The blog for Mets fans
who like to read

ABOUT US

Greg Prince and Jason Fry
Faith and Fear in Flushing made its debut on Feb. 16, 2005, the brainchild of two longtime friends and lifelong Met fans.

Greg Prince discovered the Mets when he was 6, during the magical summer of 1969. He is a Long Island-based writer, editor and communications consultant. Contact him here.

Jason Fry is a Brooklyn writer whose first memories include his mom leaping up and down cheering for Rusty Staub. Check out his other writing here.

Got something to say? Leave a comment, or email us at faithandfear@gmail.com. (Sorry, but we have no interest in ads, sponsored content or guest posts.)

Need our RSS feed? It's here.

Visit our Facebook page, or drop by the personal pages for Greg and Jason.

Or follow us on Twitter: Here's Greg, and here's Jason.

Just Watch

“Wanna watch the Mets play the Angels?”
“What’s gonna be in it?”
“Mike Trout.”
“Didn’t he used to be great?”

“A great is a great. Wanna watch?”
“What else is gonna be in it?”
“Travis d’Arnaud.”
“Doesn’t he always kill us?”

“Not necessarily. Wanna watch?”
“What else is gonna be in it?”
“A bullpen game.”
“One of those things with no starters? Don’t those suck?”

“They can, but sometimes they’re OK if there’s a real starter on the right side. Wanna watch?”
“What else is gonna be in it?”
“Balls being called strikes at a critical juncture.”
“Isn’t that terrible umpiring?”

“Probably, but perspective matters here. Wanna watch?”
“What else is gonna be in it?”
“A leadoff homer.”
“Won’t the Mets be behind if there’s a leadoff homer?”

“There are leadoff homers and then there are homers that lead off the home team’s first inning, hint, hint. Wanna watch?”
“What else is gonna be in it?”
“Francisco Lindor.”
“The guy who hasn’t had a base hit in ages?”

“Slumps end, hint, hint, hint. Wanna watch?”
“What else is gonna be in it?”
“Pete Alonso.”
“The slugger who hasn’t hit a home run in ages?”

“Like I said, slumps END, sometimes resoundingly. Wanna watch?
“Gee, I dunno. Can you promise me I’ll be happy if I do?”
“I can promise you you’ll be sorry if you don’t.”
“OK, let’s watch.”

“Too late. You missed it because you asked too many questions.”
“What happened?”
Read between the lines.”
“What does that mean?”

“Again, with the questions.”

What Summer's Made For

I decided it was time to reintroduce myself to my baseball team.

The Mets entered the All-Star break by losing an annoying game to the Royals, which isn’t exactly a new occurrence in 2025. I didn’t bother with the ASG beyond shrugging at the swing-off, and was relieved to have a few days’ break from this maddening Mets squad, which is seemingly hell-bent on being less than the sum of its parts.

Then a few days turned into a few more. When the schedule resumed I was in Atlanta at a sci-fi convention; I registered that the Mets were losing to the Reds, not doing anything particularly well in the process, and hearing boos from the fans. I wasn’t sad to miss that either. (I did regret not seeing David Wright going into the team Hall of Fame, of course, but that’s something I can catch up with at my leisure.)

The Mets salvaged the final game against the Reds, to my mild surprise given what had come before; I was on a plane without Wi-Fi when they commenced hostilities against the Angels on Monday night. Once the plane landed, Howie Rose caught me up in a hurry: They’d gone down 4-0, clawed back to 4-2, but seemed determine to dig the hole deeper.

More of the same; I groused about their suckiness on Bluesky as I waited for a Lyft to take me home.

But I kept an earbud in, and by the time I got home the Mets had a genuine threat going — one they cashed in with a little help from the hapless Angels. (OK, maybe a lot of help from the hapless Angels.) Edwin Diaz started off the ninth by missing to his arm side, but quickly corrected the issue and punched out three Angels, ending the game by freezing Taylor Ward on a perfect slider a pitch after nearly decapitating him with a fastball, which was honestly kind of mean.

I was mollified, and maybe even felt a little bad — my team had been annoying me, I’d lashed out at them, and they’d righted the ship. So on Tuesday, when I saw it was a gorgeous summer day blissfully free of the humidity that’s gripped the city of late, I had an idea: Let’s go see the Mets.

I mean, why not? Isn’t that the whole point of living near the team you love? Why waste a picture-perfect night sitting on the couch?

Emily liked my thinking, so I secured two StubHub tickets and met her at the apple.

Tuesday’s game began strangely, with a flurry of odd plays. Juan Soto threw out Nolan Schanuel at the plate, taking an RBI away from Mike Trout. Frankie Montas ended the first by fielding a ball off his body. Yoan Moncada hit a screaming line drive that Pete Alonso leapt and speared; Alonso saw a long drive to center tracked down by Jo Adell. There were bleeders up the line and parachutes over the infield and plenty of frustration for Montas.

Kyle Hendricks, meanwhile, took a 2-0 lead into the fifth, having surrendered nothing except a Mark Vientos single that should have been caught. The Mets were being peaceable at the plate again, with Francisco Lindor‘s struggles particularly glaring, and the big boisterous crowd at Citi Field was getting restless.

And then everything changed. Brett Baty lashed a double to center, bringing up Francisco Alvarez, and I nudged Emily and made the circle in the air sign: Alvarez was going deep.

That didn’t look like the savviest prediction when Alvarez started off the AB by taking a huge swing through a change-up from Hendricks. But he hung in there, fouling away off-speed offerings and refusing to be lured by an inside fastball he wouldn’t have been able to get around on. Hendricks tried that pitch again, left it in the middle of the plate, and Alvarez tattooed it into the left-field stands, careening happily around the bases while I nodded sagely, as if my predictions always come true.

The game was tied; Ronny Mauricio then singled, stole second and came home on a single by Brandon Nimmo to give the Mets the lead. Which they then stubbornly refused to expand, leaning on relief efforts from newest Recidivist Met Rico Garcia and Reed Garrett, with Baty contributing a marvelous grab at third.

No, they just had to do it the hard way, summoning Ryne Stanek to protect a one-run lead. That looked tenuous after Stanek immediately allowed a single to West Islip’s own Logan O’Hoppe, who sounds like a 70s pitchman for Irish Spring. Stanek struck out Luis Rengifo, coaxed a fly ball from Zach Neto, but then gave up a single to Schanuel. That brought Trout up with a chance to tie the game on a single or possibly do far worse, what with being Mike Trout and all.

But of course Trout hasn’t been that Mike Trout in a while, his rocket-ride trajectory redirected earthward by years of injuries. On Monday night Diaz erased Trout on three fastballs that had a lot of plate; with the Angels threatening to expand their lead on Tuesday, Montas overpowered him with fastballs that were frankly middle-middle. Then Garcia got him with a slider that sat in the middle of the plate.

Stanek got Trout to pop up harmlessly to Alonso, ending the game. There’s a matinee left to play, but so far in this series Trout has looked like Just a Guy. And while I’m glad the Mets won, that part has been quietly heartbreaking.

Back...Back...Back...

For weeks on end, the Mets have been given lemons and we made sour faces at the way they played, little lemonade in sight. On Monday night, the Mets were given Angels. They and we chowed down on Angel food cake. It wound up being a much sweeter experience.

Not at first. The Mets had to fall behind early. As proven Sunday, it’s not necessarily so bad to let the other team build a lead and a false sense of security. It’s probably bad that the Angels from Anaheim by way of Los Angeles built a large lead of 4-0 by the third inning and that it was constructed against Kodai Senga. Senga is one of the pillars of our rotation. When Kodai crumbles, it would figure we’re all in trouble.

But that’s why we’ve got Kevin Herget. I assume that’s why we’ve got Kevin Herget. FYI, Kevin Herget is back with the Mets. FYI, Kevin Herget was once with the Mets, for one game in late April. Then he was shuffled off the active roster so the Mets could add Brandon Waddell. Waddell would be optioned to add Genesis Cabrera. Cabrera would be DFA’d so Waddell could be recalled again, by which time Herget was pitching for the Braves (once).

Got all that? Don’t worry if you don’t. When it comes to relievers you’ve probably forgotten were ever here, the Mets will always make more…or bring a couple back.

