The blog for Mets fans
who like to read
ABOUT US
Faith and Fear in Flushing made its debut on Feb. 16, 2005, the brainchild of two longtime friends and lifelong Met fans.
Greg Prince discovered the Mets when he was 6, during the magical summer of 1969. He is a Long Island-based writer, editor and communications consultant. Contact him here.
Jason Fry is a Brooklyn writer whose first memories include his mom leaping up and down cheering for Rusty Staub. Check out his other writing here.
Got something to say? Leave a comment, or email us at faithandfear@gmail.com. (Sorry, but we have no interest in ads, sponsored content or guest posts.)
Need our RSS feed? It's here.
Visit our Facebook page, or drop by the personal pages for Greg and Jason.
Or follow us on Twitter: Here's Greg, and here's Jason.
|
by Greg Prince on 5 December 2023 3:44 pm
A dozen years ago, after some dabbling on ancestry.com, I connected with a same-last-name relative living on the West Coast. She wasn’t exactly distant or long lost, but I’d had only the vaguest notion of her existence, and I don’t think that she’d ever heard of me. Stephanie and I met her and a friend for dinner when she was in town to visit some other Princes with whom nobody on our side of the divide was currently in touch. It was quite a kick hearing somebody mention people I knew of, however slightly I knew of them, as if an authentic connection existed, even if it was basically by default. Everybody was very friendly to one another for an evening…and that was pretty much that for this briefest of Prince family reunions.
On Saturday afternoon, I took part in a different yet similar familial coming together. No offense to my cousin from 2011, but this one I felt more deeply, lack of bloodlines be damned.
Saturday at the Sheraton in Flushing was Queens Baseball Convention day, a highlight of the offseason calendar for the past decade. QBC is a Hot Stove miracle pulled off by a bunch of people, led by primary organizers Keith Blacknick and Dan Twohig, who bleed orange and blue and give their sweat and tears to the endeavor as well. Every offseason, I wander into a venue that they’ve transformed into a winter wonderland for Mets fans, which is to say it’s full of Mets talk and Mets stuff and Mets vibes and Mets personalities (Billy Wagner, Cliff Floyd and Terry Collins topped the bill this year) and, of course, more Mets fans. It’s easy enough to remember QBC is coming up while not wholly appreciating that this thing doesn’t happen without so many folks making it happen.
I show up every year to help present an award named for Gil Hodges. The award was conceived back when Gil was being unjustly ignored for the Hall of Fame. Then Gil was voted into Cooperstown. QBC still gives out the award, because Gil is still Gil and the sentiment behind showing appreciation for unforgettable members of the Mets family glows on.
This year’s version of the Gil Hodges Unforgettable Fire Award was dedicated to the mom of our clan, Joan Whitney Payson. I’d prefer to refer to her from here on out as Mrs. Payson, because it doesn’t feel right or respectful to call her “Joan” or “Payson”. She was Mrs. Payson in life (1903-1975) and is Mrs. Payson for all time, and not in that unctuous way reporters refer only to sports franchise owners and nobody else in earshot as “Mr. So-and-So”. If we’re all going to be super formal and call one another by title, fine. If we’re not, it’s a bit much to “Mister” up the owner just because they’re the owner. Nelson and Fred; Fred and Jeff and Saul; Steve and Alex. They were or are people, just like you and me, even if people who can own sports franchises may have access to a different level of resources than you or I.
But Mrs. Payson was Mrs. Payson, and the chance to take a few minutes at QBC to illuminate her story in the middle of winter for a roomful of Mets fans who relish a little Mets history is one I don’t forget to appreciate. Through this platform over the years, I’ve had the opportunity to offer some insights on Gil Hodges, Ed Charles, Tom Seaver and several other leading lights of the Mets family. Given that Mrs. Payson hasn’t necessarily been top of Mets fan mind since her passing from the scene, I loved that Keith and Dan wanted to bring this woman’s legacy center stage.
I also loved that accepting the award on behalf of Mrs. Payson were some very warm people named Payson and de Roulet…and that I got to meet them and talk to them and realize that their family may not own the Mets any longer, but the Mets never truly left their family. These relations weren’t long lost and they weren’t distant. Spending quality time with Mrs. Payson’s daughter-in-law Joanne brought me back to that dinner with my cousin. She knew the stories people like me grew up on. She sprinkled names into conversation that until Saturday were only anecdotal to me. She made clear the Mets still meant something in their family’s lives, and that this little honor from QBC wasn’t incidental. In their own way, they’d been waiting for the Mets to care about Mrs. Payson. Never mind that it’s been 48 years since she died or nearly 44 years since the family got out of the baseball business. This was bigger than business to them.
You aren’t related to the woman who brought the Mets to life without that life remaining embedded in your life. These members of the Payson family tree clearly value that bond. The modern-day Mets seem to understand it. Not only did they co-name a high-rollers speakeasy for her down the right field line at Citi Field at the outset of 2023 — Joanne laughed when I brought up that branding, reminding me of Mrs. Payson’s patronage of Toots Shor’s place — but a representative of current Mets ownership, Josh Cohen, son of Steve and Alex, accompanied the Payson/de Roulet contingent to QBC. You could almost hear a circle being squared.
Daniel de Roulet, Mrs. Payson’s great-grandson, officially accepted the Gil Hodges award. Joan (he can call her that) would have been very happy to have received this token of everybody’s esteem, he said, but the real award for her and those standing in for her on this day was the presence all these years later of so many Mets fans, still caring so much about this team it was her pleasure to put into operation.
That he made sure to wear an orange sweater over a blue shirt for the occasion made his words resonate that much more.
The following are the remarks I delivered at QBC Saturday. Here’s to the woman who provided the baseball team that inspires us to this day.
***We’re gathered here today to remember two people at the heart of the beginnings of our favorite baseball team, the New York Mets.
When the Mets first took the field in St. Louis, on April 11, 1962, their first baseman was Gil Hodges. He hit the Mets’ first home run that night, one of 370 in his magnificent career. Seven-and-a-half years later to the day, Gil was managing the Mets in their first World Series game in Baltimore. Within a week, he would be known forever more as the manager of the 1969 world champions, just as we know him now and forever as Baseball Hall of Famer Gil Hodges.
We are today, as we’ve been for a decade, monumentally proud to present an award in his name, the Gil Hodges Unforgettable Fire Award, to those members of the Met family who, like Gil, have warmed our hearts, brightened our spirits, and continued to light our way, and we remain incredibly appreciative that the Hodges family has blessed this endeavor. Gil Hodges Jr. joined us when the Queens Baseball Convention began in January of 2014, and Irene Hodges was thoughtful enough to spend some time with us here last December. They both represent their dad’s legacy so wonderfully.
There was little chance that if you were going to start a new National League baseball team in New York in 1962 that you wouldn’t find a spot for Gil Hodges. He’d been a Brooklyn Dodgers player since the 1940s, a Brooklyn Dodgers icon since the 1950s and a New York favorite for all time when some team from Los Angeles made him available in the 1961 expansion draft. Gil was on the verge of turning 38, but he still had some pop in his bat and no prospective Met could have loomed as more popular for a team that was still a blank slate. In fact, the first Met who was ever booed, during the introduction of the starting lineups at the Home Opener two days after Gil hit that first home run in St. Louis, was Jim Marshall. Marshall was a late injury replacement for Hodges, whose knee was acting up. Nothing personal against Jim, but the fans who trekked to Upper Manhattan on a chilly, damp day wanted to see the hero they remembered from Flatbush — and not just the old Dodgers fans in the crowd.
Said one former follower of the New York Giants on the eve of that first Mets game at the Polo Grounds regarding the presence of Gil Hodges, “It’s wonderful to be rooting for him after hating him for so many years.” Spoken like a true Giants fan. Spoken like a true baseball fan. Spoken like someone we can call the very first Mets fan.
Of course she was the first Mets fan. She more or less started the Mets.
And that’s the other person from the beginnings of our favorite baseball team whose memory we honor today, presenting the Gil Hodges Unforgettable Fire Award to the family of Mrs. Joan Whitney Payson, the founding owner of the New York Mets.
As important as a few other figures in Mets lore are to the foundation of our franchise — Bill Shea, the attorney who started working the phones the minute the Dodgers and Giants left town because he knew New York wouldn’t be whole again until it was back in the National League; Branch Rickey, who placed his reputation behind the Continental League gambit that paved the way for National League expansion; George Weiss, the club’s shall we say president of baseball operations, stocking a roster under less than generous circumstances and playing for time with familiar faces until a farm system could take root; and Casey Stengel, the most familiar face of all, with a persona the public could embrace while forgiving the new team’s competitive shortfalls — you can’t say anybody was MORE important to getting this thing we love off the ground than Mrs. Payson.
Quick question, please answer with a show of hands: how many people here would own the New York Mets if they could?
Quick followup: how many of you are in a position to make that happen?
Happily, Mrs. Payson had the ability to own a baseball team, and more critically, she had the desire to own one. She’d already owned a small piece of one, the ballclub she called her own from a heart-and-soul standpoint, the aforementioned New York Giants. That was no bloodless investment, either. “My mother used to take me to the Polo Grounds when I was a little girl,” she once reflected, “and I almost feel as if I’d grown up there.” Her childhood baseball home was vacated when the Giants moved to San Francisco — she was the only member of their ownership group to vote against it — so she did something productive about it.
This baseball-loving lady, in conjunction with the gentlemen mentioned above, started the New York Mets. After all, she told a reporter, “once you’re a National Leaguer, you’re always a National Leaguer.” This new bunch of National Leaguers whose existence as a unit Mrs. Payson made possible played at the Polo Grounds for two years while Shea Stadium was being built, and they caught on fast with old Giants fans, old Dodgers fans and the New Breed of Mets fans who found their spiritual home in whichever borough the Mets set up shop.
Sitting adjacent to the home team’s dugout, always keeping score and usually wearing a colorful hat you could make out from the Mezzanine, was the woman who didn’t need to own the team to adore it as she did. Not that ownership didn’t have its privileges. If she wasn’t at the game, she made sure the game came to her. The summer the Mets shocked the world and first contended for first place, in 1969, there was one TV station in Maine that aired Mets games under a special arrangement with a local seasonal resident. Guess who had a house in Maine.
Seven years earlier, when the Mets were new and only the flair and volume of their losing was shocking, Mrs. Payson traveled to Europe in-season. She left instructions to be wired the results of the games so she could keep up. The results in 1962 could be a little depressing, so she amended her guidance: please wire only when the Mets win. Let’s just say the transatlantic cables grew cold.
Mrs. Payson didn’t seek out attention as owner of a major league baseball club. It may not have fit her personality and it may not have fit the times. “I think I’m some kind of a vice president or something,” she demurred when asked about her role. Even at what would qualify as an owner’s most glorious moment, the acceptance of the Commissioner’s Trophy, in 1969, she stood before NBC’s cameras in the victorious post-World Series clubhouse only long enough to graciously accept congratulations. The extent of her remarks was to call out to her manager, Gil Hodges, to be careful and not trip on the temporary platform the network had built. Good to her word, she was still rooting for Gil.
At any moment, Mrs. Payson had every right to step into the spotlight, but left the daily operation of the franchise to others. Professional sports was an old boys’ network and perhaps she was content to mostly sit in her box seat, fill out her scorecard and cheer her team on. Still, she was no disinterested party. I’ve often wondered, had she lived beyond 1975, what Mrs. Payson would have done when free agency came along in 1976. We already know she spent a decade trying to pry loose from the Giants her favorite player from the Polo Grounds, Willie Mays, offering Horace Stoneham whatever it took in terms of cash to acquire his contract while Willie was in his prime. She finally got her man, albeit once he was at the tail end of his brilliant career. Willie Mays’s No. 24 hangs in the Citi Field rafters as testament not only to Willie’s unbreakable link to National League baseball in New York, but as a reminder of Mrs. Payson’s dedication, perseverance and fandom.
She was the woman who brought National League baseball back to New York, and she was the woman who brought the greatest National League baseball player back to New York. Pretty good accomplishments amid a crusty old boys’ network. If anyone harbored any doubts she could hold her own in a locker room atmosphere, I refer you to the team dinner she attended during the club’s first Spring Training. According to left fielder Frank Thomas, Mrs. Payson ordered herself a steak. When asked how she wanted it prepared, she said, “Just cut off its horns, wipe its ass and bring it out.”
Conversely, there was a distinctive touch Mrs. Payson brought to ownership that might have been absent from other hands. In her last year at the helm of the club, shortly before she passed away, there was a brief note in the Sporting News, informing readers that “sterling silver baby cups from Tiffany’s were sent by Mrs. Joan Payson to Bob Apodaca, Jon Matlack and Randy Tate, all of whom became daddies within the last year.” When you read that, you knew Mrs. Payson had nurtured an operation where “bring your kiddies/bring your wife” really meant something.
“Why do people fuss over me?” Mrs. Payson once asked. “I’m not important.” We’d respectfully disagree. Mrs. Payson was the first woman to own, on her own steam, a big-time professional sports franchise. That alone is pretty impressive. That it was the New York Mets, and considering what the New York Mets became in their first eight years — both an immediately beloved institution and the champions of the world — Mrs. Payson’s impact shouldn’t be understated. She gave us the Mets.
The least we can do as Mets fans at a Mets fanfest is say thank you and present her with the Gil Hodges Unforgettable Fire Award.
by Greg Prince on 30 November 2023 9:08 am
Of all the key offseason hires approved by Steve Cohen, I haven’t seen the name Florian Cloud de Bounevialle O’Malley Armstrong appointed as Senior Vice President, Strategic Planning, or whatever title would imply a person has been brought in to help the Mets figure out what to do next. No wonder she’s not in Flushing, given the personal mission statement this individual issued twenty years ago and how it clashes with the way the Mets went about their baseball business this year.
The would-be Met executive in question is a British singer better known by her stage name Dido, the same Dido who had a decent-sized hit in 2003 called “White Flag,” an anthem dedicated to not giving up.
I will go down with this ship
And I won’t put my hands up and surrender
There will be no white flag above my door
Dido was singing about a romance, but her message can apply to any difficult situation. The song — which went to No. 1 in several countries and reached the Top Five on Billboard’s Adult Contemporary chart in America — isn’t thematically unusual in pop annals. “Don’t Give Up On Us” by David Soul topped the Hot 100 in 1977; “Hang On In There Baby” by Johnny Bristol went Top Ten in 1974 and happens to rank as my nineteenth-favorite song of “All-Time”. The 1985 Mets’ highlight video (film was passé in the MTV era) aired by SportsChannel during nearly every rain delay in 1986 was titled “No Surrender,” with Bruce Springsteen’s track off the Born in the U.S.A. album one of many apt tunes licensed for inclusion (if not into perpetuity, as the video’s soundtrack was hacked beyond aural recognition when revived by SNY as Mets Yearbook: 1985). Those Mets whose exploits Springsteen serenaded dueled the Cardinals down to the final weekend. No retreat, baby. No surrender.
Yet it is Dido’s ditty that comes to mind in the wake of 2023 because of the phrase inserted in the chorus. The white flag is an ancient, enduring and potent symbol of giving up, and giving up is such an odious notion within the human condition. There are more nuanced meanings available, however. In recent centuries, according to the History Channel website, “the white flag has become an internationally recognized symbol not only for surrender but also for the wish to initiate ceasefires and conduct battlefield negotiations. Medieval heralds carried white wands and standards to distinguish themselves from combatants, and Civil War soldiers waved white flags of truce before collecting their wounded.” When you look at the white flag less as a communiqué of capitulation and more in the realm of saying, à la Eric Cartman, “screw you guys, we’re going home,” then you can rationalize the value of a white flag once you’ve concluded you don’t have the wherewithal to even pretend to compete any longer.
