The blog for Mets fans
who like to read
ABOUT US
Faith and Fear in Flushing made its debut on Feb. 16, 2005, the brainchild of two longtime friends and lifelong Met fans.
Greg Prince discovered the Mets when he was 6, during the magical summer of 1969. He is a Long Island-based writer, editor and communications consultant. Contact him here.
Jason Fry is a Brooklyn writer whose first memories include his mom leaping up and down cheering for Rusty Staub. Check out his other writing here.
Got something to say? Leave a comment, or email us at faithandfear@gmail.com. (Sorry, but we have no interest in ads, sponsored content or guest posts.)
Need our RSS feed? It's here.
Visit our Facebook page, or drop by the personal pages for Greg and Jason.
Or follow us on Twitter: Here's Greg, and here's Jason.
|
by Greg Prince on 23 October 2011 8:46 am
The World Series contest that’s been instantly enshrined in history for Albert Pujols detonating three tons of TNT into the Arlington night (and then graciously sticking around to chat about it afterwards) was really decided before the King completely got his groove back. Those three homers that defined Game Three, every one of them a Poke of Pujolsian Proportions, were mammoth, majestic, magnificent…and just a shade beside the point.
The Rangers were going to lose this thing on their own merit before Albert really hit his stride. Texas did almost everything wrong, starting with drawing Ron Kulpa as the first base umpire. The home team was rooked by a lousy call, one of those instances in which a baseball-watching nation sees one thing and the only man whose vision matters sees something else — something that didn’t happen. Mike Napoli received a lousy throw from Ian Kinsler but slapped a definitive tag on Matt Holliday. Holliday was out, except to Kulpa, who seemed to be standing somewhere in downtown Fort Worth when he made his mysterious Jim Joycean judgment.
One Super Bowl III final later, it didn’t seem to matter, but who knows how a game’s shape is altered by a Sliding Doors ruling? In a parallel universe, Matt Harrison pitches differently and perhaps more soundly in that fourth inning, with two out and nobody on, trailing only 1-0. Instead, he gets worse and worse, and the Rangers get worse and worse (including poor Napoli, who channels Jeremy Reed on one particularly dismal fling home) and Texas is lucky to escape that frame down a mere five runs.
The Rangers surged back into competition in the bottom of the inning as one can apparently do in Arlington’s charming bandbox and with a lineup as dangerous as Texas’s against a pitcher as terminally undistinguished as Kyle Lohse. Michael Young homers. Nelson Cruz homers. It’s 5-3. Lohse joins Harrison as a former participant in the evening’s proceedings. The Rangers threaten to edge ever closer when Kinsler lifts a one-out fly ball that ought to score Napoli from third, but Napoli adds to his night of woes by making a lousy slide to the wrong side of home plate and he’s out to end the inning.
By now, it was clear we were past the “admirable” portion of the World Series, the segment in which stifling pitching and crisp defense were setting the tone. This was now the kind of night in which the likes of D.J. Carrasco and Ryota Igarashi would have felt right at home (which would be great for Igarashi, who could use a new professional home right about now). Scott Feldman, however, would have to do for Ron Washington. A hit, a couple of walks, a well-placed grounder and a killer double from Yadier Molina, whom I regret to inform the portion of Metsopotamia that doesn’t deign to watch World Series games, is October-lethal even when Aaron Heilman isn’t around. The Cardinals were up 8-3 in the middle of the fifth, and Pujols had yet to homer once.
Texas made one last stand, with three consecutive hits and a run to open their portion of the fifth, which was presumably fine with Tony La Russa, because it gave him an excuse to make a pitching change; Tony La Russa going more than ten minutes without making a pitching change is like Don Draper going ten minutes between cigarettes. Lance Lynn replaced Fernando Salas and, sure enough, the Rangers bats continued to smoke. A single, a sac fly and a pair of walks led to the bases being loaded, the Rangers pulling to within 8-6 and Kinsler having every chance to re-alter the trajectory of what was — depending on your preference — a pulsating offensive display or a total pitching fiasco.
Then, on a two-two delivery, Lynn popped up Kinsler to Rafael Furcal for the third out. And just like that, with four innings to go, the game was over.
And the exhibition was on.
BOOM!!! went Pujols’s first home run, a three-run blast off Alexi Ogando in the sixth, to make the score Cardinals 11 Rangers 6.
BOOM!!! went Pujols’s second home run, a two-run job off Mike Gonzalez in the seventh, to make the score Cardinals 14 Rangers 6.
BOOM!!! went Pujols’s third home run, a solo shot off Darren Oliver in the ninth, to make the score Cardinals 16 Rangers 7.
Albert was having a pretty good game when the issue was still in doubt. He had singled twice and driven in a run. But he had a phenomenal game as it was becoming abundantly clear the Rangers had blown their myriad chances to hang in with the Cardinals. Merge Albert’s two games, as the box score does, and it seems pretty clear Albert Pujols just crafted the best game any batter ever put together in a World Series.
Which is really saying something, no matter how little Albert chose to say two nights earlier.
On another night, Kulpa’s atrocious call would be the main story. Or Napoli’s all-around Schleprock luck. Or maybe Molina’s four RBIs. Or Allen Craig’s first-inning home run, which gave him three hits in his first three World Series at-bats. Or the burning of the Texas bullpen — five pitchers used, none throwing fewer than sixteen pitches. Or the way Lynn restored a semblance of order to an almost lawless game, getting Kinsler in the fifth, facing only three batters in the sixth and collecting two outs in the seventh before giving way to Octavio Dotel.
But there’s never been a night in which one man came to bat in the World Series six times, recorded five hits, walloped three home runs, drove in six runs, accumulated fourteen total bases and increased his already stratospheric market value exponentially. So yeah, Albert Pujols, whose exploits evoked necessary statistical shoutouts to Babe Ruth and Reggie Jackson, was the main story.
That he wasn’t the primary reason the Cardinals won the game we’ll just keep between us.
by Greg Prince on 22 October 2011 11:37 am
I admire the 2011 World Series thus far, which is a nice way of saying I have yet to be fully engaged by it. After the slam-bang blowouts that ended the LCSes, it was predicted/feared that the St. Louis and Texas lineups would lay waste to each other’s starting pitching and that the games would be interminable. Instead, we’ve seen starters go deep, scores stay tight and everything take three hours anyway…but really, for postseason baseball, three hours is the new two hours.
Each game has been competitive and we know there will be at least three more. Vague temporary allegiances aside, I’m mostly rooting for a seven-game series, a treat we haven’t enjoyed in nine years. That’s the longest non-maximum dry spell baseball’s championship round has endured since the period between 1912 and 1924, and there were years in the middle of that aridity when the teams played best-of-nine sets and a couple of those went eight games (which was, at the time, the new six games).
If I were a Cardinals fan, I would have been sky-high for 17 innings, particularly from the pinch-hitting exploits of Allen Craig, whom I keep confusing with that new Fox animated show. Allen Gregory should only be as entertaining — or as clutch — as Allen Craig. But then, in the eighteenth inning, I would have been mortified by how my team’s commanding lead (one of those expressions announcers use that no regular person would ever think to say) was eviscerated and became a tie.
If I were a Rangers fan, I would be sky-high from the way my team eviscerated that so-called commanding lead: not with a Cruz missile but rather with a dash of Kinsler kibbitz and a touch of Andrus angst. Somebody on the MLB Network said the Rangers played “National League baseball” in the ninth inning of Game Two. We who follow the National League simply call it “baseball,” much the way one who is not Chinese assumes someone who is Chinese might decide to order out for “food”.
It’s good stuff, but I have to confess I’m just now warming to it. As much as I look forward to the World Series (assuming I’m not completely dreading it), it usually takes me a couple of games to get acclimated, like when I go to concerts or musicals and it takes me a half-hour to adjust to the notion that I’m watching famous people sing in front of me. And then, because the players always seem tense when they realize they’re in the World Series, I get antsy. Early in Game One, it was, all right, let’s go, c’mon…uh, I’m just gonna watch Modern Family and maybe South Park for a while, but I’ll definitely check in during commercials. By the end of the second game, however, I was getting a handle on the living and dying with teams whose figurative life and death doesn’t usually faze me. I went from admiring the potential 1-0 Cardinal win to admiring the 2-1 Ranger comeback.
And maybe by tonight, I’ll be engaged by the whole thing.
What isn’t admirable was several Cardinal veterans’ refusal to engage the media hordes after they let their potential commanding lead slip away. Albert Pujols made a bad play in the field and a worse play in the clubhouse by not sticking around to answer questions. He’s the most famous player out of the 50 still playing and he made what may have been the key error of the Series when he didn’t cut off Jon Jay’s relay throw on Elvis Andrus’s single. I saw Jay, a generally unknown second-year man, stand up and answer questions while Pujols, Matt Holliday, Lance Berkman and good old Yadier Molina made themselves noticeably unavailable.
Also hanging around and hanging in there was Jason Motte, the pitcher who was supposed to protect the 1-0 lead and couldn’t. Motte had more reason to hide or vamoose, but he stood up in the best tradition of Tim Teufel and accounted for himself. And he did so, according to ESPN’s Jim Caple, because he learned how to conduct himself from a Met (who I guess used to be a Cardinal).
He said a player has a responsibility to do so, a lesson he said Jason Isringhausen taught him.“He told me that if you can talk to everyone on a day you strike the side out then you have to come out and face the music on one of those other days,” Motte said. “It’s part of the business. It’s not fun talking about it but that’s the way it and that’s the way you have to handle it. You have to man up and that’s the way it is.”
See, when you learn from a Met, you learn how to stand tall and and explain crushing defeat. No doubt Izzy learned that particular skill at the knee of John Franco.
Motte’s only recently been anointed the St. Louis closer and there’s no telling how much closing he’ll be doing the rest of the Series (or how effective his closing will be), but he deserves a gold star for professionalism even if he didn’t get the save in Game Two. Compare his attitude, let alone his availability, to that of Pujols.
“I guess the way you guys are ripping me off, I guess I need to stay tomorrow in the clubhouse until you guys decide to talk to me,” Pujols said when asked whether he has a responsibility to talk to reporters. “My responsibility is to my God and my family, I don’t have any responsibility to anybody else. And I try to do the best I can to represent the game of baseball. I do that. Sometimes you make a mistake. Do I feel I made a mistake last night? I don’t think so. What can I do? I was waiting and nobody approached me. There is nothing I can do.”
Just as one error in the field doesn’t completely diminish Pujols the player, one night of suddenly not knowing how talking to reporters works after eleven big-league seasons (and two previous World Series) doesn’t make Albert a villain. We move too quickly to divide our public figures into “good” and “bad” instead of accepting that everybody has good days and bad days. I’ve always admired Pujols more than I’ve been engaged by him, even I always swoon at his I’m not the Man, Stan’s the Man humility. Still, you’re at the center of baseball’s singular event, you’re baseball’s singular star and you need (or so you claim) the Cardinals’ PR guy to tell you exactly what to do when one of your rare bad days is over? It’s a turnoff at a time when the sport can’t seem to get enough people to turn it on.
I’m sure it won’t cause Pujols any hardship in the free agent market. I’m sure another couple of botched cutoffs won’t cost him a nickel. He’s the greatest player this century has seen. But for one night, he was no Jason Motte.
Or Jason Isringhausen.
by Greg Prince on 21 October 2011 3:41 pm
Welcome to The Happiest Recap, a solid gold slate of New York Mets games culled from every schedule the Mets have ever played en route to this, their fiftieth year in baseball. We’ve created a dream season that includes the “best” 158th game in any Mets season, the “best” 159th game in any Mets season…and we keep going from there until we have a completed schedule worthy of Bob Murphy coming back with the Happy Recap after this word from our sponsor on the WFAN Mets Radio Network.
GAME 158: September 27, 2000 — METS 6 Braves 2
(Mets All-Time Game 158 Record: 17-29; Mets 2000 Record: 90-68)
The Mets have never “backed in” to a playoff spot, if one can, in fact, be said to have not earned something it takes the bulk of 162 games to achieve, no matter where you happen to be standing when the achievement becomes statistically official. No losing when somebody else beat their closest competitor; no word filtering into a clubhouse or onto a team flight; no accidental-tourist type of qualifying for this franchise. The Mets have actively secured everything they’ve ever clinched.
But this one time, circumstances dictated the process couldn’t be made to feel a whole lot more anticlimactic.
Welcome to the Lost Clincher. Welcome to the night the Mets won the berth they needed the night after they lost the berth they wanted. Welcome to the night when the Mets didn’t quite know what to do with themselves when the obvious answer was “celebrate”.
Welcome to late September of 2000. It’s the Mets and the Braves at Shea, or shall we say the Braves and the Mets. That was the order that irked the Mets for too long, right up to and including the night before, when the Mets were still ever so slightly capable of derailing the Braves’ streak of umpteen consecutive division titles. For that to have happened, the Mets would have had to have beaten the Braves and then kept beating the Braves. But if the Mets could have done that with any kind of regularity, then the Mets would have been more than slightly alive in the final week of the year. Instead, they lost to Atlanta, 7-1, ensuring their own elimination as well as the Braves’ inevitable corporate coronation.
When Wednesday evening arrived, the team that had just seen its tragic number for the N.L. East reduced to zero turned around to tackle a different, generally cheerier task. The Mets’ magic number for the N.L. Wild Card was a mere 1. They led the Dodgers by five with five games to play. All it would take was a motivated Mets squad sticking it to a Brave bunch that didn’t have that much at stake (which Mets fans with memories that stretched back to the final weekend at Turner Field in 1998 knew wouldn’t stop Atlanta from trying to stick it to the Mets). Again, if it were that easy to beat the Braves on command, maybe it would have been Bobby Cox’s team angling for the consolation prize. Instead, it was Bobby Valentine’s, and they were resigned to making the playoffs in whatever guise the invitation came.
They might even enjoy it.
“No restrictions,” Steve Phillips responded when asked if the Mets were going to throw a clubhouse gala if they clinched what was essentially the best second-place record in the league against the team with the best record in their division. “I’ll pour champagne over somebody.”
When the game began, the Braves were mostly throwing cold water on the Mets’ celebratory ambitions. Andruw Jones homered off Rick Reed with one out in the first and the Mets were in the familiar position of trailing Atlanta. But the unflappable Reed settled down from there, keeping the Braves off the board long enough for his teammates to tie it when Todd Zeile worked a bases-loaded walk versus Kevin Millwood in the fourth. The Braves’ bid to retake the lead on another long Andruw Jones shot to right was short-circuited when Derek Bell leapt at the wall to rob him to close the top of the fifth. Bell’s knee took one for the team on the play, crashing as it did into the blue padding.
“I knew,” Bell said, “I had to go out there and catch that ball and keep us close in the game.”
Derek’s determination paid off, even after he was taken out to protect his leg. The Mets scored three runs in the bottom of the fifth, one coming on Bell pinch-hitter Darryl Hamilton’s single and two more on Edgardo Alfonzo’s 25th home run of the season. Bolstered by a 4-1 lead, Reed continued to chug along. The Mets would add one more run off Millwood and another against reliever Scott Kamieniecki to make it 6-1. Reed pitched through the eighth, allowing no more runs. His line for the night featured seven strikeouts and only four hits.
The Mets closed in on the berth they needed when Armando Benitez succeeded Reeder on the mound in the ninth. After allowing an obligatory solo home run to Andres Gallaraga, Benitez struck out old Shea friend Bobby Bonilla, gave up a single to Wally Joyner and struck out Reggie Sanders. The only obstacle standing between the Mets and their interim goal was second baseman Keith Lockhart.
Gary Cohen called the final pitch of the forgotten clincher:
“Benitez ready, the one-two pitch…SWING and a miss, he struck him out! The ballgame is over, and the Mets have clinched the Wild Card in the National League, and for the first time in franchise history, the Mets are goin’ to the postseason for the SECOND CONSECUTIVE year. And everybody comes out of the dugout, handshakes all around, and the guys from the bullpen are running in as well to be part of the celebration, as the Mets congratulate each other on clinching the Wild Card for a second consecutive season.”
