The blog for Mets fans
who like to read

ABOUT US

Greg Prince and Jason Fry
Faith and Fear in Flushing made its debut on Feb. 16, 2005, the brainchild of two longtime friends and lifelong Met fans.

Greg Prince discovered the Mets when he was 6, during the magical summer of 1969. He is a Long Island-based writer, editor and communications consultant. Contact him here.

Jason Fry is a Brooklyn writer whose first memories include his mom leaping up and down cheering for Rusty Staub. Check out his other writing here.

Got something to say? Leave a comment, or email us at faithandfear@gmail.com. (Sorry, but we have no interest in ads, sponsored content or guest posts.)

Need our RSS feed? It's here.

Visit our Facebook page, or drop by the personal pages for Greg and Jason.

Or follow us on Twitter: Here's Greg, and here's Jason.

Uprising!

Short of doing something that will get you arrested, you can’t affect the outcome of a baseball game. Your hooting and hollering does nothing. Neither does praying, cajoling or threatening. Baseball takes no notice of your swaggering overconfidence and ignores your pretend humility. It does not care that you care. It does not care that you don’t care. Your rally cap causes no butterfly effect. Neither do religious symbols, rituals or deciding to hide behind the couch. You are not playing, and therefore nothing you do matters.

And yet games like Thursday make a hash of all such rational thought. After such a victory, there are no baseball atheists in Mets hats.

Why do you watch dozens of dreary, lead-footed garbage-time affairs to the bitter end, even if your team enters the ninth down four runs with nothing discernible to play for? Because every now and then the karmic wheels you’ve kept so carefully spinning align, and your faith is rewarded. And then for the next 24 hours you get to walk the earth with a silly grin and a spring in your step — you’re one of the anointed, a believer, the orange and blue mark of favor shining on your brow. The next hundred games will likely bring failed rallies or no uprising whatsoever, but that 100th? It makes it all worth it.

In the early going against St. Louis, to say the Mets weren’t showing much would have been a kindness. Chris Capuano was down 2-0 before he recorded an out, and the Mets seemed determined to see as few pitches from Jake Westbrook as possible. They’d already done so much to help the Cardinals in the last week that I wondered sourly if they making sure they’d have enough time to skim Albert Pujols’s pool before catching their flight.

With the game having started late, I missed the middle innings picking up Joshua from school, then settled in with him for dinner at the Waterfront Ale House. We took a booth under one of the TVs, a booth I know from experience gives you an up-close view of the game provided you’re willing to crane your neck at an unnatural angle. While the kid slaughtered pixeled villains on the iPhone, I aimed my chin at the screen and watched the Mets continue to sleep-walk in announcer silence. I’ve sat in this booth during better games, I thought idly to myself, and was faintly annoyed that this wasn’t going to be one of them.

But, well, there’s a reason you play ’em.

Down 6-2 in the ninth, with the Cardinals fans baying at the chance to move within a game of the Braves, Willie Harris (who’d had a two-run homer cruelly but correctly ruled foul by the umps upon video review) worked out a seemingly cosmetic walk. Nick Evans then promptly hit a sure double-play ball to old nemesis Rafael Furcal. Furcal took a step to flip it to Ryan Theriot, but lost the handle and wound up with the ball slithering uselessly up and down his forearm. By the time he corralled it and tromped on second, Harris was safe. After Josh Thole flied out, disappointing his local rooting section, Jason Pridie walked and then Justin Turner fought his way through a terrific, Dunstonesque at-bat, spoiling pitch after pitch from Jason Motte before finally letting the ninth offering go by for a bases-loaded walk. It was 6-3, with Jose Reyes given another chance in his batting race with Ryan Braun — and oh yeah, the tying run was at first. A lot had to go right, Reyes was hitting from his weaker side, but we were at least in Ya Never Know territory.

Tony La Russa excused Motte from further duty and handed the ball over to Marc Rzepczynski, who sawed off Reyes — but Reyes had just enough oomph behind his broken lumber to push the ball over Theriot’s head, making the score 6-4 with Ruben Tejada coming up against Fernando Salas. A couple of months ago I would have hoped that the overmatched Tejada struck out instead of giving the Cards a double-play grounder, but not any more: I was glad to see him coming to the plate, remembering that he’d turned in another fundamentally sound, smart game. Salas got two quick strikes, but Tejada coolly worked it to 3-2 and then laced a ball to deep left.

I have no doubt that in plenty of parallel universes Shane Robinson’s desperate dive towards the left-field corner ended with Tejada’s drive nestled in his glove as he skidded along the warning track, granting Robinson a place in Redbird lore and ensuring him at least a decade of free beers in a large swath of the Midwest. But in this universe the ball tipped off his glove, sending various Mets racing pell-mell for various bases and tying the game. Ruben Tejada is going to be a star, I tell you.

Not that stardom is a cure-all, or forever. The Cardinals then walked Angel Pagan to reload the bases for David Wright, a strategy that in 2008 would have qualified La Russa for psychiatric care. Now, though, it made perfect sense, and Wright turned in the kind of at-bat that explains why we worry so thoroughly about him. He didn’t hit a grand slam or a long double or a bloop single or even lift a fly ball to the outfield. He struck out, closing his eyes in familiar agony and trudging back to the dugout.

But enter Harris, again, and he delivered, again — a clean, two-run single for the lead. SNY’s cameras found La Russa in the dugout, stalking and stewing, and I reminded myself sternly that I was with my child and in public, and therefore not allowed to howl profane suggestions at La Russa. Instead I settled for pointing and cackling.

We headed for home, iPhone held between us, the uncertain adventures of Bobby Parnell narrated by Howie Rose, whose voice rose and fell with our steps. For once, those adventures were not the stuff of particular drama: Parnell fanned Nick Punto, got Dennis Descalso to fly out and then faced the hated Yadier Molina, who could only wound us, not kill us. Molina tried, as he always does: He lifted a little parachute to right that Pridie dove underneath and caught with his glove held high for a thoroughly satisfying win and an equally satisfying gut shot for La Russa.

Remember this one the next time the Mets hit the ninth down four and do nothing whatsoever. And remember it the time after that, and the time after that, and so on. Karma demands such patience, and the next times the wheels align, you’ll be glad you showed it.

Seven-Run Swing to Nowhere

It’s not our pennant race, but we were about to make a potentially legendary impact on it. That would’ve been fun.

In the bottom of the second, already behind by two, Chris Schwinden couldn’t have appeared much more in danger. Infield hijinks, bloop warfare and the temptation of hitting Rafael Furcal that was just too good to pass up left ol’ No. 63 (who will be portrayed in the Moneyball sequel by the guy who played the road manager in Rock Star) with a Mo’s Zone-sized jam. Allen Craig’s single rode Schwin to a 3-0 deficit and Chris’s next two batters, with the bases still loaded, were only Albert Pujols and Lance Berkman.

That’s all.

It was almost too obvious a setup, but what are the Mets at the tail end of this lost season yet a predictable plot point? Pujols popped to Nick Evans at first for the second out, but Berkman lined a ball that had “gap” written all over it, just above Bud Selig’s signature. Only thing was it seemed to travel for an eternity, as if it hadn’t been given clearance to land.

Which was when Willie Harris reappeared. I don’t mean Willie Harris showed up in the picture from left field. I mean Willie Harris arrived from approximately 2008. The Willie Harris we’d been waiting for finally decided to don a Mets uniform, rob somebody else of a sure run-scoring extra-base hit and quite possibly ruin somebody else’s season. The Cardinals are at a juncture of the schedule and at a niche in the standings where every little thing matters. They can’t have some utility outfielder who does next to nothing when they’re not around swoop in from out of nowhere, dive into camera range and steal Lance Berkman’s three-run double.

But that’s what they got. Willie Harris of the Mets did his best Willie Harris of the Nats impression and foiled Berkman’s bid to put the game out of reach. He rescued Schwinden from an 0-6 canyon. He kept the bullpen gate locked (the value of which cannot be understated). In doing so, he also helped one of his former teams, the Braves, in that anything bad that happened to St. Louis was good for Atlanta, but spoilers can’t be choosers.

The Mets had a game to win.

The top of the third indicated they just might do that, inserting a dagger into the Cardinals’ Wild Card chances along the way…which might not be the point of a Mets win, but it sure makes a team on the precipice of its third consecutive losing season a little more interesting on the third Wednesday night in September.

Jaime Garcia, whose acquaintance we originally made on a very long afternoon and evening in the same stadium 17 months earlier, at first didn’t appear fazed by his 3-0 lead not being 6-0. He struck out the first two batters of the third, but then allowed Schwinden his first big league single (and had to be reminded to give up the ball so Chris could swear he really did get a hit that one month he played in the majors). Jose Reyes, who did nothing during daylight yet retook the N.L. batting lead when Ryan Braun went 0-for-4 at Wrigley, punched a funny-looking safety into left. Schwin sped (sort of) to third in one of those ill-advised decisions you berate yet look the other way on if it’s successful. By not stopping at second like a pitcher new to baserunning should, Chris not only planted himself in super scoring position, but he allowed Reyes to trail him into something similar.

Second and third with two out. Pagan rolled a grounder to short that thoroughly confused the detestable Furcal (once a Bobby Cox Brave, always a Bobby Cox Brave) and it just kept rolling through Rafael’s wide open legs. Schwinden and Reyes scored — there’s a phrase you didn’t think you’d be reading in 2011 — and the Mets, whom Harris had just kept from being down 6-0, were behind by only 3-2. After Wright took advantage of more Furcal befuddlement and beat out an infield hit, Josh Satin pinch-hit for Lucas Duda, who had to exit after exhibiting discomfiting unfamiliarity with the Busch Stadium right field fence.

I was concerned about Duda, yet happy to see Satin in the game because it’s been my dream for about a week to have all three September Met neophytes in one box score — and now we were two-thirds to making the following blog headline a reality:

Schwinden! Stinson! Satin!

