who’s No. 1 highlight film, the current edition of the club eked out a Shea win reminiscent of their glorious predecessors. In the bottom of the eighth, in a 0-0 game, pinch-hitter Matt Franco singled off Giant reliever John Johnstone with two out. Rickey Henderson then lifted a pop fly somewhere behind San Francisco shortstop Ramon Martinez. The Giants were still residents of Candlestick Park then, yet Martinez found the swirling winds off Flushing Bay a vexing challenge. Henderson’s ball fell in, and because there were two out, Franco kept running and scored all the way from first on an E-6. Edgardo Alfonzo followed with a walk and John Olerud singled, bringing home Henderson. Like something straight out of 1969, the Mets held on for the 2-0 win.
GAME 026: May 4, 1989 — METS 3 Reds 2 (10)
(Mets All-Time Game 026 Record: 29-22; Mets 1989 Record: 15-11)
What happens when power collides with power? Something powerful sometimes, depending upon whose power prevails.
On the pitcher’s mound at Shea Stadium to start the bottom of the tenth inning of a 2-2 game between the Mets and Reds this particular Thursday night was a 25-year-old, 6’ 4” righthander named Rob Dibble. Funny name, one could suppose (rhyming as it did with dribble), but one might also want to not smirk when Dibble rocked and fired. Having come up in the middle of the 1988 season, he wasn’t terribly well-known, but he could throw very hard. The Mets learned that the night before when Dibble threw two scoreless, hitless innings in setting up John Franco’s ninth save of the young season. In 18.2 innings pitched thus far in 1989, Dibble had struck out 23 batters.
It was not for nothing that within a year, Dibble would be widely known as a Nasty Boy.
Howard Johnson…funny name, too, in its way. But the man better known as HoJo didn’t register as nasty in anybody’s book. More like unassuming. On a team of outsized personalities in the late ’80s, Johnson mostly blended in — just another roadside motor lodge on the highway of Met life, as it were, amid the glitzier lodgings of Hernandez, Strawberry and Carter.
But HoJo had deceptive power, especially when it came to baseballs released by very hard throwers. Before establishing himself as a rare breed of slugger/speedster infielders — in 1987 he became the first non-outfielder in National League history to hit at least 30 home runs and steal at least 30 bases in one season; first switch-hitter in either league, too — he was instantly recognized for something more than his nickname. Howard Johnson was pegged as a dead-fastball hitter. The hardest throwing among N.L. pitchers knew better than to challenge Howard directly. And if they did, it was at their own peril. Just ask Cardinal flamethrower Todd Worrell, who had gained a reputation as Howard Johnson’s personal batting practice pitcher since coming to the bigs and otherwise succeeding brilliantly. HoJo had tagged Todd for four home runs since 1986.
Dibble may not have received the scouting report on Johnson. Or he may not have bothered to read it. His plan was pretty simple when brought into a game: gas. It was good enough to get Mookie Wilson swinging for the first out of the tenth inning. It wasn’t, however, nearly good enough to get Howard Johnson. Dibble went after HoJo with a first-pitch fastball.
There wasn’t a second pitch. Johnson sent Dibble’s offering soaring to deep right-center. It traveled out of the park and sent Mets fans toward the same general destination.
“He’s a dead, red fastball hitter,” Dibble said of the man who stuck him with the 3-2 loss, his first of he year, “and I gave him something to hit. He beat me.”
“There was just no sense in any outfielder even going back on that one,” impressed Met manager Davey Johnson added.
Howard Johnson, though, preferred to talk about how he had cut down on his swing this season, how he was a “smarter hitter” and wanted to do “what the situation requires”. This situation called for classic HoJo. “I could always hit the gas,” he said, “and the harder the better.”
Score one for power over power.
ALSO QUITE HAPPY: On April 30, 2000, the dictum that you can never have too many runs at Coors Field proved prescient for the Mets. Met runs were hardly in short supply as this Sunday matinee rolled on against the Rockies. The Mets put up the kinds of offensive totals one got used to seeing in Denver: a run in the second, four in the fourth, another in the sixth, then three in the seventh and a pair more in the top of the eighth. It was good enough for an 11-3 lead. But was it comfortable? Is the altitude thin in Colorado? No and yes, are your respective answers, for here came the Rockies, who nudged heretofore effective Al Leiter out of the game at 11-5, put a couple more runners on against Turk Wendell and…POW! Tom Goodwin sliced through the mile-high atmosphere with a grand slam off Dennis Cook, and suddenly it was 11-9 Mets and, oh dear, there was only one out. Cook took as deep a breath as one could in the mountains and grounded out Mike Lansing and Larry Walker to escape the eighth without further damage. The Mets took out an insurance policy in the top of the ninth by adding three more runs to their sum (featuring Edgardo Alfonzo’s fourth hit and fourth RBI of the day), and every one of them would be deeply appreciated by Armando Benitez, who allowed a two-run homer to Terry Shumpert. But the Mets’ closer recovered and preserved an all too eventful 14-11 Mets win. All could exhale, assuming there was any oxygen left at not altogether beautiful Coors Field.
