The blog for Mets fans
who like to read
ABOUT US
Faith and Fear in Flushing made its debut on Feb. 16, 2005, the brainchild of two longtime friends and lifelong Met fans.
Greg Prince discovered the Mets when he was 6, during the magical summer of 1969. He is a Long Island-based writer, editor and communications consultant. Contact him here.
Jason Fry is a Brooklyn writer whose first memories include his mom leaping up and down cheering for Rusty Staub. Check out his other writing here.
Got something to say? Leave a comment, or email us at faithandfear@gmail.com. (Sorry, but we have no interest in ads, sponsored content or guest posts.)
Need our RSS feed? It's here.
Visit our Facebook page, or drop by the personal pages for Greg and Jason.
Or follow us on Twitter: Here's Greg, and here's Jason.
|
by Jason Fry on 9 September 2015 2:16 am
My pal Will likes to strip away the sepia Valhalla folderol around baseball and replace it with a simple rule: “When my team wins, I am happy, and when they lose, I am sad.”
Pretty much. But there are degrees of happy and sad. There’s the sad of losing a ho-hum game in August when you’re a dozen games up and next month’s call-ups won’t be any better than what you have. And balancing it, there’s being happy because it’s May and you left your coat at home without checking the weather and you had hot dogs and ice cream and sang “Take Me Out to the Ballgame” and the team looks a little better than you thought and they won 5-1, or maybe it was 6-2, you’d have to check but they definitely won.
A lot of games during a typical year are like that — thumbs up or thumbs down, part of the day. But some are exceptions. For instance, there’s the sad — some would rate it devastating, others merely disappointing — of having everything come down to a single game in which your veteran starter gives up seven in the first while recording one out. You know it’s just baseball, but that kind of sad gets into your guts and bones somehow and sticks there, to seep back out at 3 AM or ambush you in your car or breathe down your neck while you’re minding your own business walking down the street. Did you really just spent 20 minutes muttering “fucking Timo” or actually cackle at the idea of Kenny Rogers sitting on a tack? Of course you did — and it’s not the first time either.
Fortunately that kind of sad has its opposite too.
Tonight was why we act stoic amid fizzled comebacks and stare heavenward after extra-inning stumbles and bear witness to second and third hours of laughers in which our guys are the laughees. Because every so often your stubborn, even stupid faith is rewarded, and baseball hands you a night of pure and utter joy — a gift that makes you remember that one audacious, world-turned-upside-down comeback feels better than a dozen gag jobs feels bad.
And every so often, one of those every so oftens comes when it matters most to a team, a season and a fanbase.
A billion years ago, at the beginning of Tuesday night, the story was Matt Harvey, seeking redemption amid a self-created storm about his innings limit, his commitment to his team and whatever the hell it is his agent thinks he’s doing. Harvey actually didn’t pitch that badly — he didn’t give up an extra-base hit, for instance, and a lot of balls found holes. Not to say that he was blameless by any means: His location was off in the early innings and he compounded a physical error with an unwise play to get that awful sixth snowballing. But turn Yoenis Cespedes‘s error and the resulting Little League grand slam for Michael Taylor into the RBI single it should have been and Harvey’s line might have looked a lot different.
None of this would have mattered if the night hadn’t taken many incredible turns. But before we go on to subsequent events, let’s take a minute to point and laugh at this dummy:
Actually I was playing to the Twitter cameras there. Yeah, it was 7-1, but the Mets had gnawed away at Jordan Zimmermann with relentless at-bats and would get into the Nats’ highly flammable bullpen. And, well, there’s something about the ’15 Mets 2.0 that makes you hope even when things seem bleakest.
Harvey was excused from scapegoat duty because of his teammates; the Mets’ seventh delivered redemption for Cespedes and then brought me back to another risen-from-the-dead inning that was a slow-motion nightmare for the other team, an endless parade of ball fours and a slow wheeling of baserunners that kept grinding along, with a third out seemingly at hand but repeatedly postponed. I’m thinking, of course, of the 10-run inning — a Shea night rivaled only by the Grand Slam single and Mike Piazza‘s post-9/11 blast in terms of sheer transformative joy experienced at a ballpark. And when Travis d’Arnaud stepped up to the plate with Drew Storen having unraveled into a pile of red and white yarn on the mound, the parallel seemed perfect. Surely this catcher would blast one over the fence, releasing the accumulated tension in a crazy big bang of an instant, just as that catcher did 15 years ago.
D’Arnaud got his pitch and clobbered it, but this line drive didn’t go over the left-field fence. It vanished into Bryce Harper‘s glove.
Storen had looked like there wasn’t enough air out there on the mound — I felt sorry for him, enemy status and all, as I think you feel for anyone struggling in the grips of a nightmare. That looked like it was happening to Addison Reed too, but the latest Met reliever auditioning for seventh-inning duties found enough on his fastball to escape a jam. Ironically, Jonathan Papelbon — the closer who displaced Storen and was summoned to pitch the eighth — was the only reliever out there for either side who didn’t look like he had a bit of jelly in his knees. Amid all this ludicrous drama Papelbon was his usual self, hunched over and glowering at home plate like a vulture.
Up stepped pinch-hitter Kirk Nieuwenhuis, whose 2015 has been ridiculous even by the standards of wacko baseball narrative: a three-homer game bracketed by not much. Kirk failed as a pinch-hitter in New York and was sent through waivers so he could be sold to the Angels, which worked out so well that he came back through waivers and got stashed in Las Vegas. And now here he was, pinch-hitting again.
Papelbon missed with a fastball for ball one, then aimed another one at the inside corner. It slid over the heart of the plate instead and the moment bat hit ball you knew it was gone. Nieuwenhuis raised his head, appreciated the trajectory for a moment, set his bat down gently and floated around the bases and into Met lore.
Magic, though, isn’t magic until there’s an F by the score. The Mets had six outs to get. Tyler Clippard, whose little squint and lip curl always makes him look perturbed, put down his old team in the eighth. The Mets rather meanly refused to put up four or five runs worth of insurance in the top of the ninth, and so in came Jeurys Familia.
It didn’t start out well — Jayson Werth lined an 0-2 quick-pitch slider up the middle for a single, barking at Familia as he went. But Matt Williams then inexplicably handed the Mets one of his three precious remaining outs by having Anthony Rendon bunt and then keeping the bunt on with Familia struggling to find the plate. Rendon, perhaps protesting having to be a party to Neanderthal idiocy, bunted so poorly that Lucas Duda forced Werth at second. The Nats probably don’t have enough season left to salvage things by firing Williams, but if I were their GM that’s what I’d do posthaste.
Familia dueled Harper, trying to tempt him into swinging at splitters that sought at his ankles, but walked him instead — which baseball orthodoxy deplores but I didn’t particularly mind, because I’d had visions of Familia hanging a splitter and Harper doing cartwheels around the bases, after which I’d have to spend thirty or forty years reading about how Harper’s ascent to the Hall of Fame and every American home’s Wheaties box really began the night he saved the Nats’ 2015 season and kick-started their dynasty.
Up came Yunel Escobar, who whacked an 0-2 fastball into the ground, a high bounce to David Wright. When Wright returned in Philadelphia you could see the game was too fast for him, and it was painful to watch him struggle to force his brain to speed up and command his body properly. But that was a while ago; Wright’s glove shot up to spear the ball and he flung it to Murphy, who surrounded second and heaved the ball to the mitt waiting at one end of the massive outstretched bulk of Duda. It found its target for the most beautiful two outs we’ve seen around here in a very, very long time.
Remember this one when baseball makes you sad, when cold rain’s falling and you’re huddled under a plastic poncho that smells like a refinery, or when it’s sunny but a Met starter’s trudging off the mound with one out in the second and the stands a-growl. On that day, remember this night and have faith that good things can happen, that this may be the game where the misery is but a prelude to a bolt of joy out of the blue. And even if it isn’t that day, take solace in the fact you’re closer to the next improbable burst of happiness that will make all of all of this worthwhile — the day that will remind you of why you love this confounding, unpredictable and beautiful game so much.
by Greg Prince on 7 September 2015 5:36 pm
The team that was a surefire bet to cruise to another division title got off to a rocky start. But then they began to right the ship, they had their pitching lined up, and once September rolled around, they took dead aim at first place, inching closer and closer day by day until they were presented with an enormous head-to-head opportunity against their direct rivals.
But, alas, the 1987 Mets couldn’t overtake the team that had run in front of them all summer long, the St. Louis Cardinals.
See? Not every historical comp revolves around the 2007 Mets blowing an unblowable lead. Sometimes teams that enter September in front stay in front. Sorry I had to drag Terry Pendleton into this, but don’t you get it?
We can be the 1987 Cardinals. Or any number of LOTS of first-place teams that didn’t become second-place teams. It happens. It happens more often than the opposite. You build a lead and you earn a cushion. The Mets went into their Biggest Series In Seven Years with a cushion of four games.
They are one-third through it with a cushion of five games because they beat the Nationals, 8-5, after taking an early lead of 3-0 on solo homers off Max Scherzer by Michael Conforto, Kelly Johnson and Yoenis Cespedes; ceding a grand slam to Wilson Ramos and then another enemy tally (oy, Niese); and then storming back. The Mets made it 5-4 and 5-5 and 6-5 and 7-5 and 8-5. The best part — besides the five runs added to the three previous runs through the offensive machinations of Cespedes, David Wright, Daniel Murphy, Curtis Granderson, Travis d’Arnaud, Ruben Tejada and let’s mention Cespedes again because it’s so much fun to realize he’s a Met who was obtained to do exactly what he’s doing — is that the Nats’ total stayed steady from the fourth through the ninth.
