The blog for Mets fans
who like to read
ABOUT US
Faith and Fear in Flushing made its debut on Feb. 16, 2005, the brainchild of two longtime friends and lifelong Met fans.
Greg Prince discovered the Mets when he was 6, during the magical summer of 1969. He is a Long Island-based writer, editor and communications consultant. Contact him here.
Jason Fry is a Brooklyn writer whose first memories include his mom leaping up and down cheering for Rusty Staub. Check out his other writing here.
Got something to say? Leave a comment, or email us at faithandfear@gmail.com. (Sorry, but we have no interest in ads, sponsored content or guest posts.)
Need our RSS feed? It's here.
Visit our Facebook page, or drop by the personal pages for Greg and Jason.
Or follow us on Twitter: Here's Greg, and here's Jason.
|
by Greg Prince on 6 January 2010 11:43 am
One of your Mets trivia staples is, “Name the Mets players who have been inducted into the Hall of Fame.” For the longest time, you had but four names to memorize if you wanted to answer in full:
• Yogi Berra, inducted 1972
• Warren Spahn, 1973
• Willie Mays, 1979
• Duke Snider, 1980
You understood each of these men were Hall of Fame Mets only because they played here after establishing their Hall of Fame bona fides elsewhere. Yogi Berra, dubbed the “Eternal Yankee,” by Allen Barra, had all of nine at-bats as a Met before re-retiring to serve as Casey Stengel’s first base coach in 1965. Warren Spahn spent only the first half of his final season, also ’65, as a Met starter; the longtime Brave finished up in San Francisco. Willie Mays gave Joan Payson the gift of almost two seasons back in New York in 1972 and ’73, and while he made an indelible impression, his Cooperstown credentials were secured as a Giant. Similar circumstances surrounded the Met tenure of signature Brooklyn Dodger Duke Snider, a Met mostly for sentimentality’s sake in 1963 (who, like Spahn, bolted to the Coast to end his career with the Giants).
We were along for the ride on their induction days. Berra was managing the Mets when he went in and Mays was in his sixth season as a Mets coach, so their hoopla wasn’t completely foreign to us, but they weren’t Hall of Fame Mets players. They were Hall of Fame players who had been Mets.
We knew we’d get one who was truly our own once Tom Seaver spent five full seasons retired from baseball — and we did. In January 1992, we got the news that 98.8% of Hall of Fame voters voted Seaver in the first chance they got. The five Baseball Writers Association of America members (of 430 voting) who didn’t check off Seaver? There were three, I think, who said they’d never select anybody on the first ballot and two older gentlemen who copped to missing Seaver’s name altogether and felt embarrassed by it.
After Seaver, it was back to trivia. Richie Ashburn became the first Met voted in by the Veterans Committee, in 1995. Like the pre-Seaver inductees, Ashburn was a Met at the end of the line, though he was, by the standards of 1962, the first good Met. Still, he was a Hall of Famer because of what he’d done as a Phillie. In 1999, Nolan Ryan became the second player inducted who had started his career as a Met. Unlike Seaver, however, his career wasn’t defined by his Mets days.
The eighth and ninth Mets went into the Hall together, in 2003. Eddie Murray was from the old school: in because he stood out as something else (an Oriole), a Met mostly in the just-passing-through sense. Gary Carter, on the other hand, became the first Met in the Hall who can be said to have burnished his credentials as a Met. He established them as an Expo, but raised his profile with us, particularly by being — judged on camera time — the face of the franchise when the Mets were at their most visible in the mid-’80s. Carter’s the second Met whose NEW YORK, N.L. line on his plaque isn’t incidental.
Rickey Henderson was elected last year, the tenth Met player in the Hall of Fame and the fifth, following Mays, Seaver, Ryan and Carter, to appear with the Mets in the postseason, indicating his stay with us was more than a footnote. But Henderson’s Mets time was a season-plus in a career that spanned four different decades. We weren’t his first team, we weren’t his last team. We’re a line on his résumé, mostly, and he’s a tenth of our trivia answer.
This afternoon, there will likely be an eleventh component to, “Name the Mets players who have been inducted into the Hall of Fame,” when Roberto Alomar is presumably announced as heading the class of 2010. Should it happen, then his plaque will — below a recitation of his many accomplishments as the game’s premier second baseman — note he was a member of NEW YORK, N.L. in 2002-2003.
If it were up to me, they’d cut off his plaque at 2001.
I saw nothing that made me think I was watching a Hall of Fame player when Roberto Alomar was a Met. If they gave me a ballot for this election, I’d have sent it back to the BBWAA blank because the only reason I’d want to vote would be to not vote for Alomar…at least not the Alomar I watched give it his none for a season-and-a-half. And unlike those two guys who missed Seaver, I wouldn’t be embarrassed by it at all.
If they gave me a ballot with two Roberto Alomars, the one who excelled from 1987 through 2001 and the one who came to the Mets and completely imploded, I’d happily vote for the first Alomar. That guy was a lock Hall of Famer. I didn’t watch him every day when he was a Padre, Blue Jay, Oriole and Indian, but I was familiar with his work. It was stellar and deserving of all the praise that will be heaped on him today.
But I’m not terribly interested in the Roberto Alomar from before 2002. He was just some superstar on some other teams. He became my baseball concern when he became a Met, and when he became a Met, he practically vanished from the face of the Earth.
I’m fine with Yogi Berra’s NEW YORK, N.L. His nine at-bats (two hits) were understood in their time as an emergency cameo. Berra had been hired to coach or publicity’s sake and because of Stengel’s high regard for his baseball acumen. After he hung up his chest protector for good, Berra went right back to coaching full-time. He spent nearly eleven seasons in a Mets uniform, before and after his induction into Cooperstown. There’s nothing wrong with Yogi Berra being thought of, however fleetingly, as a Hall of Fame Met.
I’m fine with Warren Spahn’s NEW YORK, N.L. Serving as pitching coach and regular starter, Spahn stormed from the gate, at 44, in 1965. He registered two complete game victories in April, and by early May was 2-2 with a 2.83 ERA for a still-horrendous Mets club. Eventually age and stubbornness caught up with him and, refusing assignment to the bullpen, he was released in July. Shea was only a stopover, but there’s nothing wrong with Warren Spahn being thought of, also fleetingly, as a Hall of Fame Met.
I’m fine with Ashburn and Snider in this regard, too. They were our 1962 and 1963 All-Stars, respectively. Snider (14 homers) wasn’t the happiest of Met campers, and Ashburn’s sense of irony at being the best player (.306 average) on the world’s worst club told him it was time to call it a career after one year. But they have their positive places in team history. There’s nothing wrong thinking of Richie Ashburn and Duke Snider as Hall of Fame Mets.
