The blog for Mets fans
who like to read

ABOUT US

Greg Prince and Jason Fry
Faith and Fear in Flushing made its debut on Feb. 16, 2005, the brainchild of two longtime friends and lifelong Met fans.

Greg Prince discovered the Mets when he was 6, during the magical summer of 1969. He is a Long Island-based writer, editor and communications consultant. Contact him here.

Jason Fry is a Brooklyn writer whose first memories include his mom leaping up and down cheering for Rusty Staub. Check out his other writing here.

Got something to say? Leave a comment, or email us at faithandfear@gmail.com. (Sorry, but we have no interest in ads, sponsored content or guest posts.)

Need our RSS feed? It's here.

Visit our Facebook page, or drop by the personal pages for Greg and Jason.

Or follow us on Twitter: Here's Greg, and here's Jason.

All the Fun Dudes

Has there ever been a Mets team that has had this much fun winning? Of course there’s been. From the first Mets team to post a winning record, in 1969, to the most recent Mets team prior to the current edition that did so, in 2022, they all had themselves a blast in the process of exceeding .500 and we vicariously vibed to the fun that seeped out of our screens and speakers as we skitched along for the joyride. Even the Mets teams we remember for being good enough only to let us down at the very end had to win more than they lost, indicating a cumulative net-surplus of fun was had by those doing plenty of if not necessarily quite enough winning. There’s a reason Durham Bulls righthander Ebby Calvin “Nuke” LaLaloosh was able to differentiate a given ballgame’s potential results so definitively:

“I love winning, man. I fucking love winning, you hear what I’m saying? Like it’s better than losing.”

The 2024 Mets are the latest testament to young Nuke’s hard-earned wisdom. After stumbling to a start of 0-5 and faceplanting to 22-33, the Mets at this moment are 82-68. You know your 162-game math. Whatever else happens in 2024, the Mets have secured a winning record. We’re mostly interested in whatever else happens. Nevertheless, it sure has been fun getting here.

The day the Mets won their 82nd game began with the unveiling of one purple seat amid acres of forest green to commemorate…Grimace? Yes, Grimace. Up on Carbonation Ridge, Row 6, Seat 12 is the Grimace Seat. Why 6/12? Because Grimace threw out a first pitch on June 12, which was when the Mets began a winning streak. I’m sure you’ll never forget where you were on that night, either.

Eight years ago, when Yoenis Cespedes became the first Met to reach the distant precincts of Promenade with a home run, an online petition drive launched to paint the seat where it landed neon green to match Yo’s trademark compression sleeve. It was a splendid idea conceived by splendid Mets fan Melanie Spector that unfortunately didn’t go remotely as far as the slugger’s drive. Likewise, some combination of orange and blue could have been used to single out the splashdown spots of a few other highly significant four-baggers in the very same facility. The first home run hit by a Met at Citi Field — by a fella named David Wright; the Tears of Joy home run off the bat of Wilmer Flores; the 53rd and rookie record-breaking home run from Pete Alonso: they all landed in easily identifiable seats. They could all be marked for posterity.

Fun seat?

Yet the only one that gets that treatment is one that’s basically a corporate tie-in in a part of the ballpark that’s blatantly a corporate tie-in. Perhaps you can sense my muted enthusiasm for the whole Grimace thing. Y’know what, though? Others seem to enjoy it, it stitched itself seamlessly into the storyline of a team on the rise, and other than the Hamburglar, Grimace harms no one. Have yourself a seat, whatever you are.

The next announcement from Flushing came from Francisco Lindor. His MRI is clean. That was a cause for genuine enthusiasm. The muting came in the next beat when he told reporters he still needed a few days of not playing. Magnetic Resonance Imaging only tells you if something’s wrong. It doesn’t cure it. It’s not surprising Lindor’s back requires a little more rest. But maybe they could have slid the man through a more magical tube?

Instead, the Mets had to rely on their Lindorless lineup to make magic, a tough go in the face of Jake Irvin, the pitcher the Mets didn’t hit on the Fourth of July in Washington and seemed no closer to solving Monday night in New York. Irvin Renewal is a very effective National policy, not so great for our local concerns. Fortunately, we had Sean Manaea, a buffer against offense since roughly the time it was decided Grimace is a wobbly Met talisman. Sean gave up a run in the fourth and in no other inning among the seven he pitched. With Irvin shutting the Mets down through seven, Manaea’s performance rated as mostly commendable, a little regrettable. You can’t give up one run when you’re facing Jake Irvin!

We’re totally reasonable in a playoff race.

The Mets’ best chance to score while trapped in the wilderness came in the fourth when they loaded the bases for Mark Vientos with two out. Vientos is the latest Met in one of those three-for-ever slumps. Yet you believe in Mark because Mark has made us believers. Here, in the fourth, he makes essential contact on what appears to be a swinging bunt. Lucky contact as well. More than a squib. Less than a roller. It bounces only so far down the third base line before preparing to die a hero. It’s gonna be an infield hit, provided a pouncing Irving doesn’t lay a hand on it, grab it, throw it, and beat Vientos to first. But with all the skill and time it would take to do that, there’s no way a major league baserunner isn’t going to reach the bag ahead of the throw.

Mark Simon of Sports Info Solutions offered this tidbit on Twitter/X after Vientos, in fact, was beaten by Irvin’s throw: “Mark Vientos was 4.83 seconds home to first on that slow roller that he was thrown out on — per Statcast. That’s slow. Wilmer Flores level slow. Bunch of backup catchers average about that going home to first.”

Vientos goes back to his position at third to start the top of the fifth. The Mets remain in a 1-0 hole until the eighth. Irvin remains on the mound for the Nats, just a touch too long, it seems, as Tyrone Taylor doubles to lead off and moves up to third on a groundout. Irvin exits. Derek Law replaces Irvin. Starling Marte replaces nine-hole hitter Eddy Palavers at the plate. Alvarez is starting at second because Jose Iglesias had to start at short because Mires don’t cure bad backs. Marte had been hurting, but he’s in there now. Alas, he doesn’t hurt Law when he grounds out and can’t bring home Taylor.

The lineup turns over, which for nearly four uninterrupted months meant Lindor would be up next and practically guaranteed something heroic. Instead, Iglesias is in the leadoff position. If you can’t have Lindor, you’ll take Iglesias. Unlike with Grimace, my enthusiasm for the “OMG” thing is never on mute. May it blare on a loop down the Canyon of Heroes not too many weeks from now. Getting ahead of myself here, so let’s get back to the bottom of the eighth. Taylor is on third. Two are out. Iglesias stings a ball off Law, literally. Law has to chase it behind the mound. He would have to make like Irving in order to lay a hand on it, grab it, throw, it and beat Iglesias to first. He doesn’t do any of that. Besides, Statcast says Jose’s home-to-first average speed is 4.16 seconds, best on the club, 18th-best in the majors. Taylor scores. Prepare an OMG seat if you like.

Imagine this is a September of yore when the rosters are overflowing with extra players, and extra innings can overflow into infinity. We don’t have those Septembers anymore. Teams get one additional position player on September 1 and you’re no doubt familiar with the runner who stands on second before anybody bats. The Mets and Nats do go the tenth, with all its guardrails against chaos sanitizing the game for our protection. Reed Garrett shuts down Washington, just as Jose Butto did in the eighth and Edwin Diaz did in the ninth. The Mets didn’t score in the ninth, either. Mark Vientos’s slump was still very much in effect, and he flied out to ensure at least one inning beyond regulation.

All this meant that our pokey third baseman was slated to reappear as the unearned runner to begin the bottom of the tenth. Except Carlos Mendoza has Statcast reports as well as eyes. Vientos is no Iglesias with the feet, so the manager inserts Harrison Bader as pinch-ghost runner. All the sense in the world there, except, let’s retrace our steps. Eddy Alvarez has been removed from the game, and Iglesias moved from short to second. Luisangel Acuña came in to play shortstop. Starling Marte stayed in as the right fielder after pinch-hitting, replacing Jesse Winker on defense. Now Vientos is out, and Bader is in, and did we mention Lindor’s status? If the Mets don’t score in the bottom of the tenth, the Mets have three infielders for four positions. Their only bench player left is catcher Luis Torrens, who has two games at second and two games at third in his past. Should something go terribly awry, then what? Maybe one of the pitchers started his life as a shortstop à la Jacob deGrom. Think Mendoza planned that far ahead?

Probably, but mostly he wanted to win in the tenth, which is a good thought. The Mets were due for something on the level of The Eduardo Escobar Game, I figured. Remember The Eduardo Escobar Game? It was September, two years ago, when the 2022 Mets had been (until September) having at least as much as fun as the 2024 Mets have been having since Grimace and OMG came to the fore. That game against the Marlins, on September 28, went to the tenth in a 4-4 tie. The four Met runs in regulation were all courtesy of Escobar: a two-run homer in the seventh; a two-run single in the eighth. In the tenth, same dopey rules then as now, saw Lindor materialize as the so-called free runner. Mark Canha lined out. Jeff McNeil was intentionally walked. Escobar singled to left. Lindor scored. Mets won, 5-4. Fun ensued.

That game crossed my mind as an excellent precedent for September 16, 2024, but also because of how fleeting some fun can be. It was the biggest game in our lives until the next one. The next one was in Atlanta. We’d be lacking for big games soon enough. But, man, was it and that whole year fun while the winning went on. Winning is fun, we were reminded by a former minor league phenom.

Throwing a surfeit of caution to the wind, Mendoza slotted Bader on second and instructed his minions to bring him home. Taylor couldn’t. He was intentionally passed. Francisco Alvarez couldn’t, but he made the best of his attempt, sending a fly ball so deep to right that, after it was caught, Bader could advance easily to third. So might have Vientos, but that’s hindsight. Marte was up again with a runner on third. This time, he’s this September’s Escobar, singling to left. Bader scores. Vientos would have scored. Daniel Vogelbach — who Buck Showalter once pinch-ran for with pitcher Mychal Givens — would have scored. We never did get to see Torrens play second, which Mendoza said would have been his eleventh-inning maneuver. I don’t mind sacrificing a curiosity in exchange for victory. The Mets won, 2-1, and, judging by the twin Gatorade baths dousing Iglesias and Marte, had oodles of fun doing it, just as we did experiencing it as fans.

Fun result?

Then the Dodgers’ thrashing of the Braves went final, and as I tried to remember the last time I was made this happy by an L.A. win (Game Six of the 1981 World Series, I believe), the Mets and their officially clinched winning record retook sole possession of the third Wild Card with twelve games to go and hopefully lots more fun to come.

The Asterisk of Heartbreak

A couple of things I’ve finally figured out about pitchers in recent years of fandom:

  • Their game logs are portraits of ebb and flow, and you assume the worst (or the best) at your peril. Jose Quintana looked like a prime candidate for “I’ll drive that guy to the airport myself” earlier this summer; his last four starts have been superb. Sean Manaea was kind of trundling along until he reworked his repertoire and became a mainstay. The list goes on.
  • Pretty much every pitcher (and position player, for that matter) is hurt worse than you think pretty much all the time. Bob Ojeda‘s NYT article on pain remains the touchstone, an article every baseball fan should read and re-read that’s particularly bracing for its honesty given the usual soft omerta of baseball clubhouse talk. (You’ll never forget the distinction between “fine” and “OK.”) Yes, sometimes guys are hiding injuries they should admit to and so hurting the team, but such cases are the exception to a cruel rule: particularly by September, most everybody is dealing with maladies that would send you or me to urgent care but are just life for baseball players.
  • The vast majority of pitchers aren’t Greg Maddux or Tom Seaver and miss their locations all the time. This is a feature, not a bug — having a baseball go exactly where you want it 58-odd feet from where you release it is really hard. Fortunately for pitchers, hitting a baseball is also really hard. Pitchers miss their locations all the time; other things that happen all the time are hitters guessing wrong and not swinging at hittable pitches, or not quite barreling them, or making solid contact but watching fielders do what fielders do.

