The blog for Mets fans
who like to read

ABOUT US

Greg Prince and Jason Fry
Faith and Fear in Flushing made its debut on Feb. 16, 2005, the brainchild of two longtime friends and lifelong Met fans.

Greg Prince discovered the Mets when he was 6, during the magical summer of 1969. He is a Long Island-based writer, editor and communications consultant. Contact him here.

Jason Fry is a Brooklyn writer whose first memories include his mom leaping up and down cheering for Rusty Staub. Check out his other writing here.

Got something to say? Leave a comment, or email us at faithandfear@gmail.com. (Sorry, but we have no interest in ads, sponsored content or guest posts.)

Need our RSS feed? It's here.

Visit our Facebook page, or drop by the personal pages for Greg and Jason.

Or follow us on Twitter: Here's Greg, and here's Jason.

Here's to the Winners, Losers & DVD

Congratulations to the five Faith and Fear in Flushing readers who each won a copy of Baseball’s Greatest Games: 1986 World Series Game 6 from A&E Home Entertainment in association with MLB Productions. These five industrious fellows answered a quiz issued last Tuesday to coincide with the 25th anniversary of what was then indisputably the greatest World Series Game Six ever and, recent events notwithstanding, is still the greatest World Series Game Six ever (let Cardinal blogs blow the trumpets on behalf of the 2011 version, we’ll take Mookie and Buckner for eternity, thank you very much).

Our five winners came from five different states, which shows Metsopotamia spreads out far and wide: Tim Lowell of Texas, Matt Edwards of Connecticut, Anthony Liguori of North Carolina, David Hurwitz of New Jersey and Andre Tessier of good old Long Island, New York.

As for our 18 answers, since I was inspired by Game Five’s pitchers of record, both of them former Mets, I came up with the quiz theme on the fly and thus probably could have done a better job tightening the questions. A couple of times what seemed like wrong guesses were, in fact, perfectly accurate, just not what I was thinking. But since I couldn’t rightly say, “That’s right but it’s not what I was thinking,” the judges were compelled to be generous in their interpretations. Plus I could have been a little more careful with my stat-checking, which explains the two crossouts below…and I probably should have said, “Don’t use any answer more than once.”

So with that…

1) I’m the Original Met who became the first former Met to win a World Series game. Who am I?

Roger Craig, 1964 Cardinals.

2) I’m the Original Met who became the second third former Met to lose a World Series game. Who am I?

Bob L. Miller, 1971 Pirates. 

3) I wasn’t an Original Met, but I was traded for one and wound up losing a World Series game the very same year that trade was made. Who am I?

Jack Lamabe, 1967 Cardinals, traded for Al Jackson.

4) I was a Met during three seasons when the Mets lost a combined 290 games, but don’t blame me: I lost only one two FOUR of them. I eventually hooked up with a world champion, but I lost a World Series game for them. Who am I?

Juan Berenguer, 1987 Twins; 1978-1980 Mets.

5) I pitched for the 1969 Mets, but my first World Series decision — a loss — occurred in the 1970s. Who am I?

Bob Johnson, 1971 Pirates. 

6) I lost two games in the same World Series when I was a former Met, yet I’m pretty sure even those Mets fans who rooted for me when I had been a Met didn’t mind. Who am I?

Calvin Schiraldi, 1986 Red Sox (whose first loss just happened to be the game celebrated on the prize DVD).

7) I’m a former Met who lost two games in the same World Series in New York, but I couldn’t say for sure how most Mets fans felt about it since most Mets fans probably weren’t too happy about anything during that World Series. Who am I?

Pedro Martinez, 2009 Phillies. 

8) I’m the only former Met to win a game and lose a game in the same World Series as a starter. Who am I?

Kevin Tapani, 1991 Twins. 

9) I’m the only former Met to win a game in two different World Series. Who am I?

David Cone, 1996 and 1999 Yankees. 

10) I’m the only former Met to lose a game in two different World Series. Who am I?

Alejandro Peña, 1991 and 1995 Braves.

11) I was traded to the Mets for the pitcher who would become the only former Met to lose a game in two different World Series. But my luck was better: I won a World Series game as a former Met. Who am I?

Tony Castillo, 1993 Blue Jays. 

12) I’m the former Met who nailed down a playoff spot for my team by throwing the final pitch of our clincher at Shea Stadium. More than a decade later, however, I lost a World Series game. Who am I?

Jeff Reardon, 1992 Braves (eleven years after clinching the Expos’ second-season title at Shea in 1981).

13) I won the longest postseason game ever played at Shea Stadium, but more than a decade later, I lost a regulation World Series game. Who am I?

Octavio Dotel, 2011 Cardinals. (He was in the headline, so I figured this was kind of a gimme.)

14) I’m the only former Met to lose a World Series game in the same postseason in which I had earlier pitched against the Mets. Who am I?

Mike Remlinger, 1999 Braves. 

15) I’m the only former Met to win a World Series game who also threw the final pitch for the Mets in a different postseason. Who am I?

Kenny Rogers, 2006 Tigers, better known to us as the man who threw the final, ill-fated pitch for bases-loaded ball four to end the 1999 NLCS unfavorably. (But I had to accept Rick Aguilera because he threw the final pitch for the Mets in the 1988 postseason…which caught me by surprise when it was pointed out to me, but facts is facts, he said ungramatically.)

16) I’m the only lefty former Met pitcher to win a game and lose a game in the same World Series. Who am I?

Tug McGraw, 1980 Phillies. 

17) I was once a teammate of a former Mets pitcher who had won his only World Series ring when he was a Met. During my tenure as a former Mets pitcher myself, I won a game that gave that same former Mets pitcher with whom I was once a teammate a pretty good chance to win another World Series ring. Who am I?

Darren Oliver, 2011 Rangers. (I thought this would also be a gimme considering his name was in the headline and his relationship to 1969 World Champion Met Nolan Ryan — his teammate on the 1993 Rangers, his club’s owner during this year’s Fall Classic — was all but spelled out, but I had to accept Kevin Tapani as answer because he fit the description to a tee, having been Rick Aguilera’s teammate on the 1991 Twins when Aggie had only one World Series ring to his credit. By the way, Nolan Ryan still has only one World Series ring.)

18) I’m the only former righty Met pitcher to win a game and lose a game in relief in the same World Series. Who am I?

Rick Aguilera, 1991 Twins. (And the winner of the game celebrated on the prize DVD.)

’99 Faltered, But Dotel Ain’t Done

The “we” and the “us” was not at all out of line, nevertheless I found it surprising how much Octavio Dotel engaged in first-person plural pronouns when interviewed after the St. Louis Cardinals won the 2011 World Series. He hasn’t been a Cardinal much longer than he’s been most anything else in the big leagues, but his champagne-soaked commemorative t-shirt and cap didn’t deceive. Dotel was and is, in fact, a World Champion St. Louis Cardinal.

So there’s that to like from the 6-2 win the Cardinals hung on the Rangers in Game Seven of the just-completed aptly named Fall Classic. And there’s a slew of players whose pre-tee gamewear couldn’t quite bring me down as much as my traditional personal antipathy for those two Redbirds perched on that yellow bat would suggest (even if the sight of so many sad Texas Rangers in one losing dugout kind of did). Unless you are brutally partisan, it was tough to find anything wrong with David Freese, the kid from St. Louis, winning the MVP for St. Louis. Shoot, he said that when he pitched in Little League, he wore No. 45 to honor Bob Gibson, whom he’d grown up reading about and hearing about…because he was a Cardinals fan being brought up in Cardinal country.

So there was that to like. There was the sheer unlikeliness of what the Cardinals achieved to applaud as well: mired in nowheresville at the end of August, they flapped their unflappable wings through September at a pace (23-9) that would have made Tug McGraw slap his glove against his thigh in approval 38 years earlier. There was their taking advantage of the Braves’ delicious collapse and there was their most welcome outclassing of the supposedly unbeatable Phillies. There was the best hitter maybe any of us has ever seen putting up the best individual World Series game any of us is bound to ever see, and there were two comebacks plus one walkoff for the ages squeezed into the most stunning, shocking and superlative Game Six any of us will ever see this side of October 25, 1986.

Amid my momentary uncharacteristic generosity toward everything Redbird, I even discovered a rationalization that allows me to implement a very temporary moratorium on my standing desire to watch Yadier Molina spontaneously combust. “Well,” I said to Stephanie as the cameras found our old nemesis in the middle of the celebratory scrum Friday night, “at least it’s not Jeter.”

And, at least a refugee from our half of the recently declared “best postseason series of all-time” has proactively earned a World Series ring a dozen years after we most fervently wished one on him and his two dozen then-teammates. That’s Dotel, of course. I can’t say “win one for Octavio” was exactly my rallying cry this October, but I was cheered when my friend Kevin brought to my attention that our long-ago rookie sensation had a shot at breaking a dry spell it never occurred to me existed. Until October 28, 2011, nobody from our mutually favorite Mets team had ever reached the promised land — won a World Series title, that is — since the night the ’99 Mets got driven down in old Dixie.

No, I said, that can’t be…until I looked it up and realized Kevin was absolutely correct. There was a handful of ringbearers who came to that team — Al Leiter, Dennis Cook and Bobby Bonilla from the 1997 Marlins (they could have kept Bonilla), Orel Hershiser from the 1988 Dodgers, Rickey Henderson from the 1989 A’s — but nobody who used losing to the Braves twelve years ago as a springboard to ultimate baseball reward. Until now, the only 1999 Postseason Met who played on a world champion after having been a 1999 Postseason Met was Cook, a 40-year-old member of the 2002 Angels, but one whose injury-interrupted season ousted him from the Halos’ playoff roster.

So, no, Cook did not really pitch his way to a post-’99 championship. Neither did Jason Isringhausen, who requires an asterisk on both ends of his eligibility for our discussion. Izzy was traded from the 1999 Mets (with Greg McMichael for Billy Taylor, oh boy) more than two months before that postseason commenced, and he was on the DL seven years later when the 2006 Cardinals earned their…well, we all know what they earned.

Dotel is, by all indications, the Last of the Met-hicans from the Wild Card bunch that gave us the four-game triumph over Arizona and the six-game heartbreak versus Atlanta; he, Izzy the eventual Oakland A and Melvin Mora were the only 1999 Mets active in 2011 — though Bonilla continues to receive meal money from the club. When Melvin was released by the Diamondbacks in June (perhaps as payback for throwing out Jay Bell at home in the eighth inning of what is otherwise known as the Todd Pratt game), that left Dotel alone to carry the torch from the ten games that lit up our lives twelve Octobers ago.

I wouldn’t have expected Octavio to be thinking about that October when he had this one to stay busy during. Besides, he’s been everywhere, man. It would be just about as easy to list the teams for whom he hasn’t pitched as it would to catalogue his many, many major league stops. Yet, as the enterprising and entertaining Pat Borzi let us know in the Times just after the Cards decked the Brewers to earn their World Series appointment, Dotel — traded to Houston in December 1999 with Roger Cedeño for Mike Hampton and Derek Bell — still hangs on to the bittersweet emotions of October 1999 at least a little.

Maybe more than Kevin and I do, even.

