The blog for Mets fans
who like to read

ABOUT US

Greg Prince and Jason Fry
Faith and Fear in Flushing made its debut on Feb. 16, 2005, the brainchild of two longtime friends and lifelong Met fans.

Greg Prince discovered the Mets when he was 6, during the magical summer of 1969. He is a Long Island-based writer, editor and communications consultant. Contact him here.

Jason Fry is a Brooklyn writer whose first memories include his mom leaping up and down cheering for Rusty Staub. Check out his other writing here.

Got something to say? Leave a comment, or email us at faithandfear@gmail.com. (Sorry, but we have no interest in ads, sponsored content or guest posts.)

Need our RSS feed? It's here.

Visit our Facebook page, or drop by the personal pages for Greg and Jason.

Or follow us on Twitter: Here's Greg, and here's Jason.

Shine On, You Diamond in the Rough

Wonderful profile from Brian Costa of the Star-Ledger on the more than humble background of dream closer (or perhaps starter) Jenrry Mejia:

Six years ago, Jenrry Mejia did not own a glove. He did not have a bat. He had no use for a ball.

The tools of his trade were a brush, a piece of cloth and a container of shoe polish. That was all Mejia needed when he left his house in Santo Domingo each morning and walked 30 minutes to the downtown cafe where he made his living.

On an island where baseball is like a religion, Mejia preferred shining shoes for 300 pesos a day, the equivalent of about $8.

Jenrry Mejia may appear to be The Natural reincarnated, but he didn’t start playing ball until he was 15 years old, a mere five years ago. There was no money in baseball when he was kid. He had to shine shoes to make a living.

Mejia grew up in a neighborhood called Herrera, near what was once Santo Domingo’s primary airport. He lived with his parents and his younger brother.

“Mucho pobre” is how Mejia described the area. Very poor.

Mejia started shining shoes when he was 11. He didn’t necessarily enjoy the work, but he took pride in earning money when other kids he knew were picking pockets.

“I didn’t want to steal,” he said.

He may not and maybe should not make the Mets as soon as I want him to — which is right this very minute — but he’ll be earning plenty before long if all goes right with our world (for a change). And when it does, and our good fella is facing, say, the Marlins, I look forward to him delivering a salient message to the first big Fish he sees.

Electric Youth

This talk of Jenrry Mejia starting the season as the setup man for K-Rod is ridiculous. If the season starts today, Mejia’s my closer.

Oh, if talent only made it so.

It won’t happen that way, but Jenrry is looking inevitable. It will take a bad case of evitablity — or yet another wave of Prevention & Recovery — to keep him off this team, assuming the way Mejia’s pitches move isn’t a mirage. Only an OutKast among Mets wouldn’t say, “I like the way they move.”

I sure hope I’m not seeing Julio Machado or Josias Manzanillo or Ju-ever out there when I look at Jenrry Mejia. I penciled those fellows in as oughta-be closers in their day based on larger samples. Alas, their day never really came. Jenrry Mejia Day is coming, though, and April 5 is as good a date as any to hold it.

Frankie Rodriguez needs to work the pink out of his eye. Let him set up Mejia like he set up Troy Percival long ago, back when K-Rod was unhittable (back when K-Rod was Jen-Mej). Let Parnell work the seventh. Let Sean Green park cars.

Take Me Out to Jack Murphy Stadium

Welcome to Flashback Friday: Take Me Out to 34 Ballparks, a celebration, critique and countdown of every major league ballpark one baseball fan has been fortunate enough to visit in a lifetime of going to ballgames.

BALLPARK: Jack Murphy Stadium
LATER KNOWN AS: Qualcomm Stadium
HOME TEAM: San Diego Padres
VISITS: 1
VISITED: June 20, 1996
CHRONOLOGY: 16th of 34
RANKING: 33rd of 34

I think it would be pleasant to go to a public park, find something to eat, watch some guys play ball and maybe wander around a bit. It was pleasant, actually. Stephanie and I did that at Jack Murphy Stadium.

Pleasant beats unpleasant every time. But pleasant’s not the same thing as big league, and there was something about seeing a Padres game in their original home that felt less than major. It wasn’t bad — pleasant can’t be bad — but it didn’t fill me with anything approaching awe.

Did I mention the pleasant factor was off the charts?

In my travels, I’ve had my expectations unmet and I’ve had my expectations exceeded. At the Murph (which it was still called in 1996, thankfully), I had few expectations. I’d had only one strong image of the place from all those years of staying up late to watch the Mets on the unglamorous stop of their West Coast road trips. It was the night in 1986 when Kevin McReynolds, then a Padre, was batting and he fouled a ball straight back into a square cutout in the backstop. I think it was there for a camera, but it appeared empty, much like the Murph all those late nights. Channel 9 played the disappearing foul over and over again to much McCarver and Zabriskie laughter. McReynolds remained stoic, hinting at the vibrant personality he’d bring to the Mets a year later.

Jack Murphy Stadium was that black, square-shaped hole to me. A mystery, and not one on which I’d expended much concentration as soon as the Mets would leave town. When I formed a squishy goal of someday seeing every major league ballpark, I wondered what on earth I’d be doing in San Diego to get Jack Murphy taken care of. It would have to be part of something bigger.

And it was. The previous December, as an all-encompassing birthday/holiday present to Stephanie and me, my sister and brother-in-law thoughtfully favored us with some of their frequent-flier miles and use of their Los Angeles-area apartment (a.k.a. their de facto West Coast office). They even threw in a few gift certificates to some local restaurants. Truly they are sweethearts that way. Natch, as non-fans, they’d been camping out in Southern California a few times a year for several years by then, and it’s fair to say they never particularly noticed there were three baseball teams operating in the general vicinity.

For us, that was the attraction. It never even occurred to them that was the only reason we graciously accepted their generous gesture. I mean, really, is there something else to do in Southern California?

I studied schedules, found a week when the Angels, the Padres and Dodgers would all be home and put in for vacation time. We flew out in the middle of June for the only reason I can think of spending more than a couple of days anywhere: to visit three ballparks.

San Diego was the middle of the itinerary, a Thursday afternoon against the Cubs. We started out from L.A. in the morning, in unusually fine driving fettle. It looked a little dreary on the way down. Rain in San Diego? Unpossible, as Ralph Wiggum would affirm. That was the notorious Marine Layer we were facing. Ralph Kiner — who is no Ralph Wiggum — informed us that was a staple of San Diego existence, and that it burns off by noon.