On the same day the Mets re-signed Rico Garcia, who’s not yet on the active roster but might very well bump from it someone like Kevin Herget or perhaps Kevin Herget himself, Kevin Herget pitched for the Mets, therefore making Kevin Herget the 59th Recidivist Met overall. A Recidivist Met is a Met who played for us; left to play for somebody else; and returned to play for us anew. Emotional homecomings are a part of Recidivist Mets lore: Tom Seaver and Rusty Staub spring to mind immediately; Lee Mazzilli and Hubie Brooks trail right behind. A couple of weeks ago, Travis Jankowski was glad to be back. He’s gone again. It sometimes works that way. Amid 2024’s version of the bullpen shuffle, we brought in Michael Tonkin and Yohan Ramirez; got rid of Michael Tonkin and Yohan Ramirez; and brought back Michael Tonkin and Yohan Ramirez. Their respective interim absences weren’t much longer than their combined multiple tenures. We said hello, goodbye, hello again, and goodbye for good to both relievers before the middle of May.

The Kevin Herget Mets story may have very well peaked on Monday night. If so, nice apogee for the latest Mr. Prodigal. Herget righted the ship Senga steered astray, pitching scoreless ball in the fourth and the fifth, leaving with one out and one on in the sixth, no damage done. While Kevin was stabilizing the situation, Brett Baty was improving it, socking a two-run homer in the bottom of the fourth. Chris Devenski, who by dint of being recalled on July 4 and not being sent down since may be the second-longest tenured Met reliever of all time (I’ll have to check) gave up a run in the seventh, but the game was still within reach at 5-2.

The Angels’ conceivably reachable lead bolstered my confidence. The Mets staying within striking range after not falling hopelessly off a game’s competitive map when they very well could have may provide a more promising platform for victory than an early one- or two-run lead that isn’t added to ASAP. Urgency can be enigmatic. The Mets ahead tend to nod off. The Mets not dead are capable of livening up. And, if we allow ourselves a moment to not pin the Mets’ fate solely on the Mets, the Mets were playing the Angels. There was some “there for the taking” ripening in evidence. There is a reason the Los Angeles Angels rarely rise to heaven.

Senses of what might happen are swell, but an actual comeback is what you really want. From down 5-2 and at last eliminating Angel starter Tyler Anderson with two on with nobody out in the seventh, the Mets got to coming back in earnest. Brandon Nimmo stood in the right place, in the path of a Reid Detmers delivery, thus getting dinged and loading the bases. Francisco Lindor, whose last hit coincides with the last hit featuring the Temptations probably (I’ll have to check on that one, too) bounced to short but ran like he had ten fully intact toes to beat out a double play. The Mets had their third run, and they had runners on first and third. Then they had runners on second and third, because Lindor liked running so much, he took second uncontested while the Angels thought ethereal thoughts.

What a setup for Juan Soto, who’s hit harder balls, but few better placed. This one, in the seventh, zipped straight up an unoccupied middle, scoring two, including Lindor, who’d placed himself on second with that no-biggie steal. Nice planning. Nice tie.

At 5-5 heading to the eighth, it was time to consider the bullpen again. Every bullpen, certainly every Met bullpen, has its transients and it has its staples. This one has Brooks Raley, who belongs in the latter cohort, but you wouldn’t know it by his recent lack of game logs. While some of us devoted our ruminations to David Wright, Brooks (same name The Captain gave his son) suddenly appeared as if from out of nowhere on Saturday afternoon,. Yet Raley really hadn’t been nowhere. He’d been recovering from Tommy John surgery in 2024; on the free agent market a little; then — to the surprise of those who take attendance to confirm who’s no longer in the Mets classroom and mark them permanently graduated from the hallowed halls Payson Tech, pending Recidivism — back in the organization. We were told Raley, one of the few bright spots of relentlessly dim 2023, was working his way back from his operation. Whenever he was good to go was great. It seemed folly to count on Brooks Raley to pitch for the Mets this season.

Except we kept getting reports that his track was fast, his progress was apace, and would you look at that? Brooks Raley pitches for the Mets again. He’s not a Recidivist Met, because he never technically went anywhere else, but he sure appears to have returned from somewhere. A lefty arm we can count down is like something that falls out of the sky but not on our head. In the eighth on Monday night at Citi Field, Raley landed on the mound and threw a scoreless inning to keep things tied at five.

So now we’d witnessed the comeback of Kevin Herget and were reminded of the comeback from Brooks Raley. Yet for the Mets to come back not only in this game but to what we wish to believe they are, they needed Francisco Alvarez to come back. On Monday, the catcher we’ve been waiting to achieve his presumed destiny returned from a month in the minors. His presumed destiny was stardom in the majors. Had we not seen it in the distance, maybe we’d have signed JT Realmuto instead of James McCann in the first minutes of Steve Cohen’s ownership. No need for a star catcher, we’re raising one of our own. Alvy approached his projected heights when he homered like crazy to light up the less dark parts of 2023. He regressed offensively in 2024, but he was part of a playoff push, so we didn’t dwell on the youngster’s shortcomings. In 2025, we couldn’t ignore them. Nor could Mets management, thus the Summer in Syracuse program, in which the ballclub sponsors a deserving kid from the city and sends him to experience a taste of farm life whether he wanted it or not.

Francisco seemed to have made the most of it, judging by several facets of his game Monday night, one of which was his ability to work a walk to lead off the home seventh ahead of those vital Lindor and Soto contributions; another of which was a caught stealing he worked with his shortstop in the top of the seventh; and still another of which was the tag he placed on Mike Trout to limit an accumulation of Angel insurance runs. This was in the seventh as well, Baty throwing, Alvarez catching, Trout sliding nowhere near the plate, perhaps to protect his previously injured knee. About as bad a fundamental play as I’ve ever seen a surefire Hall of Famer make, but somebody had to tag him, and young Francisco took care of that detail.

Alvarez had more work to do in the eighth. Following Baty’s one-out walk, Alvy lined a ball to the right field wall. Chris Taylor didn’t defend it as much as attempt to withstand its presence in his midst. It may or may not have been a catchable ball. Taylor opted to not find out. It appeared catchable enough that Baty made it only as far as third. Alvarez, meanwhile, chugged to second, which one can assume he enjoyed a whole lot more than being in Syracuse.

What happened next continued to indicate good things can happen when a) you put the bat on the ball and b) you hit it toward the Angels. Ronny Mauricio produced a fielder’s choice grounder to third. Yoan Moncada choice was to throw it wide of home. Logan O’Hoppe choice was to drop it. Bret slid in safely and untouched to push the Mets in front. Nimmo then made contact of his own, a sac fly to right that paved a glide path for Alvarez to score. It was 7-5, Edwin Diaz was available, and Edwin Diaz was on, striking out the side for his twentieth save and the Mets’ second consecutive comeback victory.

Mets take their inspiration where they can get it.

Afterwards, the players gathered around the clubhouse television to watch an episode of The Beverly Hillbillies just to get to the song that plays over the end credits, specifically the line where Jerry Scoggins invites everybody watching, “Y’all come back now, y’ hear?” (That’s one more detail I’ll have to check on, but based on these past two games, it sure seems true.)

100 Proof

The Reds got off to a Metslike start on Sunday, so I took that as a good sign. We’re usually the team that gets off to a Metslike start, Metslike start having developed into a synonym for immediate unease. Chance for a big inning. Leave with a run or two at most when there coulda been/shoulda been more. Load the bases next time up yet score nothing. Reds were ahead, 1-0, in the second inning.

We had them right where we needed them because they had been too much like us. They faced David Peterson, who is the best we can throw at anybody right now. Peterson overcame shaky defense behind him in the first and his own difficulties in the second. He then righted himself as an All-Star starter does. At the moment, at least on whatever we use instead of paper these days, we have something that looks like a starting rotation. Coming out of the break, Peterson is literally in the middle of it. On the mound, he is effectively at the head of it.

