Faith and Fear in Flushing made its debut on Feb. 16, 2005, the brainchild of two longtime friends and lifelong Met fans.
Greg Prince discovered the Mets when he was 6, during the magical summer of 1969. He is a Long Island-based writer, editor and communications consultant. Contact him here.
Jason Fry is a Brooklyn writer whose first memories include his mom leaping up and down cheering for Rusty Staub. Check out his other writing here.
Got something to say? Leave a comment, or email us at faithandfear@gmail.com. (Sorry, but we have no interest in ads, sponsored content or guest posts.)
Welcome to A Met for All Seasons, a series in which we consider a given Met who played in a given season and…well, we’ll see.
There’s a new world comin’
And it’s just around the bend
There’s a new world comin’
This one’s comin’ to an end
—Cass Elliot
If I have one certainty as a Mets fan, it’s that no Met will ever give us a more significant career as a Met than Tom Seaver. If I have a second certainty as a Mets fan, it’s that no Met’s promotion to the big leagues will ever mean as much to the Mets and their fans as that of Darryl Strawberry, coming as it did in 1983.
As of this moment, we’ve had 402 players make their major league debut as Mets. Bob Moorhead was the first. Andres Gimenez is the most recent. Seaver was the 39th. Strawberry checked in 140th. Moorhead didn’t mean much in the scheme of things. Gimenez we can only hope. As mentioned, no Met has ever been or ever will be more significant than Seaver. But when it comes to getting our hopes up, nobody has matched or will match Strawberry.
Nobody can. We looked forward to the arrival of Darryl Strawberry from the moment we’d heard of him and it occurred to us that all we had to do to have him was draft him and sign him. That was it. It wasn’t going to take a fancy trade. It wasn’t going to take the kind of free agent commitment to which the Mets had been allergic since big-ticket stars became available for the price of money. The 1979 Mets, unbuoyed by any kind of helpful acquisition, were at least clever enough to finish with the worst record in the National League, entitling them to make the first selection in the 1980 amateur draft (the privilege of picking first alternated by league in those days). They couldn’t call it tanking. The 1979 Mets finished worst on merit.
In the spring of 1980, there was little chance for a run-of-the-mill baseball fan to form opinions on scholastic players, not like there’s been for the past couple of decades at least. Maybe one name every few years would break into the general consciousness. Forty years ago, that name was Darryl Strawberry. Once you’ve seen a name like that, you’re not likely to forget it.
Picking up Sports Illustrated’s baseball preview issue that April, we could read about the “Stars of the ’80s” predicted to dominate the sport over the next ten years. On the cover was 1979 batting champion Keith Hernandez of the St. Louis Cardinals. He got a nice writeup alongside teammate Garry Templeton and other comers from across the NL and AL: Rick Sutcliffe of the Dodgers; Carney Lansford of the Angels; Paul Molitor of the Brewers; and Bob Horner of the Braves. The only Met mentioned among the “stars” was Nolan Ryan, in the context of not knowing which youngsters might make it big once they’d overcome their early difficulties. By 1980, Ryan was long an established superstar. He’d just been lured to Houston, becoming the first player to be paid more than a million bucks annually. You couldn’t forget that the Mets once had Nolan Ryan and traded him to California, where he’d spent eight seasons striking out most every American Leaguer he saw. You couldn’t imagine the Mets offering anybody of his ilk a multiyear megabucks contract.
In the predictions section of the magazine, the Mets were given two paragraphs of attention. They were envisioned as coming in sixth in the National League East for a fourth consecutive campaign. “Although New York should finish last again,” Larry Keith wrote, “there is hope for a brighter future, thanks to the ambitious new owners who bought the team for a record $21.1 million.” The Mets were given props for retaining Craig Swan (misspelled “Swann”) and Joel Youngblood as well as fixing up their stadium and clubhouse, but otherwise, “they haven’t substantially refurbished the lineup.” John Stearns chimed in, “Our problem is that we’ve been rebuilding for four years.” No wonder Mr. Keith finished his NL East preview with the parting shot, “while Pittsburgh is the team that everyone hopes to beat, New York is the team everyone will beat.”
That was on page 44. That was the present. But the future, if we embraced it correctly, awaited us on page 30. There, in a sidebar headlined, “Next Pick: Strawberry,” was a young man in a blue mesh ballcap and a mustard yellow top, clutching an aluminum bat. “Darryl, 18,” the caption read, “is likened to Ted Williams.”
You’re not likely to forget a comparison like that, either.
Darryl Strawberry was the one amateur player who stuck out above every other kid in the sport. You didn’t see anybody else getting folded into a package featuring Hernandez, Templeton, Molitor and so on. You did see the lede written by Joe Jares — “Darryl Strawberry may also be a star of the ’80s…” — and, if your team owned the No. 1 pick in all of baseball, you had to drool at the thought that someone who was compared to the last .400 hitter ever before you even got to the first paragraph could be ours. The brief article delved into the lefty swinger’s physical similarities to Williams, the qualities that made scouts giddy (“bat quickness”; “bat presence”; “a natural hitter”) and revealed that, oh by the way, he also pitched and excelled at a couple of other sports for Crenshaw High School in Los Angeles.
“I dream about being in the major leagues at the age of 20,” young Darryl told SI. “I dream about making it to the World Series at the age of 20 if I go to a good ballclub. And if I play well this year, I dream of coming out the No. 1 draft choice in the nation.”
Jares didn’t bother mentioning who held that No. 1 selection. Perhaps he thought injecting “the team everyone will beat” from page 44 into the idyllic scenario Strawberry was painting for himself on page 30 would be too much of a downer. But it didn’t take much for the reader, if the reader had a vested interest in accelerating the Mets’ chronic rebuilding program, to put No. 1 and this one together.
Now all it was going to take was these ambitious new owners to act appropriately.
***
As the draft approached, I knew only a few things about the Mets and drafts. First, they weren’t particularly great at negotiating them, certainly at the top end. True, the magnificent Seaver had come to the big leagues as a Met, but implicit within the legend of how the Mets got him — the Braves inadvertently skirted a rule regarding amateur eligibility while Tom was at USC and, one fortuitous drawing out of a hat later, he was ours — is that the Mets didn’t draft him. They didn’t draft that many of the eventual 1969 Mets who came up through their system. True, they scouted well to find Ed Kranepool, Cleon Jones, Ron Swoboda, Tug McGraw, Bud Harrelson and Jerry Koosman, but they all predated the draft. Once baseball decided it would be fairest to put every team on something approaching equal footing, with last year’s worst teams annually picking first, the New York Mets, about as bad as any team had ever been year in and year out, didn’t fully take advantage.
Picking second overall the first year of the draft, in 1965, the Mets selected pitcher Les Rohr.
Picking first overall the second year of the draft, in 1966, the Mets selected catcher Steve Chilcott.
Rohr got hurt. Chilcott got hurt. Between them, they played in six major league games, all of them Rohr’s. With Seaver, Koosman and later-round draftees Ryan (10th round of 1965), Jim McAndrew (11th round of 1965) and Gary Gentry (third round of 1967), the Mets had enough young pitching to cover for Rohr’s shortfall.
Chilcott was a different story within the context of Met mythology. He’s the player drafted by the Mets ahead of Reggie Jackson. There’s more that can be said to perhaps rationalize the choice, but when you learned as a budding Mets fan in the 1970s that “they picked Steve Chilcott over Reggie Jackson,” it was “enough said”. I knew sometimes the Mets made a good choice with their first pick (Jon Matlack in 1967, Lee Mazzilli in 1973) or a decent choice with their first pick (Tim Foli, No. 1 overall in 1968), but mostly I knew they picked Steve Chilcott over Reggie Jackson.
And that they’d picked Randy Sterling with their first selection of 1969. And Rich Puig in 1971. And Richard Bengston in 1972. And Cliff Speck in 1974. By 1980, I was still waiting, to varying degrees, on the returns from the “future stars” likes of Butch Benton (1975), Tom Thurberg (1976), Wally Backman (1977) and Hubie Brooks (1978). I was definitely enthused that UCLA hot shot starter Tim Leary (a righty, like Seaver) had been picked first by us and second overall in 1979. Maybe he’d be here soon.
But I also knew that the Mets had never picked anyone like what Darryl Strawberry was supposed to be…and, from reading the papers leading up to the June 1980 draft, that they were thinking of picking somebody other than Darryl Strawberry.
A couple of years before, I asked my mother if we could get a bicycle pump. I rode a lot, she rode a lot, it seemed like a good thing to have in the house. Sure, she said, she’d go to our local bike shop, Kreitzman’s, and pick one up for us. I envisioned a regular bicycle pump, like the one that Kreitzman’s let us use when we’d wheel in a little low on air. I didn’t know how else to describe it. It was a bicycle pump.
My mother came home with something else. This, she said, was what Mr. Kreitzman said was the latest in bicycle pumps, from Japan or Europe or somewhere exotic. Having patronized Kreitzman’s for as long as I can remember, I’m sure Mr. Kreitzman was being honest. They were good people. But I gotta tell ya, the damn thing was not a bicycle pump, not in the sense that you could use it to easily inflate your bicycle tires.
“Why,” I thought to myself, “can’t we ever just get the normal thing everybody else would get?”
I thought the same thing as the 1980 draft neared. The Mets are thinking of picking somebody else? Somebody other than Darryl Strawberry? Somebody other than the next Ted Williams?
Yes, apparently they were also taken by another young man from California by the name of Billy Beane. Like Strawberry, he was an outfielder. Like Strawberry, he was said to be quite talented. Unlike Strawberry, he wasn’t Strawberry.
Jesus, ambitious new owners, don’t let us down. Please bring home the right No. 1 draft choice.
To my Chilcottian surprise, they did. On June 3, 1980, Frank Cashen, the GM Nelson Doubleday and Fred Wilpon hired to rebuild the Mets to John Stearns’s specifications and then some, selected, with the first pick in the nation, Darryl Eugene Strawberry of Crenshaw High School in Los Angeles. Not only did they not blow it at No. 1, they got lucky later in the first round. Because they were owed compensation for losing Andy Hassler as a free agent, they got to pick at No. 23, and sitting there for the satisfaction of the internal Strawberry doubters was Beane. And, to fill out their portfolio a little more, with the first-round pick at No. 24, a product of having lost Skip Lockwood to free agency, they grabbed a catcher named John Gibbons. The draft wasn’t covered as it is today, but you heard about this first-round bounty. We got three players where it had seemed annually we got none.
Mostly we got Darryl Strawberry. He visited with the big club while they were on the West Coast later in June, meeting and posing with manager Joe Torre. He was officially signed in July and was assigned to Kingsport. Newsday sent a writer down to Tennessee to report back on his professional debut. The folks running our Appalachian League affiliate were handing out strawberries by the pint.
We in New York couldn’t eat up news of Strawberry’s development fast enough. From “are we gonna draft him?” we pivoted to “when is he gonna get here?” It was the summer of 1980. We understood it wasn’t going to happen immediately, and besides, we were reasonably preoccupied with the whole Magic is Back vibe permeating Flushing. But by September, the Mets had returned to “team everyone will beat” status (we finished next-to-last) and as Darryl was turning 19 in March of 1981 and 20 in March of 1982, our Strawberry yen was only intensifying. The ballclub that high school Darryl hypothesized might be good enough to add him to its World Series roster ASAP wasn’t anywhere near fruition. He might have helped a contender even then. In 1982, Darryl Strawberry of the Jackson Mets tore up the Texas League, scorching Double-A pitching for 34 home runs, 97 runs batted in and a .283 batting average. Stole 45 bases as well, because that was something he could do, too.
In 1982, the season after they fired the no longer Magical Torre, the New York Mets without Darryl Strawberry won 65 games and lost 97. They called him up in September, but just to give him a Doubleday Award, the prize the organization inaugurated just that year to recognize minor league achievement. A nice gesture, but we’d seen plenty of minor league achievement at Shea Stadium in 1982. And 1981. And 1980. And 1979. And 1978. And 1977. Managers changed. Owners changed. The ballpark had been painted. Swell. What we needed most was a major improvement in 1983. Darryl Strawberry was about to turn 21 and the endless rebuilding initiative was getting very, very old.