Anyway, those three points were floating around in my nervous brain during and then after the Mets lost a 2-1 heartbreaker to the Phillies to drop the rubber game and the third of 16 games in their stand-or-fall end-of-season gantlet. (For those keeping score at home, which is all of us, we’re now at the 18.75% mark, the Padres and D-Backs won, and the Braves lost.)

I’m sure I’ve wanted to drive David Peterson to the airport myself a time or two; there have been long stretches of his Mets career where I’ve lumped him in with Tylor Megill and basically shrugged that he has good stuff but may not ever figure it out. He’s also been hurt quite a bit; during 2023 his health devolved from “fine” to “OK” to “you have a torn labrum in your hip and we need to fix it.” Peterson is now healthy (or at least back to “fine”) and on Sunday he was the best I’ve ever seen him, using all his pitches aggressively and steaming through an intimidating Phillies lineup.

Alas, Cristopher Sanchez was also pitching beautifully, yanking Mets hitters back and forth with his changeup and his fastball so that they were always fighting the last war. (Poor Mark Vientos‘ post-strikeout expression evolved from outraged to stoic to doomed and accepting.) Add a stiff wind pushing balls away from right field and you had a scoreless duel; watching a 0-0 game I sometimes wonder if the pitchers are on or if it’s more that the bats are lethargic, but this one was the real thing.

It was a wonderful baseball game, taut and crisp and carrying a riveted crowd along for the ride as the tension got cranked steadily higher; I just hoped that wouldn’t turn into an asterisk, the thing you grudgingly admit once you run out of steam lamenting a heartbreaking loss.

The Mets finally broke through in the eighth against Sanchez, as Tyrone Taylor lifted a ball to left field, sufficiently removed from the wind’s sphere of influence to land in the seats. The lead lasted approximately eight seconds, though: Peterson started the bottom of the eighth by surrendering consecutive doubles to the wonderfully named Weston Wilson and the pedestrianly named Buddy Kennedy, and just like that we were tied. As had happened in Saturday’s heartbreaker, the Mets were tied and looking at losing the lead with a runner on third and one out. Peterson completed his work by getting Kyle Schwarber to ground out; then Phil Maton did what Reed Garrett couldn’t on Saturday and got the Mets out of the eighth with the tie intact.

It was still tied in the bottom of the ninth with Edwin Diaz pitching, wearing 21 and no name in honor of Roberto Clemente. Francisco Lindor had done the same in what became a cameo, as he wisely removed himself after an inning of work showed his back wasn’t up to the task; yes, you can now officially worry.

Diaz struck out Bryce Harper and went to work on Nick Castellanos, with Francisco Alvarez looking particularly demonstrative behind the plate, emphasizing where he wanted Diaz to locate his pitches. I noticed that; I also noticed that Diaz kept putting the high fastball, the waste pitch meant to change a hitter’s eyeline, at the top of the strike zone instead of above it where Alvarez seemed to want it.

Castellanos managed to serve one of those not-high-enough fastballs to right for a one-out single; Diaz struck out Alec Bohm but paid no attention to the lead-footed Castellanos, who alertly swiped second as J.T. Realmuto came to the plate. Diaz threw two high-90s fastballs to Realmuto to get ahead 0-2 and Alvarez indicated he wanted the next one up and out of the strike zone — the pitch Diaz hadn’t been locating as desired all inning.

He didn’t locate this one either — the ball was where Realmuto could handle it, he smacked it to right-center, and the Mets had lost.

Wonderful baseball game; too bad about that asterisk.

The Eras Tour

I decided to go into the hot take business on May 30. It wasn’t all that hot a take, actually. What I removed from the oven of projection and prediction seemed pretty obvious and therefore lukewarm as regarded a team with a record of 22-33 and a DFA-bound reliever who had just flung his glove into the stands. And he was one of our more reliable relievers.

The 2024 Mets now wallow eleven games under .500. A couple of days ago, I looked up incidences of Mets teams that had fallen double-digits below the break-even mark and still carved out a winning record by season’s end. It has happened three times in franchise history: 1973, 2001 and 2019. I offer that tidbit for nothing more than trivia’s sake, given that there’s no way this team is going to be the fourth edition of the Mets to bounce back from below. Likewise, I am no longer concerning myself with the National League playoff picture, multiple Wild Card berths notwithstanding. The Mets aren’t a part of that snapshot as June approaches and won’t be the rest of the way. As a guy who analyzes returns until he can call elections accurately on social media likes to say, I’ve seen enough. Four months remain to 2024. Get out of it what you like, or just get out and do something else.

I was hoping to mathematically clinch a full-throated Met-a Culpa Saturday. Looked good for a while. The Mets were up four runs over the Phillies. Qualms developed over that lead not being bigger — before bigger qualms took over, given that the lead was shrinking; then disappearing; then converting itself into an insurmountable deficit — but the larger point reigned as long as it could. I not only wrote that there was no way the 2024 Mets could post a winning record, I truly believed it. And I was so, so, so wrong. With a Mets win on Saturday, I could have just stood here in my wrongness and been wrong and gotten used to it…gladly.

Gladly, Mr. President!

I don’t want to say “the champagne is still on ice,” because champagne is for a very specific baseball-type occasion, so let’s say, if you can conjure a vision of a quadrennial political convention, the balloons are still netted up against the ceiling waiting for one state’s delegation or another to put the vote count over the top. We’re gonna need at least a 149th ballot, so to speak, in order to strike up the band and release those balloons. When we do win for the 82nd time this year, rest assured I’m orchestrating a massive balloon drop, even if it takes place only within the arena of my headspace.

Happy days have been here again since roughly the dawn of June. They haven’t precluded the occasional miserable interlude, but better to be massively disappointed for an afternoon in the midst of a September playoff chase than having been compelled before summer to get out and do something else.

They’re coming, any day now…

Admittedly, by the time they lost on Saturday to the Phillies by two a game they’d led by four, statistical niceties like the Mets clinching the franchise’s 28th winning record in its 63 years of existence had drifted relatively far from my mind. My primary thoughts, fueled by regret for what might have been, were best expressed via postgame screams into a pillow.

It was great to meet next-gen speedy shortstop Luisangel Acuña and his burgeoning promise, but not at the day-to-day expense of current-gen speedy shortstop (and so much more) Francisco Lindor’s back, not to mention unsurpassed everyday value.

It was great to see Starling Marte drive in three runs, but not to see him go to first base in pain when he took a pitch off the arm.

It was great to watch Luis Severino inhabit his starting pitching role with such gusto, but not when that included facilitating Bryce Harper’s monster exit from The Cage with two not-so-harmless home runs.

It was great, in retrospect, that none among Danny Young, Reed Garrett or Ryne Stanek detached his glove from his hand and proceeded to fling in Jorge Lopez-style disgust as each helped allow the Phillie comeback to complete its appointed rounds, but let’s face it: that’s a pretty low bar for greatness.

It was great that J.D. Martinez got ahold of one, but the greatness evaporated when Cal Stevenson — already a problem in this game — leapt and reeled it in before it could leave Citizens Bank Park.

It was great to imagine we’d maintain or lengthen our lead on the Braves instead of winding up the night in one of those ties that has something to do with flat feet.

Yeah, it was all great until it wasn’t. Nevertheless, I feel pretty confident that when all is said and done on this season, we’re gonna have a winning record. I feel no hesitation stemming from my usual concern for tempting the wrath of the whatever from high atop the thing to declare that achieving one more win in 2024 amounts to a formality. We’re 81-67 with fourteen to go. Eighty-two and something will happen. (Excuse me while I go outside, turn around three times and spit.)

I’m also confident that having a winning record is not what the saying and doing of what remains to this season is all about. We long ago moved on to higher stakes than breaking the .500 barrier, and with higher stakes come heightened emotions. No wonder the pillows around the house are trying not to make eye contact with me in September.

When I absolutely gave up on this team in late May, just before being presented several months of lessons regarding the jumping of guns and to conclusions, I was a little more specific in my dissolution of optimism beyond the current season and its lack of prospects (and I don’t mean Acuña). What got me when the 2024 Mets bottomed out was how low the on-field enterprise had plummeted since the headiest days of 2022, which was and still is the season before last, yet whose standard for regular-season success was rapidly growing ever more unreachable. Put aside that they needed to win at least one more game that year. They won 101 as was. Forgive a fan who thought they’d stay in that range for a while.

But then came dismal 2023 and the fetid first third of 2024, and on May 30, it struck me 2022 really was a one-year wonder, and when are we going to revel in a multimonth run like that again? The answer came: in the second and third thirds of 2024.

Who knew?

Carlos Mendoza informed reporters after Saturday’s 6-4 loss Marte was gonna get x-rayed for that HBP, an eerie reminder (as if we needed one) that when Starling got hit in the hand two Septembers ago, the 2022 boulder was nudged irretrievably downhill. Yet it’s not as if the injury bug has remained a respectable distance from our fortunes already No Jeff McNeil. No Dedniel Nuñez. No Paul Blackburn. Still waiting on resolution for Kodai Senga’s possible return. And are you more concerned about your back or Lindor’s? Also, though we have every reason to be satisfied with the starting pitching we’ve been getting, it’s strange how most of our 2022 rotation is suddenly up and about. Jacob deGrom emerged from exile to pitch Friday night for Texas, followed by Acuña trade bait Max Scherzer Saturday. We saw an overly effective Chris Bassitt just this week in Toronto. And wasn’t that Taijuan Walker halting our momentum from out of the pen in Philly? As if Harper and Stevenson needed the help.

Either way, 2022 and whatever it had going for it is long gone from the Met present. So, blessedly, is the way 2023 unraveled. Though several current players span several recent seasons, 2024, generally for better rather than worse, feels disconnected to its immediate predecessors, which shouldn’t be surprising. The 2022 campaign didn’t feel like it had much to do with 2021; and 2021 didn’t at all build on whatever we saw in 2020; and 2020 blew off course from the gathering head of steam that defined 2019; and 2019 had almost nothing in common with 2018; and 2018’s best blips shook off the stench of 2017, while its worst created their own distinct and overwhelming bad odor; and 2017 killed the momentum of 2016; and 2016, despite the momentum there at the end, gave us a different breed of Mets from 2015, the last time we went to a World Series, which we probably didn’t think was gonna be the last for what was then the foreseeable future.

Maybe it wasn’t wholly unreasonable to believe we could foresee the future. Up to a decade ago, it was easy to broadly classify eras of Mets history. Nuance notwithstanding, you’d get in a rut or you’d get on a roll and, as a fan, you adjusted expectations and aspirations accordingly. The first thirtysome years were almost Biblical in their feast/famine precision.