In Borzi’s article, Dotel revealed a surprising reservoir of resentment for how little he was used in the last NLCS of the last century. He didn’t pitch in Game Six, being passed over for the notorious Kenny Rogers (the previous 1999 Met to see World Series action, in 2006 for Detroit, against our chums from St. Louis) and wasn’t called on in the league championship series at all until the thirteenth inning of Game Five.

“What I remember about Game Five,” Dotel told Borzi regarding the three innings of one-run ball he threw to hold the fort in advance of Robin Ventura’s Grand Slam Single, “is I kept seeing pitchers coming out of the dugout, starting pitchers, and I was like, ‘What about me?’ At one point, I was like, ‘I’m not good? I’m not good enough to get in the game?’ That was the main thing. Then they decided, ‘Let’s lose the game. Let’s put in Doti.’ And then I won the game. I showed Bobby Valentine I could do it.” As for the series-ending eleventh inning of the sixth game, “nothing against Kenny,” he said, “but I think I was the right guy to come in in that situation.”

Only Dotel knows if he’s been stewing about 1999 all this time or whether Borzi’s inquiry got him going. Either way, one can understand the deep bone bruise of memory he might now and then have nursed in the ensuing decade and change. Dotel was 25 and on a team two games from the World Series. He wouldn’t get that close again until he actually made it at age 37 this year. I imagine 2011, when Octavio Dotel — a Cardinal since late July — can rightfully brandish all the “we” and “us” he wants, more than makes up for the chance he missed out on when he was much younger.

That’s the beauty and pain attached to watching the clinching/elimination game of a postseason sort itself out. Izzy plays on one world champion his entire career, but injury prevents him from participating. Mora never goes back to the playoffs, having been sent from the eventual pennant-winning Mets of 2000 to the never-contending Orioles (before winding his way to a Rockies team that strives for and misses the playoffs in September 2010 and a Diamondbacks team that heated up upon his departure in 2011). Rogers’s well-being none of us much cares about, I assume, but consider that his first World Series experience came as a 1996 Yankee, earning by participation one of those ballyhooed rings but otherwise imploding (two innings, five earned runs) and not getting another shot at earning a championship by succeeding until 2006. He’s brilliant in one World Series start at age 41, but this time his team, the Tigers, comes up short of a championship.

One never knows. Onetime Jorge Velandia trade bait Nelson Cruz tied the single-postseason home run record (8) this year and it didn’t propel him toward becoming a world champion — same as those whose shared record he tied: Barry Bonds, who never made it back to the postseason after his massive October of 2002; and Carlos Beltran, who didn’t get to the World Series when he was figuratively on fire in 2004 or when he had his moments in 2006.  That fuc…I mean excellent catcher Molina is 29 and has already made four postseasons, been in three World Series and is, as of last night, a two-time world champion. A 28-year-old third baseman named David who could have been accurately described as obscure everywhere but St. Louis a couple of months ago is now a World Series MVP. A 28-year-old third baseman named David who could have been accurately described as a superstar in and out of New York a couple of years ago — and still might answer to that description, pending fence reconstruction in an otherwise deathly quiet ballpark this suddenly snowy autumn — has yet to play in a World Series.

Mike Piazza, Edgardo Alfonzo and ten other 1999 Postseason Mets went to the 2000 World Series but didn’t win. Shawon Dunston got back, as a sidekick of Bonds’s in San Francisco, but they fell one game short to the Angels in ’02. Cedeño got back, with the ’04 Cardinals, but those Birds got swept. Ventura never got back. Pratt never got back. John Olerud never got back. Rey Ordoñez never got back. Benny Agbayani never got back after 2000, though he helped Valentine’s Chiba Lotte Marines win the Japan Series title in 2005…which is pretty great, but it’s not the World Series.

Octavio Dotel was a 1999 Postseason Met and later an Astro, an Athletic, a Yankee, a Royal, a Brave, a White Sock, a Pirate, a Rockie, a Dodger, a Blue Jay and, at last, a World Champion as a 2011 St. Louis Cardinal. After thirteen big league seasons, he pitched five games in this World Series, and in Game Seven, he faced two batters, striking out Ian Kinsler and flying out Elvis Andrus to end the top of the seventh.

I’m sorry he didn’t get to do something like that as a 1999 Met, but I’m not sorry he got to show Bobby Valentine at last.

The Happiest Recap: 160-161

Welcome to The Happiest Recap, a solid gold slate of New York Mets games culled from every schedule the Mets have ever played en route to this, their fiftieth year in baseball. We’ve created a dream season that includes the “best” 160th game in any Mets season, the “best” 161st game in any Mets season…and we keep going from there until we have a completed schedule worthy of Bob Murphy coming back with the Happy Recap after this word from our sponsor on the WFAN Mets Radio Network.

Fasten your seatbelts…

GAME 160: October 1, 1982 — Mets 1 PHILLIES 0 (10)
(Mets All-Time Game 160 Record: 27-19; Mets 1982 Record: 65-95)

One-hitters are Mets fans’ no-hitters, more so than no-hitter flirtations that wind up being something less than one-hitters…though in the Mets fan mindset, they tend to blend into the same disappointment-tinged stew that’s been simmering on the back of the franchise stove over the course of fifty years.

Pitcher keep a no-hitter going into the seventh but then give up a hit? That’s a one-hitter, unless he gives up another hit. Unless the result of the game desperately matters, what seems to get remembered is a no-hitter appeared within some pitcher’s grasp. If it ends up as a two-, three- or whatever-hitter, the headline is it wasn’t a no-hitter.

But a lack of differentiation would be unfair to the 35 one-hitters in Mets history, even if not every one-hitter was a no-hitter flirtation. Sure, you might be the kind of Mets fan who starts thinking “this could be the night” if the first pitch of the game is called strike one, but generally speaking, there is a psychic Rubicon that needs to be crossed. Five innings seems serious. Maybe four if the starter really has something on the ball. Maybe three if there was a stupendous catch behind him.

Maybe called strike one.

Anyway, there is a distinction to be made between the one-hitter in which the one hit comes from the sixth inning forward versus the kind in which the one hit fell in when you weren’t necessarily paying attention to the “H” column on the scoreboard. For example, let’s say there’s an uninspiring matchup between a lousy Mets club and another team with nothing much on the line late in a season…and let’s assume you’re watching or listening to this final Friday night game at all under those circumstances. If the Mets starter was plugged in at the last minute — he hasn’t started all year — and he’s walked a couple of guys in the third, would you necessarily notice that the first hit he surrendered didn’t come until there was one out in the fifth?

In 1982, maybe not. In 1982, the Mets had only been no-hitter starved for just under 21 years. By the end of 1982, the desperation for a no-hitter was mostly trumped by desperation for 1983 and something better than the current, godforsaken season to come along.

So maybe it wasn’t a huge deal that Terry Leach went 4⅓ before allowing Luis Aguayo to plop an artificial turf triple onto the splotchy rug covering the Veterans Stadium outfield. Or maybe it was. Maybe there was every reason to believe it was kismet that Leach, a late replacement for blister-impaired Rick Ownbey and a generally overlooked middle-innings eater up from Tidewater twice since June, would be The One. That maybe the undistinguished Leach would succeed where the likes of Seaver, Koosman and Matlack never did.

But then Aguayo’s on third with one out in the fifth, and it hardly matters. The no-hitter’s gone. Yet Ivan de Jesus’s grounder to third means Aguayo has to hold. And opposing pitcher John Denny strikes out to end the fifth. Thus, after five, Terry Leach is pitching a one-hitter. Same as Denny, come to think of it. All he’s given up hitwise is a single to Dave Kingman (breaking an 0-for-23 schneid) in the second. Nobody’s scored, and both hurlers are tossing one-hitters.

They keep it up, too. The Mets can’t do a thing with Denny, who is previewing the form that will win him the National League Cy Young Award a year later. And the Phillies, a disappointment in terms of not winning the division, but a formidable foe with 87 wins and two seemingly surefire Hall of Famers in their lineup — they can’t do a thing with Leach. The great Pete Rose is 0-for-3 after striking out in the sixth. The great Mike Schmidt is 0-for-3 after grounding out to start the seventh. Leach runs into a bit of wildness after that, sandwiching an intentional walk with two bases on balls he didn’t mean to issue but escapes a sacks-full jam when he strikes out Denny again.

After seven, Leach, like Denny, still has his one-hitter. Denny has walked three and struck out five. Leach, working with an assortment of sinkers and sliders, has permitted five walks to match his five strikeouts in the longest outing of his major league career, though that’s not saying much. He pitched 20 of 21 games in relief during 1981’s second season and his 20 previous appearances in 1982 were out of the pen as well. Besides, the Mets of 1982 have begun placing their trust in younger arms to carry them to a brighter future. A little more than three months earlier, the Times suggested the Tide rotation of Ownbey (24), Scott Holman (23), Brent Gaff (23), Walt Terrell (24) and Ron Darling (21) could be on the verge of becoming the mid-’80s equivalent of “Seaver, Koosman, Ryan, Gentry and McAndrew”.

“It’s as good a Triple-A staff as I’ve ever seen,” gushed longtime Tidewater GM Dave Rosenfield, and indeed, the staff’s midseason ERA was almost a run better than anybody else’s in the International League. Four of the five starters mentioned — everybody but Darling — would make the Mets in 1982 and were supposed to make Mets fans salivate over 1983 and beyond.

Terry Leach, 28, drew no mention at all in the Times article. He had just been recalled to New York, where he was in the process of throwing eleven consecutive shutout innings of relief. He didn’t throw hard or conventionally. His submarine delivery made him stick out as much as his age made him fade into the background. But through eight appearances covering 18 innings, he was close to flawless. His next nine outings were less so: 17 earned runs in 12.2 innings pitched. Leach was sent back to Tidewater (helping the Tides win the IL pennant while the Mets set off on a 15-game losing streak in his absence). Terry returned to the Mets in mid-September, back in form. In three relief stints, he totaled five innings and allowed zero runs.

Under the Friday night lights in Philadelphia, Denny goes to the eighth having made no substantial mistakes. He could afford one, however. Though he’s finishing up a miserable year (6-13 between Cleveland and Philly), he’s been pitching in the majors since 1974. He’s established. Leach goes to the eighth having made no substantial mistakes, and it’s a damn good thing he hasn’t. He’s been pitching mostly in the minors since 1976, ignored in the Braves system until 1980, when the Mets picked him upon his release by Atlanta. He finished strong at Jackson, earned a post-strike shot a year later but then got squeezed off the roster as 1982 got underway.

If Terry Leach wants to be considered for a spot on the 1983 Mets, he’d be advised to not make any more mistakes in what’s left of 1982. So he doesn’t. Just as Denny is perfect in the eighth, so is Terry. Just as Denny is perfect in the ninth, so is Terry once more. We’re through regulation in a 0-0 game and both starters have just thrown nine innings of one-hit ball.

Phillies manager Pat Corrales blinks first. He removes Denny after nine: one hit, three walks, seven strikeouts. His replacement is Porfi Altamirano. The righthander walks Kingman to lead off the tenth. Rusty Tillman comes in to pinch-run. Gary Rajsich singles Tillman to third. Hubie Brooks drives a fly ball to Garry Maddox in center. Ralph Kiner has made Maddox — about to win his eighth Gold Glove — famous for his defense. “Two-thirds of the earth’s surface is covered by water,” Ralph likes to say. “The other third is covered by Garry Maddox.” Sure enough, Maddox covers enough of the planet to haul in Hubie’s fly, but he can’t stop the world from turning long enough to prevent Tillman from scoring the game’s first run.