Ralph Kiner, former GM of the old Pacific Coast League Padres, was absolutely right. It was sunny and warm in Mission Valley. The stadium was kind of tucked away, but we found it with little ordeal. Security said I couldn’t keep my bottle of water, an accessory I’d begun to carry as a matter of course. I grumbled but dutifully tossed it. Concessions said they couldn’t rustle up a program. I grumbled some more, as I always bought a program in a new ballpark. There were a couple of glitches, but we were in the place with the square hole.

Per usual, I was wearing my Mets cap, which drew the attention of an usher who said something mildly disparaging but harmless, like “Mets? Why?” I explained we were New Yorkers on a baseball tour, that we had been in Anaheim the day before. “It would be nice if the Cowboy could win one of these years,” the usher volunteered. Nice of him to worry about Gene Autry, I thought. Nothing, he said, was going well for the Padres. Indeed, San Diego had gotten off to a fast start in 1996, but losing had set in: the Pads had lost 15 of its last 17 as a 6½-game lead in the West had become fourth place, two games out. Same old Padres.

But it was all new to us. I feigned concern to the usher and we went about our usual stance of rooting for the home team as long as it had no adverse impact on the Mets.

There was some color to the Padres now, and it wasn’t the drab brown that had been their trademark in the McReynolds days. They had a guy walking around dressed as a Friar, and we cheered his appearance. A couple more guys wore skinhead wigs to approximate Wally Joyner’s pate. Wally World had taken his act down the coast in ’96 and was batting .321 before his recent injury (which coincided with the 2-15 skid). We cheered for them, too. We got behind Tony Gwynn (.326 at the start of play) and Rickey Henderson (16 steals in his first year as a National Leaguer) and Chris Gomez (someone I kind of adopted a few years earlier in Toronto, but I’ll save that for the SkyDome entry). We were temp Padre fans.

It was all good fun. After a while, though, it just fell…flat. You know, like watching Kevin McReynolds for too long. Palm Trees had recently been potted over the outfield fence, which was the one architectural distinction to the venue. After a while, you stared at the palm trees and they seemed out of place at a baseball game. That’s when it began to feel like a public park. That’s when we decided to get up and seek out a snack bar.

I’d prepared for this trip as I usually did, with a ballpark guide of some sort. The one I had in 1996 said you’ve gotta try the fish tacos at Jack Murphy Stadium, they’re a local specialty. I try to do the When In Rome things, so off we went in search of fish tacos.

To reel in fish tacos, you went to a special stand, Rubio’s. You could buy ’em and bring ’em back to your seats, but there was a patio full of tables and chairs at which you could enjoy ’em. I’d read about that in the guide book as well. It was rather unorthodox to be at a baseball game and sit somewhere that wasn’t facing the field — the tables and chairs offered a view of the parking lot, with monitors for game action — but we tried it. I didn’t care for not watching the game. And I didn’t really like fish tacos.

Back at our seats, I noticed two more things I’d never before seen at a ballgame. One was a pitch count on the scoreboard. Very big letters and numbers telling us just how many balls and strikes Tim Worrell, Jaime Navarro and the relievers who succeeded them had thrown. At first I was mesmerized. Then I was distracted. I could live without knowing pitch counts.

The other thing was the out-of-town scoreboard which, during the latter stages of the game, began posting notes about the Mets’ game in Cincinnati. The hell with the Padres and Cubs. What were the Mets doing? It wasn’t the first time I eyed an out-of-town scoreboard to keep up with the Mets, but it was the first time I had done so at three time zones’ remove. I was so incredibly confused. The Mets are playing a night game, but it’s bright and sunny and the middle of the afternoon here in San Diego. It’s 4 o’clock? How can that be, when my internal alarm is set to Met Standard? And why won’t they tell me anything beyond the fact that Bobby Jones is facing Dave Burba?

My attention wandered to the banks of the Ohio River, but we still rooted for the Padres, but with less and less conviction. Joynerless and punchless, the locals didn’t score until the eighth, pulling to 3-2 on an eighth-inning two-run blast by pinch-hitter Marc Newfield. The Friar and the Joyners and we applauded heartily. Gwynn led off the bottom of the ninth with a single, stirring things further, but the Cubs brought in that crazy Turk Wendell and he retired the final three Padres. Chicago held on 3-2. San Diego had lost 16 of 18.

We filed out, counterintuitively bought a program by the exit, got in our rental car, checked into the nearby Holiday Inn, grabbed some Chinese Food at the strip mall next door and sprung for The Birdcage on hotel pay-per-view. Next day, we visited the world-famous San Diego Zoo and, in the immortal words of Lobo, motored stately into big L.A.

It was all very pleasant. It was Jack Murphy Stadium.

We Believe in Setbacks

Jose Reyes is not running. He’s not swinging. He’s not fielding or throwing. He’s not functioning as a baseball player. We understand today he’s resting. With any luck, he’s healing.

But he’s a Met, so I wouldn’t go that far.

Reyes’s thyroid condition has sidelined him for a truly Metsian prognosis of two to eight weeks. Nobody is sidelined from two to eight weeks. Nobody is projected as out from doing anything — not just playing — within a range of 14 days to 56 days. What this means, I’m going to guess, is nobody really knows what exactly is wrong with Jose Reyes or, more pertinently, what it will take to get him back to being a fulltime Met.

Right now, he’s a ghost, hovering over this organization. He and Carlos Beltran, both still on the roster, neither by any means active, each allegedly en route at some point. When 2009 became 2010, we were told this team would be better than the team before it because we’d have, once again, two of our three indispensable men in the lineup every day. “Don’t count on it,” the little Met voice in my head said. “Don’t necessarily count on guys who played 81 games and 36 games the season before.” I wasn’t ready to count on anybody who missed significant time due to injury, including Santana, Niese, Nieve, whoever. In Beltran’s case, it was the knee then, it’s the knee now. In Reyes’s case, nobody could have seen the thyroid coming. We were worried about hamstrings. The hammies are supposedly fine. The thyroid?

The thyroid?

My mother had a thyroid condition. I don’t think it was overactive; quite the opposite, actually. Reyes is a damn sight more athletic than most people’s moms (and dads). Jose Reyes is as athletic a Met as we’ve ever seen. We look forward to seeing him again, on the run, turning the DP, lashing one into the gap that was theoretically created for him. We look forward to him being as healthy a human being as he can be and, because we’re Mets fans, we’d like that to translate into a permanent return that begins to shape up 14 days from now rather than 56…or never.