Willie Mays wasn’t an unvarnished vase full of roses as a Met. He could be choosy about when would play (his presence hastened the departure of Tommie Agee) but when he did play, he was still, as much as he could be, Willie Mays. You know he hit a home run in his first game back in New York to beat his old team for his new team; you might know he drove in a crucial run in the deciding game of the 1973 NLCS while scoring another; and I hope you’ve seen at least part of his “Say Goodbye to America” farewell at Shea (echoed the following week at a valedictory press conference). What may have been most life-affirming about Willie Mays as a Met is he was still playing the game mentally as he always had physically. which transcended the village limits of Cooperstown. Take Ira Berkow’s 2001 remembrance of how he played it in just another game in 1973.
Well, let me tell you about the greatest play in baseball I ever saw — or thought I saw. Few recall it, though it was probably the greatest play Johnny Oates, a second-string catcher and later a big league manager, also ever saw — or thought he saw.
Oates was the hapless catcher in the play, which was executed by the wondrous and wily Willie Mays, who incidentally, is in the news, being frequently lauded by his godson, the basher Barry Bonds.
I was reminded of the play at the Baseball Hall of Fame induction ceremonies in Cooperstown last weekend when I saw Mays. I had wondered what he saw on that play — if he even remembered — it being so subtle, so long ago and his career so crammed with highlights.
The play was not, to be sure, the famous, stupendous back-to-the-plate catch in center field off the Vic Wertz drive in the 1954 World Series, or any other of Mays’s acclaimed swats or snares.
It took place when Mays was a Met, in a Saturday afternoon game at Shea Stadium in July 1973. The great Say Hey Kid was no longer a kid, and no longer even greeting people with, ”Say hey.” Mays was then 42, and in the 22nd and last season of his brilliant, Hall-of-Fame career.
In my mind’s eye, sitting in the press box that day, this was the situation:
Close game. I forget the opponent. Late innings. Mays is on second base. The batter — don’t remember who — drives a hit to right field. Normally, the runner would score from second fairly easily, but this is no ordinary runner. Mays seems to trudge around third, like, well, an old man, and heads home, cap still on head — remember, in his heyday the cap used to fly off his noggin as if he were in a wind tunnel. The right fielder winds up to fire the ball to the plate, certain to nail Methuselah Mays. But incredibly, Mays picks up steam and there he is racing to the plate like, well, the Say Hey Kid!
He beats the throw and is safe at home. Not only that, but because he drew the throw to the plate, the batter is able to go to second, sitting there now in scoring position.
In an instant, Mays had craftily set the whole thing up in his marvelous baseball brain. He obviously had run slowly at first to draw the throw, knowing all along he could make it home.
For me, there is nothing quite as exciting in sports as watching a player — particularly an aging veteran— use his experience, his intelligence and his considerable if waning skills to accomplish something remarkable under pressure.
One hesitates to use the word genius in such endeavors — especially with such folks as Einstein, Picasso, Freud and Frost looking from the stands — but in my view certain athletes performing certain feats may indeed possess a kind of genius.
Some three decades later I recalled the play to Mays, describing it as I remembered it. Did he remember it?
”Absolutely,” he said, in that familiar high-pitched voice. ”It was against the Braves. But there’s more to it. See, I was on second base and Felix Millan was a runner on first. Ralph Garr was in right field. But not only did I score, I slid into the catcher — it was Johnny Oates — and I pinned him to the ground so Millan could score, too.”
I didn’t remember the pinning business, so I later called Oates, at his home in Virginia. ”I always tell that story at banquets,” Oates said. ”It was the smartest play I’ve ever seen, and an embarrassing one for me.”
I told Oates what Willie told me.
“I was under the impression that it was a sacrifice fly,” Oates said. ”And I don’t remember him on top of me. He made a perfect slide and took my legs out from under me. My recollection is that I wound up on top of him. But definitely we were lying on the plate, and somehow Willie wouldn’t let me get up. The throw went over my head, and the runner behind him did indeed score — how he found the plate with us lying on it I don’t know.”
To check further for details, I called the Elias Sports Bureau, located in Manhattan, the record keeper for Major League Baseball. Elias confirmed the play essentially the way Mays remembered it, with him and Millan scoring on a hit by Wayne Garrett.
Seaver’s Met HOF credentials need no introduction. Nor Carter’s. Ryan was an integral piece of the 1969 World Champions. Henderson was the catalyst for the 1999 playoff club. Eddie Murray wasn’t particularly pleasant to the outside world as a Met in 1992 and 1993, and his Mets teams were rancid and then some, but he drove in 93 and 100 runs, respectively, and was generally vouched for as a veteran leader among his teammates.
Does any of the above sound like Roberto Alomar as a Met? Did anybody say nice things about his clubhouse presence? Were his intangibles on display? His tangibles certainly weren’t. He carried what appeared to be an air of indifference onto the field and it translated into his performance. From April 1, 2002 until his July 1, 2003 trade to the White Sox, he put up distressingly subpar numbers — certainly below the standards he set when earning the Hall of Fame votes he will surely collect.
It’s all right for a veteran to fall off. It was disturbing to see Alomar fall so far so fast in 2002 since he was in a Mets uniform while plunging, but it happens. Snider and Spahn ran out of gas, too, But you can be more than your numbers. Mays, by key accounts, was. Tom Seaver, Jerry Koosman and Tug McGraw all credited Mays — despite the lingering image of him falling down and missing fly balls in the sun-drenched Oakland Coliseum outfield — as a big influence on their ’73 pennant run that brought them to the World Series. Snider attempted to mentor a young Ed Kranepool. McGraw said Spahn helped straighten out his wayward ways when he was a rookie. Ashburn is widely renowned as the soul of the ’62 team — he midwifed the legend of Marvelous Marv Throneberry, no small task it its time.
My memory could be foggy, but I don’t remember Roberto Alomar accomplishing anything of substance or style as a Met. He exhibited lackadaisicalness and, at best, emitted disinterest. He got off to a slow start and struggled from there. Off the field? We only know what we read and hear, but this, from William Berlind, writing in the New York Times Magazine in 2002, stays with me:
Next to Piazza, Alomar is also getting changed, but they don’t say anything to each other, not even hello. Alomar has been a perennial All-Star second baseman, and the Mets expected him to become a significant part of the team, another star to pair with Piazza. Alomar lives alone in a Long Island City condo, and whenever he gets a chance, he flies back to his home in Cleveland, which is crammed with posters and paintings of himself. Earlier in the season, outfielder Roger Cedeño tracked down a picture of Alomar’s rookie baseball card and taped it up in his locker. When he saw it, Alomar flipped, and they nearly came to blows in the dugout before the game.
Alomar was supposed to be Piazza’s co-equal in 2002. He was going to help lead the team back to prominence after a mediocre 2001. He did no such thing. He didn’t do it as a second baseman, as a hitter, as a future Hall of Famer. Lots of players let down the 2002 Mets. None was a bigger downer than Alomar.