The Mets leave Rajsich on first by making two quick outs. Leach returns to the Vet mound to pitch the tenth. He allows his sixth walk of the evening, to Aguayo, to start things badly, and rookie Julio Franco bunts Aguayo to second. Terry is facing trouble…but he stares it down by grounding George Vukovich to first and popping Maddox to second.

With Brian Giles’s grab of the 30th out, the Mets have won, 1-0, and Terry Leach has pitched the first and only ten-inning one-hitter in Mets history. It’s also the only one-hitter the Mets have won in which they themselves scraped together no more than two hits. And the pitcher who upheld their honor while John Denny was holding down their bats was someone making his second major league start.

Leach didn’t inject primary drama into his storyline. That would have required at least six innings of no-hit ball, maybe seven. His effort wasn’t a one-hitter of the emotional magnitude of Tom Seaver against the Cubs (one out in the ninth) in 1969 or the Padres (two out in the ninth) in 1972. There was little heartbreak associated with a fifth-inning triple, not even the hindsight heartbreak that the fifth-inning single in the next Met one-hitter — Dwight Gooden against the Cubs, 1984 — brought to mind once it became a one-hitter and the one hit could have very easily been ruled an error. But Leach’s one-hitter was indisputably the longest, definitely the least offensively supported and, save perhaps for Bobby Jones in the clinching game of the 2000 NLDS, the most surprising.

Considering all the variables, it surely ranks among the very most impressive one-hitters in Mets history.

That he won the game shouldn’t be taken as a given. Jim Maloney no-hit the Mets for ten innings in 1965 but then lost in the eleventh. Future Mets pitching coach Harvey Haddix perfect-gamed the Braves in 1959 but then lost in the thirteenth. Even Seaver, the master of the Met one-hitter, with five between 1969 and 1977, couldn’t keep a sixth going. Tom Terrific was locked in a scoreless duel against Rick Reuschel of the Cubs with two out in the bottom of the ninth on September 24, 1975, when Joe Wallis — a.k.a. the second coming of Jimmy Qualls — broke up his no-hit bid. Even if Seaver had retired Wallis and placed nine innings of hitless ball under his belt, he wouldn’t have been able to claim a no-hitter; the Mets forgot to get him a run. Seaver came out to pitch the tenth and gave up a couple more hits.

He lost the no-hitter in the ninth, the one-hitter in the tenth, and Skip Lockwood lost the game in the eleventh on a bases-loaded walk, proving yet again how difficult it is to match length with utter mastery. But Leach did it. Leach threw a ten-inning one-hitter in which he was provided virtually no cushion by his teammates. Rose wound up 0-for-4. Schmidt wound up 0-for-4. Every Phillie wound up 0-for-Something, except for Aguayo, whom Leach stranded at third.

And what did it get Terry Leach? Sent back to Tidewater for the entirety of 1983; traded to the Cubs ahead of 1984; traded from Chicago back to Atlanta soon thereafter; released by the Braves organization within two months; and re-signed by the Mets in May of ’84, less than twenty months after his Veterans Stadium star turn. A combined 11-4 Triple-A mark between Richmond and Tidewater earned him no callup during the Mets’ return to contention. Terry’s first appearance in a major league uniform after the night he shut out the Phillies on one hit over ten innings didn’t come until June 21, 1985.

“Whether I start or relieve doesn’t matter,” Leach said after his 1982 one-hitter, “as long as I have a job.” But who would have dreamed four seasons would have to pass following his masterpiece to achieve job security?

The 1987 Mets’ starting rotation — one that included Ron Darling, but none of the other ’82 Tides who had been so highly touted — had to be absolutely decimated by injuries to bring Terry Leach to the forefront of the Mets’ plans. On October 1, 1982, Rick Ownbey couldn’t pitch, so Leach was the emergency starter. In the summer of ’87, the defending world champs were bereft of Bobby Ojeda, Rick Aguilera, David Cone and Sid Fernandez, each of them missing time due to injury, so Leach was plucked out of the bullpen.

He started ten games from June 1 to August 11. The Mets won nine of them. His ERA in a dozen appearances overall in this time frame was 2.99. His own won-lost record was 7-0. He gave up less than a hit per inning and walked a batter only every five innings. No matter what unorthodox motion it took his submarining right arm to rise to the surface, it was clear it was Terry Leach who was keeping the Mets afloat.

The perennially disregarded Leach pitched for the Mets until 1989 and in the majors until 1993. He was a member of the Minnesota Twins bullpen in 1991, where he earned the World Series ring Mets management didn’t see fit to award him for his contributions to the 1986 club. Granted, he pitched only a half-dozen games that championship year, but Ed Lynch pitched in only one, and he got a ring.

Jewelry was apparently reserved for some players. For others, there were jibes. Somewhere amid the releases and demotions, GM Frank Cashen kidded Terry, “Don’t worry, Leachie. You’ll always keep showing back up around here. You’re like a bad penny.” Had Leach’s 1985 Tides teammate Billy Beane been taking notes for his eventual career as a general manager, he might have countered Cashen’s perception. In a more enlightened industry, Terry Leach wouldn’t have been seen as a bad penny.

He was a classic undervalued asset.

ALSO QUITE HAPPY: On October 1, 1999, the Mets began their Friday night almost dead and ended it in surprisingly vital fashion.

The light that flickered hopefully at Shea when the Mets clobbered Greg Maddux on Wednesday was nearly extinguished on Thursday in an eleven-inning nailbiter lost to the Braves, 4-3. The moment of sheer devastation occurred when right fielder Shawon Dunston failed to corral a Brian Jordan fly ball that became a leadoff triple and eventual winning run, yet the knockout blow was delivered by Chipper Jones after the game. With the Mets reeling and on the verge of elimination, he snottily shrugged that his critics in the Field Level seats could now “go home and put their Yankees stuff on”.

Mets fans were not amused and wished dearly to stuff that remark up Larry Jones’ Chip-hole, but to do so in 1999 would require a reversal of fortunes bordering on the miraculous. The odds were spelled out as the Mets approached their final weekend series of the year: Only one team, the 1962 San Francisco Giants, had been two out of a postseason berth with three to play and actually played in the postseason. That was relevant because the Braves’ defeat of the Mets left the Mets a pair behind both Cincinnati and Houston in the N.L. Wild Card race. One of those two teams would definitely be the Central Division champ. The other had a significant leg up on the Mets.

All the Mets had going for them was they were only almost dead. And as long as you’re still clinically alive, anything can happen…never mind that it’s rarely happened before.

Friday evening at Shea, the Mets welcomed the Pirates and surprisingly few others. After the big ballpark was packed for three consecutive nights against Atlanta, many Mets fans apparently needed a mental-health night. Attendance was less than 30,000 for the game that would determine if the 1999 Mets had any future left in them. Those who showed up were left to wonder how long the future would take to arrive. The present was awfully mysterious about revealing what it had in store for these Mets.

The first seven innings, as prosecuted by Kenny Rogers, trended favorably. Rogers allowed no runs, three hits and struck out nine while guarding a 2-0 lead that was built on solo homers by Robin Ventura and Mike Piazza off Jason Schmidt. On a pitching staff that was always strapped for length, Rogers — acquired from Oakland prior to the July 31 trade deadline — had been close to a godsend, certainly at Shea. Kenny pitched the Mets’ first home complete game of the season on Labor Day, and the Mets hadn’t lost a single game he started there in his six previous starts.

Trouble, however, arose in the top of the eighth when Rogers walked John Wehner to lead off the inning. He made Al Martin his tenth strikeout victim, but then gave up back-to-back singles to Pat Meares and Aramis Ramirez to cut the Mets’ lead to 2-1. Bobby Valentine pulled Kenny and brought in Turk Wendell. After striking out Kevin Young, he walked Chad Hermansen to load the bases. Out went Wendell. In came John Franco. And in came Meares to score when Warren Morris scratched out a single. It might have been worse, except Franco got a very generous borderline strike call on a 3-2 pitch with the bases loaded to retire Adrian Brown and slither out of the eighth.

The team that couldn’t afford to lose was now tied. Another bases-loaded situation materialized immediately, this time for the Mets. A Darryl Hamilton single, a Rey Ordoñez walk and a Meares error on Bobby Bonilla’s grounder to short set the Mets up to break the tie. But with two out, Melvin Mora, the .138 hitter who had replaced Rickey Henderson for defense when the Mets were up by two, forced Shane Halter (pinch-running for Bonilla) at second.

An hour behind, in the Central time zone, the news was mixed. The Dodgers had taken an early lead on the Astros, and rookie starter Eric Gagne was keeping Houston in check. But from Milwaukee, the out-of-town dispatches were less encouraging. Mike Cameron and Greg Vaughn had each homered and the Reds had taken a 3-0 lead into the sixth. A win by either Cincinnati or Houston combined with a Mets loss would take put that team beyond the Mets’ reach. Wins by both of them, combined with a New York defeat, would simply eliminate the Mets altogether.

All the Mets could do was concentrate on beating the Pirates, a team in the midst of a seven-year non-winning streak. Pittsburgh entered this game at 78-81, so they hadn’t clinched a losing 1999 yet. It may not have represented much motivation for the Bucs, but knocking out a contender certainly loomed as a consolation prize. Whatever was keeping them going, the Pirates weren’t going as quietly as the Mets needed them to.

Armando Benitez came on in the ninth and struck out Keith Osik, Dale Sveum and Martin in order. That could have provided a lift for the Mets, but given two chances to build a winning rally in the bottom of the ninth, the Mets wasted them both. Edgardo Alfonzo’s walk was erased when John Olerud grounded into a 4-6-3 double play, and the gift Piazza received when Meares booted yet another ground ball was revoked when Ventura struck out.

Extras beckoned. While Pat Mahomes went about keeping the Pirates at bay — working around a leadoff single by Meares — Central developments were tilting the Mets’ way. The Astros were indeed going down to defeat, 5-1. And the Brewers had tied the Reds: Jeff Cirillo had doubled in one run in the sixth and singled in two runs in the eighth. Events at the Astrodome had been kind to the Mets and County Stadium was potentially following suit. Mostly, though, their fate depended on what happened at Shea.

Hamilton, Jay Payton and Ordoñez each produced a groundout in the bottom of the tenth versus Scott Sauerbeck, a former Met farmhand who became a Buc in the 1998 Rule 5 draft. Mahomes then chilled the Pirates in the top of the eleventh, lining out Brown, flying out Osik and freezing Sauerbeck on a called strike three. Pittsburgh manager Gene Lamont so liked what he was seeing from his pitcher that he left him in to bat for himself.

Back on the mound, Sauerbeck dug a quick hole, surrendering a leadoff single to Dunston. Mora bunted Shawon to second. Fonzie was intentionally walked, leading to runners on first and second…who went to second and third, respectively, when Olerud grounded out to the right side. The open base was filled when Lamont ordered Piazza walked.