***
The signal event in ruining the New York Mets from 1977 onward was the trade of Tom Seaver on June 15 of that year. To be fair, the Mets were already miserable when Joe McDonald pulled the trigger of the gun M. Donald Grant ordered him to point at the lower-case franchise’s head. They’d fallen fifteen games under .500 by late May, costing the Joe before Torre, Frazier, his job as manager. It’s hard to fathom that holding onto the upper-case Franchise would have meaningfully slowed the late ’70s Mets descent into the competitive abyss.
Nevertheless, trading Tom Seaver made everybody more miserable, and the cloud that moved in over Shea Stadium never fully dissipated until April 5, 1983, the day Tom Seaver returned to the mound to pitch in home pinstripes. No longer was Tom Seaver clad in Cincinnati red. This was Seaver like he oughta be. When No. 41 emerged from the right field bullpen, and close to 49,000 Mets fans stood and cheered, the Magic was as Back as it could be.
Seaver was back. In a way, the team from which he was inexcusably exiled had left a light on for him. On the 1983 Mets that Opening Day were a surprising number of survivors or at least recidivists from Seaver’s extended first term in Flushing. Ron Hodges was catching him. John Stearns might have, except he was dogged by a bad elbow. Dave Kingman was at first base. Mike Jorgensen subbed for Sky on defense. Rusty Staub was available to pinch-hit. Craig Swan was lined up to take the season’s second start, though after Tom pitched six shutout innings in the Opener en route to a 2-0 win, it almost seemed beside the point to play more games.
The paying attendance apparently thought so, for they vamoosed after Seaver gave them their dollars’ worth. No discernible crowd filed into Shea for Swan, nor veteran acquisition Mike Torrez, nor any Met starter, reliever or reserve. The 1983 Mets resisted giving their fans any impetus to pay or attend. The novelty of Seaver 2.0 had worn off quickly. The morale boost George Foster provided a year earlier didn’t even make it through 1982. Foster was still around, but he wasn’t the answer. Nobody on the roster was the answer. By May 4, the Mets, after winning their first two, had dropped to a mortifying 6-15. A three-game weeknight series against the Astros drew 15,719. That’s not an average per game. That’s the three-game gate.
It was as if 1977 had never ended. It was as if 1983 was just a continuation of every bad season in an era that was Groundhog Day before there was Groundhog Day. Something had to give. Six years and one month was long enough for the hardiest of Mets fans to wallow in the mire.
C’mon, Frank Cashen. Light our fire.
***
The general manager didn’t want to make the one move he had at his disposal. Too soon, the cautious bowtied executive believed, but nobody was winning, nobody was showing up, and nobody could be asked to wait any longer. Thus, after the loss of May 4 in front of roughly 50,000 empty seats, Cashen made his move.
The Mets announced the promotion from Tidewater of journeyman infielder Tucker Ashford.
Oh, and outfielder Darryl Strawberry.
No disrespect intended to Ashford, who was called up to give the slumping Hubie Brooks a nudge at third base, but he wasn’t really the story of the transaction box that first week in May. Nor were corresponding demotions Ron Gardenhire and Mike Bishop. Darryl Strawberry, on every sentient Mets fan’s radar from the moment Sports Illustrated spotlighted him on page 30 in April of 1980, was no longer tomorrow. He was today. May 6, to be exact, the Friday night that began the Mets’ next series, against the Reds.
This was the second coming of Ted Williams. Also, in case that wasn’t enough of a label to hang on a 21-year-old, the second coming of Willie Mays. Mays was cited as the last Triple-A outfielder called up to a New York team with comparable attendant fanfare. I was 20 in May of 1983; I’d be 21 at the end of December. I hadn’t seen Williams play, but I had seen Mays, though toward the end of his line. Darryl, the Mets and I were all born in 1962. I rather relished the concept of the three of us ushering in a brilliant new era. My role was to watch. All Strawberry had to do was hit and hit with power and run and throw and catch everything hit to him and carry the Mets out of the morass where they’d taken up unceasing residence since I was in eighth grade and Strawberry was in ninth.
No pressure, big guy. Just be an all-time great and elevate your heretofore crummy team with you. Thanks.
***
During Spring Training of 1983, Darryl Strawberry belted four homers in only 36 at-bats, as many as the team leader, Foster, had hit in nearly twice as many ABs. Despite the power, a .306 average and adding to his burgeoning trophy case the John J. Murphy Award, Cashen sent him to Tidewater. Sixteen games into the Tides’ season, Straw (as the headlines were shortening it to) had homered three times and was hitting .333 with seven steals. It seemed an obvious enough call for a last-place team to get on with progress already. Cashen seemed dismayed that he was doing it. Cashen seemed dismayed about most things as a matter of course, but he didn’t really believe Strawberry was ready to face major league pitching or perhaps ready to face major league life, whether in New York or on the road. He was only 21.
I was only 20. I wouldn’t have known what to do at that stage of my life other than go to college and come back for the summer just in time to witness the debut of Darryl Strawberry. I did know this, though: I knew that for as excited as I was, I was also a little sad this was happening. I didn’t know enough about Strawberry’s ability to face breaking balls to be concerned he wasn’t thoroughly prepared for Steve Carlton or whoever. And I wasn’t aware enough to consider that just because somebody appears to be a physically imposing athlete — Darryl was listed at a lean 6’6” — that he might not be a fully realized human being. Maybe none of us is ever as mature as we should be, but I wasn’t used to thinking about ballplayers as young men except in the most basic of “this kid is supposed to be good” terms. Until May of 1983, I’d never rooted for a Met younger than me. A few days before Strawberry was promoted, the Mets brought up shortstop Jose Oquendo, born in 1963. He wasn’t just younger than me, he was younger than the Mets.
Up to this point, despite being of legal drinking age (it was 19 in those days), I had looked up to baseball players as a child might. Even the ones I derided were baseball players. I collected their pictures on cards. I taped their likenesses to my walls. They’re in the major leagues. They must know what they’re doing. How was I supposed to know that they were people? How was I supposed to know that 21, which sounded plenty old when I was 7 and 12 and 17, wasn’t that old even if the world was about to treat you as if you knew what you were doing?
I didn’t remember everything from that Sports Illustrated article that seemed like it ran in ancient times but was barely three years before. Darryl’s background didn’t necessarily lend itself to a smooth transition to stardom. Sure, he was a five-tool player, but he was benched in high school for not hustling. He was from a large family not operating in the best of circumstances. His mother, SI quoted Darryl, had been “struggling all her life”. His father wasn’t around. In later years, recounting learning of where he’d been drafted to play, he’d chuckle that he’d had no idea where New York was. Well, I knew where Los Angeles was, but it’s safe to say I had no conception of what Darryl Strawberry’s life had been. Growing up in South Central L.A., getting good at sports, then suddenly he’s in Sports Illustrated; everybody remembers his unforgettable name; he’s signed to a professional contract at all of 18 (a good one), then he’s sent to sharpen his skills in Kingsport, Tenn.; Lynchburg, Va.; Jackson, Miss.; and Norfolk, Va. And after all that culture shock, it was next stop New York City to be a savior for hordes of people he’d never met in a place that not so long before he couldn’t have pinned on a map.
Yet that’s not what made me sad or apprehensive or not 100% jubilant that Darryl Strawberry was finally, as of May 6, 1983, going to be a New York Met. What bothered me, at the ripe old age of 20, was that if the wait was over, the anticipation was over as well. All I’d done for three years — which might as well have been three decades at that age — was look forward to Darryl Strawberry. We all looked forward to Darryl Strawberry like we looked forward to no other Met before and, I assure you, haven’t looked forward to any other Met since. He was designed to change our world. On Friday night, once he trotted out to right field, and particularly once he stepped into the batter’s box to take on the heat of Mario Soto, the proving would begin.
What, I wondered to myself, would I look forward to now?
***
The crowd for Darryl Strawberry’s debut was bigger than the crowd for the entire Astro series. Admittedly, it wasn’t anything close to a sellout, but we’re still talking about a last-place team New York had been averse to stepping up to meet for six going on seven years. There were enough who understood what was beginning in Flushing. It was tomorrow.
And apropos of his star quality and that name you couldn’t forget once you read it in a magazine, Darryl Strawberry, batting third (behind Tucker Ashford), encountered Soto, one of the fiercest pitchers in the National League in the bottom of the first inning and…struck out.
Tomorrow wasn’t going to come easily or immediately. But it was going to come. Tonight, as in Friday night the Sixth of May, took a while itself. Soto was mostly untouchable to every Met, no matter the level of experience. Seaver pitched for the Mets and held his other old club pretty much at bay until the seventh, but he’d leave in the eighth, trailing 3-1. The presumed dawn of a new era was heading for an anticlimax as Soto struck out Mookie Wilson to start the ninth and, after giving up a single to Wally Backman, who was pinch-hitting for Ashford, struck out Straw for the third time. Darryl was 0-for-4. The beginning was not auspicious.
But the game was not over. Dave Kingman, the reigning National League home run champ from 1982 (despite having hit .204), lived up to his crown, tying the game at three on a long homer to center. We had extras. In the bottom of the tenth, after the Reds had taken a one-run lead, we had another comeback. The hero of the moment this time was Hubie Brooks, homering and making a case for winning his job back from footnote Ashford. Finally, in the eleventh inning, the one swing everybody’d come or tuned into see. It was Darryl Strawberry, taking Tom Hume deep…and just foul.
So much for scripting baseball.
Darryl did reach base for the first time in the eleventh, via walk, but the Mets didn’t score. It would take until the thirteenth to resolve the issue at hand. With the 4-4 tie still in effect, Darryl was up for the sixth time in the game and his career. Two were out. The time was perfect for the next phase in the evolution of baseball superstardom — Williams to Mays to Strawberry — to manifest itself. Nah, it wasn’t gonna be that easy that quickly. But Darryl did work out another walk, off Bill Scherrer, and he did steal second. Mike Jorgensen walked next and Seaver’s fellow ex-Red Foster, facing Frank Pastore, ended the game with a three-run blast to left.
The Mets were 1-0 in the Darryl Strawberry Era.
***
In a way, Cashen was correct. Darryl Strawberry wasn’t quite ready to hit against tough National League pitching in the first part of May 1983. Middling National League pitching was a challenge, too. The climb from the minors to the majors was a steep one. Willie Mays, it was noted repeatedly, had a rough start when the Giants brought him up in May 1951. It was noted repeatedly because Darryl Strawberry’s start was comparably rough.
For a while, it felt like Strawberry would never hit. Seven games into his major league career, he was a .125 batter. In his eighth game, however, he homered for the first time, off Lee Tunnell in Pittsburgh. The next night at Shea, he homered again, off a lefty, no less, Tim Lollar of the Padres. I can attest to this historical moment because I was there to bear witness. Straw homered, Seaver started, 7,550 of us were on hand for this next footstep into the future. I had to leave after six innings because of a splitting headache, but my heart was full.
The Mets would continue to lose a bunch more than they would win for a while, motivating yet another managerial switch (George Bamberger out, Frank Howard in). Darryl would continue to take baby steps. Lefties, for the most part, were trouble. He was prone to striking out — a lot. But then there’d be a day here or a day there when the fuss that followed him from Crenshaw through the minors to Shea couldn’t have been any more self-explanatory. On June 22, he took over a game right away, launching a three-run homer in the bottom of the first at Shea off Bob Forsch of the Cardinals. Tom Seaver went back to the mound in the second and turned the lead into the final complete game victory of his Mets career. On June 26, in the nightcap of the doubleheader whose opener saw Rusty Staub notch his record-tying eighth consecutive pinch-hit and me seeing it live and in person, Darryl both homered and tripled. His average was still under .200, but with me around it was gangbusters. Perhaps we were good for each other.