There was sustained cheering, and music blasted, and the scoreboard lit up, and in case anybody had an out-of-control case of Wild Card fever, there was somewhat heightened security on hand. But 1969 wasn’t about to break out down on the field. Still, the Mets had done something they had never done before (and something time would prove difficult to do again) by punching their ticket to the postseason twice in a row. They knew from experience that once you’re in the playoffs, whether by division title or Wild Card, all that mattered was that you were there. It was worth the heartiest of handshakes and the spilling of the most sparkling of wines.
That said, it wasn’t quite Studio 54 revisited. More mild card than Wild Card.
Reed: “This is just one step.”
Mike Piazza; “It’s good just to get it over with.”
Al Leiter: “I think everyone knew we were going to clinch, it was just a matter of when. We kind of knew that coming out of Spring Training.”
If the Mets sounded a little world-weary about becoming one of only eight major league clubs that would be playing beyond its 162nd game, it was because they had as their goal the World Series, a destination they neared without making a year earlier. “We’ve been at this step before,” Reed said. “We’ve been to the next step. We have to get to the step after that.”
Nevertheless, this was the step that had to be taken, a step that sometimes seemed ready to trip the Mets up, no matter that they were more or less expected to get back to the postseason in 2000. Losing another season series — and thus division title — to Atlanta colored perceptions about these Mets, as did their high-profile four losses in six Interleague meetings with the omnipresent Yankees, along with the usual Chicken Little contretemps (Mike Hampton’s shaky start, Rickey Henderson’s fadeout and Rey Ordoñez’s season-ending broken left forearm, to name three) that are magnified tabloid-fold by playing in New York. A worrisome 1-7 stretch to open September further lent credence to the idea that the Mets and October were something less than inevitable. Yet here they were, assured of getting to a brand new starting line.
“Everyone said we’ve struggled,” Valentine said as the champagne flew outside his office, “and this is our 90th win. This team is made up of a fabulous group of individuals who are strong and talented. They proved to me, time and time again, how good they are. I’ll take my chances, I guarantee that, against anyone.”
There would indeed be Met chances to take, starting in San Francisco a week later.
ALSO QUITE HAPPY: On September 29, 1999, the Mets heeded the words of wise old inmate Red from The Shawshank Redemption. After seven excruciating games when the Mets did nothing but die, they decided to get busy living…and they chose quite a pitcher to jump out of the grave against.
Eight days earlier, the Mets alighted in Atlanta for an anticipated showdown with the Braves for first place. One game separated the two rivals. Everything that could go wrong did go wrong for New York in Dixie, and three games later, the Mets were four out of first. Three games after that, following a set in Philadelphia, the Mets were officially out of contention for the division title. It was a stunning trend: the Braves won six straight as the Mets lost six straight. Worse, the Cincinnati Reds had caught fire and now led the Mets for the Wild Card, a spot the Mets had viewed as a safety net.
A hole had been cut through their failsafe, however. The Reds had gotten so hot that as the Mets were losing their seventh consecutive game — the opener of a three-game series at Shea to the Braves — Cincinnati was passing Houston for the National League Central lead, and thus sported a record 2½ games better than the Mets. This meant the heretofore first-place Astros, who were taking on Cincy in Cincy, were suddenly the Mets’ key concern, and they were a game-and-a-half up on New York. It was a little confusing to sort out from one day to the next, but what was bloody apparent was there was little time left in the Mets’ season, and none of it could any longer be squandered on losing without interruption.
What a treat, then, that the Mets were not only facing the Braves who had left them in the dust, but had to figure out a way to beat Greg Maddux, he who entered Wednesday night’s action at 19-8…and he who benefited from the bonus status of being Greg Maddux, four-time National League Cy Young Award winner. Maddux had faced the Mets three times previously in 1999 and beaten them with little support (1-0), with loads of support (16-0) and, just the week before, with as much support as he needed when he wasn’t incredibly sharp (6-3).
This is a way to halt a seven-game winning streak and revive your disappearing postseason hopes?
As a matter of fact it was. It didn’t appear promising when Brian Jordan nicked Al Leiter for a two-run single in the top of the third and erased an early 1-0 Met advantage, but Leiter steadied himself and kept the Braves from inflicting any more damage through four. Unfortunately, the Mets came to bat in the bottom of the fourth trailing, 2-1. There was ample evidence to suggest any lead would be sufficient for Maddux to nail down his 20th win and all but nail shut the Mets’ 1999 coffin.
But hold that obituary…
Darryl Hamilton led off the Mets’ fourth with a single to right.
Roger Cedeño followed with a single to left.
Rey Ordoñez beat out an infield hit to load the bases.
Al Leiter, who began the evening as an .078 hitter, dropped the Mets’ fourth consecutive single into center field. Hamilton scampered home to tie the game at 2-2.
Rickey Henderson slapped a hit to the right side to bring home Cedeño and Ordoñez. The Mets led, 4-2.
Edgardo Alfonzo found a hole between second and third. With Leiter the baserunner at second, that meant nobody was going to advance more than 90 feet. Thus, Fonzie’s hit served to reload the bases.
John Olerud came up and totally unloaded them. He unloaded on Maddux with a grand slam home run that stunned everybody in attendance, particularly those in Atlanta uniforms. After drip-drip-dripping the Atlanta ace dry with six consecutive singles (none of them hit particularly hard), Mount Olerud erupted. Shea followed suit. At last, the Mets stopped being dead. They led, 8-2, and after a Mike Piazza single that threatened to restart the carousel of Met baserunners, Maddux left the game.
Leiter and the Mets went on to an easy 9-2 win. At Cinergy Field, the Astros beat the Reds, 4-1. That meant a tie for first in the Central and even less clarity in the Mets’ chase of the Wild Card. But what counted was the Mets, 1½ behind both teams, were up and actively in the chase once more.
GAME 159: September 25, 2008 — METS 7 Cubs 6
(Mets All-Time Game 159 Record: 21-25; Mets 2008 Record: 88-71)
On May 8, 1964, the Mets went to the bottom of the ninth inning locked in a 4-4 tie with the St. Louis Cardinals. George Altman led off against Bobby Shantz with a single. Amado “Sammy” Samuel bunted Altman to second. St. Louis manager Johnny Keane ordered pinch-hitter Jim Hickman intentionally walked. Casey Stengel sent up another pinch-hitter, Joe Christopher, and Christopher shot a grounder into left field. It scored Altman with the winning run.
That became Shea Stadium’s first walkoff win. There would be another 328 in regular-season play plus seven in the playoffs and World Series between 1964, when Shea opened, and 2008, before it was to become no more than a memory. When the first one occurred, there was no doubt it was the first, even if the phrase “walkoff win,” was decades from creation. When the last one would occur…well, that couldn’t be known until all 45 seasons, up to and including Shea’s final homestand (and maybe more), were complete.
What was known during that last scheduled week of Shea, which encompassed a four-game series against the Cubs and a three-game set against the Marlins, was the Mets needed every damn win they could get, no matter how long it took to get it. In the midst of a pennant race, the sooner, the better, but the 2008 Mets were in no position to be choosers. Score the necessary runs and cruise to victory, and nobody would complain. Play out the suspense until the final swing of the game determined a positive outcome…well, that would be the Met way, wouldn’t it?
What wasn’t what anybody wanted was how the final game of the Cub series was going for quite a while. After losing two of three to Chicago (who had already clinched the N.L. Central title and home-field advantage throughout the playoffs), Thursday night presented a desperate situation for the Mets. They were a game-and-a-half in back of Philly for first in the East and tied with Milwaukee for the Wild Card. With echoes of the 2007 collapse still resonating in the memory of everybody at Shea, all any fan could ask for was for the Mets to take a lead as soon as possible and never give it up.
Ask, and ye shall not necessarily receive.
In another season, the idea that your manager could hand the ball to Pedro Martinez to start a humongous game would have been comforting. In 2008, it was a recipe for immediate disaster. Pedro was still Pedro in terms of reputation and heart and bearing, but he was just another guy named Martinez when it came to literally starting games. In a seemingly constant state of injury rehabilitation, Pedro was a horrible first-inning pitcher in ’08. He pitched 20 of them in the course of the season and gave up 23 earned runs. That made for a first-inning ERA of 10.35 and an almost rock-solid guarantee that you’ll be digging your team an immediate hole, especially at home.
Sure enough, Pedro’s first inning against the Cubs was like most of his first innings in 2008: instantly dreadful. With two out, he gave up the first home run of Micah Hoffpauir’s major league career. The Mets were down, 1-0. Three batters later, after a walk and two singles, the Mets were down, 2-0.
The Mets got one of those runs back in the bottom of the first, when David Wright lifted a sacrifice fly to center off Rich Harden to score Jose Reyes from third. While nobody was about to throw back a Met run, there was some modestly cruel irony in who recorded the RBI and how he did it. Less than 24 hours earlier, when the Mets and Cubs were tied at six, rookie Daniel Murphy led off the Mets’ ninth with a triple. The next batter was Wright. All he needed to do was lift a fly ball of Cub reliever Bobby Howry. The Cubs, it bears repeating, had nothing to play for. The Mets had everything to play for. And Wright didn’t have to be a hero — as he had been when he popped a game-ending, ninth-inning home run at Shea against Heath Bell of the Padres on August 7 in the Mets’ second-to-most-recent walkoff win. He didn’t even have to collect a base hit — as he did when he doubled at Shea to set up Carlos Delgado’s game-ending, ninth-inning single against Vladimir Nuñez of the Braves on August 21 in the Mets’ most recent walkoff win. He just had to lift a moderately deep fly ball to score Murphy and win a crucial game for the Mets.
But he couldn’t. Or he didn’t. David struck out. Murphy stayed glued to third base. Lou Piniella ordered two intentional walks, and Howry squirmed out of trouble with no Met scoring. In the tenth, Luis Ayala gave up three runs and the Mets went on to lose, 9-6.
So you could understand if the large, chilled, rain-soaked crowd applauded David Wright’s first-inning sacrifice fly with less than outright enthusiasm.
Martinez, meanwhile, got through the second without incident, but the third was another story. It was another Hoffpauir inning, actually, and Hoffpauir had quickly become synonymous for lethal where Pedro Martinez was concerned. Ryan Theriot led off the frame with a walk, and Micah followed with a booming RBI double. The Mets, having learned that Hoffpauir had power, trailed, 3-1.
Then Pedro, because he was Pedro, even in a diminished state, called on reserves of greatness few other pitchers could have summoned. He struck out Jim Edmonds and walked Mike Fontenot before striking out Casey McGehee and Kosuke Fukodome.
The fourth didn’t include quite so dramatic a flourish, but Pedro went unscored upon, allowing the Mets to pull even in the bottom of the inning as Ryan Church doubled in Wright and Carlos Beltran.
Given a tie to defend, Pedro did what he could with the indefatigable Hoffpauir, limiting him to a single to lead off the fifth, and then used only four pitches to retire the next three Cub batters, keeping the score knotted at three apiece.
The visitors’ sixth was just as effective for the home team’s pitcher: Fukudome grounding to second; Koyie Hill striking out looking; Harden striking out swinging. Martinez had turned around his early-innings troubles and kept the Mets (who weren’t scoring) in the game.
The Mets didn’t put anything on the board in their half of the sixth. Jerry Manuel sent his starter back to the mound to commence the seventh. For the fourth time, the Cubs got their leadoff man on, this time on a Felix Pie single. Pie then stole second with Theriot at the plate. On a three-one count, Theriot walked. That was Pedro Martinez’s 99th pitch of the game, and Manuel came out to let him know it was his last.
And, pending theoretical tiebreakers and playoffs, it was also his last as a New York Met.
Pedro Martinez signed a four-year contract in December 2004. This was the fourth year, the end of it. For about a season-and-a-third, he was everything Mets fans could have desired. Then injuries began to bite him and sideline him. Nearing the age of 37, it was getting tougher and tougher for the three-time Cy Young winner (once with Montreal, twice with Boston) to reach let alone maintain his characteristic high standard.
In the heart of the steroid era, in the designated hitter league, Pedro posted consecutive season earned run averages of 2.07, 1.74, 2.26 and 2.22. In his final mostly injury-free season, 2005, he led the Mets out of mediocrity and into respectability. He finished in the Top 5 in a dozen different pitching categories that year — including coming in first in WHIP and K/BB Ratio — and, intangibly but definitively, made an impression on Mets fans. He was Pedro Martinez and he was theirs. It was a sensation that multiple trips to the disabled list and a plethora of bad first innings never quite erased.
It was no wonder, then, that once Manuel pulled Martinez, the more than 40,000 in attendance rose as one and applauded what they all assumed was the last they’d see of this immortal in their midst. It was also no wonder that Pedro, who may have had the strongest intrinsic feel of any modern player for his place in the game, acknowledged the response as only Pedro would. He gestured toward the sky and seemingly to every fan in every section of the stadium on his walk to the dugout, as if to applaud those who were applauding him.
“What went through my mind actually,” he said, “was the fans and to appreciate their support just in case I did pitch my last game as a Met or my last start as a Met.” Shea had been Pedro’s park for only four of his 17 big league seasons, but he had certainly made himself at home: “It’s been a fun place for me.” As for the realization that this could very well be it for him and Shea, he admitted a 3-3 seventh-inning tie may have been “the wrong time to think about those things, but when they started to clap for me, I thought they might be thinking the same thing.”
On a night when he was “not very happy” with his performance, the Mets’ starter nonetheless kept his team in the game. He struck out nine in six-plus innings. It was indeed something for Shea Stadium to applaud.
What happened one pitch after he left, however, was a whole other ball of wax.
Martinez was succeeded to the mound by journeyman lefthander Ricardo Rincon, wearing Kenny Rogers’s old lucky number of 73. The ten-year veteran, whose primary claim to fame was as one of Billy Beane’s trade deadline chess pieces in Moneyball, materialized in the Mets’ beleaguered bullpen on September 5. He had made seven appearances to date and hadn’t done anything terribly wrong in six of them. Given the state of Mets relief pitching, that made the 38-year-old specialist — someone who did not appear in the majors in all of 2007 — as a good a bet for Manuel to bring in as anybody warming up beyond the right field fence could have been with two on and nobody out.
That was before the first pitch Rincon threw his first batter, mighty Micah Hoffpauir. When Hoffpauir swung, every one of Ricardo’s reliefmates could see the result, because the ball soared over their airspace and likely landed on the L.I.E. Just like that, Pedro’s poignant farewell became another piece of rained-on Shea debris. The Mets trailed the Cubs, 6-3. Rincon faced two more batters, got an out and gave up a double. He left the mound to a much different critical reception from the home crowd. Like Pedro, though, he would never pitch for the Mets again.
“Never” was emerging as the theme of the evening. There would never be any more baseball at Shea after this weekend if the Mets didn’t get their act together. There would never be any chance of the Mets getting their act together if some relievers didn’t start providing some relief. There would never be any forgiveness if the Mets, who had blown a 7-game lead with 17 to play one September earlier, continued to blow the 3½-game lead they had been in the process of blowing with 17 to play this September.
Oh, and it felt like it was never going to stop raining. Just cheerful as all get-out during this, the second-to-last night game slated to ever be played at Shea Stadium.
Brian Stokes came on to pitch and got out of the seventh. Chad Gaudin replaced Harden and allowed a leadoff double to Robinson Cancel, perhaps the most unlikely starting catcher any playoff contender could come up with in the 159th game of a season. Cancel (who battled Gaudin for seven pitches) had garnered a handful of key pinch-hits across the summer, but what was most noteworthy about him was that he was batting in the major leagues at all. He sipped a cup of callup coffee with the Milwaukee Brewers in September 1999 and then spent the first eight seasons of the 21st century in the minor leagues. He didn’t make it back to The Show until June of 2008, with the Mets.