This brought up Robin Ventura with the bases loaded, which three times during the 1999 season was a surefire recipe for the finest cut of salami available. Grand slam threat aside (he had 13 in his career to date), Ventura was simply lethal that year with the bags juiced. He’d batted nineteen times with the bases loaded, going 8-for-16 and walking three times. Plus he’d hit the homer that put the Mets ahead in the fourth.

True, Piazza had gone deep in the sixth; and true, Piazza was Piazza; and just as true, Robin’s Mojo had been dipping of late (he’d batted .187 in his previous 21 games), but choosing to pitch to Robin Ventura with the bases loaded seemed like a helluva way to keep the Mets in the Wild Card hunt.

And so it was. Ventura lined a single into center, bringing home Dunston and giving the Mets a 3-2 win that was as crucial to their 1999 destiny as any. Not many minutes later, they won as bystanders, too. In the top of the tenth at Milwaukee, Marquis Grissom robbed Eddie Taubensee of a two-run extra base hit with a sensational diving catch…and in the bottom of the tenth, Ronnie Belliard singled home Mark Loretta to defeat Cincinnati, 4-3.

The Mets were one behind the Astros and the Reds with two to play. They were far more alive heading into Saturday than they had been when they came out of Thursday.

GAME 161: October 1, 1973 — Mets 6 CUBS 4
(Mets All-Time Game 161 Record: 26-19; Mets 1973 Record: 82-79)

For a pennant race that came along all at once, the lunge for the 1973 N.L. East flag sure got stubborn about getting over with. But by the time this unfathomable season was reaching its inevitable conclusion, even recalcitrance couldn’t stop the New York Mets.

First, the weather over Chicago, where the Mets were slated to play their final series, wouldn’t budge. After a scheduled off day Thursday, it poured Friday, knocking out one game. It poured Saturday, too, taking out a planned doubleheader. As of Sunday, they hadn’t played since Wednesday. The Mets left their last homestand with a record of 80-78 and a lead of a half-game over second-place Pittsburgh. Sitting inactive for three days hadn’t exactly damaged them. They were still 80-78, but their divisional lead had increased to a game-and-a-half, though it was now the Cardinals who were their closest competitor.

That’s indicative of the other element that wouldn’t get a move on in the Mets’ world: the race. Like the rain, it wouldn’t go away. Everybody who was ever a contender in 1973 remained a contender as the final scheduled day of the season commenced. Five teams — five! — were still mathematically alive that Sunday. Taking into account makeup dates that still loomed as playable for Monday, the following scenario was, at the very least, conceivable on September 30:

• The Mets could drop two doubleheaders to the Cubs and fall from 80-78 to 80-82; the Cubs, in turn, would correspondingly rise from 76-82 to 80-82.

• The Cardinals could lose to the Phillies and drop from 80-81 to 80-82.

• The Pirates (79-81) could lose to the Expos — who would complete their schedule at 80-82 — but then beat the Padres in a makeup game and move up to 80-82.

That would create the first five-way tie for first place in the history of baseball, and there weren’t enough coins in the Federal Reserve to toss to determine how a quintuple-tiebreaker might work. It wasn’t very likely the National League East would come down to that daffy a conclusion, but the fact that the possibility existed spoke to the unhinged nature of the 1973 stretch drive.

Which, in turn, spoke to how spectacularly the Mets had to play to drive the division into such glorious disarray. It’s fair to say that no 80-78 team has ever sat in first place on the final scheduled day of the season more deservedly.

From 61-71 and last place on August 30, the Mets ripped off 19 wins in their next 26 games to take over the top spot in the East. The theme of their charge was, of course “YOU GOTTA BELIEVE,” as authored by Tug McGraw, but the Tugger’s inspirational value shouldn’t overshadow all he did once he exited the bullpen buggy that fit his personality (and the times) to a tee. From September 5 to September 25, as the Mets took 15 of 19, McGraw made a dozen appearances. Every one of them was a personal and team success: he saved nine games and won three more. Eight of the outings were at least two innings long. The last of them in this stretch was typical in terms of performance and significance: two-and-a-third innings of shutout ball to nail down Jerry Koosman’s 2-1 win over the Expos on September 25th, the Mets’ season-high seventh consecutive victory.

Tug’s pitching that Tuesday night put the usual exclamation point on the Shea festivities, but nothing could have made more of a statement about the magical properties of this Met month than the way the evening began. Hours before Tug bid au revoir to the team from Canada, his most revered teammate was issuing a memorable signoff to a whole other nation.

It was Willie Mays Night, marking the end of a career surpassed by nobody for utter brilliance. Mays began it in 1951 in the same place where the Mets learned to crawl, at the Polo Grounds in Upper Manhattan. Six years and a slew of indelible images later, Willie and his team, the New York Giants, were whisked away to San Francisco. Their departure, along with the Brooklyn Dodgers’, facilitated the birth of the Mets, which was a good thing for the millions wrapped up in total Belief by September of 1973, but old-timers would tell you there was always a little something missing from the New York National League baseball scene as long as the quintessential New York National League baseball superstar was plying his trade on the West Coast.

Mrs. Joan Payson attempted to turn back time and make all right with the world in 1972 when she plied a trade of her own: Charlie Williams and cash to the Giants in exchange for Willie’s homecoming. It was a dramatic success from the Say Hey get-go…though after the euphoria of Willie Mays in a New York uniform settled down, it couldn’t help but be noticed that a season later, the Mets were left with a 42-year-old legend who had never been anything but a legend — but had never been 42 before.

Willie contributed a few timely hits in 1973, but after going 0-for-2 in Montreal on September 9, his batting average sank to a most unMayslike .211, accompanied by six homers, 25 RBIs and a mere 24 runs scored in 66 games (Willie had scored more than a hundred runs annually from 1954 through 1965). He was hurting physically after cracking two ribs on a metal rail at Jarry Park in pursuit of a foul ball, and mentally, not being the Willie Mays whom fans from coast-to-coast idolized and idealized finally caught up with him. Thus, he announced his retirement at a press conference in Shea’s Diamond Club on September 20.

Phil Pepe covered the SRO event for the Daily News, reminding any readers who were perhaps momentarily dismayed by Mays’s descent into cranky mortality — a couple of times as a Met, he hadn’t shown up when and where as expected, making Yogi Berra’s managerial tenure no easier — what Willie represented beyond his 660 home runs, 1,903 runs batted in, 2,062 runs scored, 3,283 base hits and .302 lifetime average. “[It] is not the records or the statistics or the awards that distinguish him,” Pepe wrote. “It is the memory of the way the man played the game, with a zest and a daring, with an excitement that is unmatched.”

“I’ve had a love affair with baseball,” Mays told the media, but acknowledged, “you just can’t play at 42 the way you did at 20.”

The Mets had already scheduled Willie Mays Night before his retirement went official. When they announced their intention to honor him, it was before there was any inkling that it would serve as a sidebar in a sizzling-hot pennant race…or that a pennant race might provide the backdrop to Willie Mays Night. Where No. 24 was concerned, it was unfathomable that he wouldn’t be the main attraction.

Sure enough, a full house of more than 53,000 showed up at Shea to bestow its appreciation on Mays. After a 45-minute tribute in which Willie was showered with all manner of gift and applauded by a veritable Hall of Fame cast of his Giant, Dodger and Yankee contemporaries from the golden age of New York baseball, it was the man of the hour’s turn to speak.

Those who heard what the Say Hey Kid had to say in his baseball twilight will never forget it. He thanked the crowd for remembering him for the player he had been rather than the player time forced him to become:  “If you knew how I felt in my heart to hear you cheer and know I can’t do anything about it…” He thanked the visiting Expos for enduring the delay, apologetically explaining to the Mets rivals du nuit, “This is my farewell. I thought I’d never quit.” He thanked the Mets for waiting patiently on such a big night in the course of their own journey: “I hope you go on to win the flag for the New York people. This is your night as well as mine.”

Actually, for as long as Willie spoke and for as long as Willie’s words resonated, it would always belong to him, especially given the sendoff he gave to his own sendoff:

“I see these kids over here, and I see how these kids are fighting for a pennant, and to me it says one thing: Willie, say goodbye to America.”

Was there any doubt after that that those kids — his Mets — would go out and win their seventh in a row? Was there any doubt, either, that Willie’s New York departure was every bit as fortuitous as his introduction? That came 22 years earlier, when the Giants were struggling, far removed from first place until August. Yet with rookie Willie Mays on board, those Giants caught fire, passed the Dodgers and  — after Bobby Thomson (in attendance at Shea this night) went deep off Ralph Branca (also there) — won the pennant.

“Look at it,” another Willie Mays Night guest, Brooklyn Dodger icon Joe Black, suggested. “It was Willie largely who brought the Giants out of the doldrums and now it’s Willie’s inspiration — in another way — that I think will carry the New York Mets to the National League championship and maybe to their second World Series title.”

What a great storyline for a great night. And what great resilience Willie’s Mets were showing throughout September, all seemingly regaining their health in unison, every one of them stepping up their game as the stakes grew higher. Consider Cleon Jones, who hit the homer to the put the Mets ahead on Willie’s night and made a backhanded catch worthy of Mays to help McGraw bid adieu to Montreal.

Jones’s injury-riddled season was one of the reasons the Mets stalled for so long in ’73. After playing no fewer than 129 games every season since 1966, Cleon was out for chunks of April and May and all of June. The disabled list also swallowed up significant portions of Bud Harrelson’s and Jerry Grote’s campaigns. George “The Stork” Theodore’s rookie year was derailed when he crashed into Don Hahn in July. John “The Hammer” Milner had hamstring issues. Rusty Staub’s hands were still aching from the year before. Jon Matlack absorbed a line drive to the forehead. Constructing a lineup of pain-free Mets was a challenge every night for Berra before September.

But in September, the Mets were well and benefited from running an almost set unit onto the field game after game. Leftfielder Jones was in the full bloom of health, regaining his power stroke down the stretch and slugged six homers over the final ten games. Garrett — having inherited the third base job full-time when the front office’s string of big-name bad ideas (Joe Foy, Bob Aspromonte, Jim Fregosi) finally played itself out — was suddenly Brooks Robinson on both sides of the ball…and a .422 hitter across the season’s last dozen games. Staub began a hitting streak on September 15 that, where 1973’s regular season was concerned, never ended. The rightfielder batted a Le Grand .387 in the Mets’ final fifteen contests. Hahn and Dave Schneck split time tracking fly balls in Mays’s old center field stomping grounds. Harrelson at short partnered with second baseman Felix Millan to restabilize the middle infield. Milner was at first to receive their throws. Grote was calling the shots from behind the plate.

The Mets finally had their team intact, and it was paying off.

And the pitching…always the pitching where the Mets were concerned. McGraw’s revival underscored everything, but the bullpen wasn’t just about Tug. It also featured Harry Parker coming out of nowhere and Ray Sadecki remaining rock-solid. The rotation’s least-known name, George Stone, rolled to a 12-3 record, making the trade that brought him and Millan to the Mets from Atlanta (for Gary Gentry and Danny Frisella) one of the best in franchise history.