Without me in attendance very much the rest of 1983, Darryl Strawberry took off on the trajectory predicted for him when he was in high school. In his final 82 games, starting with yours truly watching him rack up multiple extra base hits from an Upper Deck box seat, Darryl batted .295, with 22 home runs and 57 runs batted in while stealing a dozen bases. Double that for a full season and you decided his success was inevitable. Eventually he played against all kinds of pitching and destroyed the bulk of it, establishing a franchise standard for homers by a first-year player (26) that would stand for 36 years.
Despite not coming up until the second month of the season and not getting untracked until practically the midway point, Straw towered over the National League freshman class the way he did all of America’s amateurs three years earlier. When the ballots were cast for NL Rookie of the Year, he left the likes of Craig McMurtry and Greg Brock in the dust. The Mets had their first first-year award winner since their 1967 No. 1 pick Jon Matlack in 1972. Matlack had been the best first-round pick the Mets had ever made until Strawberry.
By the end of 1983, measuring the Mets in the context of before and after Darryl Strawberry seemed appropriate.
***
Darryl Strawberry beginning to live up to the potential we were all informed was his would have been reason enough to be cheered by the Mets as ’83 concluded. Oh, but there was so much more. On June 15, Frank Cashen made a move that seemed to decrease his chronic dourness, snatching from the St. Louis Cardinals former batting champ and perennial Gold Glove first baseman Keith Hernandez. Why they’d give up their best player for Neil Allen and Rick Ownbey felt mysterious, but better to not ask questions and just enjoy that the cover boy and sidebar lad from Sports Illustrated’s 1980 baseball preview issue were reunited.
Center fielder Mookie Wilson continued to run the bases with alacrity. Hubie Brooks wrested control of third base back from Tucker Ashford. Left fielder George Foster reverted to a semblance of the slugger he’d been in Cincinnati. At short, Jose Oquendo was young and full of promise. Maybe not as much promise as Straw, but that was a tall order. This was a lineup coming together, supported by a bullpen to seal their handiwork. Lefty Carlos Diaz, righty Doug Sisk and especially closer Jesse Orosco were lights out. Walt Terrell, one of two righties obtained from Texas for Lee Mazzilli in 1982, made strides (he even hit two homers in one game), and the other, Ron Darling, came up in September. Darling, like Straw, had been a first-rounder.
The Mets were a last-place team again in 1983. That 6-15 start didn’t shake off so easily; they were 37-65 before truly getting it in gear to finish 68-94…which isn’t much of a record. And the attendance was still pretty light. But if you’d stuck with the Mets in the years before they earned the right to draft Darryl Strawberry, then after the clock officially started on the wait for Darryl Strawberry to rise to the majors, you knew this last-place finish was nothing like the cellar-dwelling that had been the rule of the house prior to 1983.
The future heralded by Darryl Strawberry had commenced in earnest. And, oh, what a future it would be.
***
When SNY or MLBN shows the very occasional regular-season Mets game from 1985 or 1986, I am blown away by who the Mets put on the field on a regular basis. Darryl Strawberry in right. Keith Hernandez at first. Gary Carter catching. As often as not in the games that are chosen for reair, Dwight Gooden pitching. It boggles my mind, even knowing what I know, that these four players came with the ticket, so to speak, every time you watched the Mets in those years and a few more years to follow. In retrospect, it was like having the prime versions of Ted Williams, Reggie Jackson, Willie Mays and Tom Seaver on the same field for you every fifth night.
In real time, it was pretty close to that. You got so used to it that you might not have noticed how immense it truly was. In the day-to-day thicket of baseball fandom, you get caught up in shortcomings. When will Keith come out of his slump? Why can’t Gary throw out baserunners like he did for Montreal? Should I be concerned that Doc isn’t striking out as many batters as he was last year? You almost didn’t notice how amazing it was to have these characters linked tightly in the cause you considered holy.
After 1983, despite his rapid ascent to the upper tier of baseball superstardom, you inevitably dwelled on what was perceived as wrong with Darryl Strawberry more than you did on appreciating all that was right. Darryl didn’t make the All-Star team as a rookie. But he made it every year for the next seven years, elected as a starter six times. He matched or bettered his rookie home run total of 26 every one of those years. Three times he hit close to forty home runs. One year he stole more than 30 bases and hit more than 30 homers.
From 1983 to 1990, Darryl Strawberry totaled 252 home runs as a New York Met. It remains the most in franchise history. David Wright pulled up lame in his pursuit of this one club record he couldn’t quite reach, falling ten home runs short. Of the 252, plus the four he delivered in two postseasons, all but a handful are still going. Darryl hit the longest, most majestic home runs you’d ever seen. About half of them gave the talented Met pitching staff a first-inning lead, I’m fairly certain. About a quarter are the kinds you bring up to raise each other’s spirits decades after the fact. Nearly every one after 1983 was walloped in pursuit of a division title or higher. He hit stadium clocks. He hit stadium roofs. He disrupted Championship Series and World Series. He didn’t make it to the World Series at the age of 20. He had to wait until he was 24.
But he got there, and he got us there. Yes, all we could have wanted from that Sports Illustrated article and that wise decision regarding what to do with the first selection in the nation had come to pass. Darryl didn’t do it alone. He had high-profile help. He had Keith and Gary and Dwight. He had Mookie and Ronnie and Jesse. The cast is amazing to consider. Leading men were everywhere. The supporting players were star-caliber.
The rebuild really happened. It was barely a month from Seaver’s Opening Day turn to Darryl’s debut. While the Mets were still partially defined by Mets from the 1970s, little did we know that the present roster was a quarter-filled, too, by players who’d be around Shea in October of 1986. Little would have we dared to guess Shea would be open for business that late in a year that was coming so soon. We might have been confident coming out of 1983, but could we have seen a contender emerging in 1984, a push to the finish line in 1985 or every damn marble in creation becoming ours in 1986?
Although Orosco, Wilson, Backman, Sisk and Danny Heep were already on the team, it was the presence of Darryl Strawberry on May 6, 1983, that genuinely marked the beginning of the enormous transformation we’d all craved forever. He wasn’t the first of the 1986 Mets to arrive at Shea, but he was the first of the Big Four. We never called them the Big Four but that’s what they were: Strawberry, Hernandez, Gooden, Carter. They were all together in one place, every night pretty much, especially the nights Gooden pitched. Throw in the high-profile supporting cast and “wow,” I say to myself when I catch highlights from that era. This was our team on a going basis.
On May 6, 1983, we weren’t thinking about Hernandez in St. Louis, Gooden in Lynchburg or Carter in Montreal. We were bracing for Strawberry at Shea. He was the first to get here. He was the harbinger of our fondest dreams exhibiting themselves in the standings. He was Darryl Strawberry of the New York Mets.
Somehow, it seems to me, we too often lost sight of what the kid from Crenshaw was actually doing and how he could tower over the entire astounding scene that became Mets baseball at its best in the 1980s. We harped instead on what Darryl Strawberry didn’t do. We harped that he wasn’t Ted Williams or Willie Mays. We harped that he looked a little disinterested out in right, that some grounders didn’t get dutifully run out, that he could mope inconsolably or absent himself or snarl at a teammate or answer a reporter with an instantly incendiary reply that made you wonder what the hell he was thinking. One of the touchstone incidents everybody remembers, Darryl and Keith mixing it up on photo day in Port St. Lucie in 1989, yielded one of the great lines of the age: Darryl Strawberry finally hit the cutoff man.
Maybe it was as true as it was funny. But, really, that’s what you took away from Straw as he entered his sixth season as, by then, the best position player the Mets ever brought up through their farm system? I was going to say “…who the Mets ever developed,” but maybe that’s giving them too much credit. Every player needs coaching and mentoring, but at the end of the day and the end of a decade, it’s the player who did incredible things.
It didn’t get more incredible than Darryl Strawberry from the night he said hello in 1983 to the day he said goodbye in 1990. It could get complicated and complex and, yes, it could get frustrating. We wanted him to yield only good news, and he couldn’t. We wanted him to stick around, and he didn’t. We wanted his final stop to be Cooperstown, and that wasn’t destined to be his destination. Instead, we merely got a player who could do it all and often did.
We got the player we waited for, the player I looked forward to. Of that I am convinced.
PREVIOUS METS FOR ALL SEASONS 1962: Richie Ashburn 1964: Rod Kanehl 1966: Shaun Fitzmaurice 1969: Donn Clendenon 1970: Tommie Agee 1972: Gary Gentry 1973: Willie Mays 1977: Lenny Randle 1978: Craig Swan 1981: Mookie Wilson 1982: Rusty Staub 1990: Gregg Jefferies 1991: Rich Sauveur 1992: Todd Hundley 1994: Rico Brogna 1995: Jason Isringhausen 1996: Rey Ordoñez 1998: Todd Pratt 2000: Melvin Mora 2002: Al Leiter 2003: David Cone 2005: Pedro Martinez 2008: Johan Santana 2009: Angel Pagan 2012: R.A. Dickey 2013: Wilmer Flores 2014: Jacob deGrom 2019: Dom Smith
For the past two nights, I haven’t had to think about what to watch on television. It was summer and the Mets were on. The viewing menu for any Mets fan in summer has been dependably predictable that way since 1962. Sub in radio for television if that’s how you roll.
Score one for dependability, predictability and well-ingrained habit. On Monday night, score seven for the Mets versus only four for the Red Sox, resulting in our second win of the thus far four-game season. Michael Conforto homered at Fenway Park. So did Pete Alonso. So did Dom Smith. Michael Wacha registered five innings’ worth of outs. Seth Lugo retired the final four batters. Chasen Shreve acquitted himself adequately in middle relief. Jeurys Familia did not, but little harm was done.
Not bad for late July, eh? Except for fabled Fenway being bereft of spectators. We know that’s 2020’s default setting, but geez, Fenway, too? The sight of those empty red seats behind home plate was shocking. Preferable to cardboard cutout characters from Cheers or whatever cheeky conceit the Sox might have cooked up, but it was jarring nonetheless. I knew they’d be empty. I knew they were red. But I don’t think I’d ever seen an empty red seat behind home plate in Fenway Park during a baseball game before. There’s lot of things we’ve never seen that we keep bumping into.
For Conforto, Alonso and Smith, of course Gary Cohen told us their homers were “OUTTA HERE!” It’s the sweetest sound summer offers. But, wait a sec. While one Mets power trio was in Boston, the other was in Flushing. Gary called the game from a booth at Citi Field, adjacent to Keith Hernandez and Ron Darling in another booth. That’s the deal: announcers aren’t announcing on the road this year. Instead, they go to the nearest set of professional monitors and broadcast from shall we say home. Thus, when a Met goes deep far from Queens, shouldn’t Gary enthuse, “It’s OUTTA THERE!” wherever “there” happens to be tonight, in this case, Boston, Massachusetts?
Probably not, but the situation is definitely ripe for Steven Wright “drive on the parkway, park in the driveway” contemplation. The radio guys are also parked at Citi. Sunday night, amid the ongoing dismemberment of Corey Oswalt (who really needed to be pinch-hit for, DH be damned), Howie Rose grew increasingly wistful for all the things he’d grown used to as a baseball broadcaster but that are decreed out of his reach in the summer of 2020. No fans in Section 318 to kibitz with him and Wayne Randazzo. No renewing acquaintances with those swell flight attendants on the Delta charter. No Delta charter, natch. No sign of Jay Horwitz, for goodness sake, except by phone, Zoom or whatever conveyance he and Howie use to communicate. How can you have Mets baseball without Jay Horwitz in the house?
Which raises the more pressing elephantine question in the room, namely how can you have baseball at all in the middle of a pandemic?
Remember the pandemic? It’s why the Mets are 2-2 on July 28. Well, Frigging Edwin Diaz is the main reason the Mets aren’t 3-1, but you get my drift. And surely you haven’t forgotten the pandemic. It’s only disrupted every phase of life in these United States for four going on five months. Baseball wasn’t immune until it decided maybe it oughta try to be. Rob Manfred took a victory lap of sorts in the Times the other day. “We cannot be the one sport that doesn’t figure out how to play,” is how the self-pleased commissioner expressed his thinking once MLB had gotten its miniature season underway.
