The blog for Mets fans
who like to read

ABOUT US

Greg Prince and Jason Fry
Faith and Fear in Flushing made its debut on Feb. 16, 2005, the brainchild of two longtime friends and lifelong Met fans.

Greg Prince discovered the Mets when he was 6, during the magical summer of 1969. He is a Long Island-based writer, editor and communications consultant. Contact him here.

Jason Fry is a Brooklyn writer whose first memories include his mom leaping up and down cheering for Rusty Staub. Check out his other writing here.

Got something to say? Leave a comment, or email us at faithandfear@gmail.com. (Sorry, but we have no interest in ads, sponsored content or guest posts.)

Need our RSS feed? It's here.

Visit our Facebook page, or drop by the personal pages for Greg and Jason.

Or follow us on Twitter: Here's Greg, and here's Jason.

Junior's Mystique

With the seventh pick in the first round of Major League Baseball’s First-Year Player Draft, the New York Mets selected…some kid.

I wish him well. I wish to see him on the Mets before too long. Until then, Matt Harvey — RHP, UNC — is just a name to me, no more guaranteed of success than any of his first-pick Met predecessors. This young man could be Darryl Strawberry or Doc Gooden or Mike Pelfrey. Or he could be Steve Chilcott or Kirk Presley or Ryan Jaroncyk. They were names. Some resonate for the right reasons. Others are a badge of discouragement to Mets fans. Their failures to become more than being known as first-round Mets picks who didn’t come close to what we call “making it” probably bothers them a whole lot more than it bothers us.

The only picks, beyond the rare megahyped prospects, whose names mean anything when they come up in the draft are the ones whose fathers played in the big leagues. For example, on the MLB Network crawl Monday night, I noticed the name “Delino DeShields, Jr.,” chosen No. 8 overall by the Houston Astros. That’s Delino DeShields’ kid, I quickly concluded. Delino DeShields came up with the Expos in 1990 in the aftermath of one of their periodic purges of veteran salaries. It was the rookie year for Larry Walker and Marquis Grissom, too. The youth movement was supposed to doom Montreal to last place. Instead, they finished a strong third, winning 85 games, six behind the second-place Mets. DeShields, Walker and Grissom formed the nucleus of the Expos team that challenged the Pirates and the Phillies for the N.L. East title in 1992 and 1993, respectively. Then DeShields was traded to the Dodgers for young Pedro Martinez and Montreal became the best team in baseball for one star-crossed, strike-stricken year.

None of this has much to do with Delino DeShields, Jr., but that’s what I thought of when he was drafted by the Astros, because I don’t know a damn thing about the kid. I remember his father, and I cannot believe that the father has a kid who was just drafted by a big-league team. Didn’t Delino DeShields just come up to the Expos? How is it possible that he has a son likely en route to Greeneville, Tenn., and rookie ball? Wasn’t Delino DeShields a rookie himself twenty minutes, not twenty years ago? What do you mean he hasn’t played in the majors since 2002? And that Grissom retired in 2005, same year as Walker? What do you mean the Expos aren’t loaded with up-and-comers anymore? Come to think of it, whatever happened to the Montreal Expos?

Time’s flight isn’t news. The first-year draft is, supposedly, but I won’t know what any of it means until the players chosen begin to appear in the majors or prove conspicuous by their eventual absence. All I’ll know until then is the names, and the only names that will mean anything to me are the names that go back a generation.

That was the case on a June night in 1987 when I was listening, per usual, to Mets Extra on WHN prior to the Mets’ late game in Los Angeles. Howie Rose told us our first pick was Chris Donnels, a third baseman from Loyola Marymount, also in L.A. I’d never heard of Chris Donnels, and I’d only hear of him sparingly in the years to come. Donnels was a part-time player as a Met in 1991 and 1992 before he was lost in the expansion draft to the Florida Marlins. What I mostly remember about him is I saw him hit two home runs for the St. Lucie Mets versus the Baseball City Royals (in Haines City, Fla., home of the short-lived Boardwalk and Baseball theme park). That and my friend Joe believed he strongly resembled Ike Godsey, keeper of the general store on The Waltons.

The most amazing aspect of Chris Donnels’ big league career is it ended in 1995, reignited in 2000 and continued through 2002, like he was the second coming of Minnie Minoso, activated from retirement solely for promotional purposes. His AWOL period wasn’t that mysterious — he went to Japan, as big leaguers sometimes do. But they don’t usually return and play again in our big leagues. Chris Donnels did. He kept playing in the minors through 2004, two years after Delino DeShields hung ’em up. I’m more surprised Chris Donnels was still playing professionally six years ago than I am Delino DeShields hasn’t played in eight — or that there’s a Delino DeShields, Jr., old enough to soon sign a professional contract.

But I digress. Back to that night in 1987, or actually the next night, if I recall correctly. It was definitely in June, and it was definitely on Mets Extra because WFAN didn’t exist yet and the only place you were going to hear Howie Rose was on Mets Extra. Mets Extra, as Burt Lancaster said of the Atlantic Ocean in Atlantic City, was somethin’ then — you should have heard Mets Extra in those days. It ran for 75 minutes before every Mets game and 75 minutes after every Mets game. It was Howie Rose unplugged, bringing us every possible Met angle, every important baseball story. It was Howie Rose at his finest. I yearn for Howie Rose to spend 2½ hours with me every night on either side of Bob Murphy and Gary Thorne.

Anyway, it’s June and the draft has taken place as Rose, always the reporter even as host, is going to bring us an interview not with Chris Donnels, the 24th overall pick in the draft, but with the kid who went first in the draft, chosen by the Seattle Mariners.

His name was Ken Griffey, Jr.

Easy name to notice, right? Ken Griffey was a familiar name. There was no Ken Griffey, Sr., at the time as far as the average baseball fan was concerned, just Ken Griffey: long a Red, for a spell a Yankee, at that moment a Brave. Griffey, Jr., was his son. He was obviously well thought of or he wouldn’t have gone No. 1 in the draft…I guess. I mean Shawn Abner went No. 1 in the draft, selected by the Mets three years earlier. As of 1987, the No. 1 pick in the nation from 1984 was still a prospect. He wasn’t our prospect anymore; we’d traded him with Kevin Mitchell to get Kevin McReynolds the previous winter. (It was a trade you could call Kevin-sent.) Shawn Abner hadn’t made it yet, but he probably would, it was assumed. You made assumptions on behalf of overall No. 1 picks. Ken Griffey, Jr., had done nothing more than play high school ball in Cincinnati and apparently impress the scouts of the Seattle Mariners. It was assumed he’d make it. He was bigger news than Abner was in ’84 or B.J. Surhoff was as first pick in ’85 or Jeff King was as first pick in ’86. They all had talent. Griffey had a name.

So Rose got him on Mets Extra. He congratulated the kid, not yet 18, on his status as the first draft pick in the nation. Griffey, Jr., mumbled some thanks. Rose asked him a few questions about how it felt and whether he was excited and his dad’s reaction. Griffey, Jr., mumbled some more. It was early June. Classes, finals and graduation were barely over. This, I thought, was a kid on the phone, not just by age, but by demeanor. If a kid like this called Mets Extra and mumbled like that, Howie Rose’s producer would have hung up on him.

That was the last I heard from or thought of Ken Griffey, Jr., for a while. Why would I keep up with a Seattle Mariner minor leaguer? The Seattle Mariners were baseball’s lost battalion, playing in the majors’ saddest outpost, regularly posting baseball’s grimmest results. The Mariners were in their eleventh season in 1987. They’d yet to achieve a winning record. They finished fourth once when they lost only 86 times. That was their high-water mark, 76-86. Their best player then, 1982, was Bill Caudill, a relief pitcher. The only reason I remember Caudill is because he dressed up as Sherlock Holmes one Saturday afternoon for the NBC Game of the Week pregame show and pretended to be searching the Kingdome clubhouse for saves. The Mariners of Bill Caudill found themselves seven games over .500 in early July, just three games behind Kansas City for the American League West lead. The Mets, who had been bad as long as the Mariners had been alive and didn’t have hilarious relievers wearing trenchcoats and carrying magnifying glasses, were seven below and 8½ out. I swear to god I was jealous of the Seattle Mariners for a solid week.

That didn’t last. Nothing good ever lasted for the Seattle Mariners. They’d be back in last in 1983, losing over a hundred games. They hit the basement again in 1986, seventh in a seven-team division for the fourth time in ten seasons of Mariners baseball.  They’d have finished last more often except they had the good fortune to dwell at the bottom of the same A.L. West as Charlie Finley’s dismantled Oakland A’s, who  were a more depressing version of the M. Donald Wrecked Mets of the same period. The Mariners were terrible but couldn’t even gain traction as most pitiable. The A’s in those latter-day M.C. Hammer years were more embarrassing. The M’s expansion brethren the Blue Jays were more futile — they always finished last — and a bit more preposterous. What might have been worst for the Mariners was the way they finished last, in non-consecutive years. There’d be a last-place finish, there’d be a sixth-place ray of hope, then reality would rise up and smack them down again.

Seattle was nearly 700 miles removed from its closest big league neighbor. Back east, more than half of their games were reported in the morning papers as “(n.)” — night, too late for this edition…as if anybody was really making like Bill Caudill and searching high and low for the M’s score. The Mariners didn’t exist except as obscure and unsuccessful. They needed all the help they could get. They theoretically got in the form of high draft picks. Finish low, draft high. That’s the rule.