Jon Niese gave up five runs in the fourth, the 15th time in his career he’d given up five runs in a single inning, something no Met pitcher had ever done. Niese is a problem right now. Niese could have represented a fatal error in the company mainframe this Labor Day, but his co-workers came to his aid with vital tech support. Five Met relievers kept those five National runs very lonely. Carlos Torres (whose unmatched endurance and left calf I didn’t intend to curse), Erik Goeddel, Dario Alvarez, Hansel Robles and Jeurys Familia shut out an opposition that had gobbled up our starter and looked ravenous for more.
Well, good luck with that, Washington. No, actually, rotten luck to you. Our guys had the good luck and skill today, as the pen was mightier than the Niese (and the Nats). Hats off in particular to Goeddel for having to come in on a moment’s notice in place of a limping Torres; Alvarez for pulling a modern-day Rich Sauveur in striking out Bryce Harper after coming out of close to nowhere and making his first pitches of the season count like crazy; and Rapid Robles, whose quick-pitching drove Ryan Zimmerman to distraction…and the bench.
That was some good relief pitching. That was some good hitting, Cespedes’s (three extra base hits) and otherwise. And mostly that was some outstanding not giving up. This Mets team hasn’t heard of the 2007 Mets team. This Mets team creates its own precedent. Particularly lovable was Wright, after scoring the seventh Met run, gesticulating in fist-pumping approval in similar fashion to how he did during the last season when the Mets played games like this. That was 2008. That was seven years ago. Wright has waited a long time for this.
So have we.
Sitting down to a Labor Day contest in which the Mets were a) in first place and b) preparing to beat back the team in second place was a refreshing change of pace from all the Labor Days and all the September days we have known during this decade. I flashed back briefly to what I was doing on Labor Day two years ago. The Mets were playing the Braves. The Mets got their ass kicked slowly and repeatedly. I soaked up every goddamn pitch, wondering why I was sitting through a game as bad as that.
Now I know. It was to get to games like this and appreciate them fully.
More to come, too. We are granted no guarantees, but we have every chance to prove that 2015 is its own thing, is its own year, is its own precedent. Tomorrow night we have Harvey going. Six or twelve or some undetermined number of games after that, we might have Harvey going again. Somewhere in between, Niese might find himself. Or Niese might find himself keeping company with the other extant 2008 Met pitcher Bobby Parnell, asking from the shadows of the back of the bullpen, “Whatever became of us?” Harvey’s still a member in good standing of this rotation, just as Niese shouldn’t be professionally dead to us yet. As Jason pointed out, it was easy enough to write off Colon when he waned and he’s presently our most dependable and dynamic starter. I’m willing to give Jon the Veteran the benefit of one more start’s doubt. If he doesn’t flourish, then I’ll personally petition Scott Boras to sign him and instigate the immediate capping of his innings.
That’s a dark thought. Today is a day to look at the sunny side of life. On a Monday holiday, the Mets beat exactly who they had to beat and extended their first-place lead to five meaningful games in September.
by Greg Prince on 7 September 2015 3:45 am
Throughout my childhood and into my adolescence, if I had to see the dentist, I was dragged from Long Beach to some deteriorating section of Brooklyn. We stayed loyal to our family dentist even though our family had left that deteriorating section of Brooklyn six months before I was born (later I’d find out that my mother dated the dentist before she met my father, which might explain the endless drives she was willing to endure to continue these appointments). Probably the last time I visited the dentist in question, it was the spring of 1978. I was 15, close to finishing ninth grade. While sitting in the dentist’s waiting room, I picked up a copy of Esquire, then known as Esquire Fortnightly. Flipping through, I found an article about the Olympic figure skater Dorothy Hamill. I was never terribly interested in Dorothy Hamill, figure skating or the Olympics, but something about the article — or how I recall it — stayed with me.
The headline was, “The Exploitation of Dorothy Hamill,” and it suggested, two years after she won her 1976 gold medal, that the innocence was gone. America’s winter sweetheart was now, according to reporter Philip Taubman, “a lonely frightened figure, lost on the road to fame and fortune.” Those who handled her squeezed her into unflattering costumes and disregarded her true skating talent in service to the showbizzy routines of the Ice Capades. It wasn’t a happy fit.
Dorothy was making a nice living from the arrangement, but it just wasn’t what it once was. She was an athlete, first and foremost, but to her sponsors, she represented a corporate bonanza. The shift in priorities didn’t make for a smooth transition. “Sure, it seemed so wonderful at first,” she reflected in 1979, a year after the Esquire piece came out. “I was famous. I was going to be rich. But then the lawyers came rushing in, telling me what I ought to do and with whom. I was depressed, confused. I ended up in the hospital with a bleeding ulcer within a year.”
I’ve been thinking about the state of post-Olympic Dorothy Hamill, not just this weekend but really the whole season. I’ve thought of her when I’ve watched Matt Harvey being Matt Harvey away from the mound. I think back to the Matt Harvey with whom we all fell in baseball love. I think of those first starts in 2012, when if he gave up two runs, he’d berate himself because the Mets scored only one, and one should have been enough for him. If the Mets scored no runs, then he insisted his job was to keep them in the game by putting up zeroes. It was unrealistic, but it was endearing.
No pitcher could put that much pressure on himself and succeed across the long term, but when 2012 became 2013, we got the sense that Matt Harvey could do anything he set his mind and his right arm to. He put up zeroes almost exclusively. He allowed his team every chance to win, and for a while the Mets never lost when he pitched. He threw an almost perfect game while his nose bled. It was revealed he stared down a bully of a veteran teammate. When he needed a run, he drove it in himself. We created a cause around him and we rallied to it.
That Matt Harvey was one of the most awesome Mets I ever rooted for. I adored that Matt Harvey. I miss that Matt Harvey.
If you saw ESPN’s documentary profiling Harvey’s comeback, you’ll realize that an easy, Hamillesque narrative — it was all so simple when it was just Matt and a baseball, before there was money to be made off him — doesn’t quite click here. One of the most compelling segments of The Dark Knight Rises was how Harvey, a high school kid, wouldn’t sign with the Angels, the club that first drafted him, unless they met his price. It was almost heroic the way he didn’t take a lot of money because he thought he was worth a whole lot more money.
Heartwarming, eh?
It worked to our benefit because Matt went to college, was drafted by the Mets, signed with them and we benefited. We’re still benefiting. No matter the explanations he seemed to ship to Guantanamo Bay for enhanced interrogation, he’s been a terrific pitcher for our first-place New York Mets all year. You couldn’t fill your palm with the number of bad starts he’s made.
But even before he expressed poorly timed concern for his future self’s earning ability, this Harvey wasn’t that Harvey, the one from late in 2012 and early in 2013. Frayed invincibility on the field is one thing. We all get that. Nobody’s elbow is repaired and rehabilitated and expected to come back as good as was right away. In that regard, Harvey appears to be a medical miracle. If he hasn’t been invincible, he’s been close enough.
What I miss is his belief that he’s supposed to be invincible, his not accepting setbacks as inevitable. It was ridiculous that he thought he shouldn’t ever give up a run, but I swooned at that kind of talk. After a generation of pitchers excusing their shortcomings on the altar of having done all they could and being satisfied with wherever the chips fell, Harvey didn’t take “no decision” for an answer.
Maybe he couldn’t go on like that. What am I saying? Of course he couldn’t go on like that. But even a wiser, more mature, literally scarred Matt Harvey could have given us the impression that nothing mattered to him but him and the baseball and the winning. I liked that he acted the part of the privileged character. I liked the defiant tone he set, informing us he planned to operate and succeed on a higher level. I liked that he stood out from his talented peers. Let deGrom and Syndergaard and Matz be amiable and amicable. Let Wheeler camp out in St. Lucie for a lost season. I wanted Harvey to stare down everything that was brought at him…including innings limits.
That aura was altered over the course of 2015. The Matt Harvey who said whatever occurred to him now spoke in bland platitudes, as if Dorothy Hamill’s old lawyers came rushing in, telling him what he ought to do and with whom. The Matt Harvey who you figured was His Own Man seemed to have gone through some (rather ineffective) media training. The Matt Harvey who would give up a start only if you pried it from his cold, dead fingers, gladly stepped aside for Logan Verrett a couple of weeks ago.
It was the sophisticated way to be, not rocking the division-leading boat, being on board with management, maybe keeping an eye on a workload that lurked in the back of our minds, so it probably lurked a lot closer to Harvey’s frontal lobe. But I have to admit, I was a little disappointed that Matt didn’t raise a fuss when he was bypassed in Colorado and agreed to cool his heels for an extra five days. That wasn’t the Harvey I developed a Met crush on. It may have been a saner, safer Harvey, but it wasn’t that Harvey.
I didn’t dwell on it, but deep down, I think I suspected something was awry — though I surely didn’t imagine the Dark Knight voluntarily receding.
Not my arm. Not my payday. I keep reminding myself of that. Matt Harvey’s life intersects with mine only in that I began rooting for the enterprise that employs him two decades before he was born. Sure I want him to strike out the moon. Sure I want him to shut up and pitch for me. But it’s not my arm and it’s not my payday.
It’s his life.
But it’s our team. There’s an implied provision in the fan-team covenant that says we care about your well-being if you perform for us. Even if you don’t perform all that well for us, we’ll probably be decent to you, provided we’ve gotten the chance to feel we know you. We make exceptions, but we’ll usually remember you’re human. We sort of get that you can’t be the best every time we watch you. We just want you in there trying.
Or trying to try. Or insisting you’ll try if only you were physically able. There’s nothing shameful about being physically unable. Most of us are physically unable to throw a baseball hard enough for our elbows to notice our exertion. Major League pitchers have very different anatomies from us. We’re surprisingly perceptive on that count. If you’re Harvey and something’s bothering your arm — if something’s making you literally sore — speak up (softly, so the Nationals can’t hear you on the eve of a major series). A diminished version of yourself yields diminishing returns. I think back ten years ago to Braden Looper hiding some kind of injury for six months, preferring to pitch through the pain to help the team. It didn’t help the team. It did the opposite. That’s the kind of thing that makes me feel indecent toward you.
