The blog for Mets fans
who like to read

ABOUT US

Greg Prince and Jason Fry
Faith and Fear in Flushing made its debut on Feb. 16, 2005, the brainchild of two longtime friends and lifelong Met fans.

Greg Prince discovered the Mets when he was 6, during the magical summer of 1969. He is a Long Island-based writer, editor and communications consultant. Contact him here.

Jason Fry is a Brooklyn writer whose first memories include his mom leaping up and down cheering for Rusty Staub. Check out his other writing here.

Got something to say? Leave a comment, or email us at faithandfear@gmail.com. (Sorry, but we have no interest in ads, sponsored content or guest posts.)

Need our RSS feed? It's here.

Visit our Facebook page, or drop by the personal pages for Greg and Jason.

Or follow us on Twitter: Here's Greg, and here's Jason.

Take Me Out to Jacobs Field

Welcome to Flashback Friday: Take Me Out to 34 Ballparks, a celebration, critique and countdown of every major league ballpark one baseball fan has been fortunate enough to visit in a lifetime of going to ballgames.

BALLPARK: Jacobs Field
LATER KNOWN AS: Progressive Field
HOME TEAM: Cleveland Indians
VISITS: 1, including a tour
VISITED: August 4, 2000
CHRONOLOGY: 22nd of 34
RANKING: 11th of 34

This is what Fred Wilpon had in mind. This is what everybody had in mind. We all reflexively credit Camden Yards for starting the retro ballpark trend — with good reason, since it was first throwback stadium to take root in the middle of a city and its originality was so darn striking. But Jacobs Field was the second and it really may have been the one that confirmed the formula worked.

If it can work in Cleveland, one franchise owner after another started thinking, it can work for us.

Camden Yards deserves its iconic status, but Baltimore already had a bit of a downtown renaissance in progress when Oriole Park took wing. It had the Inner Harbor, the National Aquarium. Cleveland, on the other hand, was, no disrespect intended, Cleveland. You don’t have to be an urbanologist to understand what that meant prior to 1994. All you have to do is remember the opening scenes of 1989’s Major League, set to the strains of Randy Newman:

Cleveland city of light, city of magic
Cleveland city of light, you’re calling me
Cleveland, even now I can remember
‘Cause the Cuyahoga River
Goes smokin’ through my dreams

Randy Newman recorded “Burn On” in 1972, a tribute (if you will) to the Cuyahoga River oil fire of 1969. That was the image America had of Cleveland for the longest time: a city whose river went literally to blazes. There wasn’t much else you’d call hot about the city’s image. Cleveland was a reliable punchline for Johnny Carson, a default example when experts gathered to bemoan the fate of Our Dying Cities. It was the broken buckle of the Rust Belt, impervious to industrial-strength RustOleum. Cleveland was a joke and the Indians were a laughingstock. No wonder Major League was so funny.

And then came Jacobs Field.

Not long after we returned home from our trip there in the summer of 2000, Stephanie was catching up with the mother of her best friend from high school. She told her about our most recent vacation. We went to Cleveland, Stephanie said. Her friend’s mother very nearly fainted. She lived in Florida but was originally from Ohio. Why, she asked Stephanie, would you ever take a vacation in Cleveland? It’s the worst!

Stephanie’s friend’s mother hadn’t been back to Ohio in quite a while. And she wasn’t a baseball fan. Everybody else seemed to know things had changed on the shores of Lake Erie, or at least enough of them had been renovated to make “America’s North Coast,” as civic promoters once hailed it, palatable for a brief visit. The river wasn’t burning, the Indians weren’t losing and the downtown wasn’t a bad place at all.

In the middle of it, the ballpark. It was probably unimaginable when Jake Taylor was catching Ricky Vaughn in aging, enormous Cleveland Municipal Stadium (which was portrayed in Major League by County Stadium). I won’t call Municipal Stadium “decrepit” or “dilapidated” since I was never there — and I have a soft spot for allegedly outmoded stadia — but it’s fair to say it didn’t have the best PR, and there’s no arguing it didn’t attract many Clevelanders. As Bennett Tramer wrote lovingly of his hometown ballclub in 1979’s premiere issue of Inside Sports, he rooted for a team “so terrible that hometown kids leave the ballpark early to sneak back into school.”

From 1956 through 1992, the Indians finished among the bottom four in American league per-game attendance 33 of 37 seasons. Not coincidentally, the Indians spent the entirety of the 1960s, the 1970s and the 1980s out of contention. If the Tribe gave its fans a little hope, its fans would show up — ticket sales more than doubled when the Indians improved by 24 games in 1986 — but there wasn’t much hope. There was just a very large, very old, very deserted stadium. Bennett Tramer again:

In 25 years, the two most exciting moments have been Tito Francona’s TV commercials for Central National Bank and Valmy Thomas’s groin injury.

It would go on like that for another 15 years in the city “where the Cuyahoga River caught fire more frequently than the baseball team,” until four decades of futility at last burned away and Jacobs Field opened its gates. The Indians had a sensational young ballclub and Clevelanders couldn’t not show up. Second in the American League Central and fourth in A.L. attendance when the labor troubles hit in 1994. Second in attendance and first in all of baseball with a staggering 100-44 record in strike-shortened 1995. Division titles and sellouts became the norm. The Indians made the playoffs five years running, advancing to the World Series twice. For 455 consecutive games, the Jake, as it quickly became known, sold every ticket and filled every seat.

By 2000, with the Cleveland Indians entrenched among baseball’s most popular and powerful, I wanted in. I wanted to go to a game at Jacobs Field. I wanted a taste of Tribemania. I wanted a ticket. I wanted a seat at the table.

But how? How do you inject yourself into a crowd that regularly tops 43,000 in a ballpark that seats barely more than 43,000 (and stands a few hundred besides). Your online options were limited. StubHub was in its infancy. Scalpers? Were they legal in Ohio? How much would that cost? And where does one go in Cleveland to buy an already sold ticket? Our ballpark trips were almost always made with the baseball arrangements taken care of in advance. We weren’t going to travel great distances and get shut out. This wasn’t Municipal Stadium or Shea Stadium. You couldn’t just walk up to a window and ask for two, please.

As luck would have it, the reign of the Indians coincided with my knowing a handful of people who either lived in Cleveland or had relatives in Cleveland. Maybe it was the heat of the Tribe or the rise of the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame or the prestige of The Drew Carey Show, but every time I turned around in New York, I seemed to be in contact with somebody with some connection to Cleveland.

One of those people was a co-worker whose parents just happened to be season ticketholders at the Jake. Not just any season tickets either, but tickets that were four rows behind the first base dugout. This thoughtful young lady made a call and, voila!, the tickets were mine. Four tickets at that, which was terrific since at the center of my Cleveland network was my former co-worker Eric — his house had been our satellite office — and it would be swell to go to this game with him and his wife Shelley. I had made noises in 1993 about flying out there to take in a game with him before the old joint closed, but it never happened. This figured to more than make up for it.