It was as much a comment on Robinson’s perseverance as it was on the Mets’ desperation that he was starting behind the plate in the game the Mets absolutely had to have. There was more than a bit of that going on amid the Mets lineup card day by day. On one hand, Reyes, Wright, Beltran and Delgado missed virtually no time at all from April to September. On the other hand, the identities of the other half of the Mets’ position players were shrouded in a Shealike fog of mystery. Rookies, has-beens, concussion victims…everybody was getting a shot from Jerry Manuel. Tonight, among others, it was Robinson Cancel.
Tonight it worked. Cancel advanced to third on pinch-hitter Marlon Anderson’s groundout and scored on Reyes’s groundout. The Mets had closed to within 6-4. Scott Schoeneweis, another anxiety-inducing lefty, came on to pitch the eighth. Despite a walk to Theriot and a single from Hoffpauir (now 5-for-5, for crissake), he didn’t give up any runs.
On this soggy night, the bottom of the eighth would bring with it the air of water torture for Mets fans. Wright singled to lead off, but then Delgado — who had fastened the Mets to his back in late June and proceeded to carry them for most of the second half — grounded into a 5-4-3 double play. With that, the Mets were four outs from dropping three of four to a team that truly had nothing to play for. Without a change of direction, they’d fall two behind the idle Phillies with four to play and not keep pace with the Brewers, with whom they were deadlocked in the Wild Card division. While the Mets were trailing the Cubs, the Brewers were tied with the Pirates at Miller Park (they’d win in ten on a Ryan Braun grand slam).
Against lefty Neal Cotts, the Mets tried to light a fire in the rain. Beltran scratched out an infield hit. Ryan Church sent a liner into short left. The Mets had two on with two out. Piniella removed Cotts and brought in Howry to face Ramon Martinez, the Mets’ fourth-string second baseman behind various combinations of Luis Castillo, Damion Easley and Argenis Reyes. As with Cancel and Rincon, there was little reason to believe heretofore disregarded almost 36-year-old Martinez (first MLB game this season: 9/7/08) would be playing in the majors right about now (last MLB start: 9/18/07), and surely you wouldn’t have pegged a team fighting for its playoff life as the one to be deploying him. Nevertheless, it was Ramon at the plate as the Mets tried to overcome their self-inflicted September inertia, and it was Ramon who was up as Beltran stole third.
Then it was Ramon producing his second run batted in of the season (his first, on a bases-loaded walk, came the night before). He poked Howry’s fourth pitch into left, sending home Beltran to cut the Cubs’ lead to 6-5 and advancing Church to second. Ryan, who had suffered two concussions in his first season as a Met, was still able to use his head when the next batter, Cancel, guided a 1-2 pitch into right. Having thought to keep running from second, doom seemed to await him at the plate, as Fukudome’s throw to Hill appeared on time and on target, but Church made one of the brainier non-slides Shea had ever seen. He wound wide of Hill’s tag and then managed to grab a piece of the plate with his hand as he slipped on the wet ground. It didn’t look textbook, but it registered a fourth Mets run on the big Shea scoreboard.
“We practiced that in Spring Training,” Church winked.
The 6-6 tie was subject to the usual round of Met bullpen roulette Manuel was forced to play in these waning weeks of ’08. Billy Wagner was done in by injury and nobody the manager called on could be considered remotely reliable. Jerry tried his luck with Pedro Feliciano to start the ninth. Lousy luck: Fontenot reached him for a single. Out went Feliciano, in came Joe Smith. The sidearmer wild-pitched the baserunner to second but struck out McGehee. An intentional walk of Fukudome was ordered, and it paid off when he was forced at second. Pinch-hitter Daryle Ward then grounded out to Smith.
A Met reliever hadn’t given up a go-ahead run in a ninth inning. Maybe there was hope yet.
If the Mets were going to win, they would have to follow in the spikemarks of Joe Christopher and all those who effected Shea’s storied walkoff past. The phrase “walkoff,” as it applied to baseball, wasn’t coined until Dennis Eckersley came up with it to describe what he did after giving up Kirk Gibson’s winning home run in the ninth inning of the first game of the 1988 World Series, though Eck was thinking more in terms of a walkoff loss. Those could only befall you at home, thus Mets fans had to be optimistic if they were going to think walkoff at all. They had to conjure some of the indelible images from 45 seasons and postseasons in this stadium that was about to shutter.
It didn’t have to Gibsonian. Mets fans would accept any kind of favorable result that would send them home happy.
Somebody could turn a sacrifice into a non-interference call when the ball he bunted hit his elbow en route to first.
Somebody could tap a little roller that got through the first baseman’s legs.
Somebody could slam a bases-loaded pitch over the wall only to get tackled before making it around the bases.
Shea had exploded for all kinds of unconventional walkoff wins. J.C. Martin (1969 World Series, Game Four), Mookie Wilson (1986 World Series, Game Six) and Robin Ventura (1999 National League Championship Series) were revered for their skewed October exploits, events that turned postseason ties into postseason wins. Right now, all that was wanted was maybe somebody running inside the baseline and not getting noticed; or provoking an E-3; or getting gang-tackled shy of second (provided he touched first). Conventionally great endings — evocative of home runs hit by Lenny Dykstra (1986 NLCS, Game Three), Todd Pratt (1999 NLDS, Game Four) and Benny Agbayani (2000 NLDS, Game Four) or the twelfth-inning single that jumped off the bat of Gary Carter (1986 NLCS, Game Five) — were all right, too. If anybody could add or re-add his name to the annals of Shea Stadium Walkoff History, he might be the one to provide a pathway to one final postseason in the old ballpark.
Who could it be now?
First up, Jose Reyes — one walkoff hit to his credit, April 13, 2005. Jose’s main job, even in a tie game in the bottom of the ninth, was just to get on base. And that he did, with a single versus the latest Cub reliever, Kevin Hart.
Next up, Daniel Murphy — no walkoffs yet in his nascent career, and the freshman left fielder didn’t get his first here. Hart struck him out.
Next, David Wright — an old hand at touching off celebrations around home plate. Seven times since 2006, David had swung and put the Mets in the win column, including twice this season…even if he couldn’t bring Murphy home from third the night before. Redemption was certainly available right now. Except David struck out as Jose stole second.
After him, Carlos Delgado — the man who had done it four times in the past two years, including twice to the Cubs in 2007, once on a bases-loaded walk, once on a seeing-eye single. Think Piniella was going to give him any kid of chance? Sweet Lou ordered him passed.
First and second, two out, the batter was Carlos Beltran, author of three Mets walkoff wins since joining the club as the most desired free agent of the pre-2005 class.
• His first was a 16th-inning bomb over the right field fence to beat Ryan Madson and the Phillies, 9-8, on May 23, 2006 in the midst of a month when the Mets won seven games in their last time up.
• His second was the capper in a battle of cannon blasts on August 22, 2006. Delgado and Albert Pujols had each launched a pair of home runs, including one grand slam per slugger, but it was Beltran who exploded the two-run, come-from-behind, ninth-inning exclamation point on what became a rousing 8-7 win over the Cardinals.
• His third was a welcome 13th-inning antidote to a Billy Wagner blown save on June 11, 2008. Mike Pelfrey had thrown eight delightful shutout innings, but Wagner gave up a sickening three-run dagger to Mark Reynolds in the ninth. With Willie Randolph already on managerial deathwatch, the Shea reaction was particularly sour. Beltran couldn’t undo Wagner’s gopher ball — or, ultimately, save Randolph’s job — but he could take Edgar Gonzalez deep to temporarily save Met face, 5-3.
Could Beltran rescue the Mets once more? And if he couldn’t, could anybody? A night that began with the team leaning on a past-his-prime Pedro Martinez to get them to the seventh inning and detoured to reclamation projects Robinson Cancel and Ramon Martinez providing them with their brightest sparks; and Ryan Church figuring out how to not be out at home when there was no way he could have been safe; and the much (and deservedly) maligned bullpen collecting clutch outs after a drifter named Ricardo Rincon was torched by a match-wielding neophyte named Micah Hoffpauir…a night like this begged for satisfying closure. It was, per Bonnie Tyler on the original Footloose soundtrack, holding out for a hero.
“I have to come through,” Beltran copped to thinking as he stepped in to face Hart.
On a 2-0 count, Carlos Beltran cut loose. He lined a ball toward first. It was hit hard, but what about its sense of direction? Could it possibly elude the glove of…Micah Hoffpauir? This, after all, had been the night of Micah Hoffpauir.
But it wasn’t anymore. Beltran’s ball ticked off Hoffpauir’s mitt and into right field. That was all the invitation Reyes needed to motor home from second with the run that created a jubilant 7-6 final. As their teammates flocked to congratulate Jose at the plate and Carlos at first for ending this must’est of must-games favorably, it probably wasn’t noticed by any of the rain-soaked revelers that the Mets had just taken their first lead of the night.
And they couldn’t have possibly known that they had experienced the last walkoff win in the life of Shea Stadium.
ALSO QUITE HAPPY: On September 26, 1971, the most irresistible force in all of baseball was on the mound at Shea Stadium, seeking his penultimate win…penultimate in the sense that it was a step toward his ultimate goal. When Tom Seaver was pitching as he was down the stretch in 1971, could there be any doubt he’d get exactly what he sought?
As of the first of August, Seaver was having his typically brilliant season, except where the all-important (for forty years ago) won-lost listings were concerned. Despite an ERA of 2.26, Seaver found himself dragging around a pedestrian record of 11-8. “One thing is clear,” Jack Lang wrote in the Sporting News at that juncture. “It is not Tom Seaver’s year.”
True to Lang’s analysis, Seaver was “pitching well enough to win, but was not winning” consistently across the first four months of the season. He had the same number of losses as his primary pitching rival Ferguson Jenkins — and a demonstrably superior ERA — but the Cub ace had six more wins.
Why? Essentially, the Mets never scored for Seaver. Four of his previous five losses as a starter were absorbed by scores of 3-2, 2-0, 2-1 and 3-2. Tom’s 1971 no-decisions included an outing in which he shut out the Reds for nine innings (the Mets won 1-0 in eleven) and held the Braves to two runs in 9⅔ before allowing a tying home to Ralph Garr (the Braves won 4-3 in thirteen). After being supported lavishly in a 9-1 complete game on August 6 to boost his record to 12-8, Seaver rediscovered what it was like to be starved for runs when he went ten innings, scattered three hits, struck out fourteen Padres…and had to depart for a pinch-hitter in the eleventh because it was nothing-nothing (the Padres won in twelve).
Much as fictional Lou Brown, manager of the Major League version of the Cleveland Indians somehow calculated his club would require 32 wins to capture its division, one can picture Seaver deciding after that August 11 start at San Diego what it was going to take to win 20 games. They can only do that in the movies, maybe, but it sure appeared Seaver scripted himself a purposeful beeline straight to that milestone of excellence.
Tom Terrific clearly wanted that round number next to his name. “It takes 20 victories for people to recognize you as a great pitcher,” he said as 1971 wound down. “I’d have been satisfied with my season even if I didn’t win 20. But this proves something to all those people who may not know baseball as some of us do. All they do is look in the ‘W’ column.”
Seaver was worried about what casual fans thought? Or was he mostly concerned with living up to his own standard? “I feel I’m the best pitcher in baseball,” the five-time All-Star and 1969 Cy Young Award winner said. “I really do.”
Might as well remind the rest of the world.
In the six starts that followed his no-decision in San Diego, Seaver went 6-0, all of them route-going efforts, only one of them with as many as two earned runs allowed. The Mets gave him six or more runs to work with in five of those starts, but before he could feel comfortable about making a mistake, his supporting cast went back to its previous offensive stupor. Seaver lost a 1-0 complete-game heartbreaker to the Cubs at Shea when opposing pitcher Juan Pizarro homered in the eighth. “I pitched very well,” he said of his effort. “I didn’t win, though, did I? I didn’t win. That’s all that counts.” Tom gave up three hits in seven innings five days later at Wrigley but was bested when rookie Burt Hooton two-hit the Mets, to beat him, 3-0.
The back-to-back losses in which the Mets scored nothing for him left Seaver at 18-10. Never mind that his ERA was a mere 1.81. Never mind that he had 266 strikeouts. He wasn’t going to get to his goal of 20 wins unless he won his 19th and came back on short rest to go for the big one.
Nineteen, it turned out, was plenty big on its own steam. Taking on the division champion Pirates on a Sunday afternoon at Shea, Seaver could have been working with his groundskeeping pal Pete Flynn — he was mowing down batters like they were blades of grass. Three up, three down in the first; three up, three down in the second; three up, three down in the third.
Seaver was relentless. Given a run in the first on a Donn Clendenon RBI single and two more on hits by Cleon Jones and Tommie Agee in the fifth, the Franchise went about owning the Bucs and this game. Three up, three down in the fourth; three up, three down in the fifth; three up, three down in the sixth.
Tom Seaver was pitching a perfect game against the Pittsburgh Pirates. Roberto Clemente had the day off, but Danny Murtaugh had started several of his dangerous-hitting regulars: Willie Stargell, Al Oliver, Bob Robertson, Dave Cash. Seaver was setting down every Pirate he saw. The strikeouts were piling up. He had fanned ten in the first six innings. Win No. 19 was in sight, and it might come on the wings of the first no-hitter in Mets history…the first perfect game in Mets history.
Those particular wings were clipped as soon as the seventh got underway. Cash walked to end the bid for perfection. Then Vic Davalillo, playing in place of Clemente, stroked a clean single to center that chased Cash to third. There went the no-hitter. Oliver’s run-scoring fly ball to center spoiled the shutout, too. Now there was the matter of holding on to the lead. A runner was on, only one was out and Stargell, who already had 47 home runs (and had been clobbering the Mets literally since the day Shea opened) was up next.
Tom opted for a sinking fastball. His desire was to get Wilver to pound one into the ground and set up an inning-ending double play. True to the way Seaver planned and executed his pitching over the last two months of 1971, that’s precisely what happened: 1-6-3, Seaver to Bud Harrelson to Clendenon.
“That’s exactly what I was trying to do,” Seaver said. “I know that sounds egocentric, but that’s damn good pitching.”
Tom and the Mets stayed ahead. And Seaver returned to flawlessness thereafter. He retired the final six batters to win his nineteenth, 3-1. His only blemishes were that walk to Cash and that single to Davalillo. Because of the DP, he wound up facing just one batter over the minimum.
But he was one victory under the minimum for what was universally accepted as part and parcel of the definition of greatness…even though nobody was arguing Seaver wasn’t as great a pitcher as could be found.
“The numbers come close to saying, yes, George Thomas Seaver is the best pitcher in baseball,” Vic Ziegel wrote in the Post. “There is, Seaver understands, only one more number he must add to the list. Seaver will be trying for his 20th victory against St. Louis Thursday in the final game of the season.”
That date was only four days away from the third one-hitter of his career, meaning Seaver would go on three days’ rest…which struck some Seaver-watchers as a little too Seaver-centric for a team game. Tom had established he was at his absolute best pitching every five days, something less on his fourth day. He had indicated he’d only go on short rest if it was a really important contest. The Mets were long out of the race by the end of the season. Obviously, the cynics muttered, it’s important to Seaver that he wins 20.
Single-mindedness, of course, is what lifts a competitor above his peers, and Seaver’s drive elevated him to a plane where he had few, maybe no peers. (It also elevated the Mets to a World Championship two years earlier, when nobody outside of Baltimore seemed to mind how badly he wanted to win.) Of course Seaver wanted to pitch the final game of the year. Of course Gil Hodges would let him. And of course he’d win it, attaining No. 20 in a brilliant complete-game stifling of the Cardinals, 6-1, striking out 13 Redbirds along the way.
From a deceptively middling 11-8 through two-thirds of the season, Tom Seaver finished 1971 at 20-10. His 289 strikeouts set a record for most K’s by a righthanded National League pitcher. His 1.76 ERA was the lowest in the league since Bob Gibson’s 1.12 in 1968 and wouldn’t be bettered until Dwight Gooden’s 1.53 in 1985. Nobody struck out more batters per inning. Nobody gave up fewer walks and hits per inning. It may very well have been the greatest year turned in by someone acknowledged far, wide and forever as one of the greatest pitchers to ever play the game.