If Matt Harvey is aching, then cater to the ache. Work to soothe it, to heal it, to possibly function with it. If a limb is about to fall off, take it back in for repair and get Verrett up in the pen. Proceed with utmost caution.
If Matt Harvey is thinking that nothing aches unusually now but you can’t be too careful, the winter of 2018-19 is practically around the corner, I wish he’d think about something else.
Not my arm. Not my payday. But it is our passion. Don’t you or your agent go out of your way to screw with that. And for your own good, consider what you signed up for. This is the business you’ve chosen, the business of pursuing championships (the riches tend to follow). When I’ve been in the presence of champions or just heard or read them talking about what being a champion meant and still means to them, they rarely if ever mention the check that accompanied the ring.
I haven’t been asked to pitch since I played tee ball, and if you know tee ball, you can infer what kind of pitching ability I was blessed with, so don’t listen to me. Maybe somebody who won a Cy Young Award and a world championship knows the subject better. Maybe Dwight Gooden, who has said, in essence, take the ball and pitch, Matt. Maybe T#m Gl@v!ne, who has said, in essence, the exact same thing. Hell, take somebody like Shaun Marcum, a former Met attached to no trophies and no jewelry. He went through Tommy John surgery. We haven’t seen him up close since 2013, but he’s still trying to catch on and hang on. He’s just one pitcher, but like Gooden and like Gl@vine, he lands on the side of “sacrific[ing] the long term to try to get to the World Series.” Another former Harvey teammate currently at liberty, the recently DFA’d David Aardsma, threw in his veiled two cents as well: “I’ll pitch…just saying.”
Just saying isn’t the same as just doing. Harvey, in his attempt to Qualcomm a question that had only one answer appropriate for mass consumption, finessed it to a crisp and got rightly burned. It sounded so out of character to hear him say anything other than a slight variation on “give me the ball, I’m here to win.” Finesse is for changing speeds, not derailing Septembers. Agents are for negotiations, not surrenders. Call off your mouthpiece, Matt. Let Scott Boras blow hard on your behalf behind the scenes. Him hinting you wouldn’t pitch come hypothetical October, and you kinda, sorta confirming it without actually saying so, was neither a good look nor sound.
Nevertheless, so what? New York has long been graced by marquee players who were just saying things that played very badly in the moment. Reggie Jackson insulted the captain of his team during his first Spring Training in pinstripes. Darryl Strawberry advised us Los Angeles sure looked like a nice place for him to play full-time on the eve of a playoff showdown with Los Angeles. They were more accomplished than Matt when Matt deferred all relevant questions in the same manner Wimpy promised to pay Popeye for his hamburger: to “Tuesday,” the date of his next scheduled start (sporting of him to concede he’d keep his appointment). Reggie and Darryl shook off whatever heat they took for aggravating their teams and fans by coming up big when it mattered. That’s all that matters. But to come up big, you have to show up big.
You have to show up in October if October presents itself. You don’t fool around with that. If you can’t make it, we’ll worry about it then. But don’t give us the idea it’s of secondary importance to you a month in advance. Don’t break our covenant.
Harvey, having failed the oral portion of his exam on Saturday, took to his handy Players Tribune perch Sunday and announced in headline form, “I Will Pitch in the Playoffs.” Since he’s the New York City Bureau Chief, I assume he writes his own headlines. He can write his own ticket by helping ensure there are playoffs for him and his less controversial colleagues to pitch in. The Mets encountered another Martin Prado-shaped speed bump on their way out of Miami, so they can use all the help they can get.
Our overly branded young man has enough formal advisers on the business end and medical side, but I’ll extend a second opinion nobody requested. Matt: Talk like you pitch; don’t pitch like you talk.
by Jason Fry on 6 September 2015 2:31 am
For one night, not even the biggest Terry Collins hater could quibble with his bullpen management.
Has Bartolo Colon ever been better in a Met uniform? He simply throttled the Marlins in recording the Mets’ first complete game of the year, even contributing a highlight-of-forever play by flipping a ball behind his back to Eric Campbell, your latest Met irregular pressed into service at first base. An astonished Campbell was laughing even before the out was official; Colon did the same, strolling across the first-base line with the post-canary grin of a cat who’s going to put up 15 wins at age 42. At this point we should stop asking how long Colon will pitch; it’s obvious he’ll pitch as long as he wants to, adding more guile to the mix as ticks come off the fastball but somehow staying effective, like an endomorphic Satchel Paige.
(Would it be unsporting to take this moment to remind a good chunk of Metdom that a couple of weeks ago Everything Was Ruined™ unless Colon was released THIS VERY MINUTE NO OH MY GOD THIS VERY SECOND I’M CALLING THE FAN TO YELL SO LOUD THEY’LL HEAR NOTHING BUT STATIC AHHHHHHH!!1!!1!1!! It would be? Too bad.)
Anyway, facing the inevitable question about innings limits, Colon offered wryly that there’s no such thing at his age. Which brings us to the latest crisis in Metland, the embarrassingly public spat between Scott Boras and Sandy Alderson over Matt Harvey‘s innings limit, with Harvey in the middle grumbling gnomically and a horrified Dr. James Andrews screening his calls.
When this first became A Thing I dismissed it as the usual talk-radio bullshit; after Harvey’s comments today it’s a bit harder to hand-wave the whole mess away. But still, for now I’m treating it like a hurricane churning away in the Caribbean — keep an eye on it, but there’s no reason to board up the windows and stock up on canned food yet.
At least for once it doesn’t seem to be the Mets’ fault. Over the last 12 months Harvey has tried to pitch before it was advisable and publicly moaned and groaned about being taken out early, skipped in the rotation or slotted in as one of six. Now, all of a sudden, he’s mumbling about having two starts left before he has to become a spectator because, um, well, you know, it’s prudent to listen to the experts. It’s not a good look, to say the least; he’s going to spend every minute until his next start getting a pummeling in the court of Gotham public opinion, and rightly so.
Maybe I’m slow, but I can’t quite figure out what Boras is after here. If he waited until now to raise an innings limit he’s had in mind for months, not only the Mets but also Harvey should be furious with him, because his client’s the one who looks like the bad guy. An agent’s job is to prevent that from happening, and this isn’t the first time Harvey’s been publicly embarrassed by a situation Team Boras should never have let develop — remember the Qualcomm debacle? I’ll give Boras the benefit of the doubt that he’s sincerely trying to protect a young pitcher’s arm — or at least the massive payday that arm represents — but goodness is he ever making a mess of it.
One imagines this will get sorted out somehow and Harvey will pitch as long as there’s a reason to — he’s a ferocious competitor, and he’s savvy enough to know that ducking out of fall duty will ensure two decades of answering accusations about being a traitorous shitheel, to put it only slightly more generously than a generation of columnists will. (Here’s the normally even-keeled Mike Vaccaro firing off a mortar round.) Whatever happens, Harvey’s reputation has already taken a hit, and judging from Alderson’s comments this afternoon, the GM’s already pretty furious and not likely to cheer up anytime soon.
It’s always something around here, isn’t it? But perspective, people. The Mets won tonight and were able to cruise doing it. The Nats didn’t lose, but they lost another day off the calendar, which at this point is almost as bad. Oh, and their next opponent’s a bit tougher than the Braves.
And hey, you got to see Bartolo Colon do things no 42-year-old should be able to do. That was good too.
by Greg Prince on 5 September 2015 9:54 am
Into every life, a little Marlin must fall. And I don’t mean former teal bedbug Cody Ross.
The baseball season, even a successful baseball season, isn’t fully textured until the New York Mets lose an aggravating game to the Florida/San Juan/Miami Marlins in walkoff, gnashoff, fumeoff, bleepoff fashion. After 25 such endings in the past 20 seasons, including, thanks to how Friday night’s game ended, at least one in each of the last ten, it qualifies as morbid tradition.
For the latest exercise in aggravation, blame the manager, since that’s what we’re gonna do out of habit.
Blame the offense, which kept coming up one hit shy of pulling away.
Blame the starter, whose one unclean inning may have been one too many.
Blame the bullpen, because you don’t lose in eleven without at least a little culpability from your relief corps.
Blame the injuries that kept your three first basemen sidelined and left a middle infielder in charge of defending the gateway to the right field line.
Blame the Marlins in general; they’re the freaking Marlins.
Blame Martin Prado specifically; he’s freaking Martin Prado.
Plenty of blame to go around for how last night’s loss at the Loriatorium went down. And it’s not like our temporary friends the Braves helped matters — or our mood — by situating themselves on the wrong end of a walkoff in Washington. (Oh, and blame National supersub Matt den Dekker…you’re Matt den Dead to us.)
But what’s baseball without tradition? If he were around today, you could ask Terry Collins’s predecessor in the lineage of New York National League managers about the formidability of tradition.
You’ve heard of him. He’s the New York National League manager nobody confuses Terry Collins for.
“I’m sort of a permanent fixture,” John McGraw told Grantland Rice on the eve of the 1930 baseball campaign. “Like home plate and the flag pole.” That was probably an understatement. McGraw, architect of ten pennants and three undisputed world championships, was about to begin managing the New York Giants for the 29th of what would eventually become 31 consecutive full or partial seasons. Manhattan Schist, literally the bedrock of the borough (and the geological reason the Polo Grounds had to be constructed in the shape of a bathtub), seemed a passing fancy by comparison. Had Ralph Kiner been broadcasting then, he might have suggested two-thirds of the city’s foundation was comprised of Manhattan Schist, the rest by John McGraw.
McGraw’s permanence, however, wasn’t without pause. For several stretches between his assuming the uptown reins on July 19, 1902, and announcing he’d be surrendering them for good on June 3, 1932, McGraw was not the Giants’ manager of record. As Charles Alexander lays out in his excellent biography, Little Napoleon had to step aside for health reasons at various intervals of 1924, 1925 and 1927. More than a hundred games during the most legendary of managerial careers are thus officially listed as having been skippered not by McGraw, but Hughie Jennings (76) and Frankie Frisch (32).