But at the heart of the operation, just as in 1969, were three unstoppable starters. That’s what had to give Berra the core of his confidence when the clouds finally parted enough to play two in sodden Chicago that final Sunday, September 30. He tabbed Matlack for the opener, and the second-year lefty did not disappoint, firing a complete-game five-hitter, with nine strikeouts. The only problem was the Mets bats sat idle, perhaps not being notified that the rain, rain had gone away. The Mets scored nothing for Matlack. The Cubs scratched out a solitary run. It was enough to beat the Mets, 1-0. Paired with the last game the Mets had played, a loss to Montreal four days earlier, the hottest team in baseball was suddenly in the midst of its first losing streak of any length since August 26.

Not exactly the juncture a Mets fan would choose for his team to cool off, but another game remained that Sunday, and another stellar lefty, Koosman, was taking the mound. In the nightcap, Jerry was just about as good as Jon: nine innings, six hits, seven strikeouts, two runs allowed…and this time, the Mets’ bats got the memo that the game was on. Led by Cleon’s two-run homer and Rusty’s three RBIs, Kooz cruised to a 9-2 win. With the Cubs defeated, the five-team tie scenario disappeared. And with Pittsburgh topping Montreal, the Expos were eliminated. The Cardinals, however, won their game and stayed in the race, as did the Bucs.

So here’s where the recalcitrant 1973 pennant race stood at the end of the day when it was, on paper, supposed to end: three teams were still alive. The Cardinals, at 81-81, would sit back and monitor what would happen in Pittsburgh, where the Padres’ presence was kindly requested to make up a previously postponed game, and in Chicago, where the Mets and Cubs owed the senior circuit one more twinbill. If the Pirates, at 80-81, won, and the Mets, at 81-79, were swept, a three-way tie would occur. A Pirate loss would make Pittsburgh superfluous, but no Mets win in two games would pit New York and St. Louis in a tiebreaker.

A Mets win would make all the statistical potentialities blissfully academic. And if anybody was capable of erasing the National League East’s overcrowded blackboard once and for all, it was Berra’s starting pitcher for Monday’s opener, George Thomas Seaver.

There were worse options for a manager. There was none better.

Never mind that Tom Seaver was a tired ace pitcher, coming to the end of a season in which he surpassed 250 innings for the seventh time in his seven-year career. Never mind that two of his most recent outings went only three innings and two innings. Never mind that, at 18-10, his standard of 20 wins was out of reach. Tom Seaver, 19-Game Winner might not quite roll off the tongue after he’d won 25, 20 and 21 in three of his previous four seasons, but this was no ordinary nineteenth win sitting on the Wrigley Field table.

“When you get to where Tom Seaver is,” Larry Merchant wrote in the Post, “it doesn’t only matter how many you win, but which ones you win.”

He was Tom Seaver. He was the Franchise. He was going to lead the National League in strikeouts with 251, in ERA at 2.08, and in the as yet uncalculated category of walks and hits per innings pitched (0.976). He had the bona fides to match his reputation. And he was ready. “I’m not going to put intangible pressure to bear on myself,” Tom promised. He was just going to try to put his team in the postseason any way he could and then look forward to thus having “more work to do” five days hence at Riverfront Stadium.

After Seaver and Burt Hooton swapped zeroes in the first inning, Jones got the first big swing of the day in, belting one of the Cub starter’s knuckle-curves into the mostly deserted right-center field bleachers (paid attendance in Wrigleyville, where the Mets’ fortunes didn’t elicit much interest: 1,913). The score stayed 1-0 through three, with Seaver’s first brush with adversity — two on, one out in the third — cleared away by a Harrelson-Millan-Milner DP.

Hooton loaded the bases in the fourth on a single to Staub and walks to Milner and Jones. Perfectly set up, Grote lined a single to center to increase the Mets’ lead to 3-0. Seaver gave up two more hits in the fourth, bringing the Cubs’ total to five, but again emerged undamaged.

The top of the fifth appeared to bury the Cubs once and for all. Garrett led off with a double. Millan singled him to third. Cub skipper Whitey Lockman (a teammate of Mays’s on the Giants’ championship clubs of ’51 and ’54) pulled Hooton and inserted Mike Paul. He was greeted by a run-scoring single from Rusty and a sac fly off the bat of the Hammer. The Mets led 5-0, and the division title was so close the Mets could taste it…and the Pirates wanted to spit it out. At Three Rivers Stadium, the score from Chicago flashed as the national anthem was performed. Pittsburgh assumed its fate was sealed.

The only actor not reading from the script was Seaver. Instead of being buoyed by the relative surfeit of Met runs, he struggled. Four Cubs recorded base hits in the fourth, with the last two producing runs. It was 5-2 heading to the sixth. It stayed 5-2 until the seventh when a Ron Santo error allowed a sixth Met run to plate. Tom Seaver and a four-run lead were all anybody who bled orange and blue could dream of three innings shy of a divisional dream coming true.

Nevertheless, at the end of a season that had been so nightmarish for so long, sweet dreams were elusive. The home seventh began with Dave Rosello dunking a single into center. It was the Cubs’ tenth single of the day. Then Rick Monday, Seaver’s teammate almost a decade earlier on the semi-pro Alaska Goldpanners, mined Seaver’s exhaustion for a two-run homer. It was now 6-4. It was now getting dicey.

It was now time to take out one ace and call on another.

If Seaver had to be the pitcher to start the game that could put a cap on 1973, McGraw had to be the pitcher to end it. Like Seaver, he was ready to take the ball.

“I was pretty hot by now,” Tug wrote in Screwball, “all jacked up and believing like hell.”

Sure enough, Tug set down the Cubs 1-2-3 in the seventh…and 1-2-3 in the eighth. His streak was snapped when Ken Rudolph opened the ninth with a single, but he then struck out Rosello. Still leading 6-4, Tug faced pinch-hitter Glenn Beckert with Rudolph on first.

Which brings us, as all Happiest Recaps should, to Bob Murphy:

“Now the stretch by McGraw, the three-two delivery…the runner goes, and a little popup! Milner grabs it — he’ll run to first…double play! The Mets win the pennant! The Mets have just won the pennant in the Eastern Division! It’s all over, the Mets have won it with a magnificent stretch drive. They won nineteen and lost only eight in September, they’ve won their first October ballgame, and with it, they have won the pennant in the Eastern Division.”

The Mets were a 21-8 club dating back to the final day of August, the day they moved out of the cellar. They were an 82-79 team overall, which in every other season to that point in major league history would have meant a ticket home. Instead, in the wild and wacky year of 1973 — when “eternal optimist” Tom Seaver admitted the odds facing the Mets in summer “strained even my eternal optimism” — it was a ticket to the National League Championship Series against the Reds. They were division champs for the second time in five years, creating a miracle every bit as incomprehensible as the one from 1969. Stranger, probably.

In ’69, the Mets materialized as if from thin air, but they did it sooner and grabbed first place earlier. This team took it to the wire and then needed one more day besides. They had four teams on their tail on the supposed last day, two more still hanging around the day after. But now the Cards were done, the Pirates (losing to San Diego) were done and even they could finally take a breath. The makeup doubleheader’s second half was no longer needed, and the umpires didn’t need much of an excuse to defer to the endlessly gray skies that enveloped Chicago’s north side and call it off.

Geez, these Mets had, like McGraw, gotten so hot, that they didn’t even need an entire season to zoom from last on August 30 to first on October 1. They clinched in 161 games. The stubbornness of this season like no other may have been taking a nine-inning break, but now it insisted on continuing deep into October. Per Yogi’s summertime pronouncement, it really wasn’t going to be over until it was over…which was fine with all concerned, one Met maybe more than any other.

In September, when Willie Mays was announcing his retirement, he was already on the sidelines. He never played in another regular-season game after September 9. But he promised that if the Mets were successful in extending their fight for a pennant, he, like all the kids he called his teammates, would be prepared to play.

“If we get into the World Series,” Mays told the reporters, “I’ll be there.”

As it turned out, Willie became one of the reasons the 1973 Mets would get to the World Series, as the NLCS demonstrated he wasn’t done playing, and his hit in deciding Game Five showed he could still contribute. But before that showdown versus Cincinnati could take on its own legend, there was the matter of getting the Say Hey Kid on the plane out of Chicago.

“Where’s Willie?” Seaver asked amid the raucous clubhouse celebration at Wrigley.

“He took two sips of champagne,” Tom was told, “and he’s passed out on the training table.”

You Gotta Believe it was as fitting a reaction to all that had transpired in 1973 as any.

ALSO QUITE HAPPY: On September 27, 2008, Johan Santana…actually, that pretty much describes it. “Johan Santana” earned its place as a synonym for “one player saved an entire team, an entire season and an entire stadium,” even if it was only for one day.

The Mets needed a starting pitcher to keep them viable on the second-to-last day of the 2008 season. They trailed the Phillies by two in the N.L. East and Milwaukee by one for the N.L. Wild Card. Lose on Saturday, and their season was all but over and Shea Stadium would be destined for a meaningless game on its final day the next day. Of course they needed a starting pitcher in order to forestall calamity, but what they really needed one who would prevent their bullpen from doing any more damage to their chances than their relief corps had already done.

No kidding. The Mets’ relievers were a horror show. And their logical options to start with proper rest — raw rookie Jonathon Niese, retreads Brandon Knight and Nelson Figueroa — were not what you’d call stoppers. In a perfect world, they’d turn to Santana, who had given them their last excellent start on Tuesday: eight innings, two runs, ten strikeouts (on 125 pitches) against the Cubs. He even scored a pair himself. Santana was indeed the pitcher for the job, exactly what the Mets had in mind when they shipped four prospects to Minnesota to acquire him and forklifted a metric ton of money into his bank account to keep him around through 2013.

The only problem with the Santana-on-Saturday scenario was Johan would have only three days’ rest. And Johan Santana, two-time American League Cy Young Award winner, had never started a game in the big leagues on three days’ rest.

So why not give it a try now? It’s not like Santana wasn’t willing to do it — he “begged for the chance,” Jerry Manuel said — and it’s not like the manager had a remotely better option. And as far as anybody knew, it wasn’t like Santana wasn’t fully healthy. But in reality, he wasn’t. It wasn’t mentioned publicly, but Johan was going to require postseason surgery to repair a torn meniscus in his left knee. It had been aching badly for a month, though Johan being Johan rather brushed it off as an inconvenience.

“He told me that the only way he was not going to finish the season,” Santana’s agent Chris Leible said, “was if they took him to the hospital in an ambulance.”

Let’s back up, then. He’s never gone on three days’ left. He needs surgery. The Mets are desperate in the standings. They have nobody else who can start. They want, at all costs, to use as little of their bullpen as possible. The stadium is about to close forever. And, oh yes, the Mets are still laboring under the burden of having let a playoff spot slip through their fingers at the same time the year before.

Anything else? Anything else to put more weight on Johan Santana’s broad shoulders? Any bold statements — bolder than insisting he be the one to pitch this do-or-die game?

How about, “It’s time to be a MAN”? That’s what Johan actually wrote on a piece of paper and actually hung on the wall inside the Mets’ clubhouse before the Saturday matinee against the Marlins.

Anybody who thought Johan only scribbled a good game had seen nothing yet. On a day with as much on the line as any Mets team had ever encountered, Johan wasn’t a man — he was a team of men. He was from another planet. The Planet Johan, where pitchers don’t worry about adequate rest, joint pain or anything as silly as a pitch count.