My partner nailed all of this four years ago when he consigned Roberto Alomar to the Eighth Circle of Mets Hell:
In 2002 he hit .266, drove in 53 runs and stole 16 bases. Mediocre numbers, but rarely has a player shown so little in achieving mediocrity. Shea Stadium didn’t seem to agree with him: There were mutterings (always secondhand) that he was dismayed to see previous years’ home runs turn into flyouts, that he was miffed to find Shea’s thick grass turning ground-ball hits into 5-3s and 6-3s and 3-1s. Maybe that was the explanation for his mulish insistence on dropping down bunt after bunt, regardless of whether or not the situation called for one. And then plenty of times Alomar would snatch defeat from the jaws of questionable ideas, turning potential bunt hits, however ill-conceived, into outs by trying to dive head-first into first base.
In the field, that Gold Glove turned into pyrite. Balls that he snapped up in San Diego and Toronto and Baltimore and Cleveland skittered by him, but the worst thing was watching him turn the pivot. One of the most-acrobatic second basemen in the history of the game had turned into Gregg Jefferies: He’d take throws from shortstop with his rear end heading for left-center, shot-putting a lollipop throw that would float into the first baseman’s glove or bounce into it after the batter crossed first. It happened again and again and again, as Met announcers wondered what was going on and the boos came down from the stands.
But surely a lock for Cooperstown made his teammates better with his intangibles? Ha ha ha. Alomar sulked about being moving around in the batting order and took such umbrage to needling about his rookie card from Roger Cedeño (who may not be able to play baseball but has always been hailed as a prince of a guy) that Mo Vaughn had to intervene in the dugout in front of TV, God and everyone. Then in April 2003 he was part of the double-play tandem that blamed Jae Seo — a rookie — for the well-coiffed, Bentley-driving Rey Sanchez’s failure to cover the bag against the Expos. That’s veteran leadership! (Given that Jose Reyes’ first two double-play mates and counselors were Alomar and Sanchez, it’s a testament to his character that he isn’t Maurice Clarett.)
Then, in late June 2003, a miraculous thing happened. Suddenly Alomar was hanging in there on the pivot. Suddenly plays not made for a season and a half were being made. Suddenly he looked like…well, suddenly he looked like Roberto Alomar. The source of this miracle? The Mets were openly shopping him on the trade market. (Talk about testaments to character.) When Alomar was sent to the White Sox, he departed without mentioning the mysterious Other Roberto Alomar: “I didn’t feel real comfortable with the situation. Sometimes teams don’t work for you. I think the New York Mets weren’t the right team for me.”
Of course, sometimes players don’t work for teams. Gary Cohen, witnessing the Miracle of Robbie, turned the blowtorch on, offering a furious, dead-on indictment of his halfhearted play and famously calling him a disgrace. The response from Alomar (who was honoring the White Sox by showing actual interest in the game he was paid millions to play) was to boycott the New York media. “I heard the tape,” he said of Cohen, adding that “I did the best I could. It just didn’t work out. But to say I was a disgrace or I didn’t play hard, I don’t understand that.”
Amen to Jason’s summation. And shame on Alomar still not copping to being such an immense non-entity across nine months of Metsdom. Just the other day, he told Tyler Kepner of the Times, “A ballplayer doesn’t make excuses. In New York, I don’t think we all clicked together as a team. If we would have clicked as a team, maybe we would have done a little bit better. There were a lot of big expectations from Day 1. We played good in spring training, but when it was time to play during the season, we didn’t play good, we didn’t pitch good, and we didn’t hit good. You can’t win games like that.”
Sounds like an excuse/alibi to me.
It’s not a crime to come to the Mets and play baseball badly. (Imagine how overcrowded our prison system would be if it were.) But playing as badly as Alomar did, and showing as little as Alomar did is going to make me think twice about punching his ticket to the Hall of Fame. His time here wasn’t a Yogiesque walk-on. He came here to be the center of the team. He drifted offstage instead. There was no evidence of a Hall of Famer in either his conduct or his results.
It doesn’t mean I wish him ill in any way. I just don’t want to bestow on him the highest honor baseball has. He lost that in my eyes.
I understand that the Hall of Fame does not induct only on what a player does as a New York Met. My eyes watched Alomar most closely as a Met, but I’m not blind to his career before 2002. I comprehend his previous accomplishments as sizable, but they were disembodied from what I saw and was passionate about. From my reading about them, I can see why Berra, Spahn, Ashburn and Snider were held in fairly high regard as Mets en route to the Hall of Fame despite their not playing at that caliber as Mets. From my watching them, I could see why Mays, Murray and Henderson, while no longer shining as they did earlier in their careers, were Mets on their way to the Hall — the vestigial greatness within each of them would still reveal itself in flickering flashes and medium doses. I can remember Ryan as a youngster and can make out, in hindsight, the outlines of his greatness to come. I was privileged enough to enjoy Seaver across his prime and Carter before his waned. Those were Mets who were Hall of Famers as Mets, to be sure.
Someday I’ll say the same of Mike Piazza. I’ll say it of Pedro Martinez and even T#m Gl@v!ne, to some degree, because I was able to discern why they were considered the stars they were before they got here, and marveled at how well they continued to ply their craft (at times) even as their skills diminished. I’d go as far to swear that if Hall of Fame membership were based solely on the ability to steal bases, I’d support Vince Coleman’s induction, because amid all his myriad Mets Hell nonsense, he showed off his once-awesome base-theft ability pretty well his first Met year (even if what he ultimately stole, mostly, was money).
I never saw anything in Roberto Alomar, as a Met, that suggested to me, without knowing what he did before he got here, why he’d ever be considered a Hall of Famer for anybody. Let others whose eyes fixed on him from 1987 to 2001 consider him an indisputable Hall of Famer and celebrate his imminent induction.
I’ll just look at NEW YORK, N.L. 2002-2003 and see nothing more than trivia.
***
ADDENDUM: Son of a gun, Roberto Alomar didn’t get in after all. Just as with us in advance of the 2002 season, I guess this proves you can’t always count on receiving what you expect.
***
Also entering the Hall this summer with a blue and orange pedigree of sorts (via the Veterans Committee) is Whitey Herzog, former archnemesis when he managed the Cardinals, but quite an important figure in building the first championship Mets club. For more on the Rat from before he was such a rodent, check out Jim Burns (James H. Burns) in the Village Voice and Mark of Mets Walkoffs.
by Greg Prince on 5 January 2010 5:56 am
Six years ago today, the world became deprived of Tug McGraw. The prevailing emotion among Mets fans, baseball fans and humanity fans was sadness, which seemed not quite right since I can’t think of a ballplayer who more personified Joy with a capital J, to say nothing of Belief with a capital B. When it came to positive emotional responses, Tug brought out the Upper Case in all of us.