All of which is not to say Connie Mack overstated his admiration for his contemporary in declaring, “There has been only one manager — and his name is John McGraw.” But it does indicate how hard it is to remain an unshakable fixture when even the most permanent-seeming of sconces can be jarred loose.
Unless you’re Carlos Torres, in which case you endure like nobody around you. You may not get called on in a game in which six relievers are chosen to pitch ahead of you, but surely you endure.
The September 1 threshold has been passed, protestations of summer-lovers everywhere notwithstanding. Despite drumming up the now-perennial Sturm und Drang baseball’s sense of 25-man normality incurs when annually disrupted, the Mets and 29 other teams have made moves to widen their rosters because they can. Usually this is the juncture where however many Mets fans are still paying attention are overcome by curiosity. If 2015 was replicating all the years between 2009 and 2014, we’d probably be demanding to know why we’re not getting a long look at Matt Reynolds.
No offense to Triple-A infielders who go unseen, but this year we have greater concerns…first-place concerns. This year we’re living la vida primer lugar.
Still, with September’s dawn, we get a little variety in our roster life.
Players who were hurt are deemed done rehabbing — come aboard, Kirk!
Players who couldn’t make the cut are cut a little slack — come aboard, Kevin!
Players who possess a single skill set are put to specific use — lace ’em up, EY!
Players who have ridden the nearly transcontinental shuttle from Las Vegas to LaGuardia can put their bags down and their feet up at the 114th Street Holiday Inn — grab a bed, Soup!
Players you might not have noticed coming and going come to stay, if not play. Dario Alvarez, who accumulated two non-playing days of service time two weekends ago, potentially gets another crack at MLB action, having waited close to a year to return to the mound as a Met. He continued to wait as fellow lefty Eric O’Flaherty made a splendid case for Dario’s drift up the southpaw depth chart.
Carlos Torres can’t relate to any of this (except for the part where Alvarez didn’t pitch last night, either), at least not since June 15, 2013.
That was the day, smack dab in the middle of one of the busiest Met transaction months in recent memory, that Torres’s contract was “selected” from the 51s. Carlos came up on the same day the previously demoted Collin McHugh was officially designated for assignment and Greg Burke was optioned to the minors. Also coming and/or going that June, whether to the bigs; to the bushes; to destinations anywhere; or to the list of disabled: David Aardsma, Kirk Nieuwenhuis, Rick Ankiel, Ike Davis, Robert Carson, Mike Baxter, Josh Satin, Josh Edgin, Collin Cowgill, Justin Turner, Scott Atchison, Zack Wheeler, Eric Young, Andrew Brown, Jon Niese, Lucas Duda and Zach Lutz.
Some names remain vital in the scheme of Met things two-plus years later. Some are, at most, vaguely recalled. A couple left the organization and found better fortune. Nieuwenhuis boomeranged back. So did Young. Both of those guys are September returnees, a function of how 40 is much bigger than 25.
But only one name from the middle of June of 2013 has stayed put: Carlos Torres. He doesn’t budge. He is home plate. He is the flag pole. He is as much a part of the contemporary Met scene as at least one walkoff loss to the Marlins per year. He is the constant in a way you would probably never guess.
With apologies to Steve Phillips, if not Alex Rodriguez, hindsight reveals the Mets roster of June 16, 2013 — the day Nieuwenhuis beat Carlos Marmol with a walkoff home run as Bob Costas bemoaned the decline and fall of Western civilization — is a case of 24 + 1. Though it was Kirk who earned the kudos that Sunday, and Costas our wrath, there was a hidden milestone that has proven to run as deep as Flushing Schist, even if there is no such geological formation to explain the Mets’ part of Queens (which was, of course, built on a garbage dump, which rumor has it is where Sandy Alderson found Eric O’Flaherty). That was the day Carlos Torres became the bedrock of the Mets.
Torres made his first appearance for his new team in the sixth and seventh innings on June 16, 2013, taking over the pitching duties from Jeremy Hefner, behind whom the Mets had fallen into a 3-0 hole against the Cubs. Torres’s maiden Met innings were scoreless, which was fine, though it didn’t seem terribly significant because the Mets, at 24-39, were hopeless. One would not have necessarily guessed Torres’s zeroes would be matched by Aardsma in the eighth and Bobby Parnell in the ninth and that Marlon Byrd would lead off the home ninth with a homer, setting up the rally to follow. Duda walked; John Buck singled; Omar Quintanilla bunted each of them over; and Nieuwenhuis shocked Chicago by taking Marmol high over Citi Field’s right field wall.
It was a great moment in the moment and it touched off a mini-revival in Metsopotamia. Wheeler’s eagerly anticipated debut arrived two days later, when he sealed a doubleheader sweep in Atlanta: Harvey Day in the afternoon, Zack’s inaugural start in the nightcap. An uplifting road trip ensued and a whiff of hope was in the air (before Flushing Meadows’ garbage dump origins grew inevitably redolent).
Enough was going on that you wouldn’t necessarily notice a middle reliever with a low profile. Torres made the Mets because his contract insisted he had to. He had a provision in his deal that said if he wasn’t brought up from Vegas by June 15, he could opt out and become a free agent. The Mets liked his thirty-year-old right arm enough to not risk losing him. They put that arm to regular use. He pitched on the 16th, the 19th, the 21st and the 22nd of June (when the first run he gave up as a Met was a game-losing homer struck by his adolescence nemesis Kevin Frandsen). He pitched on the 25th at U.S. Cellular Field, a game the Mets were on the verge of losing until Daniel Murphy’s two-out infield pop fly caused a problem in the immediate vicinity of White Sox closer Addison Reed — whose shrug toward the sky didn’t sufficiently guide his second and third basemen toward catching it. The ball fell in, the Mets tied the score…and lost in the bottom of the ninth instead.
Sounds like Mets-at-Marlins play-by-play, doesn’t it?
Anyway, a lot of Carlos Torres was mixed in to the latter half of June 2013, and a lot more Carlos Torres was to come, mostly because unlike the 24 teammates he joined in the middle of that month, Carlos Torres has never left the Mets’ active roster.
Never.
Not once.
Not to go on the DL.
Not to return to Las Vegas.
Not to take paternity leave.
Not to take bereavement leave.
Not to leave at all, not even to check his messages or grab a quick smoke.
All the other names you’re reading who were around in June 2013 are either long gone or had a hiatus imposed on them the way baseball players do. Murphy was an iron man in 2013, but he missed the beginning of 2014 to be on hand for his newborn son’s opening days, plus he was injured this year (and is “day-to-day” as we speak). Wheeler, such an intrinsic part of the Mets future as of June 2013, was scratched from a Spring Training start nearly six months ago and — contrary to early reports that it was nothing much to be concerned about — went out with something enormous, the need for Tommy John surgery. We know Harvey Days were pre-empted by the same procedure for more than a year, and that his buttinski agent would prefer Harvey Innings be interrupted sooner rather than later. We know Parnell missed all but one game of 2014 and hasn’t been around much of 2015 and probably shouldn’t be on the mound for the rest of 2015. We know Hefner and Quintanilla and Buck are past-tense Mets. We know Byrd is a pennant race Giant, whatever pennant race they have left, and we just checked and discovered Aardsma was DFAa’d by the Braves (having altogether forgotten Aardsma was an Aatlantan to begin with).
Nobody has been a fully active current Met longer than Carlos Torres. Jeurys Familia, who was on the 60-day disabled list when Carlos came to town (and who also didn’t pitch last night), is runner-up in this regard, having rejoined the active roster on September 14, 2013, and pitching in one game three days later before shutting it down en route to 2014. David Wright, who scored when Reed couldn’t pilot that pop fly into a White Sock glove, predates Carlos by nine seasons, but Wright wasn’t fully active for the duration of 2013 or this particular season right here (though he was “shut down” in the waning weeks of 2014, David never technically hit the DL last year). Duda predates him by three seasons, but Duda isn’t active at all presently. During Torres’s term, Niese has missed time, Ruben Tejada has missed time, Anthony Recker has happened in Vegas and Dillon Gee stays in Vegas.
But Carlos Torres? He may not move mountains and he hasn’t worked many miracles, yet the Mets keep him like an oath.
It may not be the most unshakable of active-duty tenures ever — I believe Tom Seaver was an irresistible roster force between April 11, 1967, and June 15, 1977, never going on any kind of list until “TRADED” came regrettably along — but it does defy Met intuition. In the come-and-go world of Major League Baseball, an institution Torres departed in 2011 so he could pitch in Japan, middle relievers are quickly replaceable cogs. One doesn’t quite work the way you want it to, get rid of it and grab another. It’s not like there isn’t a surplus of Burkes and Atchisons, let alone O’Flahertys, rattling around the bottom shelves of waiver wires everywhere.
Then again, when you get somebody really special, somebody who almost always gets the job done, somebody you can regularly rely on…
Carlos Torres? That doesn’t exactly sound like Carlos Torres, does it?
The truth is we don’t know. His outings generally come in three flavors:
1) Oh yeah, Carlos Torres pitched again. Whatever.
2) Wow, what a yeoman effort by Carlos Torres! Man, are we lucky to have a guy like that!
3) Seriously, Carlos Torres? Can’t we get anybody else? Geez, he sucks, just not as bad as O’Flaherty.
Carlos Torres actually does not suck, except when he does, which is a condition that befalls most Mets and all humans. It’s easy to get hung up on the sucking because the secret-weapon deployments of middle to long relievers are, by nature, infrequent. With only so many 18-inning marathons to go around, a fan’s undying gratitude for coming in and staying out there as long as it takes tends to evaporate by the next day. And how often do you really need someone to jog in from the bullpen and throw more than two innings…and if you do, how often does it lead anywhere? (In 2015, only seven of Torres’s 54 appearances to date have gone two innings or longer.) If a Carlos Torres isn’t doing something considered unsung-heroic, he’s likely just pitching some inning that has to get pitched, some inning that isn’t obviously intrinsic to a pending Met victory.