How long could Johan go? How long did the Mets need him to go? Whatever it would take, Santana would deliver. Nine innings? Obviously. One-hundred seventeen pitchers? Fine. A complete game, three-hit, nine-strikeout, 2-0 shutout that by day’s end pulled the Mets even with the Brewers for the Wild Card? That’s why they pay the man the millions they do.

That last one isn’t quite fair. The Mets paid Santana an acely sum (six years, $137.5 million) to go out and do the kinds of things he had done for the Twins every five days. Doing them on the fourth day…on the second-to-last day of the season and the stadium…on one good leg…while using one foot to keep the Mets’ bullpen door sealed securely shut…and then triumphantly tossing the ball from the final out (a deep fly to left from Cody Ross, caught by Endy Chavez) to a fan sitting behind the Mets’ dugout?

It was exactly the right time to be JOHAN, in capital letters.

Johan Santana fashioned the last win in the history of Shea Stadium. Sadly, it didn’t coincide with the last game of Shea Stadium and it wasn’t capable of creating more games at Shea Stadium, as in postseason games. By October 1, Johan would be not on a mound, but at the Hospital for Special Surgery getting that meniscus fixed. Whatever ailed the Mets after their second consecutive collapse or implosion or whatever you wanted to call it couldn’t and wouldn’t be repaired so easily. But that was hardly Johan’s fault. Nothing in the wake of the wreckage of another lost September could be left in Johan’s lap except kudos for what, all things considered, might have been the most clutch game a pitcher ever pitched in a New York Mets uniform.

In 2010, a documentary titled The Last Play at Shea was released, centering on the final concert the old ballpark ever hosted, Billy Joel’s second show in July of 2008. Because the Mets failed to make the playoffs, narrator Alec Baldwin declared Joel’s big night — which ended with Paul McCartney sitting in to perform “Let It Be” — “the stadium’s last magic moment”.

Anybody who was blessed enough to watch Johan Santana go the distance two months later would be compelled to not let that rather shortsighted assessment be.

At Sixes and Sevens

In the same way the sight of “10.27” made me smile yesterday, the thought of “Game Seven” has got me grinning today. Yet this has nothing to do with 1986. This is all about 2011 and the World Series that is doing us the courtesy of sticking around one more night.

Which still might not be enough. They used to decide the World Series in a best-of-nine format. Surely the Cardinals and Rangers can be persuaded to hang in there until November and go a little further in their autumnal exploits. And if they continue to absorb us into their activities the way they did Thursday night, would best-of-fifteen be too much to ask for? Best-of-23, maybe? ’Cause you know if Bud Selig could ram through such a format change on the fly, we’d be here in a couple of weeks looking at St. Louis and Texas, tied at eleven games apiece.

And it still wouldn’t be enough.

Whatever happens tonight, whether I outwardly exult with the Rangers or not so grudgingly tip my cap toward the Cardinals, I got what I wanted out of all this. I got Game Seven. It’s like I was sitting in a Buffalo Wild Wings commercial, the bartender heard me thinking about how I didn’t want to leave the World Series so soon and somebody pressed a button to make it rain eighth-, ninth-, tenth- and eleventh-inning runs over Busch Stadium.

“Game Seven of the World Series” would be a cliché, except it hasn’t existed for nearly a decade. The last time we saw one, I was elated because I was fully on board the Rally Monkey train, pulling hard for my temporarily adopted Angels to top the Giants. That was 2002. The year before, I was at least as thrilled to watch the Diamondbacks put the “die” in dynasty in a Game Seven for the ages. Those were genuine if temporary rooting interests rewarded with personally satisfying outcomes.

This time around, I hold no strong bias in favor of or against either participant. Yeah, I carry an oft-referenced deep legacy dislike of the Cardinals, but to root against them because they’re the Cardinals at this moment would feel small. I found myself rooting for them on and off in Game Six because without them succeeding we couldn’t have a Game Seven, and I really wanted a Game Seven.

Then again, I wasn’t rooting against the Rangers, and certainly at the fleeting instant when it appeared they were on the verge of capturing their first world championship in their forty seasons (tacking on their Senators tenure seems superfluous), I was feeling warm and fuzzy for our expansion brethren. I love a first title, whether it’s the first in a city, as it was for the Giants last year; or whether it’s the first in an eternity, as it was for the White Sox in 2005; or whether it’s the first, period, à la the Angels of ’02. The Ranger faithful put in their time, tasted their disappointment, turned out voluminously and turned up the volume in support of their likable beloveds. They deserved to get what seemed to be coming to them in the best sense of the phrase.

But then something else came at them altogether and everybody from Nolan Ryan on down was left to ponder, if not in Game Six, then when? If we’re up 7-4 in the middle of the seventh…and 7-5 going to the bottom of the ninth…and two runs ahead with two outs and two strikes, just one pitch away…

And even when that evaporated, after David Freese tripled in the tying runs (who triples in tying runs in the bottom of the ninth inning to stave off World Series elimination?), there was Josh Hamilton getting it all back on one swing in the top of the tenth, and there were the Rangers again on the precipice of what had eluded them since 1972, what had never seriously been on their radar until 2010. They were up 9-7, and all they had to do was get a fresh set of three outs.

Honest to god, though, as soon as I saw Darren Oliver was the pitcher tasked with getting them, I kind of knew the Rangers were screwed. No disrespect to our former lefty long man, but once the graphic flashed that a man with eighteen seasons of big league experience had picked up exactly six saves in his career, the sense of Texas-size doom set in. Mind you “kind of knew” and “sense of doom” indicate a lack of certainty on my part. Sometimes you just get a feeling about these things, but in Game Six of the 2011 World Series, I got about a thousand feelings, and probably 990 proved misguided. For example, at some point I decided there couldn’t be a Game Seven because how could anybody ask these players to keep playing after such an excruciating Game Six? Mea culpa on that instinct.

Nonetheless, here’s one of my thousand thoughts that stays with me hours after the fact: Tony La Russa’s greatest managerial genius may have been found not in anything he did during this epic contest but how he screwed up everybody’s notion of what a bullpen has to be when he assigned rigid roles, inning by inning, to Dennis Eckersley and everybody who pitched out of the pen in Oakland ahead of Eck. That was more than twenty years ago, but La Russa permanently changed baseball’s thinking on relief pitching. Setup men didn’t exist as such before La Russa and the late-’80s A’s. Closers weren’t automatically confined to one inning. But now all that is the norm.

The closer part was certainly the norm for Ron Washington in this most abnormal game. Neftali Feliz couldn’t quite keep the Cardinals from tying in the ninth. Then Neftali Feliz (22 pitches thrown) couldn’t be sent to the hill to pitch the tenth to redeem himself and, way more importantly, help the Rangers win their first World Series. Instead, it was 41-year-old Oliver, who was a gut-level bad bet (lefty-lefty matchups be damned; Daniel Descalsco and Jon Jay both singled off Darren anyway), and it was Scott Feldman (giving up a deceptively innocent fielder’s choice ground ball that made it 9-8), and it was the Cardinals, again a strike from elimination and again not being eliminated when Lance Berkman singled off Feldman to drive in Jay after Albert Pujols was intentionally walked.

Which, incidentally, was both the correct call (because he’s Pujols) and the dumbest idea ever (because Berkman is Berkman, never to be confused with chopped liver).

By the way, I could be talking out my hat on any of this. Game Six confounded our preconceptions into misconceptions all night. But because I was rooting for Game Seven, I didn’t much care if I was getting any of this right as I was going along. I just liked that it was going along and showing no sign of ending…until the bottom of the eleventh, that is, when Washington rolled out his eighth pitcher of the night, Mark Lowe, and I was pretty sure (more conditional hindsight) that Mark Lowe wasn’t going to continue the festivities much longer. I knew next to nothing about Mark Lowe, but I recognize an eighth pitcher of a World Season game when I see one. And so did Freese, as his game-winning home run six pitches later would attest.

Cardinals 10 Rangers 9 evoked dozens of postseason memories, Mets moments included, but to compare and contrast this Game Six to our Game Sixes from 1986, or the Game Six that didn’t end quite so joyously for us in 1999, or any Game Six you like from any World Series you care to name strikes me as inappropriate. For one thing, I’m confident Game Six of the 2011 World Series will serve as a new template for future nights of its nature. “It’s just like the time David Freese…” For another, this Game Six this morning stands alone. It has to. It happened last night. No other Game Six has given us a Game Seven for tonight, and a Game Seven for tonight is just what we needed, or at least what I very much wanted. I want it all to come down to one game, as clichéd as that sounds. This World Series and this postseason deserves this kind of final act, though I have to believe tonight’s production can’t help but serve as denouement, considering how utterly climactic last night’s was.

At times like these, I am a proud citizen of the Republic of Baseball. Here in our particular province, distant from the center of the action, we haven’t had a game in exactly a month. But that doesn’t bother me a whit right now. I hope fans of the Mets and fans of 27 other teams share my immense exhilaration that baseball continues one more night. Not because it’s baseball for baseball’s sake, but because it’s baseball that’s this absolutely thrilling.

Another Day of Life

Thanks to a fairly brutal stretch in the life of a freelance writer, I’d fallen asleep before the last out of every World Series game so far.

If I’m fated to only stay awake for one, at least I picked the right one.

If you like your baseball spine-tingling, heart-stopping and cliche-channeling, Game 6 was a game for you. Or perhaps more accurately, if you like all of those things you enjoyed the second half of Game 6. And if you like your baseball ragged and slapsticky to the point of wondering if there should be a keg at second base, the first half of Game 6 answered your prayers. Someday, it’s possible a grandchild will ask me for World Series superlatives. Sloppiest World Series game? Most-riveting one? If we subtract the ones in which I had a highly personal stake, they might just be the same game.

Also to be noted: We get another day of baseball. At this point on the calendar, with the threat of imminent snow and endless winter, a Game 7 is welcome for most any slate short of Yankees-Phillies. And if the powers that be could arrange a Game 8, I’d sign up for that too.

My rooting interest in this World Series has been a mild preference for Texas. The Rangers have never won a World Series (they’d never even been until getting Cinderella’ed last year by the Giants), which is a long hard road for a franchise that came into existence a year before we did. And I don’t start the clock at 1972, when the former Senators II took up residence in Arlington. Surely there must have been a few baseball-mad kids whose families left D.C. for the sprawling environs of Dallas at the beginning of the 1970s. Those kids have had it rough, and they’re overdue for a winter of dazed smiles and pinch-mes.

The Cardinals, by comparison, are the closest thing the National League has to the Yankees, with recent titles on their resume. Their fans can wait. Plus, while I don’t particularly begrudge Yadier Molina doing his job against Aaron Heilman in a game you probably remember, I detest Tony La Russa for his frantic overmanaging, cynical browbeating of the press corps and chronic need to call attention to himself. So I’m for Texas — but only mildly. Gray-bearded Lance Berkman and high-flying David Freese and the indomitable, carved-from-granite El Hombre have all put on quite a show, and I wouldn’t be that disappointed to see them find a happy ending at the end of their highly unlikely tale.

But back to a theme that’s intrigued me all year: storytelling. Both the Cardinals and the Rangers are terrific teams made up of unbelievable athletes whose lives are consumed by baseball. Neftali Feliz isn’t a choker any more than Freese is gritty or clutch or possessed of the magical quality of knowing how to win. (And if God told Josh Hamilton he was meant to hit a homer, he left out that there was a celestial check mark by Freese’s name too.)