GAME 027: May 5, 2004 — METS 8 Giants 2
(Mets All-Time Game 027 Record: 24-27; Mets 2004 Record: 12-15)
Everybody has his own goals and aspirations, some of which are going to matter mostly to the individual who cherishes them. A record for most home runs hit by, say, a catcher might fall into that category. Huge deal to the catcher, maybe not so much for everybody else. After all, it wasn’t one of those marks that had a long and storied tradition or came with a lineage of famous chases, like Aaron coming after Ruth or Bonds edging toward striking distance (however he did it) of Aaron.
Yet in early 2004, Mets fans were absorbed to a reasonable degree by Mike Piazza’s quest to become the catcher with the most home runs any catcher had ever hit. Being absorbed by Mike Piazza was nothing new to Mets fans, for whom Piazza was equals parts slugger and savior from the moment he arrived in their midst in 1998. He had a flair for the dramatic that transcended the statistical, so we could cut Mike a break and take his stat-fueled desires seriously. Entering the season, Piazza had totaled 347 home runs as a catcher, four fewer than Carlton Fisk…as a catcher. Fisk had 376 overall, with 25 hit doing something else when his team wasn’t batting.
That’s the thing about these positional home run records. Neither Pudge nor Mike nor, for that matter, Johnny Bench — 389 home runs in his career, 327 “as a catcher” — wore shinguards, a chest protector, a mask or a helmet backwards when they stood at rather than crouched behind home plate. On the other mitted hand, you couldn’t argue that catching did take a lot of out of a catcher, so maybe there was something to being the catcher with the most clout.
As for the taking a lot out of a player factor, the Mets noticed that. Piazza turned 35 years old late in the 2003 season. It was their goal and aspiration to get as much production as possible out of their aging catcher by turning him into a reborn first baseman. Thus, Mike began taking ground balls around a bag he was used to touching on his way to second, not standing around for any discernible period of time. Though converting Piazza to first base had been speculated upon publicly since at least 1999, when John Olerud departed for Seattle, it was an assignment Mike no more than lukewarmed to. It was, actually, a source of contemporary embarrassment in that the Mets’ biggest star learned he was headed eventually to first — left vacant by a long-term injury to incumbent Mo Vaughn — not from his first-year manager, Art Howe, but from a reporter covering the club. Howe had let word leak in an interview before mentioning to Mike that his world was abut to change.
“I didn’t realize [if] you say something on the radio around here it’s all over the place before you even blink,” said Howe, suddenly figuring out New York wasn’t Houston or Oakland. “It’s a learning process for me.”
As it would be for Mike, whose first base experience was slight and ancient by 2003. Though not hailed for his defense, Piazza was proud of his position and, despite lip service about doing whatever the team wanted, indicated little enthusiasm for a switch. “This has to be done the right way,” he said. “This is obviously turning into a life of its own.”
Because these were the 2003 Mets, the transition was literally painful. Within a week of his first base destiny becoming news, Piazza sustained a severe groin injury while batting (as a catcher) at Pac Bell Park. He’d be out for three months, and when he returned, the first base project was pushed back even further. He wouldn’t play his “new” position until the very last inning of the very last home game of the season, a night otherwise dedicated to paying tribute to retiring broadcaster Bob Murphy.
Whatever long-term plan the Mets of Art Howe and GM Jim Duquette envisioned for 2004 rested on Piazza finally taking over first and highly valued youngster Jason Phillips (a .298 hitter in ’03) becoming more or less the full-time catcher. But there remained the little matter of Piazza’s goal and aspiration. He really wanted that home run record. He needed five to top Fisk and he was given ample opportunity to scale Mount Pudge. In the Mets’ first 26 games of 2004, Piazza started behind the plate 18 times and at first base only six times. Mike crushed four homers in that span, every one of them in games when he caught.
The plan waited on Piazza’s record-breaking swing. If it wasn’t taking forever, it was taking its sweet time…at least until the first Wednesday night in May, at Shea. On that occasion, it didn’t take long. Two out, bottom of the first, Jerome Williams pitching for the Giants and, as occurred 351 times before, a ball landed over the right-center field fence.
A Mike Piazza home run. A record-breaker. Elevated from trivia to cause célèbre to obstacle to, as always seemed to be the case with Mike Piazza, an impressive achievement that made everybody who rooted for him feel better. At the curtain-call moment, with No. 352 deposited safely over the wall, nobody minded the catcher-first base tug of war. Whatever made or didn’t make sense in terms of defensive alignment, Mets fans mostly wanted what made Mike Piazza happy after all he had done in seven seasons to plaster smiles on their faces.
“I’m really excited and really proud,” Mike beamed after passing Pudge. “I’m blessed. I’ve lived a dream. Everything from here on in is icing.”