Torres’s territory isn’t even Terry Leach Country. Terry is the standard-bearer of swingmen for those of us whose frame of reference reflexively reverts to 1986 and thereabouts. Leach is legendary in these demographic parts for emerging from submarining obscurity, joining the depleted 1987 rotation and stepping up as nobody in that precise role has ever stepped up: 7-1 record, 3.51 ERA, 12 starts. Seemed like more.
Carlos hasn’t done that, but he actually did some fancy stepping in when called upon in 2013. He took the Harvey Day start in Pittsburgh in mid-July that freed Matt to start in the All-Star Game at Citi Field. He took the Harvey Day start at home in late August that materialized when Matt’s right elbow was deemed a surgical candidate. He made nine starts altogether two years ago (seemed like less), then one on a moment’s notice in 2014, filling in with five shutout innings for Bartolo Colon when Colon was called away on a family emergency.
Torres had good days and bad days in the starting role, but the real takeaway is that he was there to take the ball when needed. There has been no need for Torres to fill in as a starter in 2015. The Mets can load a six-man rotation without even trying. There is nevertheless the instinctive expectation that if something’s not quite sound with one of the golden arms, you’ll see ol’ No. 52/72 warming up at 6:55. But that simply hasn’t happened lately.
So he hasn’t been able to carve out a Leach niche. And despite being used 72 times out of the pen in 2014, he wasn’t Pedro Feliciano redux. Constant Carlos Torres didn’t perpetually yield dependable results. He has no specific Retire Ryan Howard utility to him. He was markedly better against righties than lefties in 2013, better against lefties than righties in 2014 and hasn’t mounted a sterling Batting Average Against versus either kind of batter in 2015.
When Carlos Torres isn’t exceptional, he runs the risk of becoming Carlos Tsuris, my pet moniker for any ordinary or lesser Met relief pitcher whose last name veers conveniently close to the Yiddish word for trouble. For a spell, we had the Tsuris Brothers. Carlos and Alex Torres weren’t related, but when a middle inning’s door isn’t being slammed shut, who asks a for DNA sample? Alex with the big hat isn’t around anymore, but his sibling by another transaction sticks. So does the nickname, when appropriate.
Some nights, there is tsuris no more. Some nights Carlos falls so far below radar that he’s in danger of plopping straight on to Sean Gilmartin’s noggin (though even Gilmartin was used ahead of Torres last night). There was a span between July 25 and August 13 when the Mets played 18 games and Carlos pitched in only two of them. He was still active, just not very. Some nights, though, transcend the tsuris and the inactivity and the sense that the man is the living, breathing equivalent of bullpen wallpaper.
The night of August 27 was one of those nights. That was the night Carlos Torres will want to submit on his Emmy reel. That was the night he instigated a string of extraordinary events.
(That was also one of those nights that forgives nights like last night. The Mets have had more August 27s this year than they have had September 4s. Try remembering that before assuming you’ll be screaming into your pillow again tonight.)
First, and most mundane, was Torres’s pitching: two-and-a-third scoreless innings, no runs, no walks, one harmless hit. He kept a 5-5 score tied, which was crucial if not particularly showy…save for one particular element of his outing.
Second, and most spectacular, was his participation in “the play of the year,” per Gary Cohen, the presumably unprecedented 1-3-1 putout he accidentally started yet purposely finished with his similarly versatile partner in crime, Murphy (who, in 2015, has become the only Met in franchise history to start at least a dozen games at second, third and first in the same season). It was only a crime if you were Jeff Francoeur and you realized you were robbed. For the rest of us, they performed a mitzvah.
Back when McDonald’s didn’t need to sell breakfast all day to lure customers into their stores, what Carlos and Daniel did would have fit well with their Michael Jordan-Larry Bird campaign.
Off the pitcher’s foot
Bounces to Murphy
Desperation toss to Torres
Nothing but Met
You know this play. Hopefully you haven’t forgotten it a little more than a week later or buried it under the debris of Carlos Tsuris’s succeeding appearance versus the Phils (1 IP, 4 H, 3 ER this past Tuesday night). Great plays sometimes get forgotten or buried. Murph previously made unfathomable derring-do happen as a first baseman, but I didn’t hear it recalled in the wake of the OH WOWs that accompanied the 1-3-1. On July 8, 2009, against the Dodgers, Daniel desperately flipped a bad-hop ball behind his back to Bobby Parnell and decisively retired, in the days before replay review, a lumbering Mark Loretta.
That was six years ago. That was when the Mets weren’t in first place. First place makes everything a little more memorable. The Murph-Torres “hacky sack” game — credit Josh Lewin — should live on, thanks to where the Mets are now and where we hope they’ll remain. The double play that hinged on Murphy having the presence or perhaps absence of mind to fling a lookless pass to Torres came on the 29th anniversary of another you’ll-never-see-that-again play. On August 27, 1986, the Mets finished an 8-1 road trip in San Diego when Lenny Dykstra charged Tim Flannery’s hit to center and came up throwing home to nail Garry Templeton at the plate. When John Gibbons applied the tag, he had Doug Sisk backing him up and directing him to fire to third, where Howard Johnson tagged an onrushing Flannery.
“The throw to third — out at third, the Mets win it, six to five!” Tim McCarver raved. “What a double play! Just your routine double play…your basic eight-two-five double play.”
Twenty-nine years later to the night, another band of first-place Mets were completing another 8-1 road trip with a flair-filled defensive play that couldn’t be drawn up if you tried. The Yiddish word beshert, or “meant to be,” comes to mind in tying a moment from 1986 to a moment in 2015.
That it occurred at all is a credit not just to Murphy’s, shall we say, ingenuity, but to Torres’s hustle. Murph, we know, is prone to trying what occurs to him and finding out what works later. He is the baseball embodiment of how Harrison Ford as Jack Trainer in Working Girl pegged Melanie Griffith’s Tess McGill:
“You’re like one of those crazed cops, aren’t you? The kind nobody wants to ride with! Whose partners all end up dead or crazy.
Torres proved an ideal partner for Murphy. He never gave up on the play, never assumed it wouldn’t be worth his while to race Francoeur to the bag, never broke stride, never lost track of what Murph was doing — and the universe rewarded him for his resolve.
See what happens sometimes when you hang around longer than anybody?
And there was yet another extraordinary event to be instigated by Carlos Torres in the same game. It came in the top of the thirteenth when Torres was allowed to lead off the inning for the Mets. The roster was still confined to 25 players, so Collins couldn’t be cavalier with what little he had left on his bench. Carlos hadn’t batted since 2014 and hadn’t collected a hit since 2013, but we’d already seen how athletic he could be in the field, hence it didn’t feel futile to give him a swing.
Carlos swung at a 3-2 delivery from Hector Neris. He shot it up the middle. Freddy Galvis smothered it but couldn’t remove it from his glove in time to do anything with it. Torres was on with a single. Curtis Granderson singled him to second. One out later, Murph doubled him and Curtis home.
The floodgates were open. It went from 7-5 Mets to 8-5 to 9-5. Torres the pitcher who ran, then hit, then ran, didn’t have to pitch anymore. Familia entered and closed out a night to remember.
Sure, of course, remember a game in which the Mets stormed back from a 5-0 deficit and continued to phlog and phoil the Phillies. Remember that double play and that four-run thirteenth. But really remember this:
Carlos Torres did something that had never been done by a Met reliever.
By leading off with a hit and coming around to cross the plate with the go-ahead run, Torres became the first Met relief pitcher in franchise history to do exactly that in extra innings. No Met reliever had led off an inning after the ninth with a single (or something greater) and scored any run, let alone the winning run. In fact, no Met reliever had scored a run in extra innings since Roger McDowell did it in Pittsburgh in 1988. McDowell doubled with one out, so he wasn’t quite the Rickey Henderson-brand catalyst Torres proved to be.
In all, 88 runs have been scored by Met relievers in any inning since 1962. Only five or six have been scored in extras. Why the hedging? Because Baseball-Reference credits Jesse Orosco with two of those tallies: one in 1984, in a game when there was no question he was pitching…and one in 1986, in a game when he had entered as a pitcher but had moved to right field when he batted. That was in the aftermath of the infamous July 22, 1986, Ray Knight–Eric Davis contretemps in which so many Mets were ejected that almost everybody who was left seemed to be playing out of position. Orosco and McDowell traded places between the mound and the outfield, it will be recalled, while Gary Carter took a turn at third base. Santa Claus might have filled in at second, but I’d have to look that up.
Two days before Jesse was honored with a bobblehead — for his 1986 pitching — Carlos’s extra-inning hitting and running put himself in the same conversation with Orosco and McDowell (and, in case you’re wondering, Dale Murray and Paul Siebert). Relievers scoring runs is a rarity. It took until August 24 for it to happen at all in 2015, when Gilmartin did it. There was Torres doing it three days later.
Funny how that happens.
Carlos Torres may be the most common of sights on the Mets roster. A constant sight, actually. Yet I suppose there’s no guarantee he’ll maintain his position beyond October 4, when if there needs to be a roster, its number will contract back to 25. If you can’t get a sniff in a game given over from the seventh to the eleventh to Gilmartin, Reed, Hansel Robles, Tyler Clippard, Erik Goeddel and O’Flaherty, you’ve gotta wonder.
If there is a postseason roster, will Torres the fixture be affixed to it? I say let’s achieve the need for a postseason roster before delving into the niceties.
Despite what I just said, I’ll talk potential postseason pitching plans if you ask me nicely. That’s exactly what I did on the latest edition of the Blue and Orange Nation Talking Mets podcast. Listen here.
by Greg Prince on 3 September 2015 9:09 am
We now interrupt the Mets’ first pennant race in seven years to race all the way around the bases for the first time in five years. We won’t pause to do so, however, for this is one of those plays in which you can’t hit pause. You hit and you run, or as Tom Hanks as Mr. White advised the Wonders at the Ohio State Fair in the oft-cited 1996 classic That Thing You Do!, “You unplug and you run, run offstage.”