Petey held the Reds scoreless after the first inning. The Mets pecked back in the third with a single run and nosed ahead with another single run in the fifth. Luisangel Acuña was instrumental to both rallies. It’s nice to see Acuña get a chance. It’s nice to see any Met be a part of two successful rallies in the same game. With Francisco Alvarez finishing his refresher course at Syracuse and Pete Alonso given the briefest of contusion recovery periods, Luisangel was the only member of last September’s “A” team in Sunday’s lineup. He made his sacrifice bunt matter (for the better, as it pushed Tyrone Taylor to third, en route to coming home on Brandon Nimmo’s game-tying base hit) and his fifth-inning RBI double was the closest thing we had all day to a homer, booming as it did to left to send Brett Baty across the plate from second. Acuña also made a throwing error from second in the first, but a) he was throwing to Mark Vientos, a starting first baseman for the first time all year; and b) he himself rarely plays in the first inning, so maybe he needed time to adjust to the angle of the sun.

Mostly, it was good to see Acuña out there and contributing, and it was great to see Peterson out there and stabilizing the Mets’ situation for six innings. No openers. No bulk guys. No limitations. Just a starting pitcher overcoming early problems and getting us through six, the modern equivalent of eight-and-two-thirds. David gave us 93 pitches. We don’t ask for anything more.

It’s usually splendid to see Edwin Diaz, but his entry in the eighth was surprisingly fraught. Carlos Mendoza brought him in to face the heart of the Reds order with two out and a runner on first. “Everything that can go wrong did go wrong” for Edwin Diaz used to mean Kurt Suzuki hit a grand slam. On Sunday, it boiled down to allowing a stolen base; walking a guy; giving up a single that found a hole to load the bases; and hitting the next batter with the bases loaded. The sky fell in on Edwin Diaz, yet all it did was take us from ahead 2-1 to tied at two. Diaz struck out his next batter to strand all Reds and end the eighth with the score 2-2. He’s gotten pretty good at damage control.

Juan Soto’s services were engaged, in part, so he could hit dramatic home runs in the late innings. He tried that on Saturday. Came achingly close, too. His shot to right would have provided a fabulous boost in a sensational setting, but it went just foul. Even David Wright in a luxury suite thought it was gone. The other thing Juan Soto is collecting on is his ability to walk. That’s sometimes decided by a matter of inches as well, but on Sunday in the ninth, Soto wasn’t umped to death and led off with a walk. Pete, who apparently heals like Polar Bears wear white, struck out, but Jeff McNeil doubled Juan to third. Luis Torrens, enjoying his final day as undisputed starting catcher, grounded to second. Soto did not stay grounded at third. We were told in advance about the power and the patience of Soto, but who knew he was Lou Brock on the basepaths? OK, he’s not Lou Brock, but he’s got that “not lightning fast, but knows what he’s doing” quality to him. Rusty Staub in his first term had that. Kevin McReynolds had that. Juan Soto has it. He takes off from third on Torrens’s grounder and slides home ahead of the throw. The Mets are leading, 3-2. And, when Ryne Stanek holds the fort, the Mets win, 3-2, snapping a three-game losing streak that felt longer, given the many off days in between victories.

We now have a 56-44 team after 100 games, a half-game from first place in the East, and four games clear of the nearest Wild Card contender that’s on the outside looking in. A Mets team doing all that scans as in good shape. This team doing that? I’m not sure what it’s proved after 100 games other than good shape is good, but it could be/should be better. Easy for me to say, not playing baseball in the hot sun. Maybe I’m not taking into account how elusive an actual rotation has been for Mendoza. With Manaea and Kodai Senga back and Frankie Montas seemingly ensconced, we do have one. Clay Holmes’s endurance seems a little iffy, but five solid innings per start, if he can deliver that much, might be (or might have to be) sufficient from a former closer. Peterson is Peterson, which is a reassuring thing to say and mean.

Francisco Lindor’s July 2025 is Francisco Lindor’s April from too many years. Think he won’t return to the land of the living? Think Soto won’t straighten out his deep foul flies and adjust his approach within ever-capricious ump shows? I don’t know what to think of Pete’s bruised hand, but if his version of the injured list was a six-inning stay, we’ll have faith that he’s fine. Among the youthful, somebody’s bound to bust out and become irreplaceable to Mendy. Acuña? Vientos? Baty? Alvarez? Ronny Mauricio? Flashes of brilliance need to transform to sustained light. The pieces are here. The pieces have always been here. The pieces fit when the Mets were 21-9 and 45-24. The whole in the present continues to defy contiguity. There’s something about this team that refuses to click for more than a handful of days. I keep waiting for the multiweek spurt that dismisses all doubt. The wait goes on. The doubt has just ordered in like it’s not planning on leaving.

I thought this would be the year when kvetching about the Mets would an elective rather than a required course. Any Mets fan can kvetch about any Mets angle and often does, but I was going to leave that to the chronically dissatisfied in 2025. We were 21-9 and 45-24. What was there to kvetch about? Turns out Met-kvetching is that comfortable winter coat you forget about during summer, but once you need it, boy does it feel like you never took if off. It feels as if we’re cloaked in reasons to kvetch despite our record and playoff positioning. This team doesn’t allow us to run around in short sleeves.

Acting excited by this team sometimes takes great talent.

It took me a while to conclude that the 2024 Mets were legitimately good. It’s taken me a while to come around to the idea that the 2025 Mets, while undeniably good, may not be that great. Watching them in this series, I couldn’t decide whether this team is exciting or merely capable. Even in games when good plays are made or temporarily big hits are recorded, there is something uninspiring about the 2025 Mets, which is surprising based on the ability to levitate they displayed when things were going fantastic. On Saturday, prior to whichever rally that was destined to fizzle, the enormous scoreboard showed a sizzle reel intended to get everybody’s hopes up. One clip within was of Tom Hanks — not even a Mets fan — leaping to his feet in approval of a Lindor home run. That happened at Citi Field in April. I was shocked to realize it was from the same season that included the game I was watching in front of me. In the game I was watching in front of me, Soto, Alonso, and Vientos struck out in succession in the seventh to keep the Mets behind by three runs, sucking most of the air not to mention all of the good vibes out of the Wright Day crowd. You’d have to be a better actor than Hanks to feign enthusiasm for a half-inning like that…and Hanks owns a pair of Best Actor Oscars.

The kvetching I initially found atonal stemmed, I believe, from 2025 being the first Mets season following a winning-record season to more or less roar out of the gate since 2007 (a loaded example, I grant you). The intervening Mets seasons that succeeded winning-record Mets seasons — 2008, 2009, 2016, 2017, 2020, 2023 — each significantly stumbled or scuffled during the first half; the 2008 and 2016 Mets recovered and seriously contended, while the others did not. Here in 2025, mostly building on the success of 2024, it was as if we didn’t know how to process the ups and occasional downs in progress, because we hadn’t had much recent experience maintaining momentum across calendar years. Lately, except for Sunday, it’s mostly downs and perfectly tonal kvetching in response. We’re 11-20 since the middle of June. If that’s not kvetchworthy, I don’t know what is.

Yet 100 games in, all of which have counted, the Mets are above enough of the pack by enough of a margin that the kvetching feels like something we should be able to look forward to shedding, provided a sustained string of positive outcomes convinces us we can be satisfied with what we’ve got (trade deadline flurry willing) and where we’re going. No team is more convincing than the 2025 Mets. They convince us they’re great when they win, and they convince us they’re anything but when they don’t.

Wright on Schedule

That it was inevitable didn’t make it any less irresistible. The number 5 could have been retired as soon as David Wright took off his jersey in 2018. Many of us mentally reserved a spot for it at Citi Field before Citi Field was announced as the successor facility to Shea Stadium at the outset of 2006. No more than a season-and-a-half’s worth of exposure to the prospect who lived up to his notices, and we could have guessed a day like Saturday was coming. I don’t know what they’re building over there in the parking lot, but they need to make sure we can see 5 and take heart from it forevermore.

Done! David Wright’s number was elevated to Citi Field’s highest rung on Saturday afternoon, a delightful formality whose “i” was dotted and “t” was crossed when his New York Mets Hall of Fame plaque was simultaneously unveiled upstairs from the Rotunda. The Mets, who used to do not much to remember let alone honor the players who built the best of their legacy, proceeded on the Wright track with all deliberate speed. Got him to the bigs at age 21. Got him to the rafters at age 42. Waited just long enough so his three kids can maintain tangible memories of their dad’s day in the overcast sun. Didn’t wait so long that his parents weren’t around to soak it in.