In the meantime, I looked at the early innings of today’s exhibition game. Cora was at short, just like a lot of last year. Pagan was in the outifield, just like a lot of last year. Castillo…to be fair, he’s supposed to be at second this year, but he reminded me of 2009, too. It was raining and it was 2009 on SNY. Then the rain got to be too much and they put a tarp on the field and the 1963 Yearbook on the air. It cheered me up. That team won 51 games and was a signpost of progress relative to 1962. Then the rain ended, and 2010 is back on the screen, and it’s just minor league scrubs per Spring Training usual, yet I can’t escape the sense that 2009 is in the clubhouse, getting ready for Opening Day.

It’s a lot closer than Jose Reyes is right now.

Better Know a City

What are you doing Sunday, March 21 and Saturday, March 27? You ought to be getting to better know New York’s baseball heritage. And you can, thanks to our friend historian Peter Laskowich starting up his truly marvelous tours once more.

As we’ve mentioned on several occasions, Peter will bring you directly into the DNA of New York with intertwined journeys into its baseball and into its history. You show up, you take a walk, you take a train — and you end up going places you didn’t know exist.

It’s well worth the time (a few hours that fly by) and the investment (25 bucks — a fair price in general and a bargain by Citi Field standards) to learn where we came from as New York baseball fans and Mets fans.

Peter is an engaging educator and excellent companion (and a Mets fan from the New Breed days). “Tour guide” does not do him justice. He will take you on a tour all right, but it goes beyond “…and on your right, you see a bridge.”

You will see a bridge. And you will see where it leads. And you will follow the trails beyond that. You will understand as you never have before why things are where they are and how they are. You’ll get a good bit of why answered as well.

You’re a Mets fan. You read Faith and Fear. I know you’re ball-curious. Feed that curiosity. Get together with Peter Laskowich over the course of a couple of weekends — the 21st in Brooklyn, the 27th in Manhattan. You’ll be glad you did.

Visit New York Dynamic for more information.

Small Sample Size

The 2010 Citi Field promotional date that has me most excited? It’s gotta be the retiring of 76 and 78.

Sure, we’ll be disappointed to learn that Ike Davis and Jenrry Mejia have bowed to the world-wide clamor and agreed to curtail their electrifying rookie seasons and report for immediate induction to Cooperstown, but we’ve known since about mid-May that they already belonged to the ages, and we were merely borrowing them for the briefest of times.

Ike Davis is 11 for 21 with two very long home runs and an increasingly Paul Bunyanesque legend. (I saw him with the Cyclones a couple of years back and he looked huge and immobile. I’m no scout.) Jenrry Mejia has thrown 33 Grapefruit League pitches and watched 27 of them get recorded as strikes. Small sample size? Pssht. Take it somewhere else, Bill James. You can stack our young heroes’ ages one atop the other and not get one El Duque? Age and experience hasn’t gotten us anywhere except the DL. We’re ready for a summer of ESPN riffs on Mets fans declaring I LIKE IKE and copy editors and play-by-play guys driven to drink by the first name of a pitcher who’s not old enough to join them. Besides, if we weren’t talking about Ike and Jenrry we’d be exchanging hosannas about a suddenly resurgent Fernando Martinez or the supernatural Chris Carter, he of the two home runs in one inning. Or how about that Hisanori Takahashi, who may not be young but is Japanese, which has been the only faster ticket to Met disaster for a decade or so.

You’d think those who live by small sample size would also die by small sample size, but the happy hypocrisy of spring training doesn’t abide such logic. A good couple of days is enough to vault a prospect to “promising,” “eye-opening” or “major-league ready,” but a veteran hitting a bump or two or four is inevitably focusing on his basics, knows to take it slow, or will be ready when the bell rings. Witness Johan Santana today — his pitches were up, he got cuffed around, and everything’s fine.

I’m just trying to enjoy it. It’s what March is for, ideally: kids with quick bats and lightning arms, second- and third-year guys who’ve turned corners, veterans with things to prove, and all the other gleeful cliches of the Grapefruit League. I like my glasses when they’re not just half-full but the products of a pause in pouring. Besides, like we want to talk about pink eye or wrecked shoulders or overenthusiastic thyroids, or the fact that it’s a good stretch when Oliver Perez spreads 27 strikes over 33 batters, or anything that happened in 2009.

It’s March, man. Don’t be a bringdown. That’s what April’s for.

Remember: Amazin’ Tuesdays will return on March 23 at 7 p.m., at Two Boots. Details here.

AMAZIN' TUESDAYS Return!

Mark your calendars, your Blackberries and your whatever ya got for March 23 at 7 PM and the return of AMAZIN’ TUESDAYS to Two Boots Tavern, the Lower East Side’s foremost bastion of Metsdom.

The Mets-themed reading and venting series that was infinitely more successful in 2009 than the team on which it focused makes its 2010 debut just as Spring Training will be growing interminable and the wait for Opening Day will be passing intolerable. We — that’s Jon Springer of Mets By The Numbers and I — are pleased to reignite our regular Metsfests by welcoming two distinctly Metsian voices to the Two Boots stage: the Mets Poet, Frank Messina, author of Full Count; and Edward Hoyt, a major contributor to the must-have 1969 tribute volume, The Miracle Has Landed. Both are gifted Met writers and sincere Met thinkers. You’ll enjoy hearing from them both.

In addition to bringing a Met baseball card and having Two Boots proprietor Phil Hartman buy you a beer, you will have the opportunity to purchase a copy of the brand new paperback edition of Faith and Fear in Flushing: An Intense Personal History of the New York Mets, signed by the author (me again), for 10 bucks. All proceeds from FAFIF sales at Two Boots on March 23 will go to Sharon Chapman’s marathon fundraising efforts on behalf of the Tug McGraw Foundation and its fight against brain cancer — more about which you can learn here. The paperback edition includes an epilogue on the first season at Citi Field, in case you were wondering if it’s the same exact book you already read.

(I’m not 100% sure right now how many copies I’ll have on hand, but you can contribute to Sharon’s and Tug’s cause that night and I’ll be sure to mail you out a book, inscribed any way you like, shortly thereafter.)

Great pizza, fine beverages and an evening of Mets talk while they’re still 0-0. Who can ask for anything more? We look forward to seeing you in two weeks.

Two Boots Tavern is at 384 Grand St., between Norfolk and Suffolk. You can take the F to Delancey; the J, M or Z to Essex; or the B or D to Grand. Phone: 212/228-8685.