No, heaven forefend baseball show leadership in a time when everybody else in sports is concerned with producing television content. Mind you, I’m a stone hypocrite here. I might not think it was a great idea to pretend baseball, all its precautions notwithstanding, could go along its merry way unaffected by the coronavirus solely for the higher purpose of giving me something to watch in prime time. But I did watch in prime time. I watched on Sunday night. I watched on Monday night.
In between those graciously televised presentations, it had become abundantly clear that baseball’s merry way is not going to be unimpeded by inconvenient obstacles. We knew by Sunday night that the Miami Marlins had experienced a few positive tests for COVID-19. On Monday morning we learned there were more than a dozen. The Marlins played the Phillies on Sunday afternoon. They weren’t going to be allowed to play the Orioles on Monday night. The Phillies would have to be sidelined as well, since the Marlins had visited them in Philadelphia. The next team due at Citizens Bank Park, the Yankees, weren’t going to play, either.
It was reasonable to think that it had been a pleasant baseball weekend (save for Diaz and Oswalt), but enough kidding ourselves. The Marlins had been subject to an outbreak. They were going to be the only ones? We’d heard of relatively isolated incidents since baseball started stretching to get back in shape. Now practically half a team and a couple of its coaches had what most of us in masks have been trying hard not to come down with. All the traveling and the congregating and the instinctive high-fiving…gosh, what were the odds?
I wouldn’t have been surprised had Manfred emerged from a conference call with baseball’s club owners on Monday afternoon and said, listen, we really wanted to play ball, we’d figured it out and everything, but maybe this isn’t so safe, so if you’ll excuse us, we’re gonna stash the cardboard cutouts and go home until there’s more light than tunnel where this prevalent illness is concerned. Yet I wasn’t surprised no such announcement was forthcoming.
Thus, the Mets and Red Sox played on Monday night, just as the Mets and Braves played on Sunday night. On Sunday night, as Brave after Brave scored run after run in an empty ballpark, with the euphoria of Friday afternoon’s Opener worn off and the game dragging on like a meaningless exhibition, I really didn’t see any legitimate point as to why they were doing this.
Then, Monday night, with the Mets finally hitting, and fresh baseball talk from the greatest announcers there are filling the summer evening, I sat back and realized I still didn’t see any legitimate point as to why they were doing this.
But I’ll keep watching it as long as they keep showing it to me. I guess they know that.
My mother also knows baseball and has a head for business. So she told me some other things too.
For example, she told me that days like these are a lot more likely if you’ve got cheapjack owners who can’t or won’t pay to put the best product on the field, who think it’s sensible to send a live-armed young fireballer off to the free-agent market to sign with a division rival, and try to convince you that it’s a perfectly sound plan to replace that live-armed young fireballer with reclamation projects who have solid resumes but questionable futures.
And she told me that, yes, injuries happen — but that I shouldn’t be surprised when they happen to guys who throw 100, UCLs being the thin reeds that they are, and that a wise business owner makes plans for those injuries, so that you’re not looking at, say, putting Corey Oswalt or Walker Lockett in your rotation in a year when you can contend for a playoff spot. (No, really, she said those names. I was eight years old and it was 1977, so I didn’t know whom she was talking about, but turn the clock ahead 43 years and I see what she meant.)
Zack Wheeler is in Philadelphia, and Noah Syndergaard is sitting somewhere glowering at the scar on his elbow, and Marcus Stroman is dealing with a torn calf, so the Mets’ rotation is the peerless Jacob deGrom, the promising but perilous Steven Matz … and then wishing those two guys were around.
Rick Porcello won a Cy Young award in 2016 with the Red Sox, using a potent sinker to get batters to beat balls into the ground and keeping them honest with a four-seam fastball, change-up, slider and curve. 2019, though, was a disaster — Porcello put his four-seamer front and center, and while he struck out a lot of guys, he also gave up a ton of home runs. His hard-hit percentage was the worst of his career, translating to a 5.52 ERA and a new employer.
The Mets thought they could get Porcello to go back to what worked a couple of years ago, but on Sunday night he threw too many four-seamers and sliders up in the zone, and the results were ugly: fifty-six pitches, two innings, six earned runs. Maybe Porcello will make the adjustment (though being a groundball pitcher in front of Robinson Cano isn’t necessarily a recipe for success), but it’s easier said that done — and Porcello has been plying his trade in the big leagues since 2009, meaning there’s a lot of mileage on that arm.
With Porcello excused further punishment, Corey Oswalt was brought on to take a beating, and somehow made you miss Porcello — Austin Riley hit a ball so far that J.D. Davis wound up fielding a very confused flight attendant whose 747 continued on with a ragged hole in the fuselage. (The flight attendant went just over the tip of J.D.’s glove and bounced off the warning track. She’s fine.) When LaGuardia Air Traffic Control requested that Oswalt be relieved so planes no longer had to be diverted to JFK, Paul Sewald made his 2020 debut and did the kind of things Paul Sewald has been doing since 2017. Hunter Strickland managed not to be terrible, but by then the Braves were tired of running the bases, so let’s not get too excited about a brief flare-up of Stricklandian competence.
Insult to injury: ESPN used its junior varsity broadcast crew, and while I’ll reluctantly admit Chipper Jones is a not bad color guy, Jon Sciambi and Rick Sutcliffe could find offseason work breaking terrorists at a CIA black site.
“AUUGGHGHHH!!! NO MORE OF THIS MAN BOOG! NO MORE OF HIS FRIEND SUT! IT IS A SYMPHONY OF HELL TO MY EARS! WHAT DO YOU WANT TO KNOW???!!!”
Seriously, I’m listening to Matt Vasgersian and A-Rod now and they sound like a Vin Scully/Gary Cohen supergroup.
I could say that getting the tar beat out of you 14-1 is better than looking out the window and wondering why there’s no baseball when it’s spring, and you know what? That’s true. That’s true and let’s not forget it because of one bad night. But losing by 13 isn’t better than a whole lot else, and as I type this the Mets are on caravan of buses somewhere on I-84, heading for Boston and wondering if Michael Wacha’s any better repaired than Porcello.
The saving grace of a season’s first loss, particularly if it follows the euphoria of a season’s first win, is its inevitability. It was gonna happen sooner or later. Get this unpleasant slice of reality over with since you know darn well you have to and move on. But don’t get it over with the way the Mets got it over with Saturday afternoon in the second game of long-delayed 2020. Cripes, not like that.
One strike from sticking the Braves in the National League East basement for at least one more evening — and ensuring themselves a delightful night alone in the freshly painted division penthouse — the Mets chaired the worst co-op meeting ever, inviting Atlanta to ascend right back to the pack and, in conjunction with other doings in other venues, effecting a five-way tie at the top. It’s too early to start thinking about the standings, of course.
OR IS IT?
Never mind that the second game of a sixty-game season resonates statistically differently from the second game of 162. Never mind that you most definitely do not want to assist the rival Braves in finding their footing just as they’re about to stumble from the gate but good. Mind a whole lot that Frigging Edwin Diaz, as his friends call him, gave up the home run that, with two out, nobody on, and a 2-1 lead, transformed a win into a tie and, before we knew it (though surely we knew it), a loss.
Diaz in the ninth inning and home runs go together like nausea and throwing up. True, the fastball he threw to Marcell Ozuna, which went o-ZOOM-a over the right-center field fence, wasn’t up. It was described by one and all as a good pitch, a fastball at the outer edge of the plate. Ozuna, however, had to consider it was a great pitch. He certainly did stupendous things with it, so whatever moral victory there was in seeing Diaz almost collect his second consecutive save will not count as a step forward in the Mets’ dawdle-averse playoff push.
At empty Citi Field, even the two-dimensional dogs were howling in disgust.
Funny game, this baseball. Like Diaz, Steven Matz gives up one lousy solo home run, to Adam Duvall in the second, and it turned out notable mostly because it caromed smack off the face of a cardboard cutout of Willow, Jeff McNeil’s adorable pooch in the right field stands. Matz had plenty of innings to make up for that little woof, and he did, pitching his deGrommian best and actually getting supported for it. The inning in which the Mets took the lead, the fifth, was a thing of National League beauty: a Michael Conforto double; an Amed Rosario Speedwagon triple; a hit-by-pitch for ball magnet Brandon Nimmo; and a McNeil sac fly (take that, Duvall). Matz went six very solid, allowing just one other hit and one walk, outpitching Max Fried.
The Met relievers who succeeded Matz and preceded Diaz could have passed the old Rolaids fireman hat around proudly, if that sort of thing was deemed sanitary in 2020. Jeurys Familia maintained the best shape of his life from February; Dellin Betances emerged among us in fine fettle; and Justin Wilson continued to be the lefty of our dreams (Drew Smith also looked sharp in his first post-Tommy John appearance, though by then Citi’s barn door had swung wide open). Their efforts were enough to chase away my early sense that Duvall’s dinger off Willow McNeil’s likeness was a harbinger of doom à la Dion James — also a Brave — taking inadvertent aim at a sadly positioned mourning dove with a pop fly at Shea in April 1987, a season that was never the same once Rafael Santana had to collect a bird’s remains rather than a routine out. Doggone Duvall notwithstanding, the Mets had taken wing and were staying aloft. Our 2-1 lead was holding up and holding up some more, clear to two out in the ninth.
Then it collapsed like a house of Edwin Diaz cards. When the Mets couldn’t recover in the bottom of the ninth, that meant extras, which meant WTF? Oh right, it’s that new rule that makes a mockery of all the old rules. Simply explained, dude stands on second for the Braves, and he is driven in instantly. New York newcomer Hunter Strickland (who should definitely rent rather than buy…and maybe rent by the week rather than the month) ushered in MLB’s insipid innovation presumably exactly as Rob Manfred desired, permitting three quick Brave runs in the top of the tenth. Atlanta didn’t even have to deploy vengeful Adeiny Hechavarria to deliver the crushing blow.
The Mets didn’t respond in kind. They, too, got to have an automatic runner on second, and he indeed scored, but nobody else did, which made the final 5-3 for not us. Hard to miss in the bottom of the tenth, amid a tease of a rally, was erstwhile pinch-runner Eduardo Nuñez serving as designated hitter after Luis Rojas had him take Yoenis Cespedes’s place on the basepaths in the eighth. The burst of speed seemed clever then. In the tenth, with the bases loaded and the situation Cespy-made, Yo’s bat was severely missed. Then again, the DH is an abomination, so maybe karma reaps what we sow.
This loss was just one loss. Unfortunately, it’s the most recent result we have; it was all but chalked up as a win; and whoa, there are only 58 games left in the season. Inevitability can really kill a mood, can’t it?
The Mets finally got to play baseball Friday afternoon, and while no one can say what the next week or even the next day will bring, getting to play baseball was a much-needed respite and relief.
It was also a pretty damn good baseball game, one with exactly the right amount of tension — some thrills and chills, some ebbs and flows, spikes of disappointment, sudden happiness, a gnawing tension and finally the good guys walking off victorious. The other struggles we face collectively right now aren’t so easy to parse, we have no idea what inning it is, and there’s no guarantee of a happy ending.
The game also felt — at least to me — closer to normal than I might have guessed. It wasn’t normal, of course — not without fans in the stands, not with teams carrying out the usual rituals in socially distanced ways (at least until they stopped bothering), and of course not with Opening Day coming a beat before August. But it still felt, well, perhaps “normal adjacent” covers it. Some of that was the peerless presence of Gary, Keith and Ron, with an assist from old pal Steve Gelbs. Some of it was that Citi Field’s A/V team was on its game, with the usual noisy park noise and scoreboard whoop-de-doo in the usual places, and fake crowd noise better calibrated than I’ve seen elsewhere so far. And most of all it helped that the game was still the game, with its familiar pacing and rhythms.
One thing I was thinking about even before first pitch was how to weigh each of these games. The most immediate lesson is to cherish each one, lest a brace of COVID tests or need to close things back down cancel the next one. But I think we all knew that. I was struggling with something else — the idea that each of these games is worth 2.7 times as much as one in a regulation season.