“It’s 1973 forever in some essential compartment of our collective soul,” I wrote in the wake of the news. “Tug McGraw is forever a Met, the quintessential Met, the Met whose DNA defines this franchise. Imperfect rather than inept. Hilarious but not comical. Excitable boy who’s The Man on the mound. We’re never out of it. We always have some kind of chance, some screwy opportunity to get back in the game, get back in the race, cast aside all those errors and fat pitches and LOBs that dug us into this impossible hole in April and May and June and July and August and claw our way out.”
Tug was a lovable character but he could pitch some, too. It was his turnaround as much as his spiritual uplift that made the 1973 division title and pennant possible. He was no mascot. He was a fireman, a closer, a true relief ace. All the Mets came together down that most memorable of stretch drives, but when it came to getting back in the race, it figuratively started and literally ended with Tug recording the big out.
Now there’s another race involving Tug. And that wristband above will be a part of it.
We recently told you about our friend Sharon Chapman, a.k.a. Inside Pitcher from the comments section, and how she’ll be running the New York City Marathon as a member of Team McGraw. She and they are devoted to raising funds and awareness for the good work of the Tug McGraw Foundation, an organization established to help those facing the same struggle with brain cancer that Tug fought. “Over 200,000 adults and children annually receive a diagnosis of brain cancer,” according to the Foundation, which has made its mission the support of “research that will improve their quality of life in the physical, social, spiritual, and cognitive areas.”
The wristband? Well, à la Stephen Colbert and the U.S. Olympic speedskating squad, it signifies that when Sharon runs the Marathon, she will be representing the Faith and Fear Nation. Jason and I didn’t even know we had one, but the more we thought about it, the more we liked the idea of being a small component of this big effort for Team McGraw. And even if FAFIF doesn’t quite qualify as a nationality, we do have a very nice community here, its quality proven time and again by citizens like Sharon. She did all the heavy lifting on this, getting the wristband made up amid her other myriad training and organizing efforts. All we’re doing is cheering her on and asking, if you can, to help her and the Tug McGraw Foundation’s cause along. We’ll be checking in on Sharon’s road to the New York City Marathon periodically throughout the year and telling you more about what’s fueling this truly Amazin’ run.
To learn more about the Foundation, visit their site here. To donate (any amount is vastly appreciated), visit Sharon’s page here. Share these links with whomever you think might be interested.
Go Nation Go!
by Jason Fry on 4 January 2010 2:07 pm
No, not Citi Field. That’s so last decade.
We seem to be fairly well settled in to our new Web home (many thanks to John Keegan for his help and for answering a million questions), so I thought I’d offer a quick tour of the new stuff and talk a bit about where we’re going. The idea isn’t to brag, but to get your help with identifying what’s not quite working and what could work better.
Here are some things we’ve added:
New Comment Features — You can now have your own picture or avatar, via gravatar.com — if you sign up there with the email address you used here, your picture should show up here after a few minutes. (Same for any other site on which you have a Gravatar.) You can now edit your comments for 30 minutes, request that a comment be deleted, and edit your email address and any linked URLs. You can also use URLs and other markup in comments, though be aware that too many URLs will trip our spam filter and get a comment stuck in moderation until we can rescue it.
Sharing Tools — Next to the Comment icon/counter you’ll see icons for sharing a post via email or on Facebook, Twitter, Digg or Delicious.
Print Tools — Reading Faith and Fear on the go? This will format it nicely to be printed.
Tags — We’re just starting to play with these, and resisting the urge to go back through 3,000 posts and tag every single one of them to within an inch of its life. (You might have noticed we’re a bit obsessive.) As we build out our tags we hope this will become an easy way to trace, say, all the mean things we say about Luis Castillo.
Mobile Support — Faith and Fear should now automatically format itself to look friendly on an iPhone, Blackberry, etc.
Kindle — Got a Kindle? You can read us on it for 99 cents a month.
And here are some things we’re still working on/thinking about:
More Comment Tools — We’re looking at supporting Facebook Connect for easier commenting, and more ways to build out our discussions. If you’ve got ideas, we’re all ears.
Galleries — We’re still looking around for an easy gallery tool like the one we had with Blogharbor. Many thanks to my partner, by the way, for resurrecting as many of the old site’s photos as he could.
Redesign — For now we just wanted to get the blog over onto WordPress more or less intact. Looking ahead, we’re going to make some design/layout changes, without messing with the overall look. (You know what a pain it is to figure out the Pantone colors for Mets blue and orange and then convert them to hex? No way am I revisiting that.) The goals are to get more useful information up higher (we’ve now got a right-hand column we’re not using) and more blog posts visible without a ton of scrolling. Another thing that will never change is our favicon. Mini-Shea forever!
Ads — As we said in our fall survey (thanks again to all of you who answered our questions), we intend to put ads on the site sometime this year. We’re going to go slow in hopes of getting our sea legs and figuring out what we’re doing. Anyway, stay tuned.
That’s where we are right now. If you’ve got ideas for things you’d like to see or suggestions for widgets/plugins/etc. that would make Faith and Fear work better, we’d love to hear from you in the comments or via email. Thanks for your patience with the technological bumps and the construction dust — we very much appreciate your reading and commenting, and look forward to chronicling 2010.
by Greg Prince on 4 January 2010 8:28 am
Happy Baseball Equinox! We are now closer to the start of the 2010 Mets season than we are to the end of the 2009 Mets season, and I think we can all agree we’d rather have next season than last season any day. May Jason Bay’s impending physical move us that much closer to Spring.
In the meantime, the Jets saw their own shadow, didn’t trip on it, and are giving us one more week of winter in the best sense possible.
Can they give us one more besides? Well, consider that the New York-Cincinnati sporting dynamic has worked surprisingly well when it’s counted most.
Like last night when the Jets augmented the Bengals’ generously striped uniforms with a set of 37-0 tire tracks.
Like October 4, 1999 when Al Leiter, Edgardo Alfonzo and the rest of the suddenly surging Mets ran over the Reds en route to a similarly unlikely Wild Card.
Like January 9, 1983 when Freeman McNeil piled up 202 yards on his own and the Jets dropped 44 points on a stunned Riverfront Stadium to open the 1982 playoffs.
Like a well-remembered and even better-regarded National League Championship Series from October of 1973.
Like the night in November 1969 when the Knicks trailed the ancient Cincinnati Royals by five points with 16 seconds to go, yet came away with the 106-105 victory to establish an NBA-record 18-game winning streak.
Like October ’76, when the Big Red Machine operated in accordance with our wishes and produced a four-game sweep of a team claiming to represent New York.
History’s a wildly unreliable indicator of contests still to come, but with the Jets earning the right to play Cincy all over again on Saturday, we’ll take all the good omens we can gather.