The Bare Locker

The Academy would like to pause for a moment to remember those Mets who have left us in the past year…

Casey Fossum, 2009
Who says the Mets don’t honor their heritage? Tuesday night they went to St. Louis, where they played their first National League game just over 47 years ago, and paid homage to the 1962 Mets by dropping a game below .500 and appearing en route to 40-120. […] A feller named Casey was right in the middle of it…looking approximately 71 years old.
—April 22, 2009

Emil Brown, 2009
When you think back over the first third of this season and the way Mets have regularly fallen down in the outfield, stepped gingerly around third base and not slid into home, the only surprising part of Luis Castillo going this-a-way and Emil Brown going that-a-way in their “morning, Sam…morning Ralph” homage is that something like it hadn’t happened sooner…and perhaps that Daniel Murphy wasn’t involved.
—June 7, 2009

Lance Broadway, 2009
By entering in the sixth and pitching three meaningless and not particularly effective innings, Lance Broadway became the 51st different player to play for the New York Mets in 2009. This means we’re three players away from tying the record for most Mets in one season. For that you can thank whatever voodoo takes down three different shortstops, 60% of a rotation and…well, mostly everybody.
—August 30, 2009

Brandon Knight, 2008
I saw a pitcher I’d never heard of until like a week ago throw the kind of first inning generally reserved for Hall of Famers when their teams need them most: a horrible one. But Brandon Knight, unlike he who shall not be named, pulled himself together after throwing a number of pitches (39) higher than the number on his uniform (28).
—July 27, 2008

Jon Switzer, 2009
Jon Switzer made an instantly persuasive case that he is not the answer to the search for that other lefty in the pen.
—June 12, 2009

Angel Berroa, 2009
“Fellas, forget it. You can’t shut down an Angel Berroa in clutch situations.”
—July 30, 2009

Darren O’Day, 2009
Darren O’Day looked stunned; I was not. No, I was numb, waiting with the dull, sour expectation I imagine (though this is unconfirmable) is shared by veteran skydivers when the reserve chute doesn’t open either.
—April 10, 2009

Ken Takahashi, 2009
Ken Takahashi welcom[ed] himself to the big leagues with a custom-made 1-2-6 DP (FYI, Jerry Manuel thinks his name is Takahishi).
—May 2, 2009

Cory Sullivan, 2009
For posterity: Mike Pelfrey was bad. Cory Sullivan was briefly good. Mets lost in Florida. None of this matters.
—August 27, 2009

Tony Armas, 2008
Pitched OK in winning his first start against the Cardinals, threw a scoreless inning against the Phillies, then got bombed in the 10-9 win the Mets recorded against the Phils in homage to Bob Murphy’s “They win the damn thing” call. And that was his year. U&H card, God knows why.
—November 22, 2008

Wilson Valdez, 2009
Wilson Valdez seeks a new assignment, having been designated for exactly that.
—June 22, 2009

Robinson Cancel, 2008-2009
Most of our 2008 grace notes have been delivered by the likes of Nelson Figueroa and Nick Evans and Fernando Tatis. Why shouldn’t Robinson Cancel join the parade of Mets who will never adorn the cover of the pocket schedule but can at least claim to have attached themselves to one of its squares? Or in Robinson Cancel’s case, the unscheduled half of one.
—June 16, 2008

Ramon Martinez, 2008-2009
[T]he steady veteran hand of Ramon Martinez plugged the hole and wisely, calmly threw to first for the ballgame, while callow youths Jose Coronado, Ruben Tejada and Jonathan Malo each gained valuable experience on the farm.
—May 24, 2009

Jeremy Reed, 2009
Except the first baseman is a leftfielder whose literal lack of a glove has been a running storyline for days and he’s not terribly accustomed to his surroundings. Jeremy Reed makes like it’s stoopball except without a stoop. He throws the Spaldeen as hard as he can, well out of Ramon Castro’s range, Loretta scores, the night and the morning are over, the misery lingers. Whoa. What a tragicomic event.
—May 19, 2009

J.J. Putz, 2009
Intimidating AC/DC fanfare notwithstanding, J.J. Putz failed to leave the Marlins thunderstruck.
—April 29, 2009

Tim Redding, 2009
Could Tim Redding throw the Mets’ first no-hitter? No, I soon found out…
—September 20, 2009

Argenis Reyes, 2008-09
But here’s the thing you’ve got to know: Argenis Reyes’s team won the first ten games in which he played. I can find no evidence of any other Met in 48 seasons being able to say the same thing. I looked.
—January 12, 2010

Liván Hernandez, 2009
First, you gotta start with how it ended, which was with Liván Hernandez, the human petrol pump, dispensing every last pitch the Mets’ tank would require. How many? I heard 127. Did it matter? Not really. Honestly, what does Liván Hernandez have to do but pitch? Everybody else’s arm is always being saved for a next start. Liván’s not about conservation. Liván’s about mileage.
—May 27, 2009

Duaner Sanchez, 2006; 2008
[W]hat the fudge is up with Duaner Sanchez? Last year we discovered Duaner, Duaner discovered Queens and all was good with the world until Cecil Wiggins discovered his car keys. We enter these seasons taking several things for granted based on widely held assumptions. One of them was that Sanchez overcame the car wreck, the surgery, the winter and now he’d be ready for Opening Day. It appears very much that he won’t be. And that’s cool, because who the hell are we to tell a guy who’s been through that kind of trauma to get his body in gear exactly when we want it? But Duaner, you can get to camp on time every morning. That’s big with managers and coaches.
—March 10, 2007

Brian Stokes, 2008-2009
Brian Stokes [was recognized as] August Pitcher of the Month — and ponder, if you will, what kind of month rates as its flagship pitcher Brian Stokes…
—September 23, 2009

Gary Sheffield, 2009
Maybe Gary Sheffield isn’t a 2009 Met come the middle of 2009. Maybe. But on April 17, he was. His 500th homer as a Met in black felt fair. Maybe he should have been here all along. Maybe he and Doc should have played together as Mets; maybe, in the mythology we fans like to construct for our would-be heroes, they would have kept each other on their respective straights and narrows.
—April 18, 2009

Ryan Church, 2008-2009
Will Ryan Church be the Mets’ regular starting rightfielder in 2009? Jerry Manuel says yes. Recent and even distant history say absolutely not. He probably won’t even be here come 2010. Why so fatalistic where Churchy is concerned? Because after carefully studying the relevant pages of baseball-reference, I have concluded there is no such thing as a regular starting rightfielder on the New York Mets.
—February 24, 2009

Brian Schneider, 2008-2009
By dialing up his first dinger, BriSchnei killed my private statistical notation in which every individual Met’s home run total could be expressed as Schneider Plus, as in, “That was Gary Sheffield’s eighth home run of the year, or Schneider Plus Eight.” Oh well, I imagine I’ll find something else to carp about with him.
—June 20, 2009