Seven losing seasons from 1962 to 1968.
Seven of eight winning seasons from 1969 to 1976.
Seven losing seasons from 1977 to 1983.
Seven winning seasons from 1984 to 1990.
Six losing seasons from 1991 to 1996.
Five winning seasons from 1997 to 2001.
Three losing seasons from 2002 to 2004.
Four winning seasons from 2005 to 2008.
Six losing seasons from 2009 to 2014.

The winning eras were preferable to the losing eras — welcome to Human Nature 101. Is it a stretch to suggest that the losing eras at least let you know where you stood? You stood somewhere south of the first division and you strove vicariously to make the climb upward. You lived for that year that would turn it around. When it got turned around, you felt secure in your belief that you and the Mets had arrived and were going to stick around for seasons to come. The winning eras offered their own challenges, but you had the baseline of 82 wins, probably more, taken care of…until the edge of the cliff arrived without notice and you and the Mets fell off it again. Still, it was fun while it lasted, and it usually lasted a decent interval.

Once we get that 82nd win of 2024, may it pave the way for many more wins in what’s left of this season this month and what will be tacked on to this season next month. And may the years that follow treat 2024’s 82+ wins as useful precedent rather than one-off aberration.

The First 6.25%

When they announce the next year’s baseball schedule I take a look, because how can’t you? But after a couple of glances — When’s the home opener? How many times do we go to the West Coast? — I go back to whatever I was doing. The dates are far off, you have no idea which teams will have made leaps forward or taken steps back, and everything’s just too theoretical for deep engagement.

Then the schedule becomes real, and if you find yourself with something to fight for in September, you pore over every remaining game, estimating and fussing and wondering and worrying.

The Mets reported for duty at Citizens Bank Park facing a gantlet: seven against the Phillies, interrupted by three with the Nats, then three with the Braves and three with the Brewers. Two first-place teams, the team the Mets are trying to hold off in the wild card, and a squad whose rebuild has accelerated.

Yikes! But it’s also true that as a baseball fan, the surest way to look foolish is to try to outguess the game.

The early innings of Friday night’s game were even more nerve-wracking than one would expect, given the stakes. The Phillies came out wearing their New Sweden on steroids City Connects (J.T. Realmuto‘s yellow catching gear made him look oddly like Bumblebee from the Transformers movies) and kept hammering balls delivered by Jose Quintana, only to see every drive except Bryce Harper‘s first-inning double find a Met glove. (Pete Alonso set the tone immediately with a jai alai capture of a laser beam from Kyle Schwarber that nearly tore his glove off.) Meanwhile, the Mets could do absolutely nothing against Aaron Nola, who got hitter after hitter to worry about his curveball and so left them gaping at the fastball.

Still, the Mets were driving Nola’s pitch count up, and that was enough to make you squint and hope a little. It was a relief when Jose Iglesias led off the fifth with a single — at least there went Nola’s no-no dreams. Tyrone Taylor followed with a single of his own and Nola went to work against Francisco Alvarez, whose ABs have been much better of late. Alvarez swung and missed at Nola’s first offering, a curve that got a little more plate than its deliverer would have liked. The second pitch was another curve, lower and inside and harder to square up in isolation, but Alvarez was now looking for a curve in that general area. He golfed the ball into the night, waving it fair and watching it rattle off the foul pole for a 3-0 Mets lead.

Jubilation, and the Mets weren’t done: After singles from Francisco Lindor and Mark Vientos, Brandon Nimmo hammered another Nola curve into the right-field stands for the second three-run shot of the inning. The Mets were up 6-0, Nola was exiting, and wasn’t baseball wonderful?

That was all Quintana needed as he cruised through seven innings, Harrison Bader added a three-run shot of his own (nine runs via three-run shots — Earl Weaver would have been delighted), and the Mets finished up taking their hacks against Roger Clemens‘ kid, the one named Knothole or Knitcap or some other stupid K word inflicted on him by his war-criminal father. There was a bit of fuss in the ninth as Alex Young ran into trouble and Lindor left early with what’s being called lower-back soreness; the former can be dismissed with a wave at the scoreboard, and we’ll worry about the latter when we’re told we have to.

Only the most deluded optimist would high-five madly at having survived 6.25% of the gantlet, but only the most determined pessimist would get so hung up on the remaining 93.75% that he’d refuse to enjoy the moment.

It’s baseball; don’t try to outguess it.

Thought Process No Longer Valid

So, what do I lead with when this no-hitter is over? Bob Moose in 1969? Max Scherzer in 2015? Proof that a no-hitter thrown at the Mets late in a season doesn’t necessarily preclude that season from having a successful (maybe Amazin’ly successful) postseason? That’s a tough sell. I know it’s true, but when the Mets have looked like they’ve looked for not only these eight innings when they’ve done literally nothing against Bowden Francis but for days on end, who wants to be the house optimist?

Should I compare it to Chris Heston in 2015? Yes, we did get no-hit twice en route to a pennant. The first one had more novelty to it, given that it was the first one we’d been smothered by in 22 years. We were also in the midst of a teamwide slump then, but that was in June, and the game was effectively out of reach, and the difference was that by the time it got to the ninth inning, I was kind of pulling for Chris Heston to finish the job, because what the hell, right? Maybe not right, but it’s where my head was on that night. That night, however, isn’t this afternoon. This afternoon in Toronto is in September. Nothing’s been clinched the way it was when Scherzer went medieval on our bats at the tail end of 2015. Resolution to the season isn’t far off the way it was when Heston rose from oblivion to stifle us in the promising, albeit pre-Cespedes portion of that year.

The Ed Halicki no-hitter from 1975? Not much relevance. Darryl Kile? That was a September, but the September of 1993, a year that had spiraled into hopelessness by May. Bill Stoneman’s in 1972 was also in Canada, but so what? Jim Bunning’s perfect game was historic, in its own category. Sandy Koufax was Sandy Koufax. Jim Maloney carried his into the eleventh. They say it wasn’t a no-hitter — thanks, Johnny Lewis — but I’ll bet it very much felt like one that night in 1965.

We have a few too many opposition no-hitters to reference. We don’t need another.

All we’ve got going for us after eight innings on Wednesday, September 11, 2024, where Bowden Francis’s no-hit bid is concerned is maybe he’s inherited some of that Dave Stieb come close for the Blue Jays but not get it energy. Also, the game’s not over with yet, but that feels like a technicality. The Mets allowed themselves to see all of six pitches in the eighth. The first two batters made outs after one pitch apiece. Is the bus to the airport idling so loudly that it’s distracting you fellows? I know Rogers Centre used to be called SkyDome, but do you have to sky out practically every at-bat? What a waste of Sean Manaea’s six-and-two-thirds of one-run ball, not to mention the credible relief we got from Reed Garrett and Danny Young. Maybe a 1-0 loss via no-hitter is the bottoming out this “attack” needs to get going in Philadelphia this weekend. No, I don’t know how getting no-hit would serve to jump-start the bats, but I’m grasping here. I’m going to have to write this disaster up. I need something.

About the only thing interesting left to not exactly root for but take in is hearing Keith Raad call the last out of a no-hitter. That was the main reason I rooted for Chris Heston in 2015. I wanted to hear Howie Rose do the honors, even if it was from the victimized side. Howie understood the responsibility that night. A no-hitter is a no-hitter. I think Keith gets it, too.

But that’s the smallest of consolations when we’re tied with the Braves for the final playoff spot, they play the Nationals tonight, and our schedule gets much harder after Toronto. Then again, Toronto hasn’t been easy. This is too much of a callback to the Angels series and the A’s series. Why are we playing all these allegedly crummy American League teams if we can’t take at least two out of three from all of them?

Who’s up to start the top of the ninth, anyway? Yeah, like that’s gonna matter.

Spoiler alert: It did matter.

Thanks for Calling

“Welcome back to Mets Talk. Caller, you’re on.”

“Yeah, hi. The Mets have to do better than they did Tuesday night in Toronto.”
“You’re absolutely right. Thanks for calling. Our next caller…”

“Um, yeah, long-time listener, first-time caller.”
“Great. What would you like to talk about?”
“I’m really sorry the Mets lost, 6-2, to the Blue Jays.”
“Me, too. Thanks for calling. Next caller, whatcha got?”

“Yeah, David Peterson has to do better than he did last night.”
“He sure does. Been doing great of late, not so much most recently. Hopefully he gets back on the horse. Thanks for calling. Our next caller…”

“Hi, listen, Tylor Megill, who hasn’t been that good when he’s gotten his chances, was terrific Monday, but Peterson, who’s been so good, wasn’t the next night.”
“Funny how that goes. Thanks for calling. We’re talking calls. Here’s our next one.”

“Carlos Mendoza shook up the batting order a little bit, but it didn’t really work. Can you remember the last time the Mets got a big hit?”
“Certainly before they had two guys named Alvarez in the lineup. Thanks for the question. Next caller, you’re on.”

“Hi, I’m a big Mets fan and I have to say I’m disappointed at how they didn’t hit Chris Bassitt.”
“Bassitt sure quieted the already quiet Met bats and disappointed more than a few Mets fans. Bassitt’s definitely done both before. Thanks for calling. We have another call.”

“How are the Mets supposed to win if they’re practically all gonna be in a slump at the same time?”
“That’s a great question with no easy answers. No doubt the front office and the dugout brain trust are working on concepts of a plan to get off the offensive schneid. Appreciate the call. You’re next.”

“Hey, the Braves won while the Mets lost, which means we’re tied for the last Wild Card spot again.”
“Thanks for the update. Next caller.”

“Hello. I was wondering if there was anything more to say about a lousy game and not so great outcome.”
“Nope. Thanks for calling. We’ll be right back.”

For Mets talk that’s likely to be a little more scintillating, join me at the Levittown Public Library Thursday afternoon at 3:30 for a discussion focused on the joys of baseball — rooting, writing and reading. More information is here.

Smooch the Ugly Ones Too

Baseball, I’ve long insisted, is humanity’s acme of artistic expression. But that’s not to say every game is a work of art.

Whatever that was that the Mets and Blue Jays foisted on us tonight would definitely not qualify. It was a mess, with Tylor Megill mowing down anonymous Blue Jay recruits (and a morose-looking Vladimir Guerrero Jr.) like a combine but then inexplicably leaving with 88 pitches on his odometer and a 1-0 lead. I dislike second guesses, but that counts as a first guess — Gary and Keith were wondering why Megill was taken out, as was I, as was you, as was everybody.

The decision immediately imploded as the Mets got a run of bad relief pitching: After recording an out Danny Young hit a guy and gave up a single, which led Carlos Mendoza to signal for Jose Butto. Recently Butto’s looked like he’s auditioning to return to starting, needing time to fine-tune his control regardless of whether or not time is available for him to do that. Butto fell behind and gave up a hit, leading to a mound visit in which Francisco Alvarez gave him the Full Lasorda, a mix of exhortation and can-do and stern warnings. It was an impressive Come to Jesus moment from a young catcher, but it also didn’t work: Butto hit the next guy to tie the game, then yielded a sacrifice fly to put the Mets behind.

(So of course he got the win. For the 845,093rd time, it’s an unfair game.)

(Edit: The above was based on SNY’s postgame screen, which was a placeholder; in fact the below-mentioned Ryne Stanek got the win, and properly so. Reset the Unfair Game counter to 845,092.)