But Ferguson Jenkins, who posted an ERA a full run higher, went 24-13 and was voted the Cy Young Award by a pretty wide margin. All those writers must have done was look in the “W” column.
by Greg Prince on 19 October 2011 7:37 pm
“Some people never got over the sixties, or the war, or the night their band opened for the Rolling Stones at the Marquee, and spend the rest of their days walking backwards; I never really got over Charlie. That was when the important stuff, the stuff that defines me, went on.”
—Rob Fleming, High Fidelity, by Nick Hornby
Exactly five years have gone by since the Mets were a single successful swing away from a trip to the World Series. They seem light years removed from being in that position again.
So I’m not surprised I drunk-dialed 2006 last week, or did the video-viewing equivalent thereof.
It was bound to happen. Every October from 2007 on, I have my fingers on the keypad but usually hang up, choosing instead to mutter to myself about the way it was and the way it was going to be. This October, though, it was creeping up and into me in such a fashion that it could not be avoided. Last Monday night, as the Cardinals were bashing the Brewers, TBS’s announcers again and again referenced the Cardinals’ victory in the 2006 World Series. Try as I might — and I didn’t try very hard — I couldn’t remember anything about the 2006 World Series, save for three facts:
1) Tiger pitchers made an error in every game.
2) I watched very little of any game.
3) I seethed with resentment while all five games took place.
Facts 2 and 3 are closely related.
Last Tuesday night, as the Tigers strove to slow the Rangers at Comerica Park, my attention was focused squarely on the Texas left fielder, Endy Chavez. When Endy, batting ninth in the league where non-La Russa players can do that, made his 2011 postseason debut, Fox had the decency to run the clip we used to see about every 10 seconds when Endy wore No. 10 for the Mets. Scott Rolen swung, Chavez went back, Chavez leapt at the fence, Rolen was out.
Beautiful.
Joe Buck sort of remembered Endy turning it into a double play with a dynamite relay throw. Tim McCarver thought Buck was hallucinating. Of course Buck was right (“of course Buck was right” is a phrase you won’t read too often). Endy did fire the ball back into Jose Valentin who in turn hustled it to Carlos Delgado to double Jim Edmonds off first. Endy Chavez had saved two runs and created two outs along with Oliver Perez’s bacon. We’ll let McCarver off the hook for faulty memory this one time seeing as how Tim was just back from “minor” heart surgery. Besides he and Cardinal Joe were properly awed five years after the fact by Endy’s…I was gonna call it handiwork, but that’s too generic for something so unique to one man and one catch. They were properly awed five years after the fact by Endy’s Endywork.
All it took for my eyes to water ever so slightly was the sight of Endy at all in October. Even in Texas blue. Even wearing unfamiliar No. 9. Even grounding out unheroically to second. Endy the Ranger can’t hide his true colors nor his magical aura. He’s a Forever Met. That catch cemented his status.
Five years later, it’s his Rangers and those Cardinals in the World Series. It’s good to see Endy thrives to this day. There was something wonderfully retro about the fame that followed him in the wake of his catch. Hey kid, you made a quite grab there! How would you like to be in our ad for milk? Endy could do no wrong the rest of his Met career, which, like the Mets’ viability as contenders, wound through 2008. Endy’s catch was voted the fourth-greatest moment in Shea Stadium history by fans I’d otherwise scoff at for displaying such short-term memory (winning the 1969 World Series ranked behind Piazza’s 9/21/2001 home run, for crissake). Hey kid, what a catch! We want to put you on this big-time list! Endy’s catch was the last fantastic thing to happen for the Mets as opposed to the last fatalistic thing to happen to the Mets. The final score of Game Seven should have been Cardinals 3 Mets 1 Endy ∞ for infinity. Endy’s catch, at least when viewed as a moment unto itself, transcends piddling bottom-line results.
Being reminded of it and all that surrounded it — starting with the “2006 World Champion” yammering the night before — was enough to make me check out of the ALCS for a couple of innings and check my DVD shelf for a disc I bought as soon as it was released, and watched, I’m pretty sure, only once:
The Team. The Time. The 2006 Mets.
I’ve still only watched it once from start to finish, sometime in the spring of 2007. Last week, I joined it in progress, in the August chapter, during an interlude devoted to the 1986 Mets’ 20th anniversary and how it made all sense in the world that we’d be celebrating that team from that time in a year when this team in this time was marching inevitably toward something approximating its ancestral glory.
Drunk-dialing 2006 as I was, I expected to get sloppily emotional when the last Met season with which I had a satisfying relationship picked up on the other end. But it wasn’t like that. If anything, after tracking down 2006 on that DVD, I am, at last, over 2006.
Thus, after a half-decade spent intermittently praising the last year the Mets won anything, I come here tonight to necessarily bury it.
According to the DVD, Endy still makes the catch. And yes, the Mets still rack up 97 rollicking wins in the regular season, still blow away the rest of the East by midsummer, still steamroll the Dodgers in the NLDS. Yes, there are still dynamite individual performances and there is still reassuring team cohesiveness. From that perspective, revisiting the last Met season with which I had a satisfying relationship panned out. In small doses, with a skilled fast-forward finger, I could have used The Team. The Time. The 2006 Mets. as a soothing balm for my chronically aching baseball soul.
But that doesn’t happen when you drunk-dial. You’re probably too angry and upset to be soothed. A few happy highlights don’t serve the function of an electric heating pad set on HI. You want more from your DVD. You want to be taken away to a better team and a better time and lose yourself in all the winning it gave you.
Instead, I was left to cope with the reality that all the winning they gave me in 2006 wasn’t quite enough and that all they were explicitly promising to give me after 2006 — narrator Tim Robbins played up “the years to come” as practically a sure thing — never arrived. Therefore, instead of misting up and wallowing in the sweet memories of the undisputed best season of the past decade, I just got angrier and more upset.
Which is where drunk-dialing turns ugly.
Stupid 2006, what did YOU ever do for me? What did you leave me with? NOTHING! I gave you a year of my life and then I gave you a pass for what you didn’t give me later. And now all you do is mock me with your talk of “years to come” with your fancy new ballpark and your core young players and all the valuable experience they gathered that will surely pay off in championships and elation. But it didn’t. And now look where we are: the Cardinals are on the verge of making another World Series, Endy Chavez is on somebody else’s contender and I can’t even count on you to keep Jose Reyes. “The Team?” “The Time?” I bought what you were selling! I thought we were going to be together forever. I thought this would STILL be the time! But it’s not. Have you seen the standings? Have you seen how bad it’s gotten? We finished behind the frigging NATIONALS this year. We finished fourth three years in a row. You know who the only teams are who haven’t won as many as 80 games in a season the last three years? I’ll TELL you who they are: The Royals, the Pirates, the Orioles, the Astros…AND US! That’s who we are now. Some team and some time you turned out to be.
By then, I’m certain the 2006 DVD had stopped listening to my pathos-fueled rant, which was OK, since I was only venting at that point. Still, I couldn’t look at The Team. The Time. The 2006 Mets. anymore. I ejected it from the machine and returned it to its case and its case to its shelf. I put the ALCS back on, but I wasn’t much in the mood to pay attention to 2011. I had exhausted all my energy on 2006, a year I was now ready to declare I was finally over.
That only took five years.
But that’s normal, according to my ballological clock. A half-decade’s remove is usually what it takes to tell me, beyond the last lingering shadow of a doubt, that whatever year I hold particularly dear is gone for good. You’d figure the calendar would take care of that, but it doesn’t, not in baseball, not when you’re stuck on a season that defines its era, one you wish hadn’t ended…or hadn’t ended the way it did.
I knew 1986 was over once 1987 rolled around and refused to unfold overwhelmingly in our favor, but deep down I kept waiting for what I decided was normality to kick in and for Baseball Like It Oughta Be to, well, start being again. Even as ’86ers were peeled off the roster by attrition, or premeditated acts of “what have you done for us lately?” forced amnesia, I refused to believe there wasn’t a 1986 hiding somewhere inside this franchise as 1987 and 1988 and 1989 and 1990 progressed. On the fifth anniversary of the seventh game of the 1986 World Series — which helpfully coincided with the seventh game of the 1991 World Series — something clicked. It was a new era. Others contended for and went to postseason. The Mets were a wreck. There wasn’t a 1986 in them anymore. It was time to move on.
But I could always count on my videotape from 1986 to overwhelm me with surpassing joy when I needed a shot of it.
I replayed October 1999 over and over, year after year. What if we started Rogers at home where he was untouchable instead of on the road where he was worthless? What if Bobby brought Reed back on short rest against Atlanta instead of Leiter, who couldn’t handle it? Where was Yoshii after Game Five? How come nobody could get a bunt down? We would have won a Game Seven — no question. The Mets went to a World Series the season after, one that, like store-brand cereal, tasted like disappointment and presented its own set of soggy regrets, but I was willing to shrug off the final chapter of 2000. 1999 was the one that should have had more life in it. 1999 was the cure for the common postseason. 1999 never would have been lost on some rookie nobody had heard of six weeks earlier leisurely trotting from first to home in a World Series. It might have been lost, but it would have been far more operatic and at least partially life-affirming (imagine Melvin Mora not busting it the way Timo Perez didn’t; ya can’t). Anyway, the 2004 Red Sox came along and did what the 1999 Mets didn’t do but I was always convinced should have: climb back from 0-3 to win a seven-game series. The only thing I didn’t like about the Red Sox doing it was they weren’t the second to do it. But I was glad they did it. I took one final regret-filled lap that autumn and finally let 1999 rest on its pedestal. It was time to move on.
But I could always count on my videotape from 1999 to overwhelm me with surpassing joy when I needed a shot of it.
October 2006 has stayed with me from the moment it ended shy of what I and millions considered its destiny. It has shaded nearly every overarching Met thought I’ve generated in the past five years. At first, it was “2006 was great, therefore 2007 will be greater.” Then it was “2006 was great, 2007 turned into disaster, let’s get it back in 2008.” Then it was “2006 was great, 2007 and 2008 were insults to its memory, and I think we may be much further removed than one unhittable Adam Wainwright curveball from returning to where we left off.”
Then it was 2009 and 2010 and 2011, three seasons that bore no resemblance to 2006’s six-month festival of self-confidence. As we sank from a club that almost won in October to a club that found ways to lose in September to a club that didn’t win very often from April onward, 2006 grew ever more distant, and not just chronologically. One by one, then two by two, members of the 2006 team departed the Met ark. In five years’ time, nobody, save for the two biggest names, was left from that postseason.
Still, deep, deep down during these past three years, I still tended to think we were living in the same era as 2006, that if this wasn’t “The Team,” then maybe it was still “The Time”. That maybe we weren’t winning many ballgames and weren’t realistically competing for any playoffs, but that somehow it was all an aberration. That if somebody would just fix something, “The Time” would kick back into gear and “The Team” could resume being the kind of fabulous operation that we were so convinced it was on the cusp of being.
Never happened. And it never will, at least not in any way that connects “then” to potential future Met success. The Time, the era that encompassed 2006, clearly ended with the closing of Shea Stadium in 2008. It didn’t have to, but it did. The standings made that clear by 2009 and the composition of the roster underscored it. The sense that we were on the precipice of a boom period in Mets history evaporated everywhere but deep, deep down as Citi Field began getting lived in. The early years of the new ballpark were supposed to be when the Mets’ time was cresting, when the Mets were going to be the team in New York and the team in the National League East and, quite possibly, the team in all of baseball.
Never happened.
2006, whatever its charms while it was in progress, predicted nothing. It wasn’t the start of something big. It was the sole high point of an era that stopped short of becoming an epoch. The Mets weren’t what we thought they were going to be. They weren’t a dynasty. They weren’t even a mini-dynasty. Nestled as their sole divisional title was between eleven consecutive by the Braves and five in a row from the Phillies, they were George Lazenby, the not-so-famous actor who played James Bond for one movie between Sean Connery’s and Roger Moore’s extended runs. Or Steve Patterson, the not-so-famous center at UCLA after Lew Alcindor (a.k.a. Kareem Abdul-Jabbar) and before Bill Walton.
The 2006 Mets were the ones who didn’t make more of their big chance, which never got bigger than it did five years ago tonight, October 19, 2006, when Endy Chavez made an unbelievable catch, but also when Jeff Suppan couldn’t be hit, when Yadier Molina couldn’t be kept in the yard and when Adam Wainwright threw a curveball that almost certainly couldn’t be touched…though it might have been nice had the otherwise sainted Carlos Beltran reached out and attempted to touch it.
For five years, I’ve been reaching back and attempting to touch 2006, to reach into it and find its most enduring properties. Sadly, it mostly comes down to one catch that came in a loss that ended what felt like a season for the ages yet turned out to be an age that didn’t last long.
The DVD won’t be coming off the shelf again for a while.
by Greg Prince on 18 October 2011 9:12 am
Welcome to The Happiest Recap, a solid gold slate of New York Mets games culled from every schedule the Mets have ever played en route to this, their fiftieth year in baseball. We’ve created a dream season that includes the “best” 157th game in any Mets season, and we keep going from there until we have a completed schedule worthy of Bob Murphy coming back with the Happy Recap after this word from our sponsor on the WFAN Mets Radio Network.
GAME 157: September 24, 1969 — METS 6 Cardinals 0
(Mets All-Time Game 157 Record: 22-24; Mets 1969 Record: 96-61)
“Tonight the New York Mets and the Saint Louis Cardinals. The Mets have a magic number of one. This afternoon, the Chicago Cubs won their ballgame from Montreal by a score of six to three to keep alive their chance for a tie for the championship. So the Mets’ magic number is one; a Met victory here tonight would clinch the championship in the Eastern Division of the National League. So we have a big, big crowd on hand for this concluding game of the series.”
—Lindsey Nelson, pregame
Seven years removed from the humblest beginnings imaginable. Two years removed from 101 losses. One year removed from a place so low that the standings didn’t include it anymore. Light years removed from what the human imagination could have dreamed up six months before. The longest of long shots six weeks earlier. Yet for two weeks, nobody couldn’t have known this was coming.
Still beyond the realm of the imagination, but there was no stopping it. The New York Mets were about to become champions. Champions of the National League’s Eastern Division, but it might as well have been the universe. Just by arriving on the edge of clinching, they were the champions of possibility. They were the champions of wishing and hoping and praying, if not necessarily thinking, because thinking would have guided any sane person away from this scenario. They were the champions of faith.
And this Wednesday night, the final scheduled home game of 1969, may merit the title of champion of all regular-season games in Mets history. Considering where the Mets had come from and where they would go shortly thereafter, no Mets win in the first half-century the team existed — or maybe ever — could possibly mean quite as much.
“Hello everybody, it’s Lou Brock coming around to lead off now for the Saint Louis Cardinals in what is, for the Mets and Mets fans, the biggest baseball game ever played in this stadium.”
—Lindsey Nelson, top of the first
Was there any way the Mets were going to lose this game? Putting aside whatever latter-day metrics might tell us retroactively about win probability; and the factors that might have influenced this matchup — Steve Carlton was 17-10, Gary Gentry was 11-12, the Mets were 11-6 vs. the Cards; and the eternal truth that it’s anybody’s ballgame, particularly before one starts…no, the Mets were not going to lose this ballgame.
The Mets were going to use this ballgame as the template for all celebratory events to come. They and the 54,928 on hand needed the practice. They’d never had anything concrete to celebrate before other than themselves. Mets fans led the league in mere happiness to be here — that there were Mets to root for and that they were the ones doing it.
Even Leo Durocher’s Cubs cooperated. The former frontrunners had lost 9 of 14 coming into their afternoon action. Had they dropped their matinee to sixth-/last-place Montreal, the Mets would have been in Anticlimax City. But they beat the Expos, less keeping their own chances alive than making sure the party in Flushing would be more than hugs and hearty handshakes.