It didn’t occur to me that two of the three would actually get a hit in the same inning…in the same crucial inning, no less. The top of third crucial? When Satin laced a double to left-center, scoring both Pagan and Wright, it couldn’t have been more crucial in a pennant race setting. The Mets now led 4-3 when all the world (me, anyway) expected them to be scuffling from at least six runs down.

0-6 to 4-3, thanks to Harris, thanks to Schwinden, thanks to Satin: one guy Cardinals fans likely don’t fear and two rookies the red-clad Redbird acolytes had probably never heard of. That’s a seven-run swing destined to go down in somebody’s September history — maybe a paragraph of Cardinal woe, maybe a couple of sentences of Brave escape, maybe even some obsessive Mets fan’s compulsive chronicling. Whoever was to write it, it represented a classic pennant race pivot. The Cardinals had all the momentum until some team that hasn’t seen the bright side of contention in years took it away from them.

There. There’s your storyline, Mets. Now go out and complete the narrative.

Well, you can’t leave work like that to the Mets, obviously. Schwinden pitched four more marvelous innings, but Garcia grew downright oppressive as well as efficient: 32 pitches yielded four scoreless innings. The Schwin ride ended, the Mets relievers came in, I nodded off, and the score by the ninth was Cardinals 6 Mets 4. Willie homered for the second time all season, thus forever disassociating himself from Club Hessman, but nobody was on base and nobody else would be on base. The Mets lost 6-5.

There was no turning of the screws on St. Louis. They had a great night, actually, picking up a full game on Atlanta. There was no follow-through on that seven-run swing. There wasn’t even a Josh Stinson sighting. The headline that says it all comes courtesy of the dependably propagandistic mets.com:

Loss shows Mets how far they have to go

They clinched a sub-.500 record, their sixth losing campaign of the past decade (covering the regimes of four different general managers, if you’re scoring at home). They fell further behind the Nationals and are just as close — 2½ games — to fifth place as they are to third. Jose couldn’t make hay from Braun’s bad day and sits in decimal-point purgatory with him. And Duda needs to be re-evaluated to make sure he didn’t suffer a concussion when his head met Busch’s wall.

How far do they have to go? Seven more of these.

Slow Learners

Sticking with the education theme Yahoo! was kind enough to come up with for us and 29 other contributing blogs, my attention was detained this morning when I saw the following headline on mets.com:

Mets’ loss to Cards a valued learning experience

Say, I thought, that looks familiar. Where and when have I seen that sentiment before?

Oh yeah — on the same site at the same time under more or less the same circumstances a year ago:

Rival’s clinch could be lesson for young Mets

Hey, the Mets are learning! They’re sitting quietly in their dugout as the upperclassmen on the Phillies one season and the Cardinals the next teach them how to win by giving them a competitive wedgie! Aren’t those contenders courteous that way?

I realize the headlines are a matter of MLB accentuating the positive (the way ensuring uniformity is better than honoring the memories of fallen heroes); and yes, the Aldersonians need time to undo the damage Tropical Storm Minaya wreaked; and yes, [fill in your rationalization of choice regarding the prevailing mediocrity of the era and how it might actually end someday], but geez. It’s yet another September of learning by losing for the New York Mets. Another year when the L’s outpoint the W’s. Another chance to pick apart Mike Pelfrey’s brain. Another offseason when patience won’t be so much a virtue but our only option as Mets fans.

Yippee.

Between Their Ears

In delivering our Detention Lecture for Yahoo! Sports, Greg and I noted some silver linings about the 2011 Mets, most notably that they had a number of players who made leaps in how you think of them, whether the jump was between “useful player” and “potential star” or “bench guy” and “bona fide regular.” Your roster may vary; mine would include Lucas Duda, Ruben Tejada, Daniel Murphy, Justin Turner, Jon Niese, Dillon Gee and Manny Acosta.

At the same time, the Mets have what seems like an inordinate number of players whose potential seems to defy statistical analysis and depend in part on psychology. At which point, stop a moment. As I’ve written before, I admire sabermetrics because it guards against our innate desire to tell stories, which we do by cherry-picking data points and incidents to construct narratives that may not be justified. But at the same time, there are factors that seem like they’d affect on-field performance while eluding statistical capture. I’m not talking about lazy sports tropes like being a gritty player who elevates his game in the clutch and knows how to win. At least I don’t think that’s what I’m talking about. Rather, I’m interested in things that may have gotten into players’ heads, changing their approach or otherwise distorting their performance. The outcome is measurable; the precipitating factor may not be.

But that may just be storytelling with fancier words. As always, it’s important to look for other potential answers. For instance, has Angel Pagan regressed because he is lazy and/or crazy, or have we just constructed a story around the fact that his 2010 BABIP (batting average on balls in play) was .331, while this year it recently stood at an unlucky .285? Pagan’s decline in fielding metrics is harder to explain away, but fielding metrics are known to be pretty wonky year-to-year, and isn’t it possible that stewing over things going wrong at the plate hurt Pagan’s play in the field? Similarly, does Bobby Parnell really lack the makeup to be a closer, or do we think he stinks because his opponents’ BABIP has been an eye-popping .362? That raises the distinct possibility that Parnell’s been unlucky, done in by his defense, or both.

That said, though, it does seem — at least to me — like this year’s Mets have a number of players whose scuffling began with something going on between their ears. (Maybe every team has the same amount of guys for whom this seems true. I don’t know.)

This isn’t always a killer. When he came up, the most startling thing about Lucas Duda besides his intimidating stature was how openly he wondered about whether he belonged in the big leagues. Public self-doubt is generally considered a baseball sin (I remember it getting Jason Jacome shipped out rather speedily), but Duda’s power potential and physique let him escape being called “soft” long enough for him to show results on the field, apparently giving him the self-confidence he was missing at first.

Josh Thole admitted earlier this year that he’d let himself get away from his grind-it-out style at the plate, hurting his offensive performance, and it seems plausible that fueled a regression in his work behind the plate.

I’ll leave arguments about just how “big” Citi Field really plays to Jeff Francoeur and analysts, but its psychological effects on Mets hitters are a different matter. Something has happened to Jason Bay in the last two years, causing him to become so befuddled at the plate that he finally decided to rebuild his swing from the ground up, trying to reconstruct what had worked in Pittsburgh and Boston. Something has happened to David Wright in the last three years, suppressing his power numbers and also driving down his on-base percentage. Wright was once a keen-eyed, calm hitter who’d methodically turn an 0-2 hole into a 3-2 count; now, you brace yourself for an anxious expansion of the strike zone. Are Citi Field’s dimensions the culprit? You could argue about that forever, but the correct answer may be “Who cares?” If Wright and Bay think the dimensions are the problem, and have changed swings and plate approaches because of that thought, isn’t that ultimately more important than the reality of what hit-trackers show?

Then there’s Mike Pelfrey. Sigh.

I long ago made Big Pelf into my latest Mets scapegoat, so this is obviously full of confirmation bias. That said, Jesus does he ever wear a fan out, whether it’s losing his cool on the mound, seeming hopelessly confused about how to use his pitches, being helpless at home, needing Wright and a procession of personal catchers to keep him focused, or too many other things that have made him far less than the sum of his parts. If you could stick the brain of R.A. Dickey or Johan Santana in Pelf’s skull, I really think he’d win 18 games every year. But Pelf has to rely on his own gray matter, and so there he was tonight in the bottom of the fifth, approaching Cardinal batters like a spooked horse, paying no attention to runners and forgetting to back up plays in the infield. It’s beyond frustrating by now.

The rest of the game was actually pretty fun, at least until the Cardinals administered a sound beating to 2012 tenured relievers Tim Byrdak and D.J. Carrasco. Before their misfortunes, this was an entertaining game that had you half-expecting to see Davey Johnson and Whitey Herzog glowering at each other across the infield, possibly culminating in Tony Pena trying to confiscate Howard Johnson’s bat. After the Mets cuffed Edwin Jackson around, Kyle McClellan approached his assignment more like George McClellan facing the Army of Northern Virginia, dithering and procrastinating and proving unable to either field a bunt or throw a strike. (Though could the Mets please stop bunting, seeing how a] it’s stupid; and b] they suck at it?) Then there was the shocking sight of Octavio Dotel, who about five minutes ago was a lithe Mets rookie trying to no-hit the Padres and is now somehow a pudgy-looking 37-year-old journeyman. Other things I’ll remember: Ruben Tejada coolly gunning down Rafael Furcal on a bang-bang play at first, and the horrific, metronomic-like regularity of having to face Albert Pujols and Lance Berkman.

Watching Josh Stinson stare in at Thole’s mitt in unfortunate conjunction with Pujols’ bat, I wondered if they speak of the El Hombre in hushed tones in the clubhouses of Savannah and Binghamton, speaking of his alleged weaknesses in fearful whispers. You know what? If they don’t, they should.

The Happiest Recap: 145-147

Welcome to The Happiest Recap, a solid gold slate of New York Mets games culled from every schedule the Mets have ever played en route to this, their fiftieth year in baseball. We’ve created a dream season that includes the “best” 145th game in any Mets season, the “best” 146th game in any Mets season, the “best” 147th game in any Mets season…and we keep going from there until we have a completed schedule worthy of Bob Murphy coming back with the Happy Recap after this word from our sponsor on the WFAN Mets Radio Network.

GAME 145: September 17, 1986 — METS 4 Cubs 2
(Mets All-Time Game 145 Record: 25-21-1; Mets 1986 Record: 95-50)

It would be bad form to carp at the 1986 Mets that, “It took ya long enough” to arrive on the precipice of clinching their division. No Mets team had ever had a title in its grasp so soon in either schedule or calendar terms. But the grasping had been going for a little while now, so when the Mets showed up at Shea with their magic number a solitary 1 this Wednesday night…well, it took them long enough.