But it didn’t help. The Mariners’ first overall No. 1 pick came in 1979. They used it to select Al Chambers, an outfielder who would come up in 1983 and be done by 1985 after 57 big league games. The Mariners picked first in the nation again in 1981. They selected pitcher Mike Moore. Moore gave them a ton of innings, one obviously outstanding season (17-10 in ’85), another that deserved to look better (9-15 in ’88 but with the fourth-best WHIP in the American League) and absolutely nothing to show for it from a team perspective. The Mariners finished last for the fifth time since 1977 in 1988. Moore filed for free agency, fled to Oakland and won two games in the earthquake World Series of 1989, including the clincher.

The A’s had rejuvenated by 1988 The Blue Jays had become a powerhouse by 1988. Everybody except the Cleveland Indians had taken a legitimate run at success since the year the Mariners were born. It had to look bleak in Seattle. It always looked bleak in the Kingdome, according to those who had bothered to buy a ticket and sit inside. Seattle was such a lovely city. Its baseball stadium and baseball team couldn’t have been less so.

Then came 1989 and Ken Griffey, Jr., the No. 1 draft pick from 1987, having developed from mumbling high school kid to the subject of a lot of excited talk. Griffey was mentioned quite a bit his rookie year, buzzed about more than any Mariner had ever been, even Bill Caudill. It was mostly talk from where I sat. I was on the East Coast, focused on the Eastern Division of the National League, the A.L. West was diametrically opposed to my line of sight. The only thing I was aware of as regarded the Seattle Mariners in 1989 was we were close to trading them Howard Johnson and Sid Fernandez to get Mark Langston. The trade never happened. Seattle dealt their lefty ace to the Expos for a younger southpaw, Randy Johnson. Langston was hyped as the difference-maker in a pennant race, but it didn’t work out. He was let go after that year ended, paving the way for the Montreal youth movement that unveiled to the world the likes of Larry Walker and Marquis Grissom and Delino DeShields, Sr.

Griffey was hyped, too. Not enough to win Rookie of the Year (that went to Oriole reliever Gregg Olson) but enough to mark him as something more than a name. There was still curiosity about the name, however. His dad, Griffey, Sr., as he was becoming known, was still playing. By 1990, it was a huge deal that the father, 40, signed with Seattle to play with the son, 20. They homered in the same game in September.

The Mariners lost that night. They had losing records during the first two years of Ken Griffey, Jr. Fourteen years of Mariners baseball never produced as many as 79 wins. But Junior, as he was now routinely identified, was a great distraction and building block. The 1991 Mariners compiled a winning record. It was only 83 wins, and it was only good for fifth place, but it was something. Griffey was also something, racking up 100 RBI for the first time, elected to the All-Star team for the second time, earning a Gold Glove and a Silver Slugger in the process. And as he was rapidly becoming the darling of baseball lovers who managed to find out about him despite his being stranded in Seattle, he broke through on the most transcendent level possible.

On February 20, 1992, Ken Griffey, Jr. portrayed himself on an episode of The Simpsons.

The Simpsons first saw light as animated shorts on The Tracey Ullman Show when Griffey was a senior at Moeller High in Cincinnati. They got their first big break, their Christmas special, the December after Junior placed third in A.L. ROY voting. Each was a phenomenon in the early ’90s, one of those things you just had to tell your friends to watch. Ken Griffey, Jr., and The Simpsons were made for each other.

The episode in which they came together was “Homer at the Bat,” the one where the Springfield Nuclear Power Plant softball team shifts into high gear. Mr. Burns, refusing to take any chances by relying on his worker drones, hires a band of ringers to ensure victory over bitter rival Shelbyville. In order of major league debut, they were:

SS — Ozzie Smith
C — Mike Scioscia
2B — Steve Sax
3B — Wade Boggs
1B — Don Mattingly
RF — Darryl Strawberry
P — Roger Clemens
LF — Jose Canseco
CF — Ken Griffey, Jr.

Alas, each member of Mr. Burns’ “beloved ringers” befalls some obstacle or cartoon tragedy that doesn’t allow him to compete…all except for Darryl, whom Burns removes despite his having gone 9-for-9 with nine home runs because Shelbyville has brought in a southpaw to face him. “It’s called playing the percentages,” the skip informs Straw. Junior, meanwhile, is out of action from an overdose of the nerve tonic Mr. Burns prescribed. Seems it did a number on the kid’s head. It’s all recounted in Terry Cashman’s classic tale:

We’re talkin’ softball…
From Maine to San Diego.
Talkin’ softball…
Mattingly and Canseco.
Ken Griffey’s grotesquely swollen jaw.
Steve Sax and his run-in with the law.
We’re talkin’ Homer… Ozzie and the Straw.

It’s hard to know whether there was a Simpsons softball curse, but it is worth noting that none of Mr. Burns’ ringers ended 1992 on a team that finished with a winning record. The Mariners were back in last, even though the only thing that swelled for Griffey in real life his power: 27 home runs, 103 runs batted in. If anything else great came of that season in Seattle, it was how they would use the No. 1 pick in the draft they were granted for finishing so badly. With the first pick in the nation in June 1993, the Mariners selected shortstop Alex Rodriguez. That same year, Randy Johnson’s potential became performance (19-8, 308 strikeouts). He entered the All-Star Game at Camden Yards in the third inning and backed John Kruk about ten feet off the plate, lefty vs. lefty (playing the percentages, you know). Legends were taking shape in Mariners uniforms, but one had a head start on the rest. In the All-Star home run hitting contest, Ken Griffey, Jr., launched a ball that soared past the Camden outfield grandstand, remained aloft over Eutaw Street and bounced off the otherwise unreachable B&O Warehouse.

By year’s end, Griffey would hit 45 home runs that counted. The next year, before the same strike that would strip the Expos of their best chance ever at a pennant, Griffey had put 40 home runs in the books by the second week of August.

It was official: Ken Griffey, Jr., was now bigger than The Simpsons.

More would happen for Griffey and the Mariners, most notably their instantly legendary Refuse to Lose drive to the A.L. West title in 1995, featuring Junior’s return from a gruesome wrist injury, a one-game playoff stifling applied by Johnson to the choking California Angels, and then the five-game exercise in breath-holding better known as the American League Division Series between the Mariners and Yankees. It wasn’t settled until the eleventh inning of the fifth game, when Edgar Martinez doubled home Joey Cora with the tying run and Junior Griffey — sliding past Jim Leyritz — with the winning run. Seattle and the Mariners and the kid had all grown up at once. A city fell in love with its team and voted to fund it a new ballpark.

There’s more one could say about Ken Griffey, Jr., from there, but I’m not the one to say all that much of it. I was riveted by that playoff series and his All-Star appearances and the SportsCenter highlights of his unbelievable catches in center fields all over the A.L., but the distance from here to Seattle generally limited my view of Griffey on a nightly basis. He became big business for baseball at a time when all the big stars came from other sports, but that didn’t matter all that much to me. Those were just commercials. He was also at the core of the baseball card boom, but I wasn’t a collector anymore, so if you said “Junior: mint” to me, I’d assume you meant candy, not Upper Deck.

I was too old to look up to Ken Griffey, Jr., but I was intermittently fascinated by him. As I recall his Seattle days — sketchily, partially, curiously — he strikes me as the last megastar surrounded by at least a veneer of mystique. That he peaked at such an incredibly high level before every single play was readily available for download likens him in my mind to Ted Williams or Stan Musial or someone similarly exalted from the newsreel age. If you didn’t live in a place where you could see them regularly, you saw them hardly at all. We weren’t quite that in the dark here in New York in the 1990s, but as a National League fan in the days before Interleague play made everybody that much more accessible, Griffey was off my daily radar. By not being overexposed to him, I was undersaturated by him — but by no means unappreciative of him.

Ken Griffey never came to Shea Stadium as a Mariner. He almost came there as a Met, however. That, too, carries a touch of mystique. When Junior’s contract was going to be up in Seattle and he was going to be too much to afford, the Mariners tried to trade him back east, closer to his family in Orlando. New York was closer to Florida than Washington state. A deal was reportedly on the table in December 1999: Armando Benitez, Octavio Dotel and Roger Cedeño for Ken Griffey, Jr. Sounded tantalizing to me. Not so much to Griffey, who says he wasn’t given ample opportunity to consider such a life-changing move. Like HoJo and Sid for Langston, this deal with the Mariners died. (Apparently the only notable M we were ever destined to receive was J.J. Putz.)

When we finally saw Griffey at Shea, he was a Red, the way his dad had been. After years of reflexively cheering visiting icons — McGwire, Sosa, Ripken — we mostly booed Ken Griffey for turning us down. When the ninth inning of his first game in Flushing came down to Griffey vs. Benitez, Armando was our guy. He struck out Junior with the tying run on first. We cheered our closer. We booed their superstar.

That’ll teach him to not be one of us.

Junior the Red was never Junior the Mariner except for his seeming elusive to me. He was in our time zone, but not our division. He was injured a lot. The Reds would come to Queens, he wasn’t with the team. I’d go to Cincinnati, he’d be scratched from the lineup. When he did show his face, we’d still boo, but more out of ritual than ire. After a while, I’m pretty sure we forgot why we were booing. On his last trip in, Mother’s Day 2008, we didn’t boo at all.