The Blue Jays gagged up a game on Sunday against the Braves; tonight, wearing City Connects best described as Marlins North, they demonstrated admirable even-handedness in gagging up a game against us. I’ll leave the details smudgy to avoid further embarrassment for all involved, noting simply that the Mets got two runs on one hit, and the one hit was an oopsie cue-shot infield single. The rest was a slapstick farce of walks and errors and wild pitches and passed balls, best witnessed through the holes of a bag over one’s head regardless of your rooting interests. The winning run was scored by pinch-runner and former speed-skating medalist Eddy Alvarez, who replaced Pedro Reyes, whose own lone appearance also came as a pinch-runner. Should some waiver-wire guy named Delgado or Beltran wind up as a Met in the next few days, I’d advise them to rent and not buy.

Anyway, Ryne Stanek worked a blessedly blame-free eighth and Edwin Diaz came in for the ninth. Diaz’s final pitch was a fastball that Leo Jimenez whacked to right for what looked like a crushing walkoff homer, or at least it looked like that for 90% of its flight, until the ball’s momentum sagged and it came down in Starling Marte‘s glove in front of the fence. The Mets celebrated with the dazed smiles of a tour group that just exited a van that’s screeched to a stop inches from a ravine: Well, that’s a story to tell the grandkids!

Still, the ugly ones count just as much as the pretty ones, and right now each and every win is to be cherished and fussed over and smooched like a beauty-pageant winner arrived to take you for a spa weekend. Hello, aren’t you lovely and wasn’t that a delight? Smooch smooch smooch.

* * *

We’ve lost our fourth ’69 Met of the year with the death of Forever Met Ed Kranepool. Read Greg’s tribute — from our 2020 A Met for All Seasons series — here.

For Eddie

Ed Kranepool has passed away at the age of 79, though I don’t see how that’s possible. I’ve always considered Eddie Kranepool the closest thing there was to immortal our world. He was with us from just about the very beginning, and, as far as I was concerned, he was going to be around forever. I guess he will be, in our Met hearts and Met minds. I brought up his name on a podcast last week. I brought him up to my companion at the game yesterday. This is par for the Krane course. Nobody who rooted for the Mets from 1962 to 1979 will forget the high school phenom; the bonus baby; the young comer; the struggling major leaguer; the world champion platoon first baseman; the personification of professional renaissance; or the pinch-hitter deluxe. Every ring around the Mets’ tree had his signature carved within. Stopping playing didn’t erase the spot he held in our consciousness. I have a feeling it will grow only stronger.

From our 2020 series “A Met for All Seasons,” it is my privilege to share with you the last article we posted. Fittingly, Ed was our finale (representing 1979), because when it comes to a Met and all seasons, who the hell could possibly have followed Eddie Kranepool?

***

I’ve been alive forever
And I wrote the very first song

—Barry Manilow

Jeurys Familia (2012-2018, 2019- ) won’t still be relieving for the Mets in 2029. Jacob deGrom (2014- ) won’t still be starting for the Mets in 2031. Michael Conforto (2015- ) won’t still be driving in runs for the Mets in 2032. Brandon Nimmo (2016- ) won’t still be getting on base by any means necessary for the Mets in 2033. Dom Smith (2017- ) won’t still be pounding out doubles for the Mets in 2034. Jeff McNeil (2018- ) won’t still be pinging from position to position for the Mets in 2035. Pete Alonso (2019- ) won’t still be blasting homers for the Mets in 2036. Andrés Giménez (2020- ) won’t still be making plays in the hole for the Mets in 2037.

And if they are, they won’t be doing whatever they’re still doing for another year besides.

Steadiest Eddie.

So let’s salute as unbreakable a Mets record as exists: Ed Kranepool’s 18 seasons as a Met, spanning 1962 to 1979. Nobody else has come close to playing so long for us, let alone playing so long for us and nobody else. It is highly unlikely anybody else will ever play more. Longevity. Continuity. Exclusivity. The combination is not to be underestimated, because the combination crafted by Kranepool has never been equaled.

• Cure David Wright (2004-2016, 2018) of his spinal stenosis and let him play his entire contract, through 2020, without pause. He might make the Hall of Fame, but he comes up a year short of Ed Kranepool as a Met.

• Fix the left elbow of John Franco (1990-2001, 2003-2004) without time away for Tommy John surgery and then keep him around instead of letting him slip off to Houston for his final innings. He comes up two years short of Ed Kranepool as a Met.

• Same for fantasy-version, never-leaves, therefore in theory never-gets-in-trouble so we never have reason to stop loving him Jose Reyes (2003-2011, 2016-2018). Uninterrupted Reyes comes up two years short of Ed Kranepool as a Met.

• What if Buddy Harrelson (1965-1977) never left instead of spending two years with Philly and one in Texas? Still not enough. When Buddy was coaching in 1982 and the Mets were suddenly short of infielders, there was some chatter that the 38-year-old former Gold Glover might have to be activated. Add that hypothetical to the other hypothetical and still nope. Harrelson comes up two years short of Ed Kranepool as a Met.

• Straighter and narrower paths for Darryl Strawberry (1983-1990) and Doc Gooden (1984-1994) that carry them respectively to the ends of their careers (1999 and 2000, respectively) in Flushing? Like Wright, each man still winds up a year short of Ed Kranepool as a Met.

• Maybe if Tom Seaver’s restoration in 1983, intended to eradicate that he was forced to abdicate following his initial 1967-1977 reign, isn’t botched in 1984, and he stays at Shea all the way to 1987, which was when he officially retired…that’s sixteen seasons as a Met and it’s also STILL not enough to measure up to Ed Kranepool as a Met.

And if you’re a New York Met who’s beyond the reach of even Tom Freakin’ Seaver, then, brother, you must be doin’ somethin’ Amazin’.

You can attempt to delete ifs and buts from the story of every Met who isn’t Eddie Kranepool, but they’ve all got ifs and buts. For example, if the Mets never traded Jerry Koosman, he conceivably could have played all nineteen of his seasons with the Mets (and maybe been A Met for All Seasons), but then we don’t get Jesse Orosco and we can’t say for sure who would’ve gotten the second last out of a World Series in Mets history.

No, no buts about Eddie Kranepool. No ifs, either. Ed Kranepool showed up early and stayed as late as he possibly could. He put in 18 seasons; 18 seasons in a row; and 18 seasons in a row as a Met only.

Edward Emil Kranepool in a taxi, honey.

Nobody’s had a Met career like Kranepool’s, except Kranepool. Nobody’s been a Met like Kranepool, except Kranepool. Nobody’s been the Mets like Kranepool, except Kranepool. That was the case in 1962, in 1979, in all the seasons in between and, as the four-plus decades since he played have illustrated, forever after. Projections are dangerous to make without the data to back it up, but I feel comfortable declaring nobody else ever will be a Met like Kranepool, except Kranepool.

That’s the beauty. That he’s still Ed Kranepool and there’s still no catching him or matching him let alone the possibility of hatching him, or a reasonable facsimile thereof. There’s exactly one Ed Kranepool. Nobody else has one of him because there is only one of him. Baseball-Reference lists “similarity scores” for every player with decently measurable major league tenure (100 IP; 500 AB), so while you can certainly find statistical comps for Ed Kranepool if so inclined, I don’t believe any other baseball franchise has so deeply embroidered within the fabric of their story any figure quite like him.

Ed Kranepool is of the New York Mets.
The New York Mets are of Ed Kranepool.
He’s ours, dammit.

***
Ed Kranepool, we have determined, has the Most Seasons record cold. Most games played, too, with 1,858, topping Wright by more than a full season-and-a-half’s worth. According to Baseball Musings, nobody’s played in more Met losses than Eddie: 1,102, which will come with the territory of anybody whose 18 Met seasons, partial and full, encompassed eight last-place finishes. Krane is second in wins, however, with 746 (with five ties thrown in for middling measure). Befitting a man of his experience, he dots Top Fives and Top Tens all over the Met charts.

He earned his spots in the upper levels of Mets compilation categories by hanging in there. It is no insult to say Ed Kranepool’s best quality as a player was sticking around and sticking around some more. That and arriving in the big leagues sooner than any Met ever had or ever will. The latter is technically unknowable, but give us a shout when you come across another Met not yet old enough to vote.

The Youth of America gets some private tutoring.

Eddie was only 17, no older than ABBA’s Dancing Queen, when he made his major league debut, which makes sense only when you realize the Mets weren’t yet six months old themselves and how is an infant franchise supposed to know you don’t put a 17-year-old in the big leagues unless it’s World War II or you’re nurturing the next Mel Ott? They signed Ed in late June shortly after his high school graduation and ten days after Marv Throneberry failed to touch two-thirds of the necessary bases to secure what he thought was a triple. So yeah, the baby Mets were in the market for a first baseman of the future practically right away. At James Monroe High School in the Bronx, Ed broke records established generations before by a fella named Hank Greenberg. He was a heavily scouted, hot enough property in those pre-draft days to elicit a bonus of $85,000, a lofty figure for 1962.

Ed chose the Mets because he deduced advancement on a ballclub in dire need of help would come quickly. Yet the Mets didn’t rush him to the majors right away. No, they waited until September. Then they give him just a taste. The fans, too. They needed something to savor en route to 40-120, something that would tell them the future had some promise in it. Kranepool relieved Gil Hodges on defense on September 22. He got his first base hit a day later in what was supposed to be the final game the Mets would ever play in the Polo Grounds. The following April, Shea Stadium wasn’t ready, so the Mets were back in Manhattan. So was Eddie, though he probably wasn’t ready, either. How could he be? He was only 18. A productive Spring Training had lured Casey Stengel into insisting on Krane’s inclusion on 1963’s Opening Day roster, but the minors beckoned by July.

In 1964, at 19, Eddie was an established big leaguer, though one seemingly final detour to Triple-A at least provided him a story to tell again and again (as if being schooled by Stengel while wet behind the ears wasn’t enough of a conversation piece). After slumping during Shea’s first weeks, he tore up Buffalo, earning a promotion in late May. He played in a doubleheader for the Bisons on a Saturday in Syracuse and schlepped to Queens for a doubleheader the next afternoon. That one, against the Giants, went 32 innings in toto, and Eddie played all of it. Had the May 31 nightcap lasted just a little longer, Krane likes to mention, he would have been playing in another month.

“When are we gonna be ready?”

The Mets’ youth movement was planting its seeds during Kranepool’s first years, and it was reasonable to assume he was on the verge of sprouting. In recent times, when prodigy Bryce Harper was breaking in to rave reviews, and later when Juan Soto was doing the same but even more spectacularly, their ascent up the ranks of the all-time teenager home run list was duly noted. You know whose name continued to show up prominently in such historical accountings? Yeah, Ed Kranepool’s. His 12 home runs before the age of 20 slot him eighth among all teens in baseball history. Admittedly, there’s not a ton of competition, given that relatively few players see the majors before their twenties, but among those who did, Eddie showed more power than most of them. Krane is one behind his boyhood idol Mickey Mantle, one ahead of Robin Yount. Mantle and Yount are in the Hall of Fame. (It only seems like Soto already is, too.)

Eddie was at least, after turning twenty the previous November, an All-Star in 1965. The Mets were on their way to losing more than a hundred games for the fourth consecutive season, so this was one of those situations in which there was a Met All-Star because the rules said there had to be, but Eddie was posting very respectable numbers, batting over .300 through mid-June and hitting .287 once he joined the likes of Mays, Aaron and Clemente at Metropolitan Stadium in Bloomington. Ed didn’t play, as the NL won without his contributions, but they certainly didn’t ask him to vacate the premises.