The tickets we were provided were for Friday, August 4, so that automatically became the fulcrum of our vacation and the core of what became the closest I ever experienced to my version of a fantasy camp. The Saturday before, I went to Shea and saw the Mets win. I went back on Sunday, and I saw the Mets win. The Mets lost on Monday, but I didn’t go. I went Tuesday, the Mets won. Returned Wednesday afternoon, the Mets won again. Four games in five days, four consecutive wins.

And then it was off to Cleveland. Who could ask for anything more out of the middle of summer?

Take that, Randy Newman.

My ballpark fetish has exposed me to brief glimpses of America’s medium-sized cities, places I never would have visited otherwise. Unless there was business taking me to Cleveland, no way I’m there, even if they do have a Hall of Fame. So when Stephanie and I landed at Cleveland Hopkins International Airport and found our way to the light rail that (per Eric’s instructions) takes you to Tower City and then emerged in the middle of some “downtown” we’d never given any thought previously — downtown having a different connotation in all these other places than it does in New York — it was actually kind of exciting.

New Yorkers getting excited over Cleveland…go figure.

I liked the compactness of downtown Cleveland. It was just a few blocks from Tower City, the big mall/office complex, to our lakefront hotel, which itself wasn’t too many steps from the Hall and the Browns’ new stadium. We even figured out that Cleveland State University was within reasonable walking distance; procuring college t-shirts from universities we know little about are one of our vacation rituals.

As for the object of our desire, Jacobs Field, it was also nearby. Of course it was. It was the magnet in the middle of our minds from the moment we checked in until we got through our game. After dropping our luggage, we walked over and peeked in. There was no game in progress, but it was right there on the street waiting to be gazed upon. You could see the field and all the touches that made it special, like the toothbrush lights and the massive scoreboard (which seemed bigger in those days before everybody got one). You could enjoy the sandstone exterior, an unwitting antidote to the epidemic of Camden-style bricks almost everybody else building a ballpark was copying from Baltimore. Cleveland had itself an original.

The game was Friday night, but I couldn’t wait 24 hours for more Jake. It was just too damn alluring and we were just staying way too close to pretend it wasn’t calling to us. We learned they gave tours, so we showed up Friday afternoon after purchasing our CSU shirts (Go Vikings!) and got the inside look.

That was fun, too, though it revealed my only substantive gripe with the place: the suites. They were stacked atop each other so high — suite, suite, suite — until the upper deck could have been called America’s North Coast. I thought the idea of these retro parks was intimacy, yet the regular Tribe fans were pushed heavenward by the swells. My tickets weren’t in the upper deck, so it wasn’t going to affect me one bit, but I try to maintain an aesthetic standard on these trips. One thumb down for oversuiteing Jacobs Field.

And we could have done without what seemed like 20 minutes sitting around one of the suites as part of the tour. I don’t think that was planned, as our tour guide seemed flustered by some technical glitch and parked us on a bunch of private couches and barstools. It was nice, sure, and it’s novel compared to not sitting in a suite, but the more I think about it, the less these things have to do with baseball…and I don’t have to think that much about it. Yet no ballpark built in the past 20 years has been completed with the selling point being “we’ve eliminated suites.” The Jake sold them out like they sold every seat, so more power to ’em, I guess.

A couple of other Jake tour highlights: Charlie Manuel’s parking space (if I could have foreseen the future, I would have done something nasty to it); the tantrum room right off the Indians’ dugout (where players could take out their frustrations away from umpires and the looming threat of ejection); and standing and posing for pictures on the field itself. Prior to August of 2000, I’d given no thought to following in the tracks of Chief Wahoo. Now I just had to be photographed on his sacred ground.

Fine official tour to go with our sneak preview the evening before. On our walk back to the hotel, we stopped in Tower City to look around and found a store that sold ballpark photos from all over the American League. I snapped up Baltimore, Boston and Detroit. Ten years later, I’ve yet to figure out what to do with them, but I know had to have them while they sat on the counter of a store in Cleveland where I’d never be again.

The main course awaited at 7:05. I was excited about taking another stroll from our hotel, breathing in the bracing lakefront air, joining the parade of locals until we all, as one, got our Tribe on. But that little thrill was pre-empted because our friends were picking us up and, in appreciation for the tickets they — actual fans of this team — couldn’t hope to lay their hands on, taking us to dinner. Well, we could hardly complain about either of those options.

Eric and Shelley brought us to a steakhouse on the edge of downtown. One of the more impressive pregame dinners I’ve ever enjoyed. They made for great companions. It was my first time meeting Shelley. As for Eric, we generally only saw each other at trade shows or when our former employer would fly him in for a meeting. Friendly sort when we were discussing beverage or magazine matters, but move us toward baseball and man, this guy was a blast! Remind me never to go to a convention when I can go to a ballgame.

Full but hardly sated, it was off to the Jake. Eric parked in an off-site lot that charged $20 (downtown ballpark, limited parking) and we were in our fabulous seats just in time for first pitch. From there, nearly every pitch was whacked around. Turn of the Century DH league baseball..DUCK!

The Indians and the Angels each planted some sacrificial tomato can on the mound and their respective offenses let fly. Four for Cleveland in the bottom of the first. Four for Anaheim in the top of the second. Five for the home team in the third. Single runs for the visitors in the tops of the fourth and fifth. What did that make the score?

A lot. Yet all those base hits meant very little compared to a Roberto Alomar bunt attempt gone foul. Robbie, as we called him in our continual efforts to sort of fit in on these sojourns, bunted way too hard. He fouled it directly back, off the window of the press box. It bounced just as hard in the direction of the really good seats behind the first base dugout.

It was coming right toward us. A small mob converged and the ball disappeared. Stephanie, on my left, bent down as if she was going to find it sitting at her feet. Oh, I thought, that’s so cute! She actually thinks the ball landed, of all places, right by her shoes.

Guess what — it did. Stephanie got the ball.

WOW! My wife “caught” a foul ball! Sure, what she really did was pick it up off the ground, but they’re all acrobatic snares of sizzling liners in the paper the next day, so way to go!

Two aspects of this that still slay me:

1) Stephanie has never attended a baseball game in which she didn’t warn me of the terror lurking in her soul regarding a foul ball taking her head off (no matter how far we sat from likely foul ball territory), yet she couldn’t have been more blasé about her Jacobs find. While I was scouring the area to see where the sphere of dreams landed, she just sat and smiled and handed it to me. Is this what you were looking for?

2) Eric, lifelong fan of all Cleveland sporting combines, witness to no Cleveland championships, scarred as any Cuyahogan by the 1997 World Series that got away in the ninth inning of the seventh game…Eric had been to loads of Indians games at mammoth Municipal Stadium where your chances at a foul ball were mathematically excellent. He never got one. At the Jake, albeit with more competition, same thing — no dice. Somehow, Eric chose the half-inning of Roberto Alomar’s fateful at-bat as the half-inning to go to the men’s room. Thus, when he returned to his seat and saw me holding a baseball hit moments earlier by the biggest star on his favorite team…I believe the first two words uttered were “what” and “the”. Eric’s indignation was mock but still, out-of-towners just cruise in and grab a ball. Ouch.