For 2023, Faith and Fear in Flushing chooses as its Nikon Camera Player of the Year — an award presented to the entity or concept that best symbolizes, illustrates or transcends the year in Metsdom — The White Flag. By the middle of a campaign that was going nowhere, the Mets arrived at the realization that the most sensible way to play out their season was to find the first door leading to the future and give up on any pretense of contention.
In the words of Quick Draw McGraw Snagglepuss, exit stage 2024.
Between just before midnight on July 27 and just before 6 PM on Deadline Day, August 1, the New York Mets traded from their roster six veteran players. Five were exactly the kinds of players any team would want on their roster if that team was serious about making a run for a playoff spot, which is, in theory, the idea at the heart of any baseball season. Offed in the 112-hour selling period were a quality closer, two professional hitters and two starting pitchers universally described as future Hall of Famers. Each of those players the Mets no longer saw any need to keep around was placed in a good home, which is to say on a team with its eyes on October. Indeed, each of the teams acquiring one of these Mets played beyond the regular season.
The Miami Marlins traded for David Robertson, the quality closer. They made it to the Wild Card round.
The Milwaukee Brewers traded for Mark Canha, one of the professional hitters. They won their division.
The Arizona Diamondbacks traded for Tommy Pham, the other professional hitter. They won the National League pennant.
The Houston Astros traded for Justin Verlander, owner of three Cy Young Awards. They went to the League Championship Series.
The Texas Rangers traded for Max Scherzer, whose trophy case also houses a trio of Cy Youngs. They won the World Series.
Imagine having all these postseason pieces alongside a passel of other capable and accomplished players, including a few very much in their prime, all on one team. Then imagine looking at that team as a whole.
It looks better in the anticipatory imagination than it did on the field for the first four months of the 2023 season. The New York Mets already tried that cast. Scherzer and Verlander and Pham and Canha and Robertson and Alonso and Lindor and McNeil and Senga and Nimmo and Ottavino and Raley and an injection of youth from Alvarez and Baty and Vientos. A person planning to watch that collection of talent every day as of Opening Day couldn’t wait to see what they’d do together.
A person who actually watched that collection of talent every day from Opening Day until July 27 couldn’t stand to look at them any longer. A lot of people, actually — a lot of people who were Mets fans with high hopes at the outset of 2023 and a lot of people who had virtually no hope by the second half of the season.
Myself I’d count as no longer one of the truly hopeful by the night of June 8, once the Mets had been swept by the Braves in Atlanta. “Swept” doesn’t really do what the Braves did to the Mets justice. In each of three games at Truist Park, the Mets took a lead. In each of those three games, the Braves overcame the Mets’ lead. The series finale served as the most stark example of the chasm that had developed between these two franchises in the eight months since they each finished with 101 wins in 2022. The Mets hit three home runs; scored in five separate innings; and took or held a lead during every inning between the second and the ninth.
The Braves won in ten, 13-10.
A result of this nature in another season would have launched me into a rage or sent me spiraling into despair. This result in this season liberated me. As of June 8, when the Mets fell 8½ games behind the Braves, I was freed of the expectations that hadn’t matched the reality of the Mets for 63 games. This was no longer 2022. This was no longer Mets vs. Braves for the duration. The 2023 Mets had played with lethargy rather than urgency in April and May. June was starting no better. The Braves were still the Braves. Huzzah, I decided on June 8, I no longer have to take this team seriously as a National League East contender. After the way the Mets let the division title slip from their grasp in 2022, it was a perverse relief not to validate their presumed powerhouse status. Presumption evaporated on June 8. The Mets’ chance to catch the Braves evaporated with it.
But I didn’t think they would altogether disappear from the Wild Card race. And I don’t know if they ever did altogether disappear from the Wild Card race, even as June maintained its rancid pace — they’d ended June 1 at 30-27 and awoke July 1 at 36-46. That June swoon sure resembles a disappearing act. Yet the world in which fans of my vintage learned baseball, wherein your team was either fighting for first place or was languishing no place, had evolved into one dripping with consolation prizes. One Wild Card became two. Two Wild Cards became three. With three Wild Cards up for grabs, you have to be absolutely awful to be prohibitively out of it at the dawn of July. When the Mets completed compiling their nineteenth loss in their previous twenty-five contests, they sat ten games from the nearest Wild Card. Not a promising position from which to launch a highly improbable comeback, but not an absolutely impossible scenario, certainly not when you considered…
a) Roughly half a season remained.
b) The Wild Card scramble encompassed a slew of flawed entrants.
c) It was the fiftieth anniversary of 1973.
From July 1 through July 7, the Mets won six in a row. Verlander won a game and looked great doing it (7 IP, 0 ER). Scherzer won a game, regardless of how he looked (6 IP, 4 ER). Senga and Robertson teamed up on a four-hitter, striking out thirteen between them, winning and saving the Mets to victory once Alvarez (homer) and Canha (triple) provided some ninth-inning firepower. The 42-46 Mets were now 6½ games from the Wild Card. Fluidity was the fuel of conditional optimism. So many teams were fewer than double-digits from the final playoff berth. So many weeks were still on the schedule. So many Mets seemed to be coming alive. So, why couldn’t the Mets transform lethargy into energy?
I don’t know. But they didn’t. They lost their final two games before the All-Star break, their first two after the All-Star break, traded off some wins and losses for the better part of the next two weeks and entered the night of July 27 seven games under .500 and 7½ from a Wild Card. With a little over two months to go, they were running in place.
Steve Cohen saw the same team every Mets fan had in 2023, the one that looked imposing in March, the one that had marched into a miasma by late July, less the fog of war than a fog of bore. At the same stage in 1973, the Met record was worse (44-57 then vs. 47-54 now) and the distance from a playoff spot was three games farther away, and if you wished to hang your hat on You Gotta Believe, you were welcome to. But there’s a reason a season like 1973 lives on in legend: because it doesn’t happen every year.
Cohen discerned 1973 wasn’t going to happen in 2023, so he signed off on the trading of Robertson on the 27th; Scherzer on the 29th; Canha on the 31st; and Verlander and Pham and, for good measure, journeyman reliever Dominic Leone (to the then still aspirational Angels) on the First of August. Leone was the Mike Phillips-for-Joel Youngblood transaction of this Deadline Day. Robertson, Canha and Pham felt like standard-issue selloffs, veterans going somewhere else as a towel was being thrown in. A team that planned to contend over the final 61 games wouldn’t let go of its closer, even if he was a contingency closer, and wouldn’t have dispatched two bats that had been through the wars unless there was an obvious replacement in the wings (there wasn’t). But at the risk of diminishing the significance of the trades of Robertson, Canha and Pham, it was Scherzer on a Saturday night and Verlander on the succeeding Tuesday afternoon that made the deadline experience a full-blown Anti-Dido.
The White Flag was soaring above Citi Field, roughly where a 2023 pennant might have flown. Not only were Verlander, who had found his footing after an injury, and Scherzer, whose season hadn’t been quite so encouraging but he still carried that “knows how to win” cachet to the mound, were big names. They were tethered to big contracts. Not long, but hefty. How are you going to trade superstars of their caliber without picking up a ton of the ton they were owed?
You are going to be Steve Cohen is how. You are going to display a healthy impatience for how things are going, pick up the contractual tab in order to pry loose the best available prospects and determine that the preferable course of action is to lean into next season and the seasons after that, no matter how discouraging these half-dozen trades could have been interpreted in the context of this season. You interpret the trades instead as a necessary reset and bring back minor leaguers labeled legitimate prospects, executing what one self-styled wag referred to as the Steve Cohen Supplemental Draft. Suddenly, your farm system is restocked. Suddenly, a longshot playoff bid that has vanished is forgotten. Suddenly, you’ve heard of Luisangel Acuña and Drew Gilbert and Ryan Clifford and a bunch of other fresh faces nowhere near ready in the moment, but the hell with the moment. There are moments to come.
With their white flag, the Mets initiated a competitive ceasefire and conducted what amounted to battlefield negotiations with the general managers of organizations that were still out there fighting. They distinguished themselves from combatants by playing whoever they had handy and collected more than their share of wounds amid some grisly box scores. Mostly, they got through the season. They never effectively replaced Verlander and Scherzer (they are future Hall of Famers), but it’s not like we had really gotten attached to them as Mets. The starting pitching without them, led skillfully by Senga, performed with consistent competence down what in other seasons we would have labeled the stretch. Robertson wasn’t missed that much because there weren’t many save opportunities. DJ Stewart in right was enough of a revelation to erase cornermen Canha and Pham from our collective consciousness until perhaps we noticed them participating in the playoffs. Ronny Mauricio came up, flashed some of the ability we’d been told he’d been honing, and reminded us what fun it is to welcome genuine comers to the big leagues.
The Mets finished a little more below .500 (75-87) than they were when they began to make their trades, nine games from the third Wild Card slot, which is to say that for all their temporary tanking, they didn’t plunge significantly deeper into the abyss than they already had. Seven-and-a-half out when they commenced dealing. Nine out long after the dealing was done. They were a reflection of the squishy blob that represented the middle tier of their league. The postseason made room for a pair of 84-78 clubs in Miami and Arizona; Arizona made its way to the World Series. The 1973 Mets qualified at 82-79, albeit by capturing first place. Different times.
Still, one is permitted to squint in the rearview back to late July and make out a scenario in which those five players who helped five different contenders confirm their playoff reservations stayed with the Mets and were of similar use to our team, which wasn’t really in it, but not totally out of it, and played better than .500 ball — 22-21 — over their final 43 games despite the white flag having been definitively waved. Maybe 22-21 becomes 27-16 if we still have those guys we traded… and certain other teams don’t have some of those guys we traded…and because we didn’t wave the white flag, we don’t display post-deadline symptoms of shell shock (like that 0-6 road trip before we more or less straightened ourselves out)…and a few other things happen…and luck is finally on our side…and You Gotta Believe! But then you remember what everything looked like when we landed in late July and how you likely weren’t saying to yourself, “I just know we’re going to ride Verlander, Scherzer, Robertson, Canha and Pham in conjunction with everybody else here to a pennant.”
Whether the Mets of the fairly near future, elevated by the prospects received in exchange for raising the white flag in 2023, are in for a tangibly better ride is a component of the remains-to-be-scenery. It’s almost as if we can’t know what will happen until it actually happens. Or know what might have happened when it didn’t happen.
FAITH AND FEAR’S PREVIOUS NIKON CAMERA PLAYERS OF THE YEAR
1980: The Magic*
2005: The WFAN broadcast team of Gary Cohen and Howie Rose
2006: Shea Stadium
2007: Uncertainty
2008: The 162-Game Schedule
2009: Two Hands
2010: Realization
2011: Commitment
2012: No-Hitter Nomenclature
2013: Harvey Days
2014: The Dudafly Effect
2015: Precedent — Or The Lack Thereof
2016: The Home Run
2017: The Disabled List
2018: The Last Days of David Wright
2019: Our Kids
2020: Distance (Nikon Mini)
2021: Trajectories
2022: Something Short of Satisfaction
*Manufacturers Hanover Trust Player of the Year
National League Town is the Mets podcast that takes controversial stands like “David Wright oughta get a bunch of Hall of Fame votes!” Listen for elaboration here.
by Greg Prince on 25 November 2023 7:11 pm
I have a few overriding memories of Ron Hodges’s Mets career that aren’t his signature moment in baseball.
1) Memorial Day 1976: The Mets have won the first game of a holiday doubleheader against Pittsburgh. They’re being shut out by Doc Medich in the second game. Ron Hodges hits a home run in the ninth. They still lose, but I remember the home run. Until I looked it up after learning of Ron’s passing at the age of 74 on Friday, I kind of remembered the home run being more dramatic. Maybe it won the game. Maybe it was his second of the game or at least the day. No, just a solo home run that brought the Mets within one. Hodges had been in Tidewater most of 1975, once the glitter of what he’d done as a rookie in 1973 had worn off and the Mets had become more interested in grooming John Stearns as the eventual successor to Jerry Grote. Clearly, Hodges was now back to stay. Maybe that’s what felt dramatic about it.
2) August 1980: The Mets aren’t doing well. They were for several months, but they’ve been beset by frontline injuries, including one that’s taken out their only All-Star, Stearns. Alex Treviño — good defense, light bat, zero power — is starting most games. Butch Benton, first-round draft pick in 1975, is backing up Treviño with a batting average so low (.048) that the caliber of his catching doesn’t immediately spring to mind in 2023. They miss Stearns. Maybe they miss somebody else in their catching corps. Briefly commiserating with a fellow Mets fan in 1980, I’m asked, “Why isn’t Ron Hodges playing?” He’s out with an injury, I said. Mystery solved for that guy, but it occurred to me that Hodges could be absent for more than a month — he hadn’t played since the Fourth of July — and somebody not paying rapt Met attention might not notice.
3) June 21, 1984: Rusty Staub delivers the difference-maker in a critical 10-7 home win over the Phillies on the first day of summer, as critical as a win can be on the first day of summer, considering the season wouldn’t be over until early fall. It felt as big as any June game I could remember. I was following along from a distance — a lot of calls to Sportsphone while grinding out my summer semester at USF — but I was all over this game. The Mets entered a half-game behind the Phillies for first place. The Cubs were circling the top of the standings as well, but knocking out the Phillies, who’d owned the division more years than not since 1976, was paramount to me. Staub’s pinch-hit single in the seventh to put the Mets ahead to stay signified something more than a pleasant June afternoon result unfolding. It was Rusty! The last time we were in first place this deep into a season was 1973! Who was one of our heroes then? Rusty! Of course Rusty was sent away after 1975 and wouldn’t return until 1981. If you wanted a sturdier throughline from You Gotta Believe to believing anew, you needed look no further than the contributions of Ron Hodges, a player who, save for a Triple-A stint in 1975 or Disabled List stay in 1980, had been at Shea since the last time Shea was inarguably the place to be. Versus Philadelphia this day in 1984, he reaches on a two-out error in the fifth, which allows two runs to score; drives in a run on a groundout in the seventh; walks with the bases loaded in the eighth for one more insurance tally. None of it is heroic, exactly. All of it helpful to a newly minted first-place ballclub, all of it a testament to what can happen if somebody hangs around long enough.
Ron Hodges hung around plenty. He showed up with little notice in ’73 and was a Met every single season thereafter through ’84, a dozen seasons in all. As a Met and only a Met, only Ed Kranepool and David Wright outlasted him. That he made himself technically irreplaceable for twelve years without ever excelling on the level of Wright or building a legend à la Kranepool makes his endurance all the more remarkable.
Scouting report? He was good at being Ron Hodges. Every franchise is better off when it has somebody who fits that description.
 Ron settling in at Shea.
A lefty-swinging minor leaguer who wasn’t necessarily filling any Mets fan’s radar in the hotly anticipated prospect sense, Hodges was called up from Double-A Memphis in June for the primary reason catchers are called up before September. Because some other catcher is hurt. That might be an oversimplification, but without running the research, I’d swear it’s mostly true. Butch Benton was called up because Stearns was hurt. Francisco Alvarez was called up because Omar Narváez was hurt. Ron Hodges was called up because Jerry May was hurt. Jerry May, a veteran, was here because Jerry Grote was hurt. For years, the catching pecking order had been Grote and Duffy Dyer, unless Grote was hurt. Then it was Dyer and hope for the best. Depth demanded something more in June of 1973 once the Jerrys were left hanging on the DL vine.