That may be mathematically accurate, but thinking about it that way simply isn’t going to work. Whether you’re a player or a manager or just a fan, you can’t put baseball on fast-forward. The healthier mindset, I think, is to simply note that it’s July 24 and the Mets are in a dogfight for first place, with every team within a game of them in the standings. That’s a more natural way to approach this sprint to October — and it has the additional benefit of being true, as we used to joke in the newsroom.
The game itself was a tight, taut little thriller, with Jacob deGrom coming out throwing 100 MPH gas past Ronald Acuna Jr. and throttling the Braves for as long as his pitch count allowed. He left with a no-decision, which I suppose is a sign of normalcy I could have done without.
Meanwhile his opposite number, Atlanta’s Mike Soroka, escaped trouble a couple of times. His first getaway came right out of the gate, when a leadoff single by Brandon Nimmo was followed by Jeff McNeil hammering a liner past first. Unfortunately, it was right into Freddie Freeman’s glove instead of a foot or so past him, turning a first Met run into an unassisted double play. At home, where Nimmo’s single had convinced me the Mets would finish 60-0, I reversed myself to wail that 0-60 was foreordained, which may sound deeply psychotic but was actually a good sign. Every Opening Day is a reminder of the dangers of emotional small sample sizes.
Then, in the fifth, Ender Inciarte went above the fence — as he’s done before — to take a two-run homer away from J.D. Davis. That time, I had no philosophical silver lining to grumpily appreciate, and just said a bad word.
The game ground along until the seventh, with Seth Lugo and Chris Martin having taken over for deGrom and Soroka. And then, with one out in the seventh, Martin left a fastball over the plate to Mets designated hitter Yoenis Cespedes.
The Yoenis Cespedes Experience has been a surreal ride for more than two years: blown ankles, rumored wild boars, holes in ranchland, restructured contracts, and more perils than a railroad that uses Paulines as mile markers. Cespedes can’t really run, let alone play the field, but neither skill was required to send Martin’s pitch to its beautiful and distant reward. Cespedes’s swing was pure 2015, a viciously beautiful assault, followed by a bat flip that all but winked and asked, “Remember me?”
But would one skinny lousy run be enough? Justin Wilson got through the eighth, helped by a nifty play by newly minted Met Andres Gimenez — in his first-ever big-league chance, no less — and a cutter that was high but arrived when Acuna was expecting a fastball. Still, as the bottom of the eighth arrived, I strongly urged the Mets to score somewhere in the neighborhood of five runs. Which, granted, is always a good idea, but I’ve rarely wished it so fervently. 2020 has been a rough year, and I was feeling a little fragile about the prospect of watching Edwin Diaz defend a one-run lead.
But that was what was going to have to happen. And so, baseball being baseball, of course Diaz looked terrific. The fastball was properly smoking but more importantly the slider had bite and wiggle, both of which were tragically lacking for most of last year. There was some anxiety after a one-out walk to Freeman, of course, though I was heartily glad to see healthy and playing baseball, despite how that usually ends for the Mets. But our nemesis never reached second: Diaz caught Marcell Ozuna looking, then punched out summer-camp Met castoff Matt Adams for the ballgame.
The Mets are 1-0 — which means they’re 1-0, not 2.7-0 or any of that stuff. (Seriously, don’t — given everything else we’re all dealing with, the first three-game losing streak will be the death of you.) They won a game, even if the stadium was empty and the calendar unfamiliar, and it felt good. It felt good in ways that were weird, and maybe also in ways that reveal we’re all skating on emotional thin ice, but mostly it felt good in ways that were familiar — much-needed reminders of what we’ve had to put aside and what so many are working hard to restore.
Welcome to A Met for All Seasons, a series in which we consider a given Met who played in a given season and…well, we’ll see.
Guess who’s back
Back again
—Eminem
When you are lacking it, few pitches are more alluring than boring old competence. Consider a few politicians who’ve seized on the idea of knowing what they were doing and then went fairly far in their endeavors.
• “I see an America on the move again, united, its wounds healed, its head high, a diverse and vital nation, moving into its third century with confidence and compassion and competence,” Jimmy Carter envisioned in June of 1976 en route to the Democratic presidential nomination and, ultimately, the presidency.
• “After eight years of charisma and four years of the clubhouse, why not try competence?” Ed Koch’s TV commercials asked as the congressman from Manhattan’s Silk Stocking District successfully ran for mayor in 1977.
• When Michael Dukakis addressed the 1988 Democratic National Convention as its nominee, he framed the upcoming election as “about competence”. True, he wasn’t elected, but his numbers shot through the roof after that speech.
Getting the job done carries a timeless appeal. Jacob deGrom has been getting the job done since 2014. And nobody’s more appealing to us today.
A century after Warren Harding rode the promise of a “return to normalcy” to the White House, baseball belatedly enters 2020 utterly beyond the norm. Opening Day, that perennially hailed harbinger of springtime renewal, arrives today, July 24. One-hundred two fewer games than normal will be played in the regular season. Six teams more than normal will make the playoffs. Players are regularly sidelined by a malady you’d never heard of when the most recent World Series ended.
But if you need something approximating normal, look to the pitcher’s mound at Citi Field around 4:10 this afternoon. Barring a tightening of the most valuable back in Queens, you’ll see Jacob deGrom throwing a baseball on behalf of the New York Mets.
Let’s get this long-delayed, ill-advised party started!
It doesn’t get much more normal nor competent nor reassuring than that. If recent history is to be trusted, it doesn’t get any better. And if you’re looking for a pitcher to see you through to the most unforeseen Opening Day imaginable, well, why not the best?
***
Long before we stumbled into this apparently godforsaken decade, several years before he officially ascended to the heights of the last one, Jacob deGrom was promoted from Triple-A Las Vegas to help fill out the Mets’ bullpen. Before he could fire one pitch in major league relief, he was tabbed instead to start a ballgame. The date was May 15, 2014. The opponent was the Yankees. The result was predictive: deGrom was effective and the Mets lost.
It took eight starts for Jake to get a win, yet we could already be fairly certain we had a winner on our hands. He had stuff. He had command. He had poise. The wins — whether for him as a pitcher or us as a team — would come eventually. They had to. An award came in November. Jacob deGrom, whose debut materialized with minimal fuss, was named National League Rookie of the Year. He snuck up on it like he snuck up on the rest of us who were waiting for others. Waiting for Matt Harvey to return from Tommy John surgery. Waiting for Zack Wheeler to accelerate his development. Waiting for Noah Syndergaard to get his shot.
Inevitably, you have the glamorous teammate who draws the lion's share of attention and the teammate who quietly gets the job done. pic.twitter.com/jkgt4nkNdF
When the Mets stand feet apart from one another along the first base foul line, there will be no sign of Harvey or Wheeler or Syndergaard on the premises. Also missing will be the usual 44,000 fans Opening Day draws, but that’s 2020 for ya. Regarding the elements more directly connected to the Mets, Harvey is reportedly en route to Kansas City, Wheeler has taken the money to run to Philadelphia, and Syndergaard is rehabbing from his own TJS, presumably down in PSL, though who can tell these days? DeGrom, the Met who didn’t attract a scintilla of the attention those talented fellows did when they were rising onto our radar, is wearing No. 48 in New York and will be for as much foreseeable future as these days can possibly contain.
Within his generation of Mets pitching prospects, nobody went further, and he ain’t goin’ anywhere.
***
Ideally, all the Mets pitchers we pictured forever starring for us when we were dreaming our pitching dreams circa 2014 — including Rafael Montero, who was considered a bigger star in the making upon his concurrent-with-deGrom promotion — would still be starring for us at the dawn of the 2020s. It hasn’t worked out that way. Little deal was made of Jacob deGrom, yet nobody’s been the bigger deal or has signed one, for that matter. He’s been certified the best pitcher in his league two years running. He’s clearly the signature arm of a franchise that fancies itself legendarily pitching-rich. He’s carved himself a niche on the Mets’ version of Mount Pitchmore alongside Tom Seaver, Dwight Gooden and Jerry Koosman, and is maybe not too many innings from joining Tom Terrific in elevating their dual status to twin peaks.
At first glance, hair was deGrom’s defining characteristic. These days it’s excellence.
Unlike contemporaries of his who are or were delighted to cultivate alter egos for themselves, mature 32-year-old Jake doesn’t actively evoke comic book exploits. He’s content to be a marvel in the black and white universe of Baseball-Reference. There was a time when he had colorfully long hair. He trimmed it. His last name is spelled unconventionally, but it’s not as if someone courting the spotlight goes the lower-case route. His Players Weekend nickname of choice two years running has been “deGrom”. The first year it was Jake, which he explained was chosen for him because he didn’t know he was supposed to pick one.
On another pitcher, such a modest profile might come off a bit on the dull side. On Jacob deGrom, it fits beautifully. Underrate him a tad. Overlook him as you instinctively praise others elsewhere first. If it bothers him, he’ll take it out on the strike zone. Let his All-Star associates collect notices. He collects outs. That’s plenty charismatic.
Speedy Billy Hamilton was thought to be running away with the 2014 Rookie of the Year prize. DeGrom steadily picked up ground on the veritable hare and won it (basically clinching it when he struck out the first eight Marlins he faced on September 15…before his bullpen blew the game for him). Legendarily stellar Max Scherzer placed a presumed death grip on the 2018 Cy Young by midseason. DeGrom went about his business, lowering his ERA start by start, and won it. Hyun-jin Ryu was sparkling deep into summer and was clearly on his way to the 2019 Cy Young. DeGrom derailed him and won it. You would have had to have bet on Clayton Kershaw and Zack Greinke to have taken the first and last games of the 2015 NLDS. You would have lost both times because the lesser-hailed deGrom won each game.
Told ya he was a sneak.
Jacob may not ostentatiously point to himself, but he doesn’t deflect pressure. The easygoing righty was regularly asked all winter and extended winter if he’s up for earning a third straight Cy (what else are ya gonna ask at this point?). He dependably replied, in so many words, sure. “I don’t like giving up runs,” he told reporters this week, a sentiment that could have gone without saying. In 2018 and 2019, he gave up barely more than two of the earned variety every nine innings over the 421 innings he worked. When I consider deGrom’s relationship to allowing runs, I think of how the reverend tried to calm an embarrassed Mary Richards in the classic “Chuckles Bites the Dust” episode of The Mary Tyler Moore Show when Mary had been laughing uncontrollably at Chuckles the Clown’s funeral. It was OK to laugh, he said, because “tears were offensive to him, deeply offensive.”
Mary proceeded to burst into tears. Us? We burst into applause just about every inning Jacob departs the mound.
***
Maybe Jacob deGrom isn’t the perfectly pleasant sort he comes off as behind the scenes. Maybe he spent his quarantine revealing a boastful bent to his Central Florida neighbors from a safe distance: “I am Jacob deGrom, millionaire. I own a mansion and a yacht.” More likely, when he wasn’t taking advantage of a rare summer hiatus with his family, he was throwing baseballs at whoever or whatever was available in his backyard, trying to improve himself at his craft. We’ll see, when he faces the Braves, how much better he’s gotten since we last saw him. He couldn’t get much better, you’d figure. Of course you can’t figure much with this surreal season at hand.
I figure deGrom will go out there and be deGrom. I figure deGrom will beat himself up if he gives up more than a run or two. I figure deGrom will stick to his business. I don’t figure we’ll see a lot of commercials starring Jacob deGrom unless they’re commercials for Jacob deGrom pitching. The only product I remember him endorsing was insurance, which was totally on brand because every Mets fan sleeps better known Jake from Flushing is on call.
SNY did air a campaign commercial on his behalf at the end of 2018 — spoofing the ominous-toned scare tactics particularly devious politicians have regularly used to run a tank over more competent opponents. For deGrom at the time, the goal was to poke holes in the “wins” debate. Two years ago around now, the Mets weren’t scoring for Jake, just as they hadn’t been in 2014, and as a result, Jake wasn’t winning. He was just getting batters out. The out party carried the day. Now we don’t hesitate to recognize a pitcher who does all he can to propel his team to victory, even when his team doesn’t return the favor. Jacob deGrom has won 21 games over the past two years — ten in 2018, eleven in 2019. He’s been the practically unanimous Cy selection both times.