Only someone who’s paid attention over the past two decades would note on this brilliant green and white morning how many different regimes have come in and definitively/permanently changed the Jets’ culture, attitude and fortunes for the better. In their first or second seasons, Bruce Coslet, Bill Parcells, Herm Edwards, Eric Mangini and now Rex Ryan each led the Jets to the playoffs amid declarations that their triumph marked the end of the Same Old Jets. These — in 1991, 1998, 2001, 2006 and 2009 — were the New Jets, as evidenced by the much-needed facelift the clear-eyed coach and the revamped organization that was fully behind him had given the heretofore hopelessly wrinkled franchise. You could throw in, under this banner, Pete Carroll (1994) and Al Groh (2000), who didn’t make the playoffs in their sole seasons at the helm but were credited as breaths of fresh air during their evanescent strong starts.
The Jets turn over more new leaves than recidivist junkies. But it beats turning over the ball. Just ask the Bengals.
Congratulations, then, to this latest crew of Whole New Jets for soaring into the postseason on the wings of circumstances weird enough to faze even Sully Sullenberger.
• They lost games by 4, 3, 5, 2 and 3 points.
• They lost games with less than 2 minutes to go, less than 10 seconds to go, with no seconds to go and in overtime.
• Their coach, with two weeks remaining, announced they were eliminated from contention even though they technically weren’t. (I can’t believe Jerry Manuel never thought of that.)
• Their multiple rivals for a potential playoff spot all had to lose with one week remaining…and they all lost.
• Their final two opponents were each division champions. Yet the Colts graciously decided to quit playing in the middle of their game and the Bengals politely stepped aside in the first quarter.
And that, plus a punishing rushing game and steadfast defense, is how you somehow go from a hopeless 4-6 to a jubilant 9-7 and wake up the 5-seed in the AFC.
The long-term implications don’t matter right now. It won’t matter whether Ryan’s overhaul truly transforms the Jets for seasons to come or if a few Week 17s from now some other coach in a green sweater vest is celebrating how his special system and awesome outlook have finally pushed the Jets from perennial disappointments to consistent contenders. The Jets are winners now is what matters. The Jets were winners Sunday night. They took one of the odder paths any team in any sport has ever taken to the playoffs, but they’re there. They’re at Cincinnati in five days, six days after Cincinnati only nominally made a trip to the Arctic Meadowlands.
The Bengals have been installed as slight favorites. As Pete Rose himself might say, take the Jets and the points.
by Greg Prince on 2 January 2010 3:49 pm
Move over, Joe Carter. The University of South Florida Bulls’ 27-3 romp over the Northern Illinois Huskies in the 2010 International Bowl has supplanted the 1993 Toronto Blue Jays’ walkoff World Series win as the greatest moment in SkyDome/Rogers Centre history.
Why, it’s even better than the time Ken Huckaby took out Derek Jeter at third base. (Not that we ever, ever cheer for injuries, mind you.)
USF is my alma mater. I graduated from there so long ago they didn’t have a football team (and I was robbing various roommates of sleep by clacking the night away on an electric typewriter). Then they invented one with the hopes of someday playing a bowl game in January. They were probably thinking of something a little more traditional than the International Bowl, but newbies can’t be choosers.
In the past five years, USF — handling a pigskin only since 1997 — has participated in the Meineke Car Care Bowl, the PapaJohns.com Bowl, the Brut Sun Bowl (earned after an occasionally spectacular 2007 campaign), the magicJack St. Petersburg Bowl and now the one that mysteriously materializes in Canada on the first Saturday of the new year.
Canada? College football? It doesn’t sound prestigious on the surface, but I’ll take the win and consider it a measure of the Bulls going global. Seven American wins this season and now one North of the Border. You know what that means…
Prestige Worldwide!
by Greg Prince on 1 January 2010 6:08 pm
Tomorrow, Saturday, January 2, looms as one of the finest days and happiest New Year’s greetings in sports broadcasting history. After your USF Bulls gore the Northern Illinois Huskies in the much-awaited International Bowl at noon on ESPN2 (it’s on ESPN2 because it’s twice as big a deal as any bowl on ESPN), switch to SNY by five o’clock for the METS YEARBOOK MARATHON.
• 5:00 PM — Mets Yearbook: 1968
• 5:30 PM — Mets Yearbook: 1963
• 6:00 PM — Mets Yearbook: 1975
• 6:30 PM — Mets Yearbook: 1971
• 7:00 PM — Mets Yearbook: 1984
I’m not sure if SNY planned this blessed event as a way of extending the good vibes sure to be wrought by the Bulls’ victory (guarantee of victory not included) or as a way of catapulting us in style toward the Baseball Equinox, that point on the calendar where we are exactly as far from the end of the previous season’s final Mets game as we are from the scheduled first pitch of the forthcoming season’s first Mets game. This winter’s Baseball Equinox arrives Monday morning, January 4, at approximately 2:22 AM, Eastern Standard Time. Chances are you’ll be asleep, dreaming of vintage highlight films, and hopefully not up, cursing out the callowness of Mark Sanchez or the general bizarreness of Rex Ryan.
In any event, you have been warned, so be sure to watch and/or record. And in case you missed it when we were transitioning to WordPress, be sure to check our blog-exclusive interview with Gary Morgenstern, SNY’s vp of programming, to get the scoop on how Mets Yearbook came to air.
by Greg Prince on 31 December 2009 2:10 pm
How appropriate for a person who sees almost everything through Mets-tinted lenses that on the final day of this decade I turn 47. When I see 47, of course, I see not so much a chronological measurement but a uniform number. And when I see that uniform number at the end of this decade, I think of the man and the game that wound up defining this decade for me.
Some nice people have wished me a happy Jesse Orosco birthday, and I appreciate the sentiment. Of course Jesse’s the 47 of record in the Mets uniform pantheon, the only 47 caught on film doing something extraordinarily worthwhile. Why, I think I see his glove hovering over Queens right now. Less mentioned but worthy of some kind of smallish celebration was the 47 for whom Orosco II would be traded in 2000, Super Joe McEwing. Perhaps Super was intended ironically, but until he was utilized far too much to be effective, he was the ultimate Mets utility player, and every team needs one of those.
Lingering in my subconscious from the spring of 1978 is Mardie “The Chief” Cornejo, 47 the first year I ever entered with no hopes of the Mets contending for anything beyond fourth place, which proved a plateau well beyond their reach. Nevertheless, early on they didn’t look so bad, and early on two guys I’d never heard of, Mike Bruhert and Mardie “The Chief” Cornejo, helped set the pace. “The Chief” bit struck me as absurd (the chief of what, exactly?), but no more so than the concept of the 1978 Mets competing for fourth place. Even with Orosco’s glove in orbit and McEwing’s Superness in full flight, sometimes somebody says “47” and I think “The Chief”.