Thus, it was deemed time in Flushing, N.Y., for Ron Hodges from Rocky Mount, Va., who in the Daily News accounting of his promotion was identified as “no relation to late Met manager” Gil, a point hammered home in Ron’s yearbook writeups for years to come. His annual capsule bios also never failed to note Ron “had impressed Yogi Berra during 1972 inspection tour of Florida Instructional League,” where no-relation Hodges earned all-star honors. “He’s an outstanding receiver and the best catching prospect in the organization,” Billy Connors, the Mets’ minor league pitching coach informed the News. His batting average at Memphis was .173, so it was probably all about behind the plate for Ron.
Nonetheless, the freshman just shy of his 24th birthday when he came up, was a .300 hitter after his first fifteen starts, mixing in a homer and eight RBIs before National League pitchers tamed his bat. Nonetheless, Ron’s hot streak and dependable backstopping provided enough runway for Yogi — who knew something about catching — to carry Hodges along with Grote and Dyer once the incumbent came back and the Mets made their late-season move to advance from last place to first.
With a healed Grote ensconced, Hodges’s starts became rare (and Dyer’s nonexistent), but when opportunity knocked, boy did Ron answer. At Shea Stadium on the night of September 20, with the Pirates barely clinging to both first place and a one-run lead, Berra’s catching depth went into effect. Yogi used Ken Boswell to lead off the bottom of the ninth as a pinch-hitter for Grote, who had guided Jerry Koosman through eight innings of four-hit ball. Boswell responded with a single. Don Hahn sacrificed him to second. One out later, Duffy pinch-hit for reliever Harry Parker and doubled home Ken. Tie game. Hoping to build the winning run, Yogi sent Greg Harts in to pinch-run for Dyer. When that run did not materialize, it was Hodges’s turn to play. He caught the tenth, eleventh and twelfth, three perfect innings from Ray Sadecki.
In the top of the thirteenth, with one out, Richie Zisk singled. With two out, Dave Augustine…well, let’s get Bob Murphy on the mic to tell us what happened next.
“The two-one pitch…
“Hit in the air to left field, it’s deep…
“Back goes Jones, BY THE FENCE…
“It hits the TOP of the fence, comes back in play…
“Jones grabs it!
“The relay throw to the plate, they may get him…
“…HE’S OUT!
“He’s out at the plate!
“An INCREDIBLE play!”
“Jones” is Cleon Jones, the left fielder, who is in the midst of a splendid career and a spectacular September. “The relay throw” is Wayne Garrett, Met third baseman more nights than not between 1969 and 1976, whether by choice or default; he’s playing shortstop at the moment after Buddy Harrelson was pinch-hit for in the whirlwind ninth. Garrett, too, is tearing it up this September. “To the plate” means Ron Hodges. Once Yogi has Grote, Grote is his September security blanket. Ron hasn’t started since the nightcap of the Labor Day twinbill that doubled as Craig Swan’s major league debut. He’s caught four-and-a-third mopup innings in the past two-and-a-half weeks before tonight.
Yet he finishes off an incredible play. Zisk is not fast as a baserunner, but he is a formidable physical force if he’s sliding into you, especially with the season on the line. Ron Hodges absorbed all 200 pounds of Zisk, tagged him, showed umpire John McSherry the ball, stood up, dusted himself off, came to bat in the bottom of the inning, and drove home John Milner from second with the winning run in a 4-3 victory. The Mets were a half-game from first place. The next night, they’d be in it, never to vacate it.
“There’s no comparison to anything I’ve ever done,” Hodges said after the game — and that was two nights after he’d delivered a game-tying pinch-single in the ninth in Pittsburgh. Rookie Ron Hodges was a pennant race veteran. He was the indispensable “2” on the 7-6-2 of a lifetime, and he drove in the only walkoff run of the Mets’ miraculous September. His signature moment in baseball is as indelible as just about any other Met’s.
That was Game No. 153 of the Mets’ 1973 season. Hodges wouldn’t play again. It was all Grote all the time all the way to the division-clincher on October 1 in Chicago. A World Series Game One ninth-inning pinch-walk for Harrelson, with Teddy Martinez immediately replacing him on the basepaths, represented his postseason participation, not only for ’73, but forever. We may have been told we had to believe more in ’74, yet Septembers were done sizzling at Shea for the rest of the Seventies. Save for a split-season mirage in 1981, the Mets would not legitimately contend into the final weeks of a campaign until the twilight of Ron Hodges’s career, and even then, in 1984, the Mets would have needed a couple of miracles on the order of 1973 to catch the Cubs, who passed them for first place for good in August.
By then, the staff Hodges caught as a rookie, helmed by Seaver, Koosman and Matlack, had gone through multiple changes. In 1984, it was full of young, electrifying arms who were eliciting comparisons to the rotation Ron had come up on. Gooden. Darling. Fernandez. In between, there had been Swan maturing and lasting almost as long as Hodges, and Zachry, and Espinosa, and Falcone, and Bomback, and any number of starting pitchers and relievers. Hodges was around for all of them. Stearns succeeded Grote as the starting catcher in 1977; injuries curtailed his incumbency. Treviño showed enough promise that he got a decent number of reps before going to Cincinnati in the George Foster trade. Benton didn’t work out in the scheme of catching depth. Neither did journeyman Bruce Bochy, among others. In 1984, a former first-round pick named John Gibbons (your 2024 New York Mets bench coach) was the designated catcher of the future until injured. Another rookie, Mike Fitzgerald, took over, with Keith Hernandez frequently visiting the mound from first base to furnish any insight a neophyte catcher might not have handy for the fresh-faced pitchers.
Hodges persevered. Still there in 1984, same as in 1973, same as in all the seasons in between. Played in more than half his team’s games only once. Batted over .260 only once. Homered as many as five times only once. The statistics seemed beside the point after a while. We had a catcher who batted from the left side, a catcher who’d been through the last true pennant race the Mets had contested, certainly the last one they’d won. We had a catcher and Hodges had a role. “When I went back to Tidewater in 1975,” Ron reflected for his SABR biography in 2018, “I made a decision to be a backup in the majors rather than a starter in the minors.” Given his longevity, it appears Hodges knew what he was doing.
 Ron getting up to leave.
Ron Hodges’s final start in the majors came on September 25, 1984, after the Mets were eliminated from postseason contention. Most of his Septembers since his first one could have been described that way, but these were the 1984 Mets, and they were en route to better days. Hodges left his soon-to-be erstwhile employers something to remember him by, a single that tied another game with the Phillies, 4-4 in the bottom of the ninth. Ron came out for a pinch-runner, Jose Oquendo, and could watch from the bench as his then-and-now teammate Staub blasted the two-run homer that won the game for the Mets. It was a big deal in that Rusty became the first player since Ty Cobb to go deep before turning 20 and after turning 40. Rusty had one more year ahead of him as a Met. Ron would get one more at-bat, pinch-hitting in Montreal on the last day of the season. John Stearns was making what proved the last start of his career. GM Frank Cashen’s eyes that day were no doubt on the Expos’ catcher, Gary Carter. Carter would be a Met in a little over two months, acquired in December for four Mets who included Fitzgerald. By then, connections with their previous longtime catchers were severed. Stearns was a free agent who didn’t play after 1984. Hodges, too. “We wish Ron all the best,” Cashen said when the Mets confirmed they weren’t picking up the veteran’s option for 1985. “He has always been a gentleman and a credit to the ballclub.”
We mostly remember Ron Hodges for one play at the plate in top of an inning and the at-bat that followed in the bottom of that frame, and given the momentousness of the context that surrounded those events, that’s an appropriate reflex. But let’s remember the years after as well. It was easy to take for granted a backup catcher who, by job description, didn’t play very much. Yet the list of backup catchers who did it for as long as Ron did it for the Mets is limited to one.
***The following is something I wrote a few years ago for a song parody contest on the Crane Pool Forum. All you need to know, besides that it’s sung to the tune of Meat Loaf’s immortal “Paradise by the Dashboard Light,” is a) the contest demanded a reference to a 1970s television show be woven within the lyrics; b) the Phil Rizzuto portion should be interpreted as being announced by — who else? — Bob Murphy; and c) the story is being told from the perspective of a rookie catcher first called up in 1973.
With that, I share with you here my 2020 salute to Ron Hodges, “Paradise by the Scoreboard Light”.
——
Well I remember every little thing
As if it happened just a year ago
Summoned up to Shea when there was only one catcher on-site
And I never dreamed my shot
Would come along quite so quickly
And all the Blues in Memphis
They were wishing they were me that night
The Eastern Division grew close and tight
Nobody was that good
No team was going right
We were sitting in the basement with a ghost of a chance
Sitting in the basement with a ghost of a chance
C’mon, hold on tight
Oh c’mon, for dear life
Though it’s kinda hopeless stuck down in sixth place
I could see a smile light up on Tug McGraw’s face
Ain’t no doubt about it
We were hardly dead
We were less than seven out
With a month ahead
Ain’t no need to resign, man
Someone alert that ol’ Sign Man
Ain’t no doubt about it
You gotta believe
It ain’t over ’til it’s over
When ya got Matlack, Koosman & Seav’
Pirates, don’t ya hear our steps?
We’re now recovered from our injuries
I’m mostly sitting on the bench
But watching’s fun, just the same
Bucs, we’re gonna let ya know
Oh, you’re gonna come to regret us
I opened up my eyes
I got a big surprise
Yogi made some moves
And suddenly I’m in the game
Grote and Dyer, they were done for the night
“Ronnie,” Yogi said, “you’re gonna do all right”
And we headed into extras with a ghost of a chance
Headed into extras with a ghost of a chance
C’mon, hold on tight
Oh c’mon, for dear life
Though I was sorta nervous on that Thursday night
I could see paradise by the scoreboard light
Though being third-string could certainly bite
(Could certainly bite)
Paradise by the scoreboard light
Could only do what I could
And let my pitch-framing skills do the rest
Ain’t no doubt about it
We were doubly blessed
’Cause we were barely one game out and we were barely…
It’s beginning to feel like Sixty-Nine
And Sixty-Nine was mighty fine
It’s beginning to feel like Sixty-Nine
And Sixty-Nine was mighty fine
It’s beginning to feel like Sixty-Nine
And Sixty-Nine was mighty fine
It’s beginning to feel like Sixty-Nine
And Sixty-Nine was mighty fine
***
Dave Augustine, the Pirates’ promising outfield prospect, in the box
Zisk takes a slight lead off first as Sadecki looks in for the sign
Young Ron Hodges behind the plate late in his rookie season
In June he was at Double-A, now he’s in the heat of a pennant race
Augustine fouls one off, over into the box seats behind first base
The ball is caught by a fan who looks very familiar to me
Why, yes, that’s Archie Bunker from Astoria, right here in Queens
I had the pleasure of meeting Mr. Bunker before tonight’s game
Archie and his son-in-law Mike are guests of our sponsor Rheingold
Natural Rheingold worked with local taverns to provide two tickets
To patrons of one of the local taverns that supports Mets baseball
And Archie’s name was drawn from an entry sent in by Kelsey’s Bar
You know, I’ve got to tell you, that Mr. Bunker is a real character
He had some very provocative things to say to me when we met
He’s also quite a bowler and asked if he could be on my new show
“Bowling for Dollars,” airing weeknights on WOR-TV, Channel 9
I told Mr. Bunker I’m not the one who makes those decisions
But I will say he seems ready-made for television
Augustine, who had called time, steps back into the box
He had gone over to the on-deck circle for some pine tar
Now everybody in the crowd, including Archie Bunker
Perches forward in his chair for the next pitch
This has been a tense affair from the word ‘go’ tonight
We’re in the top of the thirteenth inning, tied at three with two out
Again, Zisk at first, Augustine at bat with a count of two-and-one
The veteran lefty Ray Sadecki on the mound
The youngster Ron Hodges puts down his fingers for the sign
Fasten your seat belts…
***
Stop right there!
We’re gonna know right now
Dave Augustine clocks it
Off Sadecki
He hits it a ton
It’s surely going
Will we ever recover?
Will a two-run homer keep us from first place?
Dave Augustine’s fly ball seems destined for space
Is it going?
Is there a way it’s not going?
Can we get it
Before it goes?
Will Augustine’s fly ball somehow not clear the fence?
Might there still be an outcome that eludes common sense?
We’re gonna know right now
If we can go any further
And still win this
And then maybe the pennant
Well, keep an eye on it
Maybe, maybe keep an eye on it
Keep an eye on it
We could pick up ground by Friday morning
Well, keep an eye on it
Maybe, maybe Cleon’s tryin’ it
Jones is at the track
The track they put out there for his warning
Well, keep an eye on it
Maybe, maybe it’s dyin’, it’s —
The ball is not out!
It could be a new day that is dawning
We’re gonna know right now
That it’s in play
Off the top of the wall
Yes it’s in play
No it didn’t leave Shea
It took a crazy high bounce into Cleon Jones’ glove
Seems our chances at first place have been given a shove
We’re gonna know right now
If we can go any further
We might love this
We might love this forever
What’s it gonna be, Zisk?
Come on, you can hardly run
What’s it gonna be, Zisk?
Score or not?
What’s it gonna BE, Zisk?
Safe… or… OUT?
Keep an eye on Zisk
Richie isn’t fast enough for this
Well, keep an eye on Zisk
Maybe we’ll nab him with a relay
We’re gonna know right now
Will we love this?
Will we love this forever?
Where’s the relay?
Will Cleon reach Garrett?
If Garrett grabs the relay
Will he get it to me?
Can I block the plate fully
And withstand Richie Zisk?
We’re gonna know right now
If we go any further
If we’ll love this
If we’ll love this forever
Keep an eye on Zisk
Will we love this forever?
Keep an eye on Zisk
Will we love this forever?
I caught the ball from Wayne Garrett
For a play at the plate
Then I tagged Richie Zisk, whose speed did not rate
I heard the ump John McSherry call him “OUT!” and not safe
And we would love this to the end of time
I swore, we’d love this to the end of time
Then I delivered the game-winning hit
John Milner scored on my drive
We ended the night just a half a game out
In the playoffs we were soon to arrive
I’d play eleven more years
And they weren’t the worst
But nothing could match
The thrill of coming in first
Backup ’til the end of time
It’s just what I would do (woo-wooo!)
Yet you’ll see in the rotunda
My number
The number I wore
Was Forty-Two
It was long ago and it was far away
And that ball, somehow, well, it never left Shea
It was long ago and it was far away
Augustine, you can see, is a footnote today
It was long ago and it was far away
No, I’m not related to Gilbert Ray
by Greg Prince on 24 November 2023 2:42 pm
My friend Matt Silverstone. It feels good to write that. It doesn’t feel good knowing I’m writing it because I recently did a little curiosity-driven Internet snooping and discovered Matt died eight years ago. I seem to run into that situation when I start to wonder whatever happened to some old friend of mine with whom I long ago lost touch. Matt and I last got together in 1991, for lunch. Never heard from him again. I’m in time-shifted mourning.
We met when we were twelve. The junior high side of twelve. It’s an important distinction. Elementary school was well over. We were a matter of weeks past the age of absolute innocence if we use the movie Stand by Me as our guide. “I never had any friends later on like the ones I had when I was twelve,” Richard Dreyfuss as the Stephen King stand-in says at the end. “Jesus, does anyone?” The narrator had been recalling the summer when he and his three best friends went out in search of a dead body. That doesn’t sound like something I would have been into doing the summer I was twelve. By the summer I was fifteen, I imagine Matt could have talked me into it.
Matt was the first friend I made in seventh grade. I don’t remember what brought us together. Probably proximity in the same homeroom. Homerooms were determined alphabetically. My last name was the first to be called for the back of the alphabet in seventh grade. If there was one more kid named “Sullivan” or “Weinstein,” I may have wound up in another homeroom and maybe Matt and I wouldn’t have come into contact in quite the same manner. Or maybe we got chummy in math class and it was destiny. As for what drew us into hanging out, he said something amusing and I laughed is my guess. Or the other way around. Matt was a good listener. He was also innately funnier than I was. Wry and dry. I’ve been trying to remember some of the hilarious things he said all the years I knew him so I can quote him and illustrate that he was one of the funniest people I ever knew, but I think it was mostly delivery.