Every delivery figures to bring Jake closer to another Cy.
Having witnessed how Jacob rings up opposing hitters and gets shortchanged by his own — his lifetime ERA is 2.62, yet he has only 66 wins to show for it — we don’t question the won-lost equation. I have to confess I wish I could watch deGrom pitch more ninth innings. Part of that comes from a sensible desire to not see any other Met replace him late, part is the romantic in me that adores aces going the distance. Jake has made 171 starts since 2014. He’s completed three of them. I know, I know…it’s a different era; they count pitches diligently and derive conclusions from them stubbornly; he’s struck out more than nine batters per nine innings in five of his six seasons, more than ten each of the past three, so given what we understand about preserving pitchers’ arms, it would be lunacy to continually push him out there for the sake of an anachronistic metric.
But the paucity of complete games is the only reason I’m hesitant to already declare deGrom second to only Seaver in the Met pitching annals. Gooden, even when he wasn’t operating at quintessential Dr. K form, threw his share of complete games, posting 67 as a Met from 1984 to 1994. Koosman, mythic second banana to apple-cheeked Seaver, went all the way 108 times between 1967 and 1978. Seaver (1967-1977; 1983) had 166 CGs before being shipped to Cincinnati and five the year he came back from Midwestern exile. Tom was 38 that last season in New York. Not surprisingly, deGrom’s Mount Pitchmore peers compose the Top Three among Mets in complete games. Jake? He’s down in the valley, tied for 47th with, among others, Pedro Astacio, Mark Clark, Eric Hillman and Hank Webb.
I know, I know. It doesn’t matter. But it’s all I have in the way of articulating an imperfection here. Otherwise, I’m good with everything the übercompetent Jacob deGrom has done, does, and is likely to do. Therefore, Madam Chairwoman, if it please the convention, I bring forth the following motion that we suspend the rules and nominate Jacob Anthony deGrom of the Metropolitan Baseball Club from the great Empire State of New York for every high office available to him!
Ace by acclamation? AYE!
Cy Young for a third term? AYE!
DeGrom for President? Uh…
Technically, Jake won’t be old enough until the election after this one, but goodness knows we as a nation could do a lot worse than handing the ball to the absolute best.
PREVIOUS METS FOR ALL SEASONS 1962: Richie Ashburn 1964: Rod Kanehl 1966: Shaun Fitzmaurice 1969: Donn Clendenon 1970: Tommie Agee 1972: Gary Gentry 1973: Willie Mays 1977: Lenny Randle 1978: Craig Swan 1981: Mookie Wilson 1982: Rusty Staub 1990: Gregg Jefferies 1991: Rich Sauveur 1992: Todd Hundley 1994: Rico Brogna 1995: Jason Isringhausen 1996: Rey Ordoñez 1998: Todd Pratt 2000: Melvin Mora 2002: Al Leiter 2003: David Cone 2005: Pedro Martinez 2008: Johan Santana 2009: Angel Pagan 2012: R.A. Dickey 2013: Wilmer Flores 2019: Dom Smith
Welcome to A Met for All Seasons, a series in which we consider a given Met who played in a given season and…well, we’ll see.
The New York Mets will, in all likelihood, play baseball again on Friday.
I say “in all likelihood” because it might rain.
But I also say it, of course, because there’s a pandemic going on, one that New York City has a grip on but large swathes of the rest of the country have fumbled, despite our city’s experience being a traumatic object lesson a couple of months back.
Unless you’ve been under a spectacularly large rock, you knew that. (And if you didn’t know, hey, got any room in your subterranean lair?) But that’s the thing about 2020 — so much we thought we knew has been blotted out and blurred. This has been the year of writing plans in pencil, of saying “we’ll see” about next week, of next month being an undiscovered country about which speculation is reckless.
The Mets will play baseball on Friday … in all likelihood. We’re close enough to say that with reasonable certainty. Which is the best 2020 offers.
But will the Mets be playing baseball two Fridays from now? On a Friday in September? In Game 60 of this improv sprint of a schedule? No certainty whatsoever there. Write it in pencil. If you write it at all.
It’s a strange state of affairs, which comes with a certain queasiness. Not just because playing baseball may turn out to be a tragically ill-advised idea — for players, their families, coaches, stadium workers, people any of those people know, and so on out in concentric rings — but also because what normally feels sound and structural about the calendar is so flimsy this time around. 1:10p, 7:10p, even 4:10p and that occasional unwelcome 8:05p — these times are instantly recognizable and full of meaning between April and September. They’re my framework for those six months when the world’s on its proper axis, a blissful underpinning of whatever else fills up my days and weeks. I know when the next game’s coming. I can look at the series ahead and size it up. I can look all the way down to the end of the calendar and think about strength of opponents, distance of travel, off-days or their absence, and hope, worry or do some of both.
Not this year. This year will be about daily tests and measurements of community spread, and every next game’s going to be written in pencil.
Here at Faith and Fear we’ll do our best — chronicling the games as we always do, and hoping that baseball is a respite and a solace, as it has been so reliably before. We’ll also continue this series, hopefully alongside the new games.
Which means it’s my turn to go back a little ways.
How far back? Well, to 2019. But how far back is that? Depends on how you measure things.
In Met Time, it’s a whisper of a fraction of a sliver of a nanosecond, the kind of chronology best left to your friendly neighborhood quantum physicist.
In Actual Time, it’s nearly 10 months.
In Pandemic Time, it’s … a decade? A century? Forever?
The Mets last played a baseball game that counted on Sept. 29, 2019, which unfortunately isn’t the same as saying they played a baseball game that mattered: They’d been eliminated, and were closing up Citi Field against the playoff-bound Atlanta Braves. I was there, sitting in the right-field bleachers with Emily, near the gap that extends across to the Citi pavilion, the fake truck and the Shea Bridge.
I’m ambivalent about Closing Day. On the one hand, it’s the last chance to see more Mets baseball in person, and even in bad seasons I’d rather have a little more of that than face the winter. On the other hand, it’s a melancholy appearance — win or lose, it’s the end, and you walk out of the stadium into nothing. To that, add in the likelihood that Citi Field’s maroon-jacketed security guys will behave in their usual asshole fashion, sending you home with a bad taste in your mouth, and I often figure I’m better off not going.
(If you think I’m kidding about the asshole part, several years ago the maroons started shooing us out of the stands during the thank-you video. They were an impediment to enjoying games at Shea and they’re no better at Citi Field. I tried to raise this point during the brief period when people connected to the Mets bothered with blogs, but a) the maroons know all the club execs and mind their manners when they spot one; and b) as far as I can tell no club exec actually cares.)
Anyway, 2019 left me wanting more, so there we were, for a Closing Day that turned into a Closing Night, with the Mets and Braves trudging into extra innings. Free baseball, hooray! Except the baseball was free because the detestable Adeiny Hechavarria had hit a ninth-inning homer off the perpetually doomed Paul Sewald, and who knew how long we’d be there. Maybe the maroons would decide the hell with it and roust us despite the game not being over? Maybe the Mets would run out of pitchers and reacquire Oliver Perez to walk in a fatal run?
Such are the perils of Closing Day.
Except the plucky 2019 Mets had one last trick up their sleeve.
I actually remember the moment the Mets drafted Dom Smith in 2013, but that’s because it was one of the first MLB drafts to be televised, or at least one of the first televised drafts I bothered watching, since nobody except the truly obsessed knows anything about baseball draft picks. I tweeted out a joke that I was incensed because I’d wanted some other guy I’d never heard of, looked up a couple of Smith’s scouting reports — which basically said “live bat, bad body” — and forgot about him.
But Smith did OK, reaching the majors in 2017 alongside Amed Rosario. That first season was ugly — he hit .198 and his glovework at first was lacking, perhaps because he was frankly rotund and so not particularly mobile. 2018 wasn’t much better, despite Smith coming to camp looking more trim. In 2019 he had a great spring, but Pete Alonso had arrived, and Smith became an afterthought — a late-inning replacement, pinch-hitter and part of the farcical attempt to find anyone who could play left field without injuring himself.
All that had to be a brutal comedown for a young player, particularly when a stress fracture sent Smith to the injured list in late July. But he dealt with it well. He hit when given the opportunity, his defense looked much improved at first base, and he was a terrific teammate even on one leg. After the Mets gleefully stripped Michael Conforto of his uniform top post-victory, SNY cameras caught a beaming Smith gamely chasing down the hero of the hour on a convalescent’s scooter — one with a little #LFGM license plate, no less. You’d constantly find Dom at or near the dugout railing, cheering for his mates — and often in the company of Alonso, the man who’d taken the job he’d wanted.
That was admirable, but it didn’t change the fact that Smith was a young man with no real role, one likely headed for some other team’s roster in 2020. The games dwindled to few and then to one without Smith returning to action, and then that one ground along in extra innings. In the 11th inning of Closing Day Night, Hechavarria connected for another homer, this time off the hapless Walker Lockett. I slumped in my seat, thinking about the cruelty of everything. Really? The Met Jonah I’d loathed all year, at first for inexplicable reasons and then for thoroughly explicable ones, had to homer off pitiable Met relievers not once but twice? That was how the baseball gods chose to tell us it was time to go home? Getting the bum’s rush from the maroons might have been kinder.
Lockett immediately gave up another homer and, mercifully, was sent away to think about what he’d done. Chris Mazza came on and threw one pitch, retiring Francisco Cervelli on an inning-ending double play. Down by two in the bottom of the 11th, the Mets launched a fitful, most likely pretend uprising: Luis Guillorme singled off old friend Jerry Blevins, but Tomas Nido struck out. On came Anthony Swarzak, once a singularly useless Met reliever and now an annoyingly useful Brave. Swarzak yielded a single to Wilson Ramos, but then caught Rene Rivera looking. (Had the Mets ever sent three catchers in a row to the plate before? I was mildly curious. I suppose I still am.)
Because Braves manager Brian Snitker was also determined to torture us, he switched pitchers yet again, bringing on someone named Grant Dayton. The Mets countered with none other than Dom Smith — the same Dom Smith who hadn’t had a plate appearance since late July. This seemed cruel, to say the least. It all seemed cruel by that point.
And then Smith hit the ball over the fucking fence.
It sounded good off the bat, but that’s happened before. It looked better. There was air under it, and the ball describing a promising arc heading in our direction. I sprang up and hurried to edge of our section, daring to hope and chiding myself for being a sucker, but by then here was no doubt — it was gone. Smith had hit a three-run homer that had simultaneously walked off the game, the 2019 season and the 2010s.
Rounding first, Smith pointed back at the dugout in jubilation as the Braves tramped off for their dugout. (And for the playoffs, which probably softened the blow.) After hitting third base, Smith flung off his helmet and then performed a funny, shuffling little hop-dance the rest of the way down the line, vanishing into a sea of blue-clad teammates, with Alonso first in line. Out in right, I hugged Emily and yelled and said stupid amazed things.
And the maroons kept their distance.
Smith is 25 and just finished his first full(ish) year in the big leagues. He’s blocked at his natural position and doesn’t have another one readily available to him — he’ll get to DH this season, but the Mets have a lot of guys best suited to that role. I don’t know what he’ll be, or if he’ll wind up being that for us or for somebody else.
But I do know this: Even though Smith’s triple walkoff didn’t win anything for the Mets except a baseball game that no longer much mattered, it made me happy all winter. At odd times in December or January I’d catch myself smiling and realize I was thinking about seeing Smith connect and the way the ball kept coming towards us, as if this were the one time that inexhaustible, silly hope — Met fan hope, no less! — actually served as a jet stream. Even with no baseball this spring and a whole lot of misery around us, that memory was always good for a smile.
And isn’t that what baseball’s about? You learn the hard way when things aren’t particularly likely, and to calibrate your expectations accordingly — you’ll go crazy if you don’t. But once in a while, expectations go out the window. Someone — maybe even a bench guy who hasn’t seen enemy pitching in two months — does something extraordinary, and in a second or two your gloom gets transmuted into wild, incoherent, sunshine joy.