It would be misleading to play the AMFAS Young Player Peaked™ card here, because it’s hard to say a good first half in ’65 and a little pop while still getting proofed if he requested a Rheingold amounted to a peak. There were some good signs for Kranepool, but what Ol’ Case had said in the first part of his famous “in ten years…” line wasn’t quite coming to fruition. You know the bit. Stengel, in what turned out to be his final Spring Training as skipper, was telling reporters about two representatives of his Youth of America. This young feller, he more or less said of Ed Kranepool, is twenty, and in ten years has a chance to be a star. This other young feller, he said of Greg Goossen, is twenty, and in ten years has a chance to be thirty.

The joke is usually on Goossen, and perhaps Stengel, but Kranepool, at twenty, was done being an All-Star. His final 1965 numbers sagged. Once he stopped being a teenager, his home run totals ceased to appear impressive. Once he turned 21, he’d never again play in as many as 150 games in a season. Once he turned 23, he’d never again play in as many as 130 games in a season. It was somewhere around this time that the realization set in that the first amateur the Mets ever signed to much fanfare was never going to set the world on fire as a professional the way scouts thought he might when he was in high school just a few years earlier.

Or as the banner a not particularly satisfied customer brandished not very deep into the young man’s career asked, “IS ED KRANEPOOL OVER THE HILL?”

Ed Kranepool got old before his time, but only in context. When the Mets traded Jim Hickman to the Dodgers following the 1966 season, that left Ed as the only player from 1962 on the club. Those who weren’t particular about specifics would, for the rest of his Met days, refer to him as the last of the Original Mets. It was a misnomer. The Original Mets were the 28 men who broke camp in April. They included Hickman, Hodges and the first/righty Bob Miller. Legend notwithstanding, Marvelous Marv was not an Original Met. Nor were Choo Choo Coleman, the second/lefty Bob Miller or Harry Chiti, who was traded for himself. Eddie was the 45th of 45 men to play as a 1962 Met. In the popular imagination, they’re all lumped together as the lovable losers of legend. Ed played in two defeats and just three games overall that first year. There’d be plenty of losses to which he’d serve as accomplice in ’63 (starting with Opening Day, when Stengel assigned him to right field), but pinning the L of the first year on Kranepool’s forehead isn’t wholly accurate or remotely fair.

But, like with the doubleheader for Buffalo the day before the doubleheader at Shea before May turned to June, it made for a better story to point to Eddie as someone who’d been around forever. Hence, the 1967 yearbook referred to the 22-year-old as “The Dean”. It was funny because it was true. Ed was the only Met who’d been around since at least the end of the beginning. By ’67, with Ron Hunt having departed in the same trade that dispatched Hickman, he was also the only Met left from when Shea was brand, spanking new. Kranepool was only nine days older than Seaver, yet had a five-season and better than a 500-game head start on the good-looking rookie righty who would turn heads like no Met before him. Casey had given way to Wes Westrum. Stengel’s Youth of America had only taken hold in fits and starts. Seaver was the harbinger of the next era. It wasn’t quite in Queens in ’67, but if Seaver was here, it couldn’t be far off.

Kranepool was here, too. He kind of came with the place.

***
Growing up, I never thought of Ed Kranepool as a bad player. I never thought of Ed Kranepool as a good player. I just thought Ed Kranepool was a Met. I had never known the Mets without him. Unless you latched onto the Mets when they debuted on April 11, 1962, and then walked away in disgust before June was over (“how could Throneberry miss first AND second?”), nobody had ever experienced the Mets without Ed on their radar if not in their box score. My first exposure to Eddie was on a Topps 1967 baseball card, one of the I don’t know how many dozens that fell into my possession once my sister tired of accumulating them. He’s kneeling in what’s supposed to be an on-deck circle, except it doesn’t appear to be marked as such. He’s just kneeling, somewhere on grass in St. Petersburg. Not that I understood the niceties of baseball card photography when I first got a look at ED KRANEPOOL • 1B or had any conception how long he had been around relative to his teammates or his franchise when I first got my hands on it. I just knew the METS, as the pink-purple lettering identified his employer, were my local team, so I probably wanted to mark this card as special.

This is the version without the beard.

At four, maybe five years old, I took a blue Bic pen and drew a beard on Ed Kranepool’s face. I didn’t do that to anybody on any other card from any other team or, come to think of it, any other Met. Maybe I felt an instinctive connection to the Met who’d outlasted all of his previous peers to date. Maybe I was just in the mood to draw a beard on a face. Either way, I can’t recall further evidence of personal affinity for Ed Kranepool. Like I said, he kind of came with the place, simply a fact of Met life, like Shea Stadium, or Kiner’s Korner, or rallies that fell a run short in the ninth.

Gil Hodges must have thought something similar. The kid he said goodbye to in May of 1963 when he retired from playing to take up managing in Washington was still a Met five years later when Gil returned to take the Flushing reins. Lord knows the reins needed him. The Mets had never lost fewer than 95 games, never finished higher than ninth out of ten, and they only reached that height once. By the time Gil came back, Ed “had been around long enough,” Leonard Koppett wrote, “to be seen as disappointing, not the pure promise [he] had been.”

Did Gil Hodges need Ed Kranepool? He didn’t lean on The Dean nearly as much as Stengel and Westrum had, starting him less in 1968 than his predecessors had every year since 1964. It’s no coincidence that Hodges elevated the Mets to a point where they won more often and didn’t fret about losing their lovability. Their standing didn’t exceed ninth, but all contemporary observations agree that this ninth was light years removed from the tenths of yore. The losses (89) continued to outweigh the wins (73), but the chronic ineptitude that took root in ’62 was being professionally removed. Some of that lingering Youth of America was indeed in bloom, but it’s also universally agreed that it was the tending Hodges did that accelerated the growth.

It’s probably a coincidence that the reduction in Kranepool’s playing time occurred in the first season that suggested the Mets were capable of truly getting their act together. Ed’s production tumbled in 1968, even taking into consideration that this was The Year of the Pitcher. Under Hodges, playing time would have to be earned by all Mets, with bonus-baby pedigree serving as no kind of determining factor.

***
Ed Kranepool was batting .227 entering play on July 8, 1969, and was mired in a 5-for-53 slump. Nonetheless, Gil Hodges started him and batted him sixth that afternoon against one of the best righthanders in the National League, Ferguson Jenkins. It was, to that moment, the biggest game the Mets were ever scheduled to play in their eight-season existence, really the first big game they’d ever played. The first three months of the season had been a revelation. Instead of falling through the floor, they rose in the standings and, with the halfway mark at hand, they were in second place, seriously challenging the NL East-leading Chicago Cubs for first. The difference between the two teams was five games, unless you counted perceptions. The Cubs were star-laden successors to the Cardinals as smart-money favorites to breeze away with the pennant.

The Mets, no matter that they were well over .500 and actually looking down on multiple teams rather than peering up at everybody, were still the Mets. C’mon, let’s get serious.

That was a challenge the Mets were up for. Their fans, too, 55,096 of whom came to play on a day like no other at Shea. They were stoked to root the Mets over the Cubs as loud as they could. They loved these guys who were blowing by mere respectability and indeed getting serious about first place.

One guy, though, would have to earn it a little more than the others.

At 1:58 PM, according to the tick-tock chronicled in The Year the Mets Lost Last Place, “Jack Lightcap, the Met announcer delivers the starting lineups over the public address system. The crowd greets every Met name with wild cheers, every name except that of the starting first baseman, Ed Kranepool.”

Ed was the Met around whom the Mets as a whole had been chronologically built. His growing pains ensued in full view of those who loved their team but hated that they were so terribly lousy. The sour residue of those years had centered itself on one of 25 Mets in a year when every Met name should have been greeted with wild cheers. “Kranepool,” Dick Schaap and Paul Zimmerman posited, “was young only in chronology, not in manner. He ran like an eighty-year-old man catching a commuter train. His modest ability to hit became even more modest with men on base.”

Krane’s start in ’69 had been good for a while, though this, too, was to form, according to the authors. “[E]very now and then,” they wrote, “Kranepool showed flashes of the brilliance that had been expected of him. For a few weeks, usually at the start of the season, he would hit over .300, and Met fans, starved for a hero, would rally to him. But then Kranepool would start slipping toward his own level […] and the fans would abandon him.” On June 15, with Eddie’s latest seemingly inevitable slump beginning to gather downhill steam, GM Johnny Murphy traded for another first baseman, veteran Donn Clendenon. Clendenon, a righty, settled into a platoon with Kranepool, a lefty. In the week prior to the Cub series, Donn had driven in eleven runs. Donn was linked only to these good new days. Ed went back to what he himself referred to as “a seven-year losing streak”.

Prepare to dine like a champ.

No wonder, then, that if Mets fans had to not respond positively to any Met, perhaps as an exercise in figuratively pinching themselves that everything couldn’t possibly going so well, they had their object of derision all picked out. Eight Mets in July 8’s starting lineup are celebrated as soon as Lightcap announces them. “Kranepool’s name,” Schaap and Zimmerman noted, “inspires a chorus of boos.”

But that was before the game, before the fifth, when, with no runs on the board, Kranepool swung and sent a Jenkins slider over the right field wall. Nobody was booing now. And by the ninth, when the Mets were rallying from a 3-1 deficit, there was no time for ancient recriminations. Everything is happening in the now. Ken Boswell leads off with a fly ball Cubs center fielder Don Young can’t find. It lands as a double. With one out, Clendenon comes off the bench to pinch-hit, the beauty of having two capable first basemen on the roster. He hits one very deep to left-center. Young tracks it down but can’t hold it. It’s another double, though because it took its time not being caught, Boswell has to advance with caution, and he runs only to third.

That’s OK, because Cleon Jones, way up in the batting race, hits one to deep left to score both Ken and Donn. Cleon, a .352 hitter, lands at second. It’s the Mets’ third double of the inning. It’s 1969, and in 1969, managers like Leo Durocher stick with aces like Ferguson Jenkins. Durocher instructs Jenkins to intentionally walk Art Shamsky. The strategy works provisionally as Wayne Garrett grounds to second, leaving runners on second and third for the next batter.

The next batter is Ed Kranepool. Durocher can have him walked, too, so Jenkins can face J.C. Martin. But, are you kidding? Leo’s not worried about any Ed Kranepool.

Maybe he should’ve been, because Eddie makes contact with a one-and-two pitch and bloops it into left field. It falls in for a single. Jones dashes home. The Mets have won, 4-3. The Mets have picked up ground on the Cubs. The Mets are serious contenders. The fans are jubilant, and Eddie has made them so. Ed Kranepool is now batting .232, and he’s going to wind up 1969 batting only .238, but he’s quite clearly having the best season of his life. “I used to get so tired of losing,” he said. “It made the days so long and the nights so unpleasant.”

These were better days. The best two, from a Krane’s perspective, came on October 14, when the Met who’d seen it all since 1962 hit a home run in the World Series, and October 16, when the team he’d played for since 1962 won the World Series. Clendenon, Series MVP, and Kranepool combined for four dingers in the five games.

***
For the rest of Ed Kranepool’s life, he was a 1969 Met, with a 1969 World Series ring, hard-earned and hard-won. In every public reunion of the world champs, Ed would be as front and center as any of them. The “…since 1962” part was trivia now. The trials and tribulations of a bonus baby who didn’t live up to the hype, who was labeled intermittently as “bitter” or “lazy” was dusty backstory. Eddie beat the Cubs. Eddie beat the Orioles. Eddie, along with his teammates who sung about it on The Ed Sullivan Show, had heart.