Eric still has no championships from his teams, but if it makes him feel any better, we haven’t come up with any foul balls since 2000.

Our friends were such nice people, but not all Tribalists were so civilized. Specifically, a bunch of tanked-up teens were giving the business to one Angel in particular, Mo Vaughn. Mo, they deduced, was a large fellow, so they saw fit to remind him loudly and crudely that he wasn’t — fit, that is. As Mo led off the seventh with Anaheim two runs down, I must confess that I hoped he’d shove their taunts down their throats just on principle. In another stroke of luck, Vaughn’s fellow slugger Jim Thome, standing around first base for Cleveland between his own at-bats, couldn’t field a grounder. E-3 on the Thomenator, Mo Vaughn on first.

Then Justin Speier throws a wild pitch and Vaughn speeds to second. HA! He’d come around to score as the Angels eventually tied it 9-9.

9-9. Geez, the American League can be numbing.

I went back to nominally supporting the Indians out of courtesy, but I wasn’t too upset when Adam Kennedy singled home Garret Anderson in the top of the ninth to make it 10-9 Angels. This had been a long-ass game. We had our ball, we had a ball in general, but by the ninth, we’d seen just about everything Jacobs Field had to offer. The Mets were in Arizona (playing the “Rattlers” according to the out-of-town scoreboard). I was tired, I was full, now I was distracted. When can I get back to the room to track the Mets on the ESPN crawl?

No worries. There was one more thing Jacobs Field had to offer us. With one out and one on, Thome stepped in against Angels closer Troy Percival. The Thomenator had also decided it had been a long enough night and he creamed the fourth pitch he saw. Just like that, after nearly four hours, we had our final: Indians 11 Angels 10.

It meant more to Eric than it did to me, but that was a helluva way to end any game — no doubt the most exciting ending to what I’ll call an “other” game I’ve ever witnessed. Jerks who told Mo Vaughn how effing fat he was gaining satisfaction notwithstanding, it was a ton of fun leaving a ballpark in that kind of delirious crowd.

For Thome, it was career home run No. 225; he now has 587, eighth all-time. For Jacobs Field, it was consecutive sellout No. 423; the streak would snap at 455 the following April (the Red Sox have long since smashed that record, with Fenway selling out 622 straight games and counting). For the Indians, it was part of a late-season surge that would catapult them into Wild Card contention where they’d come up just short of their sixth consecutive postseason appearance. Another division title, unfortunately for them, was out of the question, as Charlie Manuel’s club was outpaced early in the A.L. Central by the White Sox of Jerry Manuel. Quite a manager that guy was supposed to be.

Roberto Alomar and Mo Vaughn were two superstars I’d remember from this night but presumably forget about as soon as Eric and Shelley dropped us off at our hotel where I’d race to turn on Baseball Tonight and learn Joe McEwing and the Mets were sticking it to Randy Johnson and those redubbed Rattlers. True, the next day Stephanie and I visited an Indians clubhouse store in a downtown mall and picked up a Beanie Baby-type keychain with ALOMAR 12 inscribed on its back because we were so grateful to Robbie for having such precise aim with his misfired bunt. We’d take Beanie Robbie home and put real Robbie’s ball in a case and place them both atop our bedroom dresser and glance at them now and then and remember what a good time we had in Cleveland in the summer of 2000.

But otherwise, we’d have no reason to let either Roberto Alomar or Mo Vaughn cross our Met minds on a going basis in the foreseeable future. Nope, no way.

A friend spent his own vacation this past June in Cleveland, timing it to catch the Mets at the Jake or whatever it’s called now. He was happy our team swept their team, but reported “that ballpark is kind of sad.” No crowds, no life, not well kept up — “it shows you what Citi Field could be like in ten years if they don’t take care of it.”

My Jacobs Field, however, will always look fantastic from the fourth row.

Two Small Moments

As cool weather and tiny crowds herald the quiet of the offseason, rooting for the Mets threatens to become fun again, a story of kids trying to learn lessons and win jobs and make you eager for 2011. (Granted, playing the Pirates is an excellent recipe for feeling better about things.)

From tonight’s game, two moments that will stick with me long after the rest of this game has been forgotten.

The first was Angel Pagan going into a slide at the edge of the grass in right-center, his butt skidding across the grass as he flung one arm one way to steady himself and the other arm (the one with the glove) the other way, where it intersected the ball struck a moment before by John Bowker. Pagan caught the ball short of the 415 sign, rolled over on the warning track, sprang up (somehow in the right direction), fired to Ruben Tejada to start the double play, fell down again, then looked up wide-eyed and waved one hand in slightly woozy triumph. The Pirates’ relievers (soon to be employed for no particular reason by the unnecessarily thorough John Russell) gaped in amazement. Mike Pelfrey said wow. I did both.

It’s been a pleasure to watch Pagan go from prodigal son to slightly daffy semi-prospect to all-around star, but I can’t remember a moment for him quite like that one. That was a catch to rival Tommie Agee skidding on his belly at Shea, a grab that would adorn a gate if it had happened during the postseason. As it is, you should see it on replays for years. I’ve watched it about 12 times now and it still makes me laugh and shake my head in appreciation. Ain’t baseball wonderful?

The other moment belonged to Lucas Duda, the hulking rookie whose first big-league go-round has been beyond cruel, as in 1-for-33 beyond cruel. Duda got a hit in his third big-league game, in Chicago on Sept. 3, but hadn’t scratched anything in 23 at-bats since. That’s nearly two weeks without a hit, a solid 45 aggregate minutes or so of standing at the plate and watching pitches and swinging at them and getting nowhere while tens of thousands of people watch and wonder — as you must have once or twice — if you’re fated to ever get a hit.

Duda’s misery had become so pitiable that when he came up in the fourth I was thinking that something ought to be done. I’m all for the kids’ learning lessons, but one hit in the first 2 1/2 weeks of play is all stick and no carrot, and it seemed like a good idea for Duda to develop a mysterious minor ailment and be shut down for the year out of caution. A moment after I thought that, Duda ripped a Charlie Morton fastball down the right-field line for a double, scoring fellow Youts of America Ike Davis and Josh Thole. Standing on second, Duda looked carefully expressionless, but that was OK — I was smiling for both of us.

In his next at-bat, of course, Lucas Duda doubled again. Ain’t baseball wonderful?

I Think I Made The Right Call

Passed on a game for which a ticket awaited me…the weather, of course. I felt pretty bad about it once they started playing and it calmed down where I was. Somehow I managed not to fully realize just how stormed the greater Metropolitan area was getting while I was fretting, particularly in the general vicinity of the railroad tracks I depend on to whisk me toward Citi Field.

Now I see sometimes missing a Mets game isn’t the worst idea in the world. (And from the looks of things, it appears the vast majority of 42,000 seats would agree.)

So I do have enough sense to come in out of the rain and everything else, even if a series-sweeping victory got swept away from my view.

Oh well, that’s what they have TV and common sense for.

Mets making good for those with tickets in hand and similar life-over-death priorities, even if it meant missing the Pirates walking their fourth consecutive plank.