And that joy is sustaining. It might get you through an entire winter. It might even help you through a fearful spring, and prepare you for an uncertain summer.
After sampling slices of the most depressing pair of Mayor’s Trophy Games ever presented, I’ve turned from being cautiously anticipant of the 2020 season back toward my previous state of “baseball amid all of this — they can’t be serious.” That there were no fans at Citi Field on Saturday or at the other local ballpark Sunday was bad if necessary enough in context. The synthetic sound effects applied to make everything seem less abnormal cynically insulted intelligence, while the cardboard cutouts proved only that if we are told something is sort of normal enough times, we might very well adapt.
So here comes the new abnormal, first pitch this Friday at 4:10, deGrom versus incredulity that this is actually happening.
Though we’re in a state of suspended disbelief that Baseball 2020 is a logistically workable therefore good idea, I won’t pretend I’m not a little on board with brand new baseball materializing on TV and radio. I won’t pretend I wasn’t happy to hear Met voices return to an approximation of their natural habitat, even if Howie Rose worked from home and GKR called the game transpiring in one stadium from another stadium. I won’t pretend I didn’t enjoy that a Subway Series-ish game at Citi Field encompassed no discernible cheering for the crosstown invaders. I won’t pretend that Amed Rosario lashing a triple down the left field line wasn’t briefly energizing. I won’t pretend Tomás Nido crossing up a five-man infield with a solid single to right didn’t have me snickering vengefully at a shift gone awry.
But I won’t pretend that Nido pulling into first to the sound of canned applause didn’t kill the moment. I read that MLB has supplied each team with 75 different recorded crowd reactions. By the time these games are no longer labeled exhibitions, maybe some bright technician will mix a 76th for those times when something perfect in its specificity happens for the home team. When the backup catcher gets a hit that figuratively spits in the face of the opposing manager’s defensive strategy, the noise from the crowd is akin to a very knowing “TAKE THAT!” You can’t script it and you can’t fake it.
Yet fake it they will, because there’s no way of creating it for real as it happens. We’re gonna pretend that’s OK and normal. Give virtual reality enough time and not only will the reaction be lifelike, the backup catcher will hit like that regularly.
I wonder if there will be a cardboard cutout usher on Field Level chasing a cardboard cutout of me back to Promenade?
***
The televised Mets’ offense was moribund, which was a disappointment in the wake of the encouraging developments that took place in intrasquad action last week. Of course any encouraging developments in intrasquad action are always tempered by discouraging developments. Somebody looking great hitting means somebody didn’t look great pitching, and vice-versa. Still, after so much time away, you’d take a .500 record if the Mets could play themselves every day (and nobody takes ill).
Neither of this weekend’s games ran into extras, though the Mets took the field in the bottom of the ninth despite having gone scoreless in the top of the ninth while trailing. They had to get their work in. In Florida in March, you’d shrug. In the Bronx in July, it’s just one more abnomal thing you pretend to treat as normal. The teams opted not to practice the new rule in which every extra half-inning will begin with a runner on second and nobody out. That sounds like a rule right up the Met bullpen’s alley. Met relievers are pioneers in the art of having a runner on second with nobody out.
To paraphrase President Bartlet regarding calls for a flag-burning amendment, is there an epidemic of nineteen-inning games that I’m not aware of? I mean it, man, is there an emergency-level outbreak of marathon baseball no one’s kept me posted on? In 2019, the Mets lost one game in eighteen innings, one in sixteen and one in fourteen. They won one in thirteen innings and lost one in twelve. They played eleven games that went either ten or eleven innings, which are reasonable in the length department, meaning that out of 162 contests last year, you could classify four or five as unreasonably long. Out of a projected sixty this year, that would translate to like a couple. Maybe.
Is slapping a runner on second and calling it baseball really helping anybody? Same for the three-batter rule for every pitcher who doesn’t end an inning. Few Met relievers should face three batters in a week let alone in a row.
Along with the advent of the “nine-hole hitter” in the National League, it all strikes me as dumbing down a game we always took pride in being nuanced. Perhaps that ship (registered as the S.S. Launch Angle) has been sailing for many moons, but now they’re essentially saying the quiet parts out loud.
***
I don’t want this to pretend this is normal because I don’t want it to feel normal. It’s not normal. I just as soon mark 2020 as a Comma Year, with everybody’s en-dash interrupted. If Elias wants, imply the comma and just keep the continuity cooking, fine. We who were here will know that 2020 wasn’t really there. Future generations can be surprised to discover the details.
It’s not that I’m not a little happy to consume a soupçon of baseball activities. I was actually most moved during this Summer Camp Sponsored by Some Camp Company when I caught video of intrasquad action, regardless of which Mets were beating which. It was Mets in shorts tossing the horsehide around, taking a few swings, nobody acting as if they were coming to society’s rescue. It was close enough to the game I love for a few seconds. Therefore, if they want to get together and play a little socially distant pepper a couple of times a week on SNY while Gary, Keith and Ron chat about the weather, that would satisfy my yearning for something that looks and sounds like baseball. It’s the looking and sounding like baseball that isn’t really baseball but will count as baseball that doesn’t deserve to be processed as normal. We count what we count, so inevitably we will count the sixty-game season if the sixty games are played — with the DH infecting the NL; with a runner intentionally on second to start the tenth; with the cardboard cutouts looking down at their cardboard phones — but it’s hard to want to count this as real or normal or real-lite or normal-adjacent.
It’s not a balm. It’s not a blessing. It’s not a much-needed distraction. What’s much needed isn’t baseball. The staging of a truncated season is not an excuse for public officeholders to point to all the progress we’re making because MLB is somewhat open for business. It’s not cause for a torrent of “but at 4:10, there will be the Mets and the Braves and baseball and all will be right with the world, if only for a few hours” rhapsodizing. Too much is wrong with the world for that.
Still, Gary Cohen sounded very glad to have broadcast the first exhibition game Saturday night and Pete Alonso confirmed he and his teammates were “so dang happy to be back”. I don’t want to begrudge them, so I tried to take a cue from them and get as pumped as the prerecorded crowd noise murmuring behind them. I’ll be danged that I’m not nearly so pumped.
I like that there’s been a break in the drought, but I can get by on the Mets Classics and the One-on-Ones and writing about Tommie Agee and reading about Todd Pratt. I’d understand if that was all the baseball we were gonna get in 2020. This is an aberration transcending all the aberrations we’ve known. This isn’t August 1981 after a strike or September 2001 after a dignified, respectful pause. This isn’t the Astros vacating Houston for a series while hurricane damage is absorbed, assessed and cleared away to a slight extent. The Blue Jays and their American cousins have been told they can’t play in Canada, period. Buster Posey and David Price are among those who won’t play at all by informed choice. There’s an injured list specifically for players who test positive for COVID-19, which despite being wished away hasn’t magically disappeared from these shores. Freddie Freeman’s temperature hit 104.5 (or about 300 points lower than he hits against the Mets), but he’s been cleared to play, thus we’re now in a circumstance where it would be inhuman to not be delighted to see Freddie Freeman. The stands are empty by design, which means we can’t make fun of Marlins fans or the lack thereof.
Following a string of years when the Mets have lost more than they’ve won and they finally start to win, we adapt to the idea that they’re supposed to win. Following a string of years when the Mets have won more than they’ve lost and they unfortunately start to lose, we adapt to the idea that we shouldn’t expect them to win. We root for the Mets consistently, hardly noticing that we constantly recalibrate our perspective on them on the fly. We landed in the middle of 2019 expecting absolutely nothing from them. We ended 2019 palpably let down they didn’t make the playoffs. We keep adapting. We’re probably adapting to this half-assed, half-baked, wholly bizarre return of baseball, whether we’re enthused to do so or not.
You can only grumble “this sucks” for so long before you either stop talking about it altogether or you suck it up and tune in. I don’t seem to have stopped talking about it.
***
This past Saturday night, in the 2020 the magnetic schedule on our fridge still claims it is, Stephanie and I were going to be at Citi Field. I imagine I would have been out there more than a few times already had this year not become this year, but this was the only game for which I had definite plans prior to the sport shutting down. Our friends Garry and Susan Spector had invited us far in advance to take part in a celebration of their 25th wedding anniversary. They were married in Oklahoma in July of 1995, but they’ve preferred to summer in Flushing since. They even reserved a suite for the occasion.
In the alternate timeline, Stephanie and I boarded an LIRR train to Jamaica, then another to Woodside, then the 7 in the other direction to Mets-Willets Point. The traveling was going to be too hot for my wife’s liking, but there was going to be air conditioning where we were headed and, more importantly, there were going to be the Spectors sharing an extraordinary marital milestone in the perfect place. They’re at Citi Field most every day and night of the regular season. We were gonna toast their anniversary with them and watch the Mets play the Mariners with them along with others who were gonna be thrilled to be there. The Mariners had never been to Citi Field. Now they’ve been to Citi Field as much as the rest of us in 2020.
It’s a shame Garry and Susan didn’t get to host their party on Saturday night, just as it’s been a shame that I don’t know how many people haven’t gotten to do what they’d planned to do since March, a spectrum of events that expand well beyond the missed frivolity of a ballgame that never got played and a suite that never got occupied. One shudders to think about how much of life in 2020 isn’t what people had reason to assume it would be. And that it’s not over yet.
Ballparks are for celebrating. I hate to see them used as soundstages. Friends are for toasting. Happy 25th, Garry and Susan. Fingers crossed and masks on, we’ll see ya soon enough.
Welcome to A Met for All Seasons, a series in which we consider a given Met who played in a given season and…well, we’ll see.
Being a catcher is a tough gig. The hours of squatting are bad enough, before considering foul tips, overenthusiastic backswings, and collisions at the plate. But being a backup catcher? That’s even tougher. Now you get all of the above, but with minimal job security. There’s job portability, granted — most every team is interested in catching depth all the time — but that often translates to bouncing between Double-A and Triple-A affiliates, hoping for invites to spring training, perhaps even ones that come with actual playing time, and maybe the occasional cup of coffee on a big-league roster, which will likely begin with your employer already looking for your replacement.
And so backup catchers dot franchises’ all-time rosters: pitcher whisperers who can’t hit, hitters whose teams won’t admit they can’t catch, veterans just hanging on for the lottery ticket of another Florida or Arizona spring, journeymen rewarded with a week in the Show before becoming coaches or instructors. Backup catchers arrive when rainouts have crammed the schedule with too many games in too few days, in June when injuries and exhaustion are mounting, and in September when rosters expand. Most of the time they depart with little notice — they’re the oh-by-the-way player move noted on the telecast during a slow moment in the bottom of the second.
When Todd Pratt was 29, he was working at a Florida instructional school and managing a pizza parlor. He was out of baseball after playing 102 big-league games over 11 pro seasons as the property of six organizations, and it would have taken a truly heroic optimist to predict his future would include star turns on baseball’s October stage, cult-hero status and years of reasonably secure big-league jobs.
Somehow, that’s what happened.
But let’s go back to the beginning. The Red Sox drafted Pratt out of high school in ’85, sending him to the New York-Penn League’s Elmira Pioneers. It didn’t exactly go well — he hit .134. But his defense was enough to keep him bumping around the lower levels of the Boston system (with a brief departure as an Indians’ Rule V pick) and earn a spot with New Britain, in Double-A, in ’88. Which is where he stayed for three seasons. Insult to injury: His 1990 baseball card identifies him as Todd Pratts.
The Red Sox were grooming Pratt as a player-coach, with New Britain manager Butch Hobson bringing him to Pawtucket for the ’91 season. When a knee injury felled Eric Wedge, Pratt got a chance to change the narrative. Inheriting the starting job, he hit .292 with decent power. A call-up beckoned … except in August Pratt broke his hamate, the bone whose sole remaining anatomical function is to sideline baseball players. Instead of a September stint at Fenway Park, Pratt became a six-year free agent. He signed with the Orioles, was taken in the Rule V draft by the Phillies, lost a bid to back up Darren Daulton, and found himself back in Double-A.