Marlon Anderson, 2005; 2007-2009
Yet there’s the ball, not being picked up. And there’s Marlon, running hard every gosh darn step of the way. He easily has a triple. Easily. If he can get to third, he’ll be there with one out…and right, he better keep going. No way a Met brings a runner home from third. I sure hope Manny Acta is thinking the same thing. He is! Marlon has this look on his face that says “Really? Well, if you insist.” And his unremarkable body keeps chugging. Finley has the ball. He hits the cutoff man. Marlon’s run 340 feet…350 feet…357…358…he slides…another Molina awaits. Here’s the throw, there’s the play at the plate…Holy cow, I think he’s gonna make it!
—June 12, 2005

Ramon Castro, 2005-2009
Ramon Castro’s blast off Ugueth Urbina will surely stand the test of time as a touchstone in Mets history. It was a game-, season- and life-altering event. Unless we lose the next two.
—August 31, 2005

Billy Wagner, 2006-2009
In the top of the ninth, I realized the season could very well be over in a matter of seconds — and no wonder. We suck! We can’t get anybody out! Why didn’t we score more runs? Why did we sign this guy for…how many MORE years are we STUCK with him? COME ON BILLY!!! I never stood eight innings at Shea Stadium only to end the ninth slumped in my seat as a Met win was secured. I couldn’t stand and I couldn’t cheer. After spending the preceding 24 hours doing my Metsian best to Believe, I couldn’t believe we actually won.
—October 19, 2006

Carlos Delgado, 2006-2009
Amid the hand slaps, fist knocks and hip bumps the victorious first place Mets exchanged with one another after the final out of this afternoon’s game, there was an embrace. David Wright hugged Carlos Delgado. David was hugging Carlos for all of us. There isn’t a Mets fan I know of who doesn’t owe Delgado a hug. Hindsight being what it is, the time for the hug was a couple of months ago when Delgado was dragging and taking the team, we were sure, down with him. We’re not that pure of heart. We are, bottom line, results-oriented. We are often not as smart as we think we are. We saw a washed-up ex-power hitter who couldn’t or wouldn’t move around first and we were ready to trade him, release him, place him in the blue and orange bin that goes by the curb. We sure like him now.
—July 24, 2008

Leaning Forward

Next week the clocks spring ahead. Silly clocks — we’re already there. We’re running on Jenrry Mejia Daylight Savings Time. Mejia was so lights out in his exhibition debut Friday that the umps called the game on account of darkness.

This is a great time to be a Mets fan if you ignore thyroids, pink eyes and god knows what else is being prevented or recovered from. Veterans who are out have time to come back. Rookies who aren’t ready look pretty darn good right now. Guys who we may never hear of again — Mike Hessman is batting every time I turn around — are helping to rack up the runs.

It’s the hour of Mejia, the day of Hessman, the weeks of Ike Davis and Kirk Nieuwenhuis and Jason Pridie and Mike Cervenak and old man Fernando Martinez, 21 years old and slugging his way across the comeback trail. It would be surprising if any of them is lining up for an Opening Day apple. A few will probably see us later in the season or in their careers. Some will be “Mike Hessman…why does that name sound familiar? Was he in Spring Training with us one year?”

In one sense, that’s all the season preview I need on March 6. It’s fun to contemplate these names, bookmarking some for later, knowing we’ll forget a few when they don’t stick around. The only thing anybody is able to tell me for sure about the 2010 Mets is that they’ll be 0-0 on April 5. I don’t know how much I derive from these much enjoyed spring broadcasts is going to enhance my understanding or appreciation of a bunch of games that don’t count. But I am enjoying them.

In another sense, I am mainlining anticipation. I need to be immersed in who’s on these Mets, who will be on these Mets, who has been on these Mets. I need to keep getting stoked. That’s why I read blogs. That’s why I write blogs. That’s why I’m excited about two excellent products that I think you’ll enjoy as well.

First, there’s the Maple Street Press Mets Annual, full of great perspectives on everything Met. It’s got this year, it’s got the years to come, it’s got — because it has to — last year and it’s got the years from before that bring us our present and future. This is the third year MSP has published Mets Annual, and it keeps getting better. You can find it on New York-area newsstands, or you can order it here.

Then, there’s a new entry in the preview category, and it will knock your virtual socks off. It’s the Amazin’ Avenue Annual, which brings the concept of “labor of love” to a whole new level. Perhaps you read AA on a regular basis. If you don’t, you should. It’s written by a team of Mets fans who take nothing at face value and aren’t shy about drilling right past the superficial deep into the Metropolitan brain. They decided the world needed a publication that just wouldn’t quit. The AAA never ceases — instead, it keeps amazing, it keeps delighting and it keeps informing. It makes you think plenty, with a forecast for 2010, an autopsy on 2009, a sense of 2011 and a satisfying trip into the time before. The book — and it is a book — is available for free downloading here; a printed and bound copy for those who take their baseball library literally will be made obtainable at cost shortly.

I should point out Jason and I contributed* to both publications, and we’re each excited to have been a part of them. But that’s not the only reason I strongly recommend both previews. They were conceived and edited by Mets fans, they contain the insights of Mets fans, they were published with the best interests of Mets fans at heart and they will have you, my fellow Mets fans, roaring right past March into April.

*Jason covered the world of Mets blogging, and I offered a fan’s eye view of  living with Citi Field as well as a tenth-anniversary appreciation of the 2000 National League Champion Mets for the Maple Street Press book; my partner and I collaborated on an examination of “When the Mets Got Good Again,” the four seasons in which the Mets rose from 90+ losses to a winning record, for the Amazin’ Avenue preview.

Take Me Out to Olympic Stadium

Welcome to Flashback Friday: Take Me Out to 34 Ballparks, a celebration, critique and countdown of every major league ballpark one baseball fan has been fortunate enough to visit in a lifetime of going to ballgames.

BALLPARK: Olympic Stadium
HOME TEAM: Montreal Expos
VISITS: 1
VISITED: June 16, 1987
CHRONOLOGY: 5th of 34
RANKING: 34th of 34

Two things strike me as I consider the ballpark that is technically my least favorite of those I’ve visited:

1) Despite considering Olympic Stadium the worst place I ever saw a major league baseball game, I had a marvelous, memorable time there and would not want to have not experienced it.

2) Despite having had a marvelous, memorable time at Olympic Stadium, I consider it the worst place I ever saw a major league baseball game.

I think these conclusions say less about Olympic Stadium and more about baseball. Stade Olympique really was a lousy place for a game, and it didn’t matter one bit. Perhaps if I had been a Montreal Expos fan it might have gotten to me in the long term, but I was just a traveler on a pilgrimage, and I came away highly satisfied at the results of my journey. Clearly, the least impressive ballpark available is better than just about any place in the world that isn’t a ballpark.