In ninth grade, there were two guys in one of our classes who, for lack of a more precise term, we’ll label preppies. This was before “preppies” were a thing, but go with it. One of them called out to the other about nothing of note, maybe a little too excitedly. Matt watched them interact and pegged them to me as “the gold dust twins,” no further elaboration. None needed. I laughed for about three weeks.
Anyway, in the fall of seventh grade we got to talking, and it became habitual. I went over to his house on a Saturday, which seemed an exotic thing to do, given that he lived on the other side of town. On that first trip I met his parents and his baseball cards. He wasn’t all that interested in either entity, but I knew who his father was before I ever knew Matt. His father was Lou Silverstone. If you read Mad magazine in the 1970s, you recognized the byline. Yes, Matt would confirm to those who would ask, that was his dad. It didn’t seem to impress him much. Lou didn’t seem terribly impressed by himself, either. He was low-key friendly, a good match for Matt’s Canadian-born mother. I aged out of the Mad habit as junior high went on, but I’m still grateful that when we were in high school Lou slipped me a complimentary copy of the issue with his parody of The White Shadow in it. He seemed particularly proud of that one.
Matt didn’t slip me any complimentary baseball cards from his collection, but I seem to recall we worked out a reasonable price for a stack of his otherwise neglected 1970 Topps, particularly some Seattle Pilots I was suddenly yearning for in November of 1975. I learned early on that while Matt was pro-Mets in that way kids on Long Island grew up being then, he wasn’t much of a sports fan. He wore a New York Giants hoodie to school, which caught my eye since I didn’t know too many other Giants fans. He shrugged that his grandmother gave it to him.
Some of the cards Matt didn’t sell me and other flammables became subject to Matt’s experiments with matches and rubber cement up in his treehouse. I’d never before been in a treehouse and, other than Matt’s, I haven’t been in one since. I didn’t know treehouses actually existed outside comic strips. It served as Matt’s pied-à-terre, where he could take a friend from the other side of town and burn things in peace. There was a bit of a rebellious or nihilistic streak to Matt. He didn’t have much use for the conventions of polite society. Maybe he grew tired of answering the same questions about who his father was or what it was like to be as tall as he was. Burning cardboard in the treehouse was one of his ways of going off the grid. Rubber cement, I learned from him, made for effective lighter fluid.
I waited this long to mention Matt’s height. He was a head or more taller than most everybody in junior high, 6-foot-6 by high school. He appeared mature enough so that on the first day of tenth grade, a vice principal told him in all earnestness he shouldn’t be sticking around this building anymore now that he’d graduated. I had decent height, enough to be placed in the back row of class pictures. Matt was the kid who was always directed to the center of that row. It must have gotten tiring to be reminded, when nobody had anything else to say, that he was unusually tall. Kids are good at pointing out physical differences. I’m pretty sure I never commented to him that he was tall. Maybe that’s why we stayed friends.
Matt did go out for basketball. Mostly the bench in JV, then on the varsity our senior year. He was just enough of a jock to make it work for him; he liked to surprise-punch me in the arm, as if that was something friends did. I never got mad at him for it, but that shit hurt. His game was being tall. Once in a while I’d get caught up in some schoolyard two-on-two with him versus any comers who wandered by. I wasn’t much good, but was usually willing to throw myself into it for a few minutes. Matt was a splendid teammate. Introduced me to the phrase, “Let’s kick some ass.” I’d heard others threaten to kick “your” ass (or my ass), but never with “ass” used as a non-specific object of kicking. I thought he made up the term.
I attended Matt’s JV games, which were usually sad affairs in that they were played after the varsity ones, which meant the gym cleared out and it was me and Matt’s parents representing maybe a quarter of the crowd. Matt, in turn, came to my school plays and made himself available to deliver copies of the school paper to various classrooms at my request when I was editor. From 1979 to 1982, he joined me at one Mets game annually, always into the experience if not deeply invested in the outcome. We supported each other’s endeavors and formed what amounted to our own social or antisocial circle. Matt didn’t not get along with anybody, but he was allergic to adolescent niceties. If “everybody” was doing it or watching it or talking about it, Matt wasn’t terribly interested in it.
As ninth grade drew to a close, what Matt wanted to do most was cut class. Like treehouses, that was one of those things I’d heard of but didn’t know was something that really existed outside of teachers warning against it. Matt talked me into joining him, probably to our shared detriment. I was very much on the bubble when it came to passing biology with the Regents on the horizon, and the biggest cutting-class call of all was not going to a review session that I, maybe both of us, could have used; my mother certainly believed I should have been there. Then again, it wasn’t mandatory, and we had our bikes, and we were riding on the boardwalk early on a June afternoon when those other suckers were stuck in school trying to remember which ventricle did what. Let’s just say I scraped by in bio and just now had to Google “ventricle,” whereas I’ll never forget that day on the boardwalk.
Having led me astray at the end of ninth grade, Matt set my agenda for the summer that followed. A lot of bike riding. He was really into bikes, especially fixing up old ones, including one for me. A lot of going to the beach, which was never something that appealed to me a ton once my family installed central air conditioning, but this was our dead-body summer, when Matt was expert at talking me into whatever. Without having to sell it, Matt convinced me everything we did was exactly what we should have been doing, even if it was stuff it wouldn’t have otherwise occurred to me to do, even if it was stuff I knew Matt shouldn’t have been doing. For example, Matt purchased from a classmate for twenty dollars and carried around a switchblade. I write that now and I wouldn’t blame you for expecting Blackboard Jungle to break out, but no rumbles were on the horizon. It was just Matt’s process for defying whatever might be expected of an exceptionally tall if otherwise average suburban ninth-grader going on tenth. He mostly liked to talk about the knife, as if he was keeping it handy for show ‘n’ tell (he gave it a name — Boopsie, I think, derived from Betty Boop). The only cutting he was gonna do was of class. The whiff of danger was enough.
I believe my role in Matt’s life as junior high was becoming high school was to be the kid who wasn’t remotely dangerous. Matt’s parents seemed to appreciate he had one friend who didn’t seem like the type to sell him a switchblade.
Midway through college, Matt transferred to a school on the East Coast of Florida. I was on the West Coast. He had his parents’ old Chevy Malibu and treated it like his bike, not hesitating to go out for a long ride, in this case to my side of the state. He’d call me on a Saturday afternoon and tell me to get ready for his arrival. I didn’t tell him no, and a few hours later he’d appear. This was during Matt’s would-be Lothario phase. Like with the switchblade, it made for better talk than action, which was just as well based on his patter. We’d run into a couple of girls I knew on the dorm elevator and he’d turn on the charm. The girls would laugh and exit. I’d cringe. He’d be undeterred.
I’ve been blackout drunk once in my life. It was one of those weekends Matt showed up. His advance instructions were for me to furnish gin. He’d bring tonic to make gin and tonics and then we’d go out. I’d heard of gin and I’d heard of tonic and I’d heard of them mixed together. I had never partaken. But if Matt is driving all the way over from the East Coast, I’d hate to be a bad host. Plus there was a party that night at the dorm that didn’t require any driving, so I guessed it was OK to have a few. I went to the Albertson’s liquor store, I picked up the distilled spirit in question, and we made gin and tonics, regardless that neither of us was adept at measuring gin versus tonic. Beyond cringing in the elevator at his rap (“hey, we’ve got gin and tonics in Greg’s room”), what I mostly remember is waking up after midnight on my roommate’s bed muttering about how “what I really want is to be in love,” and Matt listening to this without judgment. I’d be sober enough soon enough to give him directions to the 24-hour McDonald’s on Fowler Avenue, which is where one would go after adding too much gin to the gin and tonics. The next morning, he wakes me up bright and early so we can drive to Clearwater Beach, a spot he assumed I knew the location of. Only vaguely. I wasn’t any more of a beachgoer in Florida than I was in Long Beach unless Matt called.
Our last lunch was a half-dozen years after college. We’d kept in touch, but didn’t see each other very much. He was working in the same North Shore town I was, so it was convenient. I told him about a Mexican restaurant, and he was very much that’s it, that’s the place where we have to go, Mexican food absolutely. There was a little Damone from Fast Times at Ridgemont High to Matt: act like wherever you are, that’s the place to be. Setting baseball cards ablaze in a treehouse. Riding bikes on the boardwalk when we were supposed to be reviewing biology. Mixing gin and tonics like total amateurs. Mexican for lunch. I’d known Matt for sixteen years by then. It was a blast being reintroduced to his moves.
This was the summer of a bit of upheaval at my magazine, with an editor coming in who I didn’t necessarily trust. I droned on quite a bit during lunch about whatever indignities I perceived were being foisted upon me. Matt listened, because Matt was good at listening, though I had the sense it might have been a bit much with the droning on my end. Regardless, when we returned to my office for a few minutes after lunch and I introduced him to the momentary bane of my existence, Matt used all of his six feet and six inches to seem intimidating on my behalf. Later on, the editor and I would work out our differences and we remain friends to this day. At the time, however, the guy confessed he thought Matt was gonna kick his ass for me.
My wedding was a few months away at that point and I told Matt to be on the lookout for an invitation. I don’t think I ever got an RSVP. I was disappointed, but not surprised. The same scenario played out for my Bar Mitzvah. Matt didn’t really go in for those things. He did agree to be a groomsman at my sister’s wedding mostly because he assumed there’d be bridesmaids to work his charms on. I don’t think he signed my high school yearbook, either. That was Matt being Matt, I decided. Matt being Matt made him one of my favorite people ever. Matt being Matt also made me not reach out beyond 1991. I don’t want to bother somebody who doesn’t care to be bothered. I’ll see him when I see him, I figured, but I never did see him again. He didn’t show up for the two high school reunions I bothered with, and I knew damn well he wasn’t a social media person. I made cursory searches a few times, anyway. No dice.
His father I did bump into a few times, on the LIRR in the late 1990s. Lou had moved from Mad to Cracked as one might in his field. Became its editor, in fact. Matty was doing fine, he said, he’d send my regards. Lou died at 90 in March of 2015, the same year my father took ill. Eight months later, my recent rabbit-hole exploration revealed, Matt — married with two children and living one county east of me — died at the age of 52, apparently from cancer, which seems to have taken too many of my friends from my youth, guys with whom I was no longer in contact but had never forgotten. Matt was certainly unforgettable to me, down to my bones. My arm still hurts thinking about him.
by Greg Prince on 22 November 2023 2:01 pm
“I call to order the 2023 meeting of the Faith and Fear in Flushing Awards Committee for the purpose of selecting the Richie Ashburn Most Valuable Met for the season just past. Before we proceed, is there any old business?”
“Yeah — who did we name last year?”
“Uh… Starling Marte.”
“Wow. That doesn’t look very visionary a year later.”
“Perhaps not, but FAFIFAC isn’t in the business of forecasting. It’s in the business of reflecting.”
“Still, I’m beginning to wonder if there’s a FAFIF MVM curse. Who did we give the award to the year before last?”
“Uh… Aaron Loup and four other relievers who pitched a lot and pretty well.”
“Loup? He was gone the next year.”
“C’mon. One of the other relievers in that writeup was Edwin Diaz.”
“The Diaz who got hurt during Spring Training this year?”
“Well, it wasn’t Yennsy Diaz.”
“Ohmigod, we really are putting a curse on these guys.”
“Nonsense. We gave it to Jacob deGrom three times.”
“And look at him now. Missed most of the year and won’t be back until who knows when.”
“We also gave it to Beltran, Wright and Reyes, and they’re all on the Hall of Fame ballot.”
“See? None of them is still playing. Maybe we prematurely ended their careers.”
“Let’s get serious about this season. How about a nomination for the Most Valuable Met of 2023?”
“I nominate Nobody.”
“You really believe this curse business?”
“No, I’m saying that after a year like 2023, it’s clear that Nobody was ‘most valuable’ to the Mets, certainly not valuable enough to make any kind of difference.”
“We can’t do that.”
“Why not?”
“Because we don’t do that.”
“That’s not an answer.”
“It is in this case. We’ve given a Most Valuable Met award since the end of our first season in 2005, no matter how not good the season was.”
“I know. But has any season felt less valuable than the one we just got through?”
“I never thought of it that way.”
“Think about it.”
“I have. And you’ve got a point. Twenty Twenty-Three felt uniquely lacking in value while it played out and I have little desire to revisit it in granular form.”
“Great. So we’re agreed that our Most Valuable Met should be Nobody. Can I get a second?”
“Hold on. We don’t do that.”
“You already said that.”
“And I’ll keep saying it. Every baseball season, even the shortest and least inspiring, has its most valuable players, and even the lamest Met years have their most valuable players. We always come up with somebody because somebody inevitably stands out. Remember, we named the award for Richie Ashburn because the beat writers voted Ashburn the first Mets MVP in 1962, and that team lost 120 games.”
“Fine. But just so you know, to me, the MVM of 2023 is Nobody.”
“Duly noted. Now let’s get serious. Who’s our Most Valuable Met?”
“I don’t know. Lindor? Senga?”
“Yeah, that’s pretty much what I was thinking.”
“Which one?”
“Both, with Francisco Lindor and Kodai Senga sharing the designation as Faith and Fear in Flushing’s Richie Ashburn Most Valuable Mets for 2023.”
“Great. Move to adjourn!”
“Wait!”
“What?”
“There’s got to be more to it than that.”
“Why?”
“Because we do that.”
“These are your reasons? ‘We don’t do that.’ ‘We do do that.’”
“Baseball is defined by its traditions, and it is our tradition to celebrate our MVMs.”
“Can’t we start a new tradition of getting it over with? Like we wished the 2023 Mets had simply gotten their season over with?”
“Hmm…that would embody the spirit in which the 2023 Mets season played out.”
“Glad you see it my way. Move to adjourn!”
“Not so fast.”
“Never so fast with you. Why can’t we adjourn?”
“Listen, an entire season of Mets baseball was played, and we’re here to honor the two Mets who were not only here from the beginning of the season to the end — which isn’t something too many Mets could say — but two Mets who excelled from beginning to end.”
“I seem to recall Lindor slumping for a while.”
“Everybody slumps.”
“Wasn’t there a pop fly he didn’t catch?”
“Everybody makes mistakes. He was nominated for a Gold Glove, for cryin’ out loud.”
“His batting average was pretty low in the middle of the season.”
“It rose in the second half, and he was never not productive. More than a hundred runs scored, nearly a hundred runs driven in, first Met in the 30-30 club since Wright — and he won the Silver Slugger! First Met shortstop since Reyes to do that.”
“Senga barely qualified for the ERA title.”
“But he did, in fact, qualify. Finished second in the National League in that category, same place he finished in Rookie of the Year voting.”
“He pitched professionally in Japan for more than a decade. Was he really a rookie?”
“In the eyes of MLB, he was. We’ll take their word for it.”
“That bit where he always needed extra rest never sat right with me.”
“Call it an adjustment period. You change countries, rely on an interpreter and get batters out for six months.”
“Had some bad outings.”
“Had many more good outings, especially as he got used to pitching in the majors. The Mets won seventeen of his twenty-nine starts, and this wasn’t a team that won nearly enough of anybody’s starts.”
“I couldn’t help but notice that on the night both Lindor and Senga were being toasted for reaching their individual milestones — Senga becoming the first Met rookie since Gooden to strike out 200 and Lindor belting his 30th home run to make himself 30-30 — that the Mets lost.”