All the Mets needed to do was beat the Phillies once on Friday night, September 12. The Phils had displaced the Expos in second place, so it was a perfect setup — eliminate your “closest” rivals and drink champagne. Except the Mets lost on Friday the 12th. And Saturday the 13th. And Sunday the 14th. The Mets’ closest rivals were sticking around, no matter that “around” — 19 out with 20 to play — barely amounted to the same divisional area code. It wasn’t like the Mets weren’t going to clinch at some point relatively soon.

But, uh, not to carp, but, um…when might that be?

Not Monday the 15th. The Phillies kept winning and the Mets, to use a phrase that almost never came up in 1986, kept losing, this time 1-0 in 13 innings (on a bases-loaded walk) in St. Louis. Their magic number had been 2 for days on end. And it was ensured of not going down to more than 1 until the next night, once Philly took its fifth in a row. But the Mets “finally” won another game on Tuesday the 16th, topping the Cardinals at Busch, 4-2. The victory meant they’d clinched a tie for first, which was hardly their goal that week or that year. Still, they celebrated a little, pelting each other merrily with shaving cream pies in the visitors’ clubhouse.

As celebrations go, they hadn’t seen or done nothin’ yet.

Keith Hernandez had an idea. He asked Mets fans, through the media, to not party too hard should the Mets finally reach the first of their 1986 aspirations when they got home Wednesday night to Shea, a place the Mets figured to need well past the final game of the regular season.

“Please ask them not to destroy the field,” the first baseman plead, cognizant of how the stands emptied onto the grass in 1969 and 1973.

Nice thought, but just like Keith’s plan to be in the lineup per usual for the potential clinching game against the Cubs, there could be no guarantees. Hernandez took ill and Davey Johnson had to pencil rookie Dave Magadan in his place: playing first, batting third and coming through.

In a scoreless game, Chicago starter Dennis Eckersley put Lenny Dykstra and Wally Backman on base with one out in the third. Up stepped the callow Magadan, yet the kid from Tampa did his best Hernandez impression, singling home Lenny to give Dwight Gooden a 1-0 lead. Two batters later, Darryl Strawberry singled in Backman. And for the next couple of innings, Gooden kept the 2-0 shutout going — long enough for young Dave to knock in Dykstra again.

“Shea is going to be rocking like you’ve never seen it rock,” Wally predicted as the Mets packed up in St. Louis. “I don’t want to hear myself scream.”

The second baseman was getting his wish. The crowd of more than 47,000 paid was ready to blow from the first pitch, and once they were granted a brand new 1986 Met hero (“DAVE MAGADAN FAN CLUB,” read one quickly scribbled sign), there was no curbing their enthusiasm. It was 4-0 after another Strawberry RBI in the seventh. It was 4-2 after rookie Rafael Palmeiro reached Gooden for a two-run homer, but this was one was Gooden’s to win (and surely not lose). Hernandez’s flu symptoms didn’t stop him from replacing Magadan for defense — and the thrill of being on the field as the clinching approached.

The Mets and their fans had indeed waited an extra several days for this moment, just as they’d waited through two near-misses in 1984 and 1985, just as they’d waited through 13 long years with no playoff berth at the end of any season’s rainbow.

“I think back to how we used to feel at this point of the season,” Mookie Wilson recalled for the Daily News’s Howard Blatt of the early years of his Met career. “Now we’re on the other end of the stick, and it’s the other guys playing out the string, and I remember how that feels. It seemed like this day was a long way away.”

For Mookie, it had taken parts of seven seasons to arrive here. For Lee Mazzilli, rescued from the proverbial scrap heap in August, it had taken even longer. He came to the majors with the Mets in September 1976, just as things were about to take a drastic turn for the worse. He was traded away in the spring of 1982, when things were still going pretty badly. “I know what it was like ten years ago,” the Mets from humbler times told Blatt.

Most everybody in that stadium and watching on Channel 9 and listening on WHN knew that a decade-plus had gone into this night becoming this night. Hence, it’s no wonder that when Bob Murphy called Chico Walker’s final swing in the ninth…

“Ground ball to the right side of the infield…Backman has it…to Hernandez…Mets win! It’s over!”

…Keith’s pleas to “not ruin the field too much” fell on deaf ears. The Mets’ champagne-soaked 4-2 win that clinched their third National League East title had been too long incoming to keep everybody sitting, standing or even jumping up and down in one spot. The field, like the division, was overrun. Head groundskeeper Pete Flynn — charged with readying the playing surface usable for a Thursday matinee (nice scheduling) — grumbled that the more vandalous of the fans “didn’t deserve” a championship. GM Frank Cashen admitted he “figured on a few crazies,” not the estimated 6,000 who poured down and wrought destruction.

Security would never allow such a scene again, but the stadium withstood the rampage. Good thing it did: the Mets had just confirmed that Shea would be staying busy significantly longer than usual come October.

ALSO QUITE HAPPY: On September 13, 2000, the Mets broke themselves of an unfortunate habit. A five-game losing streak covering the final week of the 1998 season cost the team its shot at the Wild Card. A seven-game losing streak during the final two weeks of 1999 endangered what seemed like a surefire date in the playoffs. And now, in 2000, the Mets appeared ready to make things hard on themselves.

The team entered September with a half-game lead over the Braves, the first time they were out in front of the pack at that juncture of the calendar since 1988. Perhaps dizzy from scaling such heights, the Mets fell from grace the second the month began. They lost seven of eight, including a three-game sweep at the hands of the Cardinals, a potential playoff opponent…though the way the Mets were playing, that was a rather presumptuous hypothetical. The division was getting away, per usual — Atlanta was back in the saddle again — and Arizona, having fortified its pitching with a July trade for Curt Schilling, was sitting a handful of games in back of New York for the Wild Card.

After losing series to the Cards, the Reds and the Phillies, the Mets welcomed the Brewers to Shea, which was usually encouraging news for the home team. Nevertheless, Milwaukee took the Monday night opener of their three-game set before the Mets rebounded on Tuesday night. The finale, on a beautiful Wednesday afternoon in Flushing, would indicate just how rocky their road to October might be.

Mike Hampton had been obtained the previous December to win big games late in the season, and though matinees versus the Brewers might not have been whom GM Steve Phillips had in mind when he thought of must-wins, Hampton tackled his assignment aggressively. He was reached for an unearned run in the first (a line drive baffled right fielder Lenny Harris), but he settled down for eight innings of shutout ball from there. Problem was his opponent, 6’ 7” righty Jeff D’Amico, towered over Mets batters, striking out ten and scattering four singles.

The game remained a tense 1-0 affair clear into the ninth and may have wound up the same, except Milwaukee manager Davey Lopes submitted to the cult of the closer and replaced his brilliant starter with reliever Curtis Leskanic. Jay Payton greeted Leskanic with a leadoff double, and with two outs, Robin Ventura sent him home with another double. It was a 1-1 game heading to extra innings.

After Armando Benitez pitched a scoreless tenth, former Met Juan Acevedo allowed a pair of one-out singles to Mike Bordick and Joe McEwing before popping up Bubba Trammell. That left things up to Payton, a notoriously poor bases-loaded hitter in 2000, but capable of handling himself with two on and two out. Sure enough, he handled the first pitch he saw from Acevedo, sending it soaring over the left-center field fence at Shea for a 4-1 win that righted the Met ship. Payton’s walkoff homer touched off a modest three-game winning streak and quelled recurring doubts where this team and September were concerned.

GAME 146: September 16, 1976 — METS 4 Cardinals 1
(Mets All-Time Game 146 Record: 21-26; Mets 1976 Record: 77-69)

The summer of 1976 presented unforeseen opportunities for a couple of relatively obscure Minnesotans — better known than most people, but overshadowed in their chosen professions.

Consider Walter “Fritz” Mondale, a United States Senator from Minnesota for nearly a dozen years. Mondale wasn’t as well known as political titan and mentor Hubert Humphrey, but he did explore a run for the Democratic presidential nomination in 1974. As quickly as he looked into it, he looked away from it, admitting he didn’t have the “fire in the belly” that such an undertaking would demand.

Someone who did was another early starter, the former governor of Georgia, Jimmy Carter. Carter embraced the Holiday Inns Mondale resisted, laid extensive caucus- and primary-state groundwork, ingratiated himself with all the party activists he could while nobody was yet paying serious attention, and before the Democratic establishment knew what hit it, Jimmy Carter was their frontrunner and nominee. When it came time for the would-be president to pick a would-be vice president, he chose someone experienced, respected and used to being overshadowed: Minnesota’s Fritz Mondale.

Mondale was officially nominated for the second spot on the Democratic ticket at Madison Square Garden on July 16, 1976. Nine days later, north of the United States border, another Minnesotan skilled at operating in the shadow of a more charismatic frontrunner wasn’t having his happiest day on the hustings. When Andre Thornton singled home Ellis Valentine in the bottom of the ninth at Jarry Park on July 25, Jerry Koosman walked off the Montreal mound a hard-luck loser of a 2-1 game…the kind of game every Mets pitcher of that era experienced regularly. Koosman pitched very well, but received little support. His record fell to 11-7. With the Mets having 64 games remaining in 1976, anybody dreaming of a 20-win season for the veteran lefty would have to bank on two factors being omnipresent:

1) Jerry Koosman would have to be very, very good.

2) Jerry Koosman would have to be uncommonly fortunate.

Kooz would have to be responsible for the first part. The rest was up to his teammates and fate.

It was fate that sent Koosman to the Mets in 1964, the same year Mondale debuted among the senators in Washington. Kooz was serving his country then, playing a little army baseball in Texas when the son of a Shea Stadium usher had the pleasure of catching him. He sent word to his dad, who alerted scout Red Murff to check him out. Suitably impressed, Murff signed Koosman. Three years later he got his first taste of the bigs. A year after that, in 1968, Jerry led the Mets (and all National League rookies) with 19 wins.