The kid, 40, finished up in Seattle last week. His manager announced his retirement for him. Junior didn’t sound like he much felt like talking to Howie Rose when he was drafted into the professional ranks; I take it he didn’t feel like talking as he was leaving. That’s OK if he was a little grumpy on the way out. He smiled plenty for 22 seasons, certainly the first batch of them. He made others smile as well. The instant obits for his career were like something they would have trotted out for Musial or Williams. He was this era’s kid bidding his fans adieu without, as of yet, tipping his cap. But surely had been the Man in one sense or another from 1989 to 2010. The relatively ineffectual Red years were glossed over. The recent report that he was napping in the Mariner clubhouse when he was needed for pinch-hitting was consigned to a footnote. Nobody brought up that stale chestnut about a player who doesn’t win a ring not really being that great. Ken Griffey, Jr., breathed life into one of the deadest franchises in modern baseball history. He doesn’t get a ring for that, but he ought to get a medal.

His individual statistics would need no embellishment in a more innocent age, but Griffey’s 630 home runs positively glow in contrast to the tarnished numbers of the few players who could be considered peers among his contemporaries. Thank you, everybody seemed to say, for not being one of those guys. Thank you for not doing what those guys did. Thank you for — as far as we can tell — never attempting to enhance your performance with anything stronger than Mr. Burns’ nerve tonic.

When the head of the last active Springfield Nuclear Power Plant ringer swelled grotesquely, at least we knew it was a cartoon.

What was it like to get literally if temporarily close to Ken Griffey, Jr. as he was becoming baseball’s most celebrated player? Find out from Dave Murray at Mets Guy in Michigan.

Take Me Out to Bank One Ballpark

Welcome to a special Monday edition of Flashback Friday: Take Me Out to 34 Ballparks, a celebration, critique and countdown of every major league ballpark one baseball fan has been fortunate enough to visit in a lifetime of going to ballgames.

BALLPARK: Bank One Ballpark
LATER KNOWN AS: Chase Field
HOME TEAM: Arizona Diamondbacks
VISITS: 1
VISITED: May 8, 1999
CHRONOLOGY: 21st of 34
RANKING: 22nd of 34

Bank One Ballpark ran hot and cold. Literally. It was hot outside. I learned it could be hot inside. In deference to that possibility, sitting and watching a midday ballgame in the desert could be a little chilly — literally and figuratively.

To say the BOB left me cold would be stretching my reservations. It was certainly a marvel and perhaps still is. As with SkyDome upon its arrival onto the major league landscape, marveling was half the point of going to a game there. It was the second park that could routinely open and close its roof. That Toronto had the first of those contraptions in the major leagues didn’t make Arizona any less novel. Or impressive.

Impressive is what the BOB had going for it above all else when I visited in 1999 to cheer for the Mets far from home. A little too impressive, somehow. Or, as Mr. Burns judged Martin Prince’s actual power-producing entry in the children’s nuclear power plant model contest, “Too cold and sterile. Where’s the heart?”

I didn’t much question the need for the retractable roof that would be closed for the game ahead, not after the brief walk from the street where my transplanted friend Joel — who, along with his also-transplanted brother Anthony, was hosting me, Larry and Fred for a fairly impromptu reunion that weekend — had parked. You didn’t want to be outside in Phoenix in the middle of the day. We made all kinds of “…but it’s a dry heat” jokes to amuse each other on the stroll from the car to the BOB, but never mind the dry. There was heat.

Plenty of heat surrounded the Diamondbacks in their early days. They were designed to be as model a baseball franchise as any that ever drew breath in the expansion age. No lovable losing for them. Except for having managed the Yankees previously, D-Back generalissimo Buck Showalter bore no resemblance to Casey Stengel. Casey invented the Mets from an identity standpoint. Attempting to invent them from a baseball standpoint would have been useless in light of the expansion rules of 1961-62. Back then, the existing owners took the newbies’ money and cheerfully let them poke around their refuse pile, hiding anybody who could be described as remotely useful. You don’t lose 120 games without a little help from your supposed friends. Thus, Casey Stengel wasn’t just talking crazy when he went on and on about his Amazin’, Amazin’, Amazin’ Mets. He needed to distract New York from the reality of those first Mets clubs. In doing so, he shaped them into a phenomenon that transcended infrequent wins and myriad losses.

Showalter, on the other hand, was going to reinvent baseball in the desert as quickly as he could. He was a detail-obsessed genius whose fingerprints were all over the Diamondbacks from their conception. That included Bank One Ballpark, which was going to be as impressive as Showalter was considered after helping to revive the Yankees in the early ’90s and bringing them to the brink of their next dynasty. Fired by the not yet lovable George Steinbrenner for daring to not win that team’s first playoff series in fourteen years, Arizona grabbed him the second he became available and gave him incredible lead time (hired on November 15, 1995 for a team that wouldn’t play its first game until March 31, 1998) to craft the Diamondbacks in his own image. He was said to be on top of everything from the high-priced free agents owner Jerry Colangelo would sign — an option not available to George Weiss in 1962 — to the nouvelle purple and teal palette that became the official team colors to the throwback-style dirt path that ran between the batter’s box and the pitcher’s mound.

I think of the hype around Showalter and his alleged penchant for perfection when I think of visiting Bank One Ballpark. Showalter, remember, was the guy who threw a controlled fit because Ken Griffey, Jr., took batting practice with his cap backwards. Baseball loved Junior showing childlike enthusiasm for the game. Showalter frowned that the direction of Griffey cap wasn’t to code. Predictably, there was nothing backwards about the BOB. The BOB was all about looking forward. Even the name, when you broke it down, implied an irresistible force that was on the march and gaining steam.

Oh, BOB was a cheerful enough nickname — not unlike Buck — but Bank One Ballpark hinted at where we were going with our professional playgrounds. There had been Wrigley and Busch and most recently Coors and Turner, but even as they doubled as billboards for brands, they were gum and beer and cable television, products designed to make you enjoy yourself. Tropicana Field, baptized for baseball the same year as the BOB, connoted something sunny, juicy and, for St. Petersburg, local. Utilities and high-tech, meanwhile, had already infiltrated stadium entrances, but fans patronizing clumsy conceits like Cinergy Field and Qualcomm Stadium and 3Com Park knew better. The could continue to call their homes Riverfront or the Murph or the Stick, just as they always had.

With Bank One Ballpark, however, there was no mistaking the corporate coldness right there on the birth certificate. These weren’t naming rights you could ignore. This was Bank One Ballpark from the beginning. And, what pray tell, did Bank One have to do with Phoenix or Arizona? At least Edison International, temporary rights holder in Anaheim starting in 1997, was from California. So was Qualcomm. 3Com wasn’t, but Silicon Valley was and you could make the leap from there to San Francisco (not that I ever knew precisely what 3Com was, did or made). Bank One had nothing explicitly to do with where the Ballpark that answered to its name was built. It was a financial institution seeking regional brand awareness and penetration. Or something like that.

From the outside, the BOB looked like no other ballpark. It wasn’t round or boxy. It resembled an airplane hangar. When I was a kid being dragged to visit doctors or relatives in Brooklyn, we’d drive from Long Beach, through the Rockaways and over the Marine Parkway Bridge (later amended to Marine Parkway-Gil Hodges Memorial Bridge) where Flatbush Avenue begins and pass Floyd Bennett Field, New York’s first municipal airport. It had a series of eight no longer used airplane hangars. The BOB looked like an enormous version of those. As we got closer to it, we were greeted, I vaguely recall through the heat, by some cutesy baseball-themed sculptures. I guess that was so you didn’t mistake the facility for an airplane hangar.

There was a tension between the modernism necessary to execute a retractable-roofed stadium in the middle of a burgeoning downtown and the desire to at least partially ride the retro wave that had been in ballpark vogue since Camden Yards opened six years prior (thus, that pretentious dirt path). It was sort of like the desire to have a unique Arizona feel to the scene — accented by those garish teal and purple uniforms on which Showalter signed off — while accepting megabucks to plaster the rootless Bank One logo all over the place. It continued indoors, which featured, among many other attractions/distractions, a Hall of Fame exhibit, on loan from Cooperstown. The Diamondbacks had existed for little more than a year to this point, but they were trying to steep themselves in baseball history, just as the sculptures outside tried to give fans a cue as to what awaited them inside. That type of touch could have been taken as truly tradition-friendly or it could have been interpreted as a overly marketing-driven. It was probably somewhere in between.

The one thing you heard about beyond everything else in the buzz over the BOB when it debuted in 1998 was the swimming pool in right field. The Bank One name may not have screamed “Valley of the Sun!” but a pool sure did in a suburban backyard sense. Hot out? Take a dip! It was said to be inspired by the shower Bill Veeck installed behind the bleachers at old Comiskey Park. Except the shower was democratic — you’d step right in and cool off — and this was a showy party suite; a manufactured quirk to go with the angles carved into the outfield fence and the shadows that crept through the adjustable outfield windows. It was an attempt at what the D-Back marketing department no doubt filed under Fun.