“Carlton strikes out Jones. First strikeout for Carlton. Donn Clendenon’s coming up. Clendenon’s hitting Two Forty-Six, he has thirteen homers and forty-five runs batted in. Lefthander Steve Carlton checks the runners, here’s the pitch to Clendenon, swung on and hit DEEP to center! Way back, Flood goes back into the track, it’s going, going, it’s gone, it’s a home run! A home run for Clendenon! Donn Clendenon hit a three-run homer over the center field fence. The Mets are out in front by a score of three to nothing, one man out, nobody on and Ron Swoboda coming up.”
Donn Clendenon, 34, was acquired for nights like these. Not that there were nights like these in the Mets’ past, but GM Johnny Murphy and manager Gil Hodges were intent on making sure there’d be a few in the near future when they pulled the trigger on a four-for-one deal with Montreal at the June 15 trading deadline. They had to give up a quartet of youngsters. One of them, Kevin Collins, had been a Met on and off since 1965 — he pinch-hit on Opening Day against the Expos. One of them, Steve Renko, had pitched at Wrigley Field that very afternoon of September 24, taking the well-timed loss in front of 52,711 fewer people than would be at Shea Stadium this night. The other two fellows, Bill Carden and Dave Colon, never reached the majors. Collins played in the bigs until 1971. Renko had a representative career, winning 134 games (while losing 146) from 1969 until 1983.
Steve Renko was still pitching and occasionally winning more than a decade after Donn Clendenon retired. Renko theoretically could have helped the Mets throughout the 1970s and into the 1980s. But that didn’t matter. The distant future, that time toward which the Youth of America had been mythically developing since Shea Stadium was under construction, was no longer the Mets’ nebulous aim. The Mets in the middle of June 1969 decided they were a “now” team. They now needed a power-hitting first baseman, a veteran righty complement to the prematurely ancient if technically 24-year-old Ed Kranepool.
Clendenon’s three-run homer off Carlton marked the instant “now” arrived. Four prospects were a scant price to pay for that 3-0 lead.
“Low and away for a ball, it’s two-two. I got a letter this week from an army chaplain in Korea saying that the United States servicemen there were pulling for and following the fortunes of the New York Mets day by day. Here’s a swing, a fly ball to deep right field, Flood going back into the track, he’s way back there, and he leaps up, can’t get it! Home run! A home run for Ed Charles! A two-run homer! Ed Charles hit his third home run of the year over the right field fence, the right-center field fence, a two-run homer that scored Swoboda ahead of him, the New York Mets are leading five-nothing, and that is all for Steve Carlton! The sign has gone to the bullpen now for Dave Giusti.”
—Lindsey Nelson, bottom of the first
Ed Kranepool, born in November 1944, made his major league debut in 1962. Ed Charles, born in April 1933, made his major league debut in 1962.
Something was wrong with this picture, and it had nothing to do with the high hopes and big bonus applied to 17-year-old Kranepool. Charles should have been a major league infielder in the 1950s. He was a .300 hitter in Class C ball at age 18. He maintained that level his next couple of seasons as he climbed the Braves chain before and after a stint in the military. He reached Triple-A for the first time in 1956 and put all the lower minors behind him by 1958.
And there, it seemed, Ed Charles was left, an experienced, skilled minor leaguer in his sixth…seventh…eighth…ninth year in the pros. The Braves never brought him up from Triple-A.
Couldn’t have anything to do with a quota system that informally limited the number of black players on any given roster, could it?
Charles thought so. Prevailing evidence doesn’t suggest otherwise. Ed Charles may not have been a player the caliber of incumbent Braves third baseman Eddie Mathews, but he certainly should have been given a shot long before Eddie Kranepool got one. Charles was a native of the Jim Crow South, Daytona Beach, Fla. His inspiration was the sight of Jackie Robinson playing Spring Training baseball in 1946, the year before he broke the major league color line (another “informal” obstacle) with Brooklyn. Jackie may have integrated baseball, but he didn’t make the business end of it color-blind.
Ed didn’t get his break until Milwaukee traded him to the Kansas City A’s, where he put up respectable numbers for a hopeless organization. As he established himself in the American League, the Glider, as he was known, became intent on making his own luck as much as he could, displaying “a discipline and humility that is rarely seen in the clubhouse,” by George Vecsey’s Joy in Mudville reckoning. “He began attending college in his late twenties and wrote inspirational poetry, paying for the printing and mailing it to young fans who asked for autographs.”
When the Mets traded Larry Elliot (and cash) to Kansas City in May 1967 to get Charles, they got more than a third baseman. They got a man who, per Vecsey, “drew the Met players closer together with his warmth and maturity.”
Twenty-eight months later, as the righthanded half of a third base platoon on a first-place team, Ed drew them two runs closer to a championship.
“In case you joined us along the way, the New York Mets got five runs in the bottom of the first. Harrelson singled and Agee walked. After Jones struck out, Clendenon hit a three-run homer. Swoboda walked and Charles hit a two-run homer, and that was all for the starter Steve Carlton. Dave Giusti came in to relieve him, here’s Giusti’s pitch. Hit DEEP to right, that’s WAY back there, it’s going, going…and it is GONE for a home run for Clendenon, his second home run of the night! The Mets are leading six to nothing. Home run number fifteen for Donn Clendenon, over the right field wall and into the Met bullpen.”
—Lindsey Nelson, bottom of the fifth
Has any in-season trade in Mets history paid the immediate dividends that the Donn Clendenon deal did? They got him in the middle of June and well before September was over, they had a single-digit magic number. Who else effected that kind of result? Even Keith Hernandez, acquired exactly 14 years later, didn’t make that quick a difference.
In Stanley Cohen’s 1988 retrospective, A Magic Summer, it is instructive to reread how Donn Clendenon’s teammates recalled him almost twenty years on. “The catalyst,” according to Art Shamsky; “a take-the-pressure-off kind of guy,” said Tug McGraw; “probably the key to our whole season,” in Wayne Garrett’s mind — “the ingredient we needed.”
Were 35 RBIs ever as important as those Donn Clendenon collected between June 22 and September 24, up to and including the bottom of the fifth when his second home run of the night increased the Mets’ lead to six? He played in only 72 games for New York in ’69 because he platooned with Kranepool. Think about that for a moment. The fortunes of a franchise, a city and maybe the sport pivoted on the presence of a man who split time with, well, Eddie Kranepool. But Kranepool plus Clendenon, along with Ken Boswell plus Al Weis, Wayne Garrett plus Ed Charles, and Art Shamsky plus Ron Swoboda added up to the sum of Gil Hodges’ parts. Their individual numbers may have matched their reputations, but their collective contribution was writing a fairy tale.
Clendenon was clearly the most accomplished of the 1969 Mets’ irregulars. He’d had two seasons of better than 90 RBIs as a Pirate and in ’68, The Year of The Pitcher, drove in 87. The Mets didn’t have anybody with those credentials. The expansion draft made him an Expo. Good sense — Clink’s no-BS threat to retire — prevented him from becoming an Astro despite Montreal’s attempt to trade him to Houston. A college education and off-season planning gave him a path outside baseball, working for the Scripto pen company (as a VP, no less). Foresight and fortune, though, had a different script in mind. Commissioner Bowie Kuhn convinced him to play in Quebec. Johnny Murphy convinced his employers to send him to Queens.
It’s no wonder Donn Clendenon stood out as a veteran, accomplished, professional power hitter on the New York Mets. He was that good and they hadn’t had anybody quite like him before. Yet he meshed as well as he mashed. Consider Tom Seaver’s recollection of the Mets’ first home game after Donn joined their ranks. It involved his wife, Nancy, introducing herself to hubby’s new teammate, and Donn “putting on a little show” in return, suavely charming the ace’s better half as only a veteran, accomplished professional power hitter might.
“Hi Donn,” Tom greeted him after perhaps enjoying the show enough. “What are you kissing my wife’s arm for?
“It’s great to be a Met,” Donn replied.
It was even better to be up 6-0 with 14 outs to for a divisional flag.
“So two cast aside by Gary Gentry here in the seventh inning, it brings up Tim McCarver. The Cardinals’ talented backstop has fouled to third and fouled out to first, nothing for two. In the Astrodome tonight, the Atlanta Braves will call on Pat Jarvis and Houston will pitch Tom Griffin. Over the inside corner, strike one called. Tom Griffin of Houston and Gary Gentry of the Mets the two top rookie pitchers in the league this year. Interestingly enough, both are trying for their twelfth win tonight. Ground ball hit hard, but right at Al Weis, he has it. Throws to Clendenon and the side is out. No runs, no hits, no errors, none left. Now seventh-inning stretch time for the huge crowd at Shea Stadium. At the end of six-and-a-half innings, the New York Mets six and the Saint Louis Cardinals nothing.”
—Bob Murphy, middle of the seventh.
How did they do it? How did the Mets keep churning out hard-throwing young arms? Seaver in ’67, Koosman and Ryan and McAndrew in ’68, now this year Gary Gentry? You could piece together lineups from what others would consider spare parts if you could pitch like the Mets. And boy could the Mets pitch.
Gary Gentry sure could. He was drafted out of Arizona State in June 1967. It was off to Double-A Williamsport, where his ERA sat under two and his strikeout-per-inning rate was nearly nine. Promoted for a full year at Triple-A Jacksonville, he threw 198 innings in 1968 and won 12 games.
Gentry was ready. In his first start, on April 10, he came within one out of a complete game, giving up two runs to the Expos. Tommie Agee hit a home run to Shea Stadium’s highest fair perch and the Mets were a game over .500. The team was 2-1. The rookie was 1-0. Gary Gentry slotted in nicely behind Seaver and Koosman. He may not have been quite at the level in his rookie year that they had been in theirs — Seaver was Rookie of the Year, Koosman finished a hair behind Johnny Bench — but there was no shame in holding down a spot every five days with this crew. He had the stuff and he had the self-confidence to fill an important role on a team that didn’t necessarily think it was making a miracle. Gentry was just doing what he had always done.
“I never played on a team that didn’t expect to win,” Gary told Cohen, recounting his squads’ successes through college and the minors. “So when I came up with the Mets in ’69, I never thought about anything except winning. I didn’t know much about the team’s history.”
Yet here he was, 33 games into his big league career, emphatically rewriting it. Through seven visiting innings, the Cardinals landed only three baserunners, and two of those were erased on double plays. The Mets of this new era, of these days of Gentryfication when winning was the norm and losing was for the other guys, had their eyes on the finish line. They were going the distance, and Gentry would be damned if he wasn’t going to be the one to take them there.
Gentry, as befit a pitcher pitching behind Seaver and Koosman, liked completing games, even if he wasn’t given that many opportunities relative to his more-established teammates. In 1969, pitchers were geared to finish what they started. Mets starters completed 51 of their starts and that was good for only sixth in the National League. Just as Gil Hodges wasn’t shy about platooning, he didn’t hesitate to deploy an effective bullpen led by the likes of righty Ron Taylor and lefty Tug McGraw. It was all about the team winning.
Nevertheless, Gentry preferred to complete games. He finished five entering the action of September 24: a number stellar in modern terms (as many as Clayton Kershaw would compile in 2011, for example), a total that wasn’t even on the radar in 1969. In retirement, Gentry would rue that he was a victim of “the relief syndrome,” the budding pattern in baseball that didn’t demand nine innings out of every starter. Gentry wanted that demand made of him. He wanted Hodges and pitching coach Rube Walker to leave him in. “That was my style of baseball,” he told Cohen. “I always felt that I got to the majors ten years too late.”
Actually, after he worked the eighth and prepared to take the ball in the ninth, the Mets still out front by a half-dozen runs, it was clear Gary Gentry was right on time.
“Lou Brock will lead off against Gary Gentry. The crowd is standing, waving and cheering. The Mets are three outs away from a divisional crown. Fouled back to the screen, strike one. This is the moment Mets fans have waited for. Ed Charles in close at third against Lou Brock. Brock has one of the two hits given up by Gary Gentry, who has turned in an absolutely magnificent performance with the pressure on. Now the lean righthander stands and pitches. Call strike on the outside corner! It is two strikes. And the standing room crowd will be roaring with each delivery.”
—Bob Murphy, top of the ninth
Brock produced a grounder up the middle that Harrelson made a play on, but Buddy couldn’t throw out the speedy Redbird. St. Louis had a man on first. Vic Davalillo was up next.
“Not a soul is leaving the stadium. Everybody just jamming the aisles and standing right by the exits. Now the Glider comes over from third to have a word with his young pitcher. This has to be a huge moment in the life of Ed Charles. He has known about as much hard times as anybody. Ground ball hit toward the middle, Harrelson can’t get it. It’s a base hit to center for Davalillo, and the Cardinals are slowing things up on back-to-back base hits by Brock and Davalillo.”
Gentry had hoped for an “easy game,” and that it had been for the longest time. The confident rookie was nervous for the first four or five innings and then was “just more or less in a hurry to get the game over with so that everyone could enjoy what was happening.”
The nerve of those Cardinals to delay such a well-planned party. But Gentry got two quick strikes on the next batter, Vada Pinson, before the St. Louis right fielder fouled one off.
“Now Gentry up in pitching position. And the pitch on the way…swing and a miss, he struck him out! The Mets are two outs away. Strikeout number five for Gary Gentry. Now the hitter is Joe Torre. The infield is set at double play depth.”
Joe Torre grew up in Brooklyn before there were Mets. In the borough of Dodgers, he was a Giants fan. Then he left to become a Milwaukee Brave. There was talk through the spring that the kid who had grown into a five-time All-Star catcher might come home. The Braves were looking to trade him in the aftermath of his role during the Spring Training player job action (more a boycott than a formal strike). Torre was sitting out camp — “sulking” in Manhasset, by Vecsey’s account — waiting for resolution. In March, the Mets still needed a power-hitting first baseman, and Joe could certainly fit that bill. He’d played the position intermittently since the Braves had moved to Atlanta in 1966. With a hitter of Torre’s caliber, Hodges wouldn’t have to platoon at first.
What would it take to make it so New Yorkers could come see what this Brooklyn kid could do in Queens? A lot, Joe Durso recounted in Amazing. The first request filed by Atlanta GM Paul Richards was for Ryan, outfield prospect Amos Otis, and Jerry Grote (which would have sent Torre back behind the plate). After Johnny Murphy presumably stopped laughing at the audacity of the proposal, he countered with something less Met-onerous: Grote’s backup J.C. Martin, Kranepool, either Ryan or Jim McAndrew, and somebody else for Torre and third baseman Bob Aspromonte. This time it was Richards who demurred.
Murphy held on to all his young players until Clendenon became available in June and then stayed in possession of the ones he really liked. Richards, meanwhile, swapped Torre to St. Louis for Orlando Cepeda. If the division leads held over the next week, the Mets and Braves would meet not at the trading table but in the first National League Championship Series. Atlanta had just the night before wrested control of the wild West from San Francisco by winning their fifth in a row.
The Mets, meanwhile, were still looking at Joe Torre, but in a very different context than they did six months earlier.
“Torre, the cleanup batter, has lined out, bounced out and popped up, nothing-for-three. Al Weis shaded toward the middle of the diamond. And the pitch on the way…low and outside, it’s ball one. The crowd chanting We’re Number One. The Mets made up fifteen-and-a-half games since the thirteenth of August. And the pitch thrown…fouled into the air, back toward the crowd. It’s one ball and one strike to Joe Torre. Tim McCarver is the on-deck hitter. Mets have the infield hoping for a chance to make a double play that would end it. Tommie Agee just a stride to left-center. Now the ballboy brings out some balls for umpire Al Barlick. Lou Brock is on second and Vic Davalillo is the runner on first with one man out. Ninth inning, six-nothing New York, and the pitch…ground ball foul, down the third base line. He went after a curve from Gary Gentry.”