The first dollop was provided by his teammates that very night. In the eighth inning, with the game tied at two, Shane Spencer swatted a three-run homer as a left fielder, Mike Cameron sent one out of the yard as a center fielder and Kaz Matsui simply singled in a run as a shortstop. The Mets won 8-2. There was another helping of icing the next night, and it was all courtesy of the greatest home run-hitting catcher of all time. Piazza broke a 1-1 tie in the bottom of the eleventh against the Giants’ Jim Brower, winning another game for the Mets as a catcher. “It was fun to be a part of,” Piazza said humbly.
Leave it to the Mets of this era to throw a wet blanket on everything. “Mike’s a catcher first and a first baseman second,” Howe said soon after. “Somewhere down the road, he’ll be playing a lot of first base.” The road led all the way to one week later when Mike began being penciled in almost regularly as the Mets’ starting first baseman. An extended break, however, was provided in mid-June, right around the time the Mets invited Fisk, Bench, Yogi Berra and Gary Carter to Shea as part of a celebration of the catcher’s home run record. When his peers in immortality showed up, it wasn’t to honor a first baseman.
“Only we as catchers can fully appreciate what it takes to go behind the plate every day and also put some offensive numbers on the board,” the dethroned Fisk said. “Mike has met that challenge for years now.”
Postscript: Mike Piazza played 68 awkward games at first base in 2004. Art Howe would be dismissed from his Met job at the end of that season. Piazza would play three more years in the majors, retire with 427 home runs overall, 396 of them as a catcher and never be asked by any other manager to play first.
Nor, as far as anybody can tell, did he vociferously volunteer.
ALSO QUITE HAPPY: On May 16, 1962, with the Mets trailing the Cubs 5-4 in the bottom of the eighth, Gil Hodges took advantage of the Polo Grounds’ unique dimensions and launched a fly ball to center field which, amid the rolling pastures under Coogan’s Bluff, became the first inside-the-park home run in Mets history. Gil’s interior blast helped send the game into extra innings where, in the eleventh, Felix Mantilla’s infield single with the bases loaded brought home John DeMerit to give Casey Stengel’s squad a 6-5 win. The victory catapulted the 9-18 Metsies into an eighth-place tie with the Colt .45s. It was also their second consecutive extra-inning win, both coming at the expense of last-place Chicago.
by Greg Prince on 2 May 2011 5:10 pm
As U-S-A! U-S-A! was helpfully identified as the site of Sunday night’s Mets-Phillies game, my instinctive need for the Mets to prevail briefly melted away. It was the top of the ninth of an increasingly endless 1-1 deadlock. We’d just surrendered the tying run in the bottom of the eighth and, given the usual trajectory of these Citizens Bank Park affairs, it didn’t seem reflexively pessimistic to assume a) we wouldn’t score here and b) the Phillies would find a way to test Frankie Rodriguez’s anger-management resolve as soon as they took their next licks.
What difference does it make? I reasoned. Mets lose, Mets win…we got Bin Laden. Besides, Philadelphia is where our nation was founded. It’s where my favorite movie musical was set. They’re Americans. We’re all Americans. That’s what matters tonight.
That feeling lasted maybe about a dozen U-S-A!s.
Not that the great news wasn’t great news; not that prioritization should be dismissed lightly; not that we’re all not in this together. We are all in this together…but the “this,” for the balance of the telecast in question, was the Mets and the Phillies. And I’m in this with the Mets, so I’ll decide what matters.
That’s freedom, baby. That’s what those scenes with William Daniels as John Adams, Howard Da Silva as Ben Franklin and Ken Howard as Thomas Jefferson were getting at. Besides, the last time I defaulted to “baseball doesn’t really matter” was for reasons far less given over to cathartic chanting.
Baseball didn’t matter to me in the wake of September 11, 2001. Too much was too awful to indulge in anything that didn’t strike me as too significant. The off-field happenings of May 1, 2011, were the delayed response to that which, as one news anchor after another was happy to repeat, changed everything/changed America. Killing Bin Laden doesn’t equal Bin Laden killing nearly 3,000 people with one evil plot. It doesn’t end the longest war in American history. It isn’t the stuff of ticker-tape parades. But it is, as deaths go, the best one I’ve ever lived through — and while I wanted to hear all about it, I didn’t see any point in consigning the Mets to doesn’t-matter territory.
The Mets always matter unless there’s something so horrific going on in the background that we can’t possibly wrap our heads around them. We’ve had one of those, and even if its aftermath may never be fully resolved, I’m not shopping around for another one.
***
Since the news anchors were also vigilant enough to let us know in the same breath that they were breaking their breaking news to us that we’d also never forget where we were when we found out about it, I’ll throw my two instant-recollection cents in and report that I was…well, I was watching the Mets game. I was doing it like the dinosaur I am at heart. I didn’t have my Droid on, thus no Twitter. I don’t own a laptop. My computer was upstairs while I was downstairs. And I hadn’t changed the channel from ESPN since about 9 o’clock, so anything that was going on in the world — and what could possibly be going that’s more important than the Mets and Phillies on Sunday Night Baseball if Mad Men is out of season? — wasn’t going to be known by me unless Dan Shulman told me about it.