But Koosman’s role was destined to be, essentially, vice president of the rotation. Tom Seaver was its commander-in-chief, staying healthier, generally winning more games (if not necessarily bigger ones, as Kooz’s 3-0 World Series record would attest) and definitely attracting more attention. Seaver was the undisputed ace of the staff for the entirety of his stay in New York.

Yet after the Mets escaped Montreal in late July of 1976, their best pitcher was clearly Jerry Koosman. His next five starts each yielded a complete game victory, including a 3-2 decision over the first-place Phillies and a 1-0 shutout of the West-leading Reds. The Mets weren’t scoring much for him, but he was making whatever he got stand up.

Following a poor outing against the Dodgers at the end of August, Koosman’s record was 16-8. Thus, a good September could make Kooz the first lefthanded 20-game winner in Mets history…and the first pitcher not named Seaver to reach that plateau.

Another 1-0 whitewashing, this one of the Giants (secured when John Milner drove in the game’s only run in the eighth), brought Koosman to 17-8. A nine-strikeout performance tamed the Cubs five days later helped him to reach 18 wins. Five days after that, a third consecutive complete game — Jerry’s 11th in 12 second-half starts — took care of St. Louis at St. Louis. Koosman had matched his career-high 1968 victory total of 19.

Now it was time to make it twenty.

The Cardinals were the opponent again, this time on a Thursday night at Shea, an occasion for Mets young and old to come to the aid of their pitcher. Veteran Felix Millan scored the first run of the game, in the third, when ex-Cub Don Kessinger couldn’t handle venerable Joe Torre’s ground ball. The next Met run came when rookie Roy Staiger sent Torre home on a single in the fifth. Bruce Boisclair, in his first full season, chipped in an RBI single and a homer.

And Koosman did the rest: nine innings, four hits, 13 strikeouts. The only blemish was Keith Hernandez’s eighth-inning solo home run, but it barely mattered. Koosman rushed the finish line like the Cy Young contender he’d become, striking out Joe Ferguson, Mike Anderson and Cruz in the ninth. With the last strike safely in John Stearns’s mitt and the 4-1 win complete, Koosman ascended to center stage. He was a 20-game winner at last.

“What took you so long?” his fellow 20-game club member Seaver asked him with a wink.

Toasting the achievement with his teammates in the clubhouse (Koosman had ordered a case of champagne), the man from Minnesota made an exultant acceptance speech: “It is the night of my life. This is the night I have waited for since I was sixteen years old.”

On November 2, the Baseball Writers Association of America announced the 21-10 Koosman finished in second place to Randy Jones of the Padres for the 1976 National League Cy Young Award. In other election results that same day, the voters of America chose Walter Mondale as their next vice president.

All told, not a bad Tuesday for medium-profile Minnesotans.

ALSO QUITE HAPPY: On September 12, 1984, precedent was officially shattered, though that was almost a formality. Everybody swore they’d never seen a rookie pitcher strike out batters the way Dwight Gooden did. Now irrefutable evidence was at hand.

On a Wednesday night at Shea against the Pirates, Gooden blew a 2-2 fastball by former Mets farmhand Marvel Wynne for his tenth strikeout of the evening. That gave Doctor K 246 of his namesake for the season, a new rookie record. The previous holder was Herb Score, whose output for the 1955 Cleveland Indians was one fewer.

“I’m delighted for him,” Score said after he was displaced in history. “In 10 or 12 years, I’m sure he’ll have other records that mean even more.”

Gooden, in the meantime, just kept pitching to Pittsburgh, and just kept striking out Bucs. He finished the night with 16, a career-high in a career that was awfully young yet already stellar. The 2-0 win improved his personal victory total to 16, while the strikeout sum became Doc’s 14th double-digit effort of his freshman season. He’d come up with another gem one start later, fanning 16 Phillies, though he’d lose the game, 2-1, on a balk, of all things.

Presenting irrefutable evidence that the 19-year-old phenom wasn’t perfect.

GAME 147: September 13, 1997 — METS 9 Expos 6 (11)
(Mets All-Time Game 147 Record: 23-24; Mets 1997 Record: 80-67)

There’s no better time to test your belief system than when things appear beyond belief…or beyond the power inherent in “You Gotta Believe,” the September credo of every true Mets fan since 1973. In September 1997, one’s last thread of credulity came awfully close to snapping, which was too bad, considering all that had come before.

The 1997 Mets were expected to do little in the standings, yet they never received the expectations memo. A slow start (8-14) was eradicated by a strong middle (57-35), and the Mets were headed for their first winning record in seven years and claimed a decent shot at the National League Wild Card. As late as July 28, they had the second-best record in the N.L. and a half-game edge over the beefed-up Florida Marlins for a playoff spot.

But by September, the Mets were fading. The winning record was intact — no way this wouldn’t be the Mets’ best season since 1990 — but the Marlins had swum almost out of sight. Thus, when the Expos came to Shea for a four-game set on September 11, the Mets were practically in win-or-go-home mode. Every day in which ground wasn’t gained prior to the Mets’ visit to Miami for four games starting September 19 was a day when the Mets’ dreams would take a body blow.

Against the Expos across the next 96 hours, the Mets made every moment count.

On Thursday night the 11th, as the Mets opened for business six behind Florida with eighteen to play, the Mets built a 6-1 lead entering the eighth when Montreal pulled close on an RBI single from Orlando Cabrera and a three-run homer off the bat of Jose Vidro. Insurance would be necessary in the bottom of the inning, and it would come in an unlikely form. John Olerud, who had already singled, doubled and homered, needed a three-base hit for the cycle…which was like saying a person with a penny, a nickel and a quarter needs an eight-cent piece to round out his change. John Olerud was the slowest first baseman this side of Mo Vaughn, and Vaughn actually totaled more career triples to date. Oly had all of six (to Vaughn’s eight) entering 1997, and none all year. Yet with the bases loaded and two out, Olerud hit a ball to deep center that emergency center fielder Vladimir Guerrero — out there only because Felipe Alou had made multiple moves and was forced to insert his literally hamstrung right fielder into unfamiliar territory — couldn’t track it down. It took an injured, out-of-position rookie to make it happen, but John Olerud got his triple, his cycle and, most importantly, three huge insurance runs on the board. It was Olerud’s only triple of the year and the last time Vlad ever played center. The Mets won, 9-5, and moved to within 5½ of the idle Marlins.

On Friday night the 12th, the Mets hosted Flaming Pie Night, promoting the latest CD released by onetime Shea Stadium star Paul McCartney. Paul didn’t show up (except on DiamondVision), but then again, neither the Mets’ offense until the eighth. An Olerud single and a Carlos Baerga sacrifice fly tied the score at two. Then Met bats went back into hibernation, at least when runners were on base. The Mets stranded one in the ninth, two in the tenth, one in the eleventh, two in the twelfth and one more in the fourteenth, all while Met relievers — including Mel Rojas for three sparkling innings — held the Expos in check. In all, Met pitching had kept Montreal scoreless since the second inning. But that all went for naught when Joe Crawford, surrendered a two-out, bases-empty home run to Rondell White to fall behind, 3-2. Against Expo closer Uggie Urbina in the bottom of the fifteenth, the Mets puts two on with one out before Carl Everett flied to right and Luis Lopez struck out. In 15 innings, Mets pitchers struck out 16 batters, but Mets batters left 16 runners on base. The only saving grace of the 3-2 defeat was the Marlins went down, 1-0, to the Giants, keeping the Mets 5½ back.

Two games went by and the Mets had picked up a half-game. There was still time to edge closer to Florida in advance of their prospective showdown a week later, but any more implosions like Friday night’s, and the competitive portion of the season would end instantly. And that would have been a pity. The 1997 Mets didn’t just win more games than they lost. They won spiritedly and dramatically and they won late a lot. They scored more eighth-inning runs and in more eighth innings than any team in the National League, emblematic of a never-say-die team that plowed ahead with no stars to relatively little notice. They weren’t supposed to be in any kind of playoff race as late as September 13, not even on the fringes of one. Yet here they were, within dreaming, maybe sprinting distance of making it to October.

But first, mid-September and its perils.

On Saturday afternoon the 13th, the Mets’ sprint seemed to be at its end and the Mets’ dreams were all but dashed. After two batters, Met starter Jason Isringhausen had the Mets behind, 2-0, on a Mark Grudzielanek single and a Mike Lansing home run. White drove in a third run before the first was done.

From there, Montreal starter Dustin Hermanson took over. He was a little wild, but not at all hittable. The Mets couldn’t touch him in the first or the second or the third or the fourth. Ex-Met David Segui reached Isringhausen for a two-run double in the fifth to pad Hermanson’s advantage to 5-0. To Hermanson, it looked like window dressing. The Mets didn’t touch him in the bottom of fifth, either, putting the Mets twelve outs not just from psychic elimination but being no-hit for the first time since Darryl Kile did it to them in 1993.

Callup Carlos Mendoza, pinch-hitting for Turk Wendell, lined Hermanson’s third pitch of the sixth inning toward left fielder Brad Fullmer. As it sank, it bounced of Fullmer’s glove, falling in for what official scorer Bill Shannon decided was the first hit of Mendoza’s major league career…and the first hit off Hermanson all day. On SportsChannel, Mets announcers Howie Rose and Fran Healy, watching it from as many angles as possible, didn’t necessarily agree, but there was no changing Shannon’s mind. The no-hit bid was over.

But Dustin’s dominance wasn’t. Hermanson wild-pitched Mendoza to second and walked Olerud with two out but struck out Butch Huskey to end the Mets’ mini-threat. They went down in order in the seventh and, by now trailing 6-0, managed no more than a walk (Hermanson’s fifth) in the eighth.