Ed Kranepool was now a world champion — a 1969 World Champion New York Met. Nobody could take that away from him. The journey from the basement to the penthouse was complete. With the possible exception of Ed Charles, whose professional baseball career commenced in 1952; was stymied for a decade by institutional racism; and then got bogged down by colorless losing in Kansas City, nobody in a Mets uniform could have appreciated this new reality more than the Krane.

Except the Glider really could call his journey complete. His career ended with Game Five of the World Series (whether he wanted it to or not was another matter). Charles was 36. Kranepool was 24. Though he’d worked as a stockbroker in the offseason and might have thrived in business had he followed that path, he was a ballplayer first and foremost. He had a lot more ball to play.

After 1969, it couldn’t help but be kind of a downer to have to live up to what he’d just been a part of. It showed, not only in his performance but his demeanor. For all the youth he’d embodied, Ed never evinced a sense of ebullience. Maybe he didn’t feel a reason to. He never knew his father, who’d been killed in World War II. He’d been pushed to compete in the top tier of baseball before he was ready. The fans were preternaturally impatient. The reporters always had questions (and occasionally had digs). The manager expected improvement, championship ring or not.

For a spell in 1970, Ed Kranepool went to a place he’d rightfully assumed he was done with, save for annual exhibitions. He was sent to the minors. The erstwhile All-Star, the man who belted a home run in the previous October’s World Series, was batting .118. He was also 25. Not old. Not baseball old, even. It wouldn’t have seemed all that strange if all you knew was age and average and didn’t know the name and what he’d done last summer and fall.

But this was Ed Kranepool, who’d been a Met since 1962 and hadn’t been a minor leaguer since 1964. It was a shock to the system, both that of Mets fans and The Dean. Ed went to Tidewater, hit .310 and returned. The Mets hadn’t thrived in his absence, failing to defend their championship, but Ed was better in the long haul for his visit to Triple-A. Starting in 1971, Ed wasn’t just a young veteran ballplayer, but a reliable young veteran ballplayer. The average soared to .280. The OPS+, for the first time in his career, rose above 100, indicating he was more than a replacement-level player. Not that anybody had that stat handy in ’71, but he’d transitioned to the latter half of his career in style. Gil Hodges’s expectations were being met.

Ed’s speed demanded In Action cards portray him standing his ground.

Alas, Gil would be gone before Opening Day 1972, a victim of a fatal heart attack. It was a blow to the entire organization. Nobody likely felt it any more than his fellow first baseman from 1962, the youngster the manager had pushed to mature. “He learned to respect me,” Ed reflected to his SABR biographer Tara Krieger in 2008, “and I learned to respect him.”

The Mets’ next manager, Yogi Berra, who also had played briefly with Kranepool, was a mellower figure. He inherited a club whose offense was bolstered heading into ’72, with trades for Jim Fregosi and Rusty Staub. One of those swaps worked out better than the others — and they were supplemented by another deal for Ed’s former All-Star teammate Willie Mays — but the season, like the two seasons preceding it, were no better than 83-win wonders. They were good enough for third place, which after 1969 wasn’t very good at all.

Then came 1973, and a division captured on 82 wins (maybe that had been the problem from ’70 through ’72 — the Mets were winning one game too many). Eddie was a decidedly part-time player as he reached his late twenties. Clendenon had moved on, but John Milner’s power eventually made him the first baseman more days than not. With the Hammer supplanting the Krane, Ed took more reps in the outfield than he had at any time in a decade. It paid off in the fifth and final game of the NLCS. Staub was out with a sore shoulder, so Berra had to improvise. Eddie started in left, with Cleon in right. Kranepool drove in the Mets’ first two runs in the first, then took a seat so Mays could pinch-hit and drive in another in the fifth. Four innings after that, the Mets had their and Eddie’s second pennant.

***
The Mets didn’t win the World Series in 1973, and Ed Kranepool never got close to another postseason once Oakland beat New York in seven games. His legacy, however, was about to be embellished. For Mets fans coming of rooting age in the middle and late ’70s, stories of Kranepool’s shortcomings sounded as if they’d been excavated from the ruins of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. It may have happened, but we didn’t really understand. Eddie Kranepool, to us, wasn’t a bonus baby who never delivered on his promise. He was ED-DEE Kranepool who delivered big-time when called upon, two syllables at a time.

A Mets fan’s view of Ed Kranepool really depended on when one tuned into his long-running show. Getting hooked on the Mets by 1974 got you the Eddie you couldn’t fathom was once considered unpopular. To those of us who were too young to have grasped the 1960s in real time, this Eddie Kranepool, who arose in the wake of his roommate Tug McGraw’s cry of YOU GOTTA BELIEVE, even overshadows the Eddie Kranepool who shows off his 1969 World Series ring. In the 1960s, I was drawing beards on his baseball card. In the 1970s, I was wrapping rubber bands around my Ed Kranepools and storing them safely in a shoe box. I even had him on my closet door — not a card, but an autographed photo. Ed had come to my sixth-grade class one day when I was absent to hand them out. I don’t know how I always managed to be absent for the cool shit, but I was. The story I was told the next day was our teacher was friends with him, so why wouldn’t Ed Kranepool visit Lindell School without notice? Miss Goldstein was kind enough to put aside a picture for me, writing “Greg” on the border. It was almost like it was personalized.

How was I absent for this?

While this was an out-of-the-ordinary occurrence, somehow I wasn’t that surprised that Ed Kranepool would visit a random classroom on a random weekday sans warning. Ed and Ron Swoboda had run a restaurant on Long Island. He lived here year-round. Getting the opportunity to meet Ed Kranepool (unless you were dumb enough to be out with a cold or something) seemed to come with the territory, like what Wayne Campbell said on Wayne’s World about Fleetwood Mac’s Rumours. A copy of the album was issued to every kid in the suburbs.

Eddie, I’m sure, got a nice hand from a roomful of kids. How nice, I couldn’t say. He was beloved without exactly being lovable, though one must concede love is a matter of taste. Drop by Kranepool’s Ultimate Mets Database fan memories page and you’ll be overwhelmed by how many of the Metsian persuasion pledge eternal allegiance to Eddie — and be more than a little taken aback by those who would be fine if a sinkhole opened up and swallowed him.

Ah, Mets fans.

Generally, familiarity bred affection. Getting really good at something didn’t hurt, either. Ed Kranepool’s 18 seasons yielded 4.3 wins above replacement, per Baseball-Reference. That’s negligible, marginal, insignificant if you didn’t put the number to the name. But the name was Ed Kranepool, and had we known about WAR then, we wouldn’t have cared, because there was one thing Ed Kranepool was, in fact, really good at. Besides sticking around, I mean.

Ed Kranepool became the world’s greatest pinch-hitter this side of Manny Mota. From 1974 to 1977, he batted .447 (42-for-94) in the role that suited him to a tee. In his first pinch-hitting appearance of 1978, he homered off Stan Bahnsen of the Expos to win the game, the first and only walkoff home run of his career. Sometimes he was so good at pinch-hitting, his managers got carried away and pushed him off the bench and into the starting lineup. It was the bench’s loss. For a couple of years, he was pretty close to a regular again and better than ever at it. In his early thirties, he was an approximation of what he was supposed to have been all along. In 1976, he pinch-hit only ten times because Joe Frazier started him more than 100 games, the most votes of confidence Ed had received since Hodges began to fully “respect” him in 1971. In 1975, Ed hit .323 after making Metsopotamia rub its eyes in disbelief by lifting his average above .400 in early June. There was talk of a write-in campaign to make him an All-Star for a second time (it didn’t get anywhere). Poet Bob McKenty was so inspired by the Krane’s surge that he channeled his amazement in verse for the Times:

Although his bat knows no fatigue,
Eddie Kranepool is unique:
The only man in either league
To bat .400 twice a week.

Throughout this second or third phase of his renaissance, Ed Kranepool wore an expression of a man just getting comfortable with being accepted for who he is. The residual gawkiness of the teen and preternatural grumpiness of the dismissed was still in evidence, but this was the Krane. The bird with whom he was homophonically linked is described as large, long-legged and an opportunistic feeder. Some are said to not migrate at all and keep to themselves.

The Krane was indeed a rare bird, native to the meadows of Flushing.

Sounds about right. As Leonard Koppett reflected as the flight of the Krane entered what turned out to be its loftiest elevation in 1974, “He didn’t appreciate being the butt of all those jokes in the early days, felt that he hadn’t been given as many opportunities to play regularly as he had earned. He didn’t hold grudges, and he appreciated his responsibilities in a public relations sense, but he was not what one would call a warm personality.”

Nevertheless, Ed Kranepool is who we got as Mets fans, and who we as Mets fans got, even if Ed Kranepool didn’t always seemed thrilled to be Ed Kranepool. He’d smile for the camera if the situation demanded it, but otherwise seemed a little shall we say circumspect about the whole thing — Joe Pesci’s description of the white-haired gent in his mother’s painting in Goodfellas comes to mind: “And this guy’s saying, ‘whaddaya want from me?’”

It’s worth remembering that when a pennant wasn’t being chased, Eddie was essentially just another guy going to work in the same job he had for a long time back when most ballplayers weren’t compensated lavishly and weren’t above replacement. He often seemed unhappy with his situation, maybe with his co-workers, surely with his employers. You stay in the same job for 18 years and not sound surly now and then. Except nobody with a notepad or microphone is likely to ask you what you’re thinking at the end of a bad day or unsatisfying year.

Yet he seemed to smile for the cameras a little more as the years went by. He starred in his very own Gillette Foamy commercial, implicitly attributing the upturn in his fortunes since 1971 not to extra swings in the cage but the shaving cream he was enthusiastically apportioning across his face. When Newsday carriers were encouraged, in the summer of 1977, to convince more of their neighbors to sign up as subscribers, the bait the paper offered us to hustle and sell was a ticket to see the Mets one night real soon, specifically “Mets stars Henderson and Kranepool”. Henderson was the new kid, Steve, from Cincinnati. We all knew Kranepool. We might not have thought of him as a star, but with Seaver and Kingman traded, and Koosman and Matlack struggling, we got it.

I never did sign up any new subscribers (other than my parents), but I would have taken a ticket to Newsday Night at Shea Stadium to see Ed Kranepool. Starting, pinch-hitting, shaving…didn’t matter. ED-DEE could do it all.

***
On December 8, 1978, the Mets traded Jerry Koosman to Minnesota for minor league pitcher Greg Field and a player to be named later, leaving only one 1969 Met to be a 1979 Met. Ed Kranepool got to Shea before every one of his world champion teammates and he outlasted them, too. The Dean had extended his tenure to a record-breaking 18th season. He was The Fantasticks, running Off-Broadway since the early ’60s, with no closing date in sight. His peers had been Throneberry and Coleman and the two Bob Millers at the beginning, then the men who made a couple of miracles. Now he was part of a unit whose headliners were named Mazzilli, Stearns, Swan and the darling of the Newsday carrier set, Henderson. Every Met who’d been on an active roster from late September 1962 to late September 1979 had something in common: they had all been Ed Kranepool’s workplace proximity acquaintances. There were close to 300 men who qualified, almost everybody who’d ever been a Met.

That didn’t include Harry Chiti. He’d been traded for himself before Ed got called up.

One of the best ever in a pinch.