Ralph Kiner, Bob Murphy reported over Mets flagship WJRZ-AM and affiliates like WKAJ-FM in Saratoga Springs, was down in the clubhouse awaiting to “talk with the players as they come in”. Lindsey Nelson was handling play-by-play duties on Channel 9. The three men had been Original Mets, chronicling every move Casey Stengel made, dating back to St. Petersburg in the runup to 1962, and following the fortunes of his successors Wes Westrum, Salty Parker and now Hodges. They weren’t “we” announcers, though. They were even-handed — complimentary to the other side when the other side deserved it, which was most of the time from 1962 through 1968. Life was different now, though. The Mets were the heart of the story Murphy and Kiner and Nelson told. The Mets were the story everywhere. They had been on the cover of Time and Life that September. They would dominate the front page of the New York Times the next day. And the Mets fans were the story every bit as much as the Mets team.
“[T]he roar that is going to come out of this stadium on the final out, if the Mets are still in front,” Murphy predicted in the seventh, “is going to be something to hear. After seven agonizing years and many frustrations, the Mets fans, the best and most loyal baseball fans to be found in this land, are really going to have something to cheer about.”
It’s easy enough to butter up your listeners, but Murph wasn’t saying anything that wasn’t easily verifiable. The Mets opened for business in a crumbling Polo Grounds with a roster that was every bit as dilapidated, and the best and most loyal baseball fans were born. They accepted the Mets and their flaws. They took them to their heart and didn’t let them go. The 40-120 Mets drew 922,530 to a neighborhood most (including the erstwhile New York Giants) were bent on avoiding. This was in an age when a million fans was not a given for any team and nearly a million for a historically horrendous team was as laughable as the idea of trading Ryan, Otis and Grote all at once.
In 1963, the Mets barely improved to 51-111, the Polo Grounds crumbled a little more and attendance leapt to over a million. Those fans, identified immediately by Metsologists as a New Breed, made noise, made banners, and made a pledge of undying love with no evidence their ardor would be rewarded with anything but more losing.
The love affair continued in a new ballpark in another borough. The Mets drew 1,732,597 to beautiful Shea Stadium in 1964. The facility sparkled. The team (53-109) was mostly grim as ever. Novelty? The Mets were a shade worse in 1965 (50-112) yet they drew a shade more. They showed the slightest sign of forward progress in 1966 — not finishing last, not losing a hundred games (66-95) — and attendance soared toward 2 million. The gate leveled off in 1967 and 1968, but the Mets were still bringing more fans through the turnstiles for tenth- (61-101) and ninth-place (73-89) baseball than just about anybody in the National League was attracting for outfits sporting better records. And if Mets attendance didn’t lead one and all in sheer body count, nobody beat it for enthusiasm generated.
Why? Why were Mets fans so giving of affection when the Mets couldn’t possibly reciprocate in the win column? Theories abounded from the first day Ol’ Case set to putting the most human face in captivity on what could have been a very dismal enterprise. Mets fans were the way they were because they were imps…or ironists…or inveterate optimists…or enthralled by being in on the ground floor (or basement) of what was brand spanking new — at a moment in time when Camelot was in full swing and the Beatles were first tuning their instruments…or reassured by a well-orchestrated throwback to what had recently departed (Senior Circuit successors to the Giants and Dodgers, the Mets held an Old Timers Day during their very first year of existence)…or underdogs in life, so therefore they couldn’t help but identify with the most clearly identifiable underdogs of baseball.
“The Metophile,” the Times’s Robert Lipsyte wrote with tongue a touch in cheek as he attempted to explore what made Mets fans tick in 1963, “is a dreamer. He believes that one day he will punch that arrogant foreman at the plant square on his fat nose; that he will get in the last word with his wife; that he will win the Irish Sweepstakes; that the Mets will start a winning streak.”
Early in that second season, Lipsyte predicted the Met Mystique would wear thin soon enough. “The pure Metophile,” he warned, “is likely to disappear in a few years. Even now, more and more ordinary people go to the Polo Grounds to watch a baseball game. As the Mets progress from incompetency to mediocrity, their psychological pull will be gone.”
The Mets, however, breezed right by mediocrity and bulleted to overwhelming success. Their appeal required little analysis now. As the franchise’s top executive, M. Donald Grant, would put it with the kind of grace and accuracy with which he wouldn’t forever be associated, “Our team finally caught up with our fans. Our fans were winners long ago.”
“This,” Bob Murphy assured his listeners in the seventh inning on September 24, 1969, “has truly been an amazing year for the New York Mets.”
What else was left to say?
“It’s two-and-two on Joe Torre with one out in the ninth. The pitch by Gentry is…fouled, out of play behind the third base dugout to the crowd. Everybody right on the edge of their seat. I’ll bet Cleon Jones sets a track record getting to that dugout from left field when that final out is made.
“Gentry, working hard here against Joe Torre, now in the set position, here’s the pitch. GROUND BALL HIT TO SHORTSTOP. HARRELSON TO WEIS, THERE’S ONE, FIRST BASE, DOUBLE PLAY! THE METS WIN! IT’S ALL OVER! OH, THE ROAR GOING UP FROM THIS CROWD! An unbelievable scene on the field. Fans are POURING onto the field, the ballplayers trying to get to the dugout. A six-four-three double play, and it’s all over. Congratulations to Gil Hodges, the coaches and the ballplayers — what a year! It’s hard to believe.
“The Mets are on their way into the clubhouse, final score, the New York Mets six and the Saint Louis Cardinals nothing, they knocked Steve Carlton out in the first inning, Donn Clendenon hit a three-run homer, Ed Charles hit a two-run homer, later in the game, Clendenon hit another home run, and Gary Gentry, the rookie righthander from Phoenix, Arizona, pitched a marvelous FOUR-hit shutout.
“THOUSANDS and THOUSANDS of fans are out on the playing field. Banners are being paraded. The Mets are IN the clubhouse. And in just a very few moments, we’ll be joining Ralph Kiner as he picks up the comments from the players.
“Ah, it’s almost too much to believe. Imagine finishing ninth a year ago, one game out of tenth, although it was a vastly improved club…Gil Hodges, who a year ago today suffered a heart attack in Atlanta, Georgia, fighting back from a heart attack to take his ballclub in his second year and MOLD a championship team.”
“Well, we’ll be back with the locker room show now in just one moment.”
But first, after a commercial break, and as the microphones picked up Jane Jarvis’s happy organ accompanying the nonstop elation in the background, Bob Murphy offered a coda from the booth that would eventually bear his name:
“THOUSANDS and THOUSANDS of Mets fans are out on the field, all shouting We’re Number One, We’re Number One. You have to see this scene to believe it. All the happiness comes pouring out.
“For the first six years of their lives, the Mets were laughed at, kicked around. They were the ballclub that was the big joke. They never believed it themselves, they knew they were going to be a ballclub.
“George Weiss, the first president of the Mets, had put together a good organization. The SCOUTS, the best he could get his hands on, turned out to be exactly that, the very best. They started signing GREAT young pitchers. It took a short time to develop them in the farm system. It took the guiding hand of a Gil Hodges to put it all together. And now THIS is the climax, a scene that Mets fans, I’m sure, since that first day eight years ago, have longed for.”
On July 31, 1994, Bob Murphy stood at a podium in Cooperstown accepting the Ford C. Frick Award for baseball broadcasting. In his acceptance speech, Bob singled out his favorite Mets team of them all.
“They were my boys of summer,” the Hall of Fame announcer said. “You’ll never enjoy a year any more than following the 1969 Mets.”
Though he never used his signature phrase that Wednesday night at Shea Stadium when Clendenon, Charles and Gentry starred and first place was clinched, chances are pretty good that September 24, 1969, endures as Bob Murphy’s Happiest Recap of them all.
ALSO QUITE HAPPY: On October 1, 1985, the clock was ticking on the Mets’ playoff chances. Good thing they employed a slugger who could make time stand still.
Of course if the Mets could have done that sooner and longer, they’d have been in better shape entering their final week. But things had not gone to plan since their dramatic three-game series at Shea against the rival Cardinals three weeks earlier. They came out of that showdown up one game on St. Louis. Alas, their advantage was short-lived. Within 48 hours, they had dropped a half-game behind the Redbirds. As the Mets were splitting six games against the Expos and Phillies, the Cards were off on a seven-game winning streak.
There was no momentum for New York. From September 13 through September 27, while the Cardinals were ripping off 14 wins in 15 games, the Mets scuffled as a barely .500 team, going 9-7 and never stringing together two consecutive wins. Dwight Gooden was blazing through September — in his three post-Cardinal starts totaling 26 innings, Doc drove in seven runs…or seven more than were charged to his microscopic earned run average. Gary Carter was catching him superbly and knocking in practically every Met he saw: 19 RBIs in 15 games played. But the team as a whole was sagging at the worst possible juncture. Not only was it getting late, but the Cardinals had gotten unbeatable.
The nadir came on Friday night the 27th in, not surprisingly, Pittsburgh. Pittsburgh represented rampant bad news for the Mets in September 1985, dating back to Keith Hernandez’s detour there to testify in the baseball drug trials early in the month. The last-place Pirates were an unlikely crew to sidetrack the Mets, but when they sailed into Shea the weekend of the 20th, it was more “oy” than “ahoy”. Despite Doc’s breakout offensive game on Saturday the 21st — which included his first major league homer — the Pirates took two of three in Flushing. Then, on the night when, thanks to the ravages of Hurricane Gloria, much of Metropolitan New York had to listen to the Three Rivers opener on battery-operated radios, the Mets’ chances practically blew away.
Early leads of 2-0 and 5-2 were gone with the wind in Pittsburgh as Ed Lynch left with recurring back spasms after two, and Tom Gorman, Wes Gardner and Randy Niemann each imploded in a six-run bottom of the third. The Mets were down 8-5 and lost 8-7. The defeat left them 4½ out with eight to play, an almost impossible hill to climb given how hot St. Louis had been.
A series of small miracles unfolded from there. The Cardinals displayed elements of being human and lost two of three in Montreal, the rubber game there turning on a two-run triple from ex-Met Hubie Brooks. Back in Pittsburgh, the Mets recovered from their devastating Gloria Night defeat to take the next two from their Buccaneering tormentors. Saturday afternoon’s 3-1 win was keyed by a George Foster home run and eight solid innings from rookie Rick Aguilera.
That would have been no more than a footnote had Sunday not been rescued at the last minute. Roger McDowell and Jesse Orosco let a 6-4 lead slip away in the eighth when they allowed three horrifying runs. Now down one run with three outs remaining in the competitive portion of their season, Howard Johnson tied the game at seven when he homered to lead off the ninth against Cecilio Guante. And Gary Carter capped his National League Player of the Month bid when he blasted a two-run home run off Larry McWilliams in the tenth; it was Kid’s 13th dinger in September. Orosco straightened up in the bottom of the inning to preserve the 9-7 win that literally saved the Mets’ 1985 season.
The Pirates, who had taken 8 of 18 from the Mets on their way to 104 defeats (while losing 15 of 18 to St. Louis), may have threatened the Mets’ viability, but their effect on the pennant race no longer mattered once Orosco grounded out Sammy Khalifa to let the Mets squirm out of Three Rivers with two wins. Their attention was focused squarely on their next destination: Busch Stadium.
“The only thing we were hoping for was to have our fate in our own hands,” said HoJo after doing his part to ensure the Mets’ fighting chance. “We’re three games back. There’s still a ways to go.”
“It was so important to go into St. Louis and be no more than three out,” Carter assessed of where the Mets stood with six to play. “It’s up to us to prove we can beat them. We basically have to beat them all three games. We have to play our best baseball of the season in the next three.”
Over the next eleven innings, you could say they did. Unfortunately, as had become the Mets’ burden, the Cardinals were no slouches, either. “St. Louis has been so hot lately,” HoJo said, “every mistake we’ve made has been magnified.”
The answer was to make no mistakes, starting with the manager and to whom he’d give the ball in the do’est-or-die’est game the Mets had played since the 1973 World Series ended badly in Oakland. A dozen years earlier, Yogi Berra skipped over one of his well-rested hot hands, George Stone, and prevailed on Tom Seaver in Game Six and Jon Matlack in Game Seven to finish off the A’s on short rest. It didn’t work out. While it wasn’t exactly analogous, Davey Johnson had options entering the Tuesday night opener in St. Louis. It was Ron Darling’s turn to pitch, but because Monday was an off day, Gooden was clearly available. His last outing, a shutout in Chicago, had taken place five days earlier. Gooden hadn’t allowed an earned run since August. With everything riding on this game, how could Davey not go with not just his ace, but baseball’s premier pitcher?
“I got telegrams telling me that I was a fool not to start Dwight against [John] Tudor,” Johnson wrote with Peter Golenbock in Bats. “I received one telegram from a doctor in Brooklyn suggesting I pitch Gooden the last five innings of each of the last three games! One fan suggested that if Darling was really going to start, I should fool the Cardinals by letting Doc take batting practice and then have him walk down from the bullpen just before the game, as though he was going to warm up. Very clever.”
Somehow, Johnson remained unmoved. Darling kept his spot in the rotation. The second-year righty may not have been Doc (17-1, 1.36 ERA in his past two-dozen starts), and he may not have been Tudor (19-1, 1.46 ERA in the same span), but he wasn’t a desperate choice. Entering October, Ron was 16-5, sporting a 2.94 ERA. He had been an All-Star selection in July. “All I knew,” Darling reflected nearly a quarter-century later in The Complete Game, “was that it was my turn to pitch and that we needed this game, so I went at it hard.”
That made two of them, for Tudor, too, was competing at an elevated level. Less was at stake for the Cardinals, given their three-game edge, but beating the Mets a night before Gooden showed his face would be tantamount to the knockout blow the Busch Stadium crowd craved. One placard held aloft beyond the outfield fence described what everybody on both sides was thinking:
LET’S GET IT ON
Hernandez, vilified in his first post-drug trial trip to St. Louis — he had testified that he had done coke as a Cardinal — became the first baserunner of the game when he walked with two out in the first. But Tudor stranded him there. Irrepressible rookie speedster Vince Coleman (109 bags and counting) led off for the Cardinals by walking, but was forced at second, and Darling didn’t give up anything else in the inning.
A pattern was established. Tudor and Darling were shadowing each other. A man on here, a man on there, but nothing substantial of an offensive nature could be sparked. Mets 0 Cardinals 0 for the longest, tensest time. The first serious threat arose in the top of the seventh when the bottom of the Mets’ order sprang to life. With one out, Ray Knight singled. Howard Johnson ran for him and raced to third when Rafael Santana doubled. Second and third, Darling up. Davey Johnson attempted to squeeze HoJo home.
Ronnie didn’t get the bunt down. Howard was a dead duck. Two out, with Santana taking third on the failed attempt. Swinging away, Darling popped to third. Inning over, still no score.
Darling went back to doing what he did well. He got a first out in the bottom of the seventh before allowing a double to Terry Pendleton and a walk to Mike Jorgensen. Ozzie Smith was next and he rapped into a 1-6-3 double play.
Still no score.
The eight was three up, three down for Darling, then for Tudor. The ninth showed potential for the Mets when Carter doubled to start it, but he never got any further than second. Darling pitched the ninth as well as he pitched the previous eight: Tommy Herr fouled out, Darrell Porter grounded to second and Andy Van Slyke grounded to first. When Darling took the toss from Hernandez, he had just completed nine shutout innings. Four hits, three walks, no runs. “Quite simply,” Hernandez judged, “Darling pitches the game of his career.”
“It was the first time,” Darling would write with Daniel Paisner, “I experienced the full intensity of the professional game.”
But it was still 0-0 going to the tenth. Darling was pulled for pinch-hitter Tom Paciorek. And Tudor was still on the mound for St. Louis. The lefty flied Paciorek to right, Mookie Wilson to left and grounded Wally Backman (technically a switch-hitter, but notoriously feeble against southpaws) to short. Jesse Orosco would now be charged with matching Tudor’s latest zero. It was a little dicey — stretch drive pickup par excellence Cesar Cedeño walked and stole second — but Jesse escaped trouble when he retired aching pinch-hitter Jack Clark. Most encouragingly from a Met perspective, the Cards’ aborted rally saw Whitey Herzog send up Tito Landrum to bat for Tudor. The Mets had officially withstood the best the White Rat could possibly throw at him. Tudor went ten and allowed no runs, but like Darling, he was now irrelevant to the outcome.