The presence of Rhon and Elisa Wright may have made me happiest Saturday — in stark contrast to the 5-2 loss the Reds pinned on the Mets following the conclusion of the day’s far more pleasurable ceremonial aspects. Not only is David in his prime as a person, but those who raised him appear in the finest of fettle. I kind of fell in love with them watching the SNY documentary about their son. They wanted the best for him. They cleared a path for him. They’re proud of not just his accomplishments, but his whole being. It was all I could do to not hug them when I saw them in the press conference room prior to Saturday’s game.

I don’t think David Wright’s parents are wholly unique in getting behind their child and pushing him forward, it’s just that we have evidence of how it worked out for us, and how much it meant and continues to mean to them. I don’t know what it was like inside the Wright household when our boy was a kid, but it certainly seems they understood what he wanted to do and are happy he did it (I’m not sure I fully grasp what it’s like to have been in a parent-child relationship where the emotional transactions were that clear-cut). David didn’t have to wish Rhon and Elisa were here to see this day. The long view of history is a marvelous thing, but some heels don’t have to cool until they’re ice cold.

I also adored what could have been taken as the random assortment of teammates who traveled to Flushing on David’s behalf. I knew they weren’t random because I’ve been following David’s story for the half of his life that he’s been an all-time Met, yet when I glanced over my shoulder and saw Joe McEwing, Josh Satin, Cliff Floyd, and Michael Cuddyer sitting in a row waiting to hear from their friend before the ballpark as a whole would wrap its arms around him, I wanted to grab each of them and slip them into a binder. David’s story inevitably mentions them as influences and compatriots, not just guys he used to work with. Jose Reyes was there, of course, as was Daniel Murphy. Two managers, Terry Collins and Willie Randolph, plus coach Howard Johnson joined in the assemblage. HoJo’s old pal Keith Miller was David’s agent, and he was on hand, too. In 1988, I went out of my way to purchase a Keith Miller baseball card. When was the last time any Mets fan stopped to think about most of these guys? David is probably more thoughtful than most of us. A passel of columnists, reporters, and broadcasters who don’t necessarily come around that often also made sure to be back for The Captain. It was old home weekend at a home that’s not that old and a returnee who hadn’t been gone too incredibly long.

Citi Field isn’t the House that Wright Built. If it was, the dimensions would have been constructed in deference to his opposite-field power. But it was immediately the House of David when it opened in 2009, and Saturday proved it always will be. He was so comfortable being who he was, which is to say always a touch uncomfortable that 42,000 people arrived en masse to see him, and many among them wore his name and number on their backs. But he gets that they did, and nobody could have been more appreciative that others thought he deserved such attention. Reverence he’d avoid if he could, but it was too late. Leave it to David, and he’d simply romanticize being a kid who got his picture taken in Norfolk with Tides like Clint Hurdle and D.J. Dozier…which he did, because what else is a kid who went to Tides games gonna romanticize?

David was always one of us, geographically displaced on the surface, but with a running start. He didn’t have to subscribe to Baseball America to get a handle on Mets Triple-A prospects. He just had to get a ride with his dad, who worked security at Harbor Park in his off hours from the police force. Maybe that appreciation of how baseball comes together, from the inside out and not just on the field, explains why David maintains so many friendships with players who didn’t approach his performance level, and why more than any player I can think of was enmeshed with so much of the Mets personnel who make the Citi Field operation run. It was no accident he could offer up warm and textured memories when asked in his press conference about the late public relations specialist Shannon Forde and the late team photographer Marc Levine. It was no accident that practically the first words out of his mouth when he stepped to the mic during his ceremonies were to acknowledge Tony Carullo, the longtime visiting clubhouse manager who was receiving the Mets’ Hall of Fame Achievement Award.

It was never an accident that David was everybody’s captain from just about the moment he showed up at Shea. The old saying suggests you should treat people the way you wish to be treated. I suspect David Wright didn’t dwell on how he’d be treated. He put those around him first, including however many tens of thousands paid their way into Shea or Citi on a given night. It came through when he addressed his fellow Mets fans in the crowd on Saturday. David Wright forever came across as our hometown kid. It doesn’t matter that he’s from Norfolk, Va. He grew up in Metsopotamia. Everything about him can seem a little corny, a little hokey, a little less than big-time. That’s because he’s one of us — the corny, the hokey, life-size at our biggest. He’s never put on pretensions that he was any more than that, except he played ball. Sometimes we forget what a bleeping star he was.

Good thing we are able to gaze up at 5 to remind us.

The Sun Sometimes Comes Out Tomorrow

Twenty-one years ago tomorrow, the surprisingly contending Mets did not look ready for what was hitting them at Shea Stadium, giving up six runs in the first inning. They’d do plenty of hitting themselves before the game was over, and Armando Benitez would come on to get the save, but the Mets didn’t do enough hitting, and Benitez by then was the closer for the Florida Marlins. Strange time capsule the box score of July 20, 2004, left us. Steve Trachsel started and kept starting despite a disastrous first inning, staying on through five. Future Mets Luis Castillo, Jeff Conine, and Damion Easley joined forces with former Mets Benitez and Josias Manzanillo in the 9-7 victory for the defending world champions. The Marlins, between fire sales, rose to 47-46, one game better than the Mets, each club part of a four-team scramble for first place in the NL East. The scramble would end within a couple of weeks, the Mets — and the Marlins, for that matter — altogether unscrambled from any October aspirations.

On the Met side, John Franco was sent out to pitch the sixth and gave up what would prove to be the winning runs. By the time Johnny was deployed (earlier than had been his custom in his long reign as hometown closer), the Mets had tied the Marlins at seven. Trachsel had settled down and the bats had come alive. Three runs were driven in by Richard Hidalgo, an acquisition in June who was on an all-time Met heater in July, homering ten times. Richard’s three-run bomb in the bottom of the third inning this Tuesday night is what evened the game at 7-7. Two batters earlier, first baseman Eric Valent had pulled the Mets to within 7-4. Valent wasn’t in the starting lineup. He subbed in the top of the second for Mike Piazza. Piazza had to exit after a collision on defense with Juan Pierre. Mike, an All-Star catcher trying his best to become a passable first baseman, was the victim of the baserunner and a throw from his third baseman arriving all at once in an awkward position. His left wrist took the worst of it. He’d be out for a week.

By the time he came back, there’d be a new third baseman for the New York Mets.

On July 21, as Piazza healed, the future arrived in the person of 21-year-old David Wright, hot stuff from Norfolk and at Norfolk, as big a part of the Mets’ plans as their current second baseman Jose Reyes loomed a year earlier. Reyes, 20, was the shortstop when he came up from Binghamton in 2003, but was moved to second in deference to the allegedly wondrous abilities of Kaz Matsui. The third baseman who threw the ball that resulted in the injury to the Mets’ marquee player was Ty Wigginton. Wiggy, as he was known, was only 25, and had attracted Rookie of the Year support in ’03, but his greatest asset as of July 21, 2004, was not youth or promise but versatility. With Mike out, Ty would be the first baseman.

Nobody else would be the third baseman for a very long time now that David Wright was here. The box score of July 20, therefore, tells a story of less a lost world than one poised to change dramatically. Wigginton would be traded before the month was done. Franco and Todd Zeile (who took over for Valent on defense) would wave goodbye to an appreciative crowd on the last day of the season. Reyes would get shortstop back, a move that would compel the less than wondrous Matsui to learn second, a transition that never really took. Hidalgo would leave as a free agent. Piazza, already a legend in these parts, returned to catching and played out his contract before his own emotional goodbye at the end of 2005. Trachsel would keep getting starts through 2006. So would left fielder Cliff Floyd. Veterans Steve and Cliff would be in the lineup on September 18, 2006, about two years and two months hence, the night the Mets clinched their first division title since 1988. In the middle of the celebratory scene that unfolded that night were the young shortstop Reyes and the young third baseman Wright. Other than Trachsel and Floyd, nobody else from either July 20 or July 21 in 2004 was on hand.

The Mets’ world accelerated its evolution the minute Wright showed up. But there was a Mets world the night before. The tomorrow in that equation was better because it formally introduced us to the player who would, in short order, embody the Mets for the next fourteen years. David Wright started fielding, started swinging, started doing everything that became instantly and indelibly familiar. David Wright started giving us seasons like 2006 and did his best to keep giving us seasons like 2006, even if we wouldn’t see another year substantively like it until 2015. That was a totally if not tonally different Met season, but the one thing it had in common with its predecessor in champagne showers was David Wright played a lead role. Not the same kind of lead role — he wasn’t so young anymore and he wasn’t healthy enough to play that much — but the superstar had become The Captain, and The Captain led the Mets, in his way, to the World Series. That was supposed to happen in 2006. It took a while. Fortunately, David had a while after 2006, if not a whole lot of while remaining after 2015.