Olympic Stadium’s No. 34 on my ballpark list — and, I don’t know, No. 36 on my life list. Where else would you rather be than at the ballpark? Even the lousiest of ballparks?

Which is what Olympic Stadium was. Lousy…yet gloriously so.

Its main drawback was it was less like a ballpark than a basement, and not the National League East kind (the Expos were doing pretty well in 1987). Or maybe it was more like a warehouse, but I don’t mean in the fun Camden Yards sense. More like those refrigerated warehouses I’d visit when I was covering beverages full-time. It was cold, there were forklifts and there was plenty of beer. Beer’s not a drawback at the ballgame, but, as you probably saw if you watched Mets @ Expos games on TV, it never looked finished.

This brings to mind one of the great things about going to a ballpark you’ve only seen on television. It’s like taking the Universal Studios tour. Look! It’s the shark from Jaws! To a great degree, you feel like you’re visiting a movie set, except everything is real, yet more so. The orange roof: really orange. The long dugouts: really long. The French: really foreign.

It was my first bilingual game (more French than English) and my first indoors game; the roof had just gotten sealed in 1987. I never got used to indoor baseball, but I can see why they planned it that way in Montreal. My friend and I were there in the middle of June, and it was not a little chilly at night.

Still, it’s unnatural. Olympic Stadium was a science experiment gone awry. If a kid could grow enough mold on a piece of bread, the result would be the same. It was just that charming.

And yet…I loved being there. I loved seeing the Olympic Stadium set. I loved baseball in two languages. I loved wandering through an indoor plaza filled with smoking Quebecers and smoked meat (even if didn’t particularly want to be singed by either). Though the attendance was middling (20,000) and the environs were dank, the scene was as festive as Olympic Stadium could be. It probably helped that the Mets were there. Mets fans liven up any scenario — we built a 7-0 lead — but Expos fans, once their team began scoring a few meaningless runs, went nuts. Or maybe those were the forklifts I heard. Whatever it was, it wasn’t sad. It was fun.

It just wasn’t as good as the other 33 ballparks I’ve attended. It was Olympic Stadium.

***

At the risk of repeating myself, I have written about this trip before in a slightly different context. For those who have somehow not committed every Flashback Friday to memory, what follows is that entry of June 8, 2007.

***

No fictional character in the popular culture — not Sidd Finch, not Chico Escuela, not Oscar Madison — has done more to enhance the Metropolitan legend than Keith Hernandez. That Keith Hernandez is technically real shouldn’t detract from his contribution to the canon one bit.

I would think that every Mets fan knows what I’m talking about, though I could be wrong. On DiamondVision during the Delgado-Benitez balk game last week, Keith appeared to ask some lucky fan which Met appeared as himself on Seinfeld. The hint couldn’t have been any plainer than the questioner’s face.

The guy they picked to answer said Tom Seaver. He still won the Uncle Jack’s prize package. I wished they’d have given it to me so I could have poured that steak sauce on his head.

The answer was Keith Hernandez. Of course it was Keith Hernandez! Who doesn’t know that? Did they find one of those people who “doesn’t look at television”? Geez!

On February 12, 1992, Keith Hernandez, his playing days not two years over, made Mets and television history by guest-starring as Keith Hernandez on the then-cult sitcom Seinfeld. He was very convincing in the role. Jerry met him at a health club and developed what we would today call a man crush on him. Elaine dated him until his smoking turned her off. And Kramer? Well he and Newman said they didn’t care for Keith Hernandez.

KRAMER: I hate KEITH HERNANDEZ — hate him!

NEWMAN: I despise him.

ELAINE: Why?

What follows is one of the great moments television has ever beamed, a dead-on parody of the film JFK in which Jerry’s neighbors explain in Zapruderish detail why they so loathe the first baseman New Yorkers so loved.

NEWMAN: June 14, 1987…Mets-Phillies. We’re enjoying a beautiful afternoon in the right field stands when a crucial Hernandez error to a five-run Phillies ninth. Cost the Mets the game.

KRAMER: Our day was ruined. There were a lot of people, you know, they were waiting by the players’ parking lot. Now we’re coming down the ramp. Newman was in front of me. Keith was coming toward us, as he passes Newman turns and says, “Nice game, pretty boy.” Keith continued past us up the ramp.

NEWMAN: A second later, something happened that changed us in a deep and profound way from that day forward.

ELAINE: What was it?

KRAMER: He spit on us. And I screamed out, “I’m hit!”

NEWMAN: Then I turned and the spit ricochet of him and it hit me.

ELAINE: Wow! What a story.

JERRY: Unfortunately the immutable laws of physics contradict the whole premise of your account.

Yes, Jerry would prove beyond all reasonable doubt there was no magic loogie — and Keith would come along in the second half of the hourlong episode to reveal the true culprit.

KEITH: Well lookit, the way I remember it I was 
walking up the ramp. I was upset about the game. That’s when you called me pretty boy. It ticked me off. I started to turn around to say something and as I turned around I saw Roger McDowell behind the bushes over by that gravelly road. Anyway he was talking to someone and they were talking to you. I tried to scream out but it was too late. It was already on its way.

JERRY: I told you!

NEWMAN: Wow, it was McDowell.

JERRY: But why? Why McDowell?

KRAMER: Well, maybe because we were sitting in the right field stands cursing at him in the bullpen all game.

NEWMAN: He must have caught a glimpse of us when I poured that beer on his head.

Wraps it up nicely, no? Except for one nagging detail:

The Mets were not at Shea on June 14, 1987 losing to the Phillies. They were in Pittsburgh beating the Pirates. An immutable law of physics — the one that would specify you can’t be in two places at one time — contradicts the whole premise of everybody’s account.

It’s still a funny episode, but it’s always bugged me that Seinfeld chose this particular date to portray this fanciful incident. I remember June 14, 1987 very well. It was twenty years ago next week and it represented a milestone in a spring full of them.

June 14, a Sunday, was the day Stephanie left town. Not forever but, save for a few visits, for three years. She was in New York to go to plays and museums to earn college credits over six weeks. Her six weeks were up on June 14. We spent the last five of them together, but now it was time for her to go, damn it.