“You don’t think you have a chance,” Huskey admitted of those kinds of circumstances. “Not the way he was pitching.” But the Mets weren’t supposed to have any kind of chance all year, so what was one more long set of odds to this bunch?

After Jason Hardtke flied out to start the ninth, Huskey made the most of his final chance, singling to center to extend his hitting streak to twenty games. Baerga then produced a grounder that found a hole between first and second. Brian McRae flied to White in right-center, which moved Huskey to third, but shoved the Mets down to their last out. As Roberto Petagine, he of the 0-for-7 .000 batting average, pinch-hit, Baerga took second on defensive indifference. Even when Petagine lined a single to center and scored both runners to make it 6-2, it couldn’t have made a great deal of difference to Hermanson. He was still up four runs, the Mets were still one out from over, and he still had a seven-strikeout, four-hitter to his credit.

“I got 26 outs,” Hermanson would say. “I should have gotten the 27th.”

But Alou decided 129 pitchers was enough for Hermanson, so he removed his starter and brought in righty Shayne Bennett. His mission was to get the game over by retiring Lopez, the Met who ended the game the night before on a strikeout. This time, however, Luis lived up to the 17 on his back and was as clutch as Keith Hernandez, singling to right. Alou ended Bennett’s cameo and went to Urbina, as nasty a ninth-inning man as the National League had in 1997. Nastiness, however, was trumped by the next batter, Matt Franco, who singled to load the bases.

The math was pretty simple: the bases were loaded with two out and the Mets were down by four. In this dream of a season, all the Mets and their fans ever asked for was a chance to keep dreaming. The math allowed that. Four was as vast a margin as could be overcome on one swing.

The next Met up was Carl Everett, slumping of late, particularly since his wife was accused of child abuse while their kids were in the Shea family room (the children were taken into protective custody in August and Everett was allowed only supervised visits). Still, he was capable of swinging for the fences, and on the first pitch Urbina threw him, he did just that…and if the fences extended right of the foul pole, Everett would have been a hero. Instead, the Mets’ fourth outfielder was faced with strike one, to say nothing of a preening pitcher. When Everett’s blow went foul, Urbina rolled up the sleeve on the right arm of his Expos jersey to let Everett know he was throwing too hard for Carl to hit anything fair.

“I’ve seen him do that before,” Everett would say later. “I’m not going to stoop to his level.”

Perhaps Urbina should have kept his sleeve shut. He worked Everett to a 3-2 count, and on the sixth pitch of their battle, Carl belted another one to deep right.

Except this one wasn’t going foul. It was going clear over the right field fence for a grand slam home run.

A game-tying grand slam home run.

“You have three guys on base, one guy at the plate and you’re down by four runs,” Everett reasoned. “It can happen. It’s real. It’s no fantasy.”

The Mets, who limped into the ninth inning trailing 6-0 had now, in Rose’s SportsChannel parlance, created “a brand new shiny one” on the scoreboard. It was Mets 6 Expos 6. As Everett pointed skyward on his way past home plate and McRae pointed at his own bicep so as to get Urbina’s goat a little more, a deep breath was in order to consider the reset that had just occurred. It was the largest ninth-inning comeback the Mets had ever engineered at Shea Stadium. The last time they trailed by a half-dozen runs in the ninth was at Atlanta in the You Gotta Believe year of 1973, when they were down 7-1 and won 8-7.

These 1997 Mets hadn’t won anything yet this Saturday, but, boy, had they not lost.

“You might have had the obituary written,” Bobby Valentine declared. “But you can tear it up, because we’re not dead yet.”

“I think Uggie can put his sleeve down now,” added Huskey.

Life support had been provided by Everett, Petagine and everybody else who hit their way on in the ninth. Now the plug would stay unpulled in the tenth and eleventh thanks to two shutout innings from John Franco, who had entered in a double-switch that removed Everett (of all people). That kept things tied long enough for the Mets to put two runners on in the eleventh against Steve Kline. Valentine resorted to hobbled left fielder Bernard Gilkey as his pinch-hitter. Alou countered with his fifth pitcher of the day, Mike Thurman.

Gilkey had spent most of Saturday in the whirlpool, trying to soothe his stiff left ankle, the one that scratched him from the lineup minutes before first pitch. He was batting for John Franco, which meant he was batting in Everett’s original position.

It must have been a lucky spot in the order, because on the second pitch he saw, Bernard launched a line drive to deep left, up into the Mezzanine, inside the pole. It was good enough for a three-run pinch-homer to win it for the Mets in eleven, 9-6. Gilkey was less matter-of-fact about the chain of events that led to his stunning homer than Everett was about his.

“I couldn’t reasonably say this could happen,” Gilkey admitted. “It was kind of farfetched.”

But it did. The almost-dead 1997 Mets were alive and reasonably well after 147 games. True, the Marlins won again, and the margin remained a daunting 5½, but pulling ahead from so far behind in what became the Mets’ 43rd comeback and 22nd final at-bat win of the year (not to mention John Franco’s last W until Game Four of the 1999 NLDS) had levitative powers, at least in the Mets’ minds.

Gilkey: “We have to keep believing until the point when it’s out of reach. Crazier things have happened.”

Valentine: “I think our reward for this season is going to be getting in the playoffs.”

On Sunday afternoon the 14th, the Mets inducted Keith Hernandez into the team’s Hall of Fame. Lopez again honored No. 17, this time with a solo home run that stood up as the only run of a 1-0 game. Dave Mlicki went 8⅔ before Greg McMichael came on to retire Guerrero for the final out. The game’s turning point, however, came when Todd Pratt dropped a ball on a play at the plate, yet umpire Larry Vanover missed the miscue and called Expo baserunner Segui out. Montreal’s dugout was so livid that the Expos’ trainer was ejected. Because the Marlins stubbornly won again, the Mets taking three of four in arguably the most exciting quartet of games Shea ever witnessed netted them only a half-game gain in their quest for the Wild Card. They were still 5½ out and their chances to reduce that margin were dwindling. That, too, was simple math.

Yet they were alive. Alive after six consecutive seasons of being the opposite. Alive after being six runs in arrears in the ninth on Saturday. Alive in the middle of September.

The 1997 Mets would eventually say die, but they would take their sweet time doing so. It was a very sweet time, indeed.

ALSO QUITE HAPPY: On September 15, 1969, one of the best pitchers of his generation threw one of the most overpowering games of his life. And it did him absolutely no good.

Meet Steve Carlton: 24, hard-throwing, ultracompetitive and getting better all the time. One of the real southpaw comers in the National League. Won 27 games in his first two full seasons and pitched in consecutive World Series for St. Louis. Named to a pair of All-Star teams. Already had 16 wins in the bank and an ERA under two entering a Monday night at Busch Stadium where Carlton would show his stuff like he’d never shown it before.

But it would still do him absolutely no good, because Steve Carlton would be meeting the Mets.

Not good acquaintances to make in the midst of September 1969.

The Mets had just come off a ten-game winning streak and stood 3½ games ahead of the Cubs in the National League East. A Sunday loss in Pittsburgh nevertheless left them 30 games above .500, and even in a 5-3 defeat, they banged out 11 hits off of Pirate starter Steve Blass. The Mets could pitch and the Mets could field…if the Mets were to suddenly start hitting with any consistency, then there’d be no chance of anybody stopping them — not even a talented lefty like Carlton.

Gil Hodges called on those who could swing from the right side to ignite a new winning streak: Al Weis at second; Ed Charles at third; Donn Clendenon at first; Amos Otis in for an injured Cleon Jones in left; and Ron Swoboda in right to go with regulars Bud Harrelson, Tommie Agee and Jerry Grote. Factor in starter Gary Gentry, and that was seven righties and two switch-hitters. Hodges, an old Marine, believed in platoons.

This night, however, he would have needed a battalion to halt Carlton, for it didn’t matter from which side of the plate the Mets swung. Everybody was taking a turn at missing what Steve threw. Harrelson struck out to start the game. Otis struck out looking behind him. An error and a base hit followed, but Swoboda struck out to end the frame. Steve Carlton wasn’t perfect in the first, but he had struck out the side.

A pattern was established. Weis would single in the second, but the other three Mets who came up all struck out. Agee struck out to end the third, giving Carlton seven K’s in three innings. It was a record-setting pace.

Down 1-0 in the fourth, the Mets rallied by way of a Clendenon walk and a Swoboda swing that connected: a two-run homer to give Gentry the lead. Unrattled, Carlton handled the next four batters as such: strikeout, strikeout, single, strikeout. That made it ten whiffs in four innings. His pace was still record-setting.

In the fifth, two more. In the sixth — after the Cards took a 3-2 lead — another. And in the seventh, with two on and two out, Otis went down looking. Fourteen strikeouts after seven innings, or four from tying the major league record for most in a nine-inning game. Bob Feller struck out 18 in a loss to Detroit in 1938; Sandy Koufax punched out 18 twice, in 1959 and 1962; and Don Wilson of the Astros tied the mark a year earlier.

And one Met in Hodges’s lineup had experienced a night very much like this before. Ron Swoboda struck out three times against Cincinnati’s Jim Maloney in 1965 as Maloney no-hit the Mets for ten innings en route to losing to New York, 1-0, on Johnny Lewis’s leadoff home run in the top of the eleventh. Swoboda was the batter up directly after Lewis and became Maloney’s 18th victim. It was Rocky’s third strikeout of that game.

Here, in St. Louis, the 25-year-old outfielder, who was one of the handful of ’69 Mets to commence his career under Casey Stengel, represented two of Carlton’s 14 strikeouts. But he was also responsible for the only two Mets runs on the board through seven. Thus, after Agee singled to lead off the eighth, and Clendenon became strikeout No. 15, there was precedent for what Swoboda was about to do.