A few minutes before eleven, Stephanie and I were in the kitchen, reassuring Hozzie that in a manner of minutes his bowl would be refilled, please calm down kitty. I could overhear, from the living room, Shulman saying something about “president” and “White House” and “statement” (or maybe “press conference”) and how we should all tune in to ABC News. I put Hozzie’s late supper on hold and, through the miracle of DVR, rewound Shulman.
“Hey! We killed Bin Laden!” I told Stephanie, debating even as I relayed the news whether “we” had done anything. I didn’t go to Afghanistan. I didn’t cross the border into Pakistan. I was never even in the Cub Scouts. But if “we” could be trying to keep Raul Ibañez mired in his massive slump, then I guess “we” could bring a war criminal to justice.
Stephanie went to bed just before the U-S-A! chants went up, just after I turned to MSNBC (against ESPN’s direct orders) to get a fuller picture. Since President Obama had the nerve to dot every “i” and cross every “t” before publicly confirming this particular development — and because I couldn’t take one more pontificating moment of Brian Williams, David Gregory and everybody else on every channel I checked letting me know how I was going to remember where I was when they told me I would remember where I was — I went back to the game, keeping an eye out via P-I-P for when Obama would actually speak.
The Mets didn’t score off Ryan Madson. The Phillies didn’t score off Frankie Rodriguez. Nothing much, besides pretty decent relief pitching, was going on in the baseball game even as everything was going on around the baseball game. Still couldn’t completely tear myself away except during commercials. I’d devoted the bulk of three-plus hours to this. If it wasn’t quite The Long War Afghanistan had unfurled into since the fall of 2001, it showed no signs of either ceasing or desisting.
I don’t remember if it was before or after Obama made his rather brisk and relatively succinct remarks that the talking heads (MSNBC, CNN, ESPN…whoever) said something about “closure,” as if it had just been issued by the Department of Talking Points. Bin Laden’s existence was certainly closed out, and that was surely a mission worth accomplishing, but I kind of doubt everything about the past ten years is simply sealed for good now.
As I drifted out of news analysis and back to play-by-play, it really hit me how long this had been going on — the big “this”…the everything changed/America changed this. Ten years is a substantial swath of time in anyone’s life, yet little of this feels like we’re One Decade Later from that day in 2001.
It’s been with us every single day as far as I can tell. We got past the initial shock, the part where we decide the non-essential things that matter to us don’t, but proliferation of nifty electronic devices aside, are we off into a distant future from where we were nearly ten years ago? Are we “over” it?
How the hell do you get over something like that?
That’s only a partially rhetorical question, because on one hand I don’t know how you would, and on the other hand I don’t know that we should. Maybe we should. Maybe ten years of proceeding as if something horrendous just happened and that we have to take every theoretical precaution to ensure, to the best of our abilities, that it doesn’t happen again isn’t a futile endeavor. But leaving out whether poking around in our bags on our way into ballgames or growing used to soldiers in camouflage carrying machine guns in Penn Station is a viable deterrent against anything that would harm us, maybe we need to keep remembering…keep being reminded.
Maybe we shouldn’t be able to walk by a firehouse and not think of the sacrifices people make for people they’ve never met and may never meet. Maybe we shouldn’t fail to rise and applaud heartily the almost routine but never rote salute to the Veteran of the Game. Maybe that almost anachronistic faded miniature American flag inside my rear windshield stays put for a good reason. Maybe I’m right to continue to avoid calling a catcher who got a key hit a “hero” because I took very seriously the admonition ten Septembers back that the real heroes in our society aren’t its athletes.
Or maybe there’s a statute of limitations on undying awareness of everything that was top of mind nearly a decade ago. “Survivor’s guilt,” a friend of mine calls it. I’m a New Yorker who was nowhere near New York on September 11. I was in Las Vegas for a beer wholesalers convention. Sounds like a wild scene, but trust me, it wasn’t. I was unable to get a flight home for five days, but my guilt isn’t over complaining ten years ago that I had to spend five extra days in a hotel room in Las Vegas nursing a head cold and getting nowhere with airlines (I hated it there, but I could think of thousands of folks in precarious circumstances who would have gladly traded predicaments with me). The guilt came from being so far away in the first place.
When I learned of and processed the events of 9/11 from TV, I took it that the terrorists had attacked New York. I mean New York was who they were going after. The Pentagon and other short-circuited D.C. targets notwithstanding, it never occurred to me they were going after the United States. As such, I felt irresponsible for not being in New York while it was going on. I should have been there. Never mind that I didn’t live or work close to the World Trade Center (my office then was at Ninth and Broadway). Never mind that I probably would have been on the Long Island Rail Road at the instant the first plane hit, and that’s assuming I had my ass in uncharacteristic gear that morning. Never mind that I brought no special skill to bear that would have been of any use to anybody in the state of emergency that gripped Lower Manhattan.