All of David’s career, which was Mets and nothing but Mets, gets honored at Citi Field this afternoon. No. 5 rises to the rafters. The club Hall of Fame, conveniently located on pillars at the top of the Rotunda staircase, adds a plaque with his likeness. Mets from 2004 and Mets from well beyond will be in attendance, as will a ballpark full of fans who watched him debut, watched him blossom, watched him endure. “Every generation throws a hero up the pop charts,” Paul Simon said. A generation of Mets fans came of age with David Wright as its frontman. He is the first Met who came along in this century to be honored as Seaver, Piazza, Koosman, Hernandez, Mays, Gooden, and Strawberry have. He is the first Met to have a single digit retired. He is singular in our history. He rose from our farm system and never sought greener pastures. Our pastures were green enough for him. His considerable talents and endless efforts richly enhanced their periodic lushness.

It was fortuitous that the Mets won the first game of the David Wright Era, on July 21, 2004. The night before, they’re a mess. The next day, they’re winners. One can ride that thread only so far. David played in 1,585 games as a Met. Their record in them was 792-793. All the ups. All the downs. So many of both in terms of what surrounded him. Throw in the postseason games in which he played, however, and his Mets went 805-804. That looks a little more Wright, doesn’t it?

As if to presage David Wright’s arrival in official Met immortality, the Mets of July 18, 2025, used the game before his number-raising and plaque-installing to remind us of what it was like in Flushing on July 20, 2004, which is to say they lost. It’s a very different club here than it was twenty-one years ago. Our contention in the NL East is no surprise. We are in a division race that, unlike 2004’s, figures to last. We have Juan Soto, and he homered in the first. We have Brandon Nimmo and Jeff McNeil, the only two Mets remaining from the back end of Wright’s tenure, and McNeil drove in Nimmo in the second. And we have the gumption to manufacture a Fireworks Night rally in the ninth that evoked memories of the one Piazza capped in the eighth on June 30, 2000, when David was a year away from getting drafted by the Mets. On that night, Mike Hampton started versus the Braves. It didn’t go well, and we trailed, 8-1, before prevailing, 11-8. Hampton straightened himself out from that off outing and pitched the Mets to a pennant. When Mike chose free agency and signed with the Rockies, the Mets received a supplemental first-round pick. They used it to draft David Wright. You might say they won even more.

The ninth-inning rally from this Fireworks Night in the present, however, fizzled. The Mets fell Friday to the Reds, 8-4. Sean Manaea pitched far better than Steve Trachsel did on Wright’s Eve then, but for not as long. In his second post-IL start, Manaea worked four sharp innings before being pulled. The 2-1 lead he bequeathed to Alex Carrillo transformed into a 3-2 deficit in the fifth. It was 6-2 when Carrillo gave way to Brandon Waddell. It became 8-2 as Carlos Mendoza resolutely rested the remainder of his bullpen in this first game after the four-day All-Star break. Had Mendy had John Franco, Dan Wheeler, Ricky Bottalico, and Mike DeJean at his disposal as Art Howe did on July 20, 2004, he probably wouldn’t have used them, either. I never thought I’d say this, but score one for Art Howe.

The Mets’ comeback in the ninth showed promise — two runners in, bases loaded, Francisco Lindor coming to bat as the tying run — but no payoff, as Lindor popped out to clear the field for fireworks. The Reds played like they had something to prove. The Mets for too many innings seemed disengaged. Maybe the All-Star break needed to be five days.

Or maybe they just need to get a look at David Wright today and start turning things around for good.

Pete, But No Re-Pete

It’s a Tuesday night in July of 1970. It is the twelfth inning of a 4-4 contest. Pete Rose is on second. Jim Hickman singles into center field. Rose motors around third base. Amos Otis fires to the plate. Rose keeps coming home, regardless that Ray Fosse is blocking his path. The on-deck batter Dick Dietz gesticulates toward the baserunner that he needs to get down and slide. The baserunner has his own idea of what that means. Pete Rose is a bull in Riverfront Stadium’s china shop. Fosse is a cape to be rushed through. All the metaphors collide. Rose bowls over Fosse. The runner is safe, and the National League has won the All-Star Game, 5-4.

It was the Tuesday night that hooked me on the All-Star Game for the next 55 years. It was to be played hard, played by the best, played all night if necessary, played without regard to consequences for opponents who got in the National League’s way. The National League was the league the Mets were in — the Mets’ manager, Gil Hodges, ran the show; the Mets’ ace, Tom Seaver, started the show; the Mets’ shortstop, Bud Harrelson, would trot back to his position for the thirteenth had Otis and Fosse combined to nail Rose — therefore on this Tuesday night and in every primetime showcase like it over the next 55 years, the National League would be my team. Every National Leaguer, even those I rooted against as a matter of course, were was my guy. Every American Leaguer, whatever degree of unawareness I held for most of them as the seasons went by, was a guy who had to be bowled over or at least defeated. For all the pageantry and provincialism that’s informed my fluctuating year-by-year interest since, that’s the equation that’s kept me coming back midsummer after midsummer.

It’s a Tuesday night in July of 2025. It is not the tenth inning. It could be, but there is no tenth inning, despite the score sitting at National League 6 American League 6 after nine. I have tuned in and stayed tuned in. I have always tuned in. I will probably always tune in. I have been rooting on this Tuesday night for the National League to beat the American League. When I was a kid, when I was a teen, and as I was entering adulthood, the National League almost always beat the American League. The National League had been beating the American League in All-Star Games since I was born. National League victories were my birthright. In my twenties, an NL victory was no longer a sure thing. By the time I turned thirty, the American League had been winning dependably for several summers. Except for a few oases of what I considered normality, my life since then has been pocked annually by the AL finding a way to win the All-Star Game…or the NL finding a way to lose.

At the end of the sixth inning this Tuesday night in July of 2025, the National League has this thing in the bag. Or so I almost think. Three of the four Mets who are on hand have seen to it that we — my team, my league — will win have already played. There’s a moment, in the fourth, when David Peterson grounds Aaron Judge to Francisco Lindor, who throws to Pete Alonso for the out. I couldn’t have adored it any more had that been, say, Bobby Murcer grounding out to Buddy on a pitch thrown by Tom. The All-Star Game was a throughline for me. Mets besting Yankees. National Leaguers topping American Leaguers. Little moments within bigger moments on nights when this was the only baseball anywhere. It didn’t count. It counted as much as I wanted it to.

In the bottom of the sixth at Truist Park, my team’s home stadium for one night and one night only, Pete comes to bat with two runners on base and the NL ahead, 2-0. Kris Bubic is pitching for the American League. Kris Bubic is from the Kansas City Royals. I didn’t notice Kris Bubic over the weekend when the Mets were in Kansas City. Truth be told, I’d never heard of Kris Bubic. It’s not the summer of 1970 when I considered it my duty as a seven-year-old to know every star in baseball. I follow the Mets mostly. The stars I need to know I know. The stars I don’t know tend to be evanescent. Every year at these affairs there’s a slew of names that are new to me. Maybe they’ll be back next year. Probably not. but I will.

Still, Bubic is the pitcher, and Alonso is the slugger. Pete’s a big deal on the All-Star stage usually because he takes swings in the Home Run Derby. The Home Run Derby can be quite entertaining if Pete Alonso is in it. He’s the only reason I’ve watched it in recent years. It didn’t exist in 1970, so I’ve never developed an automatic affinity for it. Pete won it in 2019 and 2021. I was pumped. He didn’t enter it in 2024. I barely noticed it. Nonetheless, it’s given Pete a certain midsummer cachet, thus when Pete Alonso connects off Kris Bubic for a three-run opposite-field homer, it’s a big Polar deal. That’s Pete Alonso! That’s the guy who shines in the Derby! To me, that’s the first baseman for the New York Mets! A Met has put the NL up, 5-0! Two batters later, Corbin Carroll, one of those stars I know and one of those guys who’s one of my guys for a night, homers with nobody on and the NL is up, 6-0, and I’d say I’m a kid again, except I’m always a kid watching the All-Star Game. But this time I’m a happy kid, because for only the eighth time in the past thirty-seven editions of this thing, we are going to win.