You don’t stand around. You don’t get to stand around until you’re dying to sit down offstage because you have run, run all the way around the bases, home to home, after hitting the ball: First base; second base; third base; home.
Coach Morris Buttermaker would be so proud of Ruben Tejada, for Wednesday night, around them bases he did roam. Tejada did what Kelly Leake couldn’t do in the climactic scene of Bad News Bears, what Kit Keller could do (rather improbably but impeccably cinematically) in the climactic scene of A League Of Their Own. He, his bat and his feet executed one of the rarest feats in modern baseball, certainly one of the rarest feats in modern Mets baseball.
Ruben Tejada hit an inside-the-park home run.
“You could’ve turned off your sets right there,” Warner Wolf used to suggest when he went to the videotape and showed the Mets falling hopelessly behind. Not that we would then and not that we do now, but once you’ve seen Ruben Tejada lash an inside-the-park home run, you could be forgiven for getting up and walking away, for you probably aren’t going to see anything more remarkable.
But when it comes to the Mets and games in which home runs rattle around inside the park, one never knows.
The Mets surged permanently ahead on the strength — there’s a word you don’t often associate with Ruben — of Tejada’s second-inning handi/footiwork. It increased the Mets’ lead from 1-0 to 3-0 en route to a characteristic 9-4 thrashing of Coach Geno Auriemma’s Phillie Huskies. But there would be more to see and relish, including relatively conventional home runs from Michael Conforto and Yoenis Cespedes; a dehydrated Matt Harvey summoning all available fluids to strike out nine hapless interlopers before departing with one out in the seventh; and Sean Gilmartin handling neatly a little situational leverage by getting out of the slight one-on, one-out jam Harvey bequeathed him when the Mets’ lead had been whittled to three.
It was all very good in its own right. There’s usually plenty to see and relish from our first-place New York Mets, but once you’ve seen Ruben Tejada lash an inside-the-park home run, you can’t reasonably expect to see anything nearly as scintillating.
Aaron Nola was pitching. Kelly Johnson was on second, having doubled in David Wright, who had singled. Tejada was working a full count, as was his wont during his 2012 heyday, when 239 feet of Statcast-measured magic unfurled.
Tejada swung and served a fair ball midway down the right field line. Domonic Brown had a vague idea about backhanding it but instead tumbled into Albert Achievement Awards territory by flipping head over heels over the lethally low nearby side wall. With the right fielder out of commission (he’d later leave to be checked out for concussion and obviously we hope that when they examined his head, they found the proverbial nothing), the ball was free to keep rolling, meaning Ruben was free to keep running. Second baseman Cesar Hernandez scurried into the corner to retrieve the ball, which indicates the ball is probably a lost cause for the defense.
Tejada slid out of habit but scored unchallenged. By crossing the plate on a ball he hit that (unlike Brown) didn’t leave the field of play, Ruben had crafted the 27th inside-the-parker in the 54-year history of the Mets. That averages out to one every two years, though that sounds more frequent than they feel.
They feel like they almost never happen. Perhaps that’s how it feels to me because when I was growing up they didn’t happen. The first five Mets ITPHRs predated my fandom, including three that happened at the Polo Grounds, where center field was vast and distant enough to come under the auspices of the U.S. Forest Service. Gil Hodges, Richie Ashburn and Charlie Neal each went deep without going out of the Polo Grounds, and none was in the young or spry phase of his respective career. (Thirty-eight year-old Hodges on being waved around third with the very first Mets Insider on May 16, 1962: “Everything had gone black.”) A more guessable candidate, Ron Hunt, notched the inaugural Shea ITPHR in 1966.
I started watching the Mets in 1969. I didn’t see an inside-the-parker until 1979. They hit one in my initial decade on the beat, via the bat and legs of Don Hahn in 1971, but I don’t remember it. I do remember Bud Harrelson — who’d inside-the-parked at Forbes Field in 1967 — scoring on some combination of self-generated hit and opposition miscue and I thought it was an inside-the-park home run, but it wasn’t. I also remember myself scoring on what was probably a four-base error in Pee Wee League tee-ball during the same general period as Hahn and Harrelson made their 360-foot trips and deciding to consider it an ITPHR because I was eight and I hit the ball, which in and of itself, considering my track record of swinging and missing at balls sitting on tees, was a fairly monumental accomplishment.
The first Met ITPHR I witnessed on television was Doug Flynn’s during what still ranks in my reckoning as one of the greatest innings in Mets history. The Mets had already hung seven on the Cincinnati Reds at Shea Stadium in the sixth inning of June 12, 1979, when Flynn batted for the second time in the frame, with two on and two out. He belted a Dave Tomlin pitch to deep center, where Gold Gloved Cesar Geronimo couldn’t catch up with it. Willie Montañez scored from third. Steve Henderson scored from first. And Doug Flynn scored from home.
The Mets…the last-place Mets…the last-place Mets who never hit inside-the-park, outside-the-park or anywhere-near-the-park home runs…posted their first 10-run inning en route to a 12-6 romp over the Big Red Machine. Dave Tomlin could have turned off his set right there.
Flynn opened the floodgates on a veritable golden age of Met inside-the-parkers. Gil Flores hit one later in 1979. Lee Mazzilli and Henderson hit one apiece in 1980. Wally Backman and Dave Kingman each hit one in 1982. The lightly recalled Mark Bradley took Fernando Valenzuela internally deep in 1983. Long and lanky Darryl Strawberry did it to Bruce Sutter in 1984, one of four future Hall of Fame pitchers to give up a Mets inside-the-parker; Sandy Koufax, Steve Carlton and Pedro Martinez also reside in that unlikely club. Straw would hit another in 1989, two years after Howard Johnson fashioned one (in the heat of a September pennant race, no less). Darryl and HoJo were 30-30 men, so no wonder they could slug mightily and dash speedily all at once.
The inside-the-parkers of the past quarter-century reverted primarily to the province of guys you wouldn’t expect home runs from otherwise. Less Strawberry, more Harrelson. Kevin Elster took advantage of the Busch Stadium dimensions and turf in 1990. Tim Bogar did the same at the Vet in 1993 (doing a number on the ligaments in his left hand as he slid headfirst into home, a reminder that the number “1993” was rarely kind to the Mets). A rookie infielder expected to maybe help out in a utility role, Edgardo Alfonzo, scored his first major league run ITPHR-style at Riverfront Stadium. Fonzie and friends were having themselves quite the Saturday on May 6, 1995, building an impenetrable 11-4 eighth-inning lead that accuracy compels me to confirm proved incredibly penetrable. The Reds scored six in the eighth and three in the ninth to prevail, 13-11.
Somewhere, perhaps, Dave Tomlin chuckled.
The next inside-the-park job was put in the books by another freshman, late-season callup and prospective postseason sparkplug Timo Perez, against the Phillies, on September 24, 2000. You had to like the way that kid hustled and took nothing for granted.
In the Faith and Fear era, we’ve blogged seven Met ITPHRs, none with more revelry than Marlon Anderson’s acronym-happy PH ITPHR on June 11, 2005, against the geographically disoriented Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim. Anderson’s perfectly placed ball — it landed in right-center at Shea at exactly the spot where Steve Finley could kick it past Vladimir Guerrero — touched off a chase for the ages. Finley chased the ball. Anderson chased history. Anderson blew a bubble and he chugged around third. Finley relayed the ball to Adam Kennedy, who relayed it to Jose Molina, whose tag of Marlon came a scosh too late. The only pinch-hit inside-the-park home run in Met annals — off Francisco Rodriguez, no less — tied the score in the bottom of the ninth and set the stage for Cliff Floyd’s tenth-inning game-winning blast, which traveled over the fence, which was probably healthier for all concerned if a hair less thrilling.
After an inside-the-parker of a pinch-hitting nature with everything on the line off a decorated closer, it would figure all else would be a little downhill, but we have reserved retrospective kudos for Kaz Matsui commencing his 2006 season (albeit a couple of weeks late) with an ITPHR. Kaz’s four-bagger was particularly noteworthy because it marked the third consecutive year in which Matsui’s first plate appearance resulted in a home run. Five months later, the most logical candidate the Mets ever had for inside-the-park glory came through with a flourish. Jose Reyes launched a ball that completely confounded the Dodgers’ Matt Kemp. Jose flew so fast around Shea’s bases that I remain convinced that if he had made a sharp left at the plate, he could have continued on to first for a five-bagger. (That was also the night I was absolutely convinced the 87-52 Mets were going to win the 2006 World Series; sigh.)
Damion Easley, whose metrics never quite captured his usefulness, went inside-the-Miller Park off future Met Chris Capuano in August of 2007. The next two times ITP happened, the victims were former Mets: Martinez for the Phillies in 2009 at Citi Field and Livàn Hernandez of pre-hype Washington in 2010 at Nationals Park. The progenitor on both occasions was Angel Pagan, and despite his well-intentioned victimizing, the Mets lost on both occasions. If you don’t clearly recall Angel’s ’09 poke to the then-cavernous recesses of the Mets’ new crib (nor Shane Victorino pointing at the ball stuck at the base of the Great Wall of Flushing instead of just picking it up, the big baby), it may be because another rarity that Sunday blotted it out: Jeff Francouer’s line drive that became Eric Bruntlett’s game-ending unassisted triple play. Come to think of it, Pagan’s second ITPHR also transpired in a game with a triple play, one he himself started in R.A. Dickey’s very first Met start.
But what Ruben did was pretty cool, too.
Also cool: going on The Happy Recap Radio Show this week. Listen to a little more Mets history talk here.
by Jason Fry on 2 September 2015 2:13 am
Tuesday night’s game … oof.