Now what do I do with myself? First thing I did after putting her on a train south to Florida was grab a seat at a bar in Penn Station, order a drink and ask the bartender how the Mets did today. He didn’t know, which I thought was highly irresponsible. The Celtics and Lakers were playing for the NBA championship on his TV. I think the Lakers won the title that day. I’m not sure. I didn’t much care. It was left to Sports Phone to inform me the Mets beat the Pirates 7-3, Sisk going 4-2/3 for the win, Darryl and, yup, Keith homering. We were still floundering in the N.L. East, 7½ in back of the Cardinals and behind the Cubs and Expos for bad measure. But it was something.

Now what else do I do with myself?

Stephanie and I met on May 11. Our first date, the Mets and Giants, was on May 15. We were spending most available waking hours together by the end of May. Our first fait accompli discussion of marriage was June 4. It was whirlwind, but it was real. Now it was hurry up and wait while she finished her sophomore, junior and senior years of college (she was only 19, for goodness sake) and I did whatever it was I had to do to become a viable member of society by the time she was done at USF.

So what do I do after getting the Mets-Pirates score? I take off to Montreal.

I had a very good friend who facilitated my meeting Stephanie. If he wasn’t in New York on that same arts program (trying to forget his old girlfriend) then I would never have been in the lobby of the hotel where my future wife was staying in May. Now it was June and not only was she riding the rails home but so was her roommate who happened to be the girl my friend got involved with that same spring (got that?). At that very moment, actually, they were broken up and he was all “let’s drink and forget her!” It was his idea to go to the bar in Penn Station.

It was my idea to go to Montreal and see the Mets play the Expos.

My friend had a whole family psychodrama playing out, culminating in his parents flying into Newark the following Friday. From there he and they would drive back to Miami. Or Philadelphia where they were from originally. Or something. I forget what the deal was exactly except he kind of invited himself to stay over at my house between Sunday and Friday, which was fine with me, not such a popular idea with my mother who really didn’t like having houseguests (despite a plenty big enough house to accommodate several). I needed to get me and my friend out of town. And plan a future. But first get out of town for the week.

I know, I said. Let’s drive to Montreal! The Mets will be there! My friend wasn’t a big baseball fan but had this accommodating habit of being into whatever you were into at the precise moment you brought it up. Like Zelig, if you ever saw the Woody Allen movie in which the title character of yore morphs right into the prevailing situation. In my friend’s case, it occasionally seemed insincere and a little desperate, but this time it was very convenient. He was totally into this impromptu sojourn into another country.

I was 24 and sporadically employed. He was 21 and had nothing to do for five days. The loves of our lives had just split. What better remedy than ROAD TRIP!?

So we did it. On Monday the 15th, three of us — me, my friend and another summer-semester castaway who just happened to need a ride to her grandmother’s in Burlington, Vt., piled into my 1981 Corolla and headed north. I barely drive round the block these days if I don’t have to, but kill time in Montreal? Sure! Drop off a virtual stranger in Vermont along the way? Why not?

As is my custom, I didn’t hit the road until late in the day Monday. In those days, I took pride in being a nocturnal animal, and driving at night didn’t bother me a bit. Besides, the summer solstice was fast approaching. It was staying light late and we were going in the general direction of the Arctic Circle. The immediate future was so bright, we had to wear…well, you know.

Day became night and New York became Vermont. The Mets on WHN faded in and out. The first of the four-game series pitted Doc Gooden, recently back from drug rehab versus Dennis Martinez, a recovering alcoholic getting a final shot. It was on Monday Night Baseball. It was also going badly: Martinez pitched a shutout (infer what you will about their respective addictions). Our third wheel guided us over the river and through the woods — or at least across Lake Champlain — to Grandma’s house. We let her out on a quiet Burlington street probably after 10 P.M. We spent maybe six hours together, the three of us, after being casually acquainted since mid-May. We shared an adventure, or part of one. And then I never saw her again.

Montreal lay ahead, but the Canadian border was of more immediate concern. This was my first trip to Canada and I didn’t know what to expect. I was told I didn’t need a passport but I had conflicting reports on whether I needed a special insurance card to drive there (Mom said yes, the Vermont girl said no; KBS Insurance mootly mailed one to the house that arrived after I returned, so I guess no). What I did understand was I was getting tired. My friend and I switched seats and he drove.

Well after midnight, we made it to Canada. A border guard greeted us with a smile. Welcome to Canada, what is your business here? My friend, at the wheel, told him, “We’re here to see a couple of ballgames.” Another smile from the guard. With almost no hesitation, he waved us through. I’m glad the Mets-Expos rivalry carried such weight.

Just like that, another country. It was still another hour and some to Montreal. Unlike in later years, I planned this not at all. Today, I research hotels and transportation and baseball tickets. Then, I figured, we’ll get there when we get there and we’ll find our way. I was quite spunky then or just became more fretful as I grew older.

As Montreal approaches, you reach a toll bridge. A Canadian toll bridge that wants a Canadian toll. A quarter, at least then. I panicked. Because I panicked, my friend panicked. Who had Canadian change? In fact, back in Vermont when we gassed up, the attendant gave me back Canadian change and I politely asked for real money. The funny thing is I seemed to believe I was the first American who ever entered Canada with only American money. I explained all this to the tolltaker at the bridge at probably two in the morning. He waved us on through. What a country!

We found downtown Montreal in the dead of night. A well-lit dead of night, I should point out, replete with restaurants advertising smoked meat sandwiches. Within downtown, we found a Holiday Inn. Looked good to us. Disheveled, unshaven and dressed nothing like businessmen, the desk clerk, who seemed mildly suspicious of our business in Canada, offered us the businessman’s rate if we could produce some proof that we had some. Business, I mean. My “Freelance Writer” card only confused him. My friend had an expired press credential from a defunct newspaper. That did the trick; we got a room and by 3:45 A.M., we saw it getting light out. I think the rate sounded absurdly high anyway, but that was in Canadian dollars. As I was catching on (and had been clued in ahead of time), it translated to like five bucks American.

That became the running joke the next morning. My friend got up and exchanged some of our money at a nearby bank and ya gotta see the prices. Everything costs like five bucks because, well, it’s Canadian.

We did what any two American guys would do in a bilingual city filled with mystery and intrigue. We went to McDonald’s. Sticking with my weird insistence on not being a stranger in a strange land, I tried to order a Quart de Livre. The girl behind the counter said, “Quarter-Pounder, what else?” Ah, the hell with it. Yes, plus fries and a diet Coke please.

It was all prelude to our business in Canada, the ballgame. The one piece of information I had cobbled together was there was subway service between downtown (which is where I assumed we were staying — it could have been midtown for all I know) and The Big O. In Montreal, you took the Metro to the games. They even talked about it on the Mets’ broadcasts from there. Our hotel was near the line that would take us to Pie IX, the local version of Willets Point. Man, I thought, this is not bad. I’m in some foreign country and I know how to get to the ballpark.