And just when I’ve decided the National League has this thing in the bag, I shudder, because you just can’t allow yourself to think that way about a game you take seriously. I’m taking this All-Star Game seriously. I take every All-Star Game seriously. The rest of the kids from 1970 or whenever grew up and grew realistic. The All-Star Game is about everything but winning, about everything but upholding the honor of the senior circuit, about everything but associating yourself with the league you consider innately better and purer and whatever other qualities you deign to ascribe to one entity over another. Logically, I understand the All-Star Game has been continually watered down as a test of wills. The rival leagues have blobbed into one shapeless entity where everybody shakes hands or hugs. The Mets just played Kansas City in the regular season, for goodness sake. Every team uses a DH. Two of the Met players in whose designation as National League All-Stars I reveled, Lindor and Edwin Diaz, were American League All-Stars not that long ago. This is all branding and marketing. Nothing is sacred anymore, certainly not the Major League Baseball All-Star Game.

But I want to believe it is, and I want to believe the National League can maintain the 6-0 lead it has built as the seventh inning approaches. Everybody is wearing his team’s actual uniform, which is a welcome throwback. We have just seen a multimedia tribute to Henry Aaron, beamed live from the outskirts of Atlanta, so maybe that, too, is a sign that we’re going to have a 1970-style result if not 1970-style climax. Hammerin’ Hank started in Cincinnati 55 years ago. Charlie Hustle replaced him in the NL lineup.

Henry Aaron is gone. Pete Rose is gone. Fifty-five years is a long time. It’s 2025. Despite a couple of touches that tap you on the shoulder to remind you of what All-Star Games used to be — is that Joe Torre, who played alongside Hank and Pete at Riverfront that night in 1970, hanging out in the AL dugout? — it’s a far different game these nights. Gil Hodges used five pitchers over twelve innings. Dave Roberts in the seventh is up to his eighth, Adrian Morejon. Adrian Morejon is on the Padres. The Mets haven’t played the Padres yet in 2025, so whatever awareness I’d built up of his existence previously has faded. He could be Kris Bubic for all I know.

Morejon, I learn, isn’t the National Leaguer I want protecting a 6-0 lead. He walks two American Leaguers and gets replaced by Roberts’s ninth hurler, Randy Rodriguez. Rodriguez, of the Giants, gives up a three-run home run to Brent Rooker, of the Athletics. From 1968 to 2024, that would have had special resonance for fans in the Bay Area, except now, while the Giants are still San Francisco, the Athletics aren’t Oakland. Technically, they aren’t anywhere. This is the sort of thing that happens in baseball in 2025. Another thing that happens is the American League dragging this thing halfway out of the bag I thought it was in. The NL leads only 6-3.

Didn’t Trevor Hoffman blow one of these back in the “this one counts” era, when the All-Star Game was supposed to determine home-field advantage for the World Series? They came up with that doozy because one year, in 2002, the All-Star Game limped to a tie in the ninth, and the mangers — one of them Joe Torre — ran out of pitchers. Players had taken to bowing out of going, and players who played had taken to bolting the premises once removed, so something had to be done. In 2006, when the Mets appeared a marvelous possibility to represent the NL in the World Series three months hence, I cared even more that the NL win the All-Star Game. Hoffman blew it for us. That we didn’t make the World Series in 2006 remains immaterial in my grudgeholding.

Didn’t Billy Wagner blow one of these, too? That was in 2008, at Yankee Stadium. We couldn’t have a Met blowing an NL win at Yankee Stadium, but there he was, being every bit the big game bet Trevor Hoffman was two years earlier. In a couple of weeks, Billy Wagner will join Trevor Hoffman in the Hall of Fame. They were both great relievers, except on midsummer nights when many were watching. I was gonna say “when everybody was watching,” but fewer and fewer watch the All-Star Game every year since 1970. Me, I keep watching, because I watched when I was seven, when Pete Rose bulled Ray Fosse out of his way, and the NL won in twelve. I never had to be marketed to again. My brand loyalty was set.

Randy Rodriguez remained on the mound long enough to give up another American League run. Now it was 6-4, NL. Tylor Megill’s brother Trevor, our tenth pitcher, got us out of it. Managers no longer manage to win the All-Star Game. Managers manage to ensure everybody gets into the All-Star Game. David Peterson could have gone another inning, but the each out any one pitcher records is one less somebody else can’t. I wish my day camp counselors in the summer of 1970 ran our games with such attention to individual feelings. I’m glad Gil Hodges ran the All-Star Game as he did.

Two more pitchers got the NL through the eighth intact. Two more pitchers did no such thing in the ninth. The second of them was Diaz, who didn’t pitch badly, but he came in with a runner on second and one out, our league’s lead whittled down to 6-5. Matt Olson made a helluva play on a hot Jazz Chisholm grounder, much as Pete Alonso made a helluva play on a hot Jarred Kelenic grounder last September. Then, Diaz didn’t cover first and the entire Met season nearly came tumbling down as a result. Now, Diaz covered first, and a second out was ensured. Progress. But Bobby Witt, the runner Edwin inherited, crossed over to third, setting him up to come home on Steven Kwan’s ensuing dribbler, no bowling into the catcher necessary. We were all tied up at six. Kwan proceeded to steal second because everybody proceeds to steal second when Diaz is pitching (unless he has Luis Torrens, Francisco Lindor and replay review working in his favor). Randy Arozarena was up. Edwin struck him out by first throwing a borderline ball on oh-and-two and then patting his head while rubbing his tummy, the signal for the robot ump to change the call of the human ump. This All-Star Game tested that same system we saw in Spring Training. It got Edwin out of trouble, so I’d say it worked.

The National League didn’t score in the bottom of the ninth. While the half-inning was in progress, the telecast showed Pete Alonso taking swings in a batting cage. My first instinct (and, I’m pretty sure, those of the uninformed announcers) was to admire Pete’s work ethic. He was out of the game, but he was using his time in a ballpark to stay sharp for the second half of the regular season. What dedication! Then, in a flash, I remembered that I didn’t have to worry about whether Diaz was going to have to pitch the tenth — Roberts had used every pitcher — because if the NL didn’t score right here and now, there’d be no tenth inning. Alonso was warming up for what loomed just over the horizon.

There would be no 2002-type tie. This time what would count would be a mini-Home Run Derby. They even had a cutesy name for it: the swing-off, like the page-off in 30 Rock, except no young lady in a blazer and a skirt would run through the halls ringing a bell. Or maybe she would. We’d never had a swing-off to conclude an All-Star Game, but after Brendan Donovan fouled out to end the ninth, we would.

Apparently, Roberts and his counterpart, Aaron Boone, had been instructed before the game to choose three sluggers to come out and take three swings versus their own league’s batting practice pitcher. But not just any three sluggers. If certain sluggers had already dressed and boarded private jets, they wouldn’t be summoned to return. No Ohtani. No Judge. No kidding. Nonetheless, it was all very festive the way it was presented. Each manager revealed to Kevin Burkhardt who his sluggers were gonna be. One of Roberts’s, batting third, was gonna be “the Polar Bear”. Pete Alonso is so famous in these circles that there’s no need for elaboration.

The swing-off immediately occupied a space between “ohmigod, they’re really doing this!” and “what the [bleep] is going on here?!?!” It was better than a tie. It was better, maybe, than a ghost runner on second, especially since there was nobody left to pitch. In 2008, at Yankee Stadium, hours after Billy Wagner couldn’t retire the AL without a ruckus, the leagues pushed the envelope of availability for fifteen innings until the NL was ready to put David Wright on the mound for the sixteenth. It strained credulity that position players were going to pitch in an All-Star Game then. Now? When it’s mildly surprising that pitchers are allowed to pitch at all ever? No chance anybody takes a chance with anybody’s arm.

Goodbye, All-Star extra innings. Goodbye, win at all costs. Goodbye, this particular legacy of Pete Rose. Like almost everything about Pete Rose, this legacy required parsing. No player burned more to win. You had to love that, especially if you were seven and he was on your team for one night. But was the All-Star win something worth wrecking Ray Fosse’s season over? Fosse’s shoulder was separated and he was never the same player again. That, however, was how the game was played in those days, the All-Star Game included. Catchers don’t block plates sans ball anymore. It’s been legislated from existence. It’s not necessarily a bad idea if you think about it. Or maybe you don’t wanna think about it. Maybe you just want everybody to be hellbent to win every night, All-Star Games included.