Still, storytelling is how we fans navigate the hours and days and weeks and years, because that’s how we’re wired. And oh what storytelling awaits these teams, should St. Louis win Game 7. Should that happen, it will be a good decade at least before a Cardinals fan concedes defeat, having escaped the hangman in such thrilling fashion not once but twice in the dwindling hours of October. On the flip side, the Rangers will graduate to the ranks of the star-crossed, playing 2012 with the Sword of Davidfreese hanging over their heads. And if 2012 doesn’t bring them that title, look out. They’ll be in Cubs and Indians territory.

The other potential outcome is less dramatic, and from a neutral point of view much kinder: If Texas wins tonight, they enter baseball’s promised land, while this year’s Cardinals team remains forever beloved.

Either way, I’ll be watching. And with this kind of baseball upon us, something tells me I’ll be awake.

Pencils Down (Gloves in the Air)

We have our five winners in the Baseball’s Greatest Games: The 1986 World Series Game 6 DVD contest. We’ll reveal the identities of the recipients of this wonderful disc, furnished by A&E Home Entertainment in association with MLB Productions, as well as the answers to our quiz in short order. For now, congratulations to five Mets fans who can throw their proverbial gloves in the air Orosco-style on this most happy date.

And if you didn’t win a DVD via FAFIF, you’ll still attain a great deal of satisfaction if you order a copy from A&E.

Oh Happy Day

As soon as I saw today’s date, I got happy. It didn’t exactly sneak up on me, what with all the 25th anniversary talk in the air, yet I was surprised at the jolt “10.27” sent charging through my system when it leapt out at me from the bottom left-hand corner of our kitchen clock. Who knew the digital readout of a month and a day could serve as such a powerful dose of serotonin?

Here’s what’s great abut October 27, 1986: everything. There is no downside to it. There is no “yes, but…” to it. It was the conclusion to a perfect season and a perfect postseason, certainly as perfect as any span of Met time could be.

After October 27, 1986? Don’t bother me with that today. Don’t bother me with the 25 years from then to now and why no equivalent to October 27, 1986, has emerged, or that no equivalent to October 27, 1986, is detectable on the immediate horizon. Can’t do anything about the former, am not thinking about the latter at this moment.

I’m thinking about October 27, 1986, and how perfect it all was. There I go using that word again: perfect. Well, it was perfect. My team won its championship. Bam — that’s it. That’s the crux, the nutshell, whatever you want to call it. It happened and I walked around with it top of mind for weeks, if not months. I walk around with it in accessible mental storage always. It’s still perfect that the Mets won the 1986 World Series, a perfect capper to the 1986 Mets having been the 1986 Mets, to 1986 being one of two years that will never have to pay for its own drinks as long as I’m at the bar and capable of running a tab on its behalf.

We have two of these. They’re both perfect. The one from October 16, 1969, I grasped on contact though not with any appreciable depth (a symptom of being six). The one from October 27, 1986…oh, that one I got with all the nuance and all the trimmings. I was there for every day that led up to it: all of 1986, all of 1985, all of 1984, all of the fallow years before, everything on a straight line back to October 16, 1969, which was the date when I decided, consciously or otherwise, that someday I would have another one just like it.

And I got it. It took what felt like forever, but I got it. They won, we won, I won — same thing in my estimation. Emotionally, I was voted a full winner’s share. No check, no ring, no trophy, but I got my reward. I don’t display it as much as I do my angst, but I know where it is. I have never allowed anything to tarnish it. I never will.

It was perfect, I tell you. Perfect.

Three DVDs to Go

[NOTE: WE HAVE OUR WINNERS. THE CONTEST IS NOW CLOSED.]

Quick quiz update: We’ve received correct answers from two readers thus far, meaning three of you still have a chance to win the fabulous Baseball’s Greatest Games: 1986 World Series Game 6 from A&E Home Entertainment in association with MLB Productions. To reiterate, this is the entire NBC broadcast of the game that began October 25, 1986 and careened into the earliest hour of October 26, 1986 (so it’s only appropriate the contest wander into a second day). What makes the DVD extra special is an audio track featuring Bob Murphy and Gary Thorne doing their play-by-play on WHN, which you can sync to the video…which is both how I watched and listened to the bottom of the tenth in real time 25 years ago and how I enjoyed the DVD on my first viewing.

If you want to buy it for yourself or a loved one, buy it here. If you want to win it, win it here. There are 18 questions — including a now accurately composed Question 4 — and all the answers can be divined with a a little scrolling and clicking on Baseball-Reference’s postseason page (with a dash of your innate Mets knowledge coming in handy). The subject is former Mets pitchers who, like Darren Oliver and Octavio Dotel in Game Five of this year’s Fall Classic, have either won or lost World Series games.

So go play and go win!

Oliver (W), Dotel (L), You (DVD)

[NOTE: WE HAVE OUR WINNERS. THE CONTEST IS NOW CLOSED.]

The story in Central Texas is Mike Napoli coming through loud and clear. The story in St. Louis is Tony La Russa hearing static on the line while his players left everything else on base. But here in Metsopotamia, where we take every opportunity we can to be parochial, Game Five of the 2011 World Series offered juicy statistical tidbit.

The winning pitcher was a former Met. The losing pitcher was a former Met. That’s never happened in the same World Series game before.

So let’s hear it (assuming we’re not using the bullpen phone at Rangers Ballpark in Arlington) for Darren Oliver, whose scoreless eighth in relief of Alexi Ogando kept Monday night’s game tied long enough for his teammates to tally the two decisive runs in the bottom of the eighth…both of them charged to the Redbird reliever who started the inning, Octavio Dotel. Though Octavio was saddled with the loss after giving up a leadoff double to Michael Young and a one-out intentional walk to Nelson Cruz, at least he was supposed to be in the game. Not every Cardinal pitcher called on immediately thereafter could say the same thing.

And if he could, there’s no guarantee anyone in management could hear him.

The way most of this postseason has been piloted, “winning pitchers” and “losing pitchers” are almost beside the point. Derek Holland getting the win in Game Four was significant in terms of his contribution (though not so significant I had to hear him doing impressions in the middle of Game Five…oh, Fox, will you ever stop stepping on your own telecasts?). Relievers nabbing W’s and/or getting stuck with L’s — Dotel put on only one runner of his own volition and somebody surrendered Napoli’s winning/losing two-run double — are mostly box score niceties. Because baseball has refused to adapt my innovative advanced pitching statistic (a.k.a. Nice Job, Atta Boy, Way To Go), individual winners and losers in a team game still require designation at game’s end.

Darren Oliver, who’s been around so long he was a teammate of the man who presently owns the club for which he pitches, served one honorable term as a Met in 2006, sucking up six valuable innings in the midst of that season’s ill-fated NLCS. Octavio Dotel, who’s been around six years fewer than Oliver but pitched for four more franchises, also did his best to push his Mets team — the ’99ers — into a World Series. He and they didn’t quite get there, though boy was it fun watching them try.

Oliver became the eighth former Met to win a World Series game. Dotel became the thirteenth former Met to lose a World Series game. I could tell you who the others were, but then it struck me, parochially, that you should tell me. If you can, I will bestow on you a valuable prize.

Because we do look at things through a blue & orange prism around here, of course today’s date jumps out at us from the calendar. It is October 25, and you don’t need to be Mets maven Mark Simon to know what that means. Twenty-five years ago tonight…well, I’ll just let Mark remind you in detail what was going on in Flushing (and, for that matter, what yours truly was thinking). Of course this is Buckner Day in Metsopotamia. We could say it’s Mookie Day, too, but who’re we kidding? One pair of legs stands out in the most visceral retelling, and though Mookie’s were the fastest, they tend to come in second in terms of the legend (even if Mookie is a certifiable legend in his own right).

Given that this is the silver anniversary of the Game Six of all Game Sixes (and we’ve had a few Game Sixes),  we have a most suitable remembrance gift to offer to FIVE of our diligent readers. A&E Home Entertainment, in association with MLB Productions, has given us copies of its newest, most valuable DVD release, Baseball’s Greatest Games: 1986 World Series Game 6. It’s the NBC broadcast with a twist: you can watch it as it aired, complete with Vin Scully and Joe Garagiola’s play-by-play, or, better yet (remember, we’re parochial), you can sync it to the audio from WHN that sensational Saturday Night/Sunday morning.  Thus, you can watch the video while listening to Bob Murphy and Gary Thorne announce their hearts out.

I’ve watched/listened to the DVD that way, and with no disrespect toward Vin and Joe, that is totally the way to go. And this is totally the DVD to have, whether you buy it from A&E or, preferably, win it right here.

How to win? By answering a quiz about former Mets (that is, pitchers who already pitched for the New York Mets in their major league career) who have won and/or lost World Series games. For those who know their way around the indispensable Baseball-Reference site, the correct answers are in your grasp (and it’s not hard to find your way around B-R).

Submit your answers via e-mail to faithandfear@gmail.com. The first FIVE entrants with ALL the correct answers will be awarded the DVD. If  we don’t get five totally correct sets of answers, then we’ll use the highest scores and break ties based on who gets the most correct answers in earliest. Usually these contests are decided relatively quickly (we’ll announce when he have our winners), but in case this one isn’t,  the deadline is Friday night, October 28, 11:59 PM EDT.

Read everything carefully, think before answering and good luck!

[NOTE: WE HAVE OUR WINNERS. THE CONTEST IS NOW CLOSED.]

1) I’m the Original Met who became the first former Met to win a World Series game. Who am I?

2) I’m the Original Met who became the second third former Met to lose a World Series game. Who am I?

3) I wasn’t an Original Met, but I was traded for one and wound up losing a World Series game the very same year that trade was made. Who am I?

4) I was a Met during three seasons when the Mets lost a combined 290 games, but don’t blame me: I lost only one two FOUR* of them. I eventually hooked up with a world champion, but I lost a World Series game for them. Who am I?

5) I pitched for the 1969 Mets, but my first World Series decision — a loss — occurred in the 1970s. Who am I?

6) I lost two games in the same World Series when I was a former Met, yet I’m pretty sure even those Mets fans who rooted for me when I had been a Met didn’t mind. Who am I?

7) I’m a former Met who lost two games in the same World Series in New York, but I couldn’t say for sure how most Mets fans felt about it since most Mets fans probably weren’t too happy about anything during that World Series. Who am I?

8) I’m the only former Met to win a game and lose a game in the same World Series as a starter. Who am I?

9) I’m the only former Met to win a game in two different World Series. Who am I?

10) I’m the only former Met to lose a game in two different World Series. Who am I?

11) I was traded to the Mets for the pitcher who would become the only former Met to lose a game in two different World Series. But my luck was better: I won a World Series game as a former Met. Who am I?

12) I’m the former Met who nailed down a playoff spot for my team by throwing the final pitch of our clincher at Shea Stadium. More than a decade later, however, I lost a World Series game. Who am I?

13) I won the longest postseason game ever played at Shea Stadium, but more than a decade later, I lost a regulation World Series game. Who am I?

14) I’m the only former Met to lose a World Series game in the same postseason in which I had earlier pitched against the Mets. Who am I?