I wasn’t there. I wasn’t nearby. I was completely out of town, completely out of the Metropolitan Area. It beat the hell out of being on a 107th floor quite obviously — it also beat the hell of what my wife went through, having to dash across the Williamsburg Bridge from her then-office on Park Place just around the corner from the Twin Towers — but it was somehow wrong to me. New York is attacked, and I’m in Nevada. What’s my problem?
So I didn’t get to be a New Yorker in New York’s hour of distress. Instead, I had to settle for being an American. I was with the rest of them, if you will. They’re not bad sorts necessarily, but they’re not us. At least that’s how I saw it for five days in Las Vegas.
Eventually it sunk in that there’s us, as in New Yorkers; and us as in Mets fans; but there’s also us as in Americans. The Big Us, if you will. The Big Us was on display in Philadelphia last night. The Big Us was chanting U-S-A! The Big Us was or wasn’t receiving closure from the president’s announcement, but it wasn’t just for citizens of one city and its outlying suburbs. It was for everybody who makes up The Big Us.
I would have chanted with those Phillies fans last night, at least until they went back to being them.
***
This morning, I dropped Stephanie off at the LIRR station and then pulled into the parking lot of our local Walgreens. A woman was standing outside the store in a Yankees jacket. As ever, I bristled a little bristle because that’s what Yankees garb of any kind makes me do. Then I looked down and realized I was wearing a Mets jacket, my oldest still-active model, purchased in 1998.
It’s as likely as not that I was wearing it or one of its now long-running counterparts ten years ago today. They were all in my closet in 2001 and they’re all there now. Different closet, same jackets. Same Mets fan.
And I was back to Sunday night before stepping into Walgreens. I was thinking about SNY’s postgame show. The Mets won their battle in 14 innings — endless enough, but somewhat short of a long war in baseball terms. We saw one of those from St. Louis last year. We saw outfielders pitching and pitchers in the outfield. Last night the closest we came was Chris Capuano temporarily on deck and Cole Hamels grounding out to second. Ronny Paulino’s fifth hit in seven attempts and Taylor Buchholz’s outbreak of effectiveness kept this game from stretching into the absurd category.
I was glad. Lengthy was OK, but absurd would have been disrespectful.
Anyway, we won and I tuned in to the postgame. Four of every five questions asked of Terry Collins and Chris Young and Pedro Beato and all-purpose sage R.A. Dickey were about the news of the death of Bin Laden. Well, of course they were. The Mets-Phillies game was to this story what the Patriots and Dolphins were for John Lennon’s murder, what the Knicks and Rockets were for the low-speed chase of O.J. Simpson. And then throw in how the Mets were present and accounted for so sturdily after September 11, 2001, well, ya gotta ask the Mets what this meant to them.
That’s when the Big Us kicked in again. Collins and Young and Beato and Dickey and David Wright (whose answers I missed initially but were, as always, sought and recorded) spoke for the Mets because they are the Mets at the moment. They were Americans in 2001 if not Mets. They were entitled to their opinions even if their connection to New York didn’t necessarily stretch back that far (though for Young, then attending Princeton, and Beato, a high school freshman at Xaverian in Brooklyn, it did). Nevertheless, I yearned for Robin Ventura and Todd Zeile and maybe Mike Piazza to somehow emerge in this clubhouse and take some questions.
This is their game, I thought first last night and again as I stared at my well-worn jacket this morning. They should have won in 14 innings the night Bin Laden was killed. Those were our guys that September and October. I’m including October because the 2001 season was pushed back a week when Bud Selig postponed games from 9/11 through 9/16. Everybody remembers Shea on September 21 and Piazza’s home run. Does anybody (besides me) remember later? Say, Shea on October 7? That was the cold, windy Closing Day when Gary Cohen finished giving the lineups on WFAN and then threw it to George Bush who announced we would be going to Afghanistan.
“As the national anthem was being sung,” Bob Herzog wrote in the next day’s Newsday, “manager Bobby Valentine and several players remained in the locker room, watching President Bush’s televised address about the Untied States’ attack on Afghanistan.” Valentine said, “I don’t know how we started the game. It seemed like everyone was listening to the president’s speech.”
Zeile was among them. “That,” our 2001 first baseman posited, “says something about the state of affairs in the world. Since September 11, a lot of what people thought was important has changed in this country.”
Ten years go by. There’s a different president. There are different Mets. There’s still a speech. It’s still about Afghanistan. There’s Young, in for Zeile, explaining that yes, he was watching Obama speak on one of the two clubhouse monitors after he was pulled following seven innings of two-hit ball. “There are some things in life,” he said in a clear Zeile-like echo, “that are bigger than a game.”
It’s still going on, I thought. Something great — definitely something justified — has taken place, but it’s still going on. Extra innings end. Seasons end. Managerial tenures end. Beloved skippers from 2001 morph into goofy (but well-meaning) television analysts in 2011. But there are still Mets compelled to address questions stemming from one day from ten years ago. We still have troops over there ten years later because of that one day from ten years ago. That one day from ten years ago hangs heavy in the air over New York long after the smoke has cleared from Ground Zero.