I’m a little cynical in recalling the BOB’s straining to have heart, but fun is fun, upper-case or otherwise. Of course it was fun getting together with my three best friends from high school. Joel had moved to Phoenix in 1993 and seemed very settled there, even if it was a little unsettling to discover he had morphed into something of a Diamondbacks fan. Too much time away from New York might do that to a fellow, I suppose, particularly when team-following technology was still getting up to speed (no blogs!). Matt Franco homered in a rare left field start, and Joel rather sheepishly admitted he had no idea who Matt Franco was. Later he seemed genuinely conflicted as the Diamondbacks provoked a John Franco meltdown. I’m pretty sure he came around by the time our great new reliever Armando Benitez came in to slam the door and earn his first Met save.

It was fun, too, having actual lunch at the ballpark. Back at Shea, there was the Diamond Club which was forever off limits to the likes of us (though nine years later, at our farewell visit in Flushing, Fred saw the name of the exclusive Met hideaway on our tickets and asked if that’s where we go for “the lap dances”), but nothing else that involved sitting. The BOB, however, featured a T.G.I. Friday’s that overlooked the outfield. It was more democratic than the pool. Anybody could sit there, eat there and drink there (or spill a tall glass of iced tea on Larry’s shorts there as I did) and you could conceivably watch baseball from there. All we took in at T.G.I. was BP, and the food was nothing you couldn’t get in literally a thousand locations, but as with so much about the BOB, you were compelled to embrace the novelty.

Perhaps innovation would be a better word. It was innovative to install a pool in right field. It was innovative to mesh purple and teal in an atmosphere whose prevailing mood — indoors on such a bright day — was vaguely gray. It was innovative to station ushers with signs requesting you wait for an at-bat to be completed before getting up from or returning to your seat. Courtesy was certainly an innovation none of us on holiday from Shea could quite grasp (which is probably why we cut in front of a line of patiently waiting Arizonans and grabbed the first empty table we saw at T.G.I. Friday’s). Temperature control was another innovative stab for which the Diamondbacks deserve more credit than scorn, though I wasn’t too impressed by it when, amid walking the surprisingly drab concourse, I noticed I was actually cold.

Yes, Fred agreed, in his customary way with words, “it’s a little brisk in here.”

But our minds were changed after the final out. Joel insisted we hang at our seats for a couple of minutes as others were doing. It wasn’t for courtesy’s sake. It was to marvel. When the game ended, the BOB rolled back its roof. Unlike SkyDome, this ceiling opened in less time than it took for Matt Franco work out a walk (or John Franco to allow one). Unlike every other park in which baseball was played indoors, this one contained what we used to call natural grass. In the aftermath of the failed Astroturf revolution, that still seemed pretty retro. It was definitely innovative. Naturally, the natural grass needed sunlight. Necessity was the mother of invention for this deluxe sardine can lid.

As a literal fanfare played over the P.A., the roof retracted. The Arizona sun came at us like a Randy Johnson fastball: high, hard and sending you ducking for cover. It didn’t take five seconds for the BOB to turn from brisk to broiling.

“And that,” Joel reminded us, “is why you have a roof here.”

***

POSTSCRIPT: The Mets came back to the BOB that October, splitting two Division Series games en route to winning the LDS at Shea. Still, it’s pretty impressive, no matter the resources or rules applied, that a second-year expansion team won a division title. Buck Showalter may have possessed a certain genius for franchise-building, but it wasn’t the long-tolerated type. Jerry Colangelo dismissed him after the 2000 season, which netted Arizona a mere 85 wins and no playoff spot. Under the lower-key Bob Brenly, the 2001 Diamondbacks, in their fourth year of existence, won one of the greatest World Series ever played, a seven-game affair versus the New York Yankees during which every Mets fan I knew and then some became a Diamondbacks diehard for the duration; I still have a t-shirt proclaiming that Fall Classic’s classic result. Joel probably would have been extra incredibly stoked by Arizona’s achievement, except he moved to Northern California in 2000, never adopting the A’s or Giants as more than local curiosities, and rejuvenating himself as a well-informed Mets fan. Bank One Ballpark, via the magic of corporate machinations, has been known as Chase Field since 2005. The Mets won 13 consecutive games there from 2004 to 2007, whatever it was called. It is currently one of eight ballparks that carry the name of a financial or insurance concern. The D-Backs no longer wear teal or purple, but the roof still works, the Friday’s is still open and the pool is still available for groups of up to 35.

Mets Sweep Florida Morons

This would be a good time to be a drive-time disc jockey in medium-sized city with a persecution complex. If I were, I’d be working under the radio name of Resentful in the Morning, and I’d stir up my listeners to join me in a natural disdain for our local baseball team’s archrivals, whom I would cleverly refer to as the Florida Morons. Actually, I would have started on Friday, in anticipation of their weekend visit, announcing the phone number of their hotel. Hey, I’d say, why don’t we give Fredi “GONER”-zalez a jingle and welcome him to our town where we know how to play baseball?

“Here’s the number,” I’d say. “Dial it and give that ol’ GONER a real Resentful wakeup call!”

Then you’d hear my sidekick ring a cowbell and echo my sentiments that “We’re gonna make Fredi a GONER by Sunday!” To punctuate the point, we’d play “Freddie’s Dead” by Curtis Mayfield three times before the next newscast.

Of course Friday night I’d be hosting a Florida Moron Fish Fry in the stadium parking lot. You bring a dead fish and we’ll gut it on the air, because that’s what we’re gonna do to those Florida Morons for the next three games. Every Resentful in the Morning listener wearing a t-shirt with the station logo would then be issued his or very own Resentful in the Morning set of Hanley Wipes because we are going to WIPE THE FLOOR WITH HANLEY RAMIREZ!

It would actually be a roll of toilet paper from Walmart because this is a mid-market station and we don’t have much of a promotional budget, but we make up for the lack of resources with community spirit. Thus, when Hanley Ramirez comes to bat, my sidekick would be sure to remind our Resentful listeners to unspool those limited-edition Hanley Wipes and LET HIM KNOW WHAT WE THINK OF THE BIGGEST MORON OF THEM ALL!

Then we’d blare “Freddie’s Dead” three or four times as we fried more fish.

Come Monday, after we crowed about having swept the Morons, particularly the way they let a big lead get away on Sunday, we’d call that disc jockey in Miami with whom we’d made a big bet on Friday. He has to send us a hundred coconuts, not only because we in our medium-sized city think that’s all they’ve got in Florida but because, as my sidekick likes to say in between ringing his cowbell, MORONS DON’T HAVE NO BRAINS IN THEIR COCONUTS! We’d then laugh hysterically and play “Freddie’s Dead” as we kicked off our WHEN’S FREDI GONNA BE GONE? countdown.

After the traffic report, we’d give our third caller — third because we just won all three games against our archrivals — the honor of joining the Resentful in the Morning team at the biggest post office in town this afternoon as we mail all those fish guts from the Fish Fry to Hanley Ramirez, care of them dang stupid Florida Morons.

Yeah, if I were a drive-time disc jockey in a medium-sized city with a persecution complex, that’s how I’d do it. But since I’m not, I think I’ll accept these three Mets wins over the Marlins with quiet dignity.

Three-Way Tie

Jeff Francoeur’s three-run home run off the Marlins’ Tim Wood in the seventh inning of today’s game not only tied the score, but it created a three-way tie for the all-time Citi Field slugging lead. That was Frenchy’s seventh ball to have soared above the Citi walls (4 last year, 3 this year), giving him as many there as Daniel Murphy and David Wright.

I previously neglected to mention Francoeur in considering who might soon rank first in this all-important category. A glaring oversight on my part, and boy am I glad I just had reason to look it up.

(Fernando Tatis has 6, but after a pinch-walk, that total’s not getting any higher as of Sunday afternoon.)

Move Over Daniel (Here Comes David)

Jonathon Niese endured. Ike Davis awoke. David Wright served the main course to one lucky Acela Club patron. The Florida Marlins learned that no one — and I mean no one —  comes into our house and pushes us around (hubris not applicable on final days of seasons). And while all this was going on, per Steve Zabriskie as the division was clinched in 1986, a certain inevitabiity became a reality.

What do you think the following names had in common prior to Saturday’s win?

• Mel Ott
• Mickey Mantle
• Duke Snider
• Bernie Williams
• Darryl Strawberry
• Mark Teixeira
• Tim Jordan
• Daniel Murphy

If you said none of the above was going to help the 2010 Mets one little bit (save possibly for some motivational speaking), you’d get partial credit. But there is a more specific answer: each of the aforementioned players stood as the home team home run king of a different New York ballpark that’s been used for major league baseball since 1900.

Stood…or stands? I suppose the present tense is applicable, though in the case of one of these men, he’s suddenly got company.

Did I say suddenly? More like it’s about time!

Did you see that shot David hit? Where it landed, under the Amtrak sign? How it bounced into somebody’s $15 dish of mousse? I made up the last part, but it did rattle around up there among the high rollers (in whose ranks I dined…once). That was as emphatic a Met home run as Citi Field has seen in its eight months of action.

Not that it’s seen very many Met home runs emphatic or otherwise since opening on April 13, 2009. The first Met home run was lined that night to left by Mr. Wright. It figured to be the first of many off David’s bat in the history of the brand new ballpark.

Define many. Your definition probably exceeds what Wright produced last year home or away. David didn’t even lead his team in home runs. Nor did he lead his stadium.

That honor belonged to his teammate, Daniel Murphy, which no doubt surprised everyone, Murphy included. In 2008, the last year of alleged pitcher’s park Shea Stadium, David swatted 33 home runs overall, 21 at Shea. During his two months as a rookie sensation the same season, Daniel homered twice, once at Shea. In the minors two years ago, he hit 13. There was nothing in his background to suggest he would become any ballpark’s all-time home run leader.