Though that didn’t make it any less mind-boggling when Swoboda swung not through a Carlton pitch but right at it, belting it out of Busch for his second two-run homer of the night. The Mets now led 4-3. There was little for Carlton to do but rear back and finish the inning with one more strikeout — No. 16 — and then set down the Mets on three consecutive strikeouts in the ninth. When he fanned reliever Tug McGraw, Harrelson and Otis (the fourth time the rookie left fielder whiffed), Carlton had the record: Nineteen strikeouts in nine innings.

What he didn’t have was an opportunity to win his overpowering start unless the Redbirds rallied in the bottom of the ninth. Two runners reached against McGraw, but Tug had an idea about not besmirching a story that seemed too good to be true. He didn’t give up any runs and the Mets came away 4-3 winners on the night they were struck out 19 times…more than any team had ever been struck out in regulation.

Every Met starter, plus McGraw, had fanned at least once. And the Mets won anyway.

What could Carlton could say? Back in the days when Lefty wasn’t so reticent to speak to the media, he explained he came to the ballpark late because of a fever, yet found himself on the mound with “the best stuff I ever had”.

Swoboda, on the other hand, was on a team enjoying a season cooked up in Mets fan’s fevered dream, and it countered anything a future Hall of Famer could bring. “He’d throw a pitch so good,” the improbable star of the game attested, “that I’d say to myself, ‘if he throws two more like it, there’s no way I can touch him.’”

Yet he laid two pretty good hands on him, marinating the tone that the Mets had set for improbable outcomes in September 1969 and perhaps foreshadowing what was to come for Carlton down the road. Steve started 76 games against the Mets in a National League career that lasted until 1986. He put up impressive numbers against them: a 3.12 ERA, a WHIP of 1.222 and more strikeouts against the Mets — 464 — than he had versus any other team. But nobody beat Steve Carlton more often than did the Mets, just as the Mets beat Steve Carlton more than they did any other pitcher in their first half-century of baseball. In a career that was put into the books at 329-244, Carlton’s record against New York finished a pedestrian 30-36.

And he’d be sharing that strikeout record with a Met by the following April.

The Mets in Detention

Our pals over at Yahoo’s Big League Stew sent the 2011 Mets to detention, and sent in me and Greg to scare ’em straight. Here’s what we said.

Reaction to Sunday’s rousing win, meanwhile, is over here.

A Good Game Won

Sometimes it’s great when the Mets make a hash of my plans.

Getting ready for today’s game, I had a promising albeit rather sorrowful blog post mapped out — it was going to deal with the Cyclones, the Sand Gnats, childhood and the inescapability of Chipper Jones. And that plan held after Chipper doubled in the third to put the Braves on top.

But then things changed, and I wound up happily balling up my plan and pitching it, as the Mets came out on top in a taut, entertaining game, one of my favorites of the year. It was one of those Just When I Thought I Was Out They Pull Me Back In games, which exactly what’s needed as an also-ran season gets down to the dregs.

Even nicer was finding Ruben Tejada front and center, with four RBIs and even a steal. (Tejada is one of those guys you assume is fast and eventually realize is anything but.) Joshua and I have talked a lot about Tejada in the last month: how a lot of guys his age are still Cyclones, how you have to accept that players that age make doofy errors of omission and commission, and how he has baseball instincts that no one can teach. Yes, his swing has gotten a bit long in recent weeks, and yes, he made an error today. But he also delivered twice, and was his usual precocious self out there at most other times. We saw it in the third: On second with two out, Tejada slowed up on David Wright’s grounder to Chipper, forcing Chipper to make the throw to first instead of giving him the easy tag play, and trying to get close enough to bother him on that throw. Joshua wasn’t interested at first, but perked up when I noted that you do that for the one play in 30 or 50 or 100 where it pushes an opponent into an error, and Tejada had known to do it. I love this kid; I can’t wait to see what kind of player he is in three or four years.

Tejada wasn’t alone in nice moments. There was Ronny Paulino, motionless at the plate in the top of the eighth like an especially contemplative Buddha as Jonny Venters threw balls five, six, seven and eight. There was Lucas Duda, taking the un-  off the untouchable Craig Kimbrel for some much needed insurance. There was Manny Acosta, cleaning up yet another Bobby Parnell mess in relatively orderly fashion. (Lest we be too hard on poor Parnell, remember that a month ago any of us would have gladly swapped Acosta for moving up three or four places in the Shake Shack line.)

I don’t care about the Mets getting to play spoiler; that always seemed like second-division stuff to me. Spoiler talk just reminded me of how few days are left on the calendar — we’re down to rookie hazing and picking bandwagon teams and planning that last visit to Citi Field. It’ll be winter all too soon, which makes every game precious and every victory even more so — and a game to put aside and think about happily in the off-season is a very fine thing indeed.

A Good Game Lost

Winning would have been preferable. Winning a bad game beats losing a good game. But since relatively little is at stake on this side of the line score, I can’t say watching a good game lost doesn’t engender its small rewards.

I liked watching Ruben Tejada overcome Tim Hudson twice and battle him gamely a third time. I liked watching Jason Bay lay out to rob Hudson of a double the afternoon after he leapt up to grab a home run from Alex Gonzalez. I liked Lucas Duda sliding hard enough to (maybe) disrupt Gonzalez’s footwork at second on what turned out to be not a routine double play. I liked Gonzalez’s neighborhood carelessness being recognized for what it was — a 6-3 fielder’s choice, not a lazily called DP. And I liked how R.A. Dickey’s knuckleball darted about for 7⅔ innings…and how Tim Byrdak calmly collected the third out of the eighth once R.A. couldn’t quite nail it down.

I didn’t care for the result, obviously. Or Hudson’s mastery of both sides of the plate. Or the indefatigability of Eternal Larry Jones. Or Dickey not getting a stupid bunt down. Or how utterly unhittable Craig Kimbrel was, is and will be for the foreseeable future (though good luck keeping it up as long as this SOB has). I surely didn’t like losing somebody else’s crucial game and not having one of our own.

But I liked that the Mets didn’t just play in a crucial game, but that they were fully present. And I liked the quality of the affair: 1-0, 2:22. The scores and times of the previous three Mets games went like this:

Wednesday — Lost 2-0 in 2:56

Thursday — Lost 10-1 in 3:22 (with a 40-minute rain delay)

Friday — Won 12-2 in 3:24

Don’t be fooled by the low score from Wednesday. It was bland and boring for 17 half-innings until the bottom of the ninth briefly got our hopes up. Thursday was a slopfest for the ages. Friday was extraordinarily rewarding on the scoreboard, and a much-needed balm for the gloom-wracked soul, yet it wasn’t what you’d call compelling baseball.

Saturday’s was a very compelling baseball game amid the most wonderful baseball time of the year. That it sped along briskly only made it better, which is one of the great ironies of this sport. You’d think you’d want something you enjoy to keep going, but baseball is generally at its best when its pace, like Eternal Larry Jones, refuses to slow down. When you wish the season wouldn’t go away so soon, it’s because you wish you could watch more games like Saturday’s, more 1-0 games that are over in less than two-and-a-half hours.

You also wish that the “1” was yours and the “0” was theirs.

Sense? Baseball? Ha!

“Hi, I’m sort of new to baseball, and I’m hoping you can help me understand it.”
“I’ll try.”
“Great. My first question is about the Mets.”
“Which is?”
“That’s the team that totally sucked on Thursday, right?”
“Yes, that’s correct.”
“I mean they couldn’t do anything right.”
“You got it.”
“They played a pretty bad team, didn’t they?”
“Yes, they played the Washington Nationals.”
“And the Washington Nationals creamed them.”
“They sure did.”

“And one of the Mets’ top players is David Wright, right?”
“Right.”
“Yet he was one of the worst culprits in that game against the Nationals, wasn’t he?”
“Oh, he was brutal. Brutal for the entire series, really.”
“Couldn’t do a thing well, could he?”
“Oh no. Totally dreadful.”
“So to sum up, the Mets were pathetic against a team that isn’t very good…”
“Yes.”
“…and their key player was about as bad as can be?”
“Total disaster.”
“Lousy Mets, awful Wright.”
“That would sum it up.”

“OK…so, if that’s true, I’m a little confused.”
“How so?”
“Well, the Mets went to Atlanta after they played Washington, right?”
“Right.”
“And I understand Atlanta is a very good team.”
“One of the best in the league.”
“Much better than the Nationals?”
“No comparison. Better by loads.”
“So if a team that’s beat by a lot by a bad team plays a good team, it’s going to lose by even more, isn’t it?”
“No.”

“No?”
“Not necessarily.”
“See, that’s the problem I’m having with this. It says here that the Mets lost to the crappy Nationals 10-1 on Thursday…”
“Which they did.”
“And they lost four straight to Washington.”
“Yah…”
“And before that they lost two to another pretty bad team, Chicago.”
“Uh-huh.”
“So there’s no way they should be able to beat Atlanta.”
“Oh, they can beat Atlanta. They can beat them plenty.”

“I don’t get it.”
“What’s not to get?”
“How does a team lose to a terrible team one day and then beat a good team…”
“Not just a good team, but a likely playoff team.”
“…beat a likely playoff team…”
“Not just beat them, but pound them.”
“…pound a likely playoff team?”
“I’m sorry, what’s the question?”
“How could the Mets get kicked around by Washington one day and then kick around Atlanta the next night.”
“Probably because they had David Wright.”

“David Wright?”
“Yup.”
“Hold on, didn’t you just say David Wright was atrocious against Washington?”
“Bottom of the barrel. Almost a bum.”
“But against Atlanta, he’s the reason the Mets won?”
“Lots of reasons, I suppose, but Wright was the big one. He was awesome.”
“You’re telling me a player who’s supposed to be one of your best who can’t do anything right against one of the worst teams can also excel against one of the best teams?”
“Of course.”
“And the Mets can lose to a lousy team, 10-1, and then beat a good team, 12-2?”
“Obviously.”
“And this doesn’t strike you as strange?”
“Why would I think it’s strange?”