The late-career magic Kranepool’s bat packed began to wear off in ’78, by which time the long days and unpleasant nights of losing were again entrenched at Shea. The newest iteration of the Youth of America was given the bulk of the playing time by Joe Torre. First baseman Willie Montañez was an RBI machine, so starting the Krane to to keep him sharp became impractical. Ed’s pinch-hitting could still be lethal (15-for-50) but his rare opportunities in the lineup went for naught (2-for-30). Keeping a 33-year-old part-timer fresh was hardly Torre’s priority. When Ed came up in 1962, there was nobody as young as Kranepool. When he headed into 1979, there was nobody in the clubhouse who could possibly relate to all of his baseball life experiences. The 18-year-veteran appeared to be, in the immortal customer-service advice of Rodney Dangerfield, all alone here.

Except on July 14, the highlight of the 63-99 1979 season in a campaign almost entirely devoid of them. It was Old Timers Day at Shea Stadium. The festivities centered on the tenth anniversary of the 1969 Mets. The bulk of them were retired from baseball already. The handful who weren’t were playing for other teams. Seaver was a Red, Koosman a Twin, Nolan Ryan still an Angel long after the Fregosi trade proved less than optimal. Most of those who no longer had a ballgame to play every Saturday showed up at Shea.

One 1969 Met didn’t have to make a special trip. For one afternoon, during pregame ceremonies, Ed Kranepool didn’t have to be a 1979 Met. He could line up with the Mets with whom he identified most closely. He could even break out into a grin when joined in the introductions by perhaps the most famous ’69er of the moment, Chico Escuela, a.k.a. Garrett Morris. Morris had broken through with his “baseball been berry, berry good to me” catchphrase on Saturday Night Live months before. It was uncommonly hip of the 1979 Mets to invite him to reprise his role — that of a 1969 Mets utility infielder — among the authentic alumni. Ed had already gone along with the joke enough to appear in a filmed bit on Weekend Update in which Kranepool had to express dismay with Chico’s new tell-all book, Bad Stuff ’Bout the Mets. Ed was a natural at expressing dismay.

Tom Seaver: “Always take up two parking places.”

Yogi Berra: “Berry, berry bad card player.”

Ed Kranepool: “Borrow Chico’s soap and never give it back.”

Ed stayed in character and shook his head that Chico was stabbing the guys in the back with his revelations. What the hell, it wasn’t like the 1979 Mets were doing any kind of a 1969 impression.

***
When the old champs scattered to their post-baseball lives and Ed Kranepool was left to continue in his long-running role, it had to be acknowledged that Eddie hadn’t only been the last of the Met-hicans from 1969 to stay at Shea, he was having a pretty damn long major league career. Those guys who tipped their mesh caps as old-timers in July (the Mets were so cheap in those days) were more or less the same age as Ed. Yet most of them were done. Ed got better at baseball as he went along. True, he was in the denouement phase of his ED-DEE peak by 1979, destined to bat only .232 in his final season, but you didn’t see Jones or Agee or Swoboda or Shamsky still being asked to pinch-hit at a ballpark near you. We’ll say it again: Eddie knew how to stick around.

Except for one night in August when, against the Astros, he left the field before the game was over. To be fair, he thought the game was over. See, the Mets were leading the Astros, 5-0, and starter Pete Falcone had induced Jeffrey Leonard to fly to center with two out in the ninth, so that seemed to end it. Except Frank Taveras had called time at short, which meant Leonard got to swing again, and he used it to single…except this time it was noticed the Mets didn’t have their full complement of nine at their positions because Kranepool, figuring the game was already in the books, had vamoosed to the clubhouse, and…well, let’s just say you don’t come up with the 1962 Mets without somewhere in your soul still being a 1962 Met. The bottom line was an Astro protest was upheld and they had to finish the game the next afternoon (no harm done, except to Falcone’s complete game).

In 1979, an 18-year feast of base hits and dependability was about to end.

It would be too much to read into one confusing episode and infer Eddie was trying to tell us, “Hello, I must be going.” Nevertheless, on September 30, 1979, anybody who was watching or listening to the Mets and Cards from St. Louis was about to witness something that seemed unimaginable across the history of the Metropolitan Baseball Club of New York.

It was Ed Kranepool’s last game. Torre sent him up to pinch-hit for John Pacella in the seventh. Eddie produced a double, his 1,418th base hit, which remained the Met standard until David Wright passed him in 2012, and his 90th career pinch-hit, still a franchise record (and 31st all-time in the major leagues). The manager just as quickly removed him for pinch-runner Gil Flores.

That was it. The Ed Kranepool Era was over.

Well, the part where he played for the Mets, that is. When you’re talking Mets, I don’t think the Ed Kranepool Era ever ends.

***
Ed Kranepool’s three-year contract expired after the 1979 season. Management was not interested in negotiating a new one. Maybe Ed could have shopped his services to the American League, where the designated hitter was embraced rather than scorned. A man over 35 could get regular swings over there without having to worry about playing the sport the way it’s designed. But the Krane was definitely not a migratory bird. He’d lived all his life in New York, whether it was the Bronx or on Long Island. Free agency opportunities notwithstanding, he wasn’t about to take flight.

Kranepool knew, as everybody did, that the Mets were going to be sold. They were scraping bottom in the standings and drawing ants (flies couldn’t be bothered), but they were still, on paper, a National League jewel in the largest market baseball had. Maybe a new GM would be interested in Kranepool. Better yet, maybe Kranepool could be in on hiring the new GM. Eddie, whose business acumen was a bigger part of skill set than foot speed, tried to put a group together. He was serious. It made the papers. But, ultimately, the group led by Nelson Doubleday and Fred Wilpon bought the Mets. Ed Kranepool didn’t. In 1980, for the first time since there’d been Mets, a Mets season would proceed without Ed Kranepool in uniform.

When the 2020 season was on hold and I had no new games to watch, I checked YouTube to see if anybody had uploaded episodes of my favorite TV drama from when Ed Kranepool was winding down as a player. To my delight, somebody had. The entire series of Lou Grant, which initially ran from 1977 to 1982, was available for my viewing, and I viewed the hell out of it, all 120 episodes. I mention this because a recurring baseball player character was introduced as a love interest for reporter Billie Newman during Season Three, a backup catcher named Ted McCovey, no relation to Willie. Ted isn’t old for a regular person, but he’s not a regular person. He’s a ballplayer and he’s just been placed on irrevocable waivers. Ted tries to explain to Billie what this all means:

You know what baseball’s done for me? Treated me like a kid for the past fourteen years, and now, suddenly, they’re telling me I’m an old man.

I don’t get the sense that’s something Ed Kranepool would have said when the Mets told him his services were no longer required, but I have to imagine he thought some unscripted unsentimental version of it. Ed was their golden boy. He grew up with them. He’d literally spent half his life answering to chants of ED-DEE, maybe tuning out the less flattering remarks that came with it. When Ed Kranepool played his last game, he was fewer than six weeks shy of 35. Not old for a regular person. Not close to old. Not even the oldest Met of his final season (Jose Cardenal was almost 36).

But too old to play for the Mets anymore, which must have been very strange.

***
About as great an Internet find as Lou Grant for me was a reprint of a magazine article from the defunct New York Sports, which lives on in pixels thanks to our friends at Metsmerized Online. It’s an article from 1984, breathed back to life by MMO in 2012, written by Len Albin. It’s called “Ed Kranepool Never Got a Day”. At the time, Ed was feeling underappreciated by Mets management not so many years after he hung up his spikes. His 1,858 games, his 1,418 hits, his 18 seasons cut little ice with an ownership more concerned with trying to make people forget the recent past than celebrating more distant glories. These Mets were just getting good at being in the present. It might have been too much to demand their executives pay proper homage to the past.

Yeah, but this was Ed Kranepool, No. 7 from 1965 forward (and No. 21 for a couple of years before that). This was Ed Kranepool when David Wright was a toddler, Eddie’s records not close to being threatened. They hadn’t given him anything approaching what he — or anybody who’d been a Mets fan more than five minutes — considered his due. No ceremony, no acknowledgement, no nothin’.

“I don’t feel an allegiance to the Mets anymore,” Kranepool told Albin, even as he dressed up in his c. 1978 uniform top and posed Lou Gehrig-style in an empty Shea, addressing the fans who weren’t there for the day he had yet to get. “Loyalty went out the window the day they didn’t sign me.”

Did Eddie mean it? Probably. And probably not. And were the Mets that blithe toward the man who as much as anybody epitomized who they’d been for almost their first two decades? Probably. But probably not. The Mets still had enough of a rearview mirror to gather Old Timers annually in the ’80s. Under Frank Cashen, they inaugurated a Hall of Fame in 1981. True, they hid the commemorative busts in the lobby to the Diamond Club where few were bound to bump into them, and they tended to not announce the ceremonies with sufficient advance notice to draw a large crowd, but they were, in their own less than fantastic way, trying to remember the kinds of Septembers like 1969 and 1973…even a little 1962 sometimes, if not any 1979.

On September 1, 1990, before the Mets took on the Giants in front of more than 40,000 fans, Ed Kranepool got his day. He became the fifth player inducted into the Mets Hall of Fame, the fourteenth member overall. Now he was a world champion, a two-time pennant-winner and recognized by the only organization with which he’d ever been associated as immortal.

The Ed Kranepool story was, at last, complete.

***
Only kidding. The Ed Kranepool story was not complete. How could it be? His era is eternal, and the people who owned the Mets were who they were.

In the winter of 2017-18, despite Eddie’s many trips back to Shea Stadium and Citi Field for commemorative occasions, we learned Kranepool was sore at Jeff Wilpon. (Why should he have been any different from the rest of us?) An article, which ran in the New York Times, described Eddie on the outs with the entity that coronated him as a Hall of Famer. Not only that, but Eddie needed a kidney. He was selling much of his baseball memorabilia, not because he needed to, he said, but because it was time.

Amends were made in the summer of 2018, with the then-COO of the Mets reaching out and bringing back Eddie for a first pitch. Of greater import, the Krane got word in the spring of 2019 that a kidney donor with a match for his needs had been found. He was in greatly improved health and spirits by late June, when the 50th anniversary of the 1969 Mets was being toasted by a full house at Citi Field. Tom Seaver couldn’t be there because dementia had sidelined him from public appearances. Too many teammates were no longer with us, but whoever could be there came. Still, without Tom, somebody would have to speak for the group after they were all introduced. That was Seaver’s role at the 40th anniversary. It was always Seaver’s role.

Who better to speak for the 1969 Mets?

At the 50th, it was Kranepool’s. Of course it was. Steadiest Eddie was always around. That was worth more than WAR. The most memorable snippet of his brief speech was an admonition to the 2019 team to not give up despite being buried in the standings. “They can do it like we did,” he said to great cheers. The modern Mets eventually listened and inserted themselves into a playoff race you would have thought they’d have needed to pay admission to see.

I’d pay admission to attend a reunion of 1979 Mets. Or 1966 Mets. Or any Mets. With Steve Cohen taking over, anything is possible. That Ed Kranepool would be eligible to speak at eighteen of them would make the proposition only more attractive. Nobody ever earned the title A Met for ALL Seasons as much as he did from 1962 through 1979. Before 1980, you couldn’t imagine a season without Kranepool. The slice of 1970 he’d spent at Tidewater was surreal enough.