There’ve been a handful of other 47s over 48 seasons, as Mets By The Numbers could tell you. There was the original 47, Jay Hook, one of the many geniuses who staffed Casey Stengel’s pitching corps. I’m not kidding about that. As Bill Ryczek notes in The Amazin’ Mets, 1962-69, “In terms of education and intellect, no staff in any league (save perhaps the Ivy League) could match the 1962 New York Hurlers.” At the head of the class was Hook and his Master’s Degree in Mechanical Engineering from Northwestern. Famously, Hook could explain in precise detail why a curve ball curved…he just couldn’t get his own to move proficiently.
Even at my advanced age, I have no memory of the 47s who followed Hook — Tom Sturdivant and Darrell Sutherland — or why, according to MBTN, the number went unworn between 1964 and 1978 when “The Chief” commandeered it. Post-Cornejo, Orosco proceeded to wear the heck out of it, clear through the end of 1987. Then it was picked up by one of those for whom our only successful Game Seven closer was traded, Wally Whitehurst. Whitehurst threw softly and kept quiet, making no big deal of 47 even after taking a temporary grip on the fifth-starter role, an assignment that essentially forced the trade of Ron Darling to Montreal; in case you were wondering why the Mets stopped winning in 1991, that’s a clue. Mike Draper wore 47 with not much distinction in 1993, a year when distinction, let alone dignity, was hard to come by in any Mets uniform. Jason Jacome raised a touch of hope when he donned 47 in ’94 but extinguished it just as quickly by putting it on again in ’95. Reid Cornelius and Derek Wallace were the next two 47s; they cut out the middle man by raising as little hope as possible.
The last Met who wore 47 was Casey Fossum, who couldn’t get out of it fast enough. Fossum slipped into 47 on April 21, 2009 and slipped out of it on April 26, 2009 before slipping out of our lives altogether. 47 did not fit Casey Fossum, but I don’t hold it against him.
47 may never fit any Met again, and for that you can thank T#m Gl@v!ne.
What, you haven’t thanked T#m Gl@v!ne lately? What are you, a Mets fan?
I’ve mostly kept Gl@v!ne out of my mind since June when the Braves bastardly bounced him after he went to the trouble of rehabbing for them. Talk about two parties and nobody to root for. T#m worked hard to come back and pitch for Atlanta at age 43. The team, for whom he excelled (in and out of their uniform, for as we know he was long stationed here undercover as The Manchurian Brave) turned its Tomahawked back on him, avoided paying him a million bucks and elevated Tommy Hanson in his place. Hanson was the right choice, but it was an awfully cold front office maneuver, even for them. In the abstract, I scolded the Braves. In my darker precincts, I chuckled that they ruined Gl@v!ne’s last stand.
Much as he ruined ours in 2007 and, in a way, this decade.
Once in a while (though not very often), some Mets fan will nominally take T#m’s side and huff that it’s not like he was trying to lose on September 30, 2007. I don’t argue that he was. T#m Gl@v!ne might have earned a win for himself had he pitched better, and wins for T#m Gl@v!ne always seemed of paramount importance to T#m Gl@v!ne. If the Mets advanced via his left arm, so be it. But he didn’t have it on September 30 vs. the Marlins (0.1 IP, 7 ER), the same way he didn’t have it on September 25 vs. the Nationals (5 IP, 6 ER), same as he didn’t have it on September 20 vs. the Marlins (5 IP, 4 ER). He came up small, smaller and smallest down the stretch as the Mets diminished, dwindled and disappeared completely.
The consensus future Hall of Fame pitcher may have been trying, but he wasn’t coming close to succeeding. You wouldn’t hold that against Brian Lawrence or Philip Humber, the two improbable starters on whom Willie Randolph found himself sadly dependent during the 17 games when the Mets stopped leading the Phillies by 7 games. You wouldn’t hold that against Mike Pelfrey, clearly not yet ready for prime time, even though it was clearly prime time. You’d take issue with John Maine and Ollie Perez if they were dreadful when it mattered — and each was — but you also remember them each pitching a gem during that period, so you cut them slack for their missteps. The only Met who didn’t give you a bad start over those 17 games was Pedro Martinez, but he could only give you so much after his injury and never on anything but extended rest.
Gl@v!ne I hold it against. I hold the 14.81 ERA over three crucial starts versus the division’s bottom-dwellers against him. I hold September 20 against him. I hold September 25 against him. And I forever hold September 30 against him. I hold that one against him — and every one his teammates — when I think about it. I think about sitting in the Upper Deck of Shea Stadium down 4-0 after five Marlin batters batted; down 4-0, with the bases loaded, after eight Marlin batters batted: down 5-0, with the bases loaded, after all nine Marlin batters batted around. The last of the Swingin’ Fish, Florida pitcher Dontrelle Willis, technically trotted to first after he was hit by the last pitch T#m Gl@v!ne would ever throw as a New York Met.
Then Gl@v!ne leaves, two of his baserunners score and there goes 2007’s last stand, dead on arrival. In the middle of the first inning, it’s Marlins 7, the Mets coming to bat.
From there, the following occurred:
• The Mets lose 8-1 while the Phillies beat Washington and there goes 2007, the year when we were supposed to avenge the quirk ending of 2006. The Phillies are division champs and I’m sitting in the Upper Deck for an eternity trying to figure out how we and I wound up here.
• T#m Gl@v!ne, in the postgame clubhouse, treats his fatal implosion like a bad day on the yacht, as if the shrimp wasn’t chilled quite to perfection. Otherwise, he can go home and count his mansions, completely undevastated by the events of the first inning.
• The aura of The Worst Collapse in Baseball History hangs in the air well into 2008, as the Mets get off to a crummy start, Willie Randolph stays far too long at the fair and I find myself in a continual state of being pissed at my team
• The Mets end 2008 just about exactly as they end 2007, which means 2007 never actually ends, it just keeps going.
• The 2009 Mets codify the decade’s disappointment factor by clearly ending the era we decided, circa 2006, was going to yield an extended mix of joy and championships. We finish with 92 losses and an overwhelming sense of despair that haunts us to this very last day of a decade when we were granted multiple chances and made optimal use of none of them.
• My 47th birthday puts me in mind of T#m Gl@v!ne, of whom, because of my Mets-tinted lenses, I will find myself thinking every time I am asked, “Age?”
On the other hand, it’s just a number. One year from now I can forget all about T#m Gl@v!ne.
And think, instead, of Aaron Heilman.
by Jason Fry on 31 December 2009 12:20 pm
As we prepare to ring in 2010, we’re also ringing in Greg Prince’s 47th birthday.
All the best to you, my dear friend, esteemed co-writer and Mets compatriot. Here’s wishing you a seat for a great game without obstructed views, however they may be defined. Here’s wishing you signing bonuses in line with the market and not Bud Selig’s desires. Here’s wishing you a ballpark full of Mets stuff. Here’s wishing you a big Happy New Year’s package from the Reds. Here’s wishing you phenoms who have a little phenom in them, veterans with leadership skills and numbers, and doctors who diagnose correctly. Here’s wishing you more Mets Yearbooks and more of Gary and Keith and Ron (and Kevin) and more of fellow fans who have something to cheer about.