“Do you see any logic in it?”
“Logic?”
“Logic…sense…a predictable pattern from which you can make some kind of projection for what happens next?”
“I don’t follow.”
“I’m asking you about baseball!”
“Oh, I see the problem.”
“You do?”
“Sure. You’re trying to make sense out of baseball.”
“Yes, I am. That’s exactly what I’m trying to do.”
“Then I have your answer.”
“Wonderful.”
“You can’t.”

“I can’t what?”
“You can’t make sense out of baseball.”
“I can’t?”
“You can’t, I can’t. Nobody can.”
“That’s impossible!”
“As impossible as the Mets losing by nine runs to a terrible team on Thursday and beating a good team by ten runs on Saturday? As impossible as a player doing nothing remotely well on Thursday and then hitting two home runs, driving in five runs and making no errors on Friday?”
“Well, that’s just…”
“Just what?”

“Um, an aberration?”
“No, it’s baseball.”
“A regression to the mean?”
“No, it’s baseball.”
“A standard deviation?”
“No, it’s baseball.”
“Stop saying that!”
“Hey, you asked me.”
“I want logic! I want sense! I have statistics and charts and graphs and databases! I want to be able to know what’s going to happen based on what just happened!”
“Then you’ll want something else. This is baseball. It’s impervious to logic and it makes no sense. The numbers and all are fascinating, and over the long term you can do all kinds of interesting things with them, but don’t rely on them to tell you everything. They can’t. 10-1 one day can become 12-2 the next. The goat can become a star just as easily as the star can become the goat. Anything can happen and it often does. Do you follow what I’m saying?”
“Not at all. I can’t make any sense of how baseball works.”
“Congratulations. You’ve finally figured it out.”

The Happiest Recap: 142-144

Welcome to The Happiest Recap, a solid gold slate of New York Mets games culled from every schedule the Mets have ever played en route to this, their fiftieth year in baseball. We’ve created a dream season that includes the “best” 142nd game in any Mets season, the “best” 143rd game in any Mets season, the “best” 144th game in any Mets season…and we keep going from there until we have a completed schedule worthy of Bob Murphy coming back with the Happy Recap after this word from our sponsor on the WFAN Mets Radio Network.

GAME 142: September 9, 2007 — METS 4 Astros 1
(Mets All-Time Game 142 Record: 22-25-1; Mets 2007 Record: 81-61)

He was back. And for one Sunday afternoon, it was enough to revel in his return.

Could Pedro Martinez’s first start at Shea Stadium in nearly a year bring with it the kind of magic that his pre-injury outings — before his shoulder, his calf, his hip, his toe…who could keep track? — regularly brought to Flushing? More importantly, could Pedro be effective enough to stabilize a Mets starting rotation that had been groping by, one arm short, through all of 2007?

Pedro returned to action six days earlier, in Cincinnati. His stuff was underwhelming but he, combined with the Mets’ bats, were effective enough to rustle up a 10-4 win, the team’s fourth in a row (after a stunning four-game sweep by the Phillies at Citizens Bank Park). When it came to Pedro at Shea, however, speed gun readings were never much the point.

He was all about presence, and his presence inspired 51,847 to form an exuberant welcoming (or welcoming back) committee. The man was an applause magnet, drawing cheers for every move he made on the field, starting with simply walking in from the bullpen.

“I’m going to enjoy every little moment that I have,” Martinez said, offering the perspective of someone whose rehab from shoulder surgery was long and arduous. He would soak in “every curtain call” and “sign as many autographs as I can because it’s not going to last too long.”

Pedro was referring to what was left of his brilliant career, but he could have been talking about his starting assignment against the Astros, for no matter how good he looked, manager Willie Randolph was keeping him on a pitch count. Perhaps it was that awareness that led the Mets fans to savor every little moment Pedro offered them, too.

How well did he pitch? He pitched well enough to win, and not in the “too bad they didn’t score for him” fashion that phrase might imply. Pedro, being Pedro, found a way to prevail even as he wasn’t quite ready to mow down Astros the way his younger self could have.

“I realize I am no more a power pitcher,” Pedro appraised, “so I rely on knowledge, experience and location most of the time.”

It worked.

• He brushed off a two-out single by Lance Berkman in the first.

• He loaded the bases in the second, but grounded out Hunter Pence to get out of it without allowing a run.

• He struck out the side in the third, but the first of those K’s went for naught as Craig Biggio — playing his final game at Shea — reached first when Paul Lo Duca didn’t handle strike three. So Pedro recorded a fourth out.

• He took the mound for the fourth fresh from doubling and scoring, and set down the ‘Stros in order.

• And in the fifth, Pedro Martinez didn’t let a single, a double and a walk bother him materially. With the bases again loaded, he flied Mike Lamb to deep center, where Carlos Beltran caught the ball for the final out of the inning and Martinez’s day.

With ninety-two pitches in the books, the crowd knew Pedro would not be coming back out, so it stood as one and it applauded heartily and lengthily. They applauded so much that Pedro — never not in the moment — came out of the Mets’ dugout to tip his cap and practically applauded them back.

There was a curtain call for the starting pitcher…for five innings’ work. Honestly, though, it couldn’t have been a more appropriate reaction. Pedro had been missed just that much.

The Mets led 2-0 after Pedro bathed in applause and headed for the showers. They held on to give him a 4-1 win. It would have been a shame to have let his decision go awry, but really the victory was the start itself.

Five innings of Pedro Martinez: So much better than none.

ALSO QUITE HAPPY: On September 12, 2009, a Fox Saturday showdown envisioned as another installment in a budding rivalry carried much different meaning for the combatants involved. The host Phillies were cruising toward their third consecutive division title, while the visiting Mets were playing out a string that had grown frayed months earlier. Yet on this late afternoon at Citizens Bank Park, the two teams went at it as if the clock had been reset to the very recent past.

David Wright singled in a pair of runs off the rapidly aging Jamie Moyer in the first and Carlos Beltran, returning to form at the end on an injury-ravaged year, sprang to life with a two-run homer in the same frame to put the Mets up 4-0. But because this was 2009 (and because it clearly wasn’t starter Mike Pelfrey’s year), they were down 8-4 after six.

The score was 9-5, Phillies, heading to the eighth, when Wright torched Brett Myers for a two-run homer and Daniel Murphy, facing Met-for-a-moment Chan Ho Park, drove in Beltran. At 9-8 in the bottom of the inning, however, Sean Green nearly made all that uphill climbing moot when he walked Jimmy Rollins and Shane Victorino with two out. The indefatigable left arm of Pedro Feliciano was called on by Jerry Manuel to take on the two batters it was paid to baffle. It walked Chase Utley, but — in its usual dependable fashion — struck out Ryan Howard to leave the bases loaded.

Feliciano’s efforts appeared for naught once Jeremy Reed and Luis Castillo made the first two outs versus Ryan Madson in the ninth. But Fernando Tatis singled and David Wright homered for the second time — he garnered six RBI — and the Mets went on to win this damn thing, 10-9;.

GAME 143: September 13, 1990 — METS 6 Pirates 3
(Mets All-Time Game 143 Record: 27-21; Mets 1990 Record: 82-61)

Eras’ ends don’t necessarily arrive with advance notice, but perhaps buried in the fine print of tickets to Shea Stadium on this Thursday night, there was a disclaimer that there might not be another game of this magnitude at this venue again for a very long time.

Or maybe all you had to do was listen to talk radio all summer long, where the No. 1 topic in New York was the fate of free agent-to be Darryl Strawberry. Would he stay? Would he go? Should he go? How could the Mets let that happen? Strawberry was having as good a year as he’d had since ascending to the majors in 1983. Darryl practically loaded the team onto his back during midseason and carried them into the thick of contention for a seventh consecutive year. Keith Hernandez was gone. Gary Carter was gone. Mookie Wilson, Lenny Dykstra, Wally Backman, Ray Knight…the champion Mets had dissolved since 1986, but Darryl Strawberry, the power-laden cornerstone of the operation, was still here.

Try to fathom the Mets without him.

It was too unsettling a thought for the heat of a pennant race, which is exactly what the Mets were trying to withstand as September 1990 reached its boiling point. Less than two weeks earlier, on Labor Day, the Mets were a first-place team, leading the Pirates by a half-game. Things began to go disturbingly wrong when the Mets traveled to Pittsburgh a couple of days later. Three games at Three Rivers became three consecutive Met losses, and their only legitimate chance for salvation lay within a two-game set at Shea.

David Cone, hyped up to within an inch of his life, made the second game matter by winning the first, defeating John Smiley on a three-hitter, 2-1. Coney’s twelfth win on the year on Wednesday pulled the Mets to within 2½ of the top. The Mets’ best shot at advancement — in the final date with the Pirates until the last series of the season — sat with Dwight Gooden.

Not a bad place for it to sit considering Gooden was enjoying one of his best post-1986 stretches. From a shaky 3-5 start to 1990, Dwight had raised his record to a more Doclike 17-6. Nevertheless, he wasn’t automatically or obviously the best pitcher in this game. Jim Leyland was starting Doug Drabek, whose record was 19-5 and whose ERA was more than a full run lower than Gooden’s.

Doc found trouble as soon as he encountered the heart of the Pittsburgh order: Andy Van Slyke doubled, Bobby Bonilla tripled and Barry Bonds doubled. It was 2-0 in the middle of the first. Fifty-one thousand Mets fans groaned.

But they had reason to change their tone soon enough. In the bottom of the fourth, Tommy Herr beat out an infield hit and Dave Magadan singled. This brought up Darryl Strawberry…and nobody could rise to an occasion like the Mets’ right fielder.