Happy Fifth Averyversary!

Avery, enjoying one of his favorite modes of transportation.

Avery the Cat! He’s the cat who was born with an exclamation point!

It was five years ago tonight Avery and I made our acquaintance. Stephanie had a tip on another cat — we had only just begun to search for a worthy successor to the late and legendary Bernie — but Avery made his availability known and she scooped him right up, recognizing talent the moment it licked her on the face. Off into a cab they went and then onto the Long Island Rail Road. Avery was just a couple of months old and he was already commuting.

This was our initial thinking after Avery got off the train:

Such a cute little kitten! But we have to be careful. He’s new, and with older, warier Hozzie around, we just can’t let him wander at will right away. We have to break him in to his new surroundings, like we did Hozzie. We have to get him through his nervousness. We’ll set him up in the bathtub and close the door, because he’ll be shy and…

AVERY!

Forget the best laid plans of us and adopted kitties. Avery was comfortable among Princes about five seconds after he came home. He jumped out of his temporary bathtub encampment and into my lap. He wanted to be around us. He wanted to be around Hozzie. Hozzie preferred to hide under a bookshelf during Avery’s first weekend (same place he mourned big brother Bernie’s passing that May). Avery was his polar feline opposite, in campaign mode from the word “meow”. Hi, he’d say, practically sticking out his paw, I’m Avery the Cat and I’m running for the office of your affections. Can I count on your vote?

He was elected in a landslide.

Hozzie eventually emerged from hiding. Avery never hid. Avery was front and center, our featured kitty. Their chemistry developed slowly, but mine and Avery’s was instantaneous. One minute I was trying to confine him to the bathtub, and before the minute was out, he was my living room companion of record. As a bonus, Avery arrived just in time to catch (or maybe magically spur) the 2005 Mets’ late-season revival. They, too, were hiding under a bookshelf, dropping from 68-60 at the tail end of August to 71-75 by mid-September. Avery jumpstarted them toward 2006. His first night, Pedro Martinez shut out the Braves. After two weeks with Avery on their side, the Mets were 83-79 and bursting out of their own bathtub.

It was a heady time for Mets and cats. It’s still a heady time for Avery. He and Hozzie are old pals now, having progressed from strangers on the carpet to colleagues in the kitchen to something approaching brothers in arms…or legs. He continues to live up to his title as World’s Most Interactive Cat, never shying from Stephanie and finding me cozily amenable after a half-decade of relentless interaction.

Quite a ride these first five years with Avery…I mean Avery! Looking forward to seeing where else he takes us!

Meanwhile, I’d like to take you to lunch at Bronx Banter, my favorite blog of a different stripe. It’s safe to eat there, despite some unsavory elements you might have read about elsewhere.

What Was That All About?

When Jenrry Mejia clutched some indeterminate part of his upper body and walked unhappily off the mound, I just stared at the TV.

It could be nothing — when a young pitcher whose arm is potentially worth millions does anything odd on the mound, the catcher rears up, the trainer double-times it to the mound, the manager frowns and takes him out, and five minutes later the young pitcher is in the clubhouse wondering how he can train himself not to ever sleep funny on a body part again, given how paranoid everybody is around here.

On the other hand, it’s the Mets. Johan Santana had a pectoral strain and is now expected to pick up a baseball again in the 33rd century, or some other depressingly far-off epoch during which we’ll still be paying Bobby Bonilla to eat things. If Mejia had taken five steps and turned into a pile of ash, I would have been horrified but not particularly surprised.

My next thought was ridiculous, but equally Metsian: Mejia had given up a run, but not a hit. The Pirates led 1-0, and Raul Valdes — who always looks like he’s heading into his boss’s office for a bad quarterly review — was jogging in from the bullpen. Wouldn’t it just be like the Mets, I thought, to finally get a no-hitter and have it be not only one of those sad combined efforts BUT ALSO A LOSS? What would we do if our long quest ended that way — with Mejia, Valdes, Manny Acosta and Sean Green pitching a no-hitter and losing 1-0 to give the Pirates their 16th road win of the season?

I think we’d insist that the scorer turn Ruben Tejada’s error into a hit, that’s what.

What Valdes authored, though, was more of a yes-hitter: He allowed four runs in 1.2 innings. In the blink of an eye it was 5-0, Pirates. And then, somehow, it wasn’t: Before you could say single single double walk single error error groundout single, the Mets were up 7-5 and everything was completely and utterly nuts. As proof, meet your winning pitcher: Raul Valdes. Honestly, the Mets and Pirates should just play each other 162 times a year, with batters swinging blindfolded and baserunners forced to utilize giant hamster balls. It couldn’t be more ridiculous than tonight’s game.

Which, come to think of it, was pretty fun.

* * *

Last night’s news from Coney Island, on the other hand, was no fun at all: Wally Backman’s mighty Brooklyn Cyclones suffered a power outage in the New York-Penn League Championship Series and were defeated. In the ninth the Cyclones were down four runs, but got two men on with one out, the crowd was roaring for them, and I briefly and blissfully let myself believe a miracle might be in the offing. But the next batter rapped cruelly and instantly into a double play, and winter had come to MCU Park. I turned off the radio and was surprised at how upset I was. I enjoy Cyclones games, but they’re a short-season A team, meaning you really are rooting for laundry: The good players move on, the not-so-good ones go home, and every year brings an essentially new team. This makes the Cyclones easy to like, but difficult — through no fault of their own — to truly love.

Yet I was crushed. I think part of that is that Emily and I were big Cyclones fans in their inaugural summer of 2001, when they were a phenomenon and Angel Pagan was their first heartthrob. The original Cyclones (let’s ignore their previous incarnation as the St. Catharines Blue Jays, let alone the misgotten year in which they were the Queens Kings) had an almost-identical overall record as the 2010 team, and were also almost unbeatable at home. They won the first game of the New York-Penn League Championship Series, leaving them just one more victory from a title. But that first win was on Sept. 10, 2001. The series never resumed, and the Cyclones had to settle for being co-champions. Which is understandable, perspective and all, but still a wrong I’ve hoped another Cyclones team would put right. I really thought this was going to be that team, right up until the moment that became impossible.

If you’re game for more thoughts on the Cyclones, I’d love it if you’d check out this piece I wrote for MSG.com.

A Lot of Fun & Depressing as Hell

My gosh, that was a lot of fun at Citi Field on Tuesday night! R.A. Dickey with another complete game, Ruben Tejada skilled at bat and in the field, Nick Evans maintaining his momentum, Angel Pagan making like it was the first half of the season and Carlos Beltran making like it was the first half of his career.

My gosh, it was depressing at Citi Field on Tuesday night! There was nobody there. If not literally nobody, then incredibly close to it. Whoever was there made as little noise as possible, save for the bursts of energy that would emanate during the scoring of nine Mets runs and the completion of nine Dickey innings. The paid attendance isn’t worth citing. Let’s just say your row was your own and probably your section, too.