There is no closure. There are the Mets, though. And there is my Mets jacket, which — like the Mets outlasting the Phillies in fourteen — matters. I say it does, so it does.
U-S-A.
by Jason Fry on 2 May 2011 3:26 am
I noticed the news around 9:45 p.m. — President Obama would address the nation at 10:30 p.m. Uh-oh, I thought, then kept checking in on the Twitter parlor game of predicting what that news would be. The smart money was on Libya, which seemed logical — some escalation of the campaign against the stubbornly resistant Qaddafi. I had my laptop with me in bed, so I kept checking while the Mets and Phils continued their staredown on the TV.
Then the rumors started. Not Libya, which would almost certainly be some kind of bad news — a greater commitment of forces, tensions with allies and the U.N., political sniping about what should have been done and when — but Osama Bin Laden, which seemed a portent of something rather different, for why would the president be giving us bad news about him late on a Sunday night? The Bin Laden reports multiplied rapidly on Twitter, coming in from Cheney confederates, Congressional staffers, anonymous State Department sources and reporters with military connections until they reached the tipping point beyond which it was impossible that that many different people could be wrong: Ten long years after the World Trade Center and the Pentagon and Shanksville, Bin Laden was finally dead.
I devoted a tab on my browser to the White House feed and kept watching the game, now with about half of my attention, as the news rippled out from Twitter to the Times’ website and the AP and then, eventually, to ESPN itself. And to the crowd at Citizens Bank Park. With Daniel Murphy batting in the ninth, the crowd began chanting “U.S.A.! U.S.A.!” Murph, at least to my eyes, looked understandably baffled, and I wondered how many of the players knew, and how they were finding out, and what would happen when Obama spoke. Would they put it on the scoreboard? Would the game stop? Would Mets and Phillies stand side by side and hug, like the Mets and Braves had done in the first game at Shea after 9/11?
None of that happened, even as the president addressed the world and ESPN dropped its sports crawl to repeat the news. But the announcers (including Bobby Valentine, who conducted himself so admirably after 9/11) began to talk about it, and on the screen you could see fan after fan staring at their cellphones and Blackberrys instead of looking at the game. Normally such a sight provokes annoyance or derision, but this time it left me almost in tears. You could see people’s faces when they read the news and when the information stopped being letters and words and became something real. You watched them show their phones to their seatmates who hadn’t known, or who just wanted confirmation. You saw joy and amazement and pride and sorrow and everything else.
I didn’t know quite what to do. I saw tweets and Facebook updates from people I knew. Some were climbing to their roofs in Brooklyn to gaze out at lower Manhattan, which those of us who were here will always see with a terrible double vision, remembering it disfigured by smoke and ruin and electrical stench. Some people I knew were heading for Ground Zero, where a crowd was gathering, or Times Square, where an amazing photograph captured firefighters from the FDNY — an agency which lost an incomprehensible 343 firefighters that day — gazing at BIN LADEN KILLED on the ticker.
My first impulse was to go, to join the crowd, to walk down Liberty Street and see it impassable because of celebration instead of disaster. To bear witness as best I could. And maybe that’s what I should have done. Maybe I’ll regret it tomorrow, just as I regret that I didn’t head into lower Manhattan with a pen and notebook that morning long ago.
But I didn’t go. And I don’t think I’ll regret it. And here’s my fumbling attempt at explaining why.
On Sept. 11, 2001 I’d worked in the World Financial Center, catercorner from the Trade Center, for nearly six years. The walk from the A station at Broadway and Fulton to 200 Liberty Street was so familiar to me that I knew every square in the sidewalk — for instance, there was one near the Millenium Hotel that had an abnormally large concentration of mica in it that glittered when the light was right. I’d walk down Fulton and jaywalk across Church to the Trade Center Plaza, passing by the huge flagpoles and trying not to be nervous on windy days when the padlocks would bash themselves against the poles and clang like out-of-tune bells. Most mornings I’d cross the plaza, which accuracy compels me to admit was huge and dreary, and exit down the steps by WTC 2. Long before 9/11, I’d sworn not to become jaded about walking to work through a scene most people only knew from movies and postcards. I didn’t like the Twin Towers much, honestly — I thought they were outsized and cold — but I did like the way the steel formed trident-shaped structures at the base, becoming nearly human-scaled close to the ground. I’d often rap on the steel of WTC 2 as I passed, sometimes nodding at the tourists lined up for the elevator to the observation deck so far above. It was mostly habit, but also an acknowledgment that I worked and lived somewhere extraordinary, and that I appreciated it.
On the morning of Sept. 10, 2001 I took that walk for the last time. Less than 24 hours later those places were gone, along with so much else that we wondered if we could bear it. So many people were dead, and I knew so many more would die, before it was over.