Hello, swing-off. Hello again, Brent Rooker of the Athletics from nowhere. Rooker got the AL back in the game, then he got the AL off to a 2-0 swing-off lead. The NL countered with Kyle Stowers of the Miami Marlins. The Mets last played the Marlins in April; forgive me for a lack of Kyle Stowers consciousness. He got one for the NL. Up for the AL came Arozarena. Only one of his swings was for a homer (with no outfielders tracking balls, it was hard to tell at first what was or wasn’t going out), so the AL now led, 3-1. The NL’s second slugger was gonna be Kyle Schwarber. I’m not in the habit of rooting for Phillies, but on Tuesday nights like these, there are no Phillies, no Marlins, no Braves. We are one big National League family.

Cousin Kyle bombed his BP pitcher, a fellow from the Dodgers named Dino Ebel — I swear I thought Joe Davis kept saying “see no evil” — with each swing he took. On Schwarber’s final lunge at glory, when he went down on one knee to get ALL of it, my instinct was to worry that he could get into bad habits swinging like that. Then I remembered swinging like that is what was encouraged in a home run derby, and, besides, what do I care about Kyle Schwarber’s habits being good? All I cared about in the moment was the NL led the AL in the swing-off, 4-3.

Which meant I cared about two things next:

1) What the AL’s final batter, Jonathan Aranda of the Rays, was going to do in his three swings.

2) The fate of the NL’s final scheduled swinger, the Polar Bear.

My NL instincts demanded Aranda — never mind that he’d played in the preceding game; I’d already forgotten who he was — must be foiled completely by his own BP pitcher, some dude Boone brought from the Yankees. My Met instincts kind of wanted to see Alonso come up and win the damn thing for us. For all of us. A little of me worried Pete would pick this moment to go into a home run drought, but more of me hoped he would ice it for the NL, and lay claim to the MVP trophy.

Alonso hit that three-run homer in the sixth. That was the biggest hit of the night, at least until Rooker hit one of his own. But if the National League won, they’d have to give the prize to Pete, wouldn’t they? And if Pete didn’t get to hit in the swing-off? There was no precedent on which to rely here. This was all new, all very postmodern.

Jonathan Aranda almost hit one ball into the seats. Had Truist Park not been designed with a brick wall over its right field fence, he would have, but the architects probably weren’t thinking about a swing-off someday deciding an All-Star Game. Or perhaps they were incredibly prescient. Either way, Aranda went 0-for-3, which meant the NL won the swing-off, 4-3, and the game itself, 6-6, not a typo. Kyle Schwarber, it occurred to me, was evoking the spirit of his Phillies’ predecessor Johnny Callison, who won the 1964 All-Star Game for the National League with a ninth-inning three-run blast, what we would come to call a walkoff homer. That game was at Shea Stadium. Callison grabbed a Mets batting helmet to do his swinging, because the powers that be weren’t fanatics (or Fanatics) about who wore what way back when. The players, however, were fanatics about competing. Callison hit his game-winner off Dick Radatz of the Boston Red Sox. Radatz was known as the Monster. Radatz was trying to get him out. Ebel was attempting no such thing versus Schwarber.

So, no, this wasn’t anything like Johnny Callison, but they gave Kyle Schwarber the MVP trophy, anyway. He didn’t do anything of note in the actual All-Star Game, but we all just saw what he did to decide the All-Star Game. My Polar bias notwithstanding, I couldn’t argue with Schwarber being declared Most Valuable. I also couldn’t quite get behind it, same as I guess I’m glad the National League won its eighth All-Star Game in the past thirty-seven, but did they? They won on a swing-off. There had no been such thing as a swing-off a half-hour earlier. Now we were determining league supremacy by it.

Huzzah?

Not quite. After fifty-five years, I’m out. Not out of baseball, and not out of the All-Star Game as something I tune into or something I obsess on for a few minutes at a time every July in terms of what Mets are named and what Mets aren’t (think Juan Soto couldn’t have done what Schwarber did?). I mean I’m out on taking its result seriously. I may have been the last adult in America to get the memo that it didn’t matter, the last to sit through all the pregame folderol — “they could have played three innings by now,” I told Stephanie during the extended introductions — because I was still anticipant that the NL was going to beat the AL. Even in the years when the AL seemed designed to beat the NL with its fewer teams and deep well of offense, I still looked at the Midsummer Classic the way I did when I was seven. On some level within me, this mattered. The National League mattered. The American League, as much as I disdained it, mattered. A game between the best of each league mattered. Interleague didn’t ruin that. Uniting the umpires and everything else under the MLB umbrella didn’t ruin that. The swift movement of players from team to team regardless of league didn’t ruin that.

The swing-off ruined that. The swing-off could rightly be viewed as “fun,” within the context of what is and what has always been an exhibition, but as someone rooting the way I have for so many midsummers, I heard myself ask myself, as I watched every visible National Leaguer jumping up and down for joy, “What the hell does fun have to do with the Major League Baseball All-Star Game?” To this curmudgeon, the swing-off proved nothing, other than Kyle Schwarber is really good at hitting the pitches Dino Ebel tees up for him. Mazel tov to both gentlemen. Had Pete Alonso been the batter to take those swings and send them beyond the fence, I would have loved him doing so, but I don’t think it would have changed how it all landed on me.

From cheering Pete Rose scoring in 1970 to awaiting Pete Alonso swinging in 2025, I was into it. It was a good run, but at last it’s barreled into a sense of dismay I find immovable.

An Old Philosophical Puzzle

And on the last day of the first half,* the Mets presented us with a fan’s oldest philosophical conundrum: Is it better to come back and lose, or not to come back at all?

The philosophy lesson came at the very end: Before that, the Mets followed one of their more frustrating 2025 scripts, in which ducks on the pond are some sort of ASMR thing that puts the rest of the lineup into a blissful doze. A one-out Mark Vientos first-inning triple yielded nothing. Ditto for Ronny Mauricio‘s single leading off the second. First and second with one out in the fourth? Nada. I could list all the souffles that fell, but you get the idea.

Alternate narrative, because sometimes it’s not always about us: Young Kansas City hurler Noah Cameron was electric, fanning eight Mets and stepping up when needed, and he got superb infield defense behind him. (The Royals’ outfield? Not so much. In fact, yikes.)

Meanwhile, Clay Holmes was fine for the Mets and Sean Manaea was better making his season debut in a piggyback role: Manaea gave up a single to the first batter he faced, Bobby Witt Jr., but then fanned five of the next six.

In the ninth the Mets dug in against Carlos Estevez, who by now must be seeing Mets in his nightmares, and rose up in self-indignation — assisted by whatever it was the Royals were doing out there in the outfield. Mauricio doubled to left over the head of Nick Loftin, whose Cedeno-esque route around the ball made you want to cover your eyes, Jeff McNeil tripled just past the glove of Kyle Isbel in center, and Jared Young brought McNeil home on a sacrifice fly that was just long enough.

Just like that the Mets had tied the game, and all they needed was for Manaea to keep the Royals in check for another half-inning. Francisco Lindor would be the Manfred man in the top of the 10th, with Vientos, Juan Soto and Pete Alonso behind him, and…

…and not so fast. Manaea got the first out of the ninth on another strikeout, but modern-day Herb Washington Tyler Tolbert served a pretty good pitch to right and then stole second. Loftin then hit a well-placed slider at the bottom of the zone just over the infield, and just like that the Mets had gone into the break with a loss.

Manaea pitched well for a club that could really use what he brings to the starting rotation. Neither of the pitches that undid the Mets were ones he’d want back. The Mets pulled off another late-inning comeback. All of these are good things.

And yet they lost. So what do you think? Better to have watched Royals outfielders do what they don’t do enough and go down 2-0? Or better to have fought back and still been dispatched? The scribes have argued this one ever since town ball took shape on some long-forgotten English village green; they’ll be arguing about it when baseball is played on Mars and aboard space stations. Sunday was just another stitch in the tapestry of what-ifs and OK-buts, with so much left to weave.