That’s not bad as far as fan comfort goes, but these things work better with a crowd. No crowd on Tuesday night. More like a klatch. Beds were made in advance and the lying in them was not unexpected. Still, vacant is vacant, and that business of how “there are 5,000 but they sound like 50,000” didn’t apply. If we were 5,000, we sounded like 500. That’ll happen at Empti Field.

But the game was full of good stuff. Oh, R.A., can’t you stick around this winter and have a snowball fight with us? With your 57 MPH knuckler, you’d be a more sporting opponent than Randy Johnson — and better company when we go sledding afterwards. And Ruben…where have you been lately? Oh right, nailed to the bench by the mad manager Manuel. Jerry accidentally wrote you into the lineup and you’re the second baseman again. I always love watching you field. Watching you hit was a boost to my fan esteem.

Nick Evans, walkoff hero of Monday night (which was acknowledged by absolutely nobody when he was announced in the lineup or when he came up to bat the first time) earned the right to keep playing at least one more game by crushing a home run to dead center. If Evans had been saving it up for months to show Manuel he still exists, the message should have been received — though with Jerry, the phone is usually turned off.

Pagan woke up and Beltran hit like a younger or perhaps just less injured man. It was just a crisp, crisp game on a crisp, crisp night. These Mets reminded me of the Mets who were once 2010 contenders. Didn’t hurt that the visiting Pirates reminded me of the Orioles and Indians from that same distant period when we were steaming hot.

Empti Field, however, is surely playing out the string. So many concessions were closed on Field and Promenade levels I’m surprised they weren’t boarded up. (Shake Shack, however, could form a line even if it was sentenced to life in solitary.) My friend Rob and I, extending our games attended streak to at least one in every season since 1995, found an open outpost upstairs. I asked for a hot dog and a knish. The knishes, the polite lady said, weren’t ready.

Ah, it was too nice a night to make a big deal of it, but it was five minutes to seven. What were they saving the knishes for — Simchat Torah? The other day, Stephanie and I got a similar answer in one of the swanky clubs we sampled. The menu said there was mushroom pizza available. That was a new one on us, so we asked for it. We were told it wasn’t ready. Just like the knish. Hmmm…perhaps the knish and the mushroom pizza, like Billy Paul and Mrs. Jones, got a thing going on.

Anyway, I went with the hot dog and pretzel instead; both were ready and both were excellent. Sometimes simple is best. Same for our seats. I asked at the box office a couple of weeks ago for two Promenade Reserved Infield, the second-least expensive tickets they had. They gave me Section 514, Row 11, about as good as I’ve ever had in this place. We could’ve moved down, I suppose, but the night and the view weren’t going to get any better.

It helps when you have all the room you want at a baseball game. That’s the hidden value of a Value night at Empti Field. That’s also the pity of it. Someday, September will be crowded and you won’t be able to sit where you want and the prevailing excuse at the concessions will likely be not that “it isn’t ready” but “we’ve run out of everything.”

And that, for all it implies about the possibilities inherent in September baseball, will be fantastic.

Move On Up, Come On Down

For any Mets fan who survived 2009 by telling yourself it couldn’t get any worse, this one’s for you. It’s 2010, and, technically, it didn’t get any worse.

The 2009 Mets limped to the finish line with 70 wins — and required a three-game sweep of the Astros the final weekend to accumulate that many. The 2010 Mets, on the other hand, have blown by their most recent predecessors with nearly two weeks to go. These Mets can boast of 71 wins and…

…well, not much else at this point, but improvement is improvement. The Mets may not have learned anything about sharp management of their affairs, and they may be playing out the string in too-familiar Quadruple-A fashion, but…um…

Did I mention they now have more wins than they did last year?

For lifting the 2010 Mets to heights the 2009 Mets could only dream of, you can thank non-2009 Met Dillon Gee for taking the ball and giving the Mets six scoreless innings in return; non-2009 Met Hisanori Takahashi providing the Mets two more scoreless innings toward the end; non-2009 Met Ruben Tejada —a non-starter in Jerry Manuel’s addled mind — doubling to deep left with one out in the tenth; and 2010 non-entity Nick Evans pinch-singling into the third base hole while Tejada ran to score the game’s only run as the mysteriously indispensable Luis Hernandez took a breather.

Evans was a semi-essential component of the last Mets club to improve its previous year’s record by one game. That was in 2008 (89 wins), when young Nick emerged from the Binghamton bushes and gave the Mets a relatively competent performance across 50 pennant race games. With everything on the line two years ago, when the Mets needed to improve on their 2007 total (88 wins) by two games, Evans started in left and batted fifth, behind Carlos Delgado. The Mets lost, Shea Stadium closed and Nick Evans all but disappeared from view.

Nick — with 80 major league plate appearances since 9/28/08 — is supposed to be in the lineup tonight, starting in left for the first time in just over a year, filling in for entrenched incumbent Lucas Duda. It’s not all bad for Lucas, however; now that his average has sunk to .031, he is entitled to a discount at Baskin-Robbins. Tejada will also be granted the privilege of starting at second over Joe Morgan Luis Hernandez this evening. Now that the Mets have clinched a better record for 2010 than they had in 2009, I guess Jerry can afford to tinker with his set lineup.

The thrill of edging the 48-95 Pirates 1-0 in extra innings for a landmark 71st win will likely prove Evansescent in the scheme of things, but at least the hundreds who attended the game at Citi Field and dutifully reported to their Promenade locations were given a cheap thrill when they were waved down by Alex Anthony to fill in some of the empty seats in the expensive Field Level sections. The Mets could afford to be generous, as rain diminished whatever enthusiasm existed to begin with for a Mets-Pirates matchup in the middle of September. Announced paid attendance, which is generally fiction as regards bodies in the ballpark, was 24,384, an all-time low for a regularly scheduled Citi Field game (14,733 were on hand for Jon Niese’s June 10 one-hitter, but that was a makeup date).

Just as improvement is improvement, a good deed is a good deed, even if it cost the Mets absolutely nothing to invite everybody to sit downstairs once it became abundantly clear downstairs would otherwise be a ghost town. I suppose it became abundantly clear months ago, when MON for Monday and PIT for Pittsburgh intersected amid the September portion of the pocket schedule. The Jets opening their new stadium (with a Same Old result) likely would have dampened physical attendance whether it rained or not. There’s a reason a series like this in stamped with the dreaded Value classification. It’s a dog whistle to the most slightly attuned fan that these games aren’t really worth your time or money — diehard company excepted; I’ll be at two of the next three games. (The only dog whistle I ever hear is METS! and I instinctively howl at the moon.)

Among the many insults perpetrated by Mets management toward Mets fans this 71-win-and-counting season is the BETTER SEATS LOWER PRICES campaign that pretends you’re being done by a favor by being offered tickets that start at $11. All things considered, eleven dollars for a Major League Baseball game — even a lonely, rainy Mets-Pirates game — seems fair. But the implication in those ads is that’s $11 per ticket (plus service charges and handing fees if you order via phone or Web) for what we, the Mets, consider the worst of our inventory: weeknight games against the lamest team we could find. Implicit in the deal, also, is you will sit as far from the action as we can put you, unless we recognize the folly of our overall pricing scheme and realize it’s kind of silly to isolate you up there.