At 0-0 in the eleventh, the heart of the Mets order had to skip a beat knowing that instead of taking on Tudor, its task at hand was reliever Ken Dayley. Except Dayley was pretty tough himself. The lefty struck out Hernandez and Carter. Strawberry, 0-for-4 versus Tudor, was next.
LET’S GET IT ON
“Oh baby, that one is WAY outta here!” Steve Zabriskie declared. The time was 10:44 PM Central Daylight. We know that because WOR’s replay showed Darryl’s rocket on Dayley’s 1-1 pitch — “one curveball too many,” according to Ralph Kiner — smacking into and bouncing off the clock along the facing of Busch Stadium’s right field upper deck.
Zabriskie: “Right fielder Andy Van Slyke didn’t even move.”
Van Slyke had something in common with Mets fans back in New York, where the remote controls in 6.7 million households throughout the Metropolitan Area were staying put on Channel 9. This riveting game at the climax of this riveting season had drawn the highest rating of any WOR program in the station’s 36-year history. But the occupants of the previously still Mets dugout moved, with everybody leaping up and out onto the Busch Astroturf to swarm Darryl upon his triumphant arrival following his 28th home run of the season, the 80th home run of his career and the biggest home run he’d ever hit in any regular-season at-bat.
“When I hit it,” Straw said in a masterstroke of understatement, “I knew it was gone.”
Oh, and the scoreboard certainly moved. It had just clicked to Mets 1 Cardinals 0.
Darryl’s mighty blow provided enough of a lead for Orosco to protect in the bottom of the inning. The Mets came away 1-0 winners when they absolutely had to gain some kind of advantage. They were two games back with two more to go in St. Louis, and five left on the schedule overall. They were still in second, but suddenly it seemed as if they weren’t running out of time…not the way Darryl had just stopped it in its tracks.
“Tell me,” Davey asked reporters afterwards, “is the clock still working?”
The Mets were, and they knew it. Darling: “I’d never seen my teammates so emotional, so invested. Ray Knight actually had tears in his eyes in the clubhouse after the game. He was pumping his fists for sheer joy, that’s how much the game meant to him and it meant much the same to every guy in that room.”
In the standings, it offered another day of hope, though Herzog was happy to point out his club was still the one with more of that where a postseason appointment was concerned. “We’ve got to win a game,” the Rat appraised. “They’ve got to sweep.”
But “they” had Doc Gooden ready for his closeup, just as Davey had planned. No telegrams were necessary from Mets fans who tuned right back in to Channel 9 on Wednesday night. That viewership record from the night before was smashed — just like that clock in right field. More than one of every four television households in the Metropolitan Area tuned in Doc’s October 2 start; four of every ten sets that were in use were used to watch Gooden strike out ten Cardinals. If he wasn’t at his sharpest (nine hits and two actual earned runs), the Doctor was as in as he had to be. With a Nielsen-boggling 61 percent of the New York viewing audience hanging on every pitch, Gooden nursed a nervous 5-2 lead home in the ninth. The Cardinals had loaded the bases with two outs, and Herr lined one final delivery (Gooden’s 136th of the night) in the general direction of right field. Fortunately for those about to gasp, Backman stood in its way and caught Herr’s ball for the final out.
Gooden had won again. His 1985 numbers were now etched for posterity and immortality: 24-4, 1.53 ERA, 268 strikeouts in 276 innings, 16 complete games. The Mets, of course, had won again. Their 20-year-old ace had brought them to a 97-61 mark, just one game behind the 98-60 Cardinals. They needed to sweep three games. They were two-thirds of the way there.
The Mets would not complete the job. Channel 9 attracted yet another record-setting audience, Hernandez answered his St. Louis detractors with five hits in five tries, and Aguilera battled gamely across six innings, but the Mets went down, 4-3, in the Thursday October 3 finale. They took it to two out in the ninth, Keith on first, Gary up, but Cardinal reliever Ricky Horton drew a fly to right from September’s Player of the Month. This ball wasn’t headed where Strawberry’s two nights earlier had gone. This one landed in Van Slyke’s glove.
Time had run out on the 1985 Mets.
At two out with three to go, they weren’t mathematically eliminated, but spiritually, it was all over. The Mets flew home to play Montreal Friday night. They won, but so did their rival. The Cardinals clinched on Saturday afternoon by beating Chicago. When Shea’s out-of-town scoreboard flashed the final from St. Louis, 45,404 Mets fans ignored the game in front of them and stood as one to salute a 161-game pennant race like no other.
It was Fan Appreciation Day in Flushing. Scarves were distributed to help the Mets faithful through the cold days ahead. Yet all the scarf recipients could think to do was create a breeze by waving them in swirling acrylic acknowledgement of the spring, summer and early fall they had just lived and died through.
The scarves were nice enough. But the memories of 1985 were what would warm Mets fans down to their souls.
Their team had never been more than five games from the lead all year long, and was in first or second every day from July 8 on. They spent a composite 68 days atop the N.L. East. But that didn’t begin to describe the passion 1985 elicited for the committed Mets fan. No numbers, not even Doc’s, could express the urgency of a full season of living on the edge with these Mets.
Gary Carter began it with an introductory home run to beat the Cardinals on Opening Day. Darryl Strawberry extended it with a home run to beat the Cardinals 155 games later. Gooden excelled the next night, Hernandez the night after that. HoJo, with Kid, in Pittsburgh over the penultimate weekend. Mookie homering in L.A. at the end of the last California trip. Mookie rushing home from second to win the first St. Louis series in New York four days later. Everybody in Atlanta on the longest and strangest night of them all. Doc essentially every fifth day for six months. And Rusty…can’t forget Rusty zipping (in his fashion) between left and right that April Sunday at Shea, Davey trying his darnedest to keep the ball from being hit to him, and the ball finding Rusty anyway, and Rusty, a 41-year-old pinch-hitter, finding the ball before it could fall in in the 18th inning.
Rusty wouldn’t be forgotten in Game 162, either. Twenty-three Sundays after making his last outfield putout, he stepped up to the plate wind down his 23-season major league career with two out in the ninth inning in the only allegedly meaningless game the Mets would play in 1985. But how could it be without meaning if Rusty Staub was batting?
The final appearance of Le Grand Orange, as a pinch-hitter for Ronn Reynolds, was greeted by the final Shea crowd of the year as everything else was that weekend: warmly, sentimentally, maybe a little mistily. Rusty Staub came to the Mets in 1972 the way Gary Carter had come to the Mets in 1985, an established big bat imported from Canada in exchange for promising youth…the missing ingredient intended to put a talented team over the top. It wasn’t to be in ’72, just as it hadn’t been in ’85, but Rusty powered the Mets to a pennant in ’73, the last pennant Shea had seen. He was petulantly traded away after ’75, but reacquired prior to ’81. A new Mets contender grew up around him in the early ’80s. He wouldn’t be in uniform to see how much it would grow after 1985, but he was still wearing No. 10 for now, and the final 31,890 Sheagoers of the year (part of the 2,761,601 who established a New York City baseball attendance record) stood to thank Rusty for both of his Met terms and all of his Met swings.
His last one, against Jeff Reardon of the Expos, didn’t result in anything more than a groundout. The game ended. The Mets lost. The season was over. But the applause didn’t quite die down. Anybody who wasn’t there Saturday was going to get his appreciation in on Sunday before letting the team scatter for winter. This was a different kind of fan appreciation day. This was sincere appreciation by the fans for the team; for 1985; for 98 wins that somehow didn’t qualify for the playoffs; and for the palpable sense that 1986 would end later and better. Rusty might not be back, but everybody else who mattered would be.
Doc. Darryl. Keith. Gary. HoJo. Mookie. Wally. Lenny. Rafael. Ronnie. Jesse. Roger. Aggie. Sid. Ray. George. Danny. Doug. Davey.
And us.
A special The Happiest Recap thank you goes out to FAFIF readers Joe Dubin (September 24, 1969) and Larry Arnold (October 1, 1985) for their respective archival material contributions to this installment.
by Greg Prince on 17 October 2011 1:42 pm
Sunday I watched a team that wasn’t expected to get as far as it did, one that overcame all kinds of skepticism to take the baseball world by storm. It was thrilling seeing them step up and prove their doubters wrong. What a great story!
Yes, I finally got around to seeing Moneyball. How about those slightly idealized 2002 Oakland A’s?
Then I came home and watched the St. Louis Cardinals win the 2011 National League pennant. Not exactly Paul DePodesta’s Peter Brand’s “island of misfit toys,” but who saw them being measured for celebratory t-shirts and caps, either? Who saw their NLCS Hollywood ending when their script was stalled in development as recently as late August?
Who saw them here at all?
It’s hard to think of the St. Louis Cardinals cast as an underdog considering they always seem to be playing ball at this time of year. It’s also hard to think of them as sympathetic given their identity as the historically annoying St. Louis Cardinals, no matter how objectively likable the contours of their current storyline. If MLB wanted me to get behind these Cardinals, they’d do what the filmmakers did when DePodesta requested his name not be used in Moneyball. They would create a composite character the way the movie did with Jonah Hill’s DePodesta stand-in, Peter Brand:
• a team from the heartland that never gives up;
• a roster dotted with players you either never heard of before September or stopped thinking about years ago;
• a logo that doesn’t inspire visceral dismay;
• a color scheme that doesn’t trigger flashbacks that have me practically reaching through my TV screen to strangle every one of their red-clad followers.
Let’s call this creatively licensed National League champion the Missouri Maulers. They play in the fictional town of Musial. Their fans all dress in green (what the hell, the A’s aren’t using it at the moment). Their manager is a kindly former actuary. Their catcher never hit a big home run in his life and isn’t at all irritatingly flamboyant. The people who attend their games like a cult never intentionally spilled beer on Lenny Dykstra.
They can still have Albert Pujols as Albert Pujols. You do need some starpower above the title.
These Maulers I could root for. These Maulers charged back from double-digits behind in late August and overcame a smug, useless collection of Braves to barely make the playoffs on the last day of the season. Then these Maulers shocked a far smugger collection of Phillies — a supposedly unbeatable champion-in-waiting whose stellar starting pitching proved helpless against Mauler magic — in the tensest of 1-0 elimination games. Finally, these Maulers made their way to Milwaukee and stuffed a sock in the mouths of a band of Brewers who couldn’t shut up long enough to actually field a grounder, collect an out or record a clutch hit.
In the next scene, the lovable Mauler joyride continues to Texas, where…well, I don’t know how it turns out, but I’m pretty sure I’d want to see them in another victorious dogpile wearing another edition of celebratory t-shirts and caps. I’d want the Missouri Maulers to keep up whatever they’d been doing. I’d want them to keep surprising me and sort of delighting me with their corps of no-names and their stubbornly indefatigable bullpen and all the cute talismans — Rally Squirrel! Happy Flight! David Freese! — they pick up along the way. If they were to beat Texas, I’d stand and applaud. If they were to lose to Texas, I’d tip my cap in their direction to acknowledge how well they persevered just for the opportunity to land at this spot when Nobody Believed In Them…But Themselves, and to thank them for making the postseason so much more interesting by how they fought.
But they’re not the Missouri Maulers. They’re the St. Louis Cardinals of Tony La Russa and Yadier Molina and The Best Fans In Baseball.
Go Rangers.
by Greg Prince on 16 October 2011 11:57 am
The Texas Rangers have my wholehearted admiration for doing one of the hardest things there is to do in baseball: getting to the mountaintop, tumbling off of it a step from its absolute peak and working their way back up to where they were a year before. No year-after hangover for the once-and-again American League champions. Maybe it’s because they douse themselves in Canada Dry.
While I’ve never been one for dynasties (perhaps because my team has never effected one), there is something comforting about the sight of familiar faces as October grows deep, provided the bodies beneath those faces aren’t clad in pinstripes. At this moment, I see the Rangers of the early ’10s and I’m reminded of the Orioles of four decades ago, the A’s who followed them, the Royals who put up a series of good fights a few years thereafter, another edition of Athletics, and then some recurring Blue Jays and Indians squads. As someone who was never compelled to follow the American League for six months at a time, these teams that won as habit, whether I particularly liked them or not, served as convenient shorthand. If it’s October, we must be in Baltimore or Kansas City or Toronto. (Anywhere but the Bronx, por favor.)
Now Texas has entered that charmed circle. If they remain sublimely successful for four of their next four to seven games, then this really has been an Arlington era for the ages. The names and faces who have embroidered themselves into the baseball fan consciousness outside the Metroplex — Cruz, Young, Kinsler, Andrus, Wilson, Feliz and their energetic manager Washington — will ascend to that imaginary Rushmore we create for our big winners. By the end of this decade, we’ll either be talking about the Texas Rangers as one of the undisputed great teams of our time or one of the underappreciated great teams of our time. If their 2011 harvest stops with a ginger ale-soaked second league title, then they’re probably consigned to trivia and unfair dismissal as a team that wasn’t able to get it done — or git-r-done, as they might say down there.
As for the team that didn’t get four of seven done in the ALCS, one wishes the best for the Detroit Tigers as they attempt to get (or git) back to where they briefly belonged this fall. I heard brave pronouncements from their clubhouse Saturday night about how they’re in this for the long haul and they have the players to do it again and this is only the beginning, but as reasonable as that sounds, and as much consolation as that might provide, it’s tough. It’s tough to ascend to the outer reaches of that mountaintop once. Doing it twice, per the late Molly Ivins, was no church-singin’-with-supper-on-the-grounds for Texas.
The Tigers shocked the segment of the baseball world that was paying attention to them in 2006 when they rose from the muck of 2003 (43-119) and won a pennant. A year later, they missed the playoffs. Two years later, they were back in the basement. Three years later, they committed what entered the conversation of Worst Collapses in Baseball History (of which there seems to have been a rash lately). The 2009 Tigers — enhanced by Miguel Cabrera, no less — were 7 ahead with 26 to play, 4½ ahead with 17 to play and, most chillingly, 3 up with 4 to play. All it got them was a 163rd-game tiebreaking loss. Dramatic as hell, but no cigar. Just another pack of cigarettes, presumably, for Jim Leyland.
Two years passed and the Tigers were A.L. Central champions again and A.L. finalists again. Bless those boys for avoiding extinction in the ALDS, but even armed with the best pitcher on the planet this year, they seemed ultimately doomed given how the skies opened every time Justin Verlander went into his windup during the postseason. True, their doom beat the doom of a dozen other teams in their league (to say nothing of our own doom), but doom is doom nonetheless.
The Rangers plated nine runs in the third inning of Game Six. One Tiger twirler after another tried his best and produced his worst. The cameras followed them down the steps to the visitors clubhouse, which seemed cruel. Let Max Scherzer and Rick Porcello throw their tantrums in peace. And for goodness sake, turn off the Leyland Cam. The Rangers kept scoring and Leyland grew more and more morbid. After yet another Ranger RBI, Jimmy seemed to be staring into that mounted lens as if to say, “We’re losing 15-4, whaddaya want from me?”
There’s no good way to have your season end if it doesn’t end with ginger ale or some other beverage flying, but it doesn’t get much worse than having your season end with multiple innings to go. Your final game is over in the third at 9-2, as it was for the Tigers; or in the second at 6-0, as it was for us in 1988 against the Dodgers; or in the first at Marlins 7, the Mets coming up to bat, as it was for us when the equipment was barely game-used on what turned out to be our last day of 2007, and you just have to sit there and wait it out. When the team that’s losing doesn’t take it lying down — the way the Rays came back from 7-0 in their 162nd game this year, for example, or the way the 1999 Mets arose from the first-inning dead in another Game Six — it takes your breath away. But it doesn’t happen often. It didn’t really happen last night, a couple of cosmetic Tiger homers notwithstanding.