And here’s hoping the same for all of you who are kind enough to read us and add your voices, and to all of us who root for this team we love even fearing it may be the death of us. Here’s to fresh starts and renewed hopes. Happy birthday, Happy New Year, happy new season.
by Greg Prince on 30 December 2009 10:19 pm
Matt Lawton hit 3 home runs during his brief 2001 term as a Met, each of them prior to the bottom of the eighth of the game of September 21, an inning he happened to lead off by grounding out to Braves shortstop Rey Sanchez. Edgardo Alfonzo swatted 15 from Opening Day until he was walked by Steve Karsay with one out in that same frame. The 2001 home run totals, up to that bases on balls, of other Mets who batted from the first inning through the seventh inning that Friday night:
• Robin Ventura: 20
• Tsuyoshi Shinjo: 10
• Todd Zeile: 9
• Jay Payton: 7
• Rey Ordoñez: 3
• Bruce Chen: 0
• Joe McEwing: 7
Combined, those nine Mets had hit 74 home runs in the first 147 games of that Mets season. None had hit one out in the 148th, which was near completion when Alfonzo walked and Desi Relaford was sent in to pinch-run for him. While several of those Mets seemed unlikely to hit a homer at any given moment, it wasn’t inconceivable that a few of them might take an Atlanta pitcher deep. Fonzie, Robin and Shinjo were all in double-digits. Zeile, Payton and McEwing had certainly homered enough that year so it wouldn’t be a novelty.
Yet none of them did homer on September 21, 2001. Mike Piazza, however, did. Mike Piazza hit his 34th home run of the season after Alfonzo walked. It put the Mets ahead 3-2. They’d go on to beat the Braves by that score.
By now you no doubt recognize the home run in question as the most famous home run hit by any Met in this decade or, depending on whom you ask, the most famous home run hit by a Met ever. It didn’t end a game. It didn’t ensure a playoff berth or a postseason series victory. It was an eighth-inning home run on a night whose cachet was generated less by competitive context than by the simple fact that more than 40,000 New Yorkers gathered at Shea Stadium to watch a baseball game.
It’s generally remembered as more, of course. It’s remembered for pregame somberness, for lingering unease and for a handful of electrifying performances. Among those belting our their best on September 21, 2001 were Diana Ross with “God Bless America,” Marc Anthony with “The Star Spangled Banner,” Liza Minnelli with “New York, New York” and Mike Piazza with the go-ahead homer off Karsay.
Piazza’s solo was the most memorable star turn of them all, but nothing that Friday night was about standing alone in a spotlight. It wasn’t about any one person. It was about thousands of people, too many of whom could not be at Shea Stadium. It was about the thousands they left behind and the millions who mourned for them. It remains remarkable to understand that the act of going to a Mets game — even a Mets-Braves game — could represent so much to so many.
And in the middle of it, Mike Piazza. There’s no tangible reason it had to be Piazza who hit the home run that recalibrated our municipal emotions. It could have been Ventura or Alfonzo or Shinjo. In theory, it could have been Ordoñez.
But it had to be Piazza. These types of moments always found Piazza. Or maybe Piazza and the moments always met in the middle. Anybody who would go as deep as Piazza did on a night that ran as deep as that one did would deserve to be remembered, but I can’t imagine anybody else would have done it. On some other Friday night in some other circumstance, sure, anybody could swing and connect. Not that night. That was what Mike Piazza did. We accepted it as extraordinary and perfectly normal, which is what the 40,000+ in attendance were seeking on September 21. We went on to hold it fondly and we hold it still. We hold the days and nights of Mike Piazza the same.
Had the boundaries of our imagination been stretched and had the home run come off the bat of another Met, would we have embraced it immediately and continued to grip it like it mattered beyond a 3-2 lead in the eighth?
I don’t know. But somehow I don’t think so.
Mike Piazza hasn’t been a Met since October 2, 2005, but I feel very comfortable considering him The Met of The Decade, for whatever that’s worth. His MVP-worthy season when the Mets earned a pennant, his monster breaking out of its cage that October, the still-stellar numbers for a fulltime catcher the next couple of seasons and the records he set might be enough to rate him this hypothetical honor. But with Mike Piazza, per usual, accomplishment is only part of the story. Electrifying performance is always the subtext.
The 2000s were the Age of Piazza. There was no other Met who commanded our attention for as long as he did or who was as worthy of it. I don’t believe he had a serious challenger in that regard.
Honorable mentions:
Pedro Martinez displayed sensational stage presence over a shorter period but racked up decidedly fewer results; David Wright put up the most impressive numbers yet still seems to be trying to fill a pair of shoes that don’t fit his feet any better than that experimental batting helmet fit his head; Carlos Beltran offered us more talent than anyone but did not truly capture our imagination; no one was more exciting at what he did than Jose Reyes yet Reyes’s stay at the top of his game has been intermittent; Johan Santana produced at the most clutch level, but hasn’t been here all that long; Al Leiter talked the best game in town before eventually talking his way out of town.
Fine Mets in our time, but none of them touches Piazza. Four seasons have passed since he played as a Met and he’s still, in our collective gut, bigger than any who have succeeded him. Mike Piazza was always big. He always made you stop and focus on him. Your eyes were instinctively PiazzaCams. You followed his every move. When he came to bat, your mind swarmed with the possibilities. You tensed up as he coiled. You exploded when he let loose.
And that was just the hitting. He wasn’t a polished catcher (nor a passable first baseman), but he was Piazza every moment he was on the field. He never stopped being Piazza. On what had to be a dozen occasions each year, his being Piazza mesmerized you. It could be because of a home run. It could be because of a glare or a quote or a reaction to your ovation. He came here in 1998 to be the Mets’ main man and, despite diminishing skills and statistics that couldn’t be ignored as the expiration of his contract approached in 2005, he never really ceded the role. His appearances as a Padre in 2006 and as a ceremonial receiver in 2008 confirmed his forever place in our hearts.
What made Piazza’s time in our midst all the more thrilling was that he never emitted the sense it desperately mattered to him. Being Piazza was his job. His baseball card didn’t require a position listed. Being Piazza was plenty. Somebody might throw an impertinent question or a bat shard at him, and he knew how to handle those just as he could handle Terry Mulholland or Carlos Almanzar or Steve Karsay among many, many others at the most momentous of moments. He was physically formidable and he did let his big stick to much of his talking, but he wasn’t exactly the strong, silent type of cliché. Mike Piazza never seemed shy, just as he didn’t too often come up shy. He was at ease with who he was. Now and again, it meant stepping up and playing the hero.