15) I’m the only former Met to win a World Series game who also threw the final pitch for the Mets in a different postseason. Who am I?

16) I’m the only lefty former Met pitcher to win a game and lose a game in the same World Series. Who am I?

17) I was once a teammate of a former Mets pitcher who had won his only World Series ring when he was a Met. During my tenure as a former Mets pitcher myself, I won a game that gave that same former Mets pitcher with whom I was once a teammate a pretty good chance to win another World Series ring. Who am I?

18) I’m the only former righty Met pitcher to win a game and lose a game in relief in the same World Series. Who am I?

*Apologies for twice muffing Question 4, for which I seem to have had a momentary lapse of reading comprehension. The pitcher in question lost four games across three consecutive seasons for the Mets: two in one year, one each in the next two years.

Two, Maybe Three Different Sports

The baseball game I watched last night in which Derek Holland thoroughly shut down the St. Louis Cardinals’ offense bore little resemblance to the baseball game I watched 24 hours earlier in which Albert Pujols filleted the Texas Rangers’ pitching staff. Holland stood head and shoulders above his competition the same as Pujols did, yet completely differently. Two different skill sets on expert display, both altering the trajectory of the World Series, at least until somebody else comes along tonight and becomes the reason either the Rangers or Cardinals appear unstoppable.

If Saturday night’s game, starring one of the all-time greats, and Sunday night’s game, starring a pitcher who didn’t make it past the fifth inning in his three previous postseason starts, seemed to have little to do with each other, at least they were technically the same sport: baseball in two of its many intriguing stripes. And thanks to Holland, we are guaranteed two more chances at seeing what else our pastime of choice can give us before it gives us nothing but Jose Reyes speculation and recrimination.

Sunday afternoon, conveniently scheduled to fill the void between World Series contests — and perhaps serving to reorient me to Life After Baseball — I enjoyed the rare opportunity to sample another professional sport up close and in person. I returned to the Meadowlands and revisited football. My thoughtful friend Sharon was kind enough to invite me to see the Jets take on the Chargers in shiny, relatively new MetLife Stadium…which I think is the first time I’ve used that name since the rights to it were assigned in August. I’m guessing I’m the fifth or sixth person who is not paid to call it MetLife Stadium who has ever called it MetLife Stadium.

Not a bad name as these things go, but also a little clunky in that it’s superfluous. The Meadowlands is the Meadowlands.

Lots of fun out there in the Meadowlands, what with it not being freezing (as it was on my one other pigskin sojourn to East Rutherford) and the Jets not losing. You get that much and you’re doing good. Everything else is an excuse to invoke George Carlin.

Baseball is a nineteenth-century pastoral game.
Football is a twentieth-century technological struggle.

In the 21st century, praise the ghost of Pete Rozelle for massive video screens that allow you to watch the game in the stadium on TV when watching the game on the field is too challenging. Like the Jets, it took me more than a half to get my act together. My instinct was to follow the quarterback after the ball was snapped, forgetting he often hands the ball to somebody else. Thus, like Mark Sanchez, I kept missing plays. But look — it’s on TV! Got my sights adjusted by the second half, but when things were going on far away from the end zone where we sat, I learned to rely at least partially on the screens. I felt I was cheating, but I more or less knew what was going on.

Baseball is played on a diamond, in a park. The baseball park!
Football is played on a gridiron, in a stadium, sometimes called Soldier Field or War Memorial Stadium.

From the outside, MetLife Stadium is a grim corporate affair. On the inside, it’s an efficient conference room with seating for close to 80,000. For football, it seems plenty ideal. I notice all the seats are steel gray or light steel gray, presumably so they won’t clash with Jet green or Giant blue given how it has to host two different teams (one of them that is eternally battling perceptions that it’s a stranger in a strange state). On my 2009 hello/goodbye to Giants Stadium, I noticed how badly bleached the red seats had gotten over 34 years. These look like they’ll weather the elements better.

Baseball begins in the spring, the season of new life.
Football begins in the fall, when everything’s dying.

It was surprisingly warm in the Meadowlands Sunday. At the same juncture of the ’09 season, it was shockingly frigid. A Nor’easter had blown through the region and left behind the notorious Hawk to torment us. Despite Sharon and I being layered against nature then, we vamoosed early (showing just what kind of football fans we are, maybe, when you get right down to it). Yesterday the big problem was the glare from the warm October sun. Or as one hard-to-satisfy patron behind us moaned, “It’s like fucking July out here.” And he did moan it.

In football you wear a helmet.
In baseball you wear a cap.

In football, mostly you wear a jersey to the game, way more than you wear a uniform top to a baseball game. That’s quite a financial let alone personal commitment. No wonder NAMATH 12 still dots the stands. We know he’s guaranteed to win the big game. SANCHEZ 6 and REVIS 24 led the current roster in representation Sunday, though every notable erstwhile Jet from KLECKO 73 through TESTAVERDE 16 to COTCHERY 89 made an appearance. Strangest sighting: O’DONNELL 14. Saddest: FAVRE 4.

Football is concerned with downs — what down is it?
Baseball is concerned with ups — who’s up?

If the Jets generated the kind of attack that made a ton of first downs, it wouldn’t have been annoying only to the pockets of StubHub-enabled Chargers fans in attendance. PA announcer: “THAT’S A JETS…” Crowd: “FIRST DOWN!” Got old quick, except I began to miss it when I began to miss the Jets making first downs. When “FIRST DOWN!” reappeared during a crucial drive in the fourth quarter, it was actually quite a rush…on the field and in the stands.

In football you receive a penalty.
In baseball you make an error.

In baseball, the error occurs and play continues. In football, certainly in the Jets-Chargers game, there was one penalty that resulted in three different decisions on where to place the ball before anybody could touch the ball again.

In football the specialist comes in to kick.
In baseball the specialist comes in to relieve somebody.

In both sports these days, everything is sponsored to within an inch of its MetLife. Some kid runs on the field to retrieve the kicking tee and we learn he’s sponsored. The only special team that wasn’t sponsored was the Flight Crew cheerleaders, and based on the video screen closeups, I can’t imagine Hooters isn’t about ink a deal.

Football has hitting, clipping, spearing, piling on, personal fouls, late hitting and unnecessary roughness.
Baseball has the sacrifice.

Though when you get patted down at the entrance to the football stadium, you do seem to sacrifice quite a bit of your dignity.

Football is played in any kind of weather: rain, snow, sleet, hail, fog…
In baseball, if it rains, we don’t go out to play.

I notice the Meadowlands…I mean MetLife Stadium doesn’t allow you to bring in an umbrella. One wasn’t needed yesterday, but what’s that all about? So we can all feel like we’re in the trenches with the linemen? Give me my couch and my own video screen against such restrictions. But no problem yesterday. I’m hypersensitive to climactic swings. Give me no fewer than 60 degrees every Sunday.

Baseball has the seventh-inning stretch.
Football has the two-minute warning.

Football has a six-day stretch during which there’s no football. It doesn’t need myriad TV timeouts or any other excessive stoppages…though it’s loaded with them. Yet we did stand for probably the last eight elapsed minutes of the game without anybody telling us to. It was easily the most exciting football game to which I’ve ever been, and I’ve been to five, including a USFL exhibition match between the Tampa Bay Bandits and the Oklahoma Outlaws (or as the tickets referred to them, the “Oaklahoma Outlaws”).

For those interminable intervals between football games, let alone baseball seasons, I heartily recommend a newly published oral history exploring my favorite era of Jets football, Sack Exchange, written by Greg Prato. It features many fond reminiscences of Shea Stadium by those who played there, worked there and screamed there in the late ’70s and early ’80s, back when the Mets vacated it for fall but didn’t leave it empty. As the book’s fantastically representative Jets fan, Johnny “Bubba” Caruso, puts it, “Shea was broken down and dirty, peeling paint, musky and smelly — but it was beautiful and we loved it.”

Baseball has no time limit: we don’t know when it’s gonna end — might have extra innings.
Football is rigidly timed, and it will end even if we’ve got to go to sudden death.

And halftime is only 15 minutes, just enough time to stand in line to use the spiritual descendants of what Leon Hess dreamed of when he schlepped the Jets out of Shea Stadium (such clean bathrooms!) and then maybe grab a couple of beverages to bring back to the seats. I might have wandered and explored a little more the way I do in ballparks, but the clock was ticking. I can miss a random middle inning in a baseball park. With the gridiron awaiting, I didn’t want to mess up my clock management.

In baseball, during the game, in the stands, there’s kind of a picnic feeling; emotions may run high or low, but there’s not too much unpleasantness.
In football, during the game in the stands, you can be sure that at least twenty-seven times you’re capable of taking the life of a fellow human being.

The “fucking July” guy was a pretty unhappy individual. First mistake the Jets made: “Same old Jets.” First ball Plaxico Burress didn’t catch: “They should send him back to jail.” Second ball Plaxico Burress didn’t catch: “He should’ve shot himself.” As a Jet touchdown was being called back for a penalty: “You can all sit down.” What a mope. But except for some witless taunting of the Chargers fans (which mainly consisted of “you suck!” and “your team sucks!”), our section wasn’t an altogether misanthropic enclave. More high-fiving to, from and with those to our left and in our immediate foreground than I’ve experienced at most Mets games (even the good ones) in recent years. I get the frustration attached to a Jets game that isn’t going well — there are only 16 games in a year and it’s been 43 years since Namath made his guarantee pay off — but there could be just a little more graciousness allowed in winning. The Chargers fans…we get it, they suck.

But bonus points to whoever started the “Fuuhhck Fran-CEEHHSS-a!” clap-clap, clap-clap-clap chant after Darrelle Revis’s gamechanging interception.

And finally, the objectives of the two games are completely different:
In football the object is for the quarterback, also known as the field general, to be on target with his aerial assault, riddling the defense by hitting his receivers with deadly accuracy in spite of the blitz, even if he has to use shotgun. With short bullet passes and long bombs, he marches his troops into enemy territory, balancing this aerial assault with a sustained ground attack that punches holes in the forward wall of the enemy’s defensive line.
In baseball the object is to go home! And to be safe! — I hope I’ll be safe at home!

Arriving safe at home on Long Island from a football game in the Meadowlands is a chore when you rely on NJTransit to get you back to Penn Station. In theory, the logistics work fine: get on one train, then transfer to another train that deposits you in the state where you’d think a team that calls itself the New York Jets would play. But the same bureaucrats who order you patted up and down when you walk in don’t know how to direct the throng on its way out. There was some funny business with a rope (which Sharon skillfully ducked under) that threatened to prevent us from boarding the first leg of our trip and an insane goal-line stand against hundreds of us as we attempted to break the plane of the platform for the second leg. I can’t say I disagreed with the “JERSEY SUCKS!” chant that went up at Secaucus, though I was charmed that an organic “J-E-T-S!” served to momentarily alleviate the building tension (which reminds me: does Fireman Ed actually extinguish flames or just shout them into ashes?).

Anyway, the trains eventually ran and we all presumably got where we were going, which in my case, was back to viewing the World Series. Football presented a nice interlude, and will no doubt continue to until the offseason grows so endless that I’ll be sure that at least twenty-seven times I’m capable of taking the life of a fellow human being.