It could have been worse, I suppose. It could have been Game Seven of the 1934 World Series when the Cardinals built a 7-0 lead in the third at what was then known as Navin Field in Detroit and Ducky Medwick raised the ire of Tigers fans with a hard slide a few innings later, accompanied by some spiked kicks in the direction of third baseman Marv Owen’s stomach. The Detroit faithful gave Medwick the Pete Rose treatment — fruit, vegetables, anything else handy — upon his returning to left field in the bottom of the sixth, and he had to be removed for his own safety. Then the Tigers fans who weren’t hauled off had to sit and watch some more as the Cardinals finished off their heroes, 11-0.
Yeah, that was worse. As was 2003 for the Tigers. And 2009 for the Tigers. Actually, the Tigers haven’t had much to spray beverages about on a consistent basis since 1935, the year after the Gashouse Gang spit championship tobacco in Detroit’s collective eye. Like the Rangers of 2011, those Cats clawed their way back to mountaintop with a second consecutive American League pennant — and they won their first World Series, beating the Cubs in six. They’ve been to the postseason all of eight times in the ensuing 76 years, never in successive campaigns. Making two trips to the outskirts of the mountaintop is extraordinarily hard.
Which is why the Rangers’ accomplishment is so darn admirable. And maybe why I’m still pissed about September 30, 2007.
Twenty-five years ago today we were still rubbing our eyes from what happened 25 years ago yesterday. Relive that Game Six with Ed Leyro, here.
by Greg Prince on 15 October 2011 8:54 am
You ever flip around while watching TV and discover some prime time show you’ve always liked is on in syndication five or six times a night and you start getting into it all over again? That’s the postseason to me right now. These games are as much fun as 30 Rock reruns, except I technically haven’t seen them before.
Having expended most of my animosity on the elimination of the Yankees and Phillies from the first round, I find myself with no solid rooting/rooting-against interest during these LCSes. I came into these series favoring the Tigers and the Brewers, yet I’m perfectly all right with the Rangers and Cardinals leading their sets 3-2. Seventh games would be wonderful. Any possible outcome that includes as much baseball as they can fit into their timeslots is acceptable. I don’t think I terribly mind anybody, save for one particular St. Louis catcher on whose head I am still waiting for space junk to fall.
Yadier Molina’s continued presence among the earthly aside, it’s simply fulfilling to have the grand old game infiltrating my media receptors every time I turn around. At least twice during the ALCS, I had to be reminded there was a game in progress. That’s made the Tigers and Rangers a pleasant surprise to behold. I’ve followed most of their scintillating action on radio, albeit with one ear’s attention. What I’m missing in detail and nuance — Cruz has how many homers now? — I’m enjoying via spontaneity. When I overheard something about a ball hitting the third base bag the other day while I was doing something else, well, gosh, that sounded intriguing. What’s that? Tigers won? Longer series? Swell! Bet I remember to tune in for the first pitch tonight.
I’ve attempted to be a little more engaged in my native League Championship Series, but it took me until Game Five to feel truly drawn in. As much I detest the Cardinals for crimes historic and imagined, I’m beginning to detect a little transitory red in my blood for them…and I surely didn’t see that coming. Part of it is disappointment in the shoddy workmanship of the Brewers, who probably should have shut the fudge up after escaping the Diamondbacks (though then they wouldn’t have been the Brewers), but more of it is a grudging admiration that the Cardinals are still playing, let alone managing to win.
Which is, I guess, what Tony La Russa does as well as anybody in the sport — which sucks, because who wants to watch Tony La Russa manage or win? Nevertheless, the real battle in this series as it heads back to Miller Park doesn’t seem like Cardinals vs. Brewers. Rather it’s the chances that the Cardinals’ bullpen arms don’t fall off from intense overuse versus La Russa’s apparent determination to rip them from their sockets. No St. Louis starter has gone more than five innings in the first five games, yet St. Louis is one win from another World Series.
Can that algorithm hold? Isn’t this supposed to be the time of the season when stud pitchers step up and give you seven or eight or nine? Or is that Verlanderian ideal overblown in the wake of the Four Aces from Philadelphia presumably sitting and stewing as their yachts float down the Schuylkill? Does Shawn Marcum have to materially outpitch Edwin Jackson tomorrow, or will Fielder and Braun simply slug away the Brew Crew’s problems long enough for Gallardo and Carpenter to match up the way each matched up, respectively, against Kennedy and Halladay on the electric Friday night that got their teams into this series to begin with?
Notice it’s all compelling questions and no definitive answers. That’s the kind of stuff that keeps you watching a show you can’t help but get hooked on.
And back from when our rooting interests were crystal clear, Mark Simon takes us back to perhaps the greatest baseball game ever played, Game Six of the 1986 NLCS, which sprawled out before us 25 years ago today.
by Greg Prince on 13 October 2011 3:48 pm
The wedding of my longtime friend Fred to his new bride Karla (“my first wife,” he jokes) was a joyous event for Stephanie and me to attend last weekend, both for the nuptials of two fine people and the opportunity to spend time with other friends with whom I go back decades. Joel, Adam and I represented Long Beach at Table 6, which made us rather exotic down in Baltimore. It was as if nobody believed Fred knew anybody from his previous, pre-Maryland life.
We all went to high school together, which didn’t make it surprising that talk eventually turned to wondering how many of our teachers were still with us. Not all that many was the consensus estimate, supported by anecdotal evidence of what we’d learned here and there of late.
Back in New York, the timing was definitely a little eerie when I picked up Newsday on Sunday and found out another from the ranks of LBHS teachers had just passed away: Thomas DeLuca, 78. He was one of my gym teachers…I think.
I say “I think,” because when you’re not altogether athletic, chances are you’re not going to have particularly strong memories of your gym teacher, unless that person made your life miserable. From what I can remember, Mr. DeLuca did no such thing to me. I can picture him in his royal blue windbreaker passing out the dodgeballs, but otherwise I have no recollection of any gym class contact with him.
I do vaguely recall interviewing him for the school paper — which is where Fred, Adam, Joel, a couple of others who couldn’t make it to the wedding and I did our original hanging out (with some producing of the school paper thrown in) — but I don’t recall it sharply. Mr. DeLuca was the basketball coach who I’m sure gave me upbeat quotes about the star of the team. He took over as football coach before I graduated, but by then I was no longer covering sports. The only other thing I’m sure I knew was a friend who was on the basketball team mainly because he was tall was never too happy being nailed to the bench and thus blamed Mr. DeLuca for his lack of playing time.
Perhaps because we had just been talking teachers, I was compelled to at least skim Stephen Haynes’s beautifully written obituary, and was gratified to learn a fact included at the end:
“The passion for sports never left DeLuca. He remained an avid Mets (post-Brooklyn Dodgers), Jets and Knicks fan.”
I didn’t know that about Mr. DeLuca. I’m sure we would have enjoyed exchanging a few words about how Lee Mazzilli was tearing up the National League when I was a sophomore or what impact a returning Dave Kingman might have on the lineup when I was a senior. The obit mentioned that he coached baseball, too, something that sounds familiar, but I can’t swear I knew that before reading it (he may have taken it on after I graduated).
Knowing now this was a fellow Mets fan, I went back to the top and read Haynes’s work more closely. Turns out Mr. D — yeah, I kind of remember the basketball players calling him that — was a big-time athlete for Long Beach High School. That sounded familiar, somehow, though where I would have heard that, I don’t know. Starred for LBHS and then NYU as an All-American in the days when NYU was an athletic powerhouse.
NYU? Did I know that? It also sounded familiar, but by now I’m pretty sure I was revising my memory of Mr. D to fit his admirable life story…
He coached my alma mater to a championship while I was in college…
He served in the Army during Korea, same time as my father did…
He’d invite the other teachers and coaches back to his house for pizza…
He received letters through the years from his former players who wanted to thank him for impacting his life…
No, I didn’t know him, but now I was warming to the idea that I should have, even if he didn’t play my awkward tall friend except in blowouts.
This, however, I knew I didn’t know: Mr. DeLuca was a minor league baseball player. At age 23, after college, after the military, he was signed by the St. Louis Cardinals. Maybe he mentioned it to his players or other students along the way in his 20-year teaching career in Long Beach, but I never heard about it. Nearly a quarter-century had passed since he was in the Redbird chain, but that wouldn’t have stopped me from telling it to everybody I met if I were him. Even if I was handing out dodgeballs, I’d definitely look to slip in a “you know, I was a professional baseball player.”
It was for just one year — or one year longer than any of us has been a professional baseball player. Mr. DeLuca was considered a “slick-fielding shortstop,” but a knee injury ended his career just as it was starting.
Curious, I checked Baseball-Reference, and son of a gun, they have a record for Thomas DeLuca: all of six games accounted for in 1957, four at Class D Albany in the Georgia-Florida League and two more with Winston-Salem in the Carolina League. He collected three hits for each team. There isn’t any indication about power or speed. The numbers are pretty sketchy.
But one of the thousand or so great things about Baseball-Reference is you can see who else played on a given team in a given year, even in the low minors. And way down in Class D Albany, two other 1957 Albany Cardinals — the only ones to make the majors — were two future Mets: Jim Hickman and Gordie Richardson.
Hickman was an Original Met and a mainstay of the franchise for its first five years. It wasn’t until after Jim was traded to the Dodgers that he relinquished his position as the Mets’ all-time hit leader to Eddie Kranepool, who holds it to this day.
Richardson won four games as a member of the 1964 World Champion Cardinals and two more as a Met during the next two seasons. Gordie’s relatively brief New York tenure is nonetheless at least tangentially related to two intertwined central storylines in Mets history:
• He combined with Gary Kroll to pitch a Spring Training no-hitter over the Pirates in 1965, the only no-hitter of any kind ever pitched in a New York Mets uniform, even in an exhibition game.
• He was the last Met to wear 41 before it was donned by George Thomas Seaver in 1967.
Southpaw Gordie Richardson made his Met debut on July 9, 1965, relieving Jack Fisher in the third inning of a game the Mets trailed 6-0 to the Astros at Shea Stadium. He gave Casey Stengel a scoreless inning before being pinch-hit for in what became a 6-2 loss. Pretty run-of-the-mill stuff for the era.
But exactly four years later, Seaver — Richardson’s Jacksonville Suns teammate in 1966, Gordie’s last year in professional ball — would be pitching from the same mound in the same uniform number and would come within two outs of a perfect game. That, of course, was the Jimmy Qualls game, which came a day after the Don Young game, so named for the Cub center fielder who couldn’t catch the two ninth-inning fly balls that set up the Mets’ winning rally. Young subsequently caught hell from Ron Santo and was benched by Leo Durocher for the next game…giving way to Qualls and his breaking up of Seaver’s masterpiece, though not materially affecting what became one of the Mets’ most memorable wins ever.
In that similarly unforgettable Don Young game of July 8, 1969, incidentally, the Cub right fielder was Jim Hickman, who homered off Jerry Koosman in the eighth to give Chicago a short-lived 3-1 lead before the Mets scored three off Ferguson Jenkins (and Young) in the ninth. Righthanded Hickman, however, would sit against Seaver. Durocher started lefty Al Spangler in his stead — Spanky, as he was known, went 0-for-3 on July 9, 1969, as the Mets won their seventh game in a row overall.
I’m guessing that a dozen years after crossing paths with Hickman and Richardson in Georgia, avid Mets fan Tom DeLuca wasn’t at all displeased.
by Greg Prince on 11 October 2011 5:57 pm
(As possibly occurred at Mets’ Dominican minor league instructional camp, following the 1999 season. Translated from the original Spanish.)
“All right everybody settle down. We’re going to take a break from our regular drills to talk about situational fundamentals.”
“Situational fundamentals, Mr. Minaya?”
“That’s right. I’m down here from New York in my capacity as senior assistant general manager because the organization wants you to know how to behave in every possible situation on the ball field. Our first priority is making sure you know what to do in an extra-inning postseason game.”
“Mr. Minaya?”
“Yes, Nelson?”
“Do you expect us to be in a lot of those in our careers?”
“Well, as New York Mets prospects, you should know that if you make the majors with our team, you have three-in-ten chance of playing in an extra-inning postseason game. That’s based on the most recently available data.”
“Wow, Mr. Minaya. That’s a very sophisticated statistical analysis.”
“Kid, we’re the New York Mets. We’re all about sophisticated statistical analysis. You know what I’m sayin’?”
“I’m not sure, Mr. Minaya.”
“We’ll save that for the class on free agent contract negotiations we’ll be holding later this week. For now, I want us to concentrate on these extra-inning postseason games. Those have some very tricky situations, so let’s get to the most important one.”
“What’s that?”
“Let’s say you’re batting with the bases loaded at home in a tie game, and you hit a ball over the wall…yes, Nelson?”
“No disrespect, Mr. Minaya, but aren’t we getting a little ahead of ourselves here? I mean we’re all basically rookies just trying to figure out how professional baseball works, and you’re talking about a very rare and very advanced situation.”
“Nelson, the New York Mets organization believes in starting at an end point and working backwards. You can’t say it doesn’t work, based on our recent success.”
“But you lost your last game.”
“You?”
“We. ‘We’ lost our last game.”
“That’s better. Show some Met pride, Nelson. Just because you weren’t on the field with Kenny Rogers when he threw ball four, it doesn’t mean you can’t claim to have taken part in our success. We may have lost, but what we lost was a big game and a big series. Take pride in that.”
“But ‘we’ lost.”
“That’s better.”
“Huh?”
“Anyway, let’s get to our visual aid. I’m going to pop in the tape from Game Five — which we won, so Nelson won’t be confused — specifically the fifteenth inning when Robin Ventura batted with the bases loaded. Do you see what he does there?”
“He hits the ball out of the park.”
“Very good, Nelson. Can you see anything wrong with what happens afterwards?”
“Sure. Anybody can see that.”
“That’s correct, Nelson. Robin tried to round the bases.”
“Wait — that’s wrong?”
“Sure. If Robin rounds the bases and scores, we win 7-3.”
“How could that be wrong?”
“It’s all right, but anybody can do that.”
“Anybody? But nobody ever did that before! Nobody ever hit a grand slam home run to end a postseason game before! By definition, nobody can do it. Or has.”
“Nelson, you’re forgetting the Mets Way. The Mets Way is to go for the drama before anything else.”
“But what about Pratt?”
“Pratt? Very dramatic. He proved that against Arizona.”
“Yes, but didn’t Pratt do wrong by tackling Ventura? He cost the Mets three runs! You…”
“We.”
“Sorry. ‘We’ should have won 7-3 instead of 4-3.”
“But Nelson, don’t you see? It’s much more dramatic this way. It’s much more exciting and memorable. We can market this. It’s already known as the ‘grand slam single’. That’s so much more interesting than just another grand slam home run.”
“I don’t know, Mr. Minaya. It seems kind of important that every run score. Besides Ventura doesn’t even get credit for a grand slam this way.”
“Robin has plenty of those, but only one of these. What’s really important is how heads-up Pratt was there, making the scene so memorable. I don’t know what Robin will do when he’s retired, but I really think Todd is managerial material.”
“For ignoring the rules?”
“Nelson, we’ll have to work on this during drills. We’ll put three men on base and you’ll hit a ball over the wall. The goal will be to make sure you don’t reach second base.”
“That’s insane!”
“You’re a good prospect, Cruz, but keep talking like that and we’ll ship you off for some marginal utility infielder. Trust me, you’ll appreciate this lesson if you’re ever up with the bases loaded in an extra-inning postseason home game that’s tied. You know what I’m sayin’?”
“I know you’re sayin’ that if I ever have that opportunity and don’t let one of my teammates tackle me, they’ll say I’m the first one to hit a grand slam home run to end a postseason game, and they probably won’t even mention Robin Ventura.”
“Very good, Nelson! Now let’s move on to our next subject: batting championships. Say you’re leading the league in hitting by a few points and it’s the last day of the season and you’re leading off for the Mets, quite possibly in your last game as a Met. What do you do? Let’s hear from someone else…Jose?”
|
|