I’d meant to go in early, then hit the snooze alarm multiple times. The impact with the first tower woke me up, but I sleepily convinced myself it was a truck going over one of those metal plates laid down in roadwork, and put my head back down. The impact with the second tower woke me up again, and this time I stayed awake — because I could hear people screaming. I watched the unimaginable, awful rest of it unfold on TV. I remember I kept shivering and couldn’t get warm, even though it was a beautiful late-summer day.
I was lucky on 9/11. I wasn’t there. No one I knew was killed, though colleagues of mine sent out to the street saw terrible things, things I know they will bear the awful weight of until the end of their days. They literally ran for their lives as the towers crumbled; our office building was ripped open by hurtling I-beams and filled with dust and powdered glass. We would rendezvous in temporary quarters outside Princeton, N.J., which would be our home for the next 51 weeks. Faced with a dreary commute made uncertain by terrorism closures and rumors, I’d stay in New Jersey for two or three nights in a row, then go back to Brooklyn. I got in the best shape I’d ever been in, flying along on the treadmill with my feet pounding out fear and anger. I also drank in the hotel bar until things went black far too many nights. I wonder sometimes how much damage that kind of hysterical overdrive did.
None of this, of course, is more than an infinitesimal disruption compared to those who had mothers and fathers and children and friends and neighbors taken from them, murdered by a madman half a world away. But at the same time, it was not nothing.
Nor is it nothing that our country changed, with wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, horror stories about renditions and interrogations, an erosion of civil rights and the rise of a security apparatus that taps our phones and peers at our email and endlessly pursues obsolete targets at increasingly demeaning airport check-ins, all at an exorbitant cost. The character of our nation has changed, as we see it and as our friends and enemies see it. We will argue for generations over whether or not these changes were necessary and what harm they did us, but none of us involved in such arguments will ever remember how things used to be without regretting that time’s passing.
After 9/11 I wondered if I should leave New York. After Emily and I had a son 14 months later, I wondered that anew. Could I stand to live in the foremost terrorism target in the world? Was it insane to raise a child there? But we stayed. And almost against my will, I came to love New York in a way I never had before. Which leads me back to tonight.
Yes, part of me wanted to go to Ground Zero, to mark the occasion. And I smiled and nodded at the scenes of celebration there. But I decided not to go.
I thought of my son, not yet born on 9/11 and now sleeping safe and sound a room away, and said a silent but grateful thank-you to the brave men and women who had done so much to make it so. And then … I got back to watching the Mets game. I have a book deadline this week, so I organized some material for the final push there. There was Sunday laundry left to be done, so I kept the washer and dryer running through their cycles. But mostly I watched the game. I cheered on Pedro Beato and everybody’s new favorite Met Ronny Paulino and Taylor Buchholz and whooped when the Mets trooped off the mound victorious.
I’m glad that the Mets and Phillies kept playing, that the patriotic cheers were spontaneous, that there was no stoppage of the game for the president or anything else. The Mets and Phillies had a game to play, and they played it until there was a winner. People in the stands cheered for their team — men and women together at a sporting event, even the unveiled and unmarried, drinking beer and holding up signs and painting their chests and eating cheesesteaks and engaging in all sorts of foolishness. I cheered for my team at home. For the most part, I did what I do. For the most part, the people in the stands and on the field did the same.
When Osama Bin Laden murdered 3,000 people, it was a Tuesday morning on a warm late-summer day. Ten years later, I heard of his death on a pleasant spring night. I followed news of his demise via a technology that didn’t exist on 9/11, while my son, just just a vague imagining in September 2001, slept 10 feet away. Where the towers once stood, new towers are visible above the cityscape. Life has gone on in ways big and small, while this obscene murderous theocrat hid in caves and compounds, behind blast walls and barbed wire. He met his end on a Sunday night in America, during baseball season, with everything he sought to disrupt and ruin continuing without him — as it has for some time with him. Living as we have and as we wish and as we will is the best revenge.
by Greg Prince on 30 April 2011 7:39 pm
Saturday’s was the first game of 2011 to leave me in Angry Bird/flipping bird mode when it was done, which seems awfully late considering much of this season’s first month was pockmarked by ugly Met losses. There were isolated incidences of ire through April, but they were usually situational, such as “how the fuck did Emaus does not pick up that ball fucking cleanly and get Capuano out of this fucking inning?” but mostly I had so few expectations for this team that they didn’t seem worth getting riled up about.
The surliest I got, probably, was when D.J. Carrasco let Chris Young’s small masterpiece against the Nationals turn into a no-decision that first home Sunday, with Blaine Boyer coming on soon enough to toss the entire team effort into an environmentally friendly Citi Field trash receptacle. But I was having a nice day in Promenade, so I chalked it up as (mostly) one of those things. Plus I was soon enough sated by how quickly the Republic of Aldersonia exercised informed impatience and disappeared those who committed game-blowing crimes against the state.
But peace in our time has given way to pissed all afternoon into evening, at least since the 2:25 Roy Halladay devoted to folding up the Mets and slipping them in his back pocket expired. What a lousy fucking way to lose a fucking lousy baseball game.