Unlike the way it was painted in the dying years of the franchise, there were Expos fans in Montreal in 1987. Enough of them so they populated a subway car. We followed them the way tourists on the 7 follow me so they don’t get lost. (At least a couple times a year that happens; I kinda dig it.)

It worked. We got off at Pie IX and never had to go outside. Just that season, the Expos finally managed to get a roof on Olympic Stadium. It wasn’t retractable as advertised 10 years earlier when it opened for baseball, but it shielded you from the elements — not a huge concern in June — and kept with the general Canadian ethos of avoiding the great outdoors. The walk from the subway to the ballpark was all indoors.

It included a pass through a lively plaza. People milled and ate and smoked and a band played “Don’t Forget Me (When I’m Gone),” a hit by Glass Tiger from the previous fall. My friend and I looked at each other and laughed out loud. Glass Tiger, we both knew, was a Canadian group and this cover band doing their song played into our concept of Canada as a country with a complex. Listen! It’s the No. 2 hit in the States! And it’s Canadian!

Tickets were easy to get. We produced Canadian money but, again, that wasn’t necessary, just cost-effective. Other Mets fans on their own sabbaticals were here, some buying tickets with U.S. currency. Somehow I felt a little offended that they didn’t make the effort to use Canadian money. (Hmmm…maybe I was the one with the Zeligaffliction.)

Box seats were maybe 15 bucks (or like five bucks American). Good deal. We sat on the first base side. I looked around and, gads, what an ugly place! Don’t get me wrong. I was happy to be there. It was exciting. It was a ballpark and the Mets were going to play. But this was everything it was said to be and less. Just because it was half in French didn’t make it slightly charming. So much space, so much of it useless. There was a veritable lumber yard behind the centerfield fence — some wood that had been left over from a construction project that ran out of funding. In the next phase of my career, I’d visit cold warehouses stacked with 24-packs of beer or soda and be reminded of Olympic Stadium.

That’s the critique in a nutshell. Too big for its own good. Too deep, too hollow. Too artificially loud thanks to the cheers that echoed all out of proportion to their actual heft. Too bad. This was the fifth ballpark I visited and I immediately decided it was No. 5 among my favorites. That pattern continued right up to the Expos’ death. At this writing, I’ve been to 30 ballparks and Le Stade Olympique is secure at No. 30 — until the 31st park gets visited. Tropicana Field or the Metrodome, long buried on my to-do list, will have to be awfully awful to undercut it.

But I’m not recollecting here to be mean to Montreal. I had a nice time. And if I had a nice time, I’m pretty sure my friend did, too. First off, the Mets took a 4-0 lead by the third and won easily, 7-3. Terry Leach, who was a godsend that season by filling in for all our injured starters, went eight innings for the victory. He was 5-0 at the end of the night. What a bon lanceur he was. I squinted down to the end of the Mets’ long dugout bench to pick out Tom Seaver who was on the comeback trail (it never took; he retired the following week) and may have seen him.

I know I saw No. 25 in the lineup, batting second and playing second. It wasn’t Backman and it wasn’t Teufel. It was Keith Miller, making his Major League debut right there in Montreal with me on hand. Because of that, I always felt proprietary of his career which didn’t amount to much, sad to say (at least before taking up agenting), but he did hustle. In the private baseball lingo another friend and I occasionally chatted in for fun, Stephanie became known as Keith Miller for coming out of nowhere and providing a spark to my life; I was Darryl Strawberry mostly ’cause I wanted to be.

Mets caps dotted the O. I was wearing one plus a Giants Big Blue Wrecking Crew sweatshirt, trying to stretch that City of Champions vibe a little longer (the Mets and Giants would both defend titles ineptly in 1987). Ran into a fellow in the men’s room who was also up from the Metropolitan area, also liked the Mets and Giants. We chatted briefly about both teams and concluded that we had had it pretty good lately in New York.

That was the only game we went to, at least the only Mets-Expos game. My friend and I walked along Rue Ste. Catherine, past the various Smoked Meat signs, and found a park near McGill University the next afternoon where we played Wiffle Ball. We’d had a Wiffle Ball game in progress since November ’85, my first post-college visit to Tampa. We played a few innings in the Albertson’s parking lot then and picked it up every time I came down. I don’t think we did much Wiffle Ball in New York, but made up for it with three innings in the park that day. We concluded the game the following March on the main baseball diamond at USF when I came down for Stephanie’s spring break. I seem to recall the final collective score winding up 43-33 in my favor, but I could be making that up.

We left Montreal Thursday morning, initially following the same path we took, back through Vermont. We got to the border, me driving this time. The United States guard wasn’t smiling when he asked what we were up to. I smiled and said we’d gone to Montreal to see the Mets play the Expos.

He looked us over. Young guys. Florida plates that I still hadn’t switched to New York. Hadn’t shaved. My friend was wearing one of his trademark Hawaiian shirts. Miami Vice was still on the air.

“Please get out of the car.”

The border guard decided were drug smugglers. He didn’t say it, but that was the strong impression he gave. He searched the car, searched our luggage, searched our pockets. He got excited twice, once when he found an empty baggy in my suitcase, once when he found pills in aluminum foil in my jeans. He actually cracked the foil open. Tylenol, I said. I get headaches.

He let us go.

The rest of the trip was uneventful except for me being pulled over for speeding on the Massachusetts Turnpike. I was doing 77 in a 55 zone. Gosh, that makes me smile today. The Mets salvaged a series split while we were in Connecticut. The next day, I drove my friend to Newark Airport (in record time from Long Island, I might add) and he hooked up with his parents. I turned around and went home.

That was it for me and Montreal and for me and grand, unplanned ROAD TRIP!s. I would have assumed this was the sort of thing I’d do from time to time for the rest of my life, but no, that was the only truly impulsive one I ever took off on. As for me and my friend, it was kind of a final flourish for our post-college friendship at least on the scale it existed in the mid-’80s. He and Stephanie’s roommate got back together in Florida and actually beat us to punch marriagewise (neither of them being sticklers about bothering to graduate). We all kind of stayed in touch, on and off, for several years thereafter. For reasons I don’t quite grasp, they and their daughter, born in December 1989, fell off our radar for good in 1996 and us off theirs. Wouldn’t have guessed that could possibly happen in June 1987, but it did.

The Mets arrived home from Montreal as well. They swept a weekend series at Shea from the Phillies in what was judged to be a great pivotal turning point to that frustrating season. No record exists on which player spit on which fans in real life.