There was little to suggest it would happen even in the limited sample provided over the course of six months. Daniel himself waited a while to get on the Citi board, and when he did, it was not clear he actually had. His very first Citi Field home run was the condiment that barely skimmed the infamous white and yellow Subway Sandwich sign on May 27. Four umpires got together, caucused over video and sent up a puff of white smoke to indicate Murph’s home run order was indeed good to go.

Throughout 2009, as sluggers named Sheffield, Delgado and Beltran fell by the wayside and Wright simply stalled, it was left to Murphy to carry the home run load for his team. It was a light load, to be sure. The ’09 Mets hadn’t heard about power to the people, let alone power to any particular field. They hit 95 homers overall (down from 172 in ’08, plummeting to the franchise’s lowest power ebb since 1992), with 49 of them at Citi Field (versus 95 at Shea the year before). On a team that ostensibly featured sluggers whose career tater totals flash impressive numbers like 509, 473, 273 and now 150, it fell to a kid who has 14 lifetime home runs to lead the way.

Daniel Murphy sextupled his 2008 sum in 2009. He hit 12 home runs, the lowest total to lead the Mets since the unplugged power trio of Steve Henderson, John Stearns and John Milner each pounded a dozen to lead the legendarily wretched 1977 Mets. His split was 5 on the road, 7 at home. Fittingly, the last Met home run of 2009 belonged to Daniel, struck the final Friday night of the season, making sure the 2009 Mets would not trail the 1977 Mets in something besides wins and not trading Tom Seaver.

Y’know, I truly loved each of those guys in his time, but I swear only a Mets fan could breathe a sigh of relief that somebody had matched Steve Henderson, John Stearns and John Milner in anything.

I’d been thinking about Daniel Murphy in the past week. There hasn’t been much occasion to do so in 2010. As you know, he was days away from starting the season at first base — tutored by Keith Hernandez and everything — when his right knee took a wrong turn in a Spring Training rundown. There went April and May.

Murph, for all his documented 2009 shortcomings, would have been a damn sight better than Mike Jacobs at first. Of course he also would have been a damn sight worse than Ike Davis, who made us forget Jacobs this year at least as fast as Carlos Delgado made us forget him in 2006. Meanwhile, we more or less collectively forgot about Murphy. Now and then we’d get an update from Injury Land, that spa where the Mets hide their lame and halting for indeterminate periods of time best measured with glaciers (Kelvim Escobar is said to have sent a postcard, but I don’t know if it ever arrived).

Somewhere along the way, probably while we were trying on I LIKE IKE t-shirts, Daniel Murphy recovered from that nasty medial collateral ligament sprain. He played in some Extended Spring Training Games — is there another team on Earth that can extend Spring Training like the Mets? — and, when pronounced fit, transitioned from injured major leaguer to healthy minor leaguer. Murph was handed a plane ticket to Buffalo and a second baseman’s glove. Last year’s first baseman who didn’t homer enough for a corner infielder (even if he homered more than everybody else around him) was going to work on becoming a middle infielder with pretty good pop.

That was until the other night when he turned a double play for Buffalo and absorbed a dirty Syracuse slide to that very same right knee. Some busher named Leonard Davis took Murph out for the season.

What can you say on our erstwhile left fielder/first baseman’s behalf at this point beyond “ouch” and “hope you get better…again”?

Daniel Murphy’s 2008 hinted at promise, which, naturally, led the Mets (and not a few Mets fans) to imagine he’d be a two-strike, line drive machine for the next ten years. He struggled in left field to start 2009, found some solace at first base, but didn’t hit to anybody’s great satisfaction. His world has now fallen apart three times in 2010: the injury in March, Davis getting called up in April and the cheap slide of June. But before Saturday, he still had one thing going for him besides a surfeit of green MURPHY 28 gear presumably priced to move in the Clubhouse Shops — he still had the Citi Field home run record all to himself.

Not to make Daniel Murphy any more miserable than he must be, but it wasn’t exactly to his credit that he gripped it as long as he did. He didn’t play as a Met these past two months, yet that seventh Citi Field home run he launched to right last October 2 had withstood all challenges through this June 4.

“What challenges?” you might be wondering. Gary Sheffield faded into the Flushing mists with 5 Citi Field home runs on his ledger of 509 lifetime. Carlos Delgado is gone, presumably stuck forever on 3 CF HRs out of 473 in a career he still hasn’t officially called quits. Beltran? You mean the latest apparition to reportedly alight amid the fog of Extended Spring Training? Let’s see him extend his Citi Field total of 3 home runs (273 total) before we believe it will ever happen. The only Met who was really pushing Murphy’s record of 7 at Citi of late was Rod Barajas, who has struck 5 of his team-leading 11 at home.

David Wright? If every day were Opening Day, he’d be The Thing That Ate Citi Field. He hit that home run against the Padres to kick off 2009. He hit another in the first home game of 2010 versus the Marlins. In between, he smacked a grand total of 4. After Opening Day this year and before Saturday afternoon, he hit zero. Did plenty of homering on the road, but dimensions and walls and goodness knows what else continued to hold him back at the place where’s he’s at least as big as life, if not bigger.

That was until the third inning, against Nate Robertson, when no wall, no dimension, no pressure, no beaning, no nothing could hold David Wright back. Finally, his second home-cooked home run of the year, his seventh ever in the still reasonably new ballpark (and his 150th overall).

David Wright has tied Daniel Murphy for most career home runs at Citi Field. Y’know, I truly hope Murph heals and finds a place to play somewhere in this sport, but I swear only a Mets fan could breathe a sigh of relief that somebody had matched Daniel Murphy in anything.

David could take the lead at anytime now. Or Rodney Allen Rip ’Em could feel frisky and grab it for a while. Ike has sent 3 out of the Citi and has shown signs more readable than “Subway” that he could go deep fairly often. (For all you cynics out there, Chase Utley leads the opposition with 4.) We don’t know who’s going to own this record when it grows more substantive, but when we learn his identity, we’ll be placing that Met alongside some true New York baseball royalty.

Who hit the most home runs at the Polo Grounds? That would be Hall of Famer and all-time good guy Mel Ott, with 323. Add in the 25 he slugged at Ebbets Field, and you’re talking about the man who literally swatted the most shots within the five boroughs of New York City.

Who hit the most home runs at the first pre-renovation Yankee Stadium? Mickey Mantle, 266, or seven more than the Babe for whom that House was built. Remember, Ruth played three fence-busting seasons at the Polo Grounds before Yankee Stadium opened (yet still managed 85 goners from 1920 to 1922, good enough for eighth most at Coogan’s Bluff).

Who hit the most home runs hit at Ebbets Field? Who else but the Duke of Flatbush? Edwin “Duke” Snider landed 175 baseballs onto Bedford Avenue and adjacent thoroughfares. Snider nosed out his future Met teammate Gil Hodges by three dingers to lead all Bums for homers hit at home.

Who hit the most home runs at renovated Yankee Stadium? Bernie Williams, 143. The Yankees don’t recognize the 1976 park as a different structure from the 1923 model, but look at the pictures. It was, in all practicality, a new ballpark, and the Yankee who had an edge when it came to homers there was their latter-day center fielder.

Who hit the most home runs at Shea Stadium? Darryl Strawberry, of course, with 127. All but four of them were crushed in a good cause. Three came as a visiting Dodger in 1991. One was launched on behalf of the other New York team when they were seeking temporary refuge from their crumbling renovated stadium in 1998 and played a single home game in Queens. Even through Darryl’s unfortunate disguise a dozen years ago, Shea’s Apple instinctively recognized its native Strawberry from the good old days of 1983 to 1990.

Who has hit the most home runs at new Yankee Stadium? Who can tell the way balls have flown out of the Anti-Citi? A quick peek of the homer logs shows the pinstriped leader to date there is Mark Teixeira, with 27, three ahead of Alex Rodriguez, who missed the first month of 2009 when the wind tunnel was particularly active in the Bronx. Hunch: A-Rod passes M-Tex before too long.

Who hit the most home runs at Washington Park? Surely you didn’t think we’d forget the pre-Ebbets home of the Dodgers/Superbas. Brooklyn played ball at this third version of Washington Park from 1898 through 1912, back when the ball was as dead as the Marlins were Saturday, yet ye olde trolley-dodging fans had occasion to cheer a Tim Jordan roundtripper 17 times. Technically, Jordan shares Washington Park home run honors with Jimmy Sheckard, who also homered there 17 times. But we’re leaning toward Jordan here since all of his Washington Park home runs were walloped for the Superbas/Dodgers while Sheckard hit 1 home run in Brooklyn for the Cubs and hit 6 others in Washington Park before 1900. As you probably know, 19th century rules specified that any batter who lined a ball off any nearby possum was automatically awarded four bases. And the possum.

• Who has hit the most home runs at Citi Field? Through the game of June 5, 2010, Daniel Murphy of the New York Mets and David Wright of the New York Mets, a paltry 7 apiece. Barring a horrendous act of nature, David will hit more there in a Mets uniform, hopefully as soon as June 6, 2010.

I’m afraid I have no idea whether Daniel will ever get another swing as a Met, home or away.

Thanks Hanley!