This time he hit, earning another ticket to Triple-A. There, he hit some more — and finally arrived in the big leagues. Pratt played 77 games over three seasons with the Phillies, and called being introduced for the ’93 World Series his greatest thrill in baseball. (He never appeared in a game.) After the strike, he signed on with the Cubs, but hit only .133 and was non-tendered. The Mariners signed him, but only as spring-training depth — a particularly dreaded rung down the backup-catcher ladder. Released at the end of March 1996, he walked away from the game.
Or at least a certain distance away. He became an instructor at Bucky Dent‘s Florida baseball school — the one with the annoying replica Green Monster — and worked for a Domino’s Pizza franchise. Contrary to later legend, he never delivered pies — he was a manager — and resisted the idea that the gig was some low point or failure. “There’s nothing wrong with managing a pizza parlor,” he’d tell reporters later, adding that the 1997 Super Bowl and its thousand orders in three hours was the hardest he ever sweated in his life.
The year was, however, a turning point. As Pratt told the story later, instructing teenagers made him realize some things about his own catching mechanics — and, one senses, a break from the grind was exactly what he needed. When the Mets called Pratt’s agent looking for pitchers, they learned the catcher might not be done with the game. Pratt decided he’d take a gamble on one more spring training, signing a minor-league deal for 1997.
(Here, an unfortunate alternate interpretation of that turning point is necessary, one you were probably expecting given the era under consideration. Pratt was named in the 2007 Mitchell Report, with Kirk Radomski saying that Pratt told him in ’97 that he’d bought Deca-Durabolin from another source, then bought steroids from Radomski in 2000 and 2001. Pratt, by then retired, rebuffed invitations to talk with investigators.)
While Pratt is mostly remembered as Mike Piazza‘s caddy, he was a Met a year before Piazza’s arrival. In fact, the trade for Piazza was yet another roadblock the Mets seemed hell-bent on throwing in Pratt’s way. In ’97 he lost the job as Todd Hundley‘s backup to Alberto Castillo, then arrived at midseason and homered off future teammate Al Leiter in his first at-bat. In ’98 Hundley was sidelined, but Pratt lost out to Castillo and Tim Spehr. He almost quit, but was talked out of it by Triple-A manager Rick Dempsey.
1998 is the year Pratt represents in our A Met for All Seasons series, but it’s probably not one he looks back on with much fondness. He had to have wondered if he’d been better off not taking Dempsey’s advice. First there was the Piazza trade, and then the Mets’ late-summer acquisition of the decidedly less-than-immortal Jorge Fabregas. Pratt didn’t forget the disrespect: Interviewed from his unlikely perch atop the world a year later, he said that “there was a lot of frustration and hurt last year the way I was treated. They kept bringing one catcher after another in here and I kept getting sent out. I mean, it’s hard to forget.”
Playing time might have been lacking, but fans warmed to the man known as Tank for his solid stature and run-through-anything mindset. Pratt was the most enthusiastic cheerleader on the Mets bench and a sunny, mildly goofy presence in the clubhouse. At Wrigley Field, he first met new acquisition Billy Taylor on the mound in the bottom of the 10th, with Cubs on first and second, nobody out and the Mets clinging to a 4-3 lead with Sammy Sosa coming to the plate. No biggie: “Hi, I’m Todd — whaddya throw?” said catcher to pitcher. (Taylor got Sosa to ground out on a slider.)
That mild resurgence would have been victory enough, but glory was on the way. The next year, Pratt became Piazza’s backup without having to endure a trip to the minors or the importation of rivals. He hit .293 in 71 games. Then, in the ’99 NLDS against the Diamondbacks, Piazza’s injured thumb ballooned to mammoth proportions after a bad reaction to a cortisone shot. Pratt went 0-for-4 in Game 3, a 9-2 Mets win, then took the field again for Oct. 9’s Game 4. The Mets led the series 2 games to 1, but a D-Backs win would force them to face Randy Johnson in Phoenix.
I was at that game, up in the right-field mezzanine with Greg, Emily and Stephanie, and it was a doozy: a duel between Leiter and Brian Anderson, Benny Agbayani driving in Rickey Henderson for a 2-1 Mets lead, Armando Benitez giving the lead back by surrendering a double to Jay Bell, Melvin Mora gunning down Bell to avert further harm, a muffed flyball by Tony Womack that helped the Mets tie things up.
In the 10th, Pratt came to the plate with one out against Arizona closer Matt Mantei. In his previous at-bat, he’d failed to bring in a run from third with one out, tapping back to Mantei. This time, Mantei started him off with a curve in the dirt. Pratt guessed the next pitch would be a fastball. He was correct — and it was right over the middle of the plate.
What followed was equal parts majesty and slapstick. The contact was loud, and Pratt windmilled the bat behind his head, giving a little hop in hopes of speeding the ball on its way. As he ran to first, his eyes at first intently followed the flight of the ball. But then they jumped to Steve Finley, the Diamondbacks’ acrobatic centerfielder, a serial robber of balls sent insufficiently high above fences.
Up in the stands, we were watching Finley too, well aware of what he could do. Finley’s first step was awkward, but he got to the fence just as Pratt’s drive reached it, and he was in the right place, his glove questing above the wall for a ball that our willpower refused to push even a measly extra few inches towards Main Street in Flushing and safety. But Finley didn’t get much elevation, and came down on the warning track, glancing reflexively into his glove. Pratt, having just rounded first, all but stopped, looking out at him. Finley looked away from his glove, his expression unreadable, lowered it, and then … hitched up his pants.
For years I marveled at what I thought had happened — that Finley, for a moment, was the only person in the park who knew that the ball was not in his glove, that Pratt had homered, and that the Diamondbacks’ season was over. But that wasn’t the case — the fans in Shea’s right-field extremities, where the stands arced back into fair territory, could see that the ball had dropped behind the fence. Those weren’t particularly desirable seats, but those in them were the first to know what the rest of us were so desperate to discover.
In excelsis Tanko.
As Finley began his dejected trip to the dugout and winter, Pratt sailed around the bases, fists pumping, while various Mets capered gleefully in every conceivable direction — John Franco‘s somehow jubilant tiptoeing still makes me laugh 21 years later. In the stands, everybody was hugging everybody, and Greg hoisted me into the air like a ragdoll. (Memo to self: My blog partner, though gentle, is strong.) It was bedlam, the happiest of pandemoniums, and somehow even happier because it was the understudy who’d aced the aria and been showered with bouquets.
On Oct. 17, Pratt would be front and center again, with the Mets scratching and clawing to stay alive against the hated Braves during a marathon NLCS Game 5, played in a miserable chilly rain. I was there again, in the farthest reaches of the left field upper deck with Emily and her dad, in seats with no view of the Diamondvision and angled so that Shea’s announcements and music registered mostly as thuds and echoes. (By way of compensation, many of those around us had pocket radios, with the voices of Bob Murphy and Gary Cohen a welcome murmur around us.)
Pratt batted fifth in the Mets’ epic 15th-inning comeback. He followed Shawon Dunston‘s legendary leadoff at-bat, the one that took 12 pitches and nearly six minutes to yield a desperately needed single; Matt Franco‘s pinch-hit walk; and Edgardo Alfonzo‘s sacrifice. Bobby Cox ordered Kevin McGlinchy to intentionally walk John Olerud, which was only sensible; Pratt strolled to the plate with a slight smile — almost a smirk — on his face. The first three pitches missed the mark, McGlinchy threw a strike, and then the fifth pitch was outside for a game-tying walk. Pratt, having done a singularly useful bit of nothing at the best time possible, flung the bat skyward in delight and steamed for first. He was there four pitches later, when Robin Ventura drove McGlinchy’s final pitch over the fence for a season-saving grand slam.
Ventura, of course, would make it to Georgia but not to second base, because an overjoyed Pratt scooped him up shy of that station, hoisting him not unlike the way Greg had heaved me airborne eight days earlier. Before being intercepted, Ventura gestured insistently for Pratt to go the other way, but the Tank wouldn’t be denied, and in the replay you can see the moment where Ventura, held helplessly aloft, gives up and concludes, “Well, this works too.”
Pratt would have other moments — practically leaping into orbit when Piazza capped the 10-run inning against the Braves with a tracer off Terry Mulholland the next summer, and starting Game 1 of the 2000 World Series. His time with the Mets ended with a regrettable whimper, as the team became enamored of Vance Wilson and sent Pratt to the Phillies in exchange for anonymous backstop Gary Bennett in July 2001, a trade somewhere between pointless and insulting. He’d spend four full seasons with Philadelphia, one with the Braves (an odd and unwelcome sight) and then retire after spending 2007’s spring training with the Yankees. By then he was 40, which is about 360 in catcher years. The kid who’d been ticketed for a life as a minor-league coach without escaping Double-A had spent 14 seasons in the big leagues, was guaranteed an ovation for the rest of his life in Flushing, and would live on forever in highlight reels.
It’s a satisfying story, one that those of us in the stands found even sweeter. Even a fringe big-leaguer is literal orders of magnitude removed from a sandlot star — Todd Pratt was a world-class athlete in ways few of us can imagine. But his boundless, Golden Retriever exuberance about baseball made that distance feel smaller. We wanted to scoop Robin Ventura up and carry him on our shoulders as a conquering hero; the Tank felt the same way, and nothing was going to stop him from doing just that.
Faith and Fear has the finest readers anywhere, we say with total objectivity, thus we thought we’d let you fine people about some Mets-related projects a few of our friends on the other side of the screen have lately crafted or are in the midst of crafting.
• Michael Elias has published the relationship-driven novel Two For Tennis (The Adventures of Mark), though don’t be thrown by the sport in the title. The book includes a generous dose of Metsian angst from the period Shea was closing and Citi was opening. We’ll share more come Oscar’s Cap season, but I can tell you there’s a nice nod to No. 41 about which one can’t say a cross word. Learn more about Two For Tennishere.
• Nick Davis, who you might remember from his wonderful 2018 American Mastersportrait of Ted Williams, is back in the baseball documentary game in a very big way, directing a multipart series on the 1986 Mets and the city that surrounded them under ESPN’s 30 for 30 banner. It’s coming to the Worldwide Leader in the hopefully not too distant future. Nick is enough of a lifelong Mets fan to not only read FAFIF regularly but wish for and be granted dinner with Bruce Boisclair as his twelfth-birthday present (Bruce called him by the wrong name and then ate the fries off his plate), so you know his head and heart are already tied for first place. Further, Nick’s dedicated crew clearly has the teamwork to make the dream work, as I learned when I had the privilege of seeing them in action prior to quarantine, when they teased hopefully coherent thoughts from some guy who watched a lot of Mets games 34 years earlier.
• James Schapiro, a contributor to FAFIF in the worst of Met times, has written a masterpiece about one of the Mets’ predecessors in their absolute best of times. To earn his master’s degree from the Columbia University School of Journalism, James delved into the events of October 4, 1955, the day the Brooklyn Dodgers won their only World Series. Through a spate of eyewitness interviews and a ton of diligent archival digging, James has brilliantly recreated a lost world in the Borough of Churches. It will have you rooting your heart out for Dem Bums and everybody who ever loved them. Take the trip to “The Day the Earth Sorta Stood Still” in the Delacorte Review and feel what it’s like when baseball dreams come true.
Congratulations to Michael, to Nick and to James. Thanks for reading, thanks for creating.
Piazza: Catcher, Slugger, Icon, Star by Greg Prince is available from Amazon, Barnes & Noble and other online booksellers.
Amazin' Again: How the 2015 New York Mets Brought the Magic Back to Queens by Greg Prince is available from Amazon, Barnes & Noble and other online booksellers.
Volume I of The Happiest Recap: 50+ Years of the New York Mets As Told in 500+ Amazin' Wins by Greg Prince is available in print and for Kindle on Amazon.
Faith and Fear in Flushing: An Intense Personal History by Greg Prince (foreword by Jason Fry), is available from Amazon, Barnes & Noble and other online booksellers.