In Spring Training of ’79, prior to his 18th season, the player to be named later from the Jerry Koosman deal, a minor league reliever named Jesse Orosco, impressed enough to make the ballclub. Or maybe Orosco was chosen a couple of weeks shy of his 22nd birthday because the Mets could pay him the minimum (they’d cut Nelson Briles in camp so they wouldn’t have to pay him a veteran’s salary despite Briles taking part in the Chico Escuela bit). As every baseball fan knows, Jesse Orosco would do so much sticking around in the major leagues that the Mets would be able to trade for him a second time, a dozen years after trading him away, more than twenty years after trading for him the first time, fourteen days before the turn of the next millennium. The Mets wouldn’t hold onto him when they did — they’d trade Orosco for Joe McEwing in Spring Training of 2000 — but that’s some serious sticking around. Jesse was still pitching in 2003, when Jose Reyes was a rookie. You’d figure Kranepool would feel a bond with Orosco based on longevity alone.

Of course the Koosman-Orosco connection is a staple of all Mets historical discussion. The happy kind, anyway. Two pitchers have been on the mound for the last out certifying the Mets world champions, and they were traded for each other: Koosman from 1969 for Orosco from 1986. Not that we knew the back half of that equation in 1979. Yet in 2012, at the Hofstra Mets 50th anniversary conference, I heard Ed Kranepool, in the midst of excoriating the Mets for too swiftly disassembling the 1969 club, rail against the Jerry Koosman trade, even dismissing the Orosco portion of the transaction and the eventual great news that came from it when a friend of mine brought it up to him.

“I don’t care about any Jerry Orosco,” Kranepool fumed.

I’m sure he knew the pitcher’s name was Jesse, but as they said in Animal House, forget it, he’s rolling. And besides, he’s Ed Kranepool. He was being loyal to Jerry Koosman; to 1969; to the Mets he knew best, the Mets with whom he most closely identified, the Mets for whom he’d stand and speak in 2019. Koosman for Orosco turned out to be not a stone steal for the Mets the way we wish all our trades to be (Kooz pitched seven seasons after leaving the Mets and won twenty games as a 37-year-old as soon as he did), but you can’t say it wasn’t a plus trade for the Mets. Orosco grew into an All-Star closer. It was not incidental that he was on the mound for that second world championship. And he did pitch several seasons into the next century.

And we tip our cap right back to ya, Ed.

Yet at that moment in 2012, when Eddie was hopping mad all over again that the Mets had traded away his last friend from 1969, leaving him to carry the banner into miserable 1979 all by himself, a fan who’d predated 1986 could feel himself empathizing with the Krane. Yeah, how could they do that to you, Eddie?

Eight years later, that same fan would saddle Kranepool with carrying the 1979 banner, but forget it, I’m rolling.

Ed Kranepool became a Met in 1962. Seventeen years later, he was still a Met. It was miserable 1979. I became a Mets fan in 1969. Seventeen years later, I was still a Mets fan. It was glorious 1986. Meaning? I dunno. Stick at something long enough and you’ll be punished or rewarded, perhaps. But it doesn’t matter that in my eighteenth year of Mets fandom, I received the gaudiest, most overpowering and dominant season of Mets baseball ever, and that in Ed’s eighteenth year of playing for the Mets, he was part of the most depressing, least encouraging season of Mets baseball ever. It wasn’t like either one of us was going to do or be something different.

I’m certain I’m more sentimental about it than he is, but we’re both as loyal as can be to our Mets.

Michigan J. Team

Sunny Sunday, slight chill, right field corner, Citi Field. It’s September with a lead over our more or less blood rival in the Wild Card race, and I’m just waiting for the Mets to do something. Do something, do anything? No, I’m being vaguely specific in my desires. I’m waiting for the Mets to do that thing they do. In polite company, I’m cheering a little here and groaning a little there. In my head, I’m practically screaming at them to be what they’ve been for nine consecutive games dating back to Resurrection Thursday in Arizona. Make with the timely hitting and the clutch relieving and then wave the OMG sign around once you win your tenth in a row, because I’ve heard yours is a ballclub that never loses. C’mon, be the Mets I’ve been watching on TV, except do it in front of me!

The Mets, alas, turned into Michigan J. Frog as soon as I got close to them. No singing. No dancing. Not nearly enough hitting, save for one measly inning. Plenty of pitching, except at the end, when we really could have used more. All in all, it was just…ribet.

Goodbye, ma baby
Goodbye, ma honey
Goodbye, ma ragtime gal

For one day, anyway.

If I had told you in late May that we’d get to September, and a 3-1 loss to the Reds would land like a fastball to the ribs because it allowed the Braves to drift back into a tie with us for the final playoff spot, you’d likely think (after insisting I submit to a breathalyzer test) that the season had turned around dramatically since bottoming out so thuddingly. You’d be absolutely right and probably plenty pleased. Except we never fast-forward to the present and this isn’t quite the right time for “if I had told you” hosannas. We live in a present every day en route to the current present and we adjust our relationship to the standings accordingly. The standings of late May said we were dead. The standings of late August suggested death’s doorstep was nigh. The standings at the dawn of the second week of September say we’re dead even with the presumed invincible Braves. The moving of mountains and traversing of oceans to get here has constituted an epic journey, yet it is immaterial to our mood the morning after our first loss in a week-and-a-half.

We know we were thisclose to staying a game, maybe moving two games ahead of Atlanta. Except we lost in the ninth to the Reds, and the Braves beat the Blue Jays in eleven. It’s the time of the season when every opportunity is golden, and we just witnessed a pair sail agonizingly slightly to the wrong side of a surprisingly short foul pole. Thus I groaned a little louder than I cheered on Sunday. Mostly I thought, from a dark place the sun didn’t reach, COME ON ALREADY, YOU STUPID TEAM!

Oh, you’re not stupid. I’m sorry for screaming, albeit in my head. If it were a September Sunday without significant stakes, what a lovely September Sunday it would have been simply for baseball’s sake. The sun, the chill, my old pal Ken with whom I’d somehow never seen a game live and in person until this one. Ken activated a lovely Ken-nection and got us seated in that right field corner, where we watched Luis Severino do all he could do for six-and-two-thirds innings of one-run ball — with acrobatic infield defense playing its usual essential role — but otherwise breathed in the frustration of the Mets not stringing together hits for the sake of a run more than once. In the bottom of the sixth, when it had been nothing-nothing all afternoon, a facsimile of a rally occurred: a one-out walk; a two-out infield hit; then Starling Marte lining a single into center to bring home Pete Alonso. There — 1-0. Surely the floodgates were open.

That next sound you heard was the floodgates being fastened. The Mets, a little less deep without the services of Jeff McNeil, scored no more. Not even Francisco Lindor could get on base. Severino, whose only blemish erupted on a dying quail of an RBI single on his last pitch, was succeeded by Reed Garrett, who prevented further Cincinnati trips to home plate as he closed out the seventh. Garrett locked down the eighth as well, but then Phil Maton cracked. Phil Maton had done almost nothing wrong since relocating to the Met bullpen from Tampa Bay’s right before the All-Star break. Yet like the Mets losing at last after winning so much, Maton grew fallible all at once.

He hits a guy. He gives up a grounder that required so much effort on the corralling that nobody could be thrown out anywhere. He allows a double that there’s no need to examine more closely on a day when video replay was called into action repeatedly. It’s clearly a no-doubt double that scores the two decisive ninth-inning runs that are about to seal our Sunday fate. You want to believe the Mets can come up in the bottom of the ninth and pull off in miniature what they’ve been pulling off writ large for more than three months, but then you see them mostly flailing at Alexis Diaz, not exactly the Reds’ answer to his brother Edwin, but close enough. “I’m six-three, I throw ninety-seven miles per hour, and there’s two of me.” The wrong Diaz got the save.

What a friend recently convinced me had been the Tom Seaver Redemption Tour, wherein we sweep every team The Franchise never should have been loaned out to, came up a veritable Jimmy Qualls shy of perfection. Three out of three from the White Sox. Three out of three from the Red Sox. Two out of three from the Reds. Next for us are the Blue Jays, the team that signed Dennis Lamp in January 1984, enabling the White Sox to choose a player from the short-lived, ill-conceived compensation pool where Tom was left to float while Frank Cashen abandoned his lifeguard chair for five minutes. On Sunday, we rooted against the Reds in our game and for the Blue Jays in the Braves’ game, with neither result working out to our satisfaction. Tonight, we root against the Blue Jays in our game and for the Reds in the Braves’ game. It’s September, you’re either with us or against us or both.

We as fans are always with us, even when we’re silently screaming at us.

Look Who's No. 6

LOOK WHO’S NO. 6

OK, maybe that message isn’t inspiring enough to make a September scoreboard in Queens, but it’s true: At this writing the Mets are a game ahead of the Braves for the third National League wild card, which is a fancy way of saying sixth in a league that now grants playoff spots to its top six teams. Moreover, they’re just a half-game behind the Diamondbacks for the second wild card (less fancy: fifth) and two games behind the Padres for the first wild card, AKA fourth.

Nine-game winning streaks will do a lot.

Saturday’s game against the Reds was one of those contests that might not be particularly interesting in the details but still says a fair amount about the mindset of team and fans. The Mets couldn’t scratch against Jakob Junis, who’d apparently gotten a deal on sliders at Costco; they hit ball after ball that looked mildly interesting off the bat but settled into an outfielder’s glove. They didn’t have a base runner until Mark Vientos walked in the fourth and lacked a hit until Jose Iglesias doubled in the fifth, all Junis gave up in five innings of work.

Meanwhile, Jose Quintana was mixing up his pitches and hitting his spots in his bid for a 100th career win, and he was helped out by some remarkable defense, with Iglesias starting a 4-6-3 double play to erase a leadoff walk in the second and Francisco Lindor initiating a twin killing in the third. The first of those looked like a magic trick: Iglesias smothered a Ty France grounder moving to his left, pivoting on his knees to wind up in perfect throwing position, and then Lindor caught his feed low and to the outfield side of second, continuing his motion to throw to Pete Alonso for the second out. The second was nearly as good, with Lindor snagging a Jonathan India grounder to deep short on the backhand and somehow pivoting smoothly to hit Iglesias at second, with his double-play partner wasting not so much as a nanosecond on the pivot to nip India on the back end.

Both plays started with a combination of perfect instincts and muscle memory — Iglesias rolling just so to be able to hit Lindor at second, Lindor converting his momentum heading into the hole into the energy needed to throw — and were completed thanks to economy of motion against a pitilessly ticking clock. The Mets will miss Jeff McNeil‘s versatility, and I’ll miss McNeil’s perpetual outrage at the slightest misfortune, but those two plays were reassurance that the Mets should be just fine up the middle.

With Junis excused further duty, the Mets wasted no time against Sam Moll: Harrison Bader broke a oil-well-deep slump with a solo homer, followed by a walk from Lindor (extending his on-base streak to 35, which is a new single-season Mets record, though his hitting streak was stopped at 16) and a Brandon Nimmo HBP. Exit Moll and enter Carson Spiers, who I perhaps once knew is long-ago Met Bill Spiers‘ nephew. Spiers the Younger was greeted rudely, with RBI singles by Alonso and a two-run double from J.D. Martinez.

That was the ballgame, pretty much: Adam Ottavino got the last out of the seventh, Danny Young turned in a spotless eighth and Edwin Diaz wobbled a bit but found himself to secure the ninth. Being sixth-best never felt so good.