Frankie Rodriguez made a good pitch. David Wright made a great pickup and throw. Ike Davis made a fine scoop. But Hanley Ramirez made everything easier on the Mets by taking his sweet time for the first third of his trip down the first base line.

We appreciate it, Hanley. We know you’re capable of doing great damage to us, and you could have contributed to your criminally talented rap sheet by beating out that funky almost-foul bouncer you hit off Frankie with two out in the ninth, the tying run on third and the go-ahead run on second. The whole inning was something out of a John Franco nightmare: an infield hit, a walk, a wild pitch, now the best hitter on the other team coming up to change the complexion of what had been a quietly promising night. You didn’t have to hit it long or hard, Hanley. You just had to hit it where they weren’t.

And run. You also had to do that, too.

It’s not optional. Running really helps you negotiate 90 feet in a most efficient manner. Ninety feet hustled can alter history, as we learned this week. Even if you don’t hit the ball 90 feet, you can still cause trouble running that far. You could have made the whole night for naught Metwise with a decent 90-foot sprint. We wouldn’t have been able to revel wholeheartedly in the decreasingly surprising good work of R.A. Dickey, the astoundingly surprising great work of Elmer Dessens, the cyclically scorching bat of Jeff Francoeur, the pleasant re-emergence of Ruben Tejada, the welcome disappearance of Gary Matthews, Jr., or the heartening sight of Frankie’s right arm still attached to his right shoulder. We would instead be gnashing our teeth and gnawing at our knuckles, not praising R.A.’s. We’d have had a 4-4 tie, go-ahead run at third, a world of spit raining down on Frankie’s head…

But no, we had a third out and a nice win. Appreciate it, pal. You be sure to take it easy.

Like anybody has to tell you that.

The One-Third Myth

It’s said often. It’s repeated here. It’s taken as something approaching gospel:

In the course of a season, a baseball team is going to win a third of its games no matter what it does and lose a third of its games no matter what it does — it’s the other third of its games that determines the success of that baseball team’s season.

Y’know what? Hogwash.

We are now at the exact one-third mark of the 2010 season, the Mets having played 54 of their scheduled 162 games and compiled a record of 27-27. I have been tracking every game the Mets have played thus far specifically to determine, to the best of my “fanalytical” abilities, whether the one-third formula has held over the first third. If it has, the Mets should have won 18 games without a doubt as to their outcome, lost 18 games without a doubt as to their outcome and gone 9-9 in the other 18 that are determining their season.

Yet it hasn’t worked that way, according to a little something I cooked up called the DTI or Determining Third Index. I have sought to identify, on a going basis, the nature of each Met result. I watch the game, I consider its ebb and flow and I slot it under one of four headings:

• Games the Mets were going to win no matter what anybody did.
• Games the Mets were going to lose no matter what anybody did.
• Wins that are determining the Mets’ season.
• Losses that are determining the Mets’ season.

Like I said, the Mets’ DTI record should be, if the one-third formula is accurate, 18-18/9-9. But it’s not. Instead, it’s 12-12/15-15. So, based on these findings through 54 games, please revise the familiar bromide to read as such:

In the course of a season, a baseball team is going to win 22.2% of its games no matter what it does and lose 22.2% of its games no matter what it does — it’s the other 55.6% of its games that determines the success of the 2010 Mets’ season.

I have no idea how typical the 2010 Mets’ experience is in context. They are not the 1962 Mets (40-120) who most emphatically did not win a third of their games in any form and they are not the 2001 Mariners (116-46) who won more than seven-tenths of their games. They’re not an outlier. If anything, as a .500 team, they should be a perfect testing ground for the one-third formula. But how they’ve gotten to .500 indicates to me far more than one-third of their games have been up for grabs.

Of course you might wonder what the bromide-coiners meant when they came up with the part about “going to” win or lose. I take it to mean that there are games that you just know your team isn’t going to blow or isn’t going to capture. Baseball-Reference can tell you all about Win Expectancy and Win Probability, but your gut — and probably your heart — can pretty well gauge how a Mets game is going. Likewise, your head can tell you if it takes off definitively in another direction or if it hasn’t made itself clear where it might wind up. To me, that’s the so-called “other third,” or, per my tracking of the DTI, the other 55.6%.

Mind you, this is an on-the-ground, middle-of-the-action way of looking at it. This is not an after-the-fact exercise. We’re not going back to a game from early in what turned to be a glorious championship season and marking it as a turning point. Ditto for not deciding, in retrospect, that we all should have known the lousy season just completed was going to hell when this or that game didn’t go our way. It also can’t possibly take into account that on a particular day, the starting pitcher was messing around in the bullpen, found a new grip and began to figure out what he was doing wrong all these years. He got shelled that day, but later on, playing a hunch, he used the grip and led the team down the stretch. That would determine your season, I suppose — as would maybe the left fielder’s biorhythms suddenly spiraling awesomely upward — but how would we know any of that from watching?

Also, let’s consider the phrase “determine your season”. If you’re already going nowhere but home on the last day of the schedule, what difference does a taut, tense game that enters the bottom of the ninth 1-1 make to your bottom line? But put that game at the end of 1999, and, as Felix Unger might say, it makes a great deal of difference. By the same token, an uncompetitive 8-1 loss in which your starter lasts only a third of an inning on the last day of the season definitely sounds like one of those you’re “going to lose” affairs. Yet, if it happens at the end of 2007, with a playoff spot sitting squarely on the line, then I’d say it just determined (and devastated) your season.

There are many variables to consider in examining the one-third bromide. This 54-game examination is simply an exercise that mixes educated observation with well-honed hunches of the “Oh well, we weren’t going to win today anyway” or “Dude, that was in the bag all the way” nature. It’s also leavened with a Mets fan’s feel for the game. You know, holding a lead but somehow knowing it’s not safe, staying close but understanding intrinsically we were doomed or even (as hard as this may be to fathom coming off the most recent road trip) having a sense that we were never out of it, no matter the early deficit.

Don’t use any of this in Vegas, but feel free to take it as you will, particularly the next time anyone starts to tell you about destiny, determination and thirds of seasons.

Following is a breakdown of the first third of this season by DTI, with select examples of the four kinds of games the Mets have played and how they’ve played them.

GAMES THE METS WERE GOING TO WIN: 12
The Mets started the season with one of these, a 7-1 handling of the Marlins by Johan Santana. I suppose he could have gotten locked in the John that morning, but otherwise that was the kind of game you just knew was a W in the making as it unfolded. Likewise, when the Mets went to Philadelphia on a roll, Barajas hit a couple of home runs and Niese cruised — that seemed fairly predestined, too. Maybe you couldn’t have seen R.A. Dickey and Hisanori Takahashi coming in a universal sense, but their shutouts over the Phillies on the last homestand, 8-0 and 5-0, respectively, felt pretty much in the bag all the way (dude). Though the final score was close — 4-2 — I had almost no doubt the Mets would win Mike Pelfrey’s start in San Diego this week once they got him a few runs. Ike Davis brought too much good karma to his major league debut on April 19 for the Mets to be denied, and they weren’t. Four nights later, John Maine had to leave early and Frankie Rodriguez made us hold our breath late, but the Braves barely showed up (misreading infield fly rules, et al), so that was one is slotted as one the Mets were going to win no matter what.

GAMES THE METS WERE GOING TO LOSE: 12
Blowouts of the unfriendly kind go here, such as Roy Halladay’s 10-0 whitewashing in Philadelphia or the next night when Johan gave up 10 earned runs. When none of your pitchers is the least bit effective — even if you’re losing only 6-4 in the middle of the game — you just know you’re going to lose…which is what happened the other night when Padres 18 Mets 6 went final. But it’s not only really bad pitching. The first week of the season, when the Mets couldn’t touch the generally vincible Burke Badenhop, that’s a game that wasn’t going to be ours, never mind the 3-1 score. When Pudge Rodriguez goes 4-for-4 and the Mets strike out 11 times, you know the Nationals have an edge far greater than a 3-2 tally (or anything a Ford commercial is selling) would indicate. Most obvious sign things aren’t going your way? When your speedy centerfielder hits an inside-the-park home run and starts a triple play, yet you never much see any chance of winning. That’s when what could have been the Angel Pagan Game become just another one the Mets were going to lose no matter what.

THE WINS DETERMINING THE METS’ SEASON: 15
A numbing 20-inning game in which you outlast the Cardinals should determine something other than you’re not going out for a while. A soaking 6-inning game when you sneak away with 1-0 decision should determine something other than your lack of dryness. Dingers dinged in the ninth inning or later by power-packing catchers go here, as do six-run eighth-inning rallies that are put to undeniably good use. But this isn’t all rousing comebacks and tests of endurance. On the first Friday night of the season, the Mets beat the Nationals, 8-2. That’s here, both because it was 2-2 in the seventh and because Mike Pelfrey seemed on the verge of melting down early yet didn’t (and hasn’t he gone a long way toward determining wins thus far?). The 4-0 victory the Mets posted somewhat handily over the Cubs on April 20 looks fairly routine on the surface, but it required Jose Reyes finding his legs (first triple since returning from the DL) and Fernando Tatis finding his pinch-hitting stroke (two-run, eighth-inning homer) — it also turned out to be the beginning of a beautiful homestand, though we couldn’t have known then. When Raul Valdes throws five relief innings once John Maine is pulled after one batter…when K-Rod fans A-Rod to end it…when a 3-0 lead is gripped tightly enough to become the finale in a Goose Egg Sweep…those are wins that seem to be determining the Mets’ season.