“So?”
“So it sort of symbolized for me the futility of this team that its two most valuable players couldn’t push it over the top in the game where they were lauded for personal stuff.”
“That’s a highly selective interpretation.”
“Well, we are a selection committee.”
“As a responsible selection committed, we’re looking at a much broader body of work. Lindor missed all of two games in 2023. Two! Senga, even with the rotation accommodating the extra rest that he functioned better with, never missed a start. They posted up and then some. Some years that really stands out.”
“If you say so.”
“I do say so. And now I need you to say so.”
“Fine. Here’s to our co-MVMs of 2023. If they weren’t necessarily more deserving than Nobody, they were certainly way better than nothing.”
“I’ll take that as a ‘yea’ vote for Lindor and Senga.”
“Yay. I mean ‘yea.’”
“Move to adjourn.”
“Seconded.”
“The 2023 meeting of the Faith and Fear in Flushing Awards Committee for the purpose of selecting the Richie Ashburn Most Valuable Met for the season just past is now adjourned. We will reconvene in short order to consider candidacies for the 2023 Nikon Camera Player of the Year.”
“Yay.”
FAITH AND FEAR’S PREVIOUS RICHIE ASHBURN MOST VALUABLE METS
2005: Pedro Martinez (original recording)
2005: Pedro Martinez (deluxe reissue)
2006: Carlos Beltran
2007: David Wright
2008: Johan Santana
2009: Pedro Feliciano
2010: R.A. Dickey
2011: Jose Reyes
2012: R.A. Dickey
2013: Daniel Murphy, Dillon Gee and LaTroy Hawkins
2014: Jacob deGrom
2015: Yoenis Cespedes
2016: Asdrubal Cabrera
2017: Jacob deGrom
2018: Jacob deGrom
2019: Pete Alonso
2020: Michael Conforto and Dom Smith (the RichAshes)
2021: Aaron Loup and the One-Third Troupe
2022: Starling Marte
Still to come: The Nikon Camera Player of the Year for 2023.
Here right now: A new episode of National League Town.
by Greg Prince on 18 November 2023 5:56 pm
To properly commemorate what would have been the 79th birthday of Tom Seaver on Friday, the New York Mets made a gift of Daniel Vogelbach’s availability to anybody who wants him. Technically, it was a non-tendering, but a gift is a gift. Vogelbach’s status as beloved Met who could deliver a hit on demand was brief. He definitely wasn’t as good as we thought in the wake of his 2022 arrival, probably not as bad as we collectively decided by the time 2023 went to hell. He very much rates a live-and-be-well farewell, at least until he goes all Travis d’Arnaud on our ass.
Joining Vogey in the land of fresh opportunity is Luis Guillorme, whose six-season tenure as a utilityman outlasted its utility by roughly a year. When he and the Mets peaked together, in the first half of ’22, Luis was Buck Showalter’s “regular irregular,” catching every ball hit near him and hitting plenty of the balls pitched to him. With defensive dexterity that earned him the nickname Los Manos, Guillorme casually nabbed a flying bat (the wooden kind) while standing in the dugout one Spring Training, and worked an at-bat as epic as his beard in another Spring Training. Perhaps Luis would prefer a stream of impressive black-ink statistics to show off to prospective employers this winter, but there’s something to be said for being enough of a legend that fans will warmly remember who you were long after they’ve forgotten what numbers you didn’t post.
Also enveloped in the non-tendering agate type are three relief pitchers — Jeff Brigham, Sam Coonrod and Trevor Gott — who call to mind the Wolf’s description of the body that needs to be disposed of ASAP in Pulp Fiction: nobody who’ll be missed. This troupe of freshly minted free agents joins a slew of other 2023 Mets who’ve been brushed aside by recent roster machinations. For those who haven’t been paying utmost attention to minute detail, Anthony Kay and Vinny Nittoli were grabbed by the vagabonding/Vegas A’s in October, while out on the open market just in time for holiday shopping are (deep breath) Rafael Ortega, Jose Araúz, Michael Perez, Danny Mendick, John Curtiss, Denyi Reyes and Tim Locastro. Carlos Carrasco left of his own expired-contract volition and Adam Ottavino declined his player option, citing a surfeit of Met uncertainty. Player churn happens every fall. Factor in new management, and the the exit velocity where old players are concerned is bound to be accelerated.
For all we know, one or more of the above will be back with the Mets sooner or later. We didn’t know Tom Seaver would be back with the Mets when he was traded on June 15, 1977, but there he was, striding in from the bullpen on April 5, 1983. We didn’t know Tom would be back with the Mets when he was swallowed up in the ill-fated compensation pool on January 20, 1984, but there he was yet again on the morning of June 6, 1987, putting on a Mets uniform and talking to Bob Murphy.
Could a comeback be any more official?
I recently stumbled across an audio gem. It’s from the Mets radio pregame show that bridged Mets Extra and Mets baseball from the first Saturday in June 36 years ago. Murphy hosted, Seaver guested. Tom was in orange and blue not for ceremonial purposes, but to take one more shot at pitching…and because the Mets weren’t giving up on contending.
Sometimes everything is about context. That morning in Flushing, the New York Mets were defending world champions, but their title defense hadn’t been going so swell. They were a fourth-place team, one game above .500 and six games from the top of their division. Yet there was hope. The night before marked the return of Dr. K. Dwight Gooden missed the first two months of the 1987 season after being directed to rehabilitation after testing positive for cocaine late in Spring Traning. One month in drug rehab at the Smithers faciity in Manhattan, one month in what amounted to pitching rehab, getting his arm back into shape in the minors. The former may not have been enough for a person with an addiction, but the latter seemed to have its intended effect. On June 5, 1987, Doc was on the mound again at Shea Stadium, holding the Pirates to four hits, four walks and one run over six-and-two-thirds innings in a 5-1 win. If Doc was back, hope was back.
Problem was, Bobby Ojeda, Rick Aguilera and David Cone were all out with injuries, and the Mets were vamping in the starting pitching department two out of every five games. That’s where an available right arm idling in Connecticut came into play. Four days before their reigning ace’s 1987 debut, Jack Lang broke a story in the Daily News that the Mets were in touch with their old ace. “Old” may have been the operative phrase, for even if Tom Seaver was and would always be The Franchise — and even if he had pitched effectively for the Red Sox in 1986 before a knee ailment eliminated him from their postseason rotation (and saved Mets fans from at least a sliver of emotional tug of war) — he was still a 42-year-old pitcher who hadn’t pitched in nearly nine months.
 News you might figure would have been greeted with more huzzahs.
Individual Mets from the club’s 1980s imperial phase were never shy about issuing opinions. Some players were conditionally supportive of the possible signing. “He may not be the Tom Seaver of old,” Wally Backman allowed, “but he knows how to pitch. If he’s healthy, he could help us.” Keith Hernandez countered, “We need immediate help. I don’t know how long it’d take him to get ready, and we need help right now.” Mex guessed Seaver would require a month to prepare, or roughly what the much younger Gooden spent tuning up. Gary Carter caught Seaver in January as part of a video shoot. “I can tell you that he could pitch in the majors today if he throws the way he did in the video,” Kid said. “He could give us a boost.” As an added endorsement, Carter noted, “Mickey Mantle took a few cuts against him and couldn’t hit him.” Mantle, however, hadn’t batted for real since 1968.
Less willing to see the Seaver glass as half-full was Lenny Dykstra. “I know we need another pitcher,” Nails assessed, “but I’m not sure he’s the one we need.” To Rafael Santana, one inactive pitcher profiled pretty much like another. “Maybe we should sign Pedro Borbon,” the shortstop said, referring to the Reds reliever of the ’70s. “He hasn’t pitched in six years.” One Met unwilling to put his name to his words threw this knockdown pitch at the prospective reunion: “He wasn’t the most popular guy in the clubhouse when he was here in ’83. I guess this shows we’re really desperate.”
Three years after the passing of the greatest Met who ever lived, the barely audible huzzahs for Seaver, let alone the thumbs-down reaction to the whole idea, come across as blasphemy. But in the moment, a pitcher who turned 42 the previous November and hadn’t fired a pitch in competition since he was 41 — never mind that this was 41 being talked about — may not have appeared an obvious plug to fill a gaping hole. Then again, he was Tom Seaver. He was 41 and all that implied. “Desperate times call for desperate measures,” Phil Pepe wrote in the News, labeling Tom Terrific “chicken soup for the Mets: he may not help, but he couldn’t hurt.”
Tom Seaver didn’t have to be the Tom Seaver of 1969 in 1987. Being better than the Tom Edens of 1987 (a fill-in starter who wasn’t closing the rotational gap) would suffice. As chicken soup for the staff, Seaver’s presence loomed as mmm, mmm, good enough. Thus, Seaver was back at Shea the morning after the night Gooden was back at Shea, and maybe the world was as it was supposed to be, the only two Met Cy Young winners to date aligning like the stars they were in our galaxy. GM Frank Cashen was clear there was “no sentiment involved” in the move, but the Bow Tie’s business implored him to be all business. Of course there was sentiment involved. Tom Seaver was no Pedro Borbon, no standard-issue retread. Doc Gooden was only 22, but he understood and respected the bona fides of his new teammate.
“Being on the same club with Tom Seaver is a tremendous thrill. It’s going to be great having him around. I’m sure he’s going to be a big help. I grew up following his career, him and other guys like Nolan Ryan, J.R. Richard and Steve Carlton — all the power pitchers. I was a power pitcher in high school so, naturally, I followed them. It’s going to mean a great deal knowing you got him behind you. I look forward to getting to know him better.”
Doc did everything but quote from Hello, Dolly!. That flourish was left to Bob Murphy, who told Tom on the pregame show, “It’s nice to have you back where you belong.” In the audio clip that runs about ten minutes, you can hear the friendship between Seaver and Murphy, two avatars of everything beautiful about Mets baseball. In the moment, the news is the story. All these decades later, we can savor the interaction as a precious meeting of Met icons.
You can also hear…
• the “Let’s Do It Again!” theme that scored Mets baseball in 1987;
• a reminder that we were listening to “Sportsradio 1050 WHN,” the country station positioning itself to radically alter its format and its medium a few weeks hence;
• a smidge of Howie Rose not yet losing patience with the kind of call that a rabid (and later reformed) WFAN listener would not blame him for growing sick of in the years to come;
• rolfing talk, with invocations of Craig Swan and Tim Leary;
• Seaver acknowledging “I’ve been on vacation for seven months” and balancing his contentment with life after baseball with the fact that “I love to pitch”;
• Tom, still using the third-person to refer to the Mets, saying “these guys have a really good ballclub” and “they would love to repeat,” and you realize nobody has been able to use the second sentiment to express the Mets’ goal since that season;
• Murph shifting from referring to Seaver in the third person to talking to Seaver in the second person, a subtle pivot from addressing the audience to addressing his interview subject, but with Bob doing it, it’s so wonderfully familiar and graceful;
• that though he didn’t necessarily miss the routine of baseball, what really “got some juices flowing” for Seaver was playing catch, which may not sound like much, unless you’ve heard or read Bill Simmons tell the story of how fate led him, as a teenager, to be involved in one of those games of catch;
• Tom’s evergreen pitching philosophy: “Fastball, curveball, slider and changeup, high and tight, low and away, don’t throw ’em down the middle and don’t walk ’em — some things about pitching never change”;
• an estimate that in a normal Spring Training, Tom would need three starts to get up to five innings, though he would need longer to produce five “good” innings;
• a timetable that would have Tom throwing as soon as he’s done talking to Bob and pitching for the Mets in their visit to Tidewater later in the week;
• Tom’s answer of “I’m gonna have to work real hard on that” to Murph’s gentle nudge that after three years where the DH rule was installed, “you’ll have to start working on your hitting again”;
• Bob reiterating the target date that was floated for Seaver’s return during Tom’s press conference that morning: “around June the Twentieth, he’ll be back into action in the National League,” a lovely if distant echo of the Mets’ reason for being, namely the void New York fans felt once the Giants and Dodgers left town;
• Tom Seaver’s honorarium for visiting with Bob Murphy will be gift certificates to Crazy Eddie…and if you haven’t heard it in a while, don’t deprive yourself of the sound of Bob Murphy informing everybody that “Crazy Eddie, his prices are insane”;
• and that, per Murph, all this is going on amid “a beautiful Saturday afternoon in New York”
I can attest to the last bullet point, if we make like the local football teams and include New Jersey in New York. I listened to this interview when it first aired over Sportsradio 1050 WHN, while pulling out of the parking lot of the Marriott in Saddle Brook, the site of my first overnight getaway with my girlfriend of then 26 days, if we’re counting back to May 11, 1987, the night she and I met. Our first actual date — at Shea Stadium (where else?) — was 22 days earlier, May 15. There’s a brick outside Citi Field inscribed with the pertinent details of that outing, so maybe that’s when the relationship picked up its requisite steam. By June 4, Stephanie and I were already talking about marriage as a done deal. It seemed most appropriate to cross state lines together on June 5, with Doc pitching on the car radio, and wake up June 6 to the news that Tom really was coming home.
 When stars were briefly aligned.
Our 32nd wedding anniversary, by the way, was just over a week ago. As I said, that detail was a done deal by that first week in June of 1987. We had our little trip to Jersey, we crossed the George Washington Bridge back into Manhattan, and the Mets would go on to defeat the Pirates once more. A beautiful Saturday afternoon in New York, indeed.
Tom’s homecoming didn’t quite pan out. The exhibition game in Tidewater on June 11 wasn’t encouraging, nor were the simulated games Tom threw to Met reserves. Once he was lit up by the likes of Barry Lyons, Seaver knew he didn’t have any competitive pitches left in his right arm and wasn’t going to be able to help the Mets attempt to repeat. “I was looking forward to writing his name in the lineup,” Davey Johnson said as the comeback attempt concluded without the desired results. On June 22, the Mets held a press conference at Shea to announce Tom Seaver’s retirement, an occasion Cashen termed simultaneously sad for the ending and happy for the setting. Bench coach Bud Harrelson, Tom’s roommate on the road all those years, reasoned that even if Tom wouldn’t be going back to the mound, at least he was stepping aside in “our uniform”. No offense to Crazy Eddie, but that represented the greatest gift inherent within Seaver 3.0.
Not as epic as a Luis Guillorme at-bat in Port St. Lucie or a Bob Murphy interview of Tom Seaver in 1987, but perfectly enjoyable: this latest episode of National League town.
by Greg Prince on 15 November 2023 1:19 pm
Whether as a season ticket perk, a stop on a tour or an element of community outreach, the Mets’ press conference space is sometimes occupied by activities other than Mets’ press conferences. Once in a while, when I’m at Citi Field with a media credential and I’m a bit early, I’ll step into the room usually used for official communications and glimpse something other than a Mets press conference in progress. The setting is familiar, the faces aren’t.
Watching on TV Tuesday, I had that same sensation. The curtain of dancing logos was hung as if to appear organic; the dais was in place (albeit in the Piazza 31 Club, because the Shannon Forde Room downstairs is ensnared in ballpark renovations); and the mics were amplifying sound. But in front of the occupied rows of chairs, there were a couple of people who, when the 2023 season ended, were essentially strangers to our baseball-consuming experience. On Tuesday, they were seated as if they belonged at the head of that room. They were talking authoritatively about the team to which we are emotionally attached. They were necessarily commanding the attention of a dutifully recording audience. I was watching because I felt I had to watch, regardless that I couldn’t shake my overriding thought of, “Who the hell are these guys and why are they talking about my Mets as if they have something to do with them?”
 “Who are these guys?” is a question a Mets fan would have found challenging to answer not too many months ago.