Let’s rip this Band-Aid off quickly: Jonathon Niese was terrible. Despite that, the Mets turned a 6-0 Phillies lead into a 6-4 contest. Enter Bobby Parnell, who combined with Eric O’Flaherty and Carlos Torres to allow eight runs in the inning — “a snowman,” as Keith Hernandez put it repeatedly. And that was pretty much it — just an absolute stinker, an avert-your-eyes disaster.
So here’s the question: Was it one of those games that even the best teams suffer now and again, or a sign of the end times? Should Jon Niese be dropped from the rotation? Should Parnell, O’Flaherty and Torres be pink-slipped, thrown in prison or shot into the sun? Should Terry Collins be fired immediately because askl34391!$%@AS;SCszddf!@?
(If you think I’m overdoing it, well, go back and look at Mets Twitter. It was like my phone was having a nervous breakdown.)
After the game, Collins was asked some good questions: With the Mets within two, why not go to Sean Gilmartin or Addison Reed, who needed work anyway? Where was Hansel Robles? Erik Goeddel?
Collins’s answer began with a quiet acknowledgment of Parnell’s struggles, which I found interesting. He’d brought Parnell in to face the bottom of the order, hoping he’d get through the inning and that would give him a lift. It hadn’t worked, and things had snowballed from there.
I don’t intend this as a particularly robust defense of Collins, because I groaned when Parnell came in and was hiding behind the couch when the inning finally came to a merciful conclusion. But we ought to try and think along with the other guy before we call for the executioner. So, in that spirit, two things:
1) The aspect of baseball we know the least about and couldn’t measure even if we did is what happens in the clubhouse. From a cold-blooded standpoint, it’s easy to say Bobby Parnell should be kept away from any baseball situation that matters until he’s more effective, which might be never. Except Parnell’s a veteran on the team, respected in the clubhouse, and just agreed to a phony DL stint rather than seek his fortune elsewhere. There’s a loyalty to him for his tenure and his track record and how hard he’s worked to get through two miserable years ruined by injuries. Again, you can’t measure that — but just because it can’t be measured doesn’t mean it isn’t there and isn’t important to the players.
Terry went to Parnell. It didn’t work. Oh boy did it not work — it could only have been worse if Mel Rojas or Rich Rodriguez had shown up. That’s inarguable. But the reasons why Terry went to Parnell aren’t as cut-and-dried as they may seem to us while we’re tweeting in a rage from our living rooms or booing madly in the Pepsi Porch.
2) I know it doesn’t feel this way, but it’s still early.
Those of us who lived through the collapses of 2007 and 2008 and have endured the awful stretch since then are haunted by ghosts and jumping at shadows. We’re simultaneously euphoric that the Mets are playing honest-to-goodness meaningful games in September and terrified that only means the disappointment will be more crushing. It’s simultaneously deeply irrational and absolutely understandable.
But the Mets themselves don’t think like this. Only four Mets date back to the finale at Shea in ’08 — the aforementioned Niese and Parnell, plus Daniel Murphy and David Wright. And only Wright was around for the ’07 disaster. Michael Conforto? He was friggin’ 14 years old when Tom Glavine lectured reporters about the difference between “disappointed” and “devastated.”
Yes, it’s September. But the Mets have 30 games left and a 6 1/2 game lead. No, that’s not a safe lead. They can lose it by futzing around with the shallow end of the bullpen, absolutely. But they can also lose it by stepping on the accelerator too early, burning out relievers and exhausting players who are undoubtedly wearier than we think they are.
It’s Collins’s job — among others — to not do that, and he has more information than we do in making those decisions. Which, granted, doesn’t ensure he’ll make the right decisions.
Over the next month there are going to be nights when Yoenis Cespedes and Travis d’Arnaud are sitting and Kirk Nieuwenhuis and Anthony Recker are in the starting lineup. We’ll scream about that on Twitter, particularly when the Mets lose by a run or two and Cespedes’s only role is to pinch-hit. The Mets have bullpen roles to figure out, and that’s going to mean some auditions that go pretty badly, as well as the usual ups and downs suffered by every reliever. We’ll scream about each and every one of those missteps, demanding the exile of relievers we insisted had to come in a few days earlier. The Mets will skip starts for Matt Harvey and Noah Syndergaard and probably Jacob deGrom. We’ll react by screaming about how Steven Matz isn’t ready and Logan Verrett is really Brian Lawrence in disguise. (Matz was 16 on the last day of ’07; Verrett was 17.) Starters will have bad outings, perhaps two or three in a row. We’ll scream about them, just like we’re screaming about Niese now, just like we were screaming about Bartolo Colon a couple of weeks ago but now aren’t because it’s time to scream about Niese instead.
It’s all a normal part of being a baseball fan, and inevitable in a pennant race — in a twisted way it’s part of the fun. But if we scream about September 1 decisions like they’re September 21 decisions, we’re going to have nothing left by the time the Nats roll into town for that final series.
Let’s not do that to ourselves. Because it doesn’t sound like any fun at all.
by Jason Fry on 31 August 2015 11:49 pm
There has to be some Mets fan out there who was called away during the bottom of the fifth and then had something to do in the top of the ninth. If so, sorry man — because the rest of Monday night’s game was about as snoozy as it gets.
There’s something to be said for a lack of drama, though. It’s just fine if the result is Phillie after Phillie looking dismayed as Bartolo Colon adds a mile per hour to his fastball here and subtracts it there and puts the ball exactly where he wants it, which is somewhere other than where the batter was looking. I can’t do better describing the Zen of Bartolo than I did last summer, so go read that. He was as on that day in St. Louis as he was tonight (and got a hit both times), except happily tonight was for much bigger stakes.
The Mets confined their offense to a single inning, with home runs by Michael Conforto (who’s gone from a cameo-as-preview to being done with the minors) and Curtis Granderson accounting for their scoring. And they confined their woes to a single inning, as Jeurys Familia looked more than a little shaky in the ninth. He surrendered singles to Cesar Hernandez and Aaron Altherr, then walked Ryan Howard.
Fortunately, Jeff Francoeur was up next, and Frenchy still has no idea that four balls mean you get to go to first base. He hit into a double play, and Familia then dueled Andres Blanco, who turned in a great at-bat but then struck out on the ninth pitch, which was eye-high.
Not a Mets classic by any means, but a Mets win, which will do very nicely. A couple of hours later the Cardinals ambushed Matt Williams‘s second-line relievers (next time you take issue with Terry Collins‘s bullpen moves, think about the things Williams comes up with) and the Mets’ lead was back to 6.5.
Six and a half and the baseball calendar says September. I still have 7 and 17 branded on some wounded part of my psyche, so the only magic number I care about will come when the Mets’ lead is larger than the number of games they have remaining. We’ll see if they get there, but this a good place to start. We’re guaranteed an exciting month and could get a magical one. Buckle up!
* * *
Here’s the latest episode of I’d Just as Soon Kiss a Mookiee, the greatest Mets/Star Wars podcast in the history of the planet. In this one, Shannon from MetsPolice and I chat with Paul Lukas of Uni Watch, I confess to hating “The Natural,” and much more. Enjoy!
by Jason Fry on 31 August 2015 1:00 am
When it happened I was sad. Michael Cuddyer had been having such a good game.
You know Michael Cuddyer. The Mets’ free-agent acquisition of the offseason, who became an instant Rorschach test for the fanbase. On the one hand, he cost money and was a former batting champ, which indicated a certain seriousness of purpose by ownership. On the other, he was old, had a history of injuries, and cost draft picks, which perhaps indicated a poor decision by the front office.
Cuddyer arrived not accompanied by much else in terms of new personnel, had a great spring training, and then looked like he’d used up all his hits in Port St. Lucie. We got to know him as a veteran with a silver buzz cut borrowed from the old mentor cop in a hundred police movies and a willingness to smile gamely from beneath a fedora. All of that was good, but not much else was: He was forced into near-daily service and didn’t look like he could hold up to the rigors of it. The hits weren’t there. He hurt his knee and spent weeks lingering on the pre-DL, that most Metsian of limbos. Somewhere in there he picked up a nickname that was cruel but undeniably clever: Michael Cadaver.
But when the Mets imported real players to replace the Quad-A slop they’d been inflicting on fans, something pretty neat happened. Cuddyer had time to heal up, and was put back into the lineup as the complementary player he should have been from the start. He kept on doing the small, admirable things he’d been doing, but he also started to hit.
On Sunday Cuddyer singled in the second off Wade Miley and scored the game’s first run. In the fourth he singled again and kept the inning alive with a hard (but clean) takeout slide at second. In the sixth he walked, then got a great read on Juan Uribe‘s double and scored right behind Daniel Murphy. When forgotten man Anthony Recker singled in Uribe, the Mets led 4-2, Noah Syndergaard was once more in line for the win, and everything looked wonderful.
At that point Cuddyer’s story wasn’t the day’s only good one. Syndergaard had thrown one of his best games in weeks, mixing up his pitches from the beginning instead of after getting in trouble and commanding both sides of the plate. (Though OK, Joe West’s plus-sized strike zone helped a bit.) The Mets, unfortunately, kept hitting in lousy luck — I lost track of how many balls they lined right at Boston fielders. The first run, appropriately, came off the bat of Syndergaard himself, a modest little arc of a single over Xander Bogaerts‘ head that followed hard-hit balls for naught from Ruben Tejada and Recker.
With the BABIP gods intent on denying Syndergaard a reasonable lead, he scuffled along with a 1-0 advantage, only to try and challenge David Ortiz on a 3-1 pitch with two out and one on in the sixth. The fastball Syndergaard threw was sizzling and low, but it had too much plate and Big Papi’s on his way to 500 homers for a reason. He turned it into a mortar shell off the facing of the Pepsi Porch for a 2-1 Boston lead. No matter: The Mets promptly grabbed the lead back. Syndergaard, clearly tired and losing his location, departed in the 7th on the right side of a 4-3 advantage.