THE LOSSES DETERMINING THE METS’ SEASON: 15
You’re down 6-1, you’re in the process of making it 6-all, yet somewhere in there Fernando Tatis doesn’t score on a passed ball that doesn’t pass very far…discouraging sign en route to a 7-6 loss. Willie Harris dives and robs you of your dignity as well as a walkoff win…also not a good omen in a 4-3 defeat. Names like Chris Ianetta, Laynce Nix, Orlando Cabrera and Adrian Gonzalez take on nasty connotations with last at-bat swings for the fences…you get the idea. These games are the daggers in your schedule, though they stab at you from different angles. Oliver Perez might pitch a very good game only to have Felipe Lopez hit a grand slam off Raul Valdes; you might withstand Tim Lincecum and a whipping wind but you can’t overcome Oliver Perez’s seven walks in fewer than four innings; David Wright might strand a tying run in the top of the ninth and throw away the winning run in the bottom of the ninth; Yovani Gallardo might last just a little longer than Johan Santana. Everybody from Adam Wainwright (complete game win despite trailing 3-0 the night after his team lost in 20 innings) to Roger Bernadina (2 home runs and a Harrisesque catch) to Fernando Nieve (walkoff wild pitch) is culpable in losses that seem to be determining in the Mets’ season.

There’s admittedly a good bit of touch and feel to all this. Maybe it was folly to think the Mets could beat Adam Wainwright with John Maine on April 18, but we did lead 3-0 in the fifth, and it was tied 3-3 in the eighth. Maybe it’s not giving Big Pelf big enough credit to think he wasn’t going to beat Washington on April 9, but at the time, we couldn’t be sure he wasn’t last year’s model. Maybe we shouldn’t have doubted the Mets’ ability to fend off the Yankees when they led their Sunday night clash 6-1 and held on 6-4. Maybe the Mets losing by two to the Marlins on May 15 implies strongly it wasn’t fait accompli that they’d lose just because Maine walked the first four Fish he saw…but your gut knew it was (as did your heart).

And maybe the second third of the season will show us this all smoothes out, that there will be fewer nailbiters and heartbreakers and more clear-cut results. Maybe after 108 games, we’ll see a ratio that hews closer to the mythical one-third formula. I’ll continue to keep track and let you know in a couple of months, but I am fairly confident that I’ve discovered a new bromide:

“In the course of a season, a baseball team is going to win a third of its games no matter what it does and lose a third of its games no matter what it does — it’s the other third of its games that determines the success of that baseball team’s season” is hogwash baseball people came up with to absolve themselves of responsibility when their baseball team loses lousily.

***

The next third of this season promises one brand new benefit, courtesy of a great new blog called Hope is the Best of Things, authored by former ace ESPN researcher Mark Kelly. The Shawshank reference alone should be enough to draw you in, but be sure to stay for the sports.

Jason Donald & The Human Elephant

Johan Santana used everything he could and kept the opposition off the board. The Mets didn’t score enough for him. Francisco Rodriguez made a tough situation even more difficult and blew a potential save. The Mets stopped scoring altogether in extra innings. Somebody on the other team hit a walkoff grand slam. The Mets lost a series set anywhere but Citi Field.

I suppose I could delve into a few of the distinguishing details that made Wednesday evening’s disturbing loss at Petco Park different from other disturbing losses in other teams’ ballparks in 2010, such as…

• Santana’s heroic struggle to maintain command for seven shutout innings;

• Rodriguez’s failure to hold Tony Gwynn in the ninth;

• the pox that is David Eckstein in all seasons;

• the sweet Bay-to-Wright-to-Blanco relay that cut down Eckstein at the plate, presenting us with a couple of innings of false hope;

• Rodriguez remaining in the game in the tenth and not giving up the tie (but mostly his remaining in the game; I still like Frankie, but I didn’t need to see any more of him);

• Valdes and Wright combining on a heady play to cut down Gwynn at third

• and Valdes proving helpless/useless from there

…but I’ll take a pass on the Mets for the moment. To be honest, I wasn’t paying that much attention to them for a couple of innings and I think you can guess why. Like everybody else with a remote control, I turned to indispensable MLB Network to watch the end of the third perfect game baseball has produced in the past month. And, like you, I saw it.

Only one interested party didn’t.

Eighty-eight spotless pitches say Armando Galarraga of the Detroit Tigers was as perfect as a pitcher could be, no less so than Dallas Braden of the A’s on May 9 or Roy Halladay of the Phillies on May 29. Like pregnant, there are no degrees of perfect; you just are. But circumstances leave me thinking Galarraga was perfect and then some. He threw a 28-out perfect game, making his accomplishment just a little more impressive than what Braden and Halladay did. Furthermore, Galarraga was equally on target after the game, handling every question regarding somebody else’s imperfection with the perfect blend of respect, regret and humanity. He didn’t spit, he didn’t cry, he didn’t kick, but he was clearly disappointed, right up to the edge of devastated. It was perfect the way Armando Galarraga went from superhuman to intensely human.

A lot was said in the aftermath of Jim Joyce’s proffering of The Worst Call Ever about the human element and how it’s part and parcel of the game, even a perfect game rendered jaw-droppingly otherwise. Following the fiftieth or sixtieth utterance of said cliché, it began to sound to me like they were talking about the human elephant. The human elephant in the room, of course, is Joyce. The final out of what was in everything but indelible ink the 21st perfect game in major league history is currently residing in the pocket of this red-faced man in blue. Everybody on TV immediately closed ranks around one of their friends from the industry. Everybody’s instinct was to say that Jim Joyce is a great guy and a great ump. Also, that Jim Joyce is human, and you can’t ignore the human elephant.

Sure you can. We have machines for that now. It’s called instant replay. It’s used on borderline home runs. It’s worked fine. It would have worked Wednesday night in Detroit. The whole world knows Jim Joyce blew the call. Jim Joyce, great guy that he is, admits he blew the call. He feels terrible. Galarraga feels terrible. Jim Leyland — who vouched for Jim Joyce minutes after getting in his face — feels terrible. Tigers fans feel terrible. Baseball fans feel terrible. It’s the most enormous case of whaddayagonnado? since Don Denkinger handed the Royals a stay of execution in the sixth game of the 1985 World Series when he magically turned the first out of the bottom of the ninth inning into a leadoff, rally-sparking single. I’d have felt worse about that one, except it screwed over the Cardinals, and I yearned more in 1985 for the screwing over of the Cardinals than I did for a correct call.

Back then, whaddayagonnado? was a rhetorical question. Denkinger blew the call and ruled Jorge Orta safe and Kansas City scored two runs and cost St. Louis a title. Today, however, we have precedent for an answer to whaddayagonnado? It’s multiple-camera instant replay. We know what actually happened in our homes. Why shouldn’t the umpires be let in on the secret? The way they are when a home run ruling is in doubt? The human elephant should be the players — a player making a bad throw, for example — not the parameters set up to determine the success of their play. No matter how great a guy and ump Jim Joyce may be, there is no reason to not officially second-guess him. The cameras are in place. The technology is in place. The rationale, after Armando Galarraga was compelled to pitch to a 28th Cleveland Indian batter, couldn’t be more firmly in place. Enough with the backslapping nonsense that dates to the 19th century. It’s 2010. We know how to rectify bad calls. What are we waiting for?

(For that matter, why should Bud Selig wait to do the right thing? An interesting take on precedent and sportsmanship from someone who does his homework here.)

If anybody looks perfect in all this besides Armando Galarraga, it is the guy who forced Jim Joyce’s errant hands. Jason Donald of the Indians was no human elephant running from home to first. The reason there was a possibility of a bad call was because there was a close play. There was a close play because Jason Donald took nothing for granted. The Indians weren’t making life particularly difficult for Galarraga before Donald’s third at-bat. Twenty-six Tribe batters entertained all of eighty pitches in their benign quest to bring Galarraga to the brink of history. Donald, the ninth-place hitter, hit the 83rd pitch from Galarraga to Miguel Cabrera at first — who knew Miguel Cabrera cared whether his team won or lost ballgames? — and the race was on.

You might say in that situation everybody’s going to run hard and try their best. I’d like to think so. But this is Major League Baseball, where players regularly treat running hard as optional. In the eighth, in what was shaping up as a perfect game against his team, Russell Branyan jogged to first to end the inning on a grounder to second. It wasn’t the same as the grounder Donald hit, but since when is there an excuse to jog with less than three outs? Come the ninth with two out, Donald sprinted. Cabrera grabbed, pivoted and threw. Galarraga hustled and covered.

Joyce blew it.

Fine. We know that. Even Donald, for all his Ecksteinian vinegar, seemed to know that. He held his helmeted head in disbelief that he was called safe. Jason Donald was almost Rupert Pupkin doing his stand-up in King of Comedy, the part in which he recounts his miserable childhood and how his school made beating him up part of the curriculum:

There was this one kid, poor kid. He was afraid of me. I used to tell him, “Hit me, hit me. What’s the matter with you? Don’t you want to graduate?”

C’mon, Jason Donald just had to be telepathically communicating to Jim Joyce. Call me out. Save yourself this epitaph. Save yourself this embarrassment. Save baseball from yourself. I swear that’s what Donald was trying to tell Joyce when he grabbed his helmet, but he couldn’t get through. Jim Leyland was already on the line.