Drabek threw Straw two balls and then a strike. The strike sailed over the right field wall to tie the game at three. Fifty-one thousand Mets fans roared. Four batters later, catcher Charlie O’Brien delivered an RBI single to provide his pitcher with a 4-2 lead. Doc kept it intact through the middle innings, while another Daryl — Boston — homered and Herr added an RBI single. Gooden lasted until Bonds nicked him for a single in the eighth that scored Jay Bell to make it 6-3, Mets. John Franco pitched the rest of the way, picking up his 32nd save, breaking Jesse Orosco’s team record.

But the night belonged to Darryl.

It was Darryl’s 34th home run of the season that changed the game and rocked the premises.

It was Darryl who crowded the Mets lineup in a way no opposing manager or pitcher could easily work around.

It was Darryl who lifted the Mets to within a game-and-a-half of first place, besting the best starter on their chief rival.

It was Darryl, who with Doc, defined the Mets era as we had known it for what seemed like forever.

Forever, however, had a limited shelf life by September 1990. Never again would Darryl Strawberry put on a Mets uniform at Shea Stadium and homer in a Mets win. And not for most of the ensuing decade would pennant race heat materialize in Flushing.

Still, if an era has to end, there are worse ways for it to take a final bow.

ALSO QUITE HAPPY: On September 8, 2001, the outlines of one of the potentially great comeback stories in baseball history were being penciled in that much darker at Pro Player Stadium in Miami. It was there that the New York Mets, left for dead by any sentient observer three weeks earlier, were reviving their season in a rush.

The same team that had been 54-68 on August 17 was going for its 17th win in 21 contests. When they were at their nadir, the Mets trailed first-place Atlanta by 13½ games in the National League East. Entering play this Saturday night, they had cut their deficit to seven games — still formidable, but not unimaginably so, considering the Mets were scheduled to take on the Braves six more times in September.

But first, the Florida Marlins, who would not be reeled in easily. The teams traded three-spots in the first inning and found themselves tied 4-4 in the sixth and 5-5 in the seventh. The Mets regained their lead, 6-5, on a Desi Relaford grounder in the top of the eighth, but a Cliff Floyd double off Rick White knocked in two runs in the bottom of the inning to send the game to the ninth with a 7-6 Florida edge.

Todd Zeile — pinch-run for by Jorge Toca — and Jay Payton each singled to start the ninth. Rey Ordoñez bunted both men into scoring position. Marlins manager Tony Perez opted to walk pinch-hitter Mark Johnson to load the bases for Matt Lawton. The strategy worked to the Mets’ advantage, as the midseason import (obtained from Minnesota for Rick Reed) doubled into right against would-be closer Antonio Alfonseca, bringing home Toca and Payton to give the Mets an 8-7 lead. Relaford followed with his fourth hit of the evening, which scored Johnson and provided Armando Benitez with a two-run cushion when he entered the game in the bottom of the ninth in search of his 38th save.

Armando took care of the Marlins in order, and the Mets had a 9-7 win, their sixth in a row. The victory kept them within seven of Atlanta. It was the first time they’d been just one game from .500 since they were 4-5 on April 12. That this was a big win in the scheme of the standings was apparent to anyone who believed the Mets still had a chance to pull off a baseball miracle.

That this was the last game the Mets would win in 2001 before events having nothing to do with baseball would overtake every New Yorker’s consciousness was something blissfully unimaginable that September Saturday night.

GAME 144: October 1, 1995 — METS 1 Braves 0 (11)
(Mets All-Time Game 144 Record: 19-29; Mets 1995 Record: 69-75)

The slightest of stakes are still stakes, and a team of professionals doesn’t question their meaning. It just goes out and refuses to be denied every chance to attain them.

That’s one way to look at how the 1995 Mets were closing out their season, which is what Dallas Green’s squad was doing this Sunday afternoon at Shea. This post-strike season — significantly shorter than standard regulation campaigns, given how long it took to achieve labor peace — may as well have been two seasons to the Mets. The first couldn’t have been much more desultory, bottoming out at 35-57 on August 5; the second couldn’t have been much more exhilarating. The Mets, who had grown progressively younger and spunkier, were one of the National League’s hottest teams, winning 33 of 51 as they entered their season finale.

If things broke right — a Mets win coupled with a Phillies loss — the club that had been buried in last place for most of two months could finish second…technically tied for second…and miles from first. The Atlanta Braves, this Sunday’s opponent, had run away and hidden from view, so it wasn’t as if the Mets had risen to playoff contention. They weren’t going to manage a winning record, either. But they had found themselves late, and this was no time to lose their momentum.

Late-season contests against teams that have clinched a playoff berth are unbalanced affairs by nature. The Braves were spending their final laps of the regular season as they did every year, whether they were playing a 162nd or a 144th game. They were tuning up for bigger things. Hence, Bobby Cox wasn’t going to push his starters. Of eight Atlanta position players, only one (Chipper Jones, whose first two career home runs were hit earlier that season at Shea) was removed at some point. John Smoltz went five shutout innings, but he, too, was taken out so as to rest for the real task at hand, the first National League Division Series, a little more than 48 hours away.

The Mets had no such distractions. Dallas Green’s pitcher, Jason Isringhausen, went eight innings, giving up no runs on four hits. But because a parade of Atlanta relievers stymied the Mets’ offense, Izzy would have to leave with a no-decision, his first after compiling a 9-2 record over his previous eleven starts. The rookie’s departure didn’t noticeably alter the course of the game. It was 0-0 after eight, then 0-0 after nine, and 0-0 — still  after ten.

While Cox no doubt fretted that the Braves’ bus to postseason was double-parked, the Mets made their move: Edgardo Alfonzo walked to lead off the bottom of the eleventh. Damon Buford did the same. Chris Jones bunted and reached first, loading the bases. The Mets’ final victory, looming as their sixth straight, was within their grasp.

But with Brad Woodall (Cox’s ninth pitcher of the day) on, Jose Vizcaino grounded back to the mound, creating a 1-2-3 double play and preserving the 0-0 stalemate. Carl Everett walked to reload the bases, setting the stage for Tim Bogar to either be a hero or delay the Braves’ travel plans a little longer.

Tim took his sweet time deciding what to do. He worked the count full before Woodall threw ball four. It may not have been heroic, but it was effective. Buford jogged down the line from third to score the only run of the season finale, giving rookie reliever Pete Walker his first (and only) Mets win, 1-0.

The loss couldn’t have meant less to the Braves, who, over the next few weeks, would roll the Rockies, eradicate the Reds and eliminate the Indians for their first (and only) Atlanta world championship. But to the Mets and their fans, it was plenty sweet. Shea public address announcer Del DeMontreaux informed what was left of that Sunday’s modest gathering of 18,876 that the Mets were the only team to sweep a series from each 1995 N.L. division winner. Indeed, they took out L.A. in August and Cincy and Atlanta in the past week. Highlights were then beamed on the video screen, with the climactic image featuring two logos: those of the Mets and their upcoming opponents, the Cardinals. It was underlined with the reminder that the next chapter for these 34-18 finishers would commence April 1, 1996.

“We’ll be back,” DiamondVision promised. “And we’ll be better.”

Actually, committed Mets fans didn’t have to wait six months for improvement. That would come as the afternoon wound down and the final score filtered northward from Miami: Marlins 8 Phillies 2. Two years earlier — in the last pre-strike campaign played to completion — the Phillies had been N.L. champs and the Mets a 103-loss embarrassment to humanity. Now the Mets shared runner-up status with the quasi-defending pennant-winners.

Granted, they were both 21 games from first place; and there was no guarantee that a sizzling finish would translate into anything come ’96; and sizzle or not, the second-place Mets were still a sub-.500 ballclub.

But that’s killjoy stuff. The Mets sent their fans into winter happy…and not happy because winter was at hand. If your next stop isn’t the playoffs, that’s as good as it gets.

ALSO QUITE HAPPY: On September 12, 1969, the first-place Mets continued to weave the kind of magic that was capturing an underdog-loving nation’s fancy.

Though Mets players might have disputed the notion that magic had anything to do with their Amazin’ success, nobody with a grip on basic baseball statistics would contend they were winning because of offense. Defense? Solid. Pitching? Outstanding. Hitting?

On this Friday at Forbes Field, hitting would have to be filed under “pitching”.

Against the Pirates in the first game of a twinight doubleheader, Jerry Koosman pitched a characteristic gem: a three-hitter that carried the day, 1-0. What made it unique was the lone run the Mets managed was driven in by…Jerry Koosman. A notoriously lousy hitter (he finished the game batting .056), Jerry singled to right with Bobby Pfeil on third in the fifth against Bob Moose. When the game went final, it could be said Kooz did something no Met pitcher had ever done: win a 1-0 game in which he drove in the only run.

That distinction would grow not nearly so distinct in the second game of the doubleheader. This time, the Mets’ starter was Don Cardwell, crafty on the mound and competent at the plate. Don was a veritable slugger among hurlers, having blasted 15 homers since 1957, including one a year in each of the three years he had been a Met. So it couldn’t have been too shocking to Pittsburgh starter Dock Ellis that Cardwell reached him for a run-scoring single in the second to put New York up, 1-0. And the eight innings of four-hit ball registered by Cardwell wasn’t wholly surprising, either.

The Amazin’ part is that when Don drove in Ron Swoboda from second in the second, that was all the scoring anybody would see in this nightcap. Ellis was brilliant the rest of the way, striking out eleven over eight, giving way to Chuck Hartenstein, who pitched a scoreless ninth. Tug McGraw succeeded Cardwell and closed out the Bucs for the 1-0 win…which meant the Mets won a 1-0 game in which their starting pitcher drove in the only run.

Again.

It had never happened in any Mets game before and now it happened twice in the same doubleheader.

Koosman’s and Cardwell’s feat would remain iconic in all future retellings of 1969, but it should be given its due as an overall Met rarity as well. Only three other pitchers turned the same trick, if that’s what it can be called: Buzz Capra, in 1972; Ray Sadecki, in 1974; and Nino Espinosa, in 1977. It hasn’t happened since.

Neither has 1969.