Which is when Cuddyer’s sweet story turned sour. With two out, Hansel Robles got Mookie Betts to hit a pop fly to left. Unfortunately, Cuddyer was playing all the way over in left center and got what he’d later call “a little bit of a late read” on it. “Late read,” in this case, meant the ball seemed to be nearing the top of its arc with Cuddyer still cemented in place way too far away. It plopped in for a bizarre triple that tied the game and made me sad — sad for Cuddyer, for Syndergaard, for the Mets and for myself.
But perhaps you’ve heard baseball is a game of redemption. In the eighth, with two outs and Murphy on first, Boston turned to a reliever with the unlikely name of Heath Hembree. (Seriously, who names a child this?) Up came Cuddyer — and there went Murphy, the Mets’ not-so-invisible ninja and avatar of chaos, stealing second. This time we witnessed a manifestation of Good Murph — he got a big jump, the pitch was head-high, and the bag was stolen easily.
Two pitches later, Hembree threw a flat fastball right down the middle that Cuddyer smacked into left field. Murph came hurtling around third, pounding his chest, and all was right with the world.
Well, not quite right — the Mets had to survive Tyler Clippard throwing two hanging change-ups to Ortiz in the eighth (not recommended but it worked) and a misplay by Tejada to start the ninth off on a bad note. But Jeurys Familia bore down and faced Betts with the game in the balance. He showed Betts the slider, the splitter and then erased him with a high 1-2 fastball that hit 100 MPH.
Just your routine ridiculously great baseball story. The Mets specialize in those of late, don’t they? Here’s to a couple of months more of them.
by Greg Prince on 30 August 2015 2:05 am
In the land of small sample sizes, the curious factoid is king, so all hail this minuscule nugget: The current series against the Red Sox represents the first series in which the Mets have dropped the first two home games versus Boston since the 1986 World Series.
Obviously, a world championship is just days away.
Until then, on the heels of listlessly losing a second consecutive “unusual” Interleague matchup to those stubborn Sox, we’ll have to make due with our slightly diminished first-place lead of 5½ games and take solace in Saturday being only the second day in three weeks when Washington actually gained ground in what we hope will soon stop qualifying as a pennant race and start registering as a runaway.
Winning in a walkover would be quite acceptable, too, but we don’t want to be greedy. We’ll take whatever we can get from our lofty National League East perch where only Mets and their trusty parakeet sidekicks dare to soar. We’ll surely take our Jesse Orosco bobbleheads and show up as early as we have to secure them.
If you were at Citi Field Saturday afternoon as I was, perhaps you nearly fainted as I could have at the sight of lines, lines and more lines outside the Jackie Robinson Rotunda two hours before first pitch. I know the game was sold out. I know the bobblehead was to be granted to only the first 15,000 ticketholders (which is downright miserly, but that’s another story). I know bobbleheads are one of the few items to which I would affix the overworked adjective awesome.
But all of a sudden we’re lining up two hours early for a giveaway? Wow. We as a people have never done that as best as I can recall. I’ve shown up at Citi for just about every bobblehead handed out since the place opened and by arriving about an hour ahead of time, I’ve never entered the joint disappointed. I couldn’t believe a two-hour lead time would be required for bobble purposes.
The buzz was unmistakable in the week leading up to Jesse Orosco Bobblehead Day, however: get there way early or get completely shut out. So Joe and I got there way early, we got on/in line (behind a brood of anticipant Bostonians, which is its own brand of weird) and we got what was coming to us. Once that primary mission was accomplished, there was still well over an hour-and-a-half until our secondary mission of watching the Mets play ball could commence.
Have to say it again: wow.
All things being equal, I don’t mind spending an extra hour inside a ballpark. I think it was the first time I saw anybody (the visitors) take batting practice without my having to flash a press pass or some similar credential. It’s probably more fun to take in from Promenade than it is up close. Still, the whole idea that you’d better get there by two o’clock for a four o’clock start’s premium was startlingly strange.
Citi Field is like this now. It has lines and people and buzz. It’s wonderful, even if on Saturday it only served to preface a game whose air came out of it almost immediately. You put a baserunner on third in the first and second and you score no runs, it’s a bad sign. Jacob deGrom was untouchable for five innings, and then just touchable enough in the sixth. Joe Kelly was never in anything resembling trouble. Ultimately the only on-field highlights were Eric O’Flaherty’s failure to completely implode and Bartolo Colon’s tantalizing success in a new role.
To be fair, O’Flaherty and Colon did essentially the same thing: they each pitched a spotty but scoreless inning. Yet Colon was the revelation, pitching in relief for the first time as a Met — maybe a harbinger of October, if there is such a month in the Mets’ future — while O’Flaherty might have been throwing his last frame here. After the game, word spread that Addison Reed was on his way from the Diamondbacks. I assume he was obtained to replace O’Flaherty. At least that’s my fervent hope. Too bad the rumors didn’t swirl sooner. We could have given Eric a Wilmerian sendoff, albeit an intensely sarcastic one.
The Met offense didn’t click whatsoever, save for the Boys of Late July, Kelly Johnson and Juan Uribe, combining to create a single run in the seventh, by which time the Red Sox had scored an insurmountable three. After a week when every number quoted was sensational and indicative of spectacular achievement, the last two games have been marked by two depressing statistics:
• On Friday, Red Sox pitchers walked 12 Met batters and the Mets lost anyway.
• On Saturday, Met pitchers struck out 16 Red Sox batters and the Mets lost anyway.
The tendency things have to even out may have been on display. The Mets couldn’t lose at home and couldn’t win on the road and now that’s evening out. The Mets couldn’t hit but could surely pitch for the longest time. The evened out until re-evening out. Given the Mets’ presence at 13 games over .500, I hope the evening out soon ceases, because I don’t want to spend the final 33 contests of 2015 in a 10-23 slide that gets us to the quintessentially evened out record of 81-81.
See how easy it is to get carried away when you’ve lost two in a row? So stop losing any in a row altogether, Mets.
Things were never exactly even-Steven for Jesse Orosco, New York Met from 1979 through 1987 (save for 1980, when he was a Tidewater Tide, which was only like being a Met). Those of us who lived the Orosco era remember a shaky, young lefty at the beginning, a dazzling stopper in the middle, a typically aggravating closer after a while and then an avatar of apocalypse by the end. His arc in Flushing crashed. If you mentioned Orosco by the latter days of ’87 and suggested anybody line up outside Shea, somebody would have brought a length of rope.
But nobody thinks of that anymore. They don’t think of the Jesse who wasn’t ready in 1979, the Jesse who had to feel his way in 1982 or even the Jesse who earned All-Star honors in 1983 and 1984. Anybody who was around for Jesse — and certainly anybody who knows him only from a loop of video clips — thinks only of Jesse flinging his glove skyward. Orosco pitched in 380 regular-season and postseason games for the Mets. He only did that glove thing twice, once in Houston against the Astros, once at Shea against the Red Sox. The latter episode (technically its knee-dropping, fist-raising immediate aftermath) was captured on 15,000 bobbleheads. I am the proud owner of one of them.
On October 27, 1986, you know what Jesse Orosco did and how it is revered to this day. On September 9, 1986, you probably have no idea that the very same closer couldn’t hold a 7-6 ninth-inning lead versus Montreal. Jesse allowed a two-run homer to Andre Dawson and an insurance run besides. The Mets went on to lose, 9-7. Prior to that outing, he’d fashioned a scoreless streak of 11⅓ innings. The Mets’ lead remained 21 games despite Orosco’s faux pas. Just one of those things, you might say.
The Shea throng said differently on that Tuesday night. Jesse was hooted off the mound. “No one on this ballclub deserves to be booed,” declared frequent jeer target Darryl Strawberry. “You hate to see Jesse or anyone get booed.” Orosco had less to say about his treatment to reporters: “I’m still not talking, sorry.”
Less than seven weeks later, Jesse’s heavenbound glove spoke volumes.
Lesson? Win the game that wins your club the World Series (along with three others in the playoffs). It will elevate you toward immortality. People will line up for your ceramic likeness. People will line up for your autograph once they’ve received your likeness (and there was a long line for it at the top of the Rotunda escalators). A person who answers an on-camera trivia question in which you are the answer will meet you as the “surprise” guest and appear to nearly faint from joy. A crowd that witnesses you coming out to greet the trivia-answerer will jump to its feet and applaud you in appreciation for doing what you did 29 years earlier, something nobody has done for them since.
You, Jesse Orosco, became the symbol of the franchise at its finest hour, winning the seventh game of the last World Series it won. You could go 3-9 with a 4.44 ERA the next year; give up the home run to Luis Aguayo that absolutely buried the last chance the Mets had of repeating as world champions; get traded to Los Angeles, help them beat the Mets for the 1988 pennant; and keep pitching for seemingly everybody but the Mets through 2003; and you’ll still forever be that symbol of when everything was perfect.
The Mets nesting in first place by a comfortable margin as the Red Sox of all possible opponents came to town was a nice coincidence as the promotional calendar flipped to August 29. The 1986 overtones are stronger when there’s a reason to believe 1986 won’t always be awaiting its endlessly overdue sequel. (Kudos to whoever decided to set Kiss Cam to a medley of 1986 love songs — nice touch!) The current standings probably had more to do with the buzz and the lines and the people than the chance to stare at Jesse Orosco in all possible forms. But the image of Jesse and what he represents is magnetic enough to attract you to thoughts that transcend a ho-hum 3-1 defeat. It made me think that I look forward to Joe and I returning to Citi Field on some future Saturday to pick up our Jeurys Familia bobbleheads, the ones which capture the exact pose Jeurys struck upon recording the final out of the 2015 World Series.
Maybe it won’t take 29 years to schedule that promotion.
***
Thanks to all of you who expressed such lovely and heartfelt sentiments regarding my dad’s situation. You’re wonderful readers and even better listeners.
|
|