On September 21, 2001, on the heels of ten days that sent a city reeling, we realized that’s exactly what a baseball player who hits a big home run is doing: playing. Piazza, we understood, wasn’t a hero. But at a Mets game — specifically that singular Mets-Braves game — nobody could have possibly played it better.
by Greg Prince on 30 December 2009 6:27 am
What did I miss? When did Jason Bay become Dave Gallagher?
We’re getting a three-time All-Star here, and not an All-Star in the sense that Gary Sheffield was stellar in Paleozoic times. We’re not getting some overblown fourth outfielder. We’re getting a guy who has played five full seasons and has driven in more than 100 runs in four of them, which appears pretty impressive considering many of his swings occurred while surrounded by Pittsburgh Pirates.
Jason Bay is a major league outfielder. We’re not converting Keith Miller from the infield or handing Daniel Murphy a treasure map and praying he’ll find a ball while he’s out there. Jason Bay survived a large left field wall in Boston. Didn’t fall down as a matter of course and was known to occasionally hit pitches off or over it.
This is an upgrade over the 2009 situation in left field. This is an upgrade over the 2008 situation in left field. He may not be as lethal with the line drives as Moises Alou when Moises Alou was healthy, but remind me of how many weeks Moises Alou was healthy. Jason Bay is capable of giving us our most consistent production at his position since Cliff Floyd was in one piece, which, sadly, wasn’t all that often. He won’t jump over fences like Endy Chavez, but the fences at Citi Field might thwart even Endy.
I’m happy to have Jason Bay coming to the Mets, assuming he passes what I hope is a rigorous physical conducted a third-party medical staff. Mind you, I’m not overwhelmed by his presence. He’s not a franchise player, but he’s performed at a high level for quite a while now and he’s not in his early forties. Thus, I ask innocently, what’s the problem, exactly? I wouldn’t give him whatever exorbitant amount they’re giving him if I were doing the Mets’ books, but since when do you attract attractive players without attractive compensation? The Mets were going to have pay somebody this offseason. The four years, $66 million and whatever scheme kicks in for a potential fifth year…insane in real life, but about par for a team that will no longer be paying Delgado and Wagner their princely sums.
And how much do you suppose ticket and taco prices were going to dip next season without Jason Bay?
I’m all for tossing suggestions into the Hot Stove. But once a deal is made, unless it is so prohibitive that it makes future upgrading impossible, I’ve got to shift into Hope For The Best territory. Somebody will inevitably produce reliable data proving Jason Bay shares more than initials with the second coming of Jeromy Burnitz, that he is sheer detriment and no asset. Yet until somebody who brandishes proof that Bay is a self-inflicting wound waiting to happen is appointed to the board of Sterling Mets, it won’t matter. I’ll be willing to complain if and when Bay is a total bust, but if he’s here, he’s here with a clean slate. Jason Bay’s my leftfielder. I don’t think he’ll turn the team around by himself, but I don’t think any one player can turn this team around.
One player can help, though. Suddenly, a lineup with Bay joining Francoeur, Wright, Beltran, Reyes — if all are healthy — is better than whatever we watched most of 2009. Suddenly, three professional outfielders who aren’t undercooked or over the hill will patrol our outfield. Suddenly, the Mets might be a wee bit better in a couple of departments.
The starting pitching’s a mess. I can’t blame that on Jason Bay. The Mets need to find some arms. They need a catcher (preferably one who won’t wear 6-4-3 on his back all season). They could use an upgrade at first and second. All that’s obvious enough to blot out illusions that this is supposed to be the free agent who delivers us to the doorstep of the Promised Land. Jason Bay’s presence will be magnified for a while because he’s the new, expensive toy, but we’ll settle in with him and accept him as a part of a hopefully long-term solution, not a singular solution himself. Here’s a multipart plan: Bay and an arm or two this year; suck less as a unit; and don’t go nuts with expectations. Improve from lousy ’09 and keep an eye on next year’s market. We’re not in this for only what lies directly ahead.
I’m conditioned to think of Mets free agents first as Tom Hausman and Elliot Maddox — scrap heap bargains that even the Dollar Tree couldn’t move — and second as Bobby Bonilla ticking time bomb disasters. Occasionally, however, the Mets make a decent signing. Like Robin Ventura. Like Carlos Beltran. Like Jason Bay? Could be.
I’ve long rued learning that the strong Rookie of the Year candidate Pittsburgh was featuring in 2004 had been a Met farmhand two years earlier. I didn’t have any better idea of Jason Bay’s pre-breakthrough existence than Steve Phillips did when he traded him for Steve Reed and Jason Middlebrook. Difference is only one of us was paid to be general manager of a big league ballclub. Yeah, Bay pinged around a bit before blossoming as a Buc. Yeah, Montreal GM Omar Minaya overlooked his talents, too. So now Minaya and the Mets make amends for Phillips dismissing Bay as nothing more than a fifth outfielder, if I recall his after-the-fact appraisal. That always makes me feel good in winter, like our getting Burnitz and Roger Cedeño back once upon a time, even if the homecoming angle won’t matter at all come summer.
In the frosty interim, Bay’s backstory is a bonus. His track record’s not bad either. However he measures up to Matt Holliday is immaterial. There was no indication Holliday wanted to be in New York, and he would have required a far larger and longer commitment. Besides, Coors Field players make me nervous outside their natural habitat. Our consolation prize is a leftfielder who can hit. Is he perfect for the manufactured quirks of Citi Field? I’d maintain all we really know about Citi Field, besides its initial resistance to photos of Mookie Wilson, is that a terrible team played in it for 81 games and looked terrible doing so. Let’s see what happens with a somewhat better and less disabled crew now that it’s less altogether mysterious.
I’ll admit I’m susceptible to the allure of brand-name players whom I don’t watch every day. I thought Francoeur was a fine idea last July based on idealized glimpses of him from his better moments in Atlanta (also, Ryan Church just depressed the living spit out of me). I recall Bay pounding the Mets silly several years ago as a Pirate and noticed the Red Sox didn’t miss too many beats when he took over for Manny Ramirez. I understand there are drawbacks. That’s gonna be the case for any leftfielder who isn’t a young, not yet corrupted Barry Bonds.
We’ve just come through one of the most grismal periods in Mets history. Hell, I’m not sure we’re still not in it. Just about everything since the ninth inning of Game Seven has ranged from grim to dismal. When the Mets take a break from saddening us and embarrassing themselves to sign a player who doesn’t out and out suck — who may actually do the opposite — I think we owe it to ourselves, within reason and the realm of our understandable caution and cynicism, to enjoy it, take a little heart from it and feel a tad better about life because of it.
This decade of Mets baseball killed us over and over again. That wasn’t Jason Bay’s fault either. We desperately need a new decade. Pending a physical, however, we won’t need a new leftfielder because we’ll have one.
Welcome to the Mets, Jason Bay. And welcome, all of us, to 2010.
|
|