Those strangers/these guys have a topline grip on the fate of our Mets fan happiness for the foreseeable future. Not that anybody can foresee the future.
David Stearns and Carlos Mendoza can’t be called strangers anymore. They are, respectively, the president of baseball operations and manager of the New York Mets. We made the camera-filtered acquaintance of Stearns at the outset of October, and we’ve been introduced to Mendoza in mid-November. The Met months we care most about are February and March somewhat, April through September intensely, and the parts of October and November that don’t take place in a press conference room if we’re lucky. We were a little lucky in 2022, not at all in 2023.
So we meet Stearns and we meet Mendoza, and they tell us how excited they are to be among us and that they’re going to do their best for us, and it is up to us to trust them and believe in them. Why wouldn’t we? Because we’ve had so many versions of these press conferences in recent memory? Because October and November at Citi Field being used for something other than press conferences has been a rare and fleeting experience? Because we’re practiced cynics hardened against an onslaught of platitudes, especially those extolling changes in the prevailing Mets culture?
All of the above. But let’s trust and believe in David Stearns and let’s trust and believe in Carlos Mendoza, anyway. They’re erstwhile strangers now. They’re the guys we’ll get used to seeing with the curtain behind them, the microphone in front of them, the weight of the franchise on their shoulders. It behooves us to be David Stearns fans and Carlos Mendoza fans. We’re New York Mets fans. For the unseeable, foreseeable future, they and we are in this thing together.
by Greg Prince on 10 November 2023 4:37 pm
Welcome back to Faith and Fear in Flushing’s recently dormant series 3B-OF/OF-3B, an attempt to understand why the New York Mets have spent so much of their (and our) lives trying to fit guys who play one position well at a position where they inevitably less well. Or, if you care to be sanguine about it, we endeavor to celebrate the versatility of the now 83 players who played both third base and the outfield for the Mets.
Wayne Garrett was not one of those players. He was versatile enough, with intervals at second (where he made his major league debut in April of 1969) and short (he was the “6” in the famous 7-6-2 putout of Richie Zisk at home plate the night the Mets definitively thwarted the Pirates in September of 1973), but what he did he did in the infield. Yet we can’t talk about the 3B-OF/OF-3B dizziness that afflicted the Mets in the years that followed Garrett’s trade to Montreal without Garrett, because Garrett leaving seemed to open the floodgates to a whole new multipositional matrix. No fewer than eight Mets joined the ranks of third basemen-outfielders in the next seven seasons. You might say that Wayne Garrett, on his way out of town, had ushered us into the octagon.
The self-perpetuating mythology that the Mets of their first two decades could never find a permanent third baseman tended to ignore the contributions of one Wayne “Red” Garrett, probably because the Mets themselves tended to ignore the contributions of one Wayne “Red” Garrett. Between May 4, 1969, and July 16, 1976, the New York Mets played 1,202 games. Wayne played third base in 711 of them, a clear majority. This includes 1971, when the redhead was serving his country until July in the Army Reserve as part of the last generation of ballplayers who had to fulfill such commitments. When he was available to play across his eight seasons as a Met, Garrett played the lion’s share of third, at first sharing time as a rookie with veteran and poet laureate Ed Charles, then threading appearances around imported answers Joe Foy, Bob Aspromonte, Jim Fregosi and Joe Torre.
“They tried to get a third baseman every year I was there,” Garrett reflected a couple of months after he was no longer a Shea Stadium staple. “I always felt if I didn’t have a good year, I wouldn’t be back.”
 Wayne had the longevity.
When he played his 711th game at third for the Mets, Wayne held the franchise record by several miles (Charles was second at 247). To this day, Wayne Garrett is the only Met to have played third base for the club in more than one World Series. His longevity in the position in his time seeped beyond the borders of Shea Stadium. Every year from ’69 to ’76. Garrett ranked among the Top 20 third basemen in the National League in terms of games played. Only two other NL third-sackers maintained that kind of presence across those eight seasons: Doug Rader and Richie Hebner.
Tony Perez was switched from third base to first base after the 1971 season and never played on the left side of the diamond again. Ron Santo was traded from the Cubs to the White Sox following the 1973 season and retired after one year on the South Side. They were the cream of the NL’s third base crop when Wayne broke in. Their accomplishments might have won them the status of immortality eventually, with each man today enshrined in the Hall of Fame, but they weren’t immune to being told they were no longer their team’s third baseman. Wayne Garrett didn’t reside in their echelon. He was forever being told he wasn’t going to be the Mets’ third baseman. Hence, the importation of Foy in 1970, Aspromonte in 1971, Fregosi in 1972 and Torre in 1975.
In 1976, the message finally became official. On Friday night July 16 at Shea versus Houston, Wayne started at third, made two putouts and two assists, and went 0-for-2 before giving way to pinch-hitter Roy Staiger. Talk about symbolism. Staiger had staked out his Third Baseman of the Future territory with his big year at Tidewater in 1975. Roy and Wayne more or less shared the position for three months of ’76, with one or the other getting swaths of playing time at third, and Wayne filling in at second for a ten-day stretch spanning May and June. Perhaps to indicate the shift from Garrett, 28, to Staiger, 25, was incomplete, the start at third base on Saturday afternoon July 17 went to utilityman Mike Phillips. Garrett pinch-hit in that game, for starting shortstop Buddy Harrelson, after which Staiger entered for third base defense, moving Phillips over to short. Elsewhere in the box score of this all-too-typical 1-0 loss for Tom Seaver (he struck out eleven, giving up only a barely fair, barely gone first-inning homer to Cesar Cedeño, while Met bats provided no support for their ace), we find Dave Kingman in right, Jerry Grote behind the plate and Joe Torre having pinch-hit for Seaver in the eighth.
Jerry Grote was the Mets’ 28th third baseman.
Wayne Garrett was the Mets’ 40th third baseman
Joe Torre was the Mets’ 48th third baseman.
Roy Staiger was the Mets’ 50th third baseman.
Dave Kingman was the Mets’ 51st third baseman.
Mike Phillips was the Mets’ 52nd third baseman.
As of July 17, 1976, 52 different Mets had played third base since the club’s 1962 founding. Six of them were in this game.
Two days later, Wayne made his final appearance as a Met, striking out as a pinch-hitter for Ken Sanders on the night Kingman — in left — hurt his thumb diving for a fly ball off the bat of Atlanta’s Phil Niekro, not only not making the catch, but short-circuiting his pursuit of the National League home run title, perhaps the National League home run record. Dave had 32. Hack Wilson had 56 in 1930. The chase of history went out the window, as did Kingman’s chance to become the first Met to lead the NL in homers. With Sky King confined to what was then called the disabled list until September, another third baseman, Mike Schmidt, caught and passed him. Compared to losing their only true power source, the trade that went through the next day was relatively small potatoes. For a franchise that was in only its fifteenth season, however, it represented a milestone, something beyond the same old same old…even if there was an element of déjà vu all over again underpinning it.
The Mets were sending their all-time third baseman to Montreal. Garrett and center fielder Del Unser became Expos so Pepe Mangual and Jim Dwyer could become Mets. Newsday’s headline: “Revolving Door Ejects Garrett,” with Malcolm Moran reviving and slightly revising a lede that could have served any reporter covering this team since 1962. “For 15 years they have come and gone,” he wrote, “each one staying for a while to occupy third base at the Polo Grounds and Shea Stadium.” As much as Garrett was the exception to the rule, the rule got him in the end. No Mets third baseman was safe.
DiamondVision was six years from existing, which was just as well, since Mets management in 1976 didn’t seem of a mind to produce a “THANKS WAYNE!” video. Manager Joe Frazier, trying not to get tossed from the revolving door himself as his team floundered double-digits from first place, referred to the veterans the Mets were jettisoning, each of whom carried a batting average in the .220s, as “deadwood,” adding that he considered his roster “pretty old. We’re stale in a few positions.” GM Joe McDonald was a little more diplomatic regarding the departed, choosing to talk up the youth and speed that would define the Mets’ lineup the rest of the way. So many times the Mets sought to supplant Wayne Garrett by bringing in somebody older. Now they did it with the homegrown Staiger, someone three years younger.
“I think Roy deserves a shot,” McDonald reasoned, “and as long as Garrett was there, the temptation was to play him.” Garrett, content to be wanted by the Expos as something other than a bad habit, didn’t apologize for his perennial resilience or continual attractiveness:
“Over here, they’ve always had the problems of third base, third base, third base. Now I’m out of the picture. Let ’em go ahead and get their third baseman. They’ve been trying to get one for eight years.”
They’d keep trying.
To helpfully warn us what would lie ahead between 1977 and 1983, Red did what Old Friends™ do. On September 29, 1976, in his first series back at Shea, Garrett crushed a grand slam off Tom Seaver to lead the Expos to a 7-2 win. It was Wayne’s first grand slam at any level. “I never hit one in high school or Little League or Babe Ruth or anything,” he said, and he couldn’t have been happier to have saved it for McDonald and Frazier. “It showed the management here about the trade.” As if Pepe Mangual (.186) and Jim Dwyer (.154) hadn’t shown them enough.
Seaver entered the night leading the league in ERA, but his old third baseman put an end to his chance to add another of those titles to his already brimming résumé. Tom would have to settle for finishing third in the category, just like the Mets in the standings, whose late surge to 86 wins nonetheless left them far from Schmidt’s first-place Phillies. Since 1969, when Tom and Wayne and all the Mets captured the world championship as well as the imagination of North America, the Mets expected better of themselves, even if we in the stands and watching from home kind of got used to them winding up stuck in the middle of the NL East pack. The 86-76 record looked better than it felt.
“It’s been that kind of year,” Seaver said without any cheer in evidence.
When it came to the Mets and “that kind of year,” Tom and we had no idea what awaited over the horizon.
***It’s May of 1977, and starting at third base for the New York Mets is Jerry Grote. That wasn’t the plan when Wayne Garrett was traded to clear a path for Roy Staiger. Not even as Staiger finished 1976 batting .158 was anybody thinking the rookie would be pushed aside by the second month of what was supposed to be his second full year in the majors. Roy, whose latter-day defensive metrics indicate he was one of the better fielding third basemen in the NL in ’76, was the Mets’ Opening Day third baseman in April ’77, homering in the team’s second game. A lingering groin muscle pull from Spring Training sidelined him for a few days, but he was back out at third soon enough. National League pitching began getting the best of him again, with his average dropping below .200.
 Roy had the promise.
When he did get on base, trouble awaited. After reaching on an error in the fourth inning at Candlestick Park on May 7, Roy came around to score from second on a single. Staiger had to slide to make it home. In doing so, his left hand was cut by Giants catcher Marc Hill’s left spike. Roy left the game and found his cut hand not improving, with swelling still a factor a week later. He’d be out ten days in all, during which time Grote — acknowledged over the previous decade as the best defensive catcher this side of Johnny Bench (and even Bench admitted he’d be the one to start working out as a third baseman if the two played on the same team) — exchanged his mitt for a glove and started eight of nine games at third base.
It wasn’t unprecedented. Jerry had played third twice for the Mets in 1966, three times in 1972 and twice more in 1973 (along with a turn in the outfield in ’72) — plus he had been Wayne Garrett’s roommate on road trips and might have picked up a couple of pointers along the way. Yet it was unanticipated. Then again, in 1977, anything seemed to go, especially the Mets’ chances of contending. They were off to a 10-18 start, their worst in ten years, when Jack Lang noted in the Daily News that Grote was serving as “the Mets’ 50th third baseman this season”. A little hyperbole was permissible, as the club had already cycled through Staiger, Phillips, Torre, the previous September’s callup journeyman Leo Foster and the lately acquired Lenny Randle at third. Grote made it six in twenty-seven games. Frazier, leaning on a 34-year-old catcher who had almost retired during the preceding offseason because of chronic back pain — Topps didn’t even bother to issue a card on his behalf in its ’77 set — to refamiliarize himself with terrain he hadn’t defended in four years, acknowledged, “We need Roy’s glove.”
He tried his luck with Jerry’s. “Grote,” Lang wrote, “doesn’t have great range, but he does have good hands and has played the bag before.” Still, an older catcher playing third base is a an older catcher playing third base. At Shea against the Giants, there was a bunt Jerry couldn’t handle, and versus the Dodgers, there was a Dusty Baker line drive beyond his leaping reach that earned back page prominence in the News, with an arrow printed by the ball to imply Grote may have been out of his depth. Lang’s more charitable assessment was, “The Mets were not hurt during Staiger’s absence,” judging Grote as having “filled in quite capably. He was as much of a whiz with the glove there as he is behind the plate,” where he was being eased out to make room for young gun John Stearns. Stearns was the Opening Day catcher and held down the position almost without pause into mid-May.
John had been waiting for his break since backing up Grote throughout his rookie year of 1975. “He’s a fiery guy, a real hustler,” his first Met manager Yogi Berra said of his prized prospect backstop. “I hate to sit him. I want him to play every day and if Grote gets hurt, he’s only one day away.” Patience wasn’t exactly the kid’s calling card. At the end of his freshman season, Stearns told Journal News reporter Al Mari that he was ready to ask for a trade if he wasn’t going to catch regularly. “Call it bad management, but I never got a chance here,” he said that September. “You can’t play every ten days and stay sharp. I know I can do the job up here.” In 1976, Stearns, still a Met, accepted the wisdom of having that chance at Tidewater, opting to get better at Triple-A rather than sit in frustration in New York. In 1977, he was back to stay at Shea and on his way to his first All-Star Game, minting his status as catcher of the present.
Another Met gaining a measure of satisfaction in a May that wasn’t otherwise merry was the new guy in town, Randle. Lenny was the avatar of the unanticipated. During Spring Training, he was a Texas Ranger, as he had been since the Rangers moved to Arlington from Washington in 1972. But the incumbent second baseman, 29, was falling victim to the same dynamic that saw Grote being nudged aside for Stearns. In the Rangers’ case, it was Bump Wills, who graced the cover of Sports Illustrated as the head of the class of NEW FACES OF ’77. It wasn’t a smooth transition in Randle’s view, and tensions rose between him and manager Frank Lucchesi. Lucchesi called Randle a punk for complaining. Randle fought back, literally, punching out his manager. Texas suspended the player.
Noticing there was a proven major leaguer in his prime as available as could be, and satisfied the Lucchesi incident was an aberration, the Mets took a flyer on Randle in late April and made him their new face of ’77. Frazier may have been in the same profession as Lucchesi, but was of a different mindset where Lenny was concerned. “I wish I had four or five more just like him,” Joe said, pleased with the erstwhile Ranger’s early Met production. The reception among teammates was almost universally positive. “Phenomenal,” Jon Matlack called him. “He’s got a magic wand. he’s great to have on the ballclub.” Ed Kranepool observed, “He’s playing great baseball. He hustles, he works hard. He’s not a problem on the club.”
One voice missing from the choir of hosannas was that of the Mets’ own incumbent second baseman, Felix Millan. Randle was versatile, but second base was where Frazier inserted him, which mystified Felix, who had served the Mets steadily since 1973. “Randle plays third and the outfield, and we have a catcher playing third base,” Millan said. “Why is he playing second base? Nobody’s told me anything. They just gave Randle my job. If they don’t want me here, they can trade me. I know I can still play every day for somebody.”
Millan was hardly the only Met looking for an exit from Shea Stadium as May was nearing June in 1977, but before the month was out, he no longer had to worry about a catcher playing third base. Staiger was healed and given his job back. Alas, the Mets continued to lose, and somebody was going to be given a ticket out of town. Not surprisingly, it was the manager. Joe Frazier was fired on May 31.