In which case, come on down.

Value…interesting concept at Citi Field. If, for some reason, you envisioned September 13-16 against the Pirates as the series for you, and you decided this was the series when you’d like to break out of the de facto upper deck, what were your straight-up options? Put aside StubHub and take the Mets up on their BSLP offer. What else could you buy for this series that wasn’t the left and right field wings of Promenade? According to the ceaselessly fascinating Seating & Pricing guide on mets.com, the next least expensive seats are $15, Promenade Infield. There are some good views up there (just as there are in Promenade not Infield), but let’s say we’re being aspirational. This is the Pirates, we should be able to do better, right?

Next up is Pepsi Porch, a singular section of upper-level outfield bleachers with an intriguing perspective, where tickets for Mets-Pirates start at $24. Start? You mean there’s an end point? Indeed, there’s Pepsi Porch Gold, for $36. Those are for the first two rows of Pepsi Porch. So for twelve dollars more than Row 3, you get to sit in…Row 2. When the Brewers are here in two weeks — a Bronze set (which you have to have to come up with these prices) — the Row 3/Row 2 disparity will grow to sixteen bucks: $32 vs. $48.

Think about that: The Mets want you to sit in the outfield for a game against the Brewers for as much as $48 plus fees and charges. That’s per person. The same dynamic holds in Left Field Landing and Left Field Landing Gold: $32 for Rows 3 and back, $48 for Rows 2 and 1.

Included with Gold versions of Pepsi Porch and Left Field Landing but not with regular Pepsi Porch and Left Field Landing: access to the Caesars Club, where you get a voucher for a free…check that, you just get to come in and buy stuff if you want something.

The Mets are very big on Gold and, for that matter, Platinum, even if the night in question is framed as Bronze. They figured that by casting their lower rows on a given level in a more precious metal, they could ask for more paper. The Caesars Club seats, outside the airport lounge for which the Excelsior level is commonly known, can be pretty nice. How nice? Mets-Brewers in Caesars Club Bronze will run you $80 per ticket plus fees and charges. But if you wanted to sit in the first two rows, that would jump you to $96. For the Value-able Pirates series, Row 2 is a mere $72…a $12 step-up from Row 3.

Not included with any of these seats: a deep-tissue shoulder massage.

I could go on with this until we’re well into triple-digits, but you get the idea. And you see why there are so many empty seats at Citi Field for Mets-Pirates games and Mets-Brewers games and, for that matter, Mets-Phillies games like those Gold games played this past weekend. I was fortunate to come into a very nice ticket on Sunday. My Sunday ticket had no price listed on it, and I was very grateful to have it and use it, no questions asked. Curiosity, however, drove me to examine the Seating & Pricing chart to see what that ticket would have gone for had it been sold through standard channels.

It was conceived as a $204 ticket. A $204 ticket for one baseball game. The Mets created a pricing structure built on the idea that a very good ticket — not the absolute best in their portfolio, but a definite no-complaints seat — should or could fetch $204. Since most people go to games with other people, the idea was at least $408 would be spent for two tickets in this section. If it was a family of four that wanted four very nice seats, it would become $816.

For one baseball game. That was the thinking.

As Sunday’s funereal procession of Met outs ensued, I partook in a bit of getting up and walking around — Citi Field’s designed for that — and when I came back to my section, it didn’t seem to matter where I sat. There were, for the Gold game against our division rivals, plenty of empty seats. I plopped myself down at one point in a seat a row or two behind where my theoretical $204 seat sat. It was conceived with an asking price of $174. Nobody came along and told me I was sitting in his or her seat. It was unoccupied before I got there because it was unoccupied all day.

A little rain came toward the end of Sunday’s game. Sure would be nice to get out of it. Fortunately, the last several rows of my section were covered. I went back there, found an entire row of $144 seats that weren’t being used and waited out the inevitable final strikes from Roy Oswalt. The Mets were all wet, but I stayed dry.

$204…$174…$144…you don’t have to pay that to go to a Mets game, obviously, but the Mets thought somebody would. I’m sure somebody somewhere did. I’m sure even in this economy there are companies that gauged such seats as an investment or legitimate business expense. I’m sure there are individuals who really like those seats and can swing the payments. I’m sure that now and then somebody decides to splurge for a special occasion.

Yet it’s a baseball game. It’s a Mets game, one of 81 they play at Citi Field in a given year. Sometimes it’s Platinum, sometimes it’s Value, sometimes it’s one of three shades in between. But mostly it’s ridiculous.

Absolutely ridiculous.

I’m guessing the pricing of Citi Field tickets wasn’t pulled out of some Met executive’s deepest, darkest cavity. I’m guessing there was an examination of what other entertainment options were asking and getting and a study to determine what the market would bear. I’m guessing there was some semblance of logic applied to portraying certain games as hot tickets and others as bargain specials. I’m guessing somebody saw asking substantially more for Row 2 than Row 3 as clever as opposed to gouging. I’m guessing there’s a balance sheet somewhere in somebody’s office that proves this is supposed to make sense.

It makes none to me, no more than the extended tryouts given Lucas Duda and Luis Hernandez make, to put it in baseball terms.

Y’know, I love Mets baseball enough to have watched the Mets and Pirates Monday night with only brief excursions to check in on the Jets and Ravens, the Yankees and Rays and the Nadals and Djokovics because all those headline events are secondary in my book compared to the Mets and Pirates.

I love Mets baseball enough to celebrate a 71st win because it’s more than 70.

I love Mets baseball enough to have scared Avery the Cat off the couch when I whooped it over Nick Evans driving home Ruben Tejada in the tenth inning.

I love Mets baseball enough to accept just about every gracious invitation I’ve received these past two sodden years to Citi Field and to arrange not a few outings on my own.

I love Mets baseball enough that I have plans to see the 71-73 Mets six more times this season and am honestly wondering if I should go a seventh or eighth time besides because there will be no more chances to go at all pretty soon.

Sure enough, I love Mets baseball, but even someone with as much love for what they mean to me finds the way they market their tickets hateful. It’s arrogant and mean-spirited and I don’t blame anybody for leaving thousands and thousands of their seats empty game after game. The subpar product is one thing — lousy seasons happen to even well-run organizations. But the Gold and the Silver and all of that? The slicing and dicing of our blue and orange veins in the hope our wallets will bleed green? The pretense of doing us a big favor by selling us their worst seats for a reasonable price a big four times over the final four months of the season? The idea that the lowest ticket price for this weekend’s series against the Braves is $23 (plus fees and charges) because back in February it seemed like it might be an attractive matchup and if you can attract people, the next thing you do is shake them down for as much as you can get from them?

You’re not attracting fans with this way of doing business in 2010 and you won’t do it in 2011. You’re doing the opposite. You’re repelling them. The market is not bearing your delusional pricing structure. You’re in the second year of a new stadium and nobody cares. Whatever you envisioned with World Class Citi Field — and however lovely it is in spots — has not come to be. The scare everybody felt at the prospect of being left out as if these were the early ’90s and Citi Field was going to be jam-packed Camden Yards has passed. It got you through 70-92 2009 with 3.15 million tickets sold. Whatever the final record in year two, even though it will be better than it was in year one, you’ll be nowhere near 3.15 million tickets sold. And wherever you wind up in attendance after 81 games this year, chances are you won’t see it next year.