• I hate how close to moral victory territory losing 2-1 to Halladay felt, the way young Niese kept up with the old master. That’s great for Disney, not for the major leagues. They’re mortal over there, even in the rotation. Your guy pitches well, you should be capable of figuring out how to score for him, even against Halladay, against whom the Mets are 0-6 since he became a Phillie. We face this magnificent bastard far too often to revel the slightest in moral victory.
• I hate that Niese’s slim one-run margin through the middle of the seventh sat there so tenuously. The only other time this season when visions of a lead becoming a win danced through my oughta-know-better head was that Young game against Washington. That was my 500th official Mets game attended and I made the rookie mistake of trying to calculate how many wins I would soon have in the bag once the Mets nailed it down. The answer was one fewer than I dared to presume. Today, as Niese showed signs of just maybe besting Halladay, I wondered if just maybe I’d have to revise my Game 027 plans where The Happiest Recap is concerned. Once John Mayberry took Niese past the flower pots in left field, that pondering was rendered moot. (Smooth move, Ferguson.)
• I hate that the thought of beating Roy Halladay looms as so momentous an occasion that I was actually considering it as potentially one of the two best 27th games in Mets history. The Mets, as I’ve learned through my hours of scouring box scores, used to engage in and win pitchers’ duels with some degree of regularity. It wasn’t that big a deal to beat the Roy Halladay of other eras once the Mets conquered Koufax — it wasn’t unprecedented, anyway. Nowadays, it’s not that the aces have gotten bigger, it’s that the Mets have gotten smaller.
• I hate that I spent eleven seasons on a series of living room couches watching the Mets crumble before one edition of Atlanta Braves after another, cursing everything about the team that could not be dislodged from the top of the National League East, finally ascending to the mountaintop via one fleeting six-month joyride only to slide down the side of Everest yet again, left to stare up at another perennial division champion that’s just as formidable, just as indestructible, just as irritating to lose to too many fucking times in the course of a year.
• I hate that the six-game winning streak got me taking this stupid team more seriously than I’d ever planned on in 2011. As Joey “The Lips” Fagan tried to console Jimmy Rabbitte at the end of The Commitments, they raised my expectations of life and lifted my horizons…at least enough to make me think we were gonna ditch fifth place for the foreseeable future. Well, even that much hasn’t transpired. Fuck!
• I hate that the six-game winning streak was built on a foundation of hay. The Mets took one from the lousy Astros, three from the lousy Diamondbacks and two from the lousy Nationals before the lousy Nationals took one from us. You play who you play, I always say, but the Mets don’t seem to beat anybody who’s capable of sustaining superior play. They’re 8-7 against sub-.500 outfits and 3-10 against the thus far good squads. It’s eerily and unsatisfyingly reminiscent of how the Mets conducted themselves from June 11 through October 3 of 2010: 12-1 versus absolute dregs Baltimore, Cleveland and Pittsburgh, 35-54 versus all other comers. The Mets are the weasely third-graders who stick it to the first-graders just coming back from shingles, and can’t do a thing with the rest of the third grade.
Anything else to get my hate on? Oh, let’s see, I hate that…
the Phillies continue to have a nicer ballpark than we do;
that the character-starved people (with the occasional Well-Meaning exception) who get to go to that ballpark leave it, as a rule, feeling just super;
that Charlie Manuel obviously had no compunction about letting Halladay bat in the bottom of the seventh of a tie game — as it should be, but it’s become so goddamn rare that it’s almost shocking;
that Buchholz can get Polanco out and Polanco still produces the eventual winning RBI;
that the whole world stops spinning and lefties have to be retrieved from under rocks the moment Ryan Howard shows his face/arms;
that Wilson Valdez has managed to make Chase Utley’s absence almost incidental;
that Vance Worley, Joe Grahe and Darrin Winston combined to shut us out for eight innings Friday night;
that they don’t miss fifth starters nor two closers;
that Willie Harris is a no-tool threat coming off the bench;
that Willie Harris isn’t given every opportunity to pal around with his buddies in our nation’s capital;
that Ike Davis doesn’t know better than to swing at first pitches with runners on base;
that the Mets didn’t see Ball One until their tenth batter;
that there are still tailors who lovingly hand-craft double play balls and they all work for Roy Halladay;
that Fox chooses to save money by refusing to employ a professional play-by-play announcer and instead uses apparent contest-winner or obvious nepotee Matt Vasgersian to fill the spaces between Tim McCarver;
that the Mets continue to punish us by sticking us with Wayne Hagin;
and that exactly one-sixth of the season is in the books, we’ve had a lovely hot streak, yet we’re still a basement-dwelling 11-16 unit that might get better for a spell but will most likely revert to form, and whatever portion of the summer isn’t wasted worrying and wondering about which big contract will be traded — and for what — will be given over to teasing us with Matt Harvey or whoever because all this team has going for it is a vague notion that the future will beat the present all while the present proves it has a perverse talent for sticking around clear to the end of September.
Other than that, good game.
|
|