“I was ready to get out from under,” Frazier said of his 15-30 club. “It was driving me up a tree.” Ready to take on the same daunting oak of a challenge of steering the Mets out of last place was Joe Torre, initially hired as a player-manager (a designation that lapsed after a few weeks). The Mets had never had one of those before, but they also never had so much obvious dissension roiling their clubhouse. Millan wanted out. Matlack wanted out. Kingman was more unhappy than usual. And, not incidentally, Seaver’s ongoing conflict with M. Donald Grant was its own prime time drama.
“If Joe can do better with the team,” Frazier said, “more power to him, but I honestly didn’t see anything encouraging on the outskirts.”
The new Joe did one thing upon his taking over. He declared Lenny Randle would be his everyday leadoff hitter and third baseman (with Millan resuming everyday duty at second). Roy Staiger’s return from his hand injury, during which he batted .308 in eleven games, did not win him any long-term goodwill from the new manager, who knew a little something about playing third base. He also knew Randle, whose first few Met days included a couple of reps in left, was the hottest player Frazier bequeathed him, with an average that soared above .350. Staiger, for whom the Marc Hill cut was the deepest, was assigned to Tidewater for most of the rest of the season; come December, he was traded to the Bronx for Sergio Ferrer. Except for four games as a Yankee in 1979, Roy spent three years marooned in Triple-A, and was then through as a major leaguer. While he hadn’t made a great case for himself as the Met solution at third base, his tenure turned truncated once he experienced that injury to his hand after he slid home in San Francisco.
The batter who drove him in and ultimately toward dispensability? Lenny Randle.
***For about a week, Joe Torre definitely did better than Joe Frazier with the team. The Mets responded to their old peer and new leader, winning seven of eight. It was Honeymoon in Flushing time, but honeymoons last only so long, and the Mets’ 1977 season was trudging onward no matter which Joe was running the show, stuck in sixth place for the duration. Whatever respect and affection Seaver and Kingman had for the new skipper did not extend to the chairman of the board. Both stars wanted out, and both men were accommodated by a tone-deaf front office that sent both packing. Kingman, slumping but still the Mets’ only bona fide slugger, was sent to San Diego. Seaver, merely The Franchise, was traded to Cincinnati. The season, already doomed, was now dead. The era in which the Mets finished above .500 almost annually and fancied themselves de facto contenders heading into every April was just as gone. Those frustrating third-place finishes of the early and mid-1970s were about to start looking impossibly aspirational.
Seaver and Kingman wouldn’t be the last stalwarts of the previous era to walk out the door in the months ahead. Felix Millan’s hold on second base ended with a body slam from baserunner Ed Ott in Pittsburgh in August. The next time he played ball, it would be in Japan (for two years sharing a league with post-Expo Wayne Garrett). Jerry Grote was swapped to the Dodgers before September, in time to make L.A.’s postseason roster. Jon Matlack would find his trade request granted in December when he was dispatched to Texas in a four-team deal that also turned 1973 holdover John Milner into a Pirate. Before 1978 got underway, one more extremely familiar face was missing, with shortstop Bud Harrelson — a Met so long he was probably hiding somewhere within the club’s skyline logo — traded in Spring Training to the Phillies.
Before any of that happened, there was the matter of welcoming to the Mets the six players acquired for their two icons on June 15, 1977, along with another player exchanged for one of the Mets’ lesser lights. Seaver’s bounty was a starting pitcher, Pat Zachry (1976 co-Rookie of the Year in the NL); two minor league outfielders, Steve Henderson (who was immediately promoted to the majors as a Met) and Dan Norman (who would make his debut in September); and a glove-first infielder who was never going to crack the starting lineup of the Big Red Machine, Doug Flynn. Kingman wrought a reliever, Paul Siebert, and a veteran utility guy whose upward mobility in the game was years earlier undermined by a gruesome outfield injury, Bobby Valentine. That third deal, the one not dominating front and back pages, saw Mike Phillips go to St. Louis for a former Red, Joel Youngblood.
If you’re scoring at home, Flynn, Valentine and Youngblood all arrived wearing various labels of versatility, and each would play some third base for the Mets in 1977, elevating the season’s total to nine Mets on third, or the most in any year since 1967…which also happened to have been the last time the Mets finished last before 1977. Their hideous 64-98 mark represented a dropoff of 22 wins from 1976, a year-over-year plunge that would stand as the worst in Mets history until the Mets of 2023 stumbled 26 games off their 2022 pace. With so many of their veterans gone or going, the Mets tried to sell themselves to an increasingly indifferent public as an agglomeration of promising youth. “Bring your kids to see our kids!” newspaper ads suggested. Four of the of the Mets’ kids posing — Flynn, Henderson, Zachry and Youngblood (alongside Stearns and Lee Mazzilli) — were June newcomers. Crowds failed to materialize in response. Shea Stadium attendance set a new low in 1977.
 Lenny had it all.
Ironically, the baseball team so often cited for its revolving door at third base featured as its best player in its worst year in a decade its third baseman. Not that Lenny Randle was all that interested in the irony. “I’m not into the history of the Mets,” he advised. “I know they had a guy named Joe Foy and Ed Charles there, but that’s about all.” Third Baseman No. 54 concluded his first season in Queens batting .304 in 136 games; sealing two walkoff wins with that magic wand Matlack admired; stealing 33 bases to establish a new club record; withstanding the weirdness of being at the plate as darkness descended over Shea Stadium amidst the July 13 New York City blackout (“I thought to myself, ‘This is my last at-bat. God is coming to get me.’”); and answering, at last with authority, the question of “Who’s on Third?” Randle was delighted to claim the spot as his own. “I’d like to play here forever,” Lenny said toward the end of a season that few remaining Mets fans wished would go on any longer.
What Randle really adored was his position, especially that it was his. Versatility may appeal to managers and general managers, but as a player who shifted among second, third and the outfield in Texas, “I never knew where I’d be,” he explained. “You take ground balls for infield practice and fly balls for the outfield and when the game starts, you’re so tired you’re lucky if you have seven innings in you. I love third base. I’m doing the best I can to master it.”
In a year when the Mets couldn’t have been less popular, Lenny was the Met most easily embraced. “You can’t help but love the fans in New York,” Randle said as he grew accustomed to his surroundings. “They pump you up. I feel I owe the fans my best as an entertainer. I don’t cheat them.” His second Met manager was just as crazy about him as his first. “Randle has great instincts to get to the ball,” Torre said in September. “He catches line drives, throws from his knees, he’s a scrapper. He has been all year. As of now, there is nobody on this team than can do the things Lenny can. He’s aggressive offensively and makes great plays defensively.” If not much else seemed bright about 1977, at least we could count on the productive and beloved Lenny Randle at third base, presumably for years to come.
Lenny Randle lasted one more year as a Met. It didn’t go as well as it did in 1977. Before 1978 was over, four more Mets who hadn’t yet taken a turn there would get a crack at the hot corner Randle would wind up vacating before Opening Day 1979. The revolving door was destined to spin quite a bit into the decade ahead and sputter in circles before the Mets would return to contention. And the mixing and matching of third basemen and outfielders — encompassing miscasting, reluctance, dismissiveness and a couple more catchers — was just getting going.
Yet again.
THE METS OF-3B/3B-OF CLUB
Turn and Face the Strange (1976-1977)
21. Lenny Randle
Mets LF Debut: April 30, 1977
Mets 3B Debut: May 8, 1977
22. Joel Youngblood
Mets 3B Debut: June 24, 1977
Mets LF Debut: June 27, 1977
PREVIOUS INSTALLMENTS OF 3B-OF/OF-3B
Chapter 1: 1962
Chapter 2: 1963-1969
Chapter 3: C-3B-OF
Chapter 4: 1970-1975
by Greg Prince on 7 November 2023 5:51 am
When I first heard of bright, young Yankees bench coach Carlos Mendoza a few years ago, I was disappointed to think that our September 1997 callup outfielder, the one who broke up Dustin Hermanson’s no-hit bid in what became known within certain circles of the Metsnoscenti as The Carl Everett Game with his first major league hit, had gone wayward in life. Aw, a Yankee? Then again, we couldn’t be responsible for what a Met of 15 games did with his post-playing career more than 20 years later, especially once he was exposed in the ensuing offseason’s expansion draft and was selected by the Tampa Bay Devil Rays.
Then I looked into Yankees bench coach Carlos Mendoza a tiny bit further and realized he’s a different Carlos Mendoza. Our Carlos Mendoza from 26 years ago was born in November 1974. Their Carlos Mendoza from these days was born in November 1979. The November 1979 Carlos Mendoza would have had to have been 17 to have played for the 1997 New York Mets. Ed Kranepool, born in November 1944, was and remains the only 17-year-old to have ever played for any New York Mets.
That was the tipoff that the Carlos Mendoza I remembered wasn’t the Carlos Mendoza who was getting written about as a bright, young managerial candidate. As a fan of a franchise that has sorted through pairs of Bob Millers, Bob Johnsons and Bobby Joneses, to name one trio of duos (the Mike Marshalls, Pedro Martinezes and Chris Youngs amount to another three), it was easy enough to discern once the facts were examined.
For a franchise that has sorted through a surfeit of bright, young managerial candidates and actually appointed a few of them manager in the past half-dozen years, definitive and useful facts about those types of fellas tend to be elusive early. The Carlos Mendoza from the Yankees is now, by all accounts except official, the manager of the New York Mets, following in the footsteps of previously anointed bright, young managerial candidates about whom we knew only so much, which is to say nothing much, as potential managers. It’s probably no more relevant to invoke their names than it is the Carlos Mendoza from the 1997 Mets, but we don’t have a lot of facts to tell us anything else.
Hence, we will think of Mickey Callaway, who was considered hot stuff when the Mets grabbed him in October 2017; and Carlos Beltran, who was considered an intriguing choice when the Mets grabbed him in November 2019; and Luis Rojas, who was considered a promising Plan B worthy of the shot the Mets were giving him in January 2020. We might also think of Buck Showalter, who succeeded all of them in what amounted to no time (hired by the Mets, December 2021) at all because none among Callaway, Beltran or Rojas lasted very long if at all. Then again, neither did the massively experienced Showalter (honored as NL Manager of the Year, November 2022; dismissed as manager of the Mets, October 2023).
Here we are, well into this offseason’s The Mets Are Hiring Another New Manager story and we’ve barely talked about the new manager. Pending his introductory press conference in which he will be presented in the best of lights, what is there to talk about as of now other than he’s not the guy with the same name from 1997 and he’s not those guys who invited the same broad-strokes categorization from previous introductory press conferences? This Carlos Mendoza has never managed in the big leagues before? Neither had any first-time big league manager. Some succeeded in their first posting. Some would go on and find success at a later date in another place. Some weren’t what was hoped for when hired and never much panned out for anybody.
That frames Carlos Mendoza the New York Mets manager in even broader strokes. He could be anybody. But broad strokes are what we have, along with the endorsements he’s gotten about being bright and young and capable and confident and collegial and communicative and comfortable with computerized calculations. The next contemporary manager lauded in advance for his lone-wolf tendencies and disdain of data will be the first. If sliced bread isn’t the comp for what Carlos Mendoza will be hailed as the best thing since when he slips a Mets jersey over his shirt and tie, it will be an upset.
If Carlos Mendoza is the manager of the New York Mets for more than two seasons, it will be an aberration. That’s a calculation conducted not with a computer but from recent experience, all of it basically immaterial. Mendoza is not Callaway, Beltran or Rojas, just as he is not Showalter or 1997 Mendoza. He is an individual like any of us and, as long as he’s here and entrusted with what managers are entrusted, we have to trust him from the get-go. The get-go wears off once it gets going, and then the trust is conditional based on how the club he’s managing is playing, which probably won’t be fully reflective of how he’s managing, but he’s the manager and it’s easier for us to pin whatever’s going wrong on the manager. Or, perhaps, praise the manager for whatever’s going right. We do that, too, sometimes.
Carlos Mendoza is the manager of the New York Mets not only because his four predecessors entrusted with the role over the past six years don’t manage here anymore but, we infer from multiple reports, the manager the Mets really wanted, experienced Craig Counsell, chose to go elsewhere. That’s an inference. Counsell did go elsewhere, to Chicago from Milwaukee, but despite the on-paper sense it made that Counsell would follow David Stearns from the Brewers to the Mets, it’s possible Stearns and Steve Cohen concluded Mendoza was, when all factors were balanced, more the manager for them. Throughout this round of baseball teams interviewing managerial candidates, the buzz on Mendoza was consistently enthusiastic. Nobody not on the inside really knows what any of that means, but he must have been impressing more than one owner and one president of baseball operations. A career of managing in the minors and coaching in the majors that dates back to 2009 was leading somewhere, not just to hearty handshakes at the end of interviews. One of those interviews was bound to lead to a manager’s position.
Now he’s got it. What we’ve got we don’t know. We never do at the outset. If we’re still talking about Carlos Mendoza in the present tense more than two years hence, we’ll have an idea that we got something and someone good.
by Greg Prince on 6 November 2023 12:02 pm
Whether it was out of quaint National League loyalty, appreciation for vanquishing the Phillies, or a fleeting fancy born of the whims of October, I was an Arizona Diamondbacks fan for five nights in the World Series, extending the quick hop I made aboard their slithering bandwagon during the NLCS. An interim fan, you might have called me. It didn’t work out in terms of a burst of vicarious championship satisfaction, but I was glad enough they were my team for a week or two (Brent Strom’s unbecoming September crankiness toward a Ford C. Frick Award nominee notwithstanding). They played good Diamondbacks baseball for as long as they could, moving runners over and the like; they were young and athletic, with a dash of experience to provide a little faith that they knew what they were doing. I didn’t know much about the Diamondbacks before the postseason. I was happy to make their acquaintance until, inevitably, I reverted to not much caring about them.
But it helps to have a rooting interest if you wish to be engaged by a Metless tournament. By Game Five of the World Series as Arizona tried to hang on for dear life, I believe I was rooting less for the D’Backs and more for more baseball. There was a ground ball as the middle innings were becoming the late innings that I really wanted to see reach the outfield but didn’t. C’mon, keep going. That grounder was carrying within its stitches my hope that the postseason would keep going, too. A month since they made their last out, I hadn’t missed the most recent edition of the Mets whatsoever, but I did feel a void when November baseball expired ahead of its allotted time frame.
The Texas Rangers dictated the World Series would last no more than five games, just enough to escalate onlooker interest by a tick. Our last two World Series of surpassing Metsian concern, in 2000 and 2015, teased us during fifth games that a sixth was somewhere between probable and possible, and if we could get a sixth game, who was to say there wouldn’t be a seventh? In 2000 and 2015, it was the Mets’ opposition answering that question. Winners of Game Five who enter said competition up three games to one too often write the history…though we didn’t mind that in 1969.
Despite cheering on their opposition like I meant it, I found nothing to dislike in the Rangers, an affable and talented bunch with a few faces fairly familiar to us lurking in the shadows. Goodness knows those who truly cared about them had waited long enough. A first-time/long-time world championship for a franchise — whether actually its first or the first most any living fan of that team has experienced — should be a cause for sportwide celebration, fans affiliated with the losing side excused if they’re not feeling the love. I watched a bit of the Rangers’ parade through the streets of Arlington. I imagine some in the crowd were simply big proponents of success and celebration, but you know plenty lining the sidewalks had waited what was, for them, forever. In the context of Texas Rangers baseball, transplanted from Washington in 1972 and proceeding ringlessly until Wednesday night, it had been forever.