My most basic advice? Cut it out.

Cut out the Platinum, Gold and so on crap in 2011. What you’ve got isn’t glittering. Your Value setup wherein the left and right field seats are $11 and the ones in the middle are $15? Split the difference and make them all a lucky $13 for every game next year. Make your so-called Promenade boxes $18. Do what you want with your suites and übercushy home plate seats, but come to grips with the rest of your locations being fine and dandy but not Rockefeller & Vanderbilt and price accordingly. Price realistically. Remember that your customer, ultimately, is not some imaginary high-roller with $204 to drop at will, but the diehard Mets fan who comes out in the rain on a Monday night in September when there are objectively better things to watch on television so he or she can see his or her favorite team play and — hopefully — beat the Pirates.

Do more for that person than telling him or her that this one time, we’re gonna give you a break…but just this one time.

Report From Citizens Bank Park North

Things that went wrong in one Mets fan’s day:

* The Mets didn’t get a single runner to second base. What a dull, listless game this was. I remember Chris Carter nearly letting a ball go over his head in left and Jose Reyes smacking a single off Roy Oswalt. Everything else isn’t just forgotten — it didn’t register in the first place.

* Jerry Manuel continued to dare the Mets to fire him early, spouting insane nonsense about winning games as justification for sticking a Quadruple-A warm body in Luis Hernandez on the field while Ruben Tejada sits on the bench instead of continuing to learn lessons that could pay off in 2011. This has gone far beyond Jerry’s usual genial stupidity and become out-and-out dereliction of duty. By trying to smear lipstick on his pig of a record, Manuel is stealing wins from his successor and from 2011.

* There is no sign that anyone in the Mets’ dysfunctional joke of a front office is interested in stopping this. Perhaps their time is taken up by egging the press on in publicly shaming players, in hopes that will stop sportswriters and fans from remembering who gave those players dumb contracts in the first place. I differentiate between the treatment of Castillo and Perez and that afforded Beltran, by the way. Castillo and Perez were bullied by people who should man up and release them, but they had lousy excuses for being Walter Reed no-shows, so I’m not too worked up. Beltran had a reason for his absence, and what’s been done to him is character assassination that’s both shameful and self-defeating.

* Customer service continues to decay ominously at Citi Field, with concession lines moving at the speed of continental drift as workers shuffle around with glazed looks in their eyes. At one point Greg asked me, “When did this place turn back into Shea?” I just shook my head sadly.

* It rained. I’m trying to figure out how this is Jerry Manuel’s fault. He certainly didn’t help, how’s that?

* If going by noise, the crowd was perhaps 45% Phillies fans. I know a body count wouldn’t reflect that — it’s no particular surprise that fans of a team gunning for a division title and watching Oswalt made more noise than shell-shocked fans of a bad, boring, star-crossed disaster. But our row had more Phillies fans than Mets fans, and there were speckles of red everywhere you looked.

* As a bonus, the guy behind me was the single stupidest fan I’ve ever sat near who wasn’t wearing a Yankee hat. I didn’t mind that he was cheering full-throttle for the enemy — that’s his right. What got me was that he’d apparently never been to a game: On one utterly routine 6-3 groundout, he inhaled sharply as Wilson Valdez scooped up the ball, babbled “c’mon c’mon c’mon c’mon” as Valdez lobbed it over to beat a jogging Met, then exploded with joy when the ball plopped into Ryan Howard’s mitt. He did this for 27 outs. I wanted to strangle him, learn CPR, revive him, then strangle him again.

* The U.S. Open exists.

* Game 2 of the Cyclones’ New York-Penn League Championship Series was rained out, foiling my shot at seeing a climactic Game 3 in which the Cyclones could win a title. Game 3 will still happen if the Cyclones win Game 2, but it would be on Tuesday night, meaning I can’t go. Stupid Jerry Manuel.

Things that went right in one Mets fan’s day:

* Jon Niese pitched well, got one of the Mets’ four hits, and drew a walk.

* I got to sit companionably for a bit with my co-blogger and Stephanie, his lovely, kind and patient wife.

* The sight of my kid in a green raincoat and screaming yellow blingy giveaway sunglasses. Imagine if “I’m Still Here” came with a flashback of Joaquin Phoenix in character, but as a seven-year-old. It looked like that. Made me laugh.

* The food’s still good. Carnitas = win.

* The game was boring and depressing, but it was over in a tidy two hours and 15 minutes.

Turn Around, Pelfrey

It’s great that Mike Pelfrey turned around his performance from Labor Day when he stunk out Nationals Park. He was, on Saturday at Citi Field, a breath of fresh air, holding the Phillies runless for seven innings. Pelf certainly held his own as long as he could, until the eighth when the Phillies began to nick away in earnest at his 4-0 lead. So Jerry Manuel comes out to get him, one of those few times I’m glad to see Jerry emerge from the dugout. Pelf was clearly done.

Funny thing, I flashed back to the early days of Manuel when everything he did was a breath of fresh air, including insisting the pitcher coming out remain on the mound long enough to greet the pitcher coming in. It was an encouraging sign of teamwork, and as long the 2008 Mets were winning, it seemed substantial. Now and then since then I’ve noticed the removed pitcher not remaining. Saturday I paid attention to the exchange to see if Jerry’s old edict still had legs.

Pelfrey indeed stayed and waited for Bobby Parnell. Hey, I thought, that’s the way to go, that’s the way for a starter to transition to a reliever, that’s the way for the Mets to work together toward a hard-earned win. Yet as I was forming that thought, Tim McCarver pointed out an uncomfortable truth.

Mike Pelfrey stood on the mound during the entire pitching change interlude with his back to Jerry Manuel. And when Parnell arrived at the mound, the ball was transferred to Bobby’s glove not by Jerry, but by Mike. All told, it constituted a breach of baseball “etiquette,” according to Tim.

If you want to talk etiquette, being left to listen to Tim McCarver and talking mannequin Matt Vasgersian for nine innings goes against the courtesy television networks used to show its viewers on Saturday afternoons. We used to be handed our baseball by the likes of Curt Gowdy, Tony Kubek, Vin Scully, Bob Costas (before his sanctimony gland exploded) and Sean McDonough. They were all class acts in their time, just as Tim McCarver ruled the airwaves in his time…which has mostly passed. Fox’s booth is a nightmare in broad daylight no matter who’s manning it on a given Saturday, and our old pal Timmy isn’t helping. McCarver long ago lost his analytical fastball and, unlike Tom Seaver in his White Sox days, doesn’t deliver much on just guts and guile.

But once in a while, Timmy can rear back and fire a most astute observation like he used to with aplomb, back when he was all-world on local and national broadcasts. In this case, in the eighth inning, he threw a perfect strike when he noticed and articulated the scene on the mound.