* They’ve actually played 97 games, which is 60% of a season, but nobody needs to hear from That Guy.

A Game of Half-Inches

The Mets are a half-game in first place as the final action before the All-Star break approaches. That seems appropriate, given that so much of the Mets’ good fortune seems to depend on opposing baserunners being the equivalent of no more than a half-step off a base while a Met fielder’s tag is touching him. Actually, a half-step would be a generous measurement. Try a half-inch, if that much.

The latest example came Saturday afternoon in the bottom of the eighth at Kauffman Stadium. The baserunner was the Royals’ Bobby Witt, who had walked with one out. Edwin Diaz is having a glorious season, but he still walks guys, and the guys he walks tend to run. Luis Torrens knows that. Francisco Lindor knows that. Harrison Friedland knows that. You probably know several of those Met names intimately and one in passing. The name Harrison Friedland passes through our consciousness every time there’s a close play on the basepaths, usually at second.

Witt was heading there in the eighth, where Lindor was waiting for Torrens’s throw. Friedland, the Mets’ analyst of video replays, was the most interested of observers, at least as interested as second base umpire Alan Porter. Porter thought Witt was safe. Couldn’t blame the ump. The Royals’ superstar looked supersafe.

Hey VR, we’ve got your Sportsperson of the Year.

But our replay supervisor has super vision. Witt, he divined, might have breathed just enough to have removed some scintilla of his body from the bag in the process of sliding onto it. Challenge the call, Friedland advised bench coach John Gibbons over the replay hotline. Gibby passed the word to Carlos Mendoza. Mendy made with the earmuffs motion. Say what you will about the replay rule, but it has given us a wonderfully silly gesture that carries within it the power to alter the course of innings, games, and seasons.

Our favorite gesture, however, is the fist pump we make when an opponent’s stolen base is microscopically examined and eventually overturned. We may feel a little less than clean if he’s ruled out on the tickiest-tackiest video judgment call, but is it our fault MLB hasn’t instituted some kind of force field mechanism that proclaims, He was on the bag for 99.99% of that slide, don’t be swayed by the 00.01% that’s clearly incidental to the play? They wanna call runners out for the teensiest bit of daylight, provided a ball gets to the base and a tag stays on the guy, we’ll take it.

Good execution as always from Luis and Francisco. Outstanding microscope peering yet again from Harrison. Witt gets erased. Royals have two outs. Diaz gets the third, and then comes back for the ninth. By then, the 2-1 lead he was protecting is 3-1, and his two-inning save he’s attempting is en route to completion.

Great second game of a three-game set in Kansas City. Juan Soto blasted a home run that turned their fountain into a wading pool. Frankie Montas was Montastic for five innings. Middle relief in the sixth and seventh, from Reed Garrett and Chris Devenski, respectively, warded off Royal spirits. Tight defense from Tyrone Taylor and Luisangel Acuña prevented leaks. Jeff McNeil, when he knocked in Pete Alonso with a ninth-inning run insurance run, could have bumped Flor Cawley as State Farm Agent of the Day. And, perhaps most helpful of all, we had our video guy working marvelously within a system that allows for a video guy to do a thing we wouldn’t have guessed would exist when we fell in love with baseball.

Yet there he is and there it is. The Mets are first-place team by a half-game because sometimes a half-inch makes all the difference.

Nice Rest If You Can Get It

Surely you’ve been told at some point in your life, “Get some rest and you’ll feel better.” I felt fine in the bottom of the sixth Friday night, though I’d felt better before the Royals tied the Mets at one apiece. The part of the rain-delayed game in which Kodai Senga pitched four scoreless innings in his return from the IL made me feel superfine, actually. The lone Met run coming across on a bases-loaded walk issued by Old Friend™ Michael Wacha to Pete Alonso in the third felt OK, though just OK. Pete belting one would have felt fantastic. So would have Juan Soto doing something of that nature, except he struck out prior to Pete’s at-bat. A Mets fan always feels the heart of the order should beat more loudly.

Mostly in the bottom of the sixth, I felt sleepy, thus I closed my eyes and missed the seventh inning, the top of the eighth, and however the bottom of the eighth started. Not that I knew the bottom of the eighth was in progress as I stirred. All I knew when I roused to consciousness was a commercial was on TV. I didn’t know what time it was, because the clock I rely on to tell me that at a glance after I nod off — the clock that has centered three separate living rooms of ours over the past almost 34 years — recently stopped operating. Changing batteries hasn’t worked. Tapping it purposefully hasn’t worked. Sweet-talking it back to ticking and/or tocking hasn’t worked. The clock was a wedding gift from a relative on my father’s side of the family. Its sentimental value is a product of its longevity. It’s our clock. Other methods of accessing the time are easily available to us, but we like our clock. Now it’s an ornament, perched atop a standard-definition television whose purpose these past two baseball seasons is to sit quietly behind the high-definition model we installed so we can consume media like modern folks do. The SDTV, acquired in June 2004, still worked as of January 2024, but it didn’t do enough, so we finally moved on to the kind of thing most people look at. Ol’ Boxy behind it is too heavy to move without calling a coupla guys. That dependable television of yore has therefore become a shelf for a clock that no longer tells time.

And maybe Vientos got fixed.

The commercial I woke to was for a car. I don’t know what kind of car (I can’t stress how not up to date I am when it come to cars), but it was high-end enough to hint that I wasn’t watching in the middle of the night. If it was the middle of the night, an infomercial would be on. More likely there’d be a message on my HDTV to PRESS ANY KEY, because energy-saving mode would have shut off active programming. It couldn’t be terribly late, I figured. Maybe the game is still going. Or we might be in the postgame show. The car commercial would drive off into the sunset, and then Gary Apple would speak in the past tense. I’d hate to think I’d slept through the conclusion of the game. Or maybe I’d hate to find out how the game turned out.

Rewinding the DVR struck me as an option. Or just grabbing my phone. Welcome to the second quarter of the 21st century, pal. It’s all right there on your device. You’re staring at clocks that aren’t running before figuring out how the Mets should make you feel. Get with the times.

Royals 3 Mets 1. Bottom of the eighth. Like Mr. Magoo in A Christmas Carol, I learned it wasn’t too late. But I did learn the Mets were losing, and that didn’t feel great. Bobby Witt had homered while I napped. Ouch.

Commercial break ends. Eyes open a little more. Steve Gelbs speaks. Carlos Estevez is on for the Royals with the bases loaded. Hey, Steve nudges Ron Darling, remember Carlos Estevez from last October? Carlos Estevez…I’m still sleepy, Steve…just tell me. He gave up that grand slam to Francisco Lindor. Good sign, maybe.

Alonso strikes out. So much for signs. Mark Vientos is up with one out. Mark Vientos up hasn’t been a good sign at all this year. Earlier in the game, when I was fully awake, Mark struck out and took it out on his bat at home plate. They showed that replay multiple times. It was dramatic video. But not as dramatic as what Vientos did against Estevez, doubling into the right-center gap. All three Mets on base, including dashing when he wants to be Soto, score. We go from down, 3-1, to up, 4-3. I go from wanting to turn the TV off and fall back asleep to determined to stay up.

The Mets were determined to make awake the way to be. In the ninth, against Taylor Clarke, Lindor launched a fly ball that just cleared the fence between center and right. It counted as a three-run homer. And as I debated whether this was a secure enough lead that would allow me to snooze in peace, Soto did something very similar. His fly ball was to the left of center, but it also went out. Now it’s 8-3. Now I don’t want to sleep quite so soon. I hang in there with Chris Devenski getting the final three outs and stick around for Vientos smiling with headphones on (Gelbs has to interview him from the booth since SNY didn’t spring to station an auxiliary Gelbs in KC), then treat my drowsy self to Apple’s postgame show. My favorite part is when Other Gary goes to commercial by saying, “More to come,” and I reflexively respond, “Mordecai.” I doubt it’s anybody else’s favorite part. The more that came, Mordecai, was Carlos Mendoza agreeing with reporters that it was a big game for Mark, then Kodai Senga and his interpreter assuring the same scrum that all is good on the ghostforker’s end. Plus the Phillies lost and the Mets are only a half-game out, and at least for a night, all is well. Either all is well or not at all well when it comes to these Mets. Take the good night’s rest when the Mets provide it.