Although I was on the side of the Diamondbacks, I could not see those shots of the Rangers dugout where their manager stood tall and not be all for Bruce Bochy. I rallied around the skipper during the Giants’ three World Series conquests in the previous decade and never developed any animus for the man despite his sending Madison Bumgarner to shut us out in the 2016 Wild Card Game. “Boch,” as they call him, just seems to have a feel for what needs to be done in any situation, whether it’s leaving a MadBum into finish a seventh game as he did versus Kansas City nine Series ago, or plucking an umpteenth reliever from the mound despite a seemingly unblowable lead and going to his closer to put the hammer down, which he did in Game Four this year when he replaced Will Smith with Jose Leclerc (Leclerc gave up a hit that made things a little closer, but in the end it worked). Every Ranger pointed to Boch’s calmness as the constant that got them through every bumpy moment in the season and postseason, and I could totally see it, especially when Rangers interviewed in the minutes after they eliminated their last obstacle and gained their first ring were cool and collected rather than shouting “WOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!”. After Bochy retired from San Fran in 2019, I wondered if anybody in Flushing thought to give him a call on those several occasions we had an opening. He was apparently lurable and was damn well worth a feeler.
 Eventually got a callup. Should’ve been called to manage the big club decades later.
Of all within the Texas traveling party claiming Mets ties — idled pitchers Jacob deGrom and Max Scherzer, fill-in right fielder Travis Jankowski (whose performance helped his club remained calm following the injury to otherworldly Adolis Garcia), general manager Chris Young and pitching coach Mike Maddux — Bochy’s connection is both the most ancient and the least outwardly consequential. Bruce spent two years in the Mets organization, in 1981 and 1982, mostly with Tidewater. Perhaps he whispered something useful in the ear of a young Orosco or Darling that paid off long-term. Mostly, he was the guy who got written about in his first St. Petersburg Spring Training for having an oversized head and needing to tote his own batting helmet from team to team, where it would be painted whatever color would allow him to blend in. Bruce scored four runs as a Met. He has exactly that many World Series trophies to his credit now.
What a difference a manager makes. Or so we will allow ourselves to assume, considering San Francisco never celebrated a title until Bochy guided them to the promised land in 2010 (and 2012 and 2014), and North Texas wasn’t the capital of baseball until 2023. We will also wish to assume there’s something to this Leader of Men stuff because the Mets believe Carlos Mendoza is their next difference-maker, one who, if he’s as impactful as can be, will add his name to a very short list. Forty years ago at this time, the list of managers who had made all the difference to the Mets from a world championship standpoint contained only one name: Gil Hodges. That fall, fourteen years removed from the only Mets manager who had ever worked a miracle working that miracle, I don’t know if any of us imagined the newest fella hired to fill Gil’s old office was going to lead us toward a doubling of the names on that list.
The Contemporary Baseball Era Committee recently announced which managers, executives and umpires it is considering for Hall of Fame induction next year. Eight people have been nominated. One is Davey Johnson, whose bona fides reflect winning seasons in Cincinnati, Baltimore, Los Angeles and Washington (with all but the Dodgers earning division titles on his watch), but his ultimate selection would serve mainly as acknowledgment of the underrated work he did in New York. If this committee votes Davey in, it will be because 1986 remains A Year to Remember, but it oughta be as much about what faced him when he took over in October 1983 and how quickly he transformed everything around him.
I don’t know if Davey elevating a moribund major league club toward and eventually to the highest of heights will resonate with the voters. The others they’re mulling (Jim Leyland, Cito Gaston, Lou Piniella, Bill White, Ed Montague, Joe West and Hank Peters) are well-credentialed, too, and certainly each manager in the group can claim an element of franchise-spurring. But I’m gonna be parochial here. I know what the Mets were before Davey, during Davey, and after Davey. I know Davey was difference personified. The Mets were never better as a going concern than they were when Davey Johnson managed them. They were never better in a single season than they were when Davey Johnson managed them, and few teams have been better than his 1986 Mets. In case you hadn’t noticed, the Mets haven’t won a World Series since Davey Johnson managed them.
The distance from the mood at Shea when he took over — and introduced himself to the New York media by thanking Frank Cashen “for having the intelligence to hire me” — to the day slightly more than three years later when Davey and his team accepted plaudits at City Hall measured far more than 13 miles. Davey’s presence at the helm in Queens may not have represented the first mile in zooming the Mets from winning infrequently to winning it all, but he sure accelerated the process, and it’s impossible to imagine anybody else guiding the trip. Should the committee recognize Davey Johnson’s role in turning a perennial loser into one of that generation’s most compelling winners, may the rigors of travel to Cooperstown for the acceptance of a plaque not too many spots from Gil Hodges’s be easy on him.
Right before Johnson began to stamp his eternal imprint on the Mets’ story, the manager who immediately preceded him stepped aside about as gracefully as one could fathom. On October 1, 1983, one day before the Mets swept a Closing Day doubleheader to put the best ending possible on their fifth sixth-place campaign in seven seasons, that Mets manager couldn’t announce definitively whether he’d be with the club in 1984, though he probably knew. All he would allow to reporters was, “I’m sure my boss, Mr. J. Frank Cashen, will show sincerity, generosity and compassion in his decision. I’m sure that whatever happens will happen for the best.”
That last part was right as could be. Davey Johnson coming aboard a couple of weeks later was absolutely for the best. As for the rest, the generosity was all Frank Howard’s. The man was about to be fired as manager of the New York Mets, in that way it is said every manager is hired to be fired. When Cashen broke the news to the media on October 2, the GM said “circumstances” did Howard in, with the Mets’ 68-94 final record a circumstance bound to tower over even the tallest of managers, which the 6-foot-7 Howard surely was. Cashen also said he made up his mind to not retain Howard in September, once the all-but-inactive Dave Kingman declined his manager’s invitation to start a game at first base. Kingman felt like he hadn’t had enough defensive reps recently — and hadn’t worked out at the position much since Keith Hernandez arrived — to acquit himself adequately in the field. Howard chose to respect the veteran slugger’s wishes rather than order him to grab his mitt and get out to first. It didn’t go over well in the front office.
 No hard feelings? Howard, Swan and Bamberger intimate all is well on the 1982 Mets.
Frank Howard’s title from early June until early October was interim manager. The interim manager was clear on what that meant: “They made me no promises.” Howard was in the job because the permanent manager he served as a coach, the previously retired George Bamberger — who cut short his tenure with the Brewers after heart bypass surgery in 1980 — had enough of the Mets and quit to literally go fishing. Bamberger, a Cashen favorite from their days in Baltimore, never seemed enthused about leading the Mets. He gave it a year and change and, well, never changed. “I was starting to get headaches from the tension,” George said a couple of months later. Howard, on the other hand, never lacked enthusiasm in 1982 and 1983, whether it was running the Jumbo Franks in intrasquad games versus fellow coach Jim Frey’s Small Freys, or setting Craig Swan straight at the end of a road rip when the veteran pitcher griped a little too long and loud about the travel arrangements (Swannie was beefy, but a shoving match with someone 6-foot-7 will make a person who isn’t at least 6-foot-8 change his tone). Frey had managed the Royals to the 1980 World Series, yet Cashen chose Howard, whose managerial record in San Diego was brief and unspectacular, as Bamberger’s successor.
“I have the highest regard for Jimmy Frey,” Cashen said in June, “but felt we needed a strong personality — and that’s why I chose Big Frank.” Translation: somebody who could be described as “jumbo” was more likely to be listened to in a sullen, last-place clubhouse than somebody described as small…even if longtime beat writer Jack Lang sized Howard up as “a giant of a man with the personality of a pussycat”.
With Howard taking over, the 1983 Mets intermittently purred. The young talent, featuring Darryl Strawberry, indicated last place wasn’t going to be the Mets’ residency into perpetuity, and the trade for Keith Hernandez said something about Cashen’s sense of purpose. When he was promoted, Howard said he wouldn’t stand for play that was “indifferent and haphazard”. For a time there was none of that to the team’s approach. Frank Howard’s Mets, at their August best, were vibrant and brimming with promise, as boisterous if not as big as he was, giving a fan the idea that this team was a growth stock. How much Howard and what Lang referred to as his “quiet but driving leadership” had to do with it was in the eye of the beholder. Under their interim manager, the Mets went 52-64, with a little too much coming down to earth to be ignored by September.
Still, the enthusiasm was always in evidence, and when one flashes back to the best parts of the interim summer of Frank Howard, one sees the big man on the top step congratulating his players if they crossed the plate, and clapping for them as long they hustled from home to first. In his 2009 memoir The Complete Game, Ron Darling, a September 1983 callup, recalled his first manager as a “hard charger,” if perhaps a bit over the top. “Frank is pushing for everyone on the club,” young Straw said as he got his feet wet in the majors. “He wants you to give 100 percent. It’s great to see a manager who wants you to give effort all the time” (even if neophyte Darryl didn’t always play as if he fully interpreted that particular message). Howard struck this home viewer as the quintessential upbeat coach in a sport in which people called coaches are assistants; I could never quite wrap my mind around the idea that Frank Howard was The Manager. Maybe his interim status played into that perception. Deciding whether he was genuine managerial timber, redwood stature aside, would be best left to those who got a closer look. Howard never managed again after Cashen removed both “interim” and “manager” from his title. Yet when he was let go, older Mets who’d seen their share of skippers offered only glowing reviews for public consumption.
Tom Seaver: “Frank is a fine man. I can’t think of anybody warmer to play for. His sincerity was tremendous.”
Mike Torrez: “Howard is a good man to play for. He’s an honest man. He gives you the ball and he asks you to give 100 percent.”
Bob Bailor: “I liked playing for Frank. His enthusiasm for the game is unmatched. Especially on a club like this where there isn’t too much electricity in the dugout to start with.”
Rusty Staub: “I enjoyed playing for Frank. I hope something positive happens for him. A lot of people here are going to miss his patience.”
Turns out they wouldn’t have to. Rusty and the 1984 Mets would continue to benefit from whatever Frank Howard brought to the enterprise, as Cashen’s invite to remain in the organization, along with Davey Johnson’s half-throated assent, convinced him to stay on among the new manager’s staff. “I like Frank Howard,” Johnson said about his predecessor. “I like his enthusiasm. I like his energy and I like the fact that he is a good baseball man. I want to surround myself with the best baseball men I can find.” Having apparently taken time out from steering Tidewater to the 1983 Triple-A championship to watch what might affect his 1984 job prospects, Davey couldn’t help but add, “I did not like the way he managed.” When Davey was asked how he’d handle a situation like Big Frank encountered with Kingman, the new sheriff in town responded, “If a player did that to me, I’d tell him to pack his bags and go home.”
Frank Howard kept his bags unpacked for another year in New York, still bringing that trademark enthusiasm, energy and size to the dugout the year the Mets finally turned it around, going 90-72 and finishing 6½ games from first place after leading the division much of the summer. They weren’t quite ready to make the postseason, but they were getting there. When they did, Frank Howard would be in Milwaukee, reunited with Bamberger, who, like Bochy, resisted staying retired from managing. Frank had coached for Bambi when George first ran the Brewers, and baseball men tend to stay in touch with one another.
Clearly, baseball organizations liked having Frank Howard around as a coach, as he’d spend almost every season through the end of the 20th century assisting one manager or another. For three seasons, from 1994 to 1996, he’d be back in Queens, as one of Dallas Green’s Mets coaches. It was an era when the records were losing and the outlook was dim, quite a bit like 1982 and 1983, but Big Frank’s enthusiasm never wavered. Howard had coached for Green in the Bronx in 1989. Like Bamberger, Green knew a good and loyal baseball man when he saw him, and Howard returned the loyalty in kind, not to mention effort. Frank was known, per Newsday’s Marty Noble, as “the foremost workaholic among baseball coaches,” an extension of what Howard asked of his players when he managed them. “The cheapest commodity in our business,” he preached, “is 90 feet.”
 Before there was Judge and Altuve, there was Hondo and Buddy.
For someone whose Met contribution is chronologically distant and whose Met footprint is admittedly light — when he died at the age of 87 on October 30, amid the Rangers-Diamondbacks World Series, his time as Mets manager was mentioned in passing at most — it says something that Frank Howard’s career was intertwined at least a little with a whole bunch of Mets managers. Played in Los Angeles with Jeff Torborg. Coached for Green and Bamberger and Johnson, as mentioned. Coached alongside Buddy Harrelson in 1982 (separated by a listed eight inches in height and triple-digits in weight, they made quite a picture together), Mike Cubbage in 1994 and 1995 (they could compare notes on their respective experiences as purely interim Met managers), and Bobby Valentine the first two months of 1983 and all of 1984, with Bobby V serving as his third base coach in between.
“It was an honor to coach with and coach for Hondo,” Valentine tweeted last week, invoking Frank’s most commonly referenced nickname. Howard had a few, including the Capital Punisher and the Washington Monument, nods to not only his prodigious power — 382 home runs, enough hit so high and far to inspire the repainting of several seats at RFK Stadium — but his importance to D.C. baseball when he was essentially the lone star of the Senators in the years before that franchise abandoned Washington for the Lone Star state to become the pre-championship Texas Rangers. In paying tribute to him in the Washington Post, Tom Boswell wrote the region’s undying affection for Hondo and continual invocation of his exploits “were a core piece of what kept Washington fighting to get another team.”
The Washington Senators featured Frank Howard once they traded reliable lefty starter Claude Osteen to the Los Angeles Dodgers to have Hondo as their own. On the Dodgers between 1959 and 1964, Howard played some first base. So did another future Mets manager, Gil Hodges. They were teammates in L.A. before Gil returned to New York to play for the new National League expansion club at the Polo Grounds. When Gil had no more playing left in him, he departed for the District to earn his managerial stripes, running a hopeless club and making them a little less hopeless through the mid-’60s. It was the apprenticeship that paved the way for Gil’s immortal difference-making at Shea in 1969.
That part would come soon if not soon enough for Mets fans. In the interim, in the lower reaches of the American League, Hodges had work to do, and he did it best with Howard, changing the slugger’s perspective on how to think about what pitchers were thinking, and, by Frank’s own reckoning, improving his game. “He’s made me a better ballplayer, no question of that,” Hondo said of Hodges while he was building his Monumental résumé in Washington. Howard expanded further on Gil’s influence decades later for Hodges biographer Mort Zachter: “When you manage a marginal club, you really have to manage.”
Frank Howard went to four All-Star Games as a Senator between 1968 and 1971 — “a line drive by Howard could behead someone” was Seaver’s impression after taking stock of him in the batter’s box during the 1970 Midsummer Classic — and earned a World Series ring with the 1963 Dodgers, setting the stage for L.A.’s Game Four 2-1 clincher with his fifth-inning homer off Whitey Ford. After hitting the last home run ever for the Senators in September of ’71, he hit the first home run ever for the relocated Rangers in April of ’72, months before the Tigers scooped him up for the power boost he could provide down the stretch as they outdueled the Red Sox for that year’s AL East title. Yet it was a ballclub that didn’t exist as such when he played, the Washington Nationals, who tended to his legacy in retirement. The Nats unveiled a statue of Frank in front of their new ballpark and inducted him into their Ring of Honor. They would be the ones to announce Howard’s passing, and it was the Nats who made sure Frank was an honored guest when they brought the World Series back to Washington in 2019 after an 86-year absence.
 Bogar, Howard and the Met ties that bonded.
As Nationals Park public address announcer Phil Hochberg was taking a moment to direct the crowd’s attention to D.C.’s legend emeritus prior to Game Four, Howard, seated on the field and wearing a Nats jersey, received a visit from the home team’s first base coach, Tim Bogar. Bogar was a Met when Howard coached for the club the second time, in the ’90s. Frank was Tim’s first base coach and everybody’s “attitude coach”. The visit was brief but warm. Their bond, forged well before the Nationals moved from Montreal, jumped off the screen like a homer off Howard’s bat. Those Mets where Bogie met Hondo may have been a marginal club, but you always knew Frank Howard really coached.
|
|