Just what the fudge was Mike Pelfrey doing out there with his back to Jerry Manuel?

Soon enough Mets ownership will turn its back on Jerry Manuel. His contract will expire and there will be no earthly reason to offer him another one. The fresh air from the summer of ’08 long ago went stale. Jerry manages without a clue almost every game — and before every game. Take the latest trend in lineups, the one that has made everyday staples of Lucas Duda and Luis Hernandez.

Duda is plainly overmatched at this stage of his nascent career. An .036 average speaks softly and indicates the kid has yet to carry any kind of stick. Still, if your goal is to size Duda up, well, OK, go ahead and get his measure (bring lots of tape). You’ve got Nick Evans sitting around most games until the sixth inning, but if you’ve made up your mind that Nick is yesterday’s news and Lucas is potentially an essential part of your future, what the hell, it’s September, we’re 11½ out with 20 to play…sure, go with Duda.

Sayeth Jerry, “I still believe he’s going to be a good hitter. It’s a matter of him getting a couple of hits in one game. I will try to find what I think are good matchups for him, but in the National League East it’s tough.”

But then how do you explain the sudden prevalence of Luis Hernandez? He could be the utility infielder of 2011…maybe. At first glance, he doesn’t seem all that uninterchangeable with — to use recent examples — Ramon Martinez or Wilson Valdez (the one we had, not the superstar Wilson Valdez on the Phillies) or Anderson Hernandez or Justin Turner or Joaquin Arias or whoever can be picked up at a moment’s notice. Still, he’s hit the ball well and he’s caught the ball well. Not much of a baserunner, judging by his getting himself doubled off second on a short pop to the outfield, but we all make mistakes. Somebody needs to scout Luis Hernandez a little…sure, play Hernandez.

Yet Jerry Manuel’s reasoning for wanting to trot this heretofore unknown quantity out to the infield day after day is Luis Hernandez gives the Mets a chance to win: “If we think we have people that are playing well, we’ve still got to try to win games. With some of the things we lack offensively, Hernandez gives us a good shot offensively.”

Ruben Tejada, your 20-year-old second baseman through the part of the season when the team was playing its best, won’t get the benefit of the extra reps provided by playing out the string. He had started to hit a bit before Hernandez showed up and became the latest object of Manuel’s fickle affections. Ruben may not be the ultimate answer at second (though I think he could be), yet he seems a more viable candidate to fill a key role on the 2011 Mets than Luis Hernandez does.

Who do you want seeing more major league pitching while there’s still time and nothing of great significance on the table in terms of standings: Luis Hernandez or Ruben Tejada? (Wow, what a question for this season to come down to.) If your answer is Hernandez and your reason is you perceive him capable of getting a few more hits than Tejada, then why grind Duda and his .036 down to the nub? Why not try a shot of Evans or Jesus Feliciano in left for a few consecutive games? I don’t know that either of those guys is your key to winning in the next three weeks, but is Duda? And, though I’d like the Mets to finish over .500, does it really matter?

Jerry’s mind turned his back on us long before we turned our collective back on him. He will deserve to go when the time comes, about ten minutes after the final out of the 162nd game of the year…no question, as the man himself likes to say.

But the man also deserves to be looked in the eye by his starting pitcher when he comes to the mound to remove him. I don’t know what goes on behind the scenes with Jerry Manuel and Mike Pelfrey — or in the head of Mike Pelfrey — but standing with his back to his manager in front of 35,000 fans and however many of us were watching on television…you don’t do that. You just don’t. I don’t care if Pelf was mad about being taken out of the game or is mad about Manuel calling him an enigma (which is a good word for it) or has issues over how the team is run. I don’t care that he knows there will be no long-term repercussions since Jerry is out of the manager’s office by no later than sundown October 3.

That was a passive-aggressive little hissyfit pulled by Pelfrey and it was uncalled for. In the realm of things I can only divine from a distance, it made me madder at Pelf than I was at the so-called treacherous three who didn’t visit Walter Reed the other day. Draw your own conclusions on that invented scandal, but that hospital trip was framed explicitly as a voluntary goodwill mission. Goodwill ideally should have been expended by all considering what Walter Reed is for and who is laid up in there, and a team ideally should act as a team in those situations (pending foundation meetings, et al), but it’s quite clear it wasn’t a mandatory expedition.

It is mandatory that you show your manager basic respect on the mound when he comes to get you. You face him and you hand him the ball. That’s not off-field stuff. That’s part and parcel of your business. Sulk in the dugout or beat up a Gatorade cooler or stuff a towel in your mouth after you take your leave. Throw your hissyfit in the runway or the clubhouse. There are ways and there are ways to do things. There is, per Tim McCarver as well as common sense, etiquette.

Mike Pelfrey pitched a good ballgame Saturday. He’s going to have to pitch more of them, whoever’s managing him next year. A lot will be piled onto that big back of his with Johan Santana recovering from shoulder surgery. Any day’s starter is the ace of the staff in my view, but it’s Pelf who stands to be first among aces come April. An ace wants to compete and not come out of a game and is prone to fuming with frustration when he can’t finish what he started, but an ace also does the right thing. Tom Seaver, Dwight Gooden, Al Leiter, Johan Santana…I don’t remember seeing any of them show such blatant disrespect to their manager, whoever managed them. I don’t remember seeing it from Oliver Perez, for crissake.

C’mon Pelf. Be as Big as we always say you are.

Standard September Mets Loss Blog Post

Expression of resigned exasperation with latest result.

Acknowledgement that result doesn’t matter at this stage of season, yet it is always frustrating to encounter this sort of result.

Link to article spelling out game details.

Snarky aside.

Key example of what went wrong in game.

Assertion of saving grace, focusing on how this was just one game and player who committed key example of what went wrong in game will hopefully improve.

Snide allusion to disliked secondary player’s particularly poor performance.

Expression of resigned exasperation that big picture is as bleak as latest result.

Link to article about newest discouraging development.

Passing attempt to project what newest discouraging development means for foreseeable future.

Explicit admission that future can’t be foreseen but newest discouraging development is indeed discouraging.

Weaving together of various recent discouraging developments so as to suggest overarching discouraging trend that makes rooting for team difficult.

Allusion to most embarrassing recent discouraging development that constitutes most disturbing manifestation of trend.

Link to terrible article illustrating dimwitted coverage of recent discouraging development.

Link to good article serving as counterweight to dimwitted coverage.

Half-hearted analysis of most embarrassing recent discouraging development (undermined by personal conviction that most recent discouraging development was very much a non-story, yet not commenting on it at all after a few days doesn’t feel right, either).

Link to archived blog post to demonstrate longstanding pattern of discouraging developments.

Conclusion of analysis finding all parties are at least partially at fault (should include at least one point nobody else has made).

Assertion of enduring fondness for team in spite of all prevailing evidence that team has become too exasperating to inspire any fondness whatsoever.

Expression of dismay that season will soon be over in spite of latest result, recent discouraging developments and bleak big picture.

Link to archived blog post from when things were better to serve as reminder that things aren’t always this bad.

Gratuitous reference to Mike Hessman (optional).