So now Donald is the least-loved baserunner in Cleveland Indians history since Willie Mays Hayes mouthed off on Opening Day in Major League. Nobody wants to see him on first. Nobody wants to see any more of this game. This game should be over. This game was perfect. But, per Joyce, the game must go on. It continues for five more pitches, the last of them grounded by Trevor Crowe to Brandon Inge, who throws to Miguel Cabrera without incident. It’s a one-hitter for Armando Galarraga. Put it, if you must, in the books. Could you blame the Comerica crowd for booing a shutout victory?

Yet there was something else that caught my eye in the seconds before a contingent of discontented Tigers descended on Jim Joyce to register their hard-earned protests. It was Jason Donald. As Inge was throwing to Cabrera, Donald was heading for home, which made me wonder one thing:

What was Jason Donald doing on third?

It didn’t come up in the Tiger telecast, because who could think of anything but Armando Galarraga being robbed of his perfect game by Jim Joyce, but Jason Donald kept playing baseball. While Crowe took strike one, Donald took off for second. It was scored defensive indifference. With the count one-and-one, Donald took off for third. It was also scored defensive indifference. Galarraga wasn’t holding him on, so he took his bases. It was 3-0 Detroit, there were two out in the ninth, the game hadn’t taken close to two hours to arrive on the cusp of its likely finish line, yet Cleveland was technically alive. You’re always alive as long as you have ups, and Jim Joyce gave Cleveland at least one extra up.

The Indians proved as recently as Saturday, when they were down 10-5 to the Yankees in the seventh inning, that being alive has its benefits. That day, David Robertson hit Crowe to lead off the seventh. With one out, Crowe took off for second — not defensive indifference, but not the sort of thing that figured to make a great deal of difference in the outcome. If you’re going to try to steal second trailing by five, sniffed Michael Kay on YES, you had better make it.

Crowe made it. Austin Kearns singled him home to make it 10-6. Before long, Joba Chamberlain replaced David Robertson and it was 10-9, Yankees. Lou Marson was on second and Matt LaPorta was on third. Up stepped rookie shortstop and ninth-place hitter Jason Donald. He doubled them both home to give Cleveland an 11-10 lead. They went on to win, 13-11.

Like I said, you never know what will happen when you’ve got ups. Jason Donald, a big leaguer only since May 18, figured that out Saturday — probably before. He was handed first base on Wednesday, but he took second and third. Who knew what might happen? Who knew Galarraga wouldn’t give up a legitimate hit from there or that Joyce wouldn’t gift the Indians more chances? Donald didn’t, and it’s to his credit he didn’t decide that he did.

It makes no never-mind to anybody’s bottom line. The score stayed 3-0, Detroit, and defensive indifference doesn’t go on a baserunner’s permanent record. All anybody will remember about Jason Donald in this perfect game was that they saw him beaten to the bag by at least half a step, just as they will remember that Armando Galarraga retired 28 consecutive batters when the first 27 should have been sufficient — and that Jim Joyce may be considered a great guy, but on the only night anybody ever noticed him, he was a disaster as an umpire. It won’t be long recalled that amid the tremors unleashed by the worst call in a generation Jason Donald kept on running.

The human elephant, unlike its jungle counterpart, has a rather selective memory.

***

Today, incidentally, is the 78th anniversary of Lou Gehrig homering four times in the same game. This rare and remarkable feat received little notice because on the very same day, John McGraw, announced his retirement from the New York Giants in his 31st season of managing them. Retirements of legends could overshadow rare and remarkable feats then. Nowadays? Not so much.

***

Make a donation, get a book: details here. (And thanks to those who already have.)

Make a Donation, Get a Book

Father’s Day is coming up! Graduation Day is coming up! Any day is coming up! You don’t really need an occasion, but in deference to Dads & Grads being a perennial theme of June, we are making a special offer to Faith and Fear in Flushing readers.

Between now and June 13, if you make a donation of $15 to Sharon Chapman’s Tug McGraw Foundation fundraising effort, you will receive a personally inscribed and autographed copy of the newly released paperback edition of Faith and Fear in Flushing: An Intense Personal History of the New York Mets to give as a gift to your dad, to your grad, to yourself or to anybody you like.

This is a limited-time and limited-quantity offer, so please act now. You make the donation here and you will be contacted for confirmation of all details regarding where you want it sent and how you want it made out; if you’d prefer it unsigned, that’s all right, too. We cover shipping and handling and will get it out to you in a timely manner.

Why are we doing this? A few reasons:

1) Faith and Fear in Flushing is the official blog sponsor of Sharon Chapman’s New York City Marathon Run for the Tug McGraw Foundation. You can read all about Sharon’s motivation and preparation here, but in a nutshell, she has dedicated herself to the Marathon and to Tug, and we enthusiastically support her efforts.

2) The Tug McGraw Foundation is an outstanding organization dedicated to fighting the deadly disease of brain cancer, with an emphasis on improving quality of life for those battling the scourge of a tumor. You can learn more about the Foundation’s exemplary work here.

3) We believe Tug McGraw remains, more than 35 years since his trade to Philadelphia and six years since his untimely passing from brain cancer, the embodiment of the spirit of everything that we stand for as Mets fans: not giving up, not giving in, not taking ourselves unnecessarily seriously. Faith and Fear ranked Tug McGraw the Seventh-Greatest Met of the First Forty Years, an appraisal based as much on who he was and what he means to us as how he pitched. He pitched, not incidentally, very well.

4) Faith and Fear in Flushing: An Intense Personal History of the New York Mets is the story of one Mets fan and all Mets fans. It’s our story. Recently, Shannon Shark of Mets Police described it as “a Mets fan walking you through the history of the Mets from a personal standpoint.” I like that. And I think any Mets fan — your dad, your grad, yourself, whoever you know who bleeds orange and blue — will like this book. It takes you from the birth of the Mets and the concomitant conception of the author clear through to the final day of Shea Stadium and — exclusive to the paperback edition — the first year of Citi Field. All the highs, all the lows, all the in-betweens are in there. You’ll recognize yourself as much as you’ll get to know me and connect to your own Met soul.

We hope you take advantage of this limited-time, limited-quantity offer. Again, please click here to make your $15 donation to this incredibly worthy cause. Once it goes through, you’ll receive an e-mail and the wheels (or feet) will be put in motion to get you the book.

It will be our honor if you take us up on this. Thank you.

Well Hello, Mike Pelfrey

At the risk of antagonizing tedious radio hosts, I’m proud of Mike Pelfrey too.

Perhaps that’s OK with Mike Francesa, since I’m 15 years older than Big Pelf. (Not that I give a shit.) I’m proud of Pelf for the same reasons I suspect Matt Cerrone was: Pelf has spent his entire professional career as a Met and, after a decidedly awkward adolescence, appears to have become a star. It’s great to see.

Stardom for Pelf didn’t seem particularly likely not so long ago. There was the game against the Giants in which he telegraphed his pitches through the rather straightforward method of stomping around on the mound muttering what he was going to throw. There were all the times he let an inning get away from him and wandered around behind the rubber fidgeting and plucking at his cap and generally being cranky until his catcher and/or his infielders and/or his pitching coach had to go out there and settle him down, like a horse whose eyes have rolled back in his head. Pelfrey wasn’t just a plus-sized bag of eccentricities — he was the baseball equivalent of the guy in your office whom you kept an eye on because you figured he’d show up with an arsenal the day after his downsizing. Below the neck, his sinker seemed disinclined to sink and his college-baseball coach crabbed on the air that his velocity had disappeared. Oh, and Tom Seaver thought he was dumb. (Often merely a synonym for not Tom Seaver, but still.) Yes, there was a statistical case to be made that the biggest change wasn’t Pelfrey himself but the fact that he was stuck in front of Daniel Murphy and Luis Castillo and a grab bag of impostor shortstops, but on some level I think we resisted believing that, because we’d seen so much twitching and grousing and strange behavior and ineffective pitching that we were no longer inclined to give Pelf the benefit of the doubt.

Tonight there was none of that: It was groundouts and strikeouts, that diving splitter and heavy sinker leaving the Padres looking like they were trying to lift bocce balls over the infield. Pelfrey was 110 pitches worth of wonderful — and with the exception of one horror show in Philadelphia (aided and abetted by a couple of balls that just eluded Jose Reyes and Alex Cora), he’s been wonderful all year, emerging as not just a credible starter but a solid complement to Johan Santana. (After which God knows, but let’s stick to the subject at hand.) He’s a homegrown Met made good, after a long stretch in which he seemed to be breaking bad. Damn right I’m proud of him.

Francisco Rodriguez, on the other hand, seems to have been put on this earth to give me agita. I’ve never much liked K-Rod. His ripcord mechanics leave him in horrible fielding position, his histrionics are irritating, he does stupid things (witness that pickoff attempt with two outs in the ninth), and of course there’s his history of high-profile gag jobs. (Tell me you weren’t waiting for a game-winning home run. I was.) There are a few elite closers, and then there are guys who pitch the ninth and do what plenty of other guys with two good pitches could do about as well. Frankie’s the latter; too bad he’s being paid like the former.

But he survived and so did we, in this ballpark where the Mets always seem to succumb to disaster in the middle of the night. (Nice